Earliest comprehensive Church (Ecclesiastical) History is by Eusebius in the early 300s AD, having researched and traveled the ancient world, Eusebius documented facts going all the way back to the time of Jesus our Lord. So having said that, in this Church History, he records that Clement of Alexandria journaled that when he first became a Christian, he traveled the ancient world to seek out what direct students of the apostles he could spend time with and learn from, and so Clement did just that. He learned under direct disciples of Peter, Paul, James and John. Now why do I mention that, because contrary to 4th and 5th century AD dogma, Clement writing in late 100s AD, having had this sort of FRONT ROW SEAT to the apostolic teaching, says repeatedly in his writings that THE EPISTLE OF BARNABAS was written by that Barnabas that traveled with Paul the apostle. That drowns out the naysayers against this book, including Eusebius' own 4th century AD canon list that suggests otherwise based on a democratic vote of worldwide bishops. Contrary to the historical events that Eusebius documents in his Ecclesiastical Church History, this is opinion, a canon list is just opinion.
The early Christians are the only reason we know who wrote which respective Gospels and letters, they separated the true gospels and letters from the fake ones written by liars, they preserved these writings by making many copies and not letting them fall into obscurity. With all that being said I don't know how I can logically accept them telling me John wrote his gospel but then reject them when they tell me Barnabas wrote this letter.
I just find it interesting that it’s difficult to find the data spoken about David and not following the counsel of ungodly men like the fish that swim about in darkness in the depths.
The origins of the formation of the Canon of the New Testament was birthed out of the lectionary readings of formal communal worship. Being that the New Testament was a worship text, a book that wasn’t utilised for worship had no place in that text. Also a book had to be recognised and used universally in Church worship, which The Epistle of Barnabas was not. It was predominantly used in the East, not so much in the West.
@@cedonullidude It seems people just became really weird in the 4th century, like Athanasius saying Hermas and Barnabas aren't canon but are good for teaching and should be read by new converts. It seems silly to me. Barnabas is referred to as Scripture by the early church fathers and that's good enough for me. And by those methods of discernment which you described, which I know were the methods used by men around the time of Eusebius, you would have to remove Revelation. And additionally, Hermas was read more frequently in many places than the letters in our New Testament copies today. I don't say that to elevate Hermas higher than other Scriptures, but to point out that there are books which were read widespread and very frequently, such as Hermas, and are not found in modern New Testament copies. The method isn't even really being applied honestly.
@@ante-nicenechristianityI understand but it was the catholic bishops that came together to take certain parts of the Bible out. As well as Enoch. Which Jesus even quoted Enoch
@Christfollower111 Yes, it was first the Jews that removed Enoch but Christians retained it, but much later on bishops removed the book. I will say however, the Protestants are much more hateful to Scripture and love cutting out books. The Catholics and the Orthodox sect are bad, but they at least keep Tobit and Sirach and complete-Daniel and others. But the true "catholic" (the one who accepts the faith once universally shared) and "orthodox" (the one who accepts the historic faith from the apostles) of course accepts Enoch and the rest. All of the ante-nicene bishops say these books are inspired.
@@ante-nicenechristianity you can’t say all Protestants are hatful and group with such words as that. And Jesus is the only way to heaven . You can’t pray to merry and the angels and make it to heaven still btw. God says don’t talk to the dead as well as pray to angels. Jesus
@@Christfollower111 I have no idea what you are saying, I'm not Catholic or Orthodox. I would never play to a creature, much less a woman. The early church taught that only God can be prayed to and that the dead do not hear your prayers.
Greetings! after years of reading The Bible. the epistles, and more particularly the Book of Hebrews, as to whom is the authorship of it. By some this is in question, some supposing it is Paul's writing. Albeit unlike Paul's other epistles ...his style, also how Paul includes his name. I'm am now convinced after hearing this epistle if Barnabas , (2023) that the author of Hebrews in my mind, undoubtedly the author is Barnabas. The same meticulous comparison of OT verses showing those things were types of Christ. He, like in the book of Hebrews, takes great care in showing the readers that It is Jesus spoken of in types & shadows in the Old Testament fulfilled in the blessed Saviour in the gospels. For me, I am convinced the author of The book of Hebrews, of a certainty is, indeed, Barnabas. Awaiting the blessed Hope!
I'm convinced by the Church Fathers that Paul wrote Hebrews. The reason for remaining anonymous was because the Hebrews hated Paul, so he didn't announce his authorship. There is the idea that it was originally written in Hebrew, and that it was later translated into Greek (which is why the writing style appears different than his other letters). I also want to add that writing on the Types and Symbolism is not at all unique to Barnabas, everyone did that. Christ talks about the Types, as well as the apostles, and the church fathers. Paul talks a great deal about the Types in his letters.
Barnabas confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh at minute 12:00, and that Jesus is the Son of God. Therfore we know that this spirit is of God. ( 1 John 4) Thank you brother for this edifying scripture. I subbed and will search your channel for more treasure like this one.
Love it. Wow this is Truth to me. So, the Jesus type was the Goat given to Azazel and the Sacrificed Goat in Town was a type of Us. Becoming Holy? Quotes Enoch! Reverences Stones like in Shepherd of Hermes!
It's boiled down to Barnabas or Paul as the author of Hebrews from the Church fathers, although the prevailing opinion seems to have been Paul. Nevertheless, the shared spirit is definitely there, I agree.
This is indeed a word from GOD as he is also quoting sayings from The Didache: The Teaching of The 12 Apostles smh wow Im truly amazed as I just recieved the Didache in the mail and it has the exact same saying ...confirming it was indeed written by the 12 Apostles
I used Eleven Labs. I'm in the process right now of making one for Against Heresies by Irenaeus. By the way, I've seen a few of your videos before, specifically your own Barnabas video. I actually used to listen to it before I made this one. Thanks for making stuff like that.
@@ante-nicenechristianity Thank you. I read those books out for my own study way back before the Internet was even a thing. I figured if I read them with understanding, I'd hear them with understanding. I'm very impressed by the AI voices these days, and this so far is the best I've heard. Thanks again, and by all means, make more.
I appreciate you both. Having audio narrations when i discovered the earliest christian writings in 2011, was such a cold drink of water to a parched thirsty soul.
There's one thing that sticks out to me. He mentions how Abraham is referencing Gen 14: 14 how the 300 and 10 and 8 in terms of the letters they relate to. However the Tau in Hebrew doesn't represent 300, it represents 400. True in Greek it's 300 but the Greek language was over a millennia away by the time of Abraham. Edit: I feel I just got an answer to this question: It was for the people contemporary with Jesus who were reading the scriptures in Greek to see.
I met a man who is educated and fluent in Biblical Greek and Hebrew who believed the Jews had corrupted their gematria, and this is my opinion. It's not a stretch to believe the same people who outright corrupted their Scriptures (the genealogies in Genesis being the most notorious) would also corrupt the value of their letters.
@@fivefingerfullprice3403 And "murderers of the prophets." Not only because they killed their flesh but would at times attempt to corrupt the Scriptures. A pure copy of the Old Testament no longer exists in Hebrew. The most reliable copy exists in Greek, just like the prophecy of the 318 is still preserved in the Greek.
Please do more rare and apocryphal works with this ai voice. It's one of the best I've heard and their aren't many good ones for many of the more obscure works. EDIT: Just realize it was Joshua Graham lol. It would be great to have his voice do the entire Bible and some of the more obscure works, but that’s probably a lot of work/money to make happen.
No, it's pretty doable. I intend to get around to making some audiobooks of Scripture, mainly Old Testament because all of the available OT audiobooks are translations from the Masoretic instead of the Septuagint. I am going to be making an Audiobook of Recognitions of Clement next though.
@@ante-nicenechristianity There is a guy from 4chan who says he plans to do the entire NT in Joshua Graham's voice. I think some of the OT books have been done like Genesis. You can find them pretty easily by searching on TH-cam. I was just surprised to see a Joshua Graham reading of a more obscure document such as this one.
@Bluedevil70 As I said, the available audiobooks are based on very crummy translations, the old testament especially. I would make a quality old testament audiobook from an English translation based on the Septuagint. Most of the stuff that's been done with the voice that I have seen is KJV. KJV is outdated English that most common people don't understand and on top of that it was using the Masoretic for the Old Testament which is unreliable.
@@ante-nicenechristianity Oh I wasn’t sure if you were referring to the Joshua Graham ones specifically or the general readings of the Bible on youtube like the Alexander Scourby readings. I just completed my first reading of the Bible, I read the KJV. I rather like the writing style but I don’t know much about the quality of the translation versus the original writings. Currently reading some of the extra-canonical works like the apostolic fathers writings and some of the more questionable old testament era works that are not included in the canon.
@Bluedevil70 I can very confidently tell you that the only people that question the full canon of the OT are the Jews and heretics. The histort is like this; the Jews originally had the entirety of the books of the OT, they were requested to translate all of these works into Greek (the most popular language of the time) a couple centuries before Christ. This translation is referred to as the 'Septuagint' and held in high regard by the Jews, and was at a point more commonly read than the Hebrew in certain places. Christ and the Apostles quote and refer to many of these books which are now considered "questionable" throughout the NT. The Jews started removing entire books, removing sections from books, and even started changing sections. The entire Ante-Nicene Church used the Septuagint and despised the things the Jews were doing to their Scriptures. Eventually the Jews disavowed the Septuagint, although they had formerly approved it. By the time of the KJV self acclaimed Christians were so warped in their thinking that they should use the Jews' manuscripts over the Septuagint, despite the Jews' manuscripts being newer and less reliable, because they were written in Hebrew and the Septuagint is not. It's all very silly and frustrating. Again, the KJV uses very old, outdated English, and there's nothing superior about that, Scripture itself wasn't written in King James' English, it was written first in Hebrew then common Greek. When it was written, the NT wasn't super poetic and Shakespe Shakespeare like, it was written in the regular common style of that time. And the KJV uses unreliable manuscripts for the OT that don't reflect what Christ, the apostles, or the early Christians used. I strongly encourage you to read the Ante-Nicene Fathers and consider buying a modern translation of the Septuagint. I know that the Orthodx Study Bible does a decent job.
But I discipline my body and make it my slave, so that, after I have preached to others, I myself will not be disqualified. - 1 Corinthians 9:27 Same message. But you have foreskin on your ears.
@@randersson3154 "I discipline my body and make it my slave so that I don't get thrown into the lake of fire." That's what Paul is saying. Go get your ears circumcised.
@@ante-nicenechristianity NO-WAY!! That is incredibly difficult to believe. This is one of the best narrators I’ve ever heard! The tonation is very close to perfect and the book makes perfect sense. Do you know where I can access a list of Christian books that have been narrated in this voice? ... What is the name / identity of the voice? I’m am seriously blown away by this! 😯
@@onlyhis5870 This is the only one of its kind for right now. I made this myself and carefully chose the best available translation. I plan on making many more, so if you're interested in this kind of thing I would recommend periodically checking back in to see if anything new has been added to the channel. My ambition for many years was to create the first set of high quality audiobooks of the church fathers. I've modeled my life after their teachings, the Bishops of the first 3 centuries. I try to make an effort to expose their doctrines to everyone, and part of that is achieved through making good audio formats of their writings.
It’s Joshua Graham from Fallout. There are a lot of AI narrations of scripture using the Fallout NPC. Little upsetting that his name isn’t listed in the title or description.
So quick question. And to establish my tone is not dismissive or judgmental, but just curious: You are ok with using icons, but not okay with veneration?
As a lifelong atheist, I'm not expert on the Christian writings. I've read (and forgotten, for the most part) Augustine, Eusebius, Photios (whom I found passably entertaining in the moment) and snippets of a few others. But for me as for many others, literature faded in the Dark Ages before it shone with new brilliance in the Renaissance. So I opine only - at the risk of giving offense, I know - that anyone can read all sorts of fantastical things into the Hebrew scripture (ask David Koresh, if you can) and that Trypho was on point when he brought up, in polite opposition to Justin, the myth of Perseus and Danae.
@@ECLECTRIC_EDITS "Whatever gods exist - if any exist at all - must follow natural law, because not even a god can make two and two equal five." (Pliny the Elder)
@@ECLECTRIC_EDITS Was Pliny unfamiliar to you before you Googled him? He died during the volcanic eruption at Pompeii, but before then, he wrote the world's first encyclopaedia, which I've read along with the works of many other pagan authors. I found all of them far more entertaining and enlightening than the desperate and opposing attempts of the early Christian writers to untangle the mysteries of the Trinity.
Interesting how the church refuses to acknowledge this book! So many different churches with complete different teaches and different Bibles. And all refuse to read this book. Makes me believe we aren't in the short season!
This letter was read by early Christians and was included with the rest of the New Testament books up to the 4th century. It's found right alongside the rest of the New Testament in Codex Sinaiticus from the 300s. It's authorship is provided to us by Clement of Alexandria (2nd century) and Origen (3rd century) who both tell us that Barnabas wrote this. The Church does not refuse to acknowledge this book; Protestants, Catholics, and Orthodox exclude the book but they're not part of the Church.
they don't refuse to knowlege this book, you can find and read it, you don't need to ignore early christian writtings just because they aren't in the Bible
It's a work that is no longer extant, but 99% sure it was by Moses. You have to remember that people in the first century had access to so many more texts and traditions that we unfortunately do not. There are actually quite a few books quoted in both the Old and New Testament which are no longer extant today. I wish I had more information on it for you.
@@ante-nicenechristianity The enemy has removed a lot. But the Holy Spirit guides those with the eyes to see and ears to hear to living waters. Thanks a lot for uploading this.
@@Keturah53 Hebrew has an equivalent alphabet letter, but this epistle was written in Greek and the early Christians read from the Greek Septuagint. You know this because he's speaking on the numeric value of the letter, 300, which is specific to the Greek letter "Tau".
@@jonathanbarnes3061 I'm pretty sure they were pointing out that Kate's comment makes no sense because the Hebrew letter doesn't have that numerical value.
This author had a lot of great things to say that were sound and helpful teaching. His beliefs about these animals he mentioned were strange, and often not very accurate to their behavior. I wonder what led to those beliefs.
His declaration that in 6000 years God will bring everything to a close does contradict Scripture stating that not even Jesus knows the day nor the hour God the Father will bring the end about. There is good in this epistle, and also some things that don’t line up with the truth.
@@boopdoop2251 Hey, man, thank you for finally giving me the truth on the apostle's letter! I was so silly for going to the same ancient sources that verify Matthew as the author for his respective gospel when all this time I could have gone to you! Please let me know when you publicly release your canon, as your authority on the matter can't be denied!
So, according to you, God had to formally give it to them in writing that they should only worship the God who just rescued them from Egypt and formally forbid them in writing from worshipping a gold statue of the Egyptian god Apis?
@@ante-nicenechristianity ah you learn something new everyday , but i still cant see this letter of barnabus in the bible? which part of the bible is it in m8
@Sir-zl2nq Up to the first 5 centuries after Christ this book was considered scripture by Christians, and is identified by some of the most respected early Christian writers (Clement of Alexandria and Origen) as having been written by the very Apostle Barnabas who accompanied Paul. In the earliest codexes, Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Claromontanus, it is included amongst the rest of the New Testament writings. Barnabas fell out of favor over time. Eventually it was demoted to being a reliable book but not part of the so-called official canon. And then by the time of the protestant reformation it was not even considered reliable. I think if you're going to accept when the early church tells you Matthew the apostle wrote his respective gospel then you should accept it when they told you Barnabas wrote his respective letter.
It was included with the rest of the New Testament for the first four centuries of Christianity and many people came to believe in that time. I have no idea what you are talking about.
Interesting, so according to this epistle there is still at least 4,000 years left before the end days because “a day for the Lord is 1,000 years” and it’s only been a little more than 2,000 since the resurrection. So much for all the doomsday talk going around these days lol
Sir, it appears that the resurrection was around 1000 years ago, the alleged 2000 years being a lie, and then was the millenial reign of Christ, and now we are in Revelation 20 after the millenial reign and before the white throne judgment Revelation 20 and 21 talk about. Jesus was literal when he said in Matthew that "this generation shall not pass until this is all fulfilled". I also believe that all the dates we got for inspired writings like the Epistle of Barnabas are wrong. It all went down in the decades leading up to tribulation. ...there is a reason they call the last 1000 years "the dark age"... Interesting coincidence: the alleged kingdom of Byzantine lasted EXACTLY 1000 years even to mainstream history... Look into the "short s3ason" of Revelation 20. It's not a salvational issue, for who repents and believes in Christ is saved. But it's an issue of avoiding deception and pain resulting from it.
It's weird that he speaks of the three works of the Lord. The garden of Eden with Adam and Eve was the hope of life Righteousness was Jesus Christ And then proof of the understanding of this as a species was glad love. Which means that there's another king in the line. It talks about it in our Bible that we have as well, and that there's a king that annoyance the third temple that brings back Jesus Christ on the clouds. Jesus is still king of heaven but the kingdom of heaven is revealed in Revelations as having walls😅 In another way of thinking about it is the blessing of the two brothers Jacob and Esau. One was blessed with life and the other was blessed with the ability of the sword to make the others kneel to the family😅 It's even funny because Jacob was grasping Esau's heel because Jesus was a gift for King. David, a blessing that was bestowed later. But he got the blessing of the birthright because his mother sent him forward. My mother earth is like she's covered in blood. Do something... And father did If you look at the traits that he's outlining and then you put them in with a Christian faith and then you put that against a traits of the Islamic faith. You'll see that the one that he's speaking of is being able is the Islamic faith. Which goes back to the tower of Babel where the languages were split by the angel Gabriel so that the people would not be able to continue building a tower to kill God. It's funny to this day we still have technical vernacular in each specialty, so the species cannot communicate clearly and concisely because they're specialized vernacular between us. Not only that, but there's also vocabularies between the people to divide the house even further as the Bible says a divided house cannot stand. Put to say that the devil wouldn't know how to put this to work. The devil doesn't like humans because he's probably the bodyguard of the family of Christ. Why are there primate standing in the garden of Eden and the king's own children are hidden in time. God says he's king of kings and that's why I use king there and king of kings would mean that he is God but his sons would be king Jesus because he was king but he was slain King David and his concept because they slander the works that were done for him and King Solomon because they despised the wisdom and all of this was done by lil king or 📯 horn? Muhammad can also emphasize the little king because he never controlled the kingdoms like King David established the territory for God, King Solomon who built the first temple but also controlled the most wisdom and knowledge. Something God says is more valuable than gold and silver or even King Jesus Christ who subdued the whole world even crushed his adversaries after he was gone but he is king of heaven. 😅 For the ones that are sprinkling are also the same ones that will condemn you based on their own righteousness and merit of their own judgment in a way of judging others based on their own perception of the reality of what's going on when God himself says I judge only the heart But the dark histap is also showing that father departed the temple. The very curtain was ripped when he left the curt when he left the temple and entered into Jesus on the cross and circumcision of the heart is actually circumcision reasons removal of something so like the removal of God from the temple But the eagle and the hawk and the crow are all trainable. So you should first try the train the animal before you eat it But there's more to the story of the food. The pig as far as food safety, if you cook it inappropriately and I heard it's been eating. The wrong stuff will kill the whole tribe the same with shellfish most everything on the forbidden food list. If it's prepared properly or harvested at the right time is edible but it takes a level of wisdom and knowledge to understand it. But Adam and Eve were in the garden but they weren't true children of God. Hence, the devil hated them because more likely he was the bodyguard of the children of God because Jesus wasn't hung on the cross until he told the devil the depart from him, which by that point had been repentant into Lucifer, which means angel of light. How would you get half the angels decide with you? He would tell them. Of course he says God being you're worse than unbeliever if you don't support your children but he is hidden his own children within the cloth of time and I bet you could get half the army to rise up against him But this is spoken of in the Bible that the angels didn't have all of the information because the angels that were thrown out that gave information to the humans as spoken of in there that they didn't have all the information. They didn't have the whole story The treasures hidden in darkness is that a lot of the Bible when it's translated into English like the book Genesis literally reads jeans like DNA is not Genesis or allah all amp hours which is a measurement that would result in you being able to see light because it's electrical energy or Isaiah with spacing is AI. AH, ask your phone a question, turn it over and look at what the battery is rated in. All of the Old testament books are built this way. There's only a couple like Isaiah that will have spacing and then the only exclusion from going back from to an electrical principle is Jesus name and it's rated in a mechanical principle which is jes space us jes being the measurement of a jet engine us, do you fly on jets or like the holy Ghost? If you don't understand a jet engine, surely you understand the concept of that abstract thrust moving you in a direction rapidly The other thing is the human body and a female when she is fertile her DNA and her saliva are not the DNA but the saliva will actually dry and form a fern leaf which is a tree of life when a tree drips of blood. But it's further understanding the concept that God was ahead of us. We have to catch up with him. He doesn't have to catch up with us. The female by herself is a fern during certain times when she separated from that of a man because her body is unique Israel is again and a conflict and the only way that she can survive. Will they get rid of Hamas in the tunnels? You just need to use explosive gas heavy gases for the tunnels that have drainage holes. You blow those first and then you go back and you kill them in with a medium weight gas by feeling the tunnel to the appropriate air fuel and then igniting it. As far as deceiving God the thousand snakes they have things like a needle like MRNA COVID. They were told to treat disease a certain way and they completely through it in the trash. More so than any other nation on earth is real Eve goes back to the garden of Eden and DNA. It says that she was always allowed to eat from the tree of good and evil. She was probably able to pick and choose the pregnancies. It wasn't until Adam decided to eat from the tree of good and evil. You reap what you sow and they reaped what they sold. They didn't bless one of the children so they had one child that could never measure up with resulted in murder. Cain killed the Abel but he had also committed a crime. Adam, being that he didn't support his children which makes you worse than an unbeliever Eve was allowed to pick and choose from the tree because if she terminated her pregnancy then there would be nothing sown. It was just gone but because Adam wasn't the same as Eve when he did it it became a sin. A transgression like if God forsake us as a male, it's instant transgression because he wouldn't have supported his children if you're a believer and you're one of the children. Which runs into late term abortion cuz I think 30 something years old is a little late to be aborted. If it's not pro-abortion Christian family shouldn't, but it also shouldn't be forcing the weeds to have children. Has a farmer you don't fertilize the weeds? But in Job it says in with the children of God and God when he spoke to some of the kings of the earth he says you shall only have a son and do not judge me as I have two sons. Bible speaks of this as well because Jesus is one of the sons and then there's another king of Israel that anoints the temple to come. That brings Jesus back on the clouds and Jesus is still king of heaven but in Revelation it shows that heaven has walls. It has a measurement and it is not the whole planet. 😂 Also in Job got asked Satan where have you been and he says to and fro to and fro has more to do with time travel than actual locations. The story of Jacob in Esau is also representative of the situation. One brother that was in Adam and Eve's line and then one brother that was grasping the ankle because he was a gift to King. David, but he also was safeguarding the steps of his brother
I can't tell if you're making fun of the idea of the pope or not. Peter wasn't the first pope, the office was invented hundreds of years later, but he was the first Bishop of Rome alongside Paul until they could find someone to take over permanently.
Wait.... "lawlessness?"... The guy just explained that Jesus came to eradicate the "law of compulsion." Now he wants people to adhere to another law?... So, was God wrong the first time? The first law didn't work? Lol
Not just some "guy" but Barnabas. "Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but the one who does the will of My Father who is in heaven will enter. Many will say to Me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in Your name, and in Your name cast out demons, and in Your name perform many miracles?’ And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; leave Me, you who practice lawlessness.’" Matthew 7
This sounds like a angry man retaliating in scripture . This Jesus account does not flow with the love portrayed in the other gospels. And the language sounds like a mixture of old and new english which says to me it was not written back then.
This is probably one of the most stupid comments I've ever read, the last sentence especially. If you kept your ears open at the reading of any of the four gospels or the letters of Paul you would recognize Barnabas has the same spirit. But that last comment, I don't even know what to say to something so stupid. It's an English translation from Greek, it was not written in English.
The Early Church Fathers, Clement and Origen, highly respected the book and called it Scripture. The Letter of Barnabas should not have been disregarded.
I come to warn you all in the name of Lord Jesus Christ our Savior and my Hero, to say to you: Lord just himself said this would happen (matthew 24:4-8) and it came true as expected: Matthew 24:4-8 [4]And Jesus answered and said unto them, Take heed that no man deceive you. [5]For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many. [6]And ye shall hear of wars and rumours of wars: see that ye be not troubled: for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet. [7]For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places. [8]All these are the beginning of sorrows. If you renounce Lord Jesus Christ our Savior and insted of trusting him who gave life for you. And you insted believe the father of lies, aka: the slanderer the dossiper the deceiver the adversary the false accuser You would then in turn walk on the common path; therfore renouncing you salvation and damning yourself to hell. Matthew 24:10-14 [10]And then shall many be offended, and shall betray one another, and shall hate one another. [11]And many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many. [12]And because iniquity shall abound, the love of many shall wax cold. [13]But he that shall endure unto the end, the same shall be saved. [14]And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the end come. Beware false prophets. Matthew 7:13-15,21-23 [13]Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat: [14]Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it. [15]Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. [21]Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. [22]Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? [23]And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity. Accept Lord Jesus Christ into your hearts and obey his commandments and you will have eternal life after death. John 14:6-7 [6]Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me. [7]If ye had known me, ye should have known my Father also: and from henceforth ye know him, and have seen him. Fun fact: the gospel of peace has 4 different books written by 4 different vessels by the will of God. Wich if you know your history of the first century, 4 witnesses is needed to provide it as fact. The Holy Bible is fact and provides it in the old testament: carta.fiu.edu/gsc-creative/2016/04/12/3-scientific-facts-you-never-knew-were-in-the-bible/ Their is even proof of the great flood the schools hide from you to keep them from you: th-cam.com/video/6tLQX-hQMT4/w-d-xo.html If you still don't believe, intern: don't want to have a happy eternity in heaven with our Father who loves us, and our Savior, Lord Jesus Christ who was mocked, spat on, beaten, Insulted, whipped, tortured, and was killed just for us: then call me, the vessel who is being used to warn you all out of love, by the power of the Holy Spirit, Father, and Lord Jesus Christ: call me a "fool" and don't blame us for your eternal torture. But if you believe us then start reading the Bible starting with the gospel of peace (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and Jhon) then read (Acts) , and then you will be saved by the Holy Spirit within you and will, out of obedience, humility, and a desire to please Abba, Father & Lord Jesus Christ our Savior: you will then have salvation. By the will of the Holy Trinity influencing my actions: you have been warned. Reading the Holy Bible, I have seen that one can be directly referenced anonymously within scripture. how many others remember this?:(Jeremiah 1:5) - love sister malia: bride of the glorious Lord Jesus Christ our Savior and my Hero who saves me, even from my nightmares
God said through His prophet Jeremiah, "Search for the ancient path... which will purify you," and Jude tells us that "the faith was once for all given to the saints" in his time. You're right about avoiding heretics and encouraging others to do the same. But you really should submit to the wisdom and instruction of the early church to be properly guided through scripture if you haven't already.
The Bible isn’t all scriptures, didn’t get promised a perfect bible, got the promise of a Spirit of Truth. Truth was spread out. Nothing is infallible and even lies can be profitable.
![ทุกครั้งที่หลับตา (Lucid Dream) - AYLA's [ Official MV ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/4i1OBAQyv58/mqdefault.jpg)
Earliest comprehensive Church (Ecclesiastical) History is by Eusebius in the early 300s AD, having researched and traveled the ancient world, Eusebius documented facts going all the way back to the time of Jesus our Lord. So having said that, in this Church History, he records that Clement of Alexandria journaled that when he first became a Christian, he traveled the ancient world to seek out what direct students of the apostles he could spend time with and learn from, and so Clement did just that. He learned under direct disciples of Peter, Paul, James and John. Now why do I mention that, because contrary to 4th and 5th century AD dogma, Clement writing in late 100s AD, having had this sort of FRONT ROW SEAT to the apostolic teaching, says repeatedly in his writings that THE EPISTLE OF BARNABAS was written by that Barnabas that traveled with Paul the apostle. That drowns out the naysayers against this book, including Eusebius' own 4th century AD canon list that suggests otherwise based on a democratic vote of worldwide bishops. Contrary to the historical events that Eusebius documents in his Ecclesiastical Church History, this is opinion, a canon list is just opinion.
The early Christians are the only reason we know who wrote which respective Gospels and letters, they separated the true gospels and letters from the fake ones written by liars, they preserved these writings by making many copies and not letting them fall into obscurity. With all that being said I don't know how I can logically accept them telling me John wrote his gospel but then reject them when they tell me Barnabas wrote this letter.
@@ziphos me too
I just find it interesting that it’s difficult to find the data spoken about David and not following the counsel of ungodly men like the fish that swim about in darkness in the depths.
The origins of the formation of the Canon of the New Testament was birthed out of the lectionary readings of formal communal worship. Being that the New Testament was a worship text, a book that wasn’t utilised for worship had no place in that text. Also a book had to be recognised and used universally in Church worship, which The Epistle of Barnabas was not. It was predominantly used in the East, not so much in the West.
@@cedonullidude It seems people just became really weird in the 4th century, like Athanasius saying Hermas and Barnabas aren't canon but are good for teaching and should be read by new converts. It seems silly to me. Barnabas is referred to as Scripture by the early church fathers and that's good enough for me. And by those methods of discernment which you described, which I know were the methods used by men around the time of Eusebius, you would have to remove Revelation.
And additionally, Hermas was read more frequently in many places than the letters in our New Testament copies today. I don't say that to elevate Hermas higher than other Scriptures, but to point out that there are books which were read widespread and very frequently, such as Hermas, and are not found in modern New Testament copies. The method isn't even really being applied honestly.
Makes perfect sense… I bring my broken heart to my Creator and my heart then sings gladness of my Creator! I love God with all my heart!
Amen!!!❤
I needed to hear this inspiration today.. thank you Lord Jesus..
HalleluYAH! APTTMH❤️🔥 and our coming King Yahusha HaMichiah💫🩸🙌🏽🙌🏽.
Thank you for this upload, Shalom🙏🏾
Indeed...,feeling this in my deepest DNA brother! Love to all!
My daily routine listening to scripture expanding my knowledge 🙏 amen
One of my favourite books,soooooo gooooooooooooooooooooooooood.
This is inspired Scripture !
Absolutely
Isn't the whole Bible the inspired word tho
Wow 😯 Praise God for this!
Shame on the Catholic wicked church for taking this out. This so good and it reveals so much about how Jesus was there since the beginning
There's no point in specifically targeting the catholics when also the orthodox and the protestants don't include Barnabas.
@@ante-nicenechristianityI understand but it was the catholic bishops that came together to take certain parts of the Bible out. As well as Enoch. Which Jesus even quoted Enoch
@Christfollower111 Yes, it was first the Jews that removed Enoch but Christians retained it, but much later on bishops removed the book. I will say however, the Protestants are much more hateful to Scripture and love cutting out books. The Catholics and the Orthodox sect are bad, but they at least keep Tobit and Sirach and complete-Daniel and others. But the true "catholic" (the one who accepts the faith once universally shared) and "orthodox" (the one who accepts the historic faith from the apostles) of course accepts Enoch and the rest. All of the ante-nicene bishops say these books are inspired.
@@ante-nicenechristianity you can’t say all Protestants are hatful and group with such words as that. And Jesus is the only way to heaven . You can’t pray to merry and the angels and make it to heaven still btw. God says don’t talk to the dead as well as pray to angels. Jesus
@@Christfollower111 I have no idea what you are saying, I'm not Catholic or Orthodox. I would never play to a creature, much less a woman. The early church taught that only God can be prayed to and that the dead do not hear your prayers.
God bless you for sharing this....
More audiobooks to come!
Greetings! after years of reading The Bible. the epistles, and more particularly the Book of Hebrews, as to whom is the authorship of it. By some this is in question, some supposing it is Paul's writing. Albeit unlike Paul's other epistles ...his style, also how Paul includes his name.
I'm am now convinced after hearing this epistle if Barnabas , (2023) that the author of Hebrews in my mind, undoubtedly the author is Barnabas. The same meticulous comparison of OT verses showing those things were types of Christ. He, like in the book of Hebrews, takes great care in showing the readers that It is Jesus spoken of in types & shadows in the Old Testament fulfilled in the blessed Saviour in the gospels.
For me, I am convinced the author of The book of Hebrews, of a certainty is, indeed, Barnabas.
Awaiting the blessed Hope!
I'm convinced by the Church Fathers that Paul wrote Hebrews. The reason for remaining anonymous was because the Hebrews hated Paul, so he didn't announce his authorship. There is the idea that it was originally written in Hebrew, and that it was later translated into Greek (which is why the writing style appears different than his other letters).
I also want to add that writing on the Types and Symbolism is not at all unique to Barnabas, everyone did that. Christ talks about the Types, as well as the apostles, and the church fathers. Paul talks a great deal about the Types in his letters.
Barnabas confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh at minute 12:00, and that Jesus is the Son of God. Therfore we know that this spirit is of God. ( 1 John 4)
Thank you brother for this edifying scripture. I subbed and will search your channel for more treasure like this one.
Love it. Wow this is Truth to me. So, the Jesus type was the Goat given to Azazel and the Sacrificed Goat in Town was a type of Us. Becoming Holy? Quotes Enoch! Reverences Stones like in Shepherd of Hermes!
Loving this letter. Reminiscent of Hebrews and I can see why some scholars believe he wrote that one as well.
It's boiled down to Barnabas or Paul as the author of Hebrews from the Church fathers, although the prevailing opinion seems to have been Paul. Nevertheless, the shared spirit is definitely there, I agree.
It is one of the most beautiful.
so sad mos treligious people wish nothing to do with it... it was viewed as inspired prior to Constantine. Acts 11 confirms Barnabas as a disciple.
interesting. some helpful phrases to remind me to find the corresponding Scripture references
Thanks for this.
Absolutely, I plan on making more.
This is indeed a word from GOD as he is also quoting sayings from The Didache: The Teaching of The 12 Apostles smh wow Im truly amazed as I just recieved the Didache in the mail and it has the exact same saying ...confirming it was indeed written by the 12 Apostles
Could you tell us which text to speech program you used to make this? There are so many books I want hear with this kind of quality....
I used Eleven Labs. I'm in the process right now of making one for Against Heresies by Irenaeus.
By the way, I've seen a few of your videos before, specifically your own Barnabas video. I actually used to listen to it before I made this one. Thanks for making stuff like that.
@@ante-nicenechristianity Thank you. I read those books out for my own study way back before the Internet was even a thing. I figured if I read them with understanding, I'd hear them with understanding. I'm very impressed by the AI voices these days, and this so far is the best I've heard. Thanks again, and by all means, make more.
The reader sounds like Richard Burton!
Sounds like Joshua from New Vegas
I appreciate you both. Having audio narrations when i discovered the earliest christian writings in 2011, was such a cold drink of water to a parched thirsty soul.
Hard to believe this wasn't a actor, consider doing this with the Odes of Solomon please
I will be doing Psalms of Solomon at some point.
( 44:00) Love the One who made you.
There's one thing that sticks out to me. He mentions how Abraham is referencing Gen 14: 14 how the 300 and 10 and 8 in terms of the letters they relate to. However the Tau in Hebrew doesn't represent 300, it represents 400. True in Greek it's 300 but the Greek language was over a millennia away by the time of Abraham. Edit: I feel I just got an answer to this question: It was for the people contemporary with Jesus who were reading the scriptures in Greek to see.
I met a man who is educated and fluent in Biblical Greek and Hebrew who believed the Jews had corrupted their gematria, and this is my opinion. It's not a stretch to believe the same people who outright corrupted their Scriptures (the genealogies in Genesis being the most notorious) would also corrupt the value of their letters.
@@ante-nicenechristianity True enough, there's a reason Jesus called them liars, vipers, hypocrites, etc...
@@fivefingerfullprice3403 And "murderers of the prophets." Not only because they killed their flesh but would at times attempt to corrupt the Scriptures. A pure copy of the Old Testament no longer exists in Hebrew. The most reliable copy exists in Greek, just like the prophecy of the 318 is still preserved in the Greek.
Please do more rare and apocryphal works with this ai voice. It's one of the best I've heard and their aren't many good ones for many of the more obscure works.
EDIT: Just realize it was Joshua Graham lol. It would be great to have his voice do the entire Bible and some of the more obscure works, but that’s probably a lot of work/money to make happen.
No, it's pretty doable. I intend to get around to making some audiobooks of Scripture, mainly Old Testament because all of the available OT audiobooks are translations from the Masoretic instead of the Septuagint. I am going to be making an Audiobook of Recognitions of Clement next though.
@@ante-nicenechristianity There is a guy from 4chan who says he plans to do the entire NT in Joshua Graham's voice. I think some of the OT books have been done like Genesis. You can find them pretty easily by searching on TH-cam. I was just surprised to see a Joshua Graham reading of a more obscure document such as this one.
@Bluedevil70 As I said, the available audiobooks are based on very crummy translations, the old testament especially. I would make a quality old testament audiobook from an English translation based on the Septuagint. Most of the stuff that's been done with the voice that I have seen is KJV. KJV is outdated English that most common people don't understand and on top of that it was using the Masoretic for the Old Testament which is unreliable.
@@ante-nicenechristianity Oh I wasn’t sure if you were referring to the Joshua Graham ones specifically or the general readings of the Bible on youtube like the Alexander Scourby readings. I just completed my first reading of the Bible, I read the KJV. I rather like the writing style but I don’t know much about the quality of the translation versus the original writings. Currently reading some of the extra-canonical works like the apostolic fathers writings and some of the more questionable old testament era works that are not included in the canon.
@Bluedevil70 I can very confidently tell you that the only people that question the full canon of the OT are the Jews and heretics. The histort is like this; the Jews originally had the entirety of the books of the OT, they were requested to translate all of these works into Greek (the most popular language of the time) a couple centuries before Christ. This translation is referred to as the 'Septuagint' and held in high regard by the Jews, and was at a point more commonly read than the Hebrew in certain places. Christ and the Apostles quote and refer to many of these books which are now considered "questionable" throughout the NT. The Jews started removing entire books, removing sections from books, and even started changing sections. The entire Ante-Nicene Church used the Septuagint and despised the things the Jews were doing to their Scriptures. Eventually the Jews disavowed the Septuagint, although they had formerly approved it. By the time of the KJV self acclaimed Christians were so warped in their thinking that they should use the Jews' manuscripts over the Septuagint, despite the Jews' manuscripts being newer and less reliable, because they were written in Hebrew and the Septuagint is not. It's all very silly and frustrating.
Again, the KJV uses very old, outdated English, and there's nothing superior about that, Scripture itself wasn't written in King James' English, it was written first in Hebrew then common Greek. When it was written, the NT wasn't super poetic and Shakespe Shakespeare like, it was written in the regular common style of that time. And the KJV uses unreliable manuscripts for the OT that don't reflect what Christ, the apostles, or the early Christians used.
I strongly encourage you to read the Ante-Nicene Fathers and consider buying a modern translation of the Septuagint. I know that the Orthodx Study Bible does a decent job.
"I who also am hoping to be saved" (0:25)
After hearing this I knew this is a blind man not knowing truth.
But I discipline my body and make it my slave, so that, after I have preached to others, I myself will not be disqualified. - 1 Corinthians 9:27
Same message. But you have foreskin on your ears.
Not the same message, Paul knew for sure and the other didn't know for sure. It is still an interesting story but not something to lead us.
@@randersson3154 "I discipline my body and make it my slave so that I don't get thrown into the lake of fire." That's what Paul is saying. Go get your ears circumcised.
@@ante-nicenechristianity it seems like you don't see the distinction I'm trying to make.
4:47, 17:15, 41:10, 46:53
Amen 🙏.
Amen
Do you know the name of this narrator please, because I want to look him up? He’s excellent! Thanks for posting this! 🙏🏼
It is actually a robot if you can believe it. Text to Speech.
@@ante-nicenechristianity NO-WAY!! That is incredibly difficult to believe. This is one of the best narrators I’ve ever heard! The tonation is very close to perfect and the book makes perfect sense.
Do you know where I can access a list of Christian books that have been narrated in this voice? ... What is the name / identity of the voice? I’m am seriously blown away by this! 😯
@@onlyhis5870 This is the only one of its kind for right now. I made this myself and carefully chose the best available translation. I plan on making many more, so if you're interested in this kind of thing I would recommend periodically checking back in to see if anything new has been added to the channel.
My ambition for many years was to create the first set of high quality audiobooks of the church fathers. I've modeled my life after their teachings, the Bishops of the first 3 centuries. I try to make an effort to expose their doctrines to everyone, and part of that is achieved through making good audio formats of their writings.
@@ante-nicenechristianity I truly appreciate your efforts and will definitely be checking back. TY! 🙏🏼
It’s Joshua Graham from Fallout. There are a lot of AI narrations of scripture using the Fallout NPC. Little upsetting that his name isn’t listed in the title or description.
So quick question. And to establish my tone is not dismissive or judgmental, but just curious: You are ok with using icons, but not okay with veneration?
As a lifelong atheist, I'm not expert on the Christian writings. I've read (and forgotten, for the most part) Augustine, Eusebius, Photios (whom I found passably entertaining in the moment) and snippets of a few others. But for me as for many others, literature faded in the Dark Ages before it shone with new brilliance in the Renaissance. So I opine only - at the risk of giving offense, I know - that anyone can read all sorts of fantastical things into the Hebrew scripture (ask David Koresh, if you can) and that Trypho was on point when he brought up, in polite opposition to Justin, the myth of Perseus and Danae.
Life long athiests means you are a lifelong believer in nonsense
@@ECLECTRIC_EDITS "Whatever gods exist - if any exist at all - must follow natural law, because not even a god can make two and two equal five." (Pliny the Elder)
@@waltergold3457 Pliny the elder. Died: 79 AD, Stabiae.
@@waltergold3457 Today he's remembered as a subpar beer.
@@ECLECTRIC_EDITS Was Pliny unfamiliar to you before you Googled him? He died during the volcanic eruption at Pompeii, but before then, he wrote the world's first encyclopaedia, which I've read along with the works of many other pagan authors. I found all of them far more entertaining and enlightening than the desperate and opposing attempts of the early Christian writers to untangle the mysteries of the Trinity.
25:20 Levitus 11
Interesting how the church refuses to acknowledge this book! So many different churches with complete different teaches and different Bibles. And all refuse to read this book. Makes me believe we aren't in the short season!
This letter was read by early Christians and was included with the rest of the New Testament books up to the 4th century. It's found right alongside the rest of the New Testament in Codex Sinaiticus from the 300s. It's authorship is provided to us by Clement of Alexandria (2nd century) and Origen (3rd century) who both tell us that Barnabas wrote this. The Church does not refuse to acknowledge this book; Protestants, Catholics, and Orthodox exclude the book but they're not part of the Church.
they don't refuse to knowlege this book, you can find and read it, you don't need to ignore early christian writtings just because they aren't in the Bible
Thanks for posting. Wonderful!
Is there a hard copy of this book?
www.amazon.com/Apostolic-Fathers-Greek-English-Translations/dp/080103468X/ref=asc_df_080103468X/?tag=hyprod-20&linkCode=df0&hvadid=312134266711&hvpos=&hvnetw=g&hvrand=7994016462357308802&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqmt=&hvdev=c&hvdvcmdl=&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=9016679&hvtargid=pla-453727242439&psc=1
True Christianity.
18:24 does anyone know what prophet or scripture is being referenced here?
It's a work that is no longer extant, but 99% sure it was by Moses. You have to remember that people in the first century had access to so many more texts and traditions that we unfortunately do not. There are actually quite a few books quoted in both the Old and New Testament which are no longer extant today. I wish I had more information on it for you.
@@ante-nicenechristianity The enemy has removed a lot. But the Holy Spirit guides those with the eyes to see and ears to hear to living waters. Thanks a lot for uploading this.
The cross is shaped like what?
He was talking about how the Greek letter "Tau" is shaped like a cross.
@@Keturah53 Hebrew has an equivalent alphabet letter, but this epistle was written in Greek and the early Christians read from the Greek Septuagint. You know this because he's speaking on the numeric value of the letter, 300, which is specific to the Greek letter "Tau".
@@Keturah53 that doesn't make sense 😒
@@Sleepyskarloey9460- Hebrew and Greek letters no mystery just antiquity.
@@jonathanbarnes3061 I'm pretty sure they were pointing out that Kate's comment makes no sense because the Hebrew letter doesn't have that numerical value.
Barnabbas is also Joseph. Paul is Benjamin. James is Jacob, Jude is Judah
Is this the voice of Joshua Graham from Fallout New Vegas???
This author had a lot of great things to say that were sound and helpful teaching. His beliefs about these animals he mentioned were strange, and often not very accurate to their behavior. I wonder what led to those beliefs.
His declaration that in 6000 years God will bring everything to a close does contradict Scripture stating that not even Jesus knows the day nor the hour God the Father will bring the end about. There is good in this epistle, and also some things that don’t line up with the truth.
@@boopdoop2251 Hey, man, thank you for finally giving me the truth on the apostle's letter! I was so silly for going to the same ancient sources that verify Matthew as the author for his respective gospel when all this time I could have gone to you! Please let me know when you publicly release your canon, as your authority on the matter can't be denied!
How could they broke the covenant that was not even given to the yet?
So, according to you, God had to formally give it to them in writing that they should only worship the God who just rescued them from Egypt and formally forbid them in writing from worshipping a gold statue of the Egyptian god Apis?
Old covenant is Gone
We're are the gentle? Think
listen again to it @@ante-nicenechristianity
@davidross4524 No one here said the Old Covenant wasn't gone, it's definitely gone. Stop making pointless comments.
What translation is this?
It's a translation by Michael Holmes with some minor changes to better fit the Greek.
is this the gospel of barnabus ? ie the book which wasnt put in the bible
No, the Gospel of Barnabas is a forgery, *this* is the Letter of Barnabas.
@@ante-nicenechristianity ah you learn something new everyday , but i still cant see this letter of barnabus in the bible? which part of the bible is it in m8
@Sir-zl2nq Up to the first 5 centuries after Christ this book was considered scripture by Christians, and is identified by some of the most respected early Christian writers (Clement of Alexandria and Origen) as having been written by the very Apostle Barnabas who accompanied Paul. In the earliest codexes, Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Claromontanus, it is included amongst the rest of the New Testament writings. Barnabas fell out of favor over time. Eventually it was demoted to being a reliable book but not part of the so-called official canon. And then by the time of the protestant reformation it was not even considered reliable.
I think if you're going to accept when the early church tells you Matthew the apostle wrote his respective gospel then you should accept it when they told you Barnabas wrote his respective letter.
I see why it was not included in canon.
What a worthless comment.
Makes sense why they left this out of the Bible because then no one would believe that yeshua was crucified
It was included with the rest of the New Testament for the first four centuries of Christianity and many people came to believe in that time. I have no idea what you are talking about.
That's not the gospel of Barnabas, a Islamic medieval forgery, but a epistle, written in early christianity that affirm the crucification
Shalom
Interesting, so according to this epistle there is still at least 4,000 years left before the end days because “a day for the Lord is 1,000 years” and it’s only been a little more than 2,000 since the resurrection. So much for all the doomsday talk going around these days lol
Sir, it appears that the resurrection was around 1000 years ago, the alleged 2000 years being a lie, and then was the millenial reign of Christ, and now we are in Revelation 20 after the millenial reign and before the white throne judgment Revelation 20 and 21 talk about. Jesus was literal when he said in Matthew that "this generation shall not pass until this is all fulfilled".
I also believe that all the dates we got for inspired writings like the Epistle of Barnabas are wrong. It all went down in the decades leading up to tribulation. ...there is a reason they call the last 1000 years "the dark age"... Interesting coincidence: the alleged kingdom of Byzantine lasted EXACTLY 1000 years even to mainstream history... Look into the "short s3ason" of Revelation 20. It's not a salvational issue, for who repents and believes in Christ is saved. But it's an issue of avoiding deception and pain resulting from it.
It's weird that he speaks of the three works of the Lord.
The garden of Eden with Adam and Eve was the hope of life
Righteousness was Jesus Christ
And then proof of the understanding of this as a species was glad love.
Which means that there's another king in the line. It talks about it in our Bible that we have as well, and that there's a king that annoyance the third temple that brings back Jesus Christ on the clouds.
Jesus is still king of heaven but the kingdom of heaven is revealed in Revelations as having walls😅
In another way of thinking about it is the blessing of the two brothers Jacob and Esau. One was blessed with life and the other was blessed with the ability of the sword to make the others kneel to the family😅
It's even funny because Jacob was grasping Esau's heel because Jesus was a gift for King. David, a blessing that was bestowed later. But he got the blessing of the birthright because his mother sent him forward. My mother earth is like she's covered in blood. Do something... And father did
If you look at the traits that he's outlining and then you put them in with a Christian faith and then you put that against a traits of the Islamic faith. You'll see that the one that he's speaking of is being able is the Islamic faith.
Which goes back to the tower of Babel where the languages were split by the angel Gabriel so that the people would not be able to continue building a tower to kill God. It's funny to this day we still have technical vernacular in each specialty, so the species cannot communicate clearly and concisely because they're specialized vernacular between us. Not only that, but there's also vocabularies between the people to divide the house even further as the Bible says a divided house cannot stand.
Put to say that the devil wouldn't know how to put this to work. The devil doesn't like humans because he's probably the bodyguard of the family of Christ. Why are there primate standing in the garden of Eden and the king's own children are hidden in time. God says he's king of kings and that's why I use king there and king of kings would mean that he is God but his sons would be king
Jesus because he was king but he was slain King David and his concept because they slander the works that were done for him and King Solomon because they despised the wisdom and all of this was done by lil king or 📯 horn? Muhammad can also emphasize the little king because he never controlled the kingdoms like King David established the territory for God, King Solomon who built the first temple but also controlled the most wisdom and knowledge. Something God says is more valuable than gold and silver or even King Jesus Christ who subdued the whole world even crushed his adversaries after he was gone but he is king of heaven. 😅
For the ones that are sprinkling are also the same ones that will condemn you based on their own righteousness and merit of their own judgment in a way of judging others based on their own perception of the reality of what's going on when God himself says I judge only the heart
But the dark histap is also showing that father departed the temple. The very curtain was ripped when he left the curt when he left the temple and entered into Jesus on the cross and circumcision of the heart is actually circumcision reasons removal of something so like the removal of God from the temple
But the eagle and the hawk and the crow are all trainable. So you should first try the train the animal before you eat it
But there's more to the story of the food. The pig as far as food safety, if you cook it inappropriately and I heard it's been eating. The wrong stuff will kill the whole tribe the same with shellfish most everything on the forbidden food list. If it's prepared properly or harvested at the right time is edible but it takes a level of wisdom and knowledge to understand it. But Adam and Eve were in the garden but they weren't true children of God. Hence, the devil hated them because more likely he was the bodyguard of the children of God because Jesus wasn't hung on the cross until he told the devil the depart from him, which by that point had been repentant into Lucifer, which means angel of light. How would you get half the angels decide with you? He would tell them. Of course he says God being you're worse than unbeliever if you don't support your children but he is hidden his own children within the cloth of time and I bet you could get half the army to rise up against him
But this is spoken of in the Bible that the angels didn't have all of the information because the angels that were thrown out that gave information to the humans as spoken of in there that they didn't have all the information. They didn't have the whole story
The treasures hidden in darkness is that a lot of the Bible when it's translated into English like the book Genesis literally reads jeans like DNA is not Genesis or allah all amp hours which is a measurement that would result in you being able to see light because it's electrical energy or Isaiah with spacing is AI. AH, ask your phone a question, turn it over and look at what the battery is rated in. All of the Old testament books are built this way. There's only a couple like Isaiah that will have spacing and then the only exclusion from going back from to an electrical principle is Jesus name and it's rated in a mechanical principle which is jes space us jes being the measurement of a jet engine us, do you fly on jets or like the holy Ghost? If you don't understand a jet engine, surely you understand the concept of that abstract thrust moving you in a direction rapidly
The other thing is the human body and a female when she is fertile her DNA and her saliva are not the DNA but the saliva will actually dry and form a fern leaf which is a tree of life when a tree drips of blood. But it's further understanding the concept that God was ahead of us. We have to catch up with him. He doesn't have to catch up with us. The female by herself is a fern during certain times when she separated from that of a man because her body is unique
Israel is again and a conflict and the only way that she can survive. Will they get rid of Hamas in the tunnels? You just need to use explosive gas heavy gases for the tunnels that have drainage holes. You blow those first and then you go back and you kill them in with a medium weight gas by feeling the tunnel to the appropriate air fuel and then igniting it. As far as deceiving God the thousand snakes they have things like a needle like MRNA COVID. They were told to treat disease a certain way and they completely through it in the trash. More so than any other nation on earth is real
Eve goes back to the garden of Eden and DNA. It says that she was always allowed to eat from the tree of good and evil. She was probably able to pick and choose the pregnancies. It wasn't until Adam decided to eat from the tree of good and evil. You reap what you sow and they reaped what they sold. They didn't bless one of the children so they had one child that could never measure up with resulted in murder. Cain killed the Abel but he had also committed a crime. Adam, being that he didn't support his children which makes you worse than an unbeliever Eve was allowed to pick and choose from the tree because if she terminated her pregnancy then there would be nothing sown. It was just gone but because Adam wasn't the same as Eve when he did it it became a sin. A transgression like if God forsake us as a male, it's instant transgression because he wouldn't have supported his children if you're a believer and you're one of the children. Which runs into late term abortion cuz I think 30 something years old is a little late to be aborted. If it's not pro-abortion Christian family shouldn't, but it also shouldn't be forcing the weeds to have children. Has a farmer you don't fertilize the weeds?
But in Job it says in with the children of God and God when he spoke to some of the kings of the earth he says you shall only have a son and do not judge me as I have two sons. Bible speaks of this as well because Jesus is one of the sons and then there's another king of Israel that anoints the temple to come. That brings Jesus back on the clouds and Jesus is still king of heaven but in Revelation it shows that heaven has walls. It has a measurement and it is not the whole planet. 😂
Also in Job got asked Satan where have you been and he says to and fro to and fro has more to do with time travel than actual locations. The story of Jacob in Esau is also representative of the situation. One brother that was in Adam and Eve's line and then one brother that was grasping the ankle because he was a gift to King. David, but he also was safeguarding the steps of his brother
Very interesting that barnabas refers to Jesus as the rock and not Peter….. didn’t he know Peter was the first pope?!
🤔 😂
I can't tell if you're making fun of the idea of the pope or not. Peter wasn't the first pope, the office was invented hundreds of years later, but he was the first Bishop of Rome alongside Paul until they could find someone to take over permanently.
Wait.... "lawlessness?"... The guy just explained that Jesus came to eradicate the "law of compulsion." Now he wants people to adhere to another law?... So, was God wrong the first time? The first law didn't work? Lol
Not just some "guy" but Barnabas.
"Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but the one who does the will of My Father who is in heaven will enter. Many will say to Me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in Your name, and in Your name cast out demons, and in Your name perform many miracles?’ And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; leave Me, you who practice lawlessness.’" Matthew 7
This sounds like a angry man retaliating in scripture . This Jesus account does not flow with the love portrayed in the other gospels. And the language sounds like a mixture of old and new english which says to me it was not written back then.
This is probably one of the most stupid comments I've ever read, the last sentence especially. If you kept your ears open at the reading of any of the four gospels or the letters of Paul you would recognize Barnabas has the same spirit. But that last comment, I don't even know what to say to something so stupid. It's an English translation from Greek, it was not written in English.
what a sinister reading voice...
I'd call it masculine.
I SEE WHY THE #CATHOLICS TOOK THIS OUT LOL
The Early Church Fathers, Clement and Origen, highly respected the book and called it Scripture. The Letter of Barnabas should not have been disregarded.
@@ante-nicenechristianityI too have been attacked for defending Barnabas.
I come to warn you all in the name of Lord Jesus Christ our Savior and my Hero, to say to you:
Lord just himself said this would happen (matthew 24:4-8)
and it came true as expected:
Matthew 24:4-8
[4]And Jesus answered and said unto them, Take heed that no man deceive you.
[5]For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many.
[6]And ye shall hear of wars and rumours of wars: see that ye be not troubled: for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet.
[7]For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places.
[8]All these are the beginning of sorrows.
If you renounce Lord Jesus Christ our Savior and insted of trusting him who gave life for you.
And you insted believe the father of lies, aka:
the slanderer
the dossiper
the deceiver
the adversary
the false accuser
You would then in turn walk on the common path; therfore renouncing you salvation and damning yourself to hell.
Matthew 24:10-14
[10]And then shall many be offended, and shall betray one another, and shall hate one another.
[11]And many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many.
[12]And because iniquity shall abound, the love of many shall wax cold.
[13]But he that shall endure unto the end, the same shall be saved.
[14]And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the end come.
Beware false prophets.
Matthew 7:13-15,21-23
[13]Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat:
[14]Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.
[15]Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.
[21]Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.
[22]Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?
[23]And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.
Accept Lord Jesus Christ into your hearts and obey his commandments and you will have eternal life after death.
John 14:6-7
[6]Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.
[7]If ye had known me, ye should have known my Father also: and from henceforth ye know him, and have seen him.
Fun fact: the gospel of peace has 4 different books written by 4 different vessels by the will of God. Wich if you know your history of the first century, 4 witnesses is needed to provide it as fact.
The Holy Bible is fact and provides it in the old testament: carta.fiu.edu/gsc-creative/2016/04/12/3-scientific-facts-you-never-knew-were-in-the-bible/
Their is even proof of the great flood the schools hide from you to keep them from you: th-cam.com/video/6tLQX-hQMT4/w-d-xo.html
If you still don't believe, intern: don't want to have a happy eternity in heaven with our Father who loves us, and our Savior, Lord Jesus Christ who was mocked, spat on, beaten, Insulted, whipped, tortured, and was killed just for us: then call me, the vessel who is being used to warn you all out of love, by the power of the Holy Spirit, Father, and Lord Jesus Christ: call me a "fool" and don't blame us for your eternal torture.
But if you believe us then start reading the Bible starting with the gospel of peace (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and Jhon) then read (Acts) , and then you will be saved by the Holy Spirit within you and will, out of obedience, humility, and a desire to please Abba, Father & Lord Jesus Christ our Savior: you will then have salvation.
By the will of the Holy Trinity influencing my actions: you have been warned.
Reading the Holy Bible, I have seen that one can be directly referenced anonymously within scripture. how many others remember this?:(Jeremiah 1:5)
- love sister malia: bride of the glorious Lord Jesus Christ our Savior and my Hero who saves me, even from my nightmares
God said through His prophet Jeremiah, "Search for the ancient path... which will purify you," and Jude tells us that "the faith was once for all given to the saints" in his time. You're right about avoiding heretics and encouraging others to do the same. But you really should submit to the wisdom and instruction of the early church to be properly guided through scripture if you haven't already.
The Bible isn’t all scriptures, didn’t get promised a perfect bible, got the promise of a Spirit of Truth. Truth was spread out. Nothing is infallible and even lies can be profitable.