Flight Test of the RunCam WifiLink OpenIPC system - it's good!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 44

  • @MCsCreations
    @MCsCreations 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Awesome flying and testing, Wayne! Thanks a bunch!!! 😃
    I'm starting to think this system is really close to prime time! It really looks good!
    Stay safe there with your family! 🖖😊

    • @CurryKitten
      @CurryKitten  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Cheers MC :)

  • @TitanFPV
    @TitanFPV 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks Wayne! Nice to see new video systems beginning to mature.

    • @CurryKitten
      @CurryKitten  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes - it definitely looks better with the MPSOSD functions in place - which I was working on this week. Follow video to come (hopefully) soon

  • @robertbobgriffith5292
    @robertbobgriffith5292 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wayne, it's amazing the Clarity via the TH-cam post is excellent. The avenues of Open IPC are coming along well. As mentioned in your other posts I am looking forward to the point of fruition for easy setup by novices. Most interesting.

  • @Realsixman
    @Realsixman 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Keep the content coming mate❤

    • @CurryKitten
      @CurryKitten  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Will do - some more OpenIPC stuff coming up soon

  • @EnglishTurbines
    @EnglishTurbines 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Interesting video Wayne....I was impressed with the unsmeared grass in the feed. Although this problem dissapears with a little more altitude.....🤔😳😳😏🇬🇧

    • @CurryKitten
      @CurryKitten  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Agreed - although if you are buzzing the ground like we do tend to in quads, that smear is a bit off putting

    • @EnglishTurbines
      @EnglishTurbines 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @CurryKitten Yes, that's exactly what I meant....🤔😏😏

  • @heliharris69
    @heliharris69 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think the result is brilliant something different is always interesting... Great presentation as are all your video's.

    • @CurryKitten
      @CurryKitten  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks muchly :)

  • @timothius9000
    @timothius9000 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    loving FOSS for rc, especially that a RubyFPV ground-station can connect to a openIPC drone. this opens up the hardware possibilities a ton

    • @CurryKitten
      @CurryKitten  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ehat's FOSS - I'm unfamiliar with that acronym/word ?

    • @timothius9000
      @timothius9000 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@CurryKitten free open source software

  • @dempa3
    @dempa3 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That's quite good! Thank you for demonstrating it!

    • @CurryKitten
      @CurryKitten  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No problem!

  • @MattBalder
    @MattBalder 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Awesome! I'm looking forward to trying this out hopefully in the near future.

    • @CurryKitten
      @CurryKitten  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's getting better pretty quickly. I was just working on the MSPOSD today and it looks really good

  • @henrirotthier5710
    @henrirotthier5710 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That looks very promising. At the price analog VTX are for the moment, this could become a serious candidate. This could also being down the price of DJI and Walksnail systems

    • @CurryKitten
      @CurryKitten  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Interestingly, just today Caddx (who, of course, own the Walksnail brand) dropped $1000 into OpenIPC funding and are looking to work with them. To what end right now, we don't know.

    • @notsogood4321
      @notsogood4321 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@CurryKitten most likely caddx will just release a airunit , though what im hoping is that they might do is help openIPC/openHD with the radio transmission hardware - openIPC and openHD both use basically cracked wifi modules so there are limitations in their capabilities and caddx has plenty of experience with radio transmission hardware . Also im hoping that they might release the SDK's and relevant files so that openIPC can run their software on the avatar VRx module

  • @stelic9515
    @stelic9515 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We can use phone in a VR google box and is close to FPV googles. I like the ideea of using the phone for FPV, the phone screen is much better than most of FPV googles

    • @CurryKitten
      @CurryKitten  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Very true - a modern phone is light years ahead of many goggles. Great if you've got a VR style adapter to fit them in

  • @snowsh1ne
    @snowsh1ne 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I use a quest 3 as my goggles with the android app and it works great with the runcam

    • @CurryKitten
      @CurryKitten  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hows the latency on them? I must remember to mention this as I'm sure there's a certain crossover of FPV pilots and VR headsets (not me, I went Playstation VR, so I'm a bit stuffed there!)

  • @smika710
    @smika710 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice, I did the radxa+rxl8812au and emax 100mw vtx

    • @CurryKitten
      @CurryKitten  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The Radxa is where the smart money goes. I like the fact it's easy to build something mountable on your goggles as well as being able to add buttons to start/stop recording and change channels. I would get one to replace my NVR, but i want to see if a commercial goggle module comes out soon

    • @smika710
      @smika710 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@CurryKitten I saw a post from Mario on YT responding to a comment suggesting not to hold ones breath about it last few days. Who knows. Maybe caddx can make a openipc vrx that plugs into their goggles X.

    • @notsogood4321
      @notsogood4321 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@CurryKitten there is a radxahat (a shield for the radxa with bec , usb hub , wifi , buttons all integrated onto the board so a pretty easy ground station build) being worked on i think more info on that will come out on december , as far as im aware there is no truly "of the shelf" VRx module atleast coming out soon . More info on the openIPC goggles will be released during December BUT igor said IF the goggles even make it to market expect it mid 2025 or later ... so dont hold your breath for it essentially

  • @pointless2596
    @pointless2596 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can I use the runcam wifi link with the nvr board

    • @CurryKitten
      @CurryKitten  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yep - it's what I was using to fly with. OpenIPC is the common factor, so you should be able to use any receiver with any transmitter - as long as you are using compatible frame rate/resolution on both ends

  • @StuartDesign
    @StuartDesign 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Would you happen to know if it is technically possible to use the RunCam Wi-Link without the USB OTG Adapter? I know performance would take a hit but just want to know if short range tests are possible with just a tablet only.

    • @CurryKitten
      @CurryKitten  8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      It's not possible, no. It's because (I think - I can't remember if OpenIPC does this) but the video link isn't actually wifi as you know it. It talks directly to the hardware and uses a more direct protocol which a tablet can't

    • @StuartDesign
      @StuartDesign 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@CurryKitten Ah no worries, thanks so much anyway. This channel has really valuable info!

  • @richardburrows1610
    @richardburrows1610 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What are the antennas you are using?

    • @CurryKitten
      @CurryKitten  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There are 2 simple dipoles on the Walksnail VTX. I've used a cable tie and some heat shrink to hold them up in the direction I want them

  • @stevefox3763
    @stevefox3763 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I give up, all my comments are getting deleted.

    • @CurryKitten
      @CurryKitten  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What's getting deleted Steve? I don't see any comments in the "held" folder where anything with URLs would usually get put into

    • @stevefox3763
      @stevefox3763 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@CurryKitten I said that the runcam is a great little cam and I have one running ruby on a car, I also said that Petru has posted the video of my first test of my runcam on the ruby website and can be found by clicking the resources tab, my video contains day and night footage.
      I posted two different comments on here and both got deleted :(

    • @stevefox3763
      @stevefox3763 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@CurryKitten I agreed that its a great little cam and said that I have a runcam running ruby on a car, I said that petru posted my first test footage to the ruby w site and can be found on the resources tab and that my footage includes night footage near the end. Who knows if this will get deleted, I just tried to reply to you and that also got deleted, YT hates me for some reason.

    • @nic.h
      @nic.h 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@stevefox3763 YT hates pretty much any user