Great job as always, Joshua. We don’t want to penalize the offense by calling a foul on the defense too soon, not allowing the play to start develop and finish before the whistle. Two of the 5 plays seem incorrect. Take another look making the call when the play is over. Best, for a strong season finish.
Thanks for this. very intresting. Are officials instructed to call line-ball calls one way or the other? I would like to see it called as a shooting foul if its line ball.
@@OfficialsInstitute Where it is not obvious whether the ball handler was in the act of shooting or not; where either decision can readily be substantiated.
Josh on play #4 I agree the primary defender may not have committed a foul “during the act of shooting”. BUT did you notice that the secondary defender (#34) came in and rested his arm on top of the shooters head just as the shooter went airborne? As you have advised many times, hold the whistle to see how the play develops. Had this been done, the second foul is a shooting foul all day regardless of the first defenders actions.
In the last play, what did you mean when you asked if “the foul occurred before the player was grounded”? What is the definition of grounded when a player is in the act of shooting?
All respect, Josh prob had a couple incorrect…penalizing the offense by calling a foul on the defense. Allow the play to start-develop-finish before whistling. Play accuracy will be optimized by employing a patient whistle.
#4, #5 do not seem correct. Continuous Motion rule and 6.7 Comments are not properly applied. Patient whistle, not penalizing the offense by calling a foul on the defense, will get all of these plays called correctly.
PLay #2 is obviously a shooting foul. Then play #4, player pump fakes, defender is in air and lands on player as he is going to shoot. The ruling in the video is that player was not starting the act of shooting, but what else was he doing if not starting to shoot, he had both feet on floor and may have shot from that position, did he actually have to jump to start the act? In Play #2 the player was another step from shooting still but gets benefit of doubt that he is going to shoot (clearly), Play #4 the player never gets to jump because defense lands on top of him... I would have said he was shooting.
4 of 5 with learning on play #4…thank you for this breakdown!
Great job!
Great job as always, Joshua.
We don’t want to penalize the offense by calling a foul on the defense too soon, not allowing the play to start develop and finish before the whistle. Two of the 5 plays seem incorrect. Take another look making the call when the play is over.
Best, for a strong season finish.
Thanks for your comment.
4 out of 5, not bad. Thanks for everything you do.
Great Job! Thanks for watching.
Think I got them all correct, including the last one being officials judgement.
Great job. Thanks for watching.
4 out 5. Thanks for this video
Great job! Thanks for watching.
Great inclusion of play #5. Not all plays can be clearly adjudicated
Agreed
Thanks in sharing your official institute.
It's my pleasure
Play #1 &4 not shooting foul
Play#2,3&5
Shootinh foul
Could you do more videos like this where you provide examples and then we guess. They could be for travels, fouls etc?
We’ll try to create some more. Thanks for watching.
Thanks ! No problem for watching because your videos are awesome and great ways to learn. @@OfficialsInstitute
Thanks for this. very intresting. Are officials instructed to call line-ball calls one way or the other? I would like to see it called as a shooting foul if its line ball.
What is line ball?
@@OfficialsInstitute Where it is not obvious whether the ball handler was in the act of shooting or not; where either decision can readily be substantiated.
Josh on play #4 I agree the primary defender may not have committed a foul “during the act of shooting”. BUT did you notice that the secondary defender (#34) came in and rested his arm on top of the shooters head just as the shooter went airborne? As you have advised many times, hold the whistle to see how the play develops. Had this been done, the second foul is a shooting foul all day regardless of the first defenders actions.
Did not see that one. Good catch.
In the last play, what did you mean when you asked if “the foul occurred before the player was grounded”? What is the definition of grounded when a player is in the act of shooting?
A player can either be airborne or not. So using the work grounded simply describes a player who is not airborne.
i need more
thanks for watching
4/5 the fifth needs explanation
Good job 5th play is too close to call, even in freeze frame.
All respect, Josh prob had a couple incorrect…penalizing the offense by calling a foul on the defense. Allow the play to start-develop-finish before whistling.
Play accuracy will be optimized by employing a patient whistle.
Thanks for watching
#4, #5 do not seem correct. Continuous Motion rule and 6.7 Comments are not properly applied. Patient whistle, not penalizing the offense by calling a foul on the defense, will get all of these plays called correctly.
Thanks for your input
PLay #2 is obviously a shooting foul. Then play #4, player pump fakes, defender is in air and lands on player as he is going to shoot. The ruling in the video is that player was not starting the act of shooting, but what else was he doing if not starting to shoot, he had both feet on floor and may have shot from that position, did he actually have to jump to start the act? In Play #2 the player was another step from shooting still but gets benefit of doubt that he is going to shoot (clearly), Play #4 the player never gets to jump because defense lands on top of him... I would have said he was shooting.
By written rule, he stopped his act of shooting when he recoiled for the contact, but your argument is worth considering.
4/5 but i think last video is foul on act of shooting...
Too close for me. 50/50