"You are detained until I have ascertained whether you have committed an offence." Thanks for the admission, bud. Much appreciated. Will make the claim process much smoother.
Yep. Just admitted it's in breach of the "innocent until proven guilty" premise. You're expected to prove your innocence ------- that's not how it works...........
@@ianhill4585 he was innocent until proven guilty, he was never charged with anything. they were investigating and let him go when they realised its an xbox controller. you lot really are thick.
@@ianhill4585 and...? most of the world thought it was flat. they were wrong and so are you. in this video he says the officer has to tell him under what section... he doesnt. only when you are charged you have to officially be told the section. he was only investigating and only needed to say the reason why to the suspect. all was done correctly, he investigated, told him why and let him go once he established no crime was committed. nothing to see here.
So basically he's detaining you to see if you have a drone. If you do have one, you are free to go as no crime was committed. If you don't have one, you are free to go as no crime was committed.
The police should get their facts right first. Before harassing the public for no reason. Or we are worse than the North Korean or Chinese dictatorships. Our police should be using taxpayers resources for real crimes.
@@notmenotme614 bro they’re spending more time catching “offensive tweeters” then actually catching groomers and stopping knife crime. Your taxes are wasted
Reggie my son that was totally brilliant. Seems like these cops have taken it upon themselves to take away the publics right to film. Aggressive officer shouting a load of babble while he tries think up a crime he can do you for, accuses you of being aggressive because your reply was interfering with his ability to think. The police refuse to follow their own policies for photography They REALLY do not want independent auditing , i wonder why.
We need tyrants like these off the streets none of those scumbags had a single sense of law or legislation just a desire to abuse the public. Sue them Reg for false detention.
These clowns are not tyrants, they have not got the brain capacity. Time and time again it shows the lack of understanding, knowledge and the will to learn the law. The cretinous halfwits are embarrasing, and what on gods earth was Lesbo Cop going on about at the end.
Showed him up for the incompetent aggressive clown he was, almost embarrassed he's Scottish 🤣 I had a proper laugh out loud moment when the silly moo was looking up to see the drone, funny as feck! Love your work Reggie, keep it up. I'll leave another lovely Google review on their page. 🏴
What an embarrassment, "you've got nothing better to do" personally I think finding poorly educated Police officers who are quite happy to abuse their powers enforcing "laws" the are obviously too lazy to learn, or they lack the capacity to apply those laws in a fair, reasoned and mature fashion, is NOT a waste of time. The rights of the individual are trampled underfoot again with false detainment and ridiculous threats.
9:00 Telling him that you were going to fly your drone over the station just proved to him that you know he fucked up and fabricated laws - you were basically telling him that he was totally incompetent.
If there is a sign on a door or entry way, unless otherwise stated, the sign applies to the area past the door or entry way. If the sing on that entry way was a 5mph speed limit sign, it doesn't apply to the road in front of the entry way. It applies to the area past the entry way.
Laughing my ass of here Reg. What a great spoof, pure brilliance fella. That chunker of a cop really lost it a couple of times there. And those signs on the wall, what a bloody cheek, I can see this station getting swamped with auditors. C'mon Marti, get in there and fill your boots lad.
What a complete fool that copper was. If I lived next door to him I’d be asking over the garden fence if it was an offence to carry a game controller in public. If I worked with him I’d be saying ‘mate, you made yourself look a complete tool there’. The PCSO was like a little child having been made a toilet monitor. Great video, allowing them to look exactly what they are - fools and tyrants.
The detainment was presupposed on a false premise; therefore it was an unlawful detainment, i.e., a criminal offence. The Officer who committed the criminal offence needs to be arrested and charged accordingly.
Well done to Cumbria Police 👍👍👍 for years I’ve told anyone who would listen how much of a disgrace the force is, give yourself a round of applause Reggie for showing them up 👍
Imagine kids today playing a prank like we used to. Taking gates off and leaning them up so they fell over when you opened them. Tying door handles together. All sorts of tricks . This guy would try to charge them for anti social behaviour
What a bunch! Absolutely no idea of the laws they are supposed to uphold. He was sweating cos he wasn't sure if he and his three dollies had any power to detain or arrest you or the capability of doing it. Did you spoil their lunch break? Or did they just have nothing to do? Brilliant work!
The more I watch this I realise how much PC Plod was winding himself up.Once he realised he had been stitched up he should have lightened up and laughed with the rest of us.Reggie you are pure gold .
Reggie is brilliant. It takes a lot of confidence to do such audits and the way he handles a pack of contentious officers by simply knowing his rights is impressive. We should all strive to have the same knowledge as Reggie so that if you do ever encounter such officers you are prepared. Also to note, most people can get flustered when confronted by officers, the adrenaline rush gets to them and they slip up or aren't as concise as they could be in the heat of the moment and the officers pounce on that. Reggie has incredible composure. An example to us all. Keep going Reg!!
I'm stopping you because I'm unsure if you're breaking the law! That's called an investigation and is not a basis for detainment. Nor is flying a drone above buildings that aren't subject to the official secrets act or into restricted airspace. This detainment was a 100% illegal and clearly (based on his personal opinions and knowledge of auditing) retaliatory stop.
@@cypeman8037 The official secrets order of the official secrets act, also known as the "prohibited places" order 1994 (rev 1955) is building specific and covers like 11 buildings I seem to remember. It's on the legislation gov site.
@@4pThorpy A few police stations tried this in an attempt to stop auditors, however, the few as stated buildings that are covered are certainly NOT a tiny police station in a no-nothing area I personally think the police are concerned that they will be seen to be idle layabouts, certainly not turning up at many crime scenes anymore, 4 days to turn up to a burglary woke an 83-year-old woman at 2am to give her a "crime number" or whatever for insurance, no investigation whatsoever
I do not believe a copper can detain anyone for any other reason than to conduct a search because they have reasonable suspicion that the person is in possession of drugs, offensive weapon or articles connected to terrorism (with some other very specific exceptions not relevant here). They have to tell you why you are being detained for a search. This video shows none of that, therefore illegal detainment. Please tell me if I am wrong or not.
What a clown who should really look up the law before he calls you out in breaking the law. Flying a drone over the police station is in itself not unlawful unless the CAA disallows it fir being in a restricted air space. Take this further Reggie as it is clear he should not be a cop. Love the way you handled him though.
Get that claim in Reggie and let’s get this video posted everywhere to show this goon and his fellow female idiots for what they are. Being Audited is clearly getting under their skin so needs to be upped. He clearly showed contempt for a member of the public cos he thought you were an auditor and thinks he owns the air space in his yard. I thought he was gonna burst in tears at one point.
The Undisputed Heavyweight Champion... Reggie....The X Box.....Photo. King of the comical auditors. After seeing the other posts with the cloned drone, I knew this was going to happen. Well done Reggie, fantastic audit and entertainment. That copper, I honestly don't know where to start.
7:20 So he has just made the situation even worse for the his force. He knows Reggie is an auditor and he still goes through the whole charade of saying that filming into a private place is an illegal act when his briefing about auditors would've explained everything and should've said the best thing to do is to leave them alone and not engage. Looks like PC 154 didn't engage his brain cell.
So he comes out to "ascertain" if you are carrying out a legal activity and when you object you're verbally aggressive . But his "ascertaining" means illegally detaining you. Well I ascertained from the comfort of my armchair that officer is a complete idiot who doesn't know the law. and I didn't need a drone to do it. Plonker.
Under Modus Ponens law he is affirming the consequent, i.e., assuming the consequent implies the antecedent, rather than the antecedent implies the consequent. In laymen's terms: he assumes an offence has been committed without having any evidence of the offence, and without being able to actually articulate the section of law which has been broken. It's like saying, "I don't know what offence you have committed, and I don't have any evidence to imply you have committed an offence; but, I believe you have committed an offence and i'm going to find out [a] what that offence is, and [b] what evidence there is for that offence".
@@martinsanders6124 My my Martin that was one absolute belter of a comment -- so in consequence thereof,[with no antecedent intent] please accept my compliments.
Hi Reggie Photo, the catalogue of compound error the man gets caught up in is almost incredible!, to start with he did not introduce himself properly, he then fell into the trap of claiming that he was applying laws that he knew nothing about and using his suspicion alone without any necessary foundation. In the end he has to take the walk of shame without the slightest sign of humility or contrition, I think the term 'butt hurt' fits him quite well. Some people might suggest that your provocative behaviour was not reasonable or necessary and that might br true but it is part of standard police procedure to learn to deal with 'awkward customers' in a calm and respectful manner and absorb any and all provocation, failure to do so in any way let alone all ways is not acceptable and if it takes the activities of people like you to expose those deficiencies then good on you!. Cheers, Richard.
Come on now Reggie, you can’t play Xbox in public in this day and age with the current climate. Section Xbox 360 of the police reform act: it is illegal to carry unidentified wireless Bluetooth controllers around a police station.
A quick Google search will tell you there are only 3 occasions when a police officer can ' detain' you. All other times they need to arrest you. This was totally unlawful and if you can make a complaint at the very least.
That sign must apply if you are entering the station. It is NOT legally enforceable on the public footpath. Unless restrictive bylaws have been sneaked in.
You cannot be detained until they find out if you have committed an offence. This resulted in a payout by the Met Police a year or so ago by Iain Gould (solicitor) who fought a case like this and won compensation. And here's the big one......section 25 of PACE was repealed in 2006 and replaced by section 24. It's not a power to detain it covers powers to arrest. I sent an email to the Chief Constable Michelle Skeer regarding this incident. UPDATE...... Received reply from Chiefs batman. He has forwarded the complaint to PSD. They can't do anything because I'm not a witness. But if Reggie has complained it will be taken into consideration.
@@budgetnuclearweapons7858 They can't detain you to do an investigation to find out a crime, they can only detain you to search you under any relevant legislation, Misuse of drugs, section 1of PACE, et Al. Otherwise you could be stopped and detained on a whim until the police find a crime. See Walker v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis. (2014). EWCA. Civ 897.
6:00 And one minute after the start of the encounter, PC 154 now makes the biggest mistake of his life (other than being born, but that's not fair on his parents who probably love him to bits) and detains Reggie when the law he's quoted doesn't exist and therefore makes the detention unlawful. He can't use the excuse of not needing to know every single bit of the law when he had more than enough opportunity to be informed of the law before he came out and approached Reggie. There was no expeditious reason to detain Reggie as he wasn't running away so PC 154 had time to inform himself beforehand. And when it comes to complaint and civil case time, the police can't use the excuse that he acted properly even if just a bit mistaken - that didn't work in Julian Chamberlain's case and he got £5k as a result.
Flying a drone over a police station is not a crime.. hence Section 25 of PACE doesn’t apply since you can be arrested for any offence. That was an unlawful detainment.. the police cannot detain you until they figure out if a crime had been committed…
Somebody needs to educate him on the laws of photography in public and the laws on the sky.He also needs to be educated in how to properly investigate a person and a situation.I really hope you take this further.
They think they own the skies they think the cars are theirs they think they know the law they think they can tell you what to do.they think its ok to lie.they think its ok to kidnap you.they think they can steal your property.they think they can tell you you cant take pictures they think they can tresspass you.what more bs do they think they can get away with.the public need to wake up the public need to film everything they do.the public need to hold these idiots to acvount.dont put claims in just sue the individual.take their huse their cars their goods like they do ours.get strong folks and challenge these clueless idiots
That sign is meaningless and the police don't have the authority to dictate what hobbies people conduct in the street. People need to go to this police station and record it constantly because that poolice sergeant said it was against the LAW.
Absolutely! Are they going to arrest every single person with a dash-cam in their car who drives past and films that police station! 🤣 There is no logic to their useless sign. I bet they stuck it up to try and deter auditor from visiting. Auditors assemble!! 😂
@@LindaWisdomphotography Yes, I must say they are asking for the “Streisand Effect” to come into play. For those not aware in a nut shell about twenty years ago Barbara Streisand didn’t want a photographer who was doing some sort of art project thing to video her posh house from the air (I think)and made a song and dance about it in court. In the end photos of the house and presumably gardens etc of it ended up on the news and hundreds and hundreds of nosey people came to visit.
Great audit Reg - (mixed feelings whether it's worth you making a complaint though). And didn't we see just how quickly that idiot began to turn aggressive! What a hotheaded nob. Probably a good thing you had your camera going!
Well done Reg. While he was being aggressive in his tone towards you, he accused you of the same? No wonder that people have no more respect for these power happy twits.
Another mysandrist mutter from the gutter, always have to say something. That sign is legal? . The ego driven power hungry enforcer should investigate with the law and not his motor mouth opinion! As for the cowardly gaggle of little girl misandrist handcocked harpies. Hiding behind someone else so they can take the opportunity of their usual brave tactic to group cackle insults whilst walking away. They should continue on out of the once respected service. ALL MOUTH and NO BRAINS!!!!
@@woowah32 are you for real Do you not see the abuse of power here Harassment for what an imaginary drone If they don't see a drone by law there is no suspicion
8:45 And now the most serious mistake committed by PC 154 - section 25 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 was repealed in 2006. If he meant section 24, which being kind to him due to his emotional distress, he was really thinking of, then he would would've got away with it if he actually arrested Reggie and not just detained him. Reggie would only have to give his name and address after arrest not just by being detained. Detainment only allows PC 154 to investigate and the first thing he should've done is look at the controller and tell Reggie to bring the drone down.
It was so weird. I'm detaining you to see if you have a drone. If you do have one, you are free to go as no crime was committed. If you don't have one, you are free to go as no crime was committed.
Good video Reggie. I enjoyed watching this one. The police made themselves look very foolish. They proved that the training they received was woefully inadequate. Thanks for all you do mate. Respect!
@@notmenotme614 not to break it mention that you know you cops borderline useless on a good day.once had a car broken into had to basically threaten to call the chief inspector for the region to make them do anything.
Any copper who cannot control their anger while on duty, can be threat to the public. Police are paid to enforce law, their standard of self control must be high. Peace and love Reggie.
You got him bang to rights on a law suit reggie. Where a constable has reasonable grounds for suspecting that any offence which is not an arrestable offence has been committed or attempted, or is being committed or attempted, he may arrest the relevant person if it appears to him that service of a summons is impracticable or inappropriate because any of the general arrest conditions is satisfied. (2)In this section “the relevant person” means any person whom the constable has reasonable grounds to suspect of having committed or having attempted to commit the offence or of being in the course of committing or attempting to commit it.
Too funny sent by Johnny 5 O. 🇨🇦🇨🇦. This was hilarious couldn’t stop laughing 🇨🇦 I’m a new sub and now a big fan of ur work. U can’t bait a good officer!! Well done
My reply from Cumbria PSD: “I have taken an initial look into your complaint and can confirm that the Sergeant 0154 made his line manager aware of the situation immediately following the incident and a Reflective Practice Process has been instigated to address Sergeant’s shortcomings. The Reflective Practice process aims to challenge officers where they may fall short through constructive conversations with their line manager to identify and implement any necessary learning. This may include, but is not limited to, additional training, closer supervision, refreshers of guidance etc.” Bit of a result.
Haha loved this one smiling from ear to ear right now. Detaining you for doing something that even if you were actually doing was legal and you weren't doing it
![[UNCUT] ชาวบ้านถาม “นายกอุ๊งอิ๊งค์” ประชาชนมีกิน มีใช้ กี่โมง? I คนดังนั่งเคลียร์ I 16 ส.ค. 67](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/tKZvOzLIJJc/mqdefault.jpg)
"You are detained until I have ascertained whether you have committed an offence."
Thanks for the admission, bud. Much appreciated. Will make the claim process much smoother.
You are detained until I can think of an excuse to detain you.
Yep. Just admitted it's in breach of the "innocent until proven guilty" premise. You're expected to prove your innocence ------- that's not how it works...........
@@ianhill4585 he was innocent until proven guilty, he was never charged with anything. they were investigating and let him go when they realised its an xbox controller. you lot really are thick.
@@Writeous0ne And everyone in this section has a different Opinion to yours, and we're thick?
Oh deary dear. 😋
@@ianhill4585 and...? most of the world thought it was flat. they were wrong and so are you.
in this video he says the officer has to tell him under what section... he doesnt. only when you are charged you have to officially be told the section. he was only investigating and only needed to say the reason why to the suspect. all was done correctly, he investigated, told him why and let him go once he established no crime was committed.
nothing to see here.
So detained for pretending to do legal activity. You couldn't make this shit up!
So basically he's detaining you to see if you have a drone. If you do have one, you are free to go as no crime was committed. If you don't have one, you are free to go as no crime was committed.
The police should get their facts right first. Before harassing the public for no reason. Or we are worse than the North Korean or Chinese dictatorships.
Our police should be using taxpayers resources for real crimes.
😁😂😂😂
@@notmenotme614 bro they’re spending more time catching “offensive tweeters” then actually catching groomers and stopping knife crime. Your taxes are wasted
He might get 'dearrrsted' again. Or is it unarrested.
@@mrdarren1045 being detained isnt the same thing as being arrested
Reggie my son that was totally brilliant. Seems like these cops have taken it upon themselves to take away the publics right to film. Aggressive officer shouting a load of babble while he tries think up a crime he can do you for, accuses you of being aggressive because your reply was interfering with his ability to think. The police refuse to follow their own policies for photography They REALLY do not want independent auditing , i wonder why.
Your reply was interfering with his ability to think ,that made me laugh awesome 🤩
We need tyrants like these off the streets none of those scumbags had a single sense of law or legislation just a desire to abuse the public. Sue them Reg for false detention.
These clowns are not tyrants, they have not got the brain capacity. Time and time again it shows the lack of understanding, knowledge and the will to learn the law. The cretinous halfwits are embarrasing, and what on gods earth was Lesbo Cop going on about at the end.
You didn't make them commit an unlawful detainment. You didn't make them behave like absolute plods. They did that all by themselves.
Showed him up for the incompetent aggressive clown he was, almost embarrassed he's Scottish 🤣 I had a proper laugh out loud moment when the silly moo was looking up to see the drone, funny as feck! Love your work Reggie, keep it up. I'll leave another lovely Google review on their page. 🏴
🤣🤣🤣👍
What an embarrassment, "you've got nothing better to do" personally I think finding poorly educated Police officers who are quite happy to abuse their powers enforcing "laws" the are obviously too lazy to learn, or they lack the capacity to apply those laws in a fair, reasoned and mature fashion, is NOT a waste of time. The rights of the individual are trampled underfoot again with false detainment and ridiculous threats.
Absolute clowns. The standard of policing is embarrassing.
Reggie on top form and holding his own.
what an absolute clown, could see his assumed 'authority' melt as every second passed
he knew he was being baited and fell for it anyway, takes REAL stupidity to do that.
9:00 Telling him that you were going to fly your drone over the station just proved to him that you know he fucked up and fabricated laws - you were basically telling him that he was totally incompetent.
If there is a sign on a door or entry way, unless otherwise stated, the sign applies to the area past the door or entry way.
If the sing on that entry way was a 5mph speed limit sign, it doesn't apply to the road in front of the entry way. It applies to the area past the entry way.
LEGEND !!!
Just goes to show mr clown just wanted to assert his authority…….
We need more like this !
Laughing my ass of here Reg. What a great spoof, pure brilliance fella. That chunker of a cop really lost it a couple of times there. And those signs on the wall, what a bloody cheek, I can see this station getting swamped with auditors. C'mon Marti, get in there and fill your boots lad.
The penny suddenly dropped but he already committed himself to his own downfall.
you absolutely kill it Reggie lol, love your work, and the humour you bring into it.lol, awesome, never stop being you. lol
Honestly Reggie best audit I have seen in years so funny but great keep up the great work mate
What a complete fool that copper was. If I lived next door to him I’d be asking over the garden fence if it was an offence to carry a game controller in public. If I worked with him I’d be saying ‘mate, you made yourself look a complete tool there’. The PCSO was like a little child having been made a toilet monitor. Great video, allowing them to look exactly what they are - fools and tyrants.
At 6.30 he realised he'd fucked up!
The detainment was presupposed on a false premise; therefore it was an unlawful detainment, i.e., a criminal offence. The Officer who committed the criminal offence needs to be arrested and charged accordingly.
@@martinsanders6124 Fingers crossed
@@tractorboy2002 👍
@@AYTAZED That's a bit extreme.
Well done to Cumbria Police 👍👍👍 for years I’ve told anyone who would listen how much of a disgrace the force is, give yourself a round of applause Reggie for showing them up 👍
oh dear, yet another constable who thinks he can detain someone in order to find if an offence has been committed. No such power bloody exists.
Imagine kids today playing a prank like we used to. Taking gates off and leaning them up so they fell over when you opened them. Tying door handles together. All sorts of tricks . This guy would try to charge them for anti social behaviour
Those are now terrorists acts
What a bunch! Absolutely no idea of the laws they are supposed to uphold. He was sweating cos he wasn't sure if he and his three dollies had any power to detain or arrest you or the capability of doing it. Did you spoil their lunch break? Or did they just have nothing to do?
Brilliant work!
He was butt hurt lol , detained over an X Box controller , you could not make it up , brilliant.
The Feelings Police in action once again.
Keep it up dude. The more officers dealing with you will let me get on with my daily crimes. Cheers brother
I'm subbed, that was too bloody funny. Spat my coffee on my keyboard at the end there ya bastard. Stay safe, stay free.
The police seem totally paranoid about cameras. This law isn't complicated. Why don't they understand it?
Let's be honest..... they aren't the sharpest tools in the shed.
The tide is turning, for too long the police have gotten away with things cos they lie, but the camera never lies
Because they are thick as bricks
The more I watch this I realise how much PC Plod was winding himself up.Once he realised he had been stitched up he should have lightened up and laughed with the rest of us.Reggie you are pure gold .
Your a knob
he's scottish, they are stubborn
Best audit I've seen for a long, long time! 🤣😊❤
👍🤟👊
Outstanding. You're up there with AB for auditing. Briliant. I've had so many lol moments. cheers bro :)
Reggie is brilliant. It takes a lot of confidence to do such audits and the way he handles a pack of contentious officers by simply knowing his rights is impressive. We should all strive to have the same knowledge as Reggie so that if you do ever encounter such officers you are prepared. Also to note, most people can get flustered when confronted by officers, the adrenaline rush gets to them and they slip up or aren't as concise as they could be in the heat of the moment and the officers pounce on that. Reggie has incredible composure. An example to us all. Keep going Reg!!
Thanks mate respect 🙏
Practise makes perfect, and Reggie's done that. PC 154 hasn't.
@@ReggiePhoto what a prize plum you found here reggie
You're so right. Auditors, like.....AB, NobodyPoor, Kolee, Plod etc are all masters at their art.
@@2icelollys1goat they dont know their arse from their elbows.
I'm stopping you because I'm unsure if you're breaking the law! That's called an investigation and is not a basis for detainment. Nor is flying a drone above buildings that aren't subject to the official secrets act or into restricted airspace. This detainment was a 100% illegal and clearly (based on his personal opinions and knowledge of auditing) retaliatory stop.
Official Secrets Act, you crack me up. FFS. People sign the official secrets act, not buildings. 😂😂
@@cypeman8037 The official secrets order of the official secrets act, also known as the "prohibited places" order 1994 (rev 1955) is building specific and covers like 11 buildings I seem to remember. It's on the legislation gov site.
@@4pThorpy A few police stations tried this in an attempt to stop auditors, however, the few as stated buildings that are covered are certainly NOT a tiny police station in a no-nothing area
I personally think the police are concerned that they will be seen to be idle layabouts, certainly not turning up at many crime scenes anymore, 4 days to turn up to a burglary woke an 83-year-old woman at 2am to give her a "crime number" or whatever for insurance, no investigation whatsoever
@@robba1234 we had a guy in the states who did the same. It was hilarious. They spent 45 minutes fishing for a crime. He lost.
"Stupid is as stupid does"(Forrest Gump).😂😂
I do not believe a copper can detain anyone for any other reason than to conduct a search because they have reasonable suspicion that the person is in possession of drugs, offensive weapon or articles connected to terrorism (with some other very specific exceptions not relevant here). They have to tell you why you are being detained for a search.
This video shows none of that, therefore illegal detainment.
Please tell me if I am wrong or not.
They took the bait to easy well done reggie hilarious 😂😂😂
What a clown who should really look up the law before he calls you out in breaking the law. Flying a drone over the police station is in itself not unlawful unless the CAA disallows it fir being in a restricted air space. Take this further Reggie as it is clear he should not be a cop. Love the way you handled him though.
Shocking how the other coppers stood there and said nothing about an illegal detainment.
It’s pathetic that they can “detain” a citizen until they “Find out” if you’ve committed an offence.
Absolutely loved this, "Are you a snowflake or what?" that cop didn't know what way to turn, his wee ego got burned
"crime bodge"
Get that claim in Reggie and let’s get this video posted everywhere to show this goon and his fellow female idiots for what they are. Being Audited is clearly getting under their skin so needs to be upped. He clearly showed contempt for a member of the public cos he thought you were an auditor and thinks he owns the air space in his yard.
I thought he was gonna burst in tears at one point.
One of your finest Reggie. You made the Officer look a simpleton.
... with minimum effort.
To be honest it didn't require much effort.
To be honest he is a simpleton. Nobody made him look like one...
Ha !! He thinks that using the word ascertain … many times makes him sound intelligent …. It doesn’t
@@britbyname3620 I have a feeling that he may not have an entire grasp of the meaning and usage of ascertain.
10:36 “and who are you like?” Lovely stuff Reggie 👍🏼 this is one of the best ones mate
The Undisputed Heavyweight Champion... Reggie....The X Box.....Photo. King of the comical auditors. After seeing the other posts with the cloned drone, I knew this was going to happen. Well done Reggie, fantastic audit and entertainment. That copper, I honestly don't know where to start.
7:20 So he has just made the situation even worse for the his force. He knows Reggie is an auditor and he still goes through the whole charade of saying that filming into a private place is an illegal act when his briefing about auditors would've explained everything and should've said the best thing to do is to leave them alone and not engage. Looks like PC 154 didn't engage his brain cell.
Can’t keep there mouths shut
So he comes out to "ascertain" if you are carrying out a legal activity and when you object you're verbally aggressive . But his "ascertaining" means illegally detaining you.
Well I ascertained from the comfort of my armchair that officer is a complete idiot who doesn't know the law. and I didn't need a drone to do it. Plonker.
Under Modus Ponens law he is affirming the consequent, i.e., assuming the consequent implies the antecedent, rather than the antecedent implies the consequent.
In laymen's terms: he assumes an offence has been committed without having any evidence of the offence, and without being able to actually articulate the section of law which has been broken.
It's like saying, "I don't know what offence you have committed, and I don't have any evidence to imply you have committed an offence; but, I believe you have committed an offence and i'm going to find out [a] what that offence is, and [b] what evidence there is for that offence".
@@martinsanders6124 My my Martin that was one absolute belter of a comment -- so in consequence thereof,[with no antecedent intent] please accept my compliments.
@@DavidBrown-nv3tw I am much obliged :)
Hi Reggie Photo, the catalogue of compound error the man gets caught up in is almost incredible!, to start with he did not introduce himself properly, he then fell into the trap of claiming that he was applying laws that he knew nothing about and using his suspicion alone without any necessary foundation.
In the end he has to take the walk of shame without the slightest sign of humility or contrition, I think the term 'butt hurt' fits him quite well.
Some people might suggest that your provocative behaviour was not reasonable or necessary and that might br true but it is part of standard police procedure to learn to deal with 'awkward customers' in a calm and respectful manner and absorb any and all provocation, failure to do so in any way let alone all ways is not acceptable and if it takes the activities of people like you to expose those deficiencies then good on you!.
Cheers, Richard.
That Cop Shop Is A Circus and he was the Ring Master - Our Reggie doing what he does best 👌
Come on now Reggie, you can’t play Xbox in public in this day and age with the current climate.
Section Xbox 360 of the police reform act: it is illegal to carry unidentified wireless Bluetooth controllers around a police station.
😂😂 👌
Bwhahahaha, Ohmaphuknsides 😂✌️
Laughing my shit off GJ nice one,,!
Anyone who starts a conversation with Excuse Me Sir ... and ends it with Your Just an Idiot.... clearly lost their way in the exchange.
🤣🤣🤣😜
I’m with the coppers. Interactions like this are why society today is so aggressive, divided and hungry for confrontation.
All walked away with their Ego's hurt. Great Audit 👍
A quick Google search will tell you there are only 3 occasions when a police officer can ' detain' you. All other times they need to arrest you. This was totally unlawful and if you can make a complaint at the very least.
That sign must apply if you are entering the station. It is NOT legally enforceable on the public footpath. Unless restrictive bylaws have been sneaked in.
Johnny 5-0 sent me here. This was brilliant!!! Well done, sir.
Respect mate 💙📸👍🤟
I just subscribed to your channel Johnny 5 0 sent me keep up the good work my friend from across the pond 😎🇺🇲
You cannot be detained until they find out if you have committed an offence. This resulted in a payout by the Met Police a year or so ago by Iain Gould (solicitor) who fought a case like this and won compensation.
And here's the big one......section 25 of PACE was repealed in 2006 and replaced by section 24. It's not a power to detain it covers powers to arrest.
I sent an email to the Chief Constable Michelle Skeer regarding this incident.
UPDATE...... Received reply from Chiefs batman. He has forwarded the complaint to PSD. They can't do anything because I'm not a witness. But if Reggie has complained it will be taken into consideration.
Brilliant just brilliant
Keep spreading the knowledge to the people 🗣️👍🏾✌🏾
They literally don’t know what they are talking about pulling out all sorts of wrong and obsolete sections.
They can detain you if they SUSPECT you have committed a crime.
It remains that right up until a conviction......or not.
@@budgetnuclearweapons7858 They can't detain you to do an investigation to find out a crime, they can only detain you to search you under any relevant legislation, Misuse of drugs, section 1of PACE, et Al. Otherwise you could be stopped and detained on a whim until the police find a crime.
See Walker v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis. (2014). EWCA. Civ 897.
6:00 And one minute after the start of the encounter, PC 154 now makes the biggest mistake of his life (other than being born, but that's not fair on his parents who probably love him to bits) and detains Reggie when the law he's quoted doesn't exist and therefore makes the detention unlawful. He can't use the excuse of not needing to know every single bit of the law when he had more than enough opportunity to be informed of the law before he came out and approached Reggie. There was no expeditious reason to detain Reggie as he wasn't running away so PC 154 had time to inform himself beforehand. And when it comes to complaint and civil case time, the police can't use the excuse that he acted properly even if just a bit mistaken - that didn't work in Julian Chamberlain's case and he got £5k as a result.
Flying a drone over a police station is not a crime.. hence Section 25 of PACE doesn’t apply since you can be arrested for any offence.
That was an unlawful detainment.. the police cannot detain you until they figure out if a crime had been committed…
Reggie, detained for flying an Xbox. Genius!
🤣🤣🤣
Somebody needs to educate him on the laws of photography in public and the laws on the sky.He also needs to be educated in how to properly investigate a person and a situation.I really hope you take this further.
Indeed
They think they own the skies they think the cars are theirs they think they know the law they think they can tell you what to do.they think its ok to lie.they think its ok to kidnap you.they think they can steal your property.they think they can tell you you cant take pictures they think they can tresspass you.what more bs do they think they can get away with.the public need to wake up the public need to film everything they do.the public need to hold these idiots to acvount.dont put claims in just sue the individual.take their huse their cars their goods like they do ours.get strong folks and challenge these clueless idiots
He also needs a refresher on professionalism and courtesy, the instigating, escalating liar.
Someone needs to educate the scumbag Chief Constable responsible for that "no photography" sign.
I think the cop was setup by some of the others .He seems to be a rookie.
That sign is meaningless and the police don't have the authority to dictate what hobbies people conduct in the street. People need to go to this police station and record it constantly because that poolice sergeant said it was against the LAW.
Absolutely! Are they going to arrest every single person with a dash-cam in their car who drives past and films that police station! 🤣 There is no logic to their useless sign. I bet they stuck it up to try and deter auditor from visiting. Auditors assemble!! 😂
That sign is provocative and brings the police service into disrepute.
Go do it then pinaci
@@Domopremo I would but some locations are a very long way from my house so wouldn't be practicable. My comment is for those in the general area.
@@LindaWisdomphotography Yes, I must say they are asking for the “Streisand Effect” to come into play. For those not aware in a nut shell about twenty years ago Barbara Streisand didn’t want a photographer who was doing some sort of art project thing to video her posh house from the air (I think)and made a song and dance about it in court. In the end photos of the house and presumably gardens etc of it ended up on the news and hundreds and hundreds of nosey people came to visit.
Great audit Reg - (mixed feelings whether it's worth you making a complaint though). And didn't we see just how quickly that idiot began to turn aggressive! What a hotheaded nob. Probably a good thing you had your camera going!
It's definitely worth making a complaint. Police shouldn't be making up laws and detaining innocent people.
It will go nowhere but it’s still on record
You are absolutely brilliant, Sir! Respect from America!
Well done Reg.
While he was being aggressive in his tone towards you, he accused you of the same?
No wonder that people have no more respect for these power happy twits.
He was definitely baiting Reggie to escalate the situation into a Section 5.
Exactly he was actually taking the piss out of Reggie.
Rules for radicals
That was quality Reggie, respect for standing your ground 👍👍
Another mysandrist mutter from the gutter, always have to say something. That sign is legal? . The ego driven power hungry enforcer should investigate with the law and not his motor mouth opinion!
As for the cowardly gaggle of little girl misandrist handcocked harpies. Hiding behind someone else so they can take the opportunity of their usual brave tactic to group cackle insults whilst walking away.
They should continue on out of the once respected service. ALL MOUTH and NO BRAINS!!!!
Might be the best audit I've seen in a while.
Cops need to learn difference between public vs private
Damn fine work Reggie, put him right in his place fella, making up their own “laws” on filming, top man 👍👍👍
Ffs it wasn’t even a wireless controller 🤣 this sh1t is funny af 🤣 I like these social experiments you are doing Reggie 👍🏼
Fuck me, he’s was very aggressive in his speech talk about double standards…..what a tit. Where do these clowns come from, Billy smarts circus.
@@Davidculshaw70 these coppers needs dealing with at home
@@woowah32 funny how it got you’re attention 😉 played yourself 😬
@@woowah32 are you for real
Do you not see the abuse of power here
Harassment for what an imaginary drone
If they don't see a drone by law there is no suspicion
@@woowah32 cycling Mikey making Britain a safer place
You dealt with this like a pro reggie mate! Always rise above there schoolboy techniques 😂👍
You are the king of British audits
8:45 And now the most serious mistake committed by PC 154 - section 25 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 was repealed in 2006. If he meant section 24, which being kind to him due to his emotional distress, he was really thinking of, then he would would've got away with it if he actually arrested Reggie and not just detained him. Reggie would only have to give his name and address after arrest not just by being detained. Detainment only allows PC 154 to investigate and the first thing he should've done is look at the controller and tell Reggie to bring the drone down.
Unlawful arrest?
As you were detained, they have infact arrested you.
So it's wrongful arrest and you can sue them.
Wrong. The arrest can come after being detained for questioning. The point here is he had no grounds to do that.
That was great Reggie. I told you that you would have some fun.
omg he was on the verge of a panic attack ! Your posts are comedy gold. You really highlight how inexperienced the Police force really are.
It was illegal detaiinment because even if you did have a drone it would still not be an offence. Therefore it was illegal detainment. Claim.
It was so weird. I'm detaining you to see if you have a drone. If you do have one, you are free to go as no crime was committed. If you don't have one, you are free to go as no crime was committed.
And if he did have a drone in the air, the officer was interfering with a pilot in control of an aircraft.
That x box control is really good, it brought out a bunch of goons lol
Best vid so far. Excellent work. Bring them all in to line.
That plod was totally out of his depth. At one point I thought he was going to burst into tears.
Good video Reggie. I enjoyed watching this one. The police made themselves look very foolish. They proved that the training they received was woefully inadequate. Thanks for all you do mate.
Respect!
Respect mate 👍
What six days wasted
"nothing better to do"
Holding police accountable is far from nothing.
And if you can get a nice lawsuit going, better still.
“Nothing better to do”
While these cops wasted their own time and let down victims of real crime by not turning up or dropping their reported case.
Haven't got time to do "better things", it's a full time job monitoring lousy cops, because there is soooooo many of you.
They hang there selfs
@@notmenotme614 not to break it mention that you know you cops borderline useless on a good day.once had a car broken into had to basically threaten to call the chief inspector for the region to make them do anything.
Reggie PLEASE PLEASE do MORE of these pretend drones, they are the most hilarious of all videos..
If this place wasn’t 4 hours away from me then I would love to take the drone over. Everything he was saying was ridiculous. Great video again ❤️
Brilliant Reg, that PCSO has got a haircut like my grandad 🤣🤣
Laughing at that one Jacko
Oof
7:50 Spot on Reggie. Well said. You are most definitely being assertive. It is PC 154 who is being aggressive in his tone and attitude.
And he definitely lost it at the end calling me an idiot
"Ascertain" must be a new word he learned. Bless him.
Reggie, you had him right where you wanted him, what an absolute humpty.
The only people with nothing better to do was them
Trying to stop lawful activity 🙃
Any copper who cannot control their anger while on duty, can be threat to the public. Police are paid to enforce law, their standard of self control must be high.
Peace and love Reggie.
Respect mate 👊 👍
Officer's like this make me grateful the UK Police are not issued firearms like in other countries.
@@martinsanders6124 It’s worrying that PC154 might be issued with a biro.
@@philliplester1741 😃😃😃
Did he identify himself as a police officer when he first approached?
The chief constable is responsible for that ridiculous "no photography" sign. It has no authority and brings the police into disrepute.
That cop is a total tyrant who is uneducated on the law !! He’s an embarrassment and he’s a Sargent, I would sue him for shear ignorance.
I hope he is taught the error of his ways.
You got him bang to rights on a law suit reggie.
Where a constable has reasonable grounds for suspecting that any offence which is not an arrestable offence has been committed or attempted, or is being committed or attempted, he may arrest the relevant person if it appears to him that service of a summons is impracticable or inappropriate because any of the general arrest conditions is satisfied.
(2)In this section “the relevant person” means any person whom the constable has reasonable grounds to suspect of having committed or having attempted to commit the offence or of being in the course of committing or attempting to commit it.
Too funny sent by Johnny 5 O. 🇨🇦🇨🇦. This was hilarious couldn’t stop laughing 🇨🇦 I’m a new sub and now a big fan of ur work. U can’t bait a good officer!! Well done
Respect mate and I love that statement so true 👍 you can't bait a good officer 🤣🤣🤣🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦
Inspector Clouseau award goes to this muppet of a cop !
Brilliantly handled Reggie, firm but fair and sent the automatons packing. Well done for staying calm, top man.
Omfg this is quality our Reggie 👌👌👌
My reply from Cumbria PSD:
“I have taken an initial look into your complaint and can confirm that the Sergeant 0154 made his line manager aware of the situation immediately following the incident and a Reflective Practice Process has been instigated to address Sergeant’s shortcomings. The Reflective Practice process aims to challenge officers where they may fall short through constructive conversations with their line manager to identify and implement any necessary learning. This may include, but is not limited to, additional training, closer supervision, refreshers of guidance etc.”
Bit of a result.
Reggie is an absolute LEGEND 🙌
Think a few more stations will be putting no filming signs up but they are not law well done bud
Thanks for punctuating the dark insanity of modern society stay true stay Faithfull your a light in a very very dark world Reggie
Respect Mic 👍👌🤟
Haha loved this one smiling from ear to ear right now. Detaining you for doing something that even if you were actually doing was legal and you weren't doing it
That is golden mate! Unlawful detention there I reckon and definitely not an excuse for citing a section 25!