ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ก.ย. 2024
- As a fan of the Snapchat Spectacles, I just had to try these out and see what they were like!
Matt Gray | mattg.co.uk | @MattGrayYes
Snapchat Spectacles: Matt's First Impressions:
• Snapchat Spectacles: M...
Ray Ban Stories:
www.ray-ban.co...
Follow me elsewhere on the internet:
/ mattgrayyes
/ mattgrayyes
/ mattgrayyes
/ mattgrayyes
/ mattgrayyes
My Music:
MattGrayYes.ban...
~Kit I Use Regularly~
Sony a6400 Camera: amzn.to/3rxLpwl
Sigma 16mm f1.4 lens: amzn.to/3tYYBvZ
Peak Design Cuff Wrist Strap: amzn.to/2PdKTXh
Røde Smartlav+ Mic: amzn.to/2H1CEVJ
Røde Wireless Go: amzn.to/3lY71kH
GoPro Hero 7 Black: amzn.to/2ACdQ4u
Sony RX100M2: amzn.to/2JcxQxt
DJI Osmo Pocket: amzn.to/31Q4hLm
iPhone 12 Mini: amzn.to/31m8VSw
Snapchat Spectacles (Circular video): amzn.to/2GQ6AXc
Tascam DR-10x Audio Recorder: amzn.to/2pXQZun
Røde NTG2 Mic: amzn.to/2GHS3gi
Røde Videomic Go: amzn.to/3m1jQKP
All Amazon links are affiliate links which give me a small percentage of what you pay them as a tip for sending you their way. It doesn't cost you more.
What do you think of these? Do you want to get them?
Not sure about the Facebook connection and if I'll like them as much as just getting the Spyware glasses with the hidden camera
No! Facebook!
Facebook = No.
Don't film anyway, and the Facebook connection makes me uneasy
If facebook is involved, the answer is immediately 'no'.
I love how they advertise these with: "Capture the world as you see it". Because as everyone knows, the human field of view is about 50° and SQUARE 🤦♂️
gdhfhgh lovely
Well, the photos were wider
engineering wise it's not possible. an ultrawide would be soft when croped in...........unless they made it 4k/ or even 8k..........however than the glasses would need a bigger processor that generates more heat and needs a bigger battery......which further increases weight and cost (perhaps even a slightly larger camera lens). also wide angle would make them more complicated to use (as you may need to edit/crop videos.....which I think goes against there simplistic nature),,,,,,,,,,,,as for the existing crop, that is likely there so they can image stabilize thevideo (as stabilisatoion the image). Me personally, I have no interest, I would rather use my phone or just buy a new go pro if I want that.......but for sunn-Glasses, there are reasons they stuck with that narrow angle
@@legendp2011 I agree, but that is not the point I'm trying to make. My problem ist not that the hardware doesn't match the human FoV, but that the marketing doesn't match the hardware...
@@jullit31 How does it not match the hardware? You're capturing the world as you see it, being cropped hardly affects it at all.
smaller fov, basically the same resolution and still a missed opportunity for stereo cameras(which could be used in theory for either stereoscopic 3d or stitching the two together for a larger image. I'm probably the only one who thinks a whole other camera is a reasonable cost/value-added solution, though). Presumably the entire cost, or close to it, over the snapchat ones has come from the Ray-Ban brand. The quality of the camera would be easily forgivable if the fov wasn't so tight, which is probably the largest issue I have with them.
The connection to Facebook is a bit fishy but I guess they'll be great for the prawn industry
So these will be "Nifty Shades of Matt Gray"?
heh
If there was no connection to Facebook, they’d be a decent product. As it is though…
Even then...no
All it does is let you send photos and videos to an app which lets you post to facebook. its not as scary as yall make it out to be liol
i'm 100% convinced this is just facebooks way of finding out what IRL adverts people look at combined with yet another app to harvest information about you and your spending habits
Fyi, Facebook doesn't like it when you create another account, so consider creating a fake name with a, fake face from something like thispersondoesnotexist or something familiar
Bearing in mind just how many adverts and spammy posts there are on Facebook for "genuine" rayban knockoffs, rayban actually teaming up with Facebook is a ballsy move
you look dashing in those ray bans Matt.
He was riding a bike, not dashing. :P
The built-in speakers don't block the surrounding sounds, which can be an advantage in certain situations. For example, you can listen to music while riding a bike and you don't need to worry about not hearing the traffic around you.
Oh my god you were exactly who I thought about when I heard the news!
Honestly the narrower FOV of the new ones is the bigger issue, unless there is a way to get the raw video I'm not sure it is something I would ever want to use
I don't wear sunglasses, use facebook, or have any interest in filming but this still somehow held my attention for a quarter hour and was delightful throughout. I don't understand but I'm impressed 😅
Thanks for the video!
Wait you gotta pay over 300 pounds AND you gotta have a bunch of facebook spyware on your face?
So two monopolies: Luxottica (Arnette, Luxottica, Oakley, Ray Ban, various retail brands, various licensed brands), and Facebook (Facebook, WhatsApp, Instagram, ...) made a paid of glasses with a camera
I think regardless of the product I'd still be uncomfortable providing a Facebook product direct video from my face.
Fortunately the price to quality ratio simply doesn't cut it for my bias against Facebook to ever be an issue, it's nice, but the video still doesn't feel professional quality. Trust RB to make them look nice though :P
“I can’t be bothered.” - Every British Person
No! - some of us can't be _arsed._
The quality looks amazing! I'm actually very surprised you thought differently. I could clearly make out all the words on nearby cars and buildings. For such a small camera, it gives you plenty of quality you need, its just not cinema level quality I guess.
Matt Gray is back!
As a former bike mechanic I was going to bleat at you to “do the maintenance” but then I saw it’s one of those awful bike-share scheme squeal-and scrape-machines.
That chain sounds like it could _really_ use some oil :s
Cheapest camera unit possible it seems. It's the same all those knock off action cameras use. You know the type, those who have fake 5cm lenses on them while the actual lens is like 3mm in size.
I really wanted a pair of these, but the fact Facebook is involved in them massively puts me off but I was still considering getting a pair, but the video aspect is really disappointing to me! I was hoping for at least 1080p so I can use them in my videos and have it match my footage from my main cameras. I don’t think I’ll be getting a pair now :( nice video dude :) I enjoyed it
I wonder how long the batteries last? It is what I am most skeptical with such gadgets, like they are done after an hour or so.
Still waiting for a wearable with good binaural microphones... Google's Glass seemingly got the weight distribution right by canelevering the battery way out back behind the user's ear.
I definitely prefer my non "smart" Ray-bans no Facebook in there. (Also they have cool green lenses, mine might have cost more tho 🤫)
@@LeafTheWitch I prefer my wide-brimmed hat.
@@LeafTheWitch as someone who rocked a £10 pair of Amazon special sunglasses for years. You definitely get what you pay for.
Duude u look like David Dobrik and I mistakenly watched ur video
those could use an elastic band to go around your neck to prevent dropping considering it's price, but oh well, probably par for the course for tech accessories.
I do want glasses with both speakers and a camera in them that don't look like they were given away to children at some convention, but the facebook integration sounds like a dealbreaker. Can you use these without fb's spyware?
I'd like a pair of video glasses that either have a central wide angle camera or better yet two cameras with image stitching for a full 220 degree field of view.
It felt SO WEIRD for me looking at you cycling on the left side of the road
These are Snapchat spectacles, owned by Facebook, and owned by Luxottica, the incredibly monopolistic parent company of Ray-Ban, not only are you getting farmed for data by Facebook, but you end up giving money to a facewear manufacturer that not only owns the production of $300 facewear that costs $30 to make, but also owns the stores that these glasses are sold at. Abso-fuckin-lutely not.
Luxottica is odd, as it doesn't seem like a market that one company can force a monopoly in. (They're even more of a monopoly now; they've merged with a major French company.)
Glasses are insanely lucrative. Profit margins are always above 100%.
@@BanterEdits makes sense considering many people need glasses to even consider doing anything in their life.
@@BanterEdits you can't have profit margins above 100%
I really tried to pay attention to the video but got distracted by out of context 7 string guitar.
Is it weird that my main thought about this is that it would be perfect for a victim recording a crime. Like if the light can be turned off. The ability to just one tap start recording might be the difference between catching a criminal and them getting away.
Not weird at all ;)
Nah, a proper tat reviewer would have cut to a view of a brown sofa, doing the review while reaching around the camera.
Reject top-down, embrace sofa.
GREAT VIDEO! So far the BEST video reviewing Ray Ban video glasses found on TH-cam
thanks for trying these for all of us, because none of us would
I am impressed with how tidy and organised those shelves are!
Just don't buy these. Ever. No point in giving money to both Facebook and Luxottica, as well as all that metadata data.
Thanks for buying these, now i know i don't need to
I'm thankful, you didn't call them "smart glasses". Xiaomi is soon producing real smart glasses. Would you test them, too?
Really would love to see his point of view on them and if they are good
Interesting comment about using “Hey ” as a wake word. It never seemed rude to me. Maybe it’s an American thing, but to me it’s just a casual way of getting attention or saying hi.
It’s equivalent to Oi! For me
I didn’t know these existed until this video, and luckily between similar reservations with Facebook and a meh product review for the price, I know I don’t want it. Thanks for giving these a go Matt!
I'd definitely be expecting better camera quality for £300.
These are cool but utterly useless for those of us that wear normal, prescription glasses. I could wear them but I would be able to see practically nothing beyond about 3 metres in front of me!
Actually I think they do them with prescription lenses
check their website, they offer prescription lenses
@@MattGrayYES Oh, really? I guess because you said you bought them in a physical shop I assumed they were just off the shelf products. That's good to know that they're thinking of us (minorly) ocularly challenged folk, I remember when 3D cinema was just getting going (remember when we all thought that was going to be the next big thing?) and trying to find a pair of 3D glasses that I could comfortably wear over my normal ones was a nightmare.
I immediately got so excited when I saw this notification. Always love your content 😍
The FOV is so low they are basically useless for video imo.
it looks to me like facebook is trying to level the video within the raw circle. While the snapticals let you export circular video, the facebook glasses seem to be rotating the circle to keep you level at the horizon. Would be very nice to turn that off and get the full wide angle, but still a very interesting implementation.
Matt please make more videos! I like your calm voice and I always smile when you smile so you would fill my day with joy :)
Your distrust of these corporations is well placed.
They do suit you.
1. I wonder how easy it would be to rip apart and MacGyver them onto your own sunglasses.
2. While playing music, how easy is it to hear the surroundings? I doubt they'll be useful for the commute.
3. What's on the side where the camera isn't?
1. Probably, pretty easy.
2. You can still hear the surroundingns.
3. All the circuitry, from what i know
FOV is too narrow, resolution of video isn't great. Photos look great, but I've got my phone for that. Won't be getting one myself, but they do look great.
13:50 - FTR my vision-correcting spectacles, which I wear all day when not asleep or in the shower, weight in at 33g. So those would be an extra 50% weight.
Thanks for the honest review. I was all excited until you put them on and it looked like you had a camera built into your sunglasses.
compared to bose wayfarer design they should have collaborated with ray ban for a more universal wearable format that the wayfarer ray ban stories by facebook which
are more appealing as fashionable glasses and most places won,t allow people to wear them in secure areas.
regardless of the manufacture it,ll be several years before they,re considered durable mainstream and useful for the general public.
hope that you got your money worth Matt! a happy reviewer none the less. enjoy them.
These are perfect for me.
I take impromptu story based video clips with them and I've been really happy with them.
I find them great for taking videos when I otherwise wouldn't.
The picture quality is adequate for sharing on social media etc, but they have their limitations and won't replace something like a DJI Pocket.
I don't use them for music or telephone calls, but ideal for taking short videos when I'm cycling in the city.
Wahey!
Are you also gonna do a review on the Xiaomi smart display glasses when they come out?
Did you ever get a newer model of the Snapchat Spectacles? I got a pair of Spectacles 2 and I've never had any issues with exporting.
Edit: Also, the link in the description is broken, Matt!
I too don't like putting everything about me into a corporate database for them to use it as they will. I've never even had a facebook account.
It's just Glasshole Mk2. Pretty frames solve nothing.
God these look so much better than both the original snapticals and the latest gen 3 version.
For me the a peak of something like this is to pair with a smart watch and leave my phone at home or in my car. The Apple watch does everything I need from my phone when I'm out calls texts, and podcasts/music, the only thing it’s missing is a camera.
For me this is competing with a compact digital camera like the Sony Rx100, the advantage should be that these are already out, so it should be much faster to take photos/videos but if they’re too heavy for constant wear then I have to get them out and put them on and in that time I could’ve got a regular camera out.
Great idea, and for creating FPV content I can see the appeal, but they’re definitely fighting with a GoPro head mount and not for regular use
Once You have tested them more How much video can You record before memory or battery is used up?
Definitely less noticeable than the snades
I'm the same. I just don't like. But every one around me calls me paranoid. I don't get why.
Matt Drip
Since it has two cameras does this mean that it can record 3D videos?
Can you watch those videos with the Oculus Quest (since it's still tecnology from Facebook)?
If it can record 3d video then you can watch it on the quest with some jangling.
Matt I am trying to check the cameras on ray ban stories. Do you know do both cameras record and take pictures if I cover my right eye while videoing it blocks the video.
You're Sonos Playbar is upside down btw. Otherwise, great video :-)
I find you pretty funny mate, haha well done on this review
I think the wide angle lenses on the snapchat spectacles and the obvious indication of the camera wins it out for me, the software is a bit of an issue tho
I wanna watch movie on glasses i hope facebook metaverse project really happen not like those google glass.
I wouldn't touch any Facebook product with a bargepole.
I wonder how much similar components without those two brand names attached would cost
They look a lot cooler than the Snapchat spectacles 😎
This should just be a 10 sec vid of you stomping on the glasses
The shrek thing from Bertie's big day out is still there?!?
Matt you are looking great!!
Thanks for your take on these, great video.
I don't care about any aspect of the subjects but still had fun seeing your pov and your shared experience
Are these the large version, didn't catch it in the video?
Surely they should have made them reactive lenses so they work in all light conditions
If you mean the sunglasses lenses (not the camera ones), they have made them! ;) you can ordered them with transitions lenses (with an extra cost, of course. In Italy 100 euros more)
Oh so the Ray-Ban Stories do not produce stories aspect ratio?! lol The only reason I would get these is to post on my IG stories. I assumed they'd be built for that
WOAH these are expensive :O I do REALLY like that these are RayBan's and I didn't know the case is the charging station and the music bit. This is a proper review video as I want them now so bad.
This video is the first time I'm hearing that these exist
If only Facebook didn’t have anything to do with it.
I like the fact that you can say that you’ve got a large frame camera.
jeez the wind noise is freaking loud :/
They look incredibly creepy.
I am wondering if this years changes to the company META, and the release of Horizon Worlds has changed you thoughts. I was seriously thinking they could be a great blend in building a 3D world.
Nope. I bought it for the camera, and the camera's still shit :D
These things r trash - if u get these, hold this L
i found your video really funny great one !
Thanks, I absolutely hate them
are you related to david mitchell?
Is this like the Snapchat speckticles
I wonder if people will eventually use eye-level cameras like this in movies.
It's the same question as to if they will use phone cameras. Phones are basically just as discrete. Thing is, the quality you get isint worth it vs just pirating a better rip.
I THINK ITS THE ONE WITH THE LIGHTS ON IT
The 51st shade of Matt Gray
Thats not a bad price in pounds £ they are the same here in US Dollars S 299/329 and our money is worth more
$330 = £240…
Rubbish quality hahahaha.