When you talk abouts cons pros, you dont mention about image quality among them but other things, not good...I want to buy a camera and want to get the best picture quality, I dont care if is user friendly, range of modes, lightweight build, I care if the image quality is good or better than the other, no logic for me those cons and pros from you! But thank you!
We could get all this information on Camera Decision website. You can compare the specs as they are provided by the manufacturer, but nothing about the actual photographic results.
If you are going to buy one of these cameras, be double sure that these cameras will be adequate for your needs. To achieve the super zoom ratios, they use a smaller photo sensor and you may get sensor noise in dim light or higher shutter speeds.The phone cameras use software to compensate for the smaller sensors.
니콘 P1000 오토모드에서 10m, 20m, 50m, 100m, 200m, 300m, 500m, 1km, 2km, 5km 실제 인물 화질이 궁금합니다. 골프장, 야구장, 축구장, 야간 공연장 등에서 인물이 어느정도 화질이 나오는지 테스트 영상이 궁금합니다. 많은 이들이 제일 궁금해 할 내용인 것 같은데요~ 영상 제목을 이라고 만들면 될 것 같은데요. 인물 대신 털, 눈섭 까지 있는 큰 곰, 사슴 인형 같은 것도 괜찮겠네요 ~ 실제 야구장 축구장 골프잘(볼 날아가서 떨어지는 것 촬영 가능한지), 공연장 실제 영상이면 더 좋겠네요. 실제 비행기나 달까지, 수킬로 미터 거리의 영상은 품질이 안좋아 찍을 일이 있을까요? 영상에서는 거리가 얼마인지가 중요한데 거리 보다는 중을 얼마 했는지에 초점이... 참, 메모리는 최대 512 까지 인식 사용 가능한가요?
The only catch to the P1000 is that it’s only a 16.8 MP camera. My Canon Powershot SX70 HS, on the other hand is 20.4 MP. Despite the monstrous 125x optical zoom from the Nikon Coolpix P1000, nothing beats Canon when it comes to superzoom cameras with the most mega pixels. In conclusion, under my perspective, the more mage pixels the clearer the picture.
You lost me when you included Panasonic. My 2 Panasonic cameras have been duds. Poor photo quality at high iso, longer zoom, or even slightly low light. Will never buy a Panasonic again.
You are featuring the Minolta ProShot MN67Z and it definitively captures RAW format. I have one of those cameras in my desk right now, and RAW is the only format I shoot.
When you talk abouts cons pros, you dont mention about image quality among them but other things, not good...I want to buy a camera and want to get the best picture quality, I dont care if is user friendly, range of modes, lightweight build, I care if the image quality is good or better than the other, no logic for me those cons and pros from you! But thank you!
We could get all this information on Camera Decision website. You can compare the specs as they are provided by the manufacturer, but nothing about the actual photographic results.
If you are going to buy one of these cameras, be double sure that these cameras will be adequate for your needs. To achieve the super zoom ratios, they use a smaller photo sensor and you may get sensor noise in dim light or higher shutter speeds.The phone cameras use software to compensate for the smaller sensors.
Nikon P1000 , now you can see how 🚢 ship’s sank in the “curvature” of the sea…reappeared!! Omg, the sea is a perfect level 😮🫢😀
Yes, it is. That must mean??? You can do it.
The sea is not level, as it conforms to the earth's curvature.
Urine itty it@@Mme.Swisstella
I have the p900. Enough power to see the firmament.
Is it still good in 2024?
NIKON P1000 is the best
What About Sx60 from Canon? Or B700 is better
What about the Sony DSC RX-10IV ? I know it is an old camera (2017) but its specs seem to be on par with more modern cameras.
Absolutely the best bridge camera out there.
It's $1,500 grand. No one has that amount of money 😂
@@magnetacyan5032 Speak for yourself.
Thank you
니콘 P1000 오토모드에서 10m, 20m, 50m, 100m, 200m, 300m, 500m, 1km, 2km, 5km 실제 인물 화질이 궁금합니다.
골프장, 야구장, 축구장, 야간 공연장 등에서 인물이 어느정도 화질이 나오는지 테스트 영상이 궁금합니다.
많은 이들이 제일 궁금해 할 내용인 것 같은데요~
영상 제목을 이라고 만들면 될 것 같은데요.
인물 대신 털, 눈섭 까지 있는 큰 곰, 사슴 인형 같은 것도 괜찮겠네요 ~
실제 야구장 축구장 골프잘(볼 날아가서 떨어지는 것 촬영 가능한지), 공연장 실제 영상이면 더 좋겠네요.
실제 비행기나 달까지, 수킬로 미터 거리의 영상은 품질이 안좋아 찍을 일이 있을까요?
영상에서는 거리가 얼마인지가 중요한데 거리 보다는 중을 얼마 했는지에 초점이...
참, 메모리는 최대 512 까지 인식 사용 가능한가요?
The Sony RX10 MarkIV is still unbeatable!
The only catch to the P1000 is that it’s only a 16.8 MP camera. My Canon Powershot SX70 HS, on the other hand is 20.4 MP. Despite the monstrous 125x optical zoom from the Nikon Coolpix P1000, nothing beats Canon when it comes to superzoom cameras with the most mega pixels.
In conclusion, under my perspective, the more mage pixels the clearer the picture.
Yes p1000 is heavy too
So I should just keep my Panasonic v550 for recording airplanes ✈️ shame expecting improvements after so long
Nikon P950...
Than which is your choice?
Elimde NİKON F3 VAR ÇOKTEMİZ SATLIK TÜRKİYE GAZİANTEP🇹🇷⭐️💯👍🇹🇷⭐️💯👍🇹🇷⭐️💯👍🇹🇷⭐️💯👍
I guess it’s an AI VOICE
You lost me when you included Panasonic. My 2 Panasonic cameras have been duds. Poor photo quality at high iso, longer zoom, or even slightly low light. Will never buy a Panasonic again.
These are obsolete. Buy a micro 4/3 or apsc and buy a cheap superzoom lens.
What would be a good example of your suggestion?
To compare a good 1" Bridgecam like Lumix FZ1000 (II) with Bridgecams with crapsensors is ridiculous.
You are featuring the Minolta ProShot MN67Z and it definitively captures RAW format. I have one of those cameras in my desk right now, and RAW is the only format I shoot.