Russian players have that addiction to spawn the Pansier after dying once because they know that US players have an addiction to spawn in an aircraft after dying once.
With all due respect to Phly, he is not "disgusting with missiles". The missiles are just disgustingly braindead, and because Phly has a pulse (the bare minimum required for top-tier), he can put them to good use.
7:57 firs dude in chat: everybody have nice game. By the way, who wrote Russian language exam today? Second dude: I organized it today lol. Translation from Russian.
the exam in question "EGE" is a pain in the ass, I have to write it next year LOL. You have an obligatory Russian and Math exam, and then you choose 2 subjects (mine are English and History) exam is tough and many students get really nervous because of it
As a German I am so happy that you correctly used the "ß" instead of "ss" in the word "Scheiße" at the beginning. Not everybody (even in Germany) is capable of using this letter. Kudos my friend.
only 1 nation has a competent top tier aa that can effectively fight cas at the moment that same nation also has some of the best cas at the moment as well, i don't think anybody would've minded the addition of the pantsir if most or every nation got a contemporary for it but nope russia couldn't get the tor because that would mean they don't have the best everything
The problem is Russian bias Is the problem...if there's a problem in the game Russia gets the solution (when it's their vehicles that are broken/causing issues) and the solution they are given outperforms EVERYTHING and no other nation gets anything even remotely comparable....
1:27 yet with everything they have USSR general win rate is around 40% because most ppl just buy a top tier premium when they just started with no knowledge or experience. You'll find the highest win rate at around 50-55% at mid br ranges 4.0-8.0
Meanwhile, Mavericks are 50/50 against most ground units. Oh and they take sometimes a second or 2 to actually lock the target when you’re less than 10 KM from the target in CLEAR WEATHER…
mavericks are very stinky against actual tanks, they aint to bad against AA but when it comes to tank.... they just don't hit center mass, half the time they track the engine or tracks of a tank, its a clear nerf to there performance, its the same thing that they did to the spikes. the biggest problems with mavericks is that they don't track center mass, they don't have any sort of over pressure, I literally remember hitting a bmp1 and not over pressuring it, they literally act like 120 heat, and lastly they are missing sooooooooooooooooooooooooooo much penetration, in WT gaijin calculates the amount of penetration a shaped charge will have based on its caliber... make that one make sense for the maverick with only 830 mm of penetration.
Now imagine the PARS from the Ec 665 UHT, they are slow, explode in mid air, land on most armored place of the target, they can be shot down, etc. Gaijin only favors Russia in top tier.
@@Frosty_43 more like fire and know that there is a 10% chance of the target dying. however... yes I would take fire and forget missiles for helicopters over hellfire's, even if they rarely kill things
Activate windows is a waste of money you get nothing good out of it if they gave better security or you get AI anti virus Malware protection then it would be worth 30$ or 40$
I would like to point out how the M1128 that killed Phly at 4:16 only took damage from the SABOT CASING. The apfsds round went straight through and didn’t spall at all but that’s okay because the fricking shell casing PENETRATED THE ENGINE BLOCK.
20,000 meter shots is OP we need more anti air vehicles for Nato we need the Stryker IM-SHORAD vehicle or the SLAMRAAM SPAA system I would like to see the SLAMRAAM more 11.7 Humvee that shoots Aim-120A's Gaijin also needs to make current Tank battle maps 5x bigger on avg for anyone over 10.3 which will give the ability for better Tank on Tank battles and sky battles over the tanks then they can add Sam systems that the player can set up with a max of 1 player per side with a tank battle of 32v32 map would be EC for Realistic tank battles Helicopters would be helicopters current maps are too small for Top tier
Please add the Depleted Uraniam inserts for M1 Abrams Gaijn. So we don’t basically have an Egyptian export version as the main Abrams for the Americans.. Gaijn: kys..N O W
Shouldn't the M1A1H and onwards be the ones to get the DU? The base M1A1 didn't get it. I also didn't know that our Abrams don't get DU, always assumed so though.
@@EntrailraiderErr, actually even according to Gaijin themselves at least 5 vehicles were equipped with it in 2005, 10 years before the SEPV3s introductions… meanwhile they gave the T-80B thermals because a singular prototype was equipped with it. A few years later, the license for the 5 DU hulls was amended, which means we don’t know how many had them between 2005- and 2016, but there no longer continued to be a limit of only 5.
Beautiful video showcasing Russian bias that nobody can deny. Great work dude. Please play the Leopard A1A1 L44. I see you don't have a vid on that yet.
"russian bias" meanwhile sweden DOMINATES the ground with their upgraded leopards, better than eastern tanks in every aspect and you still cry like babies not to mention their fighters also dominate air rb and they have a solid CAS too, DEFYN proved it quite a few times how broken they are
@berser4ina Good players in good tanks win games, there's a reason Sweden has the best win rates and it's not just the tanks, swedish players are usually pretty good
Weird how when Russia had a 70% winrate, it was all just good players flocking to them, but when anybody else has good winrates it's a blatantly op lineup. Huh, strange how that works, isn't it.
That last game was something else. Oh, the team is losing? We already have at least 3 AA players? I better spawn in as one too, just to be safe. Reminds me of everyone going sniper in a battlefield game when the team is losing rather than try to win.
i agree with what you said in the last video, Its also the maps, warthunder's russian tanks are just too good at that instant shot cqc battles, I have to say that su 25 was nutty
Thing is: Russians are actually my preferred enemy: Aside weird stuff like shots through a sprocket getting deflected by the front plate(?), their one-shot spots are basically muscle memory and their Su pilots tend to fight at melee range. A bit like Americans at 4.0-5.0, except those actually suffer. Disclaimer: I play 10.3 mostly.
This is the inelegant of Russian players when they die half of them get into pantsier and the other half in su25 so they can cover each other and secure victory
You were meant to bring balance to top tier not destroy it! Fr tho nice vid, good to see it from the other side and see that these things really are just plain easy baby mode and my winrate isn't in the gutter solely because of a skill issue on my part (tho prolly still a large part let's be honest)
Russia is OP < Russian Bias It legit cant be stopped if you play your cards right, I dont understand why they added the 40km ones. And NATO has mavs that cant one shot MBTs
Use russian vehicals present in other tech trees for Example I play t72m1 in german tech trees for some reason the t72 is literally a beast tanking 7 shoots and moving fast and having good apfsds round and being beautiful itself with no downsides even it's he sometimes more powerful then mordern articlery he of 155mm cannons
In WT they have targeting pods with good imaging when in reality their targeting pods are known for their awful resolution and this is verifiable unless you take info from RT
@@WingZeroOne are you talking about very good optics quality in ka-52 which cant tell the difference between tank and tractor? (John Deere 4830, to be exact)
This is Russians society works. In reality, their equipment is sub par, but what gets reported up to leadership is the way War Thunder models these vehicles.
Dearest McPhly, I need more video collabs between you, BennyV and Odd. I have decided that these bring me the greatest joy. The sillier the better. Thank you Sempai.
@@vaclavkolar6750 yeah and the only plane that can carry more than 2 of them is that Gripen. Also the KH-38MT is literally just a fire and forget ML but fire and forget from 20km is just not realistic. It takes way too long to get there and by the time it does the enemy is often in cover or the missile lost lock somehow. The SM3 still has 4 hardpoints on top of that where you can take 4 S-25s that all easily 1 shot tanks.
@@ILikeTuwtles the MT locks in point mode until about 13km. Although Su-25SM3 and pantsir seem to be so popular that i get ussr vs ussr matches pretty often now. But su-25s have one big flaw - slow as shit and poor maneouverability. The gripen can climb high and get above battle in no time + considering average pantsir player IQ (mostly on todler unga bunga level) its actually pretty enjoyable. And i get a lot of battles where ussr doesn't spawn a single anti air so i find gripen cas pretty enjoyable now
It's a russian game, of course everything russian is the best. I swear they have a slider. The worse they're doing in Ukraine, the more the slide the bias to russia...and never the other direction.
Good to see you back my friend, i started watching your videos when i was 15/16 yo, now im 25 and always coming back from time to time just to have a good time watching your vids, AND NOW ITS TIME TO PLAY DE GERMAN DUCK AGAIN AND BLAST SOME .. Ty ❤️
its a russian game and too make a game in russia you have too promote russian culture or tech in this case otherwise you get cancelled by putin thats why they always give the russians ingame a clear advantage we need someone too make a warthunder like game in america or europe too have a balanced game sad but true
You know it is like a guy with big car compensating something small... russians are looses so brutally their equipment on Ukraine so they must compensate it somehow.. loosers.
Phly, try playing sweeden at top tier, to be honest I think that they are more overpowered, the have the best tank in the game and also the CAS is amazing.
Debatable tie for first place, but at least the gripen has to get in range of the pantsir to lob agm65G’s. And if you do go for the 20km maverick launch, the missile is slow af and unless you shoot at a stationary pantsir (which might as well will just shoot down the maverick anyways) it’s gonna miss
@ComradePanzer russia has 1 decent 11.7 (BVM) and then every other tank in the lineup is either mid or dogshit. They just have a lot of vehicles. Sure they have the pantsir (counterable if you are a good cas player) and the sm3 (F16C is just a better plane overall) but sweden, germany, france, and oh no surely bad USA are just straight better lineups at top tier. Everyone needs to stop coping and gain a few braincells.
The funniest thing to think about is that if gaijin wanted to make tech trees somewhat realistic and with real world performance, then russian top tier scrap would have to be like 3.0-4.0 in BR lower than NATO top tiers. They already need to give russian like 40 years newer stuff on the same BR as US and still nerf US ones so the russia can do well
LaserPig explained this really well in a video about the T-34. The vehicle, on paper, would be a great vehicle, should perform really well. But a great vehicle on paper becomes a shit vehicle in practice because of variables such as build quality, crew training, logistics etc. WarThunder implements vehicles solely on their schematics and stats.
to make things even worse - exactly that piece of shit in real life the T-34 has the best softstats in game - like , sharp movement, and when you stop you stop , no gun wobble no nothing. But Panzer Mark 3 and 4 or even panthers - you stop and and for ages the suspension wobbles around making you ineffective in close combat. War Thunder is reality in exact reverse. It is blatant russian Propaganda...
Top tier WT is just kinda off putting. Ill stick to low and mid if and when I do play. Props are fun. WW2 tonks are fun. Top tier RB is basically Arcade w/ Missiles Everywhere.
no according to Russian mains Russian top tier is just fine and realistic and can easily be countered they justify the bias by saying Russian tanks have bad reverse speed, 3-man crew, bad depression or even they can be one shoted through the side lol
having them stockpilled for 30 years in some old warehouse that is governed by corrupted officer canibalizing half of the shit and selling parts to everybody who wants to buy might have a slight impact in their effectiveness in real life. While in war thunder shit is factory new and crew that is maintaning it is aced out.
I dont mind it in and of itself, its the problem that number one; nobody else has anything comparable, number two; nobody has anything comparable to the Pantsir, when in combo it means that it has no counter, not even a fighter which WOULD be what NATO nations SHOULD be using to counter CAS at top tier, and not really SPAA because its just a fact that for the longest time NATO neglected SPAA defense in favor of fighter defense, the problem is the Pantsir especially when spammed pretty much creates a no fly zone because there isnt effective weapon systems on NATO side in the air to counter it (yet), this means that even if you do send up fighters to counter the Su25, the Panstirs on its team can protect it. Hopefully the addition of Fox3s will enable Fighters to fire on Su25s well out of range of the Pantsirs protection bubble, later on I expect longer range ground attack systems to be added to NATO planes to allow them to counter the Pantsir.
So the abrams has faced Russian tanks in both iraq wars and obliterated them. Were those tanks very old? Or does gaijin only lean towards realism when it suits them?
Bro those Iraqi T-72s didn't even have rangefinders. How's that a fair representation of Russian tanks? Besides, do you really think it is fair to compare a modern (for its time) Abrams and a 20 y.o. T-72 (even if it wasn't circumcised like it was in Iraq)?
Hilarious as it is, a T-72 actually has at least 1 confirmed kill on a M1A1 Abrams (which was modernised to fit the M1A2 standards and was advertised as an equal to M1A2). There's a video of a T-72B3 destroying it with a tandem missile in Ukraine, so an argument could be made that a T-72 is better than an Abrams (despite the initial 20 y.o. difference)
Those tanks were really old, with outdated ammo and shitty crew. But statement about Gaijin only leaning towards realism when it suits them is completely true, not just about Russian tree, about anything they want.
@@Философ the abrams in the first Iraq war had 105mm cannons, while the t-72s had the 120s. I think? I’m really asking about how resilient Russian tanks are to any kind of damage in the game. Rangefinder or not, a 105mm cannon could easily knockout a t72. Hell, in the current day, the DU apfsds in the Sep v2 was designed to counter Russian armor improvements. So shouldn’t the t90 be easily killed regardless of shot placement (let’s say center mass)?
If youve noticed gaijin has quitley removed that feature for russian tanks in game. You can pop thier ammo and thier turrent never pops anymore. The copium for russian vehicles in wt is insane 😂😂
Pls name at least of one aircraft in the world that has such armor as the SU 25. If this is actually shit then you have a huge number of examples. But if you give only 1 example i will personally apologize for this message.
If you think about it. The same SPAA's that are in War Thunder pose no threat at all to you in DCS (if you're not too close). We have to start playing War Thunder like we are in DCS. Long range 20+km yeeting ATGM's.
Phly since in these days you're making videos about broken stuff in the game I think you should also make a video on how terrible the 8.0 grb is since most of the tanks are non stabilized and will face 8.7/9.0
i'm so glad that the constant subtitles are gone... i realy loved your stuff until your "break", and am quiet happy that your back 💓 but i couldn't watch your newer video's because of the subtitles, again happy your back and happy that the subtitles are gone for gameplay, keep up the good work and i loke forward to watching your stuff again, pls let me know if your ready for lineup suggestions, i might have a few fun ones and or hard once.
Hey bro I was wondering if you could make a video on how to use the guided missiles like you did from the computer. My issue is that when I lock on target and half the time it won’t launch and idk if I can switch off target. I use a10a early
I think we should be able to spawn fighters with no bombs a bit easier to make up for lack of aa vehicles. This is just gonna be a tough situation to iron out. The US and a lot of other NATO countries simply do not use mobile Sam like the Russians. It’s a doctrine thing. The US especially relies HEAVILY on dominating the airspace with aircraft and not shoot down methods. Russia is the opposite. The counterparts just don’t exist. We just literally have more planes to put in the air. We have plenty of CRAM and Patriot sites but those are not vehicles.
Russian players have that addiction to spawn the Pansier after dying once because they know that US players have an addiction to spawn in an aircraft after dying once.
It’s not like the American ground at top tier are worth respawning in. You either respawn in Adats/LAV-AD or you spawn a plane.
real
Assuming they don't leave the match
what about the ka-50 and su25/39 spam?
Not as prevalent as the US cas spam(almost every fucking aircraft has guided munitions at top tier)@@thelagbros7675
Phly watching the A2S missile become an A2A missile chanting “nonono, what are you doing” and then leaving immediately was fucking hilarious
There is no Russian bias in Ba Sing Se
I am Joo dee welcome to our city
😁
Player: Top tier is the best, why would anyone play low tiers?
Me: I present Exhibit A, PhlyDaily being absolutely disgusting with missiles lol
Seems like a lot of fun, if you’re playing as RU
Disgusted at the same time
I refuse to play above 7.3 now, I finished Germany, got America and Russia to 8.7... top tier is an unbalanced mess and honestly its just full of bs.
With all due respect to Phly, he is not "disgusting with missiles". The missiles are just disgustingly braindead, and because Phly has a pulse (the bare minimum required for top-tier), he can put them to good use.
“Call in arty to protect my engine noise”… why did I neeeeever think of this. Bravo mate. I watch to learn and you learned me real good today.
I do it a lot, sometimes it kinda works
7:57 firs dude in chat: everybody have nice game. By the way, who wrote Russian language exam today?
Second dude: I organized it today lol.
Translation from Russian.
So a student and a teacher playing the same game session?
@@jeffreylmAu yes)
It's a nice example how broad the player base is for War Thunder.
the exam in question "EGE" is a pain in the ass, I have to write it next year LOL. You have an obligatory Russian and Math exam, and then you choose 2 subjects (mine are English and History) exam is tough and many students get really nervous because of it
@@funneharfaller4336 I know I passes it many years ago)
As a German I am so happy that you correctly used the "ß" instead of "ss" in the word "Scheiße" at the beginning. Not everybody (even in Germany) is capable of using this letter. Kudos my friend.
"CAS is overpowered, we need to do something, it's ruining ground rb"
"No, not like that"
only 1 nation has a competent top tier aa that can effectively fight cas at the moment that same nation also has some of the best cas at the moment as well, i don't think anybody would've minded the addition of the pantsir if most or every nation got a contemporary for it but nope russia couldn't get the tor because that would mean they don't have the best everything
Literally every other nation that now can't even use CAP to counter CAS: 💀
The problem is Russian bias Is the problem...if there's a problem in the game Russia gets the solution (when it's their vehicles that are broken/causing issues) and the solution they are given outperforms EVERYTHING and no other nation gets anything even remotely comparable....
Like that, but not just for one nation.
@@A.rtificial-I.nclusion russian bias is legit 3 ground vehicles, thats it
With the capture of the third Abrams, Gajin has confirmed that the abrams (and bradley) are coming to the russian tech tree as premiums.
😂
Can we get ukrainian tanks then? Oh no, they won't do that..
@@tankman66 like?
Oh no Ukraine was part of ussr
And guess what
We have ussr not russia in game@@tankman66
@@ibrayuri8386 very modernised T64
1:27 yet with everything they have USSR general win rate is around 40% because most ppl just buy a top tier premium when they just started with no knowledge or experience.
You'll find the highest win rate at around 50-55% at mid br ranges 4.0-8.0
so they have the longest range SPAA in game and longest range AGM for CAS ?
geeee i wonder why
Meanwhile IRL they cant even get their air force off the ground because of drones and manpads constantly knocking them out
@@RhodesianSuperioritythat's if they're not falling apart on their own because of poor maintenance
@RhodesianSuperiority meanwhile irl US lost 7 F35, their newest aircraft without any war😂
Cope.
@Niko_rj lmao only 7? Out of how many? Every country loses equipment to accidents, now let's look at how russia is doing
@@Niko_rj how's that 3 day special military operation going huh? maybe you want to volunteer for the front lines.
Day 472: play the rbt-5 at top tier
Get this man his video!!
o7
Let him have this video
Would be good to see, got my vote.
I hope he never does it.
Meanwhile, Mavericks are 50/50 against most ground units. Oh and they take sometimes a second or 2 to actually lock the target when you’re less than 10 KM from the target in CLEAR WEATHER…
Compared to the based stalinuim missle seems "perfectly balanced" to me
mavericks are very stinky against actual tanks, they aint to bad against AA but when it comes to tank.... they just don't hit center mass, half the time they track the engine or tracks of a tank, its a clear nerf to there performance, its the same thing that they did to the spikes.
the biggest problems with mavericks is that they don't track center mass, they don't have any sort of over pressure, I literally remember hitting a bmp1 and not over pressuring it, they literally act like 120 heat, and lastly they are missing sooooooooooooooooooooooooooo much penetration, in WT gaijin calculates the amount of penetration a shaped charge will have based on its caliber... make that one make sense for the maverick with only 830 mm of penetration.
Now imagine the PARS from the Ec 665 UHT, they are slow, explode in mid air, land on most armored place of the target, they can be shot down, etc. Gaijin only favors Russia in top tier.
To be fair, those are fire and forget. Not disagreeing with you though
@@Frosty_43 more like fire and know that there is a 10% chance of the target dying.
however... yes I would take fire and forget missiles for helicopters over hellfire's, even if they rarely kill things
“Nice job phly daily, keep it up”
2006 AAA and 2016 plane vs 70s planes and 80s AAA, I wonder who would win
Suprised nobody talked about the “activate windows” thingy
Activate windows is a waste of money you get nothing good out of it if they gave better security or you get AI anti virus Malware protection then it would be worth 30$ or 40$
Guys i swear its not biased warthunder definitely gives other countries these ranges (not)
A lot of them doesn't make equivalents to the best weapons Russia deploys.
@@dankaloww1067 a lot of other nations don't have russian bias
@@dankaloww1067even if that were true, why should that matter?
I would like to point out how the M1128 that killed Phly at 4:16 only took damage from the SABOT CASING. The apfsds round went straight through and didn’t spall at all but that’s okay because the fricking shell casing PENETRATED THE ENGINE BLOCK.
9:30Sounded like Jeremy clarkson seeing A Beer for the first time in a week
20,000 meter shots is OP we need more anti air vehicles for Nato we need the Stryker IM-SHORAD vehicle or the SLAMRAAM SPAA system I would like to see the SLAMRAAM more 11.7 Humvee that shoots Aim-120A's Gaijin also needs to make current Tank battle maps 5x bigger on avg for anyone over 10.3 which will give the ability for better Tank on Tank battles and sky battles over the tanks then they can add Sam systems that the player can set up with a max of 1 player per side with a tank battle of 32v32 map would be EC for Realistic tank battles Helicopters would be helicopters current maps are too small for Top tier
that sounds fun. why would gaijin do that? the management hates fun.
What's abysmal is how long it takes to grind everything. 😂
Please add the Depleted Uraniam inserts for M1 Abrams Gaijn. So we don’t basically have an Egyptian export version as the main Abrams for the Americans..
Gaijn: kys..N O W
Shouldn't the M1A1H and onwards be the ones to get the DU? The base M1A1 didn't get it.
I also didn't know that our Abrams don't get DU, always assumed so though.
I don’t think they know the properties of the DU that’s why they can’t put it into the game without having an idea on it’s defensive capabilities
you do realize the DU in the hull wasnt actually a thing until the sep V3 right?
@@EntrailraiderErr, actually even according to Gaijin themselves at least 5 vehicles were equipped with it in 2005, 10 years before the SEPV3s introductions… meanwhile they gave the T-80B thermals because a singular prototype was equipped with it. A few years later, the license for the 5 DU hulls was amended, which means we don’t know how many had them between 2005- and 2016, but there no longer continued to be a limit of only 5.
@@TheRealSteve42 Preach brother
Nice job PhlyDaily, keep it up!
Beautiful video showcasing Russian bias that nobody can deny. Great work dude. Please play the Leopard A1A1 L44. I see you don't have a vid on that yet.
"russian bias" meanwhile sweden DOMINATES the ground with their upgraded leopards, better than eastern tanks in every aspect and you still cry like babies
not to mention their fighters also dominate air rb and they have a solid CAS too, DEFYN proved it quite a few times how broken they are
Gajin tried but top tier is till unplayable unless you’re Russia
Ehhh the 2a7 is still pretty unstoppable but the shitty thing is nato spaa but yea Russia is unstoppable
last time I checked Sweden still has highest winrate, because good tanks win the games, not CAS
@berser4ina Good players in good tanks win games, there's a reason Sweden has the best win rates and it's not just the tanks, swedish players are usually pretty good
Bro stop recycling talking points. Your probs level 12 and own a challenger DS. Everyone knows Sweden is the number 1 top tier line up.
Weird how when Russia had a 70% winrate, it was all just good players flocking to them, but when anybody else has good winrates it's a blatantly op lineup. Huh, strange how that works, isn't it.
That last game was something else. Oh, the team is losing? We already have at least 3 AA players? I better spawn in as one too, just to be safe. Reminds me of everyone going sniper in a battlefield game when the team is losing rather than try to win.
Ruzzia has the best CAS and SPAA in the Game. That’s why they wont do the only ground vehicles mode
cry harder
Насколько высокой содержимости копиум нужно вдыхать чтоб высказать подобное?
Fabulous job phlyDaily keep it up!!!
i agree with what you said in the last video, Its also the maps, warthunder's russian tanks are just too good at that instant shot cqc battles, I have to say that su 25 was nutty
Thing is: Russians are actually my preferred enemy: Aside weird stuff like shots through a sprocket getting deflected by the front plate(?), their one-shot spots are basically muscle memory and their Su pilots tend to fight at melee range. A bit like Americans at 4.0-5.0, except those actually suffer.
Disclaimer: I play 10.3 mostly.
This is the inelegant of Russian players when they die half of them get into pantsier and the other half in su25 so they can cover each other and secure victory
Just got your decal, you were one of the first WT content creators I watched and got me into the game. Keep up the work.
You were meant to bring balance to top tier not destroy it! Fr tho nice vid, good to see it from the other side and see that these things really are just plain easy baby mode and my winrate isn't in the gutter solely because of a skill issue on my part (tho prolly still a large part let's be honest)
0:18 is that the OG “how the world ends” animated on MS paint video of Russia sending nukes, audio?
Love u phly glad ur back
And in the future Gaijin will be like(of course in a stereotypical russian accent) Okay, we fix, map limits will be 50 plus km extensions.
Russia is OP < Russian Bias
It legit cant be stopped if you play your cards right, I dont understand why they added the 40km ones. And NATO has mavs that cant one shot MBTs
actual brainrot zzzz
Just wait till they add kh-58 with 100 km of range
Use russian vehicals present in other tech trees
for Example I play t72m1 in german tech trees
for some reason the t72 is literally a beast tanking 7 shoots and moving fast and having good apfsds round and being beautiful itself with no downsides even it's he sometimes more powerful then mordern articlery he of 155mm cannons
Mavericks are getting fixed next update
Nice job phly daily nice job!!👍 Been a fan since the earlier days back in like 2013. Nice to see your still going bro keep up the good work brother
Gaijin believes Russian equipment is made of hope and tungsten and all other nations equipment is made of tin and thin gravy.
Its sad the only arms race russia can win is in warthunder
In WT they have targeting pods with good imaging when in reality their targeting pods are known for their awful resolution and this is verifiable unless you take info from RT
“We were listening to each other’s eardrums”. That sentence made my brain glitch out for a minute.
@@WingZeroOne are you talking about very good optics quality in ka-52 which cant tell the difference between tank and tractor? (John Deere 4830, to be exact)
This is Russians society works. In reality, their equipment is sub par, but what gets reported up to leadership is the way War Thunder models these vehicles.
Dearest McPhly, I need more video collabs between you, BennyV and Odd. I have decided that these bring me the greatest joy. The sillier the better. Thank you Sempai.
And then you have Maverics that cant do shit even when they hit the target. :D (no overpressure damage)
The G mavericks can beat anything + theyre fire n forget, tracking moving targets from 11km.I love my hungarian gripen
@@vaclavkolar6750 no man but clearly it sucks!!!!!!! (im joking)
@@vaclavkolar6750while true, that’s the exception, not the rule.
@@vaclavkolar6750 yeah and the only plane that can carry more than 2 of them is that Gripen. Also the KH-38MT is literally just a fire and forget ML but fire and forget from 20km is just not realistic. It takes way too long to get there and by the time it does the enemy is often in cover or the missile lost lock somehow. The SM3 still has 4 hardpoints on top of that where you can take 4 S-25s that all easily 1 shot tanks.
@@ILikeTuwtles the MT locks in point mode until about 13km. Although Su-25SM3 and pantsir seem to be so popular that i get ussr vs ussr matches pretty often now. But su-25s have one big flaw - slow as shit and poor maneouverability. The gripen can climb high and get above battle in no time + considering average pantsir player IQ (mostly on todler unga bunga level) its actually pretty enjoyable. And i get a lot of battles where ussr doesn't spawn a single anti air so i find gripen cas pretty enjoyable now
SOOOO TRUE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Everything you say lol😂😂😂😂😂 im so happy you are back!!!!!!! Thank you and keep up the good work!!!!!
nice job phlydaily keep it up
I’m so happy I’m getting Phly notifications again. I love you brother.
It really is daily eh?
9:13 missed opportunity for a clip from Batman the Dark Knight with the Joker saying "Here. We. Go." Otherwise another fantastic video as always xD
Nice job phlydaily great job
It's a russian game, of course everything russian is the best. I swear they have a slider. The worse they're doing in Ukraine, the more the slide the bias to russia...and never the other direction.
Good to see you back my friend, i started watching your videos when i was 15/16 yo, now im 25 and always coming back from time to time just to have a good time watching your vids, AND NOW ITS TIME TO PLAY DE GERMAN DUCK AGAIN AND BLAST SOME ..
Ty ❤️
nice job keep it up
its a russian game and too make a game in russia you have too promote russian culture or tech in this case otherwise you get cancelled by putin thats why they always give the russians ingame a clear advantage we need someone too make a warthunder like game in america or europe too have a balanced game sad but true
So sad
It moved from Russia a long, long time ago.
@@Philliben1991 just on paper the crew still live and work in russia the move too uk on paper is just for tax reasons
source: i made it up :)
@@dds7799 bot
this game really just turned into russia simulator
More like Deluded Russian Nationalist dream simulator
Russia fantasy simulator
Always has been
Don't play Top Tier, simple as.
You know it is like a guy with big car compensating something small... russians are looses so brutally their equipment on Ukraine so they must compensate it somehow.. loosers.
Killing something from 14km away.. only one SPAA with the range to even have a chance at hitting it.. coincidence it's on the same team I guess...
Phly, try playing sweeden at top tier, to be honest I think that they are more overpowered, the have the best tank in the game and also the CAS is amazing.
Debatable tie for first place, but at least the gripen has to get in range of the pantsir to lob agm65G’s. And if you do go for the 20km maverick launch, the missile is slow af and unless you shoot at a stationary pantsir (which might as well will just shoot down the maverick anyways) it’s gonna miss
Russia and Sweden are the best at top tier. But I think Sweden has better low to mid tier due to having Sabot rounds pretty early on.
@ComradePanzer russia has 1 decent 11.7 (BVM) and then every other tank in the lineup is either mid or dogshit. They just have a lot of vehicles. Sure they have the pantsir (counterable if you are a good cas player) and the sm3 (F16C is just a better plane overall) but sweden, germany, france, and oh no surely bad USA are just straight better lineups at top tier. Everyone needs to stop coping and gain a few braincells.
War Thunder, being a Rooski product, of course has Rooski fantasy weapons. Their models are utter BS. What were we expecting?
and the america tree doesnt have fantasy weapons???
@@isaiahmountford5815 no, it dosnt cease your whataboutism
The funniest thing to think about is that if gaijin wanted to make tech trees somewhat realistic and with real world performance, then russian top tier scrap would have to be like 3.0-4.0 in BR lower than NATO top tiers. They already need to give russian like 40 years newer stuff on the same BR as US and still nerf US ones so the russia can do well
@@nattly6340 lmfao the cope
@@ziepex7009 where...
Nice job Phly, keep it up!
LaserPig explained this really well in a video about the T-34. The vehicle, on paper, would be a great vehicle, should perform really well. But a great vehicle on paper becomes a shit vehicle in practice because of variables such as build quality, crew training, logistics etc. WarThunder implements vehicles solely on their schematics and stats.
to make things even worse - exactly that piece of shit in real life the T-34 has the best softstats in game - like , sharp movement, and when you stop you stop , no gun wobble no nothing. But Panzer Mark 3 and 4 or even panthers - you stop and and for ages the suspension wobbles around making you ineffective in close combat.
War Thunder is reality in exact reverse. It is blatant russian Propaganda...
Nice job PhlyDaily keep it up
It balances itself with how braindead the teams are
it just doesn't tho
No it does not
I don't think that's how that works.
Top tier WT is just kinda off putting. Ill stick to low and mid if and when I do play. Props are fun. WW2 tonks are fun. Top tier RB is basically Arcade w/ Missiles Everywhere.
no according to Russian mains Russian top tier is just fine and realistic and can easily be countered they justify the bias by saying Russian tanks have bad reverse speed, 3-man crew, bad depression or even they can be one shoted through the side lol
"can be one shoted through the side". oh i almost spat my drink out laughing at that one
@@codered372 yeah, because you can 1 shot them. its literally an aim issue on your end if you are unable to lol
@Entrailraider Any tank can be one shoted through the side to be honest.
Keep up the awesome videos Phly. Just the entertainment I need!!
I always love how well their weapons perform in this game, and yet in real life, they are the worst weapons used by the worst war fighters
having them stockpilled for 30 years in some old warehouse that is governed by corrupted officer canibalizing half of the shit and selling parts to everybody who wants to buy might have a slight impact in their effectiveness in real life. While in war thunder shit is factory new and crew that is maintaning it is aced out.
@@niestalkujmnie8022 theres more to it than that but sure
idk maybe because it's a game? All vechicles perform at 100%.
When russian army and equipment is so bad in real life you make them op in a game 😂
I dont mind it in and of itself, its the problem that number one; nobody else has anything comparable, number two; nobody has anything comparable to the Pantsir, when in combo it means that it has no counter, not even a fighter which WOULD be what NATO nations SHOULD be using to counter CAS at top tier, and not really SPAA because its just a fact that for the longest time NATO neglected SPAA defense in favor of fighter defense, the problem is the Pantsir especially when spammed pretty much creates a no fly zone because there isnt effective weapon systems on NATO side in the air to counter it (yet), this means that even if you do send up fighters to counter the Su25, the Panstirs on its team can protect it.
Hopefully the addition of Fox3s will enable Fighters to fire on Su25s well out of range of the Pantsirs protection bubble, later on I expect longer range ground attack systems to be added to NATO planes to allow them to counter the Pantsir.
If Russian equipment was as good as it is in WT, they'd have been marching through Kiev in 2022 idgaf what anybody says lmao
Next april fools:
Nato tanks max reverse speed: -5kmh
T-series reverse: -40kmh
So the abrams has faced Russian tanks in both iraq wars and obliterated them. Were those tanks very old? Or does gaijin only lean towards realism when it suits them?
Bro those Iraqi T-72s didn't even have rangefinders. How's that a fair representation of Russian tanks? Besides, do you really think it is fair to compare a modern (for its time) Abrams and a 20 y.o. T-72 (even if it wasn't circumcised like it was in Iraq)?
Hilarious as it is, a T-72 actually has at least 1 confirmed kill on a M1A1 Abrams (which was modernised to fit the M1A2 standards and was advertised as an equal to M1A2). There's a video of a T-72B3 destroying it with a tandem missile in Ukraine, so an argument could be made that a T-72 is better than an Abrams (despite the initial 20 y.o. difference)
Those tanks were really old, with outdated ammo and shitty crew. But statement about Gaijin only leaning towards realism when it suits them is completely true, not just about Russian tree, about anything they want.
@@Философ the abrams in the first Iraq war had 105mm cannons, while the t-72s had the 120s. I think? I’m really asking about how resilient Russian tanks are to any kind of damage in the game. Rangefinder or not, a 105mm cannon could easily knockout a t72.
Hell, in the current day, the DU apfsds in the Sep v2 was designed to counter Russian armor improvements. So shouldn’t the t90 be easily killed regardless of shot placement (let’s say center mass)?
@@Философ mind providing a credible source?
Russian Tank in War Thunder: HAHA STALINIUM STRONK DESTROY PUNY AMERIKAN KAPITALIST TONK!!!
Russian Tank IRL: space program
If youve noticed gaijin has quitley removed that feature for russian tanks in game. You can pop thier ammo and thier turrent never pops anymore. The copium for russian vehicles in wt is insane 😂😂
American tanks irl: metallic hotdog program
Good ol russian bias by these devs even though everyone in the world knows russian military equipment is actually shit.
Pls name at least of one aircraft in the world that has such armor as the SU 25. If this is actually shit then you have a huge number of examples. But if you give only 1 example i will personally apologize for this message.
"Wow Phly. Great moves, keep it up, proud of you."
You are my hero for saying the truth about how disgusting this game right now.
If you think about it. The same SPAA's that are in War Thunder pose no threat at all to you in DCS (if you're not too close). We have to start playing War Thunder like we are in DCS. Long range 20+km yeeting ATGM's.
I really enjoyed this one idk why but really good work dude 🔥👌🏼
It was so casual
Thank you brotha for the videos I’m so glad that your back
Really suprised those AGMs went straight through the merkavas with APS on them.
Phly since in these days you're making videos about broken stuff in the game I think you should also make a video on how terrible the 8.0 grb is since most of the tanks are non stabilized and will face 8.7/9.0
Nice job PhlyDaily, keep it up! :)
Nice Phly, JobDaily!
Phly you should bring out the B-25 in GRB, i did it for the first time yesterday and even with the stock bombs it was super fun
i'm so glad that the constant subtitles are gone... i realy loved your stuff until your "break", and am quiet happy that your back 💓 but i couldn't watch your newer video's because of the subtitles, again happy your back and happy that the subtitles are gone for gameplay, keep up the good work and i loke forward to watching your stuff again, pls let me know if your ready for lineup suggestions, i might have a few fun ones and or hard once.
Thumbnails have been killer!
Hey bro I was wondering if you could make a video on how to use the guided missiles like you did from the computer. My issue is that when I lock on target and half the time it won’t launch and idk if I can switch off target. I use a10a early
Nice job, PhlyDaily, keep it up!
Nice job Phlydaily keep it up
I think we should be able to spawn fighters with no bombs a bit easier to make up for lack of aa vehicles. This is just gonna be a tough situation to iron out. The US and a lot of other NATO countries simply do not use mobile Sam like the Russians. It’s a doctrine thing. The US especially relies HEAVILY on dominating the airspace with aircraft and not shoot down methods. Russia is the opposite. The counterparts just don’t exist. We just literally have more planes to put in the air. We have plenty of CRAM and Patriot sites but those are not vehicles.
Nice job Phlydaily keep it up! In a world of pure imagination 🎵
Nice to get some more Phly content!
Nice job PhlyDaily, keep it up.
My nephew was watching me play and he said man your good you've been watching phly daily huh I was flattered to say the least
"Nice job PhlyDaily, keep it up!"
“Nice job Phlydaily, keep it up”
Nice job PhyDailey, keep it up
my m1a2 sep v2 has a 46% winrate & my t90ms has a 76% winrate. Both with nearly the same battles & kills on them. Russian bias exist, america suffers
Phly: "Great video - keep it up!"
In my opinion, at top tier Russia has better CAS but Germany has better tanks. KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK PHLY!!!!
Nice jon Phly Daily, keep it up
Nice job phlydaily, keep it up!
What was phly singin at 7:00 kinda made me feel nostalgic
You know its a good day when phlydaily starts posting again
The fact that USA has no actual top tier SPAA yet is absolutely hilarious