Good job. I never thought to characterize science as play or experiments as games. It's a compelling narrative in itself deserves to be published. But the crux of this experiment is really about education. Can unstructured education be valuable in teaching science? As valuable as teaching ecology and earth science which they should be learning at that level. It certainly is inspiring and it deserves careful consideration.
I wish I could have been in that class. One of the things I've always hated about science class is the complete lack of room for any actual science. Science is the process of discovery. There's no discovery in following a given procedure to get the exact same results students have been getting for years. This, on the other hand, THIS is science. If only more students could experience what science really is!
I think children make some of the best scientists because they're used to not knowing anything about the world around them, so they have fewer preconceived notions and are more open to learning. I've also found, from personal experience, that people who dropped out of school early are much more open-minded about most things than people who went to college, probably for the same reason: fewer preconceived notions.
You cannot make a life form without the preexisting directives that make them. The only thing they can do is to copy directives that have already existed for thousands of years.
Evidence is of what you can see that proves there are causes we cannot see. You have a very great Maker because no physical thing is able to make you. This is the only truth that has ever done good to mankind because without your Maker, you have no hope.
GOod job, just surprisingly, if the evolution theory wasn't mentioned "Nothing will change" and all will stay as is. it's so strange that nearly in all ted talks even if it wasn't the topic, the word is always used... (some might say because it's a fact...) well it's not me who wrote that evolution is a theory widely accepted by modern scientist.. (and not a proven fact)..
You cannot tell me anything because you did not prove anything. You have no idea of how impossible it is for life forms to make or morph themselves without preexisting directives to do so.
It is possible to create a living organism from "nothing", as in nothing living. It is proven in the lab, I don't remember how. It gets complicated, but I think even you will be able to understand. Good luck, tiny one.
one of my favorite TED episodes.
Good job. I never thought to characterize science as play or experiments as games. It's a compelling narrative in itself deserves to be published. But the crux of this experiment is really about education. Can unstructured education be valuable in teaching science? As valuable as teaching ecology and earth science which they should be learning at that level. It certainly is inspiring and it deserves careful consideration.
I wish I could have been in that class. One of the things I've always hated about science class is the complete lack of room for any actual science. Science is the process of discovery. There's no discovery in following a given procedure to get the exact same results students have been getting for years. This, on the other hand, THIS is science. If only more students could experience what science really is!
I think children make some of the best scientists because they're used to not knowing anything about the world around them, so they have fewer preconceived notions and are more open to learning. I've also found, from personal experience, that people who dropped out of school early are much more open-minded about most things than people who went to college, probably for the same reason: fewer preconceived notions.
The project was conducted 2 years before they were successfully published.
I discovered that you have to have significantly sequenced directives to make a life form and objects are not able to write directives.
Brilliant!
This guy's shirt is cool.
You cannot make a life form without the preexisting directives that make them. The only thing they can do is to copy directives that have already existed for thousands of years.
Evidence is of what you can see that proves there are causes we cannot see.
You have a very great Maker because no physical thing is able to make you.
This is the only truth that has ever done good to mankind because without your Maker, you have no hope.
I am not the misguided one that thinks objects made me without knowing how.
GOod job, just surprisingly, if the evolution theory wasn't mentioned "Nothing will change" and all will stay as is.
it's so strange that nearly in all ted talks even if it wasn't the topic, the word is always used... (some might say because it's a fact...) well it's not me who wrote that evolution is a theory widely accepted by modern scientist.. (and not a proven fact)..
i cant hear anything lol why
Brains, language, excitement (What more could one want?)
Go to that spider place: metaphorsandbeyond
Involved*
You cannot tell me anything because you did not prove anything.
You have no idea of how impossible it is for life forms to make or morph themselves without preexisting directives to do so.
Fool, read up on it. Don't just say that, because it does. It does in several ways. Evolution is a beautiful science.
It is possible to create a living organism from "nothing", as in nothing living. It is proven in the lab, I don't remember how. It gets complicated, but I think even you will be able to understand. Good luck, tiny one.
Only works in left ear, very annoying
Evolution is not science.
Science does not prove the mindless fantasy of evolution.
Least viewed TEDEd video. (12.3.2024) (dd/mm/yyyy)