Zelensky will do anything to please western media. Over 600 Ukranian Troops and over 82 vehicles destroyed in 3 days in Kursk region. Only a crazy comedian will send troops to Russia without air cover. Problem with Zelensky and not generals running the war. Its really like the guest has told its really strange.
He is trading space for time just like the Ukrainians did at the beginning of the special operation. At the current rate of exchange Putin is exchanging space for time at a rate commensurate rate to the purchasing power of the Rubble to USD, and much worse than the K:D ratio accomplished grinding into Ukraine, but space is being exchanged for time nonetheless. It remains to be seen if this extremely bad exchange rate of km/days will hold up. I wonder how fast the Russians will be able to mobilize and fortify Kursk.
Ukraine is finished. Desperation move imo. Ukraine can't beat Russia. On top of that the United States did not authorize this attack. It's going to go really bad for Ukraine now.
There is no new frontline for ukraine. Ukraine always had to defend its entire border region. While russia could simply rely on the political pressure on ukraine to not touch russian territory and completely focus on invading eastern ukraine.
I am quoting one of the post…Ukraine cannot attack Russian with western weapons from Ukraine but Ukraine can absolutely can attack Russian from Russia”.
Ukraine is finished. This is a unauthorized desperation move. Do you really believe Ukraine can actually hold Russian territory. It's going to go even worse for Ukraine now.
@@anjafark You mean like NATO brutaly. imperialistcly bombing a european country called Yugoslavia in 1999 or you mean Palestine ? ) Or BBC didnt tell you about that ? xDD
@@vespercore8882 No. That's not what I mean. I remember very well the discussions in parliament how to stand to the massacres and genozides in the ongoing war in former yugoslavia. How can you even bring yourself to compare this to Ukraine? That's just despicable.
How do you know its not exactly what they wanted? Thousands of troops and equipment right out in the open? All so they could teach russia some lesson in fairness or something?
This is much more important for Ukraine to continue than most people understand. They are doing a fantastic job of breaking Putin's reputation with the Russian people. They are also fighting where the Russians were not fully prepared with a million defensive mines in the ground. Very smart. Slava Ukraine from the USA! I also notice that Moscow is a lot closer than Sevastopol. Maybe the Ukrainians should take Moscow and trade for Crimea!
LOL, Russia economy is growing 3% despites war and 16000 sanctions in place while Europe is in recession. Let's not talk about Ukraine economy. Ukraine is dying for the Blackrock. That is not a wise decision.
Since the EU and the US are allegedly helping the Ukrainians, does that mean that Russia should help, say, the EU's enemies within the EU itself. Maybe a little dynamite, a few guerilla tactics and so on to even out the results.
@@martinvidenovic5767 I see no reason why Russia couldn´t do that. And of course, i see no reason why Nato could not do the same for resistance fighters inside Russia. But my guess would be that there is a lot more untapped unrest inside of Russia waiting to be unleashed, than in the pretty peacefull EU. So please Ivan, open that box and lets see what comes out...
The question now is, can Russia afford a new front line? The thing is that Ukraine's used to Russian terrorism all along its borders. Russia is experiencing war within its borders. Furthermore it is legitimated for Ukraine to destroy whatever they can in Russia because it is self-defense.
Actually Russia can. And if Ukraine does this in more spots spread out, it is actually to Russian advantages... ... Problem only comes if, say, Ukrainians cannot be blocked in Kursk. This is like Ukraine forces creating its own kill zones for themselves, and spreading their forces thin. For Kursk... ... if Ukraine can't move east and cut eastern supply lines to eastern fronts or/and Crimea... ... this is merely enhancing exhaustion for Ukraine. Not very good news.
There is some psychological effect. Was that the mission? Was it a success? All it's gonna do is cause escalation. Can that be a success? We'll see. Ukraine lost much equipment in this publicity stunt.
I don't think they are going to stay there, but now Russia has to have troops all around their borders, that will spread their forces , less forces in other regions. I think it is strategic move to distract Russian military.
@@AG-cw9sqA strategic move?Right.All that it has accomplished is that the RAF,will open up a 5th front in that area,AND PUSH THE UAF,further West,STRETCHING AN ALREADY THIN UAF LINE,at the point of contact.Yep,A BRILLIANT STRATEGIC MOVE,no wonder as to why,Ukraine is LOOSING BADLY
@@petehowett2854 I am not saying it is good or bad, we will see, we don't know yet, just saying that they are not going to stay there, it was just strategic hit and run move, to force Russia to spread their troops, have troops all around their borders. Russian military size is not unlimited, Russia is not China. Russia has to take solders from other front lines to move them all around the borders. that means less soldiers in other locations. Or recruit more soldiers, which means less workers for the Economy. My understanding is that most of the young adult men are already recruited.
@@butstill3333UA 80% of German casualties in World War II occurred on the eastern front. The allies never faced a full strength Wehrmacht. The war in the west was a sideshow.
@@Carstininvestmentsthe problem with that is the Soviets were throwing people into the meat grinder haphazardly. Overwhelming numbers was their moto. That's the only reason why they gave the germans the most trouble. If I recall they haven't fully recovered the numbers.
@@riclate2013 That just happens to be the way that the Russians fight wars. But anybody who is telling you that the Russians have suffered more casualties than the Ukrainians is smoking crack.
@@riclate2013 that is just the way that the Russians fight wars. You may disagree with the efficiency with which they pursue their objectives. But achieve those objectives they do.
"The Biden administration has quietly given Ukraine permission to strike inside Russia - solely near the area of Kharkiv - using U.S.-provided weapons, three U.S. officials and two other people familiar with the move said Thursday, a major reversal that will help Ukraine to better defend its second-largest city." May 30, 2024 "Ukraine has not violated our policy..." US State Dept, August 8, 2024. 🤣
@@tilapiadave3234 Reaching Kiev is not the intention, just to annex the territories we all know about by now. It's complicated, take a listen to history legends TH-cam channel detailed military analysis
@@nenadmitrovic3469 LMAO ,,, your calculations ignore several factors. 1) Recent gains have been the result of massive glide bomb attacks ,, F16's will put a stop to that. 2) Russia is running out of people ,, Several countries have made it very clear they are willing to send troops on the ground in Ukraine if needed. 3) Russia is indeed running out of Tanks etc ,, 4) Russia will be broke within 2 years
I think we should redirect the question back to Ukraine. Russia can definitely afford another front. They literally sent weapons to Iran and are still stationed in African countries and Syria so it’s a little obvious. Now Ukraine on the other hand sent only 500 troops to try and make a new front line so that’s pretty obvious they are low on manpower. And no I’m not a Russian bot just stating obvious facts
The people that DW calls on here as experts are really suspect when you check their educational background and realise they have zero knowledge of what they are talking about.
Russia brutaly invaded Ukraine - a european neighbourcountry. No "crying" in Ukraine in 01/2022 in Ukraine. Russia is a fascist aggressor. As a German I think: There is much reason to cry about this. Even though Russians don't seam to see it that way. At least not yet ...
It’s definitely a short-term PR victory, but nobody knows what will happen in two weeks despite what fan boys on either side claim. Ukraine seems unable to stop the advances at the front so changing the focus of the narrative may make sense IF they can hold the territory. Otherwise this will be a colossal waste of lives and will probably be remembered similarly to the failed counter offensive.
Holding the territory is not the issue, the issue is a kill zone is set up by Ukraine itself, and it is in Russia air space. Targeting the kill zones in Russia at safe zones by Russia airpower is so much effortless... ... The issue is Ukraine has to push through the blockage, else, this is mere 'sitting ducks' strategy... ... to commit military suicide. It is like Zelensky purposely throws in the towel. If I were to be Putin, I will be so happy... ... 引蛇不出洞，造成前线牺牲不断，但你自己居然跑进来俄罗斯空军打击范围送人头... ...这不是天掉下来的馅饼？？？ 如今打击乌克兰有限仅存的有生力量才是重点，可乌克兰自己就送人头... ...你要是普京，你不会开香槟庆祝？
@@jeddvillaspin3379 Good answer. Russia would have never expected Ukraine to invade. As such Russia likely over allocated resources to the front lines and away from their own borders. Good move as it will detract Russian resources from the front lines as troops get sent back to the border. It may even get Russia nervous/wondering which border Ukraine may invade next and could force Russia to pull even more resources from the front lines to protect their own borders. These should make it a little more easy for Ukrainian troops on the front lines.
The Russian army is the second strongest in the central Russian Kursk region. The Kadyrovites could have been the third, but they fled as soon as they noticed signs of the Ukrainian Armed Forces on the horizon
Add to that AI vision and automated ground object identification, prioritisation and targeting, you have a powerful drone tool at our disposal. Automated drone swarming and loitering capability would add even more fire power and sophistication to the drone.
It is not a question If Ukraine can afford a new frontline, it’s a question if Ukraine in position of not to. East and Southern fronts have numerous lines of defence, it is hellish landscape to fight for both parties. On the contrary, Kursk border had 2 lines of defence that were breached rather rapidly
Ukrainian troops crossing Russian territory are generally on a one way ticket, and it will have a major impact on Ukrainian war effort over the next 6 months.
Quite true. All the Russians have to do is to dig in. Yes, merely dig in, hold and pump firepower into the kill zones Ukrainian troops have created for themselves, and the main forces will push into Ukraine as Ukraine is diverting manpower into kill zones exhausting itself further. You don't need huge forces or big amount of equipment for such defence. Not only that... ... now Russian air force will be operating in its air space... ... and if F16s are deployed, that'd be disastrous for Ukraine. Hard truth. Also, this shows Ukraine's 'need' to end war asap... ... hence weakness. Which means Putin will be more determined, if Putin realizes.
China already has dibs on Russia, or should I say Ruxia, China's future northernmost province. One Pu Tin is slated to become its regional governor when the acquisition is complete.
"Shows Russia's weakness" is an admission that this entire incursion is a public relations offensive, no different than the Battle of the Bulge, and will end exactly the same way.
Mind you, the Battle of the Bulge has a genuine effort on the Germans' part to recapture the port of Antwerp and to encircle the Allied armies to the north. It was a very optimistic plan, but a genuine effort nonetheless.
The battle of the bulge was a hard battle resulting in massive German casualties. The Ukrainian's have just waltzed in almost unopposed, the Chechens fled at the sight of Ukrainians and the conscripts surrendered at first contact.
@@foilhat1138 Incidentally, the Allies suffered worse casualties in the Battle of the Bulge than the Germans. It's just that the Allies could tolerate their losses and the Germans could not.
Well if Russia has no borders according to Putin, then shouldn't the Ukrainian army be able to go where ever it wants?
Putin said that Russia had no borders. He did not say Ukraine had no borders.
Zelensky will do anything to please western media. Over 600 Ukranian Troops and over 82 vehicles destroyed in 3 days in Kursk region. Only a crazy comedian will send troops to Russia without air cover. Problem with Zelensky and not generals running the war. Its really like the guest has told its really strange.
Don't forget that even Europe has no borders and that the stick has two ends.
Украине можно все
Putin said Russian borders had no end. These sentences are not the same
Putin its not an incursion, its a special operation
Putin always can change it to war. To many Ukrainian power plants still working. Humanitarian crisis? Who cares...
Lol
He is trading space for time just like the Ukrainians did at the beginning of the special operation.
At the current rate of exchange Putin is exchanging space for time at a rate commensurate rate to the purchasing power of the Rubble to USD, and much worse than the K:D ratio accomplished grinding into Ukraine, but space is being exchanged for time nonetheless.
It remains to be seen if this extremely bad exchange rate of km/days will hold up. I wonder how fast the Russians will be able to mobilize and fortify Kursk.
Как вы тви поживаете в Берлине?
And it's a bunk. 😂
Ukraine is sick and tired of being a sponge for Russia's missiles
Ukraine is finished. Desperation move imo. Ukraine can't beat Russia. On top of that the United States did not authorize this attack. It's going to go really bad for Ukraine now.
Ukraine should be more tired of being the cannon fodder for a war Zelinsky got suckered into by his Western government "friends".
There is no new frontline for ukraine. Ukraine always had to defend its entire border region. While russia could simply rely on the political pressure on ukraine to not touch russian territory and completely focus on invading eastern ukraine.
Украина всегда права
@Tintin.johansson veh deh veh hostomel 2.0
Putin said that Russia's borders do not end. Ukraine is simply advancing its liberation in his direction.
since russia border do not end, does that also end Natos supplies limits? like their tanks now can enter? lol
If I were Gerasimov, I’d stay far away from open windows and offerings of tea!! LOL!! That dude looked petrified in their meeting!
Putin was already preparing his statement for when Gerasimov "accidentally" falls down a flight of stairs repeatedly.
and no flights in helicopters!
they all looked like they were about to splatter their childhood memories on the ceiling!
Russia should apply to NATO for protection from Ukraine.
😂😂😂😂
💯🤣🤣🤣
Why should Russia apply when NATO failed ukraine?
Cope😂
@@4tuneJohn😂😂😂 yes failed sure thing, meanwhile F16 fighters are flying around Ukrainian skies.
Putin's face in the conference was brutal 😂 he was so pissed off
He was so annoyed that Nato was goading him into over reacting. You really shouldn't be trying to make light of it bud.
sure buddy
@@HeadsetHatGuy hes a sad little putin lol hes a mad little putin
Russia has no borders.
Lol
7 OCTOBER
BELGOROD ????
😂 I can show you …..
It has, but it cannot expect anyone to respect them.
Because it shouldn't exist as the terror state it is
It's just a special operation from Ukraine.
Вы такой юморист. Вы далеко от нас? Надо приехать, послушать ваши шутки
@@РоманПопов-ч6щ Sorry mate, You are not allowed to travel.....
Yes and 80,% of that operation is already dead gz 🤡
Was it successful?
@@aleszupanic6879 sure buddy! did gerasimov tell you that? or the brave akhmat warrior that ran like little girls when ukraine came across the border!
Russia has the Second Best Army
even in Russia now. 🤣🤣
Second best old army . He’s so outdated he has to put troops on the ground. Other modern countries don’t need troops on the ground any more 😅😅😅
2nd from who???
❤
@@honestmudadigwa1905 Probably Tongo...or Kiribati. I would even say Antarctic.
@@honestmudadigwa1905 Duh... the Ukrainians.
Putin wanted a buffer zone for Kursk Region… Ukraine is helping. 😂
I am quoting one of the post…Ukraine cannot attack Russian with western weapons from Ukraine but Ukraine can absolutely can attack Russian from Russia”.
Putin said that Russia's borders do not end. So, technically Ukraine is advancing its liberation towards him without crossing any Russian border.
Ukraine is finished. This is a unauthorized desperation move.
Do you really believe Ukraine can actually hold Russian territory. It's going to go even worse for Ukraine now.
It's only one thousand soldiers lol. It's smaller than a BLM riot
@@bryananderson3772 At least 3 times more than that.
German tanks have been used. Western countries have been mum on western weapons used. We’ll see!
Welcome to the party, Putin!
Satanyahu is it you ? )
@@vespercore8882 Russia brutaly, imperialistcly invaded a european neighbourcountry.
No more questions ...
@@anjafark You mean like NATO brutaly. imperialistcly bombing a european country called Yugoslavia in 1999 or you mean Palestine ? )
Or BBC didnt tell you about that ? xDD
@@vespercore8882 No.
That's not what I mean.
I remember very well the discussions in parliament how to stand to the massacres and genozides in the ongoing war in former yugoslavia.
How can you even bring yourself to compare this to Ukraine?
That's just despicable.
How does your own medicine taste, Vladimir Vladimirovich? Bitter, huh?!
How do you know its not exactly what they wanted? Thousands of troops and equipment right out in the open? All so they could teach russia some lesson in fairness or something?
Yes, Ukraine try to scare Putin with new 50 y. old F16 from USA and EU scrapyard, that are after 30 fly minutes in repair now.
JIST LIKE BELGOROD BEFORE ???
bombe atomic
@@brandonlance3601No lessons - “Reap what you sow”.
Russia is out of shovels again 😂😂😂
Do not under estimate Russia. They could live off of potatoes for decades
@@anthonygordon9483 😂😂😂 Stop making me laugh bro 🤣🤣🤣
@@13ased_American13 lmao, Im glad someone gets the joke
@@anthonygordon9483LMAO…
@@anthonygordon9483 France and Germany are examples
Awaiting referendum
This is much more important for Ukraine to continue than most people understand. They are doing a fantastic job of breaking Putin's reputation with the Russian people. They are also fighting where the Russians were not fully prepared with a million defensive mines in the ground. Very smart. Slava Ukraine from the USA! I also notice that Moscow is a lot closer than Sevastopol. Maybe the Ukrainians should take Moscow and trade for Crimea!
LOL, Russia economy is growing 3% despites war and 16000 sanctions in place while Europe is in recession. Let's not talk about Ukraine economy. Ukraine is dying for the Blackrock. That is not a wise decision.
Pointless. You obviously know very little of Russia... ... :D
So you just sent thousands of troops that could be used to defend in the south on suicide attack to... damage Putin's reputation.
😂😂😂😂😂
@@route55qatar Growing by 3% Reported by Russia media... controlled by the state.
lol unable to detect an attack inside russia. 3 days later still fighting the attackers and Putin thinks he can take on nato and US what a clown.
Is only zelesnkh who is saying that when he needs more money russia becomes a world threat 😊
7 OCTOBER ,???
If Russia were as weak as you think, the United States would not have to create an alliance of 30 countries to oppose one country.
@@GokhanYlmaz-eg7jf some wars are forever, as intended.
Putin said himself & can’t take on NATO not even the United States 1on1, that’s why he have nukes
1000 soldiers just think about that🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣. And said Russia is in panic.
Russia is slowly isolating themselves to North Korea level
Using Russian logic: Ukraine has not entered Russia, but merely conducted a "military investigation."
Since the EU and the US are allegedly helping the Ukrainians, does that mean that Russia should help, say, the EU's enemies within the EU itself. Maybe a little dynamite, a few guerilla tactics and so on to even out the results.
@@martinvidenovic5767 I see no reason why Russia couldn´t do that. And of course, i see no reason why Nato could not do the same for resistance fighters inside Russia. But my guess would be that there is a lot more untapped unrest inside of Russia waiting to be unleashed, than in the pretty peacefull EU.
So please Ivan, open that box and lets see what comes out...
@@martinvidenovic5767
What enemies within the EU? 😂 And Ukraine isn't within Russia is it? Russia invaded a democratic neighbour since 2014.
Its not about a new front its about pulling Russians troops and resources from the mane front
Russia finally has the 2nd strongest army… in its own country!
Russia: We Must Retaliate
Media: How?
Russia: We must invade Ukraine
Media: But...
"Special Operation"...Ukraine can play that game too
The real question is "Can Russia afford a new front?". Brilliant move!
Yes but not Ukraine 🇺🇦
@@BadBoy-cp9lp RUS looks as WEAK as it never was before!
When was the last time ANYONE was EVER in RUS Territory with Tanks?
@@derJackistweg it didn't go well for the germans it seems
@@HeadsetHatGuy ?
Advice: ALLWAYS place a subject into every sentence, so people who don´t know you, like your mom, know what you mean.
@@BadBoy-cp9lp dream on.
The question now is, can Russia afford a new front line? The thing is that Ukraine's used to Russian terrorism all along its borders. Russia is experiencing war within its borders. Furthermore it is legitimated for Ukraine to destroy whatever they can in Russia because it is self-defense.
Ukraine can do nothing
@@TheBobVova
Yet it has,,,
Bahaha
Actually Russia can.
And if Ukraine does this in more spots spread out, it is actually to Russian advantages... ...
Problem only comes if, say, Ukrainians cannot be blocked in Kursk. This is like Ukraine forces creating its own kill zones for themselves, and spreading their forces thin. For Kursk... ... if Ukraine can't move east and cut eastern supply lines to eastern fronts or/and Crimea... ... this is merely enhancing exhaustion for Ukraine. Not very good news.
@@RudolphoAqui1000 can't achieve anything
@@AbuBawa-sw1utfull blown panic and a strategy change... that's a lot.
Imagine nato invading russia, russia have poor security
All of NATO's weapons are in Ukraine. How can NATO invade?
ive played this situation in the ww3 simulator video games
The Russian border is huge
To be honest, it was very surprising But in general, despite their attempts, it makes no sense and no difference.
Yah Right Medvedev, the “Ukrainian Reich” - You must have flunked History. Eat your words.
Even if they succeeded at taking Kursk how in the world would a couple thousands Ukrainians expect to hold that territory? Makes no sense.
“Live as brave men; and if fortune is adverse, front its blows with brave hearts”
I have a feeling this is going to end badly for Ukraine
already it's bad for both countrys
This front is probably temporary, the logistics would be a big problem for Ukraine
See what they say when Ukraine gets pushed back
*if
@@MaxVerhaag If? lol its Russian territory
@@cordellmohawk8408 so? ukraine can declare a referendum just like ruzzia did and annex it!
@@MaxVerhaag 😂😂
This is Ukraine's version of the US Doolittle Raid on Japan in World War 2. Huge psychological effect!
There is some psychological effect. Was that the mission? Was it a success? All it's gonna do is cause escalation. Can that be a success? We'll see. Ukraine lost much equipment in this publicity stunt.
Apparently this is a suicidal operation, how many soldiers can survive in a week or two
I don't think they are going to stay there, but now Russia has to have troops all around their borders, that will spread their forces , less forces in other regions. I think it is strategic move to distract Russian military.
@@AG-cw9sqA strategic move?Right.All that it has accomplished is that the RAF,will open up a 5th front in that area,AND PUSH THE UAF,further West,STRETCHING AN ALREADY THIN UAF LINE,at the point of contact.Yep,A BRILLIANT STRATEGIC MOVE,no wonder as to why,Ukraine is LOOSING BADLY
@@petehowett2854 I am not saying it is good or bad, we will see, we don't know yet, just saying that they are not going to stay there, it was just strategic hit and run move, to force Russia to spread their troops, have troops all around their borders. Russian military size is not unlimited, Russia is not China. Russia has to take solders from other front lines to move them all around the borders. that means less soldiers in other locations. Or recruit more soldiers, which means less workers for the Economy. My understanding is that most of the young adult men are already recruited.
Doubt they are able to come back from there. It just wastes the life of soldiers, which has been in the severe shortage.
Can someone remind me what happened the last time an enemy force tried to invade Kursk oblast 🤔
The Wehrmacht also continued to attack after Stalingrad. It didn’t change the ultimate outcome, though.
This situation is far different, Germany fought also against USA, so what the outcome was?
@@butstill3333UA 80% of German casualties in World War II occurred on the eastern front. The allies never faced a full strength Wehrmacht. The war in the west was a sideshow.
@@Carstininvestmentsthe problem with that is the Soviets were throwing people into the meat grinder haphazardly. Overwhelming numbers was their moto. That's the only reason why they gave the germans the most trouble. If I recall they haven't fully recovered the numbers.
@@riclate2013 That just happens to be the way that the Russians fight wars. But anybody who is telling you that the Russians have suffered more casualties than the Ukrainians is smoking crack.
@@riclate2013 that is just the way that the Russians fight wars. You may disagree with the efficiency with which they pursue their objectives. But achieve those objectives they do.
"The Biden administration has quietly given Ukraine permission to strike inside Russia - solely near the area of Kharkiv - using U.S.-provided weapons, three U.S. officials and two other people familiar with the move said Thursday, a major reversal that will help Ukraine to better defend its second-largest city." May 30, 2024
"Ukraine has not violated our policy..." US State Dept, August 8, 2024. 🤣
Putin expects Ukraine to only fight in defense mode. Now_ the war isn't only fought on Russian land but way mych too close to Moscow...
DW and bots from the comment section: so is Russia weak or Russia is going to conquer Europe? Please, clarify.
Nick Connolly always gives a solid report.
This is basically a PR distraction manoeuvre and very well thought out btw. Meanwhile the situation in the front lines is dire at best...
Its the front lines
When in the war has the front lines been Disneyland?
DIRE ? At current rates of advance Russia will reach Kiev in 2170
@@tilapiadave3234 its not about reching kiev, they claim just 4 oblasts, but at this rate Ukraine will be out of people
@@tilapiadave3234 Reaching Kiev is not the intention, just to annex the territories we all know about by now. It's complicated, take a listen to history legends TH-cam channel detailed military analysis
@@nenadmitrovic3469 LMAO ,,, your calculations ignore several factors. 1) Recent gains have been the result of massive glide bomb attacks ,, F16's will put a stop to that. 2) Russia is running out of people ,, Several countries have made it very clear they are willing to send troops on the ground in Ukraine if needed. 3) Russia is indeed running out of Tanks etc ,, 4) Russia will be broke within 2 years
A case of making a mountain out of a mole hill. 😆
Ukraine should hold a referendum in Kursk and make it officially Ukrainian territory. That's totally legal according to Russia.
This reporters hair looks like he survived a bomb blast.
Does she call him puddin?
A lot of talks about nothing
yep, nothing is happening in Kursk, everything goes according to the plan, lol.
Слава Україні! Героям слава! 🇺🇦
When a country is lead by clowns, it becomes a circus.
Moscow circus - the biggest on earth.
Putin the greatest clown ever
'Can Ukraine afford a new front line?' Better question is, can Russia?
I think we should redirect the question back to Ukraine. Russia can definitely afford another front. They literally sent weapons to Iran and are still stationed in African countries and Syria so it’s a little obvious. Now Ukraine on the other hand sent only 500 troops to try and make a new front line so that’s pretty obvious they are low on manpower. And no I’m not a Russian bot just stating obvious facts
The people that DW calls on here as experts are really suspect when you check their educational background and realise they have zero knowledge of what they are talking about.
Yeah journalist and analyst are just picked of the street..
Russian trolls are coping hard in the comments. :D
Haven't heard much from you Ukrainian trolls lately.
@@psnaris no electricity
Bots have to work hard to avoid getting sent to the front. The worse it gets, the more BS the cowards have to spew.
They miss their dad
Facts.
Putin choked on his own bitter medicine 💊 😅
Ukraine lost 50 armored vehicles, including 7 tanks. But it's American money so it doesn't much matter.
Ukraine as usual dares Russia before crying foul
There is no such thing as a Russian civilian
Russia brutaly invaded Ukraine - a european neighbourcountry.
No "crying" in Ukraine in 01/2022 in Ukraine.
Russia is a fascist aggressor.
As a German I think:
There is much reason to cry about this.
Even though Russians don't seam to see it that way.
At least not yet ...
@@chandaagritech77 its the Kremlin Bunker grandpa crying that people fight back.
In the end it looks like Russia will own Ukraine , whilst Ukraine will own Russia ...🤷🙆♀️
DW just brings a whole bunch of Ukrainian propagandists as “analysts”
Absolutely right. This woman is a hysterical propagandist. Self-deception continues.
Go watch RT, my dude 😂😂😂
😂😂😂 Watch RT dude it was non biased network 😂😂😂😂
Ukraine reason was to force Russia to pull back and defend there Territory instead of advancing..
Ukraine wasting few weapons they have
Ukrainian is playing with fire
They have mastered flame.
The door was opened on purpose inviting the Ukrainians to advance, this is called aggressive attrition.
1000 men and their equipment sacrificed for nothing.
Can you predict the future old man?
Here is future for you Russian is going to push Even more into Russian territory @@kareemdurrant139
If you know anything about war...that's just a sad pr stunt@@kareemdurrant139
I thought Russia already lost 2 years ago.
Yes russia lost their economy, now they are even losing war they created.
Ukraine should take Moscow. We've seen Putin run away before when enemies advance on Moscow.
I am Ukraine. Never forgive, never forget….
It’s definitely a short-term PR victory, but nobody knows what will happen in two weeks despite what fan boys on either side claim. Ukraine seems unable to stop the advances at the front so changing the focus of the narrative may make sense IF they can hold the territory. Otherwise this will be a colossal waste of lives and will probably be remembered similarly to the failed counter offensive.
Exactly. Suicide mission for optics. What a sham. Whatever keeps these american dollars flowing.
Holding the territory is not the issue, the issue is a kill zone is set up by Ukraine itself, and it is in Russia air space. Targeting the kill zones in Russia at safe zones by Russia airpower is so much effortless... ... The issue is Ukraine has to push through the blockage, else, this is mere 'sitting ducks' strategy... ... to commit military suicide.
It is like Zelensky purposely throws in the towel. If I were to be Putin, I will be so happy... ...
引蛇不出洞，造成前线牺牲不断，但你自己居然跑进来俄罗斯空军打击范围送人头... ...这不是天掉下来的馅饼？？？
如今打击乌克兰有限仅存的有生力量才是重点，可乌克兰自己就送人头... ...你要是普京，你不会开香槟庆祝？
russia should apply for nato membership to protect itself from ukraine aggression
Ivana stradner really tells us all we need to know, and that is, that it's all we need to know.
Ultimately, that's all we need to know.
Can Ukraine afford to only defend?
Doesn't this put them at a huge disadvantage?
Russian army is really bad at logistics. That question should be the other way around.
@@jeddvillaspin3379 Good answer. Russia would have never expected Ukraine to invade. As such Russia likely over allocated resources to the front lines and away from their own borders. Good move as it will detract Russian resources from the front lines as troops get sent back to the border. It may even get Russia nervous/wondering which border Ukraine may invade next and could force Russia to pull even more resources from the front lines to protect their own borders. These should make it a little more easy for Ukrainian troops on the front lines.
Does anyone else think that there is no censorship of opinions on TH-cam?🤔🤣
If Ukraine can afford this ?
Counterquestion: Can Russia afford this war ?
Ukraine can’t afford not to ..Master Stroke
Stay strong and a moral for your country and people💪👌
The Russian army is the second strongest in the central Russian Kursk region. The Kadyrovites could have been the third, but they fled as soon as they noticed signs of the Ukrainian Armed Forces on the horizon
If Kursk is this poorly defended, imagine what Kaliningrad is like...
speaking of media freedom, is Al Jazeera allowed in Israel?
Ukraine puts its own governor in kursk. And people voted 98% in referendum to be part of ukraine.....
Surprising indeed. But Russia should know if it can invade ukraine, then expect to be invaded by ukraine also.
Add to that AI vision and automated ground object identification, prioritisation and targeting, you have a powerful drone tool at our disposal. Automated drone swarming and loitering capability would add even more fire power and sophistication to the drone.
Probably overstretching its frontline, Ukraine
It is not a question If Ukraine can afford a new frontline, it’s a question if Ukraine in position of not to. East and Southern fronts have numerous lines of defence, it is hellish landscape to fight for both parties. On the contrary, Kursk border had 2 lines of defence that were breached rather rapidly
2:56 Dude has a strangely shaped head
Bad haircut
How they report a cross-border attack as if Ukraine has occupied the Kursk region.
Ukrainian troops crossing Russian territory are generally on a one way ticket, and it will have a major impact on Ukrainian war effort over the next 6 months.
Quite true. All the Russians have to do is to dig in. Yes, merely dig in, hold and pump firepower into the kill zones Ukrainian troops have created for themselves, and the main forces will push into Ukraine as Ukraine is diverting manpower into kill zones exhausting itself further.
You don't need huge forces or big amount of equipment for such defence. Not only that... ... now Russian air force will be operating in its air space... ... and if F16s are deployed, that'd be disastrous for Ukraine. Hard truth.
Also, this shows Ukraine's 'need' to end war asap... ... hence weakness. Which means Putin will be more determined, if Putin realizes.
Who are you, war expert strategist? 😂😂😂
A PR operation in the cost of 1000s Ukraine men?
for now there are only around 300 Russian soldiers taken as prisoners.
In that case putins operation is worst PR operation that have ever existed in world 😂
Zelensky should declare Russia as a province of Ukraine.
China already has dibs on Russia, or should I say Ruxia, China's future northernmost province. One Pu Tin is slated to become its regional governor when the acquisition is complete.
I doubt it won't end well
Now Ukraine counter attacks bullied Russia.
Stregic diversion to position F16 jets diverting the Russia to focus on this instead F16.
Think it’s just a call for support, showing that Ukraine is still capable as they lose international attention
Now Ukraine mean bisness
1000 Ukraine soldiers, calling this incursion of Russia? Zelensky is indeed a clown at all times.
Zelensky and putin are clowns
What goes around comes around...
No matter how you blink your eyes or dream the Russians love their leader❤ Russkie
What happened to Nick's head?!?! Poor guy--I hope he didn't get caught in the blowback from one of those weapons.
"Shows Russia's weakness" is an admission that this entire incursion is a public relations offensive, no different than the Battle of the Bulge, and will end exactly the same way.
Mind you, the Battle of the Bulge has a genuine effort on the Germans' part to recapture the port of Antwerp and to encircle the Allied armies to the north. It was a very optimistic plan, but a genuine effort nonetheless.
The battle of the bulge was a hard battle resulting in massive German casualties. The Ukrainian's have just waltzed in almost unopposed, the Chechens fled at the sight of Ukrainians and the conscripts surrendered at first contact.
@@foilhat1138 Incidentally, the Allies suffered worse casualties in the Battle of the Bulge than the Germans. It's just that the Allies could tolerate their losses and the Germans could not.
This whole war is terrible waste. Both Russia and Ukraine have declining populations. They cannot afford the slaughter.
Russia has declining population for long time, not Ukraine tho. Big effect of economy.
Russia show weakness since 2 years and a alf ago
Lets see how this develops, i cant help to have the feeling that this will backfire on Ukraine pretty bad, but lets hope i am wrong