I get that it's supposed to be a simplified version and that these are very complicated concepts so it's natural to miss out information but there is so much misinformation and misconceptions in it
Some minor corrections, UK does not completely count as a symbolic monarchy, The Monarch does bave involvement in the political process of the country, they are the ones that put pen to paper on bills when they have passed both the House of Commons and Lords, they are the ones that open and close parliament, who swear loyalty to the King, they are also the ones who declare that an electoral period is to commence etc. A real example of Symbolic monarchy is sweden, whos monarch is literally there only as a symbol, parliament approves and also enacts law, commands the military, the swedish monarch usually only hosts foreign dignitaries and is the one that hands someone their Nobel prizes.
The whole socialism section is wrong your describing communism not socialism. Similar but very different government ideas one communism is a form of governance where socialism is instead a set a ideas for a system.
incorrect, you got it backwards. Socialism is a political ideology, while communism is a utopian ideal. Socialism is as described a form of generally more authoritarian government, while communism at it's utopian ideal has no government.
@@lowlsqwid no that's not even close communism isn't a utopia idea the fact their are multiple communities nations shows that. Unless you think china and the ussr are utopian nation's. Socialism is a wide breath of ideas with communism as one of many political systems that use it as a framework. With plenty of example states existing most falling into the internal Communism external state capitalism model. But most of the west EU is socialist has major socialist political parties or active programs. Socialism is more comparable to markets as a political ideology. A framing for which to build within or on. Markets give us mercantilism capitalism and more socialism gives us communism but it also gives us other political frameworks the well farm state public health ECT. Communism is a government socialism is a framework communism is built on.
@@koboldqueen3055You clearly haven't read Marx... Socialism is the transitional state between capitalism and communism. There was never a "communist state", and there cannot be - as communism is a utopian post-scarcity society. What you are describing as "socialism in Europe", are rather deformed social democratic parties that have nothing to do with true socialism, as there is still capitalist mode of production in place - ie, private property.
@@koboldqueen3055 Communism is indeed a sub-section of Socialism (with Anarchism being a sub-section of Communism) and strives for a utopian ideal. There are multiple countries whose ruling parties call themselves communist, because in their conception they had communism as their ideal to strive for. They haven't yet achieved it fully, either because of a lack of resources or because of internal corruption and fall to autocracy. This video is one I have gotten recommend a few times that explain the difference and relationship between communism, socialism and anarchism: th-cam.com/video/vyl2DeKT-Vs/w-d-xo.html
To clear everything up for my fellow leftists this is how I interpret it Socialism: when the means of production is owned by the working class and a dictatorship of the proletariat is established with its main goal being to achieve communism Communism: an ideology that advocates for a communist society - a classless, stateless and moneyless society (basically a utopia)
@@RegnStövel Nah just read him and you would understand why people get sick of all this misinfo on his theory If you wanna see actual worship of marx look anywhere else other than this comment lmao
0:55 - What you describes here isn't Socialism but Marxism-Leninism or Stalinism or State Socialism or State Capitalism. Socialism isn't supposed to have a normal State and even Lenin recognized this in The State and Revolution when he talks about what is a workers' State and it's very different to what we got with the Soviet Union and all the supposedly socialistic states of the 20th Century.
Monarchy isn’t always hereditary. There were cases in history of elective monarchy, where the monarch’s successor is not necessarily his blood relative but is rather elected. One historical example of this was the Holy Roman Empire.
In the Philippines we have different form of government but some of it was secretly practicing like Oligarchy, Monarchy (a.k.a political dynasty), Communist, & Federalism.
4:17 Governors, not senators, manage the states and their constituents in the US. Senators are just state representatives to the federal government, and mostly focus on national rather than state issues. State legislatures also have senators, but I assuming ypu're referring to federal senators.
Best tax system is that in which tax is applyied on big houses , expensive car, what is expensive in house and on land owned. Because this cant be hidden , is impossible to have a big house or car and have low income at your bussines store
Good video, but should have added another disadvantage of democracy. Also, democracy does not necessarily mean human rights exist, as the majority or the representatives of the majority can vote or make decisions to nullify a person or group's rights.
This video showcases minor problems such as what is and what isn't a government. This video is presenting more of how ideologies morph the way governments work than presenting actual government forms. Firstly, let me define what I think a government is, accordingly to "A Comparative Study of Municipal Adoption of Internet-Based Citizen Participation" by Stephen K Aikins, Chapter 11, it reads "A governance structure comprising political institutions by which a state or locality is organized in order to exert its power over community politics. These political institutions are structures and mechanisms of social order and cooperation governing the behavior of individuals within the jurisdiction.". secondly, the ideologies, Socialism, Communism and Anarchism, these are ideologies and not forms of governments. Lastly, this video delves deeper into niches of government forms rather than the broad definition. In conclusion, this video shows the confusion between ideologies and governments and what they are and aren't along with how the video unnecessarily delves into niches rather than the genre as a whole.
Just a curiosity, in most democratic monarchies that currently exist, the king can dissolve parliament in times of crisis and in the case of the United Kingdom he has the royal prerogative
2:47 When you say external factors I think about NGOs, UN, WEF, WHO and other entities which are not rooted in the country we are talking about. Not defending autocracy, but clearly there is some place for confusion in this moment of the video.
@@ShoaibAktar-ur6et But corruption does not have to do much with the democracy. Corruption is another thing and democracy is just a governance system... Yes, corruption leads to stop people and the country to the progress...but should be seen in its respective domain... First should be mentioned as Democracy, after then, going deeper the topic of corruption and the implementation should be discussed...
The color on the flag of the Philippines was placed incorrect . If it's lengthwise, the red should be on the right, and the blue should be on the left side.
How did you decide what order to present these systems? Historically the systems of government we have come to know developed over time in response to the increasing social, technological and especially economic complexity of human societies. Aristotle discusses this. Hegel does in his extolling the virtues of the enlightenment (and, because his job depended on it, the superiority of the enlightenment monarchy like that of Friedrich Wilhelm III). Many other people have too. Marx of course formulates his entire philosophy based on the premise that the world proletarian revolution is the goal of human history to eliminate the false hierarchical structures cruelly imposed upon the many by the cruelty and violence of the few. By just presenting them randomly in this way you create the false impression that they are all essentially equal systems which were arbitrarily arrived at “culturally” by different people somewhat randomly. They weren’t. History proves there is a pattern to the emergence of the idea of equality over time after cruel aristocrats use greed, violence and propaganda (like religion, etc) to enforce hierarchical systems of government upon agricultural societies. Freedom for the working people can and does get won back again over time. And this idea of equality grows while the false ideology of the inherent superiority of aristocrats of all types gradually fades away.
3:13 - Maybe you're overstimating how Stalin ruled. The guy had to make complex maneuvers withing the Party to achieve his goals. The Führerprinzip would have been a better example, you even have a Nazi representing Autocracy.
A symbolic monarchy isn't completely symbolic. For instance, the militaries of Australia, Canada and New Zealand CANNOT overthrow their respective governments as the commander in chief of said militaries is King Charles and there would be repercussions.
The US is a Republic that adapts other forms into it. Federal, Constitutional, Democratic, and even some aspects of communism when looking at tax laws and real estate.
We are not satisfied with the explanation as India(Bharat) is the biggest democracy in the world but you still didn't include it in the list. I felt really bad 😔
Clear Example of Oligarchy is British India before 1958, which was ruled by British East Indian company. Who has British lord house members as Managing Directors. You can include most of land occupied by European colonizers.
As a Filipino, I’m thankful that we have a cross between the Republican and Democratic styles of goverments in my country. The people are at the epicenter of the government. I love that we have the ultimate power to elect and impeach a certain leader, President or otherwise, if they are legally proven unworthy of their political position. I do understand that, yes, there are drawbacks as with any other forms of governments, but I wouldn’t have it differently. The Philippines is for the Filipinos-the very people who made it as is.
⚜️I LOVE 👑SYMBOLIC MONARCHY👑 FROM 🇫🇷FRANCE🇫🇷!!! I LOVE 👑SYMBOLIC MONARCHY👑 BECAUSE, RULING THE COUTRY IS HARD BUT YOU SHOULDN'T RULE IT. BUT YOU ARE A 👑KING👑!!!⚜️
Stalin could be abolished if CC would decided he is not suitable, as it was with Nikita Kruchev. Stalin was best ruler, who has taken Imperial Russia with lowest literacy level to a country with Nuclear bomb... OH! And a winner of WWII, despite some countries who allowed Hitler to come in power...
i thank u for the whole simple to the point educational teaching by explaining the different kinds of governments and their simulatorities n differences that the entire world and it's people are governed by with each's own laws that maintains Law n order no matter what kind form of government and now I have come to understanding n from here I will able move on to easily learn more knowing that everything n existence has a law/code to live or follow in order to maintain contract movement to a easy rythm long as it stays on the repetitive cycle unless interfered.
7:01 - As happened with Socialism you're confusing Soviet Communism with Communism. Well, Socialism/Communism is the same thing, i.e. workers' ownership of the means of production, and it's not supposed to have a State. I will recommend a video from LuckyBlackCat that deals in the subject "Communism & Socialism: What Do They REALLY Mean?"
1:53 - What you are describing is a representative democracy mixed with bits of other democracy forms (as classical, parliamentary and particpative). Also the claim of an environment where human rights are respected in (representative) democracy is weird considering how its history.
![[TH] VALORANT Champions Seoul - Grand Final - EDG vs TH](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/WvObMc9VelI/mqdefault.jpg)
0:18 "Sweden 🇪🇸" .... *brain damage*
As a Spaniard, yeah. I got a headache, lol
As a vexoligest (a person who study flags) I was disappointed
Laos🇰🇵
Bruh
@@djlopez7976me too
What type do you want?
India: all of them🗿
Ya bro I feel all the types are in India 🇮🇳😂
Lmao 😂
I want a dictatorship like China
No monarchy only😅
@@Diecastlover777Gujarati's are the monarchs
Just pointing out that in the Monarchy section, the Spanish and Swedish flags have their labels swapped. Cheers!
Great attentiveness🙌
Came here to say the exact same thing.
@@TheAnalystYTsyou put UK flag for new zealand
Can’t forget Laos and North Korea
Since I'm a flag expert, I determined that same thing on the very 1st try
I get that it's supposed to be a simplified version and that these are very complicated concepts so it's natural to miss out information but there is so much misinformation and misconceptions in it
Especially the part where America is supposed to be a Constitutional Republic.
And let's not talk about how he explained the monarchy by highlighting only that small flaw which is actually more of an advantage 💀
Exactly
My guy did not just swap North Korea and Laos 💀💀💀
Sweden and Spain too
@@ashen1921uk and new Zealand too
Ikr@@ashen1921
Not to mention the screwing up of the new-Zealand
Laos and North Korea also
0:20 yes the Spanish flag is ikea
😂😂
The laos flag is north korea hahahhaa
it's called sweden
Some minor corrections, UK does not completely count as a symbolic monarchy, The Monarch does bave involvement in the political process of the country, they are the ones that put pen to paper on bills when they have passed both the House of Commons and Lords, they are the ones that open and close parliament, who swear loyalty to the King, they are also the ones who declare that an electoral period is to commence etc.
A real example of Symbolic monarchy is sweden, whos monarch is literally there only as a symbol, parliament approves and also enacts law, commands the military, the swedish monarch usually only hosts foreign dignitaries and is the one that hands someone their Nobel prizes.
👏👏👏👏
Yes, we have a Constitutional Monarchy, not a Symbolic Monarchy
I love how this video started direct to the point from the very first second, no introductions, the content in contenting
So much accurate and so much easily noticed mistakes. Such as wrong flags, double listing countries under different systems, wrong listing, etc
In India and Pakistan you will find all these. 😅
The whole socialism section is wrong your describing communism not socialism. Similar but very different government ideas one communism is a form of governance where socialism is instead a set a ideas for a system.
incorrect, you got it backwards. Socialism is a political ideology, while communism is a utopian ideal. Socialism is as described a form of generally more authoritarian government, while communism at it's utopian ideal has no government.
@@lowlsqwid no that's not even close communism isn't a utopia idea the fact their are multiple communities nations shows that. Unless you think china and the ussr are utopian nation's. Socialism is a wide breath of ideas with communism as one of many political systems that use it as a framework. With plenty of example states existing most falling into the internal Communism external state capitalism model. But most of the west EU is socialist has major socialist political parties or active programs. Socialism is more comparable to markets as a political ideology. A framing for which to build within or on. Markets give us mercantilism capitalism and more socialism gives us communism but it also gives us other political frameworks the well farm state public health ECT. Communism is a government socialism is a framework communism is built on.
@@koboldqueen3055You clearly haven't read Marx... Socialism is the transitional state between capitalism and communism. There was never a "communist state", and there cannot be - as communism is a utopian post-scarcity society. What you are describing as "socialism in Europe", are rather deformed social democratic parties that have nothing to do with true socialism, as there is still capitalist mode of production in place - ie, private property.
@@koboldqueen3055 Communism is indeed a sub-section of Socialism (with Anarchism being a sub-section of Communism) and strives for a utopian ideal. There are multiple countries whose ruling parties call themselves communist, because in their conception they had communism as their ideal to strive for. They haven't yet achieved it fully, either because of a lack of resources or because of internal corruption and fall to autocracy.
This video is one I have gotten recommend a few times that explain the difference and relationship between communism, socialism and anarchism: th-cam.com/video/vyl2DeKT-Vs/w-d-xo.html
To clear everything up for my fellow leftists this is how I interpret it
Socialism: when the means of production is owned by the working class and a dictatorship of the proletariat is established with its main goal being to achieve communism
Communism: an ideology that advocates for a communist society - a classless, stateless and moneyless society (basically a utopia)
India is a republic, democracy, presidential and parliamentary government country with constitutions❤😂
I am proud of my country
Presidential huh? President doesn't have control over people of india
Shithole
its totalitarian
@@flameakyt1156 Read the constitution 😂
@@epicgamer-ec8vi that is why bjp couldn't win even 300 seats this time
Marx is rolling in his grave rn
Fr fr
People need to stop worshipping him
@@RegnStövel Nah just read him and you would understand why people get sick of all this misinfo on his theory
If you wanna see actual worship of marx look anywhere else other than this comment lmao
iam rolling on my floor for him
@@9393Technatecan we just all be mature and not fight about political stuff pls this I yt
Symbolic monarchy be like : i hire a professional person in charge to manage my kingdom.
Thank you very much for honesty on a video by trying to include weaknesses of government systems and trying to remove bias
Oh how wrong you are 😂
7:49 is no one talking about the fact that bro swapped north korea and laos
Ikr!
I notice
Everyone is..
I saw and it funny
Wow a paint explainer clone that I found on the day of the first video crazy
cant wait for people to hate on all of em like the pngtubers back then
India is a republic, constitutional, democracy and socialist at the same time.
I just wanna point out the fact that oligarchy should not be synonymous with wealth, because it can come in many forms.
Pretty much every state in the world is an oligarchy
I thought Russia is a oligarchy
@@billyfung715It is totalitarian
Bro flipped indonesia's flag on its side
0:55 - What you describes here isn't Socialism but Marxism-Leninism or Stalinism or State Socialism or State Capitalism. Socialism isn't supposed to have a normal State and even Lenin recognized this in The State and Revolution when he talks about what is a workers' State and it's very different to what we got with the Soviet Union and all the supposedly socialistic states of the 20th Century.
How many comments will you post?
@@RegnStövel I posted 9 comments.
Came here to say this
Monarchy isn’t always hereditary. There were cases in history of elective monarchy, where the monarch’s successor is not necessarily his blood relative but is rather elected. One historical example of this was the Holy Roman Empire.
they still exist, though in various forms, the UAE and Malaysia for examples
One thing that you could’ve added, is that the Romans with the first one is the republic system of government before they formed the Roman Empire
India is also both of republic and democracy
Democracy tab tak jab tak Majority 🕉️ Hai .😊
I love this guys videos. They just make so much sense and they dont even take long to watch or learn.
Too bad it’s completely wrong
Japan and UK are literally the same:
UK:
*Constitutional Monarchy
*Parliamentary
Japan:
*Constitutional Monarchy
*Parliamentary
Straight to business! I love this
U forgot parlamentary Monarchy. It played a major role in history.
I love ur videos dont stop posting them👍🏼
Spanish and Swedish flags are swapped
American moment
@@TheLegoSpider lol
The UK is a constitutional monarchy 🇬🇧
In the Philippines we have different form of government but some of it was secretly practicing like Oligarchy, Monarchy (a.k.a political dynasty), Communist, & Federalism.
4:17 Governors, not senators, manage the states and their constituents in the US. Senators are just state representatives to the federal government, and mostly focus on national rather than state issues. State legislatures also have senators, but I assuming ypu're referring to federal senators.
And the US is a constitutional Republic, not a federation
Every minute of this video being played, a political scientist dies
0:20 this causes me a lot of headaches
Democracy❌ Corruption✅
Spain: ¿¡J0dεr! Soy Suecia, tio?!
Sweden: Vad tusan!? Är jag Spanien?!
Best tax system is that in which tax is applyied on big houses , expensive car, what is expensive in house and on land owned. Because this cant be hidden , is impossible to have a big house or car and have low income at your bussines store
everyone talking about laos and n. korea being swapped but no one talking about sweden and spain
ikr
Good video, but should have added another disadvantage of democracy. Also, democracy does not necessarily mean human rights exist, as the majority or the representatives of the majority can vote or make decisions to nullify a person or group's rights.
Spain: I'm sweden now?
Sweden: I'm Spain now?
This video showcases minor problems such as what is and what isn't a government. This video is presenting more of how ideologies morph the way governments work than presenting actual government forms. Firstly, let me define what I think a government is, accordingly to "A Comparative Study of Municipal Adoption of Internet-Based Citizen Participation" by Stephen K Aikins, Chapter 11, it reads "A governance structure comprising political institutions by which a state or locality is organized in order to exert its power over community politics. These political institutions are structures and mechanisms of social order and cooperation governing the behavior of individuals within the jurisdiction.". secondly, the ideologies, Socialism, Communism and Anarchism, these are ideologies and not forms of governments. Lastly, this video delves deeper into niches of government forms rather than the broad definition. In conclusion, this video shows the confusion between ideologies and governments and what they are and aren't along with how the video unnecessarily delves into niches rather than the genre as a whole.
Yeah, those old days in Somalia 😬 🇸🇴
Yeah I shocked when I heard Somalia, but it is true though :)
Just a curiosity, in most democratic monarchies that currently exist, the king can dissolve parliament in times of crisis and in the case of the United Kingdom he has the royal prerogative
Democracies: The people are the state.
Repiblics: The people own the state.
2:47 When you say external factors I think about NGOs, UN, WEF, WHO and other entities which are not rooted in the country we are talking about.
Not defending autocracy, but clearly there is some place for confusion in this moment of the video.
I love how you go straight to the point
Just gotta love how he switched around Spain and Swedens names 👍
Sheik Hasina, PM of Bangladesh is now a recent example of autocracy.
Explain... Don't know anything
*Former PM
And after that Bangladesh will be a *Military dictatorship*
Don't forgot the Thailand for manarchy
Just found out that the channel was created the same date of my bday
Hey! Didn't you mentioned *India* as the greatest example of *Democracy* ?
As an Indian South Africa is better
Leave india then@@aytshorts52009
Whi to😂
because of corruption
@@ShoaibAktar-ur6et But corruption does not have to do much with the democracy.
Corruption is another thing and democracy is just a governance system...
Yes, corruption leads to stop people and the country to the progress...but should be seen in its respective domain...
First should be mentioned as Democracy, after then, going deeper the topic of corruption and the implementation should be discussed...
The color on the flag of the Philippines was placed incorrect . If it's lengthwise, the red should be on the right, and the blue should be on the left side.
How did you decide what order to present these systems? Historically the systems of government we have come to know developed over time in response to the increasing social, technological and especially economic complexity of human societies. Aristotle discusses this. Hegel does in his extolling the virtues of the enlightenment (and, because his job depended on it, the superiority of the enlightenment monarchy like that of Friedrich Wilhelm III). Many other people have too. Marx of course formulates his entire philosophy based on the premise that the world proletarian revolution is the goal of human history to eliminate the false hierarchical structures cruelly imposed upon the many by the cruelty and violence of the few.
By just presenting them randomly in this way you create the false impression that they are all essentially equal systems which were arbitrarily arrived at “culturally” by different people somewhat randomly. They weren’t. History proves there is a pattern to the emergence of the idea of equality over time after cruel aristocrats use greed, violence and propaganda (like religion, etc) to enforce hierarchical systems of government upon agricultural societies. Freedom for the working people can and does get won back again over time. And this idea of equality grows while the false ideology of the inherent superiority of aristocrats of all types gradually fades away.
I’m not reading all that 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
@jefif when did it become a trend to be stupid.
India during Independence.....Is there an option of All of these in MCQs ?
India: Hell Yeah..... I am going to choose All of these
3:13 - Maybe you're overstimating how Stalin ruled. The guy had to make complex maneuvers withing the Party to achieve his goals. The Führerprinzip would have been a better example, you even have a Nazi representing Autocracy.
he was still a dictator
@@combineconformist Yeah
@@combineconformist He was still based
@@yamameeven967 No he wasn’t, communism was bound to fail and so was that idiot of a “leader”.
This channel tought me more than school
A symbolic monarchy isn't completely symbolic. For instance, the militaries of Australia, Canada and New Zealand CANNOT overthrow their respective governments as the commander in chief of said militaries is King Charles and there would be repercussions.
Bro said Spain is Sweden and Sweden in Spain
all people make mistakes, that's OK
this video could help me to get some ideas to my subject social science👌👌👌
This video has a lot of errors
How u don't even know
How u don't even know
How u don't even know
How u don't even know
How u don't even know
India = biggest democracy ❤
Meritocracy would be the best form of government i believe
Shame on u for not taking world's biggest democracy's name in ur video
no, there is no state in communism, that what make the difference with socialism, socialisme have a state
Saudi Arabi is not one of the oldest monachies. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia was founded in 1932
How many of these diffrent* forms of government overlap?
I love how he didn’t use the U.S. for every example
SAME HERE, I hate Yankee yappery, this was refreshing.
India being most of them
*Currently*
*Historically*
Bro skipped geography with all the wrong flags
however.... the Philippines is actually The Republic of Oligarchs :)
The US is a Republic that adapts other forms into it. Federal, Constitutional, Democratic, and even some aspects of communism when looking at tax laws and real estate.
6:58 bro called out philippines abuse of power in its nation😂
Its true tjough my country is lack of education and lack of money
wheres my bud Fascism
It is totalism
I am a fashionista is that fascism
That is an ideology
Spain *in sweden side*
Sweden *in spain side*
new zealand has a british flag
Keep up the good work 💪🏼
Spain or Sweden?
So, capitalism isn't a form of government?
It's a type of economy. For example, China is clearly a socialist state, but it's economy is a capitalistic one
We are not satisfied with the explanation as India(Bharat) is the biggest democracy in the world but you still didn't include it in the list.
I felt really bad 😔
India today is everything
Clear Example of Oligarchy is British India before 1958, which was ruled by British East Indian company. Who has British lord house members as Managing Directors. You can include most of land occupied by European colonizers.
new zealand has the only the union jack in its flag included
**Australia, Cook island, Fiji, ETC. crying in the corner**
All this type of government was good the only problem is their people.
An absolute monarchy could be the German empire in which its technically a Kaiserchy.
People who see Democracy: cool laurel crown
People who wear it: nah citizens stay away let me cook
I feel that you went weak on democracy and boosted it above the others.
hmm
@@TheAnalystYTs Is that a good “hmm” or bad “hmm”?
As a Filipino, I’m thankful that we have a cross between the Republican and Democratic styles of goverments in my country. The people are at the epicenter of the government. I love that we have the ultimate power to elect and impeach a certain leader, President or otherwise, if they are legally proven unworthy of their political position.
I do understand that, yes, there are drawbacks as with any other forms of governments, but I wouldn’t have it differently. The Philippines is for the Filipinos-the very people who made it as is.
Great effort bro 👏
Ukraine is modern example of oligarchy
There are many youtube channels with exact same voice. Why is that?
I will like this comment so The Analyst notices it
⚜️I LOVE 👑SYMBOLIC MONARCHY👑 FROM 🇫🇷FRANCE🇫🇷!!! I LOVE 👑SYMBOLIC MONARCHY👑 BECAUSE, RULING THE COUTRY IS HARD BUT YOU SHOULDN'T RULE IT. BUT YOU ARE A 👑KING👑!!!⚜️
Stalin could be abolished if CC would decided he is not suitable, as it was with Nikita Kruchev. Stalin was best ruler, who has taken Imperial Russia with lowest literacy level to a country with Nuclear bomb... OH! And a winner of WWII, despite some countries who allowed Hitler to come in power...
BROOOOOO YOU MIXED UP SWEDEN AND SPAIN!
i thank u for the whole simple to the point educational teaching by explaining the different kinds of governments and their simulatorities n differences that the entire world and it's people are governed by with each's own laws that maintains Law n order no matter what kind form of government and now I have come to understanding n from here I will able move on to easily learn more knowing that everything n existence has a law/code to live or follow in order to maintain contract movement to a easy rythm long as it stays on the repetitive cycle unless interfered.
Did they ever proofread this video before uploading or some of them are intentional?🤔
7:01 - As happened with Socialism you're confusing Soviet Communism with Communism. Well, Socialism/Communism is the same thing, i.e. workers' ownership of the means of production, and it's not supposed to have a State. I will recommend a video from LuckyBlackCat that deals in the subject "Communism & Socialism: What Do They REALLY Mean?"
1:53 - What you are describing is a representative democracy mixed with bits of other democracy forms (as classical, parliamentary and particpative). Also the claim of an environment where human rights are respected in (representative) democracy is weird considering how its history.
People who just wanted to learn Anarchy because of texhnoblade ☠️
Most people don't realise that constitutional monarchy is the most democratic form of government.
I think the swapped flag name are intentional lol, so ppl would comment and raise the algorithm