TTArtisan 10mm F2: Exploring Ultra Wide Angle on APS-C Cameras

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 ส.ค. 2024
  • TTArtisan 10mm F2: Exploring Ultra Wide Angle on APS-C Cameras
    If you're searching for a budget-friendly ultra wide angle lens, the TTArtisan 10mm f2 could be a viable option. Specifically crafted for APS-C cameras, this manual lens offers promising features. In this video, I'll showcase various images and footage captured on the Sony ZVE10 and the full-frame A7CII in APS-C mode.
    📷Check out TTArtisan 10mm f2 :
    -amzn.to/4aaZaYI
    📷 Related videos:
    - • Viltrox 20mm f2.8 revi...
    - • Sony 10-20mm f4 on ZV-...
    - • Wide-Angle Wonder: TTa...
    📷 Gears I use and recommend:
    -Main camera: amzn.to/3vNMQ1T
    -Video camera: amzn.to/3Gd7oDb
    -Small camera: amzn.to/40apZrw
    -All-around lens: amzn.to/3X65Pg0
    -Portrait lens: amzn.to/3l9umDw
    -Small zoom lens: amzn.to/3Ptj5aI
    -Long lens: amzn.to/3g9qn4g
    -Ultra wide angle: amzn.to/3rdKMhn
    -Wide lens: amzn.to/3rcjCos
    -POV camera: amzn.to/3T9OVMC
    -360 camera: amzn.to/3akIapL
    -Computer: amzn.to/3g7amLZ
    Full Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate I earn a small commission from qualifying purchases. There is NO EXTRA COST to you.
    Chapters:
    0:00 intro + unboxing
    0:18 TTArtisan 10mm f2 Sample images
    1:28 VS Viltrox 20mm F2.8 (Full Frame)
    1:45 Focus Handling
    2:01 Close-up shots
    2:32 Sunstar and flaring
    2:57 For vlogging?
    3:36 Build Quality
    4:20 Competitors
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 33

  • @Mandelrot
    @Mandelrot 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I see this a as a great option for real estate photos; thank you for this interesting review.

    • @ConstantineSPhotography
      @ConstantineSPhotography  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Indeed it would be great for real estate, and it has f2 so no need to worry about low light.

  • @8827180
    @8827180 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Well done.

  • @reljapetrovicmusic
    @reljapetrovicmusic 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Good review, good lens

  • @navikYT
    @navikYT 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks for the video. Does adding a filter cause any vignetting at the corners. Have you also tried a polarizer on it and noticed any uneven polarizing effects due to how wide the fov is?

    • @ConstantineSPhotography
      @ConstantineSPhotography  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I don't have a polarizer to test, but I just tried putting on a uv filter and unfortunately there's very obvious vignetting.

    • @ConstantineSPhotography
      @ConstantineSPhotography  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Not sure whether it depends on the thickness of the filter or not, the one I tried is the contax 72mmL39(UV)MC.

    • @navikYT
      @navikYT 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks for testing. That's what I was afraid of, the wider fov will make it hard to use any filter and ND filters are pretty useful for landscapes

    • @ConstantineSPhotography
      @ConstantineSPhotography  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's a pity, they designed a filter holder for the lens but missed this.

    • @kiliansalomon507
      @kiliansalomon507 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      it appears quite quickly but it's not unusable. i bought a 72-82 step up ring and I'm able to use either my mist or nd filter with pretty much no vignetting. when stacking both there is a bit but with active stabilisation it gets cropped out too.

  • @CaboSteveJ
    @CaboSteveJ 12 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    I need an ultrawide lens for use with subject at 1meter but changing to .7m and 1.5m indoor use so widest aperture. Will manual focus work setting it at 1m and not adjusting focus as subject comes closer or moves away without readjusting cous with this lens?

    • @ConstantineSPhotography
      @ConstantineSPhotography  12 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      No matter you use a manual lens or an af lens, you'll have to adjust focus distance if your subject stand at different distance away from the camera. Unless you use a super small aperture to create deep depth of field, but that way the image quality won't be good.

  • @salvomichielli
    @salvomichielli 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Hey! Thanks a ton for the video! It’s majestic :)
    at 3:24 when you said “due to its manual focus nature, no gyro info would be recorded for Catalyst Browser”.
    The Gyro info are recorded from the camera Gyro, not from the lens itself in this case. Why then the file wouldn’t include the gyro info?

    • @ConstantineSPhotography
      @ConstantineSPhotography  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks for supporting!
      I think it also has something to do with the lens. It doesn't have metal contact, so the camera can't recognize there's a lens on it.

    • @salvomichielli
      @salvomichielli 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@ConstantineSPhotography oh that’s weird! So even if I turn off any steady shot stabilisation in the camera menu, the file won’t contain any gyro metadata? Is it correct?!

    • @ConstantineSPhotography
      @ConstantineSPhotography  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I suppose so. Maybe unless you put on an adapter with metal contact.

    • @salvomichielli
      @salvomichielli 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@ConstantineSPhotography I can confirm that it’s like how you’re saying. No gyro info on manual focus lenses.
      I tried that using a Sirui anamorphic APSC lens, which it has a metal connector.
      So.. this lack of gyro metadata issue doesn’t come from the lack of metal contact.. and it’s pretty annoying.

    • @ConstantineSPhotography
      @ConstantineSPhotography  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So no gyro data for all manual lenses, interesting. Yeah that's annoying, and if you use Sony's active steadyshot on a manual lens, usually it'll look even more shaky because of the narrower perspective.

  • @satishkarotia1378
    @satishkarotia1378 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I love all your videos very informative I want to do real estate videos and I have Sony Ze V10 camera with kit lens, which doesn't cover much areas while shooting properties. This lens which you are talking about will help me for shooting videos... because it's manual lens will it work for shooting videos please help and reply

    • @ConstantineSPhotography
      @ConstantineSPhotography  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes you can still use a manual lens for video shooting, try using a smaller aperture (bigger F number) and use focus peaking to check which area is in focus. I would also recommend turning on active steadyshot for better stabilization

    • @satishkarotia1378
      @satishkarotia1378 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ConstantineSPhotography thanks

  • @DuniaKita19
    @DuniaKita19 หลายเดือนก่อน

    just Good.. 7 from 10.. f2 like a trash, very bad.. f2.8-5.6 better.. f8-11 good.. im try on MFT..

    • @ConstantineSPhotography
      @ConstantineSPhotography  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Really? F2 looks alright to me

    • @DuniaKita19
      @DuniaKita19 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ConstantineSPhotography f2 just for video or milkyway (if needed). Im not use f2 to photography.. Zoom in and really bad for me.. Better f2.8-f11.. I use e-pl9 and omd 5ii

    • @DuniaKita19
      @DuniaKita19 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@ConstantineSPhotography in real test yesterday and today i see new problem in this lens.. This lens is a failure.. a huge failure
      1. f2 very bad for me..
      2. when use f8-f11, there is an image point around the middle, which is not clear, like watercolor and blurry.. so bad that you can't use f8-f11..
      Some photographers also experience the same thing even though they have replaced the item (warranty)
      th-cam.com/video/tXBdMvIixlg/w-d-xo.html problem at 7:40

    • @ConstantineSPhotography
      @ConstantineSPhotography  หลายเดือนก่อน

      To me it’s pretty good for landscape

    • @DuniaKita19
      @DuniaKita19 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@ConstantineSPhotography yes im agree.. Im used too.. Just f2, f8, and f11 im disappointed.. Just only use f4 and f5.6. 😭