The A-340 uses every inch of the runway before it climbs, especially the 300 version. Scary sometimes, but still a very nice, comfortable ride. I'd take it any day. But, of course, in my opinion, nothing beats the 747-800i.
In my opininon the a380 is better, i flew on one from frankfurt to San Francisco, and It made 0 noise while climbing 1200ft/min, yet to fly on a 747-8I
@@birdwithoutwings6858 last time I flew on the 2nd longest flight with Singapore Airlines, their A345s still struggled since they didn't retract the flaps fully until we reached cruising altitude.
A beautiful aircraft! Like flying in a modern B707! The A340 is my favourite jet! I flew on the A340/600 from New York to Frankfurt with Lufthansa in 2019 and it was fantastic!
@@eat_a_dick_trudeau Inane comment not germane to the discussion of the reliability of the CFM 56. Réal Levasseur Shedalin, the TSB's lead investigator for the accident, said the plane landed too far down the runway to have been able to stop properly on such wet pavement. Investigators have found no evidence of engine trouble, brake failure, or problems with the spoilers or thrust reversers.
Don't think she is weighed down hard, they just use a bit less power on take-off to save fuel. All A340 have a 25% extra power on hand on take-off because of the regulations. They may choose to use it and rotate earlier but with more than 25% fuel consumption. So they tend to use every bit of a runaway and make the uneducated passenger sweat are they close to the end of the runaway and still on the ground at the full speed. I also like this bird once in the air and cruising altitude but dont like it on the take-off and not because of the slow climb. Just like all CFM engines (320 etc) they sound like a hair dryer at the full power. I have a feeling someone forgot to grease those bearings on their impellers. 🙃
Why Airbus fitted that big wide body with basically the same engines as an a320 (just slightly stronger) baffles me. Ik it’s just the 200 and 300 with the cfm56 but they just don’t seem strong enough for a big wide body like the a340
Cause it was the four engine fashion at that time ! Even 2 CF6 engines may have not been powerful enough for this type... Anyway I'm not an engineer but I understand your point ;)
@@nateye2450 Short answer: Compromise. Long answer: They actually had IAE on the A340 project at first with a geared turbofan supposed to power this thing, which would have burnt the same amount of fuel but had more power from it than the CFMs that it ended up with, but the engine got dropped because it wasn't economically viable. So Airbus was between a rock and hard place - having to meet efficiency targets using existing tech, or cancel the project completely - so they ended up calling in CFM to modify the A320 engine for this plane. That's why it's so horrendously underpowered.
@@birdwithoutwings6858 yea. About that, long story short it's because the -300 was initially proposed to use a different engine that didn't made it to final production. IAE Superfan.
A few years back I got to fly Air Belgium with one of the last A340-300s built (you can tell because of the more modern cabin) and it was an absolute joy to hear those hairdryers buzzing to the best of their abilities! Crazy to think these are becoming increasingly rarer to fly. Grateful to have been aboard such a silly aircraft a handful of times!
New! From the people that brought you the “Quick N’ Regrettable” Wide-Opening Blower Jam (BJ) and “Bitty Twister” Super Tight Electrified Curling Clamps, its the A340 passenger airliner - The only long range wide body aircraft powered exclusively by four (yes four!) wing-mounted Ultra Burly “Low-Hangin’ Get ‘Er Off!” (the ground) Hair Dryers!
I love the a340-300 the last time flown with virgin Atlantic and it was a comfortable ride and I love it it was the best and we took off from mco and went to London Heathrow and it was the best experience ever!
@@doabarrellroll69 I didn't know that about the A320 engines, We flew on a A340-300 In the late 90,s to the middle east from LHR so happy i got the chance to fly in one.
@@herceg6772 Yes, that too! More specifically a two-engined A340-300. It'd be awesome if Airbus released an A330-600 which would go along nicely with the 777-300ER.
all those black tire marks right there where their planes turn left onto the runway it seems to me like those are from low tire pressure leaving those black rubber marks there
![[4K] HEAVY TAKEOFF! Lufthansa Airbus A340-300 ✈ Takeoff Frankfurt](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/aP-QKgx0fBU/mqdefault.jpg)
A340-300 pilots on takeoff: *activate all hair dryers!*
2:08 - That ding once they're barely airborne is the captain letting the cabin crew know they're gonna make it 🤣
😂😂
😅
Legend says the A340 is still climbing towards cruising altitude
yea. And im suprised that this a340 300 did not tailstrike while take off
The A-340 uses every inch of the runway before it climbs, especially the 300 version. Scary sometimes, but still a very nice, comfortable ride. I'd take it any day. But, of course, in my opinion, nothing beats the 747-800i.
In my opininon the a380 is better, i flew on one from frankfurt to San Francisco, and It made 0 noise while climbing 1200ft/min, yet to fly on a 747-8I
Just the A343 most of the time, the A345 and A346 are pretty normal since they have big engines
We pay for the runway
We use the whole the runway
@@birdwithoutwings6858 last time I flew on the 2nd longest flight with Singapore Airlines, their A345s still struggled since they didn't retract the flaps fully until we reached cruising altitude.
A beautiful aircraft! Like flying in a modern B707!
The A340 is my favourite jet! I flew on the A340/600 from New York to Frankfurt with Lufthansa in 2019 and it was fantastic!
Ah yes, the A340-300, the only plane that flies on no engines and 5 APUs.
😂
@@phillipjoseph8768 il-86 be like : .......
Hasn't had an accident, record speaks for itself. I do agree that it is a flying turd
Air France 358 has entered the chat...
@@eat_a_dick_trudeau Inane comment not germane to the discussion of the reliability of the CFM 56.
Réal Levasseur Shedalin, the TSB's lead investigator for the accident, said the plane landed too far down the runway to have been able to stop properly on such wet pavement. Investigators have found no evidence of engine trouble, brake failure, or problems with the spoilers or thrust reversers.
climbing like a 707, that ol girl was weighed down hard. best plane imo, the a340. what a gorgeous plane
1
Typical for this aircraft.
Don't think she is weighed down hard, they just use a bit less power on take-off to save fuel. All A340 have a 25% extra power on hand on take-off because of the regulations. They may choose to use it and rotate earlier but with more than 25% fuel consumption. So they tend to use every bit of a runaway and make the uneducated passenger sweat are they close to the end of the runaway and still on the ground at the full speed.
I also like this bird once in the air and cruising altitude but dont like it on the take-off and not because of the slow climb. Just like all CFM engines (320 etc) they sound like a hair dryer at the full power. I have a feeling someone forgot to grease those bearings on their impellers. 🙃
The A340-300 is the reason why international airports need to build 12,000ft runways.
The sound of the engines is brilliant ❤👍
that lady was heavyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
Often noticed that for NRT-CPH route.
Best engine buzz around! Those 4xCFM-56's just ring out all together so loudly!
she's only climbing because the earth is round :D
underpowered and all, I still fucking love the A340
earth is aflat.
@@user-cf3yr8nc9w earth is square
The Earth is an irregularly shaped ellipsoid. google ftw.
@@tranquynhanh8991 no no no. The Earth is obv Donut shape
I didn’t find her underpowered at all. The feeling of the power of those 4 engines is much more reassuring than a twin.
The engines sound amazing! Just such an underpowered aircraft, I was laughing because that takeoff roll took soooo long to start 😂
Why Airbus fitted that big wide body with basically the same engines as an a320 (just slightly stronger) baffles me. Ik it’s just the 200 and 300 with the cfm56 but they just don’t seem strong enough for a big wide body like the a340
Cause it was the four engine fashion at that time ! Even 2 CF6 engines may have not been powerful enough for this type... Anyway I'm not an engineer but I understand your point ;)
@@nateye2450 Short answer: Compromise.
Long answer: They actually had IAE on the A340 project at first with a geared turbofan supposed to power this thing, which would have burnt the same amount of fuel but had more power from it than the CFMs that it ended up with, but the engine got dropped because it wasn't economically viable. So Airbus was between a rock and hard place - having to meet efficiency targets using existing tech, or cancel the project completely - so they ended up calling in CFM to modify the A320 engine for this plane. That's why it's so horrendously underpowered.
@@nerd2814 oh ok, that’s pretty interesting thanks
love the sound of those tiny engines!
Excellent video! A takeoff video that is only the takeoff, none of the prolonged taxi time, and I really appreciate that!
The climb rate is so slow, if you jumped out of the plane a minute after takeoff you would still land firmly on your feet 🤣
In fact if you jumped out a minute after takeoff and started running you'd arrive in Copenhagen before the plane
@@keithwaites9991 🤣👌
If the passengers don't like that, why don't they get out and push?
Yeah hairdryers
3:05 yeah. You shouldn’t jump out from there
Love the sound of the cfm 56 hear them everyday on the a320s moving down the runway
What an amazing sound 😍 I can listen to this all day!
hair dryer take off sound to it’s best! God I love these -300 series A340 🥰🥰
Well said 👌🏻
the -300 has the strongest version of CFM, while the -600 has the weakest version of Trent.
Interesting
except the -600 is definitely not underpowered even for its size like the -300 is
@@birdwithoutwings6858 yea. About that, long story short it's because the -300 was initially proposed to use a different engine that didn't made it to final production. IAE Superfan.
@@birdwithoutwings6858both of them are not underpowered. they have almost the same thrust to weight ratio. but the -300 is more efficient
no because the a345 engines are derated further than the a346 engines
Its such a smooth plane to be on as a passeneger. Yiu can tell the plane was heavy. Those engines were working 💪 and pitch up angle was minimal.
It was just an underpowered plane in general
My favorite part is the sound.
A320 on a long haul jet
man she sounds great
Flown with the 343 twice in my life (ZRH to SFO and ZRH to CPT. Both rides were just so very smooth.
6:30 of full-throttle. Just barely enough power. Not like a 777 that can haul ass with any engine or subtype. Still such a graceful machine.
A340-500 is Basically the opposite of this plane
And then it goes slightly back to full throttle after 30 secs for a little extra push 😂
Sounds like max thrust from take off all the way up.
I've flown once to Hong-Kong by Cathy Pacific A 340-600 what a wonderful jet i have enjoyed every single moment of the flight.
I love the first 30 seconds of flight on an A340-300, you always wonder if it's going to climb or not. It's a little scary
A few years back I got to fly Air Belgium with one of the last A340-300s built (you can tell because of the more modern cabin) and it was an absolute joy to hear those hairdryers buzzing to the best of their abilities! Crazy to think these are becoming increasingly rarer to fly. Grateful to have been aboard such a silly aircraft a handful of times!
New! From the people that brought you the “Quick N’ Regrettable” Wide-Opening Blower Jam (BJ) and “Bitty Twister” Super Tight Electrified Curling Clamps, its the A340 passenger airliner - The only long range wide body aircraft powered exclusively by four (yes four!) wing-mounted Ultra Burly “Low-Hangin’ Get ‘Er Off!” (the ground) Hair Dryers!
As seen on TV. Not available in stores.
Brilliant wing view mate! Loved the roar on this... Huge like from me! Keep it up :)
JustAnAverageTraveler thanks :) Business class is nice sometimes to get this view lol
I love the a340-300 the last time flown with virgin Atlantic and it was a comfortable ride and I love it it was the best and we took off from mco and went to London Heathrow and it was the best experience ever!
340-300 qui a un bruit magnifique ces avions sont voué à disparaître dans les années à venir.... 😱🙏
Used nearly all the runway to get airborne. Heavy
a340 engines are hair dryers
It's an A340-300, it's got A320 engines, no wonder it takes so long to takeoff
@@doabarrellroll69 I didn't know that about the A320 engines, We flew on a A340-300 In the late 90,s to the middle east from LHR so happy i got the chance to fly in one.
Awesome video! Thank you for sharing it.
The mighty A-340 has been proving flat earther's wrong since 1993!
Just awesome. The best sound heard ever in youtube.
A340-300 sounds WAY better than A340-600!! Beatiful CMF56 engine buzzsaw sound!!
The RB211 engines on the 747-400 remind me of those "hairdryer" engines lol
and the trents on the a330
That sound is 🎵 ro my 👂. I love the A340 300 and 600. My favourite ❤
Superb video... especially for aviation enthusiasts like us... thanks for sharing..!!
Sounds like a broken airconditioner but i like it
My country still use the a340, i love when it flies near my house
Hi, I'm a a340 fanboy
the a343 is not particularly overpowered lol
but an elegant aircraft.
my favourite is the the b773er though.
those engines are just impressive.
The A340 Engines at full power sounds so good
ahhh, the droning sound of four cfm56s at takeoff power.
I love the A340, it's just a 4-engined A330.
Or A330 is two engined A340
@@herceg6772 Yes, that too! More specifically a two-engined A340-300. It'd be awesome if Airbus released an A330-600 which would go along nicely with the 777-300ER.
@@ChrisZoomER yeah that would be cool. But now I love the Neo model with the zorro mask and huge engines
@@herceg6772 Same
0:57 A plane with 5 APUs
Its still on my bucket list to fly these in the forward cabin - something about the view and the sounds.
Definitely a nice seat to be ! But more costly because the forward part is usually business/first class...
this engines like b757
@@AdikUsUm0 More like 737 engines.
@@randyrankin589 yeah but 4× engines 737 and 2× engines 757
What a beautiful sounding aircraft ❤❤❤❤
Maaaan! love those CFM56 TOGA roars
fantastic wingview footage.
sounds like my PS5
Damn. That thing took a while to get off the ground.
Whooooooooohh very long take off 😲😲
1 min take off roll 😱
I watched a couple of 757 takeoff 🛫 videos then watched this for a 😂
CFM 56 is the best engine in my ears
sheeeeeeeshhhh. Blasted out of there like a rocket.
I love the earn sound
That’s such an eargasm
Nice thanks!
Damn, such a cool plane! It's a shame they've been retired
This Sound like Rock n roll❤
When the takeoff roll is the same distance as the flight
The speed it catches wowwwww
I would have given my left arm to be on one of those SAS A340 Ferrari red engines now. Before I'd avoid SAS
Like the a320-200
a340:I always respect to every inch runway that is use every inch runway
Most comfy plane in the air.
Sounds like a CFM56 from a 737 and A320 and RB211 from a 757 combined
Spectacular!
That thing is heavy!! Ate up a lot of runway and low angle of climb
Think that this plane is grounded in Marana, US. Over 12 hours away :( RIP A340 you will never be forgetted.
Airbus: A four engine single deck plane !
Usain bolt: Hi bro, see you at corpehagen
The only airliner equipped with 5 APU's
a 1 minute takeoff roll... this thing really does not have enough thrust.
but it sounds fantastic though
Very nice video
all those black tire marks right there where their planes turn left onto the runway it seems to me like those are from low tire pressure leaving those black rubber marks there
Plane just landed not low pressure lol
@@RayKit Aircraft mostly never land on the Threshold markings. lol...
@@RayKit 0:17 He meant these tire-marks.
The roar/groan of the engines made me sleepy. I would've sat back, put my eye shades on, and dozed until the first bar service.
Google Maps, 1/4 mile from brakes off to touchdown mark = 10 sec quarter mile!
"Uhh, you usin' the *whole* runway, cap?"
It took 55 seconds for the a340 to takeoff from the runway😳
These CFM engines on the 300 are like buzz saws. VERY annoying sound. Thank god they ditched them and went with the Trents.
I find it hilarious that they used the CFM 56 for a plane of this size
bro ate all the runway
It sounds so strong but strong is a hard word
Cut back on power after SIX minutes!
Så godt som hjemme... 🙂
Insane how long these engine are in toga before going into climb. And did they go into toga again after climb??
6:55
Don't think so. Possibly an altitude restriction on this particular SID.
A340 with 737 sound lmao.
The A340-300 proves conclusively that were it not for the earth’s curvature it would never leave the ground - take THAT all you flat-earthers!!
A long winded take off as I would say not much.runway left 2 get of the ground very heavy indead
idk why i am posting this comment but rip to that a340. it was broken up in may of 2022
Every A340 takeoff is heavy, after all, it has 5 hairdryers
Airbus a340-300 before production: lets use 4 B737 engines this time
Those are some pretty hair dryers, CFM56 great sound :D
1:00 takeoff roll starts
7:30 "V1"
This is the slowest acceleration I have ever seen
question: Can’t all of the A340-300s accelerate more faster?