Natural talent - myth or reality?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ต.ค. 2024
- Talent. Do men like Peter Sagan come into the world with it and develop it, or are inborn predispositions overestimated, meaning that we can achieve whatever we want just with the correct training? The last episode of "the Myths in education" series.
Talent is something only a few people have.You can't learn it, but rather are born with it
@@Ben-s7n3m talent is fake. It makes no difference.
@@Ben-s7n3m bro that is bullcrap from 1700’s
Yes, talent is definately real 100%
it is not
@@islapulikechris_13 But it definately is...
@@rivenz6 learn to spell
@@islapulikechris_13 Im not talented enough. Just keep forgetting how to spell.
@@islapulikechris_13 it is....
Talent is very important if you want to be really good at something.
@@Jerry-j1i every human has infinite potential
No
Yes
Olympic runner? Pro athlete? Maybe. But even then people make it happen. Set your own limits.
talent is a failure's excuse from those who can't put up the hard work
Talent is real, but it won’t take you all the way. You need training and practice in any skill if you want to excel. I hate when people undermine the human ability and dismiss the hard work of others with, “they are just naturally talented,” or “I could never be as talented.” It’s all hard work, no human is born with the ability to play music, or create art, or play chess. It’s all learned and practiced.
@@frogcatdog luck too, just look at the lives of people who achieve icredible feats or learn extremely fast, luck is a huge factor in their progress
Talent is everything. Nothing other than inborn talent can allow a person to become good.
Sorry.This is the facts....
First, how do you prove that someone has no talent? becuase currently your argument is circular: person succeeded? -> talent, thats not what talent is, since people with talent could fail if they are never given the opportunity right?
in another comment you asked about the difference between talent and inborn traits. the difference is that people find ways around inborn traits, while talent, as you said, "is everything"
also, what skillsets require talent? paying taxes? working 9-5? being good at basic arithmetic? putting on a pair of pants?
@@harrietjameson Putting on a pair of pants requires no talent, obviously.
@@rivenz6 so where is the line drawn?
@@harrietjameson Maybe for the things only top 5 percentile can do?
@@rivenz6 5%, so like every niche skill requires talent? i make something new and it immediately qualifies? incomplete definition
quick side quesiton: seems like you always ignore my most important arguments and always respond to some weak link. Why defend your argument in the most cowardly way possible?
also, there arent numbers for how many people are good at a certain skill, or even numbers on how many people engage in a certain skill. So getting your 5% is literally impossible
finally, how do you know this, how do you know that just because most people can do it, it doesnt require talent, cuz as far as im concerned the definition of talent doesnt include numbers. Thinking could be classified as a talent since its an innate ability you have from birth
100% myth I made a reddit post on it
Talent real
I second that. Real
@@Jenny-c9i why would god screw some ppl and bless others if he wants us to work hard if some of us can’t be that good?
@@Graeme-ve8tg no. You can’t be ‘just good’ at something
@@GallantDrop1196 Yeah but some people are just amazing without even trying hard, because I seen it. Then others who try really hard are not even any good, even after lots of years trying. So that's just how it is.
Reality
i disagree talent can be learned even you bad at it
@@TheRocketFlyerMAX you are only bad at smthn bc u dont do it
@@GallantDrop1196 im not giving up person
@@GallantDrop1196 if im worst at any, its because i dont enjoy them
@@TheRocketFlyerMAX yes my guy finally someone who is correct