A lot of people seem to be offended because I said Buddhism borrows certain elements from Hinduism. There are people claiming that Buddhism is older. I would like to make two points here: 1. It does NOT matter which religion is older, in the context of this video. My take is that of an atheist. 2. I am not a student of history. I am not making any claims. My information is based on what I have read. It could be wrong. So kindly refrain from fighting over this in the comment section. Because the people fighting are theists and I can assure you, this channel is never pleasant for theists.
@@TheIanPanda Notice to all who thinks hinduism is oldest relegion than buddhism : Buddh dharm ka name Saman/Sraman dharm hai . Sraman dharm duniya ka sabse purana relegion hai, lndus valley me bhi yhi parampra thi.Hindu logo ne karma ka siddhant, rebirth, yoga, meditation ye sab sramno se chura lia 😁
Hey Ian, I understand your perspective. Historically speaking, cross-references show that Buddhism predates what is now called Hinduism, and the term 'Hindu' is relatively recent-likely only a few hundred years old. At most, it was a form of Brahminical practice about a thousand years ago. I'd love to dive deeper into this discussion whenever we have time. I get where you're coming from, though, and you made an educated guess, which is perfectly reasonable. Instead of taking offense, people should present logical, well-reasoned explanations if they disagree. After all, as atheists, our focus should be on searching for facts and expanding our understanding, not on getting defensive. To everyone watching, let's embrace curiosity and dialogue as a way to broaden our horizons!
People usually need purpose/hope in life for motivation to live. When we don’t find any purpose/hope or don’t know what to do with our lives, we tend to find joy in someone else’s success. People want fantasy and they like to believe it to be true that gives them a sense of hope and pleasure (That is how celebrity/religious worship is formed).
Buddha himself rejected the concept of reincarnation...and those who says that are the one who tried really hard to eradicate buddhism from india but ambedkar revived buddha in india...
4:42 Karma and Rebirth as Buddha understood it is very different from how it got adapted into metaphysical and supernatural ideas by Mahayan and Vajrayan
Is there any source where details about the Buddha are available? Because as I see it, (and as I mentioned in the video) all of his teachings have been passed on and reinterpreted by the ensuing generations. And regardless of it, rebirth is still a baseless idea. The day there's real evidence of it, I will believe it.
@@TheIanPanda a basic viewing of “Doug’s dharma “ and “seeker to seeker” TH-cam channel will suffice , dogma is tougher to keep in check in even rational people so I have found the 5 aggregates a good model to understand the human experience . There are 45 volumes in the pali cannon so if you want the exact scripture no take your queries to suttacentral , you cannot discount the philosophy which led to zero which can be seen as the origin of objectivity ,check and read 5 aggregates.
Another fact that was brought to light by a fellow Ambedkarite to me is that Babasaheb never coined the term Navayana. He was not trying to create a "new" religion but merely to trying to go back to the roots of Buddha's teachings and presenting it to the modern era. It came to be known as Navayana in due course by people from other ideologies (including Buddhists) but Babasaheb never intended it to be that way. Also, yes we can separate the religion from the communalism and bigotry of its followers. If the core ideals of that religion don't endorse of any of what it's followers end up doing we can't blame the religion for that.
4:09 I beg to differ, the teachings of Quran have been "marketed" in native languages too, Urdu/Hindi/Hindustani is result of Arabic x Persian mixing with Prakrit languages.
Okay. Doesn't change the point I was making because it is still mandated to be read in Arabic, with the translations serving as guide. It's a whole different case with how the Bible is consumed.
Bro some says that in budhhism there isn't caste system & discrimination but when we see scriptures of Buddhism there is same discrimination as Hinduism
Sabse acchi buddhism ke itihaas ki jaankari ke liye aap Science Journey ji se contact krne ki koshish kriye veh hafte mein 3 baar live aate hain apne channel Ration World mein unka Science Journey naam se bhi channel hain.
Science journey wahi n who says 500000000 saal se hume Brahmins ne padhne nahi diya and then claims Ashoka was Buddhists, every single king before Ashoka was Buddhist, takshila was a Buddhist University, nalanda was a Buddhist University. BC jab sab kuch Buddhists hi tha to Brahmano ne 5000 saal se kese nahi padhne diya? 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 Literally pagalpan ki bhi koi seema hoti hogi.
@@SarojSingh-nq5qljab hindu dharma ko likha hi gya 9th century me hai or wo bhi bodhiest ka book ka Xerox kiya hai to uske bad brahmin ne warg laya logo ko divide kiya fir padhane ka adhikar nhi diya. Tera pass koi proof hai tere hindu dharm ka jo ye proof de ke 4000 sal pahle hindu dharma exist krta tha to kar dibet usse. Proof hai la**d bhar or bolega lakho purana hai 😂😂😂🤣
i like to share few points. 1) buddha belong to a tradition called as samana tradition in which atain buddhahood is supreme like the previous people who attained buddha hood like kassapa from kasi(kashi) , konagama , kakusanda , vipassi , vesabhu, and gotama or sakyamuni we have asoka inscription for 3 buddhas and mention of 7 buddhas in Fa-Xian and heun -Xang notes, plues their staues with their names written on each can be seen in the archeological site of kanganhalli, and ellora caves which can b dated from 2nd century bce to 6th century CE. 2) buddha's maternal uncle name was suppa-buddha who is father of buddha's wife , If gotama was 1st buddha then from where did his uncle got his name of suppa buddha. 3) there where stupas found in indus valley sites and according to 28 buddha theory there was a 5th buddha names a kondanna got enlightenment in amravati near maharashtra and co incidently we can found many places which are named after him like the kondana fort now known as sihagadh, kondhane caves and etc. 4) in the work of al-beruini he mentions there was a culture in ancient iran khorasan and ajgerbaijan named as shammaniya and then zoroaster comes and start preaching the majusi or parsi religion and form early islamic texts we can say that shammaniya and barmakas was the aternate name for buddhist , 5) vedic culture doesnt have any solid proof its just we dont found any substatial evidences of anything our hindu mindied fitted vedic period in that time like the 1500 BCE till 623 BCE and they took care in histroy book the points earlier i mentioned wont be in light if you want to veryify it please go ahead , Thankyou
Sir I respect Dr. Ambedkar and his idea of navayana.....but I feel it is just a social tool for uplift of the people from both physical and mental slavery amd it is not a religion at all,as religions have customs and traditions from birth to marriage to death etc,does navayana has it? If it does,please tell me.
Dear Pandaji, ❤️🙏🙏🙏♥️ It is right interpretation of Dr ambedkar and his buddhism, But you can start a series on ambedkarite buddhism and its contribution in spreading not only equality in society but a scientific, rational attitude in society, specially in dalit ambedkarite and ambedkarite buddhist society, and one of the highest literacy rate as compare to national literacy in this society etc India supports your work to spread rationality in society ❤👌
Thank you for the kind words. But the way people are attacking this video, on the topic of which is older - Hinduism or Buddhism - makes me seriously doubt the rationality of the followers of Buddhism. They show the same vanity towards their religion as any theist. I will make concept level videos advocating for equality and harmony, though. Thanks for tuning in.
we share same age i guess but in school histroy book buddha or siddhartha never called as hindu prince heis just recognized as a indian prince or just a prince...why people want to claim him to be a hindu
@@evilbrothers8001 The term "Sanatana Dharma" first appeared in the Buddhist Mahavagga, in the section called Subhashita Suttam. The text states, "Truth is the undying word; this is the eternal law" In the late 19th century, the term was revived during the Hindu revivalism movement to refer to Hinduism as a religion. The term was used to avoid using the Persian word "Hindu".
@@evilbrothers8001 with due respect can you provide any evidence or proof which can support your statement regarding sanatan and people use to worship shiva
My question is that if navayana discards god and miraculous beliefs basically refraining from both fear & reward then how is it a religion? How can it hold community in its clutches like other religions do. Isn't it just like any random philosophy which people may choose or may not . Btw i have been a atheist too for a long time now after being deeply affected by it . Keep posting such videos 🎉
Yeah dude...ur right. But we cant call it as cult, group, gang, philosopher group, etc. Also, we can't just say..."yo man don't follow god, he has nothing to do with ur life, yo are ur god, only yo can save ur life" to the people who are used to the thing called GOD and religion. this is totally another side of the coin....haha off topic stuff....lol Navyana is more like agnostic belief system.
First thing Ambedkar is not atheist, there is directly mention in Tripitaka that Buddha rejected Vedic philosophy,in tevijjya sutta ,God in devdah sutta Brahmhajala sutta,issar sutta soul also rejected by Buddha, by the way Buddhism = spirituality+atheism
लेकिन सर, आप डिफ़ॉल्ट रूप से स्वीकार कर रहे हैं कि बौद्ध धर्म से पहले हिंदू धर्म अस्तित्व में था, क्या आपके पास इसका कोई पुरातात्विक प्रमाण है? But sir you are by default accepting Hinduism was in existence before Buddhism, Do you have any archeological proof over it?
Hey IAN, great to see your content on rationalism and Logics! I’m planning to start streaming soon on similar topics, and it’s inspiring to see someone from our city leading the way in promoting rational thinking. Wishing you all the best on your journey, and I look forward to connecting with you soon. Let’s keep spreading the message of reason and logic together!
02:24,Bro Budddha Koi Hindu lindu nahi the,Brhman dharam hi 7th-8th century AD ka hai Jo ki Buddhism K weak hone Ka baad hi arise hua hai,Jab Brhamino Ne Matt or Statue,Bahut Sare Scriptures ko Copypaste kiya,10th Century SANKARACHARYA ko Khud Brhamino Ne Prachhana(chupa)Buddha Kaha tha,Esme Reincarnation Bhi dushra hai Jo Brhamin dharam or dushro se alag hai,,Jisme Personality Change ko bolte hai
To Hathibada Ghosundi inscription sanskrit me kya tumhara baap likhke gaya tha 2nd century BCE me ?? Saf saf ashamedh aur vasudev likha hua hai aur 7th century laga rakha hai
@@humanityfirst1417 Epigraphia Indica Vol. XXII, Archaeological Survey of India, pages 198-205 Date Mila hai Jan Gonda (2016). Visnuism and Sivaism: A Comparison. Bloomsbury Academic Ab ye mat bolna ASI jhutha hai
@detectivesroy Brhamino Ka Inscription PALI Prakrit main Kaise Hone Laga?Tere abbu Ki Bhasa To IRANI Sanskrit hai?Yeh Lakdi Ka Inscription Bhi 3 Fragments main Mila hai,Jisme Jabarjastee Sabdo Ko Ghused Ghused k PALI se Abbu Ka Sanskrit banaya?Yeh Bo ASI hai Jisko IVC main Pashupati Ki Seal dikhti Jiske Bare main 19th Century Tak ghanta kuch nahi Pataa tha,Even Tere abbu Ne to ASOKA Inscriptions tak ko nahi Pad Payaa tha😌
Well done @TheIanPanda, brilliant video exactly what I try to tell people who believe that babasaheb did not give any Navayan buddhism he accepted traditional buddhsim, my question to them is why would babasaheb throw us into something for which he spent his whole life fighting for, traditional Buddhism( thervada, Mahayana,vajrayana) has some unrational supernatural beliefs and practices, Babasaheb would never want that his people become highly religiously devotees his idea for Buddhism was different his idea was that the depressed classes should get educated and struggle for equal representation, his religion was based on constitutional principles of Liberty Equality and Fraternity what are true buddhist teachings.
Not true he is thervadist , if he want to start navyana then why he take dhamma Diksha from thervadi monk , after dhamma Diksha he visited only thervada Buddhist countries like shrilanka, thailand, Myanmar.we Mahars following Theravada indirectly by the name of Navyana even our marriages only thervada suttas was chanted . There is nothing like Navyana , mostly Marathi Buddhist of vidarbha region are following Theravada . And they are developing with highest literacy rate,sex ratio, urbanisation etc.
Abhi ye video maine thik se dekhi. Neo Buddhism ke baare me acchi video hai. Buddha ki philosophy matlab sirf 4 noble truths aur 8 fold path nahi hai! Wo to unhone, jo lay people hai, unko marg bataya tha. Buddhist philosophy bahut hi deeper hai. It was lot ahead of it's time. Tum Buddhist philosophy ko itana chhota mat karo! You said ki miracles aur in sab chijon ko nikal dena chahiye. Yes correct! Lekin Buddha's basic teachings aur jo misticism, tantra, rebirth etc. ke bich me bahut sari great philosophy hai. Tum Buddha ki ya Buddhist philosophy ko bahut hi ochha, small kar rahe ho. Ye Bharat ki heritage hai, treasure hai. Humko iski value karni chahiye.
All untouchables people's ancestors well understood that's the irani bramin comes to India and his copy his goutama(तथागत )teaching ❤❤ and now say that's is superior of all people that's why (bramin vs Dalits) fight 😂😂😂
1) aapko Buddhism ke bare me bahut kam pata hai 2) Samrat Ashok Gupta nahi Mourya the 3) Maharashtra me jo 3rd generation hai navyana wali wo dhire dhire Theravada ki taraf bad rahi hai
1) I agree. Never claimed to be an expert on religion. In fact I clearly mentioned I am not. 2) If you looked at the screen carefully, I had already mentioned that correction. 3) Irrelevant to the video. Aur kuch?
Right brother we are not Navyani even Babasaheb not Navyani he not started Navyana , there is only once he used in interview, we are following Theravada from 1956 ,we chanting Theravada sutta in our ceremony like marriages. ❤
@@दृष्टिकोणः All the Neo Buddhist after conversion still following their caste Nothing changed other than relegion, They still marry in their caste and sub caste.
For a context Let’s take 3 movies accepted by audiences and the hearos of those movies are larger then life Javan - Sharuk Khan KGF - Yesh Bahubali - Prabhas Now let’s imagine we are in the 35th century and lost all the holy books written on Hinduism, Islam, Christianity One day archaeology department finds the scripts written by the directors/writers of these moves and broadcast them to the world A group of people love KGF and believe it to be a true story written by divine/almighty where a hero will come and help the needy and forms KGFism (A new religion is formed) Another group loves Bahubali and believe it to be true story written by divine/almighty where a hero will come and help the needy and forms Bahubalism (A new religion) Similarly another group loves Javan and forms Javanism (A new religion) Reality: These stories are fiction but people find meaning in it and will try to acquire qualities of the so called hearos and characters in this book and they keep enhancing the text so that in the 37th century these religions dominate the world just like Hinduism, Islam and Christianity (As they won't have any way to prove these were the fictional movies) Similarly I believe some gifted individuals have written the stories out of boredom that we now consider to be holy books (It’s also possible that they might have thought this will enhance the living of people (which it didn’t ironically) Year 2020 - Islam = year 3030 - Bahubaisam Year 2020 - Hinduism = year 3030 - Javanisam Year 2020 - Christianity = year 3030 - KGFism
@@praneethchandrallapati2282 Okay let's say I agree with you what's the thaught on Vedas and vedanta or even Geeta there concepts feels like God-like Keeping Geeta aside let's see Vedas it's full of scientific and technical knowledge and also talks about really, illusion created by mind, salvation, and many more things that apply to modern worls
@@praneethchandrallapati2282 Vedas having modern theories , scientific reasons on happenings But it also contains that God exists because in this endless expanding universe There is a supreme( those are line of rig ved) And about comparison don't you think it baseless because if I agree with you with stories part how will you explain Upanishads, Vedas, vedanta, smritis and all they are told to be God written and upon reading them they feel like Even shrimad bhagvad geeta is words of God shree krishna we know and it doesn't have stories but the many eternal truths that many physiological studies, leaned men promotes it and even scientist like Durr and many more who have worked upon quantum mechanics, atoms , energy and forces and universe clearly credits hindu text for successful of there and research and says they took inspiration from those hindu text on there own books
Hi Ian. Thank you for the informative video. As always 😊. Can you also please share some resources you went through during your research of this topic. Thank you.
4:41 Karma , rebirth and soul . While Buddha denied soul.. calling it mere an illusion.. karma and rebirth is different from what hindus call karma and rebirth
@Pranav-IITD Thus, monks, any form, ... feeling, ... perception, ... fabrications, ... consciousness whatsoever that is past, future, or present; internal or external; blatant or subtle; common or sublime; far or near: every consciousness is to be seen as it actually is with right discernment as: 'This is not mine. This is not my self. This is not what I am.' Anattalakkhaṇa Sutta
@@Kingkong-gt5oj show full reference from the Pali version also because neo bhudist often change the meaning. For example, in Kalamsutta, budha has said not to believe logic too, but neo bhudist put this as buddha said to believe logic only.
@@Pranav-IITD I don't see anything wrong with what Buddha said, you can definitely have logical sounding premises that seems valid but are invalid, even if we use logic to debunk logic that means some parts of it is eventually falsifiable, you should have a certain sense of skepticism on everything that is. I don't see how that's wrong.
I I think Vipassana can fill the gap between navyaan Buddhism and traditional originated Buddhism it can be validated if you see videos or go to Vipassana SN Goenka ji has experienced many things which has been said in Buddhism
As I didn't come across any people or community from Buddhism, so unaware of practices. Any factual information would be helpful to understand how they practice in daily life. If we continue to do any daily practices (or rituals) as part of tradition or from some faith, it can't be considered as rational practice. FYI, to survive we need to feed ourselves, so we need to kill other living things for food as we can't get/process food from non-living things. This is applicable for every living things except plant(except plant/tree who eats insects) in this planet. People who claim themselves as animal lover or vegan, are very typical! They are basically cow, chicken and goat lover but not human lover or plant lover or other living things lover.
1:21 I'm new to traditional buddhism, You know me Ian , we've talked quite alot, killing animals Is considered as a sin in Buddhism , but the buddha in his teachings , has said that if one sanyasi or monk is offered or donated meat, then they may accept it , because monks don't earn or work , they are in search spiritual attainment , buddha was not a hindu prince, Hinduism didn't exist back then , only Vedas preceed buddha, Vedic culture does not hindu religion , Hindu religion is part of Vedic culture not Vedic religion Buddhism doesn't have soul , buddha denied soul There are gods (not in context of creator) in buddhism, navayana was never established by ambedkar, but ambedkar gave us a mixture of Theravada, mahayana sects beliefs Look I don't have proper evidences for all these claims but I do it from what I've learnt from Buddhist monks and my traditional buddhist friends
Idgaf but these neo budhists are trying so hard to be the first religious group in indian subcontinent Still it wouldn't be the oldest as sumerians were already there
@AbhijitZimare what ? Claims to be the oldest ? No hinduism isn't the oldest in the slightest. Rather, it is one of the oldest, which is still alive rn while many other civilizations already have some religious practices before vedic practices came into being ( still would say by evidences alone it is the oldest in indian subcontinent but if you consider whatever indus valley had as a systematic religion than it isn't ), someone already doing a wrong thing doesn't make your wrong a right one does it ?
The truth is many Buddhists text say that Hinduism is a great religion and great concept is abide within Hinduism but the reason why Buddha have to make reform is due to some greedy people of society to earn they sold religion with false rituals in Hinduism And budha is greatly influenced by Hinduism And Hinduism bad rituals which not even organically of Hinduism which are created by greedy people because we can't refuse every era will have those kind of people
In the vedas and geeta, there are shlokas which call buddha and Buddhists as the evil entity in the world, please read your scriptures before following them.
@@apoorv_mc Are you really mad 😅. Geeta was written way before the rise of Buddhism. See take it as a advice stop following those manipulator yeah listen them but do your own research
@@apoorv_mc Geeta is a conversation between krishna and Arjun about the prospect of life, why we live , why are here every question that stirs in our mind regarding existence That is what Geeta brother not a criminal record 😊
fun fact nearly 80% of all indian buddhist live in maharashtra mostly in vidarbha region religion is not what is written in books but based on peoples conduct
And they are following Theravada Buddhism, In our city, Buldhana came under vidarbha region, there is many shrilankan monk visited the Buddhist temple even today also they are in Buldhana, we practice Theravada not only vidarbha all of Maharashtra Buddhist former Mahars are followers of Theravada ,there is many Miss conception about Maharashtra Buddhist are they following navyana there is nothing like navyana , we worship Ambedkar as Emancipator ,by his efforts There is highest literacy rate of Marathi Buddhist, nearly 83% after Jains sex ratio also increasing and urbanisation also increase in them. Thank to our God Babasaheb ❣️
@ArchanaKhodve yes I know it I to live in Maharashtra the costal part my area to has a lot of Buddhist I have even seen dalit Muslims and hindus convert to Buddhism but even Buddhists make 20% in our area they don't have any pagoda or tempe most of them live a life without showing any traits of Buddhist
@Kalashok-k9p - Kitna vella hai bhai tu? World ke largest religions cover kar diya hai. Usey gine chune nahi kehte, dodo. There's nothing new to say in Sikhism.
@@TheIanPanda sikkhism me jatibad hai uspe kuchh nhi bolna hai ? Mayanmar me rohingyo or baha ki janta ki bich ki political crisis thi na ki dharm se tab bhi use jabardsti buddh ke dharm se voilence jod di . This shows how you biased are.
Bhai aapki sabi baate thik hai par History aap sahi nahi bta rahe ho Samrat Asok already buddhist the covert nahi hoye the aur buddhism old hai Hinduism se
@ bhai main aapko sirf bta raha hu aap accept karo ki aapko History nahi pata aur Bharat ka itihas galat btayege to kitne log confused ho jaige aap jahi se pata lagao aap Ashok likh rahe ho naam Asok the . Thanks for reply and maine aapka Chanel subscribe karliya achhi video thi 🙏
Hinduism ke traces Harappa ke time se hai (2900 BCE to 1700BCE) uske baad Vedic period me clearly written evidence hai (1500BCE-600BCE). buddha ka janm hi 568 BCE me hua hai to kis calculation se Buddhism older hua??? Khud buddha Khsatriya clan se the. Aur Samrat Ashok ke ancestors Hindu the to wo Buddhist kaise bane. Besides Ashoka ke later life me hi Buddhism ke aur jhukav ke evidences milte hai, Kalinga war ke baad ke.
@ashishpatil30595 - Hinduism wasn't around during Indus Valley. That was a wrong assumption thanks to the misreading of seal no. 420. What was perceived as Pashupati was probably a shaman of some kind.
@@TheIanPanda there is no conclusive evidences of those claims. It's still accepted as a pashupati. Besides Shakambhari is another substantial evidence. And still Buddhism came way later than Vedic religions which are primitive Hindu religions.
Baba Saheb K Reform Buddhism K Bare main Apke View sahi hai,Buddha Buddha & dhamma Baba Saheb,Bake sabhi kuch waste,Lekin Sanghi BJP Or sawarno K IT cell Se Fake Propaganda chalta rehta hai❤
I think Tantrik Buddhism or Tibetan Buddhism is closer to Hinduism as it follows many superstitions like worshiping of future buddha, Kali, Swaraswati like figures etc.
Religions are beliefs and they tend to mix and evolve with local ideas. People don't appreciate it, but the fact that a lot of Hindus believe that Buddha was an incarnation of Vishnu is not some conspiracy to invalidate Buddhism, but just how people think.
Appreciate your video ! I would recommend you to read the book Annihilation of caste by Babasaheb Ambedkar from Maple Classics It is a short book but it will tell much about Babasaheb's perpspective as a whole
bhaina, mai isi religion se belong karta hu, ye b utna hi polluted horha h, ab humko b soft Buddhist Nationalism whatsapp msg aate h, aur Ambedkar ji k pote ne to alag badman kar rkha h, iss sal to uske b'day ko "Swabhiman diwas" celebrate karwaya 😂😂
Have you done Vipassana it's not so please try at once it's 10 days course and its totally free just experience that what Buddha invented will come to you
Sanatan dharma, Buddhism, Sikhism, jainesm aaur Kafi sare adivasi Religion ye sab Ek sath hain inko alag alag mat karo hum sab ek saath Hindu Dharma hai .
Brahman aur Dalit ek saath nahi ho pa rahe, ye doosre religion ki baat kar rahe hain. What a joke. Mere religion pe question karne se tumhari ekta kaise bhang ho ja rahi hai, dodo?
Jake Sarna Code ke bare me pata kar. Adivashi bhi Hindu ho jata hai, Sikh bhi Hindu ho jata hai, Jain bhi Hindu ho jata hai , Bodh bhi Hindu ho jata hai, baki tabhi tak jab tak apna matlab Purna karna hai, uske bad to sab jante hain kya haal hai
@@SLAYER_OF_FOES ek din na jane mere feed me ek kahan se reel aa gya, Usme ek tuni bol raha thi ki Mahabharata Wale Arjun ki wife Ullupi Mexico ki thi, Maine kaha, arre gadho, us kalpanik kitab me bhi usko Karnataka ka bataya gya hai, tum bc uspar bhi bakwas kar rahe ho
@@TheIanPandabhai mai ex buddhist hun jitne bhi ye nav boddh bhim ta aate hain inki humse debate karao ambedkar ke bhi dhage khol denge hum ex Buddhist 😂
Bro you should research about Buddhism more deeply then you'll find out that Buddhism is the main religion of india actually Buddhism is not just a religion it's about how to live life Buddhism is teachings of buddha that's why it's called as dhamma not dharma hopefully you'll learn about buddhism more deeply Namo buddhay, bhavatu sabb mangalan
Agree. Agar jungle mein rehna pade, toh khaane ke liye shikaar karna justified hoga. But factory farming is animal cruelty, as I conceded in the video.
Jhut bolne ki bhi sima hoti hai , buddh dharm ne karma or rebirth hindu dharam se utha liya iska kya sabut hai ? Sraman prmpra hindu dharm se purani hai jisme punarjanam hai , karma ka siddhant hai usi se jain baudh dharm nikle . Jain tirthankar rishabdev ka name rigved me aya hai .video banane se pehle sahi se janch karke aya karo .
Kis point ko leke offend ho rahe ho bhai? It is immaterial kaun pehle aaya kaun baad mein. The shared elements are stupid regardless. Watch my other videos to know my POV.
Arey bhai, for the context of this video, it does not matter which came first. Multiple sources claim different things. It is a common belief that Hinduism is older. But even if that's false, it makes zero difference to what I am saying in the video. Check out my video on Hinduism to see how critical I am of religion. In comparison, I look at Buddhism way more kindly.
@@TheIanPanda kar bhi nhi paoge buddhism ko criticise, kriticize use kiya ja sakta hai jo galat ho, Dharma sabhi ke liye baraber hai . Buddhism moral true scientific relegion hai jo science se bhi uper hai . Abhi bahut si aisi chije hai jinhe science explain nhi kar sakta bahut si aisi energies hai is duniya se contact hi nhi karti , dark energy dark matter etc . Buddhism foretold world is non real , as it appears it is not true doctrine of Sunyta .
@Kalashok-k9p - Kar di bewakoofi wali baat. Buddhism has a good philosophy but there's nothing scientific about it. This is the same crap Hindus claim. Stop making claims about science without understanding what science says.
@@TheIanPanda maine bebkufi bali bat kar di thik hai buddhism me punarjanam ke alawa kya faith hai 😁 kya non scinetific hai batado? Punarjanm ke bahut cases a chuke hai (UVI) ka research paper pad lo . Buddhism is mind of science under physcology as well as suppports rationalism. Bigbang pe jhake science ke sare laws khatam hojate hai baki speculation chalti hai , gravity exist karti , dark matter exist karta jiska science ke pas koi scientific explanation nhi . Bigbang kyu hua kisne kiya ? Buddha told that every effect has a cause and everything arises due to cause and effect .it is the foundation of science . Buddha foretold energy can neither be created nor be destroyed in pratitya smutpad , law of casuality similar to newtons third law. Theory of relativity = nagarjunas sunyta , where energy takes the form of matter. Baghwan buddha told everything is changing nothing is permanent .Blind devotee of continued changing scienece urf jhute bhotikbadi nastik sabse badi irrational to ap ho jo speculations pe belief karte ho , na koi logic mante ho😁 Kaise scientific nhi hai reincarnation ko chhodke. Jab buddha ki batayi hui itni bate scientifically accurate our true hai to punarjanam bhi true hoga .
Hinduism is great if you are a so-called upper caste person. It is terrible for the marginalized castes. You might like it but it is as vain a religion as any other. And lately, with the rise of Hindutva, it has lost the moral high ground over other religions too.
Hey brother I am hoping to get your reply. I am new to this channel and I am a Hindu religion ideology follower My question is what's your approach as an atheist you disbelief Hinduism or you criticize human made rituals which were made for personal gain And support true Hinduism ideology majorly mentioned in Vedas or vedanta which also have a scientific curve along with it. I am mentioning my ideology if come to know about particular ritual I wil do my best research to find any logical reasoning, consult with atheist and also with Braham about logic and if it satisfying me I will consider it good. I have point of view that atheist are not basically those who doesn't have any research of their and own criticize Hinduism without knowing a single thing But I like those atheist who believe in other religions plus point more specificly Hinduism because I don't think so any other religions have detailed scientific and logical curve . And those atheists just criticize man made rituals I believe of taking everything as possibility and research of my own will proof they are right or wrong
It is right interpretation of Dr ambedkar and his buddhism, But you can start a series on ambedkarite buddhism and its contribution in spreading not only equality in society but a scientific, rational attitude in society, specially in dalit ambedkarite and ambedkarite buddhist society, and one of the highest literacy rate as compare to national literacy etc
Ye Antar Hai Atheist aaur Ek Leftists Atheist main ye Buddhism ko support karenga kyu ki ye hindu se hate karte hain leftists ka mindset he aaisa hai ye hinduo se hate karte hain . But Ek Asli Atheist kabhi V Hindu Dharma Se Nafrat nahi karega Woh ye sare Riti Riwaj Ko Criticise jaroor Karega Tum log kuch jada he Hate Main Ghush Chuka ho Hindu Dharma main hamesha Se Reform hota aa raha hai aaur Hamesha Hota Rahega . Ye Hamesha Change hota hai .
Tujhe 5 minute deta hoon, tere apne comment ke hypocrisy ko pehchanne ke liye. . . . . . . Buddhism ko support ka matlab Hindu se hate? Why? Why is Buddhism pitched against Hinduism in your mind? Aur main riti riwaaj ko hi criticise karta hoon, mere bhai. Reforms jo huye hain, I appreciate that. But jaativaad aaj bhi hai, I criticise that. Teri kyun jal rahi hai, woh tu better janta hai. Yahi pinned comment section mein I am calling out a guy for making stupid remarks in support of Buddhism. So, get out of your bias and see things for how they are.
buddhism is practical which focus how to live pure life not telling supernatural things,no importance to myths imagination god ,no creator god ,focus on human basics rights but in history budhhism parted into different branches hence mixing of such fake things in it also and hence buddhism diminished in india but dr br ambedkar rebuilt budhhism and replaced myths from it and added practical things that actually exists in nature, god is creation of human mind while world already exists ,no creator god ,noble eightfold path and truth is no one is important than yourself while only you know yourself better than anyone.but whatever we all are only living beings we are human first ,and world is continuously changing its temporary . cycles of development creations and death of everything ,its nature law . man can't know everything about whole world it's infinity .be happy life is too short
Hindu shabd kahin se bhi aaya ho, the religion has been around in some form or the other. The Vedic religion has mixed and mingled with local belief systems to take the form it exists in today. What's the point of arguing on a name? The fact is - Siddharth Gautam Budddha banne se pehle Buddhist bhi nahi the. So I don't know why all of you get so worked up with this point. These ideas about rebirth, karma, etc had to have come from whatever belief system he came from, Hinduism or otherwise. Unless you believe he made it up. Jainism is also older than Buddhism, by the way.
1. Pahli bat bhaijan kuch soch samaz ke bat karo . 2. Us samay Hindus the iska praman do uske bad budhha ko hindu kaho . 3. Logic = Logic , Hinduism jaha tk mene padha hai Hinduism did not exist when gautam budhha existed 4. ❤❤
🧘 We expect truthful scientific research oriented informative videos for Spiritual Seekers and Researchers Shaktipat Unbelievable mysterious powerful Spiritual Path , experiences and Unexpected physical-mental-spiritual changes in human body Kundalini Yoga ' Ramlal ji siyag sidhayog ' for Self realisation , iternal spiritual awareness , peaceful life . Towards the Truth . 🕺
Sir aryan theory per bhi eek video bana do please bahut confusion hota hai koi TH-cam per bolta hai ki ye theory sahi hai to koi bolta hai ye Galat hai so please what right eek video to Banta hai sir or series maybe thank you sir 👍
I am not a historian, buddy. Anyway, historians also have varying theories about it. But the fact is that people just want to use the findings to further their agenda - prove something. Which is pointless. Even if you establish that we have some ancestry of migrants from central Asia, it won't change who we are today. We should not be as concerned with this.
@@TheIanPandasir Indians me mix breed hai so called r1a1 Aryan and ml3 afrikan but all ambedakrite talks only eurosian that is Europe and asian not African 😂
I have a question 😅 Kab tak? Mai puchta hu akhir kb tk surface level pr discussion krte rhenge...? Atheists ko religious logo ko nicha dikhane me dopamine milta hai... Ye to waisa hi hai jaise hindus ko Muslims ko nicha dikhane me... Kbhi brmh ki bhi baat ho jaye 😅? Kya hota hai brmh? Kaise milta hai? Milne ke bad kya hota hai?
Koi kisiko neecha nahi dikha raha. Logic pe do sawaal ho jaayein toh religion walon ko inferiority complex ho jata hai, yeh unka problem hai. Brmh - whatever that is - feel free to talk about it in YOUR channel, on your time. Don't solicit discussions here.
@@TheIanPanda khair, mai to koi religion wala nhi hu to mujhe to kuch inferior feel nhi hota... Just thought ki itne sare videos dal rhe ho aap to topic progression me honge but as you said ki subscribers hi maibap hai to wahi ke wahi ghumna pd rha hai... And no offense, I don't find anything wrong with it... I was once a nastik too till I found brmh😅 😊 Yes, I'll discuss the brmh on my channel only because I don't think there's a single person remaining in this timeline who knows brmh... Sounds like ahnkari purush😂
But. ... I am not a vegetarian...still the logic " to kill an animal for the necessity of food or to fulfill the hunger, isn't cruelty " didn't go well with me... As its then like saying "to r@pe someone to fulfill s*xual or even reproductive needs isn't crime ".... No .. this is a problematic justification
@@barnaliadhikary9421 That's just "false equivalence" fallacy and most society throughout humanity upto now were ok with consumption of meat, even if we consider morality as subjective there is no need to equate non-human animals suffering to humans (only humans are on the pedestal of flaunting their morals/veganism)
@ a gye bhaukne , 5 aggregates samjho Jake , bhikku bodhi aur seeker to seeker pe ja Ke Dekh lo rebirth Ka matlab , 5 aggregates serves to check the dogma among everyone and every process
@@arnavsarkar3954 aur mujhe 5 aggregates pata hai, jo ye 5 aggregates samj jayega woh enlightened bann jayega. Lekin tum mujhe samjho ye punar janam ka concept kya hai fir ? Samsara kya hai fir ye sabd triptak me bhi hai
😅 Kya Navayana Buddhism Parlaukik Kalyan karne me samarth hai ? Kya Buddhist or Navayana Buddhist scientific hai ? Kya aap ko janakari hai ? .... According to Sanatan Vedic Hindu Dharma There are three sciences Adhibhautic Aadhidaivic Adhyatmic gyaan - vigyaan - vidya inter connected with each other ? Aap to apurnata ko bhi ak tarike se purnata batakar galat janakari prastut kar rahe hai ! Jasse manav jati ki hani hi hoti hai . 🌞
Ambedkar dared to accept another relegion because Hindus are more acceptable to new philosophy, Muslims would have killed him if he dared to do this with Muslims. Jay Bhim 💙.
Wah! Aadmi ke Hinduism chhodne mein bhi credit Hinduism ko dena hai aur isme bhi Hindu Muslim karna hai logon ko. I know people who have left Islam and nobody is killing them. Get over this mentality. There will always be religious extremism, no religion is free of it.
one of the reason why he choose Buddhism because he was forced by hindusansthae to choose between buddhism or Sikhism so he choose buddhism he was "thinking" to convert into islam.
Bro has taken burtrend Russel very seriously 😂 bro there are other paradigm too exist and for them you too are waste product as you think they are. So don't be anti thiest be atheist and behave like that.
A lot of people seem to be offended because I said Buddhism borrows certain elements from Hinduism. There are people claiming that Buddhism is older. I would like to make two points here:
1. It does NOT matter which religion is older, in the context of this video. My take is that of an atheist.
2. I am not a student of history. I am not making any claims. My information is based on what I have read. It could be wrong.
So kindly refrain from fighting over this in the comment section. Because the people fighting are theists and I can assure you, this channel is never pleasant for theists.
@@TheIanPanda 😁
@@TheIanPanda Notice to all who thinks hinduism is oldest relegion than buddhism : Buddh dharm ka name Saman/Sraman dharm hai . Sraman dharm duniya ka sabse purana relegion hai, lndus valley me bhi yhi parampra thi.Hindu logo ne karma ka siddhant, rebirth, yoga, meditation ye sab sramno se chura lia 😁
@@TheIanPanda Phir galat claim,Kya Proof BRHAMIN Dharam purana hai or Eska ELEMENT Buddha Ne liya?
@humanityfirst1417 - Comment mein kya likha hai padh le. Same baat baar baar pooch Raha hai.
Hey Ian, I understand your perspective. Historically speaking, cross-references show that Buddhism predates what is now called Hinduism, and the term 'Hindu' is relatively recent-likely only a few hundred years old. At most, it was a form of Brahminical practice about a thousand years ago. I'd love to dive deeper into this discussion whenever we have time.
I get where you're coming from, though, and you made an educated guess, which is perfectly reasonable. Instead of taking offense, people should present logical, well-reasoned explanations if they disagree. After all, as atheists, our focus should be on searching for facts and expanding our understanding, not on getting defensive. To everyone watching, let's embrace curiosity and dialogue as a way to broaden our horizons!
People usually need purpose/hope in life for motivation to live. When we don’t find any purpose/hope or don’t know what to do with our lives, we tend to find joy in someone else’s success. People want fantasy and they like to believe it to be true that gives them a sense of hope and pleasure (That is how celebrity/religious worship is formed).
Yo Chat is this real?
Buddhism shouldnt be included to hinduism,many simply say budha as an avatar,but its not true.
Yeah 😂😂😂you are right 👍🏻
It's not Gauthama Buddha who is the Avatar of lord Vishnu it's Mahatma Buddha and both are different.
@Emerald483 any budha you say as vishu's avatar is not true according to history
@@thunderpokemon2456 😂😂😂 Mahatma Buddha was not a Buddhist!!! He came before Gautama Buddha 🙏🏻
@@Emerald483 historically not acurate 🫤
Buddha himself rejected the concept of reincarnation...and those who says that are the one who tried really hard to eradicate buddhism from india but ambedkar revived buddha in india...
Now I understand why so many people who seems unbiased and rational or atheist still end up saying ohh it's all Hinduism. Good luck though 😅
Be an Agnostic and question everything 🤔
Best Thing 🗿
Advaita 🗿
You'll be upgraded to "Be an atheist and question everything"
@@50centgamer65 It's just a philosophy bhai.
You should explore more philosophies too for diverse knowledge
Be rational instead .. ... !!
4:42 Karma and Rebirth as Buddha understood it is very different from how it got adapted into metaphysical and supernatural ideas by Mahayan and Vajrayan
Is there any source where details about the Buddha are available? Because as I see it, (and as I mentioned in the video) all of his teachings have been passed on and reinterpreted by the ensuing generations.
And regardless of it, rebirth is still a baseless idea. The day there's real evidence of it, I will believe it.
@@TheIanPanda a basic viewing of “Doug’s dharma “ and “seeker to seeker” TH-cam channel will suffice , dogma is tougher to keep in check in even rational people so I have found the 5 aggregates a good model to understand the human experience . There are 45 volumes in the pali cannon so if you want the exact scripture no take your queries to suttacentral , you cannot discount the philosophy which led to zero which can be seen as the origin of objectivity ,check and read 5 aggregates.
Just one correction, Asoka was 3rd king of Mauryan Enpure not Gupta
I have mentioned that correction on screen.
❤ Spread Rationality, Logic, Facts and Scientific Temperament.
Bro seems like Rahul Sanskrityayan of 21st century 💙
Another fact that was brought to light by a fellow Ambedkarite to me is that Babasaheb never coined the term Navayana. He was not trying to create a "new" religion but merely to trying to go back to the roots of Buddha's teachings and presenting it to the modern era. It came to be known as Navayana in due course by people from other ideologies (including Buddhists) but Babasaheb never intended it to be that way.
Also, yes we can separate the religion from the communalism and bigotry of its followers. If the core ideals of that religion don't endorse of any of what it's followers end up doing we can't blame the religion for that.
@@shiroyasha_007 Reform Buddhism Bolna Theek rahega Lekin Yeh Brahminbaadi Brhamin adharam ko haga hua na Dekhke Sabkas Haga hua dekhte hai,Inreality Brhamin dharam hi NEO SANATAN Ya Capture Brhamin dharam hai
बौद्ध धर्म एक विज्ञान धर्म है
4:09 I beg to differ, the teachings of Quran have been "marketed" in native languages too, Urdu/Hindi/Hindustani is result of Arabic x Persian mixing with Prakrit languages.
Okay. Doesn't change the point I was making because it is still mandated to be read in Arabic, with the translations serving as guide. It's a whole different case with how the Bible is consumed.
Qur'an is a violence and sex book
they kept it in arabic to make it look like more mystical and make it more members only, and curiocity killed lots of cats in India itself
@@50centgamer65i have read it, it is not.
@@Epicurousdemos Qur'an is violence and sex book
Jai Bhim 💙 Jai Bharat 🇮🇳 Namo Buddhaya ☸️🗿🙏
Sir recommends you Buddha and his Dhamma by dr. B.R. ambedkar for known Buddhism.
Chal be bhimta jake tatti saf kar 😂😅
Jake apni mummy ka stan dakh nahi toh tere purvajon jaise hizde ban jaoge😂
Bro some says that in budhhism there isn't caste system & discrimination but when we see scriptures of Buddhism there is same discrimination as Hinduism
Kaha bhai
Sabse acchi buddhism ke itihaas ki jaankari ke liye aap Science Journey ji se contact krne ki koshish kriye veh hafte mein 3 baar live aate hain apne channel Ration World mein unka Science Journey naam se bhi channel hain.
Science journey wahi n who says 500000000 saal se hume Brahmins ne padhne nahi diya and then claims Ashoka was Buddhists, every single king before Ashoka was Buddhist, takshila was a Buddhist University, nalanda was a Buddhist University.
BC jab sab kuch Buddhists hi tha to Brahmano ne 5000 saal se kese nahi padhne diya?
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Literally pagalpan ki bhi koi seema hoti hogi.
@@SarojSingh-nq5qljab hindu dharma ko likha hi gya 9th century me hai or wo bhi bodhiest ka book ka Xerox kiya hai to uske bad brahmin ne warg laya logo ko divide kiya fir padhane ka adhikar nhi diya.
Tera pass koi proof hai tere hindu dharm ka jo ye proof de ke 4000 sal pahle hindu dharma exist krta tha to kar dibet usse.
Proof hai la**d bhar or bolega lakho purana hai 😂😂😂🤣
i like to share few points.
1) buddha belong to a tradition called as samana tradition in which atain buddhahood is supreme like the previous people who attained buddha hood like kassapa from kasi(kashi) , konagama , kakusanda , vipassi , vesabhu, and gotama or sakyamuni we have asoka inscription for 3 buddhas and mention of 7 buddhas in Fa-Xian and heun -Xang notes, plues their staues with their names written on each can be seen in the archeological site of kanganhalli, and ellora caves which can b dated from 2nd century bce to 6th century CE.
2) buddha's maternal uncle name was suppa-buddha who is father of buddha's wife , If gotama was 1st buddha then from where did his uncle got his name of suppa buddha.
3) there where stupas found in indus valley sites and according to 28 buddha theory there was a 5th buddha names a kondanna got enlightenment in amravati near maharashtra and co incidently we can found many places which are named after him like the kondana fort now known as sihagadh, kondhane caves and etc.
4) in the work of al-beruini he mentions there was a culture in ancient iran khorasan and ajgerbaijan named as shammaniya and then zoroaster comes and start preaching the majusi or parsi religion and form early islamic texts we can say that shammaniya and barmakas was the aternate name for buddhist ,
5) vedic culture doesnt have any solid proof its just we dont found any substatial evidences of anything our hindu mindied fitted vedic period in that time like the 1500 BCE till 623 BCE and they took care in histroy book the points earlier i mentioned wont be in light if you want to veryify it please go ahead , Thankyou
Sir I respect Dr. Ambedkar and his idea of navayana.....but I feel it is just a social tool for uplift of the people from both physical and mental slavery amd it is not a religion at all,as religions have customs and traditions from birth to marriage to death etc,does navayana has it? If it does,please tell me.
It is more of a philosophical thinking than religion
No it has😂
@@sagarnegi9464 that's what I thought.
@@NOMO-xc8vp please tell something about it.
@@AchhaAchha1 kudh search karo itna time nahi hai
जय मानवता,जय विज्ञानं,जय भीम
Jai free ka seat
Jai EWS Sudama Quota, Jai Lateral Entry, Jai Gaddari ka wealth@@sarikakumari7638
@@sarikakumari7638 jis din ye free ka seat hat jayega us din kya option leke aaoge
@@sarikakumari7638 jai mandir wala antena 😂💭
Dear Pandaji,
❤️🙏🙏🙏♥️
It is right interpretation of
Dr ambedkar and his buddhism,
But you can start a series on ambedkarite buddhism and its contribution in spreading not only equality in society but a scientific, rational attitude in society, specially in dalit ambedkarite and ambedkarite buddhist society, and one of the highest literacy rate as compare to national literacy in this society etc
India supports your work to spread rationality in society ❤👌
Thank you for the kind words. But the way people are attacking this video, on the topic of which is older - Hinduism or Buddhism - makes me seriously doubt the rationality of the followers of Buddhism. They show the same vanity towards their religion as any theist. I will make concept level videos advocating for equality and harmony, though. Thanks for tuning in.
Religion ko tyagkar Aap Aazad ho jao 🕊️
Jo Upyogi Vichar hai bas unko lelo.
we share same age i guess but in school histroy book buddha or siddhartha never called as hindu prince heis just recognized as a indian prince or just a prince...why people want to claim him to be a hindu
I think they go by their name
at the time of buddha, the word hindu was not even in existence
@@harshadkudave7051but sanatan dharam was and ppl use to worship the which the belived as god for example shiva etc
@@evilbrothers8001 The term "Sanatana Dharma" first appeared in the Buddhist Mahavagga, in the section called Subhashita Suttam. The text states, "Truth is the undying word; this is the eternal law"
In the late 19th century, the term was revived during the Hindu revivalism movement to refer to Hinduism as a religion. The term was used to avoid using the Persian word "Hindu".
@@evilbrothers8001 with due respect
can you provide any evidence or proof which can support your statement regarding sanatan and people use to worship shiva
Institution: WhatsApp University
Degree: ITUS (International Talent of Ultimate Student)
You need to read more.
Okay.
Like what? Did you not see the attachment for the copypasta to add here?
😂😂😂
grand salute to you..
My question is that if navayana discards god and miraculous beliefs basically refraining from both fear & reward then how is it a religion? How can it hold community in its clutches like other religions do. Isn't it just like any random philosophy which people may choose or may not . Btw i have been a atheist too for a long time now after being deeply affected by it . Keep posting such videos 🎉
Rationality, liberation, freedom. Ig just like atheism
@godqueque987 I got that , but atheism or atheist is not a religion . It is just a term for people who don't believe in the concept of god .
Yeah dude...ur right.
But we cant call it as cult, group, gang, philosopher group, etc. Also, we can't just say..."yo man don't follow god, he has nothing to do with ur life, yo are ur god, only yo can save ur life" to the people who are used to the thing called GOD and religion. this is totally another side of the coin....haha off topic stuff....lol Navyana is more like agnostic belief system.
First thing Ambedkar is not atheist, there is directly mention in Tripitaka that Buddha rejected Vedic philosophy,in tevijjya sutta ,God in devdah sutta Brahmhajala sutta,issar sutta soul also rejected by Buddha, by the way Buddhism = spirituality+atheism
@ArchanaKhodve can you really give a tangible definition of what spirituality is ?
लेकिन सर, आप डिफ़ॉल्ट रूप से स्वीकार कर रहे हैं कि बौद्ध धर्म से पहले हिंदू धर्म अस्तित्व में था, क्या आपके पास इसका कोई पुरातात्विक प्रमाण है?
But sir you are by default accepting Hinduism was in existence before Buddhism, Do you have any archeological proof over it?
jake padhlo bhaiyya hindu ye shabd muslmano ke diya hai duniya ko aur yaha ke logo ne mu khol ke pee liya
Navyan buddism ke jarurat iske liye padi kyunki vaha bhe jatiwad hai jaise buddha sirf ucha jaait main janm lete hain unke triptak maik likha hai
Hey IAN, great to see your content on rationalism and Logics! I’m planning to start streaming soon on similar topics, and it’s inspiring to see someone from our city leading the way in promoting rational thinking. Wishing you all the best on your journey, and I look forward to connecting with you soon. Let’s keep spreading the message of reason and logic together!
Would love to do a stream in Sambalpuri. Do count me in if you're planning that.
02:24,Bro Budddha Koi Hindu lindu nahi the,Brhman dharam hi 7th-8th century AD ka hai Jo ki Buddhism K weak hone Ka baad hi arise hua hai,Jab Brhamino Ne Matt or Statue,Bahut Sare Scriptures ko Copypaste kiya,10th Century SANKARACHARYA ko Khud Brhamino Ne Prachhana(chupa)Buddha Kaha tha,Esme Reincarnation Bhi dushra hai Jo Brhamin dharam or dushro se alag hai,,Jisme Personality Change ko bolte hai
To Hathibada Ghosundi inscription sanskrit me kya tumhara baap likhke gaya tha 2nd century BCE me ?? Saf saf ashamedh aur vasudev likha hua hai aur 7th century laga rakha hai
Itna bada allegation, praman de payoge inn baton ka
@@detectivesroy Bhaand hey Bilkul,Tujhse kisne Bola Bo INCRIPTION 2 BC ka hey or usme tere pitaji ki bhsaa hai?
@@humanityfirst1417 Epigraphia Indica Vol. XXII, Archaeological Survey of India, pages 198-205
Date Mila hai Jan Gonda (2016). Visnuism and Sivaism: A Comparison. Bloomsbury Academic
Ab ye mat bolna ASI jhutha hai
@detectivesroy Brhamino Ka Inscription PALI Prakrit main Kaise Hone Laga?Tere abbu Ki Bhasa To IRANI Sanskrit hai?Yeh Lakdi Ka Inscription Bhi 3 Fragments main Mila hai,Jisme Jabarjastee Sabdo Ko Ghused Ghused k PALI se Abbu Ka Sanskrit banaya?Yeh Bo ASI hai Jisko IVC main Pashupati Ki Seal dikhti Jiske Bare main 19th Century Tak ghanta kuch nahi Pataa tha,Even Tere abbu Ne to ASOKA Inscriptions tak ko nahi Pad Payaa tha😌
Well done @TheIanPanda, brilliant video exactly what I try to tell people who believe that babasaheb did not give any Navayan buddhism he accepted traditional buddhsim, my question to them is why would babasaheb throw us into something for which he spent his whole life fighting for, traditional Buddhism( thervada, Mahayana,vajrayana) has some unrational supernatural beliefs and practices, Babasaheb would never want that his people become highly religiously devotees his idea for Buddhism was different his idea was that the depressed classes should get educated and struggle for equal representation, his religion was based on constitutional principles of Liberty Equality and Fraternity what are true buddhist teachings.
Not true he is thervadist , if he want to start navyana then why he take dhamma Diksha from thervadi monk , after dhamma Diksha he visited only thervada Buddhist countries like shrilanka, thailand, Myanmar.we Mahars following Theravada indirectly by the name of Navyana even our marriages only thervada suttas was chanted . There is nothing like Navyana , mostly Marathi Buddhist of vidarbha region are following Theravada . And they are developing with highest literacy rate,sex ratio, urbanisation etc.
Abhi ye video maine thik se dekhi. Neo Buddhism ke baare me acchi video hai. Buddha ki philosophy matlab sirf 4 noble truths aur 8 fold path nahi hai! Wo to unhone, jo lay people hai, unko marg bataya tha. Buddhist philosophy bahut hi deeper hai. It was lot ahead of it's time. Tum Buddhist philosophy ko itana chhota mat karo! You said ki miracles aur in sab chijon ko nikal dena chahiye. Yes correct! Lekin Buddha's basic teachings aur jo misticism, tantra, rebirth etc. ke bich me bahut sari great philosophy hai. Tum Buddha ki ya Buddhist philosophy ko bahut hi ochha, small kar rahe ho. Ye Bharat ki heritage hai, treasure hai. Humko iski value karni chahiye.
All untouchables people's ancestors well understood that's the irani bramin comes to India and his copy his goutama(तथागत )teaching ❤❤ and now say that's is superior of all people that's why (bramin vs Dalits) fight 😂😂😂
1) aapko Buddhism ke bare me bahut kam pata hai
2) Samrat Ashok Gupta nahi Mourya the
3) Maharashtra me jo 3rd generation hai navyana wali wo dhire dhire Theravada ki taraf bad rahi hai
1) I agree. Never claimed to be an expert on religion. In fact I clearly mentioned I am not.
2) If you looked at the screen carefully, I had already mentioned that correction.
3) Irrelevant to the video.
Aur kuch?
@TheIanPanda thanks for reply
Sidhartha Hindu prince nahi the us samay yese dharm nahi the jaise Aaj hai
Right brother we are not Navyani even Babasaheb not Navyani he not started Navyana , there is only once he used in interview, we are following Theravada from 1956 ,we chanting Theravada sutta in our ceremony like marriages. ❤
nahi dr br ambedkar ne nahi banaya tha unki book writing and speeches mai new sect wale topic pe unhone kaha hai ki vo pure buddhism accept kiya hai
😂😂 he just changed it and said it's pure 😂😂
@@SidhantDhagare-b4y Hindu dharmat ja Mahara
@@SidhantDhagare-b4y what are you saying write in hindi or english cause i cant understand
@@दृष्टिकोणः All the Neo Buddhist after conversion still following their caste Nothing changed other than relegion, They still marry in their caste and sub caste.
@@ArchanaKhodve still you guys right mahar on caste certificate after converting.
Great videos sir
For a context Let’s take 3 movies accepted by audiences and the hearos of those movies are larger then life
Javan - Sharuk Khan
KGF - Yesh
Bahubali - Prabhas
Now let’s imagine we are in the 35th century and lost all the holy books written on Hinduism, Islam, Christianity
One day archaeology department finds the scripts written by the directors/writers of these moves and broadcast them to the world
A group of people love KGF and believe it to be a true story written by divine/almighty where a hero will come and help the needy and forms KGFism (A new religion is formed)
Another group loves Bahubali and believe it to be true story written by divine/almighty where a hero will come and help the needy and forms Bahubalism (A new religion)
Similarly another group loves Javan and forms Javanism (A new religion)
Reality: These stories are fiction but people find meaning in it and will try to acquire qualities of the so called hearos and characters in this book and they keep enhancing the text so that in the 37th century these religions dominate the world just like Hinduism, Islam and Christianity (As they won't have any way to prove these were the fictional movies)
Similarly I believe some gifted individuals have written the stories out of boredom that we now consider to be holy books (It’s also possible that they might have thought this will enhance the living of people (which it didn’t ironically)
Year 2020 - Islam = year 3030 - Bahubaisam
Year 2020 - Hinduism = year 3030 - Javanisam
Year 2020 - Christianity = year 3030 - KGFism
Bhakt nahin maanenge. Kisi bhi dharam ke bhakt nahin maanenge. Lol 😆
i would like to convert to bahubalism
the supreme lord bahubali our bahu god all powerful all knowing all merciful
@@praneethchandrallapati2282 Okay let's say I agree with you what's the thaught on Vedas and vedanta or even Geeta there concepts feels like God-like
Keeping Geeta aside let's see Vedas it's full of scientific and technical knowledge and also talks about really, illusion created by mind, salvation, and many more things that apply to modern worls
@@praneethchandrallapati2282 Vedas having modern theories , scientific reasons on happenings
But it also contains that God exists because in this endless expanding universe There is a supreme( those are line of rig ved)
And about comparison don't you think it baseless because if I agree with you with stories part how will you explain Upanishads, Vedas, vedanta, smritis and all they are told to be God written and upon reading them they feel like
Even shrimad bhagvad geeta is words of God shree krishna we know and it doesn't have stories but the many eternal truths that many physiological studies, leaned men promotes it and even scientist like Durr and many more who have worked upon quantum mechanics, atoms , energy and forces and universe clearly credits hindu text for successful of there and research and says they took inspiration from those hindu text on there own books
Hi Ian. Thank you for the informative video. As always 😊. Can you also please share some resources you went through during your research of this topic. Thank you.
4:41
Karma , rebirth and soul .
While Buddha denied soul.. calling it mere an illusion.. karma and rebirth is different from what hindus call karma and rebirth
show reference where budha called soul an illusion
@Pranav-IITD
Thus, monks, any form, ... feeling, ... perception, ... fabrications, ... consciousness whatsoever that is past, future, or present; internal or external; blatant or subtle; common or sublime; far or near: every consciousness is to be seen as it actually is with right discernment as: 'This is not mine. This is not my self. This is not what I am.'
Anattalakkhaṇa Sutta
@@Kingkong-gt5oj show full reference from the Pali version also because neo bhudist often change the meaning. For example, in Kalamsutta, budha has said not to believe logic too, but neo bhudist put this as buddha said to believe logic only.
@@Pranav-IITD bhai... Sutta ka naam bhi diya hai.. dekho zara
@@Pranav-IITD I don't see anything wrong with what Buddha said, you can definitely have logical sounding premises that seems valid but are invalid, even if we use logic to debunk logic that means some parts of it is eventually falsifiable, you should have a certain sense of skepticism on everything that is. I don't see how that's wrong.
I I think Vipassana can fill the gap between navyaan Buddhism and traditional originated Buddhism it can be validated if you see videos or go to Vipassana SN Goenka ji has experienced many things which has been said in Buddhism
As I didn't come across any people or community from Buddhism, so unaware of practices. Any factual information would be helpful to understand how they practice in daily life. If we continue to do any daily practices (or rituals) as part of tradition or from some faith, it can't be considered as rational practice.
FYI, to survive we need to feed ourselves, so we need to kill other living things for food as we can't get/process food from non-living things. This is applicable for every living things except plant(except plant/tree who eats insects) in this planet.
People who claim themselves as animal lover or vegan, are very typical! They are basically cow, chicken and goat lover but not human lover or plant lover or other living things lover.
1:21 I'm new to traditional buddhism, You know me Ian , we've talked quite alot, killing animals Is considered as a sin in Buddhism , but the buddha in his teachings , has said that if one sanyasi or monk is offered or donated meat, then they may accept it , because monks don't earn or work , they are in search spiritual attainment , buddha was not a hindu prince, Hinduism didn't exist back then , only Vedas preceed buddha, Vedic culture does not hindu religion , Hindu religion is part of Vedic culture not Vedic religion
Buddhism doesn't have soul , buddha denied soul
There are gods (not in context of creator) in buddhism, navayana was never established by ambedkar, but ambedkar gave us a mixture of Theravada, mahayana sects beliefs
Look I don't have proper evidences for all these claims but I do it from what I've learnt from Buddhist monks and my traditional buddhist friends
Idgaf but these neo budhists are trying so hard to be the first religious group in indian subcontinent
Still it wouldn't be the oldest as sumerians were already there
Dont brahmins do that already?
@AbhijitZimare what ? Claims to be the oldest ? No hinduism isn't the oldest in the slightest. Rather, it is one of the oldest, which is still alive rn while many other civilizations already have some religious practices before vedic practices came into being ( still would say by evidences alone it is the oldest in indian subcontinent but if you consider whatever indus valley had as a systematic religion than it isn't ), someone already doing a wrong thing doesn't make your wrong a right one does it ?
The truth is many Buddhists text say that Hinduism is a great religion and great concept is abide within Hinduism but the reason why Buddha have to make reform is due to some greedy people of society to earn they sold religion with false rituals in Hinduism
And budha is greatly influenced by Hinduism
And Hinduism bad rituals which not even organically of Hinduism which are created by greedy people because we can't refuse every era will have those kind of people
In the vedas and geeta, there are shlokas which call buddha and Buddhists as the evil entity in the world, please read your scriptures before following them.
@@apoorv_mc Are you really mad 😅. Geeta was written way before the rise of Buddhism.
See take it as a advice stop following those manipulator yeah listen them but do your own research
@@apoorv_mc Geeta is a conversation between krishna and Arjun about the prospect of life, why we live , why are here every question that stirs in our mind regarding existence
That is what Geeta brother not a criminal record 😊
@@Darshanik-vedDid you see Geetha being written. Geetha stories are only after the 10th Century.
@@fredyjon81 so you are basically saying Shree Krishna was incarnated during time of turk invasion (12th century)
fun fact nearly 80% of all indian buddhist live in maharashtra mostly in vidarbha region
religion is not what is written in books but based on peoples conduct
And they are following Theravada Buddhism, In our city, Buldhana came under vidarbha region, there is many shrilankan monk visited the Buddhist temple even today also they are in Buldhana, we practice Theravada not only vidarbha all of Maharashtra Buddhist former Mahars are followers of Theravada ,there is many Miss conception about Maharashtra Buddhist are they following navyana there is nothing like navyana , we worship Ambedkar as Emancipator ,by his efforts There is highest literacy rate of Marathi Buddhist, nearly 83% after Jains sex ratio also increasing and urbanisation also increase in them. Thank to our God Babasaheb ❣️
@ArchanaKhodve yes I know it I to live in Maharashtra the costal part my area to has a lot of Buddhist I have even seen dalit Muslims and hindus convert to Buddhism but even
Buddhists make 20% in our area they don't have any pagoda or tempe most of them live a life without showing any traits of Buddhist
panda sir next video on sikhism
Nah, buddy. I am done with this series. I will do other concept level videos. Hopefully those will be of some value.
@@TheIanPandasikhhism me bolne pe dar lag rha hai ! Gine chune hi relegion pe bolna hai 🤭
@Kalashok-k9p - Kitna vella hai bhai tu? World ke largest religions cover kar diya hai. Usey gine chune nahi kehte, dodo. There's nothing new to say in Sikhism.
@@TheIanPanda sikkhism me jatibad hai uspe kuchh nhi bolna hai ? Mayanmar me rohingyo or baha ki janta ki bich ki political crisis thi na ki dharm se tab bhi use jabardsti buddh ke dharm se voilence jod di . This shows how you biased are.
@@TheIanPanda no problem brother just keep making good videos
taki logo ko tumhari baat chubte rahe😄
Sikhism Next plz bhaiya
Bhai aapki sabi baate thik hai par History aap sahi nahi bta rahe ho Samrat Asok already buddhist the covert nahi hoye the aur buddhism old hai Hinduism se
Arey Samrat Ashok, aap khud bol rahe hain toh sahi hi bol rahe honge. Ab Zara ye bata dijiye ki isse mere ka context kis tarah change hoga?
@ bhai main aapko sirf bta raha hu aap accept karo ki aapko History nahi pata aur Bharat ka itihas galat btayege to kitne log confused ho jaige aap jahi se pata lagao aap Ashok likh rahe ho naam Asok the . Thanks for reply and maine aapka Chanel subscribe karliya achhi video thi 🙏
Hinduism ke traces Harappa ke time se hai (2900 BCE to 1700BCE) uske baad Vedic period me clearly written evidence hai (1500BCE-600BCE). buddha ka janm hi 568 BCE me hua hai to kis calculation se Buddhism older hua??? Khud buddha Khsatriya clan se the. Aur Samrat Ashok ke ancestors Hindu the to wo Buddhist kaise bane. Besides Ashoka ke later life me hi Buddhism ke aur jhukav ke evidences milte hai, Kalinga war ke baad ke.
@ashishpatil30595 - Hinduism wasn't around during Indus Valley. That was a wrong assumption thanks to the misreading of seal no. 420. What was perceived as Pashupati was probably a shaman of some kind.
@@TheIanPanda there is no conclusive evidences of those claims. It's still accepted as a pashupati. Besides Shakambhari is another substantial evidence. And still Buddhism came way later than Vedic religions which are primitive Hindu religions.
Thank you i an panda❤
Charvagam is purely scientific atheism but that also religion
Charvak is more like hedonism. He also rejected basic morality.
Baba Saheb K Reform Buddhism K Bare main Apke View sahi hai,Buddha Buddha & dhamma Baba Saheb,Bake sabhi kuch waste,Lekin Sanghi BJP Or sawarno K IT cell Se Fake Propaganda chalta rehta hai❤
Also Bhim buddhist worship ambrdkar as gods
Buddhist have caste system
Vaiii sambalpur ru tume ki.
🎉🎉🎉 wow it's to good
Great video sir
I think Tantrik Buddhism or Tibetan Buddhism is closer to Hinduism as it follows many superstitions like worshiping of future buddha, Kali, Swaraswati like figures etc.
Religions are beliefs and they tend to mix and evolve with local ideas. People don't appreciate it, but the fact that a lot of Hindus believe that Buddha was an incarnation of Vishnu is not some conspiracy to invalidate Buddhism, but just how people think.
तांत्रिक Buddhism = shakta Hinduism
Appreciate your video !
I would recommend you to read the book Annihilation of caste by Babasaheb Ambedkar from Maple Classics
It is a short book but it will tell much about Babasaheb's perpspective as a whole
bhaina, mai isi religion se belong karta hu, ye b utna hi polluted horha h, ab humko b soft Buddhist Nationalism whatsapp msg aate h, aur Ambedkar ji k pote ne to alag badman kar rkha h, iss sal to uske b'day ko "Swabhiman diwas" celebrate karwaya 😂😂
Bhai ab to ye log history ko tod madod ke Buddhism ko sabse purana batane me lage hai jo ye hai bhi nahi
ab kya hi karein, ab adharma ko hi apnana padega.
Log to ye bhi bol rhe ki Siddhartha Gautama reserved category se the😂
Have you done Vipassana it's not so please try at once it's 10 days course and its totally free just experience that what Buddha invented will come to you
Sanatan dharma, Buddhism, Sikhism, jainesm aaur Kafi sare adivasi Religion ye sab Ek sath hain inko alag alag mat karo hum sab ek saath Hindu Dharma hai .
WhatsApp university
Brahman aur Dalit ek saath nahi ho pa rahe, ye doosre religion ki baat kar rahe hain. What a joke. Mere religion pe question karne se tumhari ekta kaise bhang ho ja rahi hai, dodo?
Jake Sarna Code ke bare me pata kar.
Adivashi bhi Hindu ho jata hai, Sikh bhi Hindu ho jata hai, Jain bhi Hindu ho jata hai , Bodh bhi Hindu ho jata hai, baki tabhi tak jab tak apna matlab Purna karna hai, uske bad to sab jante hain kya haal hai
@basantprasadsgarden8365 true bhai inka bas chale toh Europeans or americans latin americans ko bhi hindu bana de
@@SLAYER_OF_FOES ek din na jane mere feed me ek kahan se reel aa gya, Usme ek tuni bol raha thi ki Mahabharata Wale Arjun ki wife Ullupi Mexico ki thi, Maine kaha, arre gadho, us kalpanik kitab me bhi usko Karnataka ka bataya gya hai, tum bc uspar bhi bakwas kar rahe ho
2018 se mea bhi neo buddhism hi follow krta or mea bhi nastik hun or phle se really better hun
read buddha and his dhamma
Gupta Vansh ke Ashoka 😝🤣🤣🤣 panda sab kuchh chhod dega lekin dog La pan nahi chhodega😂
Bro let's have debare with Science Journey channel ???
Not interested. Stop pimping for random debates.
Science juarney ko hum ex Buddhist ka challenge hai aker buddhism aur hypocrite ambedkar ko defend kare 🤣
@@TheIanPandabhai mai ex buddhist hun jitne bhi ye nav boddh bhim ta aate hain inki humse debate karao ambedkar ke bhi dhage khol denge hum ex Buddhist 😂
@@VanrajsinghVansjungleeex Buddhist? Ab kya ho? Muslim Christian manuwadi?
@@umasankarbehera7296 manuvaad tere dogle ambedkar vaad se 1000 guna accha hai mutra nivasi cheem ta 😁
Bro you should research about Buddhism more deeply then you'll find out that Buddhism is the main religion of india actually Buddhism is not just a religion it's about how to live life Buddhism is teachings of buddha that's why it's called as dhamma not dharma hopefully you'll learn about buddhism more deeply
Namo buddhay, bhavatu sabb mangalan
Hm jangal me nhi h so, sher se tulna nhi kr skte hai
Agree. Agar jungle mein rehna pade, toh khaane ke liye shikaar karna justified hoga. But factory farming is animal cruelty, as I conceded in the video.
@@TheIanPanda yes
Do you know pratik panda
Panda is a very common surname in Odisha. Like Patel in Gujarat. We don't all know each other.
❤❤❤
Jhut bolne ki bhi sima hoti hai , buddh dharm ne karma or rebirth hindu dharam se utha liya iska kya sabut hai ? Sraman prmpra hindu dharm se purani hai jisme punarjanam hai , karma ka siddhant hai usi se jain baudh dharm nikle . Jain tirthankar rishabdev ka name rigved me aya hai .video banane se pehle sahi se janch karke aya karo .
Kis point ko leke offend ho rahe ho bhai? It is immaterial kaun pehle aaya kaun baad mein. The shared elements are stupid regardless. Watch my other videos to know my POV.
Arey bhai, for the context of this video, it does not matter which came first. Multiple sources claim different things. It is a common belief that Hinduism is older. But even if that's false, it makes zero difference to what I am saying in the video. Check out my video on Hinduism to see how critical I am of religion. In comparison, I look at Buddhism way more kindly.
@@TheIanPanda kar bhi nhi paoge buddhism ko criticise, kriticize use kiya ja sakta hai jo galat ho, Dharma sabhi ke liye baraber hai . Buddhism moral true scientific relegion hai jo science se bhi uper hai . Abhi bahut si aisi chije hai jinhe science explain nhi kar sakta bahut si aisi energies hai is duniya se contact hi nhi karti , dark energy dark matter etc . Buddhism foretold world is non real , as it appears it is not true doctrine of Sunyta .
@Kalashok-k9p - Kar di bewakoofi wali baat. Buddhism has a good philosophy but there's nothing scientific about it. This is the same crap Hindus claim. Stop making claims about science without understanding what science says.
@@TheIanPanda maine bebkufi bali bat kar di thik hai buddhism me punarjanam ke alawa kya faith hai 😁 kya non scinetific hai batado?
Punarjanm ke bahut cases a chuke hai (UVI) ka research paper pad lo .
Buddhism is mind of science under physcology as well as suppports rationalism.
Bigbang pe jhake science ke sare laws khatam hojate hai baki speculation chalti hai , gravity exist karti , dark matter exist karta jiska science ke pas koi scientific explanation nhi .
Bigbang kyu hua kisne kiya ?
Buddha told that every effect has a cause and everything arises due to cause and effect .it is the foundation of science . Buddha foretold energy can neither be created nor be destroyed in pratitya smutpad , law of casuality similar to newtons third law. Theory of relativity = nagarjunas sunyta , where energy takes the form of matter. Baghwan buddha told everything is changing nothing is permanent .Blind devotee of continued changing scienece urf jhute bhotikbadi nastik sabse badi irrational to ap ho jo speculations pe belief karte ho , na koi logic mante ho😁
Kaise scientific nhi hai reincarnation ko chhodke. Jab buddha ki batayi hui itni bate scientifically accurate our true hai to punarjanam bhi true hoga .
Abhi from meesho 💀
hinduism is the best religion
Hinduism is great if you are a so-called upper caste person. It is terrible for the marginalized castes. You might like it but it is as vain a religion as any other. And lately, with the rise of Hindutva, it has lost the moral high ground over other religions too.
Hey brother I am hoping to get your reply.
I am new to this channel and I am a Hindu religion ideology follower
My question is what's your approach as an atheist you disbelief Hinduism or you criticize human made rituals which were made for personal gain
And support true Hinduism ideology majorly mentioned in Vedas or vedanta which also have a scientific curve along with it.
I am mentioning my ideology if come to know about particular ritual I wil do my best research to find any logical reasoning, consult with atheist and also with Braham about logic and if it satisfying me I will consider it good.
I have point of view that atheist are not basically those who doesn't have any research of their and own criticize Hinduism without knowing a single thing
But I like those atheist who believe in other religions plus point more specificly Hinduism because I don't think so any other religions have detailed scientific and logical curve . And those atheists just criticize man made rituals
I believe of taking everything as possibility and research of my own will proof they are right or wrong
Don't copy paste the same comment in every video.
Ajkal ke video zigzag effects😂 se ache ye clear concepts aur bolnemai saral words, better lagte hai.
Mujhe isse zyada editing aaj ke din mein aati nahi hai. Ha ha. I am still learning. Par baatein bol leta hoon - so, playing on my strengths.
It is right interpretation of
Dr ambedkar and his buddhism,
But you can start a series on ambedkarite buddhism and its contribution in spreading not only equality in society but a scientific, rational attitude in society, specially in dalit ambedkarite and ambedkarite buddhist society, and one of the highest literacy rate as compare to national literacy etc
make video on pure shivism
Ye Antar Hai Atheist aaur Ek Leftists Atheist main ye Buddhism ko support karenga kyu ki ye hindu se hate karte hain leftists ka mindset he aaisa hai ye hinduo se hate karte hain . But Ek Asli Atheist kabhi V Hindu Dharma Se Nafrat nahi karega Woh ye sare Riti Riwaj Ko Criticise jaroor Karega Tum log kuch jada he Hate Main Ghush Chuka ho Hindu Dharma main hamesha Se Reform hota aa raha hai aaur Hamesha Hota Rahega . Ye Hamesha Change hota hai .
Tujhe 5 minute deta hoon, tere apne comment ke hypocrisy ko pehchanne ke liye.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Buddhism ko support ka matlab Hindu se hate? Why? Why is Buddhism pitched against Hinduism in your mind? Aur main riti riwaaj ko hi criticise karta hoon, mere bhai. Reforms jo huye hain, I appreciate that. But jaativaad aaj bhi hai, I criticise that. Teri kyun jal rahi hai, woh tu better janta hai.
Yahi pinned comment section mein I am calling out a guy for making stupid remarks in support of Buddhism. So, get out of your bias and see things for how they are.
@@Morjaane_1 accha, ab ek Theist chintu hume bataega ki Atheist koun hai🤣
Accha tum logon ne reform Kiya?
Sach to ye hai ki reforms tumpar thope gaen, aur nahi to Aaj bhi jahan tahan mahilaon ko jinda jalate rahte
Hii bro i am from Odisha balangir jai bhim
buddhism is practical which focus how to live pure life not telling supernatural things,no importance to myths imagination god ,no creator god ,focus on human basics rights but in history budhhism parted into different branches hence mixing of such fake things in it also and hence buddhism diminished in india but dr br ambedkar rebuilt budhhism and replaced myths from it and added practical things that actually exists in nature, god is creation of human mind while world already exists ,no creator god ,noble eightfold path and truth is no one is important than yourself while only you know yourself better than anyone.but whatever we all are only living beings we are human first ,and world is continuously changing its temporary . cycles of development creations and death of everything ,its nature law . man can't know everything about whole world it's infinity .be happy life is too short
Crazy how Bhim who wasn't even qualified to get recognition from any Buddhist monk "repaired" Buddhism lol
Bro is giving lecture without proper study,
Sis is dropping comments with incorrect grammar.
@TheIanPanda okay mr grammarian ..
2:21 woh koi hindu bindu nahi te, hindu shabht he mughalo ke time aaya hai.ab kaise keh sakte ho😤
Hindu shabd kahin se bhi aaya ho, the religion has been around in some form or the other. The Vedic religion has mixed and mingled with local belief systems to take the form it exists in today. What's the point of arguing on a name? The fact is - Siddharth Gautam Budddha banne se pehle Buddhist bhi nahi the. So I don't know why all of you get so worked up with this point. These ideas about rebirth, karma, etc had to have come from whatever belief system he came from, Hinduism or otherwise. Unless you believe he made it up. Jainism is also older than Buddhism, by the way.
Sare dharm man made hi hea better hea nastik bno mere jese or buddhism ek rational mindset hea
Idiot we've been called Hindus by Persians and Greeks since a long time Mughals are fairly recent in that comparison
1. Pahli bat bhaijan kuch soch samaz ke bat karo .
2. Us samay Hindus the iska praman do uske bad budhha ko hindu kaho .
3. Logic = Logic , Hinduism jaha tk mene padha hai Hinduism did not exist when gautam budhha existed
4. ❤❤
His shakya family were literally Hindus bruh and he was born in 623 BC not 6233 BC when people weren't following hinduism
ian can you also make video on debate culture of india (debate with this maulvi that priest that sanatani that theist scientist )
Not much content there. People have always thought debating somehow determines what's correct. Maybe, I'll make a reel on it.
🧘
We expect truthful scientific research oriented informative videos for
Spiritual Seekers and Researchers
Shaktipat
Unbelievable mysterious powerful Spiritual Path , experiences and Unexpected physical-mental-spiritual changes in human body
Kundalini Yoga
' Ramlal ji siyag sidhayog '
for
Self realisation , iternal spiritual awareness , peaceful life .
Towards the Truth .
🕺
Your first part of the first sentence is incompatible with the second part. There's nothing scientific about spirituality, buddy.
Sir aryan theory per bhi eek video bana do please bahut confusion hota hai koi TH-cam per bolta hai ki ye theory sahi hai to koi bolta hai ye Galat hai so please what right eek video to Banta hai sir or series maybe thank you sir 👍
I am not a historian, buddy. Anyway, historians also have varying theories about it. But the fact is that people just want to use the findings to further their agenda - prove something. Which is pointless. Even if you establish that we have some ancestry of migrants from central Asia, it won't change who we are today. We should not be as concerned with this.
@@TheIanPandasir Indians me mix breed hai so called r1a1 Aryan and ml3 afrikan but all ambedakrite talks only eurosian that is Europe and asian not African 😂
@@TheIanPandaaur kisi ko nahi pata kaun kiske pahle aaya 😂
@@devendravns8288leave those ambedkarites, they think the moment you step above madhya pradesh, people turn into Vikings or some shit
I have a question 😅
Kab tak? Mai puchta hu akhir kb tk surface level pr discussion krte rhenge...?
Atheists ko religious logo ko nicha dikhane me dopamine milta hai... Ye to waisa hi hai jaise hindus ko Muslims ko nicha dikhane me...
Kbhi brmh ki bhi baat ho jaye 😅?
Kya hota hai brmh? Kaise milta hai? Milne ke bad kya hota hai?
Nicha nhi dikha rhe apni baat rakh rhe hai,
Also brmh kya hai? Acronym h kya?
@@godqueque987Oversimplification of everything, universe ko Brahm bol dete hai subtly, ho gaya filusophyyy
Koi kisiko neecha nahi dikha raha. Logic pe do sawaal ho jaayein toh religion walon ko inferiority complex ho jata hai, yeh unka problem hai.
Brmh - whatever that is - feel free to talk about it in YOUR channel, on your time. Don't solicit discussions here.
@@TheIanPanda khair, mai to koi religion wala nhi hu to mujhe to kuch inferior feel nhi hota...
Just thought ki itne sare videos dal rhe ho aap to topic progression me honge but as you said ki subscribers hi maibap hai to wahi ke wahi ghumna pd rha hai...
And no offense, I don't find anything wrong with it... I was once a nastik too till I found brmh😅
😊 Yes, I'll discuss the brmh on my channel only because I don't think there's a single person remaining in this timeline who knows brmh... Sounds like ahnkari purush😂
bramh woh jumla hai jisko tod mod ke business banaya ja sakta hai
But. ... I am not a vegetarian...still the logic " to kill an animal for the necessity of food or to fulfill the hunger, isn't cruelty " didn't go well with me... As its then like saying "to r@pe someone to fulfill s*xual or even reproductive needs isn't crime ".... No .. this is a problematic justification
It is an opinion about carnivores. Not something I am advocating.
@@barnaliadhikary9421 That's just "false equivalence" fallacy and most society throughout humanity upto now were ok with consumption of meat, even if we consider morality as subjective there is no need to equate non-human animals suffering to humans (only humans are on the pedestal of flaunting their morals/veganism)
Buddhism aatma ( soul) meh nahi manta
To rebirth kaise hota hai ? Kayi Buddhist books me hai Buddha ki punar janam ki kahani ...
@ a gye bhaukne , 5 aggregates samjho Jake , bhikku bodhi aur seeker to seeker pe ja Ke Dekh lo rebirth Ka matlab , 5 aggregates serves to check the dogma among everyone and every process
@ woh jatak “katha” hai .
@@arnavsarkar3954 aur mujhe 5 aggregates pata hai, jo ye 5 aggregates samj jayega woh enlightened bann jayega.
Lekin tum mujhe samjho ye punar janam ka concept kya hai fir ? Samsara kya hai fir ye sabd triptak me bhi hai
@@arnavsarkar3954 Bina soul ke samsara endless cycle kaise ??
सर आप सही से रिसर्च कीजिए बुद्ध जी हिंदू नहीं थे क्योंकि यह हिंदू शब्द हाल ही में आया है
WHAT'S UP UNIVERSITY VIDEO😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Okay.
jab itna bana diya to ye bhi bata do sabko budhha Ashoka ko Zameen me kis kis ne mile dafna rakha tha😂😂😂@@TheIanPanda
😂😂😂😂तुझे इतिहास की कोई जानकारी नहीं,बुद्ध हिंदू नहीं थे।
Budha was born in a hindu or vedic society that's why he was able to see the caste discrimination and social hierarchy
@@RationalAI-o4p not true, no evidence for your claim
Do point hai mere:
1. Isse mere video ke content pe kya fark padega?
2. Kuch evidence toh site kar lete, Mishra ji.
@@RationalAI-o4p buddh ke samay me caste system tha hi nahi
@@navendumishra7639 mishraji citing ambedkarite narrative is pleasant surprise
❤😂😂🎉🎉🎉😂❤❤❤😂🎉😂❤❤😂🎉😂❤❤😂
😅
Kya
Navayana Buddhism
Parlaukik Kalyan karne me samarth hai ?
Kya Buddhist or Navayana Buddhist
scientific hai ?
Kya aap ko janakari hai ? ....
According to
Sanatan Vedic Hindu Dharma
There are three sciences
Adhibhautic
Aadhidaivic
Adhyatmic
gyaan - vigyaan - vidya
inter connected with each other ?
Aap to apurnata ko bhi ak tarike se purnata batakar
galat janakari prastut kar rahe hai !
Jasse manav jati ki hani hi hoti hai .
🌞
Tu jiska reference de raha hai uska door door tak science se koi lena dena nahi hai. Apne aise opinions apne hi paas rakha karo.
@TheIanPanda
😢
Aisi koi bhi cheese astitva me nahi hai. Sab Brahmano ke brahm aur kahaniyan hai
Ambedkar dared to accept another relegion because Hindus are more acceptable to new philosophy, Muslims would have killed him if he dared to do this with Muslims.
Jay Bhim 💙.
"study IQ" ki ek video hai vo ja ke dekho then you will know why he choose Buddhism instead of any other religion
Wah! Aadmi ke Hinduism chhodne mein bhi credit Hinduism ko dena hai aur isme bhi Hindu Muslim karna hai logon ko. I know people who have left Islam and nobody is killing them. Get over this mentality. There will always be religious extremism, no religion is free of it.
one of the reason why he choose Buddhism because he was forced by hindusansthae to choose between buddhism or Sikhism so he choose buddhism he was "thinking" to convert into islam.
@@TheIanPandaeverything have extremist people
@@TheIanPandabtw i was going to write the something but you wrote before me
Bro has taken burtrend Russel very seriously 😂 bro there are other paradigm too exist and for them you too are waste product as you think they are. So don't be anti thiest be atheist and behave like that.