I remember coming across someone who was researching the sun spot cycles on the sun in the 1960's and who discovered that they were in synch with the orbits of the planets affecting the sun when they lined up together or opposite each other. His research was validated quite recently by someone with access to a modern computing facility to simulate the gravitational effects of the planets in our solar system on the sun. The Sun is the major climatic influence on the earth so it makes sense that other planets not only influence the sun but will have different effects on each other according to their proximity & mass.
A load of very interesting information in a load of Anton's videos from a load of studies from a load of scientists from a load of universities. A load of thanks.
Thank you Anton. It's nice to be consoled that most likely despite whatever happens to this planet in the coming years it's heart will still go on beating.
The ice age cycle is initiated by milankovitch cycles. But they are ended by thousands of years of dust on the ice sheets. This dust us cause by a lack of CO2 causing CO2 deserts. See: ModuIation of lce Ages by Dust and AIbedo. R
We are not in danger from the current warming cycle. We (future humans) will have problems when the climate swings back to cold. Another “Little Ice Age” will cause famines as plants don’t grow so well in cold climates.
Thanks for the video Anton. Still kind of ridiculous that YT is still assuming authority of anything that is currently controversial. They obviously know they have no merit when they quietly stopped using Wikipedia for their references.
The media doesn't treat science reports like they do political or government rumors. In the latter case there usually has to be confirmation by multiple sources. But when a science study is released they don't say, "It hasn't been confirmed, so we won't report it."
The gravitational force between Earth and Moon is 50 billion (5*10^10) times greater than the grav force between Earth and Mars at their closest. Imho it couldn't be only Mars that's responsible for affecting Earth's oceans. Very interesting and I hope they dive deeper (see what I did there?) in this long cycle. To be fair, they say Mars is 'of particular interest' (from their study: The 2.4 Myr (g4-g3) eccentricity cycle related to the precession of the perihelions of Earth (g3) and Mars (g4), and the 1.2 Myr (s4-s3) obliquity cycle associated with the precession of the nodes of the two planets, are of particular interest).
Moon has massive effect, such as the ocean tides every month. This is well known and obvious. The effect of Mars is tiny, so any possible effect needs more research to be found out. As the planets are synchronized in their orbits, it might be, that it's not only mars that causes this 2,4My cycle, and other planets are involved also.
It's a different effect, that'll affect both the orbit of both Earth and the Moon. It's different, because Mars and other planets can be seen as anchors that pull at the Earth's orbit around the Sun; the Moon can't do that, because the Moon and Earth share the same orbit around the Sun.
Maybe every so often, Mars and Earth are closer, or maybe parts of Mars are blown off, and only when the cycles line up right, that dust can be encountered by earth.
@@T.efpunktIt seems that effects can be subtle and with lag times, influenced by other, similar patterns. Imagine waves in the sea and secondary effects on gases emitted from an undersea volcano.
@@T.efpunkt There is a lag time. A good example is the tilt of the planet. For example the current declining tilt as well as solar irradation at 65n suggests that we should be entering an ice age at this very moment or within the next thousands of years. Once that effect truly takes place it seems like it can happen very quickly, so would be better to prepare I think and try to understand it more?
Sir. No we are in the world. The cycles are always happening. All at once. Right now. We should know then so we can try and plan long term. But not because of your misunderstood reasoning. You get what I'm saying right. Cause I know you have commented before
To be totally fair, astrology is perfectly valid IF AND ONLY IF you drop the predictions on behavior. Technically astrology is just a science of planetary motion created by Kepler. So astrology is correct, like quantum, but like Deepak Chopra, the crazies have taken it over.
97% of scientists agree, except for the ones that don't count... 20 years ago... tree rings are way more accurate than rock layers... also, we can't question science without a pen in our shirt pocket and a lab coat... The mighty Gore would not approve of your blasphemy.
100% of scientists agree on EXACTLY what about climate change? Fact is you are lying, and using these things out of context to lie because you're premise is a hoax. Man made climate change isn't a real problem, which is why you need to make up BS.
@@KnightspaceORG 97% of scientist agree they don't want their funding pulled and that's about as much as can be relied on. We lost science when it became a religion that you have to have faith in.
thank you Anton, another wonderful video! this one was fascinating, so interesting to see new patterns emerging as we gather more data, and to consider how patterns discovered in different specialist disciplines might share similar causes
Intresting to know that research from the university of Tromsö Norway found that the gulfstream is speeding up. They speculate its because the heat Exchange is more efficient when there is a lack of ice in the artic sea.
@@rockfri but it does flow? I wasn’t anticipating tidal movements of the same magnitude as the oceans, but I would have expected _something_ measurable?
Venus, there has been a number of articles saying a 405,000 year cycle on Earth is due to Venus and Jupiter working together. But i have not been able to find out the mechanism. Popularized science tend toward the cursory flash title. sigh.
You mean Milankovitch cycles. The Earth's orbit approximates an ellipse. Eccentricity measures the departure of this ellipse from circularity. The shape of the Earth's orbit varies between nearly circular (theoretically the eccentricity can hit zero) and mildly elliptical (highest eccentricity was 0.0679 in the last 250 million years).[6] Its geometric or logarithmic mean is 0.0019. The major component of these variations occurs with a period of 405,000 years[7] (eccentricity variation of ±0.012). Other components have 95,000-year and 124,000-year cycles[7] (with a beat period of 400,000 years). They loosely combine into a 100,000-year cycle (variation of −0.03 to +0.02). The present eccentricity is 0.0167[7] and decreasing. Eccentricity varies primarily due to the gravitational pull of Jupiter and Saturn. The semi-major axis of the orbital ellipse, however, remains unchanged; according to perturbation theory, which computes the evolution of the orbit, the semi-major axis is invariant. The orbital period (the length of a sidereal year) is also invariant, because according to Kepler's third law, it is determined by the semi-major axis. Longer-term variations are caused by interactions involving the perihelia and nodes of the planets Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, and Jupiter.[6] -wikipedia
The planets tilted at about 23 degrees likely have a common cause. Maybe that Saturn was their Sun and when captured they all retained their tilt and other factors sso far unrecognised but seen in this type of ocean effect not achieved by 'alien' Venus for example. Likely the connection is not just the tilt but also the likes of Birkeland Currents etc flowing better between the previously associated bodies.
I've watched a lot of your videos and enjoyed them. Maybe I was asleep for some of it but I don't see where this explained WHAT the connection was, why it was thought to have something to do with Mars, and how, etc. etc.
Thank you for nailing shut the coffin lid on the collapse of the Atlantic currents. That paper infuriated me, and the press of course latched on to it. It has been a course of research that started with a defective paper back in the 1980s, leading to the ridiculous film "The Day After Tomorrow". Sadly, people keep coming back to the topic. To equate a bit of modern ice melt to the catastrophic floods of the Lesser Dryas was one flaw. Forgetting the Coriolis effect was the other. Well done. And thank you.
LOL, I dunno... Definitely seeing a bit of poor science pushed/manipulated by agenda driven media/Soros-istic, Gate-ish, foriegn money.... A lot of financial contributions demand science sounds a certain way. I keep wondering when we stop that nonsense and bring back integrity to education/sciences. This isn't political for me, personally; contrary to what it may read like.
Look at National Geographic, Kenny Broad's study of stalactites in blue holes. He found a cycle he estimated at just over 10k years of Sahara sand layers found in 2 of each 3 cycles of what appeared to be something just over 10k years. So, I found why it's only 2 of 3 and that it's actually 12,900 years matching the cycle of our solar system passing through the galactic axis and more important; earth's core spin rate which resets each 12,900 from what is obviously a force from Sirius energy and the galactic energy sheet's ability to exchange this over long distance quite well thanks to multiphase waves. The same science was used by Tesla to efficiently move ac power long distance. Anyway, the sand layers prove there's a hot end to each 12,900 and we literally just had the first wave of this 2 years ago when that sand blew into Texas, finally. This marks the end and obviously a new beginning. Eventually these studies take a back seat to a far more impending threat which are the current biblical signs such as the 4.8 eclipse sign; the last sign just before the Lord comes to rescue many late spring according to Mark ch13. If Anton wants to see ice melt, well, don't worry, the heat will melt silver as earth slowly changes it's equator in 7 years. Ezekiel 22:22
I took a look at the article in Nature. Very interesting that they can use geologic records of water circulation on earth to reduce the chaos in long-term calculations of solar system orbits. Let's hope it works out. We might be able to find out if there are perturbations caused by unknown objects with long orbital periods.
tokyo temps this september have been +8C to +10C higher than average, just seems like summer temps. i.e., +34C daytime max, +26C nighttime min. (this year again almost all summer nights have been tropical). in the past week, sun's been scorching. i haven't burned or tanned all summer, but now, even i did all the same things, i got sunburn in under one hour. having in mind CMEs and geomagnetic storms of the past week, i wonder if it's correlated. very odd weather this september indeed.
It's so weird of a side note, it's like talking about the moons of jupiter without mentioning the gravitational pool of Jupiter and how it affects them. Nice video by the way
Anton; I'd love it if you would speak about the short-term, projected changes in the Milankovich and other cycles. For example: when the world's water-levels rise making the circumference of the earth larger, does the rotation of the earth also get slower? Also, does the increased surface area of the oceans'-waters lead to a greater cooling-effect as more surface water is also evaporating? Liked your video very much, thank you. h
So, Mar’s orbital pattern in relation to Earth may well contribute to Ice/Heat ages. Let me re-emphasize: A planets MOVEMENT has the capacity to affect HUGE global weather patterns. So, for 9 months in the womb, the most advanced and complex biological mechanism in the known universe is developing-the human brain. The seat of our PERSONALITY, which directs and defines us. We’ve already known the Sun affects global weather, our magnetic field, animal migration, etc. and now we see a tiny planet affecting earth patterns. And yet people still scoff at the idea that planetary movements can slightly alter such sensitive machinery during its most vulnerable developmental period, giving rise to repeatable personality traits.
Scientists: "It appears that long duration cycles of celestial alignments have deep impacts in earth's systems via subtle mechanisms of energy transfer." Astrologers: *flips table*
There is just still so much more to learn! I hope this at least means that we won't be stopping that cycle, there's already far too much we will have to solve for comfort!
Sorry if I missed it, but what exactly happens with Earth's and Mar's orbits that coincides with these geological-climatological patterns? Is there a convergence, several near passes while Earth's precession is at some sensitive point or what? (edit: Mar's has the second greatest eccentricity of orbit of all the planets. Perhaps this 86 millenia pattern at present figures in.) Knowing the cycle length, it looks like we could figure this out.
I remember a report about 15 years ago where they said that the Gulf Stream will begin to breakdown in 2030 due to the salinity being weaker due to the additional fresh water melting into the sea.
Well, hearing that the ocean currents, especially the Gulf Stream, isn't going away is a relief. My country (Finland) is approximately on the same latitudes as Alaska, but much warmer due to the Gulf Stream.
Thank you for your efforts. When I find a person to say it to I say thank you wonderful human. Look forward to seeing you in the afterlife. When we can laugh about all the bs. If there is before and after
If our magnetosphere weakens during the time of alignment with mars while the sun transfers into its maximum I'm genuinely curious as to its effects upon our planet. This seems as though it could have somewhat drastic consequences upon not just technology but life outside of humanity. Very good video Anton
Gravity is the result of energy pushing upward from the earths core, the energy eventuality falls back towards the core causing a pulling down effect we call gravity. It's elecrro magnetism, not a graviton.
Earth is only 4 billion year old, so an event with periodicity of 2 can only had happened 2 times. But the first time would had been so close to the start, that is not possible to have a geological record that old, so the sample has to register a single event. Is not possible to establish the periodicity of an event that happened only once.
I think what isn't included in climate change and the AMOC is things like the South American Anomaly, El Nino and La Niña patterns.Volcanic activity, earthquake plate boundaries. Sea grass decline and the Amazon rainforest or other global cooling features impacting ice decline.
Please tell what AMOC stands for (Atlantic something something Current?) I can’t recall off hand, and I think it’s what Anton “meant to” reference when he mentioned the Gulf Stream. As I recall, the AMOC is a circulation driven by temperature differential, wherein cold water in the North Atlantic plunges toward the ocean floor and then travels south (I think closer to Africa than to the Americas?), where warming waters begin to rise toward the surface again. Does that sound about right?
When people say that the global sea ice will melt... I can't keep watching that video. Especially when its regarding something no more than 5 years away. 😂🤦♂️👍
07:35 The earths ice can never completely melt without a span of 100 years… the sheer mass of the ice sheets, not even some-kind-of cataclysmic melt rate could equate for that.
Many amateur astronomers know that Venus nearly repeats its position in the sky every 8 years… but did you know that Mars nearly repeats its position every 47 years? I noticed that Mars was repeating its 1975 apparition a couple of years ago.
I want to think more about that problem.. I feel like it’s something that can be solved but needs someone like yourself collaborating on the problem space for good solutions to this or if we can solve this..
Which doesn't reflect the video, pointless. You mentioned like something is wrong, and it is not. Just a different reference. But I guess you are used to see the world from the North America perspective and everything else must feel weird. I just pointed that out@@douglaswilkinson5700
How far The Gulf stream deflects north may be influenced by the Atlantic circulation but is caused by the Coriolis effect so won't be shutting down unless the Earth stops rotating
You didn't address a fundamental question regarding this phenomenon: How far (how many years) into the current 2.4 million year cycle are we right now? This seems like some pretty relevant information.... TIA to anyone who happens to know and share this information.
An awful lot could be learned from sampling Mars. With virtually no plate tectonics or vulcanism, so much ancient geology will still be preserved from a similar period correlating to Earth's history which these processes have erased.
it's always more complex then the experts of the time think. that's my law of large and small objects. and connected components in a system that interacts within other system raises the magnitude of the complexity considerably. why is physics so sure of these types, problems they estimate or round off then creat non-existing forces and particles instead of searching for what their measurements didn't allow for.
![[Full] 4 ต่อ 4 Celebrity EP.910 | 22 ก.ย. 67 | one31](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/4TR3MVpOiw8/mqdefault.jpg)
I remember coming across someone who was researching the sun spot cycles on the sun in the 1960's and who discovered that they were in synch with the orbits of the planets affecting the sun when they lined up together or opposite each other. His research was validated quite recently by someone with access to a modern computing facility to simulate the gravitational effects of the planets in our solar system on the sun. The Sun is the major climatic influence on the earth so it makes sense that other planets not only influence the sun but will have different effects on each other according to their proximity & mass.
Anton vs the UN and the media? I'll go with Anton all day, every day!
A load of very interesting information in a load of Anton's videos from a load of studies from a load of scientists from a load of universities.
A load of thanks.
How rude of TH-cam to put a “content warning” (whatever it’s called) on this Wonderful Person’s video!
Context not content
There's no proof that man is driving climate change. Just lies from globalists.
No. Quality over quantity.
@@bgg-jp5eiit's still unacceptable that they try to curate content.
Anything to push the climate hoax !!!
One time while really baked I realized "everything directly effects everything else indirectly"
A corollary to Murphy's Law: Whenever you try to isolate anything by itself, you find it's connected to everything else in the universe.
I did a hit of LSD one night and solved all the world's problems, then I came down and lost the answer 😢
This seems like common sense to me wdym
just like seasons, but much longer than we can perceive because of our short life span.
What so you mean it's only 30,000 life times if your avg life span is 80... 60,000 if it's 40
Wonderful as always Anton. Thank you. 😊
Thank you Anton. It's nice to be consoled that most likely despite whatever happens to this planet in the coming years it's heart will still go on beating.
The planet was never in any danger. We are.
The ice age cycle is initiated by milankovitch cycles.
But they are ended by thousands of years of dust on the ice sheets.
This dust us cause by a lack of CO2 causing CO2 deserts.
See: ModuIation of lce Ages by Dust and AIbedo.
R
We are not in danger from the current warming cycle. We (future humans) will have problems when the climate swings back to cold. Another “Little Ice Age” will cause famines as plants don’t grow so well in cold climates.
I just love the casual way Anton suggests new research to scientist for potential discoveries🤩
@@davidelliott5843EAT ZE BUGZ
Thanks!
Thanks for the video Anton. Still kind of ridiculous that YT is still assuming authority of anything that is currently controversial. They obviously know they have no merit when they quietly stopped using Wikipedia for their references.
You must've agreed to be silenced at some point in the I agree entrance catch.😅😅😅
Ya, glad they ditched Wikipedia. Besides, the UN is SO much more trustworthy....
@@ibjackedScientists are, but TH-cam always goes down the path of least resistance.
If YT says it isn't true, they are lying and it is true.
It's context. A scientist appreciates data, correct?
The media doesn't treat science reports like they do political or government rumors. In the latter case there usually has to be confirmation by multiple sources. But when a science study is released they don't say, "It hasn't been confirmed, so we won't report it."
The gravitational force between Earth and Moon is 50 billion (5*10^10) times greater than the grav force between Earth and Mars at their closest. Imho it couldn't be only Mars that's responsible for affecting Earth's oceans. Very interesting and I hope they dive deeper (see what I did there?) in this long cycle.
To be fair, they say Mars is 'of particular interest' (from their study: The 2.4 Myr (g4-g3) eccentricity cycle related to the precession of the perihelions of Earth (g3) and Mars (g4), and the 1.2 Myr (s4-s3) obliquity cycle associated with the precession of the nodes of the two planets, are of particular interest).
Great discussion 👍
Moon has massive effect, such as the ocean tides every month. This is well known and obvious. The effect of Mars is tiny, so any possible effect needs more research to be found out. As the planets are synchronized in their orbits, it might be, that it's not only mars that causes this 2,4My cycle, and other planets are involved also.
@@OsRaunioit's every day, even multiple times a day, not every month.
It's a different effect, that'll affect both the orbit of both Earth and the Moon. It's different, because Mars and other planets can be seen as anchors that pull at the Earth's orbit around the Sun; the Moon can't do that, because the Moon and Earth share the same orbit around the Sun.
Maybe every so often, Mars and Earth are closer, or maybe parts of Mars are blown off, and only when the cycles line up right, that dust can be encountered by earth.
Milankovitch cycles tweakin.😭
😂😂😂
The gulf stream will go the other direction when the earth starts rotating backward. Sometime between 2025 and 2095.
@@planner37 proof?
@@planner37 What are you on?
@@KOZMOuvBORG He’s in shock get him out of here!
Hip bone's connected to the thigh bone... I wonder if Earth, in the obverse, has an effect on Mars. Or Venus.
All and everything has an affect .
Venus' orbit is the most circular of the solar system but Mercury's eccentricity is 2nd (which Jupiter is tweaking).
Great simple explanation of the unexplained glacial periods and the hot periods.
There are so many cycles we should figure all of them out because some of them are due or even overdue.
Then they aren't cycles if they aren't cyclical but overdue
@@T.efpunktIt seems that effects can be subtle and with lag times, influenced by other, similar patterns. Imagine waves in the sea and secondary effects on gases emitted from an undersea volcano.
@@T.efpunkt There is a lag time. A good example is the tilt of the planet.
For example the current declining tilt as well as solar irradation at 65n suggests that we should be entering an ice age at this very moment or within the next thousands of years.
Once that effect truly takes place it seems like it can happen very quickly, so would be better to prepare I think and try to understand it more?
Sir. No we are in the world. The cycles are always happening. All at once. Right now.
We should know then so we can try and plan long term. But not because of your misunderstood reasoning.
You get what I'm saying right. Cause I know you have commented before
could mean we just don't know the full scope of the cycle
Thanks for sharing this!
All those Astrology nuts must be going nuts right now 😂
To be totally fair, astrology is perfectly valid IF AND ONLY IF you drop the predictions on behavior. Technically astrology is just a science of planetary motion created by Kepler. So astrology is correct, like quantum, but like Deepak Chopra, the crazies have taken it over.
TH-cam when someone talks about the Ice Age: "Context: the Ice Age was caused by the Flinstones' dinosaur-driven industry."
97% of scientists agree, except for the ones that don't count... 20 years ago... tree rings are way more accurate than rock layers... also, we can't question science without a pen in our shirt pocket and a lab coat... The mighty Gore would not approve of your blasphemy.
@@BrokePencil100% or almost 100% of scientists reached a consensus that anthropogenic climate change is real.
Try again bud.
Fact check: True! YT is run by stupid fascists and they lie about everything
100% of scientists agree on EXACTLY what about climate change?
Fact is you are lying, and using these things out of context to lie because you're premise is a hoax.
Man made climate change isn't a real problem, which is why you need to make up BS.
@@KnightspaceORG 97% of scientist agree they don't want their funding pulled and that's about as much as can be relied on. We lost science when it became a religion that you have to have faith in.
Thanks Anton.❤❤
That grin kills me. I want THAT on a t-shirt
thank you Anton, another wonderful video! this one was fascinating, so interesting to see new patterns emerging as we gather more data, and to consider how patterns discovered in different specialist disciplines might share similar causes
Intresting to know that research from the university of Tromsö Norway found that the gulfstream is speeding up. They speculate its because the heat Exchange is more efficient when there is a lack of ice in the artic sea.
My question: is subterranean magma influenced by gravitational forces, similar to the way oceans are?
Earth's mantle doesn't flow as liquid water, so basically no
Yes but it is insignificant.
@@rockfri but it does flow?
I wasn’t anticipating tidal movements of the same magnitude as the oceans, but I would have expected _something_ measurable?
@@rockfriit doesn’t matter whether it’s solid or liquid. on these very large scales, strength/fluidity doesn’t matter very much.
It would be influenced to some degree.
I must’ve missed the part that linked the 2.4 million year cycle time to specific relative distances between Mars and Earth. Drat!😮
Venus, there has been a number of articles saying a 405,000 year cycle on Earth is due to Venus and Jupiter working together. But i have not been able to find out the mechanism. Popularized science tend toward the cursory flash title. sigh.
You mean Milankovitch cycles.
The Earth's orbit approximates an ellipse. Eccentricity measures the departure of this ellipse from circularity. The shape of the Earth's orbit varies between nearly circular (theoretically the eccentricity can hit zero) and mildly elliptical (highest eccentricity was 0.0679 in the last 250 million years).[6] Its geometric or logarithmic mean is 0.0019. The major component of these variations occurs with a period of 405,000 years[7] (eccentricity variation of ±0.012). Other components have 95,000-year and 124,000-year cycles[7] (with a beat period of 400,000 years). They loosely combine into a 100,000-year cycle (variation of −0.03 to +0.02). The present eccentricity is 0.0167[7] and decreasing.
Eccentricity varies primarily due to the gravitational pull of Jupiter and Saturn. The semi-major axis of the orbital ellipse, however, remains unchanged; according to perturbation theory, which computes the evolution of the orbit, the semi-major axis is invariant. The orbital period (the length of a sidereal year) is also invariant, because according to Kepler's third law, it is determined by the semi-major axis. Longer-term variations are caused by interactions involving the perihelia and nodes of the planets Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, and Jupiter.[6]
-wikipedia
The planets tilted at about 23 degrees likely have a common cause. Maybe that Saturn was their Sun and when captured they all retained their tilt and other factors sso far unrecognised but seen in this type of ocean effect not achieved by 'alien' Venus for example. Likely the connection is not just the tilt but also the likes of Birkeland Currents etc flowing better between the previously associated bodies.
Thank you Anton
Anton becoming our daily Interstellar climate journalist, that's what we wanna see 😂
Fascinating. Thanks
I've watched a lot of your videos and enjoyed them. Maybe I was asleep for some of it but I don't see where this explained WHAT the connection was, why it was thought to have something to do with Mars, and how, etc. etc.
TH-cam when 5 Minute Craft: 🦗
TH-cam when science communicator: DON'T TRUST EVERYTHING YOU SEE!
Yes! Very awesome!!
we are really fortunate to a yt channel like this to combat the newspaper/tv/activist grabbing headlines of ill informed people with their own agenda.
All I know is they told me last week today would be 60 degrees, its 20.
This is why I don't trust scientists that think they can predict the climate based on a few factors on earth alone.
Thank you for nailing shut the coffin lid on the collapse of the Atlantic currents. That paper infuriated me, and the press of course latched on to it. It has been a course of research that started with a defective paper back in the 1980s, leading to the ridiculous film "The Day After Tomorrow". Sadly, people keep coming back to the topic. To equate a bit of modern ice melt to the catastrophic floods of the Lesser Dryas was one flaw. Forgetting the Coriolis effect was the other. Well done. And thank you.
Thanks!
I keep saying “Do not confuse good science with poor journalism”.
whats ur point
@somethingforsenro There isn't one, they just wanted to sound smart and philosophical
@@user-to1su2iy4d Who is the other guy?
LOL, I dunno... Definitely seeing a bit of poor science pushed/manipulated by agenda driven media/Soros-istic, Gate-ish, foriegn money.... A lot of financial contributions demand science sounds a certain way. I keep wondering when we stop that nonsense and bring back integrity to education/sciences. This isn't political for me, personally; contrary to what it may read like.
Look at National Geographic, Kenny Broad's study of stalactites in blue holes. He found a cycle he estimated at just over 10k years of Sahara sand layers found in 2 of each 3 cycles of what appeared to be something just over 10k years. So, I found why it's only 2 of 3 and that it's actually 12,900 years matching the cycle of our solar system passing through the galactic axis and more important; earth's core spin rate which resets each 12,900 from what is obviously a force from Sirius energy and the galactic energy sheet's ability to exchange this over long distance quite well thanks to multiphase waves. The same science was used by Tesla to efficiently move ac power long distance. Anyway, the sand layers prove there's a hot end to each 12,900 and we literally just had the first wave of this 2 years ago when that sand blew into Texas, finally. This marks the end and obviously a new beginning. Eventually these studies take a back seat to a far more impending threat which are the current biblical signs such as the 4.8 eclipse sign; the last sign just before the Lord comes to rescue many late spring according to Mark ch13. If Anton wants to see ice melt, well, don't worry, the heat will melt silver as earth slowly changes it's equator in 7 years. Ezekiel 22:22
I took a look at the article in Nature. Very interesting that they can use geologic records of water circulation on earth to reduce the chaos in long-term calculations of solar system orbits. Let's hope it works out. We might be able to find out if there are perturbations caused by unknown objects with long orbital periods.
tokyo temps this september have been +8C to +10C higher than average, just seems like summer temps. i.e., +34C daytime max, +26C nighttime min. (this year again almost all summer nights have been tropical).
in the past week, sun's been scorching. i haven't burned or tanned all summer, but now, even i did all the same things, i got sunburn in under one hour. having in mind CMEs and geomagnetic storms of the past week, i wonder if it's correlated. very odd weather this september indeed.
Fascinating indeed. I wonder if it also affects Mars in some way. (I mean in case they're correct and it's really Mars causing it.)
Thank you
Great video,thanks 👍😊
It's so weird of a side note, it's like talking about the moons of jupiter without mentioning the gravitational pool of Jupiter and how it affects them.
Nice video by the way
Anton; I'd love it if you would speak about the short-term, projected changes in the Milankovich and other cycles. For example: when the world's water-levels rise making the circumference of the earth larger, does the rotation of the earth also get slower? Also, does the increased surface area of the oceans'-waters lead to a greater cooling-effect as more surface water is also evaporating? Liked your video very much, thank you. h
So, Mar’s orbital pattern in relation to Earth may well contribute to Ice/Heat ages. Let me re-emphasize: A planets MOVEMENT has the capacity to affect HUGE global weather patterns.
So, for 9 months in the womb, the most advanced and complex biological mechanism in the known universe is developing-the human brain. The seat of our PERSONALITY, which directs and defines us. We’ve already known the Sun affects global weather, our magnetic field, animal migration, etc. and now we see a tiny planet affecting earth patterns.
And yet people still scoff at the idea that planetary movements can slightly alter such sensitive machinery during its most vulnerable developmental period, giving rise to repeatable personality traits.
Scientists: "It appears that long duration cycles of celestial alignments have deep impacts in earth's systems via subtle mechanisms of energy transfer."
Astrologers: *flips table*
I love when Anton calls out propaganda
There is just still so much more to learn! I hope this at least means that we won't be stopping that cycle, there's already far too much we will have to solve for comfort!
Loved you Anton!!
Sorry if I missed it, but what exactly happens with Earth's and Mar's orbits that coincides with these geological-climatological patterns? Is there a convergence, several near passes while Earth's precession is at some sensitive point or what? (edit: Mar's has the second greatest eccentricity of orbit of all the planets. Perhaps this 86 millenia pattern at present figures in.)
Knowing the cycle length, it looks like we could figure this out.
0:41 Yuuuup, it's there. Lol
i would think that continental drift would affect ocean currents the most if not for temperature. at least for how the currents are shaped
Well done Anton
thank you anton petrov
Thanks for the update Anton. Right now I don't think these Martian butterfly wings are goin to create a hurricane.
First question this raises in my mind is how many ocean cables are being buried with this going on?
I remember a report about 15 years ago where they said that the Gulf Stream will begin to breakdown in 2030 due to the salinity being weaker due to the additional fresh water melting into the sea.
thank you liked and shared
80 degress??????
Well, hearing that the ocean currents, especially the Gulf Stream, isn't going away is a relief. My country (Finland) is approximately on the same latitudes as Alaska, but much warmer due to the Gulf Stream.
Thank you for your efforts. When I find a person to say it to I say thank you wonderful human. Look forward to seeing you in the afterlife. When we can laugh about all the bs. If there is before and after
Allen watts- there is no such thing as intrinsically seperate events in the universe. It's all one thing.
Lol, Anton has been FACT-CHECKED :D
No contemt warning (anynore). Thanks for your relentless daily science updates.❤
Interesting!
I had a dream that an energy force was headed to pass by Mars , Earth , and Venus .Thank God for uncertainty .
If our magnetosphere weakens during the time of alignment with mars while the sun transfers into its maximum
I'm genuinely curious as to its effects upon our planet. This seems as though it could have somewhat drastic consequences upon not just technology but life outside of humanity.
Very good video Anton
Sounds like the Mars link is pretty speculative, especially given the lack of connection to Venus.
Gravity is the result of energy pushing upward from the earths core, the energy eventuality falls back towards the core causing a pulling down effect we call gravity. It's elecrro magnetism, not a graviton.
Earth is only 4 billion year old, so an event with periodicity of 2 can only had happened 2 times.
But the first time would had been so close to the start, that is not possible to have a geological record that old, so the sample has to register a single event.
Is not possible to establish the periodicity of an event that happened only once.
I think what isn't included in climate change and the AMOC is things like the South American Anomaly, El Nino and La Niña patterns.Volcanic activity, earthquake plate boundaries. Sea grass decline and the Amazon rainforest or other global cooling features impacting ice decline.
Please tell what AMOC stands for (Atlantic something something Current?)
I can’t recall off hand, and I think it’s what Anton “meant to” reference when he mentioned the Gulf Stream.
As I recall, the AMOC is a circulation driven by temperature differential, wherein cold water in the North Atlantic plunges toward the ocean floor and then travels south (I think closer to Africa than to the Americas?), where warming waters begin to rise toward the surface again.
Does that sound about right?
When people say that the global sea ice will melt... I can't keep watching that video. Especially when its regarding something no more than 5 years away. 😂🤦♂️👍
Fascinating Captain, so Velikovsky might have been on the right track.
The sun has a greater effect on earth than Mars has on earth.
07:35 The earths ice can never completely melt without a span of 100 years… the sheer mass of the ice sheets, not even some-kind-of cataclysmic melt rate could equate for that.
Many amateur astronomers know that Venus nearly repeats its position in the sky every 8 years… but did you know that Mars nearly repeats its position every 47 years?
I noticed that Mars was repeating its 1975 apparition a couple of years ago.
As we know, everything is connected in the universe and beyond❤
The UN needs to take up this Mars warming problem. Where's Gretta ?
Shame the north Atlantic current won’t stop. I was quite looking forward to a ‘Day after tomorrow’ type weather event
Just wait until we "relearn" what saturn does.
I want to think more about that problem.. I feel like it’s something that can be solved but needs someone like yourself collaborating on the problem space for good solutions to this or if we can solve this..
Amusing to see the climate sidenote to wikipedia, while it would seem more relevant for wikipedia to reference Anton.
The oldest ice cores are right around 1 million years old. You can't grab ice cores older than 1 million years
Very good morning Gnuida
Appropriate you aired this during the month named after Mars.
The planets orbit our Sun counterclockwise as viewed from the north pole. One animation showed it as clockwise.
If you are upside down it works. In space there is no up or down.
Maybe it was oriented from the souht pole.
@@AladimBRI wrote, " ... as viewed from the north pole."
Which doesn't reflect the video, pointless. You mentioned like something is wrong, and it is not. Just a different reference. But I guess you are used to see the world from the North America perspective and everything else must feel weird. I just pointed that out@@douglaswilkinson5700
"It's a self correcting system,"
-George Carlin
The fish off the coast of Florida are acting strange. Look it up
I missed all of that I was freaking out what the small head was doing on the corner of my phone when I went to full screen.
How far The Gulf stream deflects north may be influenced by the Atlantic circulation but is caused by the Coriolis effect so won't be shutting down unless the Earth stops rotating
You didn't address a fundamental question regarding this phenomenon:
How far (how many years) into the current 2.4 million year cycle are we right now?
This seems like some pretty relevant information....
TIA to anyone who happens to know and share this information.
That United Nations banner is creepy
An awful lot could be learned from sampling Mars. With virtually no plate tectonics or vulcanism, so much ancient geology will still be preserved from a similar period correlating to Earth's history which these processes have erased.
Just a question,does the equator move up and down between the north hemisphere and the south hemisphere?
it's always more complex then the experts of the time think. that's my law of large and small objects. and connected components in a system that interacts within other system raises the magnitude of the complexity considerably. why is physics so sure of these types, problems they estimate or round off then creat non-existing forces and particles instead of searching for what their measurements didn't allow for.
It's funny how astrology gets credibility the more we understand astronomy
Great video Anton!
So long as there are places that warm up more than others, i.e., the tropics v the poles, then there will be ocean currents. They won't stop.