Another great video to help young and inexperienced officials learn what to look for to help with making the correct call..Season officials can also benefit from it..Love the videos, I share the clips with a group of officials I'm connected with and its great conversation pieces especially when we don't agree but we benefit and learn..Thanks
V good learning curve! The 5 scenario clearly demonstrate the discrepancies between Block n Charge. With ur explanation n analysis, it brings light to all ambiguities n put to clear perspective. Thks u Sir! I did harvest a lot !
Josh, great video. On play number one, who would you advise take that call? Would that normally be lead? Or would trail follow the dribbler into the lane? What do you advise?
The area that the foul happens in is the Lead's primary and even though it is a drive to the basket starting at Trail, Lead should primarily take this call. If Lead has nothing, a call from the Trail is perfectly acceptable as the Trail is following this drive all the way to the basket.
Question about Play #5. The shooter has picked the ball up, that is, started his continuous motion (7:28) before the defender is in legal guarding position (7:29). Does that make the block call correct? Thanks
Continuous motion is a factor on whether a player is considered in the act of shooting or not. The point at which the ball handler starts his shooting motion has no bearing on whether a guard has obtained or maintained a legal position. The only factor that would come into play on a player with the ball is if he was airborne before the guard obtained his position. Hope that helps.
Question, Should there ever be a time when a player is driving to the basket and there is contact with the opposing player and a no call should be made?
Every play is different, however To address your question specifically, most verticality plays involve a ball handler driving the lane and contact occurring, with the defender jumping within their own vertical plane. This type of play usually results in a no call, however every play needs to be evaluated individually and on its own merit.
@@OfficialsInstitute thanks bro for your immediate reply, coz i've observed Giannis takes long time to shoot free throw and I don't know the rules. thanks again.
1. Defender's feet were moving, block. 2. Charge, shoulder lowered. 3. Three is neither a block or a charge. It's a common shooting foul. 4. Arm extended, making that a charge. 5. Charge. Legal guarding position.
@@virom956 feet being wide have no bearing on the play unless contact is made with the leg; then it becomes a whole different story. If feet are wide and defender otherwise is legal, if contact is made with the torso, it's still a PC foul. If the feet are wide and defender is otherwise legal and dribbler goes tries to go around defender and makes leg contact, then it's a block.
@@bradwilliams6691 here the key is on 1:37 - the defender mooves towards - in such a case this is illegal as the legal move is only to side or backwards. it is Block for sure.
Another great video to help young and inexperienced officials learn what to look for to help with making the correct call..Season officials can also benefit from it..Love the videos, I share the clips with a group of officials I'm connected with and its great conversation pieces especially when we don't agree but we benefit and learn..Thanks
Thanks for watching! Really appreciate your kinds words.
Great video!
Love the way you break down LGP and if they maintain it or not.
Glad you enjoy it!
V good learning curve! The 5 scenario clearly demonstrate the discrepancies between Block n Charge. With ur explanation n analysis, it brings light to all ambiguities n put to clear perspective. Thks u Sir! I did harvest a lot !
Glad it was helpful!
Got all five correct. Thanks for the video and great explanations.
Excellent! Thanks for watching.
very good videos. It helps many refs and coaches out.
thnx. glad they are useful.
Love it awesome way to explain LGP, great job!
Thanks so much!
Got a all 5 call dis vedio is correct. thank you dis vedio
Great job. Thanks for watching.
I saw a more of a flop on play 4. I figure it would be a charge, but he flopped in my eyes on the play. Great video!
Thanks for watching.
Josh, great video. On play number one, who would you advise take that call? Would that normally be lead? Or would trail follow the dribbler into the lane? What do you advise?
The area that the foul happens in is the Lead's primary and even though it is a drive to the basket starting at Trail, Lead should primarily take this call. If Lead has nothing, a call from the Trail is perfectly acceptable as the Trail is following this drive all the way to the basket.
Question about Play #5. The shooter has picked the ball up, that is, started his continuous motion (7:28) before the defender is in legal guarding position (7:29). Does that make the block call correct? Thanks
Continuous motion is a factor on whether a player is considered in the act of shooting or not. The point at which the ball handler starts his shooting motion has no bearing on whether a guard has obtained or maintained a legal position. The only factor that would come into play on a player with the ball is if he was airborne before the guard obtained his position. Hope that helps.
I got these 5 correct. One of them was close. #4 was a push off making it a charge also.
Awesome.
Question, Should there ever be a time when a player is driving to the basket and there is contact with the opposing player and a no call should be made?
Every play is different, however To address your question specifically, most verticality plays involve a ball handler driving the lane and contact occurring, with the defender jumping within their own vertical plane. This type of play usually results in a no call, however every play needs to be evaluated individually and on its own merit.
@@OfficialsInstitute OK. Thank you so much for the response.
Could #2 be a no call?
Could #3 be an illegal contact call?
If you think the defender "flopped" in #2 a no call could be supported.
#3 is illegal contact and categorized as a blocking foul.
Way is the 4th play a charge he was moving when they had connect
Movement is allowed on all LGP plays, and shouldn't be a factor in legality UNLESS that movement is toward the opponent at the time of contact.
I got all right because of your last one
Excellent. That's fantastic.
Got all 5 correct.
Congrats. You're a master of the block/charge.
If the player control a foul? Which means is it offensive foul?
A player control foul is an offensive foul. The NFHS doesn't use that language, however, so we try to refrain from it as well.
#2 looks like a flop to me.
Could be. Thanks for watching.
i agree with all but 4. Player had legal guarding position but was a flop. better to call a block than a technical for flopping
thnx
I got 5 correct
Great job.
5 correct
Awesome. Thanks for watching.
@@OfficialsInstitute Bro how many seconds allowed to a free throw shooter?
10 seconds
@@OfficialsInstitute thanks bro for your immediate reply, coz i've observed Giannis takes long time to shoot free throw and I don't know the rules. thanks again.
4
Great Job
Got 4 out of 5 right
Great. Thanks for watching.
Much easier when action can be stopped, and we all know bleachers is the best place to make those calls
That is very true. Thanks for watching.
2 is no call
But it is not a block.
1. Defender's feet were moving, block.
2. Charge, shoulder lowered.
3. Three is neither a block or a charge. It's a common shooting foul.
4. Arm extended, making that a charge.
5. Charge. Legal guarding position.
Thanks for watching.
On #1 the moving feet thing isn't a thing. The NFHS RULE book never says you can't move your feet.
@@the1maver1ck you are right, his feet is outside of his cylinder causing of contact - block.
the Author (referee) can also make mistakes))
@@virom956 feet being wide have no bearing on the play unless contact is made with the leg; then it becomes a whole different story. If feet are wide and defender otherwise is legal, if contact is made with the torso, it's still a PC foul. If the feet are wide and defender is otherwise legal and dribbler goes tries to go around defender and makes leg contact, then it's a block.
@@bradwilliams6691 here the key is on 1:37 - the defender mooves towards - in such a case this is illegal as the legal move is only to side or backwards. it is Block for sure.
5 easy calls.
Glad you think so.
Very easy. These refs are bad.
4
Great. Thnx for watching.