ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 มิ.ย. 2024
- Rachmaninov composed the Piano Concerto No. 1, his Opus 1, at the age of 18, while he was still a student at the Moscow Conservatory. In 1917, more than two decades and two piano concerti later, he revised the score thoroughly, shaping the work into the form in which it is known today. This revised, "authoritative" version of the work is a tightly organized distillation of youthful passion and ardor, with the added influence of the turmoil that would soon force the composer to leave his native Russia for good.
The Concerto opens with a portentious declaration from the horns and a cascade of piano chords that recall the pealing of the composer's beloved Russian bells. The main theme is lyric and melancholy, the second sprightly by contrast. The first movement's huge solo cadenza (10:14), propelled by powerful chords -- highly suggestive, again, of bells -- and fiery expression, is the real heart of the work. The Andante second movement (which contains some of the most beautiful moments in music I've ever heard) provides respite before the Allegro vivace finale, which is marked by a wild main subject in shifting rhythms and a fleet, virtuosic second theme. Rapid-fire chordal passagework from the keyboard brings this most melodramatic of Rachmaninov's concerti to a thrilling conclusion.
0:00 - Vivace
13:16 - Andante
19:27 - Allegro vivace - เพลง
This concerto has one of the best opening
9:29 This violin solo part is amazing...
I feel the same
violin solos in the middle of an orchestral piece feel so expressive - they have a real singing quality:)
Should anyone be wondering, the orchestra is the Royal Scottish National Orchestra, and the conductor is Bryden Thomson.
So nice to hear this instead of 2 and 3 over and over again.
This concerto is underrated!
It's actually one of his best rated concertos. Totally still underplayed
@@andrewmowatt6188 I thought many people back when Rachmaninoff had performed this piece had very low opinions on it.
@@andrewmowatt6188 And he was also very depressed because of it and had writer's block for a long while and after therapy and such he made the 2nd which was a great quality piece (I do love this one as well despite it being massively underrated)
@@ludix711 we'll bring it back to the light. :)
@@andrewmowatt6188 Indeed friend!
Between his incredible Schumann concerto and this, I feel like I've totally slept on Shelley. Will definitely need to check out more of his recordings.
My best love of all Rachmaninoff piano concertos.
Grieg's A minor Concerto served as the model for the original version of this Concerto: in fact, the Grieg was Rachmaninoff's favorite Piano Concerto. The original version of the Rachmaninoff has been recorded.
The Grieg!
this is a certified Piano Concerto No. 1 in F# Minor by Sergei Rachmaninoff moment
0:00 - Vivace
13:16 - Andante
19:27 - Allegro vivace
Wonderful video again. Fantastic series. Didn’t know this concerto. That second movement is both ravishing and wonderfully strange. Very impressionistic. The opening of the second movement is very like the opening of Tristan und Isolde, rising chromatic scales landing on surprising chord each time. Fascinating.
So incredible - thanks for sharing!
Truly underrated.
It is PERFECT!!!
Thanks for uploading!
Wow, that’s a strenuous piece for the orchestra as well as the soloist.
Браво👏👏👏
Rachmaninoff is amazing the sound and harmony is passion
21:35 ❤
The revision of the concerto gives it a supreme equilibrium, which can be encountered in each movement. The rendition is very beautiful.
this rendition is outstanding in most places for sure
very good!!!! Great pianism which fits perfect to this music
25:57 "meow mix" theme lol
Howard Shelley has an affinity for Rachmaninoff's music that transcends criticism.
Grammar 101
Antony Gonzalez huh? What he said was grammatically perfect.
@@antonygonzalez9506 the sentence was fine lmaooo
진짜 낭만적..
Ah, Rach! Sublime yearning at its best in this concerto!
Yes, this is a revision of the original, but I can still hear the masterful themes and treatment that Rach seemed to be born with.
I have always heard that great composers do not sit at the piano and allow their hands to limit the development of their compositions,
but all of Rach seems to be about "noodling at the piano" and the excellence of his ideas and themes.
Yes, even his masterpiece: the Second Symphony sounds pianistic. Rach, the piano, the world!
Monumental
I see so many similarities between all four of his Concerti.
Rachmaninoff has a very particuliar tone and colour
@@edwardmalenfant7547 he was quite repetitive. He also revised too much, so that many pieces lack freshness
the best moment from 27:11
2:55
11:41
at 7:25 begins saint saens concerto 2 mov 3
It’s also where Lieberman got his idea for the last movement of Garogoyles.
7:00
スクリャービンの協奏曲も同じ調性なのは何かあるんでしょうかね。。。？
this is so similar to griegs concerto!!
Where (except the beginning part) ?
The structure
6:58
12:05
17:36
do you know where i can find the sheet that is used here ?
I get my sheets from IMSLP.
ok thanks !
7:34
idk why piano 2 sounds like a trumpet or something else
When I was 18 I was learning Music Theory 101.
Howard Shelley is the best
The beast
The beginning is very Grieg-like. I dunno, maybe it's just me.
The orchestra reminds me to the start of the Grand polonaise Brillante
ikr
Yes. If you read the wikipedia page about this concerto, you'll find that Rach was fond of it.
"Composition students were usually advised to base their efforts on a specific model for their first exercises in new forms. In Rachmaninoff's case this was the Grieg Piano Concerto, which was a favorite work of his and one which he had been familiar from Siloti practicing it at the Rachmaninoff household during the spring and summer of 1890 for future concerts. Rachmaninoff adapted the entire musical structure of the outer movements to the Grieg concerto, literally building his music into it. With all his other concertos, Rachmaninoff would prove more enterprising."
That was probably why this concerto was criticized when it came out
Piano Concerto No. 1 in F# Minor by Sergei Rachmaninoff
Music is perfect for Warhammer
이걸 누구보고 치라고 만든고임?
그래도 라흐마니노프 콘체르토 2,3,4번보단 치기 수월하다고 하네요..ㅋㅋㅋ
권세한 라흐 존경하는데 와 지만치라고 만든것같음
11:07 Scriabin moment
gacha songs
A little too abstract for my tast, but ambitious.
Keep playing it. It will grow on you. All 4 of his concertos are terrific and while critics and customers both have plugged 2 and 3 over the years, 1 and 4 have plenty of great ideas, expositions, etc to go around the room. I love 'em all. I do tend to agree with those who like the revised version but the original is very nice too. If you come across it don't pass it by. 4 also exists in a revised version but again the original is very nice too.
It seems a bit more jazzy, but I found it really fresh :)
@@roo159 This was written in 1891, so if you think its sound jazzy then jazz might sound like rachmaninoff to you.
I enjoy Prokofievs first piano concerto more than this one. I feel it has more artistical vision for being a first concerto at a young age. I've always felt that Prokofiev is more original and more musically talented than Rach even though I love some of Rachs work as well. There is just something about Prokofiev that is out of this world. Hate to compare but they were active during roughly the same time and Prokofiev just had a very fresh different new take on music, while I feel Rachmaninoff was perfecting the romantic music we already know, but with less originality.
From a pure pianistic point of view, Rachmaninov's music has much more to offer. To me, Prokofiev's music feels a bit like it's "deliberately constructed". Rachmaninov is just flow, flow and more flow. I do like both composers a lot.
rachmaninoff was a romantic composer
prokofiev was something completely new (contemporary)
imo Rachmaninoff is the peak of romanticism.
Prokofiev is chopin of contemporary music imo
So you're right Prokofiev was definitely something new
@@aidanm.1683 but not only was he something new because of the new style (modernism) but also because his own musical vision is quite different to many other modernists. Most modernists are very different to eachother, for example Bartok, Ravel, Shostakovich and Prokofiev sound completely different when compared to eachother. So Prokofiev isnt just a modernist, his own unique musical vision was incredibly strong and unique. A prime example of this is his third piano concerto. So argument being that i feel that Prokofiev is more unique and original of course compared to modernists than rachmaninoff is compared to other romantic composers.
you may prefer it, however, prokofiev is incredibly incompetent at writing harmony and melody, nevermind form. his first concerto is objectively bad in almost every aspect. being more original may make it easier for you to emotionally attach yourself to the piece, but other than that, it is completely worthless. Rach's 1st concerto is amazing, prokofiev's is a mistake.
@@specialperson335 unique this, unique that. he'a not good. he needs to be good for hisnuniqueness to matter, most of the time, what makes him "unique" is musical mistakes.
11:26
25:57
12:19
12:19
11:40