This entire gang of NYC filmmakers are so incredibly versatile and full of creative energy! Inspiration for yearsssss! This includes the Neistats, the Safdies and obviously, Max! Never confined to platforms or narrative styles, constantly experimental. Thank you so much Max!
I really appreciate that you include a more diverse range of perspectives on happiness in this video. In the Netherlands, the model of Maslow gets taught to kids around the country, but it is rarely challenged, almost as if it is seen as a fact of life.
These happiness films are next level Max. Your work has inspired me like no other. Your video about reading made me go from 3 books a year to 25 a year. This series of videos is changing my whole perspective on purpose.
This ties in really well with the Denmark episode. Society and the economy is set up so that basic needs and security are covered without relying on free labour from women. So people can self actualize and live their best life.
Max this series is just what the world needs. if everyone sees this and puts some small amount of effort in to live to be happy the right way we as a planet would levitate.
It's 5 am after a sleepless night and I'm withholding myself from screaming in bed because Trainspotting is one of my favorite movies hahaha I didn't expect to see Max running through Edinburgh, great stuff. Besides that, this video about happiness is exactly what I needed.
I really hope you will research and interview Asian perspectives on happiness; especially, in developing Southern Asian countries like Vietnam. It looks like the downside of developed countries like Denmark as of of the happy countries in the world is the upside in Vietnam, and vice versa. But I have lived there since I was a kid and most of our happiness comes from the neighborhood, community, and friendships.
Great vudeo. However, it should be noted that Maslow added a next level to his pyramid near the end of his life: Self-transcendence. This implies going beyond the self and embracing social and spiritual connections like Ubuntu and G-love.
This was an astonishingly great episode. Beautifully researched and presented. A very succinct - yet original and deep - exploration of an ancient quandary. Really really great stuff!
Since we've been getting different cultures perspectives on happiness, I hope there's an episode more focused on Asian's view on the matter. Anyways, these videos are a joy to watch and always bring me happiness.
ahhhh goosebumps from that ending! I love the way you told the story through different perspectives…. connecting concepts between Voltaire, a Kenyan theologian and the modern feminist movement… I deeply felt our common humanity while watching. Excited for this message to get out so doomerism can be squashed by…. championism? Haha, thank you Max + team for making such a thought provoking piece of art.
I live in Germany and can only partially understand what has been said. But I can't quite understand the diagram that says that women were happier in 1972 than they are today. From 1950 onwards, at least here in Germany, dissatisfied housewives were prescribed a "medicine" containing 16.5% alcohol by volume to make them "happy" again so that they could do their job as housewives. I don't believe that women were happier back then, instead of fulfilling their dreams, they were simply fulfilling the task that had been imposed on them since childhood. Being a housewife, bringing up children and being a good wife. Today, most women are freer in their choices. Just as I can only begin to understand this video because of the language barrier, I understand happiness. It remains a huge question mark for me.
It was also much less acceptable for women to even question, much less acknowledge their unhappiness in 1972. In the U.S., women were just beginning to achieve financial independence. A woman who complained might well be left with no child support (neither mandated nor enforced in most of the country) and limited opportunities to earn a living. It was safer to numb themselves.
I've come back to this video 3-4 times in the last few days. Really helps me articulate why some areas of my life are going so well, and others very poorly. Also since I make videos and I'm just getting into interviewing, these woven interviews are a masterclass. Thanks Max :)
This happiness videos are amazing.. just found the channel and subscribed.. commenting for the algorithm so that this will hopefully be watched by many!
Love it. High quality production as ever. I've always thought self-actualisation was an oxymoron. The African philosophy makes a lot of sense. However, western culture is a little more selfish. To become 'champions' we need to get comfortable with delayed gratification. Help yourself and you get a quick hit, help others and you might get a delayed hit. The other big challenge is that when you're at the bottom of the pyramid (fun fact, Maslow never used a pyramid to express his hierarchy), you cannot gain a sense of perspective regarding the upper levels. Goal setting must be proximate to work effectively for society as a whole. It's a lovely conundrum to mediate on #chooselife
Very amazing! Never thought this before. Ive read maslow in wiki and the critics that the idea cant be defined in collectivism. Now ive understand a lot. Thank you ☺️
Max, you continue to be an inspiration to me as an aspiring documentarian. Loved this series! Opening this one with Trainspotting was perfect, I think I need to rewatch it ASAP.
Incredible film, Max. Ubuntu seems a similar sentiment to the overview effect, which alas requires a trip to space. Terrific ending (and truly deft use of Fair Use), and *nailed* that closing VO/music timing. Walter Murch would be proud.
The narrative of women supporting men's self-fulfillment falls down the same moment you consider the raise of single motherhood for one side and single men without children on another side. Neither any of them have anything to do with the "lack of support" for women. Single mothers decide to take care of their children on their own and as such it is their responsibility since motherhood is optional since 1960 with the release of the anticonceptive pill. Single men without children are not supported by any women whatsoever, so their happiness has nothing to do with women in their lives. According to the US Census, In 1949 around 80% of US households contained married couples. In 2022, only around 47%, including older generations whose way of life is still based on old values and whose children are already grown up. This means the case that Jill Flipovic complains about is not an issue that affect most people. Most people, women or men, do not have ANY support, they don't have partners, either by their own choice or not. So, who is supposed to provide this support she talks about? Single parents, other married couples or single people? Someone has to take care of the children. She does not seem to complain about sharing the workload of raising children, but rather than society does not support an inversion of the roles in which the self-fulfillment of the woman is more important than anything else. Real equality demands equal treatment. As such women's and men's self-fulfillment are equaly important. If your partner does not support you raising the children, that's your individual issue of choice of partner. If you think your fulfillment is more important than your spouse's, then look for someone who would be happy supporting you. Or do not have children, like many people nowadays. But do not engage with someone who won't fit that role and then complain that society is broken. One must be acccounted for their own choices and responsibilities. That's what being equal entrails, something that Flipovic do not seem to get. On the other hand, I do agree that the current societal values and practicalities leave very little space for raising children with the time and care they deserve. What specific way to achieve it is an interesting matter of discussion. People have many diverse and divergent answers to this question. That would be an interesting analysis. But simplifying the issue saying "women support men but men do not support women" is reductionist and, as explained, not that applicable anymore. The discourse needs to evolve and follow the world in which we live now.
Mrs Filipovic does a good job explaining how self-actualization in a marriage often comes at the expense of one spouse, but she appears to totally miss the mark on which spouse it is. She describes how women have traditionally taken care of the "base-level" needs on Maslows hierarchy. This is very much a mischaracterization - men have traditionally been responsible for both the physiological needs of his family and the safety needs. Men are the breadwinners and the protectors of their family, and every major world religion sanctioned this role specifically to men because of the domino affect it has on the family-unit when implemented with the correct virtue system. It's sad how damaging modern feminism is to the average woman who now feels as though they are required to take it upon themselves to raise a family and provide for that family. Women and men are built different yet we complement each other with our strengths and weaknesses.
I'm old enough to remember those good old days. Men could beat their wives and children daily as long as they didn't kill them. Men could sexually abuse their children with no repercussions. Women were told to stay with the abusers and keep their mouths shut because how else could they survive financially. And, interestingly, when societies have experimented with giving cash to families in need, cash given to women goes first to bills and second to investing for the future. Men are more likely to spend to feed their egos than their families.
Women aren’t happier pursuing this self actualisation because… men had women supporting them when they wanted to self actualise… whereas women have to do it without any help from men… men will only support women when they’re helping them self actualise… when it’s a woman’s turn to self actualise… men disappear…
This entire gang of NYC filmmakers are so incredibly versatile and full of creative energy! Inspiration for yearsssss! This includes the Neistats, the Safdies and obviously, Max! Never confined to platforms or narrative styles, constantly experimental. Thank you so much Max!
👏👏 so true
O😧EE
Tell me the gang
That start is an incredible homage to Trainspotting - great eye to detail. Great work Max, love it!
I really appreciate that you include a more diverse range of perspectives on happiness in this video. In the Netherlands, the model of Maslow gets taught to kids around the country, but it is rarely challenged, almost as if it is seen as a fact of life.
Eu auero todas musicas dos mamonas assacina
Nao intendo nada sou brasil
These films are fascinating! Thank you Max Joseph and team behind this project.
These happiness films are next level Max. Your work has inspired me like no other. Your video about reading made me go from 3 books a year to 25 a year. This series of videos is changing my whole perspective on purpose.
This ties in really well with the Denmark episode. Society and the economy is set up so that basic needs and security are covered without relying on free labour from women. So people can self actualize and live their best life.
Chills at the end there
Loving the diverse perspectives on display here. From Trainspotting to Ubuntu.
Max this series is just what the world needs. if everyone sees this and puts some small amount of effort in to live to be happy the right way we as a planet would levitate.
I'll never be able to think of "We Are the Champions" the same again. Great episode 🥂
It's 5 am after a sleepless night and I'm withholding myself from screaming in bed because Trainspotting is one of my favorite movies hahaha I didn't expect to see Max running through Edinburgh, great stuff.
Besides that, this video about happiness is exactly what I needed.
CREO. QUE. ERES. TU. 😼. PERO. TE. DIGO. QUE. VALES. MUCHO. Y. PODRAS. HACER. LO. QUE. QUIERAS. 😼. INTENTALO. ESTO. Y. TODO. LO. QUE. TE. PROPONGAS. SI. NO. LO. INTENTAS. LUEGO. ESTARAS. LAMENTANDOLO. AZLO. TERMINA. LO. QUE. ESTES. EN. ELLO. Y. APUNTATE. ERES. LIBRE. NO. LO. DUDES. QUE. SALE🎉🎉🎉🎉. QUE. NO. SALE. BUENO. LO. INTENTE. DE. CORAZON. NO. LO. DUDES. VALE. PROMETELO. 😼🎉🎉🎉
@@antonioruiz4171 IK. HEB. GEEN. FLAUW. IDEE. WAAROM. JE. ZO. IDIOOT. TYPT. EN. OOK. NOG. EENS. IN. HET. SPAANS. ALSOF. IK. DAAR. IETS. VAN. MOET. BEGRIJPEN. 🤡🤡🤡 IK. BEN. NOG. NIET. ZO. VER. IN. DUOLINGO. MAAR. HEB. WEL. EEN. ZEVENTIG. DAGEN. STREAK.✨
Literally cried with that ending 🥲
ME TOO! it was really inspirational 🥹
I really hope you will research and interview Asian perspectives on happiness; especially, in developing Southern Asian countries like Vietnam. It looks like the downside of developed countries like Denmark as of of the happy countries in the world is the upside in Vietnam, and vice versa. But I have lived there since I was a kid and most of our happiness comes from the neighborhood, community, and friendships.
Can we take 2 seconds to marvel at Jill's interview background?
Right? That shot came up and I was just like 👀
This was beautiful to watch! Thank you, Max for posting this up and making Content like this! This goes way beyond TH-cam🎉
This video is an absolute winner, no wait, it's a champion. Big ups max!
Wouah tres beau documentaire j'ai beaucoup appris des 3 épisodes merci !!!
Nothing is better than watch your films, great as always
LOVE LOVE LOVE this whole series. Max you are amazing man 🎉
Great vudeo. However, it should be noted that Maslow added a next level to his pyramid near the end of his life: Self-transcendence. This implies going beyond the self and embracing social and spiritual connections like Ubuntu and G-love.
Why do we strive to be happy? Why can’t we live with unhappiness? Why happiness?
Yess, opening with Trainspotting was spot on!
This was an astonishingly great episode. Beautifully researched and presented. A very succinct - yet original and deep - exploration of an ancient quandary. Really really great stuff!
Since we've been getting different cultures perspectives on happiness, I hope there's an episode more focused on Asian's view on the matter.
Anyways, these videos are a joy to watch and always bring me happiness.
literal chills at the end there. beautiful beautiful
This is amazing creativity Max. You're creating some of the most beautiful stories narrating happiness to the masses. Keep up the great work!
ahhhh goosebumps from that ending! I love the way you told the story through different perspectives…. connecting concepts between Voltaire, a Kenyan theologian and the modern feminist movement… I deeply felt our common humanity while watching.
Excited for this message to get out so doomerism can be squashed by…. championism? Haha, thank you Max + team for making such a thought provoking piece of art.
Beautiful work. Champion is the new winner
Well, I like this message. We are indeed the champions of the world
I love the style of your videos Max !
This series is the best thing I've seen on youtube lately, thank you Max, you're really good at what your'e doing, hope you keep doing that man!
I live in Germany and can only partially understand what has been said.
But I can't quite understand the diagram that says that women were happier in 1972 than they are today. From 1950 onwards, at least here in Germany, dissatisfied housewives were prescribed a "medicine" containing 16.5% alcohol by volume to make them "happy" again so that they could do their job as housewives. I don't believe that women were happier back then, instead of fulfilling their dreams, they were simply fulfilling the task that had been imposed on them since childhood. Being a housewife, bringing up children and being a good wife. Today, most women are freer in their choices.
Just as I can only begin to understand this video because of the language barrier, I understand happiness. It remains a huge question mark for me.
It was also much less acceptable for women to even question, much less acknowledge their unhappiness in 1972. In the U.S., women were just beginning to achieve financial independence. A woman who complained might well be left with no child support (neither mandated nor enforced in most of the country) and limited opportunities to earn a living. It was safer to numb themselves.
Great film-making Max, and even greater topic, I guess that we are all trying to figure what happiness is and means.. thank you for making this! 👍
I've come back to this video 3-4 times in the last few days. Really helps me articulate why some areas of my life are going so well, and others very poorly. Also since I make videos and I'm just getting into interviewing, these woven interviews are a masterclass. Thanks Max :)
More max joseph films please :)
This happiness videos are amazing.. just found the channel and subscribed.. commenting for the algorithm so that this will hopefully be watched by many!
Another amazing video in this really enjoyable series. Thank you for making these!!
keep cooking man, this series is insane ‼
Love this series, loved your interview with Rich Roll. Can't wait to see the rest of the episodes! Keep it up!
This is so enlightening thank you so much! 🪐
The Lust for Life opening is a banger.
Brilliant work Max, absolutely loving the Happiness series!
please promote those videos. They are extremly necessary for our society evolution
this one was the best one yet
please more
Love it. High quality production as ever. I've always thought self-actualisation was an oxymoron. The African philosophy makes a lot of sense. However, western culture is a little more selfish. To become 'champions' we need to get comfortable with delayed gratification. Help yourself and you get a quick hit, help others and you might get a delayed hit. The other big challenge is that when you're at the bottom of the pyramid (fun fact, Maslow never used a pyramid to express his hierarchy), you cannot gain a sense of perspective regarding the upper levels. Goal setting must be proximate to work effectively for society as a whole. It's a lovely conundrum to mediate on #chooselife
Yeah, that was 💯 another home run MaxMax. Congrats!
❤🔥❤🔥❤🔥❤🔥❤
amazing work, Max! I really admire your effort to uplift voices in philosophy which are rarely heard.
Very amazing! Never thought this before. Ive read maslow in wiki and the critics that the idea cant be defined in collectivism. Now ive understand a lot. Thank you ☺️
When is the next episode out!?
now that's some great storytelling
Max this is one my favourite series ever ! I really hope there’s more 🎉🥳
Max, you continue to be an inspiration to me as an aspiring documentarian. Loved this series!
Opening this one with Trainspotting was perfect, I think I need to rewatch it ASAP.
Really enjoying this series!
Bravoooo!!!! Goosebumps at the end on the secondary definition reveal.
Incredible film, Max. Ubuntu seems a similar sentiment to the overview effect, which alas requires a trip to space. Terrific ending (and truly deft use of Fair Use), and *nailed* that closing VO/music timing. Walter Murch would be proud.
i love watching these videos, they give me joy. please keep making content, you're amazing at this
This is what people should be watching!
Loved this doc brother. Thank you!
call me Ishmael, but I'm trying to read more book and Max keeps making these great movies!
Excellent! This is such an important series! 💜👏🏻
5:00 women’s misery quotient; self actualization (the something bigger than yourself becomes your child- not a job!)
Who made the 80's production company style intro?
Legendary as always, Max!
Thank you for another banger!❤ Great storytelling!
great topics and great work Mr Joseph. Thank you.
I have it now, happiness!
I just saw you uploaded this series, and I can't wait to watch through this. This is a fucking EVENT. Hope to keep seeing more stuff from you!
Excellent job on this video. I wish everyone wakes up happy Tomorrow and everyday after.
the end credits as always is amazing!!! Hapiness is true in every wayy shape and form
thanks for noticing
This is amazing
Yes Max, just yes!
god i fucking love this
Choose Max Joseph
SUPERB
Max doesn’t miss
commenting for the algorithm, thanks Max
Yes!
We dont deserve you Max! Thank you.
Dunno if I'm at the right place but I'm here for newsdaddy
here for News Daddy❤
muy bueno🎉👏
Okay.. wait, who said it first, John Mbiti or Albert Camus? Camus said, "I rebel therefore we exist".
MORE!
6:08 how 'bout... their kid
Im here for newsdaddy!!!?????!!!
I can't be the only person who thinks the comments section is weird
Just read through it. This is the weirdest comment I could find.
So you're telling me the famous Linux distribution is named after an African philosophy on happiness? 🤯
Interesting video,"cutting the feminist part you sneaked in the 5:00", its a nice perspective.
Fuck, this was good
este contenido en epañol me encantaria. toop
Quero ver de novo
The narrative of women supporting men's self-fulfillment falls down the same moment you consider the raise of single motherhood for one side and single men without children on another side.
Neither any of them have anything to do with the "lack of support" for women. Single mothers decide to take care of their children on their own and as such it is their responsibility since motherhood is optional since 1960 with the release of the anticonceptive pill. Single men without children are not supported by any women whatsoever, so their happiness has nothing to do with women in their lives.
According to the US Census, In 1949 around 80% of US households contained married couples. In 2022, only around 47%, including older generations whose way of life is still based on old values and whose children are already grown up. This means the case that Jill Flipovic complains about is not an issue that affect most people. Most people, women or men, do not have ANY support, they don't have partners, either by their own choice or not. So, who is supposed to provide this support she talks about? Single parents, other married couples or single people?
Someone has to take care of the children. She does not seem to complain about sharing the workload of raising children, but rather than society does not support an inversion of the roles in which the self-fulfillment of the woman is more important than anything else. Real equality demands equal treatment. As such women's and men's self-fulfillment are equaly important.
If your partner does not support you raising the children, that's your individual issue of choice of partner. If you think your fulfillment is more important than your spouse's, then look for someone who would be happy supporting you. Or do not have children, like many people nowadays. But do not engage with someone who won't fit that role and then complain that society is broken. One must be acccounted for their own choices and responsibilities. That's what being equal entrails, something that Flipovic do not seem to get.
On the other hand, I do agree that the current societal values and practicalities leave very little space for raising children with the time and care they deserve. What specific way to achieve it is an interesting matter of discussion. People have many diverse and divergent answers to this question. That would be an interesting analysis. But simplifying the issue saying "women support men but men do not support women" is reductionist and, as explained, not that applicable anymore. The discourse needs to evolve and follow the world in which we live now.
Here for news daddy
It's money and purpose
I know I’m just a random internet person making a comment, but you’ve GOT to talk to Sam Harris.
E verdade muy bien meu Deus do ceu e terra and you have been muy. Divaldo oliveira ❤🎉😢😮😅😊😊
Mrs Filipovic does a good job explaining how self-actualization in a marriage often comes at the expense of one spouse, but she appears to totally miss the mark on which spouse it is. She describes how women have traditionally taken care of the "base-level" needs on Maslows hierarchy. This is very much a mischaracterization - men have traditionally been responsible for both the physiological needs of his family and the safety needs. Men are the breadwinners and the protectors of their family, and every major world religion sanctioned this role specifically to men because of the domino affect it has on the family-unit when implemented with the correct virtue system. It's sad how damaging modern feminism is to the average woman who now feels as though they are required to take it upon themselves to raise a family and provide for that family. Women and men are built different yet we complement each other with our strengths and weaknesses.
I'm old enough to remember those good old days. Men could beat their wives and children daily as long as they didn't kill them. Men could sexually abuse their children with no repercussions. Women were told to stay with the abusers and keep their mouths shut because how else could they survive financially. And, interestingly, when societies have experimented with giving cash to families in need, cash given to women goes first to bills and second to investing for the future. Men are more likely to spend to feed their egos than their families.
Amém Amém Amém Amém Amém Amém Deus esta com migo Amém
Women aren’t happier pursuing this self actualisation because… men had women supporting them when they wanted to self actualise… whereas women have to do it without any help from men… men will only support women when they’re helping them self actualise… when it’s a woman’s turn to self actualise… men disappear…
Barely watch videos so deep - - yet entertaining