@@s00774 honestly, is it really all that important? Ask yourself, why does POSIX compliance matter for an interactive shell? For making/using portable scripts? That's what shebangs are for, /bin/sh or bash and no problems. Instead of using one shell for everything, you can use fish for interactive terminal use, and bash or even dash for scripting (dash is already used instead of bash for sh on Debian based systems). Fish just makes a lot more sense for interactive use imo, and you don't really have to learn a whole new language (it's not like you're using test and if statements on a terminal directly anyway). The only reason I wouldn't use fish is if I already had a working zsh configuration I'd been using for years.
Kitty is the best for a desktop with a gpu, but if you are using a laptop mostly on battery, kitty isnt the best, its resource hungry. I actually just use the xfce4 term, it opens immediately and doesnt hog resources. Kitty takes literally like 1.5 seconds to open (which for a terminal is an eternity) and hogs ram, cpu etc.
I have switched from Alacritty to foot. It's BLAZING fast and it has image support. Kitty has font ligature support, but it's just noticeably slow; foot, on the other hand, opens faster than any other terminal emulator I've ever tried.
I don’t care how much people say kitty is bloated. It has the best image protocol for terminals. In fact I patched ST terminal with the kitty protocol and I didn’t burst into flames. Is the best at the moment. Ps: Rust is amazing for refactoring but just because something is written in rust is no instantaneous win.
I’ve switched back and forth between these two terminals. Usually a little thing will annoy me enough. I forget exactly why I switched back to alacritty this last time. I just make sure I back up my configs with stow so that I can switch seamlessly when needed.
Something that Kitty must add for me to use it instead of Alacritty is the bright bold feature. Essentially, when text is bold, make it use the bright variant of the text color.
i personally Worked with vhyrro to make a latex rendering lib for neovim to use in neorg, which uses kitty terminal graphics protocol.. such a cool protocol to work with (currently it's not used as hologram depricated) though now i switched after 1y to foot terminal as i can feel the lag in kitty, which is much nicer and support images with sixel
Kitty is way faster than for me than most other terminals, although havent tried foot. Wezterm and Alacritty both performed very poorly on my laptop, and I'm not sure why. I'm still using X, maybe that has something to do with it
I wonder why don't we have a terminal with command prompt at first line not on the last. You type commands on first line always and see the result below like stack. It's easier to read the results. No need to seek where output starts, it's right below the command prompt.
@@typecraft_devyes the images look high quality in windows wezterm too although western hangs when you do any quick movements while editing heavily for whatever reason
Both terminal on default conf, the alacrity anti aliasing of font looks way good at least on my 720 display. But the actually reason no kitty is, just try to run unimatrix -l e on both terminal. Couldn't get colored emoji work on kitty 😂 no matter what. *yes few color emoji show but to make alacritty show all the color emoji was way way simpler then kitty (still could get it working)
I like to think that you made the switch, because of my last comment on one of your videos haha :D but seriously - good switch mate! I made the same switch 1 month ago and I'm enjoying kitty so far. Also thanks for that `kittens` tip! I didn't know about that and it's amazing
I also use kitty, mainly because of the extensivility and the ligatures. Alacritty text rendering looks a bit better to me, but kitty is very very good (much better than wezterm). I'm happy with it but the most disappointing thing about kitty is that developing custom kittens is super frustrating because de python API is not documented.
Good luck with Kitty. It works well, so long as you stay within the choke-hold configuration bounds of the developer. Changing fonts is a nightmare, but example. And if you look at the repo’s bug report page, you don’t have to dig deep to see that the developer can be a single-minded jerk at times.
You should try Foot which also has image support if you like the simplicity of Alacritty and don't mind not having GPU acceleration or X11/MacOS support.
Nothing better than kitty right now. Cross platform, image support, excellent font rendering, uses less ram and cpu than wezterm. You also don't need tmux when working locally since kitty has built in window splitting and kitty sessions. Now you just need to install fish. Faster startup times than zsh. And their abbreviation feature for a saner command history.
หลายเดือนก่อน
btw, wezterm also supports image preview and is config file is written in lua :D
Anyone explored Zutty terminal here? The developer has quite an extensive explanation in which he explains that it's the most correct working terminal which is also about as fast as Alacritty and Kitty.
you couldve done that with ueberzug protocol which works on all terminal and im pretty sure it works with yazi, it really wasnt necessary and you'll miss the dynamic cursor from alacritty
I would just like to shoutout the fastest terminal emulator I've used yet. It's the foot terminal which runs natively on wayland supports images with sixel. Its got it's own problem though. You can't use an image in the background of terminal. That's the only thing i feel like I'm missing for now
I was using kitty but then switched back to alacritty when switching distros basically. Long story short, I didn't know about the themes in kitty. I am not a ricer, just a hopper 😂 but this is pure gold. Thank you for sharing info for us advanced/not advanced users. By the way, I use mint and pop 😮
honestly i hate kitty i first used kitty, then i switched to alacritty because for me it was unusable slow, buggy, crashing all time... and i was not the only one to encounter this exact problems, i talked to more people on discord that had had the same problem buggy and crashing can be fixed, the thing with speed is that alacritty is just better, both are gpu accelerated but alacritty is way faster, which you can easily check doing a benchmark, for example doing a dd of /dev/random to a file of, lets say, 2GiB - and then, doing a cat to the random file and timing how long it takes to output all that its not really a killer thing, speed of stdout is mostly irrelevant, the only reason im commenting this is because you talked about speed in favour of kitty, which is just wrong TO BE CLEAR this is just my experience, i find kitty very interesting and, if i didnt had bugs, i would maybe use it maybe, because i dont really find the images feature useful (for me) and for multiplexxing i rather use tmux or zellij
I really respect Kitty. But i actually switched from Kitty to Alacritty. If i remember correctly, with Kitty when i Ssh'd to a client's server the prompt was messed up for some reason and i couldn't figure out why. It didn't happen with Konsole or Alacritty so i decided not to go back . I also was reading some stuff about how against Tmux the Kitty dev is (i respect that too, he has his reasoning) and i like tmux, so I'd have to use something that worked well with it
for me, image rendering is a reason to not use kitty. i want my terminal emulator to be nothing more than a dumb terminal, rendering images inside it feels kinda weird
I understand that ligatures are not a trivial thing to implement, but I feel that Alacritty really misses out on a significant user-base by not supporting them.
I like the customization of Kitty much better than all others but it is much slower than other terminal emulators. The Ghostty website has a 'cat' benchmark of the japanese bible that shows Kitty is almost as slow as the Mac terminal at around mid 300ms. Alacritty for comparison is at give or take 76ms. Wezterm was around 170ms. I am trying Wezterm but not liking the terminal tabs bar. Didn't like no border at all in Alacritty and think Kitty has my personal favorite looks. Most likely gonna switch back to it. Wezterm also works with Yazi for pictures in the terminal though.
@@EyasD04 Not particularly deep reasons, I feel that Alacritty is the much simpler tool while still doing everything I need. Config is easier to grasp and I also like the Vi mode :)
Team rxvt-unicode-256color forever. Every other one I’ve tried has something stupid about it - whether it’s copy/paste nonsense, or font kerning problems, or lack of search, or bad ssh confit, or too much decoration… rxvt-unicode-256color is fast, lightweight and configurable.
When using tmux within any terminal emulator, how do you search for words? I currently enter vim mode and search but it feels very cumbersome. I've tried tmux plugins like tmux-copycat but it's slow
If you hit ctrl+b and then [, you'll go into "copy mode" which will allow you to scrollback through your history. When you're in this mode you can hit ctrl+s which will allow you to search, from there you can hit 'n' to goto the next match or "N" to go to the previous match.
Kitty was my terminal of choice for a long time. Just recently switched to wezterm after dabbling with it for a few years. Configured in lua, used multiple graphics protocols including kitties, and is similarly performant.
Hmm, I use alacritty with ranger and it does support images with the controversial ueberzug, in fact it looks a lot like yazi... and it has for years. Only reason kitty has an slight upper hand isbthat sixel is an actual protocol, while ueberzug is a hack.
i have/get to learn new tech all of the time. the one thing that has stayed consistent and I have zero desire to try new things on is my environment. alacritty, tmux, nvim pinnacle of “if it ain’t broke”
Would love to hear your thoughts on kitty + tmux. I've been using kitty for quite a while, and one of the reasons is that I find it to be essentially a replacement for tmux. At least in terms of splits/panes. But I also know there are issues if you want to run tmux inside kitty. In fact, Kovid Goyal (kitty's creator) recommends against it. (see kitty FAQ) Anyway, I like tmux and know you're a fan too. So now that you're switching to kitty... Thanks!
Frankly, gnome terminal is enough for me. I used to use "terminator" long ago. (That weird red-framed terminal console, but this is also very good) . I will try Kitty soon. Your ability to explain is really good. Why don't you give programming training. Maybe on TH-cam platform, maybe on your own website, maybe somewhere like udemy... I think you will be very successful...
wtf, man, did literally the same (installing kitty for yazi and its image preview) just 2-3 days ago! lol. Convergent Evolution at work. Not ditching Alacritty yet, though. Will use kitty for yazi only.
So basically you are annoyed that a terminal isnt giving you image rendering you may as well use a built in GUI terminal is meant to cut out all the prerendering and stuff to save processing power and time
personally I felt kitty to be slower than alacritty. right click copy paste(putty like) is sluggish on kitty while alacritty does that with ease and faster.
On my Mac kitty runs really slow when it opens up with the shortcut I made in skhd, however on my Arch Linux system (I use arch btw) it works really great in sway. Other than that I've basically had a better experience overall with kitty.
![POLYCAT - ข้อความรูปยิ้ม [Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/lBhIgPGCgbI/mqdefault.jpg)
tl;dr: kitty supports showing images in the terminal while alacritty doesn't
And kitty is easier to configure thanks to kittens.
it does, the documentation of yazi literally says what you need to do in order to use peviews in alacritty (install ueberzug)
lmfao that's it? 😂
wezterm also can :)
Man I thought 6 minutes was a short video but somehow even that was an extreme stretch for making such a simple point.
I use fish inside of kitty for maximum cat-themed goodness.
meow
catppuccin?
fish aint posix compliant, id use something else
@@typecraft_dev Tse-Tung
@@s00774 honestly, is it really all that important?
Ask yourself, why does POSIX compliance matter for an interactive shell? For making/using portable scripts? That's what shebangs are for, /bin/sh or bash and no problems.
Instead of using one shell for everything, you can use fish for interactive terminal use, and bash or even dash for scripting (dash is already used instead of bash for sh on Debian based systems).
Fish just makes a lot more sense for interactive use imo, and you don't really have to learn a whole new language (it's not like you're using test and if statements on a terminal directly anyway).
The only reason I wouldn't use fish is if I already had a working zsh configuration I'd been using for years.
Next video: ditching Kitty for Wezterm.
We’ve all done it 😅
Haha ok
Been there. It's bound to happen 😅
Switched this week to wezterm … never going back to alacritty. I considered kitty but the the lua config for wezterm is much more powerful.
I am still on Kitty even after trying wezterm. Both are great tbh, but Kitty felt a little more fitting for someone who is in tmux a lot.
I came to the comments to say exactly the same 😂
0:00 I'm calling it: Alacritty -> Kitty for Image support
I'm calling it GUI
To be honest I was expecting ligatures.
you've been on fire lately. keep the new videos rolling.
Thanks! Will do!
How about Wezterm? Also written in Rust and is configured using Lua.
Also supports image rendering!
wezterm is the best really.
I vote for Wezterm. If you're familiar with configuring Neovim using Lua, using WezTerm will be no problem at all.
Bunch of fine fellas with good taste in terminals in this little thread here.
WezTerm is a bloat & a mess
Foot is best terminal :
- footclient start in 98 ms
- image rendering supported
- small memory fingerprint
- support emojis
- flexible
- fast
it's nice, but it isn't as fast at rendering as gpu based terminal emulators, like kitty, alacritty or ghostty
@@rev4324Where have you noticed the performance difference?
wayland only
Kitty is the best for a desktop with a gpu, but if you are using a laptop mostly on battery, kitty isnt the best, its resource hungry. I actually just use the xfce4 term, it opens immediately and doesnt hog resources. Kitty takes literally like 1.5 seconds to open (which for a terminal is an eternity) and hogs ram, cpu etc.
I have switched from Alacritty to foot. It's BLAZING fast and it has image support. Kitty has font ligature support, but it's just noticeably slow; foot, on the other hand, opens faster than any other terminal emulator I've ever tried.
I agree, been using foot and never looked back
I don’t care how much people say kitty is bloated. It has the best image protocol for terminals. In fact I patched ST terminal with the kitty protocol and I didn’t burst into flames. Is the best at the moment.
Ps: Rust is amazing for refactoring but just because something is written in rust is no instantaneous win.
Amazing video as always ... now all we need is a video about yazi :D
Working on it!
I use Kitty instead of wezterm because kitty feels smoother, no laggy when I scroll down. Also, wezterm consumes more ram.
I’ve switched back and forth between these two terminals. Usually a little thing will annoy me enough. I forget exactly why I switched back to alacritty this last time. I just make sure I back up my configs with stow so that I can switch seamlessly when needed.
Something that Kitty must add for me to use it instead of Alacritty is the bright bold feature. Essentially, when text is bold, make it use the bright variant of the text color.
These videos always come out so timely, I just finished my configuring the foot terminal on my Arch machine for the same reason!
For tldw:
It because kitty terminal have image preview, but Alacrity not.
i personally Worked with vhyrro to make a latex rendering lib for neovim to use in neorg, which uses kitty terminal graphics protocol.. such a cool protocol to work with (currently it's not used as hologram depricated)
though now i switched after 1y to foot terminal as i can feel the lag in kitty, which is much nicer and support images with sixel
Kitty is way faster than for me than most other terminals, although havent tried foot. Wezterm and Alacritty both performed very poorly on my laptop, and I'm not sure why. I'm still using X, maybe that has something to do with it
@@dv_xl that's really odd.. i am not sure about wezterm, but alacritty should be performing really well..
I wonder why don't we have a terminal with command prompt at first line not on the last. You type commands on first line always and see the result below like stack. It's easier to read the results. No need to seek where output starts, it's right below the command prompt.
Yazi's image rendering works with WezTerm and Foot too.
oh very cool!
@@typecraft_devyes the images look high quality in windows wezterm too although western hangs when you do any quick movements while editing heavily for whatever reason
and with alacritty ;-) and every other terminal emulator - you need ueberzugpp and set it as render backend in the yazi config
Thanks for the video, kitty also supports pdf file view as well as scrolling
TH-cam popped this up as Recommended Video due to my Linux searches.
This is cool to know. Thanks for producing this one. Just Subscribed.
Both terminal on default conf, the alacrity anti aliasing of font looks way good at least on my 720 display. But the actually reason no kitty is, just try to run unimatrix -l e on both terminal. Couldn't get colored emoji work on kitty 😂 no matter what. *yes few color emoji show but to make alacritty show all the color emoji was way way simpler then kitty (still could get it working)
I like to think that you made the switch, because of my last comment on one of your videos haha :D
but seriously - good switch mate! I made the same switch 1 month ago and I'm enjoying kitty so far.
Also thanks for that `kittens` tip! I didn't know about that and it's amazing
Thanks! 😁
I also use kitty, mainly because of the extensivility and the ligatures.
Alacritty text rendering looks a bit better to me, but kitty is very very good (much better than wezterm). I'm happy with it but the most disappointing thing about kitty is that developing custom kittens is super frustrating because de python API is not documented.
Extensibility*
typecraft, Do you think you could make a video comparing Kitty, wezterm and contour? It would be great to hear your opinion
I think I’ll have to!
Good luck with Kitty. It works well, so long as you stay within the choke-hold configuration bounds of the developer. Changing fonts is a nightmare, but example. And if you look at the repo’s bug report page, you don’t have to dig deep to see that the developer can be a single-minded jerk at times.
Yeah, he is based
How's changing the font a nightmare?
Lol he changes the font in the video takes literally 10 second
i'm not sure what you mean by changing fonts being a nightmare. on both alacritty and kitty it was very simple
Ngl, thought you were gonna jump on Ghostty terminal (closed beta for now) from Mitchell H :D
I just got an invite :)
@@typecraft_dev next video compare kitty to ghostty :3
Foot terminal is objectively the best performing terminal for the case of use of working with VIM.
ghostty will be the new meta (when it comes out)
Ghostty is new way to make terminals
*will be
yazi is such a goated program fr, no config needed so I can actually use it at work without being obnoxious with configs
Great video! Been on Alacritty for almost 3 years now and I'm not going anywhere. Portability and minimalism win it for me
Supposed content subject: Why switch from Alacritty to Kitty?
Actual video content: 5% relevent, 95% configuring Kitty
You should try Foot which also has image support if you like the simplicity of Alacritty and don't mind not having GPU acceleration or X11/MacOS support.
In my experience, GPU acceleration only results in screen tearing and lag in the terminal. That's why I switched to Foot.
Nothing better than kitty right now. Cross platform, image support, excellent font rendering, uses less ram and cpu than wezterm. You also don't need tmux when working locally since kitty has built in window splitting and kitty sessions.
Now you just need to install fish. Faster startup times than zsh. And their abbreviation feature for a saner command history.
btw, wezterm also supports image preview and is config file is written in lua :D
ueberzug was right there
Anyone explored Zutty terminal here? The developer has quite an extensive explanation in which he explains that it's the most correct working terminal which is also about as fast as Alacritty and Kitty.
Wezterm + Neovim is the deadliest combo, truly cross platform.
After 2 years or use, I replaced Alacritty with Gnome's Terminal because why not
You are on the right path. Already ditched kitty for wezterm
Wezterm is amazing
you couldve done that with ueberzug protocol which works on all terminal and im pretty sure it works with yazi, it really wasnt necessary and you'll miss the dynamic cursor from alacritty
You're correct, Yazi has built-in support for ueberzugpp and it does work in alacritty
32 seconds in the video and I already know the missing feature, same reason why I left Alacritty. 😂
There is no need to use Nerd Fonts in kitty
Kitty allows you to use a second font just for the icons, so you can use any regular (unpatched) font
image render is indeed fantastic. But i use kitty mainly for the built in tab, it's really easy to use, i don't need tmux or zellij anymore.
I would just like to shoutout the fastest terminal emulator I've used yet. It's the foot terminal which runs natively on wayland supports images with sixel. Its got it's own problem though. You can't use an image in the background of terminal. That's the only thing i feel like I'm missing for now
I was using kitty but then switched back to alacritty when switching distros basically. Long story short, I didn't know about the themes in kitty. I am not a ricer, just a hopper 😂 but this is pure gold. Thank you for sharing info for us advanced/not advanced users. By the way, I use mint and pop 😮
honestly i hate kitty
i first used kitty, then i switched to alacritty because for me it was unusable
slow, buggy, crashing all time...
and i was not the only one to encounter this exact problems, i talked to more people on discord that had had the same problem
buggy and crashing can be fixed, the thing with speed is that alacritty is just better, both are gpu accelerated but alacritty is way faster, which you can easily check doing a benchmark, for example doing a dd of /dev/random to a file of, lets say, 2GiB - and then, doing a cat to the random file and timing how long it takes to output all that
its not really a killer thing, speed of stdout is mostly irrelevant, the only reason im commenting this is because you talked about speed in favour of kitty, which is just wrong
TO BE CLEAR
this is just my experience, i find kitty very interesting and, if i didnt had bugs, i would maybe use it
maybe, because i dont really find the images feature useful (for me) and for multiplexxing i rather use tmux or zellij
alacritty to kitty to wezterm to foot pipeline. may sixels live forever
I really respect Kitty. But i actually switched from Kitty to Alacritty. If i remember correctly, with Kitty when i Ssh'd to a client's server the prompt was messed up for some reason and i couldn't figure out why. It didn't happen with Konsole or Alacritty so i decided not to go back . I also was reading some stuff about how against Tmux the Kitty dev is (i respect that too, he has his reasoning) and i like tmux, so I'd have to use something that worked well with it
you're looking for 5:30 (not a reason to change but that's his reason)
I also changed to kitty because I want to use yazi too, basically still like the simplicity of alacrity's setting more but kitty is okay though
My kitty configuration is colorscheme and font and I'm happy with it :D
4:45 Why quit and restart? You can reload the config at runtime. I have it on cmd+ctrl+, on Mac (think it's default)
Honestly I didn’t think about it!
for me, image rendering is a reason to not use kitty. i want my terminal emulator to be nothing more than a dumb terminal, rendering images inside it feels kinda weird
i also don't like it when terminals have built in tab support, i use tmux for that
that is a solid take! I don't disagree
No one is forcing you to use those features though
I've been using kitty for about a year now... but I'm doing absolutely nothing fancy whatsoever with it. Should really look more at what it can do.
Wezterm is the new kid in the block.. Go give it a try!
I'll have to check it out!
currently on kitty and I will only consider switching to alacritty only if they support font ligatures.
you will feel at home when ghostty is publicly available. it has everything and is faster than all of them. I really mean it!
i've heard of ghostty before, now i'm looking forward for it. Thanks
I understand that ligatures are not a trivial thing to implement, but I feel that Alacritty really misses out on a significant user-base by not supporting them.
i'm just using Gnome terminal, it's also GPU accelerated, happy with it
Wezterm supports image viewing too, just like Kitty. Warp seems to support it, but it doesn’t work out of the box on my mac.
Before watching past the intro, my guess feature you want is sixel
I was close. But I do not need neither their protocol nor sixel because I think ueberzugpp is more portable solution.
Thank you! switching to kitty here.
I like the customization of Kitty much better than all others but it is much slower than other terminal emulators. The Ghostty website has a 'cat' benchmark of the japanese bible that shows Kitty is almost as slow as the Mac terminal at around mid 300ms. Alacritty for comparison is at give or take 76ms. Wezterm was around 170ms. I am trying Wezterm but not liking the terminal tabs bar. Didn't like no border at all in Alacritty and think Kitty has my personal favorite looks. Most likely gonna switch back to it. Wezterm also works with Yazi for pictures in the terminal though.
Ironically I switched from Kitty to Alacritty two weeks ago
that's very interesting, can you please tell us why?
i want to compare your reasons with the video
@@EyasD04 Not particularly deep reasons, I feel that Alacritty is the much simpler tool while still doing everything I need. Config is easier to grasp and I also like the Vi mode :)
Is there a markdown viewer/editor that I can use in the terminal and that shows images?
You could use yazi. And get previews for images and markdown. It doesn’t edit though
iirc kitty images do not work inside of tmux, but with alacritty and ueberzug it does work
Kitty is awesome, but you have to change the icon to the neom one that looks soo much better
surprised you haven't tried wezterm yet
Maybe I will soon!
I ditched kitty when I saw the project owner being super to toxic to the community.
Was not aware of this!
@@typecraft_dev yeah it’s unfortunate. The app is great. Owner kinda ruined it for many.
I need the blocks that the warp terminal has. As far as I know, no other terminal offers blocks.
iTerm never dissapoints
Team rxvt-unicode-256color forever.
Every other one I’ve tried has something stupid about it - whether it’s copy/paste nonsense, or font kerning problems, or lack of search, or bad ssh confit, or too much decoration… rxvt-unicode-256color is fast, lightweight and configurable.
When using tmux within any terminal emulator, how do you search for words? I currently enter vim mode and search but it feels very cumbersome. I've tried tmux plugins like tmux-copycat but it's slow
If you hit ctrl+b and then [, you'll go into "copy mode" which will allow you to scrollback through your history. When you're in this mode you can hit ctrl+s which will allow you to search, from there you can hit 'n' to goto the next match or "N" to go to the previous match.
I used alacritty & kitty before. But I'm using foot now since I'm on wayland... And I'm loving it.
Kitty was my terminal of choice for a long time. Just recently switched to wezterm after dabbling with it for a few years. Configured in lua, used multiple graphics protocols including kitties, and is similarly performant.
it'd be a shame if ghostty replaced kitty 👀
👀
Kitty is the best, very customizable and you save yourself from having to use tmux.
Hmm, I use alacritty with ranger and it does support images with the controversial ueberzug, in fact it looks a lot like yazi... and it has for years. Only reason kitty has an slight upper hand isbthat sixel is an actual protocol, while ueberzug is a hack.
i have/get to learn new tech all of the time. the one thing that has stayed consistent and I have zero desire to try new things on is my environment.
alacritty, tmux, nvim
pinnacle of “if it ain’t broke”
Would love to hear your thoughts on kitty + tmux. I've been using kitty for quite a while, and one of the reasons is that I find it to be essentially a replacement for tmux. At least in terms of splits/panes. But I also know there are issues if you want to run tmux inside kitty. In fact, Kovid Goyal (kitty's creator) recommends against it. (see kitty FAQ) Anyway, I like tmux and know you're a fan too. So now that you're switching to kitty... Thanks!
Yazi, Mandarin word for duck, is pronounced as "Yah, Z'uh" roughly (I dont know how to romanize Chinese pronounciation 😬) if anyone cares
Frankly, gnome terminal is enough for me. I used to use "terminator" long ago. (That weird red-framed terminal console, but this is also very good) . I will try Kitty soon.
Your ability to explain is really good. Why don't you give programming training. Maybe on TH-cam platform, maybe on your own website, maybe somewhere like udemy...
I think you will be very successful...
Kitty < Alacritty < st
Watching this created live on Twitch was fun. Although I’m surprised you kept in the “meow”’s 😂
I ditched Alacritty for Kitty, then WezTerm. Love WezTerm, I use it with Nushell, so I’m oxidized.
welcome to team kitty… the best team there is 😏
Kitty is great, I have discovered it a few weeks ago
wtf, man, did literally the same (installing kitty for yazi and its image preview) just 2-3 days ago! lol. Convergent Evolution at work. Not ditching Alacritty yet, though. Will use kitty for yazi only.
The problem that I got with kitty is that it has memory leak on mac m1 when using tmux 😢
So basically you are annoyed that a terminal isnt giving you image rendering you may as well use a built in GUI terminal is meant to cut out all the prerendering and stuff to save processing power and time
personally I felt kitty to be slower than alacritty. right click copy paste(putty like) is sluggish on kitty while alacritty does that with ease and faster.
Interesting! I haven’t noticed any slow downs. I’ll keep my eyes open
Well, I've been using ranger with ueberzug for a pretty long time, and it performs just well on Alacritty!
On my Mac kitty runs really slow when it opens up with the shortcut I made in skhd, however on my Arch Linux system (I use arch btw) it works really great in sway. Other than that I've basically had a better experience overall with kitty.
Like Both but love Kitty. In Kitty use Crtl+Shift+F5 to reload.
I was loving ranger and nerd-nnn but yazi with kitty is amaziiiiiing btw kitty was already my terminal emulator thanks man!
I just switched FROM Kitty to Alacritty because of no smooth scrolling when using a touchpad.
Now it's time to ditch tmux and embrace Kitty tabs
KDE's Konsole and yazi works for images in the terminal
It's funny.. Alaciritty is made in Rust and is a lot faster than kitty but I still use kitty cuz I just like it.