วีดีโอ

Nice one.

According to Advaita Vedanta, everything, including matter, mind, and the sense of individual consciousness, emerges from and ultimately merges back into Brahman, the one non-dual consciousness.

holistic interconnectedness and possibilities

To use the double slit experiment sounds interesting if you could prove it by experiment. That is a hefty problem to go for

❤

Thukjeche Geshe Namdak la 😇🙏🏻

Thank you, that was a very clear presentation…helpful! ❤🙏🙏🙏

Wow that was deep from a personal level… I started out feeling love and light with Swami Sarvapriyananda and ended up feeling like I wanted to set my house on fire after listening to the angry-sounding doctor in glasses.

I wish this was longer and going a bit more into the depth of the subject.

@33:03 loud commercial 🙃 thank you for the talk

Indeed….. it must begin in education of the children

What do you know about morphic resonance i notice Bohm answered a question it is true no more detail surrounding the answer..

lack of shraddha

🙏

Instantaneous nearfield electromagnetic fields are real and have been demonstrated both theoretically using Maxwell equations and experimentally. It has been proven that information in these fields propagate instantaneously. See links below for more information. The question I would like to address here is how instantaneous nearfield electromagnetic fields can be explained using quantum mechanics and does it support a particular interpretation. I think that phenomena can be explained using Pilot Wave theory and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle (HUP). In this interpretation HUP is: Δx Δp = h, where Δx and Δp correspond to average values. So in HUP: Δx Δp = h, where Δp=mΔv, thus HUP becomes: Δx Δv = h/m. In the nearfield where the field is created, Δx=0, therefore Δv=infinity. In the farfield, HUP: Δx Δp = h, where p = h/λ. HUP then becomes: Δx h/λ = h, or Δx=λ. Also in the farfield HUP becomes: λmΔv=h, thus Δv=h/(mλ). Since p=h/λ, then Δv=p/m. Also since p=mc, then Δv=c. So in summary, in the nearfield Δv=infinity, and in the farfield Δv=c, where Δv is the average velocity of the photon according to Pilot Wave theory. But according to the Copenhagen interpretation, the above argument does not make sense, since Δv corresponds to uncertainties in their values. So proof of instantaneous propagating fields, as we have done in our experiment, would invalidate the Copenhagen interpretation and validate the Pilot Wave interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. In addition to the Pilot Wave interpretation, only the Ensemble Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics also interprets the Heisenberg uncertainty principle (HUP) in terms of averages. But the Ensemble Interpretation does not support instantaneous propagation of information, whereas Pilot Wave theory does. Therefore, other than Pilot Wave theory, no other interpretation of Quantum Mechanics supports instantaneous propagation of information as demonstrated in our experiment, and interprets the Heisenberg uncertainty principle in terms of averages. *Electromagnetic pulse experiment paper: www.techrxiv.org/doi/full/10.36227/techrxiv.170862178.82175798/v1 *TH-cam presentation of above arguments: th-cam.com/video/sePdJ7vSQvQ/w-d-xo.html <th-cam.com/video/sePdJ7vSQvQ/w-d-xo.html> *More extensive paper for the above arguments: William D. Walker and Dag Stranneby, A New Interpretation of Relativity, 2023: vixra.org/abs/2309.0145 Dr. William Walker

The basic purpose of nature is to always be changing anyway anyhow. Why didn't you mention the 500 million year two stage mass extinction period of the great oxygenation era that developed from the internal path of development by emergence and development of forms within nature? The speaker repudiates an unstable nature atop a radically unstable nonliving world in a necessary way that discounts the value of the world for the sake of his local and temporary open system. What else can he do with that critical mass of imagination that nature instilled? Could he possibly accept the world as it exists to the extent that it can be determined by limited human consciousness and seemingly unlimited self interests? Nature is the kind of nature that creates itself and also humans with their ideas of repudiation of nature as always unacceptable aspects. But humans can't comprehend the complex whole or control it wit their 30 watt brains.

Jesus surrendered to his humanity, his humanness, Mary Magdalene, the sensual-spiritual-sexual. She was the only human to experience him in that way. She surrendered to him in all ways when he was alive and when he gave up his body.

Finally some Nagarjuna-love.

Thank you Ven. Fabienne and Dr Fenwick for this discussion. Very grateful for your work.

Thank you for this!

Rovelli probably unintentionally but put forward a Samkya vs Vedanta vs Buddhism analysis.

Sarvapriyaanada padam prapadyee

I'm gonna change frames and say Vervaeke won this debate

Marvel & DC Vajrayana is inevitable

I appreciate the topic and interview but am often thrown if when serious questions regarding grave situations are asked with a laugh in tow. I hear this in other interviews from both interviewer and interviewee. I hear Harding holding a balance between seriousness and hopelessness. He answers gently and thoughtfully and in earnest. The gravity of our current situation I think requires this- a capacity hold seriousness and grief in a gentle, fluid way. This is not in anyway to say humor or comedy do not have a place in dealing with or coping with all of it but this interview does not feel jocular in the least so I'm confused by the laughing.

everything David bohm speaks about is his learning from Jiddu Krishnamurthi

i comment as i watch, not after. so i honestly didnt know this other lady was gonna say the word "ready." i feel like this should be stressed. terma is such a beautiful word tho.

im grateful theyre still lettin the old maid from Gondor's Houses of Healing come out and speak. She's one of very few humans Shadowfax would consent to show the meaning of haste. wise men may long remember your words, Ioreth. < 3 when theyre ready. $ wink wink.

I have mixed feelings about the book. Many qualities: I like the dispersed format of the story, some aspects of the style, some useful reminders such as "climate change is real and caused by humans," or "we are in the sixth mass extinction," or "this is the Jevons paradox." But too many things are plain wrong. Chapter 56 in the book: "The US and several other big countries had withdrawn from the court’s jurisdiction (The Intertnational Criminal Court of The Hague) after negative rulings against their citizens." whereas in our real world: "The General Assembly (of the UN) convened a conference in Rome in June 1998, with the aim of finalizing the treaty to serve as the Court's statute. On 17 July 1998, the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court was adopted by a vote of 120 to seven, with 21 countries abstaining. The seven countries that voted against the treaty were China, Iraq, Israel, Libya, Qatar, the U.S., and Yemen." Quite another reality... Chapter 55 in the book, writing about France: ...the Commune of 1848... No. The Revolution of 1848 (the third one) from February 22 to February 24, 1848, led to the abdication of King Louis Philippe and to the foundation of the Second Republic. The Commune was in France a Parisian insurrection against the Third Republic, from March 18 to May 28, 1871. The two are never confused, neither in French nor in English. When you know Switzerland, it is kind of hilarious to see it portrayed as a welcoming country for refugees, and in Chapter 47, you might be led to believe that the Swiss banking industry is an old thing of the past that has little to do with Swiss prosperity (LOL). And about Germany and France, chapter 50: "...the rest of the world was irrelevant, or at most instruments to be used." What should one say, then, maybe, about the USA? About China? etc. But the worst thing is the substance of the book. The reader might be led to believe that, yes, the climate situation is very, very bad (it starts like that in Chapter 1), but don't you worry too much, "clean energy", geoengineering and human goodwill will save us... in some decades, when many scientists today estimate we may have already crossed irreversible tipping points, when James Hansen writes "Eventual global warming due to today's GHG forcing alone - after slow feedbacks operate - is about 10°C." An increase of 5°C is generally considered beyond the point of extinction for humans. So false hope not based in reality is noxious, an anesthesic against action. Really, this is the only kind of book our contemporary fiction literature has to offer other than apocalyptic/survivalist, Rambo type, or stupid zombie series? At the most defining time in human history, maybe the end of humanity, I'd like to give this excerpt of "Where is the fiction about climate change" by Amitav Ghosh, in The Guardian (the whole article is online and worth reading). "In a substantially altered world, when sea-level rise has swallowed the Sundarbans and made cities such as Kolkata, New York and Bangkok uninhabitable, when readers and museum-goers turn to the art and literature of our time, will they not look, first and most urgently, for traces and portents of the altered world of their inheritance? And when they fail to find them, what can they do other than to conclude that ours was a time when most forms of art and literature were drawn into the modes of concealment that prevented people from recognising the realities of their plight? Quite possibly, then, this era, which so congratulates itself on its self-awareness, will come to be known as the time of the Great Derangement." As global warming and overshoot don't happen in a vacuum but are descending on our society with politics, here is an excerpt from "Parable of the Talents" by Octavia Butler (1998): Jarret was inaugurated today. We listened to his speech-short and rousing. Plenty of “America, America, God shed his grace on thee,” and “God bless America,” and “One nation, indivisible, under God,” and patriotism, law, order, sacred honor, flags everywhere, Bibles everywhere, people waving one of each. His sermon-because that’s what it was-was from Isaiah, Chapter One. “Your country is desolate, your cities are burned with fire: your land, strangers devour it in your presence, and it is desolate as overthrown by strangers.” Adam Flint, author of "Mona," on Amazon.

Am on my way to a Meeting with a cooperative who produce organic fertilizer. Been reading a lot about ecology & i am a practising agro-ecology promoter. As a catholic we have our Laudato Si awakening us towards the same end this conversation is tackling. Thank you so much for all you have shared, very affirming, inspiring & am truly moved to learn more & be nourished towards becoming a child of the Gaia Earth!

Thanks for the interview. KSR is one of my favourite fictional writers.

Thanks for this video. Dr PF is so fascinating and inspiring.

According to OBErs they experience seeing their body once fully out.

"All Being".

Consciousness is the ground of Albion it is energy that is neither created nor destroyed it is the possible of all possible's limitless flow of energy that we collapse into reality with our awareness.

I am hesitant to accept that you do this type of meditation a lot, Scott, because you cannot lead it for five minutes without your screen. If you practice piano everyday, you can play a piece without the sheet music in a week.

What is happiness? How can we gage without a description of happiness to use?

I am interested in getting in contact with Prof Hiley and Paul Howard for research purposes, can anyone from the Science & Wisdom team let me know how I can do this please?

Happy to such a Great debate/seminar with science and ancient philosophy

Thanks a lot❤

Producing science and spirituality without the need to consume them may be the key to avoid what is coming?

The kung fu nuns guidwd by Gyalwang Drukpa

I had the same view as a child, and when i grew up i became a buddhist.

Fast of all stop the Russian war in Ukraine !! Thousands bombs are falling and destroying the Earth!!!

Thank you, for share profound Dharma essence

I too had always been a Buddhist but didn't know it until I heard a Buddhist teaching in a language and with metaphors I could understand. Changed my life forever. I'm so happy I found the dharma again.

I watched IP at a Birkbeck alumni event. I asked Paul a question as to whether Bohm took psychedelics or not? It was a no lol.

So Very Pleased to see JTP and VM together again during this summer solstice 🙏🏼and listen again her loveliness teaching

Because we can’t figure out that how consciousness is independent from mind, brain and body that does not mean it’s independent is not true, scientist still need to work to find out hard problem of consciousness.

Is not consciousness in body but body is in consciousness, so as universe is floating in consciousness, consciousness is unbounded……