Kong Undresses Ann in (Censored!) Scene From KING KONG (1933)
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 มิ.ย. 2018
- When "King Kong" (1933) was re-released in 1938, several violent shots which violated the Production Code were removed.
Along with these went a scene considered much too risque' in which a curious Kong peels off some of Ann Darrow's clothing.
The new edit cut away just as Kong was getting started.
Here's the original, restored version...
I neither own nor claim any rights to this material. Just having some fun with it. Thanks for watching! - บันเทิง
![อาจารย์ยอด : ลุงแว่วเล่าเรื่องผี [ผี]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Fd2Qsy4dqpM/mqdefault.jpg)
![ความรักของยักษ์เขียว (ทศกัณฐ์) - เดี่ยว ไออุ่น [OFFICIAL MUSICVIDEO 4K]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/yCCy-QVHqK8/mqdefault.jpg)
The special effects there, combining Fay Wray lying in a life sized model hand with the stop motion animated, miniature Kong body, is just incredible for the day.
Mask editing. Nothing very difficult if you use black and white film.
@@marguskiis7711 : Again Margus... this was _*89 years ago*_. They couldn't even fathom back then what you say you can do now with your PC or Mac now. Quite frankly, neither could anyone else who wasn't ILM or some company like that even 15 or 20 years ago. The King Kong crew of the early 1930's had to do it the "really hard way" (inventing it all as they went) and it took them two years to get as far along as they did back then.
Breaking news: Kong gets cancelled after a sex tape of him sexually harassing a girl from 1933 surfaces thanks to Godzilla.
🤣🤣🤣🤣
And thats how Kong vs Godzilla started 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Thats to much bruh
My name is Gojira, and I've got dirt on Rodan, Mothra, Ghidorah, all those second-rate monsters. And Matthew Broderick, for that shitty American remake he talked me into.
LOL
Love how they do the stop motion along with the real clip of the actress panicking. It looks so real, the fact that they did that in 1930s is blown my mind, never thought these filmmakers are so advanced, better than Terminator Dark Fate CGI lol
Way better than any of Terminator dark fate
This is better than a lot of movies around today! Made quite an impression on me as a kid in the 70’s and continues to this day...
Are you f****** kidding me what do you think influence people like George Lucas Steven Spielberg John lantus and Stan Winston it will stop motion that influence them and they all admit that at one time another in their interviews but they said the person they admired the most was Ray harryhauser who did all the Jason and The Argonaut films that was when they got their biggest influence
Could edit together two footages but did cheap 6 fps animation. And much easier would been a actor dressed as gorilla.
@@asahutchinsonsuckslittledi1056 I got to meet Mr. Harryhausen in 2006 at the "Halfway to Hollywood" film festival in Kansas City. He was very soft-spoken and humble about all that he had done, and his influence on the film industry. He brought along some models and other collectibles that were amazing to look at, but what was even better was listening to him talk about them and the animation process. He did a Q&A after a screening of "Jason and the Argonauts" which was also very entertaining. The director of the festival was holding a box containing one of the skeleton models from "Jason and the Argonauts" as he and Ray waited for the credits to finish up before taking the stage for the Q&A, when the festival director dropped the box. The skeleton bounced out of it losing an arm along the way. Ray smiled and calmly reached down, picked it up, and said, "Don't worry about it, the arm was built to come off!". He then put the model back in the box and headed off for the stage, while the director of the festival stood there, mouth agape!
If you don't know his work, you can check it out here:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jason_and_the_Argonauts_(1963_film)
And more on the man here:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray_Harryhausen
He passed in 2013 at 94.
I love how the nostrils moved when he was smelling the clothes. Seriously, that's really good detail for a puppet.
Yep, that overgrown ape really "took a whiff of Jiff" !!
And to think this film is approaching 90 years old(1933).Imagine What audiences of that time must have thought watching this classic at the cinema.This was stop motion effects,no CGI back then,so it must have taken forever to film the movement of the models.For me the film still stands the test of time,especially Kong’s fall from the top of the EMPIRE STATE BUILDING.An iconic movie
The stopmotion looks very cheap and unnatural. Saved a bit money.
@@marguskiis7711 you funny 😂
@@nonnoyobisnis8705 You can do very smooth stopmotion but it needs much more work.
@@marguskiis7711 so you honestly believe that you would have done a better job in 1932 ???
Spoiler alert! 😂
The editing of the her in the palm of Kong was absolutely phenomenal for its time
Loved this movie as a kid in the 70s. Now I can truly appreciate how great the effects were for the time. Such a classic.
What do you think of this scene 1:31 to the end? th-cam.com/video/0JVZ0bE8hpk/w-d-xo.html
Thanks for this! I've never seen the strip scenes before nor the ones with "unacceptable violence." The scenes of violence definitely make Kong a lot less sympathetic as a character and more the monster that needs to be destroyed. I definitely need to see the film in its uncut version.
I've never seen the edited version. I've always watched the original cut.
@@matthewpasternak8128 How?
This is the first I've seen them, I've been watching this for 50 years!
@@matthewpasternak8128 Agree I recall these scenes on TV as a kid in the late 70s / early 80s.
This film will be a century old in 12 years time. That’s crazy!
Damn
And the special effects will still be more spectacular than the stale old “Hey, look at me bend over backwards and dodge this bullet in super slow motion” crap they put in every single action movie in 2021.
@@jimgardner1306 The Matrix has a lot to answer for.
Ye that is very crazy I can't wait for that lol
...and it'll still be a classic.
6 other women have come forward and are claiming that Kong touched them inappropriately as well.
Two also reported being sniffed
Well, it happened in 1933, so it's about the right time for this type of behavior to be brought out. hashtag mee2!!
Lol
@@MrTPain ROFL
Kong never touched them, those women are just pissed off because Kong Dong NEVER TOUCHED THEM... Lmao.
KING KONG wasn't made when cinema was in its 'infancy'. The 1930s is generally regarded as "The Golden Age", when filmmaking experienced a lot of innovation. KONG was one of the most important films produced in that era, expanding on spfx techniques as well as introducing new ones, and setting standards in sound design and music scoring still respected today. KONG was so ahead of its time that only two other stop-motion movies were made within 16 years of KONG's release - SON OF KONG (1933) and MIGHTY JOE YOUNG (1949). It wasn't until the films of Ray Harryhausen in the '50s and '60s that stop-motion made a major comeback. That same period saw KONG re-released in theaters and shown on TV, all of it generating renewed acclaim for the film.
This movie was utterly BRUTAL for the time period. People being eaten alive by all kinds of horrible creatures, animal violence, this scene (obviously), the train scene, Kong being shot down, that infamous deleted Spider scene, among others. In other words, this movie is one big middle finger to the censors at the time, and I love it.
*King Kong* was released a year before the Hays Code was enforced. But it couldn't have been made after 1934 -- at least not this version -- until the late '60s, when the Code was finally scrapped and the rating system was installed. The period 1929-1934 (when sound films became dominant) is known as Pre-Code Hollywood. They got away with a lot of stuff in that short window of time. It's fun to watch those movies now, in retrospect, since there was very little censorship at that time.
musicaltheatergeek79 Thanks for informing me! I actually realized my mistake a little earlier after I wrote my comment, but yeah I agree. This movies are fun.
@@musicaltheatergeek79 cartoons were also very free with what they could do in 1929 - 1933. The cartoons that got away with many things at the time was the Flesicher cartoons
It really was dropping that woman just for the sake of it dammmn
And no one seems to mention that Kong is Negro, he is a 1930's black man enlarged to huge size, with a much more primitive, violent brain. What he does to white women become even more naughty because of it!
Kong was subsequently ordered to sign the Skull Island Sexual Offenders Register for ten years.
Exactly! NO CGI!
@@craigheiss2007 huh?
Only ten years?
You get the Comment of the Year Award. Brilliant!
and banned from having children. No wonder his species is extinct.
He is gunna be in court one day wearing a suit with glasses trying to defend himself from a sexual misconduct charge
As a kid in the 50s, I loved these movies. My all time favorite is The Seventh Voyage of Sinbad. But that didn't deter me from all those monster movies from King Kong to Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein. All were so much fun to watch.
I never get tired of watching that movie! Ray Harryhausen's work is awesome.
Kong aint stupid. He went right for the jugs.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Maybe they should have named him "Shwiiiiing Kong".
He also tickled her and then sniffed his finger. Highly suggestive, and fairly gross actually, even by today's standards.
It's a film I still love to watch. Great memories of watching it with my dad as a kid.
cinematography while on the island is incredible, the flow and movement of the back ground art is just too good
Thanks for finding this old movie footage and posting it as awesome
Of all the king kong movies, my favorite is still the original 1933 release. The actors really had to act, there was no cgi, just great script writing. Classic masterpiece!
John Rodriguez I also like the orchestral soundtrack.
The acting, the music, everything is far better than what is made today.
@@55Quirll r/lewronggeneration
That's because it was not made by millennials.
Yes, and it doesn't overdue it. A nice effective hour and forty minutes.
After “tickling” Ann, Kong sniffed his fingers... Savage!
Joe biden would be proud to have kong as a son lol
@@shitahead417 lmao - surprised that YT didn't ghost you.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🦍🦍🦍🦍🦍🦍🦍💃🏿💃🏿💃🏿
@@shitahead417 another trump looser ... Kong is a winner in new York while trump is the tax evader. Ran to Florida ......coward....
Kong is Thinking: At last White Meat ! Nice 😁
As long ago as this classic movie was made it is still very watchable today. A great movie like King Kong, wonderfully told, acted, and filmed will be watched for as long as people care about great cinema. This classic film is what all subsequent versions are based on and none of these have become a classic the way this 1933 film has. Do yourself a favor if you haven’t seen it in a while, watch it again.
[":Brace67: Will do. Thanks. Transpicious now. With eyes wide open since the Transapocalypse is here was covert since baby-loan times while humans trusted and slept."]
The Background Art is Incredible as is the attention to detail. The T-Rex and Dinosaur and Lizards are Still Pretty Cool today.
The sniffing Kong does figures in later if the film is uncut. Looking for Ann Darrow in NYC, Kong pulls some random woman out of her apartment as he climbs a building. Sniffing her, he realizes it’s not Ann and casually drops her from high above the street.
the production is really good 😎👍👍
Kong was really more curious of her dress at first, then he just became more curious how she smells.
Quite realistic reactions without any malicious sexual connotation.
First time the giant ape seen these, what do we expect? The filmmakers were correct, it's the censor board that time who shaded the scene with supposed obscenity.
Thanks for posting.
You're right. He was more curious than anything. When they recreated this scene for the 1976 version however it was pretty clear that he was stripping Jessica Lange not out of curiosity but because he was a giant pervert!
@@PlumbPitiful
Hehe...
Times have changed already by 1976 and it showed the way this was dealt with.
"Peel me like one of your French bananas..."
I wheeze-laughed at that one!!!
Bow chicka bow wow.
LMFAO 🤣🤣🤣
Killed! 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
Ooh shit thats funny!.
king kong was curious as why she was wrapped up. theses scenes look pretty tame now but consider risque back than. thanks for the upload. i always wanted to see the unedited version of this most famous film of the times.
As a kid back in the 50s I remember seeing those "sexy" scenes on tv. Then later, or rather recently, when the original Kong was shown on tv I thought I was going crazy. I mean I remember the scene on the ledge but it wasn't there.....I was beginning to think I had imagined it all...but now you guys proved to me that I did, I DID see that scene.
Im sure i remember seeing that scene in the '70s, so there must have been a fuller cut of the movie floating around at some point.
One of the first movies I remember watching as a kid in the 60s. By far the best version. Still stands up. Had never seen this version of this scene. Old boy was just curious.
This was great thanks for the video
www.4shared.com/video/FWqNjE2Bei/King_Kong__1933__in_colour_.html
Super upload, thank you very much for sharing this.
Kong is thinking. This is a hell alot more fun than peeling a freaking 🍌. .😄
🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂🤣🤣😂🤣😂🤣😇🤣😂
Note that the 1976 King Kong has a similar scene where Kong gets a bit too "fresh" with Dwan, just as he does with Ann in the 1933 version, removing the woman's clothing in both movies. In Peter Jackson's 2005 King Kong, this scene is made more "family friendly", with Kong violently knocking over Ann with his finger, rather than doing more intimate things. So, at least for this one scene, the 1976 King Kong was closer to the original 1933 movie than the 2005 version.
Jessica Lange has a great set.
[": Transpicious: of them all."]
Can you imagine what would happen to her if Kong-Boy would have gone for some "stink-finger?" They should have at least showed a peek at his ape-boner while he was getting his jollies. That's my Siskel & Ebert analysis of the night. Yeah, yeah, I know they are both dead.
Well the 76 version is Italian and they put sex scenes in kids movies they always did the raciest movies in the 50s and 60s lol
Damn!! I've never seen these before, Kong is just killing and stomping out..... gives an entirely different aspect to King Kong. Thank you.
👍 Expert stop motion animation.
www.4shared.com/video/FWqNjE2Bei/King_Kong__1933__in_colour_.html
Censorship aside, the composite work in this scene is brilliant.
www.4shared.com/video/FWqNjE2Bei/King_Kong__1933__in_colour_.html
Fay Wray stunningly attractive in 1933
RZ: considering she was only 26 at the time. She made it to 96, five weeks shy of getting to 97.
Yes she was, check out also Joan Blondell and Barbara Stanwyck from the early thirties.
Aye, but it was beauty killed the beast.
One of my favorite movies of all time, still great today! I must say though that every time I've seen King Kong this scene was never deleted. I have two copies one on VHS and one on DVD and they both contain this scene. Maybe it was deleted at the time.
Don Arnold movies back then could even have certain scenes cut city by city depending on the local blue laws.
Pulling Fay Wray's clothes off? My word, that Kong was a beast! Solid me too claim.
I agree
This original uncut version was featured at the Telluride Film Festival in the early to mid-'70's. Fay Wray was there and helped with the political implications of this scene in those times.. Festival organizers at the time opined that their showing would be the last time it would be viewed. That was way before TH-cam. Nice post.
Very cool. Thank you so much for sharing this.
I remember watching the uncut version on TV, years ago.
The original, uncut version is regularly shown on Turner Classic Movies. The channel also plays many pre-code movies, and there are compilation clips here on YT.
Likewise. More than once. I first saw Kong in about 1959, and many times after that; some were censored, some were not.
@@tyrssen1 I first watched it about the same year as well. Freaked me out, but I've seen it at least a dozen times since then. When Turner Classic Movies began showing the pre-code version on a regular basis, I had to check that out a couple or three times.
This was my favorite movie growing up and I was so happy when they restored the "cut" scenes! They really butchered movies after re-releasing after the Hays code was enforced in the mid 1930s....like Kong, Frankenstein, Jekyll & Hyde etc.. Thank God someone saved those missing scenes.
There are parts of the re-released Public Enemy that are so hacked up they don't even make any sense. It wasn't until I saw the original version that I understood those scenes.
www.4shared.com/video/FWqNjE2Bei/King_Kong__1933__in_colour_.html
I went to see the then-newly restored Kong in a theater. Drew quite a crowd, too. We were all used to the stuff we'd seen lots of times on local TV, but the new stuff -- wow. People were ewwwing their way through the new parts of the film. It just worked, even after more than forty years. I hope the filmmakers would have been pleased; I understand Fay Wray was.
Thanks. I never new this. Great way to bring in new year.
I think this scene was meant to show Kong sniffing her clothes similar to a bloodhound to explain how he was able to track her in New York later.
I agree. When he pulls the first woman out of the window, he sniffs her. Then tosses her away.
That was the real reason but I'm pretty sure that was a BIG....FAIL!!!!! LMAO
@@kentcarter835 She was HOT too. Definitely worth more than a cursory toss! When we look at humanity and wonder what happened. All I can say is.... Nothing. We're right where we've always been. Sniffing our fingers. I hope this passes the ratings Gestapo.... LOL
Her clothes.....of something else?
No script writers in those days sniffed undergarments,
The worst part of King Kong was that it painted gorillas to horrible monsters that led to many being slaughtered. In fact gorillas are mostly shy and gentle.
Look at the official US propaganda posters from WW1. The "evil Hun" is portrayed as a kind of ravening gorilla-like monster, very similar to King Kong. Many of those watching the movie would have been exposed to and familiar with that kind of imagery. Sick.
Man, had they kept this and the lost 'Spider Pit' scene, this film would've been *'R'* rated.😈
Great job! One of my favorite movies!
Thank you. Brilliant rare content.
When the ape peeled the lady was something like She loves me?, She loves me not.
In practically all films the "director's cut " is ART while what is usually released is purely "commercial;" mores the pity.
This was a great find. These pre code movie versions show how open movie makers were until lobbies for morality put their prude stamp on movies
This is the version I saw on late night TV in England god knows how many years ago.
I believe the reason why this scene was removed was the fact that Kong was sniffing his thumb after rubbing her. Not because he was ripping her clothes off!
I well remember, seeing the first version of "King Kong", in Scotland, in 1948. I had to take my younger sister with me. She spent much of the movie, hiding behind the seat.
Being the brave wee laddie I was, I watched it all. Okay, sometimes with my eyes closed, very dusty Theater.
Then seeing it on Television years later, I couldn't understand why we thought it so scary.
Then many years later, saw the original again.
Proud of keeping my eyes open, all through the movie. Okay, perhaps a bit wider when he undresses Fay Wray. C'mon, she was gorgeous. Lol
Still the best King Kong, ever made.
www.4shared.com/video/FWqNjE2Bei/King_Kong__1933__in_colour_.html
So impressed with the special effects and it was from a 1933 movie. I am awed to the director and special effects creators.
Thanks for this.
I watched it several times with my dad. I have to wonder if he knew. I didn't.
Dad would have been to young to have seen it, Sad born in 30 and mom in 37.
The remarkable thing was watching it every Thanksgiving ( NYC market area ) TV guide.
Anyways, thank you.
Thanks Porfle...I remember you from the IMDb message boards. I miss those exchanges.
Me too! :)
Sorry to jump in but I miss those too. I bet IMDB's traffic has really taken a hit since getting rid of the message boards.
@@shawnc1016 posted there for over a decade. Primarily on KK, 2001ASO, Once Upon a time in the West, Dollar Trilogy, Blade Runner and other Kubrick...Leone films. There were a lot of great posters that I really enjoyed. It provided the most fun I've had on the internet.
C'mon Barbie let's go party
Ooh ooh ooh yeah
Creek Water to
Fay Wray is another slutty Canadian B movie starlet - - this edited material proves they will do anything in front of the camera
It's a fantastic scene also from a technical point of view, a real absurdity to cut it!
Awesome video my Friend
Fay Wray's last appearance was the Academy Awards in 1998. Billy Crystal was such a gentlemen with her.The movie that was nominated was The Titanic.
Just saw her grave stone, just so unbelievably simple you might just walk.past and never see it.
What do you think of this scene 1:31 to the end? th-cam.com/video/0JVZ0bE8hpk/w-d-xo.html
What was considered a nude scene in 1933 is, nowadays, considered a modest Facebook photo.
Amazing stuff, daring and hot! Thanks.
I had no idea these edits existed! My father saw the original cut in the cinema when he was a small boy.
Kong touched her body then smells his two fingers ..... hilarious and nasty haha
1 for the pink; 2 for the stink...
My boi kong a g. Takes women with out trying and even did that
Phenomenal classic cinema! Charming, surreal, and still fascinating after all these years!
Great footage of the best Kong movie, thanks for sharing. 👍👍
What a technological break-thru that was back in the 30's!
That movie would’ve been much better unedited! Cool vid👍🏻
Kong can't understand why his fingers smell like fish.
Damn,please check you MORAL GYROSCOPE GUIDELINES .AND COMPASS TOO.
I always give them the smell test before diving in too.
I remember a book version of this where they had this 'removing clothes' scene. I wondered where it came from. Now I know.
The sniffing was hilarious!
After Kong is brought back to NY and is about to be displayed, a young woman in the audience upon being told that the exhibit had something go do with a gorilla, says something to the effect of “Say, aren’t there enough of them in this town”, or words similar to that. This movie has held up so very well after all these years since it was made and is still watchable and entertaining. Even after the destruction he has caused and the number of people he has killed we still feel badly for Kong when the planes shoot and kill him and he plummets off of the Empire State Building. “Well the airplanes finally got him”. “No, was beauty killed the beast”!
Pratchett's book, "Moving Pictures" had to tip the hat to this classic scene. Of course, it was seen through a warped lens.
"He's just killed a few dozen people , ripped zome to shreds, but the airplanes got him!"
" Awww, poor thing..." WTH?
I didn't feel sorry gor him when I saw this movie the first time, about 60 odd years ago, and never have, lol.
@@tomsmith5216 You have to admit though, he was out of his element having never been to New York.
@@Brace67 Haha, he was not alone in that regard. I had the same feeling when I lived there for ten years. Never did get used to it...
Once you go King Kong, you never go back...
I don't think you're gonna go anywhere!
Lol
“ Kwality “ ........ Lol !
Read about this as a youngster in "Famous Monsters" magazine; now own the unedited cut. This is still my favorite version of Kong! Another famous scene removed from an early Tarzan film shows Tarzan & Jane swimming nude underwater. You should post that clip as well. 👍
Actually, what happened in the "Tarzan" flick was that Maureen O'Sullivan dove into the river, and her top came off as she surfaced(the reason it might have looked like she was skinny dipping was because her "outfit" was a breechclout, like Tarzans'; front and back, NO sides, held on by a string around her waist, which left PLENTY of skin showing. A film or two later, and she was wearing a mini dress instead)
@@mikegrossberg8624 Nice story, but no. The 1934 reel in question clearly shows Tarzan pulling her entire dress off as she falls into the water from the tree limb they are standing on. Subsequent shots do show both of them underwater, and while the loincloth story sequence is true, it does not apply to these scenes. In the scenes in question it is quite clear the actress or stand-in is not wearing a stitch of clothing.
@@sgtbilkothe3rd To be honest, I'd never heard of the total nudity scene, just the missing top incident
I like when he smells his fingers. Hilarious
"Sniff Sniff"
We all do.... ;D
Must have been that nice sexy perfume she was wearing.
@@jasonlee6227 I don't think it was perfume he was smelling
Damn we come a long way! Good times
I remember seeing the uncensored versions back in the '60's. Being 10 years old at the time they were pretty intense.
Likewise. The two scenes that stuck with me the most were the man being stepped on and the woman Kong mistook for Ann tossed to her death.
Another famous "Censored " scene was in Frankenstien when the monster tossed the little girl into the lake thinking she'd float like some flowers and she drowns.
Nothing will top the atmosphere of films like this and Frankenstein from that time. They had a feel that no CGI could ever hope to capture.
Agreed
Include "Dracula."
When this was first shown on British TV in the early 1970s (I was pretty young), I distinctly remember all the prodding her clothes with a finger bit.
In the states as well. I don't understand WHEN the claim of censorship is supposed to have taken place but I distinctly remember this scene in the early 70's. And if anyone wonders why, excuse me, I was twelve in 1972 I was SCREAMING for Kong to proceed.
Me too, here in Seattle. They must have put all that stuff back in after all those dumb censorship laws got thrown out in the '60s. And all the natives getting mangled!
Maybe they showed the uncut version on international channels.
First time seeing this. Had no idea. I watched this movie on tv in the 70s when I was about 12 and it was so upsetting even without these scenes. I'm glad they cut them because I would've had nightmares. The woman screaming after being dropped is the worst.
After I saw the uncut version I realized Kong got what was coming to him.
The little noise it makes when kong touches her is golden xD
Classic good movie! Even more so with these "CUT SCENES" restored!
At least he didn't smack her with his Kong Dong
WTF🤣
KONG'S MOTHER: Kong! How many times have I told you not to play with your food?
Excellent post.
That was pretty awesome! I love it when he smells his fingers-totally risqué for those days!-lol
The oboe trill when he tickles her (with a finger as thick as her body) is hilarious.
Perhaps the filmmakers were living vicariously through Kong’s actions.
She keeps looking down, probably seen his water heater sized mini me, rising from the bush
Your comment made me cry with laughter for 10 minutes! Thanks!
i dont understand this
I saw the unedited version at a revival in LA in the late 80s or early 90s. I got to meet Fay Wray! But seeing the movie unedited was like seeing it for the first time.
When she says, "You're too big King, you're too big," she really means it.
I didn’t know that these scenes were deleted because the one I have is the actual kong from 33 and my grandpa said he even bought it and everyone in the family has seen it a million times
All the scenes show as being "Cut" were shown in full on TCM a few weeks ago. Every one shown here was shown in the original release as shown.....it hasn't changed
As the uploader said, this scene (and others) were cut when the move was re-released in 1938. You can read about this on Wikipedia. What you watched was a "restored" version of the movie with the excised parts added back in.
Much better effects than many CGI scenes I've watched.
this entirely changes the pacing and seriousness of the original......
Also, the additional violence-shots were more eating-people than I recall Kong doing.
How times have changed. Today there's content on Cartoon Network that's more "risque" than this.
I think it's supposed to be a comical scene - it's like he's peeling a banana. :-)
Probably one of the most famous 'banned' scenes was the swimming scene in "Tarzan and his Mate". You may not even be able to show that scene on You Tube. From a movie released in 1932!
Thanks for your love and support Are you one of my fans out there if yes you can call or message me on my talk tour number +1 (470) 887-0398 to know it's really me message me on Whatsapp for video call..
That was an unbelievably risqué scene for a movie from that era. Maureen O’Sullivan who played the very sexy Jane, was actually Mia Farrow’s mother.
The tickling and sniffing, done to the music, provided great comic relief for the film. So, of course they had to cut it. I wonder how many other movies were ruined by censorship.