I too just started using it and the CPU hit for me is 30% for just one which is insane. Used in on the drums. Then I added the New EV2 to the empty slot and wow sounds amazing.
I purchased and used this one on a brass band mix and I agree with what you say. I like very much the brainworks SSL 4000 better (for THD, EQ, CPU usage, gain compensation). The only bad point of the BX one is the dynamic section (in my opinion). The one from ClaMixHub is way better (compressor and expander). Working with bucket view is very convenient in my opinion on mixes that involve multimicing. Convenient for High/Low pass and phase flip in context and simultaneously in the same window, stage by stage. This is the point that made me buy this thing and after 2 days, I am pleased buy this purchase. Would mostly hope for : -CPU improvement (oversampling or not for example) -Track number in buckets (would go with a plugin resize function -Gain difference display introduced by the plugin in output section
The CPU is pretty much a non-issue when it comes to the new generation of computers. I believe they have fixed the "plugin track naming" issue...or at least in ProTools it works just fine. Also Waves plugins can now be resized. I mean...the graphics don't get better...but you can resize it to make it fit your screen better. You're right. Having the ability to use Pan, Mute, Solo, Record, and Send Level Knobs from within the plugin would be nice...but I don't think its possible with any VST plugins. I have never been able to mute a DAW track from within ANY Vst plugin...maybe they could add like a internal mute button...but it wouldn't be able to mute any tracks this plugin wasn't on...when you try to solo a set of tracks that do have these plugins on it...those tracks without this plugin would still play. Keep in mind even in the Stereo version of the Pan...its still doing it internally in the plugin...rather than controlling your pan knobs in the DAW. Overall...you have to realize this is on sale for $35 for 99% of the year...while SSL console...or the controllers...costs $$$$$. If you buy the SSL fader controllers + EQ controller...you are spending well over $2000 for just controllers...and you need at least $40k to even think about buying an SSL console. Yes those are better...but for $35...this ain't bad.
Thanks for such a thorough and thoughtful review. One of my initial thoughts when first hearing about this plugin were to wonder how it compares to the brainworx SSL models, so thanks for addressing that. Harrison Mixbus too, which avoids a lot of the pitfalls you mention (w/r/t monitoring, panning, etc) by incorporating this style of console emulation into the DAW itself. This new CLA seems a bit clunky as an alternative, but more than anything I'm happy to see other plugin manufacturers embracing this kind of workflow where you're tweaking multiple tracks at once. Despite its faults, I can definitely see this being a great asset and time saver for lots of mixers.
Right, the plugin is not unusable and I'm sure many will incorporate it into their workflow. I think the CPU consumption will be the biggest issue for those who really want to use the plugin across all tracks as intended.
Ya, great for groups of 8 but for many of my tracks I have to modify into 2 or 3 buckets for a kit, specifically; or vox/BVs. I try to use it where it makes the most sense per these limits. The single additional insert is great as I have pretty much every Waves plugin, but it would be great to see 16 sized buckets, min for these issues, reducing this limitation. Analog aspects also are Pros.
Your gripes are legit. But I've seen if you have two buckets, you could open 1 plugin window for 1 bucket and another plugin window the another bucket, and put them side by side. The other thing about not having everything in the plugin is that either way most of us would have to go back to the daw because we don't only use waves plugins. That said, in your window for example, you could open two mixhub windows above your daw mixer, your tracks are also labelled there, and if you hit mute/solo or pan, your mixhub windows don't disappear, so it's much easier to go from one to another. In your video, the mute/solo is literally right below the plugin window, no?
Thanks for watching. Your suggestion seems like a logical solution for working with 16 tracks, and if your tracks are all closely grouped with no busses/aux tracks in between you can access them all without scrolling if you have the screen real estate. But if you have several busses that separate tracks, or if you're trying to compare tracks that are not close together in your DAW mixer, you still have to scroll and find them in your DAW. It's not a major issue, but it would have been easier for the workflow they are implying, especially as they've included a fader, polarity inversion, and pan for stereo channels. I understand that most mixers will not only use Waves plugins, but the idea of having input saturation, EQ, dynamics, and an extra plugin slot included here implies a workflow that stays within this plugin. If you have several other Waves plugins, you could easily mix an entire song from within the framework of the CLA plug, so why not complete the package and include mono pan, solo and mute? Either way, the biggest issue by far is the CPU consumption. It's just too CPU intensive to be useful for large sessions.
Just bought it for the channel strip. i honestly thought it would be a little better. Maybe for vocal recording but it really doesnt do too much for me
i want to ask one important question. Once you are done with all the mixing and want to render the stems. Will the Ableton render setting of 'All Individual Tracks' render each track through the CLA Mixhub settings for that track done in bucket view? OR only the MASTER track will reflect the changes you've done to your mixdown? Imagine mixing vocals in 1 bucket using mixhub and you want to render each vocal stem(main,adlibs,chorus etc) after the mixing is done so that you can send it over for remixes to other artists. Will this work or you will have to render the entire bucket only?
You should be able to render/bounce individual tracks as usual. The bucket view is just a visual placeholder, while the actual processing is being handled on each individual track.
It's worth it for the sound. Better than the Waves SSL and the BX. I spent some time with them, comparing and CLA's board won. (go figure). The HUGE bonus is just to bypass the dynamics section to throw in something better.
Ok you made a point of track counts being in the 100s...first of all CLA himself gets sessions that do have large track counts however what he does is condenses it down to 40 or so faders ..This plugin supports more than even he uses on his console so 64 is more than enough! You would deal with this plugin in the same way you would with a console when your tracks exceeded the number of faders you have.
I just my own extensive review of this Plugin and what I say is that if they was able to bring over pan view into the output view ...place a small panner there that would be great Trim is not as vital there as panning would be! CLA lets not forget that on your desk you do have a pan knob close to your faders..the trim knobs are located far away from the fader as they should be!
It's just a drum loop. Not sure if the reverb was put on it before I got it, or if the loop came that way. The only processing I used in the video was MixHub.
People are missing the point of this plug in entirely. It's an emulation of CLA's console! It's not just a workflow plug in, it also sounds amazing. You can just put this plugin on your tracks, not tweak a single knob and it will instantly sound better. If you know how to work an SSL console you are gonna love it. I bought it for $39 and I would pay that just for the 1176 and console emulation sound alone. You can't even buy an SSL compressor, 1176 comp, SSL channel strip for this price. It's a no brainier. They also make a LiTe version for people who have crappy computers. So the CPU is dramatically improved. I have used it on an entire song that I also used many other plugins on.... It worked flawlessly. It definitely sounds like a desk. Not a plugin.
I never argued against the quality of the sound - it definitely sounds good. I also did this video before they made a CPU lite version. But when time is money, workflow is important and shouldn't be disregarded. But if it works for you, great!
I mixed a rock song this past week with this on every channel. 256 buffer on a PCIe RME RayDat card. There were 40 instances total. with my 3 verbs (True Verb, Ren Verb and TSAR 1) plus two instances of EchoBoy, I only hit 78-80% CPU i5 3.6Ghz Quad. Win10 in PT 2019.5 running 48/24...Master Bus had DDMF EQ, BX Townsend Bus Comp, Soft Tube Tape. Sounded great.
Wish I saw this video prior to my knee-jerk impulse purchase of the plugin. I do use Studio One (version 2, so who know's if it will play nice at all). I have yet to try it.
100% on the cons. Spent time recently trying to see the value of this. Great idea in principle but every one of the cons yu highlight impedes practicality within a mix. The cpu factor is immense……forget using on a whole mix….if yu really want to use bring your tracks into 8 busses and work it that way…..so that max instantiation might be 9 (one on master or submix)
Demoing the lite version...idk...I'm no waves fan at all but I like it. The bass is tight(gripe about bx imo) and I personally prefer it over bx right now...the mids sound good and the comps work.
Many daw controllers only offer 8 tracks of control at a time. Knowing this the 8 track per bucket could lend it's self to that type of work flow. Just a thought I had while watching this. Cheers!
@@GreenLightSound yeah i can't mix a 15 20 tracks with Mix Hub in studio one 4 but in protools using 10 giga of ram i did mix a 32 tracks project with 4 verbs and some buss processing.Of course it was just a performance test and in a true mix scenario i have to choose some priorities to use mix hub .Anyway your video was really nice and right to the point.
Green Light Sound Have a 2013 12 core MacPro (HDX) and I’m managing a full mix, between 40 and 50 tracks with pretty much a plug in every channel. The bucket views are sweet but the real plus for me is the sound itself. Closest to a real console as I’ve gotten with a plug. If I run low on CPU maybe I’ll get the brainworx as well, but so far so good. I think it’s worth the price just for the mic/line gains.
The also should have it so when you in bucket view messing with any eqs or dynamics, what ever knob your mouse touches; that would be the selected track thats revealed once you return to channel view! This way whatever the last channel you was eq ing or whatever would also be the selected channel for Channel view! Right now channel view seems lock to whatever channel is selected on the Daw which yeah makes sense...however when you use the plugin and are in bucket view you end up dealing with more than one channel, so why not follow this work flow and whatever the last channel that was being addressed would be the one in the channel view focus instead of having to go back to the daw and select channel you was dealing with in bucket view! The problem is channel view is the only view that shows a pan knob and only if you are using a stereo plug in.... However the last time I checked an SSL with mono channels still have pan knobs and are still able to pan from left to right. So why no pan knob beats the hell out of me! Lastly give the option for full screen mode! I found myself using this plugin alot.. I go to one track and pull up a plugin and then leave that set and go to another track and pull up another plugin so I end up with 2 plugin windows that I can place both into bucket view and tell one view to show bucket 1 and the other bucket 2 thus forming what looks to be a console like view that can show 16 faders at once instead of 8 what they could do with full screen mode is allow a modifier key to be used to show 2 bucks at the same time forming the same 16 faders! They could use the same seperation indication of one bucket from the other while keeping both buckets showing this would allow the 2 buckets to show individual elements ( one bucket showing faders and the other side showing eq )! Doing the same thing that we can do now using 2 plugins ...do that but do it from one plugin Window!
Appreciate your info.... I will not be purchasing this plugin due to mainly the CPU usage. I usually have a high track counts in my mixes, especially for drums and horns....
I just ran this plugin on a Macbook air 2012 i5 1.8 4 gigs of ram and it ran 22 tracks pretty good not even using a audio interface but built in audio! What did send it over the top CPU wise was using the input section using the mic/ line options. Eq and Dynamics had little to no impact ...but the input section yes very much!
I had my own doubts, especially about the dynamics section, so i threw a shootout (th-cam.com/video/MMWKRdtWpNs/w-d-xo.html). The CLA MixHub sounds really good overall, and that may partially explain the CPU hit. I got to say that i love the bx_SSL4000 E EQ, but the dynamics section have room to improve. Nice review, cheers!
I tried this on a mix and it does sound really good but what tf goin on with the eq section..kills your cpu, had this on a kick with a bit of eq and compression and this thin was using 27%,jus for the kick..sort it out waves ffs!!
The CPU hit is the biggest issue for me. The other workflow quirks are minor, but you can't use the plugin as intended if your CPU is taking a hit like that.
What is so wrong with using 2 buckets of drums? DUH CLA would 16 faders at least for drums ( 2 Buckets ) He could take your existing modern session and mix it on his desk regardless of how ever many tracks you had! Folks need to seriously learn his method of working !
Just a drum beat? Hahahaha! Only the drum intro to the one of the most iconic songs of the 1960's, which Billboard named the #1 song on their "Greatest Girl Group Songs of All Time", which Rolling Stone Magazine ranked #22 on their list of the "500 Greatest Songs of All Time", and which Brian Wilson considers the greatest pop record ever made. No biggie. Who cares about the drummer, Hal Blaine, anyway?
Finally a real review and not a sponsered commercial
Thanks for this I needed to know if it ws cpu heavy.
Amazing tut and... Really, really love the "Be my baby" beat intro :-)
I too just started using it and the CPU hit for me is 30% for just one which is insane. Used in on the drums. Then I added the New EV2 to the empty slot and wow sounds amazing.
Very informative, excellent review.. hope WAVES sees this... Love Them!
They can and do better...
Damn, I have never wanted The Ronettes' "Be My Baby" to just start more in my entire life :p
I know. It's an iconic beat.
I purchased and used this one on a brass band mix and I agree with what you say. I like very much the brainworks SSL 4000 better (for THD, EQ, CPU usage, gain compensation).
The only bad point of the BX one is the dynamic section (in my opinion). The one from ClaMixHub is way better (compressor and expander).
Working with bucket view is very convenient in my opinion on mixes that involve multimicing. Convenient for High/Low pass and phase flip in context and simultaneously in the same window, stage by stage. This is the point that made me buy this thing and after 2 days, I am pleased buy this purchase.
Would mostly hope for :
-CPU improvement (oversampling or not for example)
-Track number in buckets (would go with a plugin resize function
-Gain difference display introduced by the plugin in output section
I'm glad you like it. It does have some nice features, and a few improvements could turn it into a great plugin for me.
The CPU is pretty much a non-issue when it comes to the new generation of computers.
I believe they have fixed the "plugin track naming" issue...or at least in ProTools it works just fine.
Also Waves plugins can now be resized. I mean...the graphics don't get better...but you can resize it to make it fit your screen better.
You're right. Having the ability to use Pan, Mute, Solo, Record, and Send Level Knobs from within the plugin would be nice...but I don't think its possible with any VST plugins. I have never been able to mute a DAW track from within ANY Vst plugin...maybe they could add like a internal mute button...but it wouldn't be able to mute any tracks this plugin wasn't on...when you try to solo a set of tracks that do have these plugins on it...those tracks without this plugin would still play. Keep in mind even in the Stereo version of the Pan...its still doing it internally in the plugin...rather than controlling your pan knobs in the DAW.
Overall...you have to realize this is on sale for $35 for 99% of the year...while SSL console...or the controllers...costs $$$$$. If you buy the SSL fader controllers + EQ controller...you are spending well over $2000 for just controllers...and you need at least $40k to even think about buying an SSL console. Yes those are better...but for $35...this ain't bad.
Thanks for such a thorough and thoughtful review. One of my initial thoughts when first hearing about this plugin were to wonder how it compares to the brainworx SSL models, so thanks for addressing that. Harrison Mixbus too, which avoids a lot of the pitfalls you mention (w/r/t monitoring, panning, etc) by incorporating this style of console emulation into the DAW itself. This new CLA seems a bit clunky as an alternative, but more than anything I'm happy to see other plugin manufacturers embracing this kind of workflow where you're tweaking multiple tracks at once. Despite its faults, I can definitely see this being a great asset and time saver for lots of mixers.
Right, the plugin is not unusable and I'm sure many will incorporate it into their workflow. I think the CPU consumption will be the biggest issue for those who really want to use the plugin across all tracks as intended.
Ya, great for groups of 8 but for many of my tracks I have to modify into 2 or 3 buckets for a kit, specifically; or vox/BVs. I try to use it where it makes the most sense per these limits. The single additional insert is great as I have pretty much every Waves plugin, but it would be great to see 16 sized buckets, min for these issues, reducing this limitation. Analog aspects also are Pros.
Your gripes are legit. But I've seen if you have two buckets, you could open 1 plugin window for 1 bucket and another plugin window the another bucket, and put them side by side.
The other thing about not having everything in the plugin is that either way most of us would have to go back to the daw because we don't only use waves plugins. That said, in your window for example, you could open two mixhub windows above your daw mixer, your tracks are also labelled there, and if you hit mute/solo or pan, your mixhub windows don't disappear, so it's much easier to go from one to another. In your video, the mute/solo is literally right below the plugin window, no?
Thanks for watching. Your suggestion seems like a logical solution for working with 16 tracks, and if your tracks are all closely grouped with no busses/aux tracks in between you can access them all without scrolling if you have the screen real estate. But if you have several busses that separate tracks, or if you're trying to compare tracks that are not close together in your DAW mixer, you still have to scroll and find them in your DAW. It's not a major issue, but it would have been easier for the workflow they are implying, especially as they've included a fader, polarity inversion, and pan for stereo channels.
I understand that most mixers will not only use Waves plugins, but the idea of having input saturation, EQ, dynamics, and an extra plugin slot included here implies a workflow that stays within this plugin. If you have several other Waves plugins, you could easily mix an entire song from within the framework of the CLA plug, so why not complete the package and include mono pan, solo and mute? Either way, the biggest issue by far is the CPU consumption. It's just too CPU intensive to be useful for large sessions.
Just bought it for the channel strip. i honestly thought it would be a little better. Maybe for vocal recording but it really doesnt do too much for me
i want to ask one important question. Once you are done with all the mixing and want to render the stems. Will the Ableton render setting of 'All Individual Tracks' render each track through the CLA Mixhub settings for that track done in bucket view? OR only the MASTER track will reflect the changes you've done to your mixdown?
Imagine mixing vocals in 1 bucket using mixhub and you want to render each vocal stem(main,adlibs,chorus etc) after the mixing is done so that you can send it over for remixes to other artists. Will this work or you will have to render the entire bucket only?
You should be able to render/bounce individual tracks as usual. The bucket view is just a visual placeholder, while the actual processing is being handled on each individual track.
@@GreenLightSound thanks man 🙏
It's worth it for the sound. Better than the Waves SSL and the BX. I spent some time with them, comparing and CLA's board won. (go figure). The HUGE bonus is just to bypass the dynamics section to throw in something better.
How's the CPU load for you?
At this point, I’d say most console modeled plugins are outdated now that tolerance modeling technology is in the bx console plugins.
Great, very informative & fair review! I was planning to pass on it anyway, but now I won't get it even at the inevitable $29 ;)
Thanks for watching!
Ok you made a point of track counts being in the 100s...first of all CLA himself gets sessions that do have large track counts however what he does is condenses it down to 40 or so faders ..This plugin supports more than even he uses on his console so 64 is more than enough! You would deal with this plugin in the same way you would with a console when your tracks exceeded the number of faders you have.
Great points. Thanks for the sharing!
Thanks for watching!
It's way too cpu heavy after trying out the demo. The bucket view doesn't even work with Waves Soundgrid.
Agreed. I think it's only useable on very small sessions, or if you have a monster CPU. Using all 64 tracks would cripple many systems.
I just my own extensive review of this Plugin and what I say is that if they was able to bring over pan view into the output view ...place a small panner there that would be great Trim is not as vital there as panning would be! CLA lets not forget that on your desk you do have a pan knob close to your faders..the trim knobs are located far away from the fader as they should be!
cool video, big help, thanks
Brilliant video . If I may ask, what even is on the kit ?
It's just a drum loop. Not sure if the reverb was put on it before I got it, or if the loop came that way. The only processing I used in the video was MixHub.
People are missing the point of this plug in entirely. It's an emulation of CLA's console! It's not just a workflow plug in, it also sounds amazing. You can just put this plugin on your tracks, not tweak a single knob and it will instantly sound better. If you know how to work an SSL console you are gonna love it. I bought it for $39 and I would pay that just for the 1176 and console emulation sound alone. You can't even buy an SSL compressor, 1176 comp, SSL channel strip for this price. It's a no brainier. They also make a LiTe version for people who have crappy computers. So the CPU is dramatically improved. I have used it on an entire song that I also used many other plugins on.... It worked flawlessly. It definitely sounds like a desk. Not a plugin.
I never argued against the quality of the sound - it definitely sounds good. I also did this video before they made a CPU lite version. But when time is money, workflow is important and shouldn't be disregarded. But if it works for you, great!
I mixed a rock song this past week with this on every channel. 256 buffer on a PCIe RME RayDat card. There were 40 instances total. with my 3 verbs (True Verb, Ren Verb and TSAR 1) plus two instances of EchoBoy, I only hit 78-80% CPU i5 3.6Ghz Quad. Win10 in PT 2019.5 running 48/24...Master Bus had DDMF EQ, BX Townsend Bus Comp, Soft Tube Tape. Sounded great.
Were you using the lite version? They released a CPU optimized version after I made the video. But I do agree, it sounds good.
Wish I saw this video prior to my knee-jerk impulse purchase of the plugin. I do use Studio One (version 2, so who know's if it will play nice at all). I have yet to try it.
The first session I tried it didn't copy any of the track names into the plugin, so it seems hit or miss. Hope it works for you.
Same here! Bought instantly. Wish I'd seen this first!
100% on the cons. Spent time recently trying to see the value of this. Great idea in principle but every one of the cons yu highlight impedes practicality within a mix. The cpu factor is immense……forget using on a whole mix….if yu really want to use bring your tracks into 8 busses and work it that way…..so that max instantiation might be 9 (one on master or submix)
Demoing the lite version...idk...I'm no waves fan at all but I like it. The bass is tight(gripe about bx imo) and I personally prefer it over bx right now...the mids sound good and the comps work.
It definitely sounds good. Most of my issues were about workflow and CPU load. The lite version came out after I made this video.
Many daw controllers only offer 8 tracks of control at a time. Knowing this the 8 track per bucket could lend it's self to that type of work flow. Just a thought I had while watching this. Cheers!
Good point. I wonder if you could assign the faders in Mixhub to a hardware controller.
Can't see any disadvantage on this beauty!!
Glad you like it. The CPU usage is the biggest disadvantage for me. The rest are just quirks you can work around. It does sound good!
@@GreenLightSound yeah i can't mix a 15 20 tracks with Mix Hub in studio one 4 but in protools using 10 giga of ram i did mix a 32 tracks project with 4 verbs and some buss processing.Of course it was just a performance test and in a true mix scenario i have to choose some priorities to use mix hub .Anyway your video was really nice and right to
the point.
Green Light Sound Have a 2013 12 core MacPro (HDX) and I’m managing a full mix, between 40 and 50 tracks with pretty much a plug in every channel. The bucket views are sweet but the real plus for me is the sound itself. Closest to a real console as I’ve gotten with a plug. If I run low on CPU maybe I’ll get the brainworx as well, but so far so good. I think it’s worth the price just for the mic/line gains.
@@raal007 Yeah the new lite version sounds ok too and i use bx in less priority things or ik briths channel if the cpu run low.
i agree
The also should have it so when you in bucket view messing with any eqs or dynamics, what ever knob your mouse touches; that would be the selected track thats revealed once you return to channel view! This way whatever the last channel you was eq ing or whatever would also be the selected channel for Channel view! Right now channel view seems lock to whatever channel is selected on the Daw which yeah makes sense...however when you use the plugin and are in bucket view you end up dealing with more than one channel, so why not follow this work flow and whatever the last channel that was being addressed would be the one in the channel view focus instead of having to go back to the daw and select channel you was dealing with in bucket view! The problem is channel view is the only view that shows a pan knob and only if you are using a stereo plug in.... However the last time I checked an SSL with mono channels still have pan knobs and are still able to pan from left to right. So why no pan knob beats the hell out of me! Lastly give the option for full screen mode! I found myself using this plugin alot.. I go to one track and pull up a plugin and then leave that set and go to another track and pull up another plugin so I end up with 2 plugin windows that I can place both into bucket view and tell one view to show bucket 1 and the other bucket 2 thus forming what looks to be a console like view that can show 16 faders at once instead of 8 what they could do with full screen mode is allow a modifier key to be used to show 2 bucks at the same time forming the same 16 faders! They could use the same seperation indication of one bucket from the other while keeping both buckets showing this would allow the 2 buckets to show individual elements ( one bucket showing faders and the other side showing eq )! Doing the same thing that we can do now using 2 plugins ...do that but do it from one plugin Window!
You make some good suggestions here.
Too heavy on cpu usage from my understanding.
It is for me.
Way too heavy, double of anything I use by Acustica Audio:(((
@@roberteismann1929 The question is, why would you even bother buying a Waves plugin if you own Acustica plugins ;)
it would have been better if they would have separated into separate plugin..
Appreciate your info.... I will not be purchasing this plugin due to mainly the CPU usage. I usually have a high track counts in my mixes, especially for drums and horns....
I just ran this plugin on a Macbook air 2012 i5 1.8 4 gigs of ram and it ran 22 tracks pretty good not even using a audio interface but built in audio! What did send it over the top CPU wise was using the input section using the mic/ line options. Eq and Dynamics had little to no impact ...but the input section yes very much!
They now have a lite version and its almost the same quality only 30 percent less cpu
Good to know. The CPU usage was the biggest drawback when this was first released.
Green Light Sound what CPU would be able to handle it normally
I had my own doubts, especially about the dynamics section, so i threw a shootout (th-cam.com/video/MMWKRdtWpNs/w-d-xo.html). The CLA MixHub sounds really good overall, and that may partially explain the CPU hit. I got to say that i love the bx_SSL4000 E EQ, but the dynamics section have room to improve. Nice review, cheers!
I tried this on a mix and it does sound really good but what tf goin on with the eq section..kills your cpu, had this on a kick with a bit of eq and compression and this thin was using 27%,jus for the kick..sort it out waves ffs!!
The CPU hit is the biggest issue for me. The other workflow quirks are minor, but you can't use the plugin as intended if your CPU is taking a hit like that.
Green Light Sound lets hope they sort it out in a future update cos this thing sounds so good but cpu killer
The CPU usage is a deal breaker for most home studios. What a dumb plugin. I love Sheps' Omni from Waves though. GOOD REVEIW.
it's not good enough for me.
What is so wrong with using 2 buckets of drums? DUH CLA would 16 faders at least for drums ( 2 Buckets ) He could take your existing modern session and mix it on his desk regardless of how ever many tracks you had! Folks need to seriously learn his method of working !
Just a drum beat? Hahahaha! Only the drum intro to the one of the most iconic songs of the 1960's, which Billboard named the #1 song on their "Greatest Girl Group Songs of All Time", which Rolling Stone Magazine ranked #22 on their list of the "500 Greatest Songs of All Time", and which Brian Wilson considers the greatest pop record ever made. No biggie. Who cares about the drummer, Hal Blaine, anyway?
Definitely an iconic beat, and often imitated. I'm a big Brian Wilson fan, and am aware of the influence the original song had on him.
@@GreenLightSound Cool. You are "in the know", and have fabulous taste! I'm a huge Brian fan too. Thanks for the review!
is the GUI now scaleable under v12?
It is.