The lecture was exhilarating,surely _however Mr.Jeanson's humility, in the face of discovering how The Bible ultimately proves itself, was absolutely wonderful to behold and added an element of - Look up & Rejoice - while we watched in awe! Thank you everso much!
There will be a lot of new 'species' due to cloning, Synthetic DNA, Ai and nano particle manipulation through 3D printing. We are back in the days of Noah
And mixing genes of animals with other animals, plants with other plants, and animals are plants. I guess they're called hybrids, like that's a good idea.
Dear Dr Nathaniel, thanks for gathering such enormous amounts of data and presenting it to us in a nut shell. Sadly, many people on earth do not share such joys of discovering the truths of the Bible but hate God without a cause.
There is something called the Sahara desert. This served as a gene divider as they say. Those south of it decoupled the gene that causes darker skin, those north of it did for the one that caused lighter skin. Natural barriers lead to unique gene pool. The ancient Egyptians were not black Africans because there dna says they weren’t. The Sudanese south of Egypt, had many pyramids as well, which were black Africans who lived off the Nile, as any where else is desert. Ancient Egypt influenced them. Simple as that.
@@MarkSmith-vo1vn The Sahara didn't divide anything. Genetics has proven that the original North Africans were the Iberomaurusians and they were half black African. There goes your Sahara divide theory in the dustbin.
@@MCfact1827 not what you said.the auther is suggesting e1b1a1(e1b1b)orginated in asia.based on what evidence? And he suggested that they were olived skined Asians. When arabia is right on the equater line.not honest scholarship
@@MoneyB-r2y I think he said they were asian because he was eluding to that the west of africa hadnt been populated yet by the e1b1ba haplogroup prior to that. Since the creation of the suez canal arabia is considered in asia not africa, even though it sits on the african tectonic plate.
Dr Jeanson, the fact that 80% of Somali males carry the E1b1b gene is not a coincidence. It is a fact that kings and queens of ancient Egypt used to travel to Somalia. They claimed that it was the land of their ancestors which they called the "Land of Gods" & the "Land of Punt" Similarities of the Somali language and that of the ancient Egypt is mind-blowing. If you would like to come to Somalia to make further research, I would be happy invite you and be my guest.
@@jubilee203 You’re both right actually because in those days there were no imaginary borders like they are now, so the great lakes region could’ve included Somalia as well.
@@jubilee203 Or more than likely some tribes from the Great Lakes region migrated and settled where Somalia is now, while other tribes moved up the Nile towards Ethiopia, Nubia and Kemet.
Don't buy this revisionist rubbish. Either the few Kings of Egypt travelled to Somalia and impregnated several hundred or thousand women around the Somalia region or 80% of all modern Somalians are descended from one line. Or the Kings themselves originated from somewhere in East or North East Africa. Seriously. Use your common sense. Which is more likely?
@@tgr5772 This is jot just blind belief. The facts are there. When queen Hatsepshut travelled to the land of Punt, she met King Parehu & Queen Hatie ( Baraxow & Xadiyo) two known personalities in Somalia
Nothing is more commendable, than finding someone, who is seeking the Truth...totally unbiased. Unbiased Truth...is certainly a "Godly" act. To go where the Truth leads...regardless of one's "feelings", is what all should strive for. It is refreshing to find a scholar who seems to be doing just that.
Ancient HAMIT land of origin was from 4502-900bc was in south Asia(india) and southeast Asia. ALL brown or black peoples. With migrations to (northeast Africa) from 4212-1000bc. FACT!
Africa is settled by NOD peoples 17,000bc- AD2024 from the ,*EDEN realm. Just like the HAWILAH(Americas), KUSH (Australia), AZZUHR (pre-Eurasians). All before the worldwide flood events of 4502bc, the latter Bronze Age wars 2400-1000bc, and the Euro colonialism AD1400s-1900s. FINALLY THE TRUTH!
Africa is the garden of eden. The middle east was once part of Africa. Ham himself was black, as were his offspring. The cradle of civilization is Africa. The Arabs themselves came from black Africa.
True look at the Egyptian statues look at Somalians it’s open evidence. The 1st so-called historians couldn’t comprehend black Africans were capable of such achievements so they separated Egypt from the rest of Africa. Egypt is a country by the Nile meaning various tribes n peoples moved to avoid desertification of the Sahara
E1b1 was in the entirety of North Africa during the holocene(Green Sahara) . Tasilli N Ajjer art work and the Uan Muhuggiag mummy prove this. Kemet was the child of proto east and west/central Africans. This is reflected in the DNA of the Royals.
Although I am a proud descendant of Africa, I have three grandparents who were either half or part Native American. However, only one of them was from the Indigenous list in your video. My maternal grandmother was half Choctaw, but she had bluish gray eyes. Her blue eyes passed down to my daughter and one of my cousins at birth. At birth, meaning they were only born with blue eyes. My daughter's eyes were dark blue and my cousins eyes were light blue, but they now have green eyes as their eyes changed as they grew up from blue to green along with another cousin who was born with green eyes. One of my cousins and I were born with blonde hair which passed down to my daughter. Now, I have reddish-brown hair, but my cousin's blonde hair turned black, and my other cousin was born with and still has red hair. We Black Americans never know what our kids will look like as we are a mixed group. Our slave ancestors were the first Mulatto group born to slaves and their white masters. Moreover, the mixture continued until many of our ancestors began to look white. It was after slavery was abolished and our Mulatto ancestors married African or Black American spouses and bore children with them that we finally started to look more like our African ancestors.
please study quite a few more Answers in Genesis videos, moreover their books, and in a nutshell realize there is only one human race. Being "proud descendant of Africa" may seem fashionable (as in the preponderance of questionalbe BLM activities) however your mention of eye & hair colors indicate something other than African OR native american descent, such as north european (viking) genes. In addition your choice of "white masters" is inaccurate and perhaps intentionally offensive, since the African tribes themselves sold their neighbors not only to "white" buyers but predominantly central & south America. If you have been watching more videos in this series, and checking other sources, you would know that the great majority of slaves were bought by South American "bipoc" owners. In fact in 2023 there are even more BIPOC slaves on this planet than ever have been before, many are children mining elements required for cell phones and EV's. Finally, The goal is not to "look more like" anything other than... to BE more like Christ, mere "looks" are deceiving....as MLK advised-- don't judge people (including yourself) by your skin (eye) color, but by the content of your character, and this is what Jesus in fact will do. Please take this comment to heart, and be part of an inclusive one-race, the human race, ignoring skin/eye/hair color, get back to what really matters-- love for ALL no matter where they come from, and rewarding actual achievements no matter what the ethnicity.
@@cherylanon5791 Why don't you learn reading comprehension skills? Then you will comprehend that my comment is not about her series or other videos, it is to corroborate with her title and something she said in this particular video using my own life experiences. I do not sit around just watching videos; I am too busy for that in addition to how much I cannot stand self-appointed ignorant people who incorrectly correct other people. I usually ignore ignorance, but I felt compelled to respond to your circumlocutory, protracted ignorance. I am an educator with several college degrees and graduate degrees. Some of those degrees are in Educational Science and Research. Educators and professional researchers are lifetime learners through research studies. However, this is not a classroom or a research lab, it is a comment section where people can comment on any part of what the content creator says that resonates with them as well as socialize, hence the term social media. Apropos, my comment was meant for the content creator, it was not addressed to you. When you mind your own business and keep your nose out of other people's business, no one will know how ignorant you are.
@@GailBecker-MSED-CM-Author I think what she was trying get at is that most of the world is tired of any sentence that starts off with "I'm a proud descendant of Africa" ... all everyone hears is Pride this, and Pride that... I think for once it would be nice if black people, or anyone for that matter, tried practicing humility instead of pride. It would be nice to see that. Just once.
@@derekmunson3695 Then I suggest that when you hear it or see it, don't listen or read it. Just ignore it and move on because you only know what you are tired of! You do not know what most of the world knows or feel, only GOD knows that. Moreover, I will say and write what is in my heart. No one is going to tell me not to be proud of my African heritage. You could have kept that surreptitious racist epithet to yourself! You know nothing about me, but what I do know is that when someone makes an accusation about a stranger without knowing anything about her (especially never having met), it usually means that is who he is. Sometimes, it is wise to mind your own business, especially when the comment is not addressed to you. That, apropos, is humility!
I’m proud of my Germanic heritage. I’m also proud to be an American. But Biblically we are one family. All distant cousins. Now we are proving the biblical texts are true through genetic evidence. It’s ok to be proud of where you came from but never stop learning. Ps college degrees mean nothing to me.
Hi, I went to the museum in Cairo and saw in glass cases multiple mummified Pharaohs. Why not compare the DNA taken from some of those (dating back a couple of millennia BC) to the Egyptians of today?
@@rohayeha Over the last 5000 years populations around the eastern Mediterranean and the Middle East have mixed a lot and this is readily apparent in the DNA. DNA analysis has in fact been done of ancient Egyptian mummies from various periods, with results that match these population movements. Modern Egyptians also show DNA overlaps consistent with the population movements of the last 2000 years as well. This information is all readily available with a quick Google search leading to articles in journals like Science.
@@rohayeha - Egypt was conquered by the Greeks in 322 BC, by the Romans in 30 BC and later by the Ottomans in-the 7th century AD. The Egyptian of today is not the original Egyptian, but Arab. Mizraim, son of Ham was the Father of the Egyptian. The Copt of Egypt is a descent of the original Egyptian of the Pharaohs.
@@masada2828 No doubt the Copts are descendents who also got mixed otherwise there is no logic in saying that in the middle of a desert in Africa a white skinned race evolved naturally. If the ancient Egyptians were migrants then the first people to reach Egypt will also be Africans
Both haplotypes E1b1a and E1b1b populated ancient Egypt, but the return migrations to the interior of Africa were more related to E1b1a. Pharaoh Ramses III and his son Pentaweret are E1b1a.
It’s a good thing that you have dispelled the myth that E1b1a has always been in west Africa but there are some geneticists that believe that the E group originated in the Levant which is really North East Africa. E1b1a is the nemesis because it does not really fit within the Cushitic bloodlines so I don’t agree that E1b1a is a Hamitic bloodline and I also don’t agree with the placing of Japhetic bloodlines under Shem. More research is definitely needed here!
FYI, Abraham had other sons besides the two. Gen. 25:1-6 Abraham had taken another wife, whose name was Keturah. 2 She bore him Zimran, Jokshan, Medan, Midian, Ishbak and Shuah. 3 Jokshan was the father of Sheba and Dedan; the descendants of Dedan were the Ashurites, the Letushites and the Leummites. 4 The sons of Midian were Ephah, Epher, Hanok, Abida and Eldaah. All these were descendants of Keturah. 5 Abraham left everything he owned to Isaac. 6 But while he was still living, he gave gifts to the sons of his concubines and sent them away from his son Isaac to the land of the east.
@@bookmouse2719 I don't think so. He sent Hagar(the EGYPTIAN!) away BEFORE Sarah died. AFTER Sarah died he married a woman by the name of Keturah. A DIFFERENT WOMAN. By the way, Since Hagar was Egyptian & she got an Egyptian wife for her Son Ishmael; it's a revelation that ISHMAEL-and HIS offspring were 75% HAMITIC, 25% SEMITIC. With that information it is more accurate to assess-for those who believe the original Hebrews were "black"-I'd say.....THEY HAVE THE WRONG SON! Think about it😉😏✌️
@@kateescarlet9693, What evidence do you have to support your claims? What example can be used to discredit the cliam the person in this post is suggesting and one in the video? What of this video can be refuted by scientific research? I couldn't find information on the DUCK therory on a Google search. Where did you find out about this therory and where can I go to find out more information? What does this therory states?
If you just consider recent colonial history, you can see the fallacy of believing that modern Egyptians are the same people as the Ancient Egyptians. Are modern Americans in the United States the same population of Native Americans who lived here 700 years ago? The Native American population, unhappily, unfortunately, violently, and regrettably, has been for all intents and purposes displaced by Europeans and the descendants of Africans that they enslaved, along with the more recent immigrants from around the world. It would be ridiculous to say that the population of North America has always been what it is, what it looks like, today. This consideration applies even more so to the long trajectory of Egyptian history, especially considering the numerous invasions over millennia since the Pharaonic era.
This is faulty logic. European colonists committed genocide in America as we all know, which resulted in the disappearance of Native Americans. But there is no historical evidence that Arabs who invaded Egypt ever committed mass slaughter in Egypt. In fact, the history says otherwise. When Muslim delegation first arrived in Egypt, it was headed by an Arab Black man. The Egyptian ruler then took aside a member of the Muslim delegation and asked why Muslims had sent a Black man as their chief because Egyptians look down upon such people. Muslims said that their leader is the most educated and able among them, and that's why he was chosen by their Caliph.
Hello! There is history written in 1905 at South Africa the document is called the short history of the native tribes of the Transvaal. The history is about the people who stayed in South Africa then,it includes the Bantu who travelled from north Africa to Southern Africa. Some of the groups written about are Batswana called Bakwena ba Bafokeng. It is stated their oral history shows that they came from Ethiopia, passed by Egypt and crossed Sahara desert when they travelled to Southern Africa. Today some Batswana (some people of Botswana) say they originate from Egypt. There is one research done on genes of children in Botswana,the research found that thier genes were similar to genes of Luhyia people of Kenya. These Luhyia are said to originate from Egypt.
😂😂😂😂, came from Ethiopia then passed by Egypt then crossed the sahara desert then went down to south Africa without carriages or horses. Call Guinness records
@@charmingyoutuber2408 No camels were known in the Arabian desert not the African, they were only introduced to Africa through Arabian caravans since 800 bc and were used in Africa from 200 AD mainly in the eastern and northeast Mediterranean Africa and much later to West or South Africa. So Again from Arabia to the East and the North, not from South and West to the North East
@@Sema-Tawy I hear you. What time period were the people in the OC migrating through? Your timeline for camels still leaves over 2000 *known* years of travel with them.
If you’re sincere about replacing the Darwin perspective you will need to confront the anti Black narrative of the early writers envolvement in race science and eugenics. All who wrote that indigenous Black inhabitants could not have created advanced civilizations like Egypt. Also it’s creation can’t be attributed to Arabs who invaded Egypt 32 dynasties after its creation and installed a completely different culture.
Once you start down the road to disproving ideas/narratives, you will be doing it forever. It is better to present the evidence and let it stand. The former looks like you have an axe to grind; the latter I'd a position to advocate.
Lol egyptians not black africans not arabs not white peoples. please study peoples of the world. Facts are facts whether u like them or not. Egyptians never black.
Telling the historical truth is NOT " an axe to grind " . Your type of " An axe to grind " is a subjective perspective . If Jews spoke about the monster that is evil Nazism , will you make a false accusation against them of " having an axe to grind " ?
Patrick Lyons - Streets that follow like a tedious argument Of insidious intent To lead you to an overwhelming question ... Oh, do not ask, “What is it?” Let us go and make our visit.
I don't trust your research, the Kemetyu are the descendants of Anu the diminutive people who built the High Culture/Civilization of the Hapi/Nile Valley. They tell you where their Ancestors came from, " the foothills of the mountain of the Moon Kilimanjaro". The euraisans are not the people who built the Culture and Spirituality of Ta-Marri, it was the Anu who built Ta-Seti and Ta-Hehesi. From the beginning of the Nile Valley Civilization in Afrika, it was Afrikans and their Culture, Language and Spirituality that shows it is an Afrikan Civilization. In the Language it shows that they used what they saw to name and use in their vernacular and speech, no euraisan would use anything that is not in their environment to incorporate into their language because they would have never saw it so how would they be able to identify a vegetable or fruit and they never seen it. It is an Afrikan Civilization.
@@derickthomas1013 Not one single evidence shows what you say . This “ they came from the mountains of moon “ was invented by hotebs in black communities and has 0 evidence.
I don’t trust your opinions either. Because you use the past tense incorrectly. Not never saw it. Never SEEN it. And not they never seen it. Never SAW it. If you murder the English language who knows what you’ve done with your ‘history?’
I agree with the conclusions reached that the ancestor to E1b1a and E1b1b, identified as (E1b1), originated in North East Africa possibly where the Aksum kingdom was located. And, It is plausible that around 700 - 400 BC a split took place between the two Y DNA lineages based on the creationist timeline. It’s ironic that were it not for the E1b1b connection to E1b1a, the world would have thought that E1b1b was of West Asian origin instead of African origin as noted at 43:59 in the video. In modern times, E1b1a is showing up in the DNA of Egyptian pharaohs like Ramses III. This means E1b1a (the same Haplogroup I have as an African American) was significantly present in ancient Egyptian DNA. It can’t be ruled out that E1b1a migrated to West Africa from Egypt. And, it’s possible that E1b1 originated in the Levant instead of the Horn of Africa. After all, the ancient Natufians of the Levant carried haplogroup E. Ancient maps referred to the Levant and southern Arabia as north east Africa or the land of Ham. Either way, E YDNA is an African lineage to which I am proud to belong.
His research is based on the European view on Bantu history. The African view is a migration from the middle east. This makes both E1b1* rooted in the same place in the middle east. Another problem with this video and creationist views is that they still use the evolutionist view of history. The Biblical view state the Ark landed at Mt Ararat. So ALL peoples MUST have a common point of origin. This fact makes his DNA tree as to who Shem, Ham and Japheth is complete nonsense.
Stop lying. As an Israelite I can assure you that we have no friends. Socalled nonblack people are not our brothers and sisters. They are hybrids ie sapiens neanderthal ie not naturally occurring. Shalom
This is fascinating. I am Scandinavian in appearance but I have northern African, western African and Nigerian genetic as well. Yet I am very pale white with blond curly hair. This all makes sense to me now. Please keep unraveling the fabric of the Mystery of the History of Humanity. Well done.
It is interesting that the producer discounts data based on the Transatlantic Slave Trade but doesn't even mention the much worse slavery of the Muslim Arabs from 700CE to the present day.
On of the reasons for that is that the Arab slave trade almost always castrated the African men. As a result, there would be almost no Y chromosome trace of the Arab easterly slave trade because the African men in the Arab trade did not reproduce, unlike in the Atlantic slave trade where they did. His study is only looking at male lineage. Children of female African slaves in the Arab world would not be detectable in Y chromosome data and so don't come into his study.
Thank you Dr. Jeanson your elaborate and scientifically based explanation is the start of a long rehabilitation and reconstruction process of African, more so Kemitic history. As an original and indigenous Sudanese (The Bari: Eastern Nilotic of ancient Nubia now Sudan) and after comparing cognates, religious practices and now your testimony on ancient haplogroups, this indeed is a reaffirmation of the African/Kemitic origins of one of the world's greatest civilisations."Truth is like death after life, it sure will come". Old kemetic saying. The ancestors are watching
The thing is people will find something wrong with his study as well..im not sure why they are so convinced that they were somehow European or Middle Eastern when it has been proven that even the so called Middle Eastern people are a branch if Black Africans who went in that land and geography intervened and changed their appearance. So yes even they started off Black African..They all did prior to physical changes..plus how they believe they were European when at that time science tells us that Europeans in the modern sense were what they looked like today..But yet they will still hold on to racist views to what is obvious but they have a right to believe what they want even if it's not true..Plus they painted themselves as they saw themselves and they were Black African but because these people have a view of Black Africa as 1 type never minded that Black people come in a variety of shades and brown is one of them..They show paintings of them staying Nubians to try and prove a point but in those painting they are represented as the same color in some but they don't show you the other side of that same box in Tuts tomb that depict him saying those of the Levant and Asiatics and in NONE of them are they depicted the same color but they won't show that part..They show them as having white skin for men and women..Thats the way they saw them..But if they were the same color as them then they would paint them the same color as them which they did not..So it's evident they knew what colors to use but on their paintings they really do depict some Nubians the same color as them..Explain their insight on why that is cause that doesn't make sense but one thing you won't see is them showing that picture and the reason is because they can't explain that away..They started off Black African and eventually mixed over time to what we see today..In Max Planck study they didn't test those in the south like Aswan because they knew what they would find..Why would you do a so called DNA test but not include everyone in the region unless you knew what the results would show..that was purposely done to play with those thay want those results so bad and when they were called out ok it they had to come clean as far as their techniques..That completely discredited the results and that is why it is not excepted..Couldn't stand uo to peer review amd you should look at what these other scientists wrote. Some were just straight up upset they would put out bad info but we know why..So before you try to use that study read the whole thing cause you'll just be embarrassing yourself..Be blessed all my brothers and sisters and search for truth and always be unbias amd you'll find it..peace up..
@@dreamdiction That is why the paint themselves black and say that that they are from the Mountains of the Moon, which ia locate South of the Sahara, between tanzania and Uganda. That is why the language is similar to thw Wolofe people in Senegal, West Africa. That is why they orientate themselves to the south the interior of Africa instead of North. Yea right!
@@lindsaywaterman2010 There are over a hundred anatomical differences between Negroid and Caucasian races. For example, the negroid skull is DOUBLE the thickness of the Caucasian skull, negroid arms are three inches longer than Caucasian arms, the anatomical differences between Negroid and Caucasian skeletons are so obvious that even an untrained child can separate them. Embalming was the standard method of burial for ancient Egyptians of all social classes, tens of thousands of ancient Egyptian mummys have been examined and they are all Caucasian.
It was about time with this breakthrough in the history of ideology and the "eyeopening per excellence"! You did it! This will stir up and calm down simultaneously - exactly what was needed. You will be mentioned, remembered, referred to and used as a tool in the process of human development.
Japhethites are the family of seven sons that was "enlarged". The Judaic lineages suffered a considerable amount of persecution and loss of the male lineages.
Thing about your video, you seem to be guessing, when you say e1b1b and e1b1a seems to be in the same area at one time, but you don't know where, have you considered that this place is Egypt? during the time of Israel's slavery? your guessing is way off, you should do more historical study, If you read Josephus writings, he was a first century historian. it could help you a lot.
What happened in South Africa is example of what happened in Israel and Egypt If what happened in South Africa was the time of war and battle,south Africa would not have gotten their land back,there is no way you can hide the truth.
@@Evidence1Only1 It was called 'Aigiptos' by the Greeks, deriving from the indigenous name of a temple in the country: He-Ku-Ptah In de course of time in developed into ne name Egypt
yes it will because turkey was the landing spot of noah and the restart ofthe human race and when do enogh family reseach like i have all back to garden of eden then you will know the truth
This is wonderful work! I have been so disappointed the way Christians have capitulated to mainstream science by also selling out the Bible. I have known if God let evolution take over his creation he would have said so. Also these ridiculous dates science comes up with while dating artifacts and geology are just all over the place and given a little prodding doesn't stand up. As someone with mostly Nordic lineage with a lot of family with middle Eastern appearance your lecture definitely hits home.
Carbon dating is not "all over the place". Isotopes give a pretty accurate date, with + or - range. Did you take chemistry or geology? Rigorous science.
What the heck is "mainstream science"? Geology, physics, chemistry, biology, if these interfere with your religion I gotta say there must be superstition in the mix.
A little clarification on pronunciation: Cush is pronounced Koosh in Hebrew, Mizraim is pronounced Mits-rah-yim or Mits-rah-yeem, and Joktan is pronounced Yoke-tahn.
My father was a committed Darwinist. He inculcated that ideology at an early age. Some of my first reading books were about dinos and ape-men. It seemed logical, but there was an emptiness to it. I thought that if Darwin was true, then there was no hope. Thank God He eventually revealed His Son to me, and now things began to make sense.
This is because you weren’t taught about evolution. Change and evolution is going to happen irregardless of your beliefs. Darwin was biased and influenced by the social sciences of that time. We have evolved 😂😂😂😂
His argument works like this: 1. Establish a Y-chromosome mutation rate based pedigree studies to calculate a Y-chromosome time to most recent common ancestor (TMRCA) approximately 4500 years ago. 2. Reinterpret the Y-chromosome phylogeny and chronology based on this earlier TMRCA. 3. Correlate historical events, like migrations, to nodes in the Y-chromosome phylogeny. 4. Overlay the Y-chromosome phylogeny onto the pedigree for Noah and his sons derived from Genesis. 5. Do (3) for Biblical events (e.g. the Flood, Babel, etc.) 6. Claim he rewrote the history of humanity and confirmed the AiG interpretation of Genesis.
There are, uh, significant problems with the case Jeanson makes.
The first, which underlies much of his analysis, is that he treats genealogy and phylogeny as interchangeable. They are not interchangeable. Genealogy is the history of individuals and familial relationships. Phylogeny is the evolutionary history of groups: populations, species, etc. A phylogenetic tree may superficially look like a family tree, but all those lines and branch points represent populations, not individuals. This is an extremely basic error.
There are additional problems with each step of the case he makes. In terms of calculating the Y-TMRCA, it’s nothing new: He uses single-generation pedigree-based mutation rates rather than long-term substitution rates. It’s the same error that invalidates his work calculating a 6000kya mitochondrial TMRCA. He even references a couple of studies that indicate the consensus date of 200-300kya for the Y-MRCA, but dismisses them as low-quality (he ignores that there are many, many more such studies). He is constrained in an extremely narrow timespan for much of the Y-chromosome branching due to its occurrence after the flood (~4500 years ago) and running up against well-documented, recorded human history (he ignores that Egyptian history spans the Flood). So he has to squeeze a ton of human history into half a millennium, at most. In correlating his revised node dates on the Y-chromosome phylogeny with historical events, he employs some really half-as…uh, amateurish “analysis”. Like, “the ancestral population for sister haplogroups existed along the line between the geographic homeland for the derived groups, and the descendants migrated in opposite directions” amateurish. I’m not exaggerating; this is how he explains how and where E1b1a and E1b1b descended from E1b1. He also just ignore inconvenient data that refute his model. Just straight up. Thanks to the crew on the Peaceful Science forum, my favorite example of this is R1b in Europe, and specifically Italy. Jeanson claims haplotype R1b arrived in Europe between 700 and 1400 CE, and specifically in Italy in the 14- or 1500s. Exceeeeeeeept…we have DNA from a stone age burial in northern Italy dated to about 14,000 years ago, and that individual was, you guessed it, R1b. Even if we take Jeanson’s YEC timeline at face value, a stone age specimen would be pretty close to the flood, about 4kya, which also directly invalidates his model. Moving on, the next step in his argument is to overlay the Y-chromosome phylogeny (now with incorrect new dates incorrectly correlated to historical events) with the pedigree of Noah and his sons and their descendants derived from Genesis. To do this, Jeanson egregiously acts as though a phylogenetic tree and a pedigree are interchangeable, treating nodes on the phylogeny as specific individuals rather than populations. And finally, he correlates the haplotypes on the phylogeny (now incorrectly overlayed with Noah’s family tree) with Biblical groups and events. That’s how Jeanson rewrites the history of humanity. That’s it. … It’s actually worse than that. Because he ignores Neanderthals. Neanderthals interbred with Homo sapiens. Most YECs have Neanderthals (and Denisovans) as descendants of Adam and Eve, and living post-flood. This means that Noah is also their Y-MRCA. The problem is that we have Neanderthal genomes, and their Y chromosomes are highly divergent. This necessarily pushes the MRCA back far beyond the YEC timeline, even using Jeanson’s incorrect mutation rates. How does Jeanson deal with this? He completely ignores it. Really. There are a grand total of three (3) mentions of Neanderthals in this book. At no point does Jeanson engage with the fact that Neanderthal genomics refutes the foundation of his argument - the recent Y-MRCA. So…that’s not great.
As soon as you say creation scientists or Christian archaeology you have done something to the original word. A creation scientist is not a scientist.... it tells you that in its naming. Same thing with the Christian Science... the Prefect in front of the word science tells you it has a different meaning. Science isn't done in any of these. It's close to science and that's why they call it a kind of Science
I made a dna study on my brothers' dna and it came out to be 30, 000 years old from Arabia (Sumerian) and my mother's from Sudan 15,000 years ago both migrated to the west Europe, Spain and England, then to France and finally to Scandinavia.
You say "it came out to be 30,000 years ago". Who told you this? How did they know? Do you believe them? What evidence have you seen that convinced you?
Yes I believe them, Both looked unlike most Finns , dark and reddish hair, both were interested in Egypt and Arabian countries and art. My mom looked like the Russian Emperor Nicolai II. My dad looked like the UK royality in Australia. They told me I have lots of relatuves in UK.
My parents never knew their origin, but both acted unlike many Finns. They traveled a lot. My mother was an painter and had made unusually extravagant clothes and she looked egyptian. My dad traveled a lot. They spoke fluently various languages. They did things Finns rarely do. They felt often that they did not belong here. It made a lot of sense to me when I heard their genetic origins.
Maybe in your Sequel to "Traced" you can put more in how the Old Testament book of Genesis is encoded in the Chinese language itself. Before B.C. the Chinese worshipped a single God. The word "Create" in Chinese has the imagery of "God Spoke" and so on. The Garden, The Fall, The Flood, Tower of Babel and even the dates for Jesus' Birth/Cruxificion/Resurrection are all recorded in Ancient Chinese documents. These documents record strange Celestial events in 4 BC and switch of Day/Night followed by Earthquakes and more strange Celestial Events in 31 AD.
Chinese written history is older than the deserts. Are you trying to say Christianity originated in China? Or are you playing that game where you connect the dots and call it a code? Have you studied Taoism or Buddhism? Do you realize that every religion has the same Golden rule? Do you really beleive that all of human history revolves around your faith? Because if you do, it's very egomaniacal and very wrong.
@@toddfordr8218 No, Christianity didn't exist until Jesus came in 4 BC. What I AM saying is that within the very Chinese Language characters themselves are the same accounts given in the Books of Moses. What I am saying is that Taoism and Buddhism didn't exist in China until around the Time of Christ. The Chinese People themselves practiced a form of Judaism, including Blood Sacrifice of spotless Sheep. Genetically, Chinese, Afghans, Jews, etc are all descendants of Shem and thus are "Semitic People". This is well recognized in Peer Reviewed Papers. What I am saying is that the Offical Chinese written documents record the dates of Jesus's Birth, Death and Resurrection.
What happened to the Egyptian history that says Berbers invaded Egypt? Surely Berbers are among the Europeans who invaded Egypt. Berbers have never been the ancient people of North Africa when they actually migrated from Europe. It's amazing how dna experts lie by saying Berbers are the ancient people of North Africa. The children of Ham are the ancient original people of North Africa and not people who migrated from Europe! Berbers have a long history in North Africa but they are not the ancient people of North Africa. To take dna samples of Berbers living in North Africa today and lie that Berbers are the ancient and original people of North Africa is laughable! 😂
Perhaps humanity should spend less time on arguing the vast ridiculousness of this physical universe and devote our lives to increased spiritual advancement. I think this is G-d’s intention when He CREATED us. The Kingdom lies within there is no doubt.
It seems you left out the Biggest Depopulation Event in Africa which is the Sub-Saharan Slave Trade and the Indian Ocean Slave Trade. Arabs and Berbers had many Concubines of Africans enslaved. Many of their Sons did the same thing. You should factor this in. Just trying to Help
Faut savoir que le MOT ESCLAVE signifie celui qui est dominé par quelqu'un ou quelque chose, DONC tu peux être esclave des cigarettes, de téléphone, de la télé, , d'alcool, de la vie de debauche, le sexe, de critique, de sorcellerie, la jalousie, du manger, d'orgueil, de colère....DONC tout le monde est esclave de quelque chose. Voir le dictionnaire. Allô salut bonjour coucou!!!🤣
The only white man who has really spoken and told us the civilization was started by Africans. The only person whose given credit to Africans. All other so called inventors do not even tok as though Africans existed .
I thought I was talking to myself. The DNA Trace, egyptology the Nigerians, native Americans the Atlantic slave trade, the sons of Noah, European, on and on and on. I really have no words to explain my enthusiasm.👍
@Lynn Link The earth may be much older than 13,000 years (7,000 years for creation + 6,000 years history) 1 In the beginning God (Jesus Elohim, PLURAL, the Elohim FAMILY) created the heaven and the earth. 2 And the earth *WAS* (Hayah: BECAME) without form, and void (destroyed and barren); and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God (Elohim, PLURAL, the family) moved upon the face of the waters. 3 And God (Elohim) said, Let there be light: and there was light. Hayah: The word is translated "became" or "become" 133 times in the Old Testament. (An example of hayah describing the transition from one state to another is Genesis 19:26 where Lot's wife became- hayah -a pillar of salt.) *Strongs Concordance: was* Word: DID Pronounce: haw-yaw Strong: H1961 Orig: a primitive root (compare 1933); to exist, i.e. be or become, come to pass (always emphatic, and not a mere copula or auxiliary):--beacon, X altogether, be(-come), accomplished, committed, like), break, cause, come (to pass), do, faint, fall, + follow, happen, X have, last, pertain, quit (one-)self, require, X use. H1933 Use: TWOT-491 Verb 1) to be, become, come to pass, exist, happen, fall out 1a) (Qal) 1a1) ----- 1a1a) to happen, fall out, occur, take place, come about, come to pass 1a1b) to come about, come to pass 1a2) to come into being, become 1a2a) to arise, appear, come 1a2b) to become 1a2b1) to become 1a2b2) to become like 1a2b3) to be instituted, be established 1a3) to be 1a3a) to exist, be in existence 1a3b) to abide, remain, continue (with word of place or time) 1a3c) to stand, lie, be in, be at, be situated (with word of locality) 1a3d) to accompany, be with 1b) (Niphal) 1b1) to occur, come to pass, be done, be brought about 1b2) to be done, be finished, be gone 2 Peter & Jeremiah seem to describe what happened at Genesis 1:2 when the earth BECAME an uninhabited wasteland - destroyed by water- BEFORE Noah’s flood. I believe this Gen 1:2 destruction took place before Noah’s flood, and that’s why YHWH said he wouldn’t flood the world again (a third time). Isaiah makes reference to this in Isaiah 24:1 Behold, the LORD maketh the earth empty, and maketh it waste, and turneth it upside down, and scattereth abroad the inhabitants thereof We are reminded that we are ignorant of antiquity and that everything occurs in cycles. Ecclesiastes 1:9 The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and *there is no new thing under the sun* It’s all been done before. Jeremiah 4:23 “I beheld the earth, and, lo, it was (BECAME) *without form, and void;* and the heavens, and they had no light. 24 I beheld the mountains, and, lo, they trembled, and all the hills moved lightly. 25 I beheld, and, lo, there was no man, and all the birds of the heavens were fled. 26 I beheld, and, lo, the fruitful place was a wilderness, and all the cities thereof were broken down at the presence of the LORD, and by his fierce anger. 27 For thus hath the LORD said, The whole land shall be desolate; *yet will I not make a full end.* The phrase “without form, and void” is only used twice in the Bible, and I believe they are describing the same event - destruction of “the old world” mentioned in the Bible. 2 Peter 3:5 “For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and *the earth standing out of the water and in the water:* 6: Whereby *the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished:* Ecclesiastes 1:9 “The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun.” Is there any thing whereof it may be said, See, this is new? *it hath been already of old time, which was before us.* 11 There is no remembrance of former things; neither shall there be any remembrance of things that are to come with those that shall come after. An OLD TIME which was BEFORE US.. BEFORE The earth became WITHOUT FORM & VOID, discussed in Genesis 1:2, & Jeremiah, and 2Peter 3:5 Genesis 1:2 is a Destruction, Genesis 1:3 is a RE-Creation *There’s no telling how many times the earth has been created and destroyed.*
Thank you for touching on the Bantu people, our history gets blurred after 300 or so years, but I enjoyed your analysis. It is in line with some of the theories on Bantu migration.
The history of the Bantu is blurred because there is a big cover up of the truth. Even this research is covering up the truth by keeping Haplogroup E’s origins out of the Levant which is really North Africa. He is giving our history to some European white folks.
He is flat wrong regarding the Bantu migrations. They are easily accommodated within conventional historical timescales, being little more than 2,000 years old.
I am an Akan, Ghanaian descendent. The descendant line of the Egyptian Kings. If you matched my DNA to the King Pharaohs you might be surprised at the similarities. But the modern day “Egyptians” refuse the truth.
I truly appreciate this presentation from someone credible. The explanations make sense by answering those ambiguous teachings children learned in school, and the questions these kids asked about the Bible.
This is the number of years since you joined, and the number of views you've had in those years. You're the common denominator! Now you have something legitimate to laugh at.
You've probably heard this before, but in case you haven't: the name for Egypt in the languages in Kenya (both Nilote and Bantu, and also Swahili) is Misri. Misraim or Misreem is a plural, refering to the people of or descendants of Misri. (I was a Peace Corps volunteer in Kenya in the late '80's.)
Wrong Ancient Egyptians were Syrians and Anatolians That is what the DNA studies said clearly All the Ancient Egyptians kings where of Levantines origins Ordinary ppl were mixed Even north african Berber were of levant origins
If there is such a correlation between Haplogroup E1b1b and the Moslem conquests, (1) Why is there not much of the E1b1b in Arabia and (2) Why is there so much of it outside the Arab caliphate at its greatest extent? E1b1b looks more like a North African haplogroupe that overflowed into Africa from Asia than the reverse.
From Arabia we have these descriptions from early Western explorers: “The inhabitants of this part of Arabia nearly all belong to the race of Himyar. Their complexion is almost as black as the Abyssinians,” -- Baron von Maltzan, 'Geography of Southern Arabia' (1872) “ [the Hamida are] small chocolate colored beings, stunted and thin… with mops of bushy hair… straggling beards , vicious eyes, frowning brows … armed with scabbards slung over the shoulder and Janbiyyah daggers…” a people “of the great Hejazi tribe that has kept his blood pure for the last 13 centuries…” --Sir Richard Burton (1879) “The people of Dhufar are of the Qahtan tribe, the sons of Joktan mentioned in Genesis: they are of Hamitic or African rather than Arab types…” --Arnold Wilson, The Geographical Journal (1927) “the most prosperous tribe of all the Hamitic group, possessing innumerable camels, herds of cattle and the richest frankincense country. They resemble the Bisharin tribe of the Nubian desert. Men of big bone , they have long faces long narrow jaws, noses of a refined shape long curly hair and brown skin.” --Richmond Palmer (1929) “Mahra is the Arab name for the Bedouin tribes who are different in appearance to other Arabs, having almost beardless faces, fuzzy hair and dark pigmentation - such as the Qarra, Mahra and Harasis… Also on “…the Qarra, Mahra and Harasis with parts of other tribes. The language is derived from the language of the Sabaeans, Minaeans and Himyarites. The Mahra with other Southern Arabian peoples seem aligned to the Hamitic race of north-east Africa… The Mahra are believed to be descended from the Habasha, who colonized Ethiopia in the first millennium BC” -- David Phillips, Peoples on the Move (2001) “European observers have made much of their physical resemblance to Somalis and Ethiopians, but there is no historical evidence of any connections.” -- E. Peterson, 'Oman’s Diverse Society: Southern Oman' And scholars have long noted: “Mr. Baldwin draws a marked distinction between the modern Mahomedan Semitic population of Arabia and their great Kushite, Hamite, or Ethiopian predecessors. The former, he says, ‘are comparatively modern in Arabia,’ they have ‘appropriated the reputation of the old race,’ and have unduly occupied the chief attention of modern scholars.” -- Charles Hardwick (1872) “Among ‘these Negroid features which may be counted normal in Arabs are the full,rather everted lips, shortness and width of nose, certain blanks in the bearded areas of the face between the lower lip and chin and on the cheeks; the large luscious gazelle-like eyes, a dark brown complexion, and a tendency for the hair to grow in ringlets. Often the features of the more Negroid Arabs are derivatives of Dravidian India rather than inheritances of Hamitic Africa. Although the Arab of today is sharply differentiated from the Negro of Africa, yet there must have been a time when both were represented by a single ancestral stock; in no other way can the prevalence of certain Negroid features be accounted for in the natives of Arabia.” -- Henry Field, Anthropology Memoirs Volume 4 (1902) “The Kushites the first inhabitants of Arabia, are known in the national traditions by the name of Adites, from their progenitor, who is called Ad, the grandson of Ham.” -- F. Lenormant (1922) “There is a considerable mass of evidence to show that there was a very close resemblance between the proto-Egyptians and the Arabs before either became intermingled with Armenoid racial elements.” -- Elliot Smith, the Ancient Egyptians and the Origins of Civilization (1923) “In Arabia the first inhabitants were probably a dark-skinned, shortish population intermediate, between the African Hamites and the Dravidians of India and forming a single African Asiatic belt with these.” -- Handbook of the Territories which form the Theater of Operations of the Iraq Petroleum Company Limited and its Associates
All these comments are guesswork based on the inclinations of the authors. Their assumption starts from Egyptians cannot be black Africans. No more. Then they weave their tripe around this assumptions
What amazes most is the fact that DNA is not being abstracted from the oldest bones found in these areas. You just gave us DNA of the people living in these areas today when know Aryan’s conquest happened in Israel, Asia, Americas, Africa and Europe. Do you have a link showing the oldest ancient DNA being abstracted from actual human bones?
I agree getting DNA from the people living in Egypt today is not complete analysis. You have to sample against ancient DNA. This is my biggest criticism of Dr. Nathian Jeanson.
This is excellent research and it answers a lot of questions for me. I'm a Afro Descedant/Afro-American. I have traced my family lineages and found living relatives in west and central Africa. When I received my results from 23 and me my Y Dna showed up as E-M4451 which is in the family of E1b1a and it shows I'm connected to the Pharaoh Rameses the III EV38. In west African history there are many oral stories about Egyptian migration to that area.
E1B1A Y Haplogroup is the lineage of Jacob. The original genetic children of Jacob called Israel it is also documented with credible nonsensical sources of scholarship. But each person has to determine the truth of any evidence presented as factual.
'The eyes of the Lord keep watch over knowledge, but he overthrows the words of the traitor.' Proverbs 22:12 ESV 'Let all the earth fear the Lord; let all the inhabitants of the world stand in awe of him!' Psalm 33:8 ESV
THE ANCIENT EGYPTIANS ARE YORUBA RACE FROM WEST AFRICA. GO TO TH-cam CHANNEL dark mattter1801 and watch who is messing with God. Also watch the infinity sign and Egyptology deepest blackhole undercover. Answers in Genesis is a liar........
Thanks for your reports about human ancestral history, I would recommend if want talk about this topic to sit and talk with the native people you are talking about, I am glad we are talking about His-Story not ours. Kushitic people deserve to talk about their knowledge before DNA. More over modern Egyptian are mixed race and they don't like to be considered African. Thank you.
It is always a good thing to remember that people moved from Egypt (Misiri) in different directions. I have traced my ancestors from East Africa to Ancient Egypt during the Pharaohs period and based on the actual people with their names and their children. These people followed the bank of River Nile northwards. They never branched to West Africa at all. In 1998 AENEAS CHIGWEDERE, published a book called "The Roots of the Bantu" based on the archaeological findings and the Timbakutu Manuscript; his research work proved beyond doubt that there were three different period which he described as "Trinity", when people left Egypt and moved directly upwards following the River Nile. So, when talking about the "Bantu" people it is helpful to remember that some never crossed Africa to Nigeria and backward to Eastern part of Africa. In any-case the Bantu people's ancestor originated from Ethiopia to Egypt then moved northwards. Even presently, the language is slightly similar within the Bantu people who never moved to Nigeria, while those from Nigeria speak like a small group in East Africa called (Luos or Nilotes), and are mainly found in Northernern Uganda up to South Sudan, some in Kenya and Tanzania. Those from Nigeria are not Bantu but Nilotics. While the rest of present East Africa and southern Africa are mainly "Bantu". So, I am having a problem with the publication about DNA'S being factual of "Bantu"'s origin and movement.
This would explain the Tamil (Dravidian) linguistic cognates Bishop Caldwell reports from West Africa. The Andaman Islanders on the East of India look Bantu. They have been there for tens of thousands of years. The Sentinel Islands protected by India from colonisation. There are also Tamil tribal folks who look Australian.
Interesting presentation. One last thing has your data been verified by genetics experts or the International Federation of Human Genetics? If not, will you be presenting at the Feb 22-26, 14th International Congress of Human Genetics held in Cape, South Africa? Many experts will be very interested in your presentation.
THE ANCIENT EGYPTIANS ARE YORUBA RACE FROM WEST AFRICA. GO TO TH-cam CHANNEL dark mattter1801 and watch who is messing with God. Also watch the infinity sign and Egyptology deepest blackhole undercover. Answers in Genesis is a liar.
42:50 your trying to fool people, yet note the E1B1* IN THE NATUFIAN CULTURE! "The announcement of a religion which had been preached by a descendant of Ishmael , whom the Moors regarded as their father ; the rapid conquests of the Mussulmans , who were already masters of half of Asia and a large portion of Africa , and who threatened to enslave the world , aroused the excitable imaginations of the Moors , and restored to their national character all its passionate energy." ~History of the Moors of Spain Florian Harper & brothers, 1841 E1B1 ONLY FOSSIL IS IN NATUFIAN CULTURE, which homeland is leaving Syria, Damascus as Shemites as Arabia was sons of Shem About 1800 B. C., according to the Arab historians, Joktanite tribes entered and conquered South Arabia, but were largely absorbed by the Cushite stock; as a result of which the second, or Sabæan, empire of Ad was formed, in which the Joktanites became the sacred and land-owning caste, while the political and economic activities remained with the Cushites. This was probably the power that dealt with the Egyptians under the XVIIth dynasty, as pictured at Deir-el-Bahri; concerning which the publication of the Egypt Exploration Fund seems a little too positive that the "Land of Punt' could not be in Arabia because the faces of the Punt people were not Semitic. The testimony of Arabia ok be at fault if they were. Later the Sabæan Cushites, conquered by the Banu Ya'rub, a Joktanite stock from Yemen, migrated into Africa, and establishing themselves in Abyssinia, continued the ancient conflict for six centuries more." ~The Periplus of the Erythraean Sea : travel and trade in the Indian Ocean by Schoff, Wilfred Harvey, 1874-1932 And nor the Arabs pushed jews into Africa The land that next to Judea contained the largest number of Jews was Egypt."(AFRICA!) `A Thousand Years of Jewish History: From the Days of Alexander the Great to the Moslem Conquest of Spain Maurice Henry Harris 1904 38:00 false 😭 show the oldest E1B1A fossil culture E1B1A IS IRON IN Africa Not Paleolithic Mesolithic nor any Neolithic fossil culture E1B1B is older then E1B1A and D is older then them both and D has a mix of Asians & said Denisovans. The DE-YAP origin needs to be PROVE by ACTUALLY FOUND FOSSIL CULTURE not guess work 35:55 that's only AD time 🌹 yet why don't you look at how E1B1A went to France 9000 ybp then went to Peru 3000bc and back to bMAC culture 2000bc before even going in AFRICA! 31:35 because E1b1b is Arab Joktan-of Ever to Ishmael While E1B1A is Israelites that was in Egypt,Africa There are no Paleolithic Mesolithic or Neolithic fossil culture of E1B1A in Africa Note this
E1b1b(Arab Muslims) came back to Africa and push out E1b1a(Bantus) from Egypt creating causing the Bantu migration. So Ancient Egyptians were Bantus. In fact, Rameses III carried haplogroup E1b1a. And, all the Armana mummies(including Tutankhaman) was found to be related genetically to people from the African Great Lakes(Also Bantus) It's academia's code not to ever state or write that Bantus or E1b1a carriers were the Ancient Egyptians. They want to leave the audience in doubt. They will say Africans, but not Bantu.
@@tgr5772 Middle east is not a continent but the description of intercontinental intersection. So, middle east did not create any race of people unlike Asia, Africa, and Europe. Africans inhabited the middle east region first. Then came major intermixing between Caucasians and Africans in that region. Majority of the people there are mixed. They're NOT a race of people. And, NO. Ancient Egypt going back to 4500 BC were pure Africans. Some mixing started taking place in the New Kingdom. So before the mixed happened there was a pure people initiating that civilization. Mix doesn't just happen in a vacuum. Ramses III carry the Bantu haplogroup E1b1a. Parts of the 19th dynasty and almost the whole 20th dynasty was ruled by the Ramses familial line. And one thing that we know about the Bantu(E1b1a) people is that they're universally pure till today, unlike the E1b1b carriers.
@@tgr5772 I agree. There was always mixing but those mixing happened when the circumstance dictates it. That circumstance entails an encounter. If that encounter never took place then you have isolation. We do have groups that went through periods of isolation or minimal encounter. The Bantu people is one of them. The Bantus for the most part exist with minimal encounter from other groups. The minimal encounter they had was through trade. Most mass mixing happened by virtue of invasion rather than voluntary. No two races of people that are indigenous to the same landmass exist. Races come into existence by virtue of isolation. Intermixing happened due to migration. Bantus did not migrate far outside Africa and Asians did not migrate far outside Asia, resulting in them maintaining their purity. "You can find red-haired, fair-skinned West Africans who are born white. Since the Romans were able to cross to Mali, the Sahara was hardly impenetrable so there was mixing and trading and migration. " I will have to disagree. There is NO fair-skinned Bantus in Africa. That doesn't exist. We do have though some Igbos who have caramel complexion but they look light relative to the darker skinned counterparts. Never fair-skinned though. You might be thinking of albinos, we Bantus suffer from that condition more than other people. But they go back to being dark skin after the first generation of procreating with another dark skin person. That diversity you're referring to is mostly genetic and not having light/white skin.
The problem with Jeanson's claims, is that both E1b1a and E1b1b are both much older (40,000 +yrs) than the 6000 yr time frame he is attempting to force them to fit. It is not a recommended practice to fuse science with judeo christian mythology.
@@lostmusichits Benny, the Lord has not yet revealed these things to you. Perhaps you are still a child, spiritually speaking. Meat is not for babies. Clearly; you DO speak from a place of ignorance.
I find this fascinating. Thanks so much for this series and this channel! On a lighter note (😊) Are there any R2d2 or C3p0 lines? How long have these DNA lines been named in this manner-just wondering, cuz if it began pre-Star Wars era, those character names might add a whole new layer of subtext to the storyline, lol!
Glad to see someone else wondering the same thing I've been asking myself (which doesn't get me very far) since his original series at the beginning of covid.
Congratulations, Dr. Jeanson ! I've been waiting for my copy to arrive, only to be informed it's first printing sold out. I am now waiting til July. Congratulations 🎉 again
السلالة Eمن أصول نيجيريا في إيران وجودهم اكثر من 10000الف سنة j1_M267 وجودهم في إيران اكثر من 10000الف سنة البروفسور ناثانيال ت.جينسون كلامه صحيح تاريخيا وعلميا بالمرصاد على كل كذاب اشر في العالم
I am a Finn, from Finland and my brothers' dna was studied in Uk with the result that our mother originated from Egypt 15000years ago and our father from Sumeria 30000 years ago. We have loads of relatives in the middle of Finland.
Seems to me that one of the most important points in the creationist vs evolutionist debate is that to be consistent, the word kind in Genasys should be considered in the context of organism descriptions in the creation story. These descriptions do not equate exactly with those of biology but are closest to the family level of the biological taxonomy, not species. This point has very important implications for any discussion on the 2 views. Nobody seems to get this obvious point, why is that? Perhaps we all just want to pick fights.
@ken Webster perhaps you mean “kind” And yes, Bible is correct that animals will create according to their “kind” Never ever in history do we see otherwise. Never ever do we see like a fish breeding out a different kind of lifeform like an elephant.
1. Egyptians still use many ancinet egyptian words in their dialect. 2. Alot of traditional egyptian food is from old a cine egyptian recipes. 3. Ancient Egyptians themselves depicted 3 different colors of their people in their paintings. 4. All the royal mummies have aqualine noses go see them for urself in Cairo. Likely middle Easter or black nubian noses.
I find these discussions fascinating, but difficult to follow and I finally realized why. I don’t know where we’re going. Couldn’t you start with an overview?
The Arabic name for Egypt is "Masr" and Egyptians are "Masri" which seems to be related to Mizraim. Christian Egyptians claim to be truly Egyptian -- and descended from the pharoahs -- and not Arabs, who are usually Muslim. When the Arabs invaded, spreading the "religion of peace" with their swords, they suppressed the Coptic language and demanded the use of Arabic only. Coptic language has survived only as a liturgical language in the rites of the Coptic Orthodox and Coptic Catholic Churches. Was there any distinction among Muslims and Christians in your DNA sampling?
They don't allow it because they deny a significant part of our world and that is the spiritual side. Without recognizing an obvious aspect is like getting half the picture, imo.
@christhurman2350 😂🤣 Wow, this was 2 yrs ago when I made this comment. Way back when my worldview was just starting to grow. I believe I meant elites back then, but today I call them the predators. Truth is always buried, thus why we need to dig for it. We're not supposed to act out of their control. If only we can learn to change our mindsets.
@@christhurman2350 i don't use pronouns, so when I said I meant elites back then as "they" that's what I meant. I now say predators as "they" instead of elites. "We" is plural aka us, the commoners/population/serfs. I am not able to break it down any more for you than this. Maybe ask a friend?
I have yet to hear a succinct synopsis of these DNA findings. I assume these long scientific videos are necessary to “prove” the science behind them. , but how about a short version for those who believe you?
EB1B1 DNA is not from middle East. It is from North East Africa(Ethiopia, Eritrea, Somalia). Thus, your data show close relation between kushite(Eastern kushite) and Berbers (Northern African kushites). Thus, your research just proved that relationship between Eastern kushites and Northern Kushites of EB1B1 DNA origin.There is no way that Somalis are 80% middle eastern origin because of Arabian invasion.
Hi, what I don't agree is that when Shem, Ham and Japhet got their y-chromosome from the same father Noah, the y-chromosomes of the sons should be different from each other?
The Bible has words for "science". God calls man's science ..."science so called". And the history has been erased like a good old fashion book burning. Buying your book right now. 👍
I am totally blown away and you have connected many dots for me. I have had two DNA analyses by different companies according to their feedback I am 43% Nigeran(Yoruba) and 23% Sierra Leonian (Mende) 7%kenyian Luya 1%Maasai 5.2 Middle Eastern 9.1% Scandinavian 1.0% 2.9 Northwest European 1% Inuit (Eskimo)2%Meso.American(Peru).
So, the clear conclusion here is Haplogroup E1b1a carriers(Bantus) were the Ancient Egyptian mainly with some E1b1b, A, and B inputs. All those Haplogroups originate in North East Africa. Then E1b1b which matured in the Middle East and also mixed Eurasian female then came back with it's full militarily might, invaded and ransacked Ancient Egypt causing what we know as the Bantu expulsion/exhodus/migration. It's so clear and simple. Caucasians went to great length to hide such simple truth. It's amazing that even though Bantus were expelled, they still occupy most of the arable land in Africa and also making up close to 70% of the population of that humongous continent. I'm starting to think that the Ancient Egyptians(Bantus) withdrawal from North Africa was more strategic than just being conquered. It's a coincidence that they would lose the war and their territorial position would get better. Most of the time when a group is conquered, their population would dwindle(Ala Native Americans, Australian aboriginees) but the Bantus took their skills somewhere else and build other empires. I guess it's testament to their skill in craftsmanship and agriculture at that time. I guess those deserts weren't worth holding onto so they took their skills somewhere else and left Egypt to the desert dwellers. Greatest decision ever made. Leave mohamed with his desert was the plan. Pretty cool plan. I like it. lol
It's sad that we have to go on a chase to find truth that is stated clearly in God's Word. We can't handle truth and prefer stories but our searches will always lead us back to truth for we know truth. I trust God, He Is Truth.
Are the ancient Egyptians related to modern Egyptians? No, the arabs who form the majority of Egpyt today are the descendants of "arab invaders" who captured it from the romans. When KEMET was invaded by foreigners the Afrikans were still living in KEMET even after the arab invaders displaced the roman invader. The Afrikans who live in "ancient egypt/KEMET are still living in egypt while some of the Afrikan population went further inwards into Afrika such as East & West Afrika and even further down south to places such as South Afrika.
The lecture was exhilarating,surely _however Mr.Jeanson's humility, in the face of discovering how The Bible ultimately proves itself, was absolutely wonderful to behold and added an element of - Look up & Rejoice - while we watched in awe! Thank you everso much!
There will be a lot of new 'species' due to cloning, Synthetic DNA, Ai and nano particle manipulation through 3D printing. We are back in the days of Noah
And mixing genes of animals with other animals, plants with other plants, and animals are plants. I guess they're called hybrids, like that's a good idea.
Thank you for bringing this up.
ITS ALREADY OUT THERE.
Yep. There are going to be a lot of designer babies.
If we are indeed in the days of Noah. There is nothing new under the sun.
Dear Dr Nathaniel, thanks for gathering such enormous amounts of data and presenting it to us in a nut shell. Sadly, many people on earth do not share such joys of discovering the truths of the Bible but hate God without a cause.
The Bible is African! Europe/romans stole it!
They say Egyptians were not black Africans but we find all ancient Egyptian culture , tradition and rituals all over African cultures today.
They lying
There is something called the Sahara desert. This served as a gene divider as they say. Those south of it decoupled the gene that causes darker skin, those north of it did for the one that caused lighter skin. Natural barriers lead to unique gene pool. The ancient Egyptians were not black Africans because there dna says they weren’t. The Sudanese south of Egypt, had many pyramids as well, which were black Africans who lived off the Nile, as any where else is desert. Ancient Egypt influenced them. Simple as that.
@@MarkSmith-vo1vn The Sahara didn't divide anything. Genetics has proven that the original North Africans were the Iberomaurusians and they were half black African. There goes your Sahara divide theory in the dustbin.
@@MarkSmith-vo1vnactually dna shows the ancient Egyptians were absolutely melanated
@@sheenamccarthy24yeah, nobody said they were white. We are saying they are not related to Central Africans.
Confirms what scholars Dr Cheik Diop and Basil Davidson have told us about Kemet
E1b1b is african in origin.this nonesense
@@MoneyB-r2y what is nonsense with regards to my reference of the 2 scholars mentioned above ?
@@MCfact1827 not what you said.the auther is suggesting e1b1a1(e1b1b)orginated in asia.based on what evidence? And he suggested that they were olived skined Asians. When arabia is right on the equater line.not honest scholarship
@@MoneyB-r2y 👍... Yeah they always lie and twist history
@@MoneyB-r2y I think he said they were asian because he was eluding to that the west of africa hadnt been populated yet by the e1b1ba haplogroup prior to that. Since the creation of the suez canal arabia is considered in asia not africa, even though it sits on the african tectonic plate.
Dr Jeanson, the fact that 80% of Somali males carry the E1b1b gene is not a coincidence.
It is a fact that kings and queens of ancient Egypt used to travel to Somalia.
They claimed that it was the land of their ancestors which they called the "Land of Gods" & the "Land of Punt" Similarities of the Somali language and that of the ancient Egypt is mind-blowing.
If you would like to come to Somalia to make further research, I would be happy invite you and be my guest.
Actually, the land of their ancestors is the beginning of the Nile/Great Lakes region.
@@jubilee203
You’re both right actually because in those days there were no imaginary borders like they are now, so the great lakes region could’ve included Somalia as well.
@@jubilee203
Or more than likely some tribes from the Great Lakes region migrated and settled where Somalia is now, while other tribes moved up the Nile towards Ethiopia, Nubia and Kemet.
Don't buy this revisionist rubbish.
Either the few Kings of Egypt travelled to Somalia and impregnated several hundred or thousand women around the Somalia region or 80% of all modern Somalians are descended from one line.
Or the Kings themselves originated from somewhere in East or North East Africa.
Seriously. Use your common sense. Which is more likely?
@@tgr5772 This is jot just blind belief. The facts are there. When queen Hatsepshut travelled to the land of Punt, she met King Parehu & Queen Hatie ( Baraxow & Xadiyo) two known personalities in Somalia
Nothing is more commendable, than finding someone, who is seeking the Truth...totally unbiased. Unbiased Truth...is certainly a "Godly" act. To go where the Truth leads...regardless of one's "feelings", is what all should strive for. It is refreshing to find a scholar who seems to be doing just that.
The ancient Egyptian considered their ancestral home as Land of Punt current Somalia 🇸🇴 And the language culture and looks are very similar!
Ancient HAMIT land of origin was from 4502-900bc was in south Asia(india) and southeast Asia. ALL brown or black peoples. With migrations to (northeast Africa) from 4212-1000bc. FACT!
Africa is settled by NOD peoples 17,000bc- AD2024 from the ,*EDEN realm. Just like the HAWILAH(Americas), KUSH (Australia), AZZUHR (pre-Eurasians). All before the worldwide flood events of 4502bc, the latter Bronze Age wars 2400-1000bc, and the Euro colonialism AD1400s-1900s. FINALLY THE TRUTH!
Africa is the garden of eden.
The middle east was once part of Africa.
Ham himself was black, as were his offspring.
The cradle of civilization is Africa.
The Arabs themselves came from black Africa.
True look at the Egyptian statues look at Somalians it’s open evidence. The 1st so-called historians couldn’t comprehend black Africans were capable of such achievements so they separated Egypt from the rest of Africa. Egypt is a country by the Nile meaning various tribes n peoples moved to avoid desertification of the Sahara
Yes, but Egyptian kings and queens conquered Punt in Yemen
I am from ancient Egypt and ancient Israel.
E1b1 was in the entirety of North Africa during the holocene(Green Sahara) . Tasilli N Ajjer art work and the Uan Muhuggiag mummy prove this. Kemet was the child of proto east and west/central Africans. This is reflected in the DNA of the Royals.
Which royals ??
@@tolusanwoolu5663Check out my he Amarna DNA results
Please keep it up. I’m so excited about your research. Thank you for all you do!
Although I am a proud descendant of Africa, I have three grandparents who were either half or part Native American. However, only one of them was from the Indigenous list in your video. My maternal grandmother was half Choctaw, but she had bluish gray eyes.
Her blue eyes passed down to my daughter and one of my cousins at birth. At birth, meaning they were only born with blue eyes. My daughter's eyes were dark blue and my cousins eyes were light blue, but they now have green eyes as their eyes changed as they grew up from blue to green along with another cousin who was born with green eyes.
One of my cousins and I were born with blonde hair which passed down to my daughter. Now, I have reddish-brown hair, but my cousin's blonde hair turned black, and my other cousin was born with and still has red hair. We Black Americans never know what our kids will look like as we are a mixed group.
Our slave ancestors were the first Mulatto group born to slaves and their white masters. Moreover, the mixture continued until many of our ancestors began to look white. It was after slavery was abolished and our Mulatto ancestors married African or Black American spouses and bore children with them that we finally started to look more like our African ancestors.
please study quite a few more Answers in Genesis videos, moreover their books, and in a nutshell realize there is only one human race. Being "proud descendant of Africa" may seem fashionable (as in the preponderance of questionalbe BLM activities) however your mention of eye & hair colors indicate something other than African OR native american descent, such as north european (viking) genes. In addition your choice of "white masters" is inaccurate and perhaps intentionally offensive, since the African tribes themselves sold their neighbors not only to "white" buyers but predominantly central & south America. If you have been watching more videos in this series, and checking other sources, you would know that the great majority of slaves were bought by South American "bipoc" owners. In fact in 2023 there are even more BIPOC slaves on this planet than ever have been before, many are children mining elements required for cell phones and EV's. Finally, The goal is not to "look more like" anything other than... to BE more like Christ, mere "looks" are deceiving....as MLK advised-- don't judge people (including yourself) by your skin (eye) color, but by the content of your character, and this is what Jesus in fact will do. Please take this comment to heart, and be part of an inclusive one-race, the human race, ignoring skin/eye/hair color, get back to what really matters-- love for ALL no matter where they come from, and rewarding actual achievements no matter what the ethnicity.
@@cherylanon5791 Why don't you learn reading comprehension skills? Then you will comprehend that my comment is not about her series or other videos, it is to corroborate with her title and something she said in this particular video using my own life experiences. I do not sit around just watching videos; I am too busy for that in addition to how much I cannot stand self-appointed ignorant people who incorrectly correct other people.
I usually ignore ignorance, but I felt compelled to respond to your circumlocutory, protracted ignorance. I am an educator with several college degrees and graduate degrees. Some of those degrees are in Educational Science and Research. Educators and professional researchers are lifetime learners through research studies.
However, this is not a classroom or a research lab, it is a comment section where people can comment on any part of what the content creator says that resonates with them as well as socialize, hence the term social media.
Apropos, my comment was meant for the content creator, it was not addressed to you. When you mind your own business and keep your nose out of other people's business, no one will know how ignorant you are.
@@GailBecker-MSED-CM-Author I think what she was trying get at is that most of the world is tired of any sentence that starts off with "I'm a proud descendant of Africa" ... all everyone hears is Pride this, and Pride that... I think for once it would be nice if black people, or anyone for that matter, tried practicing humility instead of pride. It would be nice to see that. Just once.
@@derekmunson3695 Then I suggest that when you hear it or see it, don't listen or read it. Just ignore it and move on because you only know what you are tired of! You do not know what most of the world knows or feel, only GOD knows that.
Moreover, I will say and write what is in my heart. No one is going to tell me not to be proud of my African heritage. You could have kept that surreptitious racist epithet to yourself!
You know nothing about me, but what I do know is that when someone makes an accusation about a stranger without knowing anything about her (especially never having met), it usually means that is who he is.
Sometimes, it is wise to mind your own business, especially when the comment is not addressed to you. That, apropos, is humility!
I’m proud of my Germanic heritage. I’m also proud to be an American. But Biblically we are one family. All distant cousins. Now we are proving the biblical texts are true through genetic evidence. It’s ok to be proud of where you came from but never stop learning.
Ps college degrees mean nothing to me.
Hi, I went to the museum in Cairo and saw in glass cases multiple mummified Pharaohs. Why not compare the DNA taken from some of those (dating back a couple of millennia BC) to the Egyptians of today?
They are afraid to let it be known because they know their DNA will not match with the ancient ones.
It's been done. King Tut was European and that has caused the anti-white people to blow a gasket.
@@rohayeha Over the last 5000 years populations around the eastern Mediterranean and the Middle East have mixed a lot and this is readily apparent in the DNA.
DNA analysis has in fact been done of ancient Egyptian mummies from various periods, with results that match these population movements. Modern Egyptians also show DNA overlaps consistent with the population movements of the last 2000 years as well.
This information is all readily available with a quick Google search leading to articles in journals like Science.
@@rohayeha - Egypt was conquered by the Greeks in 322 BC, by the Romans in 30 BC and later by the Ottomans in-the 7th century AD. The Egyptian of today is not the original Egyptian, but Arab. Mizraim, son of Ham was the Father of the Egyptian. The Copt of Egypt is a descent of the original Egyptian of the Pharaohs.
@@masada2828 No doubt the Copts are descendents who also got mixed otherwise there is no logic in saying that in the middle of a desert in Africa a white skinned race evolved naturally. If the ancient Egyptians were migrants then the first people to reach Egypt will also be Africans
Both haplotypes E1b1a and E1b1b populated ancient Egypt, but the return migrations to the interior of Africa were more related to E1b1a. Pharaoh Ramses III and his son Pentaweret are E1b1a.
A Few had MTDna H4a1 - red hair !! 😮
@@franwilliams5665none did
@@grandregentthragg7896
Takabuti belonged to mitochondrial haplogroup H4a1
Takabuti, was a female in ancient Egypt during the 25th Dynasty
It’s a good thing that you have dispelled the myth that E1b1a has always been in west Africa but there are some geneticists that believe that the E group originated in the Levant which is really North East Africa. E1b1a is the nemesis because it does not really fit within the Cushitic bloodlines so I don’t agree that E1b1a is a Hamitic bloodline and I also don’t agree with the placing of Japhetic bloodlines under Shem. More research is definitely needed here!
E1B1A is the blood of Israel IE Shemites E1B1B is the blood of Ham ie cush. Shalom
@@benyahudadavidl Your fake you are beta we are A
FYI, Abraham had other sons besides the two. Gen. 25:1-6 Abraham had taken another wife, whose name was Keturah. 2 She bore him Zimran, Jokshan, Medan, Midian, Ishbak and Shuah. 3 Jokshan was the father of Sheba and Dedan; the descendants of Dedan were the Ashurites, the Letushites and the Leummites. 4 The sons of Midian were Ephah, Epher, Hanok, Abida and Eldaah. All these were descendants of Keturah.
5 Abraham left everything he owned to Isaac. 6 But while he was still living, he gave gifts to the sons of his concubines and sent them away from his son Isaac to the land of the east.
Exactly! This does not line up w other research.
Keturah was another name for Hagar....the children were given (spiritual) gifts and sent to the East.
Source?
Noah was far before Abraham.
Egypt was already at it's high when Abraham was born.
@@bookmouse2719 I don't think so. He sent Hagar(the EGYPTIAN!) away BEFORE Sarah died. AFTER Sarah died he married a woman by the name of Keturah. A DIFFERENT WOMAN. By the way, Since Hagar was Egyptian & she got an Egyptian wife for her Son Ishmael; it's a revelation that ISHMAEL-and HIS offspring were 75% HAMITIC, 25% SEMITIC. With that information it is more accurate to assess-for those who believe the original Hebrews were "black"-I'd say.....THEY HAVE THE WRONG SON! Think about it😉😏✌️
Fascinating. So long as science pursues truth, it will line up Biblically.
@@kateescarlet9693, What evidence do you have to support your claims? What example can be used to discredit the cliam the person in this post is suggesting and one in the video? What of this video can be refuted by scientific research? I couldn't find information on the DUCK therory on a Google search. Where did you find out about this therory and where can I go to find out more information? What does this therory states?
Everytime!
@@michaelcarter7079 There's no point don't cast pearls to the swine!
@@NewLifeFromTheWayofTruth? Not understanding post. Can you phrase comment so I know what your talking about.
@@kateescarlet9693 ... Everything?
If you just consider recent colonial history, you can see the fallacy of believing that modern Egyptians are the same people as the Ancient Egyptians. Are modern Americans in the United States the same population of Native Americans who lived here 700 years ago? The Native American population, unhappily, unfortunately, violently, and regrettably, has been for all intents and purposes displaced by Europeans and the descendants of Africans that they enslaved, along with the more recent immigrants from around the world. It would be ridiculous to say that the population of North America has always been what it is, what it looks like, today. This consideration applies even more so to the long trajectory of Egyptian history, especially considering the numerous invasions over millennia since the Pharaonic era.
Couldnt have said it better myself! Thank you!
This is faulty logic. European colonists committed genocide in America as we all know, which resulted in the disappearance of Native Americans. But there is no historical evidence that Arabs who invaded Egypt ever committed mass slaughter in Egypt. In fact, the history says otherwise. When Muslim delegation first arrived in Egypt, it was headed by an Arab Black man. The Egyptian ruler then took aside a member of the Muslim delegation and asked why Muslims had sent a Black man as their chief because Egyptians look down upon such people. Muslims said that their leader is the most educated and able among them, and that's why he was chosen by their Caliph.
Hello! There is history written in 1905 at South Africa the document is called the short history of the native tribes of the Transvaal. The history is about the people who stayed in South Africa then,it includes the Bantu who travelled from north Africa to Southern Africa. Some of the groups written about are Batswana called Bakwena ba Bafokeng. It is stated their oral history shows that they came from Ethiopia, passed by Egypt and crossed Sahara desert when they travelled to Southern Africa. Today some Batswana (some people of Botswana) say they originate from Egypt. There is one research done on genes of children in Botswana,the research found that thier genes were similar to genes of Luhyia people of Kenya. These Luhyia are said to originate from Egypt.
True
😂😂😂😂, came from Ethiopia then passed by Egypt then crossed the sahara desert then went down to south Africa without carriages or horses. Call Guinness records
@@Sema-Tawy camels have been used to cross the desert for thousands of years.
@@charmingyoutuber2408 No camels were known in the Arabian desert not the African, they were only introduced to Africa through Arabian caravans since 800 bc and were used in Africa from 200 AD mainly in the eastern and northeast Mediterranean Africa and much later to West or South Africa. So Again from Arabia to the East and the North, not from South and West to the North East
@@Sema-Tawy I hear you. What time period were the people in the OC migrating through? Your timeline for camels still leaves over 2000 *known* years of travel with them.
If you’re sincere about replacing the Darwin perspective you will need to confront the anti Black narrative of the early writers envolvement in race science and eugenics. All who wrote that indigenous Black inhabitants could not have created advanced civilizations like Egypt. Also it’s creation can’t be attributed to Arabs who invaded Egypt 32 dynasties after its creation and installed a completely different culture.
Once you start down the road to disproving ideas/narratives, you will be doing it forever. It is better to present the evidence and let it stand. The former looks like you have an axe to grind; the latter I'd a position to advocate.
Lol egyptians not black africans not arabs not white peoples. please study peoples of the world. Facts are facts whether u like them or not. Egyptians never black.
Telling the historical truth is NOT " an axe to grind " .
Your type of " An axe to grind " is a subjective perspective .
If Jews spoke about the monster that is evil Nazism , will you make a false accusation against them of " having an axe to grind " ?
@@wodemaya7899 False equivalence.
Patrick Lyons -
Streets that follow like a tedious argument
Of insidious intent
To lead you to an overwhelming question ...
Oh, do not ask, “What is it?”
Let us go and make our visit.
I don't trust your research, the Kemetyu are the descendants of Anu the diminutive people who built the High Culture/Civilization of the Hapi/Nile Valley. They tell you where their Ancestors came from, " the foothills of the mountain of the Moon Kilimanjaro". The euraisans are not the people who built the Culture and Spirituality of Ta-Marri, it was the Anu who built Ta-Seti and Ta-Hehesi. From the beginning of the Nile Valley Civilization in Afrika, it was Afrikans and their Culture, Language and Spirituality that shows it is an Afrikan Civilization. In the Language it shows that they used what they saw to name and use in their vernacular and speech, no euraisan would use anything that is not in their environment to incorporate into their language because they would have never saw it so how would they be able to identify a vegetable or fruit and they never seen it. It is an Afrikan Civilization.
Mountain of the moon is rwenzori mountain
@@derickthomas1013 Not one single evidence shows what you say . This “ they came from the mountains of moon “ was invented by hotebs in black communities and has 0 evidence.
@@agathattg5fkwagala499 there are two mountains of the moon
Genes dont lie. Whatever their genes were, that is what they were. Just look at their genes, there are mummies.
I don’t trust your opinions either. Because you use the past tense incorrectly. Not never saw it. Never SEEN it. And not they never seen it. Never SAW it. If you murder the English language who knows what you’ve done with your ‘history?’
I agree with the conclusions reached that the ancestor to E1b1a and E1b1b, identified as (E1b1), originated in North East Africa possibly where the Aksum kingdom was located. And, It is plausible that around 700 - 400 BC a split took place between the two Y DNA lineages based on the creationist timeline. It’s ironic that were it not for the E1b1b connection to E1b1a, the world would have thought that E1b1b was of West Asian origin instead of African origin as noted at 43:59 in the video. In modern times, E1b1a is showing up in the DNA of Egyptian pharaohs like Ramses III. This means E1b1a (the same Haplogroup I have as an African American) was significantly present in ancient Egyptian DNA. It can’t be ruled out that E1b1a migrated to West Africa from Egypt. And, it’s possible that E1b1 originated in the Levant instead of the Horn of Africa. After all, the ancient Natufians of the Levant carried haplogroup E. Ancient maps referred to the Levant and southern Arabia as north east Africa or the land of Ham. Either way, E YDNA is an African lineage to which I am proud to belong.
Exactly!!
I am also descendant of Ramses III. 65% of African Americans are descendants. The Ancient Egyptians were black and they are us! We are the Royal ones!
@@NubianGoddess15 agreed.
Shalom Family, they were Israelites.
His research is based on the European view on Bantu history. The African view is a migration from the middle east. This makes both E1b1* rooted in the same place in the middle east.
Another problem with this video and creationist views is that they still use the evolutionist view of history. The Biblical view state the Ark landed at Mt Ararat. So ALL peoples MUST have a common point of origin. This fact makes his DNA tree as to who Shem, Ham and Japheth is complete nonsense.
What I take for this is we are all connected. What a wonderful time to be alive. We are all brothers and sisters. ❤️❤️❤️❤️
We are not all brothers and sisters. Only those in Christ will be brothers and sisters, and the rest will perish.
Stop lying. As an Israelite I can assure you that we have no friends. Socalled nonblack people are not our brothers and sisters. They are hybrids ie sapiens neanderthal ie not naturally occurring. Shalom
This is fascinating. I am Scandinavian in appearance but I have northern African, western African and Nigerian genetic as well. Yet I am very pale white with blond curly hair. This all makes sense to me now. Please keep unraveling the fabric of the Mystery of the History of Humanity. Well done.
I am doubting you, but curly hair is normal in germanic populations
@@guilalves them you doubt genetic science all together.
That makes you a white skin Black man, welcome home brotha ! Lol!
😂🤣😅😆
It is interesting that the producer discounts data based on the Transatlantic Slave Trade but doesn't even mention the much worse slavery of the Muslim Arabs from 700CE to the present day.
💯
On of the reasons for that is that the Arab slave trade almost always castrated the African men. As a result, there would be almost no Y chromosome trace of the Arab easterly slave trade because the African men in the Arab trade did not reproduce, unlike in the Atlantic slave trade where they did. His study is only looking at male lineage. Children of female African slaves in the Arab world would not be detectable in Y chromosome data and so don't come into his study.
Thank you Dr. Jeanson your elaborate and scientifically based explanation is the start of a long rehabilitation and reconstruction process of African, more so Kemitic history. As an original and indigenous Sudanese (The Bari: Eastern Nilotic of ancient Nubia now Sudan) and after comparing cognates, religious practices and now your testimony on ancient haplogroups, this indeed is a reaffirmation of the African/Kemitic origins of one of the world's greatest civilisations."Truth is like death after life, it sure will come". Old kemetic saying. The ancestors are watching
The thing is people will find something wrong with his study as well..im not sure why they are so convinced that they were somehow European or Middle Eastern when it has been proven that even the so called Middle Eastern people are a branch if Black Africans who went in that land and geography intervened and changed their appearance. So yes even they started off Black African..They all did prior to physical changes..plus how they believe they were European when at that time science tells us that Europeans in the modern sense were what they looked like today..But yet they will still hold on to racist views to what is obvious but they have a right to believe what they want even if it's not true..Plus they painted themselves as they saw themselves and they were Black African but because these people have a view of Black Africa as 1 type never minded that Black people come in a variety of shades and brown is one of them..They show paintings of them staying Nubians to try and prove a point but in those painting they are represented as the same color in some but they don't show you the other side of that same box in Tuts tomb that depict him saying those of the Levant and Asiatics and in NONE of them are they depicted the same color but they won't show that part..They show them as having white skin for men and women..Thats the way they saw them..But if they were the same color as them then they would paint them the same color as them which they did not..So it's evident they knew what colors to use but on their paintings they really do depict some Nubians the same color as them..Explain their insight on why that is cause that doesn't make sense but one thing you won't see is them showing that picture and the reason is because they can't explain that away..They started off Black African and eventually mixed over time to what we see today..In Max Planck study they didn't test those in the south like Aswan because they knew what they would find..Why would you do a so called DNA test but not include everyone in the region unless you knew what the results would show..that was purposely done to play with those thay want those results so bad and when they were called out ok it they had to come clean as far as their techniques..That completely discredited the results and that is why it is not excepted..Couldn't stand uo to peer review amd you should look at what these other scientists wrote. Some were just straight up upset they would put out bad info but we know why..So before you try to use that study read the whole thing cause you'll just be embarrassing yourself..Be blessed all my brothers and sisters and search for truth and always be unbias amd you'll find it..peace up..
hahah Ancient Egyptians are all Caucasians.
The Bari: Eatern?. So Bari is East?. The word "Bari" is also Somali word of the east.
@@dreamdiction That is why the paint themselves black and say that that they are from the Mountains of the Moon, which ia locate South of the Sahara, between tanzania and Uganda. That is why the language is similar to thw Wolofe people in Senegal, West Africa. That is why they orientate themselves to the south the interior of Africa instead of North. Yea right!
@@lindsaywaterman2010 There are over a hundred anatomical differences between Negroid and Caucasian races. For example, the negroid skull is DOUBLE the thickness of the Caucasian skull, negroid arms are three inches longer than Caucasian arms, the anatomical differences between Negroid and Caucasian skeletons are so obvious that even an untrained child can separate them. Embalming was the standard method of burial for ancient Egyptians of all social classes, tens of thousands of ancient Egyptian mummys have been examined and they are all Caucasian.
It was about time with this breakthrough in the history of ideology and the "eyeopening per excellence"! You did it! This will stir up and calm down simultaneously - exactly what was needed. You will be mentioned, remembered, referred to and used as a tool in the process of human development.
😅😂😅
@@kateescarlet9693 CUTE! Typical atheist reply. Empty ridicule without dealing with the science behind it. It's so predictable.
Japhethites are the family of seven sons that was "enlarged". The Judaic lineages suffered a considerable amount of persecution and loss of the male lineages.
Yes. That’s why there’s only 15-25 million Jwes worldwide today
Thing about your video, you seem to be guessing, when you say e1b1b and e1b1a seems to be in the same area at one time, but you don't know where, have you considered that this place is Egypt? during the time of Israel's slavery? your guessing is way off, you should do more historical study, If you read Josephus writings, he was a first century historian. it could help you a lot.
What happened in South Africa is example of what happened in Israel and Egypt
If what happened in South Africa was the time of war and battle,south Africa would not have gotten their land back,there is no way you can hide the truth.
SOuth Africa is the new Egypt
The TRUTH shall be revealed in these END TIMES
The truth was already revealed john3:16
Already is.❤
@@Mrbigglesworth777The Bible is a Late Late story, which true origins came out of Ancient Kemet, called Egypt by the greeks
@@Evidence1Only1
It was called 'Aigiptos' by the Greeks, deriving from the indigenous name of a temple in the country: He-Ku-Ptah
In de course of time in developed into ne name Egypt
yes it will because turkey was the landing spot of noah and the restart ofthe human race and when do enogh family reseach like i have all back to garden of eden then you will know the truth
This is wonderful work! I have been so disappointed the way Christians have capitulated to mainstream science by also selling out the Bible. I have known if God let evolution take over his creation he would have said so. Also these ridiculous dates science comes up with while dating artifacts and geology are just all over the place and given a little prodding doesn't stand up.
As someone with mostly Nordic lineage with a lot of family with middle Eastern appearance your lecture definitely hits home.
What happened with Ishmael and his 12 sons? Wouldn't they be the Arabs?
Carbon dating is not "all over the place". Isotopes give a pretty accurate date, with + or - range. Did you take chemistry or geology? Rigorous science.
What the heck is "mainstream science"? Geology, physics, chemistry, biology, if these interfere with your religion I gotta say there must be superstition in the mix.
@@jaytrey7807 Ishmael was Abraham's son with Hagar who was Egyptian (which is interesting)
Finally, Truth in Science, how refreshing, keep up the excellent work!
A little clarification on pronunciation: Cush is pronounced Koosh in Hebrew, Mizraim is pronounced Mits-rah-yim or Mits-rah-yeem, and Joktan is pronounced Yoke-tahn.
You are just making that up. Just Joking
I urge everyone to get this book. It was a fascinating read, and it put me in awe of god even more.
Is it harder or easier to understand that this presentation?
The real ancient Egyptians are in America, they are indigenous black Americans, America is the real Egypt.
😂 🧢
Igbo
@@johnmaina8619Igbo wasn't even on his E1b list
? WTH?
I never believed in evolution.
My father was a committed Darwinist. He inculcated that ideology at an early age. Some of my first reading books were about dinos and ape-men. It seemed logical, but there was an emptiness to it. I thought that if Darwin was true, then there was no hope. Thank God He eventually revealed His Son to me, and now things began to make sense.
Nice you just ploped out of the sky then.
This is because you weren’t taught about evolution. Change and evolution is going to happen irregardless of your beliefs. Darwin was biased and influenced by the social sciences of that time. We have evolved 😂😂😂😂
His argument works like this:
1. Establish a Y-chromosome mutation rate based pedigree studies to calculate a Y-chromosome time to most recent common ancestor (TMRCA) approximately 4500 years ago.
2. Reinterpret the Y-chromosome phylogeny and chronology based on this earlier TMRCA.
3. Correlate historical events, like migrations, to nodes in the Y-chromosome phylogeny.
4. Overlay the Y-chromosome phylogeny onto the pedigree for Noah and his sons derived from Genesis.
5. Do (3) for Biblical events (e.g. the Flood, Babel, etc.)
6. Claim he rewrote the history of humanity and confirmed the AiG interpretation of Genesis.
There are, uh, significant problems with the case Jeanson makes.
The first, which underlies much of his analysis, is that he treats genealogy and phylogeny as interchangeable.
They are not interchangeable. Genealogy is the history of individuals and familial relationships. Phylogeny is the evolutionary history of groups: populations, species, etc. A phylogenetic tree may superficially look like a family tree, but all those lines and branch points represent populations, not individuals. This is an extremely basic error.
There are additional problems with each step of the case he makes.
In terms of calculating the Y-TMRCA, it’s nothing new: He uses single-generation pedigree-based mutation rates rather than long-term substitution rates. It’s the same error that invalidates his work calculating a 6000kya mitochondrial TMRCA. He even references a couple of studies that indicate the consensus date of 200-300kya for the Y-MRCA, but dismisses them as low-quality (he ignores that there are many, many more such studies).
He is constrained in an extremely narrow timespan for much of the Y-chromosome branching due to its occurrence after the flood (~4500 years ago) and running up against well-documented, recorded human history (he ignores that Egyptian history spans the Flood). So he has to squeeze a ton of human history into half a millennium, at most.
In correlating his revised node dates on the Y-chromosome phylogeny with historical events, he employs some really half-as…uh, amateurish “analysis”. Like, “the ancestral population for sister haplogroups existed along the line between the geographic homeland for the derived groups, and the descendants migrated in opposite directions” amateurish. I’m not exaggerating; this is how he explains how and where E1b1a and E1b1b descended from E1b1.
He also just ignore inconvenient data that refute his model. Just straight up. Thanks to the crew on the Peaceful Science forum, my favorite example of this is R1b in Europe, and specifically Italy. Jeanson claims haplotype R1b arrived in Europe between 700 and 1400 CE, and specifically in Italy in the 14- or 1500s. Exceeeeeeeept…we have DNA from a stone age burial in northern Italy dated to about 14,000 years ago, and that individual was, you guessed it, R1b.
Even if we take Jeanson’s YEC timeline at face value, a stone age specimen would be pretty close to the flood, about 4kya, which also directly invalidates his model.
Moving on, the next step in his argument is to overlay the Y-chromosome phylogeny (now with incorrect new dates incorrectly correlated to historical events) with the pedigree of Noah and his sons and their descendants derived from Genesis. To do this, Jeanson egregiously acts as though a phylogenetic tree and a pedigree are interchangeable, treating nodes on the phylogeny as specific individuals rather than populations.
And finally, he correlates the haplotypes on the phylogeny (now incorrectly overlayed with Noah’s family tree) with Biblical groups and events.
That’s how Jeanson rewrites the history of humanity. That’s it.
…
It’s actually worse than that. Because he ignores Neanderthals. Neanderthals interbred with Homo sapiens. Most YECs have Neanderthals (and Denisovans) as descendants of Adam and Eve, and living post-flood. This means that Noah is also their Y-MRCA. The problem is that we have Neanderthal genomes, and their Y chromosomes are highly divergent. This necessarily pushes the MRCA back far beyond the YEC timeline, even using Jeanson’s incorrect mutation rates.
How does Jeanson deal with this?
He completely ignores it.
Really. There are a grand total of three (3) mentions of Neanderthals in this book. At no point does Jeanson engage with the fact that Neanderthal genomics refutes the foundation of his argument - the recent Y-MRCA. So…that’s not great.
As soon as you say creation scientists or Christian archaeology you have done something to the original word.
A creation scientist is not a scientist.... it tells you that in its naming.
Same thing with the Christian Science... the Prefect in front of the word science tells you it has a different meaning.
Science isn't done in any of these.
It's close to science and that's why they call it a kind of Science
I made a dna study on my brothers' dna and it came out to be 30, 000 years old from Arabia (Sumerian) and my mother's from Sudan 15,000 years ago both migrated to the west Europe, Spain and England, then to France and finally to Scandinavia.
👏 WOW 👏
You say "it came out to be 30,000 years ago".
Who told you this?
How did they know?
Do you believe them?
What evidence have you seen that convinced you?
@@andynoble8590 My dad was haplogroup I1 (Sumeria) my mom was T ( N Egypt). B
Yes I believe them, Both looked unlike most Finns , dark and reddish hair, both were interested in Egypt and Arabian countries and art. My mom looked like the Russian Emperor Nicolai II. My dad looked like the UK royality in Australia. They told me I have lots of relatuves in UK.
My parents never knew their origin, but both acted unlike many Finns. They traveled a lot. My mother was an painter and had made unusually extravagant clothes and she looked egyptian. My dad traveled a lot. They spoke fluently various languages. They did things Finns rarely do. They felt often that they did not belong here. It made a lot of sense to me when I heard their genetic origins.
Maybe in your Sequel to "Traced" you can put more in how the Old Testament book of Genesis is encoded in the Chinese language itself. Before B.C. the Chinese worshipped a single God. The word "Create" in Chinese has the imagery of "God Spoke" and so on. The Garden, The Fall, The Flood, Tower of Babel and even the dates for Jesus' Birth/Cruxificion/Resurrection are all recorded in Ancient Chinese documents.
These documents record strange Celestial events in 4 BC and switch of Day/Night followed by Earthquakes and more strange Celestial Events in 31 AD.
The word "Devil" in Chinese has the imagery of Man in a Garden and a presence coming in Secret.
@@whyaskwhybuddry
Devil means deceiver and Satan means adversary
Chinese written history is older than the deserts. Are you trying to say Christianity originated in China? Or are you playing that game where you connect the dots and call it a code? Have you studied Taoism or Buddhism? Do you realize that every religion has the same Golden rule? Do you really beleive that all of human history revolves around your faith? Because if you do, it's very egomaniacal and very wrong.
@@toddfordr8218 No, Christianity didn't exist until Jesus came in 4 BC. What I AM saying is that within the very Chinese Language characters themselves are the same accounts given in the Books of Moses.
What I am saying is that Taoism and Buddhism didn't exist in China until around the Time of Christ.
The Chinese People themselves practiced a form of Judaism, including Blood Sacrifice of spotless Sheep.
Genetically, Chinese, Afghans, Jews, etc are all descendants of Shem and thus are "Semitic People".
This is well recognized in Peer Reviewed Papers.
What I am saying is that the Offical Chinese written documents record the dates of Jesus's Birth, Death and Resurrection.
@@toddfordr8218
Chinese peoples biblical God given ethnicity is Moabites
(Deuteronomy 23:2-4)(Zephaniah 2:8-9)
(Psalm 83:1-6)
This video strong along forever without telling us anything about where theEgyptian DNA came from are who has the DNA now. A complete waste of time!
Praise the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ ! Thank you for your diligence and commitment to Gods words and seeking and saving the lost .
The blind leading the blind
what does Jesus have to do with anything
What happened to the Egyptian history that says Berbers invaded Egypt? Surely Berbers are among the Europeans who invaded Egypt. Berbers have never been the ancient people of North Africa when they actually migrated from Europe. It's amazing how dna experts lie by saying Berbers are the ancient people of North Africa. The children of Ham are the ancient original people of North Africa and not people who migrated from Europe!
Berbers have a long history in North Africa but they are not the ancient people of North Africa. To take dna samples of Berbers living in North Africa today and lie that Berbers are the ancient and original people of North Africa is laughable! 😂
Perhaps humanity should spend less time on arguing the vast ridiculousness of this physical universe and devote our lives to increased spiritual advancement. I think this is G-d’s intention when He CREATED us. The Kingdom lies within there is no doubt.
It seems you left out the Biggest Depopulation Event in Africa which is the Sub-Saharan Slave Trade and the Indian Ocean Slave Trade. Arabs and Berbers had many Concubines of Africans enslaved. Many of their Sons did the same thing. You should factor this in. Just trying to Help
Faut savoir que le MOT ESCLAVE signifie celui qui est dominé par quelqu'un ou quelque chose, DONC tu peux être esclave des cigarettes, de téléphone, de la télé, , d'alcool, de la vie de debauche, le sexe, de critique, de sorcellerie, la jalousie, du manger, d'orgueil, de colère....DONC tout le monde est esclave de quelque chose. Voir le dictionnaire. Allô salut bonjour coucou!!!🤣
The only white man who has really spoken and told us the civilization was started by Africans. The only person whose given credit to Africans. All other so called inventors do not even tok as though Africans existed .
I thought I was talking to myself. The DNA Trace, egyptology the Nigerians, native Americans the Atlantic slave trade, the sons of Noah, European, on and on and on. I really have no words to explain my enthusiasm.👍
We all have one Father in heaven! What a fascinating topic and research!!
Yes.
We can celebrate GOD's HOLY BIBLE Young Earth 🌎🌍 HIS-Story! TRUTH unfolding and confirmed by DNA! GLORY!
@Lynn Link
The earth may be much older than 13,000 years (7,000 years for creation + 6,000 years history)
1 In the beginning God (Jesus Elohim, PLURAL, the Elohim FAMILY) created the heaven and the earth.
2 And the earth *WAS* (Hayah: BECAME) without form, and void (destroyed and barren); and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God (Elohim, PLURAL, the family) moved upon the face of the waters.
3 And God (Elohim) said, Let there be light: and there was light.
Hayah: The word is translated "became" or "become" 133 times in the Old Testament. (An example of hayah describing the transition from one state to another is Genesis 19:26 where Lot's wife became- hayah -a pillar of salt.)
*Strongs Concordance: was*
Word: DID
Pronounce: haw-yaw
Strong: H1961
Orig: a primitive root (compare 1933); to exist, i.e. be or become, come to pass (always emphatic, and not a mere copula or auxiliary):--beacon, X altogether, be(-come), accomplished, committed, like), break, cause, come (to pass), do, faint, fall, + follow, happen, X have, last, pertain, quit (one-)self, require, X use. H1933
Use: TWOT-491 Verb
1) to be, become, come to pass, exist, happen, fall out
1a) (Qal)
1a1) -----
1a1a) to happen, fall out, occur, take place, come about, come to pass 1a1b) to come about, come to pass
1a2) to come into being, become
1a2a) to arise, appear, come
1a2b) to become
1a2b1) to become
1a2b2) to become like
1a2b3) to be instituted, be established
1a3) to be
1a3a) to exist, be in existence
1a3b) to abide, remain, continue (with word of place or time)
1a3c) to stand, lie, be in, be at, be situated (with word of locality) 1a3d) to accompany, be with
1b) (Niphal)
1b1) to occur, come to pass, be done, be brought about
1b2) to be done, be finished, be gone
2 Peter & Jeremiah seem to describe what happened at Genesis 1:2 when the earth BECAME an uninhabited wasteland - destroyed by water- BEFORE Noah’s flood.
I believe this Gen 1:2 destruction took place before Noah’s flood, and that’s why YHWH said he wouldn’t flood the world again (a third time).
Isaiah makes reference to this in
Isaiah 24:1
Behold, the LORD maketh the earth empty, and maketh it waste, and turneth it upside down, and scattereth abroad the inhabitants thereof
We are reminded that we are ignorant of antiquity and that everything occurs in cycles.
Ecclesiastes 1:9
The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and *there is no new thing under the sun*
It’s all been done before.
Jeremiah 4:23
“I beheld the earth, and, lo, it was (BECAME) *without form, and void;* and the heavens, and they had no light.
24 I beheld the mountains, and, lo, they trembled, and all the hills moved lightly.
25 I beheld, and, lo, there was no man, and all the birds of the heavens were fled.
26 I beheld, and, lo, the fruitful place was a wilderness, and all the cities thereof were broken down at the presence of the LORD, and by his fierce anger.
27 For thus hath the LORD said, The whole land shall be desolate; *yet will I not make a full end.*
The phrase “without form, and void” is only used twice in the Bible, and I believe they are describing the same event - destruction of “the old world” mentioned in the Bible.
2 Peter 3:5
“For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and *the earth standing out of the water and in the water:*
6: Whereby *the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished:*
Ecclesiastes 1:9
“The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun.”
Is there any thing whereof it may be said, See, this is new? *it hath been already of old time, which was before us.*
11 There is no remembrance of former things; neither shall there be any remembrance of things that are to come with those that shall come after.
An OLD TIME which was BEFORE US..
BEFORE The earth became WITHOUT FORM & VOID, discussed in Genesis 1:2, & Jeremiah, and 2Peter 3:5
Genesis 1:2 is a Destruction, Genesis 1:3 is a RE-Creation
*There’s no telling how many times the earth has been created and destroyed.*
🙌❤
I'm not convinced by this talk. There are lot conclusions based on speculations. It looks scientific, but I don't see where the proofs are.
Convincing is relative,understanding preferable.
Thank you for touching on the Bantu people, our history gets blurred after 300 or so years, but I enjoyed your analysis. It is in line with some of the theories on Bantu migration.
What are some theories on bantu migration. I heard they came out of Asia.
The Bantu are the ancient Semitic peoples of the Israelites
The history of the Bantu is blurred because there is a big cover up of the truth. Even this research is covering up the truth by keeping Haplogroup E’s origins out of the Levant which is really North Africa. He is giving our history to some European white folks.
He is flat wrong regarding the Bantu migrations. They are easily accommodated within conventional historical timescales, being little more than 2,000 years old.
I am an Akan, Ghanaian descendent. The descendant line of the Egyptian Kings. If you matched my DNA to the King Pharaohs you might be surprised at the similarities. But the modern day “Egyptians” refuse the truth.
I believe you.
E1B1A is the blood of Israel and the pharaohs. See Book of Jasher. Shalom from the House of DAVID and Marlborough 👊🏿🙏🏿
They might also be surprised that Menu/Mena (Menes), Tutu Ancoma (Tutankhamun), Tutu Mose (Thutmose), Sechi (Seti), Tahaqua (Tarkwa), Kuffour/ Akufu (Khuffu), Amanqua (Menkuare), Tetteh (Teti), Prah (hoprah), etc are our names too.
I truly appreciate this presentation from someone credible. The explanations make sense by answering those ambiguous teachings children learned in school, and the questions these kids asked about the Bible.
@@midlander4 Do you know the common denominator of 13 and 458?
This is the number of years since you joined, and the number of views you've had in those years. You're the common denominator! Now you have something legitimate to laugh at.
You've probably heard this before, but in case you haven't: the name for Egypt in the languages in Kenya (both Nilote and Bantu, and also Swahili) is Misri. Misraim or Misreem is a plural, refering to the people of or descendants of Misri. (I was a Peace Corps volunteer in Kenya in the late '80's.)
I had heard this, but thanks for posting about it!
Wrong
Ancient Egyptians were Syrians and Anatolians
That is what the DNA studies said clearly
All the Ancient Egyptians kings where of Levantines origins
Ordinary ppl were mixed
Even north african Berber were of levant origins
If there is such a correlation between Haplogroup E1b1b and the Moslem conquests, (1) Why is there not much of the E1b1b in Arabia and (2) Why is there so much of it outside the Arab caliphate at its greatest extent? E1b1b looks more like a North African haplogroupe that overflowed into Africa from Asia than the reverse.
😂😂😂😂
From Arabia we have these descriptions from early Western explorers:
“The inhabitants of this part of Arabia nearly all belong to the race of Himyar. Their complexion is almost as black as the Abyssinians,”
-- Baron von Maltzan, 'Geography of Southern Arabia' (1872)
“ [the Hamida are] small chocolate colored beings, stunted and thin… with mops of bushy hair… straggling beards , vicious eyes, frowning brows … armed with scabbards slung over the shoulder and Janbiyyah daggers…” a people “of the great Hejazi tribe that has kept his blood pure for the last 13 centuries…”
--Sir Richard Burton (1879)
“The people of Dhufar are of the Qahtan tribe, the sons of Joktan mentioned in Genesis: they are of Hamitic or African rather than Arab types…”
--Arnold Wilson, The Geographical Journal (1927)
“the most prosperous tribe of all the Hamitic group, possessing innumerable camels, herds of cattle and the richest frankincense country. They resemble the Bisharin tribe of the Nubian desert. Men of big bone , they have long faces long narrow jaws, noses of a refined shape long curly hair and brown skin.”
--Richmond Palmer (1929)
“Mahra is the Arab name for the Bedouin tribes who are different in appearance to other Arabs, having almost beardless faces, fuzzy hair and dark pigmentation - such as the Qarra, Mahra and Harasis… Also on “…the Qarra, Mahra and Harasis with parts of other tribes.
The language is derived from the language of the Sabaeans, Minaeans and Himyarites. The Mahra with other Southern Arabian peoples seem aligned to the Hamitic race of north-east Africa… The Mahra are believed to be descended from the Habasha, who colonized Ethiopia in the first millennium BC”
-- David Phillips, Peoples on the Move (2001)
“European observers have made much of their physical resemblance to Somalis and Ethiopians, but there is no historical evidence of any connections.”
-- E. Peterson, 'Oman’s Diverse Society: Southern Oman'
And scholars have long noted:
“Mr. Baldwin draws a marked distinction between the modern Mahomedan Semitic population of Arabia and their great Kushite, Hamite, or Ethiopian predecessors. The former, he says, ‘are comparatively modern in Arabia,’ they have ‘appropriated the reputation of the old race,’ and have unduly occupied the chief attention of modern scholars.” -- Charles Hardwick (1872)
“Among ‘these Negroid features which may be counted normal in Arabs are the full,rather everted lips, shortness and width of nose, certain blanks in the bearded areas of the face between the lower lip and chin and on the cheeks; the large luscious gazelle-like eyes, a dark brown complexion, and a tendency for the hair to grow in ringlets.
Often the features of the more Negroid Arabs are derivatives of Dravidian India rather than inheritances of Hamitic Africa.
Although the Arab of today is sharply differentiated from the Negro of Africa, yet there must have been a time when both were represented by a single ancestral stock; in no other way can the prevalence of certain Negroid features be accounted for in the natives of Arabia.”
-- Henry Field, Anthropology Memoirs Volume 4 (1902)
“The Kushites the first inhabitants of Arabia, are known in the national traditions by the name of Adites, from their progenitor, who is called Ad, the grandson of Ham.”
-- F. Lenormant (1922)
“There is a considerable mass of evidence to show that there was a very close resemblance between the proto-Egyptians and the Arabs before either became intermingled with Armenoid racial elements.”
-- Elliot Smith, the Ancient Egyptians and the Origins of Civilization (1923)
“In Arabia the first inhabitants were probably a dark-skinned, shortish population intermediate, between the African Hamites and the Dravidians of India and forming a single African Asiatic belt with these.”
-- Handbook of the Territories which form the Theater of Operations of the Iraq Petroleum Company Limited and its Associates
All these comments are guesswork based on the inclinations of the authors. Their assumption starts from Egyptians cannot be black Africans. No more. Then they weave their tripe around this assumptions
What amazes most is the fact that DNA is not being abstracted from the oldest bones found in these areas. You just gave us DNA of the people living in these areas today when know Aryan’s conquest happened in Israel, Asia, Americas, Africa and Europe. Do you have a link showing the oldest ancient DNA being abstracted from actual human bones?
I agree getting DNA from the people living in Egypt today is not complete analysis. You have to sample against ancient DNA. This is my biggest criticism of Dr. Nathian Jeanson.
This is excellent research and it answers a lot of questions for me. I'm a Afro Descedant/Afro-American. I have traced my family lineages and found living relatives in west and central Africa. When I received my results from 23 and me my Y Dna showed up as E-M4451 which is in the family of E1b1a and it shows I'm connected to the Pharaoh Rameses the III EV38. In west African history there are many oral stories about Egyptian migration to that area.
we wuz kangz!!
@@suite701 grow up
@@suite701 We are kings. You need to work on your English my non king.
@@suite701 Yes and your DNA derive from a long line of hate, which debunks all of this mumbo jumbo...
E1B1A Y Haplogroup is the lineage of Jacob. The original genetic children of Jacob called Israel it is also documented with credible nonsensical sources of scholarship. But each person has to determine the truth of any evidence presented as factual.
'The eyes of the Lord keep watch over knowledge, but he overthrows the words of the traitor.' Proverbs 22:12 ESV 'Let all the earth fear the Lord; let all the inhabitants of the world stand in awe of him!' Psalm 33:8 ESV
THE ANCIENT EGYPTIANS ARE YORUBA RACE FROM WEST AFRICA. GO TO TH-cam CHANNEL dark mattter1801 and watch who is messing with God. Also watch the infinity sign and Egyptology deepest blackhole undercover. Answers in Genesis is a liar........
Thanks for your reports about human ancestral history, I would recommend if want talk about this topic to sit and talk with the native people you are talking about, I am glad we are talking about His-Story not ours. Kushitic people deserve to talk about their knowledge before DNA. More over modern Egyptian are mixed race and they don't like to be considered African. Thank you.
They are Arabic not African
i'm a european i carry 7 % coptic egyptian dna and most of south french do and iberians too, egyptians hittites cannanites still well alive
It is always a good thing to remember that people moved from Egypt (Misiri) in different directions. I have traced my ancestors from East Africa to Ancient Egypt during the Pharaohs period and based on the actual people with their names and their children. These people followed the bank of River Nile northwards. They never branched to West Africa at all. In 1998 AENEAS CHIGWEDERE, published a book called "The Roots of the Bantu" based on the archaeological findings and the Timbakutu Manuscript; his research work proved beyond doubt that there were three different period which he described as "Trinity", when people left Egypt and moved directly upwards following the River Nile. So, when talking about the "Bantu" people it is helpful to remember that some never crossed Africa to Nigeria and backward to Eastern part of Africa. In any-case the Bantu people's ancestor originated from Ethiopia to Egypt then moved northwards. Even presently, the language is slightly similar within the Bantu people who never moved to Nigeria, while those from Nigeria speak like a small group in East Africa called (Luos or Nilotes), and are mainly found in Northernern Uganda up to South Sudan, some in Kenya and Tanzania. Those from Nigeria are not Bantu but Nilotics. While the rest of present East Africa and southern Africa are mainly "Bantu". So, I am having a problem with the publication about DNA'S being factual of "Bantu"'s origin and movement.
This would explain the Tamil (Dravidian) linguistic cognates Bishop Caldwell reports from West Africa. The Andaman Islanders on the East of India look Bantu. They have been there for tens of thousands of years. The Sentinel Islands protected by India from colonisation. There are also Tamil tribal folks who look Australian.
Bantu are not African, we are Israelites
Truth
Pharaohs are somalian we are same language and culture pls discover of this thing😭
@@xafzayar5322 that's true, all horn Africans are the same Hamitic people.
41:33 there is lots of evidence that shows that just a few thousand years ago or less, the Sahara region was green with multiple rivers.
Amazing lecture ... so informative. Thank you very much !
Interesting presentation. One last thing has your data been verified by genetics experts or the International Federation of Human Genetics? If not, will you be presenting at the Feb 22-26, 14th International Congress of Human Genetics held in Cape, South Africa? Many experts will be very interested in your presentation.
some data will not be proven in the conventional scientific methods, but does not change the truth.
@@shansands 😄😄😄😄😄😄😄
Wow so clever, not.
THE ANCIENT EGYPTIANS ARE YORUBA RACE FROM WEST AFRICA. GO TO TH-cam CHANNEL dark mattter1801 and watch who is messing with God. Also watch the infinity sign and Egyptology deepest blackhole undercover. Answers in Genesis is a liar.
@@elfodd35 To you, Not.
Anytime a book is pushed at the very start of the video, hard pass. We don't need other books to explain the Bible, it explains itself.
42:50 your trying to fool people, yet note the E1B1* IN THE NATUFIAN CULTURE!
"The announcement of a religion which had been preached by a descendant of Ishmael , whom the Moors regarded as their father ; the rapid conquests of the Mussulmans , who were already masters of half of Asia and a large portion of Africa , and who threatened to enslave the world , aroused the excitable imaginations of the Moors , and restored to their national character all its passionate energy."
~History of the Moors of Spain
Florian
Harper & brothers, 1841
E1B1 ONLY FOSSIL IS IN NATUFIAN CULTURE, which homeland is leaving Syria, Damascus as Shemites as Arabia was sons of Shem
About 1800 B. C., according to the Arab historians, Joktanite tribes entered and conquered South Arabia, but were largely absorbed by the Cushite stock; as a result of which the second, or Sabæan, empire of Ad was formed, in which the Joktanites became the sacred and land-owning caste, while the political and economic activities remained with the Cushites. This was probably the power that dealt with the Egyptians under the XVIIth dynasty, as pictured at Deir-el-Bahri; concerning which the publication of the Egypt Exploration Fund seems a little too positive that the "Land of Punt' could not be in Arabia because the faces of the Punt people were not Semitic. The testimony of Arabia ok be at fault if they were. Later the Sabæan Cushites, conquered by the Banu Ya'rub, a Joktanite stock from Yemen, migrated into Africa, and establishing themselves in Abyssinia, continued the ancient conflict for six centuries more."
~The Periplus of the Erythraean Sea : travel and trade in the Indian Ocean
by Schoff, Wilfred Harvey, 1874-1932
And nor the Arabs pushed jews into Africa
The land that next to Judea contained the largest number of Jews was Egypt."(AFRICA!)
`A Thousand Years of Jewish History: From the Days of Alexander the Great to the Moslem Conquest of Spain
Maurice Henry Harris 1904
38:00 false 😭 show the oldest E1B1A fossil culture E1B1A IS IRON IN Africa
Not
Paleolithic Mesolithic nor any Neolithic fossil culture
E1B1B is older then E1B1A and D is older then them both and D has a mix of Asians & said Denisovans.
The DE-YAP origin needs to be PROVE by ACTUALLY FOUND FOSSIL CULTURE not guess work
35:55 that's only AD time 🌹 yet why don't you look at how E1B1A went to France 9000 ybp then went to Peru 3000bc and back to bMAC culture 2000bc before even going in AFRICA!
31:35 because E1b1b is Arab Joktan-of Ever to Ishmael
While E1B1A is Israelites that was in Egypt,Africa
There are no Paleolithic Mesolithic or Neolithic fossil culture of E1B1A in Africa
Note this
@@kingmessage7069
All Semitic groups today I’m aware of are always Arab looking people…
Do you listen to sermons?
@@johnle231 ikr E1B1B are Arab Ishmael
E1B1A is Israel
I agree with you.
Just keep in mind that we must respect Africa and it's people as well as all mankind. We all matter.
Please tell us in clear and concise words where the descendants of the ancient Egyptians are today. Thanks
The modern one but with some mixtures.
E1b1b(Arab Muslims) came back to Africa and push out E1b1a(Bantus) from Egypt creating causing the Bantu migration. So Ancient Egyptians were Bantus. In fact, Rameses III carried haplogroup E1b1a. And, all the Armana mummies(including Tutankhaman) was found to be related genetically to people from the African Great Lakes(Also Bantus)
It's academia's code not to ever state or write that Bantus or E1b1a carriers were the Ancient Egyptians. They want to leave the audience in doubt. They will say Africans, but not Bantu.
@@tgr5772 Middle east is not a continent but the description of intercontinental intersection. So, middle east did not create any race of people unlike Asia, Africa, and Europe. Africans inhabited the middle east region first. Then came major intermixing between Caucasians and Africans in that region. Majority of the people there are mixed. They're NOT a race of people.
And, NO. Ancient Egypt going back to 4500 BC were pure Africans. Some mixing started taking place in the New Kingdom. So before the mixed happened there was a pure people initiating that civilization. Mix doesn't just happen in a vacuum.
Ramses III carry the Bantu haplogroup E1b1a. Parts of the 19th dynasty and almost the whole 20th dynasty was ruled by the Ramses familial line. And one thing that we know about the Bantu(E1b1a) people is that they're universally pure till today, unlike the E1b1b carriers.
@@tgr5772 I agree. There was always mixing but those mixing happened when the circumstance dictates it. That circumstance entails an encounter. If that encounter never took place then you have isolation. We do have groups that went through periods of isolation or minimal encounter.
The Bantu people is one of them. The Bantus for the most part exist with minimal encounter from other groups. The minimal encounter they had was through trade. Most mass mixing happened by virtue of invasion rather than voluntary.
No two races of people that are indigenous to the same landmass exist. Races come into existence by virtue of isolation. Intermixing happened due to migration. Bantus did not migrate far outside Africa and Asians did not migrate far outside Asia, resulting in them maintaining their purity.
"You can find red-haired, fair-skinned West Africans who are born white. Since the Romans were able to cross to Mali, the Sahara was hardly impenetrable so there was mixing and trading and migration. "
I will have to disagree. There is NO fair-skinned Bantus in Africa. That doesn't exist. We do have though some Igbos who have caramel complexion but they look light relative to the darker skinned counterparts. Never fair-skinned though. You might be thinking of albinos, we Bantus suffer from that condition more than other people. But they go back to being dark skin after the first generation of procreating with another dark skin person.
That diversity you're referring to is mostly genetic and not having light/white skin.
Horn africa .
We share DNA , culture and everything even more similarities in the language .
Beleive me just look us specially afaris
The problem with Jeanson's claims, is that both E1b1a and E1b1b are both much older (40,000 +yrs) than the 6000 yr time frame he is attempting to force them to fit.
It is not a recommended practice to fuse science with judeo christian mythology.
Do you figure in the Angel/ human mixture? Do you believe the Nephilim were on the Earth after the flood and that people today still carry that gene?
Angels and humans cannot mix. Angels dont procreate.
The Rh factor answers that question.
@@lostmusichits
What are white people
@@lostmusichits Benny, the Lord has not yet revealed these things to you. Perhaps you are still a child, spiritually speaking.
Meat is not for babies.
Clearly; you DO speak from a place of ignorance.
@@lostmusichits According to Enoch, a book which Jesus quotes in Jude, 200 fallen angels took human women to be their partners, and bore Nephilim.
I find this fascinating. Thanks so much for this series and this channel!
On a lighter note (😊) Are there any R2d2 or C3p0 lines? How long have these DNA lines been named in this manner-just wondering, cuz if it began pre-Star Wars era, those character names might add a whole new layer of subtext to the storyline, lol!
Glad to see someone else wondering the same thing I've been asking myself (which doesn't get me very far) since his original series at the beginning of covid.
This guy is nuts. Totally nuts.
@@francisgalton2678 why do you say so? Do you have any arguments to support your opinion?
@@francisgalton2678 There you are! The random heckler in the back!
@@tomhenderson6989 lol, if you don't have a coherent response, any intelligent reader would know who the random heckler is...
Hallelujah! The Word of God is the Benchmark! The True Solid Foundation! The Rock!
Congratulations, Dr. Jeanson !
I've been waiting for my copy to arrive, only to be informed it's first printing sold out.
I am now waiting til July.
Congratulations 🎉 again
Same. But I did receive his first book and have been studying it thoroughly. Absolutely fascinating stuff.
كلامه صحيح تاريخيا وعلميا
بالمرصاد على المزورين التاريخ والجينات البشرية في العالم
الدليل كلامه صحيح جميع رفاة j1_M267 وE
في إيران اكثر من 10000الف سنة
السلالة Eمن أصول نيجيريا في إيران وجودهم اكثر من 10000الف سنة
j1_M267
وجودهم في إيران اكثر من 10000الف سنة
البروفسور ناثانيال ت.جينسون كلامه صحيح تاريخيا وعلميا بالمرصاد على كل كذاب اشر في العالم
@@awokecon157 I ordered 8 April, it arrived today.👍🏼
THANK YOU FOR ALL THIS TRUTH, THE CHILDREN OF THE KINGDOM IF KEMET BLESS YOU FOR THE TRUTH❤️🌍🌞🌍❤️
I am a Finn, from Finland and my brothers' dna was studied in Uk with the result that our mother originated from Egypt 15000years ago and our father from Sumeria 30000 years ago. We have loads of relatives in the middle of Finland.
Thanks very interesting. Evolution is being proven wrong daily.
Seems to me that one of the most important points in the creationist vs evolutionist debate is that to be consistent, the word kind in Genasys should be considered in the context of organism descriptions in the creation story. These descriptions do not equate exactly with those of biology but are closest to the family level of the biological taxonomy, not species. This point has very important implications for any discussion on the 2 views. Nobody seems to get this obvious point, why is that? Perhaps we all just want to pick fights.
@ken Webster
perhaps you mean “kind”
And yes, Bible is correct that animals will create according to their “kind”
Never ever in history do we see otherwise. Never ever do we see like a fish breeding out a different kind of lifeform like an elephant.
@@johnle231 Corrected.
1. Egyptians still use many ancinet egyptian words in their dialect.
2. Alot of traditional egyptian food is from old a cine egyptian recipes.
3. Ancient Egyptians themselves depicted 3 different colors of their people in their paintings.
4. All the royal mummies have aqualine noses go see them for urself in Cairo. Likely middle Easter or black nubian noses.
I find these discussions fascinating, but difficult to follow and I finally realized why. I don’t know where we’re going. Couldn’t you start with an overview?
They have 22 -24 part series covering whole thing. It is very hard to follow but worth watching.
The Arabic name for Egypt is "Masr" and Egyptians are "Masri" which seems to be related to Mizraim. Christian Egyptians claim to be truly Egyptian -- and descended from the pharoahs -- and not Arabs, who are usually Muslim. When the Arabs invaded, spreading the "religion of peace" with their swords, they suppressed the Coptic language and demanded the use of Arabic only. Coptic language has survived only as a liturgical language in the rites of the Coptic Orthodox and Coptic Catholic Churches. Was there any distinction among Muslims and Christians in your DNA sampling?
The pharaoh used to speak 80%soninke langue 100%fact coptic are not western propaganda.
I’ve read up on this so many times that it bores me but kind of excited that someone else has researched this at the same time. Good source also
They don't allow it because they deny a significant part of our world and that is the spiritual side. Without recognizing an obvious aspect is like getting half the picture, imo.
Who is they ?
@christhurman2350 😂🤣 Wow, this was 2 yrs ago when I made this comment. Way back when my worldview was just starting to grow. I believe I meant elites back then, but today I call them the predators. Truth is always buried, thus why we need to dig for it. We're not supposed to act out of their control. If only we can learn to change our mindsets.
@@YDuskyCricket again who is « they »?? And who is the « we » in our ?? It was a legitimate question.
@@christhurman2350 i don't use pronouns, so when I said I meant elites back then as "they" that's what I meant. I now say predators as "they" instead of elites. "We" is plural aka us, the commoners/population/serfs. I am not able to break it down any more for you than this. Maybe ask a friend?
@ wait, you don’t use pronouns ?? Do you refrain from pronouns for any particular reason ?? That must be difficult …
I have yet to hear a succinct synopsis of these DNA findings. I assume these long scientific videos are necessary to “prove” the science behind them. , but how about a short version for those who believe you?
Lol
According to my DNA... my roots come from the Coptic, Egyptian, Arab .. Leviathan... wich according to the map is located in Judea ..and Egypt
Great job! I will definitely use your research in my biblical studies
EB1B1 DNA is not from middle East. It is from North East Africa(Ethiopia, Eritrea, Somalia). Thus, your data show close relation between kushite(Eastern kushite) and Berbers (Northern African kushites). Thus, your research just proved that relationship between Eastern kushites and Northern Kushites of EB1B1 DNA origin.There is no way that Somalis are 80% middle eastern origin because of Arabian invasion.
Just read through Genesis and Exodus yesterday --- this video shows up this morning.
Hi, what I don't agree is that when Shem, Ham and Japhet got their y-chromosome from the same father Noah, the y-chromosomes of the sons should be different from each other?
Interesting point
Remember Noah was NOT the first man Adam was. No doubt there were multiple Y-chromosomes in Noah's loins.
The Bible has words for "science". God calls man's science ..."science so called". And the history has been erased like a good old fashion book burning. Buying your book right now. 👍
Today we can that social media censoring.
You spent so much time telling most of us what we already know!
I am totally blown away and you have connected many dots for me. I have had two DNA analyses by different companies according to their feedback I am 43% Nigeran(Yoruba) and 23% Sierra Leonian (Mende) 7%kenyian Luya 1%Maasai 5.2 Middle Eastern 9.1% Scandinavian 1.0% 2.9 Northwest European 1% Inuit (Eskimo)2%Meso.American(Peru).
lol sir lot of genes
@@imethd90 Yeah, I said the same thing.
Earl Montgomery: Since diversity is supposed to make us stronger, you must be very strong, indeed!
So, the clear conclusion here is Haplogroup E1b1a carriers(Bantus) were the Ancient Egyptian mainly with some E1b1b, A, and B inputs. All those Haplogroups originate in North East Africa. Then E1b1b which matured in the Middle East and also mixed Eurasian female then came back with it's full militarily might, invaded and ransacked Ancient Egypt causing what we know as the Bantu expulsion/exhodus/migration. It's so clear and simple. Caucasians went to great length to hide such simple truth.
It's amazing that even though Bantus were expelled, they still occupy most of the arable land in Africa and also making up close to 70% of the population of that humongous continent. I'm starting to think that the Ancient Egyptians(Bantus) withdrawal from North Africa was more strategic than just being conquered. It's a coincidence that they would lose the war and their territorial position would get better. Most of the time when a group is conquered, their population would dwindle(Ala Native Americans, Australian aboriginees) but the Bantus took their skills somewhere else and build other empires. I guess it's testament to their skill in craftsmanship and agriculture at that time. I guess those deserts weren't worth holding onto so they took their skills somewhere else and left Egypt to the desert dwellers. Greatest decision ever made. Leave mohamed with his desert was the plan. Pretty cool plan. I like it. lol
This addressed EXACTLY the questions I have been asking about our Genesis. Thank you for you great work. 😇🙏
It's sad that we have to go on a chase to find truth that is stated clearly in God's Word. We can't handle truth and prefer stories but our searches will always lead us back to truth for we know truth. I trust God, He Is Truth.
The Kemetu are not the ancestors of the Arab Republic of Egypt 😢
What Chronology does dr Jeansson use for the ancient Egyptian dynasties?
Data keeps piling up in support of Biblical truth!
Are the ancient Egyptians related to modern Egyptians? No, the arabs who form the majority of Egpyt today are the descendants of "arab invaders" who captured it from the romans. When KEMET was invaded by foreigners the Afrikans were still living in KEMET even after the arab invaders displaced the roman invader. The Afrikans who live in "ancient egypt/KEMET are still living in egypt while some of the Afrikan population went further inwards into Afrika such as East & West Afrika and even further down south to places such as South Afrika.
I would agree but some mated with ancient Egyptians Iam sure.