Ginault Ocean Rover II - Best Affordable Rolex Sub-Style Option? Part 5 of a 5 Watch Comparison

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 90

  • @agprime
    @agprime 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    Nice watch, I do not care what people say about the manufacturer's past. Rolex has been manipulating their watches supply and demand for many years to make their watches more "exclusive" and expensive beyond retail price and I don't hear anyone saying anything about it. If you like a watch buy it.

    • @msk3905
      @msk3905 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Rolex is and probably will always be considered the gold standard in watches no matter what they do with their supply and demand, there will be people who consider it a symbol of success or “the best” just life. Other watch brands are really stepping up their game and producing amazing products for reasonable prices like this watch that looks to be an amazing value since I don’t own one. Like you said buy what you want, I personally don’t care about the brand name and recently bought a Mido when surrounded by Rolex owners who make less than me. It’s just a watch I buy watches for accuracy, well built, and looks good on my wrist.

    • @agprime
      @agprime หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@msk3905 I agree.

  • @inlandwatchreviews5745
    @inlandwatchreviews5745 6 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    My Ginault OR 2 has better lume than my Rolex Milgauss, I was going to spend $144,000.00 on a mil-sub I decided to spend $1800.00 on the OR-2. this is my real GADA watch. Great Video thank you .

  • @TheKopolanpoika
    @TheKopolanpoika 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I have OC2 both blue and black version, paid thousand dollar each and in that price absolutely killer watches. I have six Seikos in price range 1000-2000 dollars and Tudor BB41, and still day after day I choose OC2, it's just superb.
    Yeap, Ginault founder has past, but so have we all. We learn our mistakes and some times it creates something awesome, which we all know today name by Ginault.

  • @WATCHingJames
    @WATCHingJames 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    You can’t really beat Ginault. They are incredible. I know multiple Rolex owners that have a Ginault too and even they admit it is incredible

  • @craighoward5486
    @craighoward5486 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    For those who don't want to watch the entire video to find the price, it's $1,500 to $1,800.
    Enticing video until I hit that detail near the end.
    Good complete review though. Thank you!

    • @worthwhilewatches
      @worthwhilewatches  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yeah, it's not cheap, except when comparing it to the Submariner. Thanks for watching.

    • @bruh_oly1370
      @bruh_oly1370 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@worthwhilewatchesI’ve had the no date was worth every penny

  • @tailsneon556
    @tailsneon556 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I received my Ginault Silent Service in Feb. The overall finishing and quality is insane for the money. Runs dead flat 0s per day on my timegrapher.

  • @guylezius9775
    @guylezius9775 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Own 2 of these Ginault OR2’s, the one your reviewing and a no date with blue ceramic insert, stunning fit and finish….better than my Seiko SPB143…cheaper also and keeps better time ….totally worth it.

  • @seanparks1675
    @seanparks1675 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This is your best review yet. I love this series. Many channels do comparison videos, but this series is much better. I am looking forward to the final comparison.

    • @worthwhilewatches
      @worthwhilewatches  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Glad you're enjoying it. Thanks!

  • @eMKayJR
    @eMKayJR 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This particular version is actually considered Ocean Rover 2.5 - John has made some improvements to the watch compared to initial OR2 that was sold during pre-sale but has not stated those one the website. From the Ginault Facebook page and John's clarifications, the changes are as follows:
    - slimmer caseback, allowing the watch to sit at approx 11.2 mm (compared to 12.5 mm of the original OR2);
    - improved AR Coating - 3 layers of AR coating on the inside compared to 2 on the inside and 1 on the outside, allowing for better visibility and preventing scratches - AR coating on the outside is prone to scratches that are visible under certain conditions;
    - added minute indices under "Hand Build in America" - initial versions didn't have those, however John started additing those dials in 2021 so there is a batch of OR2's with the new dial but without other improvements.
    Nevertheless, every newly ordered OR2 has all of the above improvements. Just beware when buying them secondhand.

    • @worthwhilewatches
      @worthwhilewatches  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for the detailed list of changes!

  • @CyberRabid.
    @CyberRabid. 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    If you like this watch, but don't like the price, check out the Square 1545 Atmos classic line. The case finishing isn't as refined as the Ginault, but the build quality is definitely there at a third of the price.

  • @ninjatrader3858
    @ninjatrader3858 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why does your OR2 have the minute markers under the 'built in america'? From pictures i've seen online and the Ginault site, it's missing the markers?

    • @worthwhilewatches
      @worthwhilewatches  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It must be a recent upgrade made to the dial design. I noticed that too, and appreciate them being there.

    • @ninjatrader3858
      @ninjatrader3858 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@worthwhilewatches Ahhh! The no date doesn't have the minute markerts.

    • @worthwhilewatches
      @worthwhilewatches  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well, the pictures on the website of date versions also seem to have no markers. So I'm not sure.

    • @jonirwin7316
      @jonirwin7316 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It was a small improvement. It's known as the OR II.5​@worthwhilewatches

  • @t3h8ar0n
    @t3h8ar0n 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I got the ORII a few years ago but with the gold-sand lume and an inverted date dial (black background date wheel with white numbering), it is my favorite watch to wear.

  • @fixingbones
    @fixingbones 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Your videos have improved quickly. No need for slapstick humour. Your information and presentation is pretty tight, so keep to the serious stuff.

    • @worthwhilewatches
      @worthwhilewatches  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for the feedback, and for watching!

    • @sinjinadams2862
      @sinjinadams2862 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I second that. The slapstick humor has to go!

  • @eugenevedensky6071
    @eugenevedensky6071 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I miss the one I sold. If were to get it again I'd likely ask for a green aluminum bezel ;)

  • @cedarcanoe
    @cedarcanoe 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I own a prototype of Ginault’s first batch. Awesome watch.

  • @jaconstable8983
    @jaconstable8983 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great review and best of luck with the channel - deserves to do well

  • @adk7962
    @adk7962 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Excellent review. I agree with you and think it’s worth the money. Yup. Way too much text though. Looking forward to the final review! BTW. I liked some of your little animations. Maybe not throughout the entire video. Again, your camerawork and editing are really great. Thanks!

    • @worthwhilewatches
      @worthwhilewatches  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you, and thanks for watching!

  • @GapBahnDirk
    @GapBahnDirk 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'll take a Squale over the Ginault as they have heritage and history as well as offering quality and value. I particularly like the 20 Atmos Militare ceramic Mk2, which has utilitarian painted markers and broadsword hands as a homage to a Milsub. The watch also has a slim lug case and is brought up-to-date with a large crown, ceramic bezel insert and domed sapphire crystal. The Ginault is nice, but the text on the dial is somewhat inane. I agree that it is more appealing than a modern Rolex sub though.

    • @worthwhilewatches
      @worthwhilewatches  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yeah, that Squale is very nice. Thanks for watching!

  • @mrlume9475
    @mrlume9475 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I had version 1 and regretted selling it. This V2 is definitely an upgrade. Can I ask, how long did it take to receive the watch from the order date? Enjoyed this video and have subbed.

    • @worthwhilewatches
      @worthwhilewatches  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Wait time seems to be about 3 months right now. Thanks for watching!

    • @mrlume9475
      @mrlume9475 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@worthwhilewatches Thanks for that. I'll definitely consider picking the V2 up.

  • @latinballa88
    @latinballa88 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Was looking forward to this! Great video. Great series for that matter.

    • @worthwhilewatches
      @worthwhilewatches  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Glad you enjoyed it. Thanks for watching!

  • @sinjinadams2862
    @sinjinadams2862 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You've done a great job picking your five watches. My pick for the best watch will be the Titanium San Martin.

  • @eric2215-i7g
    @eric2215-i7g 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I had the OR2 date and OR2 No Date, loved them both but i have to sell the date since i hardly use it. I do wish that he can make a datejust homage or a chronograph since I'm starting to get interested in dress watches and he's been having the same watches for 4-6 years already. What will also be great if he can also create a gmt sub since that's also popular.

  • @gavinBsussex
    @gavinBsussex 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Super watch. I have an Ocean Rover and Ocean Rover 2 and they are excellent watches. If you have a Rolex but want a hugh quality daily beater at 80% of the quality of a Submariner but at a fraction of the cost, then the Ocean Rover is a superb option. The Ocean Rover 2 with the ceramic bezel is genuinely an excellent watch. Great review here.

  • @YZFMANIAC08
    @YZFMANIAC08 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Hardly a budget watch at 1500-1800 dollars. Rather save up for an entry level luxury watch like a Breitling or Tudor at this pricepoint

    • @RabbitWatchShop
      @RabbitWatchShop 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      yup. add another grand and you can get used black bay 58s all day long.

    • @ponjk101
      @ponjk101 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@RabbitWatchShop Fair point, but breitling/tudor are around £4k+ new & little less used) but ur buying this cause it's homaging (clomaging to b precise) a submariner that's £12k+. It's very well made, looks the part frm a distance or close-up & now uses selita/eta movements.. I own sinn, doxa, squale, tudor, breitling, hamilton +others, but can't justify a real submariner.. But this ginault gets there at a fraction of that.😊

    • @Ae073001
      @Ae073001 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Entry diver Breitling and Tudors are not close to 1.8k but closer to 3500. For many an extra 1.5k is not possible. So this watch, with its fit and finish quality is a good option for many.

    • @RabbitWatchShop
      @RabbitWatchShop 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ponjk101 don’t compare a Ginault to any of those brands, noob

    • @msk3905
      @msk3905 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@RabbitWatchShop I’d take this over a Tudor anyday

  • @apostolosgalimanas8274
    @apostolosgalimanas8274 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    For me the best submariner homage ever! So close with real thing...

  • @craiglibby1224
    @craiglibby1224 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I am bit surprised they don’t use the SW300-1a to help with thinness.

  • @Vox-Populi
    @Vox-Populi 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ginault has panache, like a Porsche 911, or a Subaru WRX. There's nothing else exactly like it.

  • @RocketDog73
    @RocketDog73 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Now you stated that the bezel is off centre I cannot unsee it 😢

    • @worthwhilewatches
      @worthwhilewatches  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah, that's the only knock on the build quality of this particular watch.

  • @cheesychester9647
    @cheesychester9647 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Excellent review. I own the Ginault Silent Service no date, and man, it's so nice. Fit and finish are up there with the best in my collection, easily beating any Tudor I've owned. Appreciate that you're looking at Ginault and the watch itself, not focusing on the "controversial past" that so many people can't seem to get over - like their favorite Swiss brands have no dirt in their closet.
    As much as I like my Silent Service, I think I'm going to let it go soon to fund the blue bezel Ocean Rover II with a date. Like you, I prefer all my watches with dates at this point and I need a splash of color in my sea of black watches.
    Subbed. Looking forward to future videos.

    • @worthwhilewatches
      @worthwhilewatches  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nice! I haven't checked out a Silent Service yet. I almost got the blue bezel Ocean Rover. Thanks for watching!

  • @cheongkitvong7449
    @cheongkitvong7449 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice Watch

  • @CarlosGambino_22
    @CarlosGambino_22 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'd rather buy some Tudor or longines second hand for that price ..

  • @SOCerberus94
    @SOCerberus94 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    One can also get a San Martin SN0111 sword hand variant and save >1200$ USD

    • @worthwhilewatches
      @worthwhilewatches  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's definitely a great option.

  • @geneparadiso6258
    @geneparadiso6258 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    $1500? I don’t think so.

  • @sharpe340-
    @sharpe340- 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    An unsigned clasp for the asking price is unforgivable.

  • @Mark-sd7fc
    @Mark-sd7fc 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How much is this $500 watch?? I’d rather have 3 Steinharts for the money.
    The Ginault bracelet IS very nice. I owned a ocean rover and a steinhart sold the ginault and kept the Steinhart

    • @worthwhilewatches
      @worthwhilewatches  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Steinhart makes a nice watch for sure. Thanks for watching!

  • @erikknudsen2971
    @erikknudsen2971 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Great watch but I just can't get over the murky past.

    • @cedarcanoe
      @cedarcanoe 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      So you think young criminals deserve a second chance? And yet you condemn the owner of this brand. Strange thinking.

    • @BroAriq
      @BroAriq 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What past?

    • @cedarcanoe
      @cedarcanoe 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@BroAriq google is your friend

    • @BroAriq
      @BroAriq 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@cedarcanoe and now you are my friend

    • @cedarcanoe
      @cedarcanoe 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@BroAriq man, this is all just history, there is no need to repeat all that here. Browse the internet, and learn.

  • @justmeeagainn
    @justmeeagainn 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Oh wow, another Submariner copy. Let me try to contain my excitement.

    • @worthwhilewatches
      @worthwhilewatches  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'll be moving on to other things soon.

    • @rolexsubcasewearsbettertha9571
      @rolexsubcasewearsbettertha9571 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well it is a 5 part series for Sub homages.......and Rob did an excellent job. 🎉

  • @christopherjefferson3561
    @christopherjefferson3561 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The text reminds me of my pelagos-too verbose

  • @LaithFaouri
    @LaithFaouri 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    San martin have better quality for less than $400 !

    • @grahamliggat7193
      @grahamliggat7193 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I can’t fault SM on value but having experienced Ginault watches and at least 6 SMs I don’t think SM are anywhere close on quality and they are certainly not better.

    • @LaithFaouri
      @LaithFaouri 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @grahamliggat7193 Both have same material same movement are available same BGW9 lume Both are made in China the dial on this one looks better I agree but SM cost $1000 less..

    • @grahamliggat7193
      @grahamliggat7193 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@LaithFaouri doesn’t sound like you have handled a Ginault?
      Appreciate the movement may be the same but the SM prices for the Sellita movement versions are considerably higher and the Ginault movement is regulated to COSC standards. Also that movement appears in watches that are considerably more expensive than the Ginault e.g. Oris 65 (unregulated).
      From your comment referencing “looks” I am assuming that you haven’t handled both. I would encourage you to get your hands on a Ginault before you really make up your mind. I had reservations but thought it best to actually get one so as to be fully informed rather than relying on received or assumed wisdom.
      For the record I am more of an SM fan boy than a Ginault fan boy (mainly price driven) but both are great offerings at their price points - and these are justifiably quite different. SM is probably the best bang for buck in the c.$300 gategory and Ginault is certainly an honorable mention if not the best bang for buck in the c.$1,100 category (as with SM they are regularly discounted).

    • @LaithFaouri
      @LaithFaouri 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @grahamliggat7193 I don't need to handle it I'm not going pay over $1000 for a homage watch while I can get almost the same quality for less than $400!

  • @firstnamelastname-ys3mz
    @firstnamelastname-ys3mz 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Beta watch

  • @oldmovieslist
    @oldmovieslist 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice specs but the chinese gibberish text destroys it.

  • @peterlandbo2726
    @peterlandbo2726 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Buy a used Rolex. Or Tudor. Or Sinn. Or Mühle Glashütte.....

  • @whereRbearsTeeth
    @whereRbearsTeeth 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Junk

    • @rolexsubcasewearsbettertha9571
      @rolexsubcasewearsbettertha9571 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You obviously have not handled the OR2 in person, so many RLX/Tudor owners in the group complimented how amazing Ginault's quality is comparing to the big boys. I am one of them.