@@TheRomanTribune yea agreed. The only good thing they ever did was fix MCC for the most part online and H5 multiplayer was pretty good if you’re able to accept it is not a “true halo experience.” I really miss the Halo 5 pistol, better than any multiplayer iteration of the Halo pistol in recent memory
@@Ron.Swanson. no. Don't care who likes it or not. Halo 5 was absolute trash and the numbers don't lie to prove it. Best thing 343 did was what you said about MCC, and allow another studio to make HW2. That's it..
@@TheRomanTribune Halo 5 had good multiplayer and as someone who builds in forge a lot… great tools in Forge. They truly innovated that from an objective standard. Much better than Bungie’s forge in terms of work flow. So they did some things right but that doesn’t erase all their wrong doings, I get it
@@tylerellis9097 Uuuh.. that's not true at all. The AI for Elites in Halo 3 were dumbed down significantly since they're allies and you never fight them. They're about as dumb as the Marine AI in Halo 3.
@@nagger8216 That’s objectively false you can look at their ai with the same tools used by Bungie to make them. They have the exact same ai as Halo 2s. Halo 3s marines weren’t dumbed down either the heck, unlike Elites there ai is flatout better than Halo 2s, not sitting there staring at grenades and attacking in unison due to new ai flags. You’re confusing ai with halo 2s insane enemy globals that allies also pulled from so they shot insanely fast and accurate but were not smart.
Imagine if this came out in 2002, people would have flipped their shit lol
Agreed!
Imagine if this came out in 2011...
343i might actually be trusted
@@TheRomanTribune yea agreed. The only good thing they ever did was fix MCC for the most part online and H5 multiplayer was pretty good if you’re able to accept it is not a “true halo experience.” I really miss the Halo 5 pistol, better than any multiplayer iteration of the Halo pistol in recent memory
@@Ron.Swanson. no. Don't care who likes it or not. Halo 5 was absolute trash and the numbers don't lie to prove it. Best thing 343 did was what you said about MCC, and allow another studio to make HW2. That's it..
@@TheRomanTribune Halo 5 had good multiplayer and as someone who builds in forge a lot… great tools in Forge. They truly innovated that from an objective standard. Much better than Bungie’s forge in terms of work flow. So they did some things right but that doesn’t erase all their wrong doings, I get it
a single woman made something much better than a whole industry. proof 343 is dogshit. this mod is amazing
Not to mention the official Halo: Combat Evolved "remaster" costed at least $1 million to make.
Tmw a woman made a better Anniversary version than 343 themselves.
Yeah making Halo 3 elites as enemies is a mistake though, not fun to fight against.
Cringe take because in truth it just means you’re saying H2 Elites are not fun to fight since they use the same ai and stats…which is true
@@tylerellis9097 Uuuh.. that's not true at all. The AI for Elites in Halo 3 were dumbed down significantly since they're allies and you never fight them. They're about as dumb as the Marine AI in Halo 3.
@@nagger8216 That’s objectively false you can look at their ai with the same tools used by Bungie to make them. They have the exact same ai as Halo 2s. Halo 3s marines weren’t dumbed down either the heck, unlike Elites there ai is flatout better than Halo 2s, not sitting there staring at grenades and attacking in unison due to new ai flags.
You’re confusing ai with halo 2s insane enemy globals that allies also pulled from so they shot insanely fast and accurate but were not smart.
@@tylerellis9097 uh no he's right
@@TheRomanTribune Objectively wrong
This guy only play in easy mod zzzz
At least he plays and is not watching someone else playing xD
As someone who played this mod, is actually really hard in difficulties like normal