Here you are "The Feral Child: What Happens to Someone Kept in Total Isolation?" By the TH-cam channel into the shadows. Just be ready to get blind drunk afterwards cuz you'll want to forget ever watching it.
I'm gonna make a bold assumption and say: The original language of children is exactly the one that gets them what they want. Once they figured out their caretakers were waiting for vocal reactions (by accident), they would make more sounds. And their caretakers and their rulers (who were probably getting impatient/desperate) would grasp that straw and claim it to be what they wanted it to be.
I work with kids and the pointed out what they want. I say the word. Then they’ll try so say the word and one day they know the word ! It’s a long process but they are amazing (sorry my English, not a native speaker)
I'm currently taking an applied linguistics course as part of my Master's degree program. One of this week's readings was about the girl named Genie. Yes, please continue this subject.
If they aren't also blind they could learn to understand written language surely In my elementary school one of the teachers was deaf and she could talk relatively easily with the hearing students and other teachers. She must have been really good at reading lips I guess
@@amazinggrapes3045 I'm just gonna comment at you now before somebody else does and dunks on you.. but you're one elementary schools teacher had become deaf, she wasn't born deaf. That's why you see deaf people who can speak, or say a blind person who knows to pet a dog. Nobody born deaf is that good at reading lips, unfortunately.
People actually caring about others in general is also apparently pretty recent. (In terms of strangers and others of different ethnic/cultural groups) Its also sad that so much knowledge that is undeniably useful is locked behind being total monsters. (Most of our frostbite knowledge is from the Nazis) And so most of the knowledge in this category is either from history (like the Nazis who had 0 issues torturing people) or from case studies where a single person has something happen to them and we can study the aftermath. (But such a case study obviously lacks scientific rigor which among other aspects requires controlling for all variables or atleast compensating for them)
They're still doing a lot of stuff to animals because it's considered "inhumane" to do so to humans Some of it is for the convenience of animals having shorter life spans and thus easier to see genetic and developmental effects but sometimes I am surprised by what isn't considered "animal cruelty" under the law
I'm fascinated by cases like in the film Nell. Nell and her twin sister were raised far away from other people, by a mother whose speech was garbled by a stroke. Without contact to the outside world, they spoke a mixture of their mother's garbled English and the twin-speak they invented for themselves. Sadly the sister drowned quite young, and the mother passed away from another stroke, leaving Nell all alone with no one else who could understand her. That's where the film begins. It's a very touching story of how a couple of social workers find her and slowly gain her trust, learn her language and help her integrate into society.
In Derek Bikerton's book "Bastard Tongues" there is a chapter called 'The Forbidden Experiment'. Back in the 70s Bickerton proposed a study callled ECONAL: Experimental Creation of a New Language. The idea was to move young couples who spoke languages with radically different grammars to an island where they would farm, fish, and have babies. The idea was that the children would invent a new language of their own to communicate with each other. The trial got canceled, but essentially the same thing happened by accident at a school for the in Nicaragua.
Montessori and the unfortunate instances of feral children helped linguists come up with the "sensitive period" for language learning, which is about 3 years. If a child is not exposed to a language within that period they will be severely impaired or language will not develop it at all, proving there is no "innate" language.
Ever heard of Genie Wiley? Her case was a part of my Health and Social Care A-level spec. Deprived to a single room for her entire childhood, until around 10-12 years old was she was found. Her language was restraint to only nouns.
We already have had millions of LDEs throughout history- They're called "Profoundly deaf children reared by hearing parents who believe fanatically in oralism". Thankfully, due a a greater acceptance of sign language and better amplification techniques these experiments have become far rarer.
There was no common sign language in Nicaragua, but when some schools for deaf children were set up, the children who attended them developed their own sign language without any help from teachers. For more info, look up Nicaraguan Sign Language in Wikipedia. To be fair, they were teenagers and had their own home sign systems among family and friends. You should also read the article on Home sign - a system of communication "often invented spontaneously by a deaf child who lacks accessible linguistic input."
I'm very sceptical of the human ability to carry out such an experiment effectively. Suppose you're tasked with raising children in the experiment. You'll need to let them know when you're feeding them, when it's time for bed, and when they should stop misbehaving. You're going to want to teach the child(ren) how to use the toilet. If you start using gestures, congratulations, you've just assigned meaning to gestures, and the child will be on its way to developing some kind of sign language.
Or you could just follow development of children born deaf and possibly blind. As for the trauma, seems like the Hellen Keller story might have some clues.
Helen Keller was not exactly traumatized and certainly by no means deprived of communication, even she couldn't speak or hear. She is a fabulous example of how the human brain is capable of learning many different forms of language and communication, provided the right care during those early formative years.
Language deprivation is something that actually happened to deaf children in most of history. It's why the word 'dumb' gets its second meaning of stupid after the original meaning unable to speak or silent. Until sign language was developed by kids who were put into special schools for the deaf children (set up in the 19th century). Missing out on that critical period of language exposure actually inhibited the development of the brain. Deaf kids raised by hearing parents before proper sign languages were developed worked out some basic gestures for simple, functional communication. But until there was a community of people for whom sign language was their mother tongue these gestures didn't form a proper language with real linguistic structure. It really proves the idea from 1984 that it's extremely difficult to think of something you don't have a word for.
This is unfortunately something that happens with a lot of deaf kids, namely in poorer countries. Especially when people think sign language isn’t beneficial 🙃
Oh please do make the vid about feral kids. I am fascinated by the story of Marina Chapman who was raised by Capuchin monkeys. Capuchins have recently been found to have a 3000 year archaeological history of changing stone tool use so there is a lot happening in that 65g of brain. I wouldn't have started watching Friends but for Marcel.
Somwhere in colombia, at 2010, a man "raised" 5 kids as cavemen... the oldest among them was 12. none of them knew any language. search for "niños de las cavernas de Turmequé" (caveboys from Turmequé) if your want to know more about it.
Look into the development of sign language in Nicaraguan schools for the deaf on the 1980s. An example of a language to spontaneously development among children. Likely the only one known to exist. It's a fascinating story.
anybody born deaf is surely deprived of language. they still possess an intrinsic instinct to communicate and will develop their own methods of doing so
I am curious about another language experiment. What if you have few mute nurses, that do understand multiple spoken languages and large number of talking nurses, who each understand only their own and different language. Then each day have different pair of mute and speaking nurse. The children are encouraged to develope their language and nurses too try to learn it.
People aren't ready for the truth that kids left alone to develop language together would probably speak something like the uwu conlang. Lots of vowels and short words. Very tonal. Very contextual
There is no way any ethics board in any establishment would sign off on that. Basically it would take a drastic reduction in ethical thinking for this kind of experiment to actually go ahead.
The only way such an experiment can happen today is if its a case study. (Such as a single mother a great distance from society loses her ability to speak and gets found 10 years later, and in this situation i assume she and her kid would be using sign language of some kind, either official or improved by the pair) The other option is the same as how we gathered very accurate and detailed frostbite knowledge, the Nazis take over a society and have 0 issues performing absolutely inhumane experiments on their chosen "sub human races". (Lets pray that a nazi equivalent group never rises again)
...wait, why'd you turn off the comments on your latest video? Just curious. Edit: Nevermind, it was TH-cam themselves due to the fact that the video features children
I think it’s pretty hard to take Salimbene’s portrayal of Frederick II and his alleged human experiments at face value. One thing to be aware of is that Frederick was constantly at odds with the Pope for political reasons, with Emperor and Pope struggling for control of the Italian peninsula. Frederick at one point expelled the Franciscans (the order to which Salimbene belonged) from Lombardy, and Frederick for his part was excommunicated three times. This meant that church historians had every reason to make him look as bad as possible, and I could easily believe that the stories of Frederick’s evil experiments were entirely fabricated.
Tbh. I feel like if we built our society around care and support instead of competition and individualism, we could actually do this experiment without it ruining someone's life. A care taker who is allowed to use words the kids use. Sending regular footage of kids learning to communicate so a team can confirm what communication is being expressed and how to implement it without influencing too much Some people would want to learn the language they came up with. As long as they weren't going to hit "the end of the experiment" and suddenly be unable to "earn a living". I don't see why this kind of thing couldn't eventually be done
I wonder why the children’s nurses weren’t asked sing with humming or gibberish. I might be sick to wonder but I think a child could be healthy if raised with love and non linguistic song and exposure of crouds where people speak to each other but not to the children. I think they would create a language in that scenario because they would be socially nurtured and language would be modeled without specific linguistic features.
ahh 'heroditidus' 'the half right', he can always be trusted for "accurate information" with "no embellishments" or "entirely false information solely meant to make greece look good", such a "beacon" of "honesty" and "truth" there hasn't been since.
I don't think any of these were "traumatising" (except were the babies had to fend for themselves) but most of these were just kids being raised by someone mute which is not a bad thing. Are you saying mute people are bad parents? To clarify a real LDE would probably be traumatising because it would have to last for all of their lives and they would need to be isolated from everything, even body language, which might mean they would need to be raised by robots. But being raised by a mute nurse is way better then being in the orphans at the time.
Not exactly, people raised by mute parents still have contact with language, ASL still is a type of language! It just isn’t a spoken one for the matter. And they have contact with books, movies, music etc. Kids by mute parents usually learn to communicate in ASL and in their mother tongue (if their parents wish to)
@@nyankati2178 that's why in opinion non of these stories are so bad. They may not hear spoken word but there is other ways to communicate, so there is no reason why it would be traumatising.
I don't think LDE's will necessarily be damaging... Just because the kids aren't exposed to languages doesn't mean they have to be taken away from their parents or have no interactions with adults. If linguists wanted to do it in a human way, they'd collect kids who's parents died quickly after birth(so they weren't exposed enough to language), they could also use some of their children if their parters agree, and they could interact with those children without speaking, it's not that hard, if they really wanna be cautious they could put devices on their mouths that block sounds... This way no kid is "kidnapped", they all have emotional support available in the form of adults helping them and spending time with them, and because the expirament should be over by the time they're like 6 or 7 tops, they could teach them languages once the experiment ends, which will both be an experiment on its own and will prepare them to the real world, effectively making them normal people in every aspect by the time they're adults(not to mention being a part of this experiment could probably get them scholarships). They could also be adopted once they speak some language (or even before that if the researchers decided to adopt them)
Judaism is not the oldest of the abrahamic religions Christianity is. Also Aramaic is the probably the closest to the language spoken in the Bible. Hebrew came from the Middle ages and was the derived from Aramaic, which to some degree still exists today with small Christian population in the Middle East who speak a form of Aramaic.
Man I would love to se an experiment like this take place. What if we give them a lot of money when they grow up for compensation for linguistic damage🤔🤔
Why would they want money if they dont have the concept of capitalism since they grew up removed from society? That would be the same as giving them a bunch of twigs or shiny rocks for all they care
Does this count as a spooky halloween video or do I have to do another one?
Definitely spooky… but I wouldn’t argue with the prospect of getting another!
A video about feral children would be perfect in my opinion
How did British spooks get their names like Black Shuck, Peg Powler, water kelpies and Red Cap.
Here you are "The Feral Child: What Happens to Someone Kept in Total Isolation?" By the TH-cam channel into the shadows. Just be ready to get blind drunk afterwards cuz you'll want to forget ever watching it.
@@aaronstanley6914 thanks brother, btw i'm straight edge so i'll have to watch it 100% sober.
I'm gonna make a bold assumption and say: The original language of children is exactly the one that gets them what they want. Once they figured out their caretakers were waiting for vocal reactions (by accident), they would make more sounds. And their caretakers and their rulers (who were probably getting impatient/desperate) would grasp that straw and claim it to be what they wanted it to be.
I work with kids and the pointed out what they want. I say the word. Then they’ll try so say the word and one day they know the word ! It’s a long process but they are amazing (sorry my English, not a native speaker)
If you ever read about that experiment that tried to raise a chimp as a human, you'd never doubt this. Because it is exactly how it works.
I'm currently taking an applied linguistics course as part of my Master's degree program. One of this week's readings was about the girl named Genie. Yes, please continue this subject.
What do you think would be the result of an lde
There are also deaf children growing up with no access to a sign language and therefore without any language
Yes. Language deprivation is sadly way more common than most people think.
If they aren't also blind they could learn to understand written language surely
In my elementary school one of the teachers was deaf and she could talk relatively easily with the hearing students and other teachers. She must have been really good at reading lips I guess
@@amazinggrapes3045 I'm just gonna comment at you now before somebody else does and dunks on you.. but you're one elementary schools teacher had become deaf, she wasn't born deaf. That's why you see deaf people who can speak, or say a blind person who knows to pet a dog. Nobody born deaf is that good at reading lips, unfortunately.
It's amazing how the welfare of the subjects of scientific experiments is only a recent concern.
People actually caring about others in general is also apparently pretty recent. (In terms of strangers and others of different ethnic/cultural groups)
Its also sad that so much knowledge that is undeniably useful is locked behind being total monsters. (Most of our frostbite knowledge is from the Nazis) And so most of the knowledge in this category is either from history (like the Nazis who had 0 issues torturing people) or from case studies where a single person has something happen to them and we can study the aftermath. (But such a case study obviously lacks scientific rigor which among other aspects requires controlling for all variables or atleast compensating for them)
@@jasonreed7522 not really as far as 10s of thousands of years ago we’ve found evidence of compassion
@@jasonreed7522 volunteer testing should be legal. The only control method is preventing coercion.
There’s no way that a child can consent to undergo such an experiment, but in general volunteer testing is already a thing as far as I know.
They're still doing a lot of stuff to animals because it's considered "inhumane" to do so to humans
Some of it is for the convenience of animals having shorter life spans and thus easier to see genetic and developmental effects but sometimes I am surprised by what isn't considered "animal cruelty" under the law
I'm fascinated by cases like in the film Nell. Nell and her twin sister were raised far away from other people, by a mother whose speech was garbled by a stroke. Without contact to the outside world, they spoke a mixture of their mother's garbled English and the twin-speak they invented for themselves. Sadly the sister drowned quite young, and the mother passed away from another stroke, leaving Nell all alone with no one else who could understand her. That's where the film begins. It's a very touching story of how a couple of social workers find her and slowly gain her trust, learn her language and help her integrate into society.
In Derek Bikerton's book "Bastard Tongues" there is a chapter called 'The Forbidden Experiment'. Back in the 70s Bickerton proposed a study callled ECONAL: Experimental Creation of a New Language. The idea was to move young couples who spoke languages with radically different grammars to an island where they would farm, fish, and have babies. The idea was that the children would invent a new language of their own to communicate with each other. The trial got canceled, but essentially the same thing happened by accident at a school for the in Nicaragua.
That's pretty much how hawaii creole came to exist.
I certainly would like to see a video on feral children. I've long been fascinated by Genie's story.
She wasn't really a feral child, though. She was just severely abused and neglected.
Me too - did you know her name was Susan?
Montessori and the unfortunate instances of feral children helped linguists come up with the "sensitive period" for language learning, which is about 3 years. If a child is not exposed to a language within that period they will be severely impaired or language will not develop it at all, proving there is no "innate" language.
I personally believe that if the Forbidden expirement were done, the subjects would invent their own language to speak among each other.
Yes, it reminds me of twins who create their own 'secret' language. Twinspeak.
Yeah. Just like deaf people create sign language eventually. It's also quick like 1-2 generations to create a language.
Kudos to Psamtik for at last being cool enough to change his hypothesis and decide that Phrygian must be older
Ever heard of Genie Wiley?
Her case was a part of my Health and Social Care A-level spec.
Deprived to a single room for her entire childhood, until around 10-12 years old was she was found. Her language was restraint to only nouns.
We already have had millions of LDEs throughout history- They're called "Profoundly deaf children reared by hearing parents who believe fanatically in oralism". Thankfully, due a a greater acceptance of sign language and better amplification techniques these experiments have become far rarer.
There was no common sign language in Nicaragua, but when some schools for deaf children were set up, the children who attended them developed their own sign language without any help from teachers. For more info, look up Nicaraguan Sign Language in Wikipedia. To be fair, they were teenagers and had their own home sign systems among family and friends. You should also read the article on Home sign - a system of communication "often invented spontaneously by a deaf child who lacks accessible linguistic input."
I'm very sceptical of the human ability to carry out such an experiment effectively.
Suppose you're tasked with raising children in the experiment. You'll need to let them know when you're feeding them, when it's time for bed, and when they should stop misbehaving. You're going to want to teach the child(ren) how to use the toilet.
If you start using gestures, congratulations, you've just assigned meaning to gestures, and the child will be on its way to developing some kind of sign language.
I was reading some comments. and i don't think children develop sign language unless it's a big group of them.
Or you could just follow development of children born deaf and possibly blind. As for the trauma, seems like the Hellen Keller story might have some clues.
Helen Keller was not exactly traumatized and certainly by no means deprived of communication, even she couldn't speak or hear. She is a fabulous example of how the human brain is capable of learning many different forms of language and communication, provided the right care during those early formative years.
Language deprivation is something that actually happened to deaf children in most of history. It's why the word 'dumb' gets its second meaning of stupid after the original meaning unable to speak or silent. Until sign language was developed by kids who were put into special schools for the deaf children (set up in the 19th century). Missing out on that critical period of language exposure actually inhibited the development of the brain.
Deaf kids raised by hearing parents before proper sign languages were developed worked out some basic gestures for simple, functional communication. But until there was a community of people for whom sign language was their mother tongue these gestures didn't form a proper language with real linguistic structure. It really proves the idea from 1984 that it's extremely difficult to think of something you don't have a word for.
a feral children language video sounds great!
Forbidden? Language? Experiments? You got me
This is unfortunately something that happens with a lot of deaf kids, namely in poorer countries. Especially when people think sign language isn’t beneficial 🙃
"People want to do this for the same reason they do any other experiment:" For the lulz?
I love how often this man says atoll in a video about language.
You might think it's not about language atoll, but some special kind of island
I would love to see a feral children based video from you! I think it is such an interesting topic
Nice job Pat 💜 the feral video sounds fascinating too. Keep up the amazing work ☺️
A related subject would be the languages identical twins sometimes created between them but they are raised in a language of some kind.
Oh please do make the vid about feral kids. I am fascinated by the story of Marina Chapman who was raised by Capuchin monkeys. Capuchins have recently been found to have a 3000 year archaeological history of changing stone tool use so there is a lot happening in that 65g of brain.
I wouldn't have started watching Friends but for Marcel.
Somwhere in colombia, at 2010, a man "raised" 5 kids as cavemen... the oldest among them was 12. none of them knew any language. search for "niños de las cavernas de Turmequé" (caveboys from Turmequé) if your want to know more about it.
Look into the development of sign language in Nicaraguan schools for the deaf on the 1980s. An example of a language to spontaneously development among children. Likely the only one known to exist. It's a fascinating story.
anybody born deaf is surely deprived of language. they still possess an intrinsic instinct to communicate and will develop their own methods of doing so
I am curious about another language experiment. What if you have few mute nurses, that do understand multiple spoken languages and large number of talking nurses, who each understand only their own and different language. Then each day have different pair of mute and speaking nurse. The children are encouraged to develope their language and nurses too try to learn it.
People aren't ready for the truth that kids left alone to develop language together would probably speak something like the uwu conlang. Lots of vowels and short words. Very tonal. Very contextual
I'm quite surprised that Nazis didn't do an experiment like this
Mulder: I was raised without language, Agent Scully. Look how normal I grew up!
There is no way any ethics board in any establishment would sign off on that. Basically it would take a drastic reduction in ethical thinking for this kind of experiment to actually go ahead.
The only way such an experiment can happen today is if its a case study. (Such as a single mother a great distance from society loses her ability to speak and gets found 10 years later, and in this situation i assume she and her kid would be using sign language of some kind, either official or improved by the pair)
The other option is the same as how we gathered very accurate and detailed frostbite knowledge, the Nazis take over a society and have 0 issues performing absolutely inhumane experiments on their chosen "sub human races". (Lets pray that a nazi equivalent group never rises again)
Experimentation always exists even thru languages
These experiments are necessary. The question asked is too important to not be answered.
I would want this experiment but not for language. I want to know what someone would act like if kept away from society
...wait, why'd you turn off the comments on your latest video? Just curious.
Edit: Nevermind, it was TH-cam themselves due to the fact that the video features children
What about the Nicaraguan Sign Language? Isn't that an example of a language created from scratch by children in isolation?
I think it’s pretty hard to take Salimbene’s portrayal of Frederick II and his alleged human experiments at face value.
One thing to be aware of is that Frederick was constantly at odds with the Pope for political reasons, with Emperor and Pope struggling for control of the Italian peninsula. Frederick at one point expelled the Franciscans (the order to which Salimbene belonged) from Lombardy, and Frederick for his part was excommunicated three times.
This meant that church historians had every reason to make him look as bad as possible, and I could easily believe that the stories of Frederick’s evil experiments were entirely fabricated.
Genie was one of the children that this is has been done to. Poor girl :(
Tbh. I feel like if we built our society around care and support instead of competition and individualism, we could actually do this experiment without it ruining someone's life.
A care taker who is allowed to use words the kids use. Sending regular footage of kids learning to communicate so a team can confirm what communication is being expressed and how to implement it without influencing too much
Some people would want to learn the language they came up with.
As long as they weren't going to hit "the end of the experiment" and suddenly be unable to "earn a living". I don't see why this kind of thing couldn't eventually be done
sounds like truman show
@@joda7129 lol how
@@GaasubaMeskhenet Because the kid will like just live in the experiment their whole life seperate from the world not even knowing about it
@@joda7129 how on earth would a lone person ever develop language? It would have to be a group
@@joda7129 and I definitely didn't say anything about it being their "whole life"
I wonder why the children’s nurses weren’t asked sing with humming or gibberish. I might be sick to wonder but I think a child could be healthy if raised with love and non linguistic song and exposure of crouds where people speak to each other but not to the children. I think they would create a language in that scenario because they would be socially nurtured and language would be modeled without specific linguistic features.
ahh 'heroditidus' 'the half right', he can always be trusted for "accurate information" with "no embellishments" or "entirely false information solely meant to make greece look good", such a "beacon" of "honesty" and "truth" there hasn't been since.
NAME EXPLAIN
I will like to learn about Wild Children.
Let's run a computer without its programming. This experiment ignores that we evolved alongside language.
12:57 Yes, a video on feral children would be appreciated.
8:50 the admiral? NM, it's a trap.
Isn't there any deaf children who hasn't ever been taught a sing language?
I don't think any of these were "traumatising" (except were the babies had to fend for themselves) but most of these were just kids being raised by someone mute which is not a bad thing. Are you saying mute people are bad parents? To clarify a real LDE would probably be traumatising because it would have to last for all of their lives and they would need to be isolated from everything, even body language, which might mean they would need to be raised by robots. But being raised by a mute nurse is way better then being in the orphans at the time.
Not exactly, people raised by mute parents still have contact with language, ASL still is a type of language! It just isn’t a spoken one for the matter.
And they have contact with books, movies, music etc. Kids by mute parents usually learn to communicate in ASL and in their mother tongue (if their parents wish to)
@@nyankati2178 that's why in opinion non of these stories are so bad. They may not hear spoken word but there is other ways to communicate, so there is no reason why it would be traumatising.
Great video as always! Missed opportunity to touch on the code of ethics though.
For a language to form there should pass multiple generations i think
Interesting.
Yes I do want a feral children video
I don't think LDE's will necessarily be damaging...
Just because the kids aren't exposed to languages doesn't mean they have to be taken away from their parents or have no interactions with adults.
If linguists wanted to do it in a human way, they'd collect kids who's parents died quickly after birth(so they weren't exposed enough to language), they could also use some of their children if their parters agree, and they could interact with those children without speaking, it's not that hard, if they really wanna be cautious they could put devices on their mouths that block sounds... This way no kid is "kidnapped", they all have emotional support available in the form of adults helping them and spending time with them, and because the expirament should be over by the time they're like 6 or 7 tops, they could teach them languages once the experiment ends, which will both be an experiment on its own and will prepare them to the real world, effectively making them normal people in every aspect by the time they're adults(not to mention being a part of this experiment could probably get them scholarships). They could also be adopted once they speak some language (or even before that if the researchers decided to adopt them)
"probably"
You didn't mention Nicaraguan Sign Language!
I've always heard this called the language of God experiments
The cruelest.
Judaism is not the oldest of the abrahamic religions Christianity is. Also Aramaic is the probably the closest to the language spoken in the Bible. Hebrew came from the Middle ages and was the derived from Aramaic, which to some degree still exists today with small Christian population in the Middle East who speak a form of Aramaic.
Am the exact thousandth. Lol nice
This experiment is awful. I think it can't be done no way.
The idea of a natural language is stupid. Theres some general things that are true, but there isnt gonna be an entire language natural to humans.
699 likes lol
Think of the children
I like your videos. I do not like this one as much. You should go into more detail and be more specific.
Man I would love to se an experiment like this take place. What if we give them a lot of money when they grow up for compensation for linguistic damage🤔🤔
wtf
@@ZachStarAttack my mind is twisted and i would like to see an expiremint like this happen.
Why would they want money if they dont have the concept of capitalism since they grew up removed from society? That would be the same as giving them a bunch of twigs or shiny rocks for all they care
……uhhh
@@ZachStarAttack can’t believe “wtf” got the same amount of likes as my initial post?🤔
Remember Fauci's language deprivation experiment of 2020 and 2021?