Actually Fire Departments in some areas used to be on a fee basis or privately contracted, homes would have the department logo on there home, eventually cities decided that was a bad idea , go figure
Lol when my friend and I quit our jobs at a car dealership, about 6 other people quit later that week as well. Everyone was just waiting for someone to make the first move away from that place
Because the wrong scalpel was used to cut the patient's "..." as the surgeon thought it would better for this situation even tho the Surgery was a success, we can't allow that in out clinic.
I was a lifeguard for 4 years. Every time I had to save a life was in an area that wasn't mine. But a life is a life, and I don't care about imaginary lines o the sand.
Why on earth are private companies providing life guards? Surely it's a public beach and should have publicly funded lifeguards to patrol the entire beach! At least, that is how it works in Australia. We also have volunteer lifeguards in areas that can't afford paid council lifeguards. But then I saw the beach in the video is in Florida, US. So have people there voted to privatize beaches? Or just public services?
@@lyrebird9749 Public funds buy the use of private companies~ then the private companies suck up all the blame, make there own rules, and deal with all the recriminations and all the responsibility of a duty of care for staff. The public fund office is not then held accountable for anything once they have hired out the duties to a private company. This is often the cheaper option, and the main concern for pubic funds is not to over spend. This is not my own personal view, it is just what happens.
@@caldwellfisher5288 This is awful. It's bad enough that public authorities want to outsource lifesaving to private companies. But they shouldn't be allowed to also make their own rules. People need to demand better from their state/county officials.
@@lyrebird9749 I agree, but "people" rarely know anything about it let alone want to fight against it. In any event one would expect a private company to do the same or better than one that public authorities might provide. And very likely the same staff /the same bosses/ and the same rules will move between working for private and public authorities. The rule is absurd of course, and could easily have been over looked.
@@caldwellfisher5288 It's a shame that people don't know who is responsible for life saving at their local beach, or are willing to raise this issue with local authorities. Democracy depends on people holding elected officials to account! Also, it's true that people in the same industry often move between public and private employers. But I don't agree that one would normally expect a private company to do better than a public service. A public service is there to serve the public and is accountable to the public, while a private company is there to make profits and is only accountable to it's owners or shareholders. Of course you can have poor service delivery in both public and private sectors. It depends on the service. Workplace culture and unions can also play a role. Some public service staff really don't care about their work, while some private companies pride themselves on doing a great job. But often private companies do cut corners to provide the bare minimum service they are contracted for at cheapest cost. That's not always the best service. And that's clearly the case at this beach where the private company insists on only being responsible for a particular area, even though swimmers need help along the whole beach. Thankfully some staff saw the absurdity in this. But really the locals need to raise their voice with the local authorities and demand a better service for the whole beach. Anyway, thanks for the chat :)
@@ilas5629 True, because really the part where the person was drowning was outside the area. But I think for some people it could be traumatizing to watch a person screaming for help and then just nobody coming to rescue.
Were is the mayor of the city to give that young man his key to the city. Why didn't any politician come in and say anything good about this young man.
@@rebeccahicks2392 dont know that .but my father is expert swimmer he told me once no matter how strong the current am caught in.. i can always come on surface .. Maybe one can go underwater and when the strong current stop they can come up?
Toby The Phantom There's a line between following the rules and just plain fucking stupid If someone's life is at stake, just break the rules and save him.
@Max Gill that's what i was thinking... they "made a pact to save lives instead of their jobs" by discouraging people from working there and all resigning. Big brain move.
@Max Gill Its a protest. If they all resigned in protest there might be a change in rules however small a chance. If they stayed on like nothing happened that slim chance of a change of rules becomes almost non existent. As long as people support bad rules because of apathy bad rules will continue to exist unless people show their dissent.
Joe Lane he was using a past tense because the pact was made before the incident happened so they collectively decided before it happens "if" it does, then we walk out. That's why the word if is used
This happens way too commonly now. I myself got fired for putting out an apartment fire and pulling a man out of the fire who had passed out from the smoke. My boss fired me the next day because " You're not a fireman" So apparently I'm supposed to just let people die....
God bless the helpers in the world ❤ How dare these people in power discourage human beings from helping a fellow neighbour! May they be held accountable!!!
Nah, it won't work. Besides the phrase "if everybody banded together".... Is always synonymous with socialism so...... For this kinds of causes yeah i think everybody would almost sign up but for other purposes for example socialism..... Doubt it
A life guard living to his name. I don't know where these guys are today but if they need help it's our duty as a society to provide for them, we need such people
!00% Agree. No way I could just watch someone die knowing I could help them. Fire me, I'll love my job but save my humanity. What a disgrace of a company too BTW.
Imagine the guilt that would have been eating at him for the rest of his life if he had allowed someone to drown just because of company rules. In the long run, he definitely made the right decision. Good man!
@Thunder'sDud Imagine if it had been you in the water, not being allowed to have been rescued-that would have been one excruciating death for you. But that's okay, eh? Right, got it.
There's a lot of stupidity like this going on, because Florida's legal system is supportive of the most ridiculous abuses of employees. I'm surprised the news reported it.
It's a private area of the beach and therfore owned by a private entity. It is probabky insured as well as the lifeguards. If a lifeguard breaks your sternum when giving you cpr (quite normal) you can then sue him and his employer for damages. They are insured for this between the signs but the employee puts them at risk outside. I can't say I agree but that's the reasoning.
Sir your zone's lifeguard is on lunch I've gotta follow policy as I am outside my lifeguard jurisdiction. The guy would be like what zones heeeeelllllpppp
Haha! 😂🤣😋 This is appalling though lol! If the guy was swimming in a zone then where was the lifeguard of that zone?! Beaches aren't Microsoft excel sheets. Who the heck thought of that stupid rule?! Theres no logic it's as if they think multiple people are gonna be drowning all at once all over the place it is a downright silly policy
@@ComputerJunkie00 Good that Tommy rejected, honestly a company that had a policy like that in the first probably only changed it because of the horrible publicity it got.
Mummified - exactly and if that happened the boss would flip flopped and said something like - I would never fire someone for saving a mans life regardless of the rules
Just fyi I was on the beach and that kid had nothing to do with saving the mans life, he was already pulled out of water by the time he arrived. And he stayed in the wrong section even after the right lifeguard arrived(like 30 seconds after him) what if someone was drowning in the station he left....
@@ryantheallknowing3863 If someone was drowning in the station he left, then bystanders will ask other stations just like how this first one started...
The lifeguard saved the drowning man out of good nature. The company fired him coz they don't want to get sued. However, a reasonable person would bite what he could chew. There's a small zone assigned because whoever made the policy knew that lifeguards aren't superman. What if you save the guy outside of the zone, but when you return, someone inside the zone is drowning? You would've saved the guy who swam at his own risk, and be unfair to the guy who would not have swam if not for the nearby lifeguard. If you were the guy who drowned in the safe zone, would you find the lifeguard's action to be acceptable? Answer on your own, it's just a rhetoric.
@@biggiganticbones also, if a person died in a safe zone when lifeguard rescuing others one , family of died person will sue the company of millions and most likely court say pay them as your duty is to protect within safe zone not outside... So if i am the decision maker i would fire him as well i cant risk my company for anyone life
@@biggiganticbones Life is not perfect you can't always save everyone. Ignoring someone dying just on the off chance that another person might start drowning in your zone during the time you are saving that person, is literal insanity. You don't ignore something that is really happening for a mere possibility of what could happen.
I really love that his co-workers stood up for this lifeguard. I know the company is now apologizing to him, but I don't think it's because they're sorry. It's because they are embarrassed by the negative publicity.
@@jsmith-u5i nobody was in danger in his area while he went out for the other man. The worst punishment he should’ve gotten was a warning. “Someone could’ve gotten in danger while he was out”. Nobody did though, he should be told not to do that again because there’s is a risk that could happen, and that’s it.
This is the problem with Insurance companies. They limit us so much. That they are now putting our lives in danger instead of what they are there for. To help people.
Yeah huge respect but the also just jeopardized the company it's called Liability Insurance liability anything that they do the company is responsible for
@@dramafreak7122 by that logic, the company will consider liability more important than human lives. You have any idea how disgusting and immoral that is?
So that's why the stuff on aisle 5 at Walmart was on Clarence it had after birth on it it wasn't peppermint candy cane Christmas gunk well congratulations a penny saved is a penny earned 👏
But I dont understand where they are getting this "liability" thing from as many states have "Good Samaritan" laws which protect people from such things.
@@Flakjacket96 It probably has to do with insurance/liability. When you run a business you have to deal with the liabilities and they dictate what you can or cannot do to maintain coverage. It's the unfortunate reality. It's like why you have to clock out at many jobs on breaks if you leave the premises because they are liable for your actions and it doesn't fall under their liability insurance. Going past that post while on the clock exposed the company to uncovered liability for himself and actions from the victim due to not complying with a contract. Glad everything worked out and hope the young man finds another job or another contract for the area is crafted.
“Liability issues” = Fear that the company could be fined. Money was more important to the company than a man’s life. Respect for all the lifeguards that did the right thing.
@Carrot Muffins The chances of that happening would have been about one in a ... billion? While the chances of the man dieing (had he not been rescued) was one in ... one? No lifeguard with even just a shred of morality would have stood by and watched a man drown in that situation. So, in the end, if we’re honest, it was a financial decision to fire the lifeguard. (“Better to let a man drown than to risk a one-in-a-billion chance of their being financially liable for another man’s death on their side of the beach.”)
@Karabas TV Much logic, perhaps, for an hour. But at the end of the day, are thousands of people applauding their actions ... or are they shaking their heads in disgust? It probably didn’t do much for their brand image.
@@robertdobie2544 It's bad for their brand image because the lifeguard went outside the bounds. If the lifeguard had stayed in the bounds, it wouldn't have been so bad. If they made no repercussions, it could keep happening. THen one day if someone was in trouble on both sides of the line at the same time, the company would be in a big problem. Basically, the lifeguard is the one who put the company in a bad place. Security guards have to stay in their area. There is no reason to think lifeguards should be different.
@@AshiStarshade So, what you are saying is that, had you been the lifeguard on duty, you would have run over to the border of your side of the beach. Then stopped. Then, watched as the man drowned. While explaining to the drowning man that, “One day if there were two people drowning at the same time, and I wasn’t on my side of the beach, the company would be in a big problem.” Well, okay. I suppose that would have made the drowning man feel a little better, at least. But what if the drowning man had been six inches across the border? Would you still have turned a blind eye?
@@futsk01 maybe so with our leadership being of low standards. but these young men have set an example of just how far above the bar standard they are at least by his and his friends actions.THEY WILL LEAVE NO MAN OR WOMEN BEHIND. unlike some leaders we know.
I hope you're speaking of _politicians_ in leadership positions, because if you mean men who are leaders _in general_ (and that means _any_ positions of leadership), I challenge your theory and defy you to provide real-world examples that _most men_ indeed fit your blanket statement. Further, I posit that you don't know enough men in positions of leadership to extrapolate even a _semi-accurate_ cross-section of the men who fall under what you speculate, and that your theory is based on anecdotal evidence and the men _you_ interact with, as opposed to empirical data.
because you crossed a protected area! that's the reason bro (i don't say what he did is wrong, actually what he did can't be valuated in money nor power, that's what make us "humans", but since humans created a System that organize our unique behaviors and creativity with the abilitiy to process and decide" the system is like human supervision who act as a white side of our entity, while entity our instinct ego, work as our black side, the us "humans" with the unique ability can process, analyse and decide depend on how we grow, envirement and self motivation, and that what made us unlike any other creature, survive the longest time possible in this world. i conclude this exhibit with 3 things the programated us "the system" white the controversial us "the ego" black the us physical/moral us "humans" gray
For those wondering.. Tomas and friends were offered jobs back but they refused. Publico backlash is a hell of a thing for a company. Tomas was given a key to the city at an event in his honor where the mayor also announced that they would no longer be using that company. He was also thanked in person by the man he saved a Mr. Maksim Samartsev from Estonia. "All guards would have done the same thing. I think all of us deserve this. All I did was do what I supposed to do." - Tomas Lopez.
They probably have that rule because if someone else is drowning in the area the lifeguard was supposed to protect, then the corporation can be sued for 10s of millions of dollars
He did his job he got fired but if he didn’t do his job and let the man drown he would’ve probably get fired as well so this so I’m confused on this rule
@@elliotthill7008 it has nothing to do with this case, the job says lifeguard, if you arent allowed to save life then why bother being a "lifeguard". And your statement is stupid, if you can save someone's life then you do it, stop fucking following the rules all the time, try being a human, not a robot who always follows orders and rules
Maybe the lifeguard can't go out of the protected area, but a citizen can. And maybe Tommy - just like the former "president" - THOUGHT that he would do his lunch break now, which gave him all the right in the world to save a man‘s life.
So amazingly ridiculous! Why do people make rules that don’t even make sense? So very glad that they all stuck together to prove a point and a cause. The person who was saved and his family are even happier!
How they want the lifeguards to act: 1st lifeguard: Ah yes that man appears to be doing the DEATH 2nd lifeguard: why it seems so 1st:should we help him? 2nd: and risk losing our jobs? 1st: there are somethings you got to do no matter what is the rules what only matters is what you feel in your heart and thats between you and god... 2nd:wow... 1st:good thing were atheists! Everybody at the beach:HARHARHARHARHAR Guy doing the DEATH's spirit:HAR...HAR...HAR
Well if a patient has a DNR order or wants to stop treatment to die on their own terms and a doctor decides to save them against their against their wishes then yeah a doctor should at least be scolded for that.
Man not only did that guy choose to save a life instead of save face, but so did his peers. I'm proud of all of them for choosing to be human over employees.
it would make sense if they fired a lifeguard for patrolling that area instead of the area under their jurisdiction, but firing him after he SUCCESSFULLY saved someone is insane
Im so glad his homies backed him up by quitting.
I can't stop looking at your username because it's beyond awesome!!!
your username..i can't stop loooking... *MOMENT OF REALIZATION* _AH NANI?! IS THIS THE POWER OF AN ENEMY STANDO?!_
Yes those are true friends and heroes.
Is that a jojo refrence?
Your user name is just *W O W*
That’s like telling firefighters they can’t go near a burning house because of liability reasons
Actually Fire Departments in some areas used to be on a fee basis or privately contracted, homes would have the department logo on there home, eventually cities decided that was a bad idea , go figure
Republican America ...
That’s exactly what happens..
iamchillydogg bruh
@@louieDsypo wasn't our last President Democrat though? That fire story was during 2010 when a Democratic president was in office.
All the homies backing him up. Respect
Kai Gaming real g
True
Lol when my friend and I quit our jobs at a car dealership, about 6 other people quit later that week as well. Everyone was just waiting for someone to make the first move away from that place
Cody Johnson good for y’all
Cody Johnson
Awesome dude, but why did y’all leave? Was the Manager crappy or what?
Took me 11 years to see this but massive respect for this guy.
Lol I Just hit enter on my comment and saw yours. Took me that long too. I hadn't noticed that part, 😂
Indeed
I just seen this myself. Hope all those youngmen r doing great!
I didn’t even notice it was from 12 years ago. Jeez why the hell is this recommended
It's been 12 years lol
“It’s very simple, just drown inside this designated area”
No, no he's got a point
Yep he has a point
Reminds me of the NHS.
@@gleiraffe ....right....
I think hes onto something
2025: Surgeon fired after he operated his patient succesfully.
the patient was suicidal and wanted to die, sues the doctor for saving his life.
Because the wrong scalpel was used to cut the patient's "..." as the surgeon thought it would better for this situation even tho the Surgery was a success, we can't allow that in out clinic.
we are going to come back to this in 5 years time
2025 is not gonna come
Rajiv jaigopal wadhwa that’s sounds exactly like the beginning of the Incredibles
I was thinking what if the drowning man was their boss.
save his life anyway then throw his arse back in the ocean :P
Obey his stupid made up policy.
You must abide by the rules
Save him, then get fired
He wanted to.. end... himse... well thats dark
I was a lifeguard for 4 years. Every time I had to save a life was in an area that wasn't mine. But a life is a life, and I don't care about imaginary lines o the sand.
Why on earth are private companies providing life guards? Surely it's a public beach and should have publicly funded lifeguards to patrol the entire beach! At least, that is how it works in Australia. We also have volunteer lifeguards in areas that can't afford paid council lifeguards. But then I saw the beach in the video is in Florida, US. So have people there voted to privatize beaches? Or just public services?
@@lyrebird9749 Public funds buy the use of private companies~ then the private companies suck up all the blame, make there own rules, and deal with all the recriminations and all the responsibility of a duty of care for staff. The public fund office is not then held accountable for anything once they have hired out the duties to a private company. This is often the cheaper option, and the main concern for pubic funds is not to over spend. This is not my own personal view, it is just what happens.
@@caldwellfisher5288 This is awful. It's bad enough that public authorities want to outsource lifesaving to private companies. But they shouldn't be allowed to also make their own rules. People need to demand better from their state/county officials.
@@lyrebird9749 I agree, but "people" rarely know anything about it let alone want to fight against it. In any event one would expect a private company to do the same or better than one that public authorities might provide. And very likely the same staff /the same bosses/ and the same rules will move between working for private and public authorities. The rule is absurd of course, and could easily have been over looked.
@@caldwellfisher5288 It's a shame that people don't know who is responsible for life saving at their local beach, or are willing to raise this issue with local authorities. Democracy depends on people holding elected officials to account!
Also, it's true that people in the same industry often move between public and private employers. But I don't agree that one would normally expect a private company to do better than a public service. A public service is there to serve the public and is accountable to the public, while a private company is there to make profits and is only accountable to it's owners or shareholders.
Of course you can have poor service delivery in both public and private sectors. It depends on the service. Workplace culture and unions can also play a role. Some public service staff really don't care about their work, while some private companies pride themselves on doing a great job. But often private companies do cut corners to provide the bare minimum service they are contracted for at cheapest cost. That's not always the best service.
And that's clearly the case at this beach where the private company insists on only being responsible for a particular area, even though swimmers need help along the whole beach. Thankfully some staff saw the absurdity in this. But really the locals need to raise their voice with the local authorities and demand a better service for the whole beach.
Anyway, thanks for the chat :)
"They made a pact to save lives not their jobs"
Damn that's beautiful
"Because that's what heroes do"
They probably got the job because they like saving people's jobs, not saving the company's money from being sued.
The Fellowship of the Beach
@Silicon Nomad and then this guy becomes the CEO of the Lifeguard thing
The Return of the Lifeguard
You have 999 likes, let me make it to a 1000
"If you could just drown in the designated zone, that'd be great"
🤭
Lmao
'wow, thats such good advice! I should try to drown there instead of here. Definitely something I can control. Thanks!'
Its like thats what they wanted him to do
Praise the son
Probably a good sign its time to work for someone else.
@@logan0223 wrong
@@logan0223 n o p e
@@logan0223 You think so?
@Suraj Jha She/he just said that this Comment is going to be famous, She/he deleted it. Lel
Hey verified person
Young men with principles. These boys have been raised right. Good for them.
*Their boss thought they should be like this*
"Man drowning nearby"
Lifeguard tower: Out of range.
Like in shooter games he will respawn
@THEAMAZINGSPIDER 69 you are an amazing spider!
@@SamsungS23Ultr 😂
@@wrendrawsstuff6403 egg
@@SamsungS23Ultr I can’t believe you just said that to me :0000
*egg*
His coworkers resigned too to support him. All of them are heroes.
That shouldn't really make them heroes, I'd say in my opinion its what anybody else should do.
@@eyi768 Yes, it is common sense but not everybody would do it.
@@ilas5629 True, because really the part where the person was drowning was outside the area. But I think for some people it could be traumatizing to watch a person screaming for help and then just nobody coming to rescue.
@@Jake420probably cause there wasnt any fucking lifeguards over there..?
@@Jake420 bro.. this is the most unknowledgeable conversation I have ever had, good day.
Teacher gets arrested for teaching students
Happy student Noises"
@WarLead2792 we used to get in trouble for finishing our school work too early, apparently it was unfair on the people still working on it.
Taxi driver gets arrested for taking customer to destination
Teaching outside school
*STUDY AT YOUR OWN RISK!*
Whoever runs the company should go to prison.
They’re called LIFEguards not chairguards, why is humanity getting dumber by the year?
by the second
By the penny
Every time we speak a single word.
its in florida dosent surprise me
This is 7 years ago only imagine today
This is crazy. He should be rewarded, not fired. He saved a life for crying out loud
Were is the mayor of the city to give that young man his key to the city. Why didn't any politician come in and say anything good about this young man.
wow found this vid on recomend after 7 year
Yeah lol it’s literally his job
It doesn't matter in the eyes of corporate.
Thomas Correa If corporate doesn’t care about him, then politicians certainly won’t
Lifegaurd's bosses son is drowning
Lifeguard: sorry out of my jurisdiction
@@crimsonfulgrim big brain time
Boss: YOU’RE FIRED! WHAT KIND OF LIFEGUARD ARE YOU?! Lifeguard: A Lifeguard who follows their policy 😏
666likes
@@Born2Losenot2win right, now I can't like it
Pro gamer move
I was wept into a tide but a lifeguard saved me. I am grateful for these lifeguards saving lives over their jobs.
Did u learn to swim
@@ilupillu4915 Good swimmers can still get carried away by a current or riptide.
@@rebeccahicks2392 dont know that .but my father is expert swimmer he told me once no matter how strong the current am caught in.. i can always come on surface ..
Maybe one can go underwater and when the strong current stop they can come up?
Why even have life guards at that beach then???!!!
I Stole your Cookie while you read my username True! The man being a good samaritan and doing his job still got him fired!
Tokahontas Yeah, sounds good to me
Toby The Phantom play suppose that some stupid rule is more important than someone’s life
Toby The Phantom Rules aren’t everything. You sound like the type of bitch that should run for dictator in China/Russia.
Toby The Phantom There's a line between following the rules and just plain fucking stupid
If someone's life is at stake, just break the rules and save him.
It's heartwarming to hear that all the other lifeguards resigned in protest
Tru
yea they boycotted and no other life guard gonna want to get hired there lol
@Max Gill that's what i was thinking... they "made a pact to save lives instead of their jobs" by discouraging people from working there and all resigning. Big brain move.
@Max Gill Its a protest. If they all resigned in protest there might be a change in rules however small a chance. If they stayed on like nothing happened that slim chance of a change of rules becomes almost non existent. As long as people support bad rules because of apathy bad rules will continue to exist unless people show their dissent.
Yell yeah it is. So many people are cowards to stand up to evil employers, especially in Western countries outside of the US.
What’s the point in having a lifeguard station that lifeguards aren’t allowed to leave??? Is that not the point of lifeguards???
If you have private security guards at your house, and your neighboors house gets robbed, they arent supposed to go over to save the neighboors house.
Federico Alvarez
I bloody well hope they would go next door and save my neighbours. It’s the right thing to do.
Coco Caramel Ikr
Federico Alvarez
Lol so they’re just gonna watch the neighbors get robbed and the thieves get away??!!!??😂😂
@@PlayCenterShop it's called "doing the right thing"
Now THIS is what integrity looks like! Well done young men and God bless you all. Much respect from England.
Lifeguard: I just saved a life.
His boss: No, you ruined his death.
Underated comment this deserves likes
Just me
Becuz it’s too late
@@Justme-gw2xt Man, I just wanna read something cool. Not another generic reply 😞
@@FestiveRocket so
He should’ve ask for consent before saving him🤦🏼♂️
Doctor gets fired for saving a mans life outside the hospital
Nice example but the doctor might was off duty unlike the lifeguard
Pls don't r/woosh me
The man in the mask r/woosh
DollarDiego HD
Damn that’s good
wE HAve liAbiLitY ISsuEs
Doctors can't help when off duties.
The fact that they made a pact to all quit if this scenario happened is sooo respectable
What's the point of a lifeguard who can't leave their station? That's so stupid. Leaving someone to choose between watching death and losing their job
@@fawadchaudhry6654 exactly
idk who was the guy who fired him
What do you mean by “if?”
@L This guy gets it. Tho he shouldn't be fired imo, just warned of the consequences or smth, there has to be a middle ground
Joe Lane he was using a past tense because the pact was made before the incident happened so they collectively decided before it happens "if" it does, then we walk out. That's why the word if is used
This happens way too commonly now.
I myself got fired for putting out an apartment fire and pulling a man out of the fire who had passed out from the smoke.
My boss fired me the next day because " You're not a fireman" So apparently I'm supposed to just let people die....
You did the right thing God bless. Wishing you the best for the future ❤
This should be considered wrongful termination (not sure if it would be legally speaking, but it should be)
God bless the helpers in the world ❤ How dare these people in power discourage human beings from helping a fellow neighbour! May they be held accountable!!!
bring your boss down with you and get a payout
Your former boss is evil
Good guy is a lifeguard. LIFE... GUARD... not a "deathwatcher".
"Deathwatcher" so accurately describing what the company wants, but such a badass name
the most metal thing of 2020
Actually build good.
I only liked for how awesome deathwatcher sounds
"Deathwatcher" sounds like something out of game of thrones.
“They chose to save lives instead of their jobs” respect 🙌
Alex N who tf liked this? It would’ve been perfect at 420. I’m going to like it now cause 422 is 420 too... 🥴
Wtf are u talking about bro
My god 7 year olds on a comment section
They took a job to watch people die. They knew it and took the money.
@Venomous Dragon are you in my country illegally?
I'm impressed that the other lifeguards resigned in solidarity. Think how the world would change if everybody banded together to do the right thing.
Prima61 no that would be collectivism
Nah, it won't work. Besides the phrase "if everybody banded together".... Is always synonymous with socialism so......
For this kinds of causes yeah i think everybody would almost sign up but for other purposes for example socialism..... Doubt it
@@itsmeracoon7907 & Zero
Can you think of a better course of action, and/or a better outcome in this scenario?
Well other parts of the world have strong workers unions.
@@prima6170 that's why i said "in this kind of causes" but never socialism
Wow what men of Integrity! You all are very admirable... 🙂
Imagine if the boss was drowning, and the lifeguard was just like “yeah sorry, can’t leave my station or I’ll get fired”
Well well well how the turntables
@@bobjones2294 yes the nrut have elbat
@@bobjones2294 selbatnrut eht woh llew llew lleW
@@cyanscrewdriver2092 llew llew llew woh eht selbatnrut
The ultimate r/prorevenge
"They chose to save Lives , over their jobs "
THEY ARE THE TRUE HEROES
No they are clearly criminals
@@neupapier2241 why?
@@Kyinnoo he joking
@@stillepicddt684 oh
Please just change your name bruv thanks
Life guard: lets someone die
Boss: *here you go a raise!*
Ikr! That is a stupid boss
well it is the drowner's fault for not reading the sign tbh
so wtf is the point of having a lifeguard then?
yep that sounds like what would happen
More like a Deathguard if you ask me
A life guard living to his name.
I don't know where these guys are today but if they need help it's our duty as a society to provide for them, we need such people
I'd rather be fired than getting up every morning thinking I just let a man die when i can do something to save him. Conscience will eat you alive.
Agreed
!00% Agree. No way I could just watch someone die knowing I could help them. Fire me, I'll love my job but save my humanity. What a disgrace of a company too BTW.
That requires having a conscience to begin with. The people who run that company obviously don't suffer from any such "limitations."
the right thing to do was stay at the life guard post and ignore the drowning man
@@markvanhook1923 the right thing to do is to gun down the boss of the company
i bet u if he didn’t do anything he still would’ve got fired
Yeah
DomSoWavy exactly
Strait facts
Damned if you do, damned if you don't..smh😒
Tami Bob-Manuel he probably would’ve been charged with negligence by the family of the drowned guy even though he didn’t break the rules
Imagine the guilt that would have been eating at him for the rest of his life if he had allowed someone to drown just because of company rules. In the long run, he definitely made the right decision. Good man!
Really? You think in the long run he made the right decision, not letting someone die? Thank you, Brigadier General Obvious.
@Thunder'sDud Imagine if it had been you in the water, not being allowed to have been rescued-that would have been one excruciating death for you. But that's okay, eh? Right, got it.
This should be the top comment.
@@ThunderPants13 ???
@@duffbaker9554 nah, weirdo was just being dumbass... err, I mean smart-ass
Good to see that we have young men with principles. Good on ya fellas!
The fact that you can get FIRED for saving someone’s life is outrageous. I didn’t even know stupid rules like this even existed until now.
There's a lot of stupidity like this going on, because Florida's legal system is supportive of the most ridiculous abuses of employees. I'm surprised the news reported it.
@@George-pf8zb probably because the guy he saved had a friend or family on the media.
It’s all because of liability, aka money.
Cops get fired all the time for saving lives but no one talks about it.
You can legally get sued for attempting cpr on someone unless you have a cpr card
Lifeguard: *today i watch someone drowning and I couldn’t save him*
Boss : *good job*
Hahaha
And gets a promotion
Gets a medal of honor
My favorite comment in here
I think that Will be fitting for Graystillplays or Floridaman intro line XD
lifeguard: *saves a man's life"
boss: *we don't do that here*
That is not we do here trying to fucking safe a life isn't important
🤣
But boss the rip took him outta bounds🤷 your fired 🤬
...when your boss is so stupid that he cannot figure out the title of the job it is best to move on
What he was supposed to do was take out a camera and record the drowning person
They're called lifeguards for a reason. That company is fucked up.
“Protected area?” What’s the point of having a protected area if you can’t protect anyone?
There is absolutely no point.
They are protecting the area, not anyone.
Padraig H yeah, I heard TH-cam bots have been deleting comments that have a link in it, don’t know why.
It's a private area of the beach and therfore owned by a private entity. It is probabky insured as well as the lifeguards. If a lifeguard breaks your sternum when giving you cpr (quite normal) you can then sue him and his employer for damages. They are insured for this between the signs but the employee puts them at risk outside. I can't say I agree but that's the reasoning.
Aaron B but it gives no excuse just to watch someone drown when they are outside the protected area.
The hell’s the point of a LIFEguard if they can’t even save people, which is their job!!!!
To sit and watch
@@Ykwhatimean- sit and watch people drown with popcorn in their arms
ikr doesnt make any sense, think the owner of the company needs reeducating
@@Mr_Tea_Rexx "i got fired for doing my job better then i was supposed to"
@@Ykwhatimean- whaaaa ??
"HELP HELP I'M DROWNING!!!"
"Could you swim a little closer? I can't save you way over there!"
lakshen47 h
I’m
Sir your zone's lifeguard is on lunch I've gotta follow policy as I am outside my lifeguard jurisdiction.
The guy would be like what zones heeeeelllllpppp
Haha! 😂🤣😋
This is appalling though lol! If the guy was swimming in a zone then where was the lifeguard of that zone?! Beaches aren't Microsoft excel sheets. Who the heck thought of that stupid rule?! Theres no logic it's as if they think multiple people are gonna be drowning all at once all over the place it is a downright silly policy
@deadcool 2 😂🤣😂
Sir! Oh snap he cant hear me cuz he's drowning 100 yards away 🤣 I'm glad he rescued him
Do you have a pen? You have to sign this release form before I can save you!
Respect to those young men!! We need more like you in all professions.
This was almost a decade ago. I hope these noble life guards are doing well for themselves now.
He drowned
He and the others who were fired were offered their jobs back. I believe Tommy refused the offer and decided to move on. Dunno about the rest.
@@ComputerJunkie00 Good that Tommy rejected, honestly a company that had a policy like that in the first probably only changed it because of the horrible publicity it got.
Why did he got fired? He is a *LIFEguard* and not a *watcher*
@@attache675 The problem is not the company but the laws in the US, companies are paranoid of legal consequences and this is the result.
Lifeguard: kills someone
Boss: nice job you're promoted
Lol
Lifeguard: feels so wrong but so good
ALABAMA 100
*you’re
@@williamfish shut up and enjoy the joke
How stupid would it be if someone asked him "why did u let em die?" And he would just go "oh just rules, u know didn't wanna get fired"
Mummified - exactly and if that happened the boss would flip flopped and said something like - I would never fire someone for saving a mans life regardless of the rules
Lmao like seriously
@@sadams1397 get real life logic to apply
Same reporting crew came out saying it was an outrage, just at the wrong guy...
or "we have liability issues". Thats so fucked up no amount of money should be worth more than someones life
Lifeguard: *does his job and saves a drowning man*
Boss: "we don't do that here"
Seriously just buy signs saying better not drown!!
You literally just ripped this post from the person right above you...
@@gameshroomboy7896 lmao
^“And we don’t save people we let them dye”
The fxck then what does lifeguard do they chill?!?!
If he didn’t do anything then there would be a headline “Lifeguard refuses to save drowning swimmer, results in death”
That’d probably result in him getting fired too
Damned if you do, damned if you don't! What a culture!
Just fyi I was on the beach and that kid had nothing to do with saving the mans life, he was already pulled out of water by the time he arrived. And he stayed in the wrong section even after the right lifeguard arrived(like 30 seconds after him) what if someone was drowning in the station he left....
@@ryantheallknowing3863 If someone was drowning in the station he left, then bystanders will ask other stations just like how this first one started...
@@nomealow what the hell happens at the last station?
In a world where money and liability is worth more than a human life, I am not surprised by this. These guys should be given medals.
same thing with stuff like bike lanes, bus lanes, mutifamily homes, and many more. usually these are from ignorance aswell
The lifeguard saved the drowning man out of good nature. The company fired him coz they don't want to get sued. However, a reasonable person would bite what he could chew.
There's a small zone assigned because whoever made the policy knew that lifeguards aren't superman.
What if you save the guy outside of the zone, but when you return, someone inside the zone is drowning? You would've saved the guy who swam at his own risk, and be unfair to the guy who would not have swam if not for the nearby lifeguard.
If you were the guy who drowned in the safe zone, would you find the lifeguard's action to be acceptable? Answer on your own, it's just a rhetoric.
@@biggiganticbones also, if a person died in a safe zone when lifeguard rescuing others one , family of died person will sue the company of millions and most likely court say pay them as your duty is to protect within safe zone not outside... So if i am the decision maker i would fire him as well i cant risk my company for anyone life
@@biggiganticbones Life is not perfect you can't always save everyone. Ignoring someone dying just on the off chance that another person might start drowning in your zone during the time you are saving that person, is literal insanity. You don't ignore something that is really happening for a mere possibility of what could happen.
@@eggzile1 you sir, have a spine 🥂
Hard to believe this really happened. I applaud those young men who made the correct decision.
I really love that his co-workers stood up for this lifeguard. I know the company is now apologizing to him, but I don't think it's because they're sorry. It's because they are embarrassed by the negative publicity.
Eileen P lol I agree with you a hundred percent.
I agree.
Absolutely
It's DEFINITELY because of the bad PR. Do you think for a second they would send him an apology after firing him if it DIDN'T make the news?
Fuck no.
SavedMountain 961 sarcasm at its best 🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂
I bet if he didn't save the guy and just watched from his part of the beach, they would have fired and sued him anyway.
Exactly, this was never ending well. He made the good call.
Right
Exactly exactly
Worse, he would have to live with that fact.
@@alexiswilliamsinc ima have to agree with this. Knowing someone died and you could have prevented it but didnt will you eat up alive.
Company: *“Did you just do your job?”*
Also Company: *“Unacceptable, you're fired.”*
He making the rest of them looks bad
if my job wasn't about saving lives i would gladly work for that company lol
@@jsmith-u5i nobody was in danger in his area while he went out for the other man. The worst punishment he should’ve gotten was a warning. “Someone could’ve gotten in danger while he was out”. Nobody did though, he should be told not to do that again because there’s is a risk that could happen, and that’s it.
This is the problem with Insurance companies. They limit us so much. That they are now putting our lives in danger instead of what they are there for. To help people.
HUGE RESPECT to all those guys for having each others back like that, it's beyond rare.
Seemed like a solid bunch of lads
only in america where lawsuits are more important than lives
@@joeking4954 Yes, I wish People would wake up and fight this nonsense.
Yeah huge respect but the also just jeopardized the company it's called Liability Insurance liability anything that they do the company is responsible for
@@dramafreak7122 by that logic, the company will consider liability more important than human lives. You have any idea how disgusting and immoral that is?
*”Pregnant woman arrested for giving birth”*
Taco Bell employee gets fired for putting cheese in a burrito
Soldier fired for killing an enemy
So that's why the stuff on aisle 5 at Walmart was on Clarence it had after birth on it it wasn't peppermint candy cane Christmas gunk well congratulations a penny saved is a penny earned 👏
In an undesignated area! LOL
@@mr.doodytp3793 yes
When your company chooses liability over life, it's time to find a new job.
@ no. one bad incident doesn't represent a country with 330 million people. get smart
But I dont understand where they are getting this "liability" thing from as many states have "Good Samaritan" laws which protect people from such things.
Sooo every construction / manufacturing job?
@@Flakjacket96 It probably has to do with insurance/liability. When you run a business you have to deal with the liabilities and they dictate what you can or cannot do to maintain coverage. It's the unfortunate reality. It's like why you have to clock out at many jobs on breaks if you leave the premises because they are liable for your actions and it doesn't fall under their liability insurance. Going past that post while on the clock exposed the company to uncovered liability for himself and actions from the victim due to not complying with a contract. Glad everything worked out and hope the young man finds another job or another contract for the area is crafted.
PLOT TWIST no one wanted to help
Excellent choice on their part - Kudos!!!
“Student gets expelled for getting an A”
He stayed in the library too long😂
thats pretty much what this is
"Student expelled for helping other student study and get an A"
@@MrPurple656 that student who got an A was a delinquent
@@MrPurple656 nah it is "Student expelled for topping all exams but used a different method"
“Liability issues” = Fear that the company could be fined. Money was more important to the company than a man’s life. Respect for all the lifeguards that did the right thing.
👍 yes! Exactly
@Carrot Muffins The chances of that happening would have been about one in a ... billion? While the chances of the man dieing (had he not been rescued) was one in ... one? No lifeguard with even just a shred of morality would have stood by and watched a man drown in that situation. So, in the end, if we’re honest, it was a financial decision to fire the lifeguard. (“Better to let a man drown than to risk a one-in-a-billion chance of their being financially liable for another man’s death on their side of the beach.”)
@Karabas TV Much logic, perhaps, for an hour. But at the end of the day, are thousands of people applauding their actions ... or are they shaking their heads in disgust? It probably didn’t do much for their brand image.
@@robertdobie2544 It's bad for their brand image because the lifeguard went outside the bounds. If the lifeguard had stayed in the bounds, it wouldn't have been so bad. If they made no repercussions, it could keep happening. THen one day if someone was in trouble on both sides of the line at the same time, the company would be in a big problem. Basically, the lifeguard is the one who put the company in a bad place. Security guards have to stay in their area. There is no reason to think lifeguards should be different.
@@AshiStarshade So, what you are saying is that, had you been the lifeguard on duty, you would have run over to the border of your side of the beach. Then stopped. Then, watched as the man drowned. While explaining to the drowning man that, “One day if there were two people drowning at the same time, and I wasn’t on my side of the beach, the company would be in a big problem.” Well, okay. I suppose that would have made the drowning man feel a little better, at least. But what if the drowning man had been six inches across the border? Would you still have turned a blind eye?
"help! Someone is drowning over there!"
~You have not yet unlocked that part of the beach~
tazzybear lmao
Noice
"Pay 4,99$ to unlock"
tazzybear 😂😂😂
Probably ea
What even is the point of a lifeguard if they aren't allowed to actually save swimmers?
Up next: Scientist gets fired for finding a cure to covid 19
It really just do be like that sometimes
I heard about that, it was made in Taiwan so China claimes that they made it
@@ReyX1991 I heard it was made I'm Russia
"tHaT fuNd wAs fOr cANcEr rEseArcH"
@@khadijakhan699 why?!
The boss said: no u haven't unlocked that part of the map yet
Best fucking comment 🤣
This is gonna blow up
the upgrade will cost 500000 coins
LOL
HAHAHAHAHA
These young men are more honorable than most men in leadership today.
not a very high bar, to be honest
@@futsk01 maybe so with our leadership being of low standards. but these young men have set an example of just how far above the bar standard they are at least by his and his friends actions.THEY WILL LEAVE NO MAN OR WOMEN BEHIND. unlike some leaders we know.
Well yeah becauyse most leaders are in a its only way and you listen to my way
Absolutely right on.
I hope you're speaking of _politicians_ in leadership positions, because if you mean men who are leaders _in general_ (and that means _any_ positions of leadership), I challenge your theory and defy you to provide real-world examples that _most men_ indeed fit your blanket statement. Further, I posit that you don't know enough men in positions of leadership to extrapolate even a _semi-accurate_ cross-section of the men who fall under what you speculate, and that your theory is based on anecdotal evidence and the men _you_ interact with, as opposed to empirical data.
12 years later I’m watching this. I hope the guy has found success. If it were in my power I would give him a job! This is so ABSURD!!!!
"You are being fired from being a lifeguard"
"wait what, why?!"
"because you were a lifeguard"
Ikr its so stupid -_-
when your job is guarded bc you guarded a life
because you crossed a protected area!
that's the reason bro
(i don't say what he did is wrong, actually what he did can't be valuated in money nor power, that's what make us "humans", but since humans created a System that organize our unique behaviors and creativity with the abilitiy to process and decide" the system is like human supervision who act as a white side of our entity, while entity our instinct ego, work as our black side, the us "humans" with the unique ability can process, analyse and decide depend on how we grow, envirement and self motivation, and that what made us unlike any other creature, survive the longest time possible in this world.
i conclude this exhibit with 3 things
the programated us "the system" white
the controversial us "the ego" black
the us physical/moral us "humans" gray
@@tortilla7221 yeah we watched the video :/
This is what happens when leftards with no common sense are in charge of running a life guard company.
For those wondering.. Tomas and friends were offered jobs back but they refused. Publico backlash is a hell of a thing for a company. Tomas was given a key to the city at an event in his honor where the mayor also announced that they would no longer be using that company. He was also thanked in person by the man he saved a Mr. Maksim Samartsev from Estonia.
"All guards would have done the same thing. I think all of us deserve this. All I did was do what I supposed to do." - Tomas Lopez.
That’s wonderful to hear thanks for letting us all know
Great news. Thank you.
thomas and friends
And yet Jeff Ellis management is still responsible for all the city’s aquatics
That was a Samartsev
Nice to see a group of young people with such integrity and loyalty. Kudos to them..
EXACTLY
Yea
ok boomer
The bigger question is why did everyone else at the beach seem fine watching the guy die? No one else stepped up to help? "Not my job."
Me: “hey life guard my dad’s drowning”.
Lifeguard: “sorry Bro out of my jurisdiction”
I would cause a hell of a lot of problems if a lifeguard told me that
Me to
nice👍
Great comment
First name Last name That is so better people dying
Young men with integrity, just made my day. Whoever’s responsible for making a rule that doesn’t let a life guards save a life, they need to quit.
You mean Get Fired
You mean they need to get imprisoned
They need to drown 🕳🕺
They probably have that rule because if someone else is drowning in the area the lifeguard was supposed to protect, then the corporation can be sued for 10s of millions of dollars
@@glamorouslynothere4785 😂
Alternative title: “lifeguard gets fired for doing his job”.
@Manuel Baut104 yeah oh
@Manuel Baut104 ??
@@stopit1389 ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????¿?????????????????????¿????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????¿?????????????¿?????????????????¿?¿???????¿?????¿?????????????????¿????????????????????????????????¿?????????????????!?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Technically, now technically, he broke a rule in his stupid job, not saying it’s a good thing
He did his job he got fired but if he didn’t do his job and let the man drown he would’ve probably get fired as well so this so I’m confused on this rule
I hope that lifeguard company was shut down. Firing that guy for saving a life is sickening!
I thought this was a video from the onion at first lmao
video: 8 years ago
comment: 2 hours ago
@@PrinceShehzad your reply: 22 hours ago
@@AReyes-uw6qf your reply: 49 minutes ago
@@themathaces8370 your reply: 2 minutes ago
@@dantheveganman your reply: 2 minutes ago
"Im a lifeguard"
"Yup"
"And a lifeguard's job is suppose to save people"
"Makes sense to me"
"So I saved that man"
"You're fired"
lmao accurate the talk with his boss after that
No no no *he got promoted to customer*
what's the point of the name "life guard" lmao
You don't understand. They don't pay him to safe lives. They pay him to save lives of THEIR paying customers.
You don't understand. They don't pay him to safe lives. They pay him to save lives of THEIR paying customers.
“Sorry, his life is out of my jurisdiction. Try the lifeguard around the corner.”
Pretty much is what they required them to say...
I genuinely thought this was an Onion video.
Lawrence Machiavelli same
@@elliotthill7008
Irrelevant.
@@elliotthill7008 it has nothing to do with this case, the job says lifeguard, if you arent allowed to save life then why bother being a "lifeguard". And your statement is stupid, if you can save someone's life then you do it, stop fucking following the rules all the time, try being a human, not a robot who always follows orders and rules
So wholesome, I hope they're all doing well 11 years later.
life guard: guards life
company: *wait that's illegal*
YES IM THE 69TH LIKE NOBODY LIKE
Sorry kid, it's been done.
😭😭
ITzMoFlow
Wow, that didn’t last long!
The gov said it’s illegal, not the company. But the company is a bitch for not taking this to court to get the law changrs
Person: *is drowning*
Boss: "So you have chosen death."
SimplyTheGreatest good use of that meme
Quite literally.
Lol lifeguard is like no you did. I saved a man's life.
L I T E R A L L Y
What is with people today. Can't we take this more seriously? Drowning is no joke.
Lifeguard: *Saves a life*
Sign: “Wait, that’s illegal!”
first reply yes
😂😐
Lemme ask u guys a simple question to test ur basic chemistry . What do you get when u combine one molecule of carbon with 2 molecules of oxygen ?
@@adityamenon6365 CO2? Carbondioxide?
@@chubob73 CORRECT 😁
Maybe the lifeguard can't go out of the protected area, but a citizen can. And maybe Tommy - just like the former "president" - THOUGHT that he would do his lunch break now, which gave him all the right in the world to save a man‘s life.
‘So basically, we just sit and watch them die’
Me: wtf is the purpose of a lifeguard even?
To watch people drown? You said it yourself.
Ikr
To yell at you not to run around the pool
@@anexplode7268 geez humanity is getting stupider and more fucked up this is why I dont trust people anymore :/
@@antoniovina24 this happened 7 years ago. I'm sure the rules have been changed by now
Lifeguard: "hey" "you there"
Guy: "help" "i'm drowning"
Lifeguard: "Drown closer"
Take my like and leave, thanks for the laugh btw
Take my like too and leave, thanks for the laugh btw
Underrated
Take my 619th Like, and thanks for the laugh btw
This randomly got recommended to me
The lifeguard: can’t go there. The guy drowning: *UNDERSTANDABLE, HAVE A GREAT DAY*
Omg 😂😂😂😂😂😂
Well the guy drowning would sound a little more like gurgling
No it s have a nice day no great
Underrated
XD
"A superhero is being sued by someone who, apparently didn't want to be saved."
Imagine if he hadn't helped he would be called a monster.
either way he would get fired
Yea what else is he supposed to do just let him die?
Well when you think about it the life guard in the sector of the drowning man would be fired not him but he did the right thing #commonsense
And eventually get fired.
I said common sense because he saved him instead of letting the other lifeguard get fired
"Lifeguard fired for saving someone"
"Chef fired for cooking food"
"Plants fired for creating oxygen"
lmao this is so true
@@Kathy-ih9ep We already do that lol
@@NotKiiro ah yes lmao thats y i said it innit
Earth fired for making humans live
Boss: "Why do you want to be a lifeguard?"
Man: "I want to save lives"
Boss: "No"
Man : I want to sit in a high place and watch someone cry for help and die
Boss: You are hired
@@plantman1093 Boss: Say no more
LMFAOOOOOOO
@What is BRITISH HUMOR?? WELCOME TO AMERICA
@What is BRITISH HUMOR?? Ik it's a joke because america was also known as the land of the free
So amazingly ridiculous! Why do people make rules that don’t even make sense? So very glad that they all stuck together to prove a point and a cause. The person who was saved and his family are even happier!
💰
Notice at this beach:
Hiring lifeguards to watch people drowning.
“No, no, that’s not possible the goo-lagoon is closed”
...
they just need a statue for thats job
Yeah, watchguards.
How they want the lifeguards to act:
1st lifeguard: Ah yes that man appears to be doing the DEATH
2nd lifeguard: why it seems so
1st:should we help him?
2nd: and risk losing our jobs?
1st: there are somethings you got to do no matter what is the rules what only matters is what you feel in your heart and thats between you and god...
2nd:wow...
1st:good thing were atheists!
Everybody at the beach:HARHARHARHARHAR
Guy doing the DEATH's spirit:HAR...HAR...HAR
Next: *Doctor gets fired for saving patients life*
Well if a patient has a DNR order or wants to stop treatment to die on their own terms and a doctor decides to save them against their against their wishes then yeah a doctor should at least be scolded for that.
Summonearth can you handle a joke?
hE ToUChed Me WIthOUt COnseNT
Good answer
It Should have been "Doctor gets fired for hurting children with a needle" 😱
Man not only did that guy choose to save a life instead of save face, but so did his peers. I'm proud of all of them for choosing to be human over employees.
I'd sue.
I accidentally nutted while reading your comment. I was edging
it would make sense if they fired a lifeguard for patrolling that area instead of the area under their jurisdiction, but firing him after he SUCCESSFULLY saved someone is insane
3 people drowned in his area while saving the homeless man drowning
@@Roflmao6173 there is some imbecile in the comments defending the company
That man has more humanity than his bosses
“Pilot fired for successfully landing plane”
737?
@@mrrolandlawrence no it was a 747
Don't be absurd.
Sounds like the 9/11 pilots if you ask me
That's exactly the plot of the movie "Sully". These kind of cases are fucking awful
Boxer fired for punching an opponent.