Can we create life in the lab from scratch? | Lee Cronin and Lex Fridman

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ส.ค. 2024
  • Lex Fridman Podcast full episode: • Lee Cronin: Origin of ...
    Please support this podcast by checking out our sponsors:
    - Paperspace: gradient.run/lex to get $15 credit
    - Athletic Greens: athleticgreens... and use code LEX to get 1 month of fish oil
    - Notion: notion.com/sta... to get up to $1000 off team plan
    - Blinkist: blinkist.com/lex and use code LEX to get 25% off premium
    - Onnit: lexfridman.com... to get up to 10% off
    GUEST BIO:
    Lee Cronin is a chemist at the University of Glasgow.
    PODCAST INFO:
    Podcast website: lexfridman.com...
    Apple Podcasts: apple.co/2lwqZIr
    Spotify: spoti.fi/2nEwCF8
    RSS: lexfridman.com...
    Full episodes playlist: • Lex Fridman Podcast
    Clips playlist: • Lex Fridman Podcast Clips
    SOCIAL:
    - Twitter: / lexfridman
    - LinkedIn: / lexfridman
    - Facebook: / lexfridman
    - Instagram: / lexfridman
    - Medium: / lexfridman
    - Reddit: / lexfridman
    - Support on Patreon: / lexfridman

ความคิดเห็น • 198

  • @aaronscottmatthews7883
    @aaronscottmatthews7883 2 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    Consider the simplest form of metabolism (never-mind ATP synthase)
    Imagine the sequence of events required to generate that from *scratch*

    • @kenaaronbabbit9987
      @kenaaronbabbit9987 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You Clearly know nothing about dormant spores

    • @211212112
      @211212112 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It was anaerobic I figure. Maybe even more like the pathways of sea vent organisms. I don’t think self organizing life just pops up. I think we were seeded by the older universe especially considering the molecules they found in space.

    • @kenaaronbabbit9987
      @kenaaronbabbit9987 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@211212112 he said there is a scientific lineage even if we don't understand or comprehend it in order for us to compose first the cells had to come to be in a unicellular fashion...then theyd evolve and become multicellular for one reason or another. Before that the dormant spores would have soaked up the hydrogen and oxygen and reignited. Think if it like a dry grain of sand thsts in the garden....when it's on the top and sun baked it's not actively taking on moisture because it's all dried out....but as you water it each day it softens and becomes able to hold water like a mini sponge....now inside are little crevices with dried spore particles....at the end of the day fungi are the building blocks

    • @robberlin2230
      @robberlin2230 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes exactly, but the theory requires support more than thought. The abiogenesis process skips the critical area as a small part "we don't know much about, a fuzzy area, but once complete.......

    • @Radrook353
      @Radrook353 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      They avoid imagining that in order to avoid reaching conclusions they consider unacceptable. In short, they avoid practicing science in order to evade feeling emotionally harassed by the inevitable consequences.

  • @sferrin2
    @sferrin2 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    I wonder how far off we are from actually knowing how DNA works. Right now we're basically replacing scorched wires in an old TV with new wires. A far cry from an electrical engineer who could DESIGN the thing. Being able to create a custom DNA sequence from a clean sheet and KNOW what it will make. . .it makes my head hurt just thinking about it. Which piece of code do you put where to make sure that the seed will sprout but only AFTER it passes through the gut of a mammal, and why?

    • @_P785_
      @_P785_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Not only that but the dna strand is long asf like there are trillions you’d have to peice together perfectly

    • @4D2M0T
      @4D2M0T 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Soon we can ask AI to answer this question for us....

    • @WayneLynch69
      @WayneLynch69 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Cronin mutters Craig Venter's name. Here's Venter's express opinion on "life from non-life":
      th-cam.com/video/xIHMnD2FDeY/w-d-xo.html
      "IMPOSSIBLE humans will EVER know life's origin". FOLLOWED by Nobel laureates in biology
      Leland Hartwell & Sydney Altman saying EXACTLY the same.
      BUT MOST EXTRAORDINARILY, RICHARD DAWKINS SAYS NOTHING!!
      It's his sine qua non. He has no reason for being absent "natural etiology of life", as supported by
      HIS biology bona fides.
      I accept pursing funding and fame...but this fool is going no where.

    • @sferrin2
      @sferrin2 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@4D2M0T That's not how AI works.

  • @michaeldonnelly6747
    @michaeldonnelly6747 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    So we still can't do something that happened at random in nature?

    • @distilledfreedom1840
      @distilledfreedom1840 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      No, it's infinitely unlikely to have happened.

    • @marksackhaarberg1822
      @marksackhaarberg1822 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      no😂

    • @NishanT_ACM
      @NishanT_ACM 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      bro that random process takes 500 miillion years

    • @mrn8645
      @mrn8645 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@distilledfreedom1840 - It has literally happened!

    • @tripplethicc626
      @tripplethicc626 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Isnt it natural for humans to do what they do??

  • @Lola_bunny215
    @Lola_bunny215 2 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    I always say we are the creators of the aliens we want to meet … if we start making life now in many ways, making many species , let thousands of years pass and life will be like Futurama … becuz we started it. Idk I’m high asfuck

    • @_GuzJ
      @_GuzJ 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I hate that theory because they leads me to believe we will create our own form of heaven essentially, and there isn't one in charge after all. (more scary because of lack of understanding)
      All those that go to hell stay trapped underneath the Earth's main surface layer as they didn't believe in facts/knowledge and were "cleaned" by Earth/Gaia. They were more so for selfish reasons and owning, so they were left with the Earth. Heaven, in my opinion, would be a virtual world where everyone can kinda do whatever they want without actually causing any physical harm. This can all make sense in the idea that we are God. Idk how I feel. I love knowing we are capable of endless realities, but scary to know what we interpret as "bad" can be "in charge" for awhile as no one is truly guiding us but ourselves.

    • @4D2M0T
      @4D2M0T 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah me too, but all these species will need to kill each other to survive or for whatever instinct makes all other species kill each other and even themselves as humans proven good at, but wouldn't it bee cool just like the wild west in space lets build those life bombs

    • @deokspatch8458
      @deokspatch8458 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      reddit momment

    • @HebrewsvJohnv
      @HebrewsvJohnv ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Look up Dr James Tour's latest series on TH-cam, he is going against a few of the origin of life researchers, the series is brilliant.

  • @deanalbertson7203
    @deanalbertson7203 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    So life might be more rare than we thought originally.

  • @00sh0tay
    @00sh0tay 2 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    From scratch? How about from nothing? That happened . Can you imagine the power that being has?

    • @videomontaggenerator
      @videomontaggenerator 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I hope we would befriend or kill it.

    • @Radrook353
      @Radrook353 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Bible doesn't say he created things from nothing. Where did you derive that idea from?

    • @00sh0tay
      @00sh0tay ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Radrook353you read much?

    • @00sh0tay
      @00sh0tay ปีที่แล้ว

      @TiMMY 2PHONE5 nothing is before Matter.

    • @ApostolicEchoes
      @ApostolicEchoes ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Ex nihilo is Latin for “from nothing.” The term creation ex nihilo refers to God creating everything from nothing. In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth (Genesis 1:1). Prior to that moment, there was nothing. God didn’t make the universe from preexisting building blocks.
      “Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear.”
      ‭‭Hebrews‬ ‭11‬:‭3‬ ‭

  • @anewman
    @anewman 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    sure, let's say we find out creating life is easy.. but then you have to ponder how easy is creating habitable conditions ( sun at right distance, axial tilt held stable by large moon, guardian jupiter etc)

    • @Raiddd__
      @Raiddd__ ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @ianpalacios6154 i dont think youve done the math brotha. Dont just take it for granted that "big ass number" is "close enough" to "other big ass number"

    • @TC-jo2vj
      @TC-jo2vj 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      lol what do you mean, we’ve found out creating life is incomprehensibly complex and the math for our current misunderstanding of evolution and origin of life is laughably wrong. Even billions of years is nowhere near enough time for Darwinian evolution to be true.

  • @larrybutler8794
    @larrybutler8794 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    James Tour!

  • @pdxeddie1111
    @pdxeddie1111 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    It was sure a lot easier to explain a hundred years ago when we didn't know how complicated the problem is

    • @pauldirc..
      @pauldirc.. ปีที่แล้ว +1

      So can i conclude we should believe in magical space daddy ?

    • @marksackhaarberg1822
      @marksackhaarberg1822 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@pauldirc.. I mean if you don’t I promise you will end up very depressed and miserable 😂

  • @MrKydaman
    @MrKydaman 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    It's all fun and games until you create the blob.

  • @bimjim2536
    @bimjim2536 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I can make life from scratch. All I need is some cinnamon rolls, a car battery and some pizza pizza creamy garlic dipping sauce.

    • @austinaussiec
      @austinaussiec 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Pizza Pizza is an incredibly efficient way of saying Little Caesars. Just know you have touched someone today. *giggity*

    • @beefdavidson
      @beefdavidson 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@austinaussiec Pizza Pizza is a chain in Canada independent of Little Caesars

  • @pseudonamejacobs9146
    @pseudonamejacobs9146 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    If we could create life it would give us a big insight on what life can be on other planets one of my biggest questions being is DNA a natural phenomenon or will other forms of life do it differently with their own version of dna or w.e it is we find

  • @MrPeterFranc
    @MrPeterFranc 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    It’s already been done. Non results. Just accept it. There is a creator. Life is too complex

    • @robberlin2230
      @robberlin2230 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That alternative is too complex in every other part of life for consideration it seems. Best to scrap a creator and continue doing what you would

  • @johnpatmos1722
    @johnpatmos1722 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I sure hope that Cronin isn't supposing James Tour or Stephen Meyer, for example, in this dumbed down dismissal of creationists' critique of OoL research. And as to good faith, you all have made exceedingly bold claims of what you have and will accomplish in this area of research which have grossly mislead the public.

  • @dylan-2169
    @dylan-2169 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    What if we’re the result of “origins of life bomb” from a long gone, or just distant civilization, that could possibly still out there spreading those “bombs” in other galaxies. Maybe the reason we can’t find other life is because we were the first products of the “bombs” to become technologically advanced enough to actually search for other life.

  • @obbzerver
    @obbzerver ปีที่แล้ว +3

    To save you almost 11 minutes - so far the answer is no.

  • @piddlepond
    @piddlepond 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Is there any evidence that life has originated more than once on earth outside of the first evolutionary chain?

    • @Xendindrome
      @Xendindrome 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      What's preventing new life forming on earth all the time?

    • @wertytrewqa
      @wertytrewqa 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      No there is no evidence for that type of thing.

    • @robberlin2230
      @robberlin2230 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Other than we exist, there is no evidence for abiogenesis, it's a theory

    • @anunluckyguy7586
      @anunluckyguy7586 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Xendindrome i dunno, maybe it does but just dies instantly?

  • @elvinmateo6408
    @elvinmateo6408 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    this is how pokemon began LOL

  • @kentclark9616
    @kentclark9616 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Did he honestly say “ put sand in a box and wait for life to come out” maybe I didn’t hear him properly because that would be incredibly stupid.

  • @robiulahmed
    @robiulahmed 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The trouble with building life from scratch is that you need homochiral nucleotides, homochiral polysaccharides, you have to battle degradation and once you have the nucleic acid, they have to functional enough to code for functional proteins, which means you need functional ribosomes. Also, the cell needs to be metabolic and be able to replicate. That's just scratching the surface, it's actually way more complex than that.

  • @sinthason
    @sinthason 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Are chemicals, particles, and elements considered living things? Because bonds, and reactions, still exist even if organic doesn't. So in that terms what would be the definition of life.?

    • @ricomajestic
      @ricomajestic 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No.

    • @anunluckyguy7586
      @anunluckyguy7586 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes.

    • @janbittner1465
      @janbittner1465 ปีที่แล้ว

      Life is a difficult concept to define, so it's mostly defined as a sum of properties of thing we consider living, such as:
      cellular organization, the ability to reproduce, the ability to respond to environment...
      The idea is that while a thing that has one of these properties may not be considered a living thing, once it has most if not all of them, you're without a doubt looking at a living thing.

  • @Lesminster
    @Lesminster 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    By the definition everythin new only after it's discovered it is being analyzed and our knowledge develops further. So, knowing this, it is simply not possible to predict if someting kills us all or not.

  • @brandonmcneeley2233
    @brandonmcneeley2233 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Boston Dynamics:
    Boy do we have a surprise tomorrow!

  • @TOLOFFICIAL
    @TOLOFFICIAL 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    well said

  • @Noobmaster-sd1qm
    @Noobmaster-sd1qm 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Fascinating topic, wonder if they can create life and that life can create some more life :D

    • @jasonking1284
      @jasonking1284 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It might go wrong and end up like...... The Thing....

    • @Noobmaster-sd1qm
      @Noobmaster-sd1qm ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jasonking1284 haha

  • @nowar9220
    @nowar9220 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    It's already been done using frequency... some dude did experiments in the early 1900s and he put a test tube in a beaker, the test tube had pure fresh distilled water, and the beaker had dna suspended in the solution, using frequencies he was able to form the exact same DNA in the test tube.. there was also more testing done with microbes and such getting similar results..
    I guess it's not creating new life, but he did create life forms from clean water, obviously his research was rejected by the mainstream and his colleagues, the research never ended up going anywhere just like the countless other researchers that either got ridiculed or had funding pulled and labs shut down, there's plenty of tech that's been hidden and kept from public.. it's undeniable and if you believe everything is open and nothing has been supressed, then you my friend are a fool and just simply havnt studied history..

    • @ricomajestic
      @ricomajestic 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Experiment has never been reproduced

    • @jasonking1284
      @jasonking1284 ปีที่แล้ว

      HP Lovecraft?......

    • @johnpatmos1722
      @johnpatmos1722 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This is a joke, right?

  • @JumboH
    @JumboH ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Guys what do you think is more likely to happen first? The creaton of nuclean fusion or the creation of a self-replicating life form like a cell from dust?

  • @michelangelopainters5519
    @michelangelopainters5519 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is Lex stoned?

  • @JasonAlexzander1q47
    @JasonAlexzander1q47 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Do it from atoms and real building blocks.

  • @estebantorres1547
    @estebantorres1547 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    No and we are not close

  • @sarfarazkhan8157
    @sarfarazkhan8157 ปีที่แล้ว

    We even can't creat life from life out side body.we provide environment for test tube babies but we don't grow them out side body as young ones so why don't believe someone is present who created the life from scratch.

  • @Radrook353
    @Radrook353 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Amazing how being illogical has become an emblem of being highly educated!

    • @finsic8453
      @finsic8453 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Please explain your comment sir

    • @marksackhaarberg1822
      @marksackhaarberg1822 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@finsic8453You can’t create Life from scratch. It’s a billion times more complex than Lee Cronin describes it. Doesn’t matter how much technology you have and how many scientists simultaneously work on that goal. It’s more likely to create a bridge to the Mars than creating a living cell from scratch. Just won’t happen.

  • @johnpatmos1722
    @johnpatmos1722 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wish Lex Fridman would invite Steven Meyer onto his show.

    • @mcmanustony
      @mcmanustony 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why? You can hear him deliver the same schtick he's been peddling for decades all over YT.
      I have a drinking game where I take a shot every time he says "nanotechnology", "inside the cell" "digital code".....I'm now on my fourth liver.
      He's a lying religious hack. Nothing more.

  • @johndonaldson8549
    @johndonaldson8549 ปีที่แล้ว

    Surely that can be achieved on a super computer,

  • @pseudonamejacobs9146
    @pseudonamejacobs9146 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    God lex is kinda asking some slow questions

  • @Aurora666_yt
    @Aurora666_yt ปีที่แล้ว

    I doubt it.

  • @UncleScratchnSniff
    @UncleScratchnSniff 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The first person to create life inside a lab is probably going to be Bret Chrysler. He does horrible things to dogs.

  • @zach_harrison
    @zach_harrison 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I wonder what intelligent life would look like that lives not on H20, but on methane, or something else.

    • @robberlin2230
      @robberlin2230 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You are describing the Clintons

  • @chauhanrajput4733
    @chauhanrajput4733 ปีที่แล้ว

    Interviewer is interrogating like a spy😅

  • @blueredbrick
    @blueredbrick 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amino acid would be still the same as Miller Ulrey showed.

    • @ricomajestic
      @ricomajestic 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Never replicated so most likely was not created. Contaminated flasks.

  • @radicaIarchitect
    @radicaIarchitect 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I create life every night 😊

  • @user-zd7ox7ej7v
    @user-zd7ox7ej7v ปีที่แล้ว

    I honestly feel like we was a lab creation by another civilization of beins and it cycle keeps going which explains the infinity theory of the universe.

  • @yarar-ct9lh
    @yarar-ct9lh ปีที่แล้ว

    You can’t make carbon or electrons

  • @JorgeTorres-mh7wy
    @JorgeTorres-mh7wy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    Humans will never duplicate the lord's creation no matter how hard they try.

    • @human678
      @human678 2 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      Wouldn't be so sure about that.

    • @hooch87
      @hooch87 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wait till you hear about sex. It'll blow your mimd!

    • @anunluckyguy7586
      @anunluckyguy7586 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      oh but they will

    • @anunluckyguy7586
      @anunluckyguy7586 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@KatinkaPofmuis someday, but sadly you're never gonna see it

    • @Sniper-cf1vv
      @Sniper-cf1vv ปีที่แล้ว

      God is fiction you fool

  • @stevenfoleyuk9404
    @stevenfoleyuk9404 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    God created Life from Nothing no Atoms no nothing . Good luck with your science and your Quantum Computers 😂😂😂😂

  • @bradenward4231
    @bradenward4231 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What if it isn’t possible to create life from a sterile environment. That would mean life came from somewhere else. Maybe it came here on an asteroid. Maybe there is a completely different realm of the universe with different rules where life can be created from nothing.

    • @froesefamilyadventures4616
      @froesefamilyadventures4616 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hummm. That sounds like God. Welcome to creationism my friend.

    • @janbittner1465
      @janbittner1465 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The generally accepted answer is that the water and salts which created the first protoproteins did get to earth during meteor rains.

    • @jemj-
      @jemj- 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      no it doesn't. saying a different realm of creation from nothing does not mean a all knowing all powerful god deiced to create us. i can see some of the overlap but its not mutually necessary @@froesefamilyadventures4616

  • @santiagop23
    @santiagop23 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Lol this kid was demolished by James Tour… get him on.

  • @beadoll8025
    @beadoll8025 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Answer: NO
    Because that would require God-like intelligence and we are severely lacking there....ALL OF US!

  • @garrydion8907
    @garrydion8907 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Moral obligation to create more life in the universe,yet we kill our unborn children on the alter of inconvenience

  • @GC-nm3og
    @GC-nm3og ปีที่แล้ว

    7''00"....By the way, whos the guest?
    Let the man talk!

  • @spamm0145
    @spamm0145 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Only the creator can make life from non life, all any scientist can do is take Gods work and manipulate it using the laws he created.

    • @BubbaF0wpend
      @BubbaF0wpend ปีที่แล้ว

      We'll see. If they end up creating life in a lab (they wouldn't bother with the research if they weren't confident) you may have to eat your words.

    • @davidrichmond21
      @davidrichmond21 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@BubbaF0wpend Are you serious do you know how much money is in this research.

    • @BubbaF0wpend
      @BubbaF0wpend ปีที่แล้ว

      @@davidrichmond21 And that means it's not viable?
      Do you begrudge the probably trillions that's gone to cancer research, because there's no cure yet?

    • @marksackhaarberg1822
      @marksackhaarberg1822 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@BubbaF0wpendno, we won’t see. I promise 😂

    • @BubbaF0wpend
      @BubbaF0wpend 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@marksackhaarberg1822 citation needed

  • @rhys4303
    @rhys4303 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Better question, why would you want to? Science can probably create manbearpig, but that doesn't make it right. Do science majors just sleep during the required ethics class?

    • @dbitely01
      @dbitely01 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ethics is different then the law.

    • @dbitely01
      @dbitely01 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ethics is different then the law.

    • @violent_bebop9687
      @violent_bebop9687 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Gain if function has proven ethics has died long ago.

    • @Mooorino
      @Mooorino 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      If you could become "god", would you say "no thanks". Of course not, you would say "fu** yes!". Same thing as asking anyone if they would like to have 1 million dollars? How many, in percent, do you think would say "naaah, im good!"?

    • @ricomajestic
      @ricomajestic 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      If we can make life from scratch then we could eventually make hearts, livers, kidneys, etc that would all help very sick people without the need for transplants

  • @eaf888
    @eaf888 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    🌍🌍

  • @DigitalVovoghure
    @DigitalVovoghure 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Life is so complexed. Just create an atom of Oxigen out of scratch, means joining quarks.

  • @KrystelSpicerMindArkLateralThi
    @KrystelSpicerMindArkLateralThi ปีที่แล้ว

    This wonder is on words 'beginning' & 'end' not regarding from 'birth' to 'death' but from both ends of a spectrum where either pray or eaten, & between where not defenseless.
    Re. retrocausality. I'll explain this in layman's terms using nature as a guide rather than machines & particles & scientific terms which I tend to think keeps people in the dark. I"m said to take an interest in quantum' mech. I wonder it's actually quantum that took an interest in me. No one seems to be able to tell the difference. Suits me just fine. So here goes..✍️😉🌞✍️
    The feathers over some birds, & the human head of hair come speckled, meaning rings of glowing light expand & retract upon it under sunlight as an observer approaches or backs away.
    We appear as though we're (1) watching an observer with eyes in our blind spot as does a butterfly & (2) are an observer between ourselves & an observer, shadowing them, as retracting & expanding rings give the illusion something without body be same proximity to them whether we remain still or not or whether they're backing away or drawing near.
    Does a butterfly which can't see have circles that look like eyes on its wings, to compensate for those wings making it appear bigger than its body & the colours they are making them look more spectacular in the daylight to be eaten for, then what is it we can't do when we be an invisible shadowing creature besides ourselves? Perhaps we can't see we live in a uni-multirealm of different sized same universe, not unlike the expanding & retracting rings of light in our hair.
    Are Alpha & Omega proximity relative & not relative to birth & death? The way we're born relative to the way we die may not be relative to life as lived about the uni-multirealm which has neither beginning or end besides at what point observed at. If God & our & the uni-multirealm be expansion had used deduction & vice versa (expansion & retraction both are once when 'beginning' just means from when so close observing us our shield be active, & 'end' mean where from we're observed from either too far or so close it inactive, then does it make sense that one would die should they see god if to die is all there is left to do besides begin & end as in expand & retract which go on forever?
    Is to be Alpha & Omega (as in expansion & reduction both) proximity relative & not relative to birth & death, however is birth & death also proximity relative otherwise but have to do with when too far or too close we're able to be observed? A predator stalks its prey from a distance the light ring defence be down, to race close enough to that prey the light ring defense be down too. Our only seeing this one universe & not the uni-multirealm of different sized same universe, might this mean we're either too close or too far from it or both, & that 'beginning & end' to who see their home as theirs alone & defenseless could only mean 'birth to death'? Is that we're blind to what & where we are proven by the rings of light we not observe ourselves being other than ourselves, the way that the butterfly being colourful & larger than itself proves it's blind to how it's observed & as to its proximity? So. Once were blind & now we see? Or is it we're like the butterfly, with defence mechanism respective & irrespective of we're born prey, where beginning & end could only mean from birth to death?
    ✍️😉✍️
    All I write is free. please help yourself. Free. From scratch.

  • @Canyon2023
    @Canyon2023 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can’t you just keep perfecting the sex robot…and robots designed to kill people….which are men’s two favorite things to do in life!!! Can’t you just perfect that - and create sports robots for your personal entertainment, who can fight each other in arenas?
    Do that with your billions instead of feeding the starving, and don’t solve the pollution problems whatever you do!!! DON’T DO THAT!!

  • @yarar-ct9lh
    @yarar-ct9lh ปีที่แล้ว

    You can’t don’t waist your time

  • @prvtlongarm
    @prvtlongarm 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This guy spitting up nonsense.

  • @ricomajestic
    @ricomajestic 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Abiogenesis.

    • @distilledfreedom1840
      @distilledfreedom1840 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      A myth

    • @beadoll8025
      @beadoll8025 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Where is the actual evidence for that? It's mythical bullsh*t. Even the evolutionary theory is illogical and unscientific. 14 billion years ago blah blah blah and no evidence and no eye witness accounts but believe because we said so and oh yeah you're crazy if you believe in a God but trust our adult fairytale. 😂

  • @maxtaylor1026
    @maxtaylor1026 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Its never going to happen. What ever you create guy, if it cannot replicate its not life. Good luck. And your "poor" description of a life form seems to be a foreshadowing for what you would like to deem life but won't be.

  • @UFO_PILOT
    @UFO_PILOT 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Look up "xenobots".

  • @ronaldmorgan7632
    @ronaldmorgan7632 ปีที่แล้ว

    We're nowhere near, and, there's really no benefit to doing so.

    • @jemj-
      @jemj- 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      by creating life that means we may be able to create organs for transplants or bring back extinct creatures to dying ecosystems

  • @MS-od7je
    @MS-od7je ปีที่แล้ว

    Blahaha

  • @4D2M0T
    @4D2M0T 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If we could create biological life from sand imagine where this research could eventually lead to, what if we discovered/created the ultimate biological life form that can survive on Earth, I wonder what it would be like

    • @Blobby192
      @Blobby192 ปีที่แล้ว

      yeah like a xenomorph

  • @pdxeddie1111
    @pdxeddie1111 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    but thats the point it is a terminator tomorrow I mean if ya can't figure out how it began in PRIMORDIAL earth which should be relatively easy if it was that easy then it shouldn't be that difficult to replicate. I know throw some stuff in a sterile water drum and wave some magic spells over it. Maybe that'll do it.

  • @muneebiqbal5584
    @muneebiqbal5584 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    (22:73)
    إِنَّ الَّذِينَ تَدْعُونَ مِنْ دُونِ اللَّهِ لَنْ يَخْلُقُوا ذُبَابًا وَلَوِ اجْتَمَعُوا لَهُ
    O people, an example is presented, so listen to it. Indeed, those you invoke besides Allah will never create [as much as] a fly, even if they gathered together for that purpose. And if the fly should steal away from them a [tiny] thing, they could not recover it from him. Weak are the pursuer and pursued.

  • @ammavumchild5935
    @ammavumchild5935 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Harbouring psychopath and talking about philosophy about life???
    No MERCY for any Criminal not even life sentence.

  • @dougtibbetts857
    @dougtibbetts857 ปีที่แล้ว

    Short truthful answer…. Not even a clue…. Not even in right field in the tall weeds!!

  • @aminzarei1557
    @aminzarei1557 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    U see this is the problem ,
    When our scientists instead of solving current problems, would create life or play with viruses just to prove something to some fanatics 😑

  • @user-tn6ge6tw2p
    @user-tn6ge6tw2p 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    01jst3
    VUN.RENT