Agreed. Either way I am very glad we have someone from the tech world in there helping with the guidance. I also love the fact that he is a libertarian, means less government in general.
@@jy5886 You're asking the wrong question. Do you think YOU will be better off with government full of rich people? Because you can be certain of one thing: they do not care about you.
@@wikipedia54 being rich is not the qualification but one of the indicators of one’s capabilities. I would trust people who were rich before entering the government jobs have less incentive of becoming richer than poor people.
@@jy5886 You're right, the government salary will not make them richer. So why join? The power. The power to do what they couldn't do before, make it easier for them to get richer. You haven't asked yourself why a rich person would bother entering a government job in the first place. See Nancy Pelosi for example. Or David Sacks. Both entangled in roles in government that will benefit their own wealth ahead of yours.
Perhaps we should consider abandoning the failed idea that an economy can be managed - and refocus government functions on protecting individual liberty
im so grateful for this pod that i get to tune into on a weekly basis for free. just a couple very intelligent/wealthy buddies giving us free game.. what a time we live in.
Have been a loyal listener the last 3 years. I have so enjoyed the geopolitical discussions in this forum, often changed my previous views or believed knowledge. I miss David Sacks
Wow, congratulations on your impressive investment success! Your discipline and focus on delayed gratification is truly inspiring. I'm curious, what are some of the key factors that you consider when making investment decisions? Do you have any tips for those of us who are just starting to dip our toes into the world of investing? Thanks for sharing your story!
The recruitment of successful business people to replace the lawyers that permeate government, is brilliant. This is the way it is supposed to be. The country would be better served if they would institute this policy for all future elected officials.
Are you sure? The Great Depression was cause businessmen running away with their ideas regardless of the consequences to the nations stability which then led to the rebound. Actually find it funny that it is about 100 years ago and we are following similar patterns to what led to the flip last time.
@ The depression in the 30s was caused by the Federal Reserve’s mismanagement on money supply and a lack restraint on credit. I have no idea what you are referring to in your comment. The conditions that precipitated the collapse have been building in our country over the past few years. The buying power of the dollar has declined to 3% of what it was in 1971. Stocks are being traded at ridiculous multiples. Many business people are skilled in cutting costs, improving efficiency and increasing benefits.
Lawyers may understand the legal system well, but most are incapable of governance. Too many lawyers in government, and as politicians, slows growth considerably.
@ many business people are also good at failing multiple times and relying on things like bankruptcies and protection of corporations decision makers to exploit the country while gaining rapid wealth. I’m not against stockholders gaining returns but you can only squeeze a lemon so much unless you innovate. Cost cutting doesn’t mean much, we have seen how many businesses somehow went from high quality to low quality and others just took over sectors to end up with the same practices. Years of advancements to pay more for the same or worse? Other advancements didn’t even come from companies, since they tried to hoard it. Instead it was college kids giving away tools and technology and research followed by a few years of advancements and then followed by MBAs trying to extract max value without refilling the well with new innovations. What a cabinet needs is variety. Businessmen, engineers, policymakers, someone with an ear to the people, not one class of people getting direct access to favor their business ventures.
Sacks' power comes from his visibility in this show. It would be foolish to abandon this platform and he's a pretty shrewd dude who probably realizes this.
Keith Rabois is an excellent guest! Thank you for inviting him to the show. I'll be glad when David Sacks returns to the podcast. In the meantime, I look forward to seeing David Sacks's subs for the next eight weeks. It will be fun.
Regarding Tik Tok, frankly, I'm more worried about our US government spying than Chinese spying. Domestically owned tech has inflicted unjustifiable censorship dictates on the public.
The problem with TikTok is that it gives China the power to potentially harm children in the US and exert control through propaganda/censorship. Domestic censorship is a big problem. Luckily both problems can be solved.
Please. Please. Please can we have David Sacks back. This is just NOT the same. For the 1st time ever I've skipped over large sections (not Chamath who is always brilliant) and did not watch to the end. This is not working.
Hi fellas, we’re all really looking forward to your upcoming celebration of MSTR and its addition to the QQQ. You’ll continue your fabulous and incisive coverage of the greatest financial innovation of your generation and everyone will respect your foresight & fairness in covering MSTR! 🤣🤣🤣
I am so happy there is someone noticed the world-changing quantum computer from Google. This is phenomenal and needs to follow up by younger generations!!
This is the exact point I was scrolling the comments to find. Keith made it seem like it's impossible to validate, but that's the whole point of encryption. The validation would be defeating any type of encryption with a public private key pair, being able to resolve the private key consistently with this quantum chip would be the validation.
@ exactly. The problem is “find the two prime factors of x (trillion digit number or whatever). Brute force takes forever. Validation is “multiply p by q” ie check if you guessed the right two.
If I understand/remember correctly, the Schrodinger's cat thought experiment is not in the box versus out of the box, it's whether the cat in the box is dead or alive. There's a radioactive substance that decays probabilistically, and a Geiger counter that will break a vial of poison when the counter goes off. So the probabilistic nature of the decay triggers the death of the cat in a probabilistic manner.
So when Tiktok tracks its users they are a threat and bad guys, but when WhatsApp, Facebook, Microsoft and Google do the same, it is absolutely fine. Classic American hypocracy
@@yourelawyered probably being tracked by Google, Microsoft, Apple, etc also violate the national interests of Europe, UK, Latin America and others? Or when it is done by American companies it is fine?
For physically disabled users, the new iPhone is a disaster because voice control has taken several steps back because the numbering system is no longer accurate and changes randomly. For those who use voice control to navigate the UI via the numbering system, it is now more difficult, time-consuming, and frustrating. Reminds me of Windows 95 LOL. Don't turn the iPhone into the Zune. Make Apple Great Again!
I disagree with the Tiktok thing. If any app can have these vulnerabilities, it's an OS/hardware/data access problem. Any app like Tiktok, Whatsapp, etc. should not even be able "spy" unless given permission regardless of who legally owns the app. For this reason, there are some phones now with hardware kill switches on the mic, camera, and other sensors as well as privacy mobile OSes. Google and Apple should be the ones being pushed to tighten security, not leave these loopholes untouched. Also, you can just build data access/provenance protocols so that even if China requested data legally, they wouldn't be able to do it from a technical perspective. This was the whole point of project Texas. It seems like the US enjoys keeping these security loopholes unpatched. Like why not just fix the underlying vulnerabilities? Even SMS is insecure and we still don't have a replacement. If this ban goes through, this provides precedent for a bunch of other bans like League of Legends, Temu, Capcut, etc.
Chamath can you please do us all a favor and explain MSTR to Jason? Convertible Bonds, Arbitrage and Volatility would be a nice start. Dudes a clown with his ignorence
The All-In Podcast discusses Trump's cabinet picks, Google's quantum chip, Apple's iOS issues, TikTok's legal troubles, and the state of venture capital with guest Keith Rabois. Topics include AI, crypto, and economic policies.
Exactly. Heaven forbid JCal acknowledge or give credit to Trump for being a good leader who thinks outside the box and challenges "established norms" that are no longer efficient or functional. Give credit where credit is due
Great episode… looking forward to some insights from David S next week…. That’s a beautiful and interesting background David. Would appreciate if you can share what it is.
It should be stated when talking about breaking encryption, Willow, the new quantum computer chip from Google has 105 physical cubits. However, you will need thousands of logical cubits to break current encryption. Now, depending on how much they can get the error rate down, it could take tens of thousands up to possible millions of physical cubits to get enough logical cubits to break modern encryption standards. So I don’t think it’s right around the corner. However, it is on the horizon.
Another thing is Friedberg misspeaks at 30:55 - "All modern encryption standards ... all computer technology is built on algorithms that are based on number factorization." What he means here is that asymmetric cryptography which underpins the PKI that (almost) all networking is based on (e.g. certificates). Symmetric cryptography like AES is not based on number factorization, rather much of it is based on hash functions and/or other forms of Shannon information confusion and diffusion. AFAICT it is still debated on how susceptible various symmetric preimage attacks are to quantum algorithms, but Grover's algorithm is thought to provide quadratic speedup.
@@jannichi6431 yes. More of what you see a quantum computer is is actually just a huge elaborate cooling system to keep the chips at near absolute zero
I actually kinda like this Keith guy. I feel like Sacks doesn't like to listen to science corner - even if the topics discussed will impact AI/Crypto and the things he's supposed to be advising on.
In the double slit experiment Friedberg referenced, it is not the simple act of observation that causes the collapse of the wave function. The measurement device that is used usually adds some energy to the equation and measurement = interaction. For example, if you shine light to detect the particle’s position, the light’s photons impart energy and disturb the wave-like nature of the particle. This disturbance causes the particle to appear in one place (a particle-like behavior). This collapse isn’t mystical-it’s a physical result of the interaction. I am amazed how many people still gloss over this point 🤌
Having worked in government for part of my career I always thought that government employees should be required to work in the private sector after so many years of service. Then they would understand the stressors of the average citizen.
Friedberg misspeaks at 30:55 - "All modern encryption standards ... all computer technology is built on algorithms that are based on number factorization." What he means here is that asymmetric cryptography which underpins the PKI that (almost) all networking is based on number factorization (e.g. certificates). Symmetric cryptography like AES is not based on number factorization, rather much of it is based on hash functions and/or other forms of Shannon information confusion and diffusion. AFAICT it is still debated on how susceptible various symmetric preimage attacks are to quantum algorithms, but Grover's algorithm is thought to provide quadratic speedup.
It is not about being wealthy or a businessperson. The question is, can we trust these people to run our country. Donald Trump picks were rich people that is going to be loyal to him no matter what.
@@Bryanbkkand how has that ended before? History shows it has never been favorable to the masses and usually there is a rebound after. It was 100 years ago that a bunch of nations wanted to eat their rich and did and in the US taxes hiked.
Or you could look at this way: he's secure enough to surround himself with other super successful people with experience. Results driven, not quotas driven. That's what people voted for.
The reason the iPhone doesn’t work for you is because their software kids don’t understand the importance of ‘if it’s not broken, don’t fix it." These kids’ egos get in the way of they insist upon putting their stamp on things. Wrong. When you literally have billions of folks who already know how to use your interface there is NO BETTER WAY to do it. If it takes each user an hour to become proficient at using the "new" way, you have burned over 1 billion man hours of human effort. There is literally NO BETTER WAY TO DO IT - EVER. This is why it’s so important to get it right the first time.
Yeahhhh this podcast is dead without Sacks. Not that I don't enjoy the 3 of you, but without him.....its....uhhh......yeah.... Im just now realizing just a couple minutes in, I was only really watching for him PLUS all of you 3. It works when all of you are together. Cut out Sacks? L.
![ประสบการณ์ จ้าง Developer ที่ผมจะไม่มีวันลืม [ภาค2]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/pZbsSDRrmXA/mqdefault.jpg)
Where's David!!! We need to hear the crypto plan!! Dammmmmmmittt.
Totally. Let the pod squad wet our crypto beakz.
Smh who cares?
13:35
Agreed. Either way I am very glad we have someone from the tech world in there helping with the guidance. I also love the fact that he is a libertarian, means less government in general.
And his science agenda… right? 🤣🤣🤣
I miss Sacks. 😢
13:35
Sacks is the reason I watch the show (& Chamath)
Indeed
Me too😢
We didn’t know how good we had it until it was gone
Miss David Sacks but so happy he is helping our country. Enjoyed meeting Keith Rabois.
Ditto. The chemistry was great, as was the knowledge they shared.
I’d rather have my wife leave me for a year than Sacks miss 3 weeks in a row. Keith is pretty cool tho
I feel so much better knowing David has a role in this White House.
Yeah lets put as many rich people in government
@@gr8ape111they are rich for reasons. Do you think the government will be better of with bunch of poor people?
@@jy5886 You're asking the wrong question. Do you think YOU will be better off with government full of rich people? Because you can be certain of one thing: they do not care about you.
@@wikipedia54 being rich is not the qualification but one of the indicators of one’s capabilities. I would trust people who were rich before entering the government jobs have less incentive of becoming richer than poor people.
@@jy5886 You're right, the government salary will not make them richer. So why join? The power. The power to do what they couldn't do before, make it easier for them to get richer. You haven't asked yourself why a rich person would bother entering a government job in the first place. See Nancy Pelosi for example. Or David Sacks. Both entangled in roles in government that will benefit their own wealth ahead of yours.
Miss Sackssypoo 😔😭
13:35
You’re a grown ass man, and you called another man “Sackssypoo” 🤦♂️
@@christophert8419 Thats correct Chrisypooo
@@christophert8419by the name it sounds like they may be a fm. But who knows these days 😂
@@christophert8419mate, you ain’t losing any T cells for calling someone nicknames while having anime pfp
When Sacks is gone it’s like breaking up the 4 Musketeers 😢
MAKE DAVID SACKS GREAT AGAIN
One for all, All for America!
Yeh need him back asap.
Sacks is the best part of the pod (no disrespect to the others)
It feels like we’re the ones who got broken up with
Realizing Sacks is the irreplaceable one of the pod
True, although that one week that JaCo was gone they were over a day delayed in posting the podcast.
You can feel the excitement and energy from these guys for the future of our economy. Man, I hope they're right.
Perhaps we should consider abandoning the failed idea that an economy can be managed - and refocus government functions on protecting individual liberty
im so grateful for this pod that i get to tune into on a weekly basis for free.
just a couple very intelligent/wealthy buddies giving us free game..
what a time we live in.
I love it❤
Chamath on government: "if what we want is kindergarten soccer, where everybody gets to touch the ball, that's what we are getting right now" 😂
hahaa
Trump just nominate chamath sweater czar
Keith Rabois was a refreshing change! Upgrade
Keith had great takes this week!
Have been a loyal listener the last 3 years. I have so enjoyed the geopolitical discussions in this forum, often changed my previous views or believed knowledge. I miss David Sacks
Yea lmk when David is back thank you
13:35
Same thought… this isn’t nearly the same without Sacks…
@@NiagaraWeddingVideographer stop with this - repetitive'
Glazing his donuts
Will Sacks ever be back on the pod?
13:35
Rarely I hope
I heard he's starting a pod with Dan Bongino and Trump
@Marcoose81 a weekly podcast with Trump? Doubt it
Unfortunately no. He has taken a position in the Trump administration and has retired from the podcast indefinitely. 😢
I miss you sachs
Thank you for recommending Sarah Jennine Davis on one of your videos. I reached out to her and investing with her has been amazing.
Wow, congratulations on your impressive investment success! Your discipline and focus on delayed gratification is truly inspiring. I'm curious, what are some of the key factors that you consider when making investment decisions? Do you have any tips for those of us who are just starting to dip our toes into the world of investing? Thanks for sharing your story!
Do you mind sharing info on the adviser who
assisted you? I'm 39 now and would love to
grow my portfolio and plan my retirement
@@FreyaFreya3 Sarah Jennine Davis is highly recommended
You most likely should get her basic info when you search her on your browser.
@@mayor-o1wHow do I access her ? I really need this
+156
This was a good show. I miss David, but this guest was fun and interesting.
Although I barely understood what he was talking about at first.
I just hung in there.
I find his background fascinating!
Please no more out-of-touch takes on healthcare. Signed, everyone
You're referring to the US?
Are you talking about your socialist Canada which is doing things to people that will get my comment censored on YT?
When did I sign?
The recruitment of successful business people to replace the lawyers that permeate government, is brilliant. This is the way it is supposed to be. The country would be better served if they would institute this policy for all future elected officials.
Are you sure? The Great Depression was cause businessmen running away with their ideas regardless of the consequences to the nations stability which then led to the rebound. Actually find it funny that it is about 100 years ago and we are following similar patterns to what led to the flip last time.
@ The depression in the 30s was caused by the Federal Reserve’s mismanagement on money supply and a lack restraint on credit. I have no idea what you are referring to in your comment. The conditions that precipitated the collapse have been building in our country over the past few years. The buying power of the dollar has declined to 3% of what it was in 1971. Stocks are being traded at ridiculous multiples. Many business people are skilled in cutting costs, improving efficiency and increasing benefits.
Lawyers may understand the legal system well, but most are incapable of governance. Too many lawyers in government, and as politicians, slows growth considerably.
Funny thing is that sacks is actually a lawyer😂
@ many business people are also good at failing multiple times and relying on things like bankruptcies and protection of corporations decision makers to exploit the country while gaining rapid wealth.
I’m not against stockholders gaining returns but you can only squeeze a lemon so much unless you innovate. Cost cutting doesn’t mean much, we have seen how many businesses somehow went from high quality to low quality and others just took over sectors to end up with the same practices. Years of advancements to pay more for the same or worse? Other advancements didn’t even come from companies, since they tried to hoard it. Instead it was college kids giving away tools and technology and research followed by a few years of advancements and then followed by MBAs trying to extract max value without refilling the well with new innovations.
What a cabinet needs is variety. Businessmen, engineers, policymakers, someone with an ear to the people, not one class of people getting direct access to favor their business ventures.
IT’S GREAT LEADERSHIP IN ACTION:
DJ TRUMP’s not threatened by these highly-successful, extremely wealthy people he’s surrounding himself with.
coz he knows he is a real boss
pls bring sacks back alteast once in month
13:35
Agreed. At least 1x a month to give us and America an update without journalists asking super woke questions.
Sacks' power comes from his visibility in this show. It would be foolish to abandon this platform and he's a pretty shrewd dude who probably realizes this.
Keith Rabois is an excellent guest! Thank you for inviting him to the show. I'll be glad when David Sacks returns to the podcast. In the meantime, I look forward to seeing David Sacks's subs for the next eight weeks. It will be fun.
Regarding Tik Tok, frankly, I'm more worried about our US government spying than Chinese spying.
Domestically owned tech has inflicted unjustifiable censorship dictates on the public.
We're catching hell on all sides
Gotta deal with both.
The problem with TikTok is that it gives China the power to potentially harm children in the US and exert control through propaganda/censorship. Domestic censorship is a big problem. Luckily both problems can be solved.
Please. Please. Please can we have David Sacks back. This is just NOT the same. For the 1st time ever I've skipped over large sections (not Chamath who is always brilliant) and did not watch to the end. This is not working.
Hi fellas, we’re all really looking forward to your upcoming celebration of MSTR and its addition to the QQQ. You’ll continue your fabulous and incisive coverage of the greatest financial innovation of your generation and everyone will respect your foresight & fairness in covering MSTR! 🤣🤣🤣
Whoopi! Hope David Sacks is back!
keep hoping :(
13:35
I'll tune in when Sacks return - He balanced the crew
YES, BUT THIS GUY KEITH RABIOS IS REALLY GOOD
Naaah better without him
Frieburg, making more sense of quantum computing than I've ever heard.
That’s with everything he explains. It’s his super power for sure
chamath talking out of his ass about it breaking cryptography in a few years lmaoo
Chamath’s comments on the cabinet billionaires was spot on.
He usually IS spot on .
He asks the best questions.
yea we need more billionaires they undesrtand how the system works
always 🎯
I LOVE THE NEW BESTIE
Is Sacks done on this show, now that he is in the government?
13:35
@@NiagaraWeddingVideographer Thanks!
Chamath: billionaires are just smarter! Love the common touch.
Love it!
You guys are really milking this. I think when David comes back, it will be the biggest episode on the planet.
AMEN.
Love the dynamic with Sacks, but it was amazing to have the gang go deep into tech and science corner this week!
Sacks leaving All-In, is like Justin leaving *NSYNC
I hate Apple but I love Keith's takes. Hopefully he can join in more often.
I am so happy there is someone noticed the world-changing quantum computer from Google. This is phenomenal and needs to follow up by younger generations!!
It’s exponentially easier to verify a factoring is correct than to do the factoring in the first place. That is the point of encryption basically.
This is the exact point I was scrolling the comments to find. Keith made it seem like it's impossible to validate, but that's the whole point of encryption. The validation would be defeating any type of encryption with a public private key pair, being able to resolve the private key consistently with this quantum chip would be the validation.
@ exactly. The problem is “find the two prime factors of x (trillion digit number or whatever). Brute force takes forever. Validation is “multiply p by q” ie check if you guessed the right two.
If I understand/remember correctly, the Schrodinger's cat thought experiment is not in the box versus out of the box, it's whether the cat in the box is dead or alive. There's a radioactive substance that decays probabilistically, and a Geiger counter that will break a vial of poison when the counter goes off. So the probabilistic nature of the decay triggers the death of the cat in a probabilistic manner.
This one of my top channels -keep it up guys!!!!
So when Tiktok tracks its users they are a threat and bad guys, but when WhatsApp, Facebook, Microsoft and Google do the same, it is absolutely fine.
Classic American hypocracy
You don’t understand the difference of national security risk?
@@yourelawyered probably being tracked by Google, Microsoft, Apple, etc also violate the national interests of Europe, UK, Latin America and others?
Or when it is done by American companies it is fine?
For physically disabled users, the new iPhone is a disaster because voice control has taken several steps back because the numbering system is no longer accurate and changes randomly. For those who use voice control to navigate the UI via the numbering system, it is now more difficult, time-consuming, and frustrating. Reminds me of Windows 95 LOL. Don't turn the iPhone into the Zune. Make Apple Great Again!
Should have Keith on more often, different enough from the rest of the crew but still grounded enough to give relevant input.
I disagree with the Tiktok thing. If any app can have these vulnerabilities, it's an OS/hardware/data access problem. Any app like Tiktok, Whatsapp, etc. should not even be able "spy" unless given permission regardless of who legally owns the app. For this reason, there are some phones now with hardware kill switches on the mic, camera, and other sensors as well as privacy mobile OSes. Google and Apple should be the ones being pushed to tighten security, not leave these loopholes untouched. Also, you can just build data access/provenance protocols so that even if China requested data legally, they wouldn't be able to do it from a technical perspective. This was the whole point of project Texas.
It seems like the US enjoys keeping these security loopholes unpatched. Like why not just fix the underlying vulnerabilities? Even SMS is insecure and we still don't have a replacement. If this ban goes through, this provides precedent for a bunch of other bans like League of Legends, Temu, Capcut, etc.
i get smarter everytime i listen to this pod weekly :D appreciate you keep up the good work dont change ❤
Chamath can you please do us all a favor and explain MSTR to Jason? Convertible Bonds, Arbitrage and Volatility would be a nice start. Dudes a clown with his ignorence
LOVE and miss Sacks like everyone else but Keith killed it honestly
Thanks for dropping on time
Keith was incredible - loved the pace and clarity. Great pod this week boiz!
Sacks better not be thinking he's too good for the show now that he's tzar!
Finally, a tech episode! Please keep them coming!
The All-In Podcast discusses Trump's cabinet picks, Google's quantum chip, Apple's iOS issues, TikTok's legal troubles, and the state of venture capital with guest Keith Rabois. Topics include AI, crypto, and economic policies.
I love this podcast! I love these gentlemen! I love, love the music intro. It is the best of the best! Great show guys! I missed David!
You sound like me .
I agree.
I get up and dance to it every time...lol
Exciting times with the group!
Keith drops an absolute knowledge bomb of Trump and his thousand whys, and Jason... "Let's get to the docket!"
Exactly. Heaven forbid JCal acknowledge or give credit to Trump for being a good leader who thinks outside the box and challenges "established norms" that are no longer efficient or functional. Give credit where credit is due
I’m not impressed with Keith’ expertise here. Not sure what he’s talking about! Sorry 😞
Google, TH-cam, Facebook don't track and sale our data?
We riot (spam his tweets) if Sacks isn’t back next week
So is Sacks gone permanently with a rotating 4th guest spot? Or is this just temporary while he gets settled into the new admin?
Great episode… looking forward to some insights from David S next week…. That’s a beautiful and interesting background David. Would appreciate if you can share what it is.
It should be stated when talking about breaking encryption, Willow, the new quantum computer chip from Google has 105 physical cubits. However, you will need thousands of logical cubits to break current encryption. Now, depending on how much they can get the error rate down, it could take tens of thousands up to possible millions of physical cubits to get enough logical cubits to break modern encryption standards. So I don’t think it’s right around the corner. However, it is on the horizon.
Another thing is Friedberg misspeaks at 30:55 - "All modern encryption standards ... all computer technology is built on algorithms that are based on number factorization." What he means here is that asymmetric cryptography which underpins the PKI that (almost) all networking is based on (e.g. certificates). Symmetric cryptography like AES is not based on number factorization, rather much of it is based on hash functions and/or other forms of Shannon information confusion and diffusion. AFAICT it is still debated on how susceptible various symmetric preimage attacks are to quantum algorithms, but Grover's algorithm is thought to provide quadratic speedup.
Don't we need a quantum "computer" to house the chips also?
I don't really understand what you said.
But it sounds good to me!
@@jannichi6431 yes. More of what you see a quantum computer is is actually just a huge elaborate cooling system to keep the chips at near absolute zero
I actually kinda like this Keith guy. I feel like Sacks doesn't like to listen to science corner - even if the topics discussed will impact AI/Crypto and the things he's supposed to be advising on.
Keith is freaking smart- loved new perspective
So agree with Chamath on iPhone, it’s killing me, power is corrupting
I like this guy Keith, he is really knowledgeable.
But the background is terrible.
Keith is probably one of the best choices for Sachs’s spot
Need the David, but appreciate the great pod!
Keith’s a great addition. Venture legend.
In the double slit experiment Friedberg referenced, it is not the simple act of observation that causes the collapse of the wave function. The measurement device that is used usually adds some energy to the equation and measurement = interaction. For example, if you shine light to detect the particle’s position, the light’s photons impart energy and disturb the wave-like nature of the particle. This disturbance causes the particle to appear in one place (a particle-like behavior). This collapse isn’t mystical-it’s a physical result of the interaction. I am amazed how many people still gloss over this point 🤌
Come on J… you got style, those glasses do not. It’s distracting from the content. Maybe steal some from Chamath’s home next time you visit 🤓
Having worked in government for part of my career I always thought that government employees should be required to work in the private sector after so many years of service. Then they would understand the stressors of the average citizen.
We want Sacks!
Back to the roots boys - tech, venture, startups - love it
Sacks is the only reason why I watched this pod…
Brilliant quantum computing discussion
Sacks has outgrown them
For now ..
Keith is great! Would love to see more from him on this show.
Tesla made me enjoying commute much better. Recently, the commute was the best part of my work. I only go to office 9 times per month.
Already watched on X... 1st for me... usually watch here 1st...
The All-In Holiday Party was great! Thank you all! Great meeting so many of you in the comments there too.
The oriental red and gold shelf paired with wainscot paneling against a navy wall is hurting my right side of the brain.
Great Pod!!
Friedberg misspeaks at 30:55 - "All modern encryption standards ... all computer technology is built on algorithms that are based on number factorization." What he means here is that asymmetric cryptography which underpins the PKI that (almost) all networking is based on number factorization (e.g. certificates). Symmetric cryptography like AES is not based on number factorization, rather much of it is based on hash functions and/or other forms of Shannon information confusion and diffusion. AFAICT it is still debated on how susceptible various symmetric preimage attacks are to quantum algorithms, but Grover's algorithm is thought to provide quadratic speedup.
Perfect timing, beer ‘o clock in advance 😂
Sacks was one of my favorites. It’s kinda like the Beatles splitting up. Not sure I’ll enjoy this pod as much.
It is not about being wealthy or a businessperson. The question is, can we trust these people to run our country. Donald Trump picks were rich people that is going to be loyal to him no matter what.
FU money means you don’t need to be loyal no matter what.
@@Bryanbkkmost people enter politics for power and money. They aren’t doing it out of the good of their hearts, regardless of what they say
@@Bryanbkkand how has that ended before? History shows it has never been favorable to the masses and usually there is a rebound after. It was 100 years ago that a bunch of nations wanted to eat their rich and did and in the US taxes hiked.
@@on2a wrong again. Most enter politics WITH good intent, the ones who stay in become complacent, jaded and corrupt.
Or you could look at this way: he's secure enough to surround himself with other super successful people with experience. Results driven, not quotas driven. That's what people voted for.
We need David back!!!!😢
FYI ALL IN , No Sacks, I'm out
Buh bye
@@stephj9378 LOL
The reason the iPhone doesn’t work for you is because their software kids don’t understand the importance of ‘if it’s not broken, don’t fix it." These kids’ egos get in the way of they insist upon putting their stamp on things. Wrong. When you literally have billions of folks who already know how to use your interface there is NO BETTER WAY to do it. If it takes each user an hour to become proficient at using the "new" way, you have burned over 1 billion man hours of human effort. There is literally NO BETTER WAY TO DO IT - EVER. This is why it’s so important to get it right the first time.
Sacks is bullshiting us, no one is too busy to do a 2 hour pod once a week.
Please bring back Sacks!
No more Sacks? I'm out.
Yeahhhh this podcast is dead without Sacks.
Not that I don't enjoy the 3 of you, but without him.....its....uhhh......yeah....
Im just now realizing just a couple minutes in, I was only really watching for him PLUS all of you 3.
It works when all of you are together. Cut out Sacks? L.
This is an L take. Love Sacks but it's refreshing to give tech the spotlight for a change. it wasn't supposed to be a politics podcast.
Chamath really entertained with the nerds @27:58
Miss sacks 😢
great podcast! thank you !
Sacks we miss you!!!
Not sure how I should listen to this pod now, given the direct political link and tech taking over power of us