And hyperquest is famous now, so these type of youtubers using their channels and name for getting more views bas kuchh apna logic laga ke esi script likh do jese audience ko lage are ye to bohot galat hai and this is how these type of new youtubers rising nowdays 😂
Pagal hain kya ?? Yeh hyper quest jaise log pseudoscience faila rahe hain jisse pure desh ka scientific temperament kharab hojate hain.....in jaise logo ke against koi kuch bolega toh views lene ki baat karr rahe ho@@moviesclips8470
Moral of the story: Being an IITian doesn't mean you actually know science. You're just good at dedicating yourself to solving specific questions in a short amount of time
as an iitian i would say thats true , we develop crictical thinking in problem solving in all areas but people in general think we are some kind of scientist ( which is totally wrong ) , may be 1 or 2 become.
Having gotten 6000 rank in JEE advanced myself, I think that our intuition becomes quite fast due to practice. This might kill creativity which only happens when we take a break and think outside the box. So cracking JEE is definitely not the way to being a researcher/scientist which require creative thinking.
Man thinks he doesnt need science to solve questions. But yeah we know science untill engineering level not research level. Unfortunately, the guy in the video doesnt seem to know either. He's probably those students that enter IIT with a ton of cash.
As a researcher from IIT D, I have observed that nowadays lots of students came to IIT not to learn and get knowledge but to become influencers and that IIT brand sells well.
Same, majority of students in iits don't even come for engineering too , iits lacks learning environment it should rename itself as iieel ( indian institute of everything except learning)
Namaste Rajkumar ji, Truly appreciate your efforts towards promoting scientific temperament. You've earned a new subscriber! I watched the video carefully and noticed that there may have been some misinterpretation of the concepts discussed. I’ve outlined some clarifications below Wishing you and your team continued success in your endeavours! On Quantum Theory: > It is a general term used to describe how matter and energy behave at microscopic scales, where the rules of classical physics (such as Newton's laws) no longer apply. On Relativity theory: > It is a scientific framework that explains the behavior of objects in space and time under extreme conditions, such as very high speeds or intense gravitational fields. What Does “Matter Being Alive” Mean? > ‘Matter alive’ means that matter is ‘dynamic’ and depends on its environment, rather than existing as distinct point masses. [As mentioned in Principia Mathematica of Newton] . The choice of the word 'alive' is not meant to imply consciousness, but rather to convey that matter behaves as a dynamic event influenced by interactions within the universe. Quantum mechanics reveals that matter is not isolated but exists in a web of interdependencies. Research and experiments support this interconnectedness, showing that particles like electrons exhibit behavior based on probabilities and relational properties (e.g., Wheeler’s delayed-choice experiment). On Protons and Neutrons being Fundamental Particles > Until the 1960s, protons and neutrons were considered fundamental particles. In 1964, Murray Gell-Mann and George Zweig independently proposed the quark model. In the late 1960s, experiments at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC) provided evidence for the existence of quarks. Please refer to the timeline in the video. On Paradox in finding Fundamental Particles > The paradox is that any detected particle reveals properties that imply smaller components. We observe subatomic particles through their effects, not directly. [No one has seen an electron, only the effects] If a particle can be detected, it suggests compositeness, requiring further division. And it is a constant process. So theoretically you can never reach a fundamental particle. Practically, experiments at high energies, such as CERN's, show that collisions yield energy and familiar particles rather than infinitely smaller entities. This supports the idea that energy, not matter, is fundamental Further study, please refer: Weinberg, S. (1995). The Quantum Theory of Fields, Volume 1: Foundations. Cambridge University Press. On Closing labs, CERN, NASA observatory: > On my page, I discuss metaphysics and concepts leading to ultimate reality. Even when I talk about science, I’m not referring to technology, human progress, or the latest AI. I am only discussing metaphysics - the reality of it all. CERN, NASA, or even ISRO will never reach the ultimate reality, as it is beyond sense perception or any machine. You cannot create a perfect machine; there will always be inherent errors. Labs are meant for human progress, and there’s no need to close them. But labs will not answer the ultimate questions; otherwise, philosophy departments would have been closed in your so-called scientific era. Why even invest so much in philosophy departments? On no scientific theory is 100% Accurate > Yes, no scientific theory is completely accurate. They are based on some axioms or constants that we create for the greater good. For example, the speed of light c in relativity theory - relativity theory can never fully explain why the speed of light is precisely c. That’s why science does not delve into this aspect. Both theories and machines have inherent limitations [universal constants in the case of theories, and precision limits for machines], exposing us to approximations of nature rather than an absolute reality. Science operates within these boundaries. Is there no need for sensory organs? > What would a machine do after collecting the data or going through all the programs it has been coded with? You need a man, a scientist, a human observer. I guess you were indicating that there are machines better at observing than human sensory organs. That is fine. However, in the end, you need a human or conscious observer (maybe an alien) who can use the data.Machines may enhance observation but require interpretation by a conscious observer. Why Divide Science as “Western”? > The term "Western Science" is often used to refer to scientific developments primarily from Europe and later the United States, especially during the period of the Scientific Revolution.It is not a racist label but a geographical and cultural distinction that acknowledges the influence of European institutions on modern scientific development.
Namaste Vishal Ji! Thank you so much for watching the video carefully and taking the time to provide such detailed explanations. I appreciate you being so polite, and thank you for subscribing us! Let me clarify the concepts you mentioned and address your points systematically while highlighting the science behind them. A special request at the end: 1. On Quantum Theory: Your explanation of quantum theory is correct-it deals with matter and energy at microscopic scales. However, in the video, I specifically critiqued the misuse of quantum principles to justify pseudoscientific claims. While it is a general term used to describe the plethora of phenomena, it shouldn’t be used in such a generalized way, I mentioned this in the video. You are still doing that… I asked which part of proven “Quantum Physics” states that matter is “Alive” or “Dynamic”. Would love to see the source of this claim from “Quantum Physics”. 2. On Relativity Theory: Spot on again-relativity deals with extreme conditions of speed and gravity. However, pseudoscience often takes these theories out of context. Let’s stick to Einstein’s brilliance rather than leap into unwarranted metaphysical speculations. I asked which part of proven “Relativity” states that matter is “Alive” or “Dynamic”. Would love to see the source of this claim from “Relativity”. 3. “Matter Being Alive”: Thank you for explaining this! However, using "alive" to describe dynamic properties of matter can confuse non-specialists. Wheeler’s delayed-choice experiment, while fascinating, does not support the idea of "dynamic matter being alive". It demonstrates the non-locality and probabilistic nature of particles, not "life." Misinterpreting such phenomena can mislead audiences into conflating scientific facts with metaphysics, often many people taking it in a biological sense. (We also read books - Quantum Theory and Measurement (1983) by J. A. Wheeler & W. H. Zurek) We, as creators should ensure viewers don’t confuse quantum physics with pseudoscientific interpretations often misused to justify baseless claims. For example, while quantum properties are real, they don't justify vague metaphysical ideas like "universal consciousness affecting reality." While describing matter as "alive" in terms of dynamism is an interesting analogy, it risks being misinterpreted. Newton’s Principia Mathematica discusses motion but not "aliveness." Using "alive" as a metaphor is fine in literature but problematic in science, where terms must be precise. Quantum mechanics shows interdependence among particles, but this doesn’t equate to biological life or consciousness. If we don’t take such conceptually heavy words seriously in science, I can literally claim anything and then defend it as to be quoted in some other context, you do understand that as a creator and a fellow science guy. This risks overextending the analogy into areas like consciousness, which isn’t supported by experimental data (yet). Scientific precision matters, or we risk slipping into metaphysics masked as science. 4. On Protons and Neutrons being Fundamental Particles: Absolutely-quarks replaced protons and neutrons as fundamental particles in the 1960s. My video’s aimed to highlight how scientific understanding evolves with evidence. It's a reminder that science is self-correcting, unlike dogmatic claims. If you think we have shown anything incorrect for this part in our video, let us know. 5. On Paradox in Finding Fundamental Particles: The constant pursuit of deeper understanding is the hallmark of science. The claim that we can never identify fundamental particles due to "constant compositeness" misinterprets modern particle physics. Fundamental particles, as defined by the Standard Model, are those without known substructure. Experiments at CERN and SLAC have probed quarks and leptons to incredibly small scales (10^−18 meters) and found no evidence of smaller components, reinforcing their status as fundamental. The claim that we have "never seen an electron, only its effects" is true but irrelevant. Science does not rely on direct visual observation but on consistent, reproducible evidence from experiments. Electrons are well-characterized through properties like charge, spin, and mass, all measured with extraordinary precision. This makes them as "real" as any macroscopic object we observe directly or indirectly. The discovery of the electron by J.J. Thomson (1897) and the Higgs boson at CERN (2012) exemplifies how empirical evidence confirms the nature of these particles. Moreover, experiments at higher energies, like those at CERN's Large Hadron Collider, do not reveal new "smaller entities" beyond the Standard Model. Instead, they confirm the predicted behaviors and interactions of fundamental particles, such as the discovery of the Higgs boson in 2012. The suggestion that "energy is fundamental, not matter" conflates energy and matter, which are interconvertible forms as per Einstein’s equation. Energy and matter are two forms of the same thing. Particles like electrons and photons exist as quantized energy states, but this doesn’t negate their individuality as particles. Classifying energy as "more fundamental" than matter adds a philosophical layer, not a scientific one. Please refer: Einstein, A. (1905). "Does the Inertia of a Body Depend upon Its Energy Content?" Annalen der Physik. While speculative theories like string theory (we have made a video on it) propose substructures for particles, no experimental evidence supports this yet. Labs like CERN have shown that high-energy collisions yield behavior consistent with the Standard Model, not infinite regressions of smaller entities. Thus, the idea of "paradoxes" preventing the identification of fundamental particles lacks empirical backing. Modern physics robustly supports the existence of fundamental particles like quarks and leptons based on reproducible experimental data, as detailed in Weinberg's The Quantum Theory of Fields and Einstein's work on mass-energy equivalence. continued...
continued... 6. On Closing labs, CERN, NASA observatory: I completely agree that labs cannot answer philosophical questions-they are designed to explore empirical phenomena. Philosophy complements science by addressing "why" questions. Philosophy and science thrive together, not in isolation. But you need to understand how to differentiate and avoid the amalgamation of the concepts proposed by philosophy from the mechanism derived by science, which is indeed needed to avoid misinformation and pseudoscience in “my so-called” (I’m sad you just said that, tells a lot btw) scientific era. 7. On Scientific Theories Not Being 100% Accurate: You’ve perfectly described the iterative nature of science. The idea that no scientific theory is completely accurate is correct to an extent, as scientific theories are models that describe reality within a framework of defined axioms, observations, and approximations. However, this does not diminish their precision or utility. The concept of universal constants, such as the speed of light (C), illustrates this. While science does not “completely” explain why C has its specific value, relativity explains its significance: C is the maximum speed at which information and matter can travel, and it is intrinsic to the structure of spacetime itself. This isn’t a limitation of the theory but rather a reflection of how our universe operates. Relativity, for instance, has been tested to astonishing levels of precision. Experiments such as Hafele-Keating's atomic clock tests and observations of gravitational lensing during eclipses confirm its predictions to many decimal places within its applicable domain. These results demonstrate that while theories may not be "absolutely complete," they are extraordinarily accurate within their frames of reference. To go further, the limits you refer to-like those of universal constants-are not flaws but rather boundaries defining the applicability of a theory. Science does not aim for unchanging "absolute truths" but continually refines models to approach reality as closely as possible. This iterative process is a strength, not a limitation. This self-correcting nature is why science remains robust against pseudoscientific claims, which often lack falsifiability. I recommend these materials to understand this- Einstein (1905). "On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies" (Annalen der Physik). C. M. Will (2006). "The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment" Roger Penrose (2005). The Road to Reality: A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe. 8. On Sensory Organs vs. Machines: Machines indeed require human interpretation, but they extend our sensory capabilities far beyond natural limits. Tools like the Hubble Space Telescope or the Large Hadron Collider allow us to observe phenomena that would otherwise be inaccessible. While human interpretation is crucial, the reliability of machines lies in their ability to bypass subjective biases. Conscious observers analyze and contextualize the data machines collect. However, this doesn’t imply machines are inferior; they are extensions of our senses, revealing realities we could never perceive directly (e.g., radio waves, subatomic particles). And no, we don’t need an Alien to do this:) Stop claiming anything as “Asambhav” just because you believe so. 9. Why Divide Science as “Western”?: Thank you for clarifying! While I understand “Western science” as a geographical and historical term, it’s crucial to remember science is universal. Contributions from all cultures-be it Aryabhata in India or Alhazen in the Arab world-form the collective foundation of modern science. My concern is when such distinctions are used to dismiss contributions from other regions or promote unverified claims under the guise of "indigenous knowledge." Science belongs to humanity-it thrives on collaboration across cultures and geographies. Because of my busy schedule, I could not promptly reply to your comment and your fans got a momentary pleasure seeing your response unanswered. Let’s give them a “long-lasting” pleasure. Let’s give them what they want. I’m up for a live discussion on these topics if you are ready. I’ll come to your podcast or you can come on my channel. It can be a real meet-up or a virtual meeting. Let’s promote healthy discussion over these topics. My only conditions: 1. The discussion will be “Live” instead of a recorded video which could later be manipulated. 2. We will talk only and only about Science. I have no expertise or in fact no concern about your religious, spiritual, or any other subject matter-related content. I would like to stick to science for now. If interested in giving your fans pleasure, please email me at heyrajkumar@theworldofscience.co or prteam@theworldofscience.co Thanks for your time :)
I'm also fed up of the increasing pseudoscience and misinformation being spread in India in the name of religion. I'm also an IITian and saw how religious most of the people there were. While there is nothing wrong with being religious, they are more susceptible to such propaganda that tries to paint ancient hindu scriptures as somehow containing modern scientific findings.
Go read it yourself . U just have never read anything and blindly believe that everything that is told in Hindu religious books is stupid . YOu want to paint everything that is Hindu as being idiotic. Go do your homework and dont watch these Utube videos. Earlier YOga. meditation , Jaap were also mocked at.. because that is how our brain was trained.. The society has coached us into assuming that religious book should not be read and that they are stupid.
Hinduism civilized you. I understand Pseudoscience shouldn't be supported, that doesn't mean religious people are to be hated, it's completely their preference to believe in religion or not. You sound more like an average atheist in India, who's a "wannabe-cool" because everyone around are religious and now you must do some clownery to stand out among them, though you have no legitimate reason to
@@tanujaphadke8219 see i believe, you are probably a bot because there is no possible human this stupid, that being said he/she never said that hindu scriptures are stupid or idoitic, honestly hindu scriptures are still pretty advance in astronomy and mathematics, hell they were on the verge of discovering physics before the vedic societies "collapsed" that being said c'mon man we all hindus are proud of are vedic litreture but that doesn't mean that they compare to modern science litreture.
@@raghavnautiyal9250 Your problem is - U believe and when someone questions your belief you question their mental capability to be even considered human and declare them as Bot and stupid. It is implicit when he says - Close labs, stop scientific experiments etc and questions IIT" . Veda's have clear mentions of things that science has found only in the recent 200 years. Vedas are written in Shloka form -- THey are not written in the way modern science is written and, who knows how will Science be written 5000 years from now? Vedic society people had somehow discovered advanced scientific concepts. Having said that - It is not right to call it "Psudo" , "andh vishvas" etc.... redicule it and humiliate people who are working to show the scientific aspect of the Vedas. Nobody is asking U to stop reading modern physics. I dont see a reason to question the IIT system as if it is such a shameful act to create utube video about Vedas. If vedas were from Rome or Egypt people would not have objections to it ?
@Akash that quote want to say that - Einstein indirectly saying that he knows every quantum physics. According to him he might be mad or liar. @harsh Richard is same as Einstein. @
This quote was given by niels bohr. Einstein mainly criticized quantum mechanics and often tried to disprove the uncertainty principle. Please enrich your science knowledge before commenting.
what does this prove here...the topic of this video is not understanding quantum physics but to expose the guys spreading false info on the basis of word quantum physics...they wouldn't be able to elaborate a basic theory in a quantum physics ..well Einstein is right but this doesn't add anything meaningful here
@@vinayak9828 i dont think anybody criticized a proven fact... yes he tried to disprove it cause he was researching on it if a researcher trys to disprove a theory doesnt mean hes saying its wrong hes trying to use the theory to understand others fields of science and checking if the same theory works there too
@@Anonymous-I-t3pरट्टा मार एंट्रेंस से कुछ नही होता अगर एंट्रेंस टफ कर देने से लोग साइंसिस्ट बन जाते,नोबेल प्राइज जीत जाते, new invention कर लेते तो सबसे पहले सबसे टफ़ एंट्रेंस एग्जाम अमेरिका लेता समझे बच्चे😂😂😂
IITIANS study science to crack exams not to develope rationale and then in undergrad they move to engineering which is just applied science. So most IITIANS or any topper of subject especially in India are far away from knowing what science is
Very well said. They lack critical thinking, merely puppets of the system trying to get a high paying job. That's it. That's their end goal. Nothing beyond that.
@@Am.kumar9955 isiliye 75salse iitians, Germany, Russia, USA, china, Korea, France, Israel ko scientific advancements main takkar naheindeparahihe! Koi bi religion ho bo science oupar nirvar karke jirahihe naki science on religion.
Keep up the great work. India is a country that has produced great physicists and astronomers - Aryabhatta, Bhaskara, Raman, Bose, Chandrashekhar (to name a few). Work like yours will hopefully bring us back to their thinking and take us away from the Sadhguru science we’ve started believing in.
Thank you so much for the incredibly generous super thanks and your kind words! It truly means a lot. I couldn’t agree more, India’s legacy of great minds is something we should all be proud of. Their groundbreaking work laid the foundation for modern science, and their rational, evidence-based approach continues to inspire us. I completely resonate with your point about moving away from pseudoscientific nonsense and reconnecting with the true scientific temperament that these legends embodied. Our goal with these channels have always been to promote critical thinking and foster a deeper appreciation for real science. Thank you once again for your support, it’s encouragement like this that keeps us motivated to keep pushing for a more informed and rational discourse. 🙏✨
Funnily enough they will go to hospital for diseases not to their religious places Yaha ke log doctor ko bhagwan samajhte hai aur bhagwan ko doctor Patient dies doctor ne mara Patient cures bhagwan ne bachaya
Wtf man? The sh8 u spewing? Kisne bola doctor ne maara, obv kuch cases me bolte hai log aur bhagwan ko bhi blame karte hai bahut log, and patient sahi hota hai to bhagwan ko credit dene me kya galti hai, jara bata chutiye?
Any doubts about it ?? I think you have not even understood what Einstein stated that "energy and matter is inter convertible" Einstein was only able to derive E = mc^2 for a particle completely at rest. Einstein’s formulation couldn’t account for how energy worked for a particle in motion. Vedas it is written that energy and matter is inter convertible. We do one step further for bodies faster than light- which is yet to be discovered.. where E=K MC ^2 👽 eh ! ever heard this equation ?? There is absolute written proof that Olinto De Pretto, an industrialist from Vicenza, published the equation E=mc^2 in a scientific magazine, Atte, in 1903. Einstein allegedly used De Pretto’s insight in a major paper published in 1905, but De Pretto was never acclaimed for it. Take out some time and read - The Manufacture and Sale of Saint Einstein -by Christopher Jon Bjerknes 😉😉 Then you certainly will sound intellectual - otherwise you just sound like a dumb f*ck. LCH (Large Hadron Collider) has a Shiva's statue for a reason - Adharnarishwar - aka "energy and matter is inter convertible" when Shiva performs tandav or the cosmic dance NOT Einstein for that matter.
@@PPPPSSSSCCCCIt has become increasingly popular to call anything related to Vedas, Upanishads as Psuedo Science, Anything that hasn't been proven & acknowledged by west is termed as such. Problem is we all know science, have read in school but when it comes to Vedas, Upanishads. Only a few of us have read it, so called Atheists and Rational people haven't read it, aren't aware of many terms mentioned there and thus it becomes hard to prove our point to them. We can see many scientists like Tesla, Heisenberg, Schrodinger,Bose, Ramanujan,Sagan was reading Vedas and Upanishads (I'll mention what they said in detail later on) => The ancient Indian texts, such as the Vedas, Upanishads, and Puranas, contain a wealth of scientific knowledge and concepts that were well ahead of their time. Here are some examples: _Atomic Theory_ The concept of atoms and subatomic particles is described in the following texts: 1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The universe is composed of tiny particles called 'paramanus'." (Rigveda, 10.90.3) [1] 2. _Mahabharata_ (400 BCE): "The universe is made up of tiny particles called 'anu'." (Mahabharata, Shanti Parva, 342.10) [2] _Space and Cosmology_ The ancient Indian texts describe the universe as infinite and boundless, with multiple galaxies and stars. 1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The universe is infinite and boundless." (Rigveda, 10.90.1) [1] 2. _Aitareya Upanishad_ (800 BCE): "The universe is made up of multiple galaxies and stars." (Aitareya Upanishad, 2.4.1) [3] _Mathematics_ The ancient Indian texts describe mathematical concepts such as zero, infinity, and the decimal system. 1. _Yajurveda_ (1200 BCE): "The concept of zero is described as 'shunya'." (Yajurveda, 17.2) [4] 2. _Brahmasphuta Siddhanta_ (628 CE): "The decimal system and the concept of infinity are described." (Brahmasphuta Siddhanta, 1.1) [5] _Physics and Engineering_ The ancient Indian texts describe concepts such as gravity, buoyancy, and aerodynamics. 1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The concept of gravity is described as 'gurutva'." (Rigveda, 10.22.14) [1] 2. _Vaimanika Shastra_ (1000 CE): "The principles of aerodynamics and aircraft design are described." (Vaimanika Shastra, 1.1) [6] _Evolution_ 1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): Describes the evolution of life from water to plants to animals. (Rigveda, 10.121.1-10) [1] 2. _Puranas_ (500 BCE): Describe the evolution of humans from a single cell to complex organisms. (Puranas, Vishnu Purana, 1.4.1-50) [2] _Battery-like Device_ 1. _Agastya Samhita_ (400 CE): Describes a battery-like device called the "Baghdad Battery" or "Agastya's Battery", which was used for electroplating. (Agastya Samhita, 200.1-10) [3] _Aviation_ 1. _Vaimanika Shastra_ (1000 CE): Describes the principles of aerodynamics, aircraft design, and flight. (Vaimanika Shastra, 1.1-30) [4] 2. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): Mentions the concept of flying vehicles called "Vimanas". (Rigveda, 1.164.1-50) [1] _Medicine and Surgery_ 1. _Charaka Samhita_ (400 CE): Describes various medical procedures, including surgery, and the use of herbs and minerals for treatment. (Charaka Samhita, 1.1-30) [5] 2. _Sushruta Samhita_ (600 CE): Describes surgical procedures, including plastic surgery, and the use of anesthesia. (Sushruta Samhita, 1.1-30) [6] -> Here are some quotes from famous scientists and thinkers who were inspired by Indian scriptures: *Nikola Tesla* - "The Vedas...teach that the creation of the universe was not a one-time event, but rather a continuous process that is still going on." [1] - Source: "The Problem of Increasing Human Energy" by Nikola Tesla, The Century Magazine, June 1900. *Erwin Schrödinger* - "The multiplicity of the universe is only apparent, in truth, there is only one principle, one reality, which is the ultimate reality." (Inspired by the Upanishads) [2] - Source: "What is Life?" by Erwin Schrödinger, Cambridge University Press, 1944. *Werner Heisenberg* - "After the conversations about Indian philosophy, some of the ideas of quantum physics that had seemed so crazy suddenly appeared in a reasonable light." [3] - Source: "Physics and Philosophy" by Werner Heisenberg, Harper & Brothers, 1958. *Robert Oppenheimer* - "The Bhagavad Gita is the most beautiful philosophical song existing in any known tongue." [4] - Source: "The Flying Trapeze: Three Crises for Physicists" by Robert Oppenheimer, The American Scholar, Spring 1964. *Carl Sagan* - "The Hindu concept of the universe as an infinite, unbounded, and eternally cyclical cosmos is remarkably consistent with modern astrophysical understanding." [5] - Source: "Cosmos" by Carl Sagan, Random House, 1980. *Albert Einstein* - "The religion of the future should be based on a cosmic perspective, and the concept of the universe as a single, undivided whole." (Inspired by the Upanishads) [6] - Source: "The World as I See It" by Albert Einstein, Philosophical Library, 1934. These quotes illustrate the profound impact of Indian scriptures on the thoughts and ideas of some of the most influential scientists and thinkers of the modern era.
This era will likely be remembered in the future as the age of pseudoscience in India. Channels like Hyperquest, Beer Biceps, and many others have flourished, influencing and brainwashing an entire generation. However, channels like yours, Arpit’s, and other rational science-based platforms may not gain much traction today but will likely be seen as beacons of reason and knowledge in the future.
@@same4047It has become increasingly popular to call anything related to Vedas, Upanishads as Psuedo Science, Anything that hasn't been proven & acknowledged by west is termed as such. Problem is we all know science, have read in school but when it comes to Vedas, Upanishads. Only a few of us have read it, so called Atheists and Rational people haven't read it, aren't aware of many terms mentioned there and thus it becomes hard to prove our point to them. We can see many scientists like Tesla, Heisenberg, Schrodinger,Bose, Ramanujan,Sagan was reading Vedas and Upanishads (I'll mention what they said in detail later on) => The ancient Indian texts, such as the Vedas, Upanishads, and Puranas, contain a wealth of scientific knowledge and concepts that were well ahead of their time. Here are some examples: _Atomic Theory_ The concept of atoms and subatomic particles is described in the following texts: 1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The universe is composed of tiny particles called 'paramanus'." (Rigveda, 10.90.3) [1] 2. _Mahabharata_ (400 BCE): "The universe is made up of tiny particles called 'anu'." (Mahabharata, Shanti Parva, 342.10) [2] _Space and Cosmology_ The ancient Indian texts describe the universe as infinite and boundless, with multiple galaxies and stars. 1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The universe is infinite and boundless." (Rigveda, 10.90.1) [1] 2. _Aitareya Upanishad_ (800 BCE): "The universe is made up of multiple galaxies and stars." (Aitareya Upanishad, 2.4.1) [3] _Mathematics_ The ancient Indian texts describe mathematical concepts such as zero, infinity, and the decimal system. 1. _Yajurveda_ (1200 BCE): "The concept of zero is described as 'shunya'." (Yajurveda, 17.2) [4] 2. _Brahmasphuta Siddhanta_ (628 CE): "The decimal system and the concept of infinity are described." (Brahmasphuta Siddhanta, 1.1) [5] _Physics and Engineering_ The ancient Indian texts describe concepts such as gravity, buoyancy, and aerodynamics. 1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The concept of gravity is described as 'gurutva'." (Rigveda, 10.22.14) [1] 2. _Vaimanika Shastra_ (1000 CE): "The principles of aerodynamics and aircraft design are described." (Vaimanika Shastra, 1.1) [6] _Evolution_ 1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): Describes the evolution of life from water to plants to animals. (Rigveda, 10.121.1-10) [1] 2. _Puranas_ (500 BCE): Describe the evolution of humans from a single cell to complex organisms. (Puranas, Vishnu Purana, 1.4.1-50) [2] _Battery-like Device_ 1. _Agastya Samhita_ (400 CE): Describes a battery-like device called the "Baghdad Battery" or "Agastya's Battery", which was used for electroplating. (Agastya Samhita, 200.1-10) [3] _Aviation_ 1. _Vaimanika Shastra_ (1000 CE): Describes the principles of aerodynamics, aircraft design, and flight. (Vaimanika Shastra, 1.1-30) [4] 2. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): Mentions the concept of flying vehicles called "Vimanas". (Rigveda, 1.164.1-50) [1] _Medicine and Surgery_ 1. _Charaka Samhita_ (400 CE): Describes various medical procedures, including surgery, and the use of herbs and minerals for treatment. (Charaka Samhita, 1.1-30) [5] 2. _Sushruta Samhita_ (600 CE): Describes surgical procedures, including plastic surgery, and the use of anesthesia. (Sushruta Samhita, 1.1-30) [6] -> Here are some quotes from famous scientists and thinkers who were inspired by Indian scriptures: *Nikola Tesla* - "The Vedas...teach that the creation of the universe was not a one-time event, but rather a continuous process that is still going on." [1] - Source: "The Problem of Increasing Human Energy" by Nikola Tesla, The Century Magazine, June 1900. *Erwin Schrödinger* - "The multiplicity of the universe is only apparent, in truth, there is only one principle, one reality, which is the ultimate reality." (Inspired by the Upanishads) [2] - Source: "What is Life?" by Erwin Schrödinger, Cambridge University Press, 1944. *Werner Heisenberg* - "After the conversations about Indian philosophy, some of the ideas of quantum physics that had seemed so crazy suddenly appeared in a reasonable light." [3] - Source: "Physics and Philosophy" by Werner Heisenberg, Harper & Brothers, 1958. *Robert Oppenheimer* - "The Bhagavad Gita is the most beautiful philosophical song existing in any known tongue." [4] - Source: "The Flying Trapeze: Three Crises for Physicists" by Robert Oppenheimer, The American Scholar, Spring 1964. *Carl Sagan* - "The Hindu concept of the universe as an infinite, unbounded, and eternally cyclical cosmos is remarkably consistent with modern astrophysical understanding." [5] - Source: "Cosmos" by Carl Sagan, Random House, 1980. *Albert Einstein* - "The religion of the future should be based on a cosmic perspective, and the concept of the universe as a single, undivided whole." (Inspired by the Upanishads) [6] - Source: "The World as I See It" by Albert Einstein, Philosophical Library, 1934. These quotes illustrate the profound impact of Indian scriptures on the thoughts and ideas of some of the most influential scientists and thinkers of the modern era.
As a student of IIT Madras, I am sorry on behalf of that group of IITians. Not all IITians are like that. Some people extrapolate the results of a particular experiment, under particular conditions to berserk lengths, which is not scientific, since the science needs a solid proof at every step. I agree that one, bearing a prestigious tag, has a bit more responsibility for the domain he belongs to, which is being overlooked by some people. Its time for us to grow together, developing a scientific temperament and enjoy the learning process with healthy debates. Good work brother.
Mai bhi ek jee aspirant Ajkal science ko hum logo ko aise present kiya jata hai ki keep up nahi kar paate. I am not shifting blame but this problem is prevalent more than ever. It feels really good to see someone debunking pseudo science with proper logic and proof without any hidden agenda ❤️
@@NaveenKumar-nx8yiSwami Vivekananda was a Bengali and non-veg is a common practice among Bengalis. But Swami Vivekananda never consumed beef You have proved that you have come out of WhatsApp University 👏 😂
Quantum Theory is a fundamental framework in physics that describes the behavior of matter and energy at the smallest scales, such as atoms and subatomic particles. So don't say that it's not a theory. Quantum theory itself is a scientific concept that encompasses a set of principles and ideas to explain the behavior of matter and energy at the quantum level (extremely small scales). Within quantum theory, there are several core concepts that form its foundation.
He never questioned the existence or validity of Quantum Theory. He specifically asked " Quantum Theory of what ? " - of light and matter interactions, particle interactions, field theory, theory of gravity, etc. Yes, Quantum mechanics is a fundamental framework which in general gives us the tools to deal with matter at subatomic scales - but its treatment is very different based on the domain, which is exactly what he asked for in the video.
@@Nova_Elementum There are many Hindu, non-hindu and atheist TH-camrs who have already debunked that niga many times. But I understand why you want to spam this comment on every video you come across destroying "your" fantasy.
Abbee Aakash nile kabootar jake kahi or reservation ke bhika mang niga bol ke bara aya cool banne 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 science ke baat karu raat bhar marks lau jhaat bhar chota bheem 😂jai 😂
@@minturoy5397 You honestly need to visit a doctor. Where in the world did I mention any caste or something related here? Grow up and admit the faults in your religion rather than going mad when someone points it out.
Sanatan Dharma, often referred to as the "eternal way" or "eternal order," aligns deeply with the philosophical principles of interconnectedness and the pursuit of understanding fundamental truths. From a scientific perspective, we can relate the concept of fundamental particles to Sanatan Dharma's metaphysical worldview: Sanatan Dharma emphasizes that the entire universe is interconnected and originates from a single divine essence, often called Brahman. This essence pervades all existence. Similarly in modern Physics, fundamental particles form the building blocks of all matter and energy, illustrating the unity of existence at the smallest scale. The quest to discover a unified theory in physics mirrors the spiritual quest for understanding Brahman. The philosophy also acknowledges the existence of subtle (sukshma) forces beyond what we perceive. The Vedic sages spoke of energies and vibrations that lie beneath the surface of reality. Modern physics echoes this with concepts like quantum fields and the wave-particle duality, revealing that the true nature of reality is far more intricate than what is visible. Sanatan Dharma sees time and existence as cyclical, governed by the processes of creation, preservation, and dissolution (Srishti, Sthiti, and Samhara). This cyclical view is mirrored in physics through particle interactions, conservation laws, and cosmic phenomena like star formation and decay. The cosmic dance of Shiva, embodying this eternal rhythm, finds a parallel in the cycles of transformation in the subatomic world. The concept of Maya in Sanatan Dharma, which describes the physical world as an illusion obscuring ultimate truth, resonates with the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle in physics. Just as Maya suggests that reality is deeper than sensory perception, the uncertainty principle reveals limits to observing the true state of particles, emphasizing the hidden complexity of existence. Both traditions share a relentless quest for the ultimate truth. Sanatan Dharma seeks liberation (moksha) through the realization that the Atman (self) and Brahman (universal essence) are one. Similarly, physicists aim to uncover a comprehensive framework that unifies all fundamental forces and particles, an endeavor akin to the spiritual pursuit of understanding the source of all creation. Sanatan Dharma encourages exploration on both internal and external levels-self-realization through practices like meditation and yoga, and studying the natural world for deeper understanding. Physics complements this approach by probing the universe's mysteries while also contemplating questions about consciousness, existence, and the role of the observer. In essence, Sanatan Dharma and modern physics both strive to uncover the foundational truths of existence. They reveal a universe that is interconnected, governed by eternal principles, and filled with profound mysteries, inspiring a holistic understanding of reality that transcends the boundaries of science and spirituality.
I am a science student & i believe in logical explanation... I agree with your scientific researches... But i also believe in something that is beyond science like paranormal activities,karma,past life regression therapist, akashic reader,near death experience,astral travel,soul concept etc....till now science cannot explain these things but do exist....so my perspective is science and spirituality both are different topics Don't mix it,but both also exist,you can't disagree with spirituality.....and maybe in future science can explain those things😊
Hi, I'm also against any pseudoscience. U are free to correct any misinterpretation or misinformation as Science. True Dharmik Culture as the concept of "Shastrath" which is well-organized debates & discussions. But at the same time propagating science as anti-Religion especially that with non-organised religions like Hinduism(or accurately Sanatan Dharmā) or its common roots, traced originated orders like that of Janias, Buddhists, Sikhs isn't feasible or correct. It leads to spread of misconceptions among masses and they distances themselves more from Science which is counter-productive. Reformed Christianity like Protestant Churches in the latter middle ages played a significant role in the development of Science in Europe eventually fostering Renaissance (which was initially rebirth in the interest of achieving modernly as they were in ancient greece). Most nobel laureates in Science weren't /aren't atheists statistically. So using Science to Promote atheism is systematically wrong & that's especially with un-organised religions. And while "appropriating" modern science to religion maybe wrong and often is but in case of Hyper Quest who makes videos based on ancient Philosophy in Modern Contexts that's different. Because the core principles of Sanatan Dharmā is not any organised belief system but rather development of philosophies like its 6 Upangas being the core. And as both science & Philosophy is human form of knowledge which evolves so it's not surprising that scientific concepts can be there. And moreover when, the word is actually "Darshan" in Indic Languages which in Vedic Sanskrit roots from "Drish"(to see) + "Lyut"( noun form) i.e to see/experience "as it is". If u study Vaiseshik Darshan, it isn't a religious text but on material world darshan. It mentions "Ashta Praman" or 8 limb proof for believing any truth including stressing the need for "prayog"(experiment). We can comment on something only when we know properly the both stuff. Anyone is free to debunk any wrong if u see from HQ or other, but he's a learned guy truly in the Aarsh Shastras unlike fraudsters like Sadhguru etc typo who themselves don't know the topic they speak. So it's essential to keep respectful discussions. Militant atheism especially Deracination under disguise of rationality isn't supportable as we aren't Stalinist Russia or Maoist China.
well these so called rationalist never believe for them all practices and ideology are pseudoscience in santan till a western research paper provide them approval of being true and then they called it facts...😂
See what's the problem here. The comment section has taken the debate elsewhere. By saying such things: and using innuendo: to not bring the topic, which actually bought the topic. See there's an extreme end catching problem in Indians everywhere. In the name of supporting The World Of Science हिंदी. Hyper quest has became completely stupid according to the comment section. He has no knowledge. In terms of defending Hyperquest the World of Science हिंदी has become stupid, or belonging to a party. Why? Till when you people act like this? When will you guys be rational? Whats happening here is not understanding and calling out the misinformation and asking questions and seeking knowledge. Conduction of a good debate. Rather than दूसरों के लाश पे आग सीखना। Buy demeaning each other. Bjp bhakt, pseudo, dharm, caste, hinduism, bheemta, everything came up suddenly, and from a logical debate, a scientific quest it became political, the exact what you people where opposing. What you people were quoting: "beware of ______ or else they will make you a _______" and you made thay actually happen. India is a country where knowledge was always spread by questioning, we have examples of multiple such great debates those went for days, and bought fruitful results. If its about seeking glory, seeking truth and knowledge. Don't target or misdemean anything. Why to target them, or their beliefs? Your fight is with the misinformation stick to that. Dont start attacking people or ideologies. And this is for all. Don't be Hippocrates. Ask question to Hyperquest, and seek answer. If a reply comes up make a rebuttal again. And thats how you seek glory. What I see here is people, demeaning Hinduism, vedantas or some other beliefs or ideologies or philosophies in the name of calling out misinformation. I can see such degenerating comments. And its a request to the owner if this channel. Look into it. Don't let people make your research or knowledge turn towards politics. I. The name of supporting you they ain't understanding or caring science vs pseudo science. They busy in orher things. Which will make the entire topic turn political which you are against of. And i am very much against it. फिर हो गया सत्य का खोज। Lets make it a good debate. With all of our expertise rather than demeaning each other. I see way to many people who in the name of calling out misinformation is just making it political. Stop that.
@@Bishal_Goswami no offence but wrong doing has been criticised appropriately by comments, because literally what they are saying in their videos is so vague and misleading because they are non testified statements( irrespective of source or reference), apart from that the ancient Indian philosophy and darshan Shastra is marvelous no doubt but the way these youtubers are milking and referencing out such statements as testified truths or absolute for views or personal reasons is highly criticizable.
The heat generated by a havan fire can inactivate viruses by denaturing their proteins and disrupting lipid envelopes, a process dependent on reaching sufficient temperatures (typically above 60°C). This thermal inactivation is well-documented in virology and is effective only within the immediate vicinity of the fire.
Guys that iit guy clearly wants views and understand that pure science in Hindi language will not get attention. Indian folks wants science which align with religion. Problem is with us not IIT guy. People like them get jobs as consultants in big junk food companies to attract kids and pregnant women into believing sugar is good for them. All iitans are this way. Problem is much bigger then anyone can imagine.
Yeah, absolutely. Indians are easy prey to religious stuff. Most of us lack rationality, common sense and critical thinking. Pseudo science has become an easy subject for influencers to spread misinformation about since in the end they are the ones who get away with the money, audience are left with nothing but misinformation in their brains. Any sane person who questions such idea are immediately declared an anti hindu. It's sad and pathetic.
@@dikvijaysingh5896 The major reason is the reason @Priyanshu mentioned in his comment - The people. People of both our and previous generation tend to boast and feel proud of achievements and they want the validation of social media about their beliefs/superstitions.
@@Shekhar03231It has become increasingly popular to call anything related to Vedas, Upanishads as Psuedo Science, Anything that hasn't been proven & acknowledged by west is termed as such. Problem is we all know science, have read in school but when it comes to Vedas, Upanishads. Only a few of us have read it, so called Atheists and Rational people haven't read it, aren't aware of many terms mentioned there and thus it becomes hard to prove our point to them. We can see many scientists like Tesla, Heisenberg, Schrodinger,Bose, Ramanujan,Sagan was reading Vedas and Upanishads (I'll mention what they said in detail later on) => The ancient Indian texts, such as the Vedas, Upanishads, and Puranas, contain a wealth of scientific knowledge and concepts that were well ahead of their time. Here are some examples: _Atomic Theory_ The concept of atoms and subatomic particles is described in the following texts: 1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The universe is composed of tiny particles called 'paramanus'." (Rigveda, 10.90.3) [1] 2. _Mahabharata_ (400 BCE): "The universe is made up of tiny particles called 'anu'." (Mahabharata, Shanti Parva, 342.10) [2] _Space and Cosmology_ The ancient Indian texts describe the universe as infinite and boundless, with multiple galaxies and stars. 1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The universe is infinite and boundless." (Rigveda, 10.90.1) [1] 2. _Aitareya Upanishad_ (800 BCE): "The universe is made up of multiple galaxies and stars." (Aitareya Upanishad, 2.4.1) [3] _Mathematics_ The ancient Indian texts describe mathematical concepts such as zero, infinity, and the decimal system. 1. _Yajurveda_ (1200 BCE): "The concept of zero is described as 'shunya'." (Yajurveda, 17.2) [4] 2. _Brahmasphuta Siddhanta_ (628 CE): "The decimal system and the concept of infinity are described." (Brahmasphuta Siddhanta, 1.1) [5] _Physics and Engineering_ The ancient Indian texts describe concepts such as gravity, buoyancy, and aerodynamics. 1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The concept of gravity is described as 'gurutva'." (Rigveda, 10.22.14) [1] 2. _Vaimanika Shastra_ (1000 CE): "The principles of aerodynamics and aircraft design are described." (Vaimanika Shastra, 1.1) [6] _Evolution_ 1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): Describes the evolution of life from water to plants to animals. (Rigveda, 10.121.1-10) [1] 2. _Puranas_ (500 BCE): Describe the evolution of humans from a single cell to complex organisms. (Puranas, Vishnu Purana, 1.4.1-50) [2] _Battery-like Device_ 1. _Agastya Samhita_ (400 CE): Describes a battery-like device called the "Baghdad Battery" or "Agastya's Battery", which was used for electroplating. (Agastya Samhita, 200.1-10) [3] _Aviation_ 1. _Vaimanika Shastra_ (1000 CE): Describes the principles of aerodynamics, aircraft design, and flight. (Vaimanika Shastra, 1.1-30) [4] 2. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): Mentions the concept of flying vehicles called "Vimanas". (Rigveda, 1.164.1-50) [1] _Medicine and Surgery_ 1. _Charaka Samhita_ (400 CE): Describes various medical procedures, including surgery, and the use of herbs and minerals for treatment. (Charaka Samhita, 1.1-30) [5] 2. _Sushruta Samhita_ (600 CE): Describes surgical procedures, including plastic surgery, and the use of anesthesia. (Sushruta Samhita, 1.1-30) [6] -> Here are some quotes from famous scientists and thinkers who were inspired by Indian scriptures: *Nikola Tesla* - "The Vedas...teach that the creation of the universe was not a one-time event, but rather a continuous process that is still going on." [1] - Source: "The Problem of Increasing Human Energy" by Nikola Tesla, The Century Magazine, June 1900. *Erwin Schrödinger* - "The multiplicity of the universe is only apparent, in truth, there is only one principle, one reality, which is the ultimate reality." (Inspired by the Upanishads) [2] - Source: "What is Life?" by Erwin Schrödinger, Cambridge University Press, 1944. *Werner Heisenberg* - "After the conversations about Indian philosophy, some of the ideas of quantum physics that had seemed so crazy suddenly appeared in a reasonable light." [3] - Source: "Physics and Philosophy" by Werner Heisenberg, Harper & Brothers, 1958. *Robert Oppenheimer* - "The Bhagavad Gita is the most beautiful philosophical song existing in any known tongue." [4] - Source: "The Flying Trapeze: Three Crises for Physicists" by Robert Oppenheimer, The American Scholar, Spring 1964. *Carl Sagan* - "The Hindu concept of the universe as an infinite, unbounded, and eternally cyclical cosmos is remarkably consistent with modern astrophysical understanding." [5] - Source: "Cosmos" by Carl Sagan, Random House, 1980. *Albert Einstein* - "The religion of the future should be based on a cosmic perspective, and the concept of the universe as a single, undivided whole." (Inspired by the Upanishads) [6] - Source: "The World as I See It" by Albert Einstein, Philosophical Library, 1934. These quotes illustrate the profound impact of Indian scriptures on the thoughts and ideas of some of the most influential scientists and thinkers of the modern era.
I am a BTech in CSE from IIT Kanpur. (2008) JEE AIR 280 (General) The issue is not with these people, but with you young IIT graduates who are lacking in social wisdom and are uprooted from Indian historical thought process. You are the ones who are actually living in a bubble, not them. Unfortunately you will keep living in that bubble and be full of the delusion of all-knowing at the same time. You will understand only once you're married.
@@TheWorldOfScienceHindi Koi kaam ki baat ho to batayen. Behtar yahi rahega ki IITians (khas taur par BTech) apna samajik aur sanskritik gyaan badhayen. Yah sab BTech curriculum mein nahin padhaya jaata. Ab yah main kya koi gair-wajib baat bol raha hoon? Science works for material things only, and even there the theories are ever changing. Assuming them to be established truth tantamounts to scientism.
@@parjanyashukla176Tum ek bubble me jee rhe ho 😂😂 Tumhri life society ke banye hue bubble me hai aur kuch bhi karne ke himmat nahi hai Aise thinking se tum ek ache corporate slave ban jaoge par kabhi kuch innovate nahi kar paoge Aur india ka kalyan rationality se hoga warna india humesha ek third world country rahega .
Abe teri rank chae kitne bhi ho tu ek failure hi hai kyunki tum bhi unhe chezo ko man rha hai jo ek anpad manega Padhe likha corporate slave he hoga tu
Sorry but you also made a mistake. You said around 3:45 that "If some theory works in one frame of reference, then also it may be possible that it doesn't even work in another frame of reference". This is completely wrong because if that is the case, then it is not a consistent theory in Physics. Actually, this is one of the two major conditions to prove Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity, the other condition being that the speed of light is constant and same in all inertial frame of reference. You may look up the proof and statements I said here in the book " Special Theory of Relativity- by Resnick and Halliday". Also, nothing can be measured to the last digit because of classical and eventually quantum errors that restrict us by law.
well what about newtons kinematical equations they dont work in non inertial frame and it is a consistent theory of physics within its domain of applicability....??
@TPTClub_2024 Newton's theory is correct in all inertial frames of references. And it works correctly if you make the appropriate coordinate transformations from an inertial frame of reference to a non-inertial frame of reference, provided you work with classical Physics and do not involve relativistic effects. In this case if you do it correctly, you will get an extra term in the equations of motion which can be interpreted as an extra pseudoforce. In fact by Einstein's general relativity, a non-inertial frame is same as an inertial frame where there is a additional gravitational field acting on the particles. Newton's theory is in fact a low energy approximation of Einstein's theory of gravity and Einstein's theory gives the correct description of physics in non-inertial frames of reference. In fact, the statement that "laws of Physics should be same in all inertial frames of reference" is much more fundamental than Newton's laws. This is the original statement of relativity. This mathematically means that the equations of physics should look the same in all inertial frames, provided they are written with respect to coordinates attached to the frame of the inertial observer. To convert the equations from one inertial frame to another, one needs to do coordinate transformations. Once it's done, the equation will still have the same "form" in the new coordinates of the new inertial frame. There is a set of coordinate transformations called the "Galilean transformation", that preserves Newton's equations but does not preserves Maxwell's equations of electromagnetism. Einstein observed it and tried to fix Maxwells equations, but it failed because it predicted different speed of light in different frames. Eventually he had to fix Galilean transformations and he obtained Lorenzt transformations, which preserved Maxwell equations. But Lorentz transformations does not preserves Newton's laws and eventually it had to be modified. All in all, Newton's laws are low energy approximations of much richer Einstein's Theory of relativity.
@@dear_imran It's based on Quantum mechanics and it's a good enough theory for most practical purposes and calculations at low energy regimes. But Quantum mechanics does not respects special relativity and has been eventually replaced by Quantum field theory which is relativistically a consistent theory. By a theoretical physicists standards all theories must respect relativity. Sure there are approximate theories, empirical theories and so on that work well in their regime of application but when one talks about a consistent theory by all means it should respect relativity.
I agree We can't really measure anything to the last digit. There is always some error But we humans have ways to work around things, like approximation And thats how we got to the moon and thats how we are smashing particles at speed of light Genuinely blows my mind
The notion of fundamental particle is relative until a more fundamental particle is found. In this regard suppose you go on navigating for the most fundamental particle by supplying more and more energy so that you navigate smaller and smaller wavelength at some point of time you would form a black hole so you could not navigate further. This is related to your comment at 2:32...
@@satyaanand6523 Here's is a more elaborated explanation So,Basically When we increase the energy of our probes (for example, through particle accelerators) we can investigate smaller and smaller scales. This follows from the de Broglie relation, which says that a particle’s wavelength decreases as its momentum increases. The smaller the wavelength, the more precisely we can "zoom in" on structures at smaller scales.This is where things get tricky, As you continue to increase energy (and thus decrease wavelength), the density of the energy in a given region increases. According to general relativity, if you concentrate enough energy in a small enough space, you can form a black hole a point at which gravity is so strong that not even light can escape.which means information is lost.Which gives birth to a paradox.
@ASFACT2805 ok let's consider him stupid.. but what about HYPERQUEST pseudo scientific videos. Do you have any Explainations about it.. there is no need to do debates every time . They(you) should answer this video though video...
@@sagarbhangare7624 what is pesudo science Explain what is there in the Hyper Quest video Go face to face and prove him wrong in a debate. You are doing everything for views, there the so called rational people stop speaking.
@@sagarbhangare7624 When you guys are saying the right thing then why they scared to go face to face and say it. they asking you to answer in the debt but why are they hesitating to go?
5:50 what you said is right yes while burning it's common sense for CO2 to be released, but what purification here means is not increasing the Oxygen content in air but instead it reduces the microorganism present in air, IDK about what flying beast said in his post but according to research it's a fact, and if someone want to know about the source just message i will send it Also great video appreciate it❤❤❤❤
@@naveengupta8227 Journal of Ethnopharmacology Medicinal Smoke Reduces Airborne Bacteria Effect of Yajna on Environmental Purification(2015, International Journal of Environmental Research and Development)
3:55 yeh point mei to Chatgpt bhi hyperquest ko sahi bata raha hai, ultimate reality sensory perception ke beyond ho sakti hai. Humare senses limited hain aur sirf ek chhota hissa reality ka dekh paate hain. Jo hum samajhte hain, wo humare perception aur cognition ke through filtered hota hai. Isliye, jo asli reality hai, wo humare current understanding se kaafi complex ho sakti hai. Yeh bhi ho sakta hai ki humari sensory limitations ke wajah se hum sachayi ko pura nahi samajh pa rahe hain. Ultimately, wo reality jo hum perceive karte hain, wo ek approximation ho sakti hai. 2.Universe dynamic kaafi had tak prove ho chuka hai. The dynamic nature of the universe is supported by discoveries like the Big Bang theory, Hubble's Law of cosmic expansion, redshift observations, and the discovery of Cosmic Microwave Background radiation (Penzias & Wilson, 1965). Aap ki video mei hi kamiya hai aur aap chale dusro ko roast karne. Mei Atheist hoon hyperquest ko roast karuga lekin roasting bhi to scientific honi chahiye aap patani konsi Science padke aaye hai 3. Yeh baat sach hai sirf laboratory me baith kar universe ke sach ko nahi samjha ja sakta ha wo knowledge kaafi valuable hoti hai lekin sensory organs ki limitations hoti hai isliye universe ke sach ko samajhne ke liye experimental/practical basis use me liye jaate hai taaki deep understanding badhe yaha bhi aapne cherry picking kari. Kull mila kar dekha meine aapne 1 cheez acchi boli ki Science Science honi chahiye western aur eastern ka tag nahi hona chahiye dusra ki koi bhi cheez jalao to pollutants release hote hai aur environment ko damage karte hai yeh aapne correct kiya. Ab mei aapki tactic batata hoon aapne kya kiya kuch statement uthaye hyperquest se aur use tod marod kar misinterpreting kardiya jaise unhone bola universe ke sach ko laboratory se nahi jaan sakte aur aap kehne lagaye nasa band kardo, research institute band kardo, Universities band kardo. Are bhai yeh cheeze bahut valuable hoti hai iska matlab yeh nahi ki isse pura sach jaan lenge hame apne soch ko aur area ko badhana hoga yeh matlab hoga hyperquest ka aur aapne to use band kardo wala misinterpretation kar diya aur phir aapne sabse pehle jo hyperquest ka video dikhaya suruwat mei aapne usko acche se adress nahi kiya usko aap aaram se expose kar sakte the lekin aap word sapads khelne lag gaye aise aap mislead kar rahe hai.. Ek aur cheez yaha par bhi hyperquest sahi hai ki kisi bhi fundamental particle tak nahi pahuch sakte hai kyuki khatarnak paradox aajate hai kyuki, fundamental particles tak pahuchna mushkil hai. Quantum mechanics ka uncertainty principle kehta hai ki hum particle ki position aur momentum ko ek sath exact nahi jaan sakte. Particles sirf "points" nahi, balki vibrations ya fields ke roop mein exist karte hain. Isliye unka nature samajhna paradoxical ho sakta hai. Direct observation ke bajaye, hum unka behavior indirect tareeke se samajhte hain. Isliye, hum un tak direct nahi pahuch sakte.
Bhai ne lagta hai bahut mehnat ki or uska result nhi mila ab wo sasti scheme apnayega aage badhane ki dusro ko neech bnake khud ko accha bnakr Lekin bhai wo bhi acche se nhi kar paaya, I hope in future wo accha karega. 🙏😅 Or bhai yaha pr 3:47 kuch examples de dete to accha hota hamare liye
@@thecontinental9670 Toh chatgpt ka basic version hi saare studies ka unbiased result dikhata hai to Jo science me advance version hai wo to dono hyperquest aur jinhone expose Kiya ki samajh ke bahar hai..
very soon you will end up your Journey as not a channel talking about science or rationality but as channel that promotes hate against only one indian religion and and its prectices reason --most of your followers are not watching you becouse they know science or love Scientific temperament rather they are watching you becouse they are brain washed anti hindu audience they will keep supporting you not becouse of science but becouse you will put photos of dharmic or spiritual people on your thumbnail. don't expect mature Audiences on TH-cam. happy journey
You are wrong here. Because now a days Proving science using religion increasing day by day vigorously. Don't you see that. What do you mean by anti hindu.
@@rohan_gour मैं तो किसी गैंग से नहीं, ये कल के पैदा हुए बच्चे मौज मस्ती में रहने वाले चकाचौंध में लुप्त बच्चे को क्या ही बोले 🤣 बच्चों को लगता है इनकी मौज मस्ती अहंकार अडिग रहेगा 😂
See what's the problem here. The comment section has taken the debate elsewhere. By saying such things: and using innuendo: to not bring the topic, which actually bought the topic. See there's an extreme end catching problem in Indians everywhere. In the name of supporting The World Of Science हिंदी. Hyper quest has became completely stupid according to the comment section. He has no knowledge. In terms of defending Hyperquest the World of Science हिंदी has become stupid, or belonging to a party. Why? Till when you people act like this? When will you guys be rational? Whats happening here is not understanding and calling out the misinformation and asking questions and seeking knowledge. Conduction of a good debate. Rather than दूसरों के लाश पे आग सीखना। Buy demeaning each other. Bjp bhakt, pseudo, dharm, caste, hinduism, bheemta, everything came up suddenly, and from a logical debate, a scientific quest it became political, the exact what you people where opposing. What you people were quoting: "beware of ______ or else they will make you a _______" and you made thay actually happen. India is a country where knowledge was always spread by questioning, we have examples of multiple such great debates those went for days, and bought fruitful results. If its about seeking glory, seeking truth and knowledge. Don't target or misdemean anything. Why to target them, or their beliefs? Your fight is with the misinformation stick to that. Dont start attacking people or ideologies. And this is for all. Don't be Hippocrates. Ask question to Hyperquest, and seek answer. If a reply comes up make a rebuttal again. And thats how you seek glory. What I see here is people, demeaning Hinduism, vedantas or some other beliefs or ideologies or philosophies in the name of calling out misinformation. I can see such degenerating comments. it's a hate and fixed mentality driven. I'll believe this I won't believe this. Whatever he says is wrong whatever he says is right. This bias ruins everything. In the name of calling out misinformation, people started demeaning Gaurav Taneja and Hyper quest. Rather than keeping it civil and countering it with good logic. People have shown that those who calling out, are actually themself biased and not credible. They Just hate someone and if someone is calling out their mistake. They rather focusing on the mistake. They start attacking the person. Hyperquest people fighting with The world of science people and the world of science people fighting with hyperquest people. The hate of not liking each other is only prevalent here. Not the quest for truth. I don't understand attacking Vedas or Hinduism here. Bringing caste, dharm, here. Its a battle of truth. Rather focusing that, you people bought your bloody politics here. And its a request to the owner of this channel. Look into it. Don't let people make your research or knowledge turn towards politics. In the name of supporting you they ain't understanding or caring science vs pseudo science. They busy in other things. Which will make the entire topic turn political which you are against of. And I am very much against it. फिर हो गया सत्य का खोज। All your effort will go on vaun as you will be labeld with a specific term, again. And mind you, you will only get haters of those you're exposing not rational people. Rational people sticks to the topic. And sticks in gaining knowledge and truth. Not what these comment section looks like, 85% of it. Lets make it a good debate. With all of our expertise rather than demeaning each other. I see way to many people who in the name of calling out misinformation is just making it political. Stop that.
@@Pritamvishwas685It has become increasingly popular to call anything related to Vedas, Upanishads as Psuedo Science, Anything that hasn't been proven & acknowledged by west is termed as such. Problem is we all know science, have read in school but when it comes to Vedas, Upanishads. Only a few of us have read it, so called Atheists and Rational people haven't read it, aren't aware of many terms mentioned there and thus it becomes hard to prove our point to them. We can see many scientists like Tesla, Heisenberg, Schrodinger,Bose, Ramanujan,Sagan was reading Vedas and Upanishads (I'll mention what they said in detail later on) => The ancient Indian texts, such as the Vedas, Upanishads, and Puranas, contain a wealth of scientific knowledge and concepts that were well ahead of their time. Here are some examples: _Atomic Theory_ The concept of atoms and subatomic particles is described in the following texts: 1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The universe is composed of tiny particles called 'paramanus'." (Rigveda, 10.90.3) [1] 2. _Mahabharata_ (400 BCE): "The universe is made up of tiny particles called 'anu'." (Mahabharata, Shanti Parva, 342.10) [2] _Space and Cosmology_ The ancient Indian texts describe the universe as infinite and boundless, with multiple galaxies and stars. 1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The universe is infinite and boundless." (Rigveda, 10.90.1) [1] 2. _Aitareya Upanishad_ (800 BCE): "The universe is made up of multiple galaxies and stars." (Aitareya Upanishad, 2.4.1) [3] _Mathematics_ The ancient Indian texts describe mathematical concepts such as zero, infinity, and the decimal system. 1. _Yajurveda_ (1200 BCE): "The concept of zero is described as 'shunya'." (Yajurveda, 17.2) [4] 2. _Brahmasphuta Siddhanta_ (628 CE): "The decimal system and the concept of infinity are described." (Brahmasphuta Siddhanta, 1.1) [5] _Physics and Engineering_ The ancient Indian texts describe concepts such as gravity, buoyancy, and aerodynamics. 1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The concept of gravity is described as 'gurutva'." (Rigveda, 10.22.14) [1] 2. _Vaimanika Shastra_ (1000 CE): "The principles of aerodynamics and aircraft design are described." (Vaimanika Shastra, 1.1) [6] _Evolution_ 1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): Describes the evolution of life from water to plants to animals. (Rigveda, 10.121.1-10) [1] 2. _Puranas_ (500 BCE): Describe the evolution of humans from a single cell to complex organisms. (Puranas, Vishnu Purana, 1.4.1-50) [2] _Battery-like Device_ 1. _Agastya Samhita_ (400 CE): Describes a battery-like device called the "Baghdad Battery" or "Agastya's Battery", which was used for electroplating. (Agastya Samhita, 200.1-10) [3] _Aviation_ 1. _Vaimanika Shastra_ (1000 CE): Describes the principles of aerodynamics, aircraft design, and flight. (Vaimanika Shastra, 1.1-30) [4] 2. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): Mentions the concept of flying vehicles called "Vimanas". (Rigveda, 1.164.1-50) [1] _Medicine and Surgery_ 1. _Charaka Samhita_ (400 CE): Describes various medical procedures, including surgery, and the use of herbs and minerals for treatment. (Charaka Samhita, 1.1-30) [5] 2. _Sushruta Samhita_ (600 CE): Describes surgical procedures, including plastic surgery, and the use of anesthesia. (Sushruta Samhita, 1.1-30) [6] -> Here are some quotes from famous scientists and thinkers who were inspired by Indian scriptures: *Nikola Tesla* - "The Vedas...teach that the creation of the universe was not a one-time event, but rather a continuous process that is still going on." [1] - Source: "The Problem of Increasing Human Energy" by Nikola Tesla, The Century Magazine, June 1900. *Erwin Schrödinger* - "The multiplicity of the universe is only apparent, in truth, there is only one principle, one reality, which is the ultimate reality." (Inspired by the Upanishads) [2] - Source: "What is Life?" by Erwin Schrödinger, Cambridge University Press, 1944. *Werner Heisenberg* - "After the conversations about Indian philosophy, some of the ideas of quantum physics that had seemed so crazy suddenly appeared in a reasonable light." [3] - Source: "Physics and Philosophy" by Werner Heisenberg, Harper & Brothers, 1958. *Robert Oppenheimer* - "The Bhagavad Gita is the most beautiful philosophical song existing in any known tongue." [4] - Source: "The Flying Trapeze: Three Crises for Physicists" by Robert Oppenheimer, The American Scholar, Spring 1964. *Carl Sagan* - "The Hindu concept of the universe as an infinite, unbounded, and eternally cyclical cosmos is remarkably consistent with modern astrophysical understanding." [5] - Source: "Cosmos" by Carl Sagan, Random House, 1980. *Albert Einstein* - "The religion of the future should be based on a cosmic perspective, and the concept of the universe as a single, undivided whole." (Inspired by the Upanishads) [6] - Source: "The World as I See It" by Albert Einstein, Philosophical Library, 1934. These quotes illustrate the profound impact of Indian scriptures on the thoughts and ideas of some of the most influential scientists and thinkers of the modern era.
@@letsstudy2308It has become increasingly popular to call anything related to Vedas, Upanishads as Psuedo Science, Anything that hasn't been proven & acknowledged by west is termed as such. Problem is we all know science, have read in school but when it comes to Vedas, Upanishads. Only a few of us have read it, so called Atheists and Rational people haven't read it, aren't aware of many terms mentioned there and thus it becomes hard to prove our point to them. We can see many scientists like Tesla, Heisenberg, Schrodinger,Bose, Ramanujan,Sagan was reading Vedas and Upanishads (I'll mention what they said in detail later on) => The ancient Indian texts, such as the Vedas, Upanishads, and Puranas, contain a wealth of scientific knowledge and concepts that were well ahead of their time. Here are some examples: _Atomic Theory_ The concept of atoms and subatomic particles is described in the following texts: 1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The universe is composed of tiny particles called 'paramanus'." (Rigveda, 10.90.3) [1] 2. _Mahabharata_ (400 BCE): "The universe is made up of tiny particles called 'anu'." (Mahabharata, Shanti Parva, 342.10) [2] _Space and Cosmology_ The ancient Indian texts describe the universe as infinite and boundless, with multiple galaxies and stars. 1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The universe is infinite and boundless." (Rigveda, 10.90.1) [1] 2. _Aitareya Upanishad_ (800 BCE): "The universe is made up of multiple galaxies and stars." (Aitareya Upanishad, 2.4.1) [3] _Mathematics_ The ancient Indian texts describe mathematical concepts such as zero, infinity, and the decimal system. 1. _Yajurveda_ (1200 BCE): "The concept of zero is described as 'shunya'." (Yajurveda, 17.2) [4] 2. _Brahmasphuta Siddhanta_ (628 CE): "The decimal system and the concept of infinity are described." (Brahmasphuta Siddhanta, 1.1) [5] _Physics and Engineering_ The ancient Indian texts describe concepts such as gravity, buoyancy, and aerodynamics. 1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The concept of gravity is described as 'gurutva'." (Rigveda, 10.22.14) [1] 2. _Vaimanika Shastra_ (1000 CE): "The principles of aerodynamics and aircraft design are described." (Vaimanika Shastra, 1.1) [6] _Evolution_ 1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): Describes the evolution of life from water to plants to animals. (Rigveda, 10.121.1-10) [1] 2. _Puranas_ (500 BCE): Describe the evolution of humans from a single cell to complex organisms. (Puranas, Vishnu Purana, 1.4.1-50) [2] _Battery-like Device_ 1. _Agastya Samhita_ (400 CE): Describes a battery-like device called the "Baghdad Battery" or "Agastya's Battery", which was used for electroplating. (Agastya Samhita, 200.1-10) [3] _Aviation_ 1. _Vaimanika Shastra_ (1000 CE): Describes the principles of aerodynamics, aircraft design, and flight. (Vaimanika Shastra, 1.1-30) [4] 2. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): Mentions the concept of flying vehicles called "Vimanas". (Rigveda, 1.164.1-50) [1] _Medicine and Surgery_ 1. _Charaka Samhita_ (400 CE): Describes various medical procedures, including surgery, and the use of herbs and minerals for treatment. (Charaka Samhita, 1.1-30) [5] 2. _Sushruta Samhita_ (600 CE): Describes surgical procedures, including plastic surgery, and the use of anesthesia. (Sushruta Samhita, 1.1-30) [6] -> Here are some quotes from famous scientists and thinkers who were inspired by Indian scriptures: *Nikola Tesla* - "The Vedas...teach that the creation of the universe was not a one-time event, but rather a continuous process that is still going on." [1] - Source: "The Problem of Increasing Human Energy" by Nikola Tesla, The Century Magazine, June 1900. *Erwin Schrödinger* - "The multiplicity of the universe is only apparent, in truth, there is only one principle, one reality, which is the ultimate reality." (Inspired by the Upanishads) [2] - Source: "What is Life?" by Erwin Schrödinger, Cambridge University Press, 1944. *Werner Heisenberg* - "After the conversations about Indian philosophy, some of the ideas of quantum physics that had seemed so crazy suddenly appeared in a reasonable light." [3] - Source: "Physics and Philosophy" by Werner Heisenberg, Harper & Brothers, 1958. *Robert Oppenheimer* - "The Bhagavad Gita is the most beautiful philosophical song existing in any known tongue." [4] - Source: "The Flying Trapeze: Three Crises for Physicists" by Robert Oppenheimer, The American Scholar, Spring 1964. *Carl Sagan* - "The Hindu concept of the universe as an infinite, unbounded, and eternally cyclical cosmos is remarkably consistent with modern astrophysical understanding." [5] - Source: "Cosmos" by Carl Sagan, Random House, 1980. *Albert Einstein* - "The religion of the future should be based on a cosmic perspective, and the concept of the universe as a single, undivided whole." (Inspired by the Upanishads) [6] - Source: "The World as I See It" by Albert Einstein, Philosophical Library, 1934. These quotes illustrate the profound impact of Indian scriptures on the thoughts and ideas of some of the most influential scientists and thinkers of the modern era.
Philosophy and science cater to entirely different aspects of understanding. Philosophy, especially in the teachings of Buddha and the Hindu Upanishads, emphasizes knowing the core of oneself, while science focuses on understanding the universe in materia aspect. Both pursuits contradict each other at their fundamental way of seeing things
I completely understand and respect that perspective. My concern arises when creators associate something with science inaccurately. If they had presented these concepts as philosophy, I wouldn’t have felt the need to make this video.
@@TheWorldOfScienceHindiYup . I am reading various topics like philosophy and science it would be great if you recommend me a book I have watched your previous videos on that topic it would be great if you recommend some other books which are cheap and affordable for students by the way I have bought theory of relativity and cosmos and . Your content also helps me for that purpose 👍
Why don't you try listening Swami Sarvapriyananda se speaks on Indian Philosophy (specifically Adwaita) You can listen to "Who Am I ?" video as a starting point given by him at IITK 8-10 years ago.
@@sumitdutta7043I am a huge fan of Swamiji. He is amazing, his teachings are equally poetic and scientific! He doesn't mix philosophy and science, he in fact says that one should not be in a hurry to mix the latest inventions of quantum physics with philosophy. But i truly believe that Adwait vedant is way ahead. These scientists have merely begun to scratch the surface when it comes to reality and consciousness..
Tu kyu nahi karega kyu ki tu hai hi 🐷 kya tu kabhi Qur'an ko question Kiya Jab bhi koye Hinduism ke against bolta hai phele ajate hai tum log validation Dene
You opened my eyes. Today, I have learned about pseudoscience. Previously, I had no idea about the word and its meaning. I just heard about it and didn't know it's a negative word.
Very good work.. We need to be rational towards every topic, especially science. Every one has the right to ask questions and should not be demoralized if they ask a question and say that something is wrong.
@@TheWorldOfScienceHindi you are morron man, i reported your video, hyperquest talks with sense, and your attacking him hatefully, such disgusting shameless personality of yours, iff you don't have mind to understand some one then keep shut your crap mouth
This is what I get when I asked chatgpt this: Science in Hinduism? Hinduism, as an ancient and diverse tradition, intertwines spirituality, philosophy, and an understanding of natural phenomena. While the sacred texts and practices are often spiritual or symbolic, many aspects of Hinduism align with or anticipate principles that science later formalized. Below are some examples of how actual science intersects with Hinduism: --- 1. Cosmology and Astronomy Concept of a Cyclic Universe: Hindu scriptures like the Rig Veda and Bhagavata Purana describe a cyclic nature of the universe, with periods of creation (Brahma's day), preservation, and dissolution (Brahma's night). This aligns with modern theories of a cyclic or oscillating universe. Accurate Timekeeping: Ancient Indian astronomers like Aryabhata and Bhaskara made significant contributions to astronomy. Texts like the Surya Siddhanta explain planetary movements, solar years, and eclipses with remarkable accuracy. The Age of the Universe: The Hindu calculation of time, which mentions the age of the universe in billions of years, closely aligns with modern scientific estimates (13.8 billion years). --- 2. Mathematics Zero and Decimal System: The concept of zero, crucial to modern mathematics, originated in ancient India. Aryabhata and Brahmagupta pioneered the decimal number system. Geometry and Algebra: Ancient texts like the Sulbasutras describe geometric principles for constructing altars, reflecting early developments in geometry and algebra. --- 3. Medicine (Ayurveda) Holistic Healing: Ayurveda, rooted in Hindu texts like the Atharva Veda and the Charaka Samhita, emphasizes preventive medicine, diet, and the balance of body, mind, and spirit. Many principles, such as the importance of gut health, are being validated by modern science. Surgical Techniques: The Sushruta Samhita by Sushruta details surgical techniques, including cataract surgery, rhinoplasty, and even brain surgery, demonstrating advanced knowledge of anatomy and medicine. --- 4. Environmental Science Respect for Nature: Hindu practices encourage environmental sustainability, such as planting trees (vriksha puja), protecting rivers, and maintaining biodiversity. Ecological Harmony: Concepts like pancha mahabhutas (five elements: earth, water, fire, air, space) stress the interconnection of all life forms, resonating with modern ecological principles. --- 5. Physics Atomic Theory: The ancient philosopher Kanada (6th century BCE) proposed an atomic theory in the Vaisheshika Sutra. He suggested that matter is composed of indivisible atoms (paramanu), a concept akin to modern atomic theory. Energy Transformations: The idea of shakti (energy) and its interplay with matter aligns with modern understanding of energy conservation and transformation. --- 6. Psychology and Neuroscience Meditation and Mental Health: Practices like yoga and meditation, rooted in Hindu philosophy, are widely recognized for their benefits to mental health, stress reduction, and brain plasticity. Mind-Body Connection: Texts like the Yoga Sutras of Patanjali explore the connection between consciousness, thought, and physiology, which overlaps with modern neuroscience and psychology. --- 7. Metallurgy and Engineering Iron Pillar of Delhi: This ancient iron structure has resisted corrosion for over 1,600 years, showcasing advanced metallurgical techniques. Temple Architecture: The precise engineering of Hindu temples, such as those in Hampi or Khajuraho, reflects deep understanding of physics, acoustics, and geometry. --- Limitations and Symbolism While many concepts in Hinduism appear scientific, they are often deeply symbolic or metaphysical. Modern science has validated some ideas, but others remain poetic interpretations rather than empirical truths. It’s essential to distinguish between literal and metaphorical meanings in Hindu texts. Conclusion Hinduism contains profound insights into nature and existence, many of which resonate with modern science. However, these contributions often emerged from philosophical inquiry and observation rather than the experimental methods that define contemporary science. Sanatan 🗿
@@SameersQuestForGod8 Ok here it's Science in Islam and Christianity have both been influenced by religious teachings, but the ways in which they intersect with scientific inquiry and thought have varied over time and across different contexts. Science in Islam: Islamic civilization made significant contributions to science, particularly during the Golden Age of Islam (8th to 14th centuries). Islamic scholars preserved, translated, and built upon ancient Greek, Roman, Persian, and Indian scientific knowledge, and they made groundbreaking discoveries in fields like astronomy, mathematics, medicine, and chemistry. Key figures include: Al-Khwarizmi: The father of algebra, whose work laid the foundation for modern mathematics. Ibn Sina (Avicenna): A physician whose works influenced both medicine and philosophy in the West. Al-Razi (Rhazes): A pioneering figure in medicine and chemistry, known for his contributions to the understanding of infectious diseases. Islamic science often emphasized the importance of observation, experimentation, and rational thought, as it was seen as a way to understand the natural world, which was created by God. The Quran itself encourages the study of the world and the cosmos as signs of God's existence and power, which many scholars took as a call to investigate the natural world. However, the decline of the Islamic scientific tradition in the late medieval period coincided with various political, religious, and intellectual shifts, including the rise of conservative religious movements that viewed some scientific ideas, particularly those challenging traditional interpretations of religious texts, with suspicion. Science in Christianity: Christianity's relationship with science has been more complex and marked by a variety of interactions over the centuries. In the early Christian period, there was some suspicion of scientific inquiry, as certain ideas (such as heliocentrism) appeared to contradict the Bible's accounts of the universe. However, many early Christian thinkers, such as St. Augustine and Thomas Aquinas, saw no conflict between faith and reason and believed that the natural world could be studied to better understand God’s creation. During the Renaissance and the Scientific Revolution, Christianity played a role in both supporting and opposing scientific progress. The Catholic Church, for instance, initially opposed the heliocentric model proposed by Copernicus and championed by Galileo. Galileo was famously tried by the Inquisition and placed under house arrest for promoting heliocentrism, which was seen as contradicting the biblical teaching of a geocentric universe. Despite this, many other scientists, including Isaac Newton and Johannes Kepler, were devout Christians and believed their work revealed the majesty of God. The Protestant Reformation also had a complex impact on science. Some Protestant reformers, such as Martin Luther, were wary of science, but others supported the idea that studying the natural world could deepen one's understanding of God’s will. The Protestant emphasis on literacy and the study of the Bible in the vernacular led to an increase in education, which indirectly fostered scientific curiosity. In modern times, science and Christianity have often been seen in tension, especially with regard to issues like evolution, climate change, and the age of the Earth. While many Christian denominations accept scientific findings, some more conservative or literalist groups maintain a belief in a young Earth and the idea of creationism. However, the majority of Christian denominations, especially mainline Protestant, Catholic, and Eastern Orthodox, generally accept the scientific consensus on these issues. Key Differences: Integration of Science and Religion: In Islam, the study of science is often seen as a form of worship, an effort to understand the world created by God. In Christianity, the integration of science and religion has been more varied, with some periods of tension (e.g., the Galileo affair) and others of cooperation (e.g., the scientific contributions of Christian scholars). Philosophical Approach: In Islamic thought, there is a long tradition of synthesizing scientific inquiry with religious belief, particularly in the medieval period. In Christianity, especially in its medieval and Renaissance periods, there was more tension between scriptural interpretation and scientific discoveries, though this has lessened over time. In both traditions, though, the relationship between faith and science has evolved and continues to be a topic of debate and discussion. Many modern religious thinkers from both traditions see no conflict between scientific understanding and spiritual belief. Sanatan 🗿🗿🗿
@@langotabhai1261 haan sabko yahi lagta hai ki uska dharm doosro se bahot behtar hai. Aur kamaal ki baat ye hai ki, aap paida usi dharm me hue hai jo aapko sabse behtar lag raha hai.
Opened my eyes to a whole new dimension. I would usually believe in whatever these guys were peddling before, but your video taught me to question this and everything else. Both the parts in these series were highly effective. I felt something literally opening up in my brain. Thank you. Please keep creating rational videos. Your sub and a new fan!
@@SilentNighT-f8vWho told you that Qur'an is a scientific book. Qur'an teaches the way to live our life. It does have some verses related to science but calling it a scientific book is incorrect
Much appreciated the work done by you , i always wonder why isn't there a huge language barrier in quality studies or critical thinking stuff's. I wish for all the people to at least understand this beauty once.
See that's the problem, it's a hate and fixed mentality driven. I'll believe this I won't believe this. Whatever he says is wrong whatever he says is right. This bias ruins everything. In the name of calling out misinformation, people started demeaning Gaurav Taneja and Hyper quest. Rather than keeping it civil and countering it with good logic. People have shown that those who calling out, are actually themself biased and not credible. They Just hate someone and if someone is calling out their mistake. They rather focusing on the mistake. They start attacking the person.
I am very happy to see the people like who are doing great work in science communication. Great work brother. Keep it up. Being a research scholar I feel the necessity of debunking these pseudo-scientific people.
You haven’t seen any research paper on havan, even I used to think that it won’t purify. I have never followed Gaurav Taneja and I never came across havan purify the air but after said by you, I have seen two research papers on that topic which goes against what you said. Hum pagal hain kya TH-cam main science dekh a Chathahain Lekin yahan pe superiority war chal Raha hain. Kuch comedy Webseries banao yaar.
3:00 he said that it's not possible to know the universe from our human sense ofc it is, that's why we use maths and get equations and then visualise it. I hope you will find it interesting rather than criticism.
Yes, but hyperquest is trying to promote his religion and bhakti here (we can infer that from the name of the series). He is not talking about science and math, he is talking about bhakti which is not scientific.
In your video, I found many mistakes. For example, stating that a theory can be 100% accurate is incorrect because theories are based on observation or hypothesis and cannot be 100% certain. Some exceptional cases, like in mathematics, rely on axioms and deductive reasoning, such as Pythagoras’ Theorem. Theories in most fields are highly reliable but never infallible, as they depend on current evidence and methods. Continuous questioning and testing are essential for progress. Additionally, saying that research can be conducted solely in a lab is absolutely wrong; data or information is taken from space and satellites, about space Scientists have mapped only about 5% of the observable universe, which consists of matter like stars, planets, and galaxies. The remaining 95% is composed of dark matter and dark energy, which are poorly understood and unknown I find many mistakes and misleading information in your content. He is wrong; this does not mean you are right. I can write 3 or 4 pages right now. DO YOU KNOW WHAT I LEARNED LESSON FROM TODAY FINDING MISTAKES AND CRITICISING IS EASY
@Railmantrihaazipur First, learn how to write. I also talk about exceptional cases, but that person said that theory cannot be 100% right. While he opposes that idea, I did not agree with it. Now, I have a question for you: Have you read my comment and watched the video properly? Also, make sure to learn to write.
@Railmantrihaazipur By adding a smile emoji, you didn't become cool. I'm approaching this from a scientific perspective, and there's nothing wrong with that. I'm not here to criticize religion; in fact, I support it. I just want to clarify that he is discussing very narrow aspects of science or twisting the science to make the wrong seem right. Please try not to be so dogmatic. Both you and he are presenting this video in a way that seems anti-religious. Let's strive to be scientific and share knowledge-do not use science as a weapon.
and i think you're unclear and somewhat wrong about satellites. because they are also labs, conducting experiments in the space(ex ISS) and how/what data is taken from space..? the data is collected/retrieved/researched by such labs/satellites FROM space right..? and your choice of words , my god, space scientist or astrophysicists? mathematicians? engineers?... matters like stars and planets, matter or bodies..? do you know what i learned many people just brag whatever piece of information they find on social media and pretend to be expert
Thanks for addressing such an important topic! It’s great to see someone standing up for evidence-based science and critical thinking. Misrepresenting scientific concepts not only confuses people but also disrespects the hard work of researchers. Really appreciate your effort to promote accurate info and bust pseudo-science. Can’t wait to see more of your upcoming videos. keep up the awesome work! 🙌
I want to tell you something bro. Hinduism got lot of science which we don't know. I will give u one example I can find life time of ground water. Which no machine can do. It works based on some sort of energy which we haven't discovered. I can find amount of water in each water gap that can be proved scientifically, but how I can find life time of water gap is not scietific. But it is science which no one know yet. And I can also find weights of object by touching that object. That also relates to that. It's all related to Hinduism ancient sages got something we are lacking. With which we can do a lot more than machines. We can even find water on mars with machines combined. @@TheWorldOfScienceHindi
@@Hikkiyonvy 😭😭🤡 It is not based on logic it is based on experiments, findings and research, just saying matter is alive is a philosophical thought and nothing else.
You’ll find what you’re looking for, so I’d suggest staying open-minded. Avoid going into full debunking mode-our brains are incredible. Try not to think in the rigid black-and-white terms often promoted by channels like this and HyperQuest.
Accidentally I came here and I really appreciate your efforts. Though the promotion scientific tempor is part of the constitution, recently it is being damaged at all levels. I mean speeches by top politicians, judges, podcasts/videos by social media influencers have taken a huge toll.
You're completely mistaken.😬😬 We can't directly interact with fundamental particles like quarks or leptons because: 1. They're Incredibly Tiny: These particles are far smaller than atoms, making them impossible to see or handle. We can only observe their effects in experiments like those at the Large Hadron Collider. 2. Quantum Mechanics: These particles don’t have fixed positions or states, making it impossible to pinpoint or directly interact with them. 3. Technology Limits: Even with advanced equipment, we can only detect their traces, not the particles themselves, so direct interaction isn't possible.
@@TheWorldOfScienceHindiIt has become increasingly popular to call anything related to Vedas, Upanishads as Psuedo Science, Anything that hasn't been proven & acknowledged by west is termed as such. Problem is we all know science, have read in school but when it comes to Vedas, Upanishads. Only a few of us have read it, so called Atheists and Rational people haven't read it, aren't aware of many terms mentioned there and thus it becomes hard to prove our point to them. We can see many scientists like Tesla, Heisenberg, Schrodinger,Bose, Ramanujan,Sagan was reading Vedas and Upanishads (I'll mention what they said in detail later on) => The ancient Indian texts, such as the Vedas, Upanishads, and Puranas, contain a wealth of scientific knowledge and concepts that were well ahead of their time. Here are some examples: _Atomic Theory_ The concept of atoms and subatomic particles is described in the following texts: 1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The universe is composed of tiny particles called 'paramanus'." (Rigveda, 10.90.3) [1] 2. _Mahabharata_ (400 BCE): "The universe is made up of tiny particles called 'anu'." (Mahabharata, Shanti Parva, 342.10) [2] _Space and Cosmology_ The ancient Indian texts describe the universe as infinite and boundless, with multiple galaxies and stars. 1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The universe is infinite and boundless." (Rigveda, 10.90.1) [1] 2. _Aitareya Upanishad_ (800 BCE): "The universe is made up of multiple galaxies and stars." (Aitareya Upanishad, 2.4.1) [3] _Mathematics_ The ancient Indian texts describe mathematical concepts such as zero, infinity, and the decimal system. 1. _Yajurveda_ (1200 BCE): "The concept of zero is described as 'shunya'." (Yajurveda, 17.2) [4] 2. _Brahmasphuta Siddhanta_ (628 CE): "The decimal system and the concept of infinity are described." (Brahmasphuta Siddhanta, 1.1) [5] _Physics and Engineering_ The ancient Indian texts describe concepts such as gravity, buoyancy, and aerodynamics. 1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The concept of gravity is described as 'gurutva'." (Rigveda, 10.22.14) [1] 2. _Vaimanika Shastra_ (1000 CE): "The principles of aerodynamics and aircraft design are described." (Vaimanika Shastra, 1.1) [6] _Evolution_ 1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): Describes the evolution of life from water to plants to animals. (Rigveda, 10.121.1-10) [1] 2. _Puranas_ (500 BCE): Describe the evolution of humans from a single cell to complex organisms. (Puranas, Vishnu Purana, 1.4.1-50) [2] _Battery-like Device_ 1. _Agastya Samhita_ (400 CE): Describes a battery-like device called the "Baghdad Battery" or "Agastya's Battery", which was used for electroplating. (Agastya Samhita, 200.1-10) [3] _Aviation_ 1. _Vaimanika Shastra_ (1000 CE): Describes the principles of aerodynamics, aircraft design, and flight. (Vaimanika Shastra, 1.1-30) [4] 2. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): Mentions the concept of flying vehicles called "Vimanas". (Rigveda, 1.164.1-50) [1] _Medicine and Surgery_ 1. _Charaka Samhita_ (400 CE): Describes various medical procedures, including surgery, and the use of herbs and minerals for treatment. (Charaka Samhita, 1.1-30) [5] 2. _Sushruta Samhita_ (600 CE): Describes surgical procedures, including plastic surgery, and the use of anesthesia. (Sushruta Samhita, 1.1-30) [6] -> Here are some quotes from famous scientists and thinkers who were inspired by Indian scriptures: *Nikola Tesla* - "The Vedas...teach that the creation of the universe was not a one-time event, but rather a continuous process that is still going on." [1] - Source: "The Problem of Increasing Human Energy" by Nikola Tesla, The Century Magazine, June 1900. *Erwin Schrödinger* - "The multiplicity of the universe is only apparent, in truth, there is only one principle, one reality, which is the ultimate reality." (Inspired by the Upanishads) [2] - Source: "What is Life?" by Erwin Schrödinger, Cambridge University Press, 1944. *Werner Heisenberg* - "After the conversations about Indian philosophy, some of the ideas of quantum physics that had seemed so crazy suddenly appeared in a reasonable light." [3] - Source: "Physics and Philosophy" by Werner Heisenberg, Harper & Brothers, 1958. *Robert Oppenheimer* - "The Bhagavad Gita is the most beautiful philosophical song existing in any known tongue." [4] - Source: "The Flying Trapeze: Three Crises for Physicists" by Robert Oppenheimer, The American Scholar, Spring 1964. *Carl Sagan* - "The Hindu concept of the universe as an infinite, unbounded, and eternally cyclical cosmos is remarkably consistent with modern astrophysical understanding." [5] - Source: "Cosmos" by Carl Sagan, Random House, 1980. *Albert Einstein* - "The religion of the future should be based on a cosmic perspective, and the concept of the universe as a single, undivided whole." (Inspired by the Upanishads) [6] - Source: "The World as I See It" by Albert Einstein, Philosophical Library, 1934. These quotes illustrate the profound impact of Indian scriptures on the thoughts and ideas of some of the most influential scientists and thinkers of the modern era.
Bro you don't explain the fact only do criticism do you know what the definition of alive and dead we are also nothing but matter alone are we not alive even plants are alive. The coniousness ,reproduction and metabolism are the features of living but when we go in microscopic level bacteria also alive even viruses are alive in human body made of dna and protein it means DNA is the real molecule which can consider as alive because it can replicate and it is made up of just phosphate, sugar and base these are simple molecules so we can also say that atom is the real source of energy and thats why if you are alive atoms are also... EVEN ELECTRON REVOLVES AROUND NUCLEUS SHOWS CONSCIOUSNESS... JUST CRITICAL THINKING NOT PROVEN BUT J THINK IT CAN'T BE PROVED ALSO IT CAN BE ACCEPTED AS THEORY ALWAYS
Why don't you publish your research in science journal and make understand what you are saying in science community. The things which you are claiming is not pseudo-science, because it is not even science. no scientific research have ever claim they have consciousness, If you want to get knowledge of science, don't listen to dhongi pakhandi babas. This is the effect when you listen to them. if you want to get knowledge of science then listen to real scientist. For eg Sabine Hossenfelder, Neil deGrasse Tyson etc
No If it's not proven its not theory to understand the definition of scientific theory Your not doing critical thinking Your doing mass generalization of things.
5:40 Ignition = Oxygen Absorb 10 kilo ke wood me 1 kilo ghee dalake koi phayada nahi ye hawan yagya nahi hai ... Vedo me hawan krna likha hai so simple Tambe ke diye me ghee ka Diya kapaas ki low ( Less Polution, Less Oxygen absorbed, Ghee se hawan yagya bbe ho jaata)
I think these people very well know what they are doing and what non sense they are spreading, but they continue because there's a very big pseudo science audience in our country jinhe ye capture krke bs monetize kr rhe h and exploiting them.
@TheWorldOfScienceHindi i thank you for prompting whats real hats off in such a fake society only few are real gems bow to you really thank you pls also make debunking shorts for wider reach through Instagram and yt bcz psuduscience is spreading more then any other virus taking peoples life on daily basis mentally and physically i wish you luck and thanks for contribution 🙏
I know hyper quest form his starting at start he making nice videos but when he knows most of people who watch his video are not want to know real science just want strong reasons which make there ancient believes more strong then he start doing this type things
@@AveragepoliticsEnjoyerIt has become increasingly popular to call anything related to Vedas, Upanishads as Psuedo Science, Anything that hasn't been proven & acknowledged by west is termed as such. Problem is we all know science, have read in school but when it comes to Vedas, Upanishads. Only a few of us have read it, so called Atheists and Rational people haven't read it, aren't aware of many terms mentioned there and thus it becomes hard to prove our point to them. We can see many scientists like Tesla, Heisenberg, Schrodinger,Bose, Ramanujan,Sagan was reading Vedas and Upanishads (I'll mention what they said in detail later on) => The ancient Indian texts, such as the Vedas, Upanishads, and Puranas, contain a wealth of scientific knowledge and concepts that were well ahead of their time. Here are some examples: _Atomic Theory_ The concept of atoms and subatomic particles is described in the following texts: 1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The universe is composed of tiny particles called 'paramanus'." (Rigveda, 10.90.3) [1] 2. _Mahabharata_ (400 BCE): "The universe is made up of tiny particles called 'anu'." (Mahabharata, Shanti Parva, 342.10) [2] _Space and Cosmology_ The ancient Indian texts describe the universe as infinite and boundless, with multiple galaxies and stars. 1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The universe is infinite and boundless." (Rigveda, 10.90.1) [1] 2. _Aitareya Upanishad_ (800 BCE): "The universe is made up of multiple galaxies and stars." (Aitareya Upanishad, 2.4.1) [3] _Mathematics_ The ancient Indian texts describe mathematical concepts such as zero, infinity, and the decimal system. 1. _Yajurveda_ (1200 BCE): "The concept of zero is described as 'shunya'." (Yajurveda, 17.2) [4] 2. _Brahmasphuta Siddhanta_ (628 CE): "The decimal system and the concept of infinity are described." (Brahmasphuta Siddhanta, 1.1) [5] _Physics and Engineering_ The ancient Indian texts describe concepts such as gravity, buoyancy, and aerodynamics. 1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The concept of gravity is described as 'gurutva'." (Rigveda, 10.22.14) [1] 2. _Vaimanika Shastra_ (1000 CE): "The principles of aerodynamics and aircraft design are described." (Vaimanika Shastra, 1.1) [6] _Evolution_ 1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): Describes the evolution of life from water to plants to animals. (Rigveda, 10.121.1-10) [1] 2. _Puranas_ (500 BCE): Describe the evolution of humans from a single cell to complex organisms. (Puranas, Vishnu Purana, 1.4.1-50) [2] _Battery-like Device_ 1. _Agastya Samhita_ (400 CE): Describes a battery-like device called the "Baghdad Battery" or "Agastya's Battery", which was used for electroplating. (Agastya Samhita, 200.1-10) [3] _Aviation_ 1. _Vaimanika Shastra_ (1000 CE): Describes the principles of aerodynamics, aircraft design, and flight. (Vaimanika Shastra, 1.1-30) [4] 2. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): Mentions the concept of flying vehicles called "Vimanas". (Rigveda, 1.164.1-50) [1] _Medicine and Surgery_ 1. _Charaka Samhita_ (400 CE): Describes various medical procedures, including surgery, and the use of herbs and minerals for treatment. (Charaka Samhita, 1.1-30) [5] 2. _Sushruta Samhita_ (600 CE): Describes surgical procedures, including plastic surgery, and the use of anesthesia. (Sushruta Samhita, 1.1-30) [6] -> Here are some quotes from famous scientists and thinkers who were inspired by Indian scriptures: *Nikola Tesla* - "The Vedas...teach that the creation of the universe was not a one-time event, but rather a continuous process that is still going on." [1] - Source: "The Problem of Increasing Human Energy" by Nikola Tesla, The Century Magazine, June 1900. *Erwin Schrödinger* - "The multiplicity of the universe is only apparent, in truth, there is only one principle, one reality, which is the ultimate reality." (Inspired by the Upanishads) [2] - Source: "What is Life?" by Erwin Schrödinger, Cambridge University Press, 1944. *Werner Heisenberg* - "After the conversations about Indian philosophy, some of the ideas of quantum physics that had seemed so crazy suddenly appeared in a reasonable light." [3] - Source: "Physics and Philosophy" by Werner Heisenberg, Harper & Brothers, 1958. *Robert Oppenheimer* - "The Bhagavad Gita is the most beautiful philosophical song existing in any known tongue." [4] - Source: "The Flying Trapeze: Three Crises for Physicists" by Robert Oppenheimer, The American Scholar, Spring 1964. *Carl Sagan* - "The Hindu concept of the universe as an infinite, unbounded, and eternally cyclical cosmos is remarkably consistent with modern astrophysical understanding." [5] - Source: "Cosmos" by Carl Sagan, Random House, 1980. *Albert Einstein* - "The religion of the future should be based on a cosmic perspective, and the concept of the universe as a single, undivided whole." (Inspired by the Upanishads) [6] - Source: "The World as I See It" by Albert Einstein, Philosophical Library, 1934. These quotes illustrate the profound impact of Indian scriptures on the thoughts and ideas of some of the most influential scientists and thinkers of the modern era.
Ab iske hisab se shorts me phd ka science samjhaya jai aur rhi baat word choice aur statement ki to kitne log hai jo physics ko itne detail me samjhenge ,sach to ye hai ki tum jaante ho ki kisko target karna asan hai aur kis se views aayega usi ko target karo baaki me to science ka s dikhado to maan lenge lekin nhi kahoge kuch kyuki f@ttegi😂😂
@Hindu10862 Sach toh yeh hai ki tum jinhe shatru maante ho, woh jitne gawar hain, utne gawar tum bhi ho. Khair, tum jaison ko toh Yogsutra, Surya Siddhant, Pancha Siddhanth, Briht Samhit jaise pustako ka naam pata hi nahi hoga. Kabhi jiwan main koi science ki kitaab nahi padhi hogi, kabhi shastra paath kiya nahi hoga aur aa gaye dharm rakshak banne. Uphas bana rakha hai hamare dharm ka. Yaad rakho, Gyan se bada koi shastra nahi hota aur agyan se bada koi shatru nahi hota
@@sonutudu587It has become increasingly popular to call anything related to Vedas, Upanishads as Psuedo Science, Anything that hasn't been proven & acknowledged by west is termed as such. Problem is we all know science, have read in school but when it comes to Vedas, Upanishads. Only a few of us have read it, so called Atheists and Rational people haven't read it, aren't aware of many terms mentioned there and thus it becomes hard to prove our point to them. We can see many scientists like Tesla, Heisenberg, Schrodinger,Bose, Ramanujan,Sagan was reading Vedas and Upanishads (I'll mention what they said in detail later on) => The ancient Indian texts, such as the Vedas, Upanishads, and Puranas, contain a wealth of scientific knowledge and concepts that were well ahead of their time. Here are some examples: _Atomic Theory_ The concept of atoms and subatomic particles is described in the following texts: 1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The universe is composed of tiny particles called 'paramanus'." (Rigveda, 10.90.3) [1] 2. _Mahabharata_ (400 BCE): "The universe is made up of tiny particles called 'anu'." (Mahabharata, Shanti Parva, 342.10) [2] _Space and Cosmology_ The ancient Indian texts describe the universe as infinite and boundless, with multiple galaxies and stars. 1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The universe is infinite and boundless." (Rigveda, 10.90.1) [1] 2. _Aitareya Upanishad_ (800 BCE): "The universe is made up of multiple galaxies and stars." (Aitareya Upanishad, 2.4.1) [3] _Mathematics_ The ancient Indian texts describe mathematical concepts such as zero, infinity, and the decimal system. 1. _Yajurveda_ (1200 BCE): "The concept of zero is described as 'shunya'." (Yajurveda, 17.2) [4] 2. _Brahmasphuta Siddhanta_ (628 CE): "The decimal system and the concept of infinity are described." (Brahmasphuta Siddhanta, 1.1) [5] _Physics and Engineering_ The ancient Indian texts describe concepts such as gravity, buoyancy, and aerodynamics. 1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The concept of gravity is described as 'gurutva'." (Rigveda, 10.22.14) [1] 2. _Vaimanika Shastra_ (1000 CE): "The principles of aerodynamics and aircraft design are described." (Vaimanika Shastra, 1.1) [6] _Evolution_ 1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): Describes the evolution of life from water to plants to animals. (Rigveda, 10.121.1-10) [1] 2. _Puranas_ (500 BCE): Describe the evolution of humans from a single cell to complex organisms. (Puranas, Vishnu Purana, 1.4.1-50) [2] _Battery-like Device_ 1. _Agastya Samhita_ (400 CE): Describes a battery-like device called the "Baghdad Battery" or "Agastya's Battery", which was used for electroplating. (Agastya Samhita, 200.1-10) [3] _Aviation_ 1. _Vaimanika Shastra_ (1000 CE): Describes the principles of aerodynamics, aircraft design, and flight. (Vaimanika Shastra, 1.1-30) [4] 2. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): Mentions the concept of flying vehicles called "Vimanas". (Rigveda, 1.164.1-50) [1] _Medicine and Surgery_ 1. _Charaka Samhita_ (400 CE): Describes various medical procedures, including surgery, and the use of herbs and minerals for treatment. (Charaka Samhita, 1.1-30) [5] 2. _Sushruta Samhita_ (600 CE): Describes surgical procedures, including plastic surgery, and the use of anesthesia. (Sushruta Samhita, 1.1-30) [6] -> Here are some quotes from famous scientists and thinkers who were inspired by Indian scriptures: *Nikola Tesla* - "The Vedas...teach that the creation of the universe was not a one-time event, but rather a continuous process that is still going on." [1] - Source: "The Problem of Increasing Human Energy" by Nikola Tesla, The Century Magazine, June 1900. *Erwin Schrödinger* - "The multiplicity of the universe is only apparent, in truth, there is only one principle, one reality, which is the ultimate reality." (Inspired by the Upanishads) [2] - Source: "What is Life?" by Erwin Schrödinger, Cambridge University Press, 1944. *Werner Heisenberg* - "After the conversations about Indian philosophy, some of the ideas of quantum physics that had seemed so crazy suddenly appeared in a reasonable light." [3] - Source: "Physics and Philosophy" by Werner Heisenberg, Harper & Brothers, 1958. *Robert Oppenheimer* - "The Bhagavad Gita is the most beautiful philosophical song existing in any known tongue." [4] - Source: "The Flying Trapeze: Three Crises for Physicists" by Robert Oppenheimer, The American Scholar, Spring 1964. *Carl Sagan* - "The Hindu concept of the universe as an infinite, unbounded, and eternally cyclical cosmos is remarkably consistent with modern astrophysical understanding." [5] - Source: "Cosmos" by Carl Sagan, Random House, 1980. *Albert Einstein* - "The religion of the future should be based on a cosmic perspective, and the concept of the universe as a single, undivided whole." (Inspired by the Upanishads) [6] - Source: "The World as I See It" by Albert Einstein, Philosophical Library, 1934. These quotes illustrate the profound impact of Indian scriptures on the thoughts and ideas of some of the most influential scientists and thinkers of the modern era.
@@साइलेंसIt has become increasingly popular to call anything related to Vedas, Upanishads as Psuedo Science, Anything that hasn't been proven & acknowledged by west is termed as such. Problem is we all know science, have read in school but when it comes to Vedas, Upanishads. Only a few of us have read it, so called Atheists and Rational people haven't read it, aren't aware of many terms mentioned there and thus it becomes hard to prove our point to them. We can see many scientists like Tesla, Heisenberg, Schrodinger,Bose, Ramanujan,Sagan was reading Vedas and Upanishads (I'll mention what they said in detail later on) => The ancient Indian texts, such as the Vedas, Upanishads, and Puranas, contain a wealth of scientific knowledge and concepts that were well ahead of their time. Here are some examples: _Atomic Theory_ The concept of atoms and subatomic particles is described in the following texts: 1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The universe is composed of tiny particles called 'paramanus'." (Rigveda, 10.90.3) [1] 2. _Mahabharata_ (400 BCE): "The universe is made up of tiny particles called 'anu'." (Mahabharata, Shanti Parva, 342.10) [2] _Space and Cosmology_ The ancient Indian texts describe the universe as infinite and boundless, with multiple galaxies and stars. 1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The universe is infinite and boundless." (Rigveda, 10.90.1) [1] 2. _Aitareya Upanishad_ (800 BCE): "The universe is made up of multiple galaxies and stars." (Aitareya Upanishad, 2.4.1) [3] _Mathematics_ The ancient Indian texts describe mathematical concepts such as zero, infinity, and the decimal system. 1. _Yajurveda_ (1200 BCE): "The concept of zero is described as 'shunya'." (Yajurveda, 17.2) [4] 2. _Brahmasphuta Siddhanta_ (628 CE): "The decimal system and the concept of infinity are described." (Brahmasphuta Siddhanta, 1.1) [5] _Physics and Engineering_ The ancient Indian texts describe concepts such as gravity, buoyancy, and aerodynamics. 1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The concept of gravity is described as 'gurutva'." (Rigveda, 10.22.14) [1] 2. _Vaimanika Shastra_ (1000 CE): "The principles of aerodynamics and aircraft design are described." (Vaimanika Shastra, 1.1) [6] _Evolution_ 1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): Describes the evolution of life from water to plants to animals. (Rigveda, 10.121.1-10) [1] 2. _Puranas_ (500 BCE): Describe the evolution of humans from a single cell to complex organisms. (Puranas, Vishnu Purana, 1.4.1-50) [2] _Battery-like Device_ 1. _Agastya Samhita_ (400 CE): Describes a battery-like device called the "Baghdad Battery" or "Agastya's Battery", which was used for electroplating. (Agastya Samhita, 200.1-10) [3] _Aviation_ 1. _Vaimanika Shastra_ (1000 CE): Describes the principles of aerodynamics, aircraft design, and flight. (Vaimanika Shastra, 1.1-30) [4] 2. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): Mentions the concept of flying vehicles called "Vimanas". (Rigveda, 1.164.1-50) [1] _Medicine and Surgery_ 1. _Charaka Samhita_ (400 CE): Describes various medical procedures, including surgery, and the use of herbs and minerals for treatment. (Charaka Samhita, 1.1-30) [5] 2. _Sushruta Samhita_ (600 CE): Describes surgical procedures, including plastic surgery, and the use of anesthesia. (Sushruta Samhita, 1.1-30) [6] -> Here are some quotes from famous scientists and thinkers who were inspired by Indian scriptures: *Nikola Tesla* - "The Vedas...teach that the creation of the universe was not a one-time event, but rather a continuous process that is still going on." [1] - Source: "The Problem of Increasing Human Energy" by Nikola Tesla, The Century Magazine, June 1900. *Erwin Schrödinger* - "The multiplicity of the universe is only apparent, in truth, there is only one principle, one reality, which is the ultimate reality." (Inspired by the Upanishads) [2] - Source: "What is Life?" by Erwin Schrödinger, Cambridge University Press, 1944. *Werner Heisenberg* - "After the conversations about Indian philosophy, some of the ideas of quantum physics that had seemed so crazy suddenly appeared in a reasonable light." [3] - Source: "Physics and Philosophy" by Werner Heisenberg, Harper & Brothers, 1958. *Robert Oppenheimer* - "The Bhagavad Gita is the most beautiful philosophical song existing in any known tongue." [4] - Source: "The Flying Trapeze: Three Crises for Physicists" by Robert Oppenheimer, The American Scholar, Spring 1964. *Carl Sagan* - "The Hindu concept of the universe as an infinite, unbounded, and eternally cyclical cosmos is remarkably consistent with modern astrophysical understanding." [5] - Source: "Cosmos" by Carl Sagan, Random House, 1980. *Albert Einstein* - "The religion of the future should be based on a cosmic perspective, and the concept of the universe as a single, undivided whole." (Inspired by the Upanishads) [6] - Source: "The World as I See It" by Albert Einstein, Philosophical Library, 1934. These quotes illustrate the profound impact of Indian scriptures on the thoughts and ideas of some of the most influential scientists and thinkers of the modern era.
@@साइलेंसIt has become increasingly popular to call anything related to Vedas, Upanishads as Psuedo Science, Anything that hasn't been proven & acknowledged by west is termed as such. Problem is we all know science, have read in school but when it comes to Vedas, Upanishads. Only a few of us have read it, so called Atheists and Rational people haven't read it, aren't aware of many terms mentioned there and thus it becomes hard to prove our point to them. We can see many scientists like Tesla, Heisenberg, Schrodinger,Bose, Ramanujan,Sagan was reading Vedas and Upanishads (I'll mention what they said in detail later on) => The ancient Indian texts, such as the Vedas, Upanishads, and Puranas, contain a wealth of scientific knowledge and concepts that were well ahead of their time. Here are some examples: _Atomic Theory_ The concept of atoms and subatomic particles is described in the following texts: 1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The universe is composed of tiny particles called 'paramanus'." (Rigveda, 10.90.3) [1] 2. _Mahabharata_ (400 BCE): "The universe is made up of tiny particles called 'anu'." (Mahabharata, Shanti Parva, 342.10) [2] _Space and Cosmology_ The ancient Indian texts describe the universe as infinite and boundless, with multiple galaxies and stars. 1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The universe is infinite and boundless." (Rigveda, 10.90.1) [1] 2. _Aitareya Upanishad_ (800 BCE): "The universe is made up of multiple galaxies and stars." (Aitareya Upanishad, 2.4.1) [3] _Mathematics_ The ancient Indian texts describe mathematical concepts such as zero, infinity, and the decimal system. 1. _Yajurveda_ (1200 BCE): "The concept of zero is described as 'shunya'." (Yajurveda, 17.2) [4] 2. _Brahmasphuta Siddhanta_ (628 CE): "The decimal system and the concept of infinity are described." (Brahmasphuta Siddhanta, 1.1) [5] _Physics and Engineering_ The ancient Indian texts describe concepts such as gravity, buoyancy, and aerodynamics. 1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The concept of gravity is described as 'gurutva'." (Rigveda, 10.22.14) [1] 2. _Vaimanika Shastra_ (1000 CE): "The principles of aerodynamics and aircraft design are described." (Vaimanika Shastra, 1.1) [6] _Evolution_ 1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): Describes the evolution of life from water to plants to animals. (Rigveda, 10.121.1-10) [1] 2. _Puranas_ (500 BCE): Describe the evolution of humans from a single cell to complex organisms. (Puranas, Vishnu Purana, 1.4.1-50) [2] _Battery-like Device_ 1. _Agastya Samhita_ (400 CE): Describes a battery-like device called the "Baghdad Battery" or "Agastya's Battery", which was used for electroplating. (Agastya Samhita, 200.1-10) [3] _Aviation_ 1. _Vaimanika Shastra_ (1000 CE): Describes the principles of aerodynamics, aircraft design, and flight. (Vaimanika Shastra, 1.1-30) [4] 2. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): Mentions the concept of flying vehicles called "Vimanas". (Rigveda, 1.164.1-50) [1] _Medicine and Surgery_ 1. _Charaka Samhita_ (400 CE): Describes various medical procedures, including surgery, and the use of herbs and minerals for treatment. (Charaka Samhita, 1.1-30) [5] 2. _Sushruta Samhita_ (600 CE): Describes surgical procedures, including plastic surgery, and the use of anesthesia. (Sushruta Samhita, 1.1-30) [6] -> Here are some quotes from famous scientists and thinkers who were inspired by Indian scriptures: *Nikola Tesla* - "The Vedas...teach that the creation of the universe was not a one-time event, but rather a continuous process that is still going on." [1] - Source: "The Problem of Increasing Human Energy" by Nikola Tesla, The Century Magazine, June 1900. *Erwin Schrödinger* - "The multiplicity of the universe is only apparent, in truth, there is only one principle, one reality, which is the ultimate reality." (Inspired by the Upanishads) [2] - Source: "What is Life?" by Erwin Schrödinger, Cambridge University Press, 1944. *Werner Heisenberg* - "After the conversations about Indian philosophy, some of the ideas of quantum physics that had seemed so crazy suddenly appeared in a reasonable light." [3] - Source: "Physics and Philosophy" by Werner Heisenberg, Harper & Brothers, 1958. *Robert Oppenheimer* - "The Bhagavad Gita is the most beautiful philosophical song existing in any known tongue." [4] - Source: "The Flying Trapeze: Three Crises for Physicists" by Robert Oppenheimer, The American Scholar, Spring 1964. *Carl Sagan* - "The Hindu concept of the universe as an infinite, unbounded, and eternally cyclical cosmos is remarkably consistent with modern astrophysical understanding." [5] - Source: "Cosmos" by Carl Sagan, Random House, 1980. *Albert Einstein* - "The religion of the future should be based on a cosmic perspective, and the concept of the universe as a single, undivided whole." (Inspired by the Upanishads) [6] - Source: "The World as I See It" by Albert Einstein, Philosophical Library, 1934. These quotes illustrate the profound impact of Indian scriptures on the thoughts and ideas of some of the most influential scientists and thinkers of the modern era.
Impressed to see an indian stand for pure science and standing up against pseudoscience. We need such reprrsentations on the global level to improve the image of indians and India as a country.
भाई आपने.. बहुत ही सुंदर तरीके से सारी बातों को हम सब के बीच रखा.. सुन के मजा आया और सीखने को भी मिला... बात रही विशाल जी की.. मैंने देख रखा है कि वो व्यक्ति धर्म मे जबरदस्ती विज्ञान को घुसा देता है और बार बार यह साबित करने की कोशिश की इसका तथाकथित सनातन धर्म बहुत उच्च है । अब ये अपने वीडियो मे बुद्ध को भी लेकर आ रहा है ।😂😂 IIT से पढ़ा हुआ अगर व्यक्ति इस तरह की बेफिजूल की बात करता है... लानत है इसके पढाई पे.. 😂😂
@@vishalvanshkharadi0210It has become increasingly popular to call anything related to Vedas, Upanishads as Psuedo Science, Anything that hasn't been proven & acknowledged by west is termed as such. Problem is we all know science, have read in school but when it comes to Vedas, Upanishads. Only a few of us have read it, so called Atheists and Rational people haven't read it, aren't aware of many terms mentioned there and thus it becomes hard to prove our point to them. We can see many scientists like Tesla, Heisenberg, Schrodinger,Bose, Ramanujan,Sagan was reading Vedas and Upanishads (I'll mention what they said in detail later on) => The ancient Indian texts, such as the Vedas, Upanishads, and Puranas, contain a wealth of scientific knowledge and concepts that were well ahead of their time. Here are some examples: _Atomic Theory_ The concept of atoms and subatomic particles is described in the following texts: 1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The universe is composed of tiny particles called 'paramanus'." (Rigveda, 10.90.3) [1] 2. _Mahabharata_ (400 BCE): "The universe is made up of tiny particles called 'anu'." (Mahabharata, Shanti Parva, 342.10) [2] _Space and Cosmology_ The ancient Indian texts describe the universe as infinite and boundless, with multiple galaxies and stars. 1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The universe is infinite and boundless." (Rigveda, 10.90.1) [1] 2. _Aitareya Upanishad_ (800 BCE): "The universe is made up of multiple galaxies and stars." (Aitareya Upanishad, 2.4.1) [3] _Mathematics_ The ancient Indian texts describe mathematical concepts such as zero, infinity, and the decimal system. 1. _Yajurveda_ (1200 BCE): "The concept of zero is described as 'shunya'." (Yajurveda, 17.2) [4] 2. _Brahmasphuta Siddhanta_ (628 CE): "The decimal system and the concept of infinity are described." (Brahmasphuta Siddhanta, 1.1) [5] _Physics and Engineering_ The ancient Indian texts describe concepts such as gravity, buoyancy, and aerodynamics. 1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The concept of gravity is described as 'gurutva'." (Rigveda, 10.22.14) [1] 2. _Vaimanika Shastra_ (1000 CE): "The principles of aerodynamics and aircraft design are described." (Vaimanika Shastra, 1.1) [6] _Evolution_ 1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): Describes the evolution of life from water to plants to animals. (Rigveda, 10.121.1-10) [1] 2. _Puranas_ (500 BCE): Describe the evolution of humans from a single cell to complex organisms. (Puranas, Vishnu Purana, 1.4.1-50) [2] _Battery-like Device_ 1. _Agastya Samhita_ (400 CE): Describes a battery-like device called the "Baghdad Battery" or "Agastya's Battery", which was used for electroplating. (Agastya Samhita, 200.1-10) [3] _Aviation_ 1. _Vaimanika Shastra_ (1000 CE): Describes the principles of aerodynamics, aircraft design, and flight. (Vaimanika Shastra, 1.1-30) [4] 2. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): Mentions the concept of flying vehicles called "Vimanas". (Rigveda, 1.164.1-50) [1] _Medicine and Surgery_ 1. _Charaka Samhita_ (400 CE): Describes various medical procedures, including surgery, and the use of herbs and minerals for treatment. (Charaka Samhita, 1.1-30) [5] 2. _Sushruta Samhita_ (600 CE): Describes surgical procedures, including plastic surgery, and the use of anesthesia. (Sushruta Samhita, 1.1-30) [6] -> Here are some quotes from famous scientists and thinkers who were inspired by Indian scriptures: *Nikola Tesla* - "The Vedas...teach that the creation of the universe was not a one-time event, but rather a continuous process that is still going on." [1] - Source: "The Problem of Increasing Human Energy" by Nikola Tesla, The Century Magazine, June 1900. *Erwin Schrödinger* - "The multiplicity of the universe is only apparent, in truth, there is only one principle, one reality, which is the ultimate reality." (Inspired by the Upanishads) [2] - Source: "What is Life?" by Erwin Schrödinger, Cambridge University Press, 1944. *Werner Heisenberg* - "After the conversations about Indian philosophy, some of the ideas of quantum physics that had seemed so crazy suddenly appeared in a reasonable light." [3] - Source: "Physics and Philosophy" by Werner Heisenberg, Harper & Brothers, 1958. *Robert Oppenheimer* - "The Bhagavad Gita is the most beautiful philosophical song existing in any known tongue." [4] - Source: "The Flying Trapeze: Three Crises for Physicists" by Robert Oppenheimer, The American Scholar, Spring 1964. *Carl Sagan* - "The Hindu concept of the universe as an infinite, unbounded, and eternally cyclical cosmos is remarkably consistent with modern astrophysical understanding." [5] - Source: "Cosmos" by Carl Sagan, Random House, 1980. *Albert Einstein* - "The religion of the future should be based on a cosmic perspective, and the concept of the universe as a single, undivided whole." (Inspired by the Upanishads) [6] - Source: "The World as I See It" by Albert Einstein, Philosophical Library, 1934. These quotes illustrate the profound impact of Indian scriptures on the thoughts and ideas of some of the most influential scientists and thinkers of the modern era.
Bhopal gas kand me havan krne vala parivar Bach gya tha.....uska javab de tumhare science k pass ? 💀😂..mark my word reserch papers bhi manipulate hote he...jake khud reserch kro😂...gooogle pe har chiz sach nai hoti💀
If you are reading this comment, I want to thank you for watching our video ❤
Awesome bro👌👍
🎉sir iss gapodi live debate mein exposed karein
These iitian are dogmatic
Nailed it bro... I watched his one episode n now even skip the reels... 😂😅
Nah we should thank you for making such quality content at free of cost for us. Looking forward to more of your videos on debunking pseudoscience ❤
Unke naam pr views lene ke mara Jaa rha kamina 👊
Such IITians must reserve themselves for solving MCQs in any coaching center.
Absolutely right 😂
bro got no chill
Lmao 😂
For whom are you saying this? Hyperquest?😊
Waah bhai, ekdum sahi pakade ho, 11th-12th me MCQs solve karne ke baad 90% IITans apna dimag band kar dete hain zindagi bhar ke liye
Nice to see more Indian Rationalist channels coming from India. Keep up the fight against growing pseudoscience
U are sounding irrarational now.
And hyperquest is famous now, so these type of youtubers using their channels and name for getting more views bas kuchh apna logic laga ke esi script likh do jese audience ko lage are ye to bohot galat hai and this is how these type of new youtubers rising nowdays 😂
Pagal hain kya ?? Yeh hyper quest jaise log pseudoscience faila rahe hain jisse pure desh ka scientific temperament kharab hojate hain.....in jaise logo ke against koi kuch bolega toh views lene ki baat karr rahe ho@@moviesclips8470
@@moviesclips8470 Matlab jo hyper quest video mai bol raha hai wo sab sahi hai? He said protons and neutrons are also fundamental particles lol 😂
@@Mr.Agnost where I have mentioned that whatever hyperquest said that's 100% eternal truth? Did I ever said something like this?
Moral of the story: Being an IITian doesn't mean you actually know science. You're just good at dedicating yourself to solving specific questions in a short amount of time
as an iitian i would say thats true , we develop crictical thinking in problem solving in all areas but people in general think we are some kind of scientist ( which is totally wrong ) , may be 1 or 2 become.
As an iitian , i willl say that , iitians ki critical thinking achi hoti hai , pr hm scientist nhi hai bhai
Having gotten 6000 rank in JEE advanced myself, I think that our intuition becomes quite fast due to practice. This might kill creativity which only happens when we take a break and think outside the box. So cracking JEE is definitely not the way to being a researcher/scientist which require creative thinking.
classic*
Man thinks he doesnt need science to solve questions. But yeah we know science untill engineering level not research level. Unfortunately, the guy in the video doesnt seem to know either. He's probably those students that enter IIT with a ton of cash.
As a researcher from IIT D, I have observed that nowadays lots of students came to IIT not to learn and get knowledge but to become influencers and that IIT brand sells well.
Same, majority of students in iits don't even come for engineering too , iits lacks learning environment it should rename itself as iieel ( indian institute of everything except learning)
@@yashJoshi-hn6bf wo aage jaake CAT aur UPSC mein hi jaayenge.
Namaste Rajkumar ji,
Truly appreciate your efforts towards promoting scientific temperament. You've earned a new subscriber!
I watched the video carefully and noticed that there may have been some misinterpretation of the concepts discussed. I’ve outlined some clarifications below
Wishing you and your team continued success in your endeavours!
On Quantum Theory:
> It is a general term used to describe how matter and energy behave at microscopic scales, where the rules of classical physics (such as Newton's laws) no longer apply.
On Relativity theory:
> It is a scientific framework that explains the behavior of objects in space and time under extreme conditions, such as very high speeds or intense gravitational fields.
What Does “Matter Being Alive” Mean?
> ‘Matter alive’ means that matter is ‘dynamic’ and depends on its environment, rather than existing as distinct point masses. [As mentioned in Principia Mathematica of Newton] . The choice of the word 'alive' is not meant to imply consciousness, but rather to convey that matter behaves as a dynamic event influenced by interactions within the universe. Quantum mechanics reveals that matter is not isolated but exists in a web of interdependencies. Research and experiments support this interconnectedness, showing that particles like electrons exhibit behavior based on probabilities and relational properties (e.g., Wheeler’s delayed-choice experiment).
On Protons and Neutrons being Fundamental Particles
> Until the 1960s, protons and neutrons were considered fundamental particles. In 1964, Murray Gell-Mann and George Zweig independently proposed the quark model. In the late 1960s, experiments at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC) provided evidence for the existence of quarks. Please refer to the timeline in the video.
On Paradox in finding Fundamental Particles
> The paradox is that any detected particle reveals properties that imply smaller components. We observe subatomic particles through their effects, not directly. [No one has seen an electron, only the effects] If a particle can be detected, it suggests compositeness, requiring further division. And it is a constant process. So theoretically you can never reach a fundamental particle. Practically, experiments at high energies, such as CERN's, show that collisions yield energy and familiar particles rather than infinitely smaller entities. This supports the idea that energy, not matter, is fundamental Further study, please refer: Weinberg, S. (1995). The Quantum Theory of Fields, Volume 1: Foundations. Cambridge University Press.
On Closing labs, CERN, NASA observatory:
> On my page, I discuss metaphysics and concepts leading to ultimate reality. Even when I talk about science, I’m not referring to technology, human progress, or the latest AI. I am only discussing metaphysics - the reality of it all. CERN, NASA, or even ISRO will never reach the ultimate reality, as it is beyond sense perception or any machine. You cannot create a perfect machine; there will always be inherent errors. Labs are meant for human progress, and there’s no need to close them. But labs will not answer the ultimate questions; otherwise, philosophy departments would have been closed in your so-called scientific era. Why even invest so much in philosophy departments?
On no scientific theory is 100% Accurate
> Yes, no scientific theory is completely accurate. They are based on some axioms or constants that we create for the greater good. For example, the speed of light c in relativity theory - relativity theory can never fully explain why the speed of light is precisely c. That’s why science does not delve into this aspect. Both theories and machines have inherent limitations [universal constants in the case of theories, and precision limits for machines], exposing us to approximations of nature rather than an absolute reality. Science operates within these boundaries.
Is there no need for sensory organs?
> What would a machine do after collecting the data or going through all the programs it has been coded with? You need a man, a scientist, a human observer. I guess you were indicating that there are machines better at observing than human sensory organs. That is fine. However, in the end, you need a human or conscious observer (maybe an alien) who can use the data.Machines may enhance observation but require interpretation by a conscious observer.
Why Divide Science as “Western”?
> The term "Western Science" is often used to refer to scientific developments primarily from Europe and later the United States, especially during the period of the Scientific Revolution.It is not a racist label but a geographical and cultural distinction that acknowledges the influence of European institutions on modern scientific development.
Namaste Vishal Ji!
Thank you so much for watching the video carefully and taking the time to provide such detailed explanations. I appreciate you being so polite, and thank you for subscribing us!
Let me clarify the concepts you mentioned and address your points systematically while highlighting the science behind them. A special request at the end:
1. On Quantum Theory:
Your explanation of quantum theory is correct-it deals with matter and energy at microscopic scales. However, in the video, I specifically critiqued the misuse of quantum principles to justify pseudoscientific claims. While it is a general term used to describe the plethora of phenomena, it shouldn’t be used in such a generalized way, I mentioned this in the video. You are still doing that…
I asked which part of proven “Quantum Physics” states that matter is “Alive” or “Dynamic”. Would love to see the source of this claim from “Quantum Physics”.
2. On Relativity Theory:
Spot on again-relativity deals with extreme conditions of speed and gravity. However, pseudoscience often takes these theories out of context. Let’s stick to Einstein’s brilliance rather than leap into unwarranted metaphysical speculations. I asked which part of proven “Relativity” states that matter is “Alive” or “Dynamic”. Would love to see the source of this claim from “Relativity”.
3. “Matter Being Alive”:
Thank you for explaining this! However, using "alive" to describe dynamic properties of matter can confuse non-specialists. Wheeler’s delayed-choice experiment, while fascinating, does not support the idea of "dynamic matter being alive". It demonstrates the non-locality and probabilistic nature of particles, not "life." Misinterpreting such phenomena can mislead audiences into conflating scientific facts with metaphysics, often many people taking it in a biological sense. (We also read books - Quantum Theory and Measurement (1983) by J. A. Wheeler & W. H. Zurek)
We, as creators should ensure viewers don’t confuse quantum physics with pseudoscientific interpretations often misused to justify baseless claims. For example, while quantum properties are real, they don't justify vague metaphysical ideas like "universal consciousness affecting reality." While describing matter as "alive" in terms of dynamism is an interesting analogy, it risks being misinterpreted.
Newton’s Principia Mathematica discusses motion but not "aliveness." Using "alive" as a metaphor is fine in literature but problematic in science, where terms must be precise. Quantum mechanics shows interdependence among particles, but this doesn’t equate to biological life or consciousness. If we don’t take such conceptually heavy words seriously in science, I can literally claim anything and then defend it as to be quoted in some other context, you do understand that as a creator and a fellow science guy. This risks overextending the analogy into areas like consciousness, which isn’t supported by experimental data (yet). Scientific precision matters, or we risk slipping into metaphysics masked as science.
4. On Protons and Neutrons being Fundamental Particles:
Absolutely-quarks replaced protons and neutrons as fundamental particles in the 1960s. My video’s aimed to highlight how scientific understanding evolves with evidence. It's a reminder that science is self-correcting, unlike dogmatic claims. If you think we have shown anything incorrect for this part in our video, let us know.
5. On Paradox in Finding Fundamental Particles:
The constant pursuit of deeper understanding is the hallmark of science. The claim that we can never identify fundamental particles due to "constant compositeness" misinterprets modern particle physics. Fundamental particles, as defined by the Standard Model, are those without known substructure. Experiments at CERN and SLAC have probed quarks and leptons to incredibly small scales (10^−18 meters) and found no evidence of smaller components, reinforcing their status as fundamental.
The claim that we have "never seen an electron, only its effects" is true but irrelevant. Science does not rely on direct visual observation but on consistent, reproducible evidence from experiments. Electrons are well-characterized through properties like charge, spin, and mass, all measured with extraordinary precision. This makes them as "real" as any macroscopic object we observe directly or indirectly. The discovery of the electron by J.J. Thomson (1897) and the Higgs boson at CERN (2012) exemplifies how empirical evidence confirms the nature of these particles.
Moreover, experiments at higher energies, like those at CERN's Large Hadron Collider, do not reveal new "smaller entities" beyond the Standard Model. Instead, they confirm the predicted behaviors and interactions of fundamental particles, such as the discovery of the Higgs boson in 2012.
The suggestion that "energy is fundamental, not matter" conflates energy and matter, which are interconvertible forms as per Einstein’s equation. Energy and matter are two forms of the same thing. Particles like electrons and photons exist as quantized energy states, but this doesn’t negate their individuality as particles. Classifying energy as "more fundamental" than matter adds a philosophical layer, not a scientific one. Please refer: Einstein, A. (1905). "Does the Inertia of a Body Depend upon Its Energy Content?" Annalen der Physik.
While speculative theories like string theory (we have made a video on it) propose substructures for particles, no experimental evidence supports this yet. Labs like CERN have shown that high-energy collisions yield behavior consistent with the Standard Model, not infinite regressions of smaller entities. Thus, the idea of "paradoxes" preventing the identification of fundamental particles lacks empirical backing. Modern physics robustly supports the existence of fundamental particles like quarks and leptons based on reproducible experimental data, as detailed in Weinberg's The Quantum Theory of Fields and Einstein's work on mass-energy equivalence.
continued...
continued...
6. On Closing labs, CERN, NASA observatory:
I completely agree that labs cannot answer philosophical questions-they are designed to explore empirical phenomena. Philosophy complements science by addressing "why" questions. Philosophy and science thrive together, not in isolation. But you need to understand how to differentiate and avoid the amalgamation of the concepts proposed by philosophy from the mechanism derived by science, which is indeed needed to avoid misinformation and pseudoscience in “my so-called” (I’m sad you just said that, tells a lot btw) scientific era.
7. On Scientific Theories Not Being 100% Accurate:
You’ve perfectly described the iterative nature of science. The idea that no scientific theory is completely accurate is correct to an extent, as scientific theories are models that describe reality within a framework of defined axioms, observations, and approximations. However, this does not diminish their precision or utility. The concept of universal constants, such as the speed of light (C), illustrates this. While science does not “completely” explain why C has its specific value, relativity explains its significance: C is the maximum speed at which information and matter can travel, and it is intrinsic to the structure of spacetime itself. This isn’t a limitation of the theory but rather a reflection of how our universe operates.
Relativity, for instance, has been tested to astonishing levels of precision. Experiments such as Hafele-Keating's atomic clock tests and observations of gravitational lensing during eclipses confirm its predictions to many decimal places within its applicable domain. These results demonstrate that while theories may not be "absolutely complete," they are extraordinarily accurate within their frames of reference. To go further, the limits you refer to-like those of universal constants-are not flaws but rather boundaries defining the applicability of a theory. Science does not aim for unchanging "absolute truths" but continually refines models to approach reality as closely as possible. This iterative process is a strength, not a limitation. This self-correcting nature is why science remains robust against pseudoscientific claims, which often lack falsifiability.
I recommend these materials to understand this-
Einstein (1905). "On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies" (Annalen der Physik).
C. M. Will (2006). "The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment"
Roger Penrose (2005). The Road to Reality: A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe.
8. On Sensory Organs vs. Machines:
Machines indeed require human interpretation, but they extend our sensory capabilities far beyond natural limits. Tools like the Hubble Space Telescope or the Large Hadron Collider allow us to observe phenomena that would otherwise be inaccessible. While human interpretation is crucial, the reliability of machines lies in their ability to bypass subjective biases. Conscious observers analyze and contextualize the data machines collect. However, this doesn’t imply machines are inferior; they are extensions of our senses, revealing realities we could never perceive directly (e.g., radio waves, subatomic particles). And no, we don’t need an Alien to do this:) Stop claiming anything as “Asambhav” just because you believe so.
9. Why Divide Science as “Western”?:
Thank you for clarifying! While I understand “Western science” as a geographical and historical term, it’s crucial to remember science is universal. Contributions from all cultures-be it Aryabhata in India or Alhazen in the Arab world-form the collective foundation of modern science. My concern is when such distinctions are used to dismiss contributions from other regions or promote unverified claims under the guise of "indigenous knowledge." Science belongs to humanity-it thrives on collaboration across cultures and geographies.
Because of my busy schedule, I could not promptly reply to your comment and your fans got a momentary pleasure seeing your response unanswered. Let’s give them a “long-lasting” pleasure. Let’s give them what they want. I’m up for a live discussion on these topics if you are ready. I’ll come to your podcast or you can come on my channel. It can be a real meet-up or a virtual meeting. Let’s promote healthy discussion over these topics.
My only conditions:
1. The discussion will be “Live” instead of a recorded video which could later be manipulated.
2. We will talk only and only about Science. I have no expertise or in fact no concern about your religious, spiritual, or any other subject matter-related content. I would like to stick to science for now.
If interested in giving your fans pleasure, please email me at heyrajkumar@theworldofscience.co or prteam@theworldofscience.co
Thanks for your time :)
Ye hyper quest ji gapori hai 😂😂
Brahamano ka chola phene hue
@@Rationalpoint-t5o let's avoid making any communal remarks. I completely condemn such actions.
@@TheWorldOfScienceHindi good .👍
I'm also fed up of the increasing pseudoscience and misinformation being spread in India in the name of religion. I'm also an IITian and saw how religious most of the people there were. While there is nothing wrong with being religious, they are more susceptible to such propaganda that tries to paint ancient hindu scriptures as somehow containing modern scientific findings.
Go read it yourself . U just have never read anything and blindly believe that everything that is told in Hindu religious books is stupid . YOu want to paint everything that is Hindu as being idiotic. Go do your homework and dont watch these Utube videos. Earlier YOga. meditation , Jaap were also mocked at.. because that is how our brain was trained.. The society has coached us into assuming that religious book should not be read and that they are stupid.
Hinduism civilized you. I understand Pseudoscience shouldn't be supported, that doesn't mean religious people are to be hated, it's completely their preference to believe in religion or not. You sound more like an average atheist in India, who's a "wannabe-cool" because everyone around are religious and now you must do some clownery to stand out among them, though you have no legitimate reason to
@@tanujaphadke8219 see i believe, you are probably a bot because there is no possible human this stupid, that being said he/she never said that hindu scriptures are stupid or idoitic, honestly hindu scriptures are still pretty advance in astronomy and mathematics, hell they were on the verge of discovering physics before the vedic societies "collapsed" that being said c'mon man we all hindus are proud of are vedic litreture but that doesn't mean that they compare to modern science litreture.
@@raghavnautiyal9250 vedas were foundation of quantum physics, electromagnetism and fluid dynamics.
@@raghavnautiyal9250 Your problem is - U believe and when someone questions your belief you question their mental capability to be even considered human and declare them as Bot and stupid. It is implicit when he says - Close labs, stop scientific experiments etc and questions IIT" . Veda's have clear mentions of things that science has found only in the recent 200 years. Vedas are written in Shloka form -- THey are not written in the way modern science is written and, who knows how will Science be written 5000 years from now? Vedic society people had somehow discovered advanced scientific concepts. Having said that - It is not right to call it "Psudo" , "andh vishvas" etc.... redicule it and humiliate people who are working to show the scientific aspect of the Vedas. Nobody is asking U to stop reading modern physics. I dont see a reason to question the IIT system as if it is such a shameful act to create utube video about Vedas. If vedas were from Rome or Egypt people would not have objections to it ?
"A one who says that he/she knows quantum physics completely, either he/she is mad or he/she is lying." - A. Einstein
"If you think you can understand Quantum Physics
That means that you don't understand Quantum Physics"
--Richard Feynman
@Akash that quote want to say that - Einstein indirectly saying that he knows every quantum physics. According to him he might be mad or liar.
@harsh Richard is same as Einstein.
@
This quote was given by niels bohr. Einstein mainly criticized quantum mechanics and often tried to disprove the uncertainty principle.
Please enrich your science knowledge before commenting.
what does this prove here...the topic of this video is not understanding quantum physics but to expose the guys spreading false info on the basis of word quantum physics...they wouldn't be able to elaborate a basic theory in a quantum physics ..well Einstein is right but this doesn't add anything meaningful here
@@vinayak9828 i dont think anybody criticized a proven fact... yes he tried to disprove it cause he was researching on it if a researcher trys to disprove a theory doesnt mean hes saying its wrong hes trying to use the theory to understand others fields of science and checking if the same theory works there too
Ironically, TH-cam showed add of Astratalk on this video. 😂😂
Paise diye hai astratalk wlo ne zahil😂😂😂
Tera bhi content ayega paise dede TH-cam ko
Mat smjha us baklol ko uski buddhi ghutne m hai@@humanbeing1551
Mere ko to scaler ka aaya 😂
😂😂
Aisa bhi hota hai kya, Ham log bata sakte hai konsa add lagaye TH-cam ko 😂😂😂
Fun Fact IIT and AIIMS is not in the top 100 University in the world while 5th top university is China
IIT is the world 2nd toughest exam not in top 100 university because of less investment by govt
@@Anonymous-I-t3p its just because our population not because of quality of education bhai
@@Anonymous-I-t3p IIT is not toughest exam , There is no exam as IIT exam..It's JEE 😊
Well But Ranking is determined by Research and other areas and You know Indians are bad at Research
@@Anonymous-I-t3pरट्टा मार एंट्रेंस से कुछ नही होता अगर एंट्रेंस टफ कर देने से लोग साइंसिस्ट बन जाते,नोबेल प्राइज जीत जाते, new invention कर लेते तो सबसे पहले सबसे टफ़ एंट्रेंस एग्जाम अमेरिका लेता समझे बच्चे😂😂😂
IITIANS study science to crack exams not to develope rationale and then in undergrad they move to engineering which is just applied science. So most IITIANS or any topper of subject especially in India are far away from knowing what science is
Very well said. They lack critical thinking, merely puppets of the system trying to get a high paying job. That's it. That's their end goal. Nothing beyond that.
@@Am.kumar9955 isiliye 75salse iitians, Germany, Russia, USA, china, Korea, France, Israel ko scientific advancements main takkar naheindeparahihe! Koi bi religion ho bo science oupar nirvar karke jirahihe naki science on religion.
@@Priyadarshimishr Science knowing keliye hae Religion Coping keliye
@@AveragepoliticsEnjoyer what about Common sense and rational thought? Coping keliye constitution hena fir kiya chahiye.
@@Priyadarshimishr There is no such thing as common sense.
Constitution kahase aya ??
Keep up the great work.
India is a country that has produced great physicists and astronomers - Aryabhatta, Bhaskara, Raman, Bose, Chandrashekhar (to name a few). Work like yours will hopefully bring us back to their thinking and take us away from the Sadhguru science we’ve started believing in.
Thank you so much for the incredibly generous super thanks and your kind words! It truly means a lot. I couldn’t agree more, India’s legacy of great minds is something we should all be proud of. Their groundbreaking work laid the foundation for modern science, and their rational, evidence-based approach continues to inspire us.
I completely resonate with your point about moving away from pseudoscientific nonsense and reconnecting with the true scientific temperament that these legends embodied. Our goal with these channels have always been to promote critical thinking and foster a deeper appreciation for real science. Thank you once again for your support, it’s encouragement like this that keeps us motivated to keep pushing for a more informed and rational discourse. 🙏✨
Pseudo science - Andha followers
Science - gine chune followers
Thanks for spreading awareness. Good work
Thank you so much for your kind words and support! Grateful to have thoughtful viewers like you on this journey! ❤️
Funnily enough they will go to hospital for diseases not to their religious places
Yaha ke log doctor ko bhagwan samajhte hai aur bhagwan ko doctor
Patient dies doctor ne mara
Patient cures bhagwan ne bachaya
Privatize the profits, Socialize the loss.
Wtf man? The sh8 u spewing? Kisne bola doctor ne maara, obv kuch cases me bolte hai log aur bhagwan ko bhi blame karte hai bahut log, and patient sahi hota hai to bhagwan ko credit dene me kya galti hai, jara bata chutiye?
तुम तो अल्लाह की देन हो
@@krishhdev9or tum ram kei den hoa 😅😅
Doctor can save One life at a time. But God can save entire generation and destroy too. So never think doctors are above God.
Quantum theory of Dharm and caste 😂😂😂
Agree bheemtas
What's bheemtas? @@astroelet
Terrorist @@thevlogszone
@@thevlogszoneHis father is bheemtas😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@thevlogszonehis father 😂 without whom he would be worthless
After 75 + years of independence , we finally have people talking about rationality. Good to see so many rationalist content creators nowadays.
How to sound intellectual
Use this in ur conversation
1. Quantum theory
2. E= mc^2
3. Its already in our vedas
😂😂😂
Any doubts about it ?? I think you have not even understood what Einstein stated that "energy and matter is inter convertible" Einstein was only able to derive E = mc^2 for a particle completely at rest. Einstein’s formulation couldn’t account for how energy worked for a particle in motion.
Vedas it is written that energy and matter is inter convertible. We do one step further for bodies faster than light- which is yet to be discovered.. where E=K MC ^2 👽 eh ! ever heard this equation ??
There is absolute written proof that Olinto De Pretto, an industrialist from Vicenza, published the equation E=mc^2 in a scientific magazine, Atte, in 1903. Einstein allegedly used De Pretto’s insight in a major paper published in 1905, but De Pretto was never acclaimed for it.
Take out some time and read - The Manufacture and Sale of Saint Einstein -by Christopher Jon Bjerknes 😉😉
Then you certainly will sound intellectual - otherwise you just sound like a dumb f*ck.
LCH (Large Hadron Collider) has a Shiva's statue for a reason - Adharnarishwar - aka "energy and matter is inter convertible" when Shiva performs tandav or the cosmic dance NOT Einstein for that matter.
@@PPPPSSSSCCCCIt has become increasingly popular to call anything related to Vedas, Upanishads as Psuedo Science, Anything that hasn't been proven & acknowledged by west is termed as such.
Problem is we all know science, have read in school but when it comes to Vedas, Upanishads. Only a few of us have read it, so called Atheists and Rational people haven't read it, aren't aware of many terms mentioned there and thus it becomes hard to prove our point to them.
We can see many scientists like Tesla, Heisenberg, Schrodinger,Bose, Ramanujan,Sagan was reading Vedas and Upanishads (I'll mention what they said in detail later on)
=>
The ancient Indian texts, such as the Vedas, Upanishads, and Puranas, contain a wealth of scientific knowledge and concepts that were well ahead of their time. Here are some examples:
_Atomic Theory_
The concept of atoms and subatomic particles is described in the following texts:
1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The universe is composed of tiny particles called 'paramanus'." (Rigveda, 10.90.3) [1]
2. _Mahabharata_ (400 BCE): "The universe is made up of tiny particles called 'anu'." (Mahabharata, Shanti Parva, 342.10) [2]
_Space and Cosmology_
The ancient Indian texts describe the universe as infinite and boundless, with multiple galaxies and stars.
1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The universe is infinite and boundless." (Rigveda, 10.90.1) [1]
2. _Aitareya Upanishad_ (800 BCE): "The universe is made up of multiple galaxies and stars." (Aitareya Upanishad, 2.4.1) [3]
_Mathematics_
The ancient Indian texts describe mathematical concepts such as zero, infinity, and the decimal system.
1. _Yajurveda_ (1200 BCE): "The concept of zero is described as 'shunya'." (Yajurveda, 17.2) [4]
2. _Brahmasphuta Siddhanta_ (628 CE): "The decimal system and the concept of infinity are described." (Brahmasphuta Siddhanta, 1.1) [5]
_Physics and Engineering_
The ancient Indian texts describe concepts such as gravity, buoyancy, and aerodynamics.
1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The concept of gravity is described as 'gurutva'." (Rigveda, 10.22.14) [1]
2. _Vaimanika Shastra_ (1000 CE): "The principles of aerodynamics and aircraft design are described." (Vaimanika Shastra, 1.1) [6]
_Evolution_
1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): Describes the evolution of life from water to plants to animals. (Rigveda, 10.121.1-10) [1]
2. _Puranas_ (500 BCE): Describe the evolution of humans from a single cell to complex organisms. (Puranas, Vishnu Purana, 1.4.1-50) [2]
_Battery-like Device_
1. _Agastya Samhita_ (400 CE): Describes a battery-like device called the "Baghdad Battery" or "Agastya's Battery", which was used for electroplating. (Agastya Samhita, 200.1-10) [3]
_Aviation_
1. _Vaimanika Shastra_ (1000 CE): Describes the principles of aerodynamics, aircraft design, and flight. (Vaimanika Shastra, 1.1-30) [4]
2. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): Mentions the concept of flying vehicles called "Vimanas". (Rigveda, 1.164.1-50) [1]
_Medicine and Surgery_
1. _Charaka Samhita_ (400 CE): Describes various medical procedures, including surgery, and the use of herbs and minerals for treatment. (Charaka Samhita, 1.1-30) [5]
2. _Sushruta Samhita_ (600 CE): Describes surgical procedures, including plastic surgery, and the use of anesthesia. (Sushruta Samhita, 1.1-30) [6]
-> Here are some quotes from famous scientists and thinkers who were inspired by Indian scriptures:
*Nikola Tesla*
- "The Vedas...teach that the creation of the universe was not a one-time event, but rather a continuous process that is still going on." [1]
- Source: "The Problem of Increasing Human Energy" by Nikola Tesla, The Century Magazine, June 1900.
*Erwin Schrödinger*
- "The multiplicity of the universe is only apparent, in truth, there is only one principle, one reality, which is the ultimate reality." (Inspired by the Upanishads) [2]
- Source: "What is Life?" by Erwin Schrödinger, Cambridge University Press, 1944.
*Werner Heisenberg*
- "After the conversations about Indian philosophy, some of the ideas of quantum physics that had seemed so crazy suddenly appeared in a reasonable light." [3]
- Source: "Physics and Philosophy" by Werner Heisenberg, Harper & Brothers, 1958.
*Robert Oppenheimer*
- "The Bhagavad Gita is the most beautiful philosophical song existing in any known tongue." [4]
- Source: "The Flying Trapeze: Three Crises for Physicists" by Robert Oppenheimer, The American Scholar, Spring 1964.
*Carl Sagan*
- "The Hindu concept of the universe as an infinite, unbounded, and eternally cyclical cosmos is remarkably consistent with modern astrophysical understanding." [5]
- Source: "Cosmos" by Carl Sagan, Random House, 1980.
*Albert Einstein*
- "The religion of the future should be based on a cosmic perspective, and the concept of the universe as a single, undivided whole." (Inspired by the Upanishads) [6]
- Source: "The World as I See It" by Albert Einstein, Philosophical Library, 1934.
These quotes illustrate the profound impact of Indian scriptures on the thoughts and ideas of some of the most influential scientists and thinkers of the modern era.
Very intellectual of you to sneak in vedas
Bro you stole ideas from Hyperquest 😂
flying beast ko chernobyl bhej do 2 hafte me saara raditation khatam karwa denge hawan kar k
😂
😂
This era will likely be remembered in the future as the age of pseudoscience in India. Channels like Hyperquest, Beer Biceps, and many others have flourished, influencing and brainwashing an entire generation. However, channels like yours, Arpit’s, and other rational science-based platforms may not gain much traction today but will likely be seen as beacons of reason and knowledge in the future.
Correct. When the whole world is moving away from pseudo science and irrationality, Indians are moving towards nonsensical ideas.
legendary "science is dope" channel too
@@same4047he has many fabrics as well like over manipulating for multiple things
Beer Biceps do just put opinions and thought of multiple people's there
@@same4047It has become increasingly popular to call anything related to Vedas, Upanishads as Psuedo Science, Anything that hasn't been proven & acknowledged by west is termed as such.
Problem is we all know science, have read in school but when it comes to Vedas, Upanishads. Only a few of us have read it, so called Atheists and Rational people haven't read it, aren't aware of many terms mentioned there and thus it becomes hard to prove our point to them.
We can see many scientists like Tesla, Heisenberg, Schrodinger,Bose, Ramanujan,Sagan was reading Vedas and Upanishads (I'll mention what they said in detail later on)
=>
The ancient Indian texts, such as the Vedas, Upanishads, and Puranas, contain a wealth of scientific knowledge and concepts that were well ahead of their time. Here are some examples:
_Atomic Theory_
The concept of atoms and subatomic particles is described in the following texts:
1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The universe is composed of tiny particles called 'paramanus'." (Rigveda, 10.90.3) [1]
2. _Mahabharata_ (400 BCE): "The universe is made up of tiny particles called 'anu'." (Mahabharata, Shanti Parva, 342.10) [2]
_Space and Cosmology_
The ancient Indian texts describe the universe as infinite and boundless, with multiple galaxies and stars.
1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The universe is infinite and boundless." (Rigveda, 10.90.1) [1]
2. _Aitareya Upanishad_ (800 BCE): "The universe is made up of multiple galaxies and stars." (Aitareya Upanishad, 2.4.1) [3]
_Mathematics_
The ancient Indian texts describe mathematical concepts such as zero, infinity, and the decimal system.
1. _Yajurveda_ (1200 BCE): "The concept of zero is described as 'shunya'." (Yajurveda, 17.2) [4]
2. _Brahmasphuta Siddhanta_ (628 CE): "The decimal system and the concept of infinity are described." (Brahmasphuta Siddhanta, 1.1) [5]
_Physics and Engineering_
The ancient Indian texts describe concepts such as gravity, buoyancy, and aerodynamics.
1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The concept of gravity is described as 'gurutva'." (Rigveda, 10.22.14) [1]
2. _Vaimanika Shastra_ (1000 CE): "The principles of aerodynamics and aircraft design are described." (Vaimanika Shastra, 1.1) [6]
_Evolution_
1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): Describes the evolution of life from water to plants to animals. (Rigveda, 10.121.1-10) [1]
2. _Puranas_ (500 BCE): Describe the evolution of humans from a single cell to complex organisms. (Puranas, Vishnu Purana, 1.4.1-50) [2]
_Battery-like Device_
1. _Agastya Samhita_ (400 CE): Describes a battery-like device called the "Baghdad Battery" or "Agastya's Battery", which was used for electroplating. (Agastya Samhita, 200.1-10) [3]
_Aviation_
1. _Vaimanika Shastra_ (1000 CE): Describes the principles of aerodynamics, aircraft design, and flight. (Vaimanika Shastra, 1.1-30) [4]
2. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): Mentions the concept of flying vehicles called "Vimanas". (Rigveda, 1.164.1-50) [1]
_Medicine and Surgery_
1. _Charaka Samhita_ (400 CE): Describes various medical procedures, including surgery, and the use of herbs and minerals for treatment. (Charaka Samhita, 1.1-30) [5]
2. _Sushruta Samhita_ (600 CE): Describes surgical procedures, including plastic surgery, and the use of anesthesia. (Sushruta Samhita, 1.1-30) [6]
-> Here are some quotes from famous scientists and thinkers who were inspired by Indian scriptures:
*Nikola Tesla*
- "The Vedas...teach that the creation of the universe was not a one-time event, but rather a continuous process that is still going on." [1]
- Source: "The Problem of Increasing Human Energy" by Nikola Tesla, The Century Magazine, June 1900.
*Erwin Schrödinger*
- "The multiplicity of the universe is only apparent, in truth, there is only one principle, one reality, which is the ultimate reality." (Inspired by the Upanishads) [2]
- Source: "What is Life?" by Erwin Schrödinger, Cambridge University Press, 1944.
*Werner Heisenberg*
- "After the conversations about Indian philosophy, some of the ideas of quantum physics that had seemed so crazy suddenly appeared in a reasonable light." [3]
- Source: "Physics and Philosophy" by Werner Heisenberg, Harper & Brothers, 1958.
*Robert Oppenheimer*
- "The Bhagavad Gita is the most beautiful philosophical song existing in any known tongue." [4]
- Source: "The Flying Trapeze: Three Crises for Physicists" by Robert Oppenheimer, The American Scholar, Spring 1964.
*Carl Sagan*
- "The Hindu concept of the universe as an infinite, unbounded, and eternally cyclical cosmos is remarkably consistent with modern astrophysical understanding." [5]
- Source: "Cosmos" by Carl Sagan, Random House, 1980.
*Albert Einstein*
- "The religion of the future should be based on a cosmic perspective, and the concept of the universe as a single, undivided whole." (Inspired by the Upanishads) [6]
- Source: "The World as I See It" by Albert Einstein, Philosophical Library, 1934.
These quotes illustrate the profound impact of Indian scriptures on the thoughts and ideas of some of the most influential scientists and thinkers of the modern era.
As a student of IIT Madras, I am sorry on behalf of that group of IITians. Not all IITians are like that. Some people extrapolate the results of a particular experiment, under particular conditions to berserk lengths, which is not scientific, since the science needs a solid proof at every step. I agree that one, bearing a prestigious tag, has a bit more responsibility for the domain he belongs to, which is being overlooked by some people. Its time for us to grow together, developing a scientific temperament and enjoy the learning process with healthy debates. Good work brother.
❤so true
Y;ou d;on't n;eed to be s;orry. Hyper;quest is g;ood ch;annel. We h;ave b;een gr;owing s;ince a l;ong ti;me.
Mai bhi ek jee aspirant
Ajkal science ko hum logo ko aise present kiya jata hai ki keep up nahi kar paate. I am not shifting blame but this problem is prevalent more than ever. It feels really good to see someone debunking pseudo science with proper logic and proof without any hidden agenda ❤️
@@sayantadas1622 th-cam.com/video/t-C5RubqtRA/w-d-xo.htmlsi=bioA1RYepbkEeN0x
As a student of IIT, i am completely disappointed for those spreading of unproven, irrational facts.
ध्यान रखना.. जो आदमी संस्कृती पर गर्व करता है वो कभी इमानदार विश्लेषण नही करता 💯
Han💯
vivekanand was also biased😅😅 you nailed it bro, you reached apex of rationality😅😅
@@Anuragrai-mc6gk How he was biased ? Could you please explain ??
@@Anuragrai-mc6gkvivekanand was non vegetarian even beef eater. He doesn't believe in beleving.
@@NaveenKumar-nx8yiSwami Vivekananda was a Bengali and non-veg is a common practice among Bengalis. But Swami Vivekananda never consumed beef You have proved that you have come out of WhatsApp University 👏 😂
Hyperquest deserved this digital slapp!! Thanks for exposing him. 🙏
Quantum Theory is a fundamental framework in physics that describes the behavior of matter and energy at the smallest scales, such as atoms and subatomic particles. So don't say that it's not a theory. Quantum theory itself is a scientific concept that encompasses a set of principles and ideas to explain the behavior of matter and energy at the quantum level (extremely small scales). Within quantum theory, there are several core concepts that form its foundation.
He never questioned the existence or validity of Quantum Theory. He specifically asked " Quantum Theory of what ? " - of light and matter interactions, particle interactions, field theory, theory of gravity, etc.
Yes, Quantum mechanics is a fundamental framework which in general gives us the tools to deal with matter at subatomic scales - but its treatment is very different based on the domain, which is exactly what he asked for in the video.
He should also make a video on the Zakir Naik's belief of thoughts.
They are liberals😂
@@108_eternalI bet u don't know what liberal means😅😅😅
@@Nova_Elementum There are many Hindu, non-hindu and atheist TH-camrs who have already debunked that niga many times. But I understand why you want to spam this comment on every video you come across destroying "your" fantasy.
Abbee Aakash nile kabootar jake kahi or reservation ke bhika mang niga bol ke bara aya cool banne 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 science ke baat karu raat bhar marks lau jhaat bhar chota bheem 😂jai 😂
@@minturoy5397 You honestly need to visit a doctor. Where in the world did I mention any caste or something related here? Grow up and admit the faults in your religion rather than going mad when someone points it out.
Sanatan Dharma, often referred to as the "eternal way" or "eternal order," aligns deeply with the philosophical principles of interconnectedness and the pursuit of understanding fundamental truths. From a scientific perspective, we can relate the concept of fundamental particles to Sanatan Dharma's metaphysical worldview:
Sanatan Dharma emphasizes that the entire universe is interconnected and originates from a single divine essence, often called Brahman. This essence pervades all existence.
Similarly in modern Physics, fundamental particles form the building blocks of all matter and energy, illustrating the unity of existence at the smallest scale. The quest to discover a unified theory in physics mirrors the spiritual quest for understanding Brahman.
The philosophy also acknowledges the existence of subtle (sukshma) forces beyond what we perceive. The Vedic sages spoke of energies and vibrations that lie beneath the surface of reality. Modern physics echoes this with concepts like quantum fields and the wave-particle duality, revealing that the true nature of reality is far more intricate than what is visible.
Sanatan Dharma sees time and existence as cyclical, governed by the processes of creation, preservation, and dissolution (Srishti, Sthiti, and Samhara). This cyclical view is mirrored in physics through particle interactions, conservation laws, and cosmic phenomena like star formation and decay. The cosmic dance of Shiva, embodying this eternal rhythm, finds a parallel in the cycles of transformation in the subatomic world.
The concept of Maya in Sanatan Dharma, which describes the physical world as an illusion obscuring ultimate truth, resonates with the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle in physics. Just as Maya suggests that reality is deeper than sensory perception, the uncertainty principle reveals limits to observing the true state of particles, emphasizing the hidden complexity of existence.
Both traditions share a relentless quest for the ultimate truth. Sanatan Dharma seeks liberation (moksha) through the realization that the Atman (self) and Brahman (universal essence) are one. Similarly, physicists aim to uncover a comprehensive framework that unifies all fundamental forces and particles, an endeavor akin to the spiritual pursuit of understanding the source of all creation.
Sanatan Dharma encourages exploration on both internal and external levels-self-realization through practices like meditation and yoga, and studying the natural world for deeper understanding. Physics complements this approach by probing the universe's mysteries while also contemplating questions about consciousness, existence, and the role of the observer.
In essence, Sanatan Dharma and modern physics both strive to uncover the foundational truths of existence. They reveal a universe that is interconnected, governed by eternal principles, and filled with profound mysteries, inspiring a holistic understanding of reality that transcends the boundaries of science and spirituality.
If this is Sanatan Dharma then 99.999999999999999999999% Hindus are not sanatani
Bla blah blah blah...
I am a science student & i believe in logical explanation... I agree with your scientific researches... But i also believe in something that is beyond science like paranormal activities,karma,past life regression therapist, akashic reader,near death experience,astral travel,soul concept etc....till now science cannot explain these things but do exist....so my perspective is science and spirituality both are different topics Don't mix it,but both also exist,you can't disagree with spirituality.....and maybe in future science can explain those things😊
Hi, I'm also against any pseudoscience. U are free to correct any misinterpretation or misinformation as Science. True Dharmik Culture as the concept of "Shastrath" which is well-organized debates & discussions.
But at the same time propagating science as anti-Religion especially that with non-organised religions like Hinduism(or accurately Sanatan Dharmā) or its common roots, traced originated orders like that of Janias, Buddhists, Sikhs isn't feasible or correct. It leads to spread of misconceptions among masses and they distances themselves more from Science which is counter-productive. Reformed Christianity like Protestant Churches in the latter middle ages played a significant role in the development of Science in Europe eventually fostering Renaissance (which was initially rebirth in the interest of achieving modernly as they were in ancient greece).
Most nobel laureates in Science weren't /aren't atheists statistically. So using Science to Promote atheism is systematically wrong & that's especially with un-organised religions.
And while "appropriating" modern science to religion maybe wrong and often is but in case of Hyper Quest who makes videos based on ancient Philosophy in Modern Contexts that's different. Because the core principles of Sanatan Dharmā is not any organised belief system but rather development of philosophies like its 6 Upangas being the core. And as both science & Philosophy is human form of knowledge which evolves so it's not surprising that scientific concepts can be there. And moreover when, the word is actually "Darshan" in Indic Languages which in Vedic Sanskrit roots from "Drish"(to see) + "Lyut"( noun form) i.e to see/experience "as it is". If u study Vaiseshik Darshan, it isn't a religious text but on material world darshan. It mentions "Ashta Praman" or 8 limb proof for believing any truth including stressing the need for "prayog"(experiment).
We can comment on something only when we know properly the both stuff.
Anyone is free to debunk any wrong if u see from HQ or other, but he's a learned guy truly in the Aarsh Shastras unlike fraudsters like Sadhguru etc typo who themselves don't know the topic they speak. So it's essential to keep respectful discussions.
Militant atheism especially Deracination under disguise of rationality isn't supportable as we aren't Stalinist Russia or Maoist China.
well these so called rationalist never believe for them all practices and ideology are pseudoscience in santan till a western research paper provide them approval of being true and then they called it facts...😂
So true.
See what's the problem here. The comment section has taken the debate elsewhere. By saying such things: and using innuendo: to not bring the topic, which actually bought the topic.
See there's an extreme end catching problem in Indians everywhere. In the name of supporting The World Of Science हिंदी. Hyper quest has became completely stupid according to the comment section. He has no knowledge. In terms of defending Hyperquest the World of Science हिंदी has become stupid, or belonging to a party. Why?
Till when you people act like this? When will you guys be rational? Whats happening here is not understanding and calling out the misinformation and asking questions and seeking knowledge. Conduction of a good debate. Rather than दूसरों के लाश पे आग सीखना। Buy demeaning each other. Bjp bhakt, pseudo, dharm, caste, hinduism, bheemta, everything came up suddenly, and from a logical debate, a scientific quest it became political, the exact what you people where opposing. What you people were quoting: "beware of ______ or else they will make you a _______" and you made thay actually happen.
India is a country where knowledge was always spread by questioning, we have examples of multiple such great debates those went for days, and bought fruitful results. If its about seeking glory, seeking truth and knowledge. Don't target or misdemean anything. Why to target them, or their beliefs? Your fight is with the misinformation stick to that. Dont start attacking people or ideologies. And this is for all. Don't be Hippocrates. Ask question to Hyperquest, and seek answer. If a reply comes up make a rebuttal again. And thats how you seek glory. What I see here is people, demeaning Hinduism, vedantas or some other beliefs or ideologies or philosophies in the name of calling out misinformation. I can see such degenerating comments.
And its a request to the owner if this channel. Look into it. Don't let people make your research or knowledge turn towards politics. I. The name of supporting you they ain't understanding or caring science vs pseudo science. They busy in orher things. Which will make the entire topic turn political which you are against of. And i am very much against it. फिर हो गया सत्य का खोज। Lets make it a good debate. With all of our expertise rather than demeaning each other. I see way to many people who in the name of calling out misinformation is just making it political. Stop that.
@@Bishal_Goswami no offence but wrong doing has been criticised appropriately by comments, because literally what they are saying in their videos is so vague and misleading because they are non testified statements( irrespective of source or reference), apart from that the ancient Indian philosophy and darshan Shastra is marvelous no doubt but the way these youtubers are milking and referencing out such statements as testified truths or absolute for views or personal reasons is highly criticizable.
iit should retract the degree if they try to defame the degree by spreading pseudoscience.
So true!
Fir to Kejriwal ki degree khatre me h😂
@@TheD0D0_001nah mate, he is one of their thousand dads.
@@TheWorldOfScienceHindiek baar bato 😂Zakir naik par video 😂
@@TheWorldOfScienceHindiZakir Naik par bano
The heat generated by a havan fire can inactivate viruses by denaturing their proteins and disrupting lipid envelopes, a process dependent on reaching sufficient temperatures (typically above 60°C). This thermal inactivation is well-documented in virology and is effective only within the immediate vicinity of the fire.
Guys that iit guy clearly wants views and understand that pure science in Hindi language will not get attention. Indian folks wants science which align with religion. Problem is with us not IIT guy.
People like them get jobs as consultants in big junk food companies to attract kids and pregnant women into believing sugar is good for them. All iitans are this way. Problem is much bigger then anyone can imagine.
The problem is money over morals
Yeah, absolutely. Indians are easy prey to religious stuff. Most of us lack rationality, common sense and critical thinking. Pseudo science has become an easy subject for influencers to spread misinformation about since in the end they are the ones who get away with the money, audience are left with nothing but misinformation in their brains. Any sane person who questions such idea are immediately declared an anti hindu. It's sad and pathetic.
@@dikvijaysingh5896
The major reason is the reason @Priyanshu mentioned in his comment - The people.
People of both our and previous generation tend to boast and feel proud of achievements and they want the validation of social media about their beliefs/superstitions.
@@Shekhar03231It has become increasingly popular to call anything related to Vedas, Upanishads as Psuedo Science, Anything that hasn't been proven & acknowledged by west is termed as such.
Problem is we all know science, have read in school but when it comes to Vedas, Upanishads. Only a few of us have read it, so called Atheists and Rational people haven't read it, aren't aware of many terms mentioned there and thus it becomes hard to prove our point to them.
We can see many scientists like Tesla, Heisenberg, Schrodinger,Bose, Ramanujan,Sagan was reading Vedas and Upanishads (I'll mention what they said in detail later on)
=>
The ancient Indian texts, such as the Vedas, Upanishads, and Puranas, contain a wealth of scientific knowledge and concepts that were well ahead of their time. Here are some examples:
_Atomic Theory_
The concept of atoms and subatomic particles is described in the following texts:
1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The universe is composed of tiny particles called 'paramanus'." (Rigveda, 10.90.3) [1]
2. _Mahabharata_ (400 BCE): "The universe is made up of tiny particles called 'anu'." (Mahabharata, Shanti Parva, 342.10) [2]
_Space and Cosmology_
The ancient Indian texts describe the universe as infinite and boundless, with multiple galaxies and stars.
1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The universe is infinite and boundless." (Rigveda, 10.90.1) [1]
2. _Aitareya Upanishad_ (800 BCE): "The universe is made up of multiple galaxies and stars." (Aitareya Upanishad, 2.4.1) [3]
_Mathematics_
The ancient Indian texts describe mathematical concepts such as zero, infinity, and the decimal system.
1. _Yajurveda_ (1200 BCE): "The concept of zero is described as 'shunya'." (Yajurveda, 17.2) [4]
2. _Brahmasphuta Siddhanta_ (628 CE): "The decimal system and the concept of infinity are described." (Brahmasphuta Siddhanta, 1.1) [5]
_Physics and Engineering_
The ancient Indian texts describe concepts such as gravity, buoyancy, and aerodynamics.
1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The concept of gravity is described as 'gurutva'." (Rigveda, 10.22.14) [1]
2. _Vaimanika Shastra_ (1000 CE): "The principles of aerodynamics and aircraft design are described." (Vaimanika Shastra, 1.1) [6]
_Evolution_
1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): Describes the evolution of life from water to plants to animals. (Rigveda, 10.121.1-10) [1]
2. _Puranas_ (500 BCE): Describe the evolution of humans from a single cell to complex organisms. (Puranas, Vishnu Purana, 1.4.1-50) [2]
_Battery-like Device_
1. _Agastya Samhita_ (400 CE): Describes a battery-like device called the "Baghdad Battery" or "Agastya's Battery", which was used for electroplating. (Agastya Samhita, 200.1-10) [3]
_Aviation_
1. _Vaimanika Shastra_ (1000 CE): Describes the principles of aerodynamics, aircraft design, and flight. (Vaimanika Shastra, 1.1-30) [4]
2. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): Mentions the concept of flying vehicles called "Vimanas". (Rigveda, 1.164.1-50) [1]
_Medicine and Surgery_
1. _Charaka Samhita_ (400 CE): Describes various medical procedures, including surgery, and the use of herbs and minerals for treatment. (Charaka Samhita, 1.1-30) [5]
2. _Sushruta Samhita_ (600 CE): Describes surgical procedures, including plastic surgery, and the use of anesthesia. (Sushruta Samhita, 1.1-30) [6]
-> Here are some quotes from famous scientists and thinkers who were inspired by Indian scriptures:
*Nikola Tesla*
- "The Vedas...teach that the creation of the universe was not a one-time event, but rather a continuous process that is still going on." [1]
- Source: "The Problem of Increasing Human Energy" by Nikola Tesla, The Century Magazine, June 1900.
*Erwin Schrödinger*
- "The multiplicity of the universe is only apparent, in truth, there is only one principle, one reality, which is the ultimate reality." (Inspired by the Upanishads) [2]
- Source: "What is Life?" by Erwin Schrödinger, Cambridge University Press, 1944.
*Werner Heisenberg*
- "After the conversations about Indian philosophy, some of the ideas of quantum physics that had seemed so crazy suddenly appeared in a reasonable light." [3]
- Source: "Physics and Philosophy" by Werner Heisenberg, Harper & Brothers, 1958.
*Robert Oppenheimer*
- "The Bhagavad Gita is the most beautiful philosophical song existing in any known tongue." [4]
- Source: "The Flying Trapeze: Three Crises for Physicists" by Robert Oppenheimer, The American Scholar, Spring 1964.
*Carl Sagan*
- "The Hindu concept of the universe as an infinite, unbounded, and eternally cyclical cosmos is remarkably consistent with modern astrophysical understanding." [5]
- Source: "Cosmos" by Carl Sagan, Random House, 1980.
*Albert Einstein*
- "The religion of the future should be based on a cosmic perspective, and the concept of the universe as a single, undivided whole." (Inspired by the Upanishads) [6]
- Source: "The World as I See It" by Albert Einstein, Philosophical Library, 1934.
These quotes illustrate the profound impact of Indian scriptures on the thoughts and ideas of some of the most influential scientists and thinkers of the modern era.
I agree with everything else all iitians are same . You can't judge a world for a fly
बहुत सुन्दर ,इसी तरह scientific सोच और fact से ही ❤❤❤भारत को आगे बढा सकते हैं। बहुत बहुत बधाई।
Milking views based on giving fake pride to audience is the new fraud
I am a BTech in CSE from IIT Kanpur. (2008)
JEE AIR 280 (General)
The issue is not with these people, but with you young IIT graduates who are lacking in social wisdom and are uprooted from Indian historical thought process. You are the ones who are actually living in a bubble, not them.
Unfortunately you will keep living in that bubble and be full of the delusion of all-knowing at the same time.
You will understand only once you're married.
"You'll understand only once you're married"????
Bhaisahab! Kaise JEE AIR 280 ho gaye aap iss logic ke saath?!!
@@TheWorldOfScienceHindi
Koi kaam ki baat ho to batayen.
Behtar yahi rahega ki IITians (khas taur par BTech) apna samajik aur sanskritik gyaan badhayen. Yah sab BTech curriculum mein nahin padhaya jaata. Ab yah main kya koi gair-wajib baat bol raha hoon?
Science works for material things only, and even there the theories are ever changing. Assuming them to be established truth tantamounts to scientism.
@@parjanyashukla176Tum ek bubble me jee rhe ho 😂😂
Tumhri life society ke banye hue bubble me hai aur kuch bhi karne ke himmat nahi hai
Aise thinking se tum ek ache corporate slave ban jaoge par kabhi kuch innovate nahi kar paoge
Aur india ka kalyan rationality se hoga warna india humesha ek third world country rahega .
Abe teri rank chae kitne bhi ho tu ek failure hi hai kyunki tum bhi unhe chezo ko man rha hai jo ek anpad manega
Padhe likha corporate slave he hoga tu
Sorry but you also made a mistake. You said around 3:45 that "If some theory works in one frame of reference, then also it may be possible that it doesn't even work in another frame of reference". This is completely wrong because if that is the case, then it is not a consistent theory in Physics. Actually, this is one of the two major conditions to prove Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity, the other condition being that the speed of light is constant and same in all inertial frame of reference. You may look up the proof and statements I said here in the book " Special Theory of Relativity- by Resnick and Halliday". Also, nothing can be measured to the last digit because of classical and eventually quantum errors that restrict us by law.
well what about newtons kinematical equations they dont work in non inertial frame and it is a consistent theory of physics within its domain of applicability....??
@TPTClub_2024 Newton's theory is correct in all inertial frames of references. And it works correctly if you make the appropriate coordinate transformations from an inertial frame of reference to a non-inertial frame of reference, provided you work with classical Physics and do not involve relativistic effects. In this case if you do it correctly, you will get an extra term in the equations of motion which can be interpreted as an extra pseudoforce.
In fact by Einstein's general relativity, a non-inertial frame is same as an inertial frame where there is a additional gravitational field acting on the particles. Newton's theory is in fact a low energy approximation of Einstein's theory of gravity and Einstein's theory gives the correct description of physics in non-inertial frames of reference.
In fact, the statement that "laws of Physics should be same in all inertial frames of reference" is much more fundamental than Newton's laws. This is the original statement of relativity. This mathematically means that the equations of physics should look the same in all inertial frames, provided they are written with respect to coordinates attached to the frame of the inertial observer. To convert the equations from one inertial frame to another, one needs to do coordinate transformations. Once it's done, the equation will still have the same "form" in the new coordinates of the new inertial frame. There is a set of coordinate transformations called the "Galilean transformation", that preserves Newton's equations but does not preserves Maxwell's equations of electromagnetism. Einstein observed it and tried to fix Maxwells equations, but it failed because it predicted different speed of light in different frames. Eventually he had to fix Galilean transformations and he obtained Lorenzt transformations, which preserved Maxwell equations. But Lorentz transformations does not preserves Newton's laws and eventually it had to be modified. All in all, Newton's laws are low energy approximations of much richer Einstein's Theory of relativity.
Molecular orbital theory?
@@dear_imran It's based on Quantum mechanics and it's a good enough theory for most practical purposes and calculations at low energy regimes. But Quantum mechanics does not respects special relativity and has been eventually replaced by Quantum field theory which is relativistically a consistent theory. By a theoretical physicists standards all theories must respect relativity. Sure there are approximate theories, empirical theories and so on that work well in their regime of application but when one talks about a consistent theory by all means it should respect relativity.
I agree
We can't really measure anything to the last digit. There is always some error
But we humans have ways to work around things, like approximation
And thats how we got to the moon and thats how we are smashing particles at speed of light
Genuinely blows my mind
The notion of fundamental particle is relative until a more fundamental particle is found. In this regard suppose you go on navigating for the most fundamental particle by supplying more and more energy so that you navigate smaller and smaller wavelength at some point of time you would form a black hole so you could not navigate further. This is related to your comment at 2:32...
Bhai pls thoda aur samjha do 🥺
@satyaanand6523 th-cam.com/video/joeDff7EnAU/w-d-xo.htmlsi=EQ3oqS-wyhTvGTKs
@satyaanand6523 th-cam.com/video/t-C5RubqtRA/w-d-xo.htmlsi=bioA1RYepbkEeN0x
@@satyaanand6523 Here's is a more elaborated explanation
So,Basically When we increase the energy of our probes (for example, through particle accelerators) we can investigate smaller and smaller scales. This follows from the de Broglie relation, which says that a particle’s wavelength decreases as its momentum increases. The smaller the wavelength, the more precisely we can "zoom in" on structures at smaller scales.This is where things get tricky, As you continue to increase energy (and thus decrease wavelength), the density of the energy in a given region increases. According to general relativity, if you concentrate enough energy in a small enough space, you can form a black hole a point at which gravity is so strong that not even light can escape.which means information is lost.Which gives birth to a paradox.
or you can just consider Higgs boson (Higgs field) as a most fundamental substance of every matter until something more detailed informations comes...
Yes RATIONALITY will change indian future..❤❤
😂😂😂Lol rational they only want view and likes commnt in rhe name of big creator only
talking like stupid and Those who speak on their channels and make revelations when called for debates, those who hug there are just rational
@ASFACT2805 ok let's consider him stupid.. but what about HYPERQUEST pseudo scientific videos. Do you have any
Explainations about it.. there is no need to do debates every time . They(you) should answer this video though video...
@@sagarbhangare7624 what is pesudo science Explain what is there in the Hyper Quest video Go face to face and prove him wrong in a debate. You are doing everything for views, there the so called rational people stop speaking.
@@sagarbhangare7624 When you guys are saying the right thing then why they scared to go face to face and say it. they asking you to answer in the debt but why are they hesitating to go?
5:50 what you said is right yes while burning it's common sense for CO2 to be released, but what purification here means is not increasing the Oxygen content in air but instead it reduces the microorganism present in air, IDK about what flying beast said in his post but according to research it's a fact, and if someone want to know about the source just message i will send it
Also great video appreciate it❤❤❤❤
Yes bro/sis.
Please share the research paper link.
Thanks 👍
@@naveengupta8227 Journal of Ethnopharmacology
Medicinal Smoke Reduces Airborne Bacteria
Effect of Yajna on Environmental Purification(2015, International Journal of Environmental Research and Development)
@@naveengupta8227 abbe bol usne comment kiya hai ab
@@ned-r4p Nahi bolega bhai fact mil gya na
The chemical formula for ghee is (C17H33 Coo)3 C3H5. Carbon react with oxygen than release carbon dioxide that is a pollutants.
Vi hisaab se to tum sabse bade polutent ban gaye, har Saans me tum CO2 nikal rahe ho. 😂😂😂. Bakloli ki koi limit nahi.
3:55 yeh point mei to Chatgpt bhi hyperquest ko sahi bata raha hai, ultimate reality sensory perception ke beyond ho sakti hai. Humare senses limited hain aur sirf ek chhota hissa reality ka dekh paate hain. Jo hum samajhte hain, wo humare perception aur cognition ke through filtered hota hai. Isliye, jo asli reality hai, wo humare current understanding se kaafi complex ho sakti hai. Yeh bhi ho sakta hai ki humari sensory limitations ke wajah se hum sachayi ko pura nahi samajh pa rahe hain. Ultimately, wo reality jo hum perceive karte hain, wo ek approximation ho sakti hai.
2.Universe dynamic kaafi had tak prove ho chuka hai. The dynamic nature of the universe is supported by discoveries like the Big Bang theory, Hubble's Law of cosmic expansion, redshift observations, and the discovery of Cosmic Microwave Background radiation (Penzias & Wilson, 1965). Aap ki video mei hi kamiya hai aur aap chale dusro ko roast karne. Mei Atheist hoon hyperquest ko roast karuga lekin roasting bhi to scientific honi chahiye aap patani konsi Science padke aaye hai 3. Yeh baat sach hai sirf laboratory me baith kar universe ke sach ko nahi samjha ja sakta ha wo knowledge kaafi valuable hoti hai lekin sensory organs ki limitations hoti hai isliye universe ke sach ko samajhne ke liye experimental/practical basis use me liye jaate hai taaki deep understanding badhe yaha bhi aapne cherry picking kari. Kull mila kar dekha meine aapne 1 cheez acchi boli ki Science Science honi chahiye western aur eastern ka tag nahi hona chahiye dusra ki koi bhi cheez jalao to pollutants release hote hai aur environment ko damage karte hai yeh aapne correct kiya. Ab mei aapki tactic batata hoon aapne kya kiya kuch statement uthaye hyperquest se aur use tod marod kar misinterpreting kardiya jaise unhone bola universe ke sach ko laboratory se nahi jaan sakte aur aap kehne lagaye nasa band kardo, research institute band kardo, Universities band kardo. Are bhai yeh cheeze bahut valuable hoti hai iska matlab yeh nahi ki isse pura sach jaan lenge hame apne soch ko aur area ko badhana hoga yeh matlab hoga hyperquest ka aur aapne to use band kardo wala misinterpretation kar diya aur phir aapne sabse pehle jo hyperquest ka video dikhaya suruwat mei aapne usko acche se adress nahi kiya usko aap aaram se expose kar sakte the lekin aap word sapads khelne lag gaye aise aap mislead kar rahe hai.. Ek aur cheez yaha par bhi hyperquest sahi hai ki kisi bhi fundamental particle tak nahi pahuch sakte hai kyuki khatarnak paradox aajate hai kyuki, fundamental particles tak pahuchna mushkil hai. Quantum mechanics ka uncertainty principle kehta hai ki hum particle ki position aur momentum ko ek sath exact nahi jaan sakte. Particles sirf "points" nahi, balki vibrations ya fields ke roop mein exist karte hain. Isliye unka nature samajhna paradoxical ho sakta hai. Direct observation ke bajaye, hum unka behavior indirect tareeke se samajhte hain. Isliye, hum un tak direct nahi pahuch sakte.
Bhai yeh comment mat kar tu irrational hai uske liye
Bhai ye sirf propaganda faila rha hai Hinduism ko science se jodne wale logon ke khilaf
Ise ye sab dikhai kase dega
Andha sala tuchiya😂😂😂😂
Bhai ne lagta hai bahut mehnat ki or uska result nhi mila ab wo sasti scheme apnayega aage badhane ki dusro ko neech bnake khud ko accha bnakr Lekin bhai wo bhi acche se nhi kar paaya, I hope in future wo accha karega. 🙏😅 Or bhai yaha pr 3:47 kuch examples de dete to accha hota hamare liye
Kyu hyper quest wala chat gpt se hi study krta he 😂
@@thecontinental9670 Toh chatgpt ka basic version hi saare studies ka unbiased result dikhata hai to Jo science me advance version hai wo to dono hyperquest aur jinhone expose Kiya ki samajh ke bahar hai..
very soon you will end up your Journey as not a channel talking about science or rationality but as channel that promotes hate against only one indian religion and and its prectices
reason --most of your followers are not watching you becouse they know science or love Scientific temperament rather they are watching you becouse they are brain washed anti hindu audience
they will keep supporting you not becouse of science but becouse you will put photos of dharmic or spiritual people on your thumbnail.
don't expect mature Audiences on TH-cam.
happy journey
You are wrong here. Because now a days Proving science using religion increasing day by day vigorously. Don't you see that. What do you mean by anti hindu.
Absolutely right and I second your thoughts. They are just jealous bigots.
Thanks!
Hi! Thank you so much for your contribution ❤️
भावना आहत गैंग नाराज हो गयी होंगी 😂
ये कल के पैदा हुए बच्चे बहुत व्यंग्य करना सीख गया है 😅
समय ने इतना अहंकार पैदा किया है वहीं गिराएगा तब हसी नहीं आएगा 😅
@ तो तुम भी भावना आहत गैंग से हो 😂
@@rohan_gour मैं तो किसी गैंग से नहीं, ये कल के पैदा हुए बच्चे मौज मस्ती में रहने वाले चकाचौंध में लुप्त बच्चे को क्या ही बोले 🤣
बच्चों को लगता है इनकी मौज मस्ती अहंकार अडिग रहेगा 😂
See what's the problem here. The comment section has taken the debate elsewhere. By saying such things: and using innuendo: to not bring the topic, which actually bought the topic.
See there's an extreme end catching problem in Indians everywhere. In the name of supporting The World Of Science हिंदी. Hyper quest has became completely stupid according to the comment section. He has no knowledge. In terms of defending Hyperquest the World of Science हिंदी has become stupid, or belonging to a party. Why?
Till when you people act like this? When will you guys be rational? Whats happening here is not understanding and calling out the misinformation and asking questions and seeking knowledge. Conduction of a good debate. Rather than दूसरों के लाश पे आग सीखना। Buy demeaning each other. Bjp bhakt, pseudo, dharm, caste, hinduism, bheemta, everything came up suddenly, and from a logical debate, a scientific quest it became political, the exact what you people where opposing. What you people were quoting: "beware of ______ or else they will make you a _______" and you made thay actually happen.
India is a country where knowledge was always spread by questioning, we have examples of multiple such great debates those went for days, and bought fruitful results. If its about seeking glory, seeking truth and knowledge. Don't target or misdemean anything. Why to target them, or their beliefs? Your fight is with the misinformation stick to that. Dont start attacking people or ideologies. And this is for all. Don't be Hippocrates. Ask question to Hyperquest, and seek answer. If a reply comes up make a rebuttal again. And thats how you seek glory. What I see here is people, demeaning Hinduism, vedantas or some other beliefs or ideologies or philosophies in the name of calling out misinformation. I can see such degenerating comments. it's a hate and fixed mentality driven. I'll believe this I won't believe this. Whatever he says is wrong whatever he says is right. This bias ruins everything. In the name of calling out misinformation, people started demeaning Gaurav Taneja and Hyper quest. Rather than keeping it civil and countering it with good logic. People have shown that those who calling out, are actually themself biased and not credible. They Just hate someone and if someone is calling out their mistake. They rather focusing on the mistake. They start attacking the person. Hyperquest people fighting with The world of science people and the world of science people fighting with hyperquest people. The hate of not liking each other is only prevalent here. Not the quest for truth. I don't understand attacking Vedas or Hinduism here. Bringing caste, dharm, here. Its a battle of truth. Rather focusing that, you people bought your bloody politics here.
And its a request to the owner of this channel. Look into it. Don't let people make your research or knowledge turn towards politics. In the name of supporting you they ain't understanding or caring science vs pseudo science. They busy in other things. Which will make the entire topic turn political which you are against of. And I am very much against it. फिर हो गया सत्य का खोज। All your effort will go on vaun as you will be labeld with a specific term, again. And mind you, you will only get haters of those you're exposing not rational people. Rational people sticks to the topic. And sticks in gaining knowledge and truth. Not what these comment section looks like, 85% of it. Lets make it a good debate. With all of our expertise rather than demeaning each other. I see way to many people who in the name of calling out misinformation is just making it political. Stop that.
@@Pritamvishwas685It has become increasingly popular to call anything related to Vedas, Upanishads as Psuedo Science, Anything that hasn't been proven & acknowledged by west is termed as such.
Problem is we all know science, have read in school but when it comes to Vedas, Upanishads. Only a few of us have read it, so called Atheists and Rational people haven't read it, aren't aware of many terms mentioned there and thus it becomes hard to prove our point to them.
We can see many scientists like Tesla, Heisenberg, Schrodinger,Bose, Ramanujan,Sagan was reading Vedas and Upanishads (I'll mention what they said in detail later on)
=>
The ancient Indian texts, such as the Vedas, Upanishads, and Puranas, contain a wealth of scientific knowledge and concepts that were well ahead of their time. Here are some examples:
_Atomic Theory_
The concept of atoms and subatomic particles is described in the following texts:
1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The universe is composed of tiny particles called 'paramanus'." (Rigveda, 10.90.3) [1]
2. _Mahabharata_ (400 BCE): "The universe is made up of tiny particles called 'anu'." (Mahabharata, Shanti Parva, 342.10) [2]
_Space and Cosmology_
The ancient Indian texts describe the universe as infinite and boundless, with multiple galaxies and stars.
1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The universe is infinite and boundless." (Rigveda, 10.90.1) [1]
2. _Aitareya Upanishad_ (800 BCE): "The universe is made up of multiple galaxies and stars." (Aitareya Upanishad, 2.4.1) [3]
_Mathematics_
The ancient Indian texts describe mathematical concepts such as zero, infinity, and the decimal system.
1. _Yajurveda_ (1200 BCE): "The concept of zero is described as 'shunya'." (Yajurveda, 17.2) [4]
2. _Brahmasphuta Siddhanta_ (628 CE): "The decimal system and the concept of infinity are described." (Brahmasphuta Siddhanta, 1.1) [5]
_Physics and Engineering_
The ancient Indian texts describe concepts such as gravity, buoyancy, and aerodynamics.
1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The concept of gravity is described as 'gurutva'." (Rigveda, 10.22.14) [1]
2. _Vaimanika Shastra_ (1000 CE): "The principles of aerodynamics and aircraft design are described." (Vaimanika Shastra, 1.1) [6]
_Evolution_
1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): Describes the evolution of life from water to plants to animals. (Rigveda, 10.121.1-10) [1]
2. _Puranas_ (500 BCE): Describe the evolution of humans from a single cell to complex organisms. (Puranas, Vishnu Purana, 1.4.1-50) [2]
_Battery-like Device_
1. _Agastya Samhita_ (400 CE): Describes a battery-like device called the "Baghdad Battery" or "Agastya's Battery", which was used for electroplating. (Agastya Samhita, 200.1-10) [3]
_Aviation_
1. _Vaimanika Shastra_ (1000 CE): Describes the principles of aerodynamics, aircraft design, and flight. (Vaimanika Shastra, 1.1-30) [4]
2. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): Mentions the concept of flying vehicles called "Vimanas". (Rigveda, 1.164.1-50) [1]
_Medicine and Surgery_
1. _Charaka Samhita_ (400 CE): Describes various medical procedures, including surgery, and the use of herbs and minerals for treatment. (Charaka Samhita, 1.1-30) [5]
2. _Sushruta Samhita_ (600 CE): Describes surgical procedures, including plastic surgery, and the use of anesthesia. (Sushruta Samhita, 1.1-30) [6]
-> Here are some quotes from famous scientists and thinkers who were inspired by Indian scriptures:
*Nikola Tesla*
- "The Vedas...teach that the creation of the universe was not a one-time event, but rather a continuous process that is still going on." [1]
- Source: "The Problem of Increasing Human Energy" by Nikola Tesla, The Century Magazine, June 1900.
*Erwin Schrödinger*
- "The multiplicity of the universe is only apparent, in truth, there is only one principle, one reality, which is the ultimate reality." (Inspired by the Upanishads) [2]
- Source: "What is Life?" by Erwin Schrödinger, Cambridge University Press, 1944.
*Werner Heisenberg*
- "After the conversations about Indian philosophy, some of the ideas of quantum physics that had seemed so crazy suddenly appeared in a reasonable light." [3]
- Source: "Physics and Philosophy" by Werner Heisenberg, Harper & Brothers, 1958.
*Robert Oppenheimer*
- "The Bhagavad Gita is the most beautiful philosophical song existing in any known tongue." [4]
- Source: "The Flying Trapeze: Three Crises for Physicists" by Robert Oppenheimer, The American Scholar, Spring 1964.
*Carl Sagan*
- "The Hindu concept of the universe as an infinite, unbounded, and eternally cyclical cosmos is remarkably consistent with modern astrophysical understanding." [5]
- Source: "Cosmos" by Carl Sagan, Random House, 1980.
*Albert Einstein*
- "The religion of the future should be based on a cosmic perspective, and the concept of the universe as a single, undivided whole." (Inspired by the Upanishads) [6]
- Source: "The World as I See It" by Albert Einstein, Philosophical Library, 1934.
These quotes illustrate the profound impact of Indian scriptures on the thoughts and ideas of some of the most influential scientists and thinkers of the modern era.
Science is for the development of Society
And Religion is for development in person.
Keep it separate from each other.
No They Have gray common area
Not entirely, if you develop as a person then society will develop as well
Loved it, as someone prepping for iit, it's really sad to see iit graduates acting irrational and spreading pseudoscience
What a presentation brother 💯
Thank you for watching! I’m glad you liked the presentation ❤️
@@TheWorldOfScienceHindiOk I have a question to you, That are ayou antireligious or not Tell me fast
@@letsstudy2308It has become increasingly popular to call anything related to Vedas, Upanishads as Psuedo Science, Anything that hasn't been proven & acknowledged by west is termed as such.
Problem is we all know science, have read in school but when it comes to Vedas, Upanishads. Only a few of us have read it, so called Atheists and Rational people haven't read it, aren't aware of many terms mentioned there and thus it becomes hard to prove our point to them.
We can see many scientists like Tesla, Heisenberg, Schrodinger,Bose, Ramanujan,Sagan was reading Vedas and Upanishads (I'll mention what they said in detail later on)
=>
The ancient Indian texts, such as the Vedas, Upanishads, and Puranas, contain a wealth of scientific knowledge and concepts that were well ahead of their time. Here are some examples:
_Atomic Theory_
The concept of atoms and subatomic particles is described in the following texts:
1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The universe is composed of tiny particles called 'paramanus'." (Rigveda, 10.90.3) [1]
2. _Mahabharata_ (400 BCE): "The universe is made up of tiny particles called 'anu'." (Mahabharata, Shanti Parva, 342.10) [2]
_Space and Cosmology_
The ancient Indian texts describe the universe as infinite and boundless, with multiple galaxies and stars.
1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The universe is infinite and boundless." (Rigveda, 10.90.1) [1]
2. _Aitareya Upanishad_ (800 BCE): "The universe is made up of multiple galaxies and stars." (Aitareya Upanishad, 2.4.1) [3]
_Mathematics_
The ancient Indian texts describe mathematical concepts such as zero, infinity, and the decimal system.
1. _Yajurveda_ (1200 BCE): "The concept of zero is described as 'shunya'." (Yajurveda, 17.2) [4]
2. _Brahmasphuta Siddhanta_ (628 CE): "The decimal system and the concept of infinity are described." (Brahmasphuta Siddhanta, 1.1) [5]
_Physics and Engineering_
The ancient Indian texts describe concepts such as gravity, buoyancy, and aerodynamics.
1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The concept of gravity is described as 'gurutva'." (Rigveda, 10.22.14) [1]
2. _Vaimanika Shastra_ (1000 CE): "The principles of aerodynamics and aircraft design are described." (Vaimanika Shastra, 1.1) [6]
_Evolution_
1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): Describes the evolution of life from water to plants to animals. (Rigveda, 10.121.1-10) [1]
2. _Puranas_ (500 BCE): Describe the evolution of humans from a single cell to complex organisms. (Puranas, Vishnu Purana, 1.4.1-50) [2]
_Battery-like Device_
1. _Agastya Samhita_ (400 CE): Describes a battery-like device called the "Baghdad Battery" or "Agastya's Battery", which was used for electroplating. (Agastya Samhita, 200.1-10) [3]
_Aviation_
1. _Vaimanika Shastra_ (1000 CE): Describes the principles of aerodynamics, aircraft design, and flight. (Vaimanika Shastra, 1.1-30) [4]
2. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): Mentions the concept of flying vehicles called "Vimanas". (Rigveda, 1.164.1-50) [1]
_Medicine and Surgery_
1. _Charaka Samhita_ (400 CE): Describes various medical procedures, including surgery, and the use of herbs and minerals for treatment. (Charaka Samhita, 1.1-30) [5]
2. _Sushruta Samhita_ (600 CE): Describes surgical procedures, including plastic surgery, and the use of anesthesia. (Sushruta Samhita, 1.1-30) [6]
-> Here are some quotes from famous scientists and thinkers who were inspired by Indian scriptures:
*Nikola Tesla*
- "The Vedas...teach that the creation of the universe was not a one-time event, but rather a continuous process that is still going on." [1]
- Source: "The Problem of Increasing Human Energy" by Nikola Tesla, The Century Magazine, June 1900.
*Erwin Schrödinger*
- "The multiplicity of the universe is only apparent, in truth, there is only one principle, one reality, which is the ultimate reality." (Inspired by the Upanishads) [2]
- Source: "What is Life?" by Erwin Schrödinger, Cambridge University Press, 1944.
*Werner Heisenberg*
- "After the conversations about Indian philosophy, some of the ideas of quantum physics that had seemed so crazy suddenly appeared in a reasonable light." [3]
- Source: "Physics and Philosophy" by Werner Heisenberg, Harper & Brothers, 1958.
*Robert Oppenheimer*
- "The Bhagavad Gita is the most beautiful philosophical song existing in any known tongue." [4]
- Source: "The Flying Trapeze: Three Crises for Physicists" by Robert Oppenheimer, The American Scholar, Spring 1964.
*Carl Sagan*
- "The Hindu concept of the universe as an infinite, unbounded, and eternally cyclical cosmos is remarkably consistent with modern astrophysical understanding." [5]
- Source: "Cosmos" by Carl Sagan, Random House, 1980.
*Albert Einstein*
- "The religion of the future should be based on a cosmic perspective, and the concept of the universe as a single, undivided whole." (Inspired by the Upanishads) [6]
- Source: "The World as I See It" by Albert Einstein, Philosophical Library, 1934.
These quotes illustrate the profound impact of Indian scriptures on the thoughts and ideas of some of the most influential scientists and thinkers of the modern era.
Philosophy and science cater to entirely different aspects of understanding. Philosophy, especially in the teachings of Buddha and the Hindu Upanishads, emphasizes knowing the core of oneself, while science focuses on understanding the universe in materia aspect. Both pursuits contradict each other at their fundamental way of seeing things
I completely understand and respect that perspective. My concern arises when creators associate something with science inaccurately. If they had presented these concepts as philosophy, I wouldn’t have felt the need to make this video.
@@TheWorldOfScienceHindiYup . I am reading various topics like philosophy and science it would be great if you recommend me a book I have watched your previous videos on that topic it would be great if you recommend some other books which are cheap and affordable for students by the way I have bought theory of relativity and cosmos and . Your content also helps me for that purpose 👍
Why don't you try listening Swami Sarvapriyananda se speaks on Indian Philosophy (specifically Adwaita)
You can listen to "Who Am I ?" video as a starting point given by him at IITK 8-10 years ago.
@@sumitdutta7043I am a huge fan of Swamiji. He is amazing, his teachings are equally poetic and scientific! He doesn't mix philosophy and science, he in fact says that one should not be in a hurry to mix the latest inventions of quantum physics with philosophy. But i truly believe that Adwait vedant is way ahead. These scientists have merely begun to scratch the surface when it comes to reality and consciousness..
@@nupurshinde3999 what if you're wrong
Finally kisi ne to inpar video banaya mai bhi inhe kai dino se notice kr rha tha , thanks Bhai meri taraf se full support hai apko
Tu kyu nahi karega kyu ki tu hai hi 🐷 kya tu kabhi Qur'an ko question Kiya
Jab bhi koye Hinduism ke against bolta hai phele ajate hai tum log validation Dene
Jab islam pe banaega to rona mat
You opened my eyes. Today, I have learned about pseudoscience. Previously, I had no idea about the word and its meaning. I just heard about it and didn't know it's a negative word.
Very good work..
We need to be rational towards every topic, especially science.
Every one has the right to ask questions and should not be demoralized if they ask a question and say that something is wrong.
Fundamental particles for you may not be the fundamental particles for next generation.
So true. That’s the essence of science. It keeps evolving.
Nice bhaiya u really motivated me to do research before blindly believing on shits ❤❤❤ @@TheWorldOfScienceHindi
It's not evolving. It just tells we are not accurate Everytime. We are closer to fundamental is Illusion.
@@TheWorldOfScienceHindi you are morron man, i reported your video, hyperquest talks with sense, and your attacking him hatefully, such disgusting shameless personality of yours, iff you don't have mind to understand some one then keep shut your crap mouth
Lol 😂 my man got triggered @@worldoffun9600
This is what I get when I asked chatgpt this:
Science in Hinduism?
Hinduism, as an ancient and diverse tradition, intertwines spirituality, philosophy, and an understanding of natural phenomena. While the sacred texts and practices are often spiritual or symbolic, many aspects of Hinduism align with or anticipate principles that science later formalized. Below are some examples of how actual science intersects with Hinduism:
---
1. Cosmology and Astronomy
Concept of a Cyclic Universe: Hindu scriptures like the Rig Veda and Bhagavata Purana describe a cyclic nature of the universe, with periods of creation (Brahma's day), preservation, and dissolution (Brahma's night). This aligns with modern theories of a cyclic or oscillating universe.
Accurate Timekeeping: Ancient Indian astronomers like Aryabhata and Bhaskara made significant contributions to astronomy. Texts like the Surya Siddhanta explain planetary movements, solar years, and eclipses with remarkable accuracy.
The Age of the Universe: The Hindu calculation of time, which mentions the age of the universe in billions of years, closely aligns with modern scientific estimates (13.8 billion years).
---
2. Mathematics
Zero and Decimal System: The concept of zero, crucial to modern mathematics, originated in ancient India. Aryabhata and Brahmagupta pioneered the decimal number system.
Geometry and Algebra: Ancient texts like the Sulbasutras describe geometric principles for constructing altars, reflecting early developments in geometry and algebra.
---
3. Medicine (Ayurveda)
Holistic Healing: Ayurveda, rooted in Hindu texts like the Atharva Veda and the Charaka Samhita, emphasizes preventive medicine, diet, and the balance of body, mind, and spirit. Many principles, such as the importance of gut health, are being validated by modern science.
Surgical Techniques: The Sushruta Samhita by Sushruta details surgical techniques, including cataract surgery, rhinoplasty, and even brain surgery, demonstrating advanced knowledge of anatomy and medicine.
---
4. Environmental Science
Respect for Nature: Hindu practices encourage environmental sustainability, such as planting trees (vriksha puja), protecting rivers, and maintaining biodiversity.
Ecological Harmony: Concepts like pancha mahabhutas (five elements: earth, water, fire, air, space) stress the interconnection of all life forms, resonating with modern ecological principles.
---
5. Physics
Atomic Theory: The ancient philosopher Kanada (6th century BCE) proposed an atomic theory in the Vaisheshika Sutra. He suggested that matter is composed of indivisible atoms (paramanu), a concept akin to modern atomic theory.
Energy Transformations: The idea of shakti (energy) and its interplay with matter aligns with modern understanding of energy conservation and transformation.
---
6. Psychology and Neuroscience
Meditation and Mental Health: Practices like yoga and meditation, rooted in Hindu philosophy, are widely recognized for their benefits to mental health, stress reduction, and brain plasticity.
Mind-Body Connection: Texts like the Yoga Sutras of Patanjali explore the connection between consciousness, thought, and physiology, which overlaps with modern neuroscience and psychology.
---
7. Metallurgy and Engineering
Iron Pillar of Delhi: This ancient iron structure has resisted corrosion for over 1,600 years, showcasing advanced metallurgical techniques.
Temple Architecture: The precise engineering of Hindu temples, such as those in Hampi or Khajuraho, reflects deep understanding of physics, acoustics, and geometry.
---
Limitations and Symbolism
While many concepts in Hinduism appear scientific, they are often deeply symbolic or metaphysical. Modern science has validated some ideas, but others remain poetic interpretations rather than empirical truths. It’s essential to distinguish between literal and metaphorical meanings in Hindu texts.
Conclusion
Hinduism contains profound insights into nature and existence, many of which resonate with modern science. However, these contributions often emerged from philosophical inquiry and observation rather than the experimental methods that define contemporary science.
Sanatan 🗿
😂😂😂😂😂saar then why any Hindu is scientist
Hindu only research on how cow dung cakes cure cancer😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Now also search, Science in Islam, Science in Christianity
@SameersQuestForGod8 sanatan dharm is far more better then the others 🗿🗿🗿
@@SameersQuestForGod8
Ok here it's
Science in Islam and Christianity have both been influenced by religious teachings, but the ways in which they intersect with scientific inquiry and thought have varied over time and across different contexts.
Science in Islam:
Islamic civilization made significant contributions to science, particularly during the Golden Age of Islam (8th to 14th centuries). Islamic scholars preserved, translated, and built upon ancient Greek, Roman, Persian, and Indian scientific knowledge, and they made groundbreaking discoveries in fields like astronomy, mathematics, medicine, and chemistry. Key figures include:
Al-Khwarizmi: The father of algebra, whose work laid the foundation for modern mathematics.
Ibn Sina (Avicenna): A physician whose works influenced both medicine and philosophy in the West.
Al-Razi (Rhazes): A pioneering figure in medicine and chemistry, known for his contributions to the understanding of infectious diseases.
Islamic science often emphasized the importance of observation, experimentation, and rational thought, as it was seen as a way to understand the natural world, which was created by God. The Quran itself encourages the study of the world and the cosmos as signs of God's existence and power, which many scholars took as a call to investigate the natural world.
However, the decline of the Islamic scientific tradition in the late medieval period coincided with various political, religious, and intellectual shifts, including the rise of conservative religious movements that viewed some scientific ideas, particularly those challenging traditional interpretations of religious texts, with suspicion.
Science in Christianity:
Christianity's relationship with science has been more complex and marked by a variety of interactions over the centuries. In the early Christian period, there was some suspicion of scientific inquiry, as certain ideas (such as heliocentrism) appeared to contradict the Bible's accounts of the universe. However, many early Christian thinkers, such as St. Augustine and Thomas Aquinas, saw no conflict between faith and reason and believed that the natural world could be studied to better understand God’s creation.
During the Renaissance and the Scientific Revolution, Christianity played a role in both supporting and opposing scientific progress. The Catholic Church, for instance, initially opposed the heliocentric model proposed by Copernicus and championed by Galileo. Galileo was famously tried by the Inquisition and placed under house arrest for promoting heliocentrism, which was seen as contradicting the biblical teaching of a geocentric universe. Despite this, many other scientists, including Isaac Newton and Johannes Kepler, were devout Christians and believed their work revealed the majesty of God.
The Protestant Reformation also had a complex impact on science. Some Protestant reformers, such as Martin Luther, were wary of science, but others supported the idea that studying the natural world could deepen one's understanding of God’s will. The Protestant emphasis on literacy and the study of the Bible in the vernacular led to an increase in education, which indirectly fostered scientific curiosity.
In modern times, science and Christianity have often been seen in tension, especially with regard to issues like evolution, climate change, and the age of the Earth. While many Christian denominations accept scientific findings, some more conservative or literalist groups maintain a belief in a young Earth and the idea of creationism. However, the majority of Christian denominations, especially mainline Protestant, Catholic, and Eastern Orthodox, generally accept the scientific consensus on these issues.
Key Differences:
Integration of Science and Religion: In Islam, the study of science is often seen as a form of worship, an effort to understand the world created by God. In Christianity, the integration of science and religion has been more varied, with some periods of tension (e.g., the Galileo affair) and others of cooperation (e.g., the scientific contributions of Christian scholars).
Philosophical Approach: In Islamic thought, there is a long tradition of synthesizing scientific inquiry with religious belief, particularly in the medieval period. In Christianity, especially in its medieval and Renaissance periods, there was more tension between scriptural interpretation and scientific discoveries, though this has lessened over time.
In both traditions, though, the relationship between faith and science has evolved and continues to be a topic of debate and discussion. Many modern religious thinkers from both traditions see no conflict between scientific understanding and spiritual belief.
Sanatan 🗿🗿🗿
@@langotabhai1261 haan sabko yahi lagta hai ki uska dharm doosro se bahot behtar hai.
Aur kamaal ki baat ye hai ki, aap paida usi dharm me hue hai jo aapko sabse behtar lag raha hai.
Opened my eyes to a whole new dimension. I would usually believe in whatever these guys were peddling before, but your video taught me to question this and everything else. Both the parts in these series were highly effective. I felt something literally opening up in my brain. Thank you. Please keep creating rational videos. Your sub and a new fan!
I don't know what is right or wrong. But the way of your question argue helps us to understand that everyone is not right.👍🏻
You cleared it you don't know what is right or wrong then you are biased
@satyaanand6523 dear if a person doesn't know what is right or wrong then how you say that person is biased ..😂
@@Sahil_khan_1216 dear sahil ji
Aapne pehle line me hi yeh baat clear kardi thi ki aap ko anpadh ho . Topic ka kuch bhi nahi pata. Tha
Then the Quran must be the same do you question it or is it the most perfect scientific book
@@SilentNighT-f8vWho told you that Qur'an is a scientific book. Qur'an teaches the way to live our life. It does have some verses related to science but calling it a scientific book is incorrect
Much appreciated the work done by you , i always wonder why isn't there a huge language barrier in quality studies or critical thinking stuff's.
I wish for all the people to at least understand this beauty once.
the sub count of this channel shows how only a small population of india are capable of rational thinking
Credibility is also part of it.
@@AnalysisLegend No way that Hyper Quest niga is credible.
@@Akash_Kumayu ofcourse..
@@Akash_Kumayubut no one here justifying that 😂😂
See that's the problem, it's a hate and fixed mentality driven. I'll believe this I won't believe this. Whatever he says is wrong whatever he says is right. This bias ruins everything. In the name of calling out misinformation, people started demeaning Gaurav Taneja and Hyper quest. Rather than keeping it civil and countering it with good logic. People have shown that those who calling out, are actually themself biased and not credible. They Just hate someone and if someone is calling out their mistake. They rather focusing on the mistake. They start attacking the person.
Forget about the production quantity.... The ideas matter. Happy to see debunking the nonsense being spread on social media.
I am very happy to see the people like who are doing great work in science communication. Great work brother. Keep it up. Being a research scholar I feel the necessity of debunking these pseudo-scientific people.
Dont feel jealous and insecure of IITians......
Insecure and jealous of IITians or graduates with poor knowledge of science peddling pseudoscience without any evidence? I think the latter fits here.
You haven’t seen any research paper on havan, even I used to think that it won’t purify. I have never followed Gaurav Taneja and I never came across havan purify the air but after said by you, I have seen two research papers on that topic which goes against what you said. Hum pagal hain kya TH-cam main science dekh a Chathahain Lekin yahan pe superiority war chal Raha hain. Kuch comedy Webseries banao yaar.
Please let me know about the research topic… 🙏🏽
@@satwikskattihe haven't have any paper 😂😂
@@NaveenKumar-nx8yi ijyr.dsvv.ac.in/index.php/ijyr/article/view/5/11
@@NaveenKumar-nx8yi you can just Google brother, there are two more.
💩💩
By paradox, he meant about uncertainty principle by which we can never pin point the exact location of an electron.
3:00 he said that it's not possible to know the universe from our human sense ofc it is, that's why we use maths and get equations and then visualise it. I hope you will find it interesting rather than criticism.
Yes, but hyperquest is trying to promote his religion and bhakti here (we can infer that from the name of the series). He is not talking about science and math, he is talking about bhakti which is not scientific.
In your video, I found many mistakes. For example, stating that a theory can be 100% accurate is incorrect because theories are based on observation or hypothesis and cannot be 100% certain. Some exceptional cases, like in mathematics, rely on axioms and deductive reasoning, such as Pythagoras’ Theorem. Theories in most fields are highly reliable but never infallible, as they depend on current evidence and methods. Continuous questioning and testing are essential for progress. Additionally, saying that research can be conducted solely in a lab is absolutely wrong; data or information is taken from space and satellites, about space Scientists have mapped only about 5% of the observable universe, which consists of matter like stars, planets, and galaxies.
The remaining 95% is composed of dark matter and dark energy, which are poorly understood and unknown
I find many mistakes and misleading information in your content. He is wrong; this does not mean you are right. I can write 3 or 4 pages right now.
DO YOU KNOW WHAT I LEARNED LESSON FROM TODAY FINDING MISTAKES AND CRITICISING IS EASY
@Railmantrihaazipur First, learn how to write. I also talk about exceptional cases, but that person said that theory cannot be 100% right. While he opposes that idea, I did not agree with it. Now, I have a question for you: Have you read my comment and watched the video properly? Also, make sure to learn to write.
@Railmantrihaazipur By adding a smile emoji, you didn't become cool. I'm approaching this from a scientific perspective, and there's nothing wrong with that. I'm not here to criticize religion; in fact, I support it. I just want to clarify that he is discussing very narrow aspects of science or twisting the science to make the wrong seem right. Please try not to be so dogmatic. Both you and he are presenting this video in a way that seems anti-religious. Let's strive to be scientific and share knowledge-do not use science as a weapon.
@RailmantrihaazipurHey you come here I will dispose you with some aqua regia so that you will not bark again!
and i think you're unclear and somewhat wrong about satellites. because they are also labs, conducting experiments in the space(ex ISS) and how/what data is taken from space..? the data is collected/retrieved/researched by such labs/satellites FROM space right..?
and your choice of words , my god, space scientist or astrophysicists? mathematicians? engineers?... matters like stars and planets, matter or bodies..? do you know what i learned many people just brag whatever piece of information they find on social media and pretend to be expert
@@letsstudy2308 Abe jahil kuch kaam ka likh gawar😂
Thanks for addressing such an important topic! It’s great to see someone standing up for evidence-based science and critical thinking. Misrepresenting scientific concepts not only confuses people but also disrespects the hard work of researchers. Really appreciate your effort to promote accurate info and bust pseudo-science. Can’t wait to see more of your upcoming videos. keep up the awesome work! 🙌
Full support, my friend. To be honest, I've lost hope in this country. It's refreshing to see content that promotes rational thinking.
You got a new subscriber ❤
Thanks for subscribing! 🙏
one more ❤
I want to tell you something bro. Hinduism got lot of science which we don't know. I will give u one example I can find life time of ground water. Which no machine can do. It works based on some sort of energy which we haven't discovered. I can find amount of water in each water gap that can be proved scientifically, but how I can find life time of water gap is not scietific. But it is science which no one know yet. And I can also find weights of object by touching that object. That also relates to that. It's all related to Hinduism ancient sages got something we are lacking. With which we can do a lot more than machines. We can even find water on mars with machines combined. @@TheWorldOfScienceHindi
Sahi dhoya bhai, yeh science ko apne logic se define karne ki koshish karte hai aur inko lagta hai ki scientist mazak karte hai.
Haa bilkul..IITian tag laga lene seh hi jo jime aayega bohi bolne seh ekdum accurate hoga yeh toh nahi ho sakta na.
@@AngaragBuragohainBhai ye apne aap ko khud dho rha h
Then sorry to say you don't know much about science. Science is based on logic of different perspectives
@@Hikkiyonvy 😭😭🤡 It is not based on logic it is based on experiments, findings and research, just saying matter is alive is a philosophical thought and nothing else.
PSEUDO SCIENCE KE FOLLOWERS AAGAYE BHAI IS VIDEO MAI.
पैकिंग अच्छा है बोतल का लेकिन अंदर जहर है बस वो कुछ ऐसे ही है लोगो को जहर दे रहे है
You have earned a loyal subscriber bro❤❤
Faith in humanity and youtubers restored ❤
I will recommend your channel as much as possible 👍
I'll be also joining this process of debunking after 1-1.5 years probably
That's fantastic! We need more critical thinkers on board.
@TheWorldOfScienceHindi means a lot bhai 🐈
Y;es th;is is on;going tr;end now;adays.
You’ll find what you’re looking for, so I’d suggest staying open-minded. Avoid going into full debunking mode-our brains are incredible. Try not to think in the rigid black-and-white terms often promoted by channels like this and HyperQuest.
@@cat12-b7i
Ind;ian govern;ment n;eed to in;crease sc;hool sy;llabus to inv;olve th;ese s;tupids in st;udy ra;ther th;an deb;unking busin;ess.
Accidentally I came here and I really appreciate your efforts. Though the promotion scientific tempor is part of the constitution, recently it is being damaged at all levels. I mean speeches by top politicians, judges, podcasts/videos by social media influencers have taken a huge toll.
You're completely mistaken.😬😬 We can't directly interact with fundamental particles like quarks or leptons because:
1. They're Incredibly Tiny: These particles are far smaller than atoms, making them impossible to see or handle. We can only observe their effects in experiments like those at the Large Hadron Collider.
2. Quantum Mechanics: These particles don’t have fixed positions or states, making it impossible to pinpoint or directly interact with them.
3. Technology Limits: Even with advanced equipment, we can only detect their traces, not the particles themselves, so direct interaction isn't possible.
Will make a video debunking this. Jald hi. Dekhiyega zaroor
Amazing, brother, you've nailed it...
Only science can answer science...✅
Exactly! That's what I'm trying to emphasize. 🙏🏻 Thanks for watching ❤️
@@TheWorldOfScienceHindiIt has become increasingly popular to call anything related to Vedas, Upanishads as Psuedo Science, Anything that hasn't been proven & acknowledged by west is termed as such.
Problem is we all know science, have read in school but when it comes to Vedas, Upanishads. Only a few of us have read it, so called Atheists and Rational people haven't read it, aren't aware of many terms mentioned there and thus it becomes hard to prove our point to them.
We can see many scientists like Tesla, Heisenberg, Schrodinger,Bose, Ramanujan,Sagan was reading Vedas and Upanishads (I'll mention what they said in detail later on)
=>
The ancient Indian texts, such as the Vedas, Upanishads, and Puranas, contain a wealth of scientific knowledge and concepts that were well ahead of their time. Here are some examples:
_Atomic Theory_
The concept of atoms and subatomic particles is described in the following texts:
1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The universe is composed of tiny particles called 'paramanus'." (Rigveda, 10.90.3) [1]
2. _Mahabharata_ (400 BCE): "The universe is made up of tiny particles called 'anu'." (Mahabharata, Shanti Parva, 342.10) [2]
_Space and Cosmology_
The ancient Indian texts describe the universe as infinite and boundless, with multiple galaxies and stars.
1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The universe is infinite and boundless." (Rigveda, 10.90.1) [1]
2. _Aitareya Upanishad_ (800 BCE): "The universe is made up of multiple galaxies and stars." (Aitareya Upanishad, 2.4.1) [3]
_Mathematics_
The ancient Indian texts describe mathematical concepts such as zero, infinity, and the decimal system.
1. _Yajurveda_ (1200 BCE): "The concept of zero is described as 'shunya'." (Yajurveda, 17.2) [4]
2. _Brahmasphuta Siddhanta_ (628 CE): "The decimal system and the concept of infinity are described." (Brahmasphuta Siddhanta, 1.1) [5]
_Physics and Engineering_
The ancient Indian texts describe concepts such as gravity, buoyancy, and aerodynamics.
1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The concept of gravity is described as 'gurutva'." (Rigveda, 10.22.14) [1]
2. _Vaimanika Shastra_ (1000 CE): "The principles of aerodynamics and aircraft design are described." (Vaimanika Shastra, 1.1) [6]
_Evolution_
1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): Describes the evolution of life from water to plants to animals. (Rigveda, 10.121.1-10) [1]
2. _Puranas_ (500 BCE): Describe the evolution of humans from a single cell to complex organisms. (Puranas, Vishnu Purana, 1.4.1-50) [2]
_Battery-like Device_
1. _Agastya Samhita_ (400 CE): Describes a battery-like device called the "Baghdad Battery" or "Agastya's Battery", which was used for electroplating. (Agastya Samhita, 200.1-10) [3]
_Aviation_
1. _Vaimanika Shastra_ (1000 CE): Describes the principles of aerodynamics, aircraft design, and flight. (Vaimanika Shastra, 1.1-30) [4]
2. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): Mentions the concept of flying vehicles called "Vimanas". (Rigveda, 1.164.1-50) [1]
_Medicine and Surgery_
1. _Charaka Samhita_ (400 CE): Describes various medical procedures, including surgery, and the use of herbs and minerals for treatment. (Charaka Samhita, 1.1-30) [5]
2. _Sushruta Samhita_ (600 CE): Describes surgical procedures, including plastic surgery, and the use of anesthesia. (Sushruta Samhita, 1.1-30) [6]
-> Here are some quotes from famous scientists and thinkers who were inspired by Indian scriptures:
*Nikola Tesla*
- "The Vedas...teach that the creation of the universe was not a one-time event, but rather a continuous process that is still going on." [1]
- Source: "The Problem of Increasing Human Energy" by Nikola Tesla, The Century Magazine, June 1900.
*Erwin Schrödinger*
- "The multiplicity of the universe is only apparent, in truth, there is only one principle, one reality, which is the ultimate reality." (Inspired by the Upanishads) [2]
- Source: "What is Life?" by Erwin Schrödinger, Cambridge University Press, 1944.
*Werner Heisenberg*
- "After the conversations about Indian philosophy, some of the ideas of quantum physics that had seemed so crazy suddenly appeared in a reasonable light." [3]
- Source: "Physics and Philosophy" by Werner Heisenberg, Harper & Brothers, 1958.
*Robert Oppenheimer*
- "The Bhagavad Gita is the most beautiful philosophical song existing in any known tongue." [4]
- Source: "The Flying Trapeze: Three Crises for Physicists" by Robert Oppenheimer, The American Scholar, Spring 1964.
*Carl Sagan*
- "The Hindu concept of the universe as an infinite, unbounded, and eternally cyclical cosmos is remarkably consistent with modern astrophysical understanding." [5]
- Source: "Cosmos" by Carl Sagan, Random House, 1980.
*Albert Einstein*
- "The religion of the future should be based on a cosmic perspective, and the concept of the universe as a single, undivided whole." (Inspired by the Upanishads) [6]
- Source: "The World as I See It" by Albert Einstein, Philosophical Library, 1934.
These quotes illustrate the profound impact of Indian scriptures on the thoughts and ideas of some of the most influential scientists and thinkers of the modern era.
S;cience c;an a;nswer s;cience?
W;ow!!!!
Thank you brother for making this video.Bro i am a physics research scholar and science enthusiast,How can I contact with you
Thank you so much for watching this video! You can always reach me at heyrajkumar@theworldofscience.co
Ok, I'm here for first time and I subscribed you, great knowledge brother
Bro you don't explain the fact only do criticism do you know what the definition of alive and dead we are also nothing but matter alone are we not alive even plants are alive. The coniousness ,reproduction and metabolism are the features of living but when we go in microscopic level bacteria also alive even viruses are alive in human body made of dna and protein it means DNA is the real molecule which can consider as alive because it can replicate and it is made up of just phosphate, sugar and base these are simple molecules so we can also say that atom is the real source of energy and thats why if you are alive atoms are also...
EVEN ELECTRON REVOLVES AROUND NUCLEUS SHOWS CONSCIOUSNESS...
JUST CRITICAL THINKING NOT PROVEN BUT J THINK IT CAN'T BE PROVED ALSO IT CAN BE ACCEPTED AS THEORY ALWAYS
Why don't you publish your research in science journal and make understand what you are saying in science community. The things which you are claiming is not pseudo-science, because it is not even science. no scientific research have ever claim they have consciousness, If you want to get knowledge of science, don't listen to dhongi pakhandi babas. This is the effect when you listen to them. if you want to get knowledge of science then listen to real scientist. For eg Sabine Hossenfelder, Neil deGrasse Tyson etc
No If it's not proven its not theory to understand the definition of scientific theory Your not doing critical thinking Your doing mass generalization of things.
@@AveragepoliticsEnjoyerExactly 💯
@@kapil4417037 I know Neil degrasse has no credibility only listen him on astronomy not other topics because he thinks plants has nervous system..
Exactly 💯 @@AveragepoliticsEnjoyer
Great Video ! keep it up . Hail the sciences and fight stupid people
Thank you for your support! Let’s fight misinformation and pseudoscience together 🙌🏻
@@TheWorldOfScienceHindi Zakir naik par video bana ❤
5:40 Ignition = Oxygen Absorb 10 kilo ke wood me 1 kilo ghee dalake koi phayada nahi ye hawan yagya nahi hai ... Vedo me hawan krna likha hai so simple Tambe ke diye me ghee ka Diya kapaas ki low ( Less Polution, Less Oxygen absorbed, Ghee se hawan yagya bbe ho jaata)
Kya baky Jaa rha hai
@kira_bl8qy are yagami sahab achese padhiye 4 baar padhiye smjhega
@@trainerdeveshbhai ky kehra h smaj ni ara
Hmm
I think these people very well know what they are doing and what non sense they are spreading, but they continue because there's a very big pseudo science audience in our country jinhe ye capture krke bs monetize kr rhe h and exploiting them.
Please make videos exposing all pseudoscience including podcast and fear mongering it would ne a great help
We are working on that. I’m glad to have such rational people like you in our community ❤️
@TheWorldOfScienceHindi i thank you for prompting whats real hats off in such a fake society only few are real gems bow to you really thank you pls also make debunking shorts for wider reach through Instagram and yt bcz psuduscience is spreading more then any other virus taking peoples life on daily basis mentally and physically i wish you luck and thanks for contribution 🙏
@@TheWorldOfScienceHindi 🙏
I know hyper quest form his starting at start he making nice videos but when he knows most of people who watch his video are not want to know real science just want strong reasons which make there ancient believes more strong then he start doing this type things
😂😂he wants money can't blame that fella
@@AveragepoliticsEnjoyerIt has become increasingly popular to call anything related to Vedas, Upanishads as Psuedo Science, Anything that hasn't been proven & acknowledged by west is termed as such.
Problem is we all know science, have read in school but when it comes to Vedas, Upanishads. Only a few of us have read it, so called Atheists and Rational people haven't read it, aren't aware of many terms mentioned there and thus it becomes hard to prove our point to them.
We can see many scientists like Tesla, Heisenberg, Schrodinger,Bose, Ramanujan,Sagan was reading Vedas and Upanishads (I'll mention what they said in detail later on)
=>
The ancient Indian texts, such as the Vedas, Upanishads, and Puranas, contain a wealth of scientific knowledge and concepts that were well ahead of their time. Here are some examples:
_Atomic Theory_
The concept of atoms and subatomic particles is described in the following texts:
1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The universe is composed of tiny particles called 'paramanus'." (Rigveda, 10.90.3) [1]
2. _Mahabharata_ (400 BCE): "The universe is made up of tiny particles called 'anu'." (Mahabharata, Shanti Parva, 342.10) [2]
_Space and Cosmology_
The ancient Indian texts describe the universe as infinite and boundless, with multiple galaxies and stars.
1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The universe is infinite and boundless." (Rigveda, 10.90.1) [1]
2. _Aitareya Upanishad_ (800 BCE): "The universe is made up of multiple galaxies and stars." (Aitareya Upanishad, 2.4.1) [3]
_Mathematics_
The ancient Indian texts describe mathematical concepts such as zero, infinity, and the decimal system.
1. _Yajurveda_ (1200 BCE): "The concept of zero is described as 'shunya'." (Yajurveda, 17.2) [4]
2. _Brahmasphuta Siddhanta_ (628 CE): "The decimal system and the concept of infinity are described." (Brahmasphuta Siddhanta, 1.1) [5]
_Physics and Engineering_
The ancient Indian texts describe concepts such as gravity, buoyancy, and aerodynamics.
1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The concept of gravity is described as 'gurutva'." (Rigveda, 10.22.14) [1]
2. _Vaimanika Shastra_ (1000 CE): "The principles of aerodynamics and aircraft design are described." (Vaimanika Shastra, 1.1) [6]
_Evolution_
1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): Describes the evolution of life from water to plants to animals. (Rigveda, 10.121.1-10) [1]
2. _Puranas_ (500 BCE): Describe the evolution of humans from a single cell to complex organisms. (Puranas, Vishnu Purana, 1.4.1-50) [2]
_Battery-like Device_
1. _Agastya Samhita_ (400 CE): Describes a battery-like device called the "Baghdad Battery" or "Agastya's Battery", which was used for electroplating. (Agastya Samhita, 200.1-10) [3]
_Aviation_
1. _Vaimanika Shastra_ (1000 CE): Describes the principles of aerodynamics, aircraft design, and flight. (Vaimanika Shastra, 1.1-30) [4]
2. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): Mentions the concept of flying vehicles called "Vimanas". (Rigveda, 1.164.1-50) [1]
_Medicine and Surgery_
1. _Charaka Samhita_ (400 CE): Describes various medical procedures, including surgery, and the use of herbs and minerals for treatment. (Charaka Samhita, 1.1-30) [5]
2. _Sushruta Samhita_ (600 CE): Describes surgical procedures, including plastic surgery, and the use of anesthesia. (Sushruta Samhita, 1.1-30) [6]
-> Here are some quotes from famous scientists and thinkers who were inspired by Indian scriptures:
*Nikola Tesla*
- "The Vedas...teach that the creation of the universe was not a one-time event, but rather a continuous process that is still going on." [1]
- Source: "The Problem of Increasing Human Energy" by Nikola Tesla, The Century Magazine, June 1900.
*Erwin Schrödinger*
- "The multiplicity of the universe is only apparent, in truth, there is only one principle, one reality, which is the ultimate reality." (Inspired by the Upanishads) [2]
- Source: "What is Life?" by Erwin Schrödinger, Cambridge University Press, 1944.
*Werner Heisenberg*
- "After the conversations about Indian philosophy, some of the ideas of quantum physics that had seemed so crazy suddenly appeared in a reasonable light." [3]
- Source: "Physics and Philosophy" by Werner Heisenberg, Harper & Brothers, 1958.
*Robert Oppenheimer*
- "The Bhagavad Gita is the most beautiful philosophical song existing in any known tongue." [4]
- Source: "The Flying Trapeze: Three Crises for Physicists" by Robert Oppenheimer, The American Scholar, Spring 1964.
*Carl Sagan*
- "The Hindu concept of the universe as an infinite, unbounded, and eternally cyclical cosmos is remarkably consistent with modern astrophysical understanding." [5]
- Source: "Cosmos" by Carl Sagan, Random House, 1980.
*Albert Einstein*
- "The religion of the future should be based on a cosmic perspective, and the concept of the universe as a single, undivided whole." (Inspired by the Upanishads) [6]
- Source: "The World as I See It" by Albert Einstein, Philosophical Library, 1934.
These quotes illustrate the profound impact of Indian scriptures on the thoughts and ideas of some of the most influential scientists and thinkers of the modern era.
Thank you bro for existing😂😂😂😂, It feels good that someone is there who is callingout these pseudoscientists
Finally, someone taking a stand against these so-called pseudoscientists spreading false claims. Keep up the great work!
Ab iske hisab se shorts me phd ka science samjhaya jai aur rhi baat word choice aur statement ki to kitne log hai jo physics ko itne detail me samjhenge ,sach to ye hai ki tum jaante ho ki kisko target karna asan hai aur kis se views aayega usi ko target karo baaki me to science ka s dikhado to maan lenge lekin nhi kahoge kuch kyuki f@ttegi😂😂
Agle video mein aapko science ka S dikhayenge, dekhiyega zaroor.
@Hindu10862 Sach toh yeh hai ki tum jinhe shatru maante ho, woh jitne gawar hain, utne gawar tum bhi ho. Khair, tum jaison ko toh Yogsutra, Surya Siddhant, Pancha Siddhanth, Briht Samhit jaise pustako ka naam pata hi nahi hoga. Kabhi jiwan main koi science ki kitaab nahi padhi hogi, kabhi shastra paath kiya nahi hoga aur aa gaye dharm rakshak banne. Uphas bana rakha hai hamare dharm ka. Yaad rakho, Gyan se bada koi shastra nahi hota aur agyan se bada koi shatru nahi hota
Science and religion are two different things.
Tumhare naam se h pta chal rha hai religion based wale insan ho.
Science ki baatein tumhe samjh ni aegi
You are contradicting ur self. Agar dono alag cheez hai to being religious shouldn't be correlated to being scientific lmao.@@sonutudu587
@@sonutudu587It has become increasingly popular to call anything related to Vedas, Upanishads as Psuedo Science, Anything that hasn't been proven & acknowledged by west is termed as such.
Problem is we all know science, have read in school but when it comes to Vedas, Upanishads. Only a few of us have read it, so called Atheists and Rational people haven't read it, aren't aware of many terms mentioned there and thus it becomes hard to prove our point to them.
We can see many scientists like Tesla, Heisenberg, Schrodinger,Bose, Ramanujan,Sagan was reading Vedas and Upanishads (I'll mention what they said in detail later on)
=>
The ancient Indian texts, such as the Vedas, Upanishads, and Puranas, contain a wealth of scientific knowledge and concepts that were well ahead of their time. Here are some examples:
_Atomic Theory_
The concept of atoms and subatomic particles is described in the following texts:
1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The universe is composed of tiny particles called 'paramanus'." (Rigveda, 10.90.3) [1]
2. _Mahabharata_ (400 BCE): "The universe is made up of tiny particles called 'anu'." (Mahabharata, Shanti Parva, 342.10) [2]
_Space and Cosmology_
The ancient Indian texts describe the universe as infinite and boundless, with multiple galaxies and stars.
1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The universe is infinite and boundless." (Rigveda, 10.90.1) [1]
2. _Aitareya Upanishad_ (800 BCE): "The universe is made up of multiple galaxies and stars." (Aitareya Upanishad, 2.4.1) [3]
_Mathematics_
The ancient Indian texts describe mathematical concepts such as zero, infinity, and the decimal system.
1. _Yajurveda_ (1200 BCE): "The concept of zero is described as 'shunya'." (Yajurveda, 17.2) [4]
2. _Brahmasphuta Siddhanta_ (628 CE): "The decimal system and the concept of infinity are described." (Brahmasphuta Siddhanta, 1.1) [5]
_Physics and Engineering_
The ancient Indian texts describe concepts such as gravity, buoyancy, and aerodynamics.
1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The concept of gravity is described as 'gurutva'." (Rigveda, 10.22.14) [1]
2. _Vaimanika Shastra_ (1000 CE): "The principles of aerodynamics and aircraft design are described." (Vaimanika Shastra, 1.1) [6]
_Evolution_
1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): Describes the evolution of life from water to plants to animals. (Rigveda, 10.121.1-10) [1]
2. _Puranas_ (500 BCE): Describe the evolution of humans from a single cell to complex organisms. (Puranas, Vishnu Purana, 1.4.1-50) [2]
_Battery-like Device_
1. _Agastya Samhita_ (400 CE): Describes a battery-like device called the "Baghdad Battery" or "Agastya's Battery", which was used for electroplating. (Agastya Samhita, 200.1-10) [3]
_Aviation_
1. _Vaimanika Shastra_ (1000 CE): Describes the principles of aerodynamics, aircraft design, and flight. (Vaimanika Shastra, 1.1-30) [4]
2. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): Mentions the concept of flying vehicles called "Vimanas". (Rigveda, 1.164.1-50) [1]
_Medicine and Surgery_
1. _Charaka Samhita_ (400 CE): Describes various medical procedures, including surgery, and the use of herbs and minerals for treatment. (Charaka Samhita, 1.1-30) [5]
2. _Sushruta Samhita_ (600 CE): Describes surgical procedures, including plastic surgery, and the use of anesthesia. (Sushruta Samhita, 1.1-30) [6]
-> Here are some quotes from famous scientists and thinkers who were inspired by Indian scriptures:
*Nikola Tesla*
- "The Vedas...teach that the creation of the universe was not a one-time event, but rather a continuous process that is still going on." [1]
- Source: "The Problem of Increasing Human Energy" by Nikola Tesla, The Century Magazine, June 1900.
*Erwin Schrödinger*
- "The multiplicity of the universe is only apparent, in truth, there is only one principle, one reality, which is the ultimate reality." (Inspired by the Upanishads) [2]
- Source: "What is Life?" by Erwin Schrödinger, Cambridge University Press, 1944.
*Werner Heisenberg*
- "After the conversations about Indian philosophy, some of the ideas of quantum physics that had seemed so crazy suddenly appeared in a reasonable light." [3]
- Source: "Physics and Philosophy" by Werner Heisenberg, Harper & Brothers, 1958.
*Robert Oppenheimer*
- "The Bhagavad Gita is the most beautiful philosophical song existing in any known tongue." [4]
- Source: "The Flying Trapeze: Three Crises for Physicists" by Robert Oppenheimer, The American Scholar, Spring 1964.
*Carl Sagan*
- "The Hindu concept of the universe as an infinite, unbounded, and eternally cyclical cosmos is remarkably consistent with modern astrophysical understanding." [5]
- Source: "Cosmos" by Carl Sagan, Random House, 1980.
*Albert Einstein*
- "The religion of the future should be based on a cosmic perspective, and the concept of the universe as a single, undivided whole." (Inspired by the Upanishads) [6]
- Source: "The World as I See It" by Albert Einstein, Philosophical Library, 1934.
These quotes illustrate the profound impact of Indian scriptures on the thoughts and ideas of some of the most influential scientists and thinkers of the modern era.
You earned yourself a subscriber!
Kaun meri tarah dono ka videos nahi dekhta hi😂😂😂
Mai pehle dono ko nhi dekhta tha lekin ab is channel par regular rahunga aur hyper quest ke har video Ko report karunga
Dono bekar baatein krte h.. apne domain of work pe zyada time dena hi best hai...
Mai 😂
@@साइलेंसIt has become increasingly popular to call anything related to Vedas, Upanishads as Psuedo Science, Anything that hasn't been proven & acknowledged by west is termed as such.
Problem is we all know science, have read in school but when it comes to Vedas, Upanishads. Only a few of us have read it, so called Atheists and Rational people haven't read it, aren't aware of many terms mentioned there and thus it becomes hard to prove our point to them.
We can see many scientists like Tesla, Heisenberg, Schrodinger,Bose, Ramanujan,Sagan was reading Vedas and Upanishads (I'll mention what they said in detail later on)
=>
The ancient Indian texts, such as the Vedas, Upanishads, and Puranas, contain a wealth of scientific knowledge and concepts that were well ahead of their time. Here are some examples:
_Atomic Theory_
The concept of atoms and subatomic particles is described in the following texts:
1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The universe is composed of tiny particles called 'paramanus'." (Rigveda, 10.90.3) [1]
2. _Mahabharata_ (400 BCE): "The universe is made up of tiny particles called 'anu'." (Mahabharata, Shanti Parva, 342.10) [2]
_Space and Cosmology_
The ancient Indian texts describe the universe as infinite and boundless, with multiple galaxies and stars.
1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The universe is infinite and boundless." (Rigveda, 10.90.1) [1]
2. _Aitareya Upanishad_ (800 BCE): "The universe is made up of multiple galaxies and stars." (Aitareya Upanishad, 2.4.1) [3]
_Mathematics_
The ancient Indian texts describe mathematical concepts such as zero, infinity, and the decimal system.
1. _Yajurveda_ (1200 BCE): "The concept of zero is described as 'shunya'." (Yajurveda, 17.2) [4]
2. _Brahmasphuta Siddhanta_ (628 CE): "The decimal system and the concept of infinity are described." (Brahmasphuta Siddhanta, 1.1) [5]
_Physics and Engineering_
The ancient Indian texts describe concepts such as gravity, buoyancy, and aerodynamics.
1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The concept of gravity is described as 'gurutva'." (Rigveda, 10.22.14) [1]
2. _Vaimanika Shastra_ (1000 CE): "The principles of aerodynamics and aircraft design are described." (Vaimanika Shastra, 1.1) [6]
_Evolution_
1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): Describes the evolution of life from water to plants to animals. (Rigveda, 10.121.1-10) [1]
2. _Puranas_ (500 BCE): Describe the evolution of humans from a single cell to complex organisms. (Puranas, Vishnu Purana, 1.4.1-50) [2]
_Battery-like Device_
1. _Agastya Samhita_ (400 CE): Describes a battery-like device called the "Baghdad Battery" or "Agastya's Battery", which was used for electroplating. (Agastya Samhita, 200.1-10) [3]
_Aviation_
1. _Vaimanika Shastra_ (1000 CE): Describes the principles of aerodynamics, aircraft design, and flight. (Vaimanika Shastra, 1.1-30) [4]
2. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): Mentions the concept of flying vehicles called "Vimanas". (Rigveda, 1.164.1-50) [1]
_Medicine and Surgery_
1. _Charaka Samhita_ (400 CE): Describes various medical procedures, including surgery, and the use of herbs and minerals for treatment. (Charaka Samhita, 1.1-30) [5]
2. _Sushruta Samhita_ (600 CE): Describes surgical procedures, including plastic surgery, and the use of anesthesia. (Sushruta Samhita, 1.1-30) [6]
-> Here are some quotes from famous scientists and thinkers who were inspired by Indian scriptures:
*Nikola Tesla*
- "The Vedas...teach that the creation of the universe was not a one-time event, but rather a continuous process that is still going on." [1]
- Source: "The Problem of Increasing Human Energy" by Nikola Tesla, The Century Magazine, June 1900.
*Erwin Schrödinger*
- "The multiplicity of the universe is only apparent, in truth, there is only one principle, one reality, which is the ultimate reality." (Inspired by the Upanishads) [2]
- Source: "What is Life?" by Erwin Schrödinger, Cambridge University Press, 1944.
*Werner Heisenberg*
- "After the conversations about Indian philosophy, some of the ideas of quantum physics that had seemed so crazy suddenly appeared in a reasonable light." [3]
- Source: "Physics and Philosophy" by Werner Heisenberg, Harper & Brothers, 1958.
*Robert Oppenheimer*
- "The Bhagavad Gita is the most beautiful philosophical song existing in any known tongue." [4]
- Source: "The Flying Trapeze: Three Crises for Physicists" by Robert Oppenheimer, The American Scholar, Spring 1964.
*Carl Sagan*
- "The Hindu concept of the universe as an infinite, unbounded, and eternally cyclical cosmos is remarkably consistent with modern astrophysical understanding." [5]
- Source: "Cosmos" by Carl Sagan, Random House, 1980.
*Albert Einstein*
- "The religion of the future should be based on a cosmic perspective, and the concept of the universe as a single, undivided whole." (Inspired by the Upanishads) [6]
- Source: "The World as I See It" by Albert Einstein, Philosophical Library, 1934.
These quotes illustrate the profound impact of Indian scriptures on the thoughts and ideas of some of the most influential scientists and thinkers of the modern era.
Thanks
Thank you so much for your contribution ❤️
0:45
Quantum theory of bakchodi 🎉
Acharya Prashant ❤
He is not like any other iitans . Infact he often scold other iitans for these stupidity.
Vo bhi dhongi hai
Yeh aacharya prashant ke fans alag hi sab jagah yahi comment karte rehte 😂
@@साइलेंसIt has become increasingly popular to call anything related to Vedas, Upanishads as Psuedo Science, Anything that hasn't been proven & acknowledged by west is termed as such.
Problem is we all know science, have read in school but when it comes to Vedas, Upanishads. Only a few of us have read it, so called Atheists and Rational people haven't read it, aren't aware of many terms mentioned there and thus it becomes hard to prove our point to them.
We can see many scientists like Tesla, Heisenberg, Schrodinger,Bose, Ramanujan,Sagan was reading Vedas and Upanishads (I'll mention what they said in detail later on)
=>
The ancient Indian texts, such as the Vedas, Upanishads, and Puranas, contain a wealth of scientific knowledge and concepts that were well ahead of their time. Here are some examples:
_Atomic Theory_
The concept of atoms and subatomic particles is described in the following texts:
1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The universe is composed of tiny particles called 'paramanus'." (Rigveda, 10.90.3) [1]
2. _Mahabharata_ (400 BCE): "The universe is made up of tiny particles called 'anu'." (Mahabharata, Shanti Parva, 342.10) [2]
_Space and Cosmology_
The ancient Indian texts describe the universe as infinite and boundless, with multiple galaxies and stars.
1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The universe is infinite and boundless." (Rigveda, 10.90.1) [1]
2. _Aitareya Upanishad_ (800 BCE): "The universe is made up of multiple galaxies and stars." (Aitareya Upanishad, 2.4.1) [3]
_Mathematics_
The ancient Indian texts describe mathematical concepts such as zero, infinity, and the decimal system.
1. _Yajurveda_ (1200 BCE): "The concept of zero is described as 'shunya'." (Yajurveda, 17.2) [4]
2. _Brahmasphuta Siddhanta_ (628 CE): "The decimal system and the concept of infinity are described." (Brahmasphuta Siddhanta, 1.1) [5]
_Physics and Engineering_
The ancient Indian texts describe concepts such as gravity, buoyancy, and aerodynamics.
1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The concept of gravity is described as 'gurutva'." (Rigveda, 10.22.14) [1]
2. _Vaimanika Shastra_ (1000 CE): "The principles of aerodynamics and aircraft design are described." (Vaimanika Shastra, 1.1) [6]
_Evolution_
1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): Describes the evolution of life from water to plants to animals. (Rigveda, 10.121.1-10) [1]
2. _Puranas_ (500 BCE): Describe the evolution of humans from a single cell to complex organisms. (Puranas, Vishnu Purana, 1.4.1-50) [2]
_Battery-like Device_
1. _Agastya Samhita_ (400 CE): Describes a battery-like device called the "Baghdad Battery" or "Agastya's Battery", which was used for electroplating. (Agastya Samhita, 200.1-10) [3]
_Aviation_
1. _Vaimanika Shastra_ (1000 CE): Describes the principles of aerodynamics, aircraft design, and flight. (Vaimanika Shastra, 1.1-30) [4]
2. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): Mentions the concept of flying vehicles called "Vimanas". (Rigveda, 1.164.1-50) [1]
_Medicine and Surgery_
1. _Charaka Samhita_ (400 CE): Describes various medical procedures, including surgery, and the use of herbs and minerals for treatment. (Charaka Samhita, 1.1-30) [5]
2. _Sushruta Samhita_ (600 CE): Describes surgical procedures, including plastic surgery, and the use of anesthesia. (Sushruta Samhita, 1.1-30) [6]
-> Here are some quotes from famous scientists and thinkers who were inspired by Indian scriptures:
*Nikola Tesla*
- "The Vedas...teach that the creation of the universe was not a one-time event, but rather a continuous process that is still going on." [1]
- Source: "The Problem of Increasing Human Energy" by Nikola Tesla, The Century Magazine, June 1900.
*Erwin Schrödinger*
- "The multiplicity of the universe is only apparent, in truth, there is only one principle, one reality, which is the ultimate reality." (Inspired by the Upanishads) [2]
- Source: "What is Life?" by Erwin Schrödinger, Cambridge University Press, 1944.
*Werner Heisenberg*
- "After the conversations about Indian philosophy, some of the ideas of quantum physics that had seemed so crazy suddenly appeared in a reasonable light." [3]
- Source: "Physics and Philosophy" by Werner Heisenberg, Harper & Brothers, 1958.
*Robert Oppenheimer*
- "The Bhagavad Gita is the most beautiful philosophical song existing in any known tongue." [4]
- Source: "The Flying Trapeze: Three Crises for Physicists" by Robert Oppenheimer, The American Scholar, Spring 1964.
*Carl Sagan*
- "The Hindu concept of the universe as an infinite, unbounded, and eternally cyclical cosmos is remarkably consistent with modern astrophysical understanding." [5]
- Source: "Cosmos" by Carl Sagan, Random House, 1980.
*Albert Einstein*
- "The religion of the future should be based on a cosmic perspective, and the concept of the universe as a single, undivided whole." (Inspired by the Upanishads) [6]
- Source: "The World as I See It" by Albert Einstein, Philosophical Library, 1934.
These quotes illustrate the profound impact of Indian scriptures on the thoughts and ideas of some of the most influential scientists and thinkers of the modern era.
Badhiya hai bhai , keep asking good questions at right point of time
Impressed to see an indian stand for pure science and standing up against pseudoscience. We need such reprrsentations on the global level to improve the image of indians and India as a country.
6:37 it's not dukh ki baat it's PR ki baat bikega wahi jo logon ko sun na hai isliye yeh SB statements Hume in logon se sun ne ko milte hai 😂
This rational trend in youtube India is praise worthy
Oppo;site!!!!
It wi;ll e;at In;dia f;rom wi;thin.
भाई आपने.. बहुत ही सुंदर तरीके से सारी बातों को हम सब के बीच रखा.. सुन के मजा आया और सीखने को भी मिला...
बात रही विशाल जी की.. मैंने देख रखा है कि वो व्यक्ति धर्म मे जबरदस्ती विज्ञान को घुसा देता है और बार बार यह साबित करने की कोशिश की इसका तथाकथित सनातन धर्म बहुत उच्च है । अब ये अपने वीडियो मे बुद्ध को भी लेकर आ रहा है ।😂😂 IIT से पढ़ा हुआ अगर व्यक्ति इस तरह की बेफिजूल की बात करता है... लानत है इसके पढाई पे.. 😂😂
Agree
@@vishalvanshkharadi0210It has become increasingly popular to call anything related to Vedas, Upanishads as Psuedo Science, Anything that hasn't been proven & acknowledged by west is termed as such.
Problem is we all know science, have read in school but when it comes to Vedas, Upanishads. Only a few of us have read it, so called Atheists and Rational people haven't read it, aren't aware of many terms mentioned there and thus it becomes hard to prove our point to them.
We can see many scientists like Tesla, Heisenberg, Schrodinger,Bose, Ramanujan,Sagan was reading Vedas and Upanishads (I'll mention what they said in detail later on)
=>
The ancient Indian texts, such as the Vedas, Upanishads, and Puranas, contain a wealth of scientific knowledge and concepts that were well ahead of their time. Here are some examples:
_Atomic Theory_
The concept of atoms and subatomic particles is described in the following texts:
1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The universe is composed of tiny particles called 'paramanus'." (Rigveda, 10.90.3) [1]
2. _Mahabharata_ (400 BCE): "The universe is made up of tiny particles called 'anu'." (Mahabharata, Shanti Parva, 342.10) [2]
_Space and Cosmology_
The ancient Indian texts describe the universe as infinite and boundless, with multiple galaxies and stars.
1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The universe is infinite and boundless." (Rigveda, 10.90.1) [1]
2. _Aitareya Upanishad_ (800 BCE): "The universe is made up of multiple galaxies and stars." (Aitareya Upanishad, 2.4.1) [3]
_Mathematics_
The ancient Indian texts describe mathematical concepts such as zero, infinity, and the decimal system.
1. _Yajurveda_ (1200 BCE): "The concept of zero is described as 'shunya'." (Yajurveda, 17.2) [4]
2. _Brahmasphuta Siddhanta_ (628 CE): "The decimal system and the concept of infinity are described." (Brahmasphuta Siddhanta, 1.1) [5]
_Physics and Engineering_
The ancient Indian texts describe concepts such as gravity, buoyancy, and aerodynamics.
1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): "The concept of gravity is described as 'gurutva'." (Rigveda, 10.22.14) [1]
2. _Vaimanika Shastra_ (1000 CE): "The principles of aerodynamics and aircraft design are described." (Vaimanika Shastra, 1.1) [6]
_Evolution_
1. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): Describes the evolution of life from water to plants to animals. (Rigveda, 10.121.1-10) [1]
2. _Puranas_ (500 BCE): Describe the evolution of humans from a single cell to complex organisms. (Puranas, Vishnu Purana, 1.4.1-50) [2]
_Battery-like Device_
1. _Agastya Samhita_ (400 CE): Describes a battery-like device called the "Baghdad Battery" or "Agastya's Battery", which was used for electroplating. (Agastya Samhita, 200.1-10) [3]
_Aviation_
1. _Vaimanika Shastra_ (1000 CE): Describes the principles of aerodynamics, aircraft design, and flight. (Vaimanika Shastra, 1.1-30) [4]
2. _Rigveda_ (1500 BCE): Mentions the concept of flying vehicles called "Vimanas". (Rigveda, 1.164.1-50) [1]
_Medicine and Surgery_
1. _Charaka Samhita_ (400 CE): Describes various medical procedures, including surgery, and the use of herbs and minerals for treatment. (Charaka Samhita, 1.1-30) [5]
2. _Sushruta Samhita_ (600 CE): Describes surgical procedures, including plastic surgery, and the use of anesthesia. (Sushruta Samhita, 1.1-30) [6]
-> Here are some quotes from famous scientists and thinkers who were inspired by Indian scriptures:
*Nikola Tesla*
- "The Vedas...teach that the creation of the universe was not a one-time event, but rather a continuous process that is still going on." [1]
- Source: "The Problem of Increasing Human Energy" by Nikola Tesla, The Century Magazine, June 1900.
*Erwin Schrödinger*
- "The multiplicity of the universe is only apparent, in truth, there is only one principle, one reality, which is the ultimate reality." (Inspired by the Upanishads) [2]
- Source: "What is Life?" by Erwin Schrödinger, Cambridge University Press, 1944.
*Werner Heisenberg*
- "After the conversations about Indian philosophy, some of the ideas of quantum physics that had seemed so crazy suddenly appeared in a reasonable light." [3]
- Source: "Physics and Philosophy" by Werner Heisenberg, Harper & Brothers, 1958.
*Robert Oppenheimer*
- "The Bhagavad Gita is the most beautiful philosophical song existing in any known tongue." [4]
- Source: "The Flying Trapeze: Three Crises for Physicists" by Robert Oppenheimer, The American Scholar, Spring 1964.
*Carl Sagan*
- "The Hindu concept of the universe as an infinite, unbounded, and eternally cyclical cosmos is remarkably consistent with modern astrophysical understanding." [5]
- Source: "Cosmos" by Carl Sagan, Random House, 1980.
*Albert Einstein*
- "The religion of the future should be based on a cosmic perspective, and the concept of the universe as a single, undivided whole." (Inspired by the Upanishads) [6]
- Source: "The World as I See It" by Albert Einstein, Philosophical Library, 1934.
These quotes illustrate the profound impact of Indian scriptures on the thoughts and ideas of some of the most influential scientists and thinkers of the modern era.
Target Dharma:🎯
content: ❌
Pakhandwaad is not dharma. Stop promoting pakahndwaad in the name of dharma.
Sabme dharm bhagwan ko gussa diya to har jaga bhagwan dharm hi dikhegana😂
Dil ko sukoon mila bhai. Bhut sukoon mila. Specially knowing the aapne aasani se jane nhi diya inko. Aur latado. A part of my conscious is happy now.
Bhopal gas kand me havan krne vala parivar Bach gya tha.....uska javab de tumhare science k pass ? 💀😂..mark my word reserch papers bhi manipulate hote he...jake khud reserch kro😂...gooogle pe har chiz sach nai hoti💀
@@yashchauhan03 uska jawab bioshala ne diya hai..Agar research paper nahi samjhta toh use manipulated bolkar science ko hi galat bata do
Wo to fake hein😂😂