The best part of Adam's commentary for me was the "Village Vanguard is still open" and "or you can just tune into Emmet's Place" bit. Laufrey, who only recently attended her first actual jazz gig, and a lot of her young fans, seem to think jazz is past tense, something to be rummaged through, or even saved from the throes of death, my god! That can't be further from the truth, as this community knows all too well. Jazz is thriving as much as it can in this ridiculous modern world. There's a ton of great artists out there playing incredible music and never has it been more accessible than now.
But it was very fine for Laufey to say she was "transported" by that Bill Evan's record... just in the same way people get transported reading an old book... why Adam got hung up on and concentrated on a commonly used phrase I don't know. personally I've seen all the modern jazz acts over the last 30 years, even got to know many as personal friends and I am still transported by old records... good on Laufey!
@@joeBloggs-yo6jw I think Adam understood what she meant, like we all did. That Bill Evans record DOES transport you. Don't think Adam is saying it doesn't. The point he is making is that the Vanguard is still there and if you want to experience jazz in the exact same space, you can do so right now. I've been there a couple times, and just walking into the joint is like walking into a different world. The point isn't necessarily directed towards her, as much as the general argument that comes up periodically levied by people who know nothing about the current jazz saying jazz is dead and/or needs saving. Jazz is perfectly fine. It's probably never going to appeal to the masses and that's okay. It's not necessarily supposed to. That doesn't stop the millions worldwide who study, play, practice, and enjoy this music. I agree with Patrick Bartley, it's POP that needs saving. Laufey has a better chance at saving that world than jazz. She'll also make more money doing so.
i like patrick bartley's take on this where he says it's POP that needs saving, not jazz, since there's more people playing and learning jazz now more than ever.
@@JanPrzeI agree with his take. Jazz is still alive and kicking. Just because something isn’t mainstream doesn’t mean it’s not doing well. I also believe his quote is trying to say that Jazz can most definitely help boost Pop in a creative and soundness sense.
@AstroSully honestly I feel the opposite way. Pop has always been a changing art form. Pop was jazz, then rock, then grunge, then emo, and now hip hop. Jazz in its current form is at best niche, and at worst an academic exercise in self fellating. What gives Pat the right to call the masses uneducated and needing saving? Seems like an ivory tower pov honestly and it reeks of jazz elitism. I don't think more people are playing jazz. I think more people are playing music in general and that leads to growth of jazz by extension but not necessarily that jazz is growing.
You're comparing a genre that has no rules to a specific niche genre. Listen to the radio today and you can't tell me a lot of the sound lacks creativity and versatility. What made Pop great was that it was the melting point to all of the other genres together. It's sadly not that anymore IMO. That's why I said Pop needs Jazz more than Jazz needs Pop. Jazz never will need what Pop has to offer. @@aranzabonanza7231
You said they may "just be becoming Laufey fans", but as long as youtube, apple music, spotify, etc. view Laufey as jazz, the algorithm will push more jazz related content to her fans. They will certainly click on some of that content and if only a small percentage of her fans end up liking what we may define as jazz, that's a big win.
What may happen is that YT algorithm pushes jazz-related content to Laufey viewers, and IF they watch and enjoy, then the algorithm will keep pushing jazz to all Laufey viewers. So the power is in fact in the viewers?
Right. She's getting millions of views. A jazz musician who sells 1000 albums is "successful". Hopefully a tiny fraction of Laufey fans will become fans of more str8ahead style. Maybe we'll see a few musicians that are still "jazz" but who lean toward entertainment that could capitalize on this. Specifically I'm thinking of someone like Grace Kelly. Remember most of the big stars in the golden era... people you were likely to see on TV or in a movie... Sarah, Ella, Louis Armstrong's famous vocal recordings, etc. were vocalists and I think they drew a larger audience, some of whom became fans of the great instrumentalists in the 50s-60s.@@pianopeter
I think it works well in both ways. If they label her as pop the influence of her sound does so much more for the pop genre than it would for the Jazz genre.
I don’t think the algorithm will be sending Laufey fans any Coltrane, Davs, Brubeck etc - let alone contemporary artists who inhabit a completely different space. Most likely is Norah Jones, Jamie Callum, Harry Cornick who ploughed a similar furrow a generation ago
Jazz is a language. If you want to learn any language you need to listen to others speak it, learn vocabulary, & emerse yourself in the culture & history. There's nothing wrong with musicians incorporating jazz into their own fusion sound. Just don't claim to be jazz musician if you haven't spent any time learning the language or you'll get called out like a hip hop artist whos never been to the hood. Respect the culture, simple as that.
But we have hugeee amount of hiphop artist that have never been in the hood. That just grew up listening to the music. Are they not hip hip because of that? Even if they have the lyrics, the beat and the punchlines? Rap was gate keeping in the past and now it's more open because it had too, because art can't be kept into this rigid structures. Jazz is so rigid and so gatekept that is the reason so little people listen to it. They are too focused on being an elite, a "hard to get in genre." That needs to change, or jazz will eventually die. Disrupture is needed for growth and for improving
@@cyc20976 Jazz has become the hobby of rich kids who's parents can afford Berkeley or the equivalent. That's harsh, but mostly the reality. Jazz clubs in Manhattan are filled with jazz bros, or jazzbos or muzos..(and a few female participants) ..take your pick of terms, but a bunch of guys into jazz like guys are into video games, and the people on the stand are playing to impress those folks, IOW, jazzbos impressing each other. And that world, inclusive of Berkeley, is somewhat insular. Jazz was, is, and always will be elitist, and before it was elite talent, now it is people who can afford jazz school tuition. Admittedly broad brushing here, and a bit harsh, but is that not the case, at least quite a bit? It's not the fault of younger players that jazz is not as mainstream as it had been, so "working your way" up in the jazz life is perhaps not a possibility, but the music lacks grit and soul because now it is "of the academy."
@@zdogg8This is what Jazz shouldn't be, and Jazz elitism is stupid as hell. I'm gonna try to bring back friendly Jazz in my hometown and city if I can. Hahhhhhhh....
@@shlecko Anything at the highest level has at least an element of elitism, the NYC jazz scene is for the "elite" performers, and that is not a pejorative, it simply describes the highest echelon. But who comprises that "highest echelon" has probably changed.
I think it's fun that when Adam started talking about genre being more about the people and the culture than the music, he was unintentionally summing up the final thesis statement on Adam's (OTHER Adam) video. That Laufey isn't jazz or not jazz just because of her music itself, but that there is a disconnect between her and most of her audience and the larger jazz culture. And because he hadn't watched the video all the way through yet I think he thought what he was syaing was a counterpoint to adam (neely) when it actually alligned quite well. ps: GALA X10
Agreed - I was confused when Adam Manness straight up said at the start that he hadn’t watched the full Neely video, and it really shows throughout the video when he brings up criticisms that Neely does directly address (if you watch the full Neely video). Big fan of the podcast in general, but that makes this one a bit of a miss for me
As a Brazilian Gen Z, Laufey’s music sounds like Bossa Nova inspired pop to me, so much of those elements that makes my brain go like “ahhh some Tom Jobim influence moment going on here”. And it makes me extremely sad to see people my age and younger or older think that it’s a new spin to Jazz without knowing the history and where where these amazing style comes from 🇧🇷🇧🇷. Thankfully I wasn’t introduced to jazz or bossa nova like many are being today, I was just lucky I grew up listening to it 💃🏻
Yes, I hear a lot of bossa nova elements in her music, and it’s a related question of whether and to what extent bossa nova is jazz, or a part of jazz, or just totally different from jazz.
@@RC-qf3mpas a south American, I find tying jazz solely and entirely to the culture and jazz traditions of North America a little reductive at best, and chauvinist at worst. Jazz is not only a specific culture, its a kind of music at the end of the day, and you can't listen to a jazz song and it have more merit by being from Harlem vs Brasilia. So I think then, to dent Laufey the term Jazz, is reductive
I was also alerted to Live from Emmet's Place by Adam Neely's rant-but-not-so-much-of-a-rant about Laufey and jazz. The very first one I saw was Samara Joy, and I was blown away. Ditto for Cyrille Aimée and Dan Wilson... After listening to these guys (I also downloaded Emmet's solo works from Apple Music), I believe that a structured melody and harmony form is the main thing that separates what vocalist like Aimée snd Joy from the popularized (and somewhat diluted) jazz that vocalists like Laufey. Listen to the original recording of "What Are You Doing The Rest Of Your Life", and the somewhaat rigid structure of Legrand, cleanliness of the vocals, lack of improvised melody (like Ella Fitzgerald's "Misty" when she moves from one note to the other when there is a longish rest in between), contrasting with the, say, Jim Tomlinson and Stacey Kent, or Kandace Springs. Having said that, the "labeling" of this or that does not matter at the end of the day, if someone goes ahead and tries to find "Misty", ending up with one of the greats and becomes a fan of Ella Fitzgerald or Sarah Vaughan, I would say "mission accomplished."
I know "we don't like labels" but I can say as someone trying to learn as much as I can about vocabulary and language for my own playing, the classification of certain branches or traditions within the music is super helpful for exploring for sounds I love and want to incorporate into my own playing. It's super useful for starting out with focused study as a younger player. Obviously as you get older you can expand the elements, but as someone who loves the sound of certain styles it allows me to explore and learn the specific thing I want to at the moment in a focused/deliberate way.
GALA X 10 Man, we've been having this conversation for years. People are constantly asking "What kind of music do you play?" I't so hard to pigeon hole music. We were trying to come up with something in terms of a way to market ourselves. We came up with Vintage Americana, and then Mid-Century Pop, which is when we found this podcast. We do mostly originals, definitely blues based, but it swings, it's jazzy, it even has flavors of old R&B ballads. I mean what do you call that? We don't know. I once had the honor of playing with B.B. King and this subject came up. He said "Ain't nothin' original. Ain't nobody stealin' nothin'. We all just borrowin'." I think he was right.
Galax10. I think artists like her are great bridges to jazz. Regardless of whether the “jazz police” deem someone as jazz or not jazz, the fact that it is being labeled as jazz is great as it might serve as invitation to someone to explore the history of jazz. My initial interest in learning about jazz was sparked in the last 90’s by Diana Kroll. Loved her music and it led me begin exploring the whole jazz universe. 20+ years later I continue to explore, but it probably wouldn’t have ever happened if I didn’t find that “on ramp” from Diana Krall.
Nice one. Peter and Adam got the pronunciation of Laufey's name right toward the end of the video after hearing Adam Neely say it a few times. It's "loy-vey". I sometimes converse with Miles through a Ouija board bequeathed to me by an old pool-hall hustler. I asked Miles about Laufey. He said not to worry, she could be a breath of fresh air in some way, a gateway through the past into the future, like some strange new Ouija board.
This type of discussion needs to be updated; from jazz history, anyone selling tons of records gets despised and labelled a sell-out or none jazz. All borders on jealousy. Jazz cannot remain a dinosaur of the arts. If we accept labels like Swing, Bee Bop, Hard Bop, Free Jazz, Cuban Jazz, and Japanese Jazz, why can't we get the new development of this art form? That is super gatekeeping and useless in the arts; our purpose as artists is to make music for the people rather than ourselves, than engage in labelling, this type of subject only appears when someone new makes a ton of money.
As a new gen z jazz fan (Galax10), i fully endorse the things u guys say bc it seriously resonates with how i've been able to get into jazz! I've been hooked onto 'live at Emmets place' and I love listening to classic records by Bill Evans and other cats; and Laufey was somewhat of a gateway to that path (even tho i liked jazz through j-pop, lofi jazz and other fusion genres). Either way, Laufey is amazing and i cannot wait to attend my first night at a jazz club!
GALAx10 I think that the point Adam (Edit: Neely :) ) was trying to make is not about what is jazz, but rather about the fact that it doesn't "need saving", and the fact that some people in Laufey's vicinity claim so is because they are removed from the community.
I think there's a missing understanding of semantics about this. The concept of Jazz needs saving is because it is one of the least mainstream genres. It's no about the music being dead but about losing its place in the mainstram to the point of new generations being little to not interested in it. I haven't had listened to jazz in a whole decade until her came out and then my Spotify was recommending me more jazz artist and singers. I feel that jazz circles are so deep into their bubble that they ignore the dynamics that make music popular and mainstream in the first place, and how the genre grow and evolve with generations.
@@xuxolight Fair point, in that regard, it's obviously great that artists of the genre get new exposure. Also, it's great that audiences that didn't get a chance to find their way into music they could actually love are given a guide and a soft transition into it. I've only seen this from Adam's perspective so I'm not really informed on how it is viewed from the more general public point of view. However, I would still say that the encouragement to the "outside circle" could be more of "hey check this great thing you weren't aware of" instead of taking it as a "cause". Also, I think that the internet and social media and all created a lot of globalization in the sense that while locally some genres are small (jazz, metal, etc.) they form a big enough global community. I think this has lead to artists loosing interest in the mainstream and just doing the thing they're passionate about.
@@ElbowsUnique Because the route his argument takes is essentially "1. Laufey isn't really jazz, 2. real jazz is being ignored by this narrative in adulation of her, 3. she's not saving jazz." His argument wasn't simply"jazz was doing just fine without her".
I get why Adam is stressing "labels are bad", but when it comes to connecting with players and finding my own community I often wish there were MORE labels to reference. I don't say that I play "jazz" because many people will think we have nothing in common. I also can't reference my favorite artists because they likely won't have heard of them. So when I meet another musician (outside of a jam session) I have no words to describe my style or musical interests. I find this failing of language really frustrating in a way that makes me feel musically isolated and without a community to call my own.
I dig her, reminds me of Astrud Gilberto, I'm sure lots of people thought she wasn't jazz back in the day. As someone who kinda plays jazz, kinda doesn't I've actually found these conversations interesting. I'm with our Adam though at the end of the day don't let it slow you down from making music
I think, a lot of North American jazz nerds have a cultural bias against other cultures making jazz. I don't think its racism, as most of the renowned jazz tradition in NA is africam American, but for some reason when japanese of Brazilian, or Puerto Rican artists play music that walks talks and moves like jazz, its suddenly not jazz because it "doesn't come from the jazz culture"
"...there will be an imagined version of jazz culture that’s created that i fear will push away the culture that’s already there". Now wether you share that fear or not, I wish you had adressed it as it is the main point of Adam's video. Still, always love to tune in and hear your perspectives.
I think the disconnect is that within the jazz community, we are expected to be at least somewhat conversant in a lot of different styles of jazz. Everyone has their personal favorites, but a bebop fan who knows absolutely nothing about bossa wouldn’t be considered a very serious jazz fan. But of course all the different subgenres of jazz sound REALLY different from each other. Fusion doesn’t really have any sonic characteristics in common with stride. I have some nephews who are in their early 20s, squarely Gen Z. And they just really like bossa and mid century pop. I played them some bebop to see if they’d like it, and it’s just not what they’re into. Bossa is trending, bebop isn’t, because they are totally different sounds. So now we’re judging Gen Z because they like Laufey but not Emmet Cohen, and they just don’t see it that way, because why would they consider those the same genre if they don’t sound the same and one is a “cool” sound and the other isn’t?
I feel about this same as I feel about politics, when I was younger I wished more people were into politics so the world would be better and more people are now into politics but now I wish way less people were into politics lol. Same here, we THINK we want everyone to love jazz cuz we want good music to be popular but be careful what you wish for. It ends up more like popular music becoming good not the other way around. I think we're in a good sweet spot right now. In the end listen or play what you love and forget about labels. Play what you hear and make it your own. Appreciate you guys! Gala x10
It ends up more like popular music becoming good not the other way around How is that negative for jazz ? Lets Imagine Jazz IS the most famous how is that bad ? All I can imagine is that more Jazz musicians could make a decent living by playing Jazz instead of others genres that they probably don't like and they are obligated to play.
As a college student, I would go hang out in record stores for hours and read liner notes by Nat Hentoff , Dan Morganstern et al, and decide whether or not to splurge and buy the album. Of course I read a lot more than I purchased. The liner notes were pretty much the only way to learn about jazz in many places. I was fortunate to be in a big city (Montreal) with a great jazz club (The Rising Sun) where I could hear the bebop masters in late middle age. You guys are a bit younger, records were replaced by CDs and the notes disappeared behind the plastic case. Gen Z, with Spotify, Apple Music, TH-cam and Wikipedia follow a different route. They seem to be getting where they need to go. Recently I was reading the new Ella bio and found a complete chronological Decca playlist on Spotify to play as I read. That sort of put an end to my waxing nostalgic about standing around in record stores.
GALA x 10. Love the shoutout for the Live at Emmet’s Place Performances. I’ve been saying for a few years that those performances will someday be held in the same regard as the famous live recordings from the 50’s and 60’s- Live at The Village Vanguard, etc.
I think Adam might be overplaying the "just play what you love" idea. In one sense of course that can be true insofar as its true for you. But its also bordering on basically useless as a concept. Maybe it has to do with the fear of killing creativity or leading to stereotyping or whatever else but at bottom it just doesn't mean anything. Not to get too philosophical but the reason we have categories including the category of musical genres is because that's exactly how language works in the first place. There's no actually boundary lines anywhere in nature and even if there were they would only be momentary because everything is in constant flux and change. But we humans have the remarkable ability to imagine distinct boundaries and then distinct objects which fall into distinct categories of things all of which are concepts in our own minds that we can give a label to. For instance we can hold a clump of clay that has been practically burnt to a crisp and call it a brick. We can stack these bricks on top of each other then call it a wall. We can make it really long then call it a fence or put up four walls then seal off the top with a roof and call it a house. Once we move in and become familiar with it we can call it home. Its still all just burnt and hardened clay, there is no such things as walls or houses or fences in nature. Its all just different arrangements of the same thing. HOWEVER We use language to name those different arrangements because its very very useful for us to do so. Its in fact what makes us human and is how we can progressively make more concepts which lead to hopefully more useful things. So even though its true that you can show up to your first brick laying job and say things like "it's all just clay man, does it really matter what we call it, its all just clay, theres no right or wrong way to play with clay" it will just show others that you're not a very useful employee. They need you to understand what a wall is in detail and know how to construct any size that the plans call for. They need you to know the difference between different styles of brick laying and different artistic styles because that's what the expectation is of their customers. This is already becoming waaay longer than I intended but I hope the comparison to music isnt to hard to see from the above examples. Whatever opinion we have about music and what we think it should be is entirely besides what the majority think it is and how it should be categorized. This really hasn't been an issue in musical genres up to this point in time. There was Baroque then classical then romantic period music where the boundaries are very fuzzy between the genres but nevertheless are very useful for people to use. They want to refer to a particular thing, a particular style of music and they need a word for it. Its as simple as that. There ultimately isn't any definitive definition to any of that categorization but that doesnt mean its not useful. Jazz isn't an exception and its not even up to the people that invented it or consider it an important part of their existence in the first place. Its up to all of society that uses the same language to categorize it in a way that's useful. People might not for instance want to hear what they think is random squeaking and squawking on a saxophone but instead what they heard in a French Noir film. They dont care what Charlie Parker thought his music should be called or how far out it should extend to include other music, all people want is to know what that sound is called so it can be a useful distinction between other sounds they recognize. Ones "early bebop", the other is "cool jazz". Then they can say "Great, early bebop all sounds the same to me, not a huge fan, but this cool jazz stuff I really like, now I know which is which." Someone trying to convince them otherwise isn't going to work. If the masses recognize it as a distinct thing and have a name for it, its going to stick going forward because its useful that way. Romanticizing jazz to be whatever is in your heart is going to end badly for those that really believe that because fewer and fewer people care about the past and are focused on what is happening in the now. Thats what jazz exactly was, something invented in the now, but over 100 years ago. We're in a different now where young people are creating what's meaningful to them and is a lifestyle for them. This is just how it works and has worked for centuries and millenia of using language and classifying things into different categories. Ok thanks for reading my TED talk, bye.
Thanks for taking the time to write this. I agree with much of what you’re saying here. However, as a teacher, I see way more people stuck in convention without the freedom of creative expression that beginners mind gives us. As you say, it’s human nature to categorize. We don’t really need to teach that. We love little boxes and putting things in them and labeling them. We do, however, need to remind ourselves on the regular that all rules are arbitrary and should be bent and broken as we explore. Of course, we need to learn the conventions. But again, I almost never need to remind folks of that. Btw, pretty everything I say on this show is me reminding myself of things I want to work on. I get stuck in convention and genre and need to wake myself up to the freedom of limitless possibilities every day. I also love bebop, functional harmony, and counterpoint so 🤷♂️
Great episode ! I grew up in small village in the north of Hamburg. My father had a great collection of records. He listened to classical music ( Brahms, Stravinsky, Mozart, Bach etc ), Beatles, Led Zeppelin, Miles Davis, Art Blakey, Pat Metheny....He worked at a newspaper and came home with records from Dollar Brand and Cecil Taylor that nobody was interested to write articles about... I just had my driving license, 18 years old and driving home in the old mercedes of my mom when I start listening to Pat Metheny Group playing live in Onkel Pö's Carnegy Hall in Hamburg on the radio. I pushed down the gas pedal and chased home like crazy to record this concert with my tape recorder and told my family to shut up and listen....Lyle Mays played a piano solo for more than 10 minutes . I still have the tape in my collection. I was to young to go to the Jazz Club's in Hamburg and never went to Onkel Pö's Carnegy Hall. It closed in 1986 when I started to discover the clubs and night life ... Different times now. I teach at a private Jazz School in Amsterdam. Everything is different now. You can watch these legendary concert's on TH-cam now. I love to teach my student what to listen to... they often don't know whom to listen to. Even in times where everything is available on the internet you have to know what you are looking for....
GALA X10! I'm enjoying the discussions about Laufey going around recently. I think the point about getting away from the mindset of making labels and putting artists and genres in boxes needs to be made more often!
Guys.. I think that coming from Guangzhou and mother and grandfather as musicians.. she possibly grew up listening to old records ( typical of Chinese people when I lived there) from 1930s of Shanghai Jazz singers, which went on the HK and Taiwan in the 60-80s . Is it jazz. Is it pop? Some of her songs have that vibe to it.. Even today many old “classics” of Shanghai are sung in Sino English by many singers in China. Let’s face it.. music is the vibe here and whomever and from wherever in whatever in any decade.. it comes is all about music.. old is new and new is old..
Great great vid, loved Neely’s and many others speaking about Laufey, and where she stands, especially where Patrick Bartley spoke about it, mentioning saving pop not jazz
I'll tell you guys THIS right now: As good as Neely's video was - and it totally was - I think y'all actually just topped it. This is one of the best musical discussions I've had the pleasure to observe in a LONG time.
GALA x 10 Adam, Peter, really enjoyed this episode (listened to in lieu of watching) and your open discussion around A. Neely's vid, which a friend had told me about when it came out. Some really great little audio nuggets in there from both of you. Love the show!
Thank you Adam Manes for being so inclusive. Respect!🤩 When I saw the video of Adam Neely, I had the same reaction as you. Let us explore and grow as musicians, without the hovering gate keepers. We are all just trying to balance humbleness with joy. When I was in high school, an 86 year old harmony teacher told us: “The more you learn, the more humble you become”.
GALA x10 Definitely agree that "what is jazz" is a mostly pointless discussion, but "is new artist saving jazz?" is a question that desperately needed the framework and perspective that adam gave it
It’s not completely unimportant whether it’s Jazz or not: most young people (or people) are generally not into Jazz and all that Jazz has to offer. If anything Laufey gives them the opening for enjoying certain musical language and they’re of the opinion it’s Jazz - so now some (or many) of them could ir will want to try to listen to other things in the jazz genre - they will discover a new way to listen to music other than just the usual chart or Ticktock stuff…! This is definitely good for music. For me personally, I‘ve always thought of Jazz as music, that is to a very large degree improvised and uses musical language, that generally bases on the jazz vocabulary, but also all musical vocabulary.
GALA X10!!! Greetings from a music lover from Germany of Ghanaian descent; not sure how that has shaped my artistic values but one thing I do know 4 sure: I luv you guys and your content!!
One interesting question that Adam Neely asks & you didn't get into here: Why does it matter to people whether Laufey is jazz or not? And what does it mean to them to include or exclude her from jazz?
Categories are the way we understand the world and they aren’t mere labels. Adam comes back to this topic again and again despite his protestations because he is struggling to work out a consistent position on these questions.
GALA x10. I was listening on Spotify and decided to come on to TH-cam to comment. Great review as always gents - very funny and informative. I watched Adam's video last week (and really enjoyed it) and when I saw the words mid-century pop I guessed it was in relation to that video. I loved hearing your points of view on this as the subject of genre in general has always interested me. Personally, I care more about whether the music resonates with/moves me on some level rather than the specific genre people have decided to bucket it into to. Having said that I absolutely understand the need to classify - if only for the purposes of having a conversation with other people about it, exploring it's history or allowing us to find music of a similar type that may also resonate with us (the last point could have cons though if it silos your search for good music to much).
Yes, I remember the feud between Wynton and Branford over his performing and touring with Sting starting with Dream Of The Blue Turtles. Sting’s albums were a direct artery into jazz for a lot of Generation-X (I’m 4 years older than you, Peter, and African American) and Wynton was just a hot mess over it! If anything, unfortunately, it pushed me away from everything Wynton was involved with for years. He’s not that militant anymore, thank God.
The reason all these conversations exist is because Laufey and her fans talk about Jazz as past tense. Her fans think that if Jazz doesn't make it to billboard top 100, then Jazz is dying. And the argument Adam presented is valid: Jazz is thriving quietly in a small clubs and other unpopular places. So stop thinking Jazz is dying and Laufey's here to save it. Also you know why Laufey got ton of streams? Because she *sings pop*, only with jazz vocabulary. Doesn't make she's jazz.
I latched onto this discussion after watching a Patrick Bartley response to Adam Neely. My first thought was... gotta get you'll hear it to discuss this. I was thinking we used to have Pops and Lady Day and now we have Laufrey and Nearly boy. I guess there's more to it... ? Emet's place and Patrick Bartley and Open Studio and Bob Reynolds show we're in a good place. Just listen to a bit of Chris Potter. The flame is bright. "Never mind the bollocks" bros.
Gala x10, Greetings Peter and Adam from your neighbors across the state #KCJazzALIVE. Loving your podcast. Keep up the good work. I just saw Samara Joy Saturday night at our Folly Theater. She was awesome. Probably the best concert I have seen there since Chick Corea and Gary Burton back in the early 90's. Samara Joy is the future of jazz. Not Laufey. That said if she can bring GenZ to the music, more power to her. Maybe she has something all of us jazz advocates need to learn.
Greetings from STL! I love the Folly, cool place. My first gig with Betty Carter was at the Folly in 1991, remember everything about the day vividly. 🙏🏼
GalaX10. I live in a small European city with a great musical traditition spanning decades or even centuries and covering all kind of genres. The birthplace of flamenco and, at the same time, of some of the best rock, pop and indie artist this side of the Atlantic. And, of course, there is a magnificent jazz community. Genres are just, as Adam say, a human simplification to facilitate communication, but means nothing. Communities, and the merge of information and culture bits between them, are what really matters
Let’s say Jazz is now (if it hasn’t always been that) the present or current (in live historical collective consciousness) improvisational multi genre global phenomenon that has improvisation in its centre, for structuring musical narrative, And from the personal capacity and attributes, and collective experience resulting in what we call jazz performance. It could be described also by its function: Could say; Used to celebrate personal emancipation (maturity), or freedom and individuality as a medium in musical expression, in the multitude of personal ways and resulting musicality from the collaboration among the musicians and attributes collaborating. And Global being the main word to describe the collaborative aspect of jazz that keeps growing and diversifying.
33:17 in regards to the old people possibly saying that listening to jazz only through the internet, I used to go see live jazz in a club (didn’t have to be 18/21) in my hometown every Thursday. After COVID, the place was fatally wounded and was killed off by the hurricane. For someone that wants to watch live jazz in my hometown, where can one go now except for the internet? This was the only club/bar that would host music like this, so the internet was the only place left to go
One of my favorite "jazz" pieces of all times was the arrangement you two did of "Constant Craving" - because it was a pop song I recognized. If jazz standards were on Name That Tune I'd score zero - those just aren't songs I'm interested in. Was your arrangement jazz? Or "late-century pop?"
The point about these questions of category is not about a specific, fitting a category (Oy vey, is Laufey Jazz?). Rather it is an opportunity to see if the category is usefully defined. Terminology must fully preserve its historical lineage and historical utility, but we are allowed to see if it can grow a little. Musical universes only ever expand.
See also "genre-sampling" and "culture-jamming". Successive generations with heaps of media at their fingertips will approach it as fodder to pull from, at the cost of losing touch with its original context. But this has always been the case with hybrid forms: see also "fusion", "afro-latin", "acid jazz", etc. Ain't a bad thing in my eyes, but the purists will always want to drag things back to categories because, since "genres are people", it's a large part of their identity and (sadly) one that's often exclusive.
I’m glad that “categories and labels don’t matter” and that they are “creativity killers” despite having an entire business with over a thousand videos dedicated to educating people and showing the fine details of jazz. My bad, I meant to say reggae. Even at 28:10 Adam defends the idea of king cole being a jazz musician which implies he does know what jazz is and agrees that nat king cole should be in that category of a jazz musician. My bad, I meant to say punk musician. Adam is still stuck before the Bronze Age and doesn’t realize (even while being a teacher) how to use a categories as tools instead of “creativity killers” and could be used to aim at a sound you want. Hopefully he realizes that “genres are bullshit“ is also a label.
Hey there. Thanks for taking the time to comment here. Just to clarify my point: I don’t believe that we shouldn’t ever use labels or they can’t be a useful tool. I simply don’t think that spending a ton of time identifying with, arguing about, and gatekeeping a label, genre, or concept is productive for my own growth. There’s the thing, and there’s what we call the thing. I’m more interested in working on the thing then what we call it.
If I were Laufey I wouldn't want to be given the responsibility of "saving Jazz." I'd rather have the freedom to create what I'd like without pressure. GALAx10
I did watch it all, and I watched Adam's video. You guys are tuned in! I'm from a generation before they invented the alphabet. For me - the less danger there is, the less jazz it is.
GALAx10. I'd like to see you guys play some Laufey tunes. There are definitely worse standards than most of her songs so why not. In fact, make an album. Peter and Adam play Laufey. ... and get Adam Neely to do a couple of tracks on it with you too.
GALA x 10 I think Adam Neely is interesting because I don't necessarily think he's right, but somehow his way of thinking seems to come from a similar place as to why I myself gradually started listening to a lot more jazz and jazz inspired music in the last 6-8 years I'd say. For context I'm 22 and have for the longest time felt a need to police my own thoughts and opinions, because I subconsciously have a dislike for the status quo. Very similar reason as to why I'm really into Retro or Indie games instead of anything too popular or expensive releasing today. All of that is to say that I don't think Adams Video is coming from the right place at all. But I do appreciate finding Emmet's place through that video and I'm sure Laufey might have found some new fans as well.
I came here to say the term "pickle ball curious" in my favourite of 2023 - I think Peter Martin should do an album and call it Pickleball Curious and then tour it so he can go on the pickle ball curious tour. For the record I am now pickleball curious
There is a natural tendency for artists to "mine" historic references to arrive at their own conclusions and contributions...the study of art history never ends, formally or informally
Laufey is not jazz. I don’t know why this is offensive to her fans. She makes cute music though. Nothing that serious. But enjoyable for a particular day. I find it interesting that despite having her image as the main image for the Apple Music jazz section, Apple didn’t list her album as the top jazz albums of 2023 😂
GALA x 10. Great stuff, didn’t mind the long video - could hear y’all for hours. And can’t music just be classified as good and bad and just appreciate its value? Genre association has always bothered me.
The “is-is not” issue was covered by Wittgenstein. Rather than definitions, things have more or less family resemblance to each other. Bright lines are less useful.
I agree that she's jazz 🎺 🎺 influenced pop, but are there any straight jazz 🎺 🎺 players offering to play with her. There certainly are a few pop players who have played with her.
Adam, Peter. I laugh at your disdain for the topic of defining jazz, when your podcast model is based on doing just that, in a variety of ways. Not complaining, as I’m a disciple of OS and gladly follow your lead. Would only add that trying to objectively define Jazz and label genres, musicians/artists under one umbrella is like defining your favorite ice cream of choice…it’s all ice cream…it’s all jazz. It does get complicated when we add societal norms of race, culture etc… I wasn’t alive in the 30s, 40s, but can say that music (amongst so many other aspects of life) was categorized by race in many respects. The Judy Garland singing SDMPWC or the Doris Day singing jazz arguments come to mind. Social attitudes of who played, sang jazz was predominantly focused on race across the genres. Would add to it…Lady Gaga, Rod Stewart and so many others that have chosen to cross over to traditional jazz standards or jazz entertainment. Are they singing jazz? Yes! Are they jazz musicians/artists? No. Just my take! Agree with Adam’s general sentiment that is really doesn’t matter and can be counterproductive and sometimes maddening for any musician. However, society will always want to place music, people, entertainment in a specific category…it’s kind of the human condition. Find the discussion worthy of comment from those that are in the know…like you both. Thanks.
There's a difference between jazz and jazzy, and it's all right to say so. Blood Sweat and Tears prepared me for Miles and Trane and MIngus - that was a good thing. But it's OK to define jazz, as long as you allow for wide boundaries. If I played you Beer Barrel Polka and told you it was jazz, you wouldn't have to bow down to 'my truth.' Music that's jazzy can be wonderful without being jazz. As for Neely, he's a smug dick, and I stopped listening to him a long time ago.
woah these two have a podcast? very cool. i never learned jazz but im a pop music lover who wants to inject some jazz. most jazz teachers on the internet are just telling me stuff thats over my head and ill never use. but these two have showed me how i can tell my pop music stories more tastefully!
You can only incorporate jazz by learning it. Or else you’ll come across as cheesy when putting something you don’t fully understand in another context
@@dfwherbie8814 i dont think you can make a blank statement like that. What if I simply like the chords to Autumn Leaves and want to borrow some of them?
@@suites.74 that makes no sense. “I like chords from one song, so I’ll learn that and incorporate that everywhere”? lol also, you mean the chord changes. You have to figure out how to voice them. Those changes, though, are too easily identifiable with Autumn Leaves. The min someone hears CM7, F7, B-flat, E-flat, A min, D7, people who know the song will think of the song, and it’ll work against you. And as I said earlier, if you were to insert just that in a different context, it’ll be cheesy. In order to break rules, you gotta first master them (Miles Davis said this. And I agree with him). If you don’t want to put in the work, you’re not a serious artist and musician. It’s just a past time for you, which is fine. There’s value in that too.
@@dfwherbie8814 im not really concerned with whether or not someone else thinks i am a serious artist or musician. I simply like making songs and having other people listen to them. 🤷♂️
@@dfwherbie8814 also listen to a song by Mild High Club called Homage. Hes a very very good and trained musician so not comparing myself to him but its a great song that has the Autumn Leaves changes. Even the lyrics say "Someone wrote this song before And I could tell you where it's from The 4736251 to put my mind at ease". I think its cute!
GALaLaLa...tenex. So, even though this kind of thing clearly drives Adam up the wall (for reasons that are, in and of themselves, quite understandable and legitimate), I'm glad that Peter insisted on dragging him and us all through it because, here's the thing: There's a big difference between boundary maintenance (boo!) and, well, trying keep an aesthetic community of interest alive when almost all the odds are stacked against it. I don't begrudge Laufey her popularity or notoriety, or her finding her own path through "jazz" influences. All good! Brava! But, as (our) Adam I think acknowledges at one point, the issue other Adam (Neely) is really targeting in his video is the pop cultural media narrative that has been constructed around Laufey. And that stuff makes me furious, not only because it's musically ignorant (which, if you're covering music, seems like a real deficiency in your professional training), but also, on the evidence, seems like a contemporary version of the same old whitewashing tendency that has plagued jazz (or "jazz" or "rhythm & blues" and on and on) since, well, forever. For me the most galling, and emblematic, moment in Adam (Neely's) video was his callout of the ignoramus who used the cover of the (superb) Fred Hersch / Esperanza Spalding album to exemplify the supposedly moribund "jazz" that needs "saving" by the likes of Laufey. Because, from a specifically "jazz perspective" (whatever the heck that might mean, in any possible situation where it might mean anything) Esperanza, on that album, just runs circles around anything Laufey has put out, and it's not particularly close. She swings harder. She has more and richer compositional/improvisational ideas. Her voice has much more emotional range and impact. She's wittier. And on and on. And I think we really do need a language that allows us to say just that type of thing. Aesthetic appreciation is all about making judgments--not based on heaven-sent objective standards, but based on first person reports about what different aesthetic experiences do to us. Such judgments are the bread and butter of aesthetics. And such judgments always take place within the framework of certain artistic conventions--even (maybe especially) when those conventions are being challenged and stretched (think of what Esperanza does on "Girl Talk"). In other words, I think we do want to be able to say something like: Yo, that stuff Laufey is doing is interesting, and it's cool that she's turning lots of new people on to, say, bebop language. Aweome! But if that has you digging this "jazz" thing that Laufey is talking about (and, more to the point, that her pop media narrative-makers are talking about, if mostly just to reiterate that it's dead and needs saving), then you might want to check out this other stuff over here by living jazz artists (queue "Alive at the Village Vanguard," queue the Live From Emmet's Place videos, queue Samara Joy albums, You Tubes, TikToks...) because, if you think you might be into this music, well, it's the sh*t.
Of course, to (our) Adam's point: None of this is particularly relevant to musicians qua musicians. It's simply not going to matter to the creative process at all. Where it matters is for the critical process, which is to say the process of appreciation, of communicating our joy (ahem) in hearing certain exemplars of the music. To take an example that Peter brings up: I want to be able to account for *why* the Sinatra of the Capitol years is so superior to the Sinatra of the earlier Columbia years. Not just assert it as my preference, but *account for* the difference as something you might also perceive, and share. Someone is going to say: Well, "superior" *for you* maybe (queue that Big Lebowski scene, you know the one). But the problem with this "solution" is that it doesn't, let's say, express my interest in making the judgment to begin with. I wasn't trying to express my feelings for no particular reason, nor just to get someone else's validation. Rather, I was making a judgment that (in principle at least) I think other people could, and should, share. I was saying: I hear this difference; do you hear it too? That's not an advertisement of what I believe, as if anyone cared. It's an invitation to aesthetic community. Think of it like this: Someone says to me, "I love X's music, it's just great." And I ask, "Oh really, that's interesting, why do you think so?" And the response comes back as, "Oh, I don't know, it's just my opinion really." Now, unless we can get past this moment together, it's going to be pretty difficult to have any further conversation worth having. Because if it's nothing more than your private belief, why should I care? If aesthetic judgments are just exchanges of subjective feelings and nothing further--me saying "yay!" and "boo!" and you saying "yay!" and "boo!" and maybe, by chance (or, more likely, similar social conditioning based on age, education, class, race, etc.) sometimes we happen to yay or boo the same things, and sometimes we don't, then they're not going to be particularly interesting topics of conversation--even if they're remain very efficient if somewhat superficial forms of social bonding. But if we want to have an actual conversation (call it a communion) about our different aesthetic judgments (what we think is beautiful, or cool, or what have you) we're going to have to *make claims about the works themselves.* And for that, we need a language of judgment that is going to have to reference some standards, or exemplars, or comparable experiences, of some kind, if only to account for why we think we were moved more by this work, than by that one. And this is one of the things that the concept of "genre" still does for us, I think, quite apart from selling spins and clicks.
GALA x10 I do think that labels have some use. Less so for people as they make art, but certainly for historians, students, and future generations. For instance, it would be hard to understand poetry, study it, and then to build on its history if we had no way to separate epics from sonnets and analyze them accordingly.
galax10 if a genre is just a group of people, is everything just about cliques and in-groups? i actually agree with adam neeley and you re:connecting with the present-day jazz community, but if hypothetically, andother artist in a remote place plays the tunes but would never even think to go to a jazz club, are they also not "jazz"?
The best part of Adam's commentary for me was the "Village Vanguard is still open" and "or you can just tune into Emmet's Place" bit. Laufrey, who only recently attended her first actual jazz gig, and a lot of her young fans, seem to think jazz is past tense, something to be rummaged through, or even saved from the throes of death, my god! That can't be further from the truth, as this community knows all too well. Jazz is thriving as much as it can in this ridiculous modern world. There's a ton of great artists out there playing incredible music and never has it been more accessible than now.
well said 👊🏼
@@pianopeter Thanks! Love the work y'all do.
But it was very fine for Laufey to say she was "transported" by that Bill Evan's record... just in the same way people get transported reading an old book... why Adam got hung up on and concentrated on a commonly used phrase I don't know. personally I've seen all the modern jazz acts over the last 30 years, even got to know many as personal friends and I am still transported by old records... good on Laufey!
@@joeBloggs-yo6jw I think Adam understood what she meant, like we all did. That Bill Evans record DOES transport you. Don't think Adam is saying it doesn't.
The point he is making is that the Vanguard is still there and if you want to experience jazz in the exact same space, you can do so right now. I've been there a couple times, and just walking into the joint is like walking into a different world.
The point isn't necessarily directed towards her, as much as the general argument that comes up periodically levied by people who know nothing about the current jazz saying jazz is dead and/or needs saving. Jazz is perfectly fine. It's probably never going to appeal to the masses and that's okay. It's not necessarily supposed to. That doesn't stop the millions worldwide who study, play, practice, and enjoy this music.
I agree with Patrick Bartley, it's POP that needs saving. Laufey has a better chance at saving that world than jazz. She'll also make more money doing so.
Laufey went to Berklee. I think she knows jazz is still a thing.
i like patrick bartley's take on this where he says it's POP that needs saving, not jazz, since there's more people playing and learning jazz now more than ever.
Patrick's vid is excellent --> th-cam.com/video/OhaXgjutXQ8/w-d-xo.html
It’s not really true though, is it?
@@JanPrzeI agree with his take. Jazz is still alive and kicking. Just because something isn’t mainstream doesn’t mean it’s not doing well. I also believe his quote is trying to say that Jazz can most definitely help boost Pop in a creative and soundness sense.
@AstroSully honestly I feel the opposite way. Pop has always been a changing art form. Pop was jazz, then rock, then grunge, then emo, and now hip hop. Jazz in its current form is at best niche, and at worst an academic exercise in self fellating. What gives Pat the right to call the masses uneducated and needing saving? Seems like an ivory tower pov honestly and it reeks of jazz elitism. I don't think more people are playing jazz. I think more people are playing music in general and that leads to growth of jazz by extension but not necessarily that jazz is growing.
You're comparing a genre that has no rules to a specific niche genre. Listen to the radio today and you can't tell me a lot of the sound lacks creativity and versatility. What made Pop great was that it was the melting point to all of the other genres together. It's sadly not that anymore IMO. That's why I said Pop needs Jazz more than Jazz needs Pop. Jazz never will need what Pop has to offer. @@aranzabonanza7231
You said they may "just be becoming Laufey fans", but as long as youtube, apple music, spotify, etc. view Laufey as jazz, the algorithm will push more jazz related content to her fans. They will certainly click on some of that content and if only a small percentage of her fans end up liking what we may define as jazz, that's a big win.
This is a great point!
What may happen is that YT algorithm pushes jazz-related content to Laufey viewers, and IF they watch and enjoy, then the algorithm will keep pushing jazz to all Laufey viewers. So the power is in fact in the viewers?
Right. She's getting millions of views. A jazz musician who sells 1000 albums is "successful". Hopefully a tiny fraction of Laufey fans will become fans of more str8ahead style. Maybe we'll see a few musicians that are still "jazz" but who lean toward entertainment that could capitalize on this. Specifically I'm thinking of someone like Grace Kelly. Remember most of the big stars in the golden era... people you were likely to see on TV or in a movie... Sarah, Ella, Louis Armstrong's famous vocal recordings, etc. were vocalists and I think they drew a larger audience, some of whom became fans of the great instrumentalists in the 50s-60s.@@pianopeter
I think it works well in both ways. If they label her as pop the influence of her sound does so much more for the pop genre than it would for the Jazz genre.
I don’t think the algorithm will be sending Laufey fans any Coltrane, Davs, Brubeck etc - let alone contemporary artists who inhabit a completely different space. Most likely is Norah Jones, Jamie Callum, Harry Cornick who ploughed a similar furrow a generation ago
Jazz is a language. If you want to learn any language you need to listen to others speak it, learn vocabulary, & emerse yourself in the culture & history. There's nothing wrong with musicians incorporating jazz into their own fusion sound. Just don't claim to be jazz musician if you haven't spent any time learning the language or you'll get called out like a hip hop artist whos never been to the hood. Respect the culture, simple as that.
But we have hugeee amount of hiphop artist that have never been in the hood. That just grew up listening to the music. Are they not hip hip because of that? Even if they have the lyrics, the beat and the punchlines? Rap was gate keeping in the past and now it's more open because it had too, because art can't be kept into this rigid structures. Jazz is so rigid and so gatekept that is the reason so little people listen to it. They are too focused on being an elite, a "hard to get in genre." That needs to change, or jazz will eventually die. Disrupture is needed for growth and for improving
dude, Laufey literally went to Berklee music school, so she did study it.
@@cyc20976 Jazz has become the hobby of rich kids who's parents can afford Berkeley or the equivalent. That's harsh, but mostly the reality. Jazz clubs in Manhattan are filled with jazz bros, or jazzbos or muzos..(and a few female participants) ..take your pick of terms, but a bunch of guys into jazz like guys are into video games, and the people on the stand are playing to impress those folks, IOW, jazzbos impressing each other. And that world, inclusive of Berkeley, is somewhat insular. Jazz was, is, and always will be elitist, and before it was elite talent, now it is people who can afford jazz school tuition. Admittedly broad brushing here, and a bit harsh, but is that not the case, at least quite a bit? It's not the fault of younger players that jazz is not as mainstream as it had been, so "working your way" up in the jazz life is perhaps not a possibility, but the music lacks grit and soul because now it is "of the academy."
@@zdogg8This is what Jazz shouldn't be, and Jazz elitism is stupid as hell. I'm gonna try to bring back friendly Jazz in my hometown and city if I can. Hahhhhhhh....
@@shlecko Anything at the highest level has at least an element of elitism, the NYC jazz scene is for the "elite" performers, and that is not a pejorative, it simply describes the highest echelon. But who comprises that "highest echelon" has probably changed.
I think it's fun that when Adam started talking about genre being more about the people and the culture than the music, he was unintentionally summing up the final thesis statement on Adam's (OTHER Adam) video. That Laufey isn't jazz or not jazz just because of her music itself, but that there is a disconnect between her and most of her audience and the larger jazz culture. And because he hadn't watched the video all the way through yet I think he thought what he was syaing was a counterpoint to adam (neely) when it actually alligned quite well.
ps: GALA X10
fr he literally made points that Adam Neely made and was getting offended by things because he didn't hear the full context. Kind of frustrating tbh
Agreed - I was confused when Adam Manness straight up said at the start that he hadn’t watched the full Neely video, and it really shows throughout the video when he brings up criticisms that Neely does directly address (if you watch the full Neely video).
Big fan of the podcast in general, but that makes this one a bit of a miss for me
As a Brazilian Gen Z, Laufey’s music sounds like Bossa Nova inspired pop to me, so much of those elements that makes my brain go like “ahhh some Tom Jobim influence moment going on here”. And it makes me extremely sad to see people my age and younger or older think that it’s a new spin to Jazz without knowing the history and where where these amazing style comes from 🇧🇷🇧🇷. Thankfully I wasn’t introduced to jazz or bossa nova like many are being today, I was just lucky I grew up listening to it 💃🏻
Yes, I hear a lot of bossa nova elements in her music, and it’s a related question of whether and to what extent bossa nova is jazz, or a part of jazz, or just totally different from jazz.
@@RC-qf3mpas a south American, I find tying jazz solely and entirely to the culture and jazz traditions of North America a little reductive at best, and chauvinist at worst. Jazz is not only a specific culture, its a kind of music at the end of the day, and you can't listen to a jazz song and it have more merit by being from Harlem vs Brasilia. So I think then, to dent Laufey the term Jazz, is reductive
GALA X 10. Thank you for the discussion! Reminds me of a quote i think Louis Armstrong said. “if you have to ask what jazz is, you’ll never know”.
I was also alerted to Live from Emmet's Place by Adam Neely's rant-but-not-so-much-of-a-rant about Laufey and jazz. The very first one I saw was Samara Joy, and I was blown away. Ditto for Cyrille Aimée and Dan Wilson... After listening to these guys (I also downloaded Emmet's solo works from Apple Music), I believe that a structured melody and harmony form is the main thing that separates what vocalist like Aimée snd Joy from the popularized (and somewhat diluted) jazz that vocalists like Laufey. Listen to the original recording of "What Are You Doing The Rest Of Your Life", and the somewhaat rigid structure of Legrand, cleanliness of the vocals, lack of improvised melody (like Ella Fitzgerald's "Misty" when she moves from one note to the other when there is a longish rest in between), contrasting with the, say, Jim Tomlinson and Stacey Kent, or Kandace Springs. Having said that, the "labeling" of this or that does not matter at the end of the day, if someone goes ahead and tries to find "Misty", ending up with one of the greats and becomes a fan of Ella Fitzgerald or Sarah Vaughan, I would say "mission accomplished."
I know "we don't like labels" but I can say as someone trying to learn as much as I can about vocabulary and language for my own playing, the classification of certain branches or traditions within the music is super helpful for exploring for sounds I love and want to incorporate into my own playing.
It's super useful for starting out with focused study as a younger player. Obviously as you get older you can expand the elements, but as someone who loves the sound of certain styles it allows me to explore and learn the specific thing I want to at the moment in a focused/deliberate way.
GALA X 10 Man, we've been having this conversation for years. People are constantly asking "What kind of music do you play?" I't so hard to pigeon hole music. We were trying to come up with something in terms of a way to market ourselves. We came up with Vintage Americana, and then Mid-Century Pop, which is when we found this podcast. We do mostly originals, definitely blues based, but it swings, it's jazzy, it even has flavors of old R&B ballads. I mean what do you call that? We don't know. I once had the honor of playing with B.B. King and this subject came up. He said "Ain't nothin' original. Ain't nobody stealin' nothin'. We all just borrowin'." I think he was right.
Galax10. I think artists like her are great bridges to jazz. Regardless of whether the “jazz police” deem someone as jazz or not jazz, the fact that it is being labeled as jazz is great as it might serve as invitation to someone to explore the history of jazz. My initial interest in learning about jazz was sparked in the last 90’s by Diana Kroll. Loved her music and it led me begin exploring the whole jazz universe. 20+ years later I continue to explore, but it probably wouldn’t have ever happened if I didn’t find that “on ramp” from Diana Krall.
Nice one. Peter and Adam got the pronunciation of Laufey's name right toward the end of the video after hearing Adam Neely say it a few times. It's "loy-vey". I sometimes converse with Miles through a Ouija board bequeathed to me by an old pool-hall hustler. I asked Miles about Laufey. He said not to worry, she could be a breath of fresh air in some way, a gateway through the past into the future, like some strange new Ouija board.
You're not serious right
@@tonywallens217 When I wrote that comment, I was deep in the juju, chasin' the train.
thanks for the update. good to hear Miles' perspective
🙌🏼🙌🏼🙌🏼💪🏼best comment🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆
This type of discussion needs to be updated; from jazz history, anyone selling tons of records gets despised and labelled a sell-out or none jazz. All borders on jealousy. Jazz cannot remain a dinosaur of the arts. If we accept labels like Swing, Bee Bop, Hard Bop, Free Jazz, Cuban Jazz, and Japanese Jazz, why can't we get the new development of this art form? That is super gatekeeping and useless in the arts; our purpose as artists is to make music for the people rather than ourselves, than engage in labelling, this type of subject only appears when someone new makes a ton of money.
As a new gen z jazz fan (Galax10), i fully endorse the things u guys say bc it seriously resonates with how i've been able to get into jazz! I've been hooked onto 'live at Emmets place' and I love listening to classic records by Bill Evans and other cats; and Laufey was somewhat of a gateway to that path (even tho i liked jazz through j-pop, lofi jazz and other fusion genres). Either way, Laufey is amazing and i cannot wait to attend my first night at a jazz club!
GALAx10 I think that the point Adam (Edit: Neely :) ) was trying to make is not about what is jazz, but rather about the fact that it doesn't "need saving", and the fact that some people in Laufey's vicinity claim so is because they are removed from the community.
Why does it seem like everyone is missing this point.
I think there's a missing understanding of semantics about this. The concept of Jazz needs saving is because it is one of the least mainstream genres. It's no about the music being dead but about losing its place in the mainstram to the point of new generations being little to not interested in it. I haven't had listened to jazz in a whole decade until her came out and then my Spotify was recommending me more jazz artist and singers. I feel that jazz circles are so deep into their bubble that they ignore the dynamics that make music popular and mainstream in the first place, and how the genre grow and evolve with generations.
@@xuxolight Fair point, in that regard, it's obviously great that artists of the genre get new exposure. Also, it's great that audiences that didn't get a chance to find their way into music they could actually love are given a guide and a soft transition into it.
I've only seen this from Adam's perspective so I'm not really informed on how it is viewed from the more general public point of view. However, I would still say that the encouragement to the "outside circle" could be more of "hey check this great thing you weren't aware of" instead of taking it as a "cause".
Also, I think that the internet and social media and all created a lot of globalization in the sense that while locally some genres are small (jazz, metal, etc.) they form a big enough global community. I think this has lead to artists loosing interest in the mainstream and just doing the thing they're passionate about.
@@ElbowsUnique Because the route his argument takes is essentially "1. Laufey isn't really jazz, 2. real jazz is being ignored by this narrative in adulation of her, 3. she's not saving jazz." His argument wasn't simply"jazz was doing just fine without her".
I get why Adam is stressing "labels are bad", but when it comes to connecting with players and finding my own community I often wish there were MORE labels to reference. I don't say that I play "jazz" because many people will think we have nothing in common. I also can't reference my favorite artists because they likely won't have heard of them. So when I meet another musician (outside of a jam session) I have no words to describe my style or musical interests. I find this failing of language really frustrating in a way that makes me feel musically isolated and without a community to call my own.
I dig her, reminds me of Astrud Gilberto, I'm sure lots of people thought she wasn't jazz back in the day. As someone who kinda plays jazz, kinda doesn't I've actually found these conversations interesting. I'm with our Adam though at the end of the day don't let it slow you down from making music
I think, a lot of North American jazz nerds have a cultural bias against other cultures making jazz. I don't think its racism, as most of the renowned jazz tradition in NA is africam American, but for some reason when japanese of Brazilian, or Puerto Rican artists play music that walks talks and moves like jazz, its suddenly not jazz because it "doesn't come from the jazz culture"
"...there will be an imagined version of jazz culture that’s created that i fear will push away the culture that’s already there". Now wether you share that fear or not, I wish you had adressed it as it is the main point of Adam's video. Still, always love to tune in and hear your perspectives.
I think the disconnect is that within the jazz community, we are expected to be at least somewhat conversant in a lot of different styles of jazz. Everyone has their personal favorites, but a bebop fan who knows absolutely nothing about bossa wouldn’t be considered a very serious jazz fan. But of course all the different subgenres of jazz sound REALLY different from each other. Fusion doesn’t really have any sonic characteristics in common with stride. I have some nephews who are in their early 20s, squarely Gen Z. And they just really like bossa and mid century pop. I played them some bebop to see if they’d like it, and it’s just not what they’re into. Bossa is trending, bebop isn’t, because they are totally different sounds. So now we’re judging Gen Z because they like Laufey but not Emmet Cohen, and they just don’t see it that way, because why would they consider those the same genre if they don’t sound the same and one is a “cool” sound and the other isn’t?
I really enjoy the warmth from Peter and Adam. Specifically about enjoying music that you love and finding a community that enjoys the same thing.
I feel about this same as I feel about politics, when I was younger I wished more people were into politics so the world would be better and more people are now into politics but now I wish way less people were into politics lol. Same here, we THINK we want everyone to love jazz cuz we want good music to be popular but be careful what you wish for. It ends up more like popular music becoming good not the other way around. I think we're in a good sweet spot right now. In the end listen or play what you love and forget about labels. Play what you hear and make it your own. Appreciate you guys! Gala x10
It ends up more like popular music becoming good not the other way around
How is that negative for jazz ?
Lets Imagine Jazz IS the most famous how is that bad ?
All I can imagine is that more Jazz musicians could make a decent living by playing Jazz instead of others genres that they probably don't like and they are obligated to play.
GALA x10 baby wooo, love Adam’s point about how smothering labels and distinguishing can be to creativity, music especially is soo gray
GALAx10 - Laufey is definitely good for jazz I feel, but they're also good for jazz influences flowing into other genres in general.
As a college student, I would go hang out in record stores for hours and read liner notes by Nat Hentoff , Dan Morganstern et al, and decide whether or not to splurge and buy the album. Of course I read a lot more than I purchased. The liner notes were pretty much the only way to learn about jazz in many places. I was fortunate to be in a big city (Montreal) with a great jazz club (The Rising Sun) where I could hear the bebop masters in late middle age. You guys are a bit younger, records were replaced by CDs and the notes disappeared behind the plastic case. Gen Z, with Spotify, Apple Music, TH-cam and Wikipedia follow a different route. They seem to be getting where they need to go. Recently I was reading the new Ella bio and found a complete chronological Decca playlist on Spotify to play as I read. That sort of put an end to my waxing nostalgic about standing around in record stores.
GALA x 10.
Love the shoutout for the Live at Emmet’s Place Performances. I’ve been saying for a few years that those performances will someday be held in the same regard as the famous live recordings from the 50’s and 60’s- Live at The Village Vanguard, etc.
I think Adam might be overplaying the "just play what you love" idea. In one sense of course that can be true insofar as its true for you. But its also bordering on basically useless as a concept. Maybe it has to do with the fear of killing creativity or leading to stereotyping or whatever else but at bottom it just doesn't mean anything. Not to get too philosophical but the reason we have categories including the category of musical genres is because that's exactly how language works in the first place. There's no actually boundary lines anywhere in nature and even if there were they would only be momentary because everything is in constant flux and change. But we humans have the remarkable ability to imagine distinct boundaries and then distinct objects which fall into distinct categories of things all of which are concepts in our own minds that we can give a label to. For instance we can hold a clump of clay that has been practically burnt to a crisp and call it a brick. We can stack these bricks on top of each other then call it a wall. We can make it really long then call it a fence or put up four walls then seal off the top with a roof and call it a house. Once we move in and become familiar with it we can call it home. Its still all just burnt and hardened clay, there is no such things as walls or houses or fences in nature. Its all just different arrangements of the same thing.
HOWEVER
We use language to name those different arrangements because its very very useful for us to do so. Its in fact what makes us human and is how we can progressively make more concepts which lead to hopefully more useful things. So even though its true that you can show up to your first brick laying job and say things like "it's all just clay man, does it really matter what we call it, its all just clay, theres no right or wrong way to play with clay" it will just show others that you're not a very useful employee. They need you to understand what a wall is in detail and know how to construct any size that the plans call for. They need you to know the difference between different styles of brick laying and different artistic styles because that's what the expectation is of their customers.
This is already becoming waaay longer than I intended but I hope the comparison to music isnt to hard to see from the above examples. Whatever opinion we have about music and what we think it should be is entirely besides what the majority think it is and how it should be categorized. This really hasn't been an issue in musical genres up to this point in time. There was Baroque then classical then romantic period music where the boundaries are very fuzzy between the genres but nevertheless are very useful for people to use. They want to refer to a particular thing, a particular style of music and they need a word for it. Its as simple as that. There ultimately isn't any definitive definition to any of that categorization but that doesnt mean its not useful.
Jazz isn't an exception and its not even up to the people that invented it or consider it an important part of their existence in the first place. Its up to all of society that uses the same language to categorize it in a way that's useful. People might not for instance want to hear what they think is random squeaking and squawking on a saxophone but instead what they heard in a French Noir film. They dont care what Charlie Parker thought his music should be called or how far out it should extend to include other music, all people want is to know what that sound is called so it can be a useful distinction between other sounds they recognize. Ones "early bebop", the other is "cool jazz". Then they can say "Great, early bebop all sounds the same to me, not a huge fan, but this cool jazz stuff I really like, now I know which is which." Someone trying to convince them otherwise isn't going to work. If the masses recognize it as a distinct thing and have a name for it, its going to stick going forward because its useful that way. Romanticizing jazz to be whatever is in your heart is going to end badly for those that really believe that because fewer and fewer people care about the past and are focused on what is happening in the now. Thats what jazz exactly was, something invented in the now, but over 100 years ago. We're in a different now where young people are creating what's meaningful to them and is a lifestyle for them.
This is just how it works and has worked for centuries and millenia of using language and classifying things into different categories.
Ok thanks for reading my TED talk, bye.
Thanks for taking the time to write this.
I agree with much of what you’re saying here. However, as a teacher, I see way more people stuck in convention without the freedom of creative expression that beginners mind gives us.
As you say, it’s human nature to categorize. We don’t really need to teach that. We love little boxes and putting things in them and labeling them. We do, however, need to remind ourselves on the regular that all rules are arbitrary and should be bent and broken as we explore. Of course, we need to learn the conventions. But again, I almost never need to remind folks of that.
Btw, pretty everything I say on this show is me reminding myself of things I want to work on. I get stuck in convention and genre and need to wake myself up to the freedom of limitless possibilities every day. I also love bebop, functional harmony, and counterpoint so 🤷♂️
Great episode ! I grew up in small village in the north of Hamburg. My father had a great collection of records. He listened to classical music ( Brahms, Stravinsky, Mozart, Bach etc ), Beatles, Led Zeppelin, Miles Davis, Art Blakey, Pat Metheny....He worked at a newspaper and came home with records from Dollar Brand and Cecil Taylor that nobody was interested to write articles about... I just had my driving license, 18 years old and driving home in the old mercedes of my mom when I start listening to Pat Metheny Group playing live in Onkel Pö's Carnegy Hall in Hamburg on the radio. I pushed down the gas pedal and chased home like crazy to record this concert with my tape recorder and told my family to shut up and listen....Lyle Mays played a piano solo for more than 10 minutes . I still have the tape in my collection. I was to young to go to the Jazz Club's in Hamburg and never went to Onkel Pö's Carnegy Hall. It closed in 1986 when I started to discover the clubs and night life ... Different times now. I teach at a private Jazz School in Amsterdam. Everything is different now. You can watch these legendary concert's on TH-cam now. I love to teach my student what to listen to... they often don't know whom to listen to. Even in times where everything is available on the internet you have to know what you are looking for....
GALA X10! I'm enjoying the discussions about Laufey going around recently. I think the point about getting away from the mindset of making labels and putting artists and genres in boxes needs to be made more often!
Guys.. I think that coming from Guangzhou and mother and grandfather as musicians.. she possibly grew up listening to old records ( typical of Chinese people when I lived there) from 1930s of Shanghai Jazz singers, which went on the HK and Taiwan in the 60-80s . Is it jazz. Is it pop? Some of her songs have that vibe to it.. Even today many old “classics” of Shanghai are sung in Sino English by many singers in China. Let’s face it.. music is the vibe here and whomever and from wherever in whatever in any decade.. it comes is all about music.. old is new and new is old..
Great great vid, loved Neely’s and many others speaking about Laufey, and where she stands, especially where Patrick Bartley spoke about it, mentioning saving pop not jazz
GALA x 10 - new subscriber to this channel and just bought the Open Studio entry level (not pro) video subscription. Thanks for all you do!
GALA x10 I always enjoy these conversations with you guys. Great stuff!
GREAT VID! Was hoping to find an outer voice alongside that gents vid. You giys are great. Entertaining. Fun to listen to. Subscribed. Gala ×10
GALA X10! It was fun :) your content is phenomenal. Waiting for that Bill Evans episode
I'll tell you guys THIS right now: As good as Neely's video was - and it totally was - I think y'all actually just topped it.
This is one of the best musical discussions I've had the pleasure to observe in a LONG time.
GALA X 10! Listening from Kansas City! Hope to make it to St. Louis soon to see you play!
GALA x 10
Adam, Peter, really enjoyed this episode (listened to in lieu of watching) and your open discussion around A. Neely's vid, which a friend had told me about when it came out. Some really great little audio nuggets in there from both of you. Love the show!
GALA x 10 . Always educational and fair. What more can you ask for :)
Thank you Adam Manes for being so inclusive. Respect!🤩 When I saw the video of Adam Neely, I had the same reaction as you. Let us explore and grow as musicians, without the hovering gate keepers. We are all just trying to balance humbleness with joy. When I was in high school, an 86 year old harmony teacher told us: “The more you learn, the more humble you become”.
GALA x 10 Love your guys videos, you guys are the reason Im learning to play. Thank you both so much 🙏🙏
GALA x 10
Regardless of genre, I’m grateful for the world’s wonderful talent. Thank you for the stimulating discussions, fellas.
GALA x10
Definitely agree that "what is jazz" is a mostly pointless discussion, but "is new artist saving jazz?" is a question that desperately needed the framework and perspective that adam gave it
It’s not completely unimportant whether it’s Jazz or not: most young people (or people) are generally not into Jazz and all that Jazz has to offer. If anything Laufey gives them the opening for enjoying certain musical language and they’re of the opinion it’s Jazz - so now some (or many) of them could ir will want to try to listen to other things in the jazz genre - they will discover a new way to listen to music other than just the usual chart or Ticktock stuff…!
This is definitely good for music.
For me personally, I‘ve always thought of Jazz as music, that is to a very large degree improvised and uses musical language, that generally bases on the jazz vocabulary, but also all musical vocabulary.
It is important. You have a colonialist mentality
GALA X10!!! Greetings from a music lover from Germany of Ghanaian descent; not sure how that has shaped my artistic values but one thing I do know 4 sure: I luv you guys and your content!!
GALA X10... Thanks for the 11/10 content as always guys. ❤
One interesting question that Adam Neely asks & you didn't get into here: Why does it matter to people whether Laufey is jazz or not? And what does it mean to them to include or exclude her from jazz?
Categories are the way we understand the world and they aren’t mere labels. Adam comes back to this topic again and again despite his protestations because he is struggling to work out a consistent position on these questions.
GALA x10. I was listening on Spotify and decided to come on to TH-cam to comment. Great review as always gents - very funny and informative. I watched Adam's video last week (and really enjoyed it) and when I saw the words mid-century pop I guessed it was in relation to that video. I loved hearing your points of view on this as the subject of genre in general has always interested me. Personally, I care more about whether the music resonates with/moves me on some level rather than the specific genre people have decided to bucket it into to. Having said that I absolutely understand the need to classify - if only for the purposes of having a conversation with other people about it, exploring it's history or allowing us to find music of a similar type that may also resonate with us (the last point could have cons though if it silos your search for good music to much).
Adam's videos are usually great and this one was pretty good. Still, one of my main takeaways was suddenly being reminded how pompous Wynton is.
😂to be fair, those were very old vids of Wynton speaking, like 30+ years I think
Yes, I remember the feud between Wynton and Branford over his performing and touring with Sting starting with Dream Of The Blue Turtles. Sting’s albums were a direct artery into jazz for a lot of Generation-X (I’m 4 years older than you, Peter, and African American) and Wynton was just a hot mess over it! If anything, unfortunately, it pushed me away from everything Wynton was involved with for years. He’s not that militant anymore, thank God.
Thanks for the reminder, 3rd vid I’ve seen on Laufey
GALA x10!! thanks for another fun episode guys! gr. from the Den Haag
The reason all these conversations exist is because Laufey and her fans talk about Jazz as past tense. Her fans think that if Jazz doesn't make it to billboard top 100, then Jazz is dying. And the argument Adam presented is valid: Jazz is thriving quietly in a small clubs and other unpopular places. So stop thinking Jazz is dying and Laufey's here to save it.
Also you know why Laufey got ton of streams? Because she *sings pop*, only with jazz vocabulary. Doesn't make she's jazz.
I latched onto this discussion after watching a Patrick Bartley response to Adam Neely. My first thought was... gotta get you'll hear it to discuss this. I was thinking we used to have Pops and Lady Day and now we have Laufrey and Nearly boy. I guess there's more to it... ? Emet's place and Patrick Bartley and Open Studio and Bob Reynolds show we're in a good place. Just listen to a bit of Chris Potter. The flame is bright. "Never mind the bollocks" bros.
Galax10. Gotta say I really enjoyed the conversation, I secretly hope that the future episodes will be as long, if not longer than this one.
thanks 🙏🏼 - your secret is out now! 😀
Gala x10, Greetings Peter and Adam from your neighbors across the state #KCJazzALIVE. Loving your podcast. Keep up the good work. I just saw Samara Joy Saturday night at our Folly Theater. She was awesome. Probably the best concert I have seen there since Chick Corea and Gary Burton back in the early 90's. Samara Joy is the future of jazz. Not Laufey. That said if she can bring GenZ to the music, more power to her. Maybe she has something all of us jazz advocates need to learn.
Greetings from STL! I love the Folly, cool place. My first gig with Betty Carter was at the Folly in 1991, remember everything about the day vividly. 🙏🏼
GalaX10. I live in a small European city with a great musical traditition spanning decades or even centuries and covering all kind of genres. The birthplace of flamenco and, at the same time, of some of the best rock, pop and indie artist this side of the Atlantic. And, of course, there is a magnificent jazz community. Genres are just, as Adam say, a human simplification to facilitate communication, but means nothing. Communities, and the merge of information and culture bits between them, are what really matters
Love the Neely reaction
Love the city croma. So professional, the cars passing don't even repete once! ( haha xD)
GALAx10 and was already paid up(subscribed). possibly funniest episode yet watching Adam get so pissed off 😂
Let’s say Jazz is now (if it hasn’t always been that) the present or current (in live historical collective consciousness) improvisational multi genre global phenomenon that has improvisation in its centre, for structuring musical narrative,
And from the personal capacity and attributes, and collective experience resulting in what we call jazz performance.
It could be described also by its function:
Could say; Used to celebrate personal emancipation (maturity), or freedom and individuality as a medium in musical expression, in the multitude of personal ways and resulting musicality from the collaboration among the musicians and attributes collaborating.
And Global being the main word to describe the collaborative aspect of jazz that keeps growing and diversifying.
Thank you for mentioning the coffee cup.
GALA x 10 wonderful!!👍👍👍 Greetings from Germany🤩
I agree with Adam. Just play you definitions don't matter. If others dig it great, if not, great, also...
33:17 in regards to the old people possibly saying that listening to jazz only through the internet, I used to go see live jazz in a club (didn’t have to be 18/21) in my hometown every Thursday. After COVID, the place was fatally wounded and was killed off by the hurricane. For someone that wants to watch live jazz in my hometown, where can one go now except for the internet? This was the only club/bar that would host music like this, so the internet was the only place left to go
Galax10 lmao, wishing you some quick growth with this channel.
im not sure if any big questions were answered here but i think we can all agree the entire video was at least worth Adams pain and discomfort 😂
Apparently, you guys haven't heard Laufey's version of Miles Chases the Voodoo Down.
One of my favorite "jazz" pieces of all times was the arrangement you two did of "Constant Craving" - because it was a pop song I recognized. If jazz standards were on Name That Tune I'd score zero - those just aren't songs I'm interested in. Was your arrangement jazz? Or "late-century pop?"
that's Adam's arrangement - but happy to take 1/2 credit 😉
GALAx10 ... Thanks from a Boomer who needs to know such Gen Z musical life and language (especially when with such deep historical roots)
The point about these questions of category is not about a specific, fitting a category (Oy vey, is Laufey Jazz?). Rather it is an opportunity to see if the category is usefully defined. Terminology must fully preserve its historical lineage and historical utility, but we are allowed to see if it can grow a little. Musical universes only ever expand.
See also "genre-sampling" and "culture-jamming". Successive generations with heaps of media at their fingertips will approach it as fodder to pull from, at the cost of losing touch with its original context. But this has always been the case with hybrid forms: see also "fusion", "afro-latin", "acid jazz", etc.
Ain't a bad thing in my eyes, but the purists will always want to drag things back to categories because, since "genres are people", it's a large part of their identity and (sadly) one that's often exclusive.
This channel is a goldmine
GALA X 10; just watched Adam Neely's video
I’m glad that “categories and labels don’t matter” and that they are “creativity killers” despite having an entire business with over a thousand videos dedicated to educating people and showing the fine details of jazz. My bad, I meant to say reggae.
Even at 28:10 Adam defends the idea of king cole being a jazz musician which implies he does know what jazz is and agrees that nat king cole should be in that category of a jazz musician. My bad, I meant to say punk musician.
Adam is still stuck before the Bronze Age and doesn’t realize (even while being a teacher) how to use a categories as tools instead of “creativity killers” and could be used to aim at a sound you want.
Hopefully he realizes that “genres are bullshit“ is also a label.
Hey there. Thanks for taking the time to comment here.
Just to clarify my point: I don’t believe that we shouldn’t ever use labels or they can’t be a useful tool. I simply don’t think that spending a ton of time identifying with, arguing about, and gatekeeping a label, genre, or concept is productive for my own growth.
There’s the thing, and there’s what we call the thing. I’m more interested in working on the thing then what we call it.
If I were Laufey I wouldn't want to be given the responsibility of "saving Jazz." I'd rather have the freedom to create what I'd like without pressure. GALAx10
The Village Vanguard would let us in when we were just 17, in the mid 80s.
I did watch it all, and I watched Adam's video. You guys are tuned in! I'm from a generation before they invented the alphabet. For me - the less danger there is, the less jazz it is.
GALAx10. I'd like to see you guys play some Laufey tunes. There are definitely worse standards than most of her songs so why not. In fact, make an album. Peter and Adam play Laufey. ... and get Adam Neely to do a couple of tracks on it with you too.
This is hands down the funniest episode ever 😂 Adam was losing it in the end
GALA x 10
I think Adam Neely is interesting because I don't necessarily think he's right, but somehow his way of thinking seems to come from a similar place as to why I myself gradually started listening to a lot more jazz and jazz inspired music in the last 6-8 years I'd say. For context I'm 22 and have for the longest time felt a need to police my own thoughts and opinions, because I subconsciously have a dislike for the status quo. Very similar reason as to why I'm really into Retro or Indie games instead of anything too popular or expensive releasing today.
All of that is to say that I don't think Adams Video is coming from the right place at all. But I do appreciate finding Emmet's place through that video and I'm sure Laufey might have found some new fans as well.
I came here to say the term "pickle ball curious" in my favourite of 2023 - I think Peter Martin should do an album and call it Pickleball Curious and then tour it so he can go on the pickle ball curious tour. For the record I am now pickleball curious
Gala x 10
Great episode, Guys!
He (Adam) probably referenced Chet Baker because he SANG the line.
GALA x10 - good discussion 👌🏻
There is a natural tendency for artists to "mine" historic references to arrive at their own conclusions and contributions...the study of art history never ends, formally or informally
What was that intro song? Is there a full version or was it just a little thing made for this podcast?
Laufey is not jazz. I don’t know why this is offensive to her fans. She makes cute music though. Nothing that serious. But enjoyable for a particular day. I find it interesting that despite having her image as the main image for the Apple Music jazz section, Apple didn’t list her album as the top jazz albums of 2023 😂
From what I heard it sounds like antique revival music ... but I could be wrong ...
20:30 This is what it's all about
GALA x 10. Great stuff, didn’t mind the long video - could hear y’all for hours.
And can’t music just be classified as good and bad and just appreciate its value? Genre association has always bothered me.
The “is-is not” issue was covered by Wittgenstein. Rather than definitions, things have more or less family resemblance to each other. Bright lines are less useful.
Who cares about the nomenclature ? Laufey's music is good She is a good singer and seems to always puts her presence when she sings!
I agree that she's jazz 🎺 🎺 influenced pop, but are there any straight jazz 🎺 🎺 players offering to play with her. There certainly are a few pop players who have played with her.
Adam, Peter. I laugh at your disdain for the topic of defining jazz, when your podcast model is based on doing just that, in a variety of ways. Not complaining, as I’m a disciple of OS and gladly follow your lead. Would only add that trying to objectively define Jazz and label genres, musicians/artists under one umbrella is like defining your favorite ice cream of choice…it’s all ice cream…it’s all jazz.
It does get complicated when we add societal norms of race, culture etc… I wasn’t alive in the 30s, 40s, but can say that music (amongst so many other aspects of life) was categorized by race in many respects. The Judy Garland singing SDMPWC or the Doris Day singing jazz arguments come to mind. Social attitudes of who played, sang jazz was predominantly focused on race across the genres. Would add to it…Lady Gaga, Rod Stewart and so many others that have chosen to cross over to traditional jazz standards or jazz entertainment. Are they singing jazz? Yes! Are they jazz musicians/artists? No. Just my take!
Agree with Adam’s general sentiment that is really doesn’t matter and can be counterproductive and sometimes maddening for any musician. However, society will always want to place music, people, entertainment in a specific category…it’s kind of the human condition. Find the discussion worthy of comment from those that are in the know…like you both. Thanks.
There's a difference between jazz and jazzy, and it's all right to say so. Blood Sweat and Tears prepared me for Miles and Trane and MIngus - that was a good thing. But it's OK to define jazz, as long as you allow for wide boundaries. If I played you Beer Barrel Polka and told you it was jazz, you wouldn't have to bow down to 'my truth.' Music that's jazzy can be wonderful without being jazz. As for Neely, he's a smug dick, and I stopped listening to him a long time ago.
GALA X10, Thank you !
woah these two have a podcast? very cool. i never learned jazz but im a pop music lover who wants to inject some jazz. most jazz teachers on the internet are just telling me stuff thats over my head and ill never use. but these two have showed me how i can tell my pop music stories more tastefully!
You can only incorporate jazz by learning it. Or else you’ll come across as cheesy when putting something you don’t fully understand in another context
@@dfwherbie8814 i dont think you can make a blank statement like that. What if I simply like the chords to Autumn Leaves and want to borrow some of them?
@@suites.74 that makes no sense. “I like chords from one song, so I’ll learn that and incorporate that everywhere”? lol also, you mean the chord changes. You have to figure out how to voice them. Those changes, though, are too easily identifiable with Autumn Leaves. The min someone hears CM7, F7, B-flat, E-flat, A min, D7, people who know the song will think of the song, and it’ll work against you. And as I said earlier, if you were to insert just that in a different context, it’ll be cheesy. In order to break rules, you gotta first master them (Miles Davis said this. And I agree with him). If you don’t want to put in the work, you’re not a serious artist and musician. It’s just a past time for you, which is fine. There’s value in that too.
@@dfwherbie8814 im not really concerned with whether or not someone else thinks i am a serious artist or musician. I simply like making songs and having other people listen to them. 🤷♂️
@@dfwherbie8814 also listen to a song by Mild High Club called Homage. Hes a very very good and trained musician so not comparing myself to him but its a great song that has the Autumn Leaves changes. Even the lyrics say "Someone wrote this song before
And I could tell you where it's from
The 4736251 to put my mind at ease". I think its cute!
GALaLaLa...tenex.
So, even though this kind of thing clearly drives Adam up the wall (for reasons that are, in and of themselves, quite understandable and legitimate), I'm glad that Peter insisted on dragging him and us all through it because, here's the thing: There's a big difference between boundary maintenance (boo!) and, well, trying keep an aesthetic community of interest alive when almost all the odds are stacked against it.
I don't begrudge Laufey her popularity or notoriety, or her finding her own path through "jazz" influences. All good! Brava!
But, as (our) Adam I think acknowledges at one point, the issue other Adam (Neely) is really targeting in his video is the pop cultural media narrative that has been constructed around Laufey. And that stuff makes me furious, not only because it's musically ignorant (which, if you're covering music, seems like a real deficiency in your professional training), but also, on the evidence, seems like a contemporary version of the same old whitewashing tendency that has plagued jazz (or "jazz" or "rhythm & blues" and on and on) since, well, forever.
For me the most galling, and emblematic, moment in Adam (Neely's) video was his callout of the ignoramus who used the cover of the (superb) Fred Hersch / Esperanza Spalding album to exemplify the supposedly moribund "jazz" that needs "saving" by the likes of Laufey. Because, from a specifically "jazz perspective" (whatever the heck that might mean, in any possible situation where it might mean anything) Esperanza, on that album, just runs circles around anything Laufey has put out, and it's not particularly close.
She swings harder. She has more and richer compositional/improvisational ideas. Her voice has much more emotional range and impact. She's wittier. And on and on.
And I think we really do need a language that allows us to say just that type of thing. Aesthetic appreciation is all about making judgments--not based on heaven-sent objective standards, but based on first person reports about what different aesthetic experiences do to us. Such judgments are the bread and butter of aesthetics. And such judgments always take place within the framework of certain artistic conventions--even (maybe especially) when those conventions are being challenged and stretched (think of what Esperanza does on "Girl Talk").
In other words, I think we do want to be able to say something like: Yo, that stuff Laufey is doing is interesting, and it's cool that she's turning lots of new people on to, say, bebop language. Aweome! But if that has you digging this "jazz" thing that Laufey is talking about (and, more to the point, that her pop media narrative-makers are talking about, if mostly just to reiterate that it's dead and needs saving), then you might want to check out this other stuff over here by living jazz artists (queue "Alive at the Village Vanguard," queue the Live From Emmet's Place videos, queue Samara Joy albums, You Tubes, TikToks...) because, if you think you might be into this music, well, it's the sh*t.
Of course, to (our) Adam's point: None of this is particularly relevant to musicians qua musicians. It's simply not going to matter to the creative process at all.
Where it matters is for the critical process, which is to say the process of appreciation, of communicating our joy (ahem) in hearing certain exemplars of the music.
To take an example that Peter brings up: I want to be able to account for *why* the Sinatra of the Capitol years is so superior to the Sinatra of the earlier Columbia years. Not just assert it as my preference, but *account for* the difference as something you might also perceive, and share.
Someone is going to say: Well, "superior" *for you* maybe (queue that Big Lebowski scene, you know the one). But the problem with this "solution" is that it doesn't, let's say, express my interest in making the judgment to begin with. I wasn't trying to express my feelings for no particular reason, nor just to get someone else's validation.
Rather, I was making a judgment that (in principle at least) I think other people could, and should, share. I was saying: I hear this difference; do you hear it too? That's not an advertisement of what I believe, as if anyone cared. It's an invitation to aesthetic community.
Think of it like this: Someone says to me, "I love X's music, it's just great." And I ask, "Oh really, that's interesting, why do you think so?" And the response comes back as, "Oh, I don't know, it's just my opinion really." Now, unless we can get past this moment together, it's going to be pretty difficult to have any further conversation worth having. Because if it's nothing more than your private belief, why should I care?
If aesthetic judgments are just exchanges of subjective feelings and nothing further--me saying "yay!" and "boo!" and you saying "yay!" and "boo!" and maybe, by chance (or, more likely, similar social conditioning based on age, education, class, race, etc.) sometimes we happen to yay or boo the same things, and sometimes we don't, then they're not going to be particularly interesting topics of conversation--even if they're remain very efficient if somewhat superficial forms of social bonding.
But if we want to have an actual conversation (call it a communion) about our different aesthetic judgments (what we think is beautiful, or cool, or what have you) we're going to have to *make claims about the works themselves.* And for that, we need a language of judgment that is going to have to reference some standards, or exemplars, or comparable experiences, of some kind, if only to account for why we think we were moved more by this work, than by that one.
And this is one of the things that the concept of "genre" still does for us, I think, quite apart from selling spins and clicks.
GALA x10 I do think that labels have some use. Less so for people as they make art, but certainly for historians, students, and future generations. For instance, it would be hard to understand poetry, study it, and then to build on its history if we had no way to separate epics from sonnets and analyze them accordingly.
galax10 if a genre is just a group of people, is everything just about cliques and in-groups? i actually agree with adam neeley and you re:connecting with the present-day jazz community, but if hypothetically, andother artist in a remote place plays the tunes but would never even think to go to a jazz club, are they also not "jazz"?