Tank Chats #74 Panzer I | The Tank Museum
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ต.ค. 2024
- Tank Chats playlist • Tank Chats from The Ta... Panzer I was the first tank mass produced by Germany, as part of their drive to re-arm in the 1930's before the Second World War.
The Tank Museum's Panzer IB tank is the only known commander's model of the Panzer I.
Cradit @10:25 Panzer I from The Arsenalen Museum, Sweden.
SUBSCRIBE to The Tank Museum TH-cam channel: ► / @thetankmuseum
Support the work of The Tank Museum on Patreon: ► / tankmuseum
Visit The Tank Museum SHOP: ►tankmuseumshop...
Press the little bell above to enable NOTIFICATIONS so you don’t miss the latest Tank Museum videos.
Follow The Tank Museum on FACEBOOK: ► / tankmuseum
Twitter: ► / tankmuseum
Tiger Tank Blog: ► blog.tiger-tank...
Tank 100 First World War Centenary Blog: ► tank100.com/ #tankmuseum #tanks #tankchats The Tank Museum E-Newsletter sign-up: mailchi.mp/e6f...
"Hey Germany, you're not building tanks there are you?"
"No, it clearly says 'tractor' on the blueprints, look."
"Oh very good, carry on."
"They said they're also building some anti tractor guns."
"Those Germans are strange fellows"
russia made it all happen becous we could test them there
Lol😂😂
also in russia
And what about all those U Boats Mr. Hitler?
Ohhh those things, well they ain't U Boats they're My Boats
Germany : *Ships Tanks to Russia*
"Hey what are you doing?"
"We're testing out our tractors."
"Oh okay."
Because in Soviet Russia, tractors have cannon
Edit: you got to watch out for the bears
Too bad they don't sell them in kits. Panzer 1 would be a fun summer project.
I believe Tamiya do a Panzer 1 kit.
@@thetankmuseum Haha! But I won't fit in one of those!
Tamiya do. And Hobby Boss.
@@baz6128 HAHAHA! I'm talking about a real meat grinder.
Ammo has done a 1/16 kit which is nice
Video length- 19.44...
Nice
Japan and Germany: Not so nice
I took a dump longer then that
Never noticed that....well done, Tank Fellows.
@@jermasus My Emperor! It's good to see you again!
20 minute long Tank Chat with David Willey...and it's a Friday. Sometimes life is very very good!
If only he had awesome enough facial hair to compete with David Fletcher it would be perfect!
I can hardly take my eyes off the Jawa crawler filling the background!
Perfect start to a Friday watching this on the tram on the way home.
Where are you at that has trams?
@@neilwilson5785 Nottingham
@Breezy Mods ?
Do you always go home as the day starts ?
@@neddyladdy I don't understand your comment? I commented about 5pm uk time so definitely home time.
More facts about the basic Panzer I with its rotating turret:
- Both the commander and the driver had headphones for listening to the radio receiver. But they had no microphones because there was no intercom.
- The commander turned the turret by rotating a wheel with his right hand, and elevated the two guns by rotating a wheel with his left hand.
- Both of the control wheels incorporated trigger grips. The commander could therefore fire both of the machine-guns independently.
- The link between the two triggers and the two guns were two simple push-pull cables. They had a device at the end that you screw-clamped onto the MG trigger. The MG was not modified.
- The tiny turret of the Panzer 1 had an internal roof lamp, because the machine guns might need some maintenance in situ. Power came from the hull via a small rotating link under the commander's feet.
Am I the only one that had shivers up and down the spine when I saw the insides of the tank trough the battle damage?
I mean, iI can't even imagine the mess that was inside when they captured it.
I used to have to clean out the bins for all the fish on a commercial fishing boat so I have some idea what the inside of that tank must have looked (and smelled ) like.
Scrape the nazis off the walls...
It's entirely possible though that the tank was already abandoned due to being damaged or running out of fuel (a constant occurrence for the Afrika Korps) and that a passing British tank put a couple of rounds in it just in case. (All tankers were in the habit of doing this - if it looks in the least bit threatening, put a couple of rounds in it just in case)
@@StripedbottomNo, it was knocked out whilst in action.
Superb video! Tank chats with David Willey are the most enjoyable ones for me! Outstanding presentation! 😊👍🏻 the tank museum seems to have nothing but lovely people in its ranks. I hope to meet Mr. Willey in person to shake hands and thank him for the great work he and his team is doing. Visiting Tank Fest or Tiger Day is on my bucket list for some time now
Perfect for a Friday lunch break - Thank you!
I had no idea that Pz 1s were so dinky! They were pretty much a Bren carrier with a little turret.
@AstronomyToday In those days and with the experience of WWI in mind this was to be preferred above a muddy trench with no protective armour plating at all. Also there were no real anti-tank weapons in those early days, besides other tanks. No bazookas, Piats, RPGs or other Panzerschrecks. Let alone A-10s and attack helicopters.
@@flitsertheo it's really uninformed to say that there were no AT weapons at the time, there had been tankgewehr and similar high caliber ballistic arms since ww1, and direct fire field gun/artillery existed and was extremely effective. Tanks as a counter to other tanks wasn't really doctrine until into ww2, they were meant more for infantry support and fortified position assault.
@@flitsertheo "Also there were no real anti-tank weapons in those early days, besides other tanks."
Incorrect. No one's doctrine called for tanks to fight other tanks (well besides the Brit who thought the tanks would do everything). That was the artillery's job. Tanks were designed to penetrate a defense and then run around and shoot up the enemies rear areas and infantry. And there were plenty of AT guns. They were just small of scale because the tanks were small scale in the pre-war years. AT rifles and the 37mm AT gun was considered "heavy".
Lol
Thank you for such thoughtful presentation.
When you read about the Panzer 1 on the Norwegian wikipedia and realise that Norway`s army was so poorly equipped with anti armor weapons that they couldn`t even defeat the Panzer 1.
What did they have, pea shooters?
I think atleast one panzer 1 was defeated and maybe a neubaufahrzeug ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Norway fell mostly due to the German airforce and parachute infantry.
Norway mobilized 52,000 troops, Denmark just 14,000. Finland had similar population and was able to mobilize 300,000 during the Winter War and WWII. Complete failure of leadership to provide their people the means to defend themselves.
@@EmergencyChannel Finland actually mobilized more like 500,000 for the latter part of the war. But to be fair to Denmark and Norway, the build-up in tension between Finland and Soviet Union was much more gradual and long-drawn than between Denmark/Norway and Germany (and Britain, on the one hand). Finland had already almost fully mobilized more than a month before the Soviet attack, under the guise of extraordinary military maneuvers and other such measures, and the invasion only took place after the breakdown of negotiations that lasted about the same time. In the case of Denmark/Norway it was much more of a surprise attack, with Germany only making diplomatic advances immediately after they had already invaded, and the two Scandinavian countries hoping til the last to be able to remain neutral in the conflict and avoid mobilization so as not to invite a pre-emptive strike because of it. And, as we know, Sweden actually did succeed in a similar policy, and ended up one of the few European countries that managed to avoid the horrors of WW2 almost completely.
I'm not too familiar with the mobilization effort in Denmark, but in Norway it was almost wholly ineffective though. I think they must have looked too much at the example of Finland and too little at Poland, and not realize that a modern war is way too fast-paced to mobilize by letter anymore after an enemy has already started an invasion. Their mobilization only really succeeded in the areas that were too far away for the Germans to reach in the initial stages, and which could then be covered for mobilization by British assistance.
"the panther one designed by crop" - youtube subtitles 2019
truly the most underrated panzer of the family
;)
Its underrated because it sucks Nothing Impressive about a panzer 1
@Jordan Hardesty So your Claiming that panzer 1 was a decent tank and that it wasn't replaced because of its lack of armor and fire power
@Jordan Hardesty operations with barely any resistance
@Jordan HardestyPanzer 1 and 2 sucked dude the were only succesfully used agianst countries with outdated tanks like Poland and Holland and belgium
And all were suprise attack
David Willey is just the best presenter on Tanks
The German army had more horses then tanks in the entire war.
A point overlooked by many Cory.
Cory Fice You can use horses almost on any ground.
And germans were that efficient, they used horse bodies as a sniper hideout (at least as a desperate method in the end of the war). No one was expecting that.
@@thetankmuseum That's not as major a point as it sounds. The logistics arm will always outnumber the actual fighting force. If the horses were part of the combat arms (by that I mean actual cavalry) and outnumbered the tanks, that would be a major issue. However horses were widely used on the Eastern Front, with the Soviets actually having an even lower proportion of motor vehicles than the Germans. Even France had over half a million horses in its army in 1940, far more than the number of tanks (do remember that of the Western Allies, France had the most tanks of any combatant, including Germany, at the start of the war).
That the German army was highly mechanized might have been a myth, but it wasn't much worse than the largest of its adversaries before Pearl Harbor, and in some cases better off. You're propagating another myth to counter the mechanized army myth, which is just as bad if not worse.
This also ignores the fact that German motorized logistics and combat strength was heavily dedicated to panzer divisions, while the slower infantry, who wouldn't be outrunning horse-borne transport anyways, were supplied and had their field guns transported via such means.
They used horses instead of trucks, because the german high command was well aware of the fact that the available oil reserves wouldn't allow fully mechanized troops. They also missed to fully mobilize their industrial capacities for military gear, so there wouldn't have been enough trucks/halftracks available anyway. ^^
Formula for spending a perfect rainy day: Hot cup of coffee, and a chat from the Tank Museum.
Sounds like a good setup!
I don't analyze my failures often...
...but when I do, I do it ruthlessly.
Fantastic video, really enjoying these longer videos!
Superb tank chat as always! Thanks David!
If you pronounce Krupp as 'croop', it's closer to German :)
Pfft. The Germans should learn how to pronounce it properly!! :P
@@Akm72 no we wont!
Because we are ignorant
The CC gave me "crap"
I got krupp when I was a child. (Swedish for croup)
It's a real struggle to properly pronounce Krupp as "croop". I'm so used to hearing it rhyming with "up" 🧐
Lots of background story about German army tank development during inter-war period, highlighting the contribution of Hans Von Seeckt and debunk Guderian myth on his biography, development of Panzer I, Nice.
Also Krupp's LA S = Landwirtschaftlicher Schlepper
Glad you enjoyed it!
Another excellent presentation, thanks. 😃👌👌👌👏👏👏👏👏
Amazing to think the Allies just stood by and let this all happen. "Tolerance and apathy are the hallmarks of a dying civilisation" (Aristotle).
O-kaaay... Let's address the elephant in the room (not the tank destroyer, mind you) ...
What the HELL is that looming THING hiding in the background, and what's a "sevenoaks"?
And why do we need three of them?
I was thinking the same.
It looks like an LVT landing craft.
It is a LTV 4 Buffalo, see "Tank Chats #58 Buffalo & Weasel | The Funnies | The Tank Museum"
Seven Oaks is a nice place in Kent. That's all I've got. (I was thinking the same thing!)
A lot of people don't realize how many horses were still on the battle field even in the invasion of Russia. The Germans had some 500,000 horses pulling the heavy guns and supplies in operation barbarossa. That must have been a sight.
Such a great lesson in history ...... I hunger for more!
OMG where's the CAT & KRYTON , RIMMEEEEEER ?
I guess LISTER is driving for UBER, since he lost his job on CORNATION STREET driving for STREET CARS?
Not to outstand the Panzer I but look at that absolute unit LVT in the background
Dummy thicc
Seriously, who can pay attention to the little mini-tank when there's a Jawa sand-crawler *right there* ?
Does anyone know how tall he is?
Btw. I Love your tie 😂
Complete guess but I'm saying 6'3
Invasion stripes
Well my guess is either he's a lost descendant of Goliath, or Shriners circus caused ww2
His height is 1.
One Pz1.
@@BennettIsAmazing
If you take the Panzer in the background as reference, that estimate is probably way off. Panzer I has a height of 172cm.
The only thing I'm left missing from this Tank Chat is at least a passing mention of the re-use of the chassis, namely, the Pzjg-I.
Very interesting chat,thank you sir!
To everyone looking for a model of this tank... The Paper Army channel on TH-cam has a paper model of this and other WW2 tanks from all of the combatants in the European Theater of Operations. Also you can find other paper models by Google search of the tank you're looking for and put paper model after that. For example, if I enter M4A3 Sherman Tank Paper Model into Google Search, it will bring up a number of sites where I can download various files for building a paper model of that tank and print it out on my color inkjet/laser printer at home. The models are usually free or just a few dollars/euros and there are a whole assortment of sites dedicated to paper modeling which seems to be very popular in Eastern European countries and in Turkey. Here's a link to the paper model of this tank. m.th-cam.com/video/1lwQIu7ONoQ/w-d-xo.html
I love the longer, expanded look at specific tanks!
Keep them coming!
Donated £50. Love these guys.
It looks like the Panzer would fit into the Buffalo next to it.
I'm a supporter via Patreon and this is around the third time I've watched this brilliant video. It is so rich in the origins and history of German tank development.
Excellent video. The Panzer I was such a developmental step up for it’s time, I don’t think people currently realize how important it really was back then.
I was so hoping the Panzer I Ausf. F was going to be mentioned in the video. It was the up-armored (30mm to 80mm frontal) and substantially wider tracked variant originally intended to be used as an infantry support vehicle for an invasion of 🇲🇹 Malta. An operation that, of course, never occurred.
Only about 35 Ausf. F’s we’re built and subsequently deployed to the Eastern Front. Ultimately used in anti-partisan operations. I don’t recall for certain but I think a percentage were refitted with a 20mm auto-cannon sans the two MGs.
They were Panzer I on steroids 💪 !
0 Dislikes so far ... what i like to see good job Tank Museum
1 Dislike now... must be a a French Char driver.
I figure the 1 dislike is because he forgot to mention the 5th manufacturer
4 dislikes now. Who does that ...
The French.
Apparently anyone who rated the video with a dislike reckons that he or she can do a better job LOL Some people simply like to moan (in a bad way 😉)
Excellent. Good information.
Love his tie
I find the WW1 and pre/early WW2 tanks absolutely fascinating.
0:15, that's like an early edition of the Mammoth Tank, is it?
Hooper: “That’s a twelve footer!”
Quint: “Thirteen. Got five tons on him.”
Quite good tank for its time and important step in tank development. Great video.
Great to hear you enjoyed it!
Stalin: "That's not a tank.... [grins, points at a KV-1] ... *THIS* is a tank."
Excellent tank chat, there's been that many now I can't remember if you did the Pz2?.
Great historical context! Cheers for a very informative video, guys!
Great to hear that you enjoyed it Valeriu!
of all the things that they learnt during WW1, what the germans didnt learn was not fighting a war on 2 fronts
I love the Panzer I. It was so cute.
Also, New Tank chat video,, Score. :)
If you want to see a cute tank look up the Polish TKS tankettes ... So small you could probably fit 2 in a medium sized garage.
That and they tend to drift on assphalt and or brick roads on full throttle which is amusing to watch.
You might love the Italian L6/40, then. AKA the three-stepped pyramid of doom.
@@chungusbooperI love all tanks to be honest. But yeah that one is a funny one indeed.
@@PhenixtriI think i recall having seen one of those in a documentary once.
Its why i love tankettes in general as the TKS intoduced me to these tiny midget tanks .... Makes me wish i could own a tankette as they look like they would be alot of fun to take on a joy ride xD
I’ve seen a comment that one guy supposedly looked into the hole on the side of this tank and saw the face of a German tank commander staring back at him
Given the shell in the side killed the commander and wounded the driver….
Very interesting to see an early war panzer.
This is a very intereting sample of the PZkpfw I. I have a picture of myself in front of it. :)
How could u comment so early?
@@ramon1906 At first I was confused what you meant, then I realized- 16 hours ago?? That's May 9th, what the heck?
@@ramon1906 Patreon, patreon, patreon, patreon,
Patreon, patreon, patreon, patreon
_For a small fee,_
_you can get in touch with me_
_Get the exclusives as soon as you can_
_'Cause we appreciate you as a fan_
Patreon, patreon, patreon, patreon,
Patreon, patreon, patreon, patreon
_Get everything at least a day early_
_See the comment section, from confusion_
_turn themselves al curly_
_As they have the illusion_
_That the world can function without a few bucks_
_Don't have to give us lots, we still will give you hugs_
Patreon, patreon, patreon, patreon,
Patreon, patreon, patreon, patreon
_For a small fee,_
_you can get in touch with me_
_Get the exclusives as soon as you can_
_'Cause we appreciate you as a fan_
Patreon, patreon, patreon, patreon,
Patreon, patreon, patreon, patreon
_Get everything at least a day early_
_See the comment section, from confusion_
_turn themselves al curly_
_As they have the illusion_
_That the world can function without a few bucks_
_Don't have to give us lots, we still will give you hugs_
@@Tuning3434nice song
I love the history and detail that you go into that lets us really understand what was going on.
If I am correct in France DeGaulle and in America George Patton were also pushing there mititaries to work on tanks and tank tactics.
1919 - Hey, lets make something quick and mobile
1933 - Hey, this quick and mobile thing actually works!
1944 - Hey, lets build this 200 ton slow-as-turtle thing, and call it a Maus.
The problem was the new Soviet 122mm gun on the IS tanks. You need a Maus in order to stop something like that. They reached a limit of the technology of the time for Armor. Which is in part why postwar many moved to a lighter model like the leopard 1. There was no point trying to defeat modern full sized tank guns.
That dammage on the plate armor could be from a 20mm auto cannon. During the invasion of Poland a Tankette with a 20mm auto cannon comanded by a Polish soldier was able to destroy and immobileze several German Panzer variants including one of them commanded by a german Prince. The Polish tank commander had quite a successful day in his little lightly armored tankette as he relentlessly blasted numerous panzers to scrap, employing his own blitzkrieg on the invading army. He even got out of his Tankette at one point and pulled the German Prince out of his flaming panzer in attempt to save the guy/take him hostage and he took a few other Wehrmact soldiers hostage as well with his pistol after he had destroyed their tanks.
At that time the very 1st tank models had ridiculously thin armor and it wasn't much for even a 20mm(used as a main gun) to punch through. 20 & 30mm cannons are really very versatile and have a variety of powerful ammunition types. Obviously the Germans learned alot after 1939 and built better and better tanks...also the Polish tank commander survived the invasion and the war. Very interesting story.
It was KOed and captured in N. Africa. Almost assuredly it was from a 2 pounder.
What is the purpose of having 2 machine guns in the turret ? Sequential firing ? Simultaneous firing ? Reloading issues ? With a 2 man crew, I can see reloading being an issue. But some of the turrets have one gun,others two. Anyone with knowledge on this ?
Initially (before and during the Spanish Civil war) they used armor-piercing bullets so they probably used two MGs simply because they needed/wanted more firepower. During that time they realized actual cannons were more effective at range against other tanks and upgraded some Panzers with 20mm guns. Later on they just made better and more armored tanks and stopped "improving" the Panzer I. This is what you can find on the Wikipedia (which could be partially wrong but I don't know).
More dakka.
Watch out for Bruce Crompton trying to steal it for the Tank museum in France.
I'm somewhat surprised panzer 1s weren't converted to 8cm mortar carriers for operation barbarossa. Like the french amr 35 was modified. They knew the panzers would quickly outpace the infantry and supply chains. A mobile force of indirect fire would have been invaluable for security. Stugs advance with the infantry and these about 250-500 meters behind.
I think upgrading most 1 B's by front mounting a 7.5cm leichtes infanteriegeschütz 18, like the 1B "Bison", but without carriage/trail would have been a game changer. Potentially it would have had a lower silhouette, a fault with the Bison and Panzerjager 1.
10cm mortars on command tanks?
This man always has impeccable style. Knitted tie, even.
Just noticed the tie - tank track?
I don’t want to sound greedy but could y’all do videos more please
Jesus what's that massive tank right behind him?
Fantastic video. It's so pleasing to listen to people who are so knowledgeable and passionate. If you could get a guide to talk about the collection like this as you went around the museum, I would pay handsomely for it.
Panzer I may not seem that impressive, but imagine if all you have on you is a rifle - what are you supposed to do against it?
What kind of army had only rifles?
@@Paciat None, but not all infantry were equipt with AT weapons, or AT guns
Anti-tank rifles.
@@JohnyG29 Not every soldier had an AT rifle
@@MrRikersBeard No, but most infantry platoons did.
Another great history lesson. By the way what is that monster behind you?
Panzer I is a seriously good tank for its time. That is pre war time. I'd say it was the pinnacle of it's type for the period
Not really
However excellent at getting Germany trained on how to make tanks. Germany went from no tanks to defeating France in a short time
Please keep in mind early tanks were intended as a shock force of call it powerful scouts. Germans were good at this. Later came more anti armor tanks.
Who had all of the Smart Brains? 1917 Tank, a code name, invented in Britain. France is the first nation to make a tank with of a turret. 1940 Britain fields Matilda I with one water cooled MG, Matilda II with 2pdr capable of firing only AP shot and a few tanks with three turrets.
Germany fields PZ I with two air cooled MG's, PZII with 20mm auto cannon, PZIII with 37mm, PZIV with low velocity 75mm plus Czech "trophy" tanks with 37mm.
They even had sloped frontal armor.
The interesting part is that the Germans embraced mechanisation for the front line fighting elements, but crucially not for the supply chain. I assume this is partially due to the lack of the mass production facilities, but also due to trucks/lorries not being ‘sexy’. The reference to so-called German objectivity when it comes to adopting armoured warfare instead of cavalry, misses that they also were amazingly subjective when it came to the mechanisation that mattered.
The resources simply weren't there to fully motorize their divisions. Neither the fuel nor the materials. Trucks were used extensively in supply chains, by the way. Alongside horses.
I actually find that vehicle much more interesting than the turreted version.
Germany was in the early 1930s development, the tanks required way TOO MUCH TIME to build. Lack of materials, and basically after 1941 on they were in trouble.
The Capula looks like a hat on that small tonk
It's so CUTE!
Ironic isn't it - the Panzer's started out using speed, mobility and movement to dominate the battlefield. While the Tiger and Tiger II would prove to be massively expensive immobile, heavily armoured tanks with huge firepower and little else. Which is what happens when a finely tuned military machine is stifled by single minded dictatorship.
Tiger tanks were not inmobile and unreliable. Thats a poorly founded myth.
About the rest. Hitler in fact had little interest in tanks. He was more about guns.
When they issued orders for designing tigers and for the Jagdtiger they came from the front line troops. Hitler does not given a single word about their desing requirements.
And the reason for them is obvious. They encountered bigger and heavier opponents.
"Actually, that's just wrong." ❤
I've got to say - this command version is probably WAY cooler than the turreted version, which pretty much anybody even slighty interested in tanks has seen at some point (either pics, models, vintage film). I haven't had a tank chat pop up in my suggestions for some time (not sure why, since I love them) - I'm so glad this one did. I've said enough - I want to get back to the video ASAP! Thank you, Tank Museum!!
France: We are not going to change our doctrine because WE won in the end!
GB and US: Am I a joke to you?
To be fair, the British made the same mistake.
@@EternalModerate sort of! they did develop cruiser and infantry support tanks and the B.E.F was the only fully motorised army in Europe at the time, but they also believed that the Maginot line would work and they would be fighting a WWI style war
Not so sure about that Guderian comment. Lutz was the senior officer, but Guderian was the one doing the work on the ground. I notice the other Germans involved tend to defer to him, too. He did also become the Panzer spokesman, in more than a few ways, including Inspector General of Armoured Troops, etc. He was also very much part of putting the theory into practice in France. Must say I'm a bit mystified by this endless "debunking" of Guderian in some quarters. Do they think he was there for ornamental reasons only? The guy was no fictional character in combat, either. France wasn't beaten by the pixies, for god's sake. It's a bit like claiming Fuller didn't have anything to do with his historical roles.
Failure can lead to innovation. Failure is temporary and so is success.
One aspect of the 'blitzkrieg' style is that the Germans needed vehicles that would fill the role that Cavalry once filled. The tactics aren't new, they were used by the Mongols, Huns, Scythians, Samaritans, and even as far back as the Assyrians using Chariots.
The Americans and British understood this too, producing fast tanks that could take advantage of breakthroughs, meanwhile the French were arguing amongst themselves over how tanks should even be used, with the Cavalry and Infantry both claiming sole ownership of tanks.
I was in the same pub as Dave, he let out a ripping good fart in the toilet.
I don't even understand how any military can operate without a general staff.
The Nazis did not invent the stab in the back excuse! Hindenberg was using it as an excuse as early as 1918. The Army did claim the stab in the back as one of the reasons for defeat The alternate was to accept that the Prussian lead Officer Corp was to blame. They did the same thing from 1945 onwards and then they blamed Hitler. The Prussian system did however allow for the analysis of past and possible future needs in warfare but the imperative came from the restrictions imposed at Versailles. Remember the effect of the defeat at Jena was that the Prussians adopted the system of the victor but modernised it and in the final campaign proved themselves superior to the French (yes I know Wellington and his ramshackled army helped), but the French imposed restrictions after Jena helped to provoke the change and the Prussian system had inherent capacity for change in response.
Great video, really dispels some of what I had read years ago.
I am honored to have such an authority talking about tanks over my lunch hour today. Thank you David Willey and The Tank Museum. I'm a proud Patreon supporter.
Where does Guderian fit into this development?
The Cooper Mini of tanks
Wish there was a RC model
13:33 "Take support with you, maybe a cow for milk..."
One of the forgotten tank of ww2
Pretty pathetic. But one must start somewhere.
What's the big tank in the background?
Buffalo
@@chrishewitt4220 Ta!
Try this video: th-cam.com/video/ksc3MdjWsxc/w-d-xo.html
From Pz I to King Tiger
It's interesting to see the sloped armor on the Panzer I considering how often you erroneously hear that prior to the t-34 such a layout of steel had never been thought of before.
Hell, the FT had sloped armor.
Mk4.
Any predreadnought battle ship. Etc etc
@@sugarnads Yes. And even many castle towers and turrets. But perhaps that's one of your "ect." 😉
@@polarvortex3294 what trix the weeraboos is its called 'batter' on a castle or fort
Best video I've watched in a while. Bits of history you never heard before. Thank you
David, in the close ups are you looking at the camera ?
Excellent and informative film.
The A model didn't do that well in Spain.