The special effects there, combining Fay Wray lying in a life sized model hand with the stop motion animated, miniature Kong body, is just incredible for the day.
@@marguskiis7711 : Again Margus... this was _*89 years ago*_. They couldn't even fathom back then what you say you can do now with your PC or Mac now. Quite frankly, neither could anyone else who wasn't ILM or some company like that even 15 or 20 years ago. The King Kong crew of the early 1930's had to do it the "really hard way" (inventing it all as they went) and it took them two years to get as far along as they did back then.
My name is Gojira, and I've got dirt on Rodan, Mothra, Ghidorah, all those second-rate monsters. And Matthew Broderick, for that shitty American remake he talked me into.
Love how they do the stop motion along with the real clip of the actress panicking. It looks so real, the fact that they did that in 1930s is blown my mind, never thought these filmmakers are so advanced, better than Terminator Dark Fate CGI lol
Are you f****** kidding me what do you think influence people like George Lucas Steven Spielberg John lantus and Stan Winston it will stop motion that influence them and they all admit that at one time another in their interviews but they said the person they admired the most was Ray harryhauser who did all the Jason and The Argonaut films that was when they got their biggest influence
@@asahutchinsonsuckslittledi1056 I got to meet Mr. Harryhausen in 2006 at the "Halfway to Hollywood" film festival in Kansas City. He was very soft-spoken and humble about all that he had done, and his influence on the film industry. He brought along some models and other collectibles that were amazing to look at, but what was even better was listening to him talk about them and the animation process. He did a Q&A after a screening of "Jason and the Argonauts" which was also very entertaining. The director of the festival was holding a box containing one of the skeleton models from "Jason and the Argonauts" as he and Ray waited for the credits to finish up before taking the stage for the Q&A, when the festival director dropped the box. The skeleton bounced out of it losing an arm along the way. Ray smiled and calmly reached down, picked it up, and said, "Don't worry about it, the arm was built to come off!". He then put the model back in the box and headed off for the stage, while the director of the festival stood there, mouth agape! If you don't know his work, you can check it out here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jason_and_the_Argonauts_(1963_film) And more on the man here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray_Harryhausen He passed in 2013 at 94.
And to think this film is approaching 90 years old(1933).Imagine What audiences of that time must have thought watching this classic at the cinema.This was stop motion effects,no CGI back then,so it must have taken forever to film the movement of the models.For me the film still stands the test of time,especially Kong’s fall from the top of the EMPIRE STATE BUILDING.An iconic movie
This movie was utterly BRUTAL for the time period. People being eaten alive by all kinds of horrible creatures, animal violence, this scene (obviously), the train scene, Kong being shot down, that infamous deleted Spider scene, among others. In other words, this movie is one big middle finger to the censors at the time, and I love it.
*King Kong* was released a year before the Hays Code was enforced. But it couldn't have been made after 1934 -- at least not this version -- until the late '60s, when the Code was finally scrapped and the rating system was installed. The period 1929-1934 (when sound films became dominant) is known as Pre-Code Hollywood. They got away with a lot of stuff in that short window of time. It's fun to watch those movies now, in retrospect, since there was very little censorship at that time.
musicaltheatergeek79 Thanks for informing me! I actually realized my mistake a little earlier after I wrote my comment, but yeah I agree. This movies are fun.
@@musicaltheatergeek79 cartoons were also very free with what they could do in 1929 - 1933. The cartoons that got away with many things at the time was the Flesicher cartoons
And no one seems to mention that Kong is Negro, he is a 1930's black man enlarged to huge size, with a much more primitive, violent brain. What he does to white women become even more naughty because of it!
KING KONG wasn't made when cinema was in its 'infancy'. The 1930s is generally regarded as "The Golden Age", when filmmaking experienced a lot of innovation. KONG was one of the most important films produced in that era, expanding on spfx techniques as well as introducing new ones, and setting standards in sound design and music scoring still respected today. KONG was so ahead of its time that only two other stop-motion movies were made within 16 years of KONG's release - SON OF KONG (1933) and MIGHTY JOE YOUNG (1949). It wasn't until the films of Ray Harryhausen in the '50s and '60s that stop-motion made a major comeback. That same period saw KONG re-released in theaters and shown on TV, all of it generating renewed acclaim for the film.
Thanks for this! I've never seen the strip scenes before nor the ones with "unacceptable violence." The scenes of violence definitely make Kong a lot less sympathetic as a character and more the monster that needs to be destroyed. I definitely need to see the film in its uncut version.
And the special effects will still be more spectacular than the stale old “Hey, look at me bend over backwards and dodge this bullet in super slow motion” crap they put in every single action movie in 2021.
As a kid in the 50s, I loved these movies. My all time favorite is The Seventh Voyage of Sinbad. But that didn't deter me from all those monster movies from King Kong to Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein. All were so much fun to watch.
The sniffing Kong does figures in later if the film is uncut. Looking for Ann Darrow in NYC, Kong pulls some random woman out of her apartment as he climbs a building. Sniffing her, he realizes it’s not Ann and casually drops her from high above the street.
As long ago as this classic movie was made it is still very watchable today. A great movie like King Kong, wonderfully told, acted, and filmed will be watched for as long as people care about great cinema. This classic film is what all subsequent versions are based on and none of these have become a classic the way this 1933 film has. Do yourself a favor if you haven’t seen it in a while, watch it again.
[":Brace67: Will do. Thanks. Transpicious now. With eyes wide open since the Transapocalypse is here was covert since baby-loan times while humans trusted and slept."]
Kong was really more curious of her dress at first, then he just became more curious how she smells. Quite realistic reactions without any malicious sexual connotation. First time the giant ape seen these, what do we expect? The filmmakers were correct, it's the censor board that time who shaded the scene with supposed obscenity. Thanks for posting.
You're right. He was more curious than anything. When they recreated this scene for the 1976 version however it was pretty clear that he was stripping Jessica Lange not out of curiosity but because he was a giant pervert!
Note that the 1976 King Kong has a similar scene where Kong gets a bit too "fresh" with Dwan, just as he does with Ann in the 1933 version, removing the woman's clothing in both movies. In Peter Jackson's 2005 King Kong, this scene is made more "family friendly", with Kong violently knocking over Ann with his finger, rather than doing more intimate things. So, at least for this one scene, the 1976 King Kong was closer to the original 1933 movie than the 2005 version.
Can you imagine what would happen to her if Kong-Boy would have gone for some "stink-finger?" They should have at least showed a peek at his ape-boner while he was getting his jollies. That's my Siskel & Ebert analysis of the night. Yeah, yeah, I know they are both dead.
Of all the king kong movies, my favorite is still the original 1933 release. The actors really had to act, there was no cgi, just great script writing. Classic masterpiece!
As a kid back in the 50s I remember seeing those "sexy" scenes on tv. Then later, or rather recently, when the original Kong was shown on tv I thought I was going crazy. I mean I remember the scene on the ledge but it wasn't there.....I was beginning to think I had imagined it all...but now you guys proved to me that I did, I DID see that scene.
One of the first movies I remember watching as a kid in the 60s. By far the best version. Still stands up. Had never seen this version of this scene. Old boy was just curious.
The worst part of King Kong was that it painted gorillas to horrible monsters that led to many being slaughtered. In fact gorillas are mostly shy and gentle.
Look at the official US propaganda posters from WW1. The "evil Hun" is portrayed as a kind of ravening gorilla-like monster, very similar to King Kong. Many of those watching the movie would have been exposed to and familiar with that kind of imagery. Sick.
@@kentcarter835 She was HOT too. Definitely worth more than a cursory toss! When we look at humanity and wonder what happened. All I can say is.... Nothing. We're right where we've always been. Sniffing our fingers. I hope this passes the ratings Gestapo.... LOL
This was my favorite movie growing up and I was so happy when they restored the "cut" scenes! They really butchered movies after re-releasing after the Hays code was enforced in the mid 1930s....like Kong, Frankenstein, Jekyll & Hyde etc.. Thank God someone saved those missing scenes.
There are parts of the re-released Public Enemy that are so hacked up they don't even make any sense. It wasn't until I saw the original version that I understood those scenes.
I went to see the then-newly restored Kong in a theater. Drew quite a crowd, too. We were all used to the stuff we'd seen lots of times on local TV, but the new stuff -- wow. People were ewwwing their way through the new parts of the film. It just worked, even after more than forty years. I hope the filmmakers would have been pleased; I understand Fay Wray was.
Damn!! I've never seen these before, Kong is just killing and stomping out..... gives an entirely different aspect to King Kong. Thank you. 👍 Expert stop motion animation.
I well remember, seeing the first version of "King Kong", in Scotland, in 1948. I had to take my younger sister with me. She spent much of the movie, hiding behind the seat. Being the brave wee laddie I was, I watched it all. Okay, sometimes with my eyes closed, very dusty Theater. Then seeing it on Television years later, I couldn't understand why we thought it so scary. Then many years later, saw the original again. Proud of keeping my eyes open, all through the movie. Okay, perhaps a bit wider when he undresses Fay Wray. C'mon, she was gorgeous. Lol Still the best King Kong, ever made.
All the scenes show as being "Cut" were shown in full on TCM a few weeks ago. Every one shown here was shown in the original release as shown.....it hasn't changed
As the uploader said, this scene (and others) were cut when the move was re-released in 1938. You can read about this on Wikipedia. What you watched was a "restored" version of the movie with the excised parts added back in.
After Kong is brought back to NY and is about to be displayed, a young woman in the audience upon being told that the exhibit had something go do with a gorilla, says something to the effect of “Say, aren’t there enough of them in this town”, or words similar to that. This movie has held up so very well after all these years since it was made and is still watchable and entertaining. Even after the destruction he has caused and the number of people he has killed we still feel badly for Kong when the planes shoot and kill him and he plummets off of the Empire State Building. “Well the airplanes finally got him”. “No, was beauty killed the beast”!
"He's just killed a few dozen people , ripped zome to shreds, but the airplanes got him!" " Awww, poor thing..." WTH? I didn't feel sorry gor him when I saw this movie the first time, about 60 odd years ago, and never have, lol.
I saw the unedited version at a revival in LA in the late 80s or early 90s. I got to meet Fay Wray! But seeing the movie unedited was like seeing it for the first time.
king kong was curious as why she was wrapped up. theses scenes look pretty tame now but consider risque back than. thanks for the upload. i always wanted to see the unedited version of this most famous film of the times.
after kong touch the girl with his left hand, his hand dissappear down there. wondering what he was doing with his left hand... any cut for the left hand story?
Fay Wray was a stunningly beautiful woman. She was 25 when this was made. A little trivia; she was director James Cameron's first choice to play Old Rose in Titanic but she turned him down. She was 89 when Titanic was filmed. That role of course ended up going to Gloria Stuart who was best known for the Invisible Man which came out around the same time as King Kong!
Today Hollywood assumes everyone is stupid and tries to pander to the lowest common denominator. That was a ground break piece of special effects in its time, akin to Jurassic Park in terms of boundaries pushed, and yet its still had a story and a plot that made sense, without over doing it. In my opinion, it holds up remarkably well, especially given its age....
For the times, considering the societal measures of female attractiveness, Fay Wray was a stunner out of the norm and would fit right in with modern-day fem fatales. Those legs! Also, later in the movie, in her more undressed, she gets dropped in the water. Stunning. Her carriage is of the '30s, not today's slump-shouldered norm. Stately and sophisticated...something we need to get back to for men and women.
Another famous "Censored " scene was in Frankenstien when the monster tossed the little girl into the lake thinking she'd float like some flowers and she drowns.
I believe the reason why this scene was removed was the fact that Kong was sniffing his thumb after rubbing her. Not because he was ripping her clothes off!
That was actually kinna brutal considering the time. The shots of the people flapping about in Kong's mouth were a bit gruesome even though there was no blood.
@@falcongamer58 because they are people. Humans tend to have more feelings for those like us. But of course there are many that have no feelings for anyone.
@@mikeyoung9810 don't get me wrong I understand how it feels, but I'm saying it from an objective perspective, and I prefer to look at things objectively
Probably one of the most famous 'banned' scenes was the swimming scene in "Tarzan and his Mate". You may not even be able to show that scene on You Tube. From a movie released in 1932!
Thanks for your love and support Are you one of my fans out there if yes you can call or message me on my talk tour number +1 (470) 887-0398 to know it's really me message me on Whatsapp for video call..
The original, uncut version is regularly shown on Turner Classic Movies. The channel also plays many pre-code movies, and there are compilation clips here on YT.
@@tyrssen1 I first watched it about the same year as well. Freaked me out, but I've seen it at least a dozen times since then. When Turner Classic Movies began showing the pre-code version on a regular basis, I had to check that out a couple or three times.
The curious Kong, partially stripping off her clothes, so called tickling her chest, then sniffing his fingers. Call it what you want, but Kong was getting freaky, and that's why they edited this scene. 🙈🙉🙊 This is bananas 🍌🍌🍌
The most puzzling aspect of Kong would be his bloodline. Is he the last of his kind, or is he eternal? Did the humans on the island kill off his family, which would account for his rage? If he is regularly offered human female sacrifices, what happened to the previous offerings? This is what happens when you've seen the original at least a dozen times, along with the DeLaurentis and Jackson remakes at least twice each. Someday, another remake will appear, but I think I've had enough for a lifetime.
@@jefferyroy2566 assuming the other sacrifices starve to death due to the fact how kong doesn't know what they eat among other things and I would most likely say he's the last of his kind
KS Man thanks for the heads up! Quick, to the Google Cave! (A few minutes later...) Oddly, reading about the “original” version, 1910 short I believe it was, my memory has been jogged and I feel I’ve seen it, or a bit of it. Still, 10 points to you for having the courage to speak up. But, I’m still going with Boris. Cheers.
Peter Jackson should redo this Kong, as he did with the WWI reels, it would be amazing, colorize and adjust the speed of the stop-motion scenes, would love to see him do it.
this entirely changes the pacing and seriousness of the original...... Also, the additional violence-shots were more eating-people than I recall Kong doing.
Thanks for this. I watched it several times with my dad. I have to wonder if he knew. I didn't. Dad would have been to young to have seen it, Sad born in 30 and mom in 37. The remarkable thing was watching it every Thanksgiving ( NYC market area ) TV guide. Anyways, thank you.
I didn’t know that these scenes were deleted because the one I have is the actual kong from 33 and my grandpa said he even bought it and everyone in the family has seen it a million times
Some People are also trying to criticize this Film for not looking as good as some Film Today. Well made in 1932 and released in 1933. Pretty Damned Good for the Time Period. The Dinosaurs and that Airplane Scene at the end on the Empire State Bldg were Awesome.
In the states as well. I don't understand WHEN the claim of censorship is supposed to have taken place but I distinctly remember this scene in the early 70's. And if anyone wonders why, excuse me, I was twelve in 1972 I was SCREAMING for Kong to proceed.
Me too, here in Seattle. They must have put all that stuff back in after all those dumb censorship laws got thrown out in the '60s. And all the natives getting mangled!
La primera vez la vi en el cine de mi padre a fines de los años 50, el era fanático de esta película, luego con el paso de los años fueron mis hijos los que la descubrieron... hoy, a 90 años de su estreno, nos sigue cautivando y emocionando. Aún conservo el programa de cine y mas de 30 fotogramas originales en fílmico 35 mm de esa época.... tenía el afiche original, pero me lo robaron junto con otros de la época, ese incidente me generó un profundo dolor y tristeza que aún no puedo superar.
The special effects there, combining Fay Wray lying in a life sized model hand with the stop motion animated, miniature Kong body, is just incredible for the day.
Mask editing. Nothing very difficult if you use black and white film.
@@marguskiis7711 : Again Margus... this was _*89 years ago*_. They couldn't even fathom back then what you say you can do now with your PC or Mac now. Quite frankly, neither could anyone else who wasn't ILM or some company like that even 15 or 20 years ago. The King Kong crew of the early 1930's had to do it the "really hard way" (inventing it all as they went) and it took them two years to get as far along as they did back then.
@@marguskiis7711 and your OSCAR is where now?
@@marguskiis7711bet it was rear projection in back of the Kong figure.
@@deepburrito one of the worst actors ever, Sandra Bullock, got her Oscar too, so...
Breaking news: Kong gets cancelled after a sex tape of him sexually harassing a girl from 1933 surfaces thanks to Godzilla.
🤣🤣🤣🤣
And thats how Kong vs Godzilla started 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Thats to much bruh
My name is Gojira, and I've got dirt on Rodan, Mothra, Ghidorah, all those second-rate monsters. And Matthew Broderick, for that shitty American remake he talked me into.
LOL
Love how they do the stop motion along with the real clip of the actress panicking. It looks so real, the fact that they did that in 1930s is blown my mind, never thought these filmmakers are so advanced, better than Terminator Dark Fate CGI lol
Way better than any of Terminator dark fate
This is better than a lot of movies around today! Made quite an impression on me as a kid in the 70’s and continues to this day...
Are you f****** kidding me what do you think influence people like George Lucas Steven Spielberg John lantus and Stan Winston it will stop motion that influence them and they all admit that at one time another in their interviews but they said the person they admired the most was Ray harryhauser who did all the Jason and The Argonaut films that was when they got their biggest influence
Could edit together two footages but did cheap 6 fps animation. And much easier would been a actor dressed as gorilla.
@@asahutchinsonsuckslittledi1056 I got to meet Mr. Harryhausen in 2006 at the "Halfway to Hollywood" film festival in Kansas City. He was very soft-spoken and humble about all that he had done, and his influence on the film industry. He brought along some models and other collectibles that were amazing to look at, but what was even better was listening to him talk about them and the animation process. He did a Q&A after a screening of "Jason and the Argonauts" which was also very entertaining. The director of the festival was holding a box containing one of the skeleton models from "Jason and the Argonauts" as he and Ray waited for the credits to finish up before taking the stage for the Q&A, when the festival director dropped the box. The skeleton bounced out of it losing an arm along the way. Ray smiled and calmly reached down, picked it up, and said, "Don't worry about it, the arm was built to come off!". He then put the model back in the box and headed off for the stage, while the director of the festival stood there, mouth agape!
If you don't know his work, you can check it out here:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jason_and_the_Argonauts_(1963_film)
And more on the man here:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray_Harryhausen
He passed in 2013 at 94.
And to think this film is approaching 90 years old(1933).Imagine What audiences of that time must have thought watching this classic at the cinema.This was stop motion effects,no CGI back then,so it must have taken forever to film the movement of the models.For me the film still stands the test of time,especially Kong’s fall from the top of the EMPIRE STATE BUILDING.An iconic movie
The stopmotion looks very cheap and unnatural. Saved a bit money.
@@marguskiis7711 you funny 😂
@@nonnoyobisnis8705 You can do very smooth stopmotion but it needs much more work.
@@marguskiis7711 so you honestly believe that you would have done a better job in 1932 ???
Spoiler alert! 😂
I love how the nostrils moved when he was smelling the clothes. Seriously, that's really good detail for a puppet.
Yep, that overgrown ape really "took a whiff of Jiff" !!
This movie was utterly BRUTAL for the time period. People being eaten alive by all kinds of horrible creatures, animal violence, this scene (obviously), the train scene, Kong being shot down, that infamous deleted Spider scene, among others. In other words, this movie is one big middle finger to the censors at the time, and I love it.
*King Kong* was released a year before the Hays Code was enforced. But it couldn't have been made after 1934 -- at least not this version -- until the late '60s, when the Code was finally scrapped and the rating system was installed. The period 1929-1934 (when sound films became dominant) is known as Pre-Code Hollywood. They got away with a lot of stuff in that short window of time. It's fun to watch those movies now, in retrospect, since there was very little censorship at that time.
musicaltheatergeek79 Thanks for informing me! I actually realized my mistake a little earlier after I wrote my comment, but yeah I agree. This movies are fun.
@@musicaltheatergeek79 cartoons were also very free with what they could do in 1929 - 1933. The cartoons that got away with many things at the time was the Flesicher cartoons
It really was dropping that woman just for the sake of it dammmn
And no one seems to mention that Kong is Negro, he is a 1930's black man enlarged to huge size, with a much more primitive, violent brain. What he does to white women become even more naughty because of it!
6 other women have come forward and are claiming that Kong touched them inappropriately as well.
Two also reported being sniffed
Well, it happened in 1933, so it's about the right time for this type of behavior to be brought out. hashtag mee2!!
Lol
@@MrTPain ROFL
Kong never touched them, those women are just pissed off because Kong Dong NEVER TOUCHED THEM... Lmao.
Loved this movie as a kid in the 70s. Now I can truly appreciate how great the effects were for the time. Such a classic.
What do you think of this scene 1:31 to the end? th-cam.com/video/0JVZ0bE8hpk/w-d-xo.html
Thr one with Jeff Bridges came put in the 70s.
The editing of the her in the palm of Kong was absolutely phenomenal for its time
KING KONG wasn't made when cinema was in its 'infancy'. The 1930s is generally regarded as "The Golden Age", when filmmaking experienced a lot of innovation. KONG was one of the most important films produced in that era, expanding on spfx techniques as well as introducing new ones, and setting standards in sound design and music scoring still respected today. KONG was so ahead of its time that only two other stop-motion movies were made within 16 years of KONG's release - SON OF KONG (1933) and MIGHTY JOE YOUNG (1949). It wasn't until the films of Ray Harryhausen in the '50s and '60s that stop-motion made a major comeback. That same period saw KONG re-released in theaters and shown on TV, all of it generating renewed acclaim for the film.
Who the hell cares? If I wanted this information, I'd read a book by someone that actually knew what they were talking about.
Correct. The Lumiere brothers were doing stuff like this in the 1900s, and Keaton in the 1920s.
Thanks for this! I've never seen the strip scenes before nor the ones with "unacceptable violence." The scenes of violence definitely make Kong a lot less sympathetic as a character and more the monster that needs to be destroyed. I definitely need to see the film in its uncut version.
I've never seen the edited version. I've always watched the original cut.
@@matthewpasternak8128 How?
This is the first I've seen them, I've been watching this for 50 years!
@@matthewpasternak8128 Agree I recall these scenes on TV as a kid in the late 70s / early 80s.
I first saw the restored uncensored cut in 70s theater showings, certainly not on TV. I was 17, 18. It was truly mind boggling. Thanks for posting.
@@matthewpasternak8128 In the 50's we all saw most of these scenes on tv's "Million Dollar Movie".
He is gunna be in court one day wearing a suit with glasses trying to defend himself from a sexual misconduct charge
You deliver the subpoena. I’m busy.
In another city.
better call saul, he will know what to do
But then some letters will reveal she was Kong's abusive girlfriend who forced him to do B&D play on her
Kong was subsequently ordered to sign the Skull Island Sexual Offenders Register for ten years.
Exactly! NO CGI!
@@craigheiss2007 huh?
Only ten years?
You get the Comment of the Year Award. Brilliant!
and banned from having children. No wonder his species is extinct.
This film will be a century old in 12 years time. That’s crazy!
And the special effects will still be more spectacular than the stale old “Hey, look at me bend over backwards and dodge this bullet in super slow motion” crap they put in every single action movie in 2021.
@@jimgardner1306 The Matrix has a lot to answer for.
Ye that is very crazy I can't wait for that lol
...and it'll still be a classic.
Holy shit!
As a kid in the 50s, I loved these movies. My all time favorite is The Seventh Voyage of Sinbad. But that didn't deter me from all those monster movies from King Kong to Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein. All were so much fun to watch.
I never get tired of watching that movie! Ray Harryhausen's work is awesome.
The sniffing Kong does figures in later if the film is uncut. Looking for Ann Darrow in NYC, Kong pulls some random woman out of her apartment as he climbs a building. Sniffing her, he realizes it’s not Ann and casually drops her from high above the street.
As long ago as this classic movie was made it is still very watchable today. A great movie like King Kong, wonderfully told, acted, and filmed will be watched for as long as people care about great cinema. This classic film is what all subsequent versions are based on and none of these have become a classic the way this 1933 film has. Do yourself a favor if you haven’t seen it in a while, watch it again.
[":Brace67: Will do. Thanks. Transpicious now. With eyes wide open since the Transapocalypse is here was covert since baby-loan times while humans trusted and slept."]
The Background Art is Incredible as is the attention to detail. The T-Rex and Dinosaur and Lizards are Still Pretty Cool today.
cinematography while on the island is incredible, the flow and movement of the back ground art is just too good
Kong aint stupid. He went right for the jugs.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Maybe they should have named him "Shwiiiiing Kong".
He also tickled her and then sniffed his finger. Highly suggestive, and fairly gross actually, even by today's standards.
Going for the jugs is better than going for the jugular vein, ya think?
Kong was really more curious of her dress at first, then he just became more curious how she smells.
Quite realistic reactions without any malicious sexual connotation.
First time the giant ape seen these, what do we expect? The filmmakers were correct, it's the censor board that time who shaded the scene with supposed obscenity.
Thanks for posting.
You're right. He was more curious than anything. When they recreated this scene for the 1976 version however it was pretty clear that he was stripping Jessica Lange not out of curiosity but because he was a giant pervert!
@@PlumbPitiful
Hehe...
Times have changed already by 1976 and it showed the way this was dealt with.
In other words, "the sin was in the minds of the beholders."
It's a film I still love to watch. Great memories of watching it with my dad as a kid.
Thanks for finding this old movie footage and posting it as awesome
Note that the 1976 King Kong has a similar scene where Kong gets a bit too "fresh" with Dwan, just as he does with Ann in the 1933 version, removing the woman's clothing in both movies. In Peter Jackson's 2005 King Kong, this scene is made more "family friendly", with Kong violently knocking over Ann with his finger, rather than doing more intimate things. So, at least for this one scene, the 1976 King Kong was closer to the original 1933 movie than the 2005 version.
Jessica Lange has a great set.
[": Transpicious: of them all."]
Can you imagine what would happen to her if Kong-Boy would have gone for some "stink-finger?" They should have at least showed a peek at his ape-boner while he was getting his jollies. That's my Siskel & Ebert analysis of the night. Yeah, yeah, I know they are both dead.
Well the 76 version is Italian and they put sex scenes in kids movies they always did the raciest movies in the 50s and 60s lol
"Peel me like one of your French bananas..."
I wheeze-laughed at that one!!!
Bow chicka bow wow.
LMFAO 🤣🤣🤣
Killed! 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
Ooh shit thats funny!.
Of all the king kong movies, my favorite is still the original 1933 release. The actors really had to act, there was no cgi, just great script writing. Classic masterpiece!
John Rodriguez I also like the orchestral soundtrack.
The acting, the music, everything is far better than what is made today.
@@55Quirll r/lewronggeneration
That's because it was not made by millennials.
Yes, and it doesn't overdue it. A nice effective hour and forty minutes.
As a kid back in the 50s I remember seeing those "sexy" scenes on tv. Then later, or rather recently, when the original Kong was shown on tv I thought I was going crazy. I mean I remember the scene on the ledge but it wasn't there.....I was beginning to think I had imagined it all...but now you guys proved to me that I did, I DID see that scene.
Im sure i remember seeing that scene in the '70s, so there must have been a fuller cut of the movie floating around at some point.
After “tickling” Ann, Kong sniffed his fingers... Savage!
Joe biden would be proud to have kong as a son lol
@@shitahead417 lmao - surprised that YT didn't ghost you.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🦍🦍🦍🦍🦍🦍🦍💃🏿💃🏿💃🏿
@@shitahead417 another trump looser ... Kong is a winner in new York while trump is the tax evader. Ran to Florida ......coward....
Kong is Thinking: At last White Meat ! Nice 😁
One of the first movies I remember watching as a kid in the 60s. By far the best version. Still stands up. Had never seen this version of this scene. Old boy was just curious.
The worst part of King Kong was that it painted gorillas to horrible monsters that led to many being slaughtered. In fact gorillas are mostly shy and gentle.
Look at the official US propaganda posters from WW1. The "evil Hun" is portrayed as a kind of ravening gorilla-like monster, very similar to King Kong. Many of those watching the movie would have been exposed to and familiar with that kind of imagery. Sick.
Kong is thinking. This is a hell alot more fun than peeling a freaking 🍌. .😄
🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂🤣🤣😂🤣😂🤣😇🤣😂
I think this scene was meant to show Kong sniffing her clothes similar to a bloodhound to explain how he was able to track her in New York later.
I agree. When he pulls the first woman out of the window, he sniffs her. Then tosses her away.
That was the real reason but I'm pretty sure that was a BIG....FAIL!!!!! LMAO
@@kentcarter835 She was HOT too. Definitely worth more than a cursory toss! When we look at humanity and wonder what happened. All I can say is.... Nothing. We're right where we've always been. Sniffing our fingers. I hope this passes the ratings Gestapo.... LOL
Her clothes.....of something else?
No script writers in those days sniffed undergarments,
This was my favorite movie growing up and I was so happy when they restored the "cut" scenes! They really butchered movies after re-releasing after the Hays code was enforced in the mid 1930s....like Kong, Frankenstein, Jekyll & Hyde etc.. Thank God someone saved those missing scenes.
There are parts of the re-released Public Enemy that are so hacked up they don't even make any sense. It wasn't until I saw the original version that I understood those scenes.
www.4shared.com/video/FWqNjE2Bei/King_Kong__1933__in_colour_.html
I went to see the then-newly restored Kong in a theater. Drew quite a crowd, too. We were all used to the stuff we'd seen lots of times on local TV, but the new stuff -- wow. People were ewwwing their way through the new parts of the film. It just worked, even after more than forty years. I hope the filmmakers would have been pleased; I understand Fay Wray was.
Damn!! I've never seen these before, Kong is just killing and stomping out..... gives an entirely different aspect to King Kong. Thank you.
👍 Expert stop motion animation.
www.4shared.com/video/FWqNjE2Bei/King_Kong__1933__in_colour_.html
I well remember, seeing the first version of "King Kong", in Scotland, in 1948. I had to take my younger sister with me. She spent much of the movie, hiding behind the seat.
Being the brave wee laddie I was, I watched it all. Okay, sometimes with my eyes closed, very dusty Theater.
Then seeing it on Television years later, I couldn't understand why we thought it so scary.
Then many years later, saw the original again.
Proud of keeping my eyes open, all through the movie. Okay, perhaps a bit wider when he undresses Fay Wray. C'mon, she was gorgeous. Lol
Still the best King Kong, ever made.
www.4shared.com/video/FWqNjE2Bei/King_Kong__1933__in_colour_.html
Pulling Fay Wray's clothes off? My word, that Kong was a beast! Solid me too claim.
I agree
Censorship aside, the composite work in this scene is brilliant.
www.4shared.com/video/FWqNjE2Bei/King_Kong__1933__in_colour_.html
All the scenes show as being "Cut" were shown in full on TCM a few weeks ago. Every one shown here was shown in the original release as shown.....it hasn't changed
As the uploader said, this scene (and others) were cut when the move was re-released in 1938. You can read about this on Wikipedia. What you watched was a "restored" version of the movie with the excised parts added back in.
After Kong is brought back to NY and is about to be displayed, a young woman in the audience upon being told that the exhibit had something go do with a gorilla, says something to the effect of “Say, aren’t there enough of them in this town”, or words similar to that. This movie has held up so very well after all these years since it was made and is still watchable and entertaining. Even after the destruction he has caused and the number of people he has killed we still feel badly for Kong when the planes shoot and kill him and he plummets off of the Empire State Building. “Well the airplanes finally got him”. “No, was beauty killed the beast”!
Pratchett's book, "Moving Pictures" had to tip the hat to this classic scene. Of course, it was seen through a warped lens.
"He's just killed a few dozen people , ripped zome to shreds, but the airplanes got him!"
" Awww, poor thing..." WTH?
I didn't feel sorry gor him when I saw this movie the first time, about 60 odd years ago, and never have, lol.
@@tomsmith5216 You have to admit though, he was out of his element having never been to New York.
@@Brace67 Haha, he was not alone in that regard. I had the same feeling when I lived there for ten years. Never did get used to it...
How many brand endorsements did Kong lose after that scene?
I saw the unedited version at a revival in LA in the late 80s or early 90s. I got to meet Fay Wray! But seeing the movie unedited was like seeing it for the first time.
Fay Wray's last appearance was the Academy Awards in 1998. Billy Crystal was such a gentlemen with her.The movie that was nominated was The Titanic.
Just saw her grave stone, just so unbelievably simple you might just walk.past and never see it.
What do you think of this scene 1:31 to the end? th-cam.com/video/0JVZ0bE8hpk/w-d-xo.html
This was a great find. These pre code movie versions show how open movie makers were until lobbies for morality put their prude stamp on movies
Kong touched her body then smells his two fingers ..... hilarious and nasty haha
1 for the pink; 2 for the stink...
My boi kong a g. Takes women with out trying and even did that
Excellent rear projection effects.. hats off to the film editor, he really had his work cut out for him, no pun attended..
In practically all films the "director's cut " is ART while what is usually released is purely "commercial;" mores the pity.
king kong was curious as why she was wrapped up. theses scenes look pretty tame now but consider risque back than. thanks for the upload. i always wanted to see the unedited version of this most famous film of the times.
This was great thanks for the video
www.4shared.com/video/FWqNjE2Bei/King_Kong__1933__in_colour_.html
Man, had they kept this and the lost 'Spider Pit' scene, this film would've been *'R'* rated.😈
after kong touch the girl with his left hand, his hand dissappear down there. wondering what he was doing with his left hand... any cut for the left hand story?
Is there a streaming service that has a big selection of these old movies? The selection is limited on Netflix and Amazon.
Hello! You can looking at "publicdomainmovies.info" there they have a collection of these great old movies
C'mon Barbie let's go party
Ooh ooh ooh yeah
Creek Water to
Fay Wray is another slutty Canadian B movie starlet - - this edited material proves they will do anything in front of the camera
Fay Wray was a stunningly beautiful woman. She was 25 when this was made. A little trivia; she was director James Cameron's first choice to play Old Rose in Titanic but she turned him down. She was 89 when Titanic was filmed. That role of course ended up going to Gloria Stuart who was best known for the Invisible Man which came out around the same time as King Kong!
Gloria Stuart was a beauty in her younger years too
1933 and still better than most of the crap that spews out of Hollyweird today! (Just my opinion.)
You're 100 percent correct in my opinion👍
Today Hollywood assumes everyone is stupid and tries to pander to the lowest common denominator. That was a ground break piece of special effects in its time, akin to Jurassic Park in terms of boundaries pushed, and yet its still had a story and a plot that made sense, without over doing it. In my opinion, it holds up remarkably well, especially given its age....
@@billsargent3407 agreed
For the times, considering the societal measures of female attractiveness, Fay Wray was a stunner out of the norm and would fit right in with modern-day fem fatales. Those legs!
Also, later in the movie, in her more undressed, she gets dropped in the water. Stunning. Her carriage is of the '30s, not today's slump-shouldered norm. Stately and sophisticated...something we need to get back to for men and women.
Phenomenal classic cinema! Charming, surreal, and still fascinating after all these years!
I think it's supposed to be a comical scene - it's like he's peeling a banana. :-)
Another famous "Censored " scene was in Frankenstien when the monster tossed the little girl into the lake thinking she'd float like some flowers and she drowns.
1933 movie is MUCH better than ANY of the remakes
So impressed with the special effects and it was from a 1933 movie. I am awed to the director and special effects creators.
the production is really good 😎👍👍
I believe the reason why this scene was removed was the fact that Kong was sniffing his thumb after rubbing her. Not because he was ripping her clothes off!
That was actually kinna brutal considering the time. The shots of the people flapping about in Kong's mouth were a bit gruesome even though there was no blood.
We see predators eating prey all the time, how is this different?
@@falcongamer58 because they are people. Humans tend to have more feelings for those like us. But of course there are many that have no feelings for anyone.
@@mikeyoung9810 don't get me wrong I understand how it feels, but I'm saying it from an objective perspective, and I prefer to look at things objectively
[":FalconGamer58: Yep, looking at things more objectively too and am Transpicious."]
I was getting a little bit of an 'Attack on Titan' vibe.
Probably one of the most famous 'banned' scenes was the swimming scene in "Tarzan and his Mate". You may not even be able to show that scene on You Tube. From a movie released in 1932!
Thanks for your love and support Are you one of my fans out there if yes you can call or message me on my talk tour number +1 (470) 887-0398 to know it's really me message me on Whatsapp for video call..
That was an unbelievably risqué scene for a movie from that era. Maureen O’Sullivan who played the very sexy Jane, was actually Mia Farrow’s mother.
When the ape peeled the lady was something like She loves me?, She loves me not.
At least he didn't smack her with his Kong Dong
WTF🤣
I remember watching the uncut version on TV, years ago.
The original, uncut version is regularly shown on Turner Classic Movies. The channel also plays many pre-code movies, and there are compilation clips here on YT.
Likewise. More than once. I first saw Kong in about 1959, and many times after that; some were censored, some were not.
@@tyrssen1 I first watched it about the same year as well. Freaked me out, but I've seen it at least a dozen times since then. When Turner Classic Movies began showing the pre-code version on a regular basis, I had to check that out a couple or three times.
I had no idea these edits existed! My father saw the original cut in the cinema when he was a small boy.
Wait is Fay Wray getting Tickled by King Kong
He's twiddling her boobs! Who says
old movies are boring and prudish?
She got finger blasted
Its when he sniffed his fingers that killed me 🤣
I think he's flicking her nipples to watch her boobies jiggle. Nice boobies too!
He was titflicking,which was his way of warming up to motor boating her..
The curious Kong, partially stripping off her clothes, so called tickling her chest, then sniffing his fingers. Call it what you want, but Kong was getting freaky, and that's why they edited this scene. 🙈🙉🙊 This is bananas 🍌🍌🍌
"B-A-N-A-N-A-S!"
The most puzzling aspect of Kong would be his bloodline. Is he the last of his kind, or is he eternal? Did the humans on the island kill off his family, which would account for his rage? If he is regularly offered human female sacrifices, what happened to the previous offerings? This is what happens when you've seen the original at least a dozen times, along with the DeLaurentis and Jackson remakes at least twice each. Someday, another remake will appear, but I think I've had enough for a lifetime.
@@jefferyroy2566 what? 🤔
@@jefferyroy2566 assuming the other sacrifices starve to death due to the fact how kong doesn't know what they eat among other things and I would most likely say he's the last of his kind
This is the version I saw on late night TV in England god knows how many years ago.
Nothing will top the atmosphere of films like this and Frankenstein from that time. They had a feel that no CGI could ever hope to capture.
Agreed
Include "Dracula."
Truth: Fey(the woman who plays Ann) is the sister of my great great grandmother.
... and yet, you can't even spell her name correctly....
@@Titan52berg Her name was originally spelled that way. She changed it when she started her career.
Wiki says otherwise.
@@robertlefeaux I'm just going by what my Grandmother told me.
Cool. that's snazzy. Some of those comenters need a hug and to play with their dolls.
Very cool. Thank you so much for sharing this.
I remember seeing the uncensored versions back in the '60's. Being 10 years old at the time they were pretty intense.
Likewise. The two scenes that stuck with me the most were the man being stepped on and the woman Kong mistook for Ann tossed to her death.
KONG'S MOTHER: Kong! How many times have I told you not to play with your food?
Still the greatest Kong of all. Original and best🦍
Right there with Boris Karloff’s Monster from the original Frankenstein. Can’t beat them.
Nothing else even comes close.
YES!!👍👍🍻
@@Radioactive_Slime : Actually, it was the original talking Frankenstein. There was an earlier silent version.
KS Man thanks for the heads up! Quick, to the Google Cave!
(A few minutes later...)
Oddly, reading about the “original” version, 1910 short I believe it was, my memory has been jogged and I feel I’ve seen it, or a bit of it.
Still, 10 points to you for having the courage to speak up.
But, I’m still going with Boris.
Cheers.
The little noise it makes when kong touches her is golden xD
It’s funny that nowadays this is considered rated PG at worst. Back then this would be borderline porn.
I remember a book version of this where they had this 'removing clothes' scene. I wondered where it came from. Now I know.
Peter Jackson should redo this Kong, as he did with the WWI reels, it would be amazing, colorize and adjust the speed of the stop-motion scenes, would love to see him do it.
Much better effects than many CGI scenes I've watched.
What a technological break-thru that was back in the 30's!
She keeps looking down, probably seen his water heater sized mini me, rising from the bush
Your comment made me cry with laughter for 10 minutes! Thanks!
i dont understand this
@@adnan_honest_jihadist5775 She saw his giant gorilla penis.
this entirely changes the pacing and seriousness of the original......
Also, the additional violence-shots were more eating-people than I recall Kong doing.
Thanks for this.
I watched it several times with my dad. I have to wonder if he knew. I didn't.
Dad would have been to young to have seen it, Sad born in 30 and mom in 37.
The remarkable thing was watching it every Thanksgiving ( NYC market area ) TV guide.
Anyways, thank you.
geez, those scenes of dudes getting eaten would have been hot stuff in the early days of movies
Kong can't understand why his fingers smell like fish.
Damn,please check you MORAL GYROSCOPE GUIDELINES .AND COMPASS TOO.
I always give them the smell test before diving in too.
Fay Wray stunningly attractive in 1933
RZ: considering she was only 26 at the time. She made it to 96, five weeks shy of getting to 97.
Yes she was, check out also Joan Blondell and Barbara Stanwyck from the early thirties.
Aye, but it was beauty killed the beast.
Nice legs for sure...
Will King Kong be using a walker when he goes to Federal Court ??
I didn’t know that these scenes were deleted because the one I have is the actual kong from 33 and my grandpa said he even bought it and everyone in the family has seen it a million times
Thanks. I never new this. Great way to bring in new year.
What was considered a nude scene in 1933 is, nowadays, considered a modest Facebook photo.
No, there were actual nude scenes in movies in 1933. This is not one of them.
Super upload, thank you very much for sharing this.
Is this part of the me-too movement trying to besmirch the big fella 85 years later?
Some People are also trying to criticize this Film for not looking as good as some Film Today. Well made in 1932 and released in 1933.
Pretty Damned Good for the Time Period. The Dinosaurs and that Airplane Scene at the end on the Empire State Bldg were Awesome.
Awesome video my Friend
When this was first shown on British TV in the early 1970s (I was pretty young), I distinctly remember all the prodding her clothes with a finger bit.
In the states as well. I don't understand WHEN the claim of censorship is supposed to have taken place but I distinctly remember this scene in the early 70's. And if anyone wonders why, excuse me, I was twelve in 1972 I was SCREAMING for Kong to proceed.
Me too, here in Seattle. They must have put all that stuff back in after all those dumb censorship laws got thrown out in the '60s. And all the natives getting mangled!
Maybe they showed the uncut version on international channels.
Oh man, as a kid, I looked forward to this part , every single thanksgiving. Lol
Once you go King Kong, you never go back...
I don't think you're gonna go anywhere!
Lol
“ Kwality “ ........ Lol !
La primera vez la vi en el cine de mi padre a fines de los años 50, el era fanático de esta película, luego con el paso de los años fueron mis hijos los que la descubrieron... hoy, a 90 años de su estreno, nos sigue cautivando y emocionando.
Aún conservo el programa de cine y mas de 30 fotogramas originales en fílmico 35 mm de esa época.... tenía el afiche original, pero me lo robaron junto con otros de la época, ese incidente me generó un profundo dolor y tristeza que aún no puedo superar.
Fay is just so gorgeous!
She sure is.
I concur.
Indeed, she was!
She's still alive too
@@clowntrooper61 Oh wow. Neat!