Here is a great example of how the triliteral roots in Arabic can provide a deeper understanding of the words in the Quran that are not always fully encompassed or can be fully appreciated in the English translation. th-cam.com/video/sYajKl-Xr6c/w-d-xo.html
This is very weird to watch after the latest video that sunnis supposedly follow Jews. Coming back to this 3 video years later, after you made the Sunni Jewish video, would you not qualify circumcision as something that was brought into Islam through hadith by Jewish influences? That would make a lot of sense to me.
You mentioned that God did not detail how to perform the salat in the Quran etc. etc. But God did qualify that performing the.salat, and other rites by His decree in the Quran. The fact that we are commanded to follow the religion of Abraham and followed by God’s command and confirmation in the Quran is proof enough I.e.the Quran does confirm these rites, except ‘circumcision’ and where is the proof that Abraham was ever ordered to circumcise. Your reference of the points mentioned in Hebrew and your reference of the Torah cannot be accepted because over time the Torah had been dirtied, while God has decreed that the Quran superceed all previous scriptures. You are following the wishes of the devil.
I can sense there's just too many underlying feelings of denial around this. We can check to see which practices are confirmed in the Final Testament and which is not. Something as small as Tayammum is mentioned in the scripture. Circumcision has not been mentioned at all. Therefore, Tayammum can be confirmed as a practice sent down to Abraham as well as Salat even without the details on how to perform it but still mentioning them as being an existing practice, at the same time confirming that circumcision has not been mentioned at all. So there must be some subconscious denial in people insisting on it and it's probably due to not wanting to face with the reality of losing of a vital part of their body which I can relate to. But to make it justified as a decree from God can end up being wrong in so many ways as you can imagine... Maybe I should make a video to clarify all this God willing.
As much as I'd like to agree with you because I myself am circumcised as are my children. I simply can't because of the Quran. God states that he created us perfectly and Satan claims that he will convince us to alter this creation (our bodies) and make it fair seeming.
I don't agree with this. All the practices are specified in the Quran even though it is not detailed (example, Salaat, Zakat, Fasting, Haj,..). your argument does not hold water. If Quran supersedes and confirms the previous scriptures it means that it confirms those specific commandments such as Sabbath. or Dietary prohibitions. we can see in Quran all of the rites mentioned and we are following those rites, the specifics of how to perform them may not be fully in the Quran but they have been mentioned. Also in the appendix of Rashad's translation we have these rites specified and clarified for us and still there is no mention of circumcision you would think if this is something we are required to He would mention it. Also religious freedom. For example, do you expect a child to follow a religion rites? if the Answer is NO, how you perform this act to your child as a religious practice, while the child may not be a submitter or want to be one? doesn't this contradict the concept of freedom of religion? You keep going to the Arabic to drive your argument implying that the English translation (of Rashad) would not be sufficient to understand a clear rite being or not being required as religious commandment.
Very poor analysis. Sorry but this is one of your weaker videos. For example the verb "ibtala" (to test) in 2:124 is only linked with Abraham in one other verse and that is 37:106 wherein the noun "al-balau" (the test) is used, thus the evidence is firmly weighted it refers to that, not what you said. Please note this is not the only issue in your analysis.
![เปิด อาณาจักร หมื่นล้าน "สาระตั้ม" l [Nickynachat]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3XE0nPF4YkQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Here is a great example of how the triliteral roots in Arabic can provide a deeper understanding of the words in the Quran that are not always fully encompassed or can be fully appreciated in the English translation.
th-cam.com/video/sYajKl-Xr6c/w-d-xo.html
This is very weird to watch after the latest video that sunnis supposedly follow Jews. Coming back to this 3 video years later, after you made the Sunni Jewish video, would you not qualify circumcision as something that was brought into Islam through hadith by Jewish influences? That would make a lot of sense to me.
I love to read the Bible, Old Testament and the Quran are similar to me.
You mentioned that God did not detail how to perform the salat in the Quran etc. etc. But God did qualify that performing the.salat, and other rites by His decree in the Quran. The fact that we are commanded to follow the religion of Abraham and followed by God’s command and confirmation in the Quran is proof enough I.e.the Quran does confirm these rites, except ‘circumcision’ and where is the proof that Abraham was ever ordered to circumcise. Your reference of the points mentioned in Hebrew and your reference of the Torah cannot be accepted because over time the Torah had been dirtied, while God has decreed that the Quran superceed all previous scriptures. You are following the wishes of the devil.
I can sense there's just too many underlying feelings of denial around this.
We can check to see which practices are confirmed in the Final Testament and which is not. Something as small as Tayammum is mentioned in the scripture. Circumcision has not been mentioned at all. Therefore, Tayammum can be confirmed as a practice sent down to Abraham as well as Salat even without the details on how to perform it but still mentioning them as being an existing practice, at the same time confirming that circumcision has not been mentioned at all. So there must be some subconscious denial in people insisting on it and it's probably due to not wanting to face with the reality of losing of a vital part of their body which I can relate to. But to make it justified as a decree from God can end up being wrong in so many ways as you can imagine...
Maybe I should make a video to clarify all this God willing.
As much as I'd like to agree with you because I myself am circumcised as are my children. I simply can't because of the Quran. God states that he created us perfectly and Satan claims that he will convince us to alter this creation (our bodies) and make it fair seeming.
Brother thank you for this TH-cam channel May Allah bless you. Please tell me what Quran translation is the most reliable for me to use?
Peace - Rashad Khalifa
www.quraniclabs.com/
www.quranstudyapp.com/
also please join our discord community. Invite link below.
discord.gg/submission
I don't agree with this. All the practices are specified in the Quran even though it is not detailed (example, Salaat, Zakat, Fasting, Haj,..). your argument does not hold water. If Quran supersedes and confirms the previous scriptures it means that it confirms those specific commandments such as Sabbath. or Dietary prohibitions. we can see in Quran all of the rites mentioned and we are following those rites, the specifics of how to perform them may not be fully in the Quran but they have been mentioned. Also in the appendix of Rashad's translation we have these rites specified and clarified for us and still there is no mention of circumcision you would think if this is something we are required to He would mention it. Also religious freedom. For example, do you expect a child to follow a religion rites? if the Answer is NO, how you perform this act to your child as a religious practice, while the child may not be a submitter or want to be one? doesn't this contradict the concept of freedom of religion?
You keep going to the Arabic to drive your argument implying that the English translation (of Rashad) would not be sufficient to understand a clear rite being or not being required as religious commandment.
Very poor analysis. Sorry but this is one of your weaker videos.
For example the verb "ibtala" (to test) in 2:124 is only linked with Abraham in one other verse and that is 37:106 wherein the noun "al-balau" (the test) is used, thus the evidence is firmly weighted it refers to that, not what you said. Please note this is not the only issue in your analysis.
Wahy=Instructions, not inspirations or revelations
CORAN 5 :77
Are u trying to justifie this aberation ?
U negate the CORAN !
sabaath has been abbograted.
U ar complice of this crime and u know what s happen of wrongdoer