What is Consciousness? - Carlo Rovelli Debates Buddhist Monk Geshe Namdak

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ก.ค. 2024
  • In this engaging dialogue, Buddhist scholar Geshe Tenzin Namdak enters into a profound conversation with Prof. Carlo Rovelli a renowned Quantum physicist, about consciousness's enigmatic nature. This discussion traverses the intriguing intersections of quantum physics, Buddhist philosophy, and the mind's immaterial essence, challenging our conventional understanding of reality.
    Carlo Rovelli and Geshe Namdak explore whether consciousness can be broken down into quanta and discuss the implications of viewing the mind and matter from both scientific and philosophical perspectives. They delve into the concept of consciousness as a process rather than a static entity, drawing parallels with the nature of life itself as understood through modern science and deep philosophical inquiry.
    This dialogue invites us to reconsider the fundamental questions about the mind, brain, and their interconnectedness with the universe, suggesting that a comprehensive understanding of consciousness may require synthesising scientific insight and contemplative wisdom.
    This teaser is an excerpt from our online course: "Buddhism & Quantum Physics", learn more about the course here: www.sciwizlive.com/e-learning/
    🗣️ Learn more about the speakers:
    Carlo Rovelli: sciwizlive.com/speakers/prof-...
    Geshe Namdak: sciwizlive.com/speakers/geshe...
    Science & Wisdom LIVE brings meditation practitioners in conversation with scientists to address the problems of contemporary society and come to new possible solutions. Addressing topics such as AI ethics, gender equality, climate change, and the benefits of mindfulness and meditation.
    We believe that dialogues between science and contemplative traditions inspire positive action and ethical solutions, grounded in values of cooperation, compassion, and equality.
    🌐 Visit our website: sciwizlive.com/
    ✉️ Subscribe to our newsletter: www.sciwizlive.com/about
    🚀 Follow us on:
    Facebook: / sciwizlive
    Instagram: / scienceandwisdomlive
    LinkedIn: / science-wisdom-live
    #Science&WisdomLIVE #ConsciousnessResearch #QuantumMechanics #Neuroscience #CognitiveScience #Consciousness

ความคิดเห็น • 16

  • @SusmitaBarua_mita
    @SusmitaBarua_mita 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I see mind and consciousness as non-local infinite quantum field in the formless dimension and brain in finite localized space-time form or material dimension; but brain is immersed in the infinite field and can receive and transmit information in different vibrations from and to the field of unbounded mind consciousness ~

    • @scienceandwisdomlive
      @scienceandwisdomlive  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for sharing your thoughts, Susmita!

    • @TheMahayanist
      @TheMahayanist ปีที่แล้ว

      Makes sense, if QT is actually fundamental.

  • @dawid_dahl
    @dawid_dahl 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Finally some Nagarjuna-love.

  • @gustavosanthiago
    @gustavosanthiago ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I think we can tackle the mind-brain issue from two different levels. On a substance dualism level, which we find in Hinayana philosophy and much of modern thinkers, it is really mysterious and will require a lot of research (which might be inconclusive afterall). But, as Carlo pointed out, the Buddha and Nagarjuna demonstrated how both matter and mind are, on the ultimate level, insubstantial. So on this level, there’s no fundamental distinction between mind and brain because neither is ultimately findable. Therefore, we can’t say they’re different and obviously we can’t say they’re the same. I think its a matter of level of analysis.

  • @gregori000
    @gregori000 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Rovelli probably unintentionally but put forward a Samkya vs Vedanta vs Buddhism analysis.

  • @mrbwatson8081
    @mrbwatson8081 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The brain 🧠 and body is what consciousness looks like from a certain perspective. The universe ✨ as a whole is what consciousness looks like from a certain perspective.

  • @SaraM-py4jl
    @SaraM-py4jl ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I suggest everyone interested in “consciousness matter” to listen the point of view of another Italian physicist (known better in Silicon Valley how one of the inventors of the Microprocessor and Touch Screen technology), his name is Federico Faggin.
    He is currently funding scientists in Europe and USA who are interested in this matter.
    He has a good point in believing that consciousness is not an epiphenomenon of the brain’s activity but a phenomenon itself ( irreducible) which is being detected by our brains.

  • @TheWayOfRespectAndKindness
    @TheWayOfRespectAndKindness ปีที่แล้ว

    May I suggest that Space/Time and Consciousness are equivalent. The matter of our brain being equivalent to the matter of the universe.

    • @matmolin
      @matmolin ปีที่แล้ว

      "As above, so below; as below, so above. As within, so without; as without, so within." and "The all is mind". What you're saying is pretty much the first and second principle of hermetism ;)

  • @alokbhattacharyya2140
    @alokbhattacharyya2140 ปีที่แล้ว

    We have to assume that consciousness is a fundamental quantity, like mass, length, time etc. It can be detected. It can possibly be measured. But, it cannot be explained in terms of anything else simpler.

    • @eoneom
      @eoneom ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Why would you assume that it's fundamental?

  • @yifuxero5408
    @yifuxero5408 ปีที่แล้ว

    Consciousness can be experienced "In-Itself" in the state of Samadhi (Satori). No problem, access the foremost Shiva mantra from the Rig Veda: "Mahamritunjaya mantra - Sacred Sounds Choir" Listen to it for 5 min per day for at least two weeks. In due time you will and tap into and merge with the non-dual Reality, what Spinoza called Substance, also called by Aristotle "Being-In-Itself", the One of Plotinus, the Tao, etc.

  • @dayanarias5704
    @dayanarias5704 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The brain is not the mind we know this through Bardo experience when brain is dead life continues,,he has to make clearer stand on this point..cause then he also says that the mind can be more real than the brain..which is contradiction not a paradox

    • @dayanarias5704
      @dayanarias5704 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jasoncullen8430 incorrect there are literally tens of thousands direct experience of ppl who have come back to life explaining Bardo there are also astral traveling ppl who leave body while still alive and proven reincarnation experience look up unmistaken child documentary

  • @roselotusmystic
    @roselotusmystic ปีที่แล้ว

    NonDual . . . MindMatter 🙏
    WHY is it so hard?
    ParaDox 🙏😹