IMEC 2023 DAY 1: Tom Campbell - The Mandela Effect - Natural Artifact of the Nature of Consciousness

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 47

  • @CynthiaSueLarson
    @CynthiaSueLarson ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Thanks for watching and sharing and commenting on this presentation by Tom Campbell! I especially love how he shares some reports of some very credible people telling him about being teleported to safety, and how Tom shares his first-hand experience with four-way nasal spray changing--rather inexplicably!

    • @natashapope3785
      @natashapope3785 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Something is happening Cynthia????Big!❤

  • @monterock6726
    @monterock6726 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This was a wonderful presentation!
    I first came across one of Tom's presentations (a 3 hour presentation) back in 2010. As I was listening to what he had to say I was thinking to myself, "Man, this guy is one dry speaker!" However, dry as his presentation was, the material he was presenting I found to be riveting! What I heard in those 3 hrs dramatically adjusted my process of thinking. One example of that is that I started handling incoming information in a different manner. Instead, of either rejecting it or accepting it I assigned it a percentage of probability and posted it on my mental sliding scale of probability. As additional info comes in re a certain bit of information it's % of probability is adjusted accordingly.
    In 2012 I began reading, studying and applying the teachings of A Course in Miracles. Everything that Tom is saying is also found in the ACIM teachings. It's the same content only presented in a different form. For example, Tom shares several stories that demonstrate a larger "System" is putting data into one's data stream that defies the person's idea of reality in order to open the person's mind up to greater possibilities. In ACIM this would be described as the illusory Holy Spirit, which is invisible to form, informing form that there is something more than form.

  • @fionacrowe9216
    @fionacrowe9216 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    It’s so great to see Tom Campbell’s talk here. Thanks so much for sharing!
    I wonder if we may be seeing more of these Psy phenomena including the mandela effect because the traditional route to becoming love (ie. Religion)has fallen out of fashion.

  • @ReikiMedium333
    @ReikiMedium333 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Shared and Thanks the pieces are starting to fit together for me now.

  • @johnnada.
    @johnnada. ปีที่แล้ว +1

    22:47 the new paradigm is laid out
    this seems to avoid questions of causation and creation itself

    • @johnnada.
      @johnnada. ปีที่แล้ว +1

      this necessity for survival of a larger consciousness system through a medium of matter is where it falls short - it isn’t clear why this system would need individual humans to role play on a material plane

    • @yo3429
      @yo3429 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@johnnada. What about fractal growth? It needs to start somewhere, also the outcome can vary and add valuable information in later states.

    • @johnnada.
      @johnnada. ปีที่แล้ว

      @@yo3429 my immediate thought is that it’s a principle, therefore not dependent on matter even though it’s applicable - I think the tendency to stay anchored in materialism is the issue that ME/retroactive continuity is here to show us - it’s not that “nothing is real”, and it’s not about manifesting some material preference by way of will power, I think it’s pointing to a higher understanding of substance and vision

    • @yo3429
      @yo3429 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@johnnada. plausible

  • @natashapope3785
    @natashapope3785 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you Tom. I know what would do it maybe but cant share it yet. 🎉❤

  • @bferrell1797
    @bferrell1797 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Interesting theory.

  • @elliebrooks3611
    @elliebrooks3611 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I’ve been reading and looking at Bob Monroe and My Big Toe and this is an important accomplishment in the journey, it really fits in the associative synaptic connections of the journey towards clarity! (A mouthful, a word salad). Well Tom, information, perhaps many parallel lives, retrocausality? Changes in the fabric of one reality because of attention on the holographic nature by more people? How does a celebrity have a name change? Or can two memories of the same event from two or more lives become juxtaposed and a new event is created? Love to hear your thought on the big five: WHO, WHAT, WHERE, WHEN, and gee, what’s the last one?

    • @robriceridge
      @robriceridge ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Your comment on how are celebrity names changing and my theory is that not everyone shifts/shifted,maybe because of individual vibration frequency.That would explain the difference in names as we are the interlopers who remember a name spelled another way and they've never known any other.

    • @johnnada.
      @johnnada. ปีที่แล้ว

      @@robriceridge what about “residue” or evidence that confirms memories that don’t appear to be the current reality?

    • @robriceridge
      @robriceridge ปีที่แล้ว

      @@johnnada. When you mix,say, oil and water you get an uneven distribution of the two and I'd use this analogy to the M.E where two realities are artificially smashed together,one dominant and the other still showing vague vestiges,or 'residue' from the perhaps violent-in-quantum- terms collision of it's prior reality.That's my best guess at the moment.Thanks.

    • @johnnada.
      @johnnada. ปีที่แล้ว

      @@robriceridge very interesting way of looking at it

    • @johnnada.
      @johnnada. ปีที่แล้ว

      “two or more” (Matt. 18:11) creating a new event… makes me wonder if there have been examples of more than two changes to any effect - for example, truth #1 is the memory of Mark Hamil and truth #2 is the existence of Mark Hamill - there are now two versions if evidence is considered as valid as the current reality - have there ever been more than two? Rodin’s Thinker has changed more than once…

  • @chris123457839
    @chris123457839 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Tom is an international treasure. A true pioneer.

  • @dawnbern2917
    @dawnbern2917 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I certainly appreciate Tom's participation, although I'm not sure what I got out of it. He seemed to slap a lot of different labels on things, the biggest in my mind was his label of the "Larger Consciousness System," which I can't distinguish from our more common terms of God, the Great Dow, Source, The All Etc. I take great issue with his definition of "consciousness" being "awareness with a choice." The 'choice' part sounds like 'free will' to me. Yeah, he speaks of this as fact as well as many other things, where my 'truth bell' just did not ring. If he's really defining free will as consciousness, then he's leaving out another category of consciousness, which I could perhaps describe as wilded consciousness, like that of the birds outside your window... they cannot choose, there is no right and wrong for them, some say they are one with God.

    • @yo3429
      @yo3429 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, LCS is the 'neutral' form of God/All, and surely animals got a choice ... where to go, what to eat and much more. In other ways they are hard wired, more NPC like, like we are in some things.

    • @monterock6726
      @monterock6726 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      All symbols, words , and concepts are but pointers to that which IS beyond symbols, words, and concepts. That which is beyond definition, description or explanation. In the illusory condition of being human, being a person, we can and often do form deep attachments to symbols, words, and concepts. So much so that our attachments blind us to seeing beyond the form to the content being pointed to.

    • @dawnbern2917
      @dawnbern2917 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@monterock6726 Sure, so now we've added to the inherent confusion around symbols.

  • @olivier3847
    @olivier3847 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    jay essex explained 'mandela effect' in his latest video

  • @davidhaith1725
    @davidhaith1725 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    He didn't answer the question of the guy who asked why the ME is seemingly recent and not reported throughout history. And the same guy exampled meeting someone at a party and the ME over his name.
    But if in this case somebody had been running a voice recorder so he could consult this - what would it evidence? Would it say John or Jim and settle the issue or would the recording change the scenario so there would be no ME created at all?
    Generally I thought that Tom with his minor explanations was like a |UFO researcher suggesting birds or swamp gas to cover anomalies. It's not those causes we are concerned with - just the paranormal primary one which Tom should have focused on completely.
    And like in the UFO research field which is my bag, his views seemed to reflect those of researcher Grant Cameron that he calls the 'wow factor'. He posits that weird stuff happens to grab our attention and move us along to greater enlightenment - which is very similar to Tom's view

    • @monterock6726
      @monterock6726 ปีที่แล้ว

      It sounds like you might have the ME figured out and Tom's big T.O.E. is coming up short to your own.

  • @rickyshaw5560
    @rickyshaw5560 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    God put a code in everything that bear whittness to His ever Omni Presence throughout all of creation, when these thing's happen, He's Saying I Am The Alpha & The Omega, Before Abraham I Am!

    • @yo3429
      @yo3429 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's easy, yes. Another example: We tell children 'god (LCS) sees everything', most people don't get it that it's the pure truth.

  • @robriceridge
    @robriceridge ปีที่แล้ว

    If you leave your home and slip on something on your porch your first instinct would be to look at where your feet were and decipher the cause of them moving beyond your control.I liken the M.E to this scenario where if you look for the cause you might find a banana peel but if you find nothing at all and can't attribute it to ice in the summer nor a visible spill then your mind would shift to what other choices could possibly be available.For an inexplicable occurance you must obviously look for hidden reasons.Without going into theory as I've posted before,I'll simply state one seemingly innocuous term...coincidence.The onset of the M.E. anomalies timeline concurs with the beginning of the LHC particle experiments.That's where my 'outside the box'thinking takes me.

    • @monterock6726
      @monterock6726 ปีที่แล้ว

      In my belief system there is no such thing as coincidence.

  • @joycebox5869
    @joycebox5869 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Volume is to low.

  • @JeremyHelm
    @JeremyHelm 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    19:52 what makes a good hypothesis

    • @JeremyHelm
      @JeremyHelm 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      23:52 of individuals in a consciousness system

    • @JeremyHelm
      @JeremyHelm 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      29:13 categories & peanut gallery commentary?

  • @natashapope3785
    @natashapope3785 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It would be good to take "the princess frog with the golden crown " out of the pocket???

  • @joycebox5869
    @joycebox5869 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What happened to the live chat? Lol, it just disappeared 😮

    • @CynthiaSueLarson
      @CynthiaSueLarson ปีที่แล้ว

      Check again... it's still live right now.... last few minutes for this premiere! Thanks for joining us and chatting with us!

  • @laurataylor7103
    @laurataylor7103 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Darn.... so hard to hear him.

  • @jamham888
    @jamham888 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Mandela effect happens when more than a few people are incorrect in the same way about something factual. That can happen because its a possibility, people are not all that intelligent and/or the human memory is not always absolutely perfect. Thats how it seems.

    • @ME-im3ui
      @ME-im3ui 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not it's not. It's an unknown (possibly man made) force that has changed past and present on a quantum level.

    • @jamham888
      @jamham888 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Oh yeah

  • @sunset4ever29
    @sunset4ever29 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    He is trying to make sense of something he doesn't understand. He is brilliantly intelligent, but he doesn't understand the effect any more than the flat-out deniers do.

    • @dawnbern2917
      @dawnbern2917 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yep I was thinking the same thing, thank you!

    • @monterock6726
      @monterock6726 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Well, duh. Of course he's doing that! The individual that doesn't try to make sense out of what he doesn't understand is an individual that is imprisoned in the status quo. Are you not here trying to make sense out of what you don't understand?

  • @natashapope3785
    @natashapope3785 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    😂😂😂