Every Political Ideology Explained in 8 Minutes

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 มิ.ย. 2024
  • Every famous political ideology gets explained in 8 minutes.
    I explain stuff through paint, subscribe and activate the bell if you liked this video.
    Join my Discord to discuss this video:
    / discord
    💼 Business Mail: operamp4@gmail.com
    (I do not associate with these websites; I only used their ideology balls to explain them.)
    All of the ideology ball designs are taken from:
    polcompball.wiki/wiki/Main_Page
    pcbwiki.net/index.php/Main_Page
    -- TIMESTAMPS --
    0:00 Conservatism
    0:11 Liberalism
    0:42 Moderatism
    0:58 Capitalism
    1:13 Socialism
    1:36 Syndicalism
    2:04 Corporatism
    2:31 Libertarianism
    2:49 Separatism (secessionism)
    2:59 Communism
    3:14 Feminism
    3:34 Anarchism
    3:48 Enviromentalism
    4:05 Populism
    4:32 Republicanism
    4:44 Progressivism
    4:56 Imperialism
    5:25 Egalitarianism
    5:38 Transhumanism
    5:52 Communitarianism
    6:17 Authoritarianism
    6:36 Fascism
    7:25 Nazism
    -- SOURCES --
    (Some of this information has been directly taken from these websites.)
    en.wikipedia.org

ความคิดเห็น • 13K

  • @sootythunder3111
    @sootythunder3111 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +20280

    You know it’s extremly refreshing to see someone point out the difference between capitalism, corporatism, and corpratacracy

    • @thetalantonx
      @thetalantonx 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +711

      Right? That alone was worth me just liking and subscribing rather than picking on the smaller bits I disagreed with (due to my experience in and dealing with them giving me a more granular view.)

    • @ThePaintExplainer
      @ThePaintExplainer  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1131

      Thanks, glad you enjoyed it!

    • @andrewrobb3258
      @andrewrobb3258 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +363

      Gess the corporatism/corportocricy misunderstanding is to the right as the socialism/communism misunderstanding is to the left. Realy wish people would look up details on these things as they do matter.

    • @ghostmantagshome-er6pb
      @ghostmantagshome-er6pb 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +186

      A communist is just a socialist in a hurry.

    • @cazzac4817
      @cazzac4817 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

      @@andrewrobb3258 croporatocracy is just liberal corporatism whereby private individuals are free to join and leave and create corporations at their own whim.

  • @CCharles0519
    @CCharles0519 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +11117

    No sponsors, no intros, just straight to the point, simple and quick. If only more videos were like this.

    • @Epic_R3K47
      @Epic_R3K47 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      Agree

    • @java4653
      @java4653 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The first post thinks Conservatism is it's own thing and that "Conserve" is its basis. This person understands nothing . It has fascism as an single ideology when it's a tool for gaining power in a democracy, with the actual beliefs of 20th C. fascists varying from country to country.

    • @MrGamelover23
      @MrGamelover23 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +174

      Unfortunately, you can't make a job out of this without sponsors.

    • @TheMadWhit666
      @TheMadWhit666 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +59

      Lol then how else are they going to make money??

    • @dntakemesrs
      @dntakemesrs 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Give them time and these videos will have all of that.

  • @lilbirb082
    @lilbirb082 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +197

    For all of the uneducated people getting mad in the comments over the liberalism section here is an explanation, in north America what we call "liberalism" has basically nothing to do with the actual historical definition of liberalism. In North America the term liberalism really just means social democracy with a strong emphasis on progressivism, an American "liberal" would support high taxation, welfare, limited gun ownership, and suppression of "hate" speech amongst other things, but actual liberalism is basically the complete opposite of that, classical liberals are against unnecessary taxation, support strong gun and property rights, absolute free speech, and limited government in general. "Hey that kind of sounds like conservatism" While classical liberalism does share a lot of ideas with what north Americans call "conservatism" it is still a completely separate ideology, classical liberals support the autonomy of the body as they see it as the first line of private property so they fully support the right to abortion, classical liberals support absolute free speech unlike conservatives or progressives who only support free speech when it's inline with their beliefs, classical liberals support a very secular government, support lazies-fare capitalism (which basically just means capitalism with almost 0 governmental regulation), and as said before in favor of a small government in general, unlike conservatives who do support small government intervention in the economy, but are in favor of government interference in the personal lives of citizens, like banning abortion, or certain media that they find "immoral"

    • @stefantom4
      @stefantom4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Very informative

    • @dannylojkovic5205
      @dannylojkovic5205 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      This. What we call “libertarianism” in America, is just liberalism in the rest of the world

    • @alexandernaydenov7539
      @alexandernaydenov7539 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@dannylojkovic5205true

    • @BrendenNichols
      @BrendenNichols 21 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      This ideology is what I’d say most accurately describes me.

    • @RealEstateMasterrr
      @RealEstateMasterrr 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      This doesn’t make sense at all. Because as a liberal, what conservatives make fun of me for here in the U.S, everything in the video related exactly to me. The conservative part seemed to be exactly the Conservatives. I think you just felt guilty from this video. It’s called denial. Maybe you are a liberal and you haven’t done enough research just yet.

  • @user-oj6qr9wl6e
    @user-oj6qr9wl6e 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

    I appreciate the objectivity and non biased values when explaining these topics. It really helps understand their general forms for what they are rather to how they function.
    A testament to how good this video is is how the comment section is very relaxed despite the topic in question being very pollarizing. Thanks a lot!

  • @Daniel_Black.
    @Daniel_Black. 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +770

    Mine is autism
    Edit: for all those saying this was offensive I'm diagnosed autistic and have been for several years

    • @WhatDillionYT
      @WhatDillionYT 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

      🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

    • @anbubu
      @anbubu 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

    • @theduckconstructs7686
      @theduckconstructs7686 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

    • @cheesehoncho4685
      @cheesehoncho4685 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

    • @Cdontdoit
      @Cdontdoit 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

  • @nguyenminhle8694
    @nguyenminhle8694 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1383

    Wow, this is the calmest comment section I've ever come across under a video that talks about...politics

    • @HerrscherPuppet
      @HerrscherPuppet 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +67

      Yeah. It’s almost uncanny

    • @HDGAMERZ-ib3bs
      @HDGAMERZ-ib3bs 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Do your own research, half the video is not factual. The only ones he gets right are all the right winger ones for some reason.

    • @AmericanPendetta
      @AmericanPendetta 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      YouRube’s censorship is ALWAYS bad

    • @isaacvaldez4134
      @isaacvaldez4134 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Don't jinx it.

    • @jonathanjohnjohnson
      @jonathanjohnjohnson 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Here, I'll start the argument.
      I THINK:
      It's pronounced gif, not gif

  • @VisualVoyages08
    @VisualVoyages08 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +50

    Kudos for shedding light on the nuances between capitalism, corporatism, and corporatocracy. It's rare to see someone tackle these distinctions. Your clarity is a breath of fresh air in the content space. Looking forward to more insightful breakdowns!

    • @Dynamic-cy8wn
      @Dynamic-cy8wn 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I just follow one thing, Christianity. Dont need no nonesense.

    • @somenamethatisntmine6736
      @somenamethatisntmine6736 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      ​@@Dynamic-cy8wn True irony right there.

    • @Dynamic-cy8wn
      @Dynamic-cy8wn 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@somenamethatisntmine6736 Why are you so angry all the time?

    • @TheDarkLordsoflight
      @TheDarkLordsoflight หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Dynamic-cy8wnbc he gets beat at home by his stepdad

  • @lts_Abdullah
    @lts_Abdullah 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +62

    A video without an intro is just a breath of fresh air

  • @crimzonpegasus9714
    @crimzonpegasus9714 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2786

    I've always hated these labels being thrown around so casually and carelessly. You can share values from multiple political ideologies, and not agree with some others in the same ideology. Yet you get shunned because they see you as group A, when you can share values with group A, B, and C

    • @BlackStar_734
      @BlackStar_734 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +126

      This is so true. It's so sad that people expel others from their lives over minor differences in thought.

    • @jaromino77
      @jaromino77 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +151

      Nobody can ever really entirely fit into one ideology without contradicting themselves. People have to do a better job acknowledging that other people and themselves are diverse in judgements and beliefs

    • @manictiger
      @manictiger 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +92

      I have an ideology called realism. It's where I look at humanity, and realize that the vast majority of them are so insanely mentally deficient, that I can't talk to them about politics.

    • @carson3140
      @carson3140 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Very true, I share values with both feminism and nazism for example.

    • @wetter4293
      @wetter4293 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      THIS IS HOW THEY DIVIDE US. It's the reason the left and right has such extreme values. It's also the reason we can't seem to agree on seemingly simple yet basic and society driving facts...

  • @DLiver
    @DLiver 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4699

    It's interesting to see how each ideology is practiced differently by the people of the modern world than what the actual ideology stands for.

    • @WhatIMakeIsRandom
      @WhatIMakeIsRandom 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +63

      I thought the same!

    • @emmakaisa27
      @emmakaisa27 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      I actually don't think so

    • @Aexitprod
      @Aexitprod 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      which one?

    • @Lowseeds
      @Lowseeds 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +381

      @@Aexitprod I mean take femnism for example, t means equal rights, but some people have warped its meaning quite alot

    • @c43pmurderson25
      @c43pmurderson25 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +291

      Like socialism. The description in this video presents the theory, which appears pretty good for the worker. However, if one takes into account the history of socialism and its current practice in many places around the world, then one sees that the theory and practice are quite disparate.

  • @Squiddo-gt6xu
    @Squiddo-gt6xu 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +65

    It's so rare to find a video like this that is completely un-biased and just gives you the facts. Subscribed 👍

    • @PritchardPub
      @PritchardPub 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      But they didn’t. They took 1 second to say 3 things about conservatives and then kept going on and on about how liberals love various freedoms so much. One of the biggest ones being gun ownership though, is embraced by conservatives along with many others including free speech. And no, we aren’t conservatives. Just making an observation others clearly missed.

    • @karaqakkzl
      @karaqakkzl 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@PritchardPub they were obsession with labeling everyone left or right to see who is bad but none of solutions were practically work. Like the guy said "reality is a left-wing bias"

    • @Acrocanthosaurus
      @Acrocanthosaurus 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@karaqakkzl What does "reallity is a left-wing bias" mean?

  • @Terence.Watkins
    @Terence.Watkins 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Imagine my surprise when I discover this channel, love two videos, say “wow, this channel is really good, im gonna watch their backlog” only to learn that there is five total videos on the entire channel and it (deservedly) got 90k subs in the past month or so

  • @Zaltic
    @Zaltic 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3638

    I think we can all agree that almost all of these ideologies' followers never actually do what they're defined, rather just hold the titles

    • @dominikrni
      @dominikrni 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +631

      Except nazism

    • @Zaltic
      @Zaltic 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +172

      @@dominikrni fair point 😂

    • @duncanchillake8024
      @duncanchillake8024 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +82

      I guess we're all moderatists

    • @JaneDoe-pp8se
      @JaneDoe-pp8se 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      yeah

    • @iyoyoyoyoyoyoyo
      @iyoyoyoyoyoyoyo 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +78

      Perhaps most don't actually know what the ideology they're holding actually means and just follow what others have said

  • @vtopos
    @vtopos 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3399

    Glad you distinguished the difference between corporatism and corporatocracy.

    • @ThePaintExplainer
      @ThePaintExplainer  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +309

      Yeah, they tend to get confused a lot

    • @zyyl1949
      @zyyl1949 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +106

      Corporatism is very rare in the modern world, China is the only one that comes to mind when thinking of a country/state leaning towards it

    • @ManiacMayhem7256
      @ManiacMayhem7256 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@zyyl1949
      Singapore

    • @MrArthys
      @MrArthys 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      ​@@zyyl1949is South Korea an example of corporatism or corporatocracy?

    • @zeroworldcraft
      @zeroworldcraft 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

      There is no difference. Just time... This thought I have just said is a huge deal. Anarchy + time = dictatorship. Dictatorship + time = monarchy.

  • @someguynamedluden1090
    @someguynamedluden1090 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    This comment section is either gonna be really chill or really chaotic

  • @pistolero22
    @pistolero22 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    this is a great explanation of all the political ideologies, thank you for teaching me more about politics

    • @user-kv4ev6qs3i
      @user-kv4ev6qs3i หลายเดือนก่อน

      It is a great explanation of the ideologies he talks about however it is no where near all of them and would take a very very long time to explain every single one there is a video about every single ideology though and it is about 3 hours long

  • @mr.monitor1305
    @mr.monitor1305 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3594

    Thank you for explaining the difference between libertarianism and liberalism. I see too many people today thinking they are one in the same.

    • @MicahMicahel
      @MicahMicahel 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      leftists? They don't understand what liberalism means. Trudeau or anyone that pushed mandates our censorship is not liberal or libertarianism. Woke people are never libertarians because wokeness is literally social fasciism.

    • @cnjor2331
      @cnjor2331 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      Same

    • @tsevra2437
      @tsevra2437 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This is because the only ones who misuse these terms are the Americans. Everybody out the US calls liberals those who approve Ricardo's, Hayek's, Von Mises', etc. ideals, while libertarianism is usually used for anarchosocialist movements.

    • @ptrknvk
      @ptrknvk 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +87

      Tbh, classical liberalism (f.e. Austrian economical school) is very close to libertarianism.

    • @tsevra2437
      @tsevra2437 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

      @@ptrknvk It is not, in no way. That's some Ayn Rand type of argument. Although they pretend their "revolutionary" economical system is disguised through the lens of the sole consumer, and not through the demand-offer curve, their final conclusion is driven through an abstraction of the rudest laissez-faire law of nature, which is not ultimately very libertarian. One has to think that libertarianism is arguably built over the pilars of social interaction, not the cult to the individual.

  • @Alpha_Foxtrot-28
    @Alpha_Foxtrot-28 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +295

    Schrodingerism: a political stance which depends on whom an individual is trying to troll on the internet that day.

    • @mathinho1237
      @mathinho1237 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      To filiate you need to don't have a life

    • @alejandrorivera6122
      @alejandrorivera6122 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      I strongly subscribe to this ideology.

    • @adarshshankarrai9912
      @adarshshankarrai9912 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      supporter of this ideology

    • @WRSpiral
      @WRSpiral 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      The greatest most successful ideology of them all.

    • @asinglemaleinuk
      @asinglemaleinuk หลายเดือนก่อน

      Is the cat dead, or alive

  • @GalicianArca
    @GalicianArca หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    tbh if we put every political idealogy into real-time manifestation "Fascist" idealogy or simililar idealogy tend to survive longer than the rest when in a dire situation

    • @m.r4841
      @m.r4841 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not really. How long survived Nazi Germany or fascist Italy? Not that long

    • @xiiir838
      @xiiir838 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@m.r4841 Germany did not because it got into a w a r with the most powerful nations at the time.
      But if you look at it objectively, that third germanc something turned a country with an economy similar to Venezuela into a regional power that had to be put down by three of the biggest countries on Earth at the time, not to mention the crazy scientific advanves they did.

    • @xiiir838
      @xiiir838 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They do because that ideology is specifically designed for w * r.
      A hard hierarchy and a focus on m*Iitar*st*c entreprises makes them the best for times of w * r

    • @GalicianArca
      @GalicianArca หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@xiiir838 not just war but a sense of unification

    • @xiiir838
      @xiiir838 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@GalicianArca idk about that, dude. The people that call themselves fscsts aren't anything close to the classical form of that ideology. Rather, they seems to be very attracted to the Germanic branch.
      Just something to think about. I don't think they can really create great communities that envelope an entire country

  • @black.sasuke.uchiha
    @black.sasuke.uchiha 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2436

    I really like that the narrator jumped straight into it, no intro, and defined everything concisely and quickly, a lot of these terms are used in an interchangeable manner. I subscribed, you’re currently at 39K but I know you’ll reach 40K soon!

    • @kingoverflow
      @kingoverflow 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Sasuke 🤡

    • @Rock2765-gw1qc
      @Rock2765-gw1qc 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      He has now

    • @guylikesbananas3986
      @guylikesbananas3986 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      yes

    • @SkyForgeGears
      @SkyForgeGears 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@kingoverflow 🤡"kingoverflow"

    • @Felivii
      @Felivii 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Road to 100k!

  • @bigmyke2008
    @bigmyke2008 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +949

    It’s refreshing to hear political ideologies being explained without smug rhetoric and banter. I look forward to more content

    • @EliW95
      @EliW95 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      except 'libertarianism;' is not an 'ideology' any more than arithmetic saying 2+2=4 is an 'ideology' it's a simple bleeding obvious principle that should be so universally recognized that no one should have to call themselves a 'libertarian' any more than anyone has to call themselves a slavery abolitionist

    • @dirtydeeds4free553
      @dirtydeeds4free553 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

      ​@EliW95 what? You do understand the idea of different people believing in different things right?

    • @EliW95
      @EliW95 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@dirtydeeds4free553 yes i do, but there is *no legitimacy* in believing that others should be subjugated to your personal values and preferences. I shouldn't get to force you to conform to the doctrines of Islam if you believe in some sect of Christianity, likewise you shouldn't be able to force me to conform to whatever religion or religious sect you believe in if I don't want to, as just one example. Libertarianism actually allows a *broad spectrum* of belief systems and philosophies as long as they essentially adhere to the non-aggression principle
      what could be more simple and reasonable than that?

    • @theoutergod8666
      @theoutergod8666 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      ​@@EliW95 So tell me.
      -If I am powerful, and you are weak, why should I let you be alone?
      -You obviously envy me, so you ARE plotting something against me. You want my wealth. I need to get rid of you.
      -You live in a mudshack, I live in a palace, you are obviously miserable. You don't see the truth, so you protest, but I will make you see the light I bring.
      -Why should I let you be, if you are not a human at all?

    • @EliW95
      @EliW95 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@theoutergod8666 you're making blanket assumptions. I'm actually *against* the employer employee relationship dynamic because i basically see it as a form of de-facto indentured servitude due to the nature of the power dynamic, and i actually tend to put more of an emphasis on the *personal relations* aspect of the market (basically the aspects that are in line with mutualist philosophy) rather than an emphasis on capital investment and accumulation, which would *necessarily* mean narrowing (but not eliminating because that would be *realistically impossible* ) the wealth inequality and therefore power imbalance of society
      but thanks for the blanket assumptions jack@ss

  • @perishedfortune
    @perishedfortune 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Thank you! This helped with my understanding of politics for my AP Human Geography political unit!

  • @Connorthecatsdad
    @Connorthecatsdad หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's amazing how when various ideologies are summarized briefly and with objectivity, you can see common ground with ideologies you may have found yourself opposed to, and maybe some room for criticism of those with which you already align. Great video

  • @MaitlandJones
    @MaitlandJones 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2525

    Brilliantly done, I thought this would just be a meme video, but I was quickly pleasantly surprised when you defined conservatism and liberalism by their classical definitions. I was impressed even further when you didn't simply conflate authoritarianism, fascism, and National Socialism with each other. All while being completely neutral with each one! Well done!

    • @ThePaintExplainer
      @ThePaintExplainer  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +157

      Thank you so much!

    • @skillfullshank1300
      @skillfullshank1300 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +88

      I'm not sure how neural he was with nazism, seeing as how the music kind of built up and such, however that doesnt really matter nazism isn't really an ideology that is defendable. Other than that I'd say he represented every ideology completely fairly.

    • @ronanbreen1141
      @ronanbreen1141 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      ​@@ThePaintExplaineryour video is good and unbiased. Would have liked to have seen social democracy some where tho

    • @Etrius10
      @Etrius10 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Still grossly biased in a disingenuous fashion, typical redditor political leanings. Nothing new here.

    • @Quin_BNK
      @Quin_BNK 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@ronanbreen1141It'd fit in Comunitarianism I believe

  • @TransparentEclipse
    @TransparentEclipse 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1515

    Political ideologies are such a divisive topic, glad to see them explained in a simple and easy to understand way so that people can make up their own minds instead of just listening to whoever is close to them in their lives and parroting the information.

    • @NazriB
      @NazriB 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Lies again? LA Liga Good Papi

    • @MrSirFluffy
      @MrSirFluffy 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +57

      Kind of. The issue is the video did a fine job at describing the traditional definitions, however, if you are an American for instance these terms mean something very different.
      For instance modern Conservatism in the US is Liberalism in this video. Liberals in the US are actually leftist that don't support Liberal values, they only use the name.

    • @jhanson313
      @jhanson313 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      i hope you dont make ur decision on who to vote for based on this video LOL

    • @MauGouveiaa
      @MauGouveiaa 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Being simple and precise doesn't mean being correct. By watching the vídeo, it looks like ideologies are options which you choose. No, ideologies choose you, they build the basic fundations for your thoughts. And the ideologies on the vídeo aren't on the same level: Everyone is a liberal at some level, capitalism is a economic sistem, not a single person ever defines itself as a populist because it's just a label (just like ''terrorist'').
      The first use of the word ''ideology'' was by french ideologist post french revolution. They tried to create a universal theory about ideas, where you can analize politics objectively without taking sides.
      Being ideological means, by the original definition, doing exactly what this vídeo is doing.

    • @BeerMetal58
      @BeerMetal58 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MrSirFluffy You are out of your mind. Modern Conservatism in the US is right-wing near-fascism everywhere else in the world. "Liberals" in the US would be considered actual conservatives just about everywhere else that isn't a dictatorship.

  • @Thomas.T8
    @Thomas.T8 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This is an amazing channel😆 I'm learning so much! Thank you for your content.

  • @Emily-qu3ty
    @Emily-qu3ty 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nice and informative video. Keep making more videos like this.

  • @chernobylthing3932
    @chernobylthing3932 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3699

    For a video explaining politics, this was refreshingly apolitical and unbiased.

    • @pumpupsongs5500
      @pumpupsongs5500 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +111

      No it wasn’t their was an obvious bias if you cant tell the bias your biased

    • @KarlSnarks
      @KarlSnarks 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +247

      @@pumpupsongs5500 Well enlighten us..

    • @iaminsideyourwalls2021
      @iaminsideyourwalls2021 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +258

      ​@@pumpupsongs5500I can't take someone who can't use correct grammar and punctuation seriously

    • @famisheddendon
      @famisheddendon 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +71

      It was very immediately biased

    • @purplerVAL
      @purplerVAL 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +110

      @@famisheddendon please show where

  • @saltyiceteamaker6140
    @saltyiceteamaker6140 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +841

    This video was incredibly informative for being only 8 minutes. I'd like to see some of those ideology explained more in depth

    • @stupedcraig
      @stupedcraig 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yeah, this is awesome. I didn't realize Transhumanism was an option. We shall overcome our weak puny bodys with the power of robotics!

    • @Nykandros
      @Nykandros 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      He should so off-compass ideologies next. Avaritionism, Kraterocracy, etc.

    • @TheRezro
      @TheRezro 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Unfortunately many of mentioned ideologies are marginal or theoretical.
      It does not explain core division in the politics.

    • @ThePaintExplainer
      @ThePaintExplainer  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +57

      Might make a more in-depth one with basically all of the existing ideologies, but it'll be like 2 hours long.

    • @umfreakingmad5386
      @umfreakingmad5386 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      ​@@ThePaintExplainerPlease do!

  • @WhaddeyaTalkeenabeet
    @WhaddeyaTalkeenabeet 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This channel never fails to teach me about things 100x better than school ever did

  • @devendrapandey3761
    @devendrapandey3761 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This is the best channel ive ever found
    Thanks algorithm god

  • @chambersbenjo
    @chambersbenjo 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +773

    your coverage of anarchism was very well put together, which is rare in a lot of videos on the topic. well done

    • @Michigander_of_the_West
      @Michigander_of_the_West 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      Ironically

    • @ghostlegend434
      @ghostlegend434 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It’s ai

    • @deinsilverdrac8695
      @deinsilverdrac8695 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      it was very simplified tho.
      There's technically a state, it's just not differenciated from the people.
      The state simply have no power.
      There's people who mannage the society, they just have no power over anyone else, so they can't abuse it.
      what's worse is that people will mistake anarchy with anarchism, a thing media and politics have pretty much forced to fught against this political ideology.
      That and just dropping bomb on the anarchism village and societies.

    • @Bunny_Bill
      @Bunny_Bill 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@ghostlegend434 don't care. I get to learn. I'd be a lot more upset if the creator pulled a kwebbelkop

    • @luis-sophus-8227
      @luis-sophus-8227 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Anarchism: No rules lol

  • @MrSigriwal
    @MrSigriwal 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7874

    Very good video and also very unbiased explanations, You did not mix Fascism and Nazism and also didn’t mock conservatives or Support the feminist by saying their right which most people do.

    • @ThePaintExplainer
      @ThePaintExplainer  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1676

      Thanks! The goal was to be as unbiased as possible

    • @kid14346
      @kid14346 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +345

      ​@@ThePaintExplainer there were still some minor instances of bias I would say. Some of the ideologies had big angry eyes. Like that obviously doesn't mean you think they are evil or anything, just that a lot of people will see an ideology that l9oks mean or has a gun and be like, "I don't like that one!"

    • @ThePaintExplainer
      @ThePaintExplainer  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1083

      I didn't make the ideology designs, they were taken from the polcompball subbredit and its website, it's linked in the description!

    • @BlatentCheater
      @BlatentCheater 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Screw feminists

    • @dapweb9373
      @dapweb9373 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +273

      @@ThePaintExplainer Well then that subreddit should’ve drawn the feminist with angry eyes! 😂
      Seriously, that is such an inaccurate drawing of a feminist…💀

  • @katze256
    @katze256 20 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Straight to the point, nice. Never heard of syndicalism before, i like the sound of it.

  • @dimi.giamas
    @dimi.giamas 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Bro I have to say I loved this video it made me understand what the ideologies says and made me understand many things thanks man

  • @colinjohnston9824
    @colinjohnston9824 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1445

    Unfortunately many people believe they are supporting a specific ideology, but the ideology is in name only. The liberal party of Canada, for example, is liberal in name, but in practice has been reducing privacy rights, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of assembly, worker rights, and human rights in an authoritarian manner.

    • @LordKimani
      @LordKimani 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +77

      Truth, I live in Toronto and could tell you this myself

    • @abefernandez6546
      @abefernandez6546 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +129

      Alot people claim they are liberal but believe in the opposite of those belief. Some of them are totally fine with authoritarianism.

    • @SpecialistScorch
      @SpecialistScorch 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

      That’s interesting, they’re trying to do the exact same thing in the US

    • @ManaPirate
      @ManaPirate 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

      We have the Liberal-National Coalition in Australia, and they are very conservative in their views, mostly serving the highest earners and appeasing their strongest voting force at the detriment to progress. (I have some heavy bias here of course). Names really don't mean anything which is unfortunate since it can be quite misleading.
      We also have a minor party called "The Informed Medical Options Party" which the overview is that they want to ensure the health of the nation which sounds great, but in reality they're just anti-vaxxers trying to impose dangerous ideologies.
      I just wish there was some sort of regulation ensuring people knew what they were voting for at face value

    • @seanhartnett79
      @seanhartnett79 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +47

      I mean conservative parties have moved towards fascism.

  • @twmarmy0226
    @twmarmy0226 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3165

    I expected 8 minutes of pure banter and trolling, but received 8 mins of actually educational political education.
    My disappointment is immeasureable and my day is ruined

    • @Revenant-oq9ts
      @Revenant-oq9ts 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +130

      The more I watched this, the more I realized how little people know about their own self professed ideology, let alone that of others.

    • @pyrovania
      @pyrovania 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +57

      It is useful because people throw these words around without knowing what they mean.

    • @ruinhem
      @ruinhem 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes. Learn to navigate this rotten mess and be a part of the mob. Not to speak ill of the video but it is all utterly meaningless.

    • @Kephy_
      @Kephy_ 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@Sinivaal Corporations always rule in a free market.

    • @rompevuevitos222
      @rompevuevitos222 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Kephy_Also free markets are infamous for crashing and burning, then making the common folk pay the broken dishes.

  • @user-ni9hy3fu8e
    @user-ni9hy3fu8e 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    great job! summed up complex topics in a quick, digestable format, with relatively little bias. your attention to differentiating the concepts between certain groups (communism/socialism, fascism/nazism for example) was helpful and more informative than a lot of media i find myself seeing. i did find the feminism topic to be maybe a little oversimplified, in fact, a deeper dive into feminism as a whole would be great to see. there's a clear difference to the feminism movement 50+ years ago and generally speaking, how it's aged each decade.

  • @thebteamgamingchannel5701
    @thebteamgamingchannel5701 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Parts of this need updating. You did a great job of explaining how all of these ideals originally started and what their doctrine was in the beginning, but some of those ideals have been hijacked in recent years and are no longer what they claim to be.

    • @1c0nic_player
      @1c0nic_player 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      none of these will ever be perfect, these are just the ideas they’re founded on. it looks different in context or with dumb and corrupt ppl

  • @monty6851
    @monty6851 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +250

    Transhumanism in a nutshell:
    "From the moment I understood the weakness of my flesh, it disgusted me. I craved the strength and certainty of steel"
    Edit: thanks to contributions in the comments, we can also include Witchers and X-Men in nutshell transhumanism. Praise the Omnisiah for the sharing of information on the internet

    • @5erase
      @5erase 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

      If I ever have to get prosthetics I will dedicate my life to Transhumanism

    • @benyseus6325
      @benyseus6325 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

      Trahnshumansim can also evolve into genetic augmentation and biological supplementation - it doesn’t necessarily have to directly correlate to synthetic implants and cyborg bodies

    • @nadaningunos9339
      @nadaningunos9339 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      'Wake up samurai'

    • @cthulhufhtagn7520
      @cthulhufhtagn7520 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      ​@@benyseus6325That still counts as technology, but yes I agree that his description of it was rather lacking. The "ultimate goal" in transhumanism is morphological freedom and being able to control whatever aspects of the human condition that you wish, not all transhumanists want immortality, god-like intellect or an indestructible powerful body

    • @monty6851
      @monty6851 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@5erase you're not wrong, and now we can include Witchers and X-Men as nutshell transhumanism

  • @spectator352
    @spectator352 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Exactly what I needed, I'm using this to catalogue a fictional nation I'm making. Thank you!

  • @BINSNEWS
    @BINSNEWS 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great summary. I don't know if all Moderates are within the Overton Window, but I'm glad U brought it up.

  • @cosmosxk9695
    @cosmosxk9695 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +904

    I liked it. The presentation seemed neutral and focused on describing the ideologies, including their perspectives. I learned more about some ideologies I knew some things about, and even some that I didn't know anything about, like Corporatism, Communitarianism and Moderatism. Thank you for making a video that is both informative and descriptive.

    • @ThePaintExplainer
      @ThePaintExplainer  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

      Glad you liked it!

    • @juni5822
      @juni5822 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@blackpanther5086you responded to a comment praising their work on the video with a Hitler quote and a salute emote? Never mind the Nazi roach that you are part, you also can't even read. That's a double whammy

    • @thomasdehaan00
      @thomasdehaan00 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      ​@blackpanther5086how can you advocate for a guy who committed genocide?

    • @Birri919
      @Birri919 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      @@thomasdehaan00 He probably thinks he's one of the ubermensch even though we all know most neo-nazis would be sent straight to the camps

    • @john1802
      @john1802 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@Birri919how does it makes any argument? What if he is actually pure aryan? And most importantly nazis weren't putting everyone non aryan in camps, try learning history

  • @kataclysmad1065
    @kataclysmad1065 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +723

    As i came across, I was genuinely pleased by the tone and the synthesis of the video. Coming from France, politics is number one topic everywhere, but it seems we lost the idea where debating for a better system turned to an endless fight between parties instead of realising most of us have the same goals. It is a well done video with usefull hindsight. Eager to see more of your content.

    • @cesruhf2605
      @cesruhf2605 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      yeah as a french we definitely need to be taught to be able to listen even though we think we might disagree, and have more civilised discussions rather than constantly shouting at each other

    • @21minus1
      @21minus1 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      all people have different goals

    • @jpraise6771
      @jpraise6771 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      His Majesty Jesus Christ has sent me on a mission with a message to tell the masses! Fear not, my brothers, your hunger shall be no more. He who dispenses the bread of life shall be your sustenance!

    • @ashryil
      @ashryil 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@21minus1 no

    • @moemuxhagi
      @moemuxhagi 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      'Faut aussi que les gens comprênent que la politique française n'est PAS la politique américaine : on a plus de deux partis, et les deux principaux sont pas "gauche libérale et extrême droite conservatrice", c'est "gauche populiste et droite moderationniste" 😮‍💨 trop de jeunes passent trop de temps sur internet, et à cause de l'influence des US, ils sont convaincus que LEUR politique est LA politique. Non. Faut juste ouvrir un peu les yeux et voir la différence d'idéaux

  • @RobotDCLXVI
    @RobotDCLXVI 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Saved the best for last, eh?

    • @absolux789
      @absolux789 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      literally nobody thinks you’re funny.

    • @JoyoMoyo
      @JoyoMoyo 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Utter clown saying this. Go outside and get some air

  • @marvinmiller2983
    @marvinmiller2983 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I'm glad you distinguished liberalism and progressivism because it seems nowadays, those two terms are used interchangeably, and a lot of people who call themselves conservative today actually align with a lot of traditionally liberal values.

  • @imagination_nub
    @imagination_nub 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1032

    Something I love about this video is that he made almost all of them sound good. From watching that video, I couldn't say where this guy stands politically. Only a few things to say where he doesn't.
    It's refreshing to have a video about politics that's purely objective and doesn't bring any of the personal beliefs of the creator into it

    • @TheUnderscore_
      @TheUnderscore_ 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +73

      It's definitely not "purely objective," because as you said there are "a few things to say" what he doesn't agree with. Thankfully we can say those things are agreed upon for most of us as well lmfao, but still not "purely objective."

    • @LukeTheGreat1
      @LukeTheGreat1 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hes literally biased towards leftardism. Its clear as day.

    • @mite3959
      @mite3959 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TheUnderscore_ Only really fascism and nazism from what i can tell

    • @colincrosgrove9132
      @colincrosgrove9132 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

      I don't think it's completely subjective. He talks bad about one bad ideology but then tries to sound neutral or not bad about another pretty horrific one.

    • @bigounce-xj7kn
      @bigounce-xj7kn 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@colincrosgrove9132?

  • @veilnebula2411
    @veilnebula2411 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +49

    5:38 from the moment I understood the weakness of my flesh it disgusted me.

    • @Monkey_no_luffy
      @Monkey_no_luffy 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      💀

    • @vamperjr1376
      @vamperjr1376 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      I craved for the strength and certainty of steel.

    • @oscramos8298
      @oscramos8298 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hit the gym

    • @veilnebula2411
      @veilnebula2411 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@oscramos8298 i go to gym on a daily basis, i think i still have the right to memes ok?

    • @oscramos8298
      @oscramos8298 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      yes@@veilnebula2411

  • @user-ek2zb1nv4k
    @user-ek2zb1nv4k 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for not injecting too much dogmatic undertone into what should be as transparently educational and unbiased as possible. I’m thanking you because so so many other channels will often use what seems to be straightforward education and inject undertones that automatically cast aspersions onto on side and use flowery and appealing language for the side they hope to make seem good. But that poisons the well unless it’s stated that the video will contain political opinion and bias

  • @user-ll1wc3lw5t
    @user-ll1wc3lw5t 10 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Really appreciate your ability to remain non bias in a politically themed video, good job man!!

  • @JayHoffmann842
    @JayHoffmann842 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +449

    This will be a giant channel in a few months. Keep making content like this. Seems like you’ve done it before. Very natural

    • @symbolsarenotreality4595
      @symbolsarenotreality4595 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Only for reactionaries.

    • @normalchannel2185
      @normalchannel2185 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Bro joined 15 days ago, posted 2 vids and is already on featured/trending charts with total views above 1M
      madlad,

    • @taliacheng5006
      @taliacheng5006 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@normalchannel2185I think this is redeemed zoomer, who has another channel that is focused on spreading his presbytarian (branch of christianity) faith. He made a really good all christianities/all religions video before

    • @normalchannel2185
      @normalchannel2185 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@taliacheng5006 it seemed like his style tbh

    • @EpicnessYeet
      @EpicnessYeet 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@taliacheng5006redeemed zoomer's voice is more pitched than this creator's voice, but i can see that he was probably inspired by redeemed zoomer.

  • @dumbbumsc5329
    @dumbbumsc5329 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +179

    Very quick and clear with good visual aids. Learning is never more enjoyable. I am absolutely subscribing

    • @AImighty_Loaf
      @AImighty_Loaf 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Excellent, perfect video for a low attention span zoomer

  • @Sly88Frye
    @Sly88Frye 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    There are definitely some things here I didn't know so I appreciate that.

  • @Hellnation13
    @Hellnation13 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is wonderful, thank you.

  • @Monderoth
    @Monderoth 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +109

    That was a surprisingly accurate description of anarchism. It sounds like it was taken right from Kropotkin, and that's a level of understanding that I genuinely didn't expect.

    • @KarlSnarks
      @KarlSnarks 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      When he said socialism is an umbrella term and showed anarchism as one of the words under the umbrella, I knew he was going to give a fair definition of anarchism.

    • @e66iu
      @e66iu 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      When I watched that part on anarchism, I thought, "hey, that doesn't sound bad...wait...have I been lied to... again?" I know nothing of Kroptkin, but I'm intrigued to find out based on this comment. Anarchism doesn't just devolve into "violence hierarchy" like I was taught? (like: zombie apocalypse rules, battle royale rules, smash bros free for all rules)

    • @ironspaghett
      @ironspaghett 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's anarchism. Who cares if you're fair? It's as realistic a system of government for our time as a government comprised of platypie and unicorns.

    • @ironspaghett
      @ironspaghett 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@e66iuYes. It does. Because that is the nature of man. We aren't enlightened things, we are just animals.
      It would be nice to live in a world where something like this could exist, but devolution and the slippery slope are real when it comes to humanity.

    • @KarlSnarks
      @KarlSnarks 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@e66iu If we're going by examples, there have been instances of anarchist or anarchist-adjacent experiments on larger scale (the largest up to ten million population, so not extremely large), like currently the Zapatistas in Mexico and Rojava in Syria, and historically Makhnovchina in Ukraine and Revolutionary Catalonia and Aragon in the Spanish civil war (fun fact, George Orwell fought alongside them against Franco).
      Peter Kropotkin was a Russian prince who rejected his title to become an anarchist, and is seen as the father of anarcho-communism, free communes that form confederated associations with other communes, and share in production by need. He's also nicknamed Bread-Santa ;P
      The yt channel Then & Now has a good introduction to the history of anarchism, and two videos on Joseph Proudhon (a Mutualist anarchist). Anark has a great series called A Modern Anarchism, though it's on the longer side, and Andrewism is also a good channel. The subreddit r/anarchy101 is very helpful and has a link to an FAQ of the ideology.

  • @drandren9093
    @drandren9093 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1257

    This is a little bit insignificant but the fact you actually explain fascism properly or at least a lot better than other people is huge props to you. Most people will just use it interchangeably with Nazism, or just twist the reality of it which takes away from the actual things that make it a horrible ideology.

    • @whyisyes3957
      @whyisyes3957 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +260

      @@blackpanther5086It’s pretty right, it lines up with the beliefs of the Nazi Party

    • @cheekguardian1378
      @cheekguardian1378 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

      ​@@blackpanther5086how exactly?

    • @ahandlemustbechosen
      @ahandlemustbechosen 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      @@blackpanther5086 How?

    • @hyperboreanmustache
      @hyperboreanmustache 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He doesn’t know jackshit about Fascism, certainly never read Gentili or any other primary font. Read 100 questions by Oswald Mosley to get a grip

    • @thinksetsoup5790
      @thinksetsoup5790 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@cheekguardian1378how? Have you gone through history class? Don’t tell me you’re one of the morons that believe that ww2 never happened and Adolf Hitler didn’t exist.

  • @NagaNationalist
    @NagaNationalist 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    7:25 Austrian Painter's favourite

  • @mayonster4798
    @mayonster4798 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    what a nice video! i bet the comment section will be civil and nice to each other!

  • @TheNightbean
    @TheNightbean 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +765

    Ya know, I usually associate these little political blob dudes with online brain rot, but this was legitimately informative. Thank you! I’m looking forward to part 2!!

    • @Nyx__
      @Nyx__ 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +53

      The people who use these blobs unironically are often very brain rotted. The blobs do however make for a good way to illustrate the different ideologies into their flags and give them some "personality".

    • @thelitmango6333
      @thelitmango6333 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +67

      ​​​​@@Nyx__"ah yes you fools that use the little colorful blob have brain rot, but me an over 20 year old male with an anime profile pic doesn't have any brain rot."

    • @NisangaiZ
      @NisangaiZ 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      ​@@thelitmango6333No offense to the first guy but that was hilarious

    • @FranklinFleming-lm1yu
      @FranklinFleming-lm1yu 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Noo lol 😆🤣 it was rott 100%

    • @FranklinFleming-lm1yu
      @FranklinFleming-lm1yu 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@thelitmango6333 read what you wrote 😂

  • @mercenarygundam1487
    @mercenarygundam1487 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +119

    The fact you used polandball art and makes it easy to digest, makes it worth viewing

    • @ough.
      @ough. 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      fax

    • @ough.
      @ough. 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      i think polandball is taking over, even my sisters history teacher printed a cuba polandball on the worksheet

    • @mercenarygundam1487
      @mercenarygundam1487 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@ough. The one time Satire has been used for good.

  • @bruhpaint6729
    @bruhpaint6729 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    For anyone confused what private property means in socialism/communism: private property is specifically property used for production (like factories) while personal property is things you personally own (like your house).

  • @myuniversemyself8493
    @myuniversemyself8493 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I've never commented on TH-cam but I've never seen such simple, direct, educational, not boring, and straight video. Just amazing I'll look forward to get more of your videos keep it up.

  • @josharko111
    @josharko111 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +295

    I think it's also worth explaining the difference between private and personal property. When discussing politics, private property means that which is owned by companies, while personal property is that which an individual owns. A restaurant is private property, your microwave is personal property.

    • @Grundrisse
      @Grundrisse 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

      There's no difference between these two! Karl Marx wants to take away my Funko Pop.

    • @rafaelpupo1908
      @rafaelpupo1908 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Glad somebody explained it

    • @vitulus_
      @vitulus_ 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      If I use my computer for work at home is that private or personal property?

    • @josharko111
      @josharko111 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@vitulus_ if you bought it, it's personal.

    • @vitulus_
      @vitulus_ 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@josharko111 Yeah but I buy other tools for my business that are solely used for work. I'd be surprised if they were personal?

  • @ArtemisSkyeB
    @ArtemisSkyeB 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +599

    One small thing I noticed that stuck out to me:
    Under the communism section, you put a house to represent private property. That would not be private property unless you are using it to make money.
    Private property is stuff like the factories, machines, and anything else used to produce wealth. A house, your toothbrush, etc. would be personal property, and it would be yours and you would keep it.
    I hope I explained it well. I’m really tired rn

    • @quaksbongos658
      @quaksbongos658 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +133

      So true, thank u tired lesbian

    • @mymelo-kz8xs
      @mymelo-kz8xs 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      What if you sew clothes in your house and sell the clothes

    • @salmonandsoup
      @salmonandsoup 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +104

      @@mymelo-kz8xs You're not using the house itself to make money. Everyone needs a home to live in; housing is a human right (or it should be). Unless the house itself is specifically what makes you money, it's personal property.

    • @TheFeralcatz
      @TheFeralcatz 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +48

      Most communist regimes did seize private homes though.

    • @ArtemisSkyeB
      @ArtemisSkyeB 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +61

      @@aaaaa-tx3qb In that case, that would be an example of workers owning the means of production. A pen, a notebook, paint supplies, etc. are the machines or otherwise used to make a product. So long as that is owned collectively by the workers, it's good. If a job only requires one individual, then that individual owns everything. If a job requires two or more, maybe they each own their individual sewing machine, but they collectively own the business or factory.
      The simple answer is: The workers should own the items and things needed to make a product, regardless of the number of workers.

  • @saadbenbenabslam5176
    @saadbenbenabslam5176 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Excellent Match, true gentleman of a coach

  • @takartamuk7578
    @takartamuk7578 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Very informative video thank you🙏💯

  • @camerapasteurize7215
    @camerapasteurize7215 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +234

    I like how this shows how there's significant overlap in many of these ideologies, so you can see how anyone can define their beliefs to include multiple of these.
    I also appreciate how you showed that progressivism and liberalism are not the same thing! People tend to refer to progressives as liberals, which implies that people who don't hold progressive viewpoints don't support classical liberalism.
    Edit: to everyone responding complaining about the difference between modern liberalism and classical liberalism, yes. I understand there is a difference, and I'm not advocating to stop calling modern liberals "liberals" even though most of their ideals have little overlap with classical liberalism. I'm just pointing out a lesser known fact. I myself am more of a libertarian in terms of political views, with conservative morals.

    • @jfast8256
      @jfast8256 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Especially since liberals believe in freedom of speech and individualism where modern progressives are extremely authoritarian and collectivist.
      What is "progressivism" was definitely answered for it's core belief. However, it's followers today have adopted parts of both fascism (minus the nationalism) and authoritarianism (expect the power being held by the mob).
      As an atheist liberal I cannot stand the modern progressive. They are evil to the core.

    • @Habib_Xon
      @Habib_Xon 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I've known that they are different. However Im most definitely not going to stop using the term to encompass all liberals

    • @jfast8256
      @jfast8256 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Habib_Xon progressives are NOT liberal. Me, a liberal, my WORST political rival enemy is the progressive. We are nothing alike. I'm free speech, they are censorship. I'm protect the individual, they are authoritarian. I'm free market capitalism, they are socialism. Calling a "progressive" a liberal is just as stupid as calling a man a "woman" (something dumb ass progressives do). Do you want to be like a progressive and not know the difference between a man and woman or a liberal and a progressive?

    • @Yuvraj.
      @Yuvraj. 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

      @@Habib_Xon Why? It's inaccurate to call all progressives liberals, and vice versa. Why purposefully make that error?

    • @ericraululyeetusdelyeetus5028
      @ericraululyeetusdelyeetus5028 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      ​@@Yuvraj. I suppose because it's all too common for the two terms to be conflated, it's nearly impossible to discuss something political while making this distinction...and expecting the one you're conversing with to, in good faith, get the point, and start also making this distinction.
      Long story told short, because it's simpler this way unfortunately.

  • @rubenfeijoolopez8572
    @rubenfeijoolopez8572 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +49

    You clicked becouse politics. I clicked becouse cute ideollogy balls. We are not the same.

    • @Spubbily01
      @Spubbily01 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Based

    • @taureon_
      @taureon_ 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      i clicked because i saw a female anarcho ball

    • @sauliusvitkauskas8741
      @sauliusvitkauskas8741 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@taureon_ bro really said: smas-

    • @thejanitor3263
      @thejanitor3263 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I clicked for both

    • @tweettweetyweety
      @tweettweetyweety 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@taureon_ Panty and Stocking anarchy

  • @WetDoggo
    @WetDoggo 3 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    In the last ideology, the guy with the mustache would be an Untermensch himself

  • @cesarcesar5129
    @cesarcesar5129 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I love how they all sound good.

  • @byronee
    @byronee 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +469

    There is one essential part of Fascism that you left out: Fascism heavily advocates for a national rebirth. This is one of the defining reasons why Nazi's were seen as Fascist rather than being strictly authoritarian. The Nazi's believed in a national rebirth which in their case, was the Third Reich.

    • @MrBenMcLean
      @MrBenMcLean 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah except that literally everybody believes in national rebirth. Obama certainly did. Lincoln concluded his Gettysburg Address with, "that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom."
      So just because the Nazis happened to have something in common with literally everybody without exception doesn't make literally everybody without exception a Nazi.

    • @KiwiSpartan01
      @KiwiSpartan01 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Thank you

    • @ScreamingManiac
      @ScreamingManiac 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Its funny how many people are called nazis today because when you actually think about what nazism actually is. There would be like 0.000001% of people today who actually hold that ideology.

    • @luccaprado1
      @luccaprado1 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

      That and Fascism is also a type of corporatism.

    • @Zzzzzzzxxxxxxxx
      @Zzzzzzzxxxxxxxx 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      And Hegelian idealism, which without it’s not even possible to have fascism as it’s the starting point. Economics too I guess with syndicalism and corporatism

  • @serenitythelefty4916
    @serenitythelefty4916 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +145

    I feel like some of these are less political ideologies and more economic ideologies or philosophical ideologies (transhumanism for example) which might be confusing for some people. Other than that this was a surprisingly good video covering the very basic overview of these without going into overwhelming depth.

    • @DemonKing19951
      @DemonKing19951 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      To be fair, there really isn't a classical political ideology that isn't also an economic ideology. Governments/groups of humans formed to make their resource lasted longer and were easier to get. Almost every basic aspect of society expends from that basic concept. Even things like authoritarianism which seems completely political is still entrusting one person with the job of a least deciding who allocates resources and what land they acquire. You have to get to incredibly modern stuff before you really start seeing political views purely based non-physical concepts. Most people actually in power need to have some idea of what resources should go where and democracies/republics/most other governments with real divisions of power and responsibility really didn't thrive until relatively recently.

    • @Outlaw7263
      @Outlaw7263 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Transhumanism is basically either the Adeptus Mechanicus from Warhammer 40k or Maelstrom from Cyberpunk.

    • @cryptguard
      @cryptguard 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Outlaw7263GOD BLESS THE OMNISSIAH

    • @KarlSnarks
      @KarlSnarks 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Political and economic ideologies often overlap, because your economic views will often also shape how you think government should be run and how involved it should be (or not exist at all). Philosophical ideologies that have ideas about society also often have a political component.

  • @mikeroberts7921
    @mikeroberts7921 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you for this. I wish this had been around back in the day when I was a young sprout, studying civics in the 9th grade. Civics was a required course then, I don’t know if it is now.

  • @art2103
    @art2103 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Im all for transhumanism. Lets reach singularity and transcend to immortality

    • @milkdrinker5782
      @milkdrinker5782 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      No.

    • @art2103
      @art2103 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@milkdrinker5782 we might have a problem then

  • @AquaBlue77
    @AquaBlue77 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +356

    I really liked your short minimalistic, to-the-point, uncomplicated explaining of each ideology. I understood everything here. While big, long-winded, complicated videos trying to explain the same things, just tend to confuse me even more. You've just got both a like and subscribe from me...

    • @AImighty_Loaf
      @AImighty_Loaf 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      "Now I'm an expert on everything after ingesting 10 seconds of information on a specific topic. My opinions and perspectives hold more merit now"

    • @MountainDaughter
      @MountainDaughter 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      my little brainy wainey no like big talky walky so i likey wikey small time wordy dirtys.

    • @ElSandwich777
      @ElSandwich777 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      @@AImighty_Loaf MEGA KEK. They were saying that the explanations were simple enough that a child could grasp it, while simultaneously comparing it to Political SlutSmores you can get virtually anywhere else on the Tube.
      There was no boast of superiority here, save for the one response that followed it.

    • @itsmeoj
      @itsmeoj 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yip yap yap yap

    • @prettygreenbud
      @prettygreenbud 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@AImighty_Loafyou’re sad

  • @TherionBlueblood
    @TherionBlueblood 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +194

    I didn't even realise that a good amount of those existed, so thanks for actually telling me in a way I can understand. I would be interested in a video that goes in depth on other political ideologies, although even just this video is a great way to understand the surface level of political ideologies.

    • @clalam5241
      @clalam5241 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yea its almost like politics is an extremely large 3 dimensional spectrum

    • @WillySalami
      @WillySalami 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@clalam5241 Politics is no spectrum, it's more like a sea, I mean, I dare you to place Duginism, Conservatism, Carlism, Fascism, Social-Democracy, Marxist Socialism, Liberalism and Anarchism in a 3-dimensional spectrum.

    • @thetalantonx
      @thetalantonx 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      When you start getting more granular it's worth having them explained and defined as in neutral a way as possible like this, and then having each explained/defined/attacked/defended by proponents and opponents. The more specific an explanation becomes the more you can get lost in minutiae and have "positives" taken for granted or dismissed.
      If you can find honest opponents, it's really fascinating to have a system defended by someone who dislikes it - you know "what are the best features of X system that you wish Y (your system) had?"

    • @misterboxhead3045
      @misterboxhead3045 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Do you still remember half of these?

  • @aura4973
    @aura4973 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I love this channel

  • @Jesusisking326
    @Jesusisking326 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Could you make a longer video diving deeper into each of them

  • @arcticgrayling3368
    @arcticgrayling3368 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +63

    Where's racism

  • @wilder11
    @wilder11 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +143

    One thing y'all should keep in mind is that few of these are actually mutually exclusive.
    Many of these "teams" could work together, in theory. Some do in the real world. Others are complete contradictory but become allies anyway.
    TL;DR it's rarely ever just the one thing. Great video man.

    • @ronster.
      @ronster. 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      nah, none of these can coincide.

    • @boythefather9868
      @boythefather9868 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Indeed, capitalism and socialism are different and contradictory in economic context. However, environmentalism and egalitarianism can be augmented depending whether businesses practices corporate social responsibility and the general public truly want to create an egalitarian society.

    • @ronster.
      @ronster. 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      i was kidding btw i posted this for sillies w/ a friend (its an inside joke)

    • @alexdraco9926
      @alexdraco9926 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Indeed I find myself under the umbrella of no less than 4 of these ideologies

    • @wilder11
      @wilder11 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ronster. Well I'm glad you had fun.

  • @truebruhmoment4667
    @truebruhmoment4667 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    As a person who didn't understand about politics, this video has helped me understand what politics are about and there were more politics out there than i could ever have imagined

  • @aaronsaunders6974
    @aaronsaunders6974 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    8:07 tell that to ernst roehm, man

  • @NoopyP
    @NoopyP 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +379

    If this video didn't exist, I would have never gone out of my away to better understand the spectrum of different political ideologies because I'm pretty much apolitical (although one of my friends who's very into politics has guessed I'd be an anarchist). So thank you for providing me with this information in a small amount of time.

    • @OraTorgrurhh
      @OraTorgrurhh 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +51

      Nobody is apolitical, you just don't have the right words to put on your ideas/opinions (anarchism could be a start). Almost everything you do and think has some political ramifications.

    • @NoopyP
      @NoopyP 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +69

      @@OraTorgrurhh I totally understand that but it's not just not knowing the terminology, it's also that I simply don't have a clear opinion on many issues because I'm not informed on them, either because I haven't been exposed to them, because I see both sides, or because I don't care enough. But I guess that would simply be being moderate?

    • @codyluna7065
      @codyluna7065 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      @@NoopyP The price for refusing to participate in politics is becoming governed by your inferiors. -some Greek dude..
      When you realize that the true purpose of political structures is to control the information we get it can really shock you into paying attention why things are the way they are and why so many people are, like yourself, apolitical by design.
      To determine who owns you, first determine who you aren't allowed to criticize.

    • @yoututiitdlrlrkrkr560
      @yoututiitdlrlrkrkr560 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Just be careful because the real world usage of these online is that of a label for a tribe which may include random extraneous other ideas that they will enforce on anyone they can.

    • @xviii5780
      @xviii5780 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      ​​@@OraTorgrurhh Apolitical = doesn't want to engage in political struggle or take sides

  • @xuyi_wang
    @xuyi_wang 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Cool that video makes me clear about those therms

  • @andreim.5324
    @andreim.5324 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    First of all, thank you for this great video!
    Looking at all these ideologies, what I find funny, scary and sad, is that each of them has at least 1 good element within them.
    The sad part is we will never be truly united as a species, unless an ideology appears that encapsulates all the good elements of each of the above, which is practically impossible.

    • @nelisezpasce
      @nelisezpasce 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A psychopath could take advantage of any ideology to spread wanton misery
      We should detect it before it gets out of control, putting measures against it
      Everyone deserves help and forgiveness, except remorseless monsters, we cannot help those
      We still have lots of history to learn from, let's educate the unwitting enablers of said monsters today
      Unsuppresed knowledge is key, access to information no matter how controversial or disturbing should be a given right

  • @darkwowplayer
    @darkwowplayer 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +436

    Crazy how almost all of these actually sound pretty good on paper, yet we know how bad they are in practice.

    • @xedeanz9324
      @xedeanz9324 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +127

      Fr especially capitalism

    • @darkwowplayer
      @darkwowplayer 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +176

      @@xedeanz9324 Captialism is actually one of the few that is proven to work decently well, albeit it's not perfect, but mixing Capitalism with certain ideals of other systems has worked very well for the many first world countries that have adopted it.
      I was mostly referencing Communism, Communalism, and Socialism.

    • @dannybonsai7102
      @dannybonsai7102 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

      yup, it marries well with liberalism that may act to preserve individual rights as well as a free market, just reeling it in so it doesn't evolve into corporatocracy.@@darkwowplayer

    • @gambasfritasconcorbata5936
      @gambasfritasconcorbata5936 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@darkwowplayercapitalism demonstrably doesn't work, it's destroyed the environment and forces people to starve

    • @USSAnimeNCC-
      @USSAnimeNCC- 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      All of these what about nazism non of is good on paper unless your a other hating maniac

  • @siarhian10
    @siarhian10 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Personally I would go over both pros and cons of each of them as well since there are definitely positive and negative aspects of all of these

  • @eneaganh6319
    @eneaganh6319 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +69

    I wouldn't call feminism a political ideology, more like a social movement

    • @juannaym8488
      @juannaym8488 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      Political ideology and social movement are sometimes hard to differentiate. There are parties and governments that have defined feminism as their core value, so I think this fits here

    • @farkasabel
      @farkasabel 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      If feminism is a political ideology then mgtow as well.

    • @TFFAN16
      @TFFAN16 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@farkasabelthe difference there is that mgtow already reached the height of its popularity in roughly 2016 to 2019 and even then it never achieved even close to the overall notoriety or puplicity that feminism did, whether by chance or design you be the judge.

    • @farkasabel
      @farkasabel 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@TFFAN16 it did. Although it became "red pill". Andrew Tate and other manosphere podcasts and ideologs already made a change. High school student males already lean towards these ideas.

    • @farkasabel
      @farkasabel 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TFFAN16 plus in many countries the military/defensive capabilities are dwindling due to the lack of manpower as many these man who traditionally gave the capable fighting force to the countries refuse to fight for it.

  • @dannybrat3127
    @dannybrat3127 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +209

    I learned more about our government in 8 minutes than years of social studies

    • @plugshirt1762
      @plugshirt1762 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      @@schmiggidy Doesn't that stick hurt?

    • @foundationuser5043
      @foundationuser5043 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      @@schmiggidy What??? Another student didn’t learn from textbooks and hour long lectures like you did??? WHATTT. I can’t believe not every kid learns the same way!!! 😱😱😱😱
      Crazy man. Almost like some people are different than you.

    • @foundationuser5043
      @foundationuser5043 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@plugshirt1762 Must have haha, since he mocks others for not remembering the lessons.
      I finished all dash 1 Social studies, but my memory still slips sometimes since I wasn’t beat I guess lol.

    • @peapod5629
      @peapod5629 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@foundationuser5043let's be honest you probably aren't a real "visual learner" or whatnot, you just don't have the willpower and self control to listen to your teachers and classes 😢😮😅😂😊

    • @traderben9530
      @traderben9530 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@peapod5629Nah I genuinely absorb info better through reading at my own pace. I can't be the only one. I borderline passed/failed many classes, but quickly picked up statistics and calculus on my own when my job called for it. Wheras in school those two had very low grades despite putting in the hours.

  • @dark.explainer_
    @dark.explainer_ 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Incredibly informative video! Your concise breakdown is both eye-opening and educational

  • @dylanhitchcock6574
    @dylanhitchcock6574 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Saving this so I can brush up on it every so often. Always wanted to know what some of these actually meant without any bias.

  • @delfox1009
    @delfox1009 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This should be shown in schools so kids can have a general overview on all ideologies

  • @KalebPeters99
    @KalebPeters99 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +87

    This was fantastic! I'm loving the trend of low production quality but high information density educational content. Subscribed!

  • @Sandy-qr2ff
    @Sandy-qr2ff 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +59

    I don't know how you manage to make the ideologies sound so horendeous, sci-fi and good, into a neutral view at the same time

  • @rutasermuksnyte6662
    @rutasermuksnyte6662 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    NGL 2 OF THE LAST Ideologys were 🔥🔥🔥

  • @krishdalmia2507
    @krishdalmia2507 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Really Refreshing Content

  • @davejoseph5615
    @davejoseph5615 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +262

    This was a good idea although some of these are merely political priorities rather than political systems. You might also consider a video describing how these can be blended or corrupted.

    • @pieines7299
      @pieines7299 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      I like what has being tried here, but I feel rather uneasy on some definition.
      I know that the author tried to be objective in those numerous definition, but it seem we are mistaking the robe for the monk here.
      I mean by that that people under ideology will claim that something is their focus, while in fact, movement born from this ideology usually have another objective. it being more a cover for another less... sellable.
      Nazi under nazism seemed more than willing to bend what is a aryan/subhumain as long as it suited them, especially when material expropriation or general opposition to anything lefty was in the table. The aryan thingy seem to be more decorum than the core principle, which is "the nation need a all powerful authority unimpeded by law or morality to do what it see fit to save the nation from it's internal and external menace" which itself hide the political backstabing and personal gain that govern nazi politics.
      And, you could say that would not be applying the real theorical nazi, but if nazi are not nazi, who are ?
      I feel like a lot of the ideology described here are in that situation.

    • @USSAnimeNCC-
      @USSAnimeNCC- 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Well fascism do tend to lead nazism except their not alway nazi like the anti-trans and anti-lgbt rhetoric coming form the far right but we don’t call them nazi we call them fascist or authoritarian

    • @rompevuevitos222
      @rompevuevitos222 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      All systems can be corrupted or blended in equal ways.
      Dictatorships and monarchies can both arise from anarchism, communism and capitalism alike.
      Capitalism allows uncapped generational wealth which leads to single people holding enough power to rule. Since money = power. Or just allowing someone to hoard wealth trough dirty means and then using said money to avoid consequences.
      Communism (as it's been done in the past) puts production under leaders, and in communism production = power.
      It is also pretty funny because the whole point of communism is that the PEOPLE control the production, but since no leader actually ever did communism this never really was attempted.
      In anarchism, there is a power vacuum ready for the taking. It's just a matter of time.

    • @YouTubeAccount-ie7xb
      @YouTubeAccount-ie7xb 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      “Political 👉Ideology👈”

    • @user-si7qi4xtriad
      @user-si7qi4xtriad หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@USSAnimeNCC-what do we call a far left group that advocates violence against a person or group who doesnt align with their political/personal beliefs? Is that even a thing? Im not really political , but there is always a mirror.

  • @Epic_R3K47
    @Epic_R3K47 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +42

    I needed this. Made up my own country. But couldn't decide what ideology to pick.

    • @scottanos9981
      @scottanos9981 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      When in doubt, moderate out. 😅

    • @exotic1405
      @exotic1405 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      I made a country. It's called fip. The population count is 1 and its me, also the territory spans across the entire planet. Get off my land

    • @Epic_R3K47
      @Epic_R3K47 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@exotic1405 Who are you.

    • @enexua_07
      @enexua_07 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The president of fip, i guess ? @@Epic_R3K47

    • @user-wb7ho8vg1j
      @user-wb7ho8vg1j 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      lmao@@exotic1405

  • @SanaWaheed-gu1fr
    @SanaWaheed-gu1fr 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It would be great if you explain about different fighter jets and their identities or maybe about CEOs and business positions

  • @ryansequeira8486
    @ryansequeira8486 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fantabulous work sir, need a PDF or some form of a download or notes or cards or a one pager❤