GOSPEL OF JAMES 🔥 Protoevangelium of James
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ม.ค. 2020
- The Gospel of James, also known as the Protoevangelium of James, and the Infancy Gospel of James. Audio book. This is LibriVox recording and is in public domain. Narrated by CJ Plogue. The Gospel of James is an apocryphal gospel probably written around the year AD 145 or earlier, which expands backward in time the infancy stories contained in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke, and presents a narrative concerning the birth and upbringing of Mary herself. It is the oldest source to assert the virginity of Mary not only prior to, but during (and after) the birth of Jesus. The ancient manuscripts that preserve the book have different titles, including "The Birth of Mary", "The Story of the Birth of Saint Mary, Mother of God," and "The Birth of Mary; The Revelation of James." It is also referred to as "Genesis of Mary". It is regarded as canonical in the Eastern Churches.
#GospelofJames #GenesisofMary
VERY INTERESTING TO KNOW MORE ABOUT THE VIRGIN MARY AND HER PARENTS
I always want to know about Mary’s life, is so beautiful and perfect. Thank you Mary for your obedience to God ♥️🌼🌹🕊 pray for us Mother of God!😇
@Original O.G. Troll lol I'm jus finding out about this "gospel " now because muslms love to use it.
This is from the 2nd Century
So beautiful no other woman on earth has ever been like Mary a woman perfect to God and blessed above every woman, she felt no greater than others she was the greatest blessing to the earth from one of the lowest and meekest righteous man
Thank you so much for this
i love this, have the Book, enjoy it emincenely
Becky Evans immensely
I love the gospel, infact it has given me most answers to rhetoric questions in the 3gospels , I wonder why such a vital information is considered as apocalyptic?
I ask the Same thing.
Apocryphal, yeah?
Apocryphal, not apocalyptic. And what apocryphal means in this context, essentially, is a writing that was not ultimately included in the authorized canon of Scripture. Now, there could be many reasons for this, including that such writings were not universally recognized as authentic from all groups of practicing Christians. But understand that the process of deciding what would ultimately be included in the New Testament was a centuries long process of numerous church councils, comprised of very fallible men participating in a process that was, at times, nakedly political.
@@markpkessinger using the word “essentially “ is unnecessary
because darkness runs this world and our God who loves us so gave us free will and this has been abused and manipulated by many. the gospel of Mary Magdalene, the gospel of Thomas and the secret book of John are all very worth reading as well. they contain more teachings from the Master Jesus
I'm BUZZIN LOVE'S!!!
Mary according to this story is not from a poor household. She is of a well to do family. Then why do they make Jesse's out to be poor.carpentor. He was of a high status, not surprisingly, since Mary and Joseph were both in line to the throne of Israel. Which was infact the cause of Heruds fear of losing his throne.. Jesus was by all accounts ,the rightful king of Israel.
Have you read about Joseph of Arimathea, the man who walked with Jesus and whose tomb Christ was placed in? There is more history of Jesus to be learned. God bless
The New Testament Epistle of James was written before the Crucifixion.
Wrong
@@HistoryandReviews You do get that "Wrong" does not undo fifteen years of debate which has never come close to refuting the idea that James is pre Crucifixion? "Wrong" does not make the idea wrong, only your desire to bury it. James is a pre Crucifixion epistle.
@@richardmclaughlin8345 no it isn’t. James doesnt even mention jesus but once and some scholars think that one reference is an interpolation. The earliest dating is the 40s the latest being 150
How can James be a cousin and brother @ the same time if the both had the same parents ?
Because Mary never slept with Joseph . She stayed a virgin her whole life. I assume James was Joseph son from another marriage. No such thing as cousins at this time. They would have called someones cousin someone’s brother in the Jewish culture at that time. So, that’s why people say he was the brother or cousin of Christ. We know he was related in some way. We just don’t know how he was related.
Yes . The Orthodox Church maintains James was the son of Joseph from his previous marriage, thus technically a stepbrother to Jesus Christ.
He can be both a cousin and a brother if Joseph wife is Mary's sister, assuming Mary has a sister. Now James is Jesus's brother because it's is His half brother by law as Mary is betrothed to Joseph. At the same time he is Jesus's cousin because their mother are sisters.
At the same time I have heard that during that time in Jewish culture and early Christians called each other “brother” or “sister” and it didn’t necessarily mean biological brothers or sisters. They could have been even unrelated. Language at that time doesn’t have the same connotations that it does today. However the Orthodox Church does think of him as stepbrother to Christ because of Joseph’s previous marriage.
@@Unseen.Warfareno bro they have Four kids together Jude, Simon, Joses/Joseph and James (James the Just, the Brother of Jesus)
How I wish they would remove the 🎶 🎵 music
The magi visited Jesus in a house. Not a cave... almost all of the content are false and contradict the Bible
Good for knowledge so we can prepare ourselves when we preach our Catholic brothers and sisters
What evidence do you have this is "false."
Just because you learned it in Sunday school, doesn't mean it's true.
Which are your sources?
@@mwu2712 compare this fallacy book to the gospels and you'll find dozens of contradictions
@@njohn6995 Matthew 2:11 (KJV) And when they were come into the house, they saw the young child with Mary his mother, and fell down, and worshipped him: and when they had opened their treasures, they presented unto him gifts; gold, and frankincense, and myrrh.
please read and study your Bible with the guidance of the Holy Spirit. What you've been taught in church might be false.
What a false gospel. This is not orthodox. It denies the human aspect of Jesus. It says "And immediately the cloud disappeared out of the cave, and a great light shone in the cave, so that the eyes could not bear it. And in a little that light gradually decreased, until the infant appeared, and went and took the breast from His mother Mary." For Jesus to be fully man, he must be born from the Virgin, not beamed out... This is an attack on Christ's nature and this is why it is not accepted.
Cool Guy not everything should be taken literally, are carnal minds need understanding, this comes only from the comforter, I pray you seek Jesus, bow the knee, beg forgiveness and plead the blood of Christ. He is the truth the life the way. For my people perish for a lack of knowledge. May the Lords peace love and grace be with you.
@@leemichael4570 I do seek Jesus and bow the knee to him and believe in him with all my heart. I don't know what that has to do with anything. The Gospel of James is not cannonical and there is a reason it is not part of the 4 gospels. This is a gnostic work that was produced to support the idea that Jesus did not come in the flesh.
It’s not accepted because the Romans hijacked the religion from James the just
@@ericreza4000
Absolutely correct bang on the nail.
You would feel the same way if Revelation wasn't Cannon and the gospel of John was not canon. Both book written long after Jesus death and both fabricated. Constantine and the early church decided what would be Cannon and what would not. It came down to a few votes
Why are you choosing to read a translation in Elizabethan, as opposed to modern, English? All those "thee," "thou" and "thy" words don't make the text any more respectful, and only serve to make the text more difficult for modern English speakers. You may not know this, but 'thou', in Elizabethan English, was the singular familiar pronoun for 'you,' and would have been used to address close friends and family. 'You," in Elizabethan English, is the formal form for 'you.' "Thee" is the oblique/indirect object form of thou, and 'thy' or 'thine' are the possessive forms. But using them today makes little sense. And it isn't somehow more "holy" to use archaic langage!
I enjoyed her choice of what you refer to as “archaic” language.
@@dukeraul624 -- I enjoy Elizabethan English, too, when and where appropriate. But if they are translating for a modern audience, the use of pronouns that have not been in common usage for 400 years is indeed archaic.
@@markpkessinger sad that it’s becoming archaic to study the art and evolution of language. Go football
@@dukeraul624 -- Archaic is not intended as an insult. It just means that its an older usage that is no longer commonly used. If the desire is to communicate with readers today, then the wiser course is to use modern ENglish.
Why don’t you translate it?
False gospel
Christianity is not marry and Jesus Christianity is the spiritual personal relationship with YAWY through Chriist Jesus To live life like Jesus did on earth These false gospel writers formed muslim god allah and mohmad
Yahwah is the antichrist