Omega Seamaster 300m: No Time To Die

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 54

  • @gigagreg1164
    @gigagreg1164 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    I don't know about spy watch but this has been a great dad watch... gradients of brown and warm tones give off dad vibes. Light weight, durability and mesh bracelet are great as a comfortable daily wear to navigate changing diapers, washing dishes, taking out the garbage and other household chores without worrying about scratches standing out. And the watch makes you feel elevated and cool to wear but understated enough to have on at birthday parties without getting attention or showing off. This has also been great to travel with and stays off most people's visual radars. I look forward to building more great memories with this watch.

  • @danielpowers2413
    @danielpowers2413 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I’d say the NTTD Seamaster matches the Caribbean aesthetic of Jamaica and Bond’s retired lifestyle there with his Land Rover Defender and nice refined villa, sailboat, spear fishing etc.

  • @nickkambitis5340
    @nickkambitis5340 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I love hearing your thoughts on all watches. I have an IWC pilots (2008) on a steel bracelet, which I love. 👍🏼👍🏼

  • @patrickjean-philippe7679
    @patrickjean-philippe7679 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Nice video. I knew I had to have this watch from the moment I saw it on the October 2019 Omega Newsletter. It has a unique style; it’s subdued, muted, very much under the radar but with a powerful design which I really like. I collected it in Paris in May this year and I find it awesome, I have been wearing it since that time. I enjoy it in both the NATO and the Milanese bracelet. The lume is great. The lightness it great although I feel Omega should have made a special calibre for it with titanium mainplates for extra lightness… Regarding IWC, I have a 2005 Spitfire Doppelchronograph, 2006 Ceramic Doppelchronograph and a 1941 B-Uhr 52 S.C.

    • @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch
      @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Good choice and couldn't agree more. ! I'm loving this watch more and more every day.
      Dopperchrono is also quite the choice albeit a little on the big side for me 😀

    • @patrickjean-philippe7679
      @patrickjean-philippe7679 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I agree. Yes, at 44mm the Doppelchronograph is on the large side and once one had the experience of watches with more reasonable dimensions i.e. diameter & thickness then it becomes quite difficult to wear the larger ones again. I think that 39-42 mm is nice providing the thickness remains well contained.

    • @pavelnikolaev2660
      @pavelnikolaev2660 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hey, nice comment! Can you give more insights on situations with low light (something medium). Is it still readable ?

    • @patrickjean-philippe7679
      @patrickjean-philippe7679 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It’s awesome in low light 🤩

  • @stevesaka8191
    @stevesaka8191 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    First you have become one of my absolute favorite watch YTbers - love the info, the measured and reasoned yet with clear opinions, very refreshing. I own this watch and I love it, and I agree 100% on your take of the aesthetics - one of your most bang on comments was that it was more a field watch than a diver, that really sums up this piece. As for the bracelet, my initial thoughts regarding the comfort mirrored yours, but with just a little wear that stiffness goes away and it becomes quite flexible and comfortable, and even though the clasp is too long, I often forget it is even on. One of the nice things about this watch is it is significantly thinner than any other 300M which I love. I know for some the "fauxtina" is an issue, but imo that isn't really fair, because this watch is very crisp and clean and intentionally done in a brown color way, it does not look fake vintage. I do have two negatives: #1 No one mentions in these reviews is that the combination of the thinner titanium case paired with 8806 caliber's ceramic ball bearing rotor results in a rather loud and rattle like rotor sound - although it is normal given the movement design paired with this thin a case in this medium it is very odd for a watch at this price point. It was very unsettling at first, but I have come make peace with it. #2 - The skeleton sword hands with their dark finish set against the matte brown dial make it one of the least legible Omega's I have ever owned. I really wish Omega had given more thought to this and opted for a different handset for this model. I love the watch so much however, I may eventually see if I can have it modded. Keep up the great work - love the content.

    • @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch
      @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks for the feedback. Much appreciated. And true about the sound of the seamaster in ti. The movement sounds cheap. If you have the chance - try a Tudor FXD in the carbon / Red bull version. It also has that cheap sound. I've noticed a few titanium watches that acoustically do not help the movement in any way... 😀😀

    • @patrickjean-philippe7679
      @patrickjean-philippe7679 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It’s funny, I have yet to hear the noise of the 8806 in my NTTD Seamaster. I wear it normally, each day and I don’t hear it’s rotor going around. If I put the watch against my ear though I can hear a humming… Strange.

  • @kevinbeasley2302
    @kevinbeasley2302 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I agree with you. This watch is gorgeous. I like your take that the 60th anniversary is more like a tool watch. As always, a very engaging video. You tell this Omega story with analytical flare. Much appreciated. ⌚

  • @RootBeerGMT
    @RootBeerGMT 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I dig the watch, but the lack of a ceramic bezel at this price point is nuts.

    • @patrickjean-philippe7679
      @patrickjean-philippe7679 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why is a ceramic bezel insert so critical to you vs an anodised aluminium one whereas both can be replaced at a whim if badly chipped or scratched ?

    • @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch
      @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I think it's best without. Looks more like a tool watch because it doesn't have the shine. Aesthetically I think it's spoton . 😊

  • @paulmorris1808
    @paulmorris1808 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Am lucky enough to have this watch and I love everything about it especially the bracelet oddly enough. And it is not at all an in your face piece it is perfectly conservative.

  • @cosmodoc
    @cosmodoc 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If you compare the Omega NTTD to the offerings from Rolex, you get far more bang for buck with the Omega! I enjoy your content so far, greetings from Manchester, UK, subscriber No71!😊

    • @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch
      @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Agree. Omega makes great watches and on the movement spec & finishing side coupled with their current price point they’re an excellent proposition compared to Rolex.
      Thanks for the sub and glad you liked my content 🤙

    • @fontyyy
      @fontyyy 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This Seamaster MSRP is an eye watering £9500, the NATO is an extra £330.
      You can pick up the full set second hand for under £6k. You basically lose £4k as you walk out of the AD.
      The black Submariner date MSRP is £9k (yes, less than the Seamaster), you can't find one under MSRP second hand.
      You can find the previous model slightly cheaper.
      I don't know why anyone buys a new Omega.
      It's the same with the Seamaster. They're £7.5k now, and £4k seconds hand. You've got to really want a new one to throw £2.5k out of the window just to say it's new.

    • @rodrigomothe13
      @rodrigomothe13 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@fontyyyWell, it's a matter treating watches as a commodity versus buying a watch that you actually love. None of them is right or wrong, but I think the watch scene would be better without people who only care about price and investment

    • @fontyyy
      @fontyyy หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rodrigomothe13 So let's say you're a Rolex fan with £20k in your pocket and you're willing to play the AD game.
      You pick yourself up a nice watch to show you're not a tire kicker, I dunno a CW C60 GMT, white dial, orange GMT hand, a Rolex homage if ever there was one. A £1000 secondary, you'll never lose £250 on that watch. Ever.
      You go into your local Rolex AD and express interest in the steel sports models, but we know, even now, you'll probably get offered an OP at best.
      £5550.
      So you take it, and you keep going in, wearing it, popping in ever 10-15 days, chatting watches and eventually you get offered a Submariner.
      £9450.
      And you eBay the OP, you make £600 on it after fees.
      So, the Sub stands you at £8850 really.
      And you repeat that again and get offered a Bruce Wayne GMT.
      £9550.
      And you eBay the Sub, making ,£2.5k on it and £3.1k in total, so the GMT stands you at £6450 really.
      And you keep going in, chatting, always wearing the GMT, and eventually you get the offer, a steel Daytona.
      £13200.
      And you eBay the GMT, £13k easily, netting you a total profit over 3 watches of over £6.5k
      So your Daytona which is worth a cool £20k every day of the week stands you at less than £7k.
      Which, if I'm not mistaken won't buy a new Seamaster or a Speedmaster these days.
      That (loosely) is the Rolex AD game, yes it might take longer and they'd like you to buy your wife a little Datejust and your son a Tudor GMT but that's roughly how it works.
      You don't want to play? Fine, neither did I, but my Starbucks is down 25% on what I paid, do I care? No. Because I'm never selling it, I bought it to mark signing my divorce papers (ok, sending an email!).
      It isn't for sale, not for current market, not for what I paid, not for 10x that.

  • @alanl.1379
    @alanl.1379 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Subbed for the content - liked for Eva 💚

  • @patrickjean-philippe7679
    @patrickjean-philippe7679 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    My Seamaster NTTD bezel has started to loose its luminous material…

  • @Leedoggie6677
    @Leedoggie6677 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Not to be a contrarian, but I think the marker colors match the stones from that Italian city perfectly. I’d rock that thing at a Marilyn Manson concert on a Saturday, then to church the next morning.

  • @robertschriek1353
    @robertschriek1353 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ive got mesh bracelets that cost well under 100 euro’s that are less overdesigned and more practical and probably more comfortable. Sticking to my early 2000 300m :-)

  • @rachelwaller1210
    @rachelwaller1210 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Uncle Straps sell a titanium jubilee bracelet designed for this watch. I haven't ordered it, so can't comment on the quality but it looks very good on the photos.
    ps - I love your videos and check every week for new ones!

    • @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch
      @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks - Will try to make videos you continue to come back to 😊

    • @Brew2point0
      @Brew2point0 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You just blew my mind with that brushed titanium jubilee. Had no idea that existed but it's perfect.

  • @1henshin359
    @1henshin359 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'd rather call this SMP the NTTD Omega, omitting 'Seamaster'. I feel that this watch has its own personality, detaching itself from the SMP line. It's not an 'alpha' watch like the Submariner or any other modern ceramic dive watch, but rather a 'sigma' watch with its own territory. It's not Superman but Black Adam.

    • @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch
      @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I like your analogy. Omega do have a tendency to try to shoehorn the bond watches in everywhere.
      The real question though is - Can Black Adam, as the Rock insinuates, beat superman?

    • @LarrySealeArcheryCoach
      @LarrySealeArcheryCoach 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Haha. Everyone knows only Batman stands a chance against Superman!

  • @salam-s9y
    @salam-s9y 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    My problem with this is the bezel action is awful. I have a Ti Signum GMT (South African micro) at $500 that has a lovely bezel action. No excuses for Omega.

  • @geertvoorwinden8924
    @geertvoorwinden8924 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In my opinion, a nato strap is for wrists above 19 cm.

  • @Cvp411y
    @Cvp411y 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Got this on a nato …. Very nice !

  • @WAMwatches
    @WAMwatches 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Like the watch hate the bracelet. I have my own reasons. 1st the gap… if I’m buying a factory bracelet I don’t want to see a gap between it and the watch. If it’s after market, I’m ok cuz trying to match the curve is tough. But from the manufacturer, they should be able to create something that looks seamless. 2nd they often don’t taper, which impact comfort. Like the look still not sold on the size.

  • @uncles2000
    @uncles2000 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    It is impossible to wear a watch, that sports a screw down HE valve, hanging off the side, to any event, that includes the word dress on the invitation. This watch is more akin to a hybrid field watch than a diver. It would have looked ‘the part’ on a 300 Heritage case. You’re correct about the earth tones matching an outdoor environment. This is why I purchased the watch. I love’d the use of mat gray Ti, cream, and brown.

    • @patrickjean-philippe7679
      @patrickjean-philippe7679 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I was blow away by this watch at first sight when I saw it from the Omega newsletter announcing its launch. It has something pretty unique about it aside from being discreet, subdued, under the radar, …

    • @mattlampert8598
      @mattlampert8598 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Whine whine. It’s a brilliant watch as for whatever purpose the buyer chooses. Stop bitching. I wear mine in any situation; office or casual. You don’t need to be a bloody military expert pat to wear it. Jesus.

    • @patrickjean-philippe7679
      @patrickjean-philippe7679 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

      The helium escape valve is part of Omega’ signature so if you don’t like it then you should look elsewhere.

    • @uncles2000
      @uncles2000 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@patrickjean-philippe7679 Why would look elsewhere? I own the NTTD. I have no issue with the watch or HE.

    • @patrickjean-philippe7679
      @patrickjean-philippe7679 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Ok, I own it too. I may have misunderstood your post then. One thing though, mine has issues with its lume material as it is peeling off on some dial markers and has fallen off on some of the bezel markers too. So a fantastic watch but watch the lume carefully whilst it remains under guarantee.

  • @Daniel3NT
    @Daniel3NT 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    and its by far the thinnest seamaster - the only acceptable one

  • @soopafly887
    @soopafly887 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Found it ❤

  • @ShanePleasance
    @ShanePleasance 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Gah - you ask good questions - next Bond watch?! Best Bond watch?! Next Bond?! Hmmm.... This watch has really grown on me, a little like fungus on an aged patina. Or something like that. Its a worry, Bond is expected to be more woke, so we don't know who (or what) we will get. I did buy the Spectre Seamaster, loving the little lollipop second hand. Disappointed I have not been able to blow up my wicked step-brother with it, but it hasn't stopped me trying.

    • @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch
      @Mike.thiswatchthatwatch  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Does your brother by any chance have a scar over his left eye and an all white cat? If so, by all means blow him up.
      I'm kind of partial to the old Seikos from the late 70s and 80s especially the one from the spy who loved me, but that's probably because it's also from the movie with the submarine Lotus Esprit

    • @ShanePleasance
      @ShanePleasance 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Mike.thiswatchthatwatch Ah, you know the brother too! I had people round the other day looking for him as he hasn't paid the bill for the shark tank.

  • @richardbuss8986
    @richardbuss8986 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Your comments about a spy not wearing a $10k watch is silly. Bond drives an Aston Martin.