William Eggleston | TateShots

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 ก.ค. 2024
  • Known for his rich and complex images of the American South, William Eggleston is the godfather of colour photography.
    Though his images record a particular place at a certain point in time, Eggleston is not interested in their documentary qualities. Instead, when asked what he is photographing, Eggleston simply answers 'Life today'. Curator Simon Baker explores the work of this master and pioneer of colour in fine art photography, on display at Tate Modern. 'William Eggleston never takes multiple shots of the same image' says Baker, instead he takes 'just the right picture at just the right moment'.
  • ภาพยนตร์และแอนิเมชัน

ความคิดเห็น • 31

  • @TheChrisrg
    @TheChrisrg 10 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I love Eggleston's America.

  • @jasonlee8156
    @jasonlee8156 ปีที่แล้ว

    Looking at his photos must give some older people a nostalgic feeling. For a seemingly idyllic time/place.

  • @nocommentnoname1111
    @nocommentnoname1111 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    To me his work lives on the edges of everyday snapshot world and genius. One minute I may say what?, the other wow (on the same image)!

  • @nickfanzo
    @nickfanzo ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A genius, master of composition and color. Many Instagram wrapped imitators try to be him, but they all fail.

  • @mikebaginy8731
    @mikebaginy8731 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fabulous photos, what a wonderful exhibit!

  • @philw8741
    @philw8741 5 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    William Eggleston has never been arsed about all the pretentious talk, he basically just takes photographs.

    • @stuartwray6175
      @stuartwray6175 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He doesn't intellectualise - Brings to mind a writer like Raymond Chandler or film maker such as Alfred Hitchcock. Nonetheless what they make is unique and inspired.

  • @dukewinward
    @dukewinward 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    How many good photos are taken everyday now with everyone being a photographer of selfies and documentaries, not much chance of standing out anymore or making a living unless you are a photographer of weddings and divorces. Most artists create a few good works and the rest of their works are recipe based on previous successes for putting food on the table.

  • @BackFocus11
    @BackFocus11 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent!

  • @7kurisu
    @7kurisu 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    i wanted to see more!

  • @durango-CODEBUILDER
    @durango-CODEBUILDER 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cant believe I missed this...

  • @lordoftheflings
    @lordoftheflings 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    proves that you don't need to print HUGE to have your work hanging in a museum.

    • @nickfanzo
      @nickfanzo ปีที่แล้ว

      All of Edward Weston’s prints are contacts 8x10

  • @BOBMAN1980
    @BOBMAN1980 8 ปีที่แล้ว +48

    What's annoying about watching videos like this--where curators and academics gush on about the genius of the moment--is you know they would've chafed at the very same individuals and their work(s) had they encountered them as unknowns.
    True story. . . . .

    • @melikatalks7676
      @melikatalks7676 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      BOBMAN1980 So true.
      But to be fair, it's normal for critics to have to catch up to the artist. Rarely do they ever encounter an actual visionary who is ahead of his time, most of the time they presume it's just bad art.
      Criticism could be just like art itself. There are a lot of good artists but few truly exceptional ones. There are also a lot of good critics, but few can see beyond what others do.

    • @handsomefingers
      @handsomefingers 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Of course, because the very same photographer usually produce tons of non-extraordinary images too.

    • @capnrob97
      @capnrob97 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I have a bunch of pics on Flickr, add more everyday. I wonder after I am long gone if someone will discover my dormant account and will read into my ordinary pics some deep meaning of what I was trying to convey when all I was doing was snapping photos.

    • @cameraman655
      @cameraman655 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      In the art world, they are often referred to as the Gatekeepers...keeping out the riff-raff, at least until they are discovered, then they gush..

  • @synthesaurus
    @synthesaurus 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    How the heck did the guys back in the day shoot 64 iso film indoors?

  • @Igaluit
    @Igaluit 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I didn't know people were still doing dye transfers.

  • @huntrrams
    @huntrrams 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    How do you achieve the colors of Eggleston? The only slide film available for this is Ektachrome

    • @mikutai6395
      @mikutai6395 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ektar 100 is pretty close. Eggleston used color negative such as kodacolor

  • @stephengreico2810
    @stephengreico2810 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Eggleston was great no doubt. Love his work
    But that film stocks and the time/place he shot did him huge favors.
    You just can't reproduce what he did in today's times.

  • @thewastedmuseum
    @thewastedmuseum 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    what kind of a camera did he use?

    • @leplasti
      @leplasti 10 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      He has a HUGE collection of rangefinder cameras (mostly Leicas).

    • @gohumberto
      @gohumberto ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I truly hate it when people ask me that, because it wasn't the camera that got up at 6am to walk the streets of a city.
      It tells me that people don't understand photography at all, and think that a new camera will fix their problems.
      Every modern camera is capable of superb images.
      The question you should be asking is, "What alarm clock did you use?". because getting out of bed to take photos is more important than the camera under your bed.

  • @Hariharanchrisb
    @Hariharanchrisb 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    eggleston handles a different form of aesthetics..

  • @ibrake4butterflies733
    @ibrake4butterflies733 8 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    .....but where is the photoshopping......no photoshop???......he had to...what....get his exposures just right?...so...uh...

  • @nickfanzo
    @nickfanzo ปีที่แล้ว

    It’s a myth he only takes one shoot of every image, there is proof that this isn’t true. For example the airplane window photo with the glass, there are multiple negatives of that scene and you can see he was trying different approaches to that picture.
    Artists love to make myths about themselves.
    He also shot more color negative film than slides.