Amazingly awesome argument for God on Fitrah (innate nature) by Asadullah Ali Al Andalusi!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ส.ค. 2024
  • A rising star of the Ummah, Asadullah Ali, gives an awesome philosophical argument for God and the fitrah. Asadullah Ali has two degrees in philosophy, his thesis was on ISIS and has worked 10 years as a security expert for the Malaysian government.
    Understanding Atheism:
    • Video
    Andalusian Project: / channel
    A must watch debate: • ***FULL DEBATE!*** Moh...
    Check out my bitchute channel: www.bitchute.c...
    Nasheed: • JUNDULLAH NASHEED - MU...

ความคิดเห็น • 42

  • @mohammadhassanamer0599
    @mohammadhassanamer0599 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    SubhanAllah! As a student of Philosophy and a believer in Islam, this guy's argument makes total sense

    • @bayyinahawesome415
      @bayyinahawesome415  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Assalamu alaikum
      Maybe you haven't seen him before. I urge you to subscribe to his channel Andalusian project. This person is unbelievable in every good way MashaAllah.

    • @bayyinahawesome415
      @bayyinahawesome415  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Nasir Khan
      Assalamu alaikum
      His ijihad on the masked arab was simply a gift from Allah that I needed at the exact time that I watched it. I feel like crying sometimes when I remember about his leave from TH-cam. May Allah bless him and his family.
      May Allah bless you and your family also brother.

  • @bayyinahawesome415
    @bayyinahawesome415  5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    For copyright issues, the nasheed clip at the end has no audio.

  • @imammurrahsstudent8905
    @imammurrahsstudent8905 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Can you gimme the link bro

    • @bayyinahawesome415
      @bayyinahawesome415  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Assalamu alaikum.
      The description box has a link to the video.

    • @imammurrahsstudent8905
      @imammurrahsstudent8905 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@bayyinahawesome415 walaikum assalam
      Thanks bro

  • @Mahmood42978
    @Mahmood42978 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This superfcially sounds good, but this is more the merit of its presentation than its content. If we breakdown the premises, there are some severe logical gaps in the ultimate punchiline of the argument.

    • @bayyinahawesome415
      @bayyinahawesome415  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Assalamu alaikum brother.
      Can you please elaborate on your comment?

    • @RayyanMemonTheJoker
      @RayyanMemonTheJoker 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Could you elaborate?

    • @Mahmood42978
      @Mahmood42978 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@bayyinahawesome415 walaikum assalam, limitlessness and immeasurability are just negations also constructed from our experience.

    • @bayyinahawesome415
      @bayyinahawesome415  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Mahmood42978
      Assalamu alaikum brother.
      Limitlessness and immeasurability are experiences of non experience if that makes sense.

    • @Mahmood42978
      @Mahmood42978 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bayyinahawesome415 Wa salaam you could say that but my point here is, they're negations of being Limited and measurable, we've definitely experienced those. We've also experienced the negation of things, so it doesn't seem too much of a leap to construct these from those experiences.

  • @bayaligyprof.
    @bayaligyprof. ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Using this line of argument someone can believe in Lucifer ( an unlimited , infinitely powerful evil and maliciously being ) and it must be true ....

    • @bayyinahawesome415
      @bayyinahawesome415  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yeah. Proves the point of fitrah or innate belief all the more. Whether lucifer is to be worshipped is another discussion. This discussion is about the existence of a higher power but people can attribute to it many things; those aren't necessarily correct concepts.

    • @garrettabdullah8351
      @garrettabdullah8351 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Since when does Lucifer have "infinite power"

    • @bayaligyprof.
      @bayaligyprof. 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@garrettabdullah8351 By Lucifer I mean God who is malicious and unjust.
      You could name it anything you want.

  • @Fareeh.
    @Fareeh. 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    what if someone says people may came to the conclusion of god by seeing design, causality etc.

    • @user-bh3vu1bq9o
      @user-bh3vu1bq9o 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      There're two ways th-cam.com/video/c-0PDmGeMxg/w-d-xo.html

  • @tyson6695
    @tyson6695 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    By his line of reasoning. You can argue that ghosts can exist. Smh

    • @bayyinahawesome415
      @bayyinahawesome415  3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      People have many innate beliefs such as morality. The belief in God being one of them.
      Btw, there isn't much evidence to suggest that ghosts don't exist and that believing in them is inborn. So of course one can argue that ghosts can exist. And we Muslims believe in jinns which are close in description to ghosts.

    • @tyson6695
      @tyson6695 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bayyinahawesome415 see, that's the problem. I just extended his argument. So the creator of this Universe has as much credibility of existence as Ghosts do.

    • @tyson6695
      @tyson6695 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bayyinahawesome415 there are psychological, behavioural and Anthropological explanations for ghosts. All of them much more credible.

    • @sholos4478
      @sholos4478 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      it's about proving the validity of a belief in a supernatural, but he's not arguing for ghosts, try again lol.
      Moreover, you can imagine a ghost, a dead/soul of a human, white cloth, boo.
      A ghost by definition shares properties of the natural realm.
      All this shows is you didn't even understand the argument lol.

    • @tyson6695
      @tyson6695 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sholos4478 ghosts don't have white clothes, they are spirits.