tbh It makes perfect sense. You can use a telescope to see though the vacuum of space, but you can't do the same with the ocean, you actually have to go and explore it all inch by inch and building things that can withstand the pressure at the bottom of the ocean is incredibly difficult.
@@manoadamro1768 They aren't sure about any of it. An alien civilization could look at our solar system from afar and surmise that Venus and Mars are "possibly" habitable because they're in the "goldilocks zone", but we all know they aren't.
@@manoadamro1768that's not how that works. They analyze the light from the planets star that comes through its atmosphere because different compounds will absorb different wavelengths of light.
We know all we need to about the oceans. That’s just a thing people say, that we don’t , because it sounds interesting and thoughtful. It’s also a thing people who want grant money say.
Imagine living in a solar system where there's 4 habitable planets and people travel between them on holiday or immigrate from one to another for a better life
That would be neat, eh. I often wonder about those sorts of things myself. One day I s'pose but when that time comes we'd have been pushing up daisies for a good while! But hey ho, it's still a nice thought all the same.
Learning about all this makes me realise just how perfect the conditions of our solar system, sun, even our own planet is. We’ve found thousands of planets out there and none are even close to as perfect for life as earth. The odds of our planet being so perfect for life must be insane.
@@timduggan1461 why you lived? Ppl never believe in GOD when their life full happiness and joy. Ppl believe in GOD just when their life in danger. Who will you looking for if your life in danger?
I like how the title of this video says, “Planets More Habitable Than Earth” yet the dude goes onto describe them as if they’d be too harsh for us, lol.
As of yet, have haven't discovered a habitable planet, they just claim every planet that is possible to have water is habitable. Almost all of them are too close to the sun's, tide locked, bad atmosphere or some other issue that is major
Water pressure...seems like the deeper you go the more your holding the earth on your back..... I believe they'll make a metal strong enough one day ...like vibranium..😂😂
that's exactly what I thought and I find it a bit disappointing as the content is interesting. There was no need to use a such title. It literally says the opposite of what is described in the vid...
@@ultra8380 Yeah, I know right?! Especially when the video title is hinting at more habitable planets for humans. Millions of sperm and you were the fastest? I bet you thought that was your big, “Gotcha” moment right? lol.
The more I see videos like this, the more I’m starting to become convinced that humans may not be able to survive somewhere else even with relatively habitable conditions around those stars…For instance those other places mentioned have different gravity levels, different power structure of the stars, different atmospheric pressure etc….Every fiber of our being is in direct relation to the variables/settings of Earth. It likely wouldn’t translate somewhere else. Our bones, blood, skin, muscles etc would all be affected in a negative way. Earth is our home.
@@robynliteracy7057 I agree Robyn that’s a great point. When I initially heard about the idea of terraforming Mars the concept seemed interesting and I told myself it makes the most sense that humans need to colonize other planets to increase the chance for the continuation of our species in the long term. But then I started realizing how unbelievably barren/cold/desolate a place like Mars is. Living on Mars would be a nightmare not to mention how ugly the planet is compared to Earth and how the quality of our lives would be exponentially worse even if we survived the toxic atmosphere. There’s a very depressing quality when thinking of leaving Earth and moving backwards from the living standards we are accustomed to. Thanks but no thanks!
@@shaanchaudhry5719 We need a planet with active inner core to shield from toxic radiation that our sun gives. And thats another factor where Mars fails completely. There is no active inner core planet in our solar system beside earth. All others are barren, lifeless, unshielded. An electromagnetic shield is the first thing I would require in order to survive on a planet orbiting its sun. Radiation from the sun is so powerful it penetrates the earth's atmosphere creating O3 from O2. Imagine to be exposed to the sun's radiation unshielded. It is an instant death. Burns from radiation and immerse energy levels. Even that far from the sun as we are (or Mars is).
@@johnrichmond8606 We earned our place here. Every fiber of our being originated with the ingredients found here. Evolving on our host planet is completely different than going to a remote planet.
The thing that really gets me about this is that we're only identifying planets as habitable zone based on where life we're used to could exist. There could be life that we could never even perceive, and that life could also never perceive us.
True, but I’d hardly call it anthrocentrism. We’re looking for carbon-based life because carbon is extremely common in the universe and easily forms bonds with other atoms, which allow for complex molecules. Due to just basic chemistry carbon-based life would need water and oxygen so we’re looking for that. The next best element to look for is silicon…but it’s only 1/10th as abundant as carbon and forms only a fraction as many compounds (and half of them are _with carbon)._ And all the other elements are even more unlikely. The universe has some fundamental rules to it. I mean yeah sure maybe there’s life out there based on non-Baryonic matter or something, bunch of Photino birds making nuisances of themselves or whatever. But we have no possible way to detect them and no idea how they’d function so there’s no real point in looking. For now, given its abundance, it makes the most sense to stick to looking for carbon-based life.
@@RogueShadows - Yea but we hardly understand all the rules of the universe... Look at how little we understand about dark matter and dark energy for one... But I'm not opposed to us searching. If we find something, that's good.
Yeah I always wonder if there are living things on planets that are super hot or super cold. There must be. Even though it's not suitable for us, it might be suitable for other things. That's so scary to think about.
One light year is approximately 6 trillion miles. With current technology and understanding of physics and time, it would take tens of thousands of years to go just that distance, let alone 23 light years. The question of time and dimension would need to be solved, with the technology to do it, before space travel could become a possibility.
This is all just nonsense. Even if instellar flights were possible, they would be messages in a bottle. One-way street with no return, for 3 adventure astronauts Financed by 8 billion involuntary. 2 billion people have never experienced a ride in a car or bus. So much for reality. We don't need new worlds, we need mirrors.
Very pompous and arrogant to actually think that humans are powerful and important enough to to actually destroy Earth. Our planet could end us in one cataclysm and recover without ever noticing.
Why terrifying? It's not like physics is going to allow us to meet. So we need to be the best caretakers of our planet as it is the only sustainable one in our solar system. Ooops....to late... Next species step right up and takes your chances !
I refuse to believe we were the only other intelligent life in this universe. Even if it was billions of years ago on another planet in another galaxy, I like to imagine some other intelligent life existed.
We're very sure about the utter hostility to life as we know it, on Mars. We also know that Mars is a toxic, irradiated, ball of poisnonous dust, with no protection from harmful solar radiation, or from galactic cosmic rays. Also that its Average Global Temperature (AGT) is Minus 82 Degrees Fahrenheit! For comparison, Earth's AGT is about 57 Degrees F. We're very sure about the Dead Planet of Mars. Did I mention virtually no atmospheric pressure and 62% less gravity than Earth? If you walked outside your pressurized habitat on Mars without a pressure suit on, your blood and eyes would begin to boil, your internal organs would begin to 'fizz' like opening a can of hot soda, and you'd be a skeleton with freeze-dried skin on it within 90 seconds or LESS! We're very sure about Mars!
All these "habitable exo planets" are 1. Way too far away. 2. Although they could be in a habitable zone & have water, they might still not be habitable. Some of them could be some Mars type planet and could have enough materials to be terraformed easily.
My biggest thing about these videos is it just shows how much we focus on specific planets. While I know we are searching for planets that could host life for humans, we are dismissing other planets that could host other life. We don't even know if any of the Gas Giants have life on their planet cause we can't go there. There is no surface (or at least no known surface) and the gravity would be too much after a certain point is reached. Yet that doesn't mean no life is there at all. Just like how different life has adapted to places on Earth, the same could be said for other planets. This would explain why we haven't found any signs of life outside our own planet. We are only looking for specific conditions that support life. Now you might be asking a particular question. If life is out there, why haven't they made contact with us? The same reason would apply to them. If their planet structure is deems\ed as "inhabitable" to us, they may deem our planet structure to be "inhabitable" for them and thus rule our planet out as a place for life.
We are lookingbin roght direction .any nee planet found will be refered in respect to earth only. Earth has millions of species and millions more yet to be discovered . We are evolved yet to go deep in our own oceans nor deep in lands . Finding life elsewhere is greatest thing in cosmos and its difficult as on now . Scientist predictions are still meerising
Although red dwarfs are smaller and cooler than the sun, they tend to spin faster and be more active. This means they give off a lot of radiation that would be harmful for life on any planets that might orbit them.
I thought the same. These planets need a much thicker atmosphere than on Earth to protect them from the crazy radioactivity created by their red dwarf suns. But a thick atmosphere would cause the planet to be very cold because not enough sunlight could reach the surface. For reasons like this, it is almost impossible to find habitable planets around red dwarfs.
Yeah, and this system has three of those bad boys. Pretty much guaranteed to be sterile, unless there is some kind of entity that is capable of surviving those conditions, not entirely impossible I suppose.
@@Kado1609 Young red dwarfs, with ages less than a few billion years, are known as strong sources of high-energy radiation, including blasts of ultraviolet light and X-rays.
Some of these "super habitable" planets make me wonder if life started so abruptly and was able to spread so quickly that it hinders the complexity. Like if the environment doesn't challenge organisms enough, they might have found some happy stasis as an algae that has no reason to evolve
What im wondering about is how much the earths wobble/seasons affected evolution. And how much or moon does. Those 2 combined maybe put evolution in a certain speed because species had to be adaptable.
Right. I’ve thought the same thing. It’s like they are almost “too comfortable” where here things had to keep fighting and changing and evolving to live.
@@fitfogey Interesting thought, but I don't think that's very likely tbh. We should not assume that life on other planets would be easier or more stable and sustainable than it was and is on Earth. Other Earth-like planets too would likely experience periods of heavy tectonc activity leading to eruptions and possibly extinction events. They too could be hit by intense bursts of radiation or asteroids. A rogue planet or giant asteroid could pass by close enough to tilt their axis, induce or affect rotation around their own axis, or even change their orbit around their star (fingers crossed that this doesn't occur on Earth for the foreseeable future, lmao). Those things could happen anywhere on any habitable, Earth-like exoplanet. Earth probably is not unique in that regard.
It really does being up questions like, what happens if people are in a habitable area but don't have access to the things we're accustomed to - if they regress back into tribal like, that could raise the question of if that could have happened before even. Obviously that's questions alone, not much consideration included, simple speculation.
I hope this channel grows and stays around a long time. I'm sick with Covid and am having the worst time sleeping. This is fascinating and relaxing enough to distract me from being cranky and ill. ❤
I love how they say they found planets more habitable then earth in the title but what they say in the videos doesn't even sound like it. I'm not saying there is or isnt any life on those planets and maybe there is but im just saying maybe the title should be changed. I mean they say in the video that those planets they mentioned are potentially habitable. But the title says they are more habitable.
Solar systems more habitable than ours might fit, as some had multiple planets in the sweet zone. Technically ours has three too though. If only we could give Mars some of Venus’s excess atmosphere.
This channel helped inspire me to take astronomy classes and keep working towards a possible career in astrobiology. ❤ always look forward to new videos.
@@Mario_Sky_521 it is still related to/based on Astronomy. I assume it's an established science taught at universities, not just based on imagination...
Being in the habitable zone is one thing but you also have to take into account bacteria and the whole ecosystem of the planet. I doubt we will ever see a planet more "habitable" than Earth because of this.
the only reason Earth is perfectly habitable is that we evolved on earth and grew to fit the environment. We foolishly assume these are the concrete requirements for life, but there could be life on other planets thriving under much much different conditions that are inhabitable to earth life. Why do we assume water is required for life? it is on earth but that doesn't mean its necessarily the case on other planets
@@jukijunk it's possible but probably going to take another century, seeing we're still far away from having transportation that could travel near the speed of light, let alone time travel or teleportation. Let's just hope for the best🙏
In LDS scripture, Moses 1:33 "And worlds without end have I created, and I created them for mine own purpose, and by the Son I created them, which is mine Only Begotten". - the whole chapter is very supportive of this scientific video.
Even if we as humans have discovered potentially habitatable planets outside of our solar system and even galaxy, there's no way EVER in our lifetime we'll ever get there.!!
@@LilPersey Oh yeah? Rest assured, we will NEVER reach planets outside the Milky Way Galaxy. We're unlikely to reach other star systems WITHIN the Milky Way Galaxy! Dream all you want to, geek, but it's NOT going to happen.
@@redbinaural how would higher gravity change the evolution of life. Yes if it’s so extreme prob something but there’s def adapting and the life would easily sustain if giving right conditions and oxygen levels
If there is trillions of galaxies out there where each galaxy has trillions of stars in it and each star has its own solar system with its orbiting planets, isn't it possible to have the exact planet formation similar to the earth formation out there? or to put it in another word, is it possible that there is only one earth-like planet formation in this massive and vast universe?
both things are possible it just depends on the odds... say there's 10^30 habitable planets out there... huge number but then say the odds of life spontaneously happening given the right elements and the conditions of the planet being exact right and that life not getting killed early by radiation or planetary impacts etc etc is 1/10^40 ... then quite frankly it's a miracle life even sprouted once so there's just too many variables
@@BondJFK Its a theory that we cant even fully grasp because space time is 4 dimensional. This theory has been supported by a number of experiments tho, like measuring the deflection of light by the sun, and the observation of gravitational waves. Also, there is a lot of evidence from cosmology that supports the idea of a space time fabric, including the observed large-scale structure of the universe and the cosmic microwave background radiation
One thing that most scifi movie failed to show is that The biggest threat of a habitable alien planet is its microorganisms. Who knows what kind of disease that it can cause to our human physiology.
The idea that pathogens that evolved for completely different conditions would find us appetizing is an odd belief. Most pathogens can't comfortably infect all life on this planet, and they evolved to do so, it's more likely our immune systems would crush anything we encounter.
I love that you added the elite dangerous clip at the beginning. Although the renderings of the planets may not be accurate, i can go there in that game. It uses an up-to-date model of our entire galaxy and
The Goldilocks Zone all depends on the type of Sun you have. The Goldilocks Zone is different around each Star. Bigger, hotter Stars like the Sun, a G-type Star, have a wider habitable zone, while smaller Red Dwarfs confine habitable planets to a narrower range.
@@rji5377Exactly, Fish that live deep in the oceans where the pressure is enough to crush your skull, No light can reach and every creature is blind, Some animals have evolved to respond to those conditions.
I always find this stuff fascinating, because to me the concept of the habitable Zone assumes that life can only occur were their is water. What about life that isn't made or doesn't need water to exist. Just because we never found evidence to support that doesn't make it not possible. Look at the concept for Silicon based life forms, they would be breathing Sand and would be able to endure much hotter temperatures.
Because when guesstimating what planets are worth investigating regarding habitability we're trying to *narrow* the list down. Simple, known variables are better for that.
The experts are very careful to say "life as we know it", because theyre not trying to get tripped up in the definition of life. Some places we will never look for life simply because we know WE can't live there.
@@tonig2757 Up to 400 Billion possible stars in just this galaxy. A NASA-sized budget. A handful of capable devices you have to share with thousands of other researchers and need to book time on in advance. Months or years of analyzing the data. Let us know when you find the robot planet. 😉
“When I see your heavens, the works of your fingers, The moon and the stars that you have prepared. What is mortal man that you keep him in mind, And a son of man that you take care of him?”
You have provided well researched and edifying scientific knowledge and explained it with terse proficiency. A fine lecture and interesting exploration of our best nieghbors in the Scorpius galaxy just 26 light years away . Give us more like this . Thank You.
it is very unlikely that any planets around those stars would support life because they would constantly be bombarded by radiation. We should instead be focusing on stars that are very similar or even identical to our own, which are much more rare but the chance of an actual habitable planet is higher
We would need another G2-V star like Sol since humans , livestock and all of our plants evolved to live under this type of star. We could probably get away with something between G0 and G4.... But it would have to a G type star.
Atmosphere Man , atmosphere!!! They have 1-5x times thickness that of Earth's atmosphere... So there must be ozone or other layer that protects them just like earth being 3rd planet in habitable zone to avg star
This is all true but we dont have the tech to find planets similar ro earth as sunlike stars emit much more light so the light that reaches us is unaffected by the orbit of a small planet around a dim red dwarf this is not the case. Also the astromers would have to wait years for repeated orbits to be confirmed as planets like ours are much further out than those around red dwarves which complete an orbit in days. I cant see nasa allowing james webb to focus on a sun like star fkr at least 4 years to confirm an earth like planet can you ? Theyd rather use it to take diffrent photos of galaxies and supernovas etc etc every week.
Earth is not the perfect condition for life, life just found a way(evolved) to make Earth perfect for itself. We learnt how to survive on Earth through millions of years of evolution.
Just stop with these headlines, @ 3:12 the video itself says GL667 C "potentially habitable super earths". We know nothing with any certainty, so why speculate with such confidence?
It's definitely very interesting, but at 23 Light years away, it would take over 300 thousand years to get there by conventional rocket. We might as well call that impossible. Even if there was an advanced civilization there, it would take us 23 years to send a message and another 23 years to get a reply. Obviously, we need a warp drive or a third stage guild navigator to fold space.
To dig deeper into the depths of thought - it is mentioned that certain aspects of these planets, like lacking water, may make them inhabitable and life could not be sustained - however, you must consider the possibility that life on different planets may not require the same things to live that we do. We know what keeps our species going, but you can't apply our requirements to other planets with the possibility of other - unknown - species. The possibilities are infinitely unknown, or unfathomable.
People have and are thinking about all that. The thing is, is that ALL life as we know it, no matter where it resides, requires WATER! Even cyanobacteria and other hearty extremophiles. Okay? If we found life that DIDN'T require water, would we even recognize it? When looking for evidence of ET life, even just microbes and slime, it makes logical sense that we, 'follow the water'.
It's marvellous what scientists have found out about distant stars and their XO planets. It makes me think how perfect the earth is placed for life in all its diversity as we know it to survive. Plus, we have a planet out there that acts as a dustbin to trap asteroids and meteorites that could potentially hit Earth. And although there may be a planet that supports life somewhere out there, at this moment, we haven't found one. So, to me, it's important that we look after what we have here on the planet we call Earth and home.
I am sick of that anti free market commie junk 45 years of handing over our free enterprise to communism in china, and your ohhh so important EPA regulations could not be added in the anti trade agreements? It is not about saving the planet, it is about growing communism. Maybe we are stuck here because communism dumb's down our education. If Aliens made it here, want to bet they live under philosophies such as individual liberty, which is why they have not been hostile. Tape recorder for a brain. Knock it off!
Our existence is just a blink in Earth's lifetime. Some planets had life but lost it, some will have in the future. Millions of years able to change everything.
Imagine when aliens found our planet, they probably would have been very happy by discovering a habitable planet full of life with some intelligence on it!
Intelligence??? Earth is the cesspool of planets. It is why they have not asked us to join the G.F.P (Galactic Federation of Planets) which is like the U.N. Except much much more intelligent.
I’ve always found it arrogant for scientists to say that there’s absolutely no chance that any type of life can survive somewhere simply because it doesn’t share the same features as earth. How do we know there aren’t life forms out there who breathe an entirely different type of component or can withstand insanely harsh environments that we can’t? There’s simply no way to ever know unless we were to actually go there.
Aren’t those planets plummeted with heavy radiation due to them being too close to their hosts stars? This is the main con of a planet being located in the habitable zone of a small star.
Atmosphere dude , atmosphere!!! They have 1-5x times thickness that of Earth's atmosphere... So there must be ozone or other layer that protects them just like earth being 3rd planet in habitable zone to avg star
It is exciting to find out more about distance potential habitable planets, however it will mean so much more if and when we are able to build a spacecraft that will allow us to visit them. We are a long way from that being a practical consideration. For example, if we could travel half the speed of light, it would take over 50 years to reach a system 26 light years away.
Why not look at another view of even we travel at the speed of light it takes us 26years to reach which is 1/3 of a normal human life time. At current technology it may be nearly an impossible feat, lets see next 50years where can it lead us to, destruction or migration whichever comes first
@@jefftan9826 exactly, who knows if in 50 years we will have the capacity to travel stars if everything collapses due to climate change or nuclear warfare
@@jarogniewtheconqueror2804 been more then 50 years... been that since 'landing on the moon' in the 70s kids thought we'd be on mars now. Only thing thats happened are how it was all faked, all original footage was lost, and recreated 😅 all imagery is CGI and the moon rocks were exposed to be wood 😅 what proof??...
Idealist dreamers who refuse to face the reality, right before them, of their own making. It's an escapist diversion, the idea of colonizing Mars, say. It seems like a great future, until we consider the reality of humanity bringing its, granted, positive baggage with it to wherever we go, but not considering that we'll also bring our negative baggage as well.
We can fix them, but that doesn't mesh with endless growth, and capitalism requires endless growth. So, we'll have to keep on this suicidal path until the billionaires can get themselves out of here.
Fun Fact: 18% of all known Exoplanets already have a Wal Mart bag hanging from some sort of tree-like lifeform on them, and 3% have a discarded Covid mask in a ditch. Stay sexy Humanity!!
Here is a future topic to consider maybe. I was wondering about the possibilities of how Earth achieved it's vegetation from seeds of real things rather than imagination. I can only come up with two possibilities myself. 1) The Sun, is actually the burning core of a larger planet that exploded, or was impacted to the point of destruction. If this original planet already had vegetation, then Earth is a remnant piece, and our positioning to sustain life makes our results quantifiable there. 2) Other pieces of space debri, from outer areas with seeds in the composition. Impacting Earth early on. Otherwise, we have to determine how seeds were made out of nothing but some hot air potentially.
If the mass of a planet is 5 times that of earth, no one would be able to walk. Or get up once they've fallen down. If Earth had been even half again as massive as it is, we would even have been able to get into orbit.
Why do you assume 5 times more mass means 5 times more surface gravity? The mass of Mars is double the mass of Mercury yet both planets have the same surface gravity. A planet with 5 times the mass of Earth, would have the same surface gravity if it had the perfect diameter.
There are a lot of assumptions in this video: there are over 200 specific conditions that must exist in order to support life. Several comments in the video show that these conditions do not exist at all. Plus there is the distance: we are essentially quarantined to our own solar system. Exo Planets yes; life - no.
I’m sure in another galaxy there’s another similar to earth. It’s insane how vast and almost like infinite galaxies. In comparison we only represent like a grain of sand in the ocean .
@@kevinrtres You are not a preacher, mind your own business and stop attacking people in the comments. As someone who believes in God, this really makes me feel ashamed of my religion lmao ☠️☠️☠️
@@kevinrtreshundreds of years ago God’s annoying and genocidal fandom claim that Earth is the center of space, now his even more annoying fandom are piggybacking SCIENCE videos commenting his greatness. If he is really great can he pull another earth closer to ours so we can go there because “bad guys” are ruining this one now?
@@sutediheriyonoBaladMaUng even of we are alone, sometime in the future when our technology is advanced enough, just like our ancestors did on earth, we will eventually migrate beyond our known stars, who knows maybe we already have migrated sometime the past and those of us who Came to Earth were forced to start over, we will only know in time, long after us.
Yes, with all that vastness out there and the billions of star systems, I truly believe there are many civilizations in the great cosmic soup that is the universe. I mean, why not eh? But as you say, we'll probably never know. Then again...
All that knowledge amazes me. Scientists are grossly underrated. Most of them enjoy much less recognition than all those undeserving celebrities we idolise.
Wonderful. On my wish list would be rocky watery worlds in the Goldie lock zone. I'm asking for much but water is quite important (and very pleasant!). I read somewhere that the light shining from a star, through the atmosphere of an exoplanet can sometimes be perceived all the way to our instruments! (spectrum analysis of H2O, I think).That's quite a feat. Meaning that in some cases, they were able to ascertain the presence of water vapor in their atmosphere. Could you tell us examples of this, still evaluated with other favorable parameters like Goldie lock zone, is it also rocky (not just gas) and of the right size? Thank you so much. "The mind is not a vessel to be filled but a fire to be kindled." - Plutarch
I grow tired of these click baits about planets around a K-type star that are probably tidally locked and stripped of atmosphere. Also, the eccentricity of this planet is 0.27 while the Earth's is .017.
At today's rate of travel, it would take us about 851,000 years to travel 23 light years. That is if we were moving at the speed of the fastest current spacecraft we have today. If we continue to develop other craft now in research we could probably cut it down to about 460,000 years so yeah, that's good. Of course, we could travel at the speed of light and get there in 23 years, but since many of the most intelligent people on Earth have said that we may never be able to travel at the speed of light due to time, space and a bunch of other mumbo jumbo physics that tend to get in our way as we approach those speeds, chances are we will never get to those star systems and planets. And here's another thing we need to consider. If we are able to somehow bend time and space and make those trips much shorter (don't hold your breath) then we will enter a whole new area of time travel which is exactly what that will be. Again, something many top physicists say is impossible - the paradoxes presented with time travel, worm holes, and warped space are too numerous and unproven to overcome. The only thing we could hope for is some solution we have yet to even imagine that will allow to make those trips in a reasonable time. Think of the change humans will go through in another 100,000 years. Compare to where we were a 100,000 years ago. If we developed this unknown spacecraft in 200,000 years, it is possible we could pass those earlier versions of humans on their way to the same star system. A version of humans that have spent thousands of generations on a spacecraft would be passed by the planetary version of evolved humans. Weird stuff to think about.
Because these supposed planets are unreachable for us humans in our Little span of life I can myself pretend that I have discovered millions if not billions of habitable earth like planets...I would not be bothered to bring proofs from over there.
@@slayer8actualyou threw out a lot there, but I'll just say two things: while light speed is impossible, travelling at 99.999999999999999% of lightspeed is perfectly acceptable by our current understanding of the physics. And second, time travel isn't impossible, changing time is.
What I take away from content like this is that we need to focus on building habitats that can move to where the resources are in the outer solar system rather than worrying about habitable planets we can't reach.
@@GAMERGODDESS-x5g 😂I'm sure he will have his way with mars in the near future. I'm specifically referring to places we can't reach in our lifetimes. Perhaps we'll be able to turn rotating habitats into generation ships one day(assuming we don't figure out some means of FTL travel) but we have to start developing artificial habitats somewhere and doing it where the resource rich asteroids are just makes sense.
Since we are living in a holographic universe, we are probably having a vacation or earth experience in our bodies which would be our time travel suits . So why not take the next experience on another planet. Just saying
A triple star system is unstable, and therefore won't last for long. Either one will be flung out, or one will be consumed by one or both of the others.
The planets mentioned in this video do not really seem like an extraterrestrial paradise, but nevertheless, when compared with other planets, they are certainly good. We were lucky to find them. Their features are unlikely to allow our descendants to live on these planets in the same way as on Earth. At least not everywhere and not always, if we are not talking about life at established stations. It is likely that life has appeared there by now. I like to think about it enough, I really want scientists to finally invent a telescope that can view the landscapes of the planets. I know it's terribly difficult. But it's certainly easier to build spaceships, don't you think ? 😅
@@LivinProoof We might develop it in the future. But it doesn't matter because by that time we will probably be dead. Just like Newton who formulated the laws of motion and gravity but did not live to witness them being used in the Apollo Mission.
@@HobbyOrganist Exactly, teleportation would be the only invention that could do that and even then teleporting a human body without it getting completely decimated in my opinion is physically impossible. Moving a human body at the speed of light is equally impossible, I don't see how there's any way to move a body that quickly without it being torn to shreds.
These assumptions are made based on a tiniest flicker of light on a pixel that represents a planet passing in front of a star in a far away galaxy. Keep that in mind.
When discovering new stars and planets, scientists will most probably send microorganisms there. And who knows, we probably must have evolved from such things sent by advanced life on another planet. It would be fun to discover if we were potential samples sent amongst 1000 others :D
My theory is, a cell was created by electrons colliding and getting stuck in aloop, the reason why cells could survive without water, is how it was originally formed, the electric could possibly have formed on water or underground, but it only had these materials to develop,so basically, life is litrally just our brain, let me expaine. A forming cell isnt able to create consciousness, but it does understand how to do functions and do what its told,by making other forms, lile copies of the cells. Over times, they floated in the air, and yes, a single cell could have creared oxygen or any type of gass to move around, or perhaps it just naturally formed, anyway, it eventually landed on the surface, and eventually evolved into plant and stuff. The thing is tho, i believe, that the reason why we need oxygen and food and water, is because, over the tens of thousands of years, the cells copied eachother, generating more water, and oxygen, in order to copy and make another form, thats why pregnant women need to eat more food because of the way the cells created, without waterl, or a single gass or anything missing it cant copy itselt. So then over the thousands of years, there was biggwr forms, with brains and actual funtions, and stuff, and realisd thay the suns energy isnt strong enough to keep the bigger joined up cells to communicate and stuff, so it made water into a energy and because a cell was always made up of water and energy, they started to eat eachother, and then this is were cancer was developed, the cells didnt wanna die, creating a unequal balance, if one cell was to eat the other, life would not develoup, so the cells eventually split up, but some was remaimimg in the group, but i believe that some chemicals or anything that could cause cancer, could possibly trigger a warning signal in the cell, based on how it happend millions of years ago! Daymmm i should be a scientist hahha! Edit: For anyone wondering, it's possible to be conscious as a cell, but at a certain point, as the male cells enter the body, those male cells have been programmed to do what it's suppost to do, creating a way to make reproducing magical in order to survive as little cells, however, the cells always start as the brain, because a single cell has a little brain inside, so it develops into more and more, and creates copies of eschother, and it's told what to do by dna, basically millions of years ago, dna was like a first l Language, but there dosnt necessary have to be alive or aware to do so, could just generally be due to constant loops and copies doing same thing.
Besides when we have been searching for decades for… anything and have only found a couple one called organisms if even. Probably some viruses. It’s rare if there is other life on earth with how we record currently
we JUST started leaving our own solar system and we are looking LIGHT YEARS beyond earth. We are brand ass new at this. Human time is NOTHING compared to cosmic and geological time. The best humans can do is social fn media. We are a trial and nothing more. Humans do not matter outside of your own family unit, you have zero value to the world @@Shitockiful
So all that is needed is to find a way to travel at the speed of light, and then survive 23 years of space travel on a spaceship capable of providing self sustainability for itself and its passengers, while constantly being exposed to various space radiation. Can't honestly see that happening any day soon when even a trip to the moon is still considered an extreme challenge.
@nealvandersteltexpreales-qz5og Oh yes. Instead let's just ignore the basics physics that govern every development humans have achieved and hope for a miracle.
It wouldn't be 23 years. At 80% of lightspeed only 15 years would pass due to time dilation. At 99.9% of the speedlight only 1.5 years would pass for the space ship and the people in it.
Without a Moon precisely the size of ours, Earth becomes a desolate wasteland; both Earth & the Moon must also be of the exact current size & distance. Imagining another planet capable of supporting human life is like imagining clocks spontaneously creating themselves. Imagining that humans can create such a perfect system is presumptuous beyond all reason; we can't even take care of what we've got & we are forever staring at the next Hitler who wants to be ruler of it all.
Nobody knows yet if these planets are actually safe for humans even if they have water and air like earth. What if they have deadly creatures or harsh natural calamities???
My own view is that the human race won't be the ones actually travelling to different planets. I think that humans will build the spacecraft, and the lucky ones... Genetically modified bacteria, fungi, plants that will be able to survive, adapt to the harsh conditions and go onto colonise different planets. I think as humans the distances would be to great and we wouldn't be able to adapt. I think that the human race is being used to build these better and more advanced space craft.
Many bacteria and fungus live as a part of us; on our skins, in our stomachs, etc… so even if we do attempt a manned mission, they will always be with us, and even if we fail they may still succeed to propagate on another celestial body from our remains.
And definitely no other planet that we'll ever be able to get to! (I believe God, the Supreme Creator, set it up this way. On average, the stars are about Five Lightyears apart.) God doesn't want, or intend, his intelligent creatures to reach other star systems. And for good reason!
I haven’t personally seen beyond our sky’s so knowing what’s out there and believing are two totally different mind sets. I believe that if there is more beyond our sky’s then why limit life to one planet. I also believe we (humans) are unique to this planet no matter how inhabitable other places may be even we (humans) can acclimate to different habitats. While many fear the depth of this conversation piece I find it fascinating. How wonderful is the power of life.
To understand that you must look at all the extreme and bizarre geological changes the earth went through to create life. What are the odds that similar conditions created another planet? Not to mention a few of those events almost wiped out all life on earth during catastrophic events.
I love the way that you all discuss as if humans are the pinnacle of evolution. Animals have evolved in equally amazing ways. We are just another species in a host of millions of other species. Our ego dictates we are better. We are not. We are the suicide species. Billions of species throughout the galaxies all thinking they are similarly unique.
Red Dwarf stars are so small the habitable zone is close-in, so close-in that the planets are tidally locked. Tidally locked planets would be a very difficult place to inhabit, as any atmosphere would be moving at thousands of kilometers per hour. The only planets in these systems that might harbor life are ocean-worlds. Do the two yellow-orange stars have planets? Those would be far better candidates to look at.
Crazy we're able to confidently describe planets that are lightyears away, yet we don't even know what lurks in the deepest parts of our own oceans.
tbh It makes perfect sense. You can use a telescope to see though the vacuum of space, but you can't do the same with the ocean, you actually have to go and explore it all inch by inch and building things that can withstand the pressure at the bottom of the ocean is incredibly difficult.
I don't think the word "confidently" is the word I'd use. Lot's of "possibilities" and "uncertains" thrown in there. They don't really know.
@@manoadamro1768 They aren't sure about any of it. An alien civilization could look at our solar system from afar and surmise that Venus and Mars are "possibly" habitable because they're in the "goldilocks zone", but we all know they aren't.
@@manoadamro1768that's not how that works. They analyze the light from the planets star that comes through its atmosphere because different compounds will absorb different wavelengths of light.
We know all we need to about the oceans. That’s just a thing people say, that we don’t , because it sounds interesting and thoughtful. It’s also a thing people who want grant money say.
Imagine living in a solar system where there's 4 habitable planets and people travel between them on holiday or immigrate from one to another for a better life
. . . and they're stupid enough to go to war with each other on all of them!
Well, if there's immigration, I say build a wall between them.
That would be neat, eh. I often wonder about those sorts of things myself. One day I s'pose but when that time comes we'd have been pushing up daisies for a good while! But hey ho, it's still a nice thought all the same.
pretty sure there would be piracy and war
It would just means 4 more planets for human to pollute and destroy
Learning about all this makes me realise just how perfect the conditions of our solar system, sun, even our own planet is. We’ve found thousands of planets out there and none are even close to as perfect for life as earth. The odds of our planet being so perfect for life must be insane.
And that alone might be why we're possibly the only advanced lifeforms
Proof of God?
@@riyaansheikh7470 Nope.
Life with full of joy is heaven.
We are live in heaven, but ppl still thinking it's not.
@@timduggan1461 why you lived?
Ppl never believe in GOD when their life full happiness and joy.
Ppl believe in GOD just when their life in danger.
Who will you looking for if your life in danger?
I like how the title of this video says, “Planets More Habitable Than Earth” yet the dude goes onto describe them as if they’d be too harsh for us, lol.
As of yet, have haven't discovered a habitable planet, they just claim every planet that is possible to have water is habitable.
Almost all of them are too close to the sun's, tide locked, bad atmosphere or some other issue that is major
Water pressure...seems like the deeper you go the more your holding the earth on your back..... I believe they'll make a metal strong enough one day ...like vibranium..😂😂
that's exactly what I thought and I find it a bit disappointing as the content is interesting. There was no need to use a such title. It literally says the opposite of what is described in the vid...
It’s almost as if humans aren’t the only things that can live on a planet
@@ultra8380 Yeah, I know right?! Especially when the video title is hinting at more habitable planets for humans. Millions of sperm and you were the fastest? I bet you thought that was your big, “Gotcha” moment right? lol.
The more I see videos like this, the more I’m starting to become convinced that humans may not be able to survive somewhere else even with relatively habitable conditions around those stars…For instance those other places mentioned have different gravity levels, different power structure of the stars, different atmospheric pressure etc….Every fiber of our being is in direct relation to the variables/settings of Earth. It likely wouldn’t translate somewhere else. Our bones, blood, skin, muscles etc would all be affected in a negative way. Earth is our home.
@@robynliteracy7057 I agree Robyn that’s a great point. When I initially heard about the idea of terraforming Mars the concept seemed interesting and I told myself it makes the most sense that humans need to colonize other planets to increase the chance for the continuation of our species in the long term.
But then I started realizing how unbelievably barren/cold/desolate a place like Mars is. Living on Mars would be a nightmare not to mention how ugly the planet is compared to Earth and how the quality of our lives would be exponentially worse even if we survived the toxic atmosphere. There’s a very depressing quality when thinking of leaving Earth and moving backwards from the living standards we are accustomed to. Thanks but no thanks!
So you don't think we're able to adapt look at how we've changed ourselves and Earth
@@shaanchaudhry5719 We need a planet with active inner core to shield from toxic radiation that our sun gives. And thats another factor where Mars fails completely. There is no active inner core planet in our solar system beside earth. All others are barren, lifeless, unshielded. An electromagnetic shield is the first thing I would require in order to survive on a planet orbiting its sun. Radiation from the sun is so powerful it penetrates the earth's atmosphere creating O3 from O2. Imagine to be exposed to the sun's radiation unshielded. It is an instant death. Burns from radiation and immerse energy levels. Even that far from the sun as we are (or Mars is).
@@johnrichmond8606 We earned our place here. Every fiber of our being originated with the ingredients found here. Evolving on our host planet is completely different than going to a remote planet.
They'll figure it out
The thing that really gets me about this is that we're only identifying planets as habitable zone based on where life we're used to could exist. There could be life that we could never even perceive, and that life could also never perceive us.
True, but I’d hardly call it anthrocentrism. We’re looking for carbon-based life because carbon is extremely common in the universe and easily forms bonds with other atoms, which allow for complex molecules. Due to just basic chemistry carbon-based life would need water and oxygen so we’re looking for that.
The next best element to look for is silicon…but it’s only 1/10th as abundant as carbon and forms only a fraction as many compounds (and half of them are _with carbon)._ And all the other elements are even more unlikely.
The universe has some fundamental rules to it. I mean yeah sure maybe there’s life out there based on non-Baryonic matter or something, bunch of Photino birds making nuisances of themselves or whatever. But we have no possible way to detect them and no idea how they’d function so there’s no real point in looking. For now, given its abundance, it makes the most sense to stick to looking for carbon-based life.
Correct, but that's is all we can do. We cant see what we cant see.
@@RogueShadows - Yea but we hardly understand all the rules of the universe... Look at how little we understand about dark matter and dark energy for one... But I'm not opposed to us searching. If we find something, that's good.
@@peternielsen8601 - I know that. Did I say I opposed what we're doing? No...
Yeah I always wonder if there are living things on planets that are super hot or super cold. There must be. Even though it's not suitable for us, it might be suitable for other things. That's so scary to think about.
One light year is approximately 6 trillion miles. With current technology and understanding of physics and time, it would take tens of thousands of years to go just that distance, let alone 23 light years. The question of time and dimension would need to be solved, with the technology to do it, before space travel could become a possibility.
Finding other civilizations or life is dreaming with open eyes...
@@eilonjhave u seen the 100 serie?😁it really remind me ,and is my Dream too
Humanity will likely go extinct long before time travel is possible. We’re just a fart in the wind
How would you even navigate at that kind of speed. Space would suddenly become a very crowded place...
This is all just nonsense. Even if instellar flights were possible, they would be messages in a bottle. One-way street with no return, for 3 adventure astronauts Financed by 8 billion involuntary. 2 billion people have never experienced a ride in a car or bus. So much for reality. We don't need new worlds, we need mirrors.
When you consider the way humanity has destroyed earth, all other planets are better off without us. Amen.
BS nonsense
There is no progress without sacrifice.
Very pompous and arrogant to actually think that humans are powerful and important enough to to actually destroy Earth. Our planet could end us in one cataclysm and recover without ever noticing.
@marekburza7425 Sundial?
Agree completly.
Two possibilities exist: either we are alone in the Universe or we are not. Both are equally terrifying
~ Arthur C Clarke
My notifications...
🤔 Indeed.
😄👍
I want to think that we are not alone 12:40
boring comment
@@bonysminiatures3123 and your's is any better?🤷♂️
Why terrifying? It's not like physics is going to allow us to meet. So we need to be the best caretakers of our planet as it is the only sustainable one in our solar system. Ooops....to late... Next species step right up and takes your chances !
I watched to the end waiting to hear about the planet that was more habitable than ours but still waiting!
😂
All of them because they aren't choking to death on plastic.
It's all bulshit bro keep falling for it
Yeah, they're ALL pretty iffy, huh? Especially since this video was based SOLEY on imagination and conjecture and a LOT of wishful thinking.
@@Maputi_na_Kalabaw choking on plastic is better than living on planets 10x hotter than an oven
I refuse to believe we were the only other intelligent life in this universe. Even if it was billions of years ago on another planet in another galaxy, I like to imagine some other intelligent life existed.
Ha! You think man is intelligent?
Other intelligent life?? Which other one are you referring to?
@@foxhollowantiques7098 By definition the answer to that would be certainly.
@@ericc2083 aliens.. I guess
@@monobiteme6014 Ok...if you say so. I thought she meant in addition to aliens.
Imagine owing private rockets or renting them to go away for holidays or to shift, other than the earth. A new holiday destination.
It is funny that we are not sure about Mars, but are sure about planets that are light-years away.
We're very sure about the utter hostility to life as we know it, on Mars. We also know that Mars is a toxic, irradiated, ball of poisnonous dust, with no protection from harmful solar radiation, or from galactic cosmic rays. Also that its Average Global Temperature (AGT) is Minus 82 Degrees Fahrenheit! For comparison, Earth's AGT is about 57 Degrees F. We're very sure about the Dead Planet of Mars. Did I mention virtually no atmospheric pressure and 62% less gravity than Earth? If you walked outside your pressurized habitat on Mars without a pressure suit on, your blood and eyes would begin to boil, your internal organs would begin to 'fizz' like opening a can of hot soda, and you'd be a skeleton with freeze-dried skin on it within 90 seconds or LESS! We're very sure about Mars!
?
We aren't though. Did you listen to any of it?
😂😂
All these "habitable exo planets" are 1. Way too far away. 2. Although they could be in a habitable zone & have water, they might still not be habitable. Some of them could be some Mars type planet and could have enough materials to be terraformed easily.
This makes me remember to never take a day for granted. What we have here on earth is truly remarkable. We are very lucky
They haven't found any habitable planets.
@@davidlafleche1142 op
@@davidlafleche1142 to far away
Yes, and let us take better care of Earth. It's the only Earth we have-!
@@charleswest6372 ok lets use your money
My biggest thing about these videos is it just shows how much we focus on specific planets. While I know we are searching for planets that could host life for humans, we are dismissing other planets that could host other life.
We don't even know if any of the Gas Giants have life on their planet cause we can't go there. There is no surface (or at least no known surface) and the gravity would be too much after a certain point is reached. Yet that doesn't mean no life is there at all. Just like how different life has adapted to places on Earth, the same could be said for other planets.
This would explain why we haven't found any signs of life outside our own planet. We are only looking for specific conditions that support life. Now you might be asking a particular question. If life is out there, why haven't they made contact with us? The same reason would apply to them. If their planet structure is deems\ed as "inhabitable" to us, they may deem our planet structure to be "inhabitable" for them and thus rule our planet out as a place for life.
i've also considered this. what's habitable for us might be a hellscape for some alien species
Sorry my little friend but earth triumphs
Plus in earth we have many different organisms that adapted to various different environments but not a gas
That’s not possible because the boiling point of 100 degrees & freezing point of 0 degree Celsius of water will be common across the Universe.
If you know what really habitable means, we would not anything say easily as we feel certain ways.
We are lookingbin roght direction .any nee planet found will be refered in respect to earth only. Earth has millions of species and millions more yet to be discovered . We are evolved yet to go deep in our own oceans nor deep in lands . Finding life elsewhere is greatest thing in cosmos and its difficult as on now . Scientist predictions are still meerising
Although red dwarfs are smaller and cooler than the sun, they tend to spin faster and be more active. This means they give off a lot of radiation that would be harmful for life on any planets that might orbit them.
I thought the same. These planets need a much thicker atmosphere than on Earth to protect them from the crazy radioactivity created by their red dwarf suns. But a thick atmosphere would cause the planet to be very cold because not enough sunlight could reach the surface. For reasons like this, it is almost impossible to find habitable planets around red dwarfs.
Yeah, and this system has three of those bad boys. Pretty much guaranteed to be sterile, unless there is some kind of entity that is capable of surviving those conditions, not entirely impossible I suppose.
we dont know how life evolves outside earth we dont know if life can exist in what we see as inhospitable places... we only know what we know tbh
@@Kado1609
Young red dwarfs, with ages less than a few billion years, are known as strong sources of high-energy radiation, including blasts of ultraviolet light and X-rays.
It's actually absurd to think we're alone in the universe.
Blows my mind everytime i think about it. How tf our earth function so perfectly and we have yet to come across other life in space…
We have no idea, there are planets that we can't even see. We can only go so far so we have no idea.
@@BestCarMediashit I think we have already on some low key shit
nope. we are alone
Lol maybe that's where they will send the frozen IVF babies to be raised by the new androids.
Some of these "super habitable" planets make me wonder if life started so abruptly and was able to spread so quickly that it hinders the complexity. Like if the environment doesn't challenge organisms enough, they might have found some happy stasis as an algae that has no reason to evolve
What im wondering about is how much the earths wobble/seasons affected evolution. And how much or moon does. Those 2 combined maybe put evolution in a certain speed because species had to be adaptable.
Right. I’ve thought the same thing. It’s like they are almost “too comfortable” where here things had to keep fighting and changing and evolving to live.
@@fitfogey
Interesting thought, but I don't think that's very likely tbh. We should not assume that life on other planets would be easier or more stable and sustainable than it was and is on Earth.
Other Earth-like planets too would likely experience periods of heavy tectonc activity leading to eruptions and possibly extinction events. They too could be hit by intense bursts of radiation or asteroids. A rogue planet or giant asteroid could pass by close enough to tilt their axis, induce or affect rotation around their own axis, or even change their orbit around their star (fingers crossed that this doesn't occur on Earth for the foreseeable future, lmao).
Those things could happen anywhere on any habitable, Earth-like exoplanet. Earth probably is not unique in that regard.
A planet of algae is an incredible niche for an awaiting predator to evolve to graze on them
It really does being up questions like, what happens if people are in a habitable area but don't have access to the things we're accustomed to - if they regress back into tribal like, that could raise the question of if that could have happened before even. Obviously that's questions alone, not much consideration included, simple speculation.
I hope this channel grows and stays around a long time. I'm sick with Covid and am having the worst time sleeping. This is fascinating and relaxing enough to distract me from being cranky and ill. ❤
Stay inside and get vitamins, we don't want that stuff to spread again
Spread your cheeks ima be there in 5 mins
I hope you have recovered and you are well
I love how they say they found planets more habitable then earth in the title but what they say in the videos doesn't even sound like it. I'm not saying there is or isnt any life on those planets and maybe there is but im just saying maybe the title should be changed. I mean they say in the video that those planets they mentioned are potentially habitable. But the title says they are more habitable.
Yes. The title doesn't fit the video at all
@@shafootodess some other way I guess lol
Solar systems more habitable than ours might fit, as some had multiple planets in the sweet zone.
Technically ours has three too though. If only we could give Mars some of Venus’s excess atmosphere.
I thought Mars doesn’t have an atmosphere because of its low mass. I remember hearing that mars might have had an atmosphere at some point.
No life away , ligth years away 😢
This channel helped inspire me to take astronomy classes and keep working towards a possible career in astrobiology. ❤ always look forward to new videos.
We continually need people like you 👌🏼🙏🏼
@@aaasdghj1 I’m not special at all. May never end up working in the field, but we need curious people eager to learn new things and be wrong!
@@fry2901 that's exactly what I mean
That's a nice way to scam tax payer money. A career in the cartoon of space
@@aaasdghj1They steal your tax money why do you need that 🤷🤦
I am finding these astronomy videos on TH-cam so fascinating! I had no idea that much was discovered. Thank you.
@@Mario_Sky_521 it is still related to/based on Astronomy. I assume it's an established science taught at universities, not just based on imagination...
You're welcome.
No matter what it is just mind-blowing to learn about the universe and how vast it is. The more we try to discover the more complicated it becomes
Being in the habitable zone is one thing but you also have to take into account bacteria and the whole ecosystem of the planet. I doubt we will ever see a planet more "habitable" than Earth because of this.
us going to another planet in a habitable zone will do to humanity what whites did to native populations w smallpox.
We will never even get close to inhabiting those other worlds. Never. Not ever.
Yeah plus gravity and day/night cycle
the only reason Earth is perfectly habitable is that we evolved on earth and grew to fit the environment. We foolishly assume these are the concrete requirements for life, but there could be life on other planets thriving under much much different conditions that are inhabitable to earth life. Why do we assume water is required for life? it is on earth but that doesn't mean its necessarily the case on other planets
Imagine if one day our great-grandchildren have to travel light years away because they want to spend holidays on Earth.
Time travel and teleportation would probably exist
@@jukijunk it's possible but probably going to take another century, seeing we're still far away from having transportation that could travel near the speed of light, let alone time travel or teleportation. Let's just hope for the best🙏
@@michiochaaa traveling near the speed of light or equal to would be time traveling. Which is so exciting to think about
That will never happen. Stop being delusional
be because AI has taken over
In LDS scripture, Moses 1:33 "And worlds without end have I created, and I created them for mine own purpose, and by the Son I created them, which is mine Only Begotten". - the whole chapter is very supportive of this scientific video.
The bible is changed by men hands that's why it contains so much contradictions.
Quran the only preserved correct book.
Even if we as humans have discovered potentially habitatable planets outside of our solar system and even galaxy, there's no way EVER in our lifetime we'll ever get there.!!
Never say never
AI to the rescue!
In your lifetime.
@@LilPersey Oh yeah? Rest assured, we will NEVER reach planets outside the Milky Way Galaxy. We're unlikely to reach other star systems WITHIN the Milky Way Galaxy! Dream all you want to, geek, but it's NOT going to happen.
@@jillanejames4590 Or the lifetimes of many scores of generations to come.
So if life exist and remember how big dinosaurs were, imagine how big the aliens on these planets could be!!!
Not if the gravities are much higher.
@@redbinaural how would higher gravity change the evolution of life. Yes if it’s so extreme prob something but there’s def adapting and the life would easily sustain if giving right conditions and oxygen levels
Answers a lot of questions I have been asking, great work 👍👍
If there is trillions of galaxies out there where each galaxy has trillions of stars in it and each star has its own solar system with its orbiting planets, isn't it possible to have the exact planet formation similar to the earth formation out there? or to put it in another word, is it possible that there is only one earth-like planet formation in this massive and vast universe?
both things are possible it just depends on the odds...
say there's 10^30 habitable planets out there... huge number
but then say the odds of life spontaneously happening given the right elements and the conditions of the planet being exact right and that life not getting killed early by radiation or planetary impacts etc etc is 1/10^40 ... then quite frankly it's a miracle life even sprouted once
so there's just too many variables
No planet, no solar system was ever created from a bang of nothing.
Agreed
we are living on tha planet known as earth, i believe planets are real.@@marcbordeau1702
@@marcbordeau1702 maths science history unravelled in a mystery that all started with a big bang
Consistency with uploads is much appreciated. They're always looked forward to!
Fun Fact: With current technology it would take 37,000 years to travel 1 light year.
We’d better get going then 😏
Just told space and time in half then pass through the point and unfold instant space travel.
@@monkeycslYessss! Wormhole
@@microscopic.caterpill Only a mathematical concept even so called space time doesnt exist in real world
@@BondJFK Its a theory that we cant even fully grasp because space time is 4 dimensional. This theory has been supported by a number of experiments tho, like measuring the deflection of light by the sun, and the observation of gravitational waves. Also, there is a lot of evidence from cosmology that supports the idea of a space time fabric, including the observed large-scale structure of the universe and the cosmic microwave background radiation
One thing that most scifi movie failed to show is that The biggest threat of a habitable alien planet is its microorganisms. Who knows what kind of disease that it can cause to our human physiology.
The idea that pathogens that evolved for completely different conditions would find us appetizing is an odd belief. Most pathogens can't comfortably infect all life on this planet, and they evolved to do so, it's more likely our immune systems would crush anything we encounter.
Thats exactly how the aliens in war of the worlds were overcome
@@liwojenkins Using adjectives like appetizing and comfortably for single celled organisms signals to everyone that you're an idiot.
I love that you added the elite dangerous clip at the beginning. Although the renderings of the planets may not be accurate, i can go there in that game. It uses an up-to-date model of our entire galaxy and
The Goldilocks Zone all depends on the type of Sun you have. The Goldilocks Zone is different around each Star. Bigger, hotter Stars like the Sun, a G-type Star, have a wider habitable zone, while smaller Red Dwarfs confine habitable planets to a narrower range.
Goldilocks zone doesn’t mean it’s habitable, Venus and Mars are in the habitable zone too.
Even if habitable also doesn’t mean it can harbour life.
You mean our life...life can be very strange and surv very different conditions
@@rji5377Exactly, Fish that live deep in the oceans where the pressure is enough to crush your skull, No light can reach and every creature is blind, Some animals have evolved to respond to those conditions.
@@Vurinati shit many live in methane or in surfer volcanic areas. Tartagrades can survive space . Who knows what's out there
I always find this stuff fascinating, because to me the concept of the habitable Zone assumes that life can only occur were their is water. What about life that isn't made or doesn't need water to exist. Just because we never found evidence to support that doesn't make it not possible. Look at the concept for Silicon based life forms, they would be breathing Sand and would be able to endure much hotter temperatures.
There is a neat video explaining why silicon-based life is pretty much not possible
Because when guesstimating what planets are worth investigating regarding habitability we're trying to *narrow* the list down. Simple, known variables are better for that.
The experts are very careful to say "life as we know it", because theyre not trying to get tripped up in the definition of life. Some places we will never look for life simply because we know WE can't live there.
How about the concept of a planet being inhabited by creatures that are not life forms, such as robots for example.
@@tonig2757 Up to 400 Billion possible stars in just this galaxy. A NASA-sized budget. A handful of capable devices you have to share with thousands of other researchers and need to book time on in advance. Months or years of analyzing the data.
Let us know when you find the robot planet. 😉
Perfect voice for narration. So calm on the ears.
AI
“When I see your heavens, the works of your fingers, The moon and the stars that you have prepared. What is mortal man that you keep him in mind, And a son of man that you take care of him?”
Best space channel ever. Keep it up 😄
You have provided well researched and edifying scientific knowledge and explained it with terse proficiency. A fine lecture and interesting exploration of our best nieghbors in the Scorpius galaxy just 26 light years away . Give us more like this . Thank You.
Sir or Mam, your diction is impeccable!!👏🏼 very refreshing to read your message 😊
Yeah it was really, really good. Really good. Great, in fact. Really, really, really great.
Yeah AI comes up with all kinds of nonsense, happy you all enjoyed it🙄
this really fires the curiosity out of me
Ew. Bring a towel 😅
So you think it's boring? Or just makes you lose your enthusiasm for space?
Space is always mysterious and interesting
I’d rather go to one of these planets rather than Mars..
I agree
They found planets but they cannot find peace in our world lol 😂
it is very unlikely that any planets around those stars would support life because they would constantly be bombarded by radiation. We should instead be focusing on stars that are very similar or even identical to our own, which are much more rare but the chance of an actual habitable planet is higher
We would need another G2-V star like Sol since humans , livestock and all of our plants evolved to live under this type of star. We could probably get away with something between G0 and G4.... But it would have to a G type star.
Atmosphere Man , atmosphere!!! They have 1-5x times thickness that of Earth's atmosphere... So there must be ozone or other layer that protects them just like earth being 3rd planet in habitable zone to avg star
@@KungFuOne This would only hold true if they had an oxygen rich environment of around 17%. Since you need O2 + UV radiation to make ozone (O3).
This is all true but we dont have the tech to find planets similar ro earth as sunlike stars emit much more light so the light that reaches us is unaffected by the orbit of a small planet around a dim red dwarf this is not the case. Also the astromers would have to wait years for repeated orbits to be confirmed as planets like ours are much further out than those around red dwarves which complete an orbit in days. I cant see nasa allowing james webb to focus on a sun like star fkr at least 4 years to confirm an earth like planet can you ? Theyd rather use it to take diffrent photos of galaxies and supernovas etc etc every week.
Human never give up to find a GOD in the sky, but they thought it's just a science.
How exciting to imagine being advanced enough to go and discover and explore everyone of these planets and more.
How sad, that we're so advanced, yet we keep destroying the one planet that's sustaining us.
@@novalamason2964 That's not so advanced.
@@doomraider551 That’s… That’s the point.
@@novalamason2964 Such a copy-paste response. Come up with your own thoughts
@@novalamason2964 its a tutorial mode 👍👍
So exciting. We're not alone! We should go check it out ourselves someday in the future.
Earth is not the perfect condition for life, life just found a way(evolved) to make Earth perfect for itself. We learnt how to survive on Earth through millions of years of evolution.
Just stop with these headlines, @ 3:12 the video itself says GL667 C "potentially habitable super earths". We know nothing with any certainty, so why speculate with such confidence?
It's definitely very interesting, but at 23 Light years away, it would take over 300 thousand years to get there by conventional rocket. We might as well call that impossible. Even if there was an advanced civilization there, it would take us 23 years to send a message and another 23 years to get a reply. Obviously, we need a warp drive or a third stage guild navigator to fold space.
Exactly.
Hahaha awesome Dune reference. I f@ckin love you, bro!!
Spacetime is a mathematical concept you cant wrap something doesn't exist
To dig deeper into the depths of thought - it is mentioned that certain aspects of these planets, like lacking water, may make them inhabitable and life could not be sustained - however, you must consider the possibility that life on different planets may not require the same things to live that we do. We know what keeps our species going, but you can't apply our requirements to other planets with the possibility of other - unknown - species. The possibilities are infinitely unknown, or unfathomable.
People have and are thinking about all that. The thing is, is that ALL life as we know it, no matter where it resides, requires WATER! Even cyanobacteria and other hearty extremophiles. Okay? If we found life that DIDN'T require water, would we even recognize it? When looking for evidence of ET life, even just microbes and slime, it makes logical sense that we, 'follow the water'.
It's marvellous what scientists have found out about distant stars and their XO planets. It makes me think how perfect the earth is placed for life in all its diversity as we know it to survive. Plus, we have a planet out there that acts as a dustbin to trap asteroids and meteorites that could potentially hit Earth. And although there may be a planet that supports life somewhere out there, at this moment, we haven't found one. So, to me, it's important that we look after what we have here on the planet we call Earth and home.
A planet thats devoid of life aka food isn't habitable.
I am sick of that anti free market commie junk 45 years of handing over our free enterprise to communism in china, and your ohhh so important EPA regulations could not be added in the anti trade agreements? It is not about saving the planet, it is about growing communism. Maybe we are stuck here because communism dumb's down our education. If Aliens made it here, want to bet they live under philosophies such as individual liberty, which is why they have not been hostile.
Tape recorder for a brain. Knock it off!
All this Diversity of Life on Earth - People, Animals, Plants/Botanicals Insects, Microbes, Germs, Bacteria, Viruses means Earth is a ZOO.
IN AN INFINITE SPACE, we are not all.@@frankp7411
Our existence is just a blink in Earth's lifetime. Some planets had life but lost it, some will have in the future. Millions of years able to change everything.
Imagine when aliens found our planet, they probably would have been very happy by discovering a habitable planet full of life with some intelligence on it!
INILEGENCE?
Money is the lifeblood of our society, yet most people have no idea how the monetary system works, nor are they interested.
@@johnsergeithey said “some” intelligence
Logically, any intelligent beings elsewhere will observe earth and commit to avoiding us.
Intelligence??? Earth is the cesspool of planets. It is why they have not asked us to join the G.F.P (Galactic Federation of Planets) which is like the U.N. Except much much more intelligent.
@@manzion7599 you assume they think with the same logic as humans
If I could choose a super power, it would be to have the ability to visit all these planets and film my journeys for a TV series.
I’ve always found it arrogant for scientists to say that there’s absolutely no chance that any type of life can survive somewhere simply because it doesn’t share the same features as earth. How do we know there aren’t life forms out there who breathe an entirely different type of component or can withstand insanely harsh environments that we can’t? There’s simply no way to ever know unless we were to actually go there.
What if we are the Aliens?
I always felt different
if that: remember, be a better Alien yourself first 💐"
Plenty of Aliens on earth seeking for a save place to live.
From a certain point of view.
🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯
They can’t even predict weather right yet they can tell me about a planet light years away🤣🤦🏽♂️
Very interesting, more videos like this pls !
We need to make a rocket ship that travels 500 light years a second
Aren’t those planets plummeted with heavy radiation due to them being too close to their hosts stars? This is the main con of a planet being located in the habitable zone of a small star.
Atmosphere dude , atmosphere!!! They have 1-5x times thickness that of Earth's atmosphere... So there must be ozone or other layer that protects them just like earth being 3rd planet in habitable zone to avg star
@@i_hate_everything_404 do scientists know that about that these planets?
Did you not watch or listen ?? to the back of the classroom you go.
@@SelaphielGodsAngel Did you not read nor understood what I stated ?? to the back of the classroom you go.
The key to life there is to ensure you don't get bit by a radioactive spider
It is exciting to find out more about distance potential habitable planets, however it will mean so much more if and when we are able to build a spacecraft that will allow us to visit them. We are a long way from that being a practical consideration. For example, if we could travel half the speed of light, it would take over 50 years to reach a system 26 light years away.
Why not look at another view of even we travel at the speed of light it takes us 26years to reach which is 1/3 of a normal human life time. At current technology it may be nearly an impossible feat, lets see next 50years where can it lead us to, destruction or migration whichever comes first
@@jefftan9826 exactly, who knows if in 50 years we will have the capacity to travel stars if everything collapses due to climate change or nuclear warfare
The way we travel needs to evolve. Wormholes or teleportation perhaps.
@@jarogniewtheconqueror2804 been more then 50 years... been that since 'landing on the moon' in the 70s kids thought we'd be on mars now. Only thing thats happened are how it was all faked, all original footage was lost, and recreated 😅 all imagery is CGI and the moon rocks were exposed to be wood 😅 what proof??...
I posted to wrong one again, stop!
Humans cant fix the problems we have on earth but yet they talk about starting from scratch on another planet
Idealist dreamers who refuse to face the reality, right before them, of their own making. It's an escapist diversion, the idea of colonizing Mars, say. It seems like a great future, until we consider the reality of humanity bringing its, granted, positive baggage with it to wherever we go, but not considering that we'll also bring our negative baggage as well.
And screw that one up too.
We can fix them, but that doesn't mesh with endless growth, and capitalism requires endless growth. So, we'll have to keep on this suicidal path until the billionaires can get themselves out of here.
@@chuckturdburger4612 Don't confuse Corporate Capitalism with Mom 'n Pop capitalism.
We can't because we're the problem
Now we just need live footage of each planet's atmosphere and ecosystem. This has me so excited!!
Fun Fact: 18% of all known Exoplanets already have a Wal Mart bag hanging from some sort of tree-like lifeform on them, and 3% have a discarded Covid mask in a ditch. Stay sexy Humanity!!
We’ve destroyed one planet and now we go looking for others to ruin. Morally reprehensible.
Why I've always thought the Elon "nerds" aren't very bright...
Doesn't matter how many planet we can found in this world but death never leave us
is that your final answer..?
Here is a future topic to consider maybe. I was wondering about the possibilities of how Earth achieved it's vegetation from seeds of real things rather than imagination. I can only come up with two possibilities myself. 1) The Sun, is actually the burning core of a larger planet that exploded, or was impacted to the point of destruction. If this original planet already had vegetation, then Earth is a remnant piece, and our positioning to sustain life makes our results quantifiable there. 2) Other pieces of space debri, from outer areas with seeds in the composition. Impacting Earth early on. Otherwise, we have to determine how seeds were made out of nothing but some hot air potentially.
If the mass of a planet is 5 times that of earth, no one would be able to walk. Or get up once they've fallen down. If Earth had been even half again as massive as it is, we would even have been able to get into orbit.
Ringleader app
Why do you assume 5 times more mass means 5 times more surface gravity? The mass of Mars is double the mass of Mercury yet both planets have the same surface gravity. A planet with 5 times the mass of Earth, would have the same surface gravity if it had the perfect diameter.
Let’s assume that the gravity is five times greater than earths, there is still life as we know it able to sustain itself in such conditions.
There are a lot of assumptions in this video: there are over 200 specific conditions that must exist in order to support life. Several comments in the video show that these conditions do not exist at all. Plus there is the distance: we are essentially quarantined to our own solar system. Exo Planets yes; life - no.
I’m sure in another galaxy there’s another similar to earth. It’s insane how vast and almost like infinite galaxies. In comparison we only represent like a grain of sand in the ocean .
God really made some wonderful things for us to consider just how unimaginably great HE is!!!
@@kevinrtres You are not a preacher, mind your own business and stop attacking people in the comments. As someone who believes in God, this really makes me feel ashamed of my religion lmao ☠️☠️☠️
@@T1DAL-RUSH Shampies, if my words are an attack then what exactly does it help that someone only believes in God but is not truly saved?
@@T1DAL-RUSH if you can feel ashamed of your religion then are you really a true believer lmao?
@@kevinrtreshundreds of years ago God’s annoying and genocidal fandom claim that Earth is the center of space, now his even more annoying fandom are piggybacking SCIENCE videos commenting his greatness. If he is really great can he pull another earth closer to ours so we can go there because “bad guys” are ruining this one now?
Don't think we are alone in this vast Universe . Problem is , we'll probably never find out.
Realism, we are alone.
And they were too.
@@sutediheriyonoBaladMaUng even of we are alone, sometime in the future when our technology is advanced enough, just like our ancestors did on earth, we will eventually migrate beyond our known stars, who knows maybe we already have migrated sometime the past and those of us who Came to Earth were forced to start over, we will only know in time, long after us.
@@Ragnarok182 That puts me in mind of the film MARS, with Tim Robbins.
Yes, with all that vastness out there and the billions of star systems, I truly believe there are many civilizations in the great cosmic soup that is the universe. I mean, why not eh? But as you say, we'll probably never know. Then again...
@@Ragnarok182 never gonna happen .
Star wars is now coming close to Reality 🎉
Thanks for the amazing content
Not closed but still too far away.
Why do people in Star Wars have English accents? Weird.
@@ge2623 because star wars is make believe
@@TheSpecialCostumeShop Oh shit...Dammit.
All that knowledge amazes me. Scientists are grossly underrated. Most of them enjoy much less recognition than all those undeserving celebrities we idolise.
Gravity would be intense on that planet my god. All the animals are more than likely no taller than 3ft tall if life exists there!
0:16 I think you spelt 'colonised' wrong
no
Hahahahahaha you’re a bright one huh?😂😂😂😂😂
Well said! We need based scientists more now than ever.
Wonderful. On my wish list would be rocky watery worlds in the Goldie lock zone. I'm asking for much but water is quite important (and very pleasant!). I read somewhere that the light shining from a star, through the atmosphere of an exoplanet can sometimes be perceived all the way to our instruments! (spectrum analysis of H2O, I think).That's quite a feat. Meaning that in some cases, they were able to ascertain the presence of water vapor in their atmosphere. Could you tell us examples of this, still evaluated with other favorable parameters like Goldie lock zone, is it also rocky (not just gas) and of the right size? Thank you so much. "The mind is not a vessel to be filled but a fire to be kindled." - Plutarch
I grow tired of these click baits about planets around a K-type star that are probably tidally locked and stripped of atmosphere. Also, the eccentricity of this planet is 0.27 while the Earth's is .017.
Wow not bad 23 light years or 138 Trillion Miles from earth. It’s mind blowing to think that someday we might be able to travel this distance.
At today's rate of travel, it would take us about 851,000 years to travel 23 light years. That is if we were moving at the speed of the fastest current spacecraft we have today. If we continue to develop other craft now in research we could probably cut it down to about 460,000 years so yeah, that's good.
Of course, we could travel at the speed of light and get there in 23 years, but since many of the most intelligent people on Earth have said that we may never be able to travel at the speed of light due to time, space and a bunch of other mumbo jumbo physics that tend to get in our way as we approach those speeds, chances are we will never get to those star systems and planets.
And here's another thing we need to consider. If we are able to somehow bend time and space and make those trips much shorter (don't hold your breath) then we will enter a whole new area of time travel which is exactly what that will be. Again, something many top physicists say is impossible - the paradoxes presented with time travel, worm holes, and warped space are too numerous and unproven to overcome.
The only thing we could hope for is some solution we have yet to even imagine that will allow to make those trips in a reasonable time. Think of the change humans will go through in another 100,000 years. Compare to where we were a 100,000 years ago. If we developed this unknown spacecraft in 200,000 years, it is possible we could pass those earlier versions of humans on their way to the same star system. A version of humans that have spent thousands of generations on a spacecraft would be passed by the planetary version of evolved humans. Weird stuff to think about.
@@slayer8actual 🤯
Because these supposed planets are unreachable for us humans in our Little span of life I can myself pretend that I have discovered millions if not billions of habitable earth like planets...I would not be bothered to bring proofs from over there.
@@slayer8actualyou threw out a lot there, but I'll just say two things: while light speed is impossible, travelling at 99.999999999999999% of lightspeed is perfectly acceptable by our current understanding of the physics. And second, time travel isn't impossible, changing time is.
@@slayer8actual😂😂😂
What I take away from content like this is that we need to focus on building habitats that can move to where the resources are in the outer solar system rather than worrying about habitable planets we can't reach.
shh dont tell elon...he's not gonna like that.. :)
@@GAMERGODDESS-x5g 😂I'm sure he will have his way with mars in the near future. I'm specifically referring to places we can't reach in our lifetimes. Perhaps we'll be able to turn rotating habitats into generation ships one day(assuming we don't figure out some means of FTL travel) but we have to start developing artificial habitats somewhere and doing it where the resource rich asteroids are just makes sense.
It would be amazing to see all the stars and planets can you imagine living a triple star system
Since we are living in a holographic universe, we are probably having a vacation or earth experience in our bodies which would be our time travel suits
. So why not take the next experience on another planet. Just saying
Ringleader. Offers
A triple star system is unstable, and therefore won't last for long. Either one will be flung out, or one will be consumed by one or both of the others.
@@jaymiller9254
Holographic universe is pure, untestable conjecture, not theory, let alone established fact.
it’s even crazier to think that it’s probably gonna be another 500 years before humanity can even reach another solar system
The planets mentioned in this video do not really seem like an extraterrestrial paradise, but nevertheless, when compared with other planets, they are certainly good. We were lucky to find them. Their features are unlikely to allow our descendants to live on these planets in the same way as on Earth. At least not everywhere and not always, if we are not talking about life at established stations. It is likely that life has appeared there by now. I like to think about it enough, I really want scientists to finally invent a telescope that can view the landscapes of the planets. I know it's terribly difficult. But it's certainly easier to build spaceships, don't you think ? 😅
Information we have not actual, what we see the past not the present.
We'll never have the technology to travel that many light years anyways xD
@@LivinProoof We might develop it in the future. But it doesn't matter because by that time we will probably be dead.
Just like Newton who formulated the laws of motion and gravity but did not live to witness them being used in the Apollo Mission.
just one little problem- the 23 LIGHT YEAR distance that would take 23 years to get there travelling at 186,000 miles per second
@@HobbyOrganist Exactly, teleportation would be the only invention that could do that and even then teleporting a human body without it getting completely decimated in my opinion is physically impossible. Moving a human body at the speed of light is equally impossible, I don't see how there's any way to move a body that quickly without it being torn to shreds.
I really think the universe is just so vast that the thought others aren't out there is unrealistic.
These assumptions are made based on a tiniest flicker of light on a pixel that represents a planet passing in front of a star in a far away galaxy. Keep that in mind.
When discovering new stars and planets, scientists will most probably send microorganisms there. And who knows, we probably must have evolved from such things sent by advanced life on another planet. It would be fun to discover if we were potential samples sent amongst 1000 others :D
So if life is found in another planet , does this mean that Adam and Eve where NOT the only beings created by God ?
There are angels, demons, animals, plants, microbes before the creation of adam and eve.
@@PLCSadra I agree
That's awesome how we are able to use a thermometer to measure the temperature of those planets light years away.... simply amazing.
they have no bloody idea.
My theory is, a cell was created by electrons colliding and getting stuck in aloop, the reason why cells could survive without water, is how it was originally formed, the electric could possibly have formed on water or underground, but it only had these materials to develop,so basically, life is litrally just our brain, let me expaine. A forming cell isnt able to create consciousness, but it does understand how to do functions and do what its told,by making other forms, lile copies of the cells. Over times, they floated in the air, and yes, a single cell could have creared oxygen or any type of gass to move around, or perhaps it just naturally formed, anyway, it eventually landed on the surface, and eventually evolved into plant and stuff. The thing is tho, i believe, that the reason why we need oxygen and food and water, is because, over the tens of thousands of years, the cells copied eachother, generating more water, and oxygen, in order to copy and make another form, thats why pregnant women need to eat more food because of the way the cells created, without waterl, or a single gass or anything missing it cant copy itselt. So then over the thousands of years, there was biggwr forms, with brains and actual funtions, and stuff, and realisd thay the suns energy isnt strong enough to keep the bigger joined up cells to communicate and stuff, so it made water into a energy and because a cell was always made up of water and energy, they started to eat eachother, and then this is were cancer was developed, the cells didnt wanna die, creating a unequal balance, if one cell was to eat the other, life would not develoup, so the cells eventually split up, but some was remaimimg in the group, but i believe that some chemicals or anything that could cause cancer, could possibly trigger a warning signal in the cell, based on how it happend millions of years ago!
Daymmm i should be a scientist hahha!
Edit: For anyone wondering, it's possible to be conscious as a cell, but at a certain point, as the male cells enter the body, those male cells have been programmed to do what it's suppost to do, creating a way to make reproducing magical in order to survive as little cells, however, the cells always start as the brain, because a single cell has a little brain inside, so it develops into more and more, and creates copies of eschother, and it's told what to do by dna, basically millions of years ago, dna was like a first l Language, but there dosnt necessary have to be alive or aware to do so, could just generally be due to constant loops and copies doing same thing.
It's actually absurd to think we're alone in Earth itself.
Besides when we have been searching for decades for… anything and have only found a couple one called organisms if even. Probably some viruses. It’s rare if there is other life on earth with how we record currently
we JUST started leaving our own solar system and we are looking LIGHT YEARS beyond earth. We are brand ass new at this. Human time is NOTHING compared to cosmic and geological time. The best humans can do is social fn media. We are a trial and nothing more. Humans do not matter outside of your own family unit, you have zero value to the world @@Shitockiful
So all that is needed is to find a way to travel at the speed of light, and then survive 23 years of space travel on a spaceship capable of providing self sustainability for itself and its passengers, while constantly being exposed to various space radiation. Can't honestly see that happening any day soon when even a trip to the moon is still considered an extreme challenge.
not extreme 😂😂😂😂. mars is even more extreme
Ringleader. Word. App
Send AI
@nealvandersteltexpreales-qz5og Oh yes. Instead let's just ignore the basics physics that govern every development humans have achieved and hope for a miracle.
It wouldn't be 23 years. At 80% of lightspeed only 15 years would pass due to time dilation. At 99.9% of the speedlight only 1.5 years would pass for the space ship and the people in it.
"planets more habitable than Earth" because we're not there.
Sounds like "America" - "The world of plenty and opportunities." It's a farce!!
Without a Moon precisely the size of ours, Earth becomes a desolate wasteland; both Earth & the Moon must also be of the exact current size & distance. Imagining another planet capable of supporting human life is like imagining clocks spontaneously creating themselves. Imagining that humans can create such a perfect system is presumptuous beyond all reason; we can't even take care of what we've got & we are forever staring at the next Hitler who wants to be ruler of it all.
Nobody knows yet if these planets are actually safe for humans even if they have water and air like earth. What if they have deadly creatures or harsh natural calamities???
Or viruses and bacteria
My own view is that the human race won't be the ones actually travelling to different planets. I think that humans will build the spacecraft, and the lucky ones... Genetically modified bacteria, fungi, plants that will be able to survive, adapt to the harsh conditions and go onto colonise different planets. I think as humans the distances would be to great and we wouldn't be able to adapt. I think that the human race is being used to build these better and more advanced space craft.
by the lizard people?
You are right. It is your own view.
Many bacteria and fungus live as a part of us; on our skins, in our stomachs, etc… so even if we do attempt a manned mission, they will always be with us, and even if we fail they may still succeed to propagate on another celestial body from our remains.
No matter how rosy of a picture you try to paint nothing NOTHING will ever come close to the amazing and beautiful Earth.
And definitely no other planet that we'll ever be able to get to! (I believe God, the Supreme Creator, set it up this way. On average, the stars are about Five Lightyears apart.) God doesn't want, or intend, his intelligent creatures to reach other star systems. And for good reason!
I haven’t personally seen beyond our sky’s so knowing what’s out there and believing are two totally different mind sets. I believe that if there is more beyond our sky’s then why limit life to one planet. I also believe we (humans) are unique to this planet no matter how inhabitable other places may be even we (humans) can acclimate to different habitats. While many fear the depth of this conversation piece I find it fascinating. How wonderful is the power of life.
To understand that you must look at all the extreme and bizarre geological changes the earth went through to create life. What are the odds that similar conditions created another planet? Not to mention a few of those events almost wiped out all life on earth during catastrophic events.
Now thats the planets 🙃🙃
Living the life outside the solar system, sounds exciting and hopefully those habitable ones will give us comfort
o
If Evolution is a fact - then just perhaps on this planet these humans evolved to fit requirements.
I love the way that you all discuss as if humans are the pinnacle of evolution.
Animals have evolved in equally amazing ways. We are just another species in a host of millions of other species. Our ego dictates we are better. We are not. We are the suicide species.
Billions of species throughout the galaxies all thinking they are similarly unique.
Red Dwarf stars are so small the habitable zone is close-in, so close-in that the planets are tidally locked. Tidally locked planets would be a very difficult place to inhabit, as any atmosphere would be moving at thousands of kilometers per hour. The only planets in these systems that might harbor life are ocean-worlds. Do the two yellow-orange stars have planets? Those would be far better candidates to look at.
I do not get the obsession with only looking at red dwarfs for planet.
@@nicoleackerman205red dwarfs make up almost two-thirds of the stars in our galaxy.
Suns like our own mostly have gas giants in close orbit with no rocky planets to be found.