@@76133rconner the guy has his own channel (OKC Vet HPA) and made an update called "UPDATE!!!! Blanchard Police Dep"rtment!!!!" He didn't lose the lawsuit, it got rejected. They claimed there was not enough evidence.
They're just asking to get a kick out of how you react. If the police want to search your vehicle they'll just do so, they won't ask you. Same thing with asking you to exit the vehicle (NEVER do so because you are now totally vulnerable to them, the frame of the vehicle protects you from them.) They will simply remove you by force.
@@danan9061 That's what I was getting at, if they really want you out you're out but don't voluntarily make yourself vulnerable to them just because they told you to. If they mean it they'll smash their way in and rip you out anyway. Probable cause or not they don't give a fuck so why should you--they can just make it up on the spot anyway.
That a cop openly says he's willing to follow someone around just to get them for SOMETHING just to prove himself right, is next level pettiness. Welcome to Jerkwater, USA.
That should be illegal, stating that he is going to find a crime before it happens with no probable cause. It is stated stalking behavior while using official authority and resources.
What is not overlooked is the editor building up to a conclusion then moving on to the next clip lol what was the point in showing us the court video if not all lol
@@chillbro1010 In the video, the Officer says "you don't mind confirming what you said is true by allowing us to take a look", which isn't him saying 'just so you know, I can search it'. He asks for consent, is denied consent, and moves along with business while maintaining courtesy & professionalism. That officer didn't even ticket the dude. Yet, even with him doing nothing wrong, he gets put on a 'corrupt cops' compilation.
@@ddthedoorman The trick is the part where he says "You don't mind." If you say No, he can infer you meant "No I don't mind confirming, you may search my car." The only correct answer is "I do not consent to a search" or other such variations. That is the trick. Many people slip on "You don't mind" because it flips the meaning of Yes/No when answering a question/request.
@@nick4paokaraCop was searching for any reason to get into a car lmao. Routine traffic stop and his immediate go-to is to try and gain access to search the vehicle. Screw that piggy
@@chillbro1010 An asshole cop and a corrupt cop aren't the same thing. We only pay them to do two things, be assholes and follow the law. Sometimes they have trouble with the second part.
@@Farthernort i think she just knew the law well enough and knew it would be better to be put in a mental health institution rather than a prison. because if she isnt actually mentally ill as soon as she enters the mental health institution she can start to show 'progress' in her state of mind and get out earlier than prison and with no criminal charges so she saved herself.
So the officer openly admitted to an attorney, on camera, that he is willing to “stalk” (which is a felony) a law abiding citizen for as long as it takes, in the hopes of catching him in some kind of law violation??? 😮
...and all of that is legal. The courts have ruled it does not matter, as long as a traffic violation occurs, the motivation does not matter. I don't 100% agree and I think motivation should be a factor when following someone...but the motivation itself does not cause the violation to occur.
@redeastwood4850 ...because it doesn't fit the legal definition. It's really not that difficult to understand. I even explained the situation and why it's legal.
@@SB-cm9jh if he makes up an invalid reason to stop him, it's conspiring. Which is usually how retaliatory stops work. Your taillight is out. Oh now it's working but it wasn't when I pulled you over is an example. Although that one is not used as much now because of dashcams proving otherwise.
I don't know why people are excited about the first guy exercising his rights and refusing to comply but people are jumping on the lady at the end. Yes she has a shrill voice and my first feeling was to cringe but when I watched what happened it doesn't make any sense and it's a huge overreach by the police. The lawsuit is warranted. She's a lawyer. So if she was sent there by that minor's father then she likely has a right to be there and they cannot arrest her because she's speaking and they don't like it. He also didn't resist arrest because they weren't in the process of arresting her. She did not commit a crime so they were not in the process of an arrest. The first guy could have just shown his ID or could have just said why he was there and it would have been no big deal. But people stand behind him (rightly so) Because he knew he didn't have to. Yes he did make it more difficult for the police but he was well within his rights to do so and they were outside of the law with what they were trying to exercise as they tried to escalate things with her. This woman actually behaves in a less extreme manner than that man. The stakes are higher for her to be there and she isn't refusing to give information. Yet they jump to immediately wrestling her to the ground and arresting her. I don't know if it's just because she's a middle-aged lady or what but it's really interesting how people respond so differently to those two video clips
I honestly believe it is because of EGO mixed with too much coffee/redbull or something similar; refuse to think that they are that silly and uneducated
You're right it should be easy to know the more complex laws that are around if you study them. But as officers, they should understand the basics like when they can get someone's identification. I guess it can be confusing with so many states having different laws in America but still, basics are basics.
I've had a cop tell me it wasn't up to them to determine whether I had any rights violated or the law for that matter, when there was no reason to arrest me other than they didn't like my attitude. That was my lawyers job. His job was to just toss me in jail.
im pretty sure theyre all violating our rights constantly but their strategy is to let it go to court as its just a numbers game to them and most people will take a plea deal. its literally how cops and court works.. maybe they didnt read you your miranda rights so technically your confession is not allowed at trial but whos going to know how to get that evidence dismissed and also the court has no intention on taking your case to trial.. thats not how all of this really works.. they got us all thinking it works a certain way but thats just a strategy they use to get to the truth to trick you into confessing and making their case against you as strong as possible and it can be very difficult for someone to maintain themself throughout this whole process even if their case against you is very weak they will act like they got you even with very bad evidence.. and if you hire a lawyer theyre just going to take you for a ride and get you that plea deal.. theres a lot of truth to what the free men on the land say but it takes nerves of steel and strong wits to actual pull that off and maybe years of experience trying things and learning things and luck and intuition as well as actual honor and the ability to know how to make things look and utilize the theater of the mind to your advantage if you have to.. and im honestly not entirely sure if cops and prosecutors really just dont know what the law is or what theyre doing simply because day in day out they just run everyone through this bs plea process and have made it easy on themselves to try and end cases quickly or if playing dumb and doing things wrong is their strategy in court because its the burden of the defense to catch them on their trial mistakes which can be very difficult to do in the moment which is where it actually takes a highly skilled attorney to beat another attorney and is the source of their pride n the court room. it isnt as simple as relying on your rights to stand on their own believing they will magically come to your aid like guardian angels. if you dont know how to cite every one of your rights in court at the exact time they are being violated you are considered to have waived them.. and thats why court is difficult. you have to know what all of your rights are and all of the trial procedures and rules of evidence and all that and you have to be able to call out the prosecutor every time he breaks one of these ules in a timely manner otherwise your rights are waived.. and you waived them by not saying anything in the moment.. and that right there is what makes court pretty messed up in my opinion.. who would know any of this stuff let alone all of it and have the ability to actually defend all of their rights properly which is why so many people have their rights trampled on every day..
I will never forget what an old man told a bunch of us teens 50 years ago- he said if any of us was too lazy or stupid to hold down a job we could always get a job as a cop
Well hell then both of y’all should be employed tomorrow then and then maybe both of u could find other living arrangements than still living in your mommies basement huh.? See we knew y’all were smart. 😂😂
You must be one of those people who bad mouth cops like your tough but run crying to them when you get looked at wrong. That is, when mommy is not around. Fool
Cocky policeman: "Well, we have a right to demand that you identify yourself when we're investigating a possible crime." Smart lawyer: "What 'possible' crime?" Cocky policeman: "Well, it hasn't occurred yet as far as we know."
@@pneulancer naa. that would get you in trouble for "defamation". Since this is usa (almost nowhere else cops have such power and power-trips) the only counter question would be "So you are going aganist the law? you just judged me guilty without proof and we are all innocents until proven guilty". Put it on camera and they prolly have tp transfer the guy (cuz cops in usa today get fired and tomorrow are hired at the next town)
"This district attorney was calmly sitting in his truck, waiting to inspect someone's roof". Jesus, you know the economy is bad when a DA has to have a side hustle.
"You want to avoid going to jail for a roof safety violation? Hire your local district attorney today, he will check every single slat on that roof to make sure it's in compliance!"
*The fact that cop called a lawyer and needed to have probable cause explained to him by a lawyer is about as scary as it gets. We can’t allow people this stupid to become law enforcement officers. It’s a disaster waiting to happen 🤦🏼♂️*
@@gregdowd939 definitely, we can see it for ourselves, literally 😅 I TH-cam is teeming with those exact kinds of moments and the sad thing is cities are getting bankrupted by stuff like that.
It's sad how far the standard has fallen. My late grandfather was an RCMP in bc and when he'd go to a small town they were the post office police station and jail. My mom tells me stories about hearing the town drunks in the cells. Now a days just cops not royal not mounted.
@@jimdevlin4949 RCMP are some of the most corrupt assholes even more so than regular Canadian cops lol they have their own wikipedia page for how much bad shit they've done over the decades en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_controversies_involving_the_Royal_Canadian_Mounted_Police
..while asking questions and starts screaming at you when you dont answer. never forget the cop who stoped someone on a weekend asked him where is he heading, he told he is driving to work and the cop instantly called him a liar because nobody works on a weekend (wtf dude?) and the guy just responded so youre offduty right? and the cop gets real pissed because he is somehow a smartass, yeah from the perspective from a retard this ackknowlegement of the clear illogical statement must come from a genius.
@@lt4753 enough time to have read on the screen that the cop is citing their right to conduct any of this during a traffic violation stop, not an idling suspicious car.
That police chief coming down to “tell you what’s going on” needs to be fired and added to the Brady List. He is eminently unqualified to lead a Baskin Robbins.
Police chief reminded me of Jackie Gleason as Sheriff Buford T Justice in the Smokey and the Bandit movie. th-cam.com/video/ciUV77AzIB4/w-d-xo.html Best of Buford T. Justice - Smokey and the Bandit
@@BroomeBlocker4Seems like the police need much longer and better training before being allowed in that position then. If you are unable to do your job properly, especially such an important one that has the ability of controlling the lives and well-being of others, then you should never be given the opportunity to do so.
The investigator that dealt with Beatrice is a great guy. He actually had compassion when she was talking him stuff that a lot of folk wouldn't have had compassion for. I really hope she got the help she needed before she hurt herself or someone else. 🙏
It actually broke my heart to listen to her talk so calmly about wanting to take her own life and others. Much respect to people who work with individuals like this for a living
She's trying to plead insanity so that she doesn't have a hard enough charge or prison time he's being nice because he has to regardless if she is actually insane
@@watersnortmoment3734 Wouldn't fucking matter. The law is such that they can find whatever they want to waste your time & humiliate you with. Even if you end up driving away, you're still sitting there for no reason, wasting resources & time at their discretion. Municipalities in most states also have the right to investigate THEMSELVES & unless you have the money to hire a private law firm, the law (meaning the municipality that seeks to incriminate or wrongfully detain or arrest you) has the upper hand.
It's not that insane if you think about it. She was self aware enough to realize she has a serious mental illness and wanted to get herself locked up to prevent her from harming anyone she loved. I mean, she was already hearing voices telling her to drown her young niece. If it was you, wouldn't you want to get locked up too before you ended up murdering your whole family? If all insane people were actually this sane we'd live in a better world.
@@eancola6111 Uhm...I believe I said it wasn't that insane. In fact, my comment was making a case in favor of her being sane enough to seek help. How you read that as me saying she's insane I don't know.
takes over 2 years to become a lisenced barber, but only 6 months to become an armed cop in the US. that says WAY more about everything then it should, and that alone is concerning af.
@@4renchopesort of correct, it can take a few months to get the most bare bones education to be a barber. If you want to practice hair colouring, women’s hair, all that extra stuff, it takes extra time
“I’ll follow him out of town until I get one.” This is the problem with police today. You make an unlawful request of someone, then say they’re obstructing because they tell you to get lost? Then often it escalates to where a victim of this harassment gets annoyed, then they say it’s “assaulting a police officer”. Very convenient.
But then no one would get arrested at all, including actual offenders. I suggest an alternative structure of counting litigious suits against specific officers based on outcomes reducing pension contributions as a multiplier to that specific officer.
@@velvetine74Sounds good theoretically. But it still wouldn't solve the OC's concern of tax payers money being wasted on bad cops. You can't really deduct a lawsuit money from the involved cop's pension fund in all cases. Sometimes the lawsuit could be in thousand. Sometimes it could be in the 100Ks and even millions. End of the day, tax payers are holding the bag.
@@velvetine74 There’s zero evidence cops would stop making arrests Lol. That’s insane hyperbole. Cops had similar complaints about body cams and what happened? Absolutely nothing. Unless, you count officers having to adjust to the increased transparency and higher level of accountability. The incompetent cops will either be culled or not even enter that line of work.
@@abhishekn7200 The issue is Unions, and the thin Blue Line. Not these hypothetical scenarios apologists like you make up. Even in places as progressive as California, policing is the worst and any legislation to reform it is near impossible to pass At least educate yourself, and understand the situation fully, before inserting your uneducated opinions.
There's need to be a type of system at hand to cops to be notified about the law.... statue code etc... something that's quick. What can that thing be ? It can't be google.... it has to be something created specifically for cops thats only for cops but absolute. Cops can't know all the laws and codes. Cops are really more like lap dogs. Like when a warrant is out for someone they'll look for you like their life depends on it.
After my own run in with a dirty state trooper, I bought a dash cam that records inside and out. Not only to catch dirty bish state troopers, but to show my behaviors pre-pull over. Sad. I recently lost a stellar relative who was an amazing member of law enforcement. He even fought the dirty cops in his division. RIP Uncle Phil. So many will miss you!
"First thing first, rest in peace to Uncle Phil, for real. You're the only father that I ever knew, I get my bitch pregnant I'ma be a better you. prophecies that I made way back in the Ville, for phil." - J. Cole, "No Role Modelz"
i think the worst thing that can happen to you as a cop is arresting a lawyer and them letting you do it without any resistance cause you already know theyre cooking up a case
@@chancecooper4006 Ya know, I get it, I really do. There's kids of this era and their hip "newspeak" have an overbearing urge and a near incessant yearning for the word "cook" for some reason and it gets old really quick. Yes it's overused, yes it's cringe, and yes it's rather abusive to the English language in my opinion. *However,* I do not believe this one of those instances. Lend some grace. Given the context of the comment, it's enough for me to not put OP and his comment in that category. Give me a break, cut the crap.
@@LFSPharaoh Who TF are you talking about "kids" usage of "cooking". Cooking something NON-Kitchen/Food related goes back to the 17th Century, And has been widely used as a modern phrase for many decades. At a minimum Baby Boomers who are in their 70s and 80s were using the phrase when they were in their 20s. So you calling anyone a "kid" using that term must make you what 95 or 115 years old or something?
If they knew all the laws, they'd go be lawyers. More money and it's safer. They should understand the basic laws that are commonly used on their job though, completely agree.
Though you are correct about him definitely not being a lawyer, I thought that he was a private detective? I could be wrong but I think the insurance adjuster thing was said as an example of who he could be and why he could be sitting there. This is an older video and I watched its entirety many time. It is either PI or IA though. Definitely not lawyer.
The insurance adjuster isn't a "district attorney" but I guess Chinese AI content doesn't really care about accuracy. They won't even hire a narrator and always use this same text to speech, so I guess we can't expect any quality from them.
I watched the OG video and he was an insurance adjuster. Its ridiculously annoying to know they aren't providing accurate information on most of their videos..
does it really matter who knows the law and who doesnt if the people with the badges and guns will lay you out flat just because they really really want to?
What's bugging me is in most cases, even if you know the law better than the arresting cop, you're forced to spend one or more nights in jail before you appear in court to state your case. So, even if you ultimately win, you can potentially loose your job or your reputation because you were arrested. Not to mention mental exhaustion due to thinking over what you're going through, which can lead to a downward spiral.
this!!! plus, if they do something like resist arrest, that charge can still be upheld and they can be convicted of it even if the arrest is later found to be unlawful. both sides need to grow the fuck up and stop arguing about stuff. it wastes so much time. imagine the number of people who could potentially lose their lives because cops are too busy arguing with a lawyer on private property about whether he is required to identify himself or not
If you have nothing to hide then you would have no problem with a search. A cop is trying to do his job. Guy probably had lots of opened alcohol in his car.
@@rayromano6249 Except it is very easy for cops to slip in some illegal stuff in your vehicle and arrest you for it, in the guise of a search. Don't be naive.
Kop's just doingg his job. The 'Lawyer' / Ladder Guy prolonged this into a Pissin' Match which caused him to be hand-cuffed. THIs tells yoiiu vilumes about why this 'Lawyer' is doing Roof Inspections at $15/hr.
Second Story work? Not everyone keeps the windows on the second floor locked, and you can't always count on security firms to install Sensors up there.
As a healthcare provider, I was impressed with the way that the detective dealt with the woman who had tried to mow down pedestrians. She was clearly psychotic, but he was gentle and caring. Of course, one of the tricks that the cops use is to trick you into believing that they are on your side and just trying to help you. But, this detective figured out pretty quickly that this woman was in a dangerous mental state and needed help to prevent her from harming herself or others.
The FL Vs. Bijoux case is super sad. Other than being one fine piece of ass, She was quite successful. VERY Successful for being so young. Had her own firm specializing in Personal Injury (of all things!). Pretty horrifying to think that the human brain can basically just "flip a switch" & absolutely destroy your life. Whether it's in Seconds, Months or Years; You're just along for the ride. Wild stuff. She was found Not Guilty (But surely liable) Due to Insanity. Just because she isn't going to prison doesn't mean she won't be locked away for quite some time - Perhaps somewhere worse.
Saying she will kill the detective and as many people as she can is her cry for help in her own way. She knows what she's doing, she's trying to exercise some control in the limited way she can.
This is off topic from the OP, but the female attorney who had been recently diagnosed with schizophrenia, shouldn't be included in this video. I think it's bordering on being unethical. She's obviously having a mental health crisis.
@@B_Bodziak I think that it is a good thing he included her, since this is the first time I saw and listened to someone with such mental issues, and that will help me identify them in the future. Mental illness should be studied and I want to get myself informed about mental illnesses without paying 400k for a college course.
@@coaiemandushman1079 she hadn't been charged at the time of the video. I think it's in poor taste. She was claiming to have killed people, but there was later no evidence of it. She's clearly having an episode. I understand where you're coming from, too, but I don't think it's appropriate. That said/full disclosure, it's possible that I feel this way because I am a retired atty.
Those OK cops including the CHIEF were such an embarassment - they don't know the law, acted as tyrants, rude, intimidation, making up crimes, retaliation. They need immediate federal oversight. I'm so glad for body cameras.
@@nash2609doubt the cop was fired, the chief of my local town was found guilty of racial discrimination in a civil trial and still has his job, they get away with it all
Weird thing is he didn’t seem like he forgot the camera. As the citizen pulled up his phone they said ”no reason to film me, we all got cameras” I wonder what’s worse - cops that hide their petty shit or those who are unaware it’s even wrong
Legend has it that the unconventional "Let them step on their own dick" strategy has occasionally been used utilized effectively when interrogating a certain breed of psychopath.
#2 is beyond insane that such a thing is allowed to even occur with the chief even exasperating it. Scary what kind of people hold a badge. There needs to be top down review of all these incidents.
First off, I'm not defending the officers considering how the whole thing went down. However, all the dude had to do was show them his fucking ID or do anything else to prove he's there for nothing suspicious. Couldn't have been difficult, he could have easily done that. The entire shit show could have been easily avoided but he just had to go with "I HAVE MY RIGHTS" route. Then again what the fuck do I know.
@@mekz22 haven't gotten far into the second clip but went down to the comments to see if anyone was talking about it. Dude just parked and sat in the weirdest spot possible to wait for what he had to do, and when questioned about it decided it was his time to be a dick unnecessarily. Some people need to realize that sometimes it's much better to realize the situation you're in, what it looks like to others, and then just be a decent human being and talk it out. While he fully has the right to act the way he did, he just made his situation look worse by dodging everything asked.
that second encounter was painful. true sign that you live in a police state when they think they can come up to anyone and start making demands that are clearly unreasonable. just sitting in your vehicle is NOT suspicious.
As much as I dispise how the police acted there, calling this "police state behavior" is incredibly incorrect. They spent a lot of time trying to get the lawyer to cooperate, spent time double checking the laws, called the police chief himself out to discuss the issue, and eventually let the lawyer go. None of this is me saying that their behavior isn't unacceptably awful, but an actual police state wouldn't have bothered with any of this. They would have just dragged him out of the truck and beat him into the squad car. Hell, these officers would have been shot for wasting the state's time if they did half these things. Let's just call these guys what they are: Pieces of $#!?
@AlphaOmega1237 the lawyer didn't need to dude that's the point. He wasn't doing anything and mind you even though they double checked they still ignored what the lawyer said and continued to harass the lawyer in the truck
@@AlphaOmega1237 police state: a state whose government institutions exercise an extreme level of control over civil society and liberties. just because they didn't drag him out of his truck and beat him to a pulp doesn't mean their actions weren't inline with police state actions. most police are government run, so when they blatantly violate your rights and insist and persist in doing it to the point where they threaten arrest THAT is police state action. are they pieces of sh!t? absolutely yes. are they acting like a police state? absolutely yes.
@@aimalkhan5028 How many times did I say, "These officers were out of line/horrible/acting unacceptably..." ? Actually read what I said, you moron. T_T And yes, I'm calling you a moron because I went out of my way multiple times to explicitly state that the officers were in the wrong. It's more than a little annoying that you're acting like I didn't do that.
@@aimalkhan5028 They were doing their job, answering a call about a suspicious car. Of course they are going to be persistent if the guy acts like a petty child. The lawyer knew why they were here and still chose to be a smartass and waste everyones time.
@@josku5to protect your rights that you’re too stupid to understand. The fact that police are accustomed to violating the constitutional rights of citizens is a problem that every American has the duty to defend against.
@@josku5I can't speak for the bloke and I've never had any negative interaction with cops but I have with Dr's, nurses and mental health workers and the thing is when you have your own rights violated enough times (Iwon't explain theres been so many) I'm mainly talking about my human rights violated and seen other peoples too It can put you in a mindset of it doesn't matter how easy it would of been to just say his name and d.o.b or given his ID etc, you know you don't have to and that's that. Another thing that rockets me crazy (I'm already crazy so rocket is better than just saying drives 😂😂). Is the Dr's and nurses favourite game of "oh well I've just started my shift so I don't know or I've just finished my shift but I've handed everything over (meaning told the new shift what's going on). Or being told to just lay down and try stay calm when I'm having a panic attack ooooo this one is the worst when they say why are you panicking and I explain that I KNOW I'm safe and I KNOW that no-one is trying to KILL me but try telling my BROKEN adrenaline and cortisol buttons in my brain! Wow what a rant 😂😂
Yet her and her activist type firmly believe they are the voice of reason and refuse to ever listen. That's the part that always leads to the violence. It's not the right that generally incites violence, it's most always the very concerned very emotional and overly talkative left.
OMG!! That last one with the blonde attorney made me smile big time! I would of probably arrested her also. Shw thought She had so much privilege!!! 😂😂
Yes. And they are the average, not the egregious exception. Showed in real time what fake heroes, what bad apples, look like. To the literal man. And when the big chief pig showed himself, well he displayed a total lack of honor from word one to end word. A bit hilarious that they ganged up on one of their own and didn't know it. Now the d.a. knows, personally and directly, what it looks like to be on the other side of evil posing itself as the good; if he didn't know it before.
All municipal law enforcement agencies have attorneys on call. Usually it’s an assistant district attorney, but in certain situations they will speak to the actual DA. However, it seems to be a waste of time based on how frequently they ignore whatever the ADA says if it hurts their ego.
Being from the EU, I never understood why people don't just comply with police. But after seeing so many bad officers being so unprofessional, I totally get it. Escalating completely calm situations..
The US has a long history of distrust of the government and anyone in authority. There are good law enforcement officers and there are bad and how each of them behaves when you stand up for your rights is considered a litmus test to tell them apart in the US.
Yeah, a good amount of the people who get hired onto the police force here in the U.S. are nutjobs with control issues. Most are raging alcoholic's as well.
@@Metylanerwhat a horrible take. 95% of the situations could be resolved by the police actually doing their job correctly and respecting the law they are paid tax dollars to “enforce”. Even after being told directly by a lawyer this one officer chose to call himself that the man does not have any legal obligation to ID himself as no crime has been committed, his peanut brain cannot comprehend that he’s wrong and won’t let it go because of his power trip ego. The worst part is who pays all of the lawsuits when the cops overstep? They wonder why there is so much distrust and lack of respect for the police today and this is a perfect example. Trying to hold people to the law while 1. Not knowing it at all 2. When corrected just ignoring it anyway.
why do people hate on the cops there, he was just trying to make sure that the suspect was not committing a crime, and the suspect was being an arrogant piece of shit to them, "i DoNt HaVe To GiVe YoU mY nAmE" like stfu, just say you are doing a job for someone and get on with it and stop wasting people's time. im from australia so idk if my views on cops are different because i atually live in a good country non run my commie joe biden, or if you guys actually are so low life that you have to "use my amendments" to just annoy the cops. absolute tomfoolery...
@@jaredf6205 AND be willing to go sit in jail for 24-48 hours. Not many are willing to do that over showing their license. How many times have you done it Jared?
The things I've seen. They lie. A lot. They boldly lie on police reports. They choose what they want to put on those reports, too. They have goals like "arresting every teenage boy in this neighborhood." (The cops don't even live in that city, they just work there.) I assure you they wrote & did whatever they wanted before cameras.
#2 is nuts. It’s one thing to get paid and do nothing, it’s another to get paid and justify your job by harassing people because they bruised your ego.
There's nothing scarier than thinking you're not in control of your own mind. Your mind will put you in a pine box if you let it. It's not your friend.
I’ve read about the case before. I think it was proven that she tried to play the mentally ill card to get a slighter sentence for the agrivated assault charges
@@greigallan5845 there is nothing scarier than people which believes when someone tells them they hear voices, you are one of the problems, not solutions
@@fbksakskier Welcome to the Internet. You must be new here. Just so you know, the person who complains about other people's grammar in comments sections always looks dumber than the people who made the spelling error or whatever it is the other person is complaining about. Especially if they seem to do it because they can't argue against the substance of the person's comment.
In the 2nd vid, the pickup driver is a contractor hired to inspect for a job at that house. Refuses to ID. Cop calls DA who tells him he has no legal reason to get ID. Cops Sargent insists anyway. Guy got a nice lawsuit settlement for false arrest.
Geeze that Chief makes me so irate every time I watch this video. What a smug, right violating, tyrant. No wonder why so many cops think they have the absolute right to demand ID at any time. They are being taught that its ok. You would think with all the 1st Amend auditors and cop watcher videos out there that they would KWTF is up by now. Stupid!
@@rsktransport There was a case where a cop approached a blind man under the pretense that his collapsible cane, which was in his back pocket, was a pearl-handled pistol (I kid you not). The man refused to ID. The cop called her sergeant who, out of sheer frustration (ego), had the man arrested.
@@rsktransport My husband and I are just as baffled by how LEO’s aren’t understanding that Citizens are becoming more educated about the laws that apply to us. How can’t they NOT have figured that out yet?!? WTF?!?
@@readytogo6569 Cause it comes from the top. Good chiefs, then good cops and visa versa. I actually had a police officer hunt at my ranch. He didnt know I love 1st amendment videos and began to tell me how people video record the public/police/gov and how it is perfectly legal but they are trying to get a reaction so they can sue. He then followed this by telling how much phone they have reacting to these people and violating their rights. I responded by restating what he told me in a snarky way. " So, you know they arent breaking the law and looking for cops to act badly, yet you do exactly that and open the tax payer up to lawsuits? Nice? Hope he contemplated that.
The fact that he arrested him after a LAWYER told him he didn't even have the right to hold him is insane. He has great standing for a lawsuit.
That is something they shouldn't just lose their job for, but go to prison. It's gross, knowingly illegal, misuse of power.
How about it the good ole boy police chief !!
@@thefalloutlordzero proof of that lie
@@76133rconner the guy has his own channel (OKC Vet HPA) and made an update called "UPDATE!!!! Blanchard Police Dep"rtment!!!!"
He didn't lose the lawsuit, it got rejected. They claimed there was not enough evidence.
@@mz2728death penalty
"Can I search your car?"
"No."
"Damn this guy's good."
😂
This is the best comment on here! I actually pictured that and it's hilarious.
They're just asking to get a kick out of how you react. If the police want to search your vehicle they'll just do so, they won't ask you. Same thing with asking you to exit the vehicle (NEVER do so because you are now totally vulnerable to them, the frame of the vehicle protects you from them.) They will simply remove you by force.
@@devilsoffspring5519no if you are asked to leave the vehicle you have to. They will break your window and drag you out otherwise.
@@danan9061 That's what I was getting at, if they really want you out you're out but don't voluntarily make yourself vulnerable to them just because they told you to. If they mean it they'll smash their way in and rip you out anyway. Probable cause or not they don't give a fuck so why should you--they can just make it up on the spot anyway.
That a cop openly says he's willing to follow someone around just to get them for SOMETHING just to prove himself right, is next level pettiness.
Welcome to Jerkwater, USA.
Seems like that should be illegal.
That's because it is@@The_Kirk_Lazarus
How that isn’t a statement that could get a police officer fired is insane. It quite literally shows corruption
FTP. It’s us vs them.
No, that officer is the JERK, not the entirety of the US. Keep him accountable, not the rest of the nation.
Detective: "You have the right to remain silent"
Suspect: * stays silent *
Detective: 😠
literally 😂
I laughed out loud.
"i'll follow him out of town until i get one" made me feel absolutely sick. What a disturbing comment from a power tripping officer
Yup an absolute tyrant
@@jackgraham6654That's why police departments started illegally modifying their body cameras to be shut off by the officers.
Hope they dont have vasiline in prison for him
Yeah man. That comment specifically pissed me off because it's what they actually do.
That should be illegal, stating that he is going to find a crime before it happens with no probable cause. It is stated stalking behavior while using official authority and resources.
The defense lawyer slowing down the question is an overlooked gem in this compilation 😂
Treat stupid people like they’re stupid😂
ONG, bro was surely getting on the prosecutor's nerves
What is not overlooked is the editor building up to a conclusion then moving on to the next clip lol what was the point in showing us the court video if not all lol
I don't think "overlooked" means what you and everyone else who liked your comment thinks it means 😂
Punk po-lice
The compassion the cop had for her. He understood she needed help
Bro you can't start a 200iq vs corrupt cops compilation with,
"Can I search your car?"
"No thanks."
"Understandable, have a nice day."
@@chillbro1010 In the video, the Officer says "you don't mind confirming what you said is true by allowing us to take a look", which isn't him saying 'just so you know, I can search it'.
He asks for consent, is denied consent, and moves along with business while maintaining courtesy & professionalism. That officer didn't even ticket the dude. Yet, even with him doing nothing wrong, he gets put on a 'corrupt cops' compilation.
@@ddthedoorman The trick is the part where he says "You don't mind." If you say No, he can infer you meant "No I don't mind confirming, you may search my car." The only correct answer is "I do not consent to a search" or other such variations. That is the trick. Many people slip on "You don't mind" because it flips the meaning of Yes/No when answering a question/request.
Yeah and also that dude was driving around with a busted up rear end for a year lol. Get your shit fixed man then you wont get pulled over
@@nick4paokaraCop was searching for any reason to get into a car lmao. Routine traffic stop and his immediate go-to is to try and gain access to search the vehicle. Screw that piggy
@@chillbro1010 An asshole cop and a corrupt cop aren't the same thing. We only pay them to do two things, be assholes and follow the law. Sometimes they have trouble with the second part.
"the detective manages to calm her down by offering to charge her with an attempted murder" is the most hilarious sentence I've heard in a while.
I'm still at a loss why that one was included in any "High IQ" compilation.....
@@MalachiHealey Same?! like what the fuck? she didn't outsmart the cops, she was an actually psycho
@@Farthernort Has diversity, equity, and inclusion gone too far?
@@Farthernort i think she just knew the law well enough and knew it would be better to be put in a mental health institution rather than a prison. because if she isnt actually mentally ill as soon as she enters the mental health institution she can start to show 'progress' in her state of mind and get out earlier than prison and with no criminal charges so she saved herself.
I read this before I saw it and thought he was going to say it sarcastically
So the officer openly admitted to an attorney, on camera, that he is willing to “stalk” (which is a felony) a law abiding citizen for as long as it takes, in the hopes of catching him in some kind of law violation??? 😮
And still has his job?
That is the worst part.
...and all of that is legal. The courts have ruled it does not matter, as long as a traffic violation occurs, the motivation does not matter.
I don't 100% agree and I think motivation should be a factor when following someone...but the motivation itself does not cause the violation to occur.
How is this not considered conspiring?
@redeastwood4850 ...because it doesn't fit the legal definition.
It's really not that difficult to understand. I even explained the situation and why it's legal.
@@SB-cm9jh if he makes up an invalid reason to stop him, it's conspiring. Which is usually how retaliatory stops work. Your taillight is out. Oh now it's working but it wasn't when I pulled you over is an example. Although that one is not used as much now because of dashcams proving otherwise.
A Karen at the end! 🤌 a wild Karen appeared 😂
Just stop talking 🤣
She is in the “Find Out” phase
I don't know why people are excited about the first guy exercising his rights and refusing to comply but people are jumping on the lady at the end.
Yes she has a shrill voice and my first feeling was to cringe but when I watched what happened it doesn't make any sense and it's a huge overreach by the police. The lawsuit is warranted.
She's a lawyer. So if she was sent there by that minor's father then she likely has a right to be there and they cannot arrest her because she's speaking and they don't like it.
He also didn't resist arrest because they weren't in the process of arresting her. She did not commit a crime so they were not in the process of an arrest.
The first guy could have just shown his ID or could have just said why he was there and it would have been no big deal. But people stand behind him (rightly so) Because he knew he didn't have to. Yes he did make it more difficult for the police but he was well within his rights to do so and they were outside of the law with what they were trying to exercise as they tried to escalate things with her.
This woman actually behaves in a less extreme manner than that man. The stakes are higher for her to be there and she isn't refusing to give information. Yet they jump to immediately wrestling her to the ground and arresting her.
I don't know if it's just because she's a middle-aged lady or what but it's really interesting how people respond so differently to those two video clips
She won her lawsuit
Cop says "I can follow him until I get a traffic violation." Is this the kind of police you want in your town?
Yes
prime example of a loser that got bullied in school that became a cop to feel superior. 🐷
@@miketilton6393😂😂
@@miketilton6393boot licker
@@miketilton6393 Found the fascist bootlicker
As a criminal law attorney, I can assure everyone that you don’t need a 200 IQ to know more about the law than law enforcement. I’ll leave it at that.
I honestly believe it is because of EGO mixed with too much coffee/redbull or something similar; refuse to think that they are that silly and uneducated
I'd like to remind people that you're not actually allowed to be a cop if you have an IQ over 125.
You're right it should be easy to know the more complex laws that are around if you study them. But as officers, they should understand the basics like when they can get someone's identification. I guess it can be confusing with so many states having different laws in America but still, basics are basics.
I've had a cop tell me it wasn't up to them to determine whether I had any rights violated or the law for that matter, when there was no reason to arrest me other than they didn't like my attitude. That was my lawyers job. His job was to just toss me in jail.
im pretty sure theyre all violating our rights constantly but their strategy is to let it go to court as its just a numbers game to them and most people will take a plea deal. its literally how cops and court works.. maybe they didnt read you your miranda rights so technically your confession is not allowed at trial but whos going to know how to get that evidence dismissed and also the court has no intention on taking your case to trial.. thats not how all of this really works.. they got us all thinking it works a certain way but thats just a strategy they use to get to the truth to trick you into confessing and making their case against you as strong as possible and it can be very difficult for someone to maintain themself throughout this whole process even if their case against you is very weak they will act like they got you even with very bad evidence.. and if you hire a lawyer theyre just going to take you for a ride and get you that plea deal.. theres a lot of truth to what the free men on the land say but it takes nerves of steel and strong wits to actual pull that off and maybe years of experience trying things and learning things and luck and intuition as well as actual honor and the ability to know how to make things look and utilize the theater of the mind to your advantage if you have to.. and im honestly not entirely sure if cops and prosecutors really just dont know what the law is or what theyre doing simply because day in day out they just run everyone through this bs plea process and have made it easy on themselves to try and end cases quickly or if playing dumb and doing things wrong is their strategy in court because its the burden of the defense to catch them on their trial mistakes which can be very difficult to do in the moment which is where it actually takes a highly skilled attorney to beat another attorney and is the source of their pride n the court room. it isnt as simple as relying on your rights to stand on their own believing they will magically come to your aid like guardian angels. if you dont know how to cite every one of your rights in court at the exact time they are being violated you are considered to have waived them.. and thats why court is difficult. you have to know what all of your rights are and all of the trial procedures and rules of evidence and all that and you have to be able to call out the prosecutor every time he breaks one of these ules in a timely manner otherwise your rights are waived.. and you waived them by not saying anything in the moment.. and that right there is what makes court pretty messed up in my opinion.. who would know any of this stuff let alone all of it and have the ability to actually defend all of their rights properly which is why so many people have their rights trampled on every day..
"You have a ladder"
"Yeah, you gave a gun, you must be a murderer"
well said
This is B.S. " A ladder"?
I have many guns and a few ladders... Omg what have I become!?
@@tegyrbrayton5094 I own some tiny screwdrivers, I guess that makes me a watch repairman?
@@gos2slo Yes. You're as bad as I am.
Ahhh yes, Karen Hall... yep. Enjoy that bill for a dismissal 😂😂😂😂
I will never forget what an old man told a bunch of us teens 50 years ago- he said if any of us was too lazy or stupid to hold down a job we could always get a job as a cop
That's good..lol
The way I heard it was...
it takes 2 years of training to be able to cut hair.
But only 6 months to become a cop
Well hell then both of y’all should be employed tomorrow then and then maybe both of u could find other living arrangements than still living in your mommies basement huh.? See we knew y’all were smart. 😂😂
@@jeffphillips7290found the fragile cop.
And you’ll make more money than most people, pension, and medical benefits for life.
You must be one of those people who bad mouth cops like your tough but run crying to them when you get looked at wrong. That is, when mommy is not around. Fool
“Is suspicious a misdemeanor of felony” will forever be my favorite line 😂
Cocky policeman: "Well, we have a right to demand that you identify yourself when we're investigating a possible crime."
Smart lawyer: "What 'possible' crime?"
Cocky policeman: "Well, it hasn't occurred yet as far as we know."
Unbelievable when the cop said something like "How do I know you're not a burglar?". Guilty until proven innocent at its finest.
A good response might be... "How do I know you're not a corrupt, sadistic, sociopathic cop?".... I have to assume you are for my own safety.
@@pneulancer naa. that would get you in trouble for "defamation". Since this is usa (almost nowhere else cops have such power and power-trips) the only counter question would be "So you are going aganist the law? you just judged me guilty without proof and we are all innocents until proven guilty". Put it on camera and they prolly have tp transfer the guy (cuz cops in usa today get fired and tomorrow are hired at the next town)
He gave him the “..for all we know..”
@@davidnevins4752 When cops use the "for all we know” line, you should respond with “for all we know you're a [pdf file]”
People when cops don’t do their job: 🤬
People when cops do their job: 🤬
"is suspicious a misdemeanor or a felony" MWHAHAHA
"This district attorney was calmly sitting in his truck, waiting to inspect someone's roof". Jesus, you know the economy is bad when a DA has to have a side hustle.
"You want to avoid going to jail for a roof safety violation? Hire your local district attorney today, he will check every single slat on that roof to make sure it's in compliance!"
He wasn't even a DA not sure where they got this from
Hahahahahahaha.
Right
Why should Public servants be making money enough to make them rich?
"He hasnt violated really a crime"
"Are you investigating a crime? A possible crime"
"Possibly"
"Ok hes obstructing"
Holy shit dude.
Yeah it's absolutely fucking ridiculous
"I'm not here to listen to you" Chief completely disregards the bill of rights. Delusion is real.
@@PrimeRaptor It's like, THE ONLY thing he legally has to regard.
Sue
That's the main difference between a chief of police and and a sheriff. Sheriffs are elected, chiefs are not.
*The fact that cop called a lawyer and needed to have probable cause explained to him by a lawyer is about as scary as it gets. We can’t allow people this stupid to become law enforcement officers. It’s a disaster waiting to happen 🤦🏼♂️*
I think it’s good. I’ve never seen a cop run it past a lawyer; normally they just do what they’re going to do
It's a good thought, but in this case it seems like he ran it through a lawyer to figure out how he could make an arrest 😒
@GGE415 so true
It's not a disaster WAITING to happen...its a disaster that HAPPENS every day
@@gregdowd939 definitely, we can see it for ourselves, literally 😅 I TH-cam is teeming with those exact kinds of moments and the sad thing is cities are getting bankrupted by stuff like that.
That cop was so fed up with that lady I felt it when he said “please stop talking!!” 😂😂
Lawyer: You may not search my vehicle.
Dr Insanity: Whoa! 200 IQ!
Only person this video who was 200 IQ was the actual lawyer during prosecution
Excellent point !!
I didn't see any 200 IQs here. But I did see a lot of Pissing Matches that wasted a lot of time.
🤣
@@MelaniaSideWiggaand money. Almost like it’s all a giant grift. 🤔
whenever a cop says he's not here to listen to you or to shut up it makes my blood boil
It's sad how far the standard has fallen. My late grandfather was an RCMP in bc and when he'd go to a small town they were the post office police station and jail. My mom tells me stories about hearing the town drunks in the cells. Now a days just cops not royal not mounted.
If a cop said that to me, Then I will respond with deafening silence.
@@jimdevlin4949 RCMP are some of the most corrupt assholes even more so than regular Canadian cops lol they have their own wikipedia page for how much bad shit they've done over the decades
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_controversies_involving_the_Royal_Canadian_Mounted_Police
to be fair the last last deserved to be told to shut up
..while asking questions and starts screaming at you when you dont answer. never forget the cop who stoped someone on a weekend asked him where is he heading, he told he is driving to work and the cop instantly called him a liar because nobody works on a weekend (wtf dude?) and the guy just responded so youre offduty right? and the cop gets real pissed because he is somehow a smartass, yeah from the perspective from a retard this ackknowlegement of the clear illogical statement must come from a genius.
Karen: "im not even involved in this"
Cops: "that was our point the whole time" lol
Hilarious! Classic obnoxious Karen.
I hope her lawsuit falls flat. She was completely asking for it.
Yeah, she's an idiot
She filed a civil rights complaint/lawsuit against them lol, this Karen is totally a liberal douche bag.
@@searching1029 She would make a good lawyer. I'd do anything to make her stop talking.
*PREVIOUSLY ON 200IQ MOMENTS*
Cop: _ID please_
Lawyer: _No thanks_
"Being suspicious is a misdemeanor or a felony?" is such a good quote that its a crime to not have subtitled that one
lol
It’s not either but it also enough to watch the suspect
@@lt4753 they did watch the suspect, and then confronted him, and demanded identification, which it is *not* enough to do.
@@loafodisease614 how long have you been a lawyer cop?
@@lt4753 enough time to have read on the screen that the cop is citing their right to conduct any of this during a traffic violation stop, not an idling suspicious car.
That police chief coming down to “tell you what’s going on” needs to be fired and added to the Brady List. He is eminently unqualified to lead a Baskin Robbins.
Nothing wrong with being a lead at baskin robbins
@@mostlyright5384love BR,shame it’s so expensive
@@mostlyright5384 No one ever said there was. OP just said the chief couldn't run a Baskin Robbins.
Police chief reminded me of Jackie Gleason as Sheriff Buford T Justice in the Smokey and the Bandit movie. th-cam.com/video/ciUV77AzIB4/w-d-xo.html Best of Buford T. Justice - Smokey and the Bandit
His leadership reflects on his officers, you can tell they got the way they are because they run to daddy who bullies anyone who gives them trouble.
It is absolutely unbelievable that a police officer doesn’t know the law and has to call someone to be informed.
I hear you, it is Unbelievable that a police officer that does 5 months of training(21 weeks) doesn't know the law better than a lawyer
@@BroomeBlocker4Seems like the police need much longer and better training before being allowed in that position then. If you are unable to do your job properly, especially such an important one that has the ability of controlling the lives and well-being of others, then you should never be given the opportunity to do so.
Well...those few weeks of training a typical officer from the woodworks gets it is, to me, absolutely not surprising they dont know anything at all.
Why would that be unbelievable? In the US anybody can become a cop by simply applying to police academy for a few months.
Yeah? How about the police chief who said the same as the cops?
I’m not even involved in this after trying her hardest to be involved in it 😂 Karen’s crack me up 😆
The investigator that dealt with Beatrice is a great guy. He actually had compassion when she was talking him stuff that a lot of folk wouldn't have had compassion for. I really hope she got the help she needed before she hurt herself or someone else. 🙏
Totally agree. Good for you to find something positive!
I'd bet he's seen schizophrenia before, it was really obvious she had it just by her facial expression. They have really emotionless faces.
It actually broke my heart to listen to her talk so calmly about wanting to take her own life and others. Much respect to people who work with individuals like this for a living
That was sad. Hope she is getting help she needs.
She's trying to plead insanity so that she doesn't have a hard enough charge or prison time he's being nice because he has to regardless if she is actually insane
The cop was actually intentionally plotting on giving this guy a ticket, that’s premeditated.
That phrase alone should guarantee that he never works as a cop again.
@@watersnortmoment3734 Wouldn't fucking matter. The law is such that they can find whatever they want to waste your time & humiliate you with. Even if you end up driving away, you're still sitting there for no reason, wasting resources & time at their discretion. Municipalities in most states also have the right to investigate THEMSELVES & unless you have the money to hire a private law firm, the law (meaning the municipality that seeks to incriminate or wrongfully detain or arrest you) has the upper hand.
@NoneOyaBusiness What is “a sufficient amount of time” & who makes that call?
@@shechshireyour ignorance is LOUD.
I'd bet a thousand bucks you don't even know the difference between legal and lawful
@@Long-legged Thanks for the legal advice TH-cam lawyer.
16:00 "The detective manages to calm her down by offering to charge her with attempted murder"
that's something I never thought i'd hear 😂
Frr
A lawyer asked for attempted murder charges is insane
It's not that insane if you think about it. She was self aware enough to realize she has a serious mental illness and wanted to get herself locked up to prevent her from harming anyone she loved. I mean, she was already hearing voices telling her to drown her young niece. If it was you, wouldn't you want to get locked up too before you ended up murdering your whole family? If all insane people were actually this sane we'd live in a better world.
@@HurricaneSAThat’s not insanity, that’s struggling with what I’m assuming is schizophrenia. If she was insane she would never seek help.
@@eancola6111 Uhm...I believe I said it wasn't that insane. In fact, my comment was making a case in favor of her being sane enough to seek help. How you read that as me saying she's insane I don't know.
22:56 You know it's bad when the COPS tell you to stop talking. 💀
takes over 2 years to become a lisenced barber, but only 6 months to become an armed cop in the US.
that says WAY more about everything then it should, and that alone is concerning af.
ur wrong lol it takes a few months for both
@@4renchopesort of correct, it can take a few months to get the most bare bones education to be a barber. If you want to practice hair colouring, women’s hair, all that extra stuff, it takes extra time
That's not really how it works at least where I'm from.
The US has many criminals and insane crime rates. The police is understaffed.
It takes only 1500 hours to be an airline pilot.
“I’ll follow him out of town until I get one.” This is the problem with police today. You make an unlawful request of someone, then say they’re obstructing because they tell you to get lost? Then often it escalates to where a victim of this harassment gets annoyed, then they say it’s “assaulting a police officer”. Very convenient.
“Here’s the deal” is the Biggest tool cop phrase
“Ohw-kae”
Yes bro 😂😂😂@@ColeBresnehen
@@ColeBresnehengotta chew on that okay
#4 - If you are sick and fed up with Karen's.... that one is for you. 😆🤣
ALL LAWSUITS NEED TO BE PAID FROM THE DEPARTMENTS PENSION FUND AND NO WHERE ELSE.
But then no one would get arrested at all, including actual offenders. I suggest an alternative structure of counting litigious suits against specific officers based on outcomes reducing pension contributions as a multiplier to that specific officer.
That's not a bad idea@velvetine74
@@velvetine74Sounds good theoretically. But it still wouldn't solve the OC's concern of tax payers money being wasted on bad cops. You can't really deduct a lawsuit money from the involved cop's pension fund in all cases. Sometimes the lawsuit could be in thousand. Sometimes it could be in the 100Ks and even millions. End of the day, tax payers are holding the bag.
@@velvetine74 There’s zero evidence cops would stop making arrests Lol. That’s insane hyperbole. Cops had similar complaints about body cams and what happened? Absolutely nothing. Unless, you count officers having to adjust to the increased transparency and higher level of accountability. The incompetent cops will either be culled or not even enter that line of work.
@@abhishekn7200 The issue is Unions, and the thin Blue Line. Not these hypothetical scenarios apologists like you make up. Even in places as progressive as California, policing is the worst and any legislation to reform it is near impossible to pass
At least educate yourself, and understand the situation fully, before inserting your uneducated opinions.
How is the woman that hears voices a genius lawyer who beat corrupt cops??? That one belongs in a countdown of its own.
I think she was found not guilty and became a top practicing lawyer a few years later.
😂
Probably something you made up hehe.@@katielowen
Same goes for the last one too, clickbait title 💯 lol
Yes, this video is nothing about what I expected. Even if it's good, I am now removing this channel from the suggested ones and leave a dislike
Lawyer: "Do you think I'm going to break into these houses?"
Cop: "you have a ladder."
Lmao 🤣 what kind of logic is that.
Don't you know? You can get into any building as long as you are carrying a ladder. They will often hold the door for you!
The Santa Claus technique.
@@Link2editionHa nooice!
"you're wearing a striped shirt and a black beanie, and you're carrying a burlap sack with dollar signs on it"
what’s more ridiculous is 2 minutes earlier he gave the ladder a whole different purpose
The moment that cop said shut up I woulda been like
"SIR YES SIR!!!" give the officer doofey salute & rolled my window up XD
“well the two don’t go hand in hand” just cracked me up
I mean is he wrong?
I laughed at:
“I wanna take my life right now.”
“Well, that’s not good.”
Understatement of the year xD
@@blahaj784It's not an easy statement to respond to, especially when you don't know the person
I love how cops are paid and given authority to enforce the law, even when they don’t know what the laws are.
There's need to be a type of system at hand to cops to be notified about the law.... statue code etc... something that's quick. What can that thing be ? It can't be google.... it has to be something created specifically for cops thats only for cops but absolute. Cops can't know all the laws and codes. Cops are really more like lap dogs. Like when a warrant is out for someone they'll look for you like their life depends on it.
Right?😳🤦🏼♀️
Brilliant point, brilliantly worded, too!
Guess they can make their own laws.
After my own run in with a dirty state trooper, I bought a dash cam that records inside and out. Not only to catch dirty bish state troopers, but to show my behaviors pre-pull over. Sad. I recently lost a stellar relative who was an amazing member of law enforcement. He even fought the dirty cops in his division. RIP Uncle Phil. So many will miss you!
Wow, so sorry you lost your uncle. Now that's a brave man to have fought dirty cops!
so sorry
"First thing first, rest in peace to Uncle Phil, for real. You're the only father that I ever knew, I get my bitch pregnant I'ma be a better you. prophecies that I made way back in the Ville, for phil." - J. Cole, "No Role Modelz"
We need more people like your uncle
Hi Blondie, I wish u would have dropped the name of the cameras that u use. But thanks.@@BlondieHappyGuy
9:15
That’s alll you had to say from the beginning!
I don’t have to tell you that
No one said you have to tell us that” 😂😂😂😂😂
“can i search your car?”
“no.”
“worth a shot.”
Let me get the dog
i think the worst thing that can happen to you as a cop is arresting a lawyer and them letting you do it without any resistance cause you already know theyre cooking up a case
This dude said “Cooking” lmao
@@chancecooper4006 Ok?
They crafting, cooking, recipe, mastering and sniffing a case 😂
@@chancecooper4006 Ya know, I get it, I really do. There's kids of this era and their hip "newspeak" have an overbearing urge and a near incessant yearning for the word "cook" for some reason and it gets old really quick. Yes it's overused, yes it's cringe, and yes it's rather abusive to the English language in my opinion.
*However,*
I do not believe this one of those instances. Lend some grace. Given the context of the comment, it's enough for me to not put OP and his comment in that category. Give me a break, cut the crap.
@@LFSPharaoh Who TF are you talking about "kids" usage of "cooking". Cooking something NON-Kitchen/Food related goes back to the 17th Century, And has been widely used as a modern phrase for many decades. At a minimum Baby Boomers who are in their 70s and 80s were using the phrase when they were in their 20s. So you calling anyone a "kid" using that term must make you what 95 or 115 years old or something?
It's pathetic that police don't even know the laws they are suppose to be enforcing 🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️
If they knew all the laws, they'd go be lawyers. More money and it's safer. They should understand the basic laws that are commonly used on their job though, completely agree.
They know the laws, they are just ignoring them and playing dumb
@@100percentsoi5 You'd be surprised, they really don't get much training and continuous training.
They know the laws that allow them to assert their authority. They don’t know the laws that limit their authority. Same thing with bosses at jobs.
@@100percentsoi5They're not required to know the law in America. This has been held up in court.
Love the fact you got the DUI guy+ !! Love Larry!
The guy in the truck with the ladder isn't a lawyer. He's an insurance adjuster who knows his rights.
He’s still some stuck up idiot that would rather argue than easily say why he’s there
Though you are correct about him definitely not being a lawyer, I thought that he was a private detective? I could be wrong but I think the insurance adjuster thing was said as an example of who he could be and why he could be sitting there. This is an older video and I watched its entirety many time. It is either PI or IA though. Definitely not lawyer.
The insurance adjuster isn't a "district attorney" but I guess Chinese AI content doesn't really care about accuracy. They won't even hire a narrator and always use this same text to speech, so I guess we can't expect any quality from them.
I watched the OG video and he was an insurance adjuster. Its ridiculously annoying to know they aren't providing accurate information on most of their videos..
@@sooph1e 10-4, I thought he was a PI but knew he definitively was not a lawyer. These days someone will catch every mistake maker on
mad respect for the second guy (kenneth) not using the "im a lawyer" card and simply proving the cop wrong with pure knowledge
I believe he's actually an Insurance Claims Adjuster, which is why he never claimed he's a lawyer.. :)
@@michael-kjellluminis9230 Correct. He's an activist, not a lawyer. He is the TH-camr and First Amendment Auditor, *OKC Vet HPA*
I'm having trouble understanding why a "lawyer" is inspecting people's garage doors.
does it really matter who knows the law and who doesnt if the people with the badges and guns will lay you out flat just because they really really want to?
@@oliverperez9919Easy, he has two jobs.
*Ba-dum tss*
What's bugging me is in most cases, even if you know the law better than the arresting cop, you're forced to spend one or more nights in jail before you appear in court to state your case.
So, even if you ultimately win, you can potentially loose your job or your reputation because you were arrested.
Not to mention mental exhaustion due to thinking over what you're going through, which can lead to a downward spiral.
this!!! plus, if they do something like resist arrest, that charge can still be upheld and they can be convicted of it even if the arrest is later found to be unlawful. both sides need to grow the fuck up and stop arguing about stuff. it wastes so much time. imagine the number of people who could potentially lose their lives because cops are too busy arguing with a lawyer on private property about whether he is required to identify himself or not
If you have nothing to hide then you would have no problem with a search. A cop is trying to do his job. Guy probably had lots of opened alcohol in his car.
@@rayromano6249 Except it is very easy for cops to slip in some illegal stuff in your vehicle and arrest you for it, in the guise of a search. Don't be naive.
@@rayromano6249 Right to privacy. He could just have something embarrassing. Law-abiding citizens have rights, cops need to get over it
@@rayromano6249 100's of cases where innocent people let cops search their car ended up getting put in prison on a drug charge. planted evidence
Apparently having a ladder makes this officer think you are going to rob a house somehow 😂
And a TH-camr think you're a lawyer.
Yeah, when he said that, I was thinking "yeah, I'm gonna break in through the chimney."
When did a ladder become a home burglary tool? Lol.
ikr. Next, cops will say, you could kill someone with that car......you are suspicious.
Kop's just doingg his job. The 'Lawyer' / Ladder Guy prolonged this into a Pissin' Match which caused him to be hand-cuffed. THIs tells yoiiu vilumes about why this 'Lawyer' is doing Roof Inspections at $15/hr.
Second Story work? Not everyone keeps the windows on the second floor locked, and you can't always count on security firms to install Sensors up there.
The last one is the best one KAREN the attorney got arrested lmfao !!!!😂 😂😂😂😂😂
As a healthcare provider, I was impressed with the way that the detective dealt with the woman who had tried to mow down pedestrians. She was clearly psychotic, but he was gentle and caring. Of course, one of the tricks that the cops use is to trick you into believing that they are on your side and just trying to help you. But, this detective figured out pretty quickly that this woman was in a dangerous mental state and needed help to prevent her from harming herself or others.
guy even said she should probably discuss any admission off attempting murder with a lawyer lol.
When a cop suspects that a prisoner is mentally unstable, he (or she) should stop the interview and get qualified medical personnel involved.
The FL Vs. Bijoux case is super sad. Other than being one fine piece of ass, She was quite successful. VERY Successful for being so young. Had her own firm specializing in Personal Injury (of all things!). Pretty horrifying to think that the human brain can basically just "flip a switch" & absolutely destroy your life. Whether it's in Seconds, Months or Years; You're just along for the ride. Wild stuff. She was found Not Guilty (But surely liable) Due to Insanity. Just because she isn't going to prison doesn't mean she won't be locked away for quite some time - Perhaps somewhere worse.
Saying she will kill the detective and as many people as she can is her cry for help in her own way. She knows what she's doing, she's trying to exercise some control in the limited way she can.
She definitely got the good apple
"Im not even involved in this."
"That was our whole point." 😂
This had me on the floor 😂😂😂😂
Yeah, that lady was pretty dumb by not just removing herself from the scene. And then she was the one who charged the officers ? Man !!! 😂
This is off topic from the OP, but the female attorney who had been recently diagnosed with schizophrenia, shouldn't be included in this video. I think it's bordering on being unethical. She's obviously having a mental health crisis.
@@B_Bodziak I think that it is a good thing he included her, since this is the first time I saw and listened to someone with such mental issues, and that will help me identify them in the future. Mental illness should be studied and I want to get myself informed about mental illnesses without paying 400k for a college course.
@@coaiemandushman1079 she hadn't been charged at the time of the video. I think it's in poor taste. She was claiming to have killed people, but there was later no evidence of it. She's clearly having an episode. I understand where you're coming from, too, but I don't think it's appropriate. That said/full disclosure, it's possible that I feel this way because I am a retired atty.
Second lawyer should’ve let them complete the arrest. The payout for the lawsuit would’ve been juicy.
Qualified Immunity is too broad, even when wrong, it is very difficult to make officers face consequences for abuse. So the a use often goes unchecked
@@alecesnethat’s bs they pay out pretty often. It’s not their money it’s our money (the tax payers) so they don’t mind giving it out like it’s nothing
not arrest! Just detain. Perfectly OK under those circumstances
@@abbynormal8564they clearly said hes under arrest and you cant detain someone cause your suspicious they might be doing something illegal lmao
@@abbynormal8564 detainment is the same thing as arrest.
13:59 “that’s all the questions I have, judge”
I’m never heard a lawyer address them as anything but “your honour”, judge sounds insulting haha
6:55 - "I never learned any laws. They told us 'just make it up as you go'. Now I gotta call my lawyer friend 'cause he knows how to read."
Those OK cops including the CHIEF were such an embarassment - they don't know the law, acted as tyrants, rude, intimidation, making up crimes, retaliation. They need immediate federal oversight. I'm so glad for body cameras.
Yeah welcome to the good old boy network. It's all over the place, in every state.
Yeah except they are never held accountable even with body cameras lol
That'll never happen.
That you think federal agencies are any better...
That’s why you never go to Oklahoma
Imagine having your body cam rolling and saying you are going to purposefully follow someone just to pull them over.
I wonder if the guy sue the town for all they did to him for no reason... and if that cop was fired
@@nash2609doubt the cop was fired, the chief of my local town was found guilty of racial discrimination in a civil trial and still has his job, they get away with it all
Weird thing is he didn’t seem like he forgot the camera. As the citizen pulled up his phone they said ”no reason to film me, we all got cameras”
I wonder what’s worse - cops that hide their petty shit or those who are unaware it’s even wrong
I guess your so stupid at some point lose ability to measure stupid
@@BenRangelI don't think they're unaware
They just know that they won't be punished in anyway so for their intents it's not wrong
"Suspicious is a misdemeanor or a felony? LMAO
“Stop talking” -cop
😂😂😂 I felt that as soon as I heard her voice.
The sanctimonious smile, the forward head position, the bird-beak hand gestures, all of it.
"The detective manages to calm her down by offering to charge her with attempted murder" - well, that's certainly a brand new sentence
Legend has it that the unconventional "Let them step on their own dick" strategy has occasionally been used utilized effectively when interrogating a certain breed of psychopath.
#2 is beyond insane that such a thing is allowed to even occur with the chief even exasperating it. Scary what kind of people hold a badge. There needs to be top down review of all these incidents.
well, there probably is no working "top"
they will "top down" investigate their own office most likely, and will get to the bottom of the truthful fact that they did absolutely nothing wrong.
First off, I'm not defending the officers considering how the whole thing went down. However, all the dude had to do was show them his fucking ID or do anything else to prove he's there for nothing suspicious. Couldn't have been difficult, he could have easily done that. The entire shit show could have been easily avoided but he just had to go with "I HAVE MY RIGHTS" route.
Then again what the fuck do I know.
@@mekz22 haven't gotten far into the second clip but went down to the comments to see if anyone was talking about it. Dude just parked and sat in the weirdest spot possible to wait for what he had to do, and when questioned about it decided it was his time to be a dick unnecessarily. Some people need to realize that sometimes it's much better to realize the situation you're in, what it looks like to others, and then just be a decent human being and talk it out. While he fully has the right to act the way he did, he just made his situation look worse by dodging everything asked.
@@mekz22agreed!! He maybe know all the law but he is not a nice guy tbh
"No, I'm not stopping!" 😂
You know you're in for a good time when every cop including the chief show up with a massive gut.
Meanwhile you would never find a paramedic or firefighter with a gut because they actually do real work
@@lt3880
Exactly, same thing like the military 🪖🎖️🎖️🪖
@@razorramon8326tell me youre not in the army without telling me youre not in the army 😂
that second encounter was painful. true sign that you live in a police state when they think they can come up to anyone and start making demands that are clearly unreasonable. just sitting in your vehicle is NOT suspicious.
As much as I dispise how the police acted there, calling this "police state behavior" is incredibly incorrect. They spent a lot of time trying to get the lawyer to cooperate, spent time double checking the laws, called the police chief himself out to discuss the issue, and eventually let the lawyer go.
None of this is me saying that their behavior isn't unacceptably awful, but an actual police state wouldn't have bothered with any of this. They would have just dragged him out of the truck and beat him into the squad car. Hell, these officers would have been shot for wasting the state's time if they did half these things.
Let's just call these guys what they are: Pieces of $#!?
@AlphaOmega1237 the lawyer didn't need to dude that's the point. He wasn't doing anything and mind you even though they double checked they still ignored what the lawyer said and continued to harass the lawyer in the truck
@@AlphaOmega1237 police state: a state whose government institutions exercise an extreme level of control over civil society and liberties.
just because they didn't drag him out of his truck and beat him to a pulp doesn't mean their actions weren't inline with police state actions. most police are government run, so when they blatantly violate your rights and insist and persist in doing it to the point where they threaten arrest THAT is police state action. are they pieces of sh!t? absolutely yes. are they acting like a police state? absolutely yes.
@@aimalkhan5028 How many times did I say, "These officers were out of line/horrible/acting unacceptably..." ? Actually read what I said, you moron. T_T
And yes, I'm calling you a moron because I went out of my way multiple times to explicitly state that the officers were in the wrong. It's more than a little annoying that you're acting like I didn't do that.
@@aimalkhan5028 They were doing their job, answering a call about a suspicious car. Of course they are going to be persistent if the guy acts like a petty child. The lawyer knew why they were here and still chose to be a smartass and waste everyones time.
The second laywer is probably sitting there the entire time thinking 'This is going to earn me a good payday if these pricks keep up...'
So if you’re planning to case a house and area act like second lawyer.
@@ES-zl9pydoesn’t matter. You’re allowed to park in a public street.
Honestly I don’t understand why he wouldn’t just answer the cop’s questions… 🙄
@@josku5to protect your rights that you’re too stupid to understand. The fact that police are accustomed to violating the constitutional rights of citizens is a problem that every American has the duty to defend against.
@@josku5I can't speak for the bloke and I've never had any negative interaction with cops but I have with Dr's, nurses and mental health workers and the thing is when you have your own rights violated enough times (Iwon't explain theres been so many) I'm mainly talking about my human rights violated and seen other peoples too
It can put you in a mindset of it doesn't matter how easy it would of been to just say his name and d.o.b or given his ID etc, you know you don't have to and that's that.
Another thing that rockets me crazy (I'm already crazy so rocket is better than just saying drives 😂😂). Is the Dr's and nurses favourite game of "oh well I've just started my shift so I don't know or I've just finished my shift but I've handed everything over (meaning told the new shift what's going on). Or being told to just lay down and try stay calm when I'm having a panic attack ooooo this one is the worst when they say why are you panicking and I explain that I KNOW I'm safe and I KNOW that no-one is trying to KILL me but try telling my BROKEN adrenaline and cortisol buttons in my brain!
Wow what a rant 😂😂
The last cop didn’t say “shut up, shut up” he said “sit up, sit up” 😂
The second guy should sue for unlawful detention.
"Can I search your car?"
"No."
"That sounded a lot like yes"
honestly saying "i'm a lawyer" is a pretty good way to make some cops with not-so-good intentions leave
Last one was certainly an attorney „Karen“😂
How exactly is woman with bipolar and schizophrenia admitting to attempted murder on a video of lawyers "destroying" corrupt cops?
I think its just so she can plead insanity (?)
They had to throw in one 70 IQ lawyer so that the average IQ came out to an even 200?
@@arl_winsmost likely
@@arl_wins I dunno, I wouldn't consider them destroyed. They are probably okay with her pleading insanity.
Yeah, and where is the guy in the thumbnail?? I'm so damn sick of clickbait.
That Karen at the end is the type of person that you Never EVER want to be around, and to just avoid for your ENTIRE! LIFE!!
Yet her and her activist type firmly believe they are the voice of reason and refuse to ever listen. That's the part that always leads to the violence. It's not the right that generally incites violence, it's most always the very concerned very emotional and overly talkative left.
The DA at 3:20 said “is suspicious a misdemeanor or a felony?” Lmao
He is not a DA…
2nd case. UNREAL. I hope he sued this city pants off. Replace every single one of those cops. Trespassing on a public road?!?
The video says he is. @@dogsoldier6242
OMG!! That last one with the blonde attorney made me smile big time! I would of probably arrested her also. Shw thought She had so much privilege!!! 😂😂
Trying to preemptively ID someone before they commit a crime is unconstitutional. The cops should stake it out and observe. This needs to stop
Those cops from the second story are an absolute disgrace to society. I hope he sues that department for everything.
fr that cop mustve been bullied so hard in high school
Yes. And they are the average, not the egregious exception. Showed in real time what fake heroes, what bad apples, look like. To the literal man. And when the big chief pig showed himself, well he displayed a total lack of honor from word one to end word.
A bit hilarious that they ganged up on one of their own and didn't know it. Now the d.a. knows, personally and directly, what it looks like to be on the other side of evil posing itself as the good; if he didn't know it before.
Extremely easy paycheck.
So, you can be trespassed by a neighbor who is not the property owner? That dept. is so far off... They even have an attorney on call. WTF
this is made up that's why it doesn't make sense.
All municipal law enforcement agencies have attorneys on call. Usually it’s an assistant district attorney, but in certain situations they will speak to the actual DA. However, it seems to be a waste of time based on how frequently they ignore whatever the ADA says if it hurts their ego.
You'd have to be a pretty naive cop to not know your own city district attorney lmfao 😂
4:50 “You have a ladder” have you ever seen burglar equipped with a ladder. 😂
Pro burglar uses your ladder, burgling hard
Swear I was just thinking the same thing.
The Santa Clause method- enters through the chimney 😅
I see you haven't watched enough cartoons :D
@@oraalid0nitsi😂😂I was a just about to say that. It sounds like some cartoon from the 70s
Being from the EU, I never understood why people don't just comply with police. But after seeing so many bad officers being so unprofessional, I totally get it. Escalating completely calm situations..
The US has a long history of distrust of the government and anyone in authority.
There are good law enforcement officers and there are bad and how each of them behaves when you stand up for your rights is considered a litmus test to tell them apart in the US.
Do you have gun rights in the EU or are you just sheep
Yeah, a good amount of the people who get hired onto the police force here in the U.S. are nutjobs with control issues. Most are raging alcoholic's as well.
Same, 95% of the situations ive seen could have been solved by simply providing an ID and be done with it lol
@@Metylanerwhat a horrible take. 95% of the situations could be resolved by the police actually doing their job correctly and respecting the law they are paid tax dollars to “enforce”. Even after being told directly by a lawyer this one officer chose to call himself that the man does not have any legal obligation to ID himself as no crime has been committed, his peanut brain cannot comprehend that he’s wrong and won’t let it go because of his power trip ego. The worst part is who pays all of the lawsuits when the cops overstep? They wonder why there is so much distrust and lack of respect for the police today and this is a perfect example. Trying to hold people to the law while 1. Not knowing it at all 2. When corrected just ignoring it anyway.
Those officers in the 2nd video, looked exactly like they behaved 🤣
LMAO agree, they are so dumb it's sad
made their department look goofy😂
Mall cops given a real badge.
why do people hate on the cops there, he was just trying to make sure that the suspect was not committing a crime, and the suspect was being an arrogant piece of shit to them, "i DoNt HaVe To GiVe YoU mY nAmE" like stfu, just say you are doing a job for someone and get on with it and stop wasting people's time. im from australia so idk if my views on cops are different because i atually live in a good country non run my commie joe biden, or if you guys actually are so low life that you have to "use my amendments" to just annoy the cops. absolute tomfoolery...
That menopausal Karen at the end 😂 tell his father
when someone ends a question with "right?" I immediately know that they're trying to manipulate me.
Right
Right?
2 plus 2 is four, right?
@@CelabWilliams-gb6rm not it's 4
@@brave1988brave are you sure you’re right?
They give lawyers who know the laws a tough time , imagine us poor peasants
That’s when you tell them you have the right to remain silent and stop answering them.
@@jaredf6205 AND be willing to go sit in jail for 24-48 hours. Not many are willing to do that over showing their license. How many times have you done it Jared?
@@jaredf6205and then arrested.
The things I've seen. They lie. A lot. They boldly lie on police reports. They choose what they want to put on those reports, too.
They have goals like "arresting every teenage boy in this neighborhood." (The cops don't even live in that city, they just work there.)
I assure you they wrote & did whatever they wanted before cameras.
#2 is nuts. It’s one thing to get paid and do nothing, it’s another to get paid and justify your job by harassing people because they bruised your ego.
What should I tell the father!!!! Omg call Bob Barker right now!!!!! Just wanted to tell his father 😂
I hope Beatrice got the help she needed. She was definitely fighting something.
yeah, she is at least suffering a psychotic break.
There's nothing scarier than thinking you're not in control of your own mind. Your mind will put you in a pine box if you let it. It's not your friend.
I’ve read about the case before. I think it was proven that she tried to play the mentally ill card to get a slighter sentence for the agrivated assault charges
@@greigallan5845 there is nothing scarier than people which believes when someone tells them they hear voices, you are one of the problems, not solutions
Hey lets hope the ppl she ran over are ok!!!!
The fact that this level of corruption is on film and these officers still have there jobs is ridiculous
planet earth ...
Lol you have no idea. This isn't even the whole tip of the iceberg.
@@fbksakskier Welcome to the Internet. You must be new here. Just so you know, the person who complains about other people's grammar in comments sections always looks dumber than the people who made the spelling error or whatever it is the other person is complaining about. Especially if they seem to do it because they can't argue against the substance of the person's comment.
Hmm. I guess baboomp is the arbiter of internet law. Just shows how stupid he really is.
it's not corruption it's the only way that all institutions are designed be they this, the government as a whole, or corporations
In the 2nd vid, the pickup driver is a contractor hired to inspect for a job at that house. Refuses to ID. Cop calls DA who tells him he has no legal reason to get ID. Cops Sargent insists anyway. Guy got a nice lawsuit settlement for false arrest.
Geeze that Chief makes me so irate every time I watch this video. What a smug, right violating, tyrant. No wonder why so many cops think they have the absolute right to demand ID at any time. They are being taught that its ok. You would think with all the 1st Amend auditors and cop watcher videos out there that they would KWTF is up by now. Stupid!
@@rsktransport There was a case where a cop approached a blind man under the pretense that his collapsible cane, which was in his back pocket, was a pearl-handled pistol (I kid you not). The man refused to ID. The cop called her sergeant who, out of sheer frustration (ego), had the man arrested.
Such a career ending move to not listen to your own lawyer
@@rsktransport My husband and I are just as baffled by how LEO’s aren’t understanding that Citizens are becoming more educated about the laws that apply to us. How can’t they NOT have figured that out yet?!? WTF?!?
@@readytogo6569 Cause it comes from the top. Good chiefs, then good cops and visa versa. I actually had a police officer hunt at my ranch. He didnt know I love 1st amendment videos and began to tell me how people video record the public/police/gov and how it is perfectly legal but they are trying to get a reaction so they can sue. He then followed this by telling how much phone they have reacting to these people and violating their rights. I responded by restating what he told me in a snarky way. " So, you know they arent breaking the law and looking for cops to act badly, yet you do exactly that and open the tax payer up to lawsuits? Nice? Hope he contemplated that.
“Don’t touch me!” Gets touched 😂
"well the two don't go hand in hand" LMAOOO 15:36
When the chief of police doesn't know the law or any personal rights, that's how you know the whole system is fucked.
The part about the boss shows up, jumps out of his car and acts like he is angry about doing his job.
@@snoolee7950 I was about to say that. Its like "IM ANGRY BECAUSE U ARE MAKING ME DO MY JOB"
To fair they have to know the law as much as a lawyer yet get paid less and have less training time
As an officer for 28 years, I’m still amazed officers don’t know citizens rights. Contempt of cop.
YOU are part of the problem. Cops dont tell on cops, therefore the problems you have witnessed, you have contributed too. Cops suck.
Its staged
Whats staged lol@@gamtoszinios1336
You’re a tyrant and just as bad since you do nothing to stop them. That’s why it’s ACAB
Agreed Greg. Though more like "contempt of citizenry."
Lol "The officer calms her down by saying he will charge her with attempted murder."