Why F1 Style Aero is Killing MotoGP!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ก.พ. 2025
- BOOK TICKETS to our first LIVE podcast with Al Fagan from @FortyFourTeeth
👉 bit.ly/42PXTUB
7pm - 10pm, Podium Place, 31A Bone Ln, Newbury RG14 5SH
DISCOVER MORE ABOUT PODIUM PLACE: www.podiumplace.com
...............................................................................................................................................................
This week, I get on my soapbox about aero and the affect it's having on MotoGP racing. I'm joined by good mate, Graham Hardie, whose son, Mikey we sponsor in British Supersports.
ORDER YOUR REP MERCH, INCLUDING BOBBLE HATS: 👉 reperformance....
If you enjoy the video, then hit the like button, leave a comment and don't forget to SUBSCRIBE! Thanks guys!
#PoweredByMotul #Motul #44teeth #podcast
www.motul.com
✅ Standalone engine management specialists Syvecs Ltd & MoTeC
✅ State of the art MAHA Dynamometers 4WD dyno facility
✅ Maintenance and tuning for R8, Lamborghini, Ferrari, McLaren
✅ Official Akrapovic Exhaust System dealers
-----------------------------
Check out Pro-Detail uk for Xpel paint protection film, Ceramic Pro nano coatings, paint correction, preparation & appearance
-----------------------------
📞01793278069
📱07786170031
📧info@REPerformance.co.uk
🌎www.REPerformance.co.uk
Follow us:
/ reperformanceuk
/ reperformance
Thanks for all the great comments, guys! If you're into bikes, why not join us at our first Live Podcast with Al Fagan from www.44teeth.com? An evening dedicated to bikes and banter, with a few beers thrown in! Monday 25th March at Podium Place, Newbury. Hit the link to book:👉bit.ly/42PXTUB
@REPerformance I agree with some of what you are saying about aero and I prefer motogp without aero and ride height and launch control I even think they should minimise rider aids! But I don’t agree with what you said about being able to make it to the gp paddock from supersport or superbike plenty of people have done it over the years! Toseland, bayliss, Colin edwards, cal crutchlow, Ben spies, Chris vermullen to name but a few! As for jake Dixon if he is good enough he will get a ride! Just out of interest who would you replace for jake? What you said about Jonnie rea not getting the Honda ride is a bit disingenuous who were Honda meant to drop to give him the ride pedrosa or Marquez?
@@weaselswheels5258no Brit will get on a GP bike! Jake had some wildcards but won’t get the step. Rory needed 500k to ride in Moto2. Not even Toprak can get in.
Yes riders did it in the past the last one being Cal and Brad but that was over 10 years ago!
Not even Sam got to retain his Moto 2 ride!
@@REPerformanceUK Sam also made it to MotoGP. If jake is good enough he will get the step up! Bradley smith I’m assuming you are talking about? Yes smith got to MotoGP so did Scott reading but they both came through the ranks 125, moto2 then stepped up to gp so the path is easier if you are already in the paddock. But my point is if you are good enough you will get there! If jake wins moto2 he has a great chance of getting a ride. Look at pedro came on the scene a few years ago and he’s already in MotoGP why? Because of his talent he won moto3 moto2 and is a future gp champ imho! Love your videos especially the bike content 👍
how can the guy say just look at the values when they literally removed racing with all of this .... lap times are better yes ... next year we perform this on rails then its even more better ha..
perform jaa... xd
The racing is as good as ever. There were 10 different riders to score victories (if you count the sprint races) and every manufacturer scored podium finishes. Yamaha was the only bike that didn't score a win and they were the only team to only have 2 bikes. The championship came down to the final race. The runner-up was a satellite team and third place was a one year old bike. I know it's really fashionable to pretend things aren't good, but don't let other people try to convince you there's anything lacking in the competition.
The engineering geek in me DESPISES the war on everything cool to go faster. If it was up to these guys we would have a spec series with pack racing that’s incredibly dangerous and impossible to set up a pass.
Sounds like a great season
The question is not about how many winners, the question is how close is each race?
@@tbsmdelhi96
Close. You should start watching.
@@A.J.1656the racing is close sure but there’s no actual back and forth battles between riders. Vinales was like 0.3 back all the way until he crashed and didn’t have a single chance to overtake. Where’s the fun in that?
To make bike racing fair every rider should have an 8x4 sheet of plywood strapped to their back . That would take any aero advantage away and sort the men from the boys .
They carry all sorts on motorcycles in India 😂
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂u got me rolling mate! Bikes and wood are my games but not mixed like that .... YET!
This comment made my day! 🤣😂🤣
It's interesting how, at the beginning of the 1000cc era, they went for single shorty exhaust systems that terminated just outside the bellypan. Now they are running a long 4-2-1 system. To me the best period was 08 - 12 when they were wheelspin drifting around corners like King Kenny showed us how..
there is lots of tech that does not get done unless you have: engineers, smart people, or combo and money added. With dynos today you can be sure that optimum combo is being achieved but don't forget about noise and emissions too. Specifically if you have the hi pressure internal pressure meeting atmospheric pressure with drop but use a conical reducer it can really increase flow. Lots of people don't care but stuff like this has an impact. It all does!
they still don’t have traction control and abs afaik so the lack of wheelspin is just a testament to their skill
Tires have come way too far in a decade for skids. Even GT3s don't wiggle like they used too. The falloff/tire degradation is too steep
A 4-2-1 system tends to make more average power through the power band. The single shorty 4-1 tends to make more peak power, but less other places.
They likely did a ton of testing and decided on the higher average power as it’ll help the most. The high peak would be best for top speed, but they’re not typically at top speed long enough for an extra .5 mph to be a big deal.
Keep an eye on Alex Rins, he smokes his tire all the time.
F1 and MotoGP are the pinnacle of technology and it’s sadly a double edged sword. They’re making incredible machines but at the cost of true racing values. This is why as much as I love MotoGP and F1, for me the GT cars such as big Mercs, 720 Mclarens etc and WSBK and BSB are better racing series. Cracking video Ricky 👍
Thats why offroad racing like Rally and Baja is great. It's still a pinnacle of motorsport, but the cars never get too complicated or crazy because they would just break. They stay simple, easy to understand, and relatively "car looking".
@@icebrewNot even remotely true.
@stuartstogdill2406 my bad, the evidence you have provided had completely changed my outlook on motorsports. Thank you for sharing a portion of your wisdom.
They'll keep refining aero and adding bodywork until the bikes in MotoGP are huge
Unexpectedly that was probably the most interesting chat you’ve had for a long time.
Agreed. YT recommended this video to me and i watched/listened all the way to the end. I haven't followed motoGP for years and had no idea about all the aero stuf they put on the GP bikes these days. Nice video!👍
Fascinating to learn of the links between F1 and MotoGP. I wasn’t aware of the testing crossovers. Even an aerodynamicist leaving to a linked team raises so many questions about spending caps.
For the first time in 10 years or more, I haven’t renewed my MGP subscription. Just can’t be arsed watching it anymore and it’s to friggin expensive, so sod em. I’ll be watching BSB & WSBK.
£10 a race weekend on the new app apparently not that expensive 👍
Also worth having a look at MotoAmerica. Good quality racing
Same. I need to check out BSB
MotoAmerica is a pretty good series to watch on tv
@@phoenixbda6164completely agree. Great racing on some fantastic tracks. Moto America is a great series👍👍
Genuinely loving your one on one chats that really talk the talk. Very informative. Keep it up.
Stumbled across this video because of the TH-cam scrambler... THANK YOU!!! I've learned more about the new aero on the GP bikes than I ever could have with HOURS of research. Great stuff.
Thanks for watching
@@REPerformanceUK and you are right...the racing is MUCH more exciting in WSBK than in the GP series.. unfortunately we don't get WSBK here in the US on any regular TV channels.. it's all 3 minute TH-cam highlights. Bummer.
Wsb is gunna be good this year, what did you make of Lowes outside line pass on Bautista ?
Astonishing mate, what a pass!
Unbelievable move, that 👍
he should pass if Bautista is being held back. would be bloody embarrassing if the bloke couldn't.
Phillip island was resurfaced. Massive Grip
Wsbk is a non event and they should just make it a spec series and use a single engine supplier.
That Ducati has been completely neutered and revs less than the bloody road bike
Not sure how this come up in my feed, but glad it did. 53 year old, newbie motorcycle racer, new subscriber! Keep up the good work.
Great convo. For me what draws me in is the rider ability over any kind of tech. The tech is interesting, especially engine configurations and chassis design but when i think back to the best riders and racing it was all about who could tame the beast. Stoner on the Ducati, Doohan on the NSR would be a great examples. Edwards on the RC51, Foggy on the Ducati etc... Great riders riding at thier limit. I don't see that in Motogp so much now as there is so much tech doing the work for them.
TY
There is definitely a lot of skill involved, the bikes are just less relatable to watch. Part of the reason why worldSBK is more fun to watch.
I Couldn't disagree more
i can see new leathers being developed to work in conjunction with the diffuser so the rider could control the amount of downforce it produces by shifting the elbow or something
F1 did something similar to this. A couple times. It got banned every time.
Superb video bud 👏🏼 we do need more eyes on MotoGP - its an incredible motosport to watch, and the masses are still watching that snooze fest that is F1. I have to say though that MotoGP last season was absolutely epic and this season is set to be insane with all the changes.
F1 has had a renaissance due to that bloody netflix show. The actual action is shit and the cars sound crap. Bring back the v10 or fu:k off!
@@david_new46 Yeah that's true, i started watching F1 because of Drive to Survive but I quit as soon as I realized it's boring as fuck, race by race is terrible, the Netflix show makes it look so much more entertaining than it is, the only thing they have is really fast cars that I'm pretty sure impress by how fast they are when u watch it live, other than that, don't even waste your time on it, total crap.
Yeah, that's something I'm still trying to figure out, despite being a lot better race by race, bike racing is a lot less popular than snooze fest car racing, I think it all boils down to most people having no experience with bikes whatsoever so they can't relate to it.
@@Maidenintime86it's also marketing mate. Media presence is so different between F1 and MotoGP. I've grown up with both but how many people who aren't into Motorsports know what F1 is and how many know what MotoGP is? More people know of F1 because it seems to be covered much more on the media side of things, both the news media and also social media. F1 keeps pushing for more marketability in a way MotoGP just doesn't. It only makes the racing worse of course, because the only thing that matters to those wankers is numbers going up. But it explains why it's still so much bigger than other series that have much better racing.
Still like your bike content the best. Your enthusiasm is refreshing.
I appreciate that! Thanks for watching
MotoGP had 8 different race winners in 2023.
15 different on the podium.
That is by no means a shit racing series.
It’s the F1 class of two wheels. Of course they have to push the limits of engineering. I absolutely love the geeky stuff in MotoGP.
But you’ll probably have your way in a couple of years without aero.
Calling MotoGP the F1 of 2 wheels is actually an insult, for racing fans, MotoGP is a LOT better, but for car fans F1 is better, that's the difference, there's barely any racing in F1 man, just huge gaps everywhere.
It’s the king class of two wheel prototype racing, like F1 is for cars.
It’s in terms of the engineering, not the racing.
But we're those wins by people that got ahead in the first corner and then held that for the entire race... Can still be boring. We want tussles
Great video guys you and Graham should do more bike content together! Very informative 👏 thank you
You’re right, and Ricky has my agents number 😂
Great talk 👍
Yup, guys have wicked accidents following or worse, getting cut off by an "aero bike"... You just can't predict the sudden forces on you. Braking easily upends the bike 😢
Well I'll be fucked...... You've just said what I have been trying to say for years and I thank you big time for spitting out the words in my head so clearly and truthfully that I will now share your video across every channel regarding MotoGP!!!! I'm now a new subscriber.... From Aussie Land 😊
More chats like this please! Sat round a workshop table, cup of tea, guest(s), pick a subject and talk shop …just bikes though!
Speaking of aero . . . did you guys catch the Daytona 200? Suzuki: 5 bikes in the top 9 finishers, Yamaha: 2 bikes and Ducati was first and 9th. Pit lane speed limiter electronics and no aero worth mentioning . . . 3 pit stops. Maybe motoGP races need to be 3x as long . . . like 30 - 40 laps with a pit stop or two. 😁😘 best discussion of aero I’ve ever heard!
Question time- what’s your thoughts on Rossi racing in WEC LMGT3?
Wasn't aware of your videos and I thought this was going to be another powerpoint complain guy video. So pleased with what this video is. Love it!
Brilliant off the cuff wide ranging discussion of aero, I was captivated. Well done gents.
100% agree. One thing you didn't mention is the cost/benefit ratio for the bike companies.
Most of the tech in F1 can filter down to even the most mundane road cars, where as most of the new MotoGP tech cant or has no benefit for road riding. Suzuki pulled out, Kwak and BMW wont touch it with a barge pole. Its nowhere near as big as F1 from a marketing standpoint, and with the huge shift away from sports bikes by consumers, the question is what does the bike Co get out of it?
With new tech Its basically getting more boring, more dangerous(tyre pressures, wayward ride hight devices etc), less diverse machinery and less connected to fans.
Yeah maybe tech from F1 does filter down to daily drivers, but if you are out driving your Prius with some sort of F1 technology you won't feel like an F1 driver will you? the only reason why F1 is bigger is because most people have no experience on bikes, so they can't relate to it, and also as F1 is a lot faster, I'm pretty sure many go to watch it live without knowing shit about it just to see those cars flying-by, F1 is by far the most overrated sport.
@@Maidenintime86 Im talking about why bike companies are in the sport. same as F1, marketing and development. If the development and costs associated don't translate to anything useful, the reason to participate is lower, if the public find it boring, marketing isnt so effective, the reason to participate drops even further.
MotoGP has lost some of the biggest factories over the last few year, because the cost/benefit ratio doesn't add up.
As a quick aside: Dalara actually helped KTM build the Xbow, so KTM made a road car with a pro team.
i think the wings should be transitioned to winglets and spoilers, or at least the number of wings or aerofoils should be limited, and until then, they are just going to keep putting holes in the bodywork. spoilers with winglets could give them an opportunity to tune the thickness of the material to deform in a favorable way when there is a change of direction, allowing some of the aero to work in the corners a little more. Its the wild west right now and it has made it tough to get back in to the racing, with the japanese contingent a pretty long way off the mark. I think removing turbulence, and lift is great for safety and the aero can probably help in that regard, but im not sure allowing them to put aerofoils on everything is making for the most compelling races. You can always drill one more hole, and I think thats a dangerous place to push rules lawyers, vs material thickness and deformation.
Aero sucks in looks and what it is doing to racing.. F1 sucks more than aero😮 Good rant Ricky 😂
It actually 'blows' more than sucks. Unless you're talking about ground-effect? 😮
Ricky alost 31K subs congrates man i do really enjoy ur thoughts on bike & car design thanks man fer ur time Champ
Thank you for watching
Saved this vid for the Saturday morning turbo sesh, great stuff as always Rick and Dav
Enjoy!
First time 've see a video from you, but gotta say it's the most interesting one I've seen i ages. Thanks for the good content!
I think the true solution is just to specify a certain box size around the bike and get the manufacturers to build a bike that fits the box’ dimensions but not exceeding it. And they can go ham in what they want to fit into that box size. Less regulations, more freedom and hopefully more variations among bikes
i stopped watching motogp just after stoner quit and they stopped 2strokes in moto3, and i stopped watching moto2 after they phased out 250 2 strokes. I feel like it just wasn't as exciting after that point. Stoner and rossi fighting at laguna seca is still my favorite moment in motorsport history.
Yeah, that one or the Stoner Rossi fight at Catalunya are epic races.
It's a double sword and the effects of aero are not all negative. Mainly is it has brought the field closer together in lap times. Often the entire field (discounting wild cards) can be within 1 sec in lap times. Last season we had 9 different winners and no one went on win streaks beyond 2 or 3 wins in a row.
Negatives, passing can be more difficult with the turbulent air disrupting the aero. And Ducati has made the most of the aero (and the active ride height), plus nearly half the grid on Ducs that it's almost another Ducati Cup.
Bring back the Big Bang 2 strokes I loved watching it back in the day and give me a TZR 250 road bike I loved them
Racing is better in modern MotoGP than seeing Honda win and dominate everything because they had the best bike by far in the 2-stroke era, watch Assen 2018, if you don't think that's better than anything 2 strokes had to offer, you're a lunatic, races back in the day were boring as fuck, the only reason why you think it was better is because of bloody nostalgia, Phillip Island 2022 was better than anything during that time you mentioned, I feel bad if you missed it, 8 riders fighting for the win the whole race.
These 4 stroke bikes are just as hard to ride as any 2 stroke
Obviously, two young pups talking to you there Andy, your absolutely right, the sound the smell the racing, so much better on the two strokes.
Shut up boomer that technology is trash and extremely slow
It’s dangerous for motorbikes though. It’s only a matter of time before something bad happens. The aero causes to much on the slipstream.
I understand what you mean, and I kind of agree with you. I've said for years, motorcycles need active-aero. Not just air brakes on the back like a hypercar, to stabilize the rear, and keep it on the ground. But also, active-aero elements that create Downforce that adapts to lean-angle.
Unless it's a Dragbike, or highway-runner. Fixed aero is pointless for cornering. You need active-aero for circuits & sprints.
And I agree with you that dirty-air from aero-kits, does interfere with traditional racing.
I think, MotoGP should have little to no Downforce for grid circuit racing. But have a separate division, even on the same track, same day, have a crazy, unlimited aero time-attack event, like the cars do.
I believe this is the best option, and sounds fun as hell to participate & watch.
Got to agree aero spoils the racing , didn’t know about the wind tunnel stuff being done for F1 , just had a school day 👌
I don't particularly like the aero, however, I don't think you can ban it. I think gp should be as simple as, make what you can to go as fast as you can
great to see 2 highly mechanical minds be honest and agree but disagree with each others opinion yet they both respected there others opinions on the developemnt of aero in gp.
Great chat session, informative and entertaining.
Thanks! Glad you enjoyed it
I was having this discussion with my dad - we both agreed that its just far to much.
We always loved watching MotoGP and Superbikes and also go to the races when they are in the UK.
But MotoGP have just gone so far away from what a Motorbike should be that it just feels like a completely different championship than it did 5-6 years ago.
Its making the racing very boring and each race is just a tyre wear train - go slow all race because the bike has so much grip it destroys the tyres if you push to hard.
The bikes no longer move around and have to be ridden like you are on rails
I used to think Graeme was quick, then I met Mikey😅
Informative video that. Nice one👍
😅
:)
I feel rude to ask this here and don’t know who to ask - I can’t find many main and rod bearings for a 5.0 gallardo and heaps for a 5.2. Are they interchangeable? Thanks and sorry again. Al
Answer this guy bro
Great discussion man. I’d love to hear more of your thoughts on bike racing these days. Things are very different now
Totally agree with you, F1 has amazing technology, advertising and skilled drivers, but compared with most other motorsport is dire to watch. BSB was brilliant last year, the last round was so tense I could barely watch......they limit electronic intervention, riders make a bigger difference , the action is so close. F1 cars can't do wheel to wheel dicing, motogp looks to be slowly going that way because of aero. Keep up the great content 👍🏻
BSB was ruined by the showdown points crap
Nice insight, thanks guys😊. I don't ride a bike but my younger brother does , Cheers ❤
Cracking episode chaps, really interesting chat.
Hi
I have never heard a younger (I'm an old git now) person speak like that about racing, how do you view road racing NW200 or IOM
Keep up the good work
How exactly do you ban aero though? the genie is out of the bottle. It's not moveable wings, they're fixed.
Very interesting. Havent actually ridden with aero but in theory I dont like it. One- more downforce =more traction =more tire heat= shorter tire life. Second- if I am leading a race with aero i have 10mm preload on the forks and brakes but if I am drafting in the same corner my bike doesnt have the same air and loses the 10mm preload. How do I ride a bike that handles differently depending on how much air I am in?? I noticed you mentioned that at low speeds some lose front braking with the lower air pressure but also as the downforce lessens the chance of locking the front end up increases. I think you will see more accidents with aero and little real benefit to the motorcycle world.
That's precisely why it's hard to pass in F1 as well - more air disturbance when following a leading vehicle is a double edged sword.
On one hand, you are able to move quicker in the slipstream, but on the other, you have to brake earlier with less downforce and grip because of the stirred up and less dense air.
So following close is very hard and can wear out your tires with more slipping, making it a "pass or hang back" situation in some cases - hence DRS being added.
The tires heat up primarily by slipping and braking, that's why drag and f1 cars do burnouts before races.
You're saying that pushing the tire harder against the surface is gonna heat it more, which is only true if the tarmac is hotter than the tire to begin with.
The gas inside the tire is not undergoing fusion to say more pressure = more heat.
@REPerformanceUK I agree with some of what you are saying about aero and I prefer motogp without aero and ride height and launch control I even think they should minimise rider aids! But I don’t agree with what you said about being able to make it to the gp paddock from supersport or superbike plenty of people have done it over the years! Toseland, bayliss, Colin edwards, cal crutchlow, Ben spies, Chris vermullen to name but a few! As for jake Dixon if he is good enough he will get a ride! Just out of interest who would you replace for jake? What you said about Jonnie rea not getting the Honda ride is a bit disingenuous who were Honda meant to drop to give him the ride pedrosa or Marquez?
I'm guessing they go so far as designing the aero pieces and wings entirely around the riders body shape, weight and height so the wings are different from rider to rider?
Bro explained it well, thank you.
Glad you liked it! Thanks for watching
What you think that Liberty may Buy Dorna & Moto GP
This was so interesting, can't help but subscribe
Thanks
Cheers guys, fab stuff as always 👍
Why is there a rover 400 on the ramp behind you 😅
The TT is the only good bike content left.
Have you not seen the bsb
wsbk is still pretty good
Motoamerica as well
The first guy is bang on the money. . . Look at the MotoGP bikes without the aero garbage and they were still prototype bikes, they were still insane bikes
Amazing words, absolute truth and no bias. Thank you for this video.
Thanks for watching
The thing is, it's not that clear cut... if every race was boring fair enough, and some of them are, but there's still enough going on that you get some insane races and moments. Phillip Island 2022 was crazy. Hopefully over the next couple of years Dorna make the right decision and bring some regulations in to make sure the races stay dynamic and interesting. No idea if this season will be boring or not, it's quite uncertain.
I’m not so much against advancing the sport but I am against another F1 scenario where the tops teams have a bigger budget to advance va the smaller teams who barely stay in the grid….that then spreads the pack!
Nothing is killing MotoGP, it is more alive and exciting than ever. Click bait title.
Atmosphere is part of the arena we play in. Regardless of how much you don't like it we still need to push through the air and aero is going to be part of designing the fastest bike.
I used to draw bikes like that 20 years ago. I would look at my brothers bike and wonder how much would it help, why don’t the do it?
I’ve been following GP racing for 40 years, it has never been better!!!
Suzuki saw the Ducati Aero Cup coming against their old I4 and said no thank you. If Fabio and Pedro end up on Ducatis its officially over then
Very good and enlightning statement! Thanks :)
Glad you enjoyed it! Thanks for watching
really interesting discussion,, I think the WEC HYpercar and LMP3 races this year will be really interesting, They have adjusted their format extensively and with Rossi and Button in the driver lineups this year I really think this series is on the up. Although all the same aero issues raised in the video are present at lease the attritional nature of the races and multi driver teams and multiple pit stops allow for another variable in who wins the races
I didn’t know the LMP3 race in WEC
Looks like the whole racing fans world is converging to WEC. F1, MotoGP all these diehard fans of actual racing have been feeling scammed for far too long
@@thecompanioncube4211 WEC gets hated on because people don’t like the BoP system they imposed. Plus IMO, I think their maximum BHP is far too low - needs to be 1200 bhp on 1000 kg
@@godwindracing6056One of the problems that WEC has to deal with is, they absolutely need to race at Le Mans, and that's a Grade 2 circuit, made largely of public roads. That limits the maximum safe speeds, so the ruleset is based around a 3:25 target laptime there. (The LMP1-H era was faster, but LMP1 hybrids made their speed differently, blasting out of corners, then running on the ICE only for a while, then lifting and coasting for fuel saving. Hypercar's ruleset doesn't let hybrids get additional power beyond the ICE's power and doesn't allow front hybrid deployment below a certain speed, so they behave like non-hybrids, and the target stint length doesn't, AFAIK, consider lifting and coasting, so a slower lap has the same top speed.)
Brilliant chat
Thank you
Unfortunately nothing about Moto GP and Formula One are related. The areo on motorcycles force the bike down in corners which is bad but also faster enter/exit speed. In order to go fast and decelerate even faster thus downforce must be applied in any motorsport.
In defense of Bautista, the other ducatis are far behind. He doesn t exit the corner like that because the bike is good, he exits like that because he is really strong. That said clearly he has an advantage on the tire management side because he is lighter but if you see him he is also always sideways
Wow certainly stuff to think about. I was wondering why Honda and Yamaha are struggling so bad but it makes sense now. You got a new sub out of me, great convo!
Aero in moto go has been interesting but it's time to change the rules and shave the wing and bits. Get the temps on the tires more stable, make the bike easier to handle and fight with.
My idea would be that dorna limmits the total down force instead of dicking around regulating the wings
I gave up on motogp when it became the ducati cup and the aero.
WSBK is my go to now
Random one... is that the same graham hardie that used to ride bmx at Worcester ramps back in The day?
Certainly is, feels like a long time ago now
@graeme4130 yeah feels like a lifetime! Those 360s of yours have stayed with me still though 🤙
brilliant in-site and explanation of aero on moto gp, absolutely love motogp but do agree that "aero" is killing the racing
I’ve been speaking out against the aero stuff from the start. Thru the bike for following okay, but they need to severely reduce the legality box all over for the bikes, to contain the use of aero.
F1 is sh** because you never have, or rarely have more than ine team dominating. Thats not just because they have aero.
For me, seeing these aero advances, is incredible.
Id also counter-argue, there could be too much over-taking in Motogp.
i think they can keep aero but change the engine spec back to 800s or even smaller. where they have to make a choice between aero for cornering and blitzing the straights. with the engine spec where it is they have too mutch power to play with. where they have to make a compromise with rideability. didn't work out last time but with the engineering we have today it can be done.
about 2 minutes in you say aero is used for downforce to cheat grip. F1 has started implementing aero designs so that the air behind the car is less turbulent. The air turbulence from the car ahead draft hampers the chasing cars performance. So they are trying to make the sport more competitive.
I do think bikes should prioritise getting the aero more slippery instead of downforcy like in f1.
I think when it comes to DRS, letting a car passing you and then slipstreaming your way to get back the position will only work if you are not racing against Max Verstappen. DRS still have its fun moment just like that one time in Canada 2013 when Hamilton and Alonso battling to be behind of each other's car just to get that DRS bonus.
I think another reason Yamaha and Honda are behind is they didn't keep doing development during covid like they were ordered to and the euro manufactures did it quietly
Not an expert in the area but what about the marketing side? Put aero on the fastest machines, emphasize it by how important it is to be used in racing, there brands get noticed and then results in more sales on road bikes. I dont know ...just my thought
Hard to ban aero unless you make all the bikes Cafe racers with a standard fuel tank design for all.
Good idea
Anyone who says MotoGP is like F1 doesn’t remember what racing was like 12 years ago. Riders who were not on a factory bike had no chance of finishing in the top 10.
I agree 100%. I used to be a MotoGP AND F1 fan. I dropped F1 when the aero made racing not fun to watch and now I am thinking about dropping MotoGP and watch WSBK instead.
They need to adapt what LMH / LMDh at WEC and IMSA are doing.
Bloody brilliant episode guys, I even sharedto Ted Kravitz as I think this is so informative, and right.
I like options. If I want to see good racing I’ll watch Indy or something and for the engineers I like f1. No need for all Motorsport to be the same.
First video ive seen from theae guys, good discussion
Both Moto GP and F1 should be spec series. Same bike, same tires, same everything except the rider and his race craft. When Ferrari F1 team takes 4.9 billion a year to run, but Haas F1 team only has 750 million per year. How is this competitive. I know the grids are set up for the fast to race the fast and last to race the last. It’s just not racing, in my opinion
Saw the hoodie and instantly subscribed.
Thank you
As an avid and massive MotoGP fan I disagree, the level of development is fascinating and the racing is good. Aprillia playing with ground effect in the corners is fascinating also.
I agree the front tyre temp thing is a spoiler to the racing.
Both MotoGP and WSBK are the 2 best racing categories in the world and massively entertaining.
There are rumours that Liberty are looking at buying MotoGP... that will kill MotoGP.
Thank you for the great video.
It doesn’t make any sense to remove ‘all aerodynamics’ out of MotoGP bike design. Aerodynamics, in some form, have always played a part in MotoGP bike design. Aerodynamics will continue to be part of MotoGP bike design in the future. The question is, how much aerodynamic design should be incorporated into MotoGP.
Personally, I would like to see aerodynamics reduced in MotoGP with the introduction of rules that govern what type of aero designs can be used and have these aero designs standardised and regulated across all bike manufacturers.
I would also like to see electronic rider aides reduced, putting a greater emphasis on the rider’s skill and ability to control how the bike performs (wheelies, slides, tyre wear, cornering, starts, breaking and so on) rather than the bike’s electronics being so advanced that riders with less natural ability and feel for the bike are able to push hard and be competitive with riders who have more natural bike control skills (like has become the case in modern MotoGP).
Please don’t get me wrong. I’m not saying that the current crop of MotoGP riders are not exceptional riders. They are all phenomenal talents. However, the modern MotoGP bikes, with their suite of electronic rider aides and aero additions, have made the bikes easier to ride fast, where any natural, human, talent one rider may have over another is muted by these electronic and aerodynamic aides.
I am not advocating a return to the unruly days of 500cc GP bikes or whatever the modern equivalent of a 500cc 2-stroke bike might be. What I would love to see is that there is a shift of emphasis back towards letting the individual skill set of the rider being more of the primary reason for which rider wins a race or wins the championship rather than which rider has the best bike with the best electronics package and best aero design.
Essentially, I would like to see MotoGP change for the same reason that Rossi cites as to why he left Honda to join Yamaha - that it takes more than having the best bike on the grid to win a MotoGP championship. The skill of the individual riders should also be an equal consideration and determining factor in racing.
Motogp is supposed to be the highest level of "racing", but some people focus on the formula being prototype and speed. If that is the right way to go then let each bike go out like qualifying with a clear aero "flight path" let's see who is fastest and then we give that guy the trophy. It will result in maximum development and speed and it won't be frustrated by racing (like a landspeed record, let them focus on the speed).
But if you are interested in racing you can't take the same path. You need to only allow development in areas that don't undermine the bikes speed in a race scenario / close quarters so that racing is supported.
IMO, I think drag racing is the most exciting motorsport, fastest motorsport on the planet, the start and finish is generally the most exciting parts, with drag racing you get that all the time!
Great race bike content! 👍
Thanks!
i am saying this for a long time. we would have better racing, regardless if its on 4 or 2 wheels and what series, if there was no downforce allowed.
not only would the rider/driver would count more, it would look more interesting.
what looks more interesting, a car on bike on rails or a vehicle that moves aroung, sliding and skidding?