You listen to Tyson hour after hour. And do not notice one of his revisionist histories. Tyson's toxic cult of personality suffers a tragic lack of critical thinking skills.
Neil is just one of those rare people who can, without effort, make you feel total and complete awe about the world around you, because he is able to capture his own feeling of awe and put it into words. He's become a true inspiration to me as of late, and i think that is what this world needs more of, inspiring people who are proud of what they know and want to encourage others to learn about the universe as well.
Except for the Muslims he so desperately wants to try and grand-stand about, seeing as nearly everything they "came up with" were from stolen Greek and Roman texts. The Greeks invented Algebra, the Muslims took that concept, made a few alterations, and then renamed it.
I've never watch YT videos for more than a half hour but any talks, features, interviews, etc with Neil Tyson in it, I can watch hours of. He is a fascinating person with thoughts, ideas and comments that stray from the collective norm.
@@Solrac924 you are going against the teachings from the Bible... do not judge and here you are judging... you aren't religious... you are a charlatan... a fake religious person
Took so long to find this Christopher but so glad you uploaded it. I'm 56 years old and have just found 'I ....... love science' so only just found Dr DeGrasse Tyson. This is great
I wouldn't be surprised if I've watched everything on TH-cam that has Tyson in as of today, and this is the one that I come back to time and time again. The other would be "The Moon, the Tides and why Neil DeGrasse Tyson is Colbert's God"
Tyson lays numerous piles of bull shit in his keynote address for the TAM6. And the "skeptics" swallow it without question. This is a great video. Tyson discredits the James Randi Education Foundation gang more thoroughly than a hostile challenger could ever hope to do.
How many times have you watched Tyson's account of Bush's 9-11 speech at 50:03 ? Far from being "an attempt to distinguish we from they" Bush's actual speech was a call for tolerance and inclusion. It was delivered from a mosque. Turns out Tyson confused Bush's 9-11 speech with his eulogy for the Space Shuttle Columbia Astronauts. However in neither speech did Bush try to set Christians above Muslims. That vile accusation comes from Tyson's imagination. And that is just one of several steaming piles of bull shit in the above video. Let Tyson and his clueless following become known for stupidity and dishonesty.
@@infinitysend I am calling out falsehoods. Let Tyson and The New Atheist Clique become known for their dishonesty and credulity. You're okay with lies so long as they support your own set of prejudices. Tyson and Trump are flip sides of the same disease -- tribalism before truth.
Thankfully, it's people like NDT who continue to educate the religious ignorant masses to the truth that it is not god that invented man, but man who invented god. Good for him - we need many, many more like him in the world.
Thank you so much for the intellingent, beautiful and also a very funny speach! I watched it a few times, and it always made me think and laugh! I'm so glad Dr. DeGrass Tyson is among us. I'm your fan! Thank you so very much for everything you teach us!
That's because it's largely wrong. It is embarrassing to those that uploaded it. Neil has taken down his Bush and Star Names story at 49:00 since it was debunked in 2014 by Sean Davis. LIkewise the Ghazali and Newton stories are also confused garbage. I think the person behind this TH-cam channel is dead. Or else he would have taken down these embarrassing piles of shit.
+Medival Jonsson The Bush segment got a good laugh. But as anyone who remembers Bush's actual post 9-11 speech knows, it's false. Nevertheless, his crowd eats it up. The folks in his audience believe themselves to be really smart. But exactly the opposite is true. It is like stand-up comedy for flaming fucktards. :D hopsblog-hop.blogspot.com/2016/01/fact-checking-neil-degrasse-tyson.html
Not even for really smart, for intelligent people in general. But yeah, he really should do a stand-up with the bullshit conspiracy-theorists say and write, I would pay for it in a second!
+dONALD42, not even intelligent people in general. Much of Tyson's presentation is wrong. To swallow this B.S. you need to be a stupid person that has slept through their high school science and history classes.
Sorry, but listening to Tyson will make you even more dumberer. For example Tyson's Bush and Star Names story is fiction. See www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/09/27/neil-degrasse-tyson-admits-he-botched-bush-quote/ And that's not the only steaming pile of bull shit in this talk. But Tyson's fans swallow his bull shit without question. Truly Tyson's fans lack critical thyinking skills.
Even by Tyson's usual high standard, this presentation was amazing! His joy & celebration of discovery is simply infectious! Perhaps the best 90 minutes I've spent watching anything in a very long time.
Tyson has extremely low standards when it comes to rigor and accuracy. You haven't detected any of the bull shit in Tyson's routine? Not surprising. Like most of Tyson's fans your scientifically illiterate and lack critical thinking skills.
@@orian8837 50:05 Tyson gives a false account of President Bush's 9-11 speech. Bush's actual speech was a call for tolerance and inclusion. It was delivered from a mosque. In 2014 Sean Davis challenged Tyson to provide the speech he described. He could not. He informed Davis "One of our mantras in science is that absence of evidence is not evidence of absence." But then Neil's error started getting more attention, even appearing in The Washington Post and other major news outlets. With a great deal of arm twisting Neil admitted he had confused Bush's eulogy for the Space Shuttle Columbia Astronauts with his 9-11speech. However Bush did not try to set Christians above Muslims in either speech. Neil apologies to Bush. This was after the Bush and Star Names fiction had been a standard part of Neil's routine for eight years. There are two other false histories in the above video. Would you like to hear more?
@@orian8837 1:00:55 Tyson makes several false claims in his talk about Newton vs Laplace. Tyson claims that Newton could have easily done Laplace's work in an afternoon. But Newton just stopped when he ceded his brilliance to God. Newton did not just stop.Again and again he returned to the problem of modeling multi-body systems. In particular he invested a great deal of time and effort trying to model the 3-body system of the earth, moon and sun. Tyson's claim is demonstrably false from the get go. After Newton tried, Leonhard Euler took a crack at it. Euler is thought by many to be the greatest mathematician that ever lived. Laplace held that opinion. And then Lagrange. Perhaps you've heard of the Lagrange points? They should be called the Euler-Lagrange points. Euler discovered L1, L2 and L3. Lagrange discovered L4 and L5, the points leading and trailing the orbiting body by 60º. d'Alembert also worked on the problem. More than 100 years later Laplace built his n-body perturbation theory that somewhat explained the stablility of the solar system. But he built on decades of work by Newton, Euler, Lagrange and d'Alembert. When Tyson says perturbation theory is a simple extension of calculus that Newton could have done in an afternoon, he is talking out of his ass. To support his claim Tyson portrays Newton as super human claiming he did decades of work in just two months on a dare. The "dare" Tyson speaks of seems to be the famous Edmund Halley question on planetary orbits, the question that prompted Newton to write Principia. Halley made this "dare" in 1684 when Newton was in his 40s. This was decades after Newton did his calculus work and 7 years after Newton figured out that inverse square gravity implies Kepler's laws. So, no, neither Newton's calculus work nor his work on orbital mechanics were prompted by this "dare". It was Isaac Barrow that steered Newton towards calculus. Barrow, Fermat, Descartes, Cavalieri and others had laid the foundations of calculus in the generation before Newton and Leibniz. Barrow was Newton's older colleague at Cambridge. Barrow made Newton aware of this body of work in 1665. Newton spent the next three years organizing these efforts and adding his own innovations. So yes, this happened before Newton turned 26. But, no, not a two month effort. More like decades of effort from many people. And not on Halley's dare made nearly 20 years later. Regarding orbital mechanics, Newton started thinking about gravity and his laws of motion in 1665. But it was in the winter between 1676 and 1677 that he made a break through and found that inverse square gravity implies Kepler's laws, elliptical orbits and all. So, no, not a two months effort. More like 12 years. And, no, not on Halley's "dare". Halley asked his question in 1684, 7 years after Newton had figured it out. Nearly everything Neil says about Newton is addled nonsense. Unlike Tyson's Bush and Star Names tale, this bit of wrong history hasn't received as much attention. It is rather convoluted and more esoteric so the error isn't as obvious. Neil has been made aware of his errors. But I haven't seen him lift a finger to correct the misinformation he's spread. He's evidently made a choice to let these falsehoods remain in circulation.
I wrestled through this because the sound is sooo bad. But I persisted and loved this talk. Neil is such an example to me. He says what I think and believe. Thank you Neil.
The Bush and Star Names story at 50:00 was debunked in 2014 by Sean Davis of the Federalist. Bush's actual speech was a call for tolerance and inclusion delivered from a mosque. It turns out Tyson had confused Bush's eulogy for the Space Shuttle Columbia astronauts with his 9-11 speech. The bit on Hamid al Ghazali was also debunked. And his schtick on Newton is also horribly addled and confused. If you believe Neil's addled history you are someone lacking in critical thinking skills.
In school every now and then we were asked to make a presentation on who our hero was, I always just closed my eyes and pointed my finger at a list of paper and did a presentation on whoever it landed on. If I could go back in time, I would have presented Neil as my hero.
Indeed. He's continuously dropping steaming piles of bullshit. And his credulous fans scarf it up. And these are the same self proclaimed skeptics who are continuously bragging about their ability to detect bull shit. hopsblog-hop.blogspot.com/2016/01/fact-checking-neil-degrasse-tyson.html
Although if he lived in Newton's time, NDT would have to refer to him as 'master'. How many scientific brains have we lost through ignorance and religious education.
Rumplestiltskin I'm sure you're familiar with the curve of scientific progress? Without christianity we'd have been colonizing Mars about a century ago.
Galileo was educated in a Catholic school and university. He used books preserved and copied by Catholic monks. Without the Catholic work to teach literacy, preserve and copy books, build schools, hospitals, observatories and universities, we would still have no industrial revolution. (Although I don't give Catholics all the credit. There have been other religious traditions that revere scholarship and a love of learning. Some Muslim traditions, Judaism, Protestants, Buddhism, etc.)
Hollister David Well, in hindsight we can never tell, but what we do know is that we lost a lot of knowledge when Christianity spread across Europe. This tells us people were perfectly capable of making scientific discoveries without Christianity, plus they'd have had a head start, as they'd have never had to deal with Christianity's hunger to destroy scientific progress. So they'd have had less resistance and more existing knowledge to work with. It'd have undoubtedly led to exponential scientific discoveries, many centuries before our time. That curve I was talking about earlier looks like this for a reason: buelahman.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/darkages.gif But it happened this way, we can't go back in time. The point being, although it's easy to point to christians making scientific progress, the vast amount of Einsteins and Stephen Hawkings we lost over it certainly doesn't fix it in any way.
vincentpol Alternate histories are nothing more than speculation. They can't be tested in reproducible experiments -- There's no way we can go back in time and change the parameters. So keep it up. Keep on throwing out assertons that can't be tested and proclaiming it SCIENCE! I can use a good laugh.
Now if there was a church or public facility accompanied with a public speaker or, even better, astrophysicist openly willing to publicize information like this to the general public I would be there every imaginable open opportunity I possess!
Why do religious people always flood the comments with quotes from the Bible when videos are about science and/or religion? Doesn't make sense. Speak your own thoughts, not the words of MEN from centuries ago
as an 18 yrs old guy ...looking back i realised i learned more on the internet than in school :| ty uploader....and ty all the uploaders for the videos that educated people in thinking
You're probably correct. If you're the typical Tyson fan you slept through school. You do realize there is a lot of misinformation in this video? Nope? Critical thinking skills -- get some.
@@LTN000 In 2021 the video is still up. And still spreading misinformation. A number of Tyson's claims have been demonstrated to be false. For example his claim that Bush's 9-11 speech was "an attempt to distinguish we from they"? 50:00 Bush's actual 9-11 speech was a call for tolerance and inclusion. It was delivered from a mosque. See www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/09/27/neil-degrasse-tyson-admits-he-botched-bush-quote/ And that is one of several steaming piles of bull shit Tyson dropped on the stage at TAM6. Good skeptics will advise us to make a habit to question claims to see if they're supported by evidence. This is practiced by those with critical thinking skills. Tyson correctly tells us that scientific literacy empowers us to know when someone is full of shit. And yet we witness this audience of "skeptics" swallowing one pile of bullshit after another. Why? Because the people in this audience lack critical thinking skills. LTN000, you were dumber than a bag of rocks 8 years ago. And you remain dumber than a bag of rocks in 2021.
@@HopDavid i honestly said nothing. Idk why you are being aggresive lol. I don't even remember the video, haven't opened it up. don't really care about neil in 2021, i remember exactly nothing of this video. All i can see is you being a douche making assumptions about me :)
@@LTN000 Here, let me quote you: "as an 18 yrs old guy ...looking back i realised i learned more on the internet than in school :| " Evidently you don't remember stuff from the internet as well as what people tried to teach you in school. It's a good thing you've forgotten most the stuff you learned from Tyson. Because a lot of it is wrong.
Sorry, but listening to Tyson will make you even more dumberer. For example Tyson's Bush and Star Names story is fiction. See www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/09/27/neil-degrasse-tyson-admits-he-botched-bush-quote/ And that's not the only steaming pile of bull shit in this talk. But Tyson's fans swallow his bull shit without question. Truly Tyson's fans lack critical thyinking skills.
+Teddy AP Not 100% certain, but I think both apply here. To levitate, the "a" in F=ma is replaced by the gravitational acceleration, g at whichever point on earth the levitator is at. So the force, F required is his mass x g
It's in fact correct. This is the formula by which you calculate the acceleration and mass needed for a big ass fart (pun intended) to lift you off the ground. Using the 3rd law you only get the other side of the equation, which can be calculated to a constant value. So the main part for me is the 2nd law.
Nearly 40 years ago, even WE we able to land on Mars without crashing and burning. If Aliens from another solar system can't make it to Earth without smashing into it, that is stunning incompetence.
Hi i'm Human just like you and i believe simply put that it is not our Fault we are Born so whats gives people the right to tell me im going to a Hell if i dont obey Rules when Maybe, I had no intention on being Born in the first Place? ..' im only 1 out of 50 Billion+ People that have Lived and Died on this Planet so to me thats saying ...What makes us any different to All Livings on Earth when we simply had No CHOICE''
whanaublood While I generally agree with your sentiment, this in particular is a huge WTF: "Maybe, I had no intention on being Born in the first Place" Nobody has _any_ intent until we reach a certain age. 0.o
This was an outstanding lecture and if Neil deGrasse Tyson cannot get you interested in science, nothing will! Just a fantastic review of scientific history and the debunking of ignorance!! A+++
MrGerdbrecht Where are the geeks who know how to spell microphone... Don't be talking shit on our lord and savior Neil Degrasse Tyson when you can't spell that simple of a word even with spell check
MrGerdbrecht Where are the geeks who know how to spell microphone... Don't be talking shit on our lord and savior Neil Degrasse Tyson when you can't even spell that simple of a word
Im German, and english is actually not my first choice. PS: In Germany we may write Photo/Foto, Telefon/Telephone and the good old Mikrofon. Also how does english spell check help germans when everything they write will be marked red.
Ghazali never wrote that math is the work of the evil nor did Islamic innovation end with Ghazali. You believe what Tyson tells you without question. Don't call yourself a skeptic.
i agree, i pondered on it. i imagine the way he looks at it is something like, he found the best answer and stuck with it/always used it. Never any confusion or loss in translation that way. "What do you think I am? A stand up comic?"
this reminds me of some high school conversations i had: to superficial for anyone to rightly claim the issue had been dealt with, but with just enough science and news stories so the convo feels smart, and chock full of enough self-aggrandizement to where everyone still feels like we accomplished something. almost as though our chests sticking out further will help society a little bit. 'look at all the ignorance i've dispelled by preaching to my choir!'- you can just hear it.
For those you younger folks who love NDGT (as I do too)- may I suggest that you watch anything you can find with the late Carl Sagan. Tyson took up the torch of popularizing science when Sagan died. In fact, Sagan made the original "Cosmos" series- dated today by its comparatively primitive graphics, but full of brilliant astounding insights. Interesting that both of the fantastic minds were / are astronomers, with the exceedingly rare facility to communicate to (and stir the imaginations of) us common folk.. If Sagan had been President, global warming would not be a thing today. Imagine Tyson debating Donald Trump. What a world, what a world...
Most of the stories Neil tells are addled nonsense. For example Google "Bush and Star Names". The Bush speech Neil recalls at 49:00 is a confused mix of Bush's eulogy for the Space Shuttle Columbia astronauts with his 9-11 speech. However in neither speech did Bush try to set Christians about Muslims. Bush's actual 9-11 speech was.a call for tolerance and inclusion. It was delivered from a mosque. Likewise Neil's stories regarding Ghazali and Newton are also confused garbage. In this video Neil demonstrates the so called skeptics in his audience are as credulous af.
I love this man so much. Kids today grow up with sports people as their heroes. Mine I grew up with were Albert Einstein, Stephen Hawking, Carl Sagan, Neil Degrasse Tyson, Newton, just to name a few.
I know right!? Not only is it being brought back but it's being revamped for the progress that has been made in physics, AND Neil deGrasse Tyson is going to be the actual narrator! Can you say BEST...THING...EVER!
In this video Neil has explosively filled his pants. The Bush and Star Names fiction was debunked in 2014 by Sean Davis. Lots of people have called out his addled history regarding Hamid al Ghazali and the Islamic Golden Age. Neil likes to see scientific literacy empowers you to know when someone is full of it. You really need some of that scientific literacy.
This is the first time I have heard of this guy. I see him as the "Richard Pryor of the Scientific Community". He makes it more interesting to a regular guy like me. Reminds me of Sinbad too...
Truly a brilliant man! He isn't just smart and funny, he will inspire others to take an interest in science. Excellent video. I wish there was something like this to watch every day!
Yes, Al Ghazali rejected Greek Science and philosophy. But Thomas Aquinas studied Ghazali and claimed he learned much from the Muslims. But Aquinas disagreed with Ghazali and embraced Aristotle and the Greeks. Eventually it was the Christians who gave birth to Science.
I heard that Neil DeGrasse Tyson and Seth Mcfarlane are going to be bringing back the television series 'Cosmos' sometime in 2013. What better possible way to bring back the interest in science among children and adults alike. I have not been so excited about the announcement of a television series in...........ever.
31:25 after talking about electricity and god the static went wild for a sec in some sort of recognition.hmm i need another toke.awesome lecture so far!!!!!!!!
You not aware of the false histories in this lecture? 49:22 Bush's actual 9-11 speech was a call for tolerance and inclusion. Titled "Islam Is Peace" it was delivered from the Islamic Center of Washington D.C. on September 17, 2001. Bush was exactly the opposite of the Arab hating demagogue Tyson describes. And then it slides into Tyson's fiction on Ghazali and the Islamic Golden Age. Ghazali never wrote that math is the work of the devil. Many of the pre-Ghazali accomplishments Tyson gives to Araba come from India and other cultures. And Islamic innovation didn't end in 1100 with Ghazali. I believe Tyson's slander against Newton is also in this video. But I don't have time to find the time stamp at the moment. To swallow these one needs an extraordinary lack of critical thinking skills.
wow, just because someone is loud, sounds confident & makes people laugh? he's an arrogant fool. you should listen carefully. most of what he's saying is opinions. his statements are full of fallacies, especially when speaking of religion.
I was a christian for 20 years, then I went to college. After that, I studied religion and philosophy for 10 years. I found so many holes in the creationist theory, it seemed science was an easier pill to swallow.
I HAVE listened to Tyson for 12 hours straight... and yes, I am addicted!!
You listen to Tyson hour after hour. And do not notice one of his revisionist histories.
Tyson's toxic cult of personality suffers a tragic lack of critical thinking skills.
Neil is just one of those rare people who can, without effort, make you feel total and complete awe about the world around you, because he is able to capture his own feeling of awe and put it into words. He's become a true inspiration to me as of late, and i think that is what this world needs more of, inspiring people who are proud of what they know and want to encourage others to learn about the universe as well.
Universe around you* sorry, habit speaks for world
Agreed!
Word for word
Except for the Muslims he so desperately wants to try and grand-stand about, seeing as nearly everything they "came up with" were from stolen Greek and Roman texts. The Greeks invented Algebra, the Muslims took that concept, made a few alterations, and then renamed it.
he doesn't impress me at all
I love this man. I can hear him talk all day
How do you feel now? Dude's a prick.
Your shortcuts to the Jury Duty section are GREATLY appreciated.
I've never watch YT videos for more than a half hour but any talks, features, interviews, etc with Neil Tyson in it, I can watch hours of. He is a fascinating person with thoughts, ideas and comments that stray from the collective norm.
he's a fool
@@Solrac924 amen carlos he's a fucktard
@@Solrac924 you are going against the teachings from the Bible... do not judge and here you are judging... you aren't religious... you are a charlatan... a fake religious person
Took so long to find this Christopher but so glad you uploaded it. I'm 56 years old and have just found 'I ....... love science' so only just found Dr DeGrasse Tyson. This is great
I wouldn't be surprised if I've watched everything on TH-cam that has Tyson in as of today, and this is the one that I come back to time and time again.
The other would be "The Moon, the Tides and why Neil DeGrasse Tyson is Colbert's God"
those 2, and when colbert actually interviews him, tales of urban astrophysicist and the joe rogan interview are also recurring ones
Tyson lays numerous piles of bull shit in his keynote address for the TAM6. And the "skeptics" swallow it without question.
This is a great video. Tyson discredits the James Randi Education Foundation gang more thoroughly than a hostile challenger could ever hope to do.
How many times have you watched Tyson's account of Bush's 9-11 speech at 50:03 ? Far from being "an attempt to distinguish we from they" Bush's actual speech was a call for tolerance and inclusion. It was delivered from a mosque.
Turns out Tyson confused Bush's 9-11 speech with his eulogy for the Space Shuttle Columbia Astronauts. However in neither speech did Bush try to set Christians above Muslims. That vile accusation comes from Tyson's imagination.
And that is just one of several steaming piles of bull shit in the above video.
Let Tyson and his clueless following become known for stupidity and dishonesty.
@@HopDavid If you hate Tyson so much, why do you follow him around like a jealous lover. Get a life, dude.
@@infinitysend I am calling out falsehoods. Let Tyson and The New Atheist Clique become known for their dishonesty and credulity.
You're okay with lies so long as they support your own set of prejudices.
Tyson and Trump are flip sides of the same disease -- tribalism before truth.
I don't want my approximate 90 minutes back. Why can't every video on the internet be this good?
Dr. Tyson is so brilliant and fun i could listen to him talk for hours! He is so cool!
Neil Tyson is actually addled. But he gets away with it because his audience is clueless when it comes to math, science and history.
This is one of the best videos in all of TH-cam. Educational and entertaining. This should be shown in classrooms everywhere.
I could listen to Tyson for 12 hours straight, Wisdom is addicting.
Thankfully, it's people like NDT who continue to educate the religious ignorant masses to the truth that it is not god that invented man, but man who invented god.
Good for him - we need many, many more like him in the world.
Astrophysicist and stand up comedian; a man of many talents.
Thank you so much for the intellingent, beautiful and also a very funny speach! I watched it a few times, and it always made me think and laugh! I'm so glad Dr. DeGrass Tyson is among us. I'm your fan! Thank you so very much for everything you teach us!
If I ever need a smile I just pull up anything with Neil talking
This was well worth the time!!! Brilliant! I'm glad to have this man among my kind!
This lecture is such gold, and it's getting harder and harder to find in youtube with every year :(
That's because it's largely wrong. It is embarrassing to those that uploaded it. Neil has taken down his Bush and Star Names story at 49:00 since it was debunked in 2014 by Sean Davis.
LIkewise the Ghazali and Newton stories are also confused garbage.
I think the person behind this TH-cam channel is dead. Or else he would have taken down these embarrassing piles of shit.
This is like stand-up comedy for really smart people
Sablicious Did I say ANYTHING about god?
+Sablicious idts
+Medival Jonsson The Bush segment got a good laugh. But as anyone who remembers Bush's actual post 9-11 speech knows, it's false. Nevertheless, his crowd eats it up. The folks in his audience believe themselves to be really smart. But exactly the opposite is true.
It is like stand-up comedy for flaming fucktards. :D
hopsblog-hop.blogspot.com/2016/01/fact-checking-neil-degrasse-tyson.html
Not even for really smart, for intelligent people in general. But yeah, he really should do a stand-up with the bullshit conspiracy-theorists say and write, I would pay for it in a second!
+dONALD42, not even intelligent people in general. Much of Tyson's presentation is wrong. To swallow this B.S. you need to be a stupid person that has slept through their high school science and history classes.
The smartest stand-up comedian you'll ever hear!! This is one Tyson I could watch for hours more! Thank you for the upload. Science is amazing!
Sorry, but listening to Tyson will make you even more dumberer.
For example Tyson's Bush and Star Names story is fiction. See www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/09/27/neil-degrasse-tyson-admits-he-botched-bush-quote/
And that's not the only steaming pile of bull shit in this talk.
But Tyson's fans swallow his bull shit without question. Truly Tyson's fans lack critical thyinking skills.
Good fun, great entertainment. Well worth the 1 1/2 hours.
Even by Tyson's usual high standard, this presentation was amazing! His joy & celebration of discovery is simply infectious! Perhaps the best 90 minutes I've spent watching anything in a very long time.
Tyson has extremely low standards when it comes to rigor and accuracy. You haven't detected any of the bull shit in Tyson's routine? Not surprising. Like most of Tyson's fans your scientifically illiterate and lack critical thinking skills.
@@HopDavid Wow I just got here from your Quora comment
Blessed are those who are taught by Neil deGrasse Tyson.
Much of the above video is addled bull shit. If you want to learn misinformation be my guest.
@@HopDavid what’s exactly is the misinformation?
@@orian8837 50:05 Tyson gives a false account of President Bush's 9-11 speech. Bush's actual speech was a call for tolerance and inclusion. It was delivered from a mosque.
In 2014 Sean Davis challenged Tyson to provide the speech he described. He could not. He informed Davis "One of our mantras in science is that absence of evidence is not evidence of absence."
But then Neil's error started getting more attention, even appearing in The Washington Post and other major news outlets. With a great deal of arm twisting Neil admitted he had confused Bush's eulogy for the Space Shuttle Columbia Astronauts with his 9-11speech. However Bush did not try to set Christians above Muslims in either speech. Neil apologies to Bush.
This was after the Bush and Star Names fiction had been a standard part of Neil's routine for eight years.
There are two other false histories in the above video. Would you like to hear more?
@@HopDavid very interesting, thanks. Of course I’d be very interested to hear the rest :)
@@orian8837 1:00:55 Tyson makes several false claims in his talk about Newton vs Laplace.
Tyson claims that Newton could have easily done Laplace's work in an afternoon. But Newton just stopped when he ceded his brilliance to God.
Newton did not just stop.Again and again he returned to the problem of modeling multi-body systems. In particular he invested a great deal of time and effort trying to model the 3-body system of the earth, moon and sun. Tyson's claim is demonstrably false from the get go.
After Newton tried, Leonhard Euler took a crack at it. Euler is thought by many to be the greatest mathematician that ever lived. Laplace held that opinion.
And then Lagrange. Perhaps you've heard of the Lagrange points? They should be called the Euler-Lagrange points. Euler discovered L1, L2 and L3. Lagrange discovered L4 and L5, the points leading and trailing the orbiting body by 60º.
d'Alembert also worked on the problem.
More than 100 years later Laplace built his n-body perturbation theory that somewhat explained the stablility of the solar system. But he built on decades of work by Newton, Euler, Lagrange and d'Alembert. When Tyson says perturbation theory is a simple extension of calculus that Newton could have done in an afternoon, he is talking out of his ass.
To support his claim Tyson portrays Newton as super human claiming he did decades of work in just two months on a dare.
The "dare" Tyson speaks of seems to be the famous Edmund Halley question on planetary orbits, the question that prompted Newton to write Principia.
Halley made this "dare" in 1684 when Newton was in his 40s. This was decades after Newton did his calculus work and 7 years after Newton figured out that inverse square gravity implies Kepler's laws. So, no, neither Newton's calculus work nor his work on orbital mechanics were prompted by this "dare".
It was Isaac Barrow that steered Newton towards calculus. Barrow, Fermat, Descartes, Cavalieri and others had laid the foundations of calculus in the generation before Newton and Leibniz. Barrow was Newton's older colleague at Cambridge. Barrow made Newton aware of this body of work in 1665. Newton spent the next three years organizing these efforts and adding his own innovations. So yes, this happened before Newton turned 26. But, no, not a two month effort. More like decades of effort from many people. And not on Halley's dare made nearly 20 years later.
Regarding orbital mechanics, Newton started thinking about gravity and his laws of motion in 1665. But it was in the winter between 1676 and 1677 that he made a break through and found that inverse square gravity implies Kepler's laws, elliptical orbits and all. So, no, not a two months effort. More like 12 years. And, no, not on Halley's "dare". Halley asked his question in 1684, 7 years after Newton had figured it out.
Nearly everything Neil says about Newton is addled nonsense.
Unlike Tyson's Bush and Star Names tale, this bit of wrong history hasn't received as much attention. It is rather convoluted and more esoteric so the error isn't as obvious. Neil has been made aware of his errors. But I haven't seen him lift a finger to correct the misinformation he's spread. He's evidently made a choice to let these falsehoods remain in circulation.
I wrestled through this because the sound is sooo bad. But I persisted and loved this talk. Neil is such an example to me. He says what I think and believe. Thank you Neil.
The Bush and Star Names story at 50:00 was debunked in 2014 by Sean Davis of the Federalist. Bush's actual speech was a call for tolerance and inclusion delivered from a mosque. It turns out Tyson had confused Bush's eulogy for the Space Shuttle Columbia astronauts with his 9-11 speech.
The bit on Hamid al Ghazali was also debunked. And his schtick on Newton is also horribly addled and confused.
If you believe Neil's addled history you are someone lacking in critical thinking skills.
man, this guy is a wonderful performer. enjoyed this whole show tremenduously :-)
Man,cool DP
so much scientific knowledge and curiosity around here, and we still get THAT sound quality in a video...
He is officially one of the most incredible people of all time. Uniquely affable person and such a smart cookie. Big fan, Mr Tyson.
He's such a looser
Communication is acquired skill.
First you must get your student's attention.
Money talks...! 🎉
In school every now and then we were asked to make a presentation on who our hero was, I always just closed my eyes and pointed my finger at a list of paper and did a presentation on whoever it landed on.
If I could go back in time, I would have presented Neil as my hero.
This guy never disappoints
Indeed. He's continuously dropping steaming piles of bullshit. And his credulous fans scarf it up.
And these are the same self proclaimed skeptics who are continuously bragging about their ability to detect bull shit.
hopsblog-hop.blogspot.com/2016/01/fact-checking-neil-degrasse-tyson.html
I just love this planet for having these kind of humans on it :)
His bromance with Newton is hilarious.
Although if he lived in Newton's time, NDT would have to refer to him as 'master'. How many scientific brains have we lost through ignorance and religious education.
Rumplestiltskin I'm sure you're familiar with the curve of scientific progress? Without christianity we'd have been colonizing Mars about a century ago.
Galileo was educated in a Catholic school and university. He used books preserved and copied by Catholic monks.
Without the Catholic work to teach literacy, preserve and copy books, build schools, hospitals, observatories and universities, we would still have no industrial revolution.
(Although I don't give Catholics all the credit. There have been other religious traditions that revere scholarship and a love of learning. Some Muslim traditions, Judaism, Protestants, Buddhism, etc.)
Hollister David Well, in hindsight we can never tell, but what we do know is that we lost a lot of knowledge when Christianity spread across Europe. This tells us people were perfectly capable of making scientific discoveries without Christianity, plus they'd have had a head start, as they'd have never had to deal with Christianity's hunger to destroy scientific progress. So they'd have had less resistance and more existing knowledge to work with. It'd have undoubtedly led to exponential scientific discoveries, many centuries before our time.
That curve I was talking about earlier looks like this for a reason: buelahman.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/darkages.gif
But it happened this way, we can't go back in time. The point being, although it's easy to point to christians making scientific progress, the vast amount of Einsteins and Stephen Hawkings we lost over it certainly doesn't fix it in any way.
vincentpol Alternate histories are nothing more than speculation. They can't be tested in reproducible experiments -- There's no way we can go back in time and change the parameters.
So keep it up. Keep on throwing out assertons that can't be tested and proclaiming it SCIENCE! I can use a good laugh.
No one gets a better workout in during a lecture than Neil.
"The geek shall inherit the Earth."
I think I am going to put it on a T-shirt and wear it everywhere!
Make me up a T-shirt that says 'Technology is wonderful....WHEN IT WORKS!! and I'll buy that from you too!
You're not the only one. Also i think his presentations are better than most comedy shows on air today.
"I've never been so close to japan before" lol
Nice Nazi thumbnail, pal.
Now if there was a church or public facility accompanied with a public speaker or, even better, astrophysicist openly willing to publicize information like this to the general public I would be there every imaginable open opportunity I possess!
Why do religious people always flood the comments with quotes from the Bible when videos are about science and/or religion? Doesn't make sense. Speak your own thoughts, not the words of MEN from centuries ago
Because they've only read one book?
@@utxdoni OHHHHH #biblethumpersroasted
Excellent, thank you sir
Oh man, I have got to translate this to my native language and spread out its efficacy.
did you do it ?
xxxTRU5Txxx Unfortunately not yet, time is short for the so many things I'd like to do. Sorry.
xxxTRU5Txxx By the way, is there any software to create subtitles and add them to these youtube videos?
movie maker, sony vegas, or just use the tools youtube provides.
@@xxxTRU5Txxx we did it, in Russian))
as an 18 yrs old guy ...looking back i realised i learned more on the internet than in school :|
ty uploader....and ty all the uploaders for the videos that educated people in thinking
You're probably correct. If you're the typical Tyson fan you slept through school.
You do realize there is a lot of misinformation in this video? Nope? Critical thinking skills -- get some.
@@HopDavid lol holy crap getting a reply on a 8yr old comment is weird
@@LTN000 In 2021 the video is still up. And still spreading misinformation.
A number of Tyson's claims have been demonstrated to be false.
For example his claim that Bush's 9-11 speech was "an attempt to distinguish we from they"? 50:00 Bush's actual 9-11 speech was a call for tolerance and inclusion. It was delivered from a mosque. See www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/09/27/neil-degrasse-tyson-admits-he-botched-bush-quote/
And that is one of several steaming piles of bull shit Tyson dropped on the stage at TAM6.
Good skeptics will advise us to make a habit to question claims to see if they're supported by evidence. This is practiced by those with critical thinking skills. Tyson correctly tells us that scientific literacy empowers us to know when someone is full of shit.
And yet we witness this audience of "skeptics" swallowing one pile of bullshit after another. Why? Because the people in this audience lack critical thinking skills.
LTN000, you were dumber than a bag of rocks 8 years ago. And you remain dumber than a bag of rocks in 2021.
@@HopDavid i honestly said nothing. Idk why you are being aggresive lol. I don't even remember the video, haven't opened it up. don't really care about neil in 2021, i remember exactly nothing of this video. All i can see is you being a douche making assumptions about me :)
@@LTN000 Here, let me quote you:
"as an 18 yrs old guy ...looking back i realised i learned more on the internet than in school :| "
Evidently you don't remember stuff from the internet as well as what people tried to teach you in school.
It's a good thing you've forgotten most the stuff you learned from Tyson. Because a lot of it is wrong.
I'm a little bit smarter than I was a few hours ago.
E. H nts ool,;9 ?,78 (7859 8 8* 8^^,8
L. N. Cu ko kio lmy"*) mmmfbvkn jj
comedian for scientist-wannabees. don't be fooled by this fool. NDGT is extremely ignorant & preaches scientism.
@@Solrac924 What would you insert in the place of science? Please don't say religion.
@@taylorhagin8583 for starters, I would say openness to Truth, wherever it leads.
Clearly Tyson is biased. Will you be too?
Sorry, but listening to Tyson will make you even more dumberer.
For example Tyson's Bush and Star Names story is fiction. See www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/09/27/neil-degrasse-tyson-admits-he-botched-bush-quote/
And that's not the only steaming pile of bull shit in this talk.
But Tyson's fans swallow his bull shit without question. Truly Tyson's fans lack critical thyinking skills.
Neil is the People's Champ of science.
For levitating swami it's Newton's 3rd law. Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. (not 2nd which is F = m x a )
Hmh I was thinking that very same thing. Either it was a slip on Dr. Tyson's part or we're both idiots...
+Teddy AP Not 100% certain, but I think both apply here. To levitate, the "a" in F=ma is replaced by the gravitational acceleration, g at whichever point on earth the levitator is at. So the force, F required is his mass x g
+The Skeptical Nerd Slip ups are pretty common in Tyson's presentations. I don't see how self proclaimed skeptics can drink his Kool Aid.
Hollister David I never said he was perfect. Simply that he might or might not have made a mistake and it would be foolish to assume.
It's in fact correct. This is the formula by which you calculate the acceleration and mass needed for a big ass fart (pun intended) to lift you off the ground. Using the 3rd law you only get the other side of the equation, which can be calculated to a constant value. So the main part for me is the 2nd law.
Great job Neil deGrasse Tyson your method of bringing science to the masses is amazing!!!
Nearly 40 years ago, even WE we able to land on Mars without crashing and burning. If Aliens from another solar system can't make it to Earth without smashing into it, that is stunning incompetence.
wow. do you feel better degrading & demeaning aliens now?! the arrogance is stunning.
Thank you for uploading this. Some of the best 88 minutes I've ever spent.
25:45 "Where are we now? Are we in, like, Vegas?"
...Haha awesome.
if by awesome you mean an immature ignoramus, then yes
@@Solrac924 Keep that mouth open and you'll be the centre of every party, as the trash can.
@@CosmicValkyrie Hahaha!! Are you also a materialist fool?
Ignore what he said. EVERYONE deserves and should see ALL of Dr. Tyson's work.
Hi i'm Human just like you and i believe simply put that it is not our Fault we are Born so whats gives people the right to tell me im going to a Hell if i dont obey Rules when Maybe, I had no intention on being Born in the first Place? ..' im only 1 out of 50 Billion+ People that have Lived and Died on this Planet so to me thats saying ...What makes us any different to All Livings on Earth when we simply had No CHOICE''
whanaublood While I generally agree with your sentiment, this in particular is a huge WTF: "Maybe, I had no intention on being Born in the first Place"
Nobody has _any_ intent until we reach a certain age. 0.o
Cheer up kid( hope this isn't too late ) and about 7 billion wink wink
I love Niel Degrasse Tyson and I watch Nova science always. When he can capture my 12 old grandson's attenion he's gotta be GOOD!
2 THOWSAND miligrams... of coke...
As soon as Neil said that I got a little irritated and thought why is he trying to make it sound worse than it is? Then it made sense further on.
This was an outstanding lecture and if Neil deGrasse Tyson cannot get you interested in science, nothing will! Just a fantastic review of scientific history and the debunking of ignorance!! A+++
LMAO- Did they really say lighter things fall faster than heavier things? omfg.
ignorant people say ignorant things...especially non-believers
This is a great speech. Also, it's reassuring to see that only 1% disliked it for whatever reason.
Where are the geeks that lower the loudness of the microfone.
+MrGerdbrecht Clearly didn't show up that day
MrGerdbrecht Where are the geeks who know how to spell microphone... Don't be talking shit on our lord and savior Neil Degrasse Tyson when you can't spell that simple of a word even with spell check
MrGerdbrecht Where are the geeks who know how to spell microphone... Don't be talking shit on our lord and savior Neil Degrasse Tyson when you can't even spell that simple of a word
Where are the geeks who know to delete their first edit of a comment?
Im German, and english is actually not my first choice.
PS: In Germany we may write Photo/Foto, Telefon/Telephone and the good old Mikrofon.
Also how does english spell check help germans when everything they write will be marked red.
dr.tyson and dr.kaku is my favorite physicist
Nice job breaking Islam, Al-Ghazali.
Ghazali never wrote that math is the work of the evil nor did Islamic innovation end with Ghazali.
You believe what Tyson tells you without question. Don't call yourself a skeptic.
Islamic world was already set to break since the Quran was written.
i agree, i pondered on it. i imagine the way he looks at it is something like, he found the best answer and stuck with it/always used it. Never any confusion or loss in translation that way. "What do you think I am? A stand up comic?"
watched the whole thing. wow. this felt like fresh air.
This isn't a talk about science, it's a talk about skepticism and critical thinking.
Pause the video at any given moment during any of Neil's talks. He always has the funniest face on
Such a charismatic person. Thank you Dr. Tyson.
That sound quality is pretty good considering the location. Its a hell of a lot better then most conventions.
this reminds me of some high school conversations i had: to superficial for anyone to rightly claim the issue had been dealt with, but with just enough science and news stories so the convo feels smart, and chock full of enough self-aggrandizement to where everyone still feels like we accomplished something. almost as though our chests sticking out further will help society a little bit. 'look at all the ignorance i've dispelled by preaching to my choir!'- you can just hear it.
For those you younger folks who love NDGT (as I do too)- may I suggest that you watch anything you can find with the late Carl Sagan. Tyson took up the torch of popularizing science when Sagan died. In fact, Sagan made the original "Cosmos" series- dated today by its comparatively primitive graphics, but full of brilliant astounding insights. Interesting that both of the fantastic minds were / are astronomers, with the exceedingly rare facility to communicate to (and stir the imaginations of) us common folk.. If Sagan had been President, global warming would not be a thing today. Imagine Tyson debating Donald Trump. What a world, what a world...
Most of the stories Neil tells are addled nonsense. For example Google "Bush and Star Names". The Bush speech Neil recalls at 49:00 is a confused mix of Bush's eulogy for the Space Shuttle Columbia astronauts with his 9-11 speech. However in neither speech did Bush try to set Christians about Muslims. Bush's actual 9-11 speech was.a call for tolerance and inclusion. It was delivered from a mosque.
Likewise Neil's stories regarding Ghazali and Newton are also confused garbage.
In this video Neil demonstrates the so called skeptics in his audience are as credulous af.
I love this man so much. Kids today grow up with sports people as their heroes. Mine I grew up with were Albert Einstein, Stephen Hawking, Carl Sagan, Neil Degrasse Tyson, Newton, just to name a few.
you list him among greats?! NDT hasn't done anything...except be a fool to the listening fools.
one of the best videos on youtube. period.
This guy is awesome.
Without a doubt, one of the best things i ever ever spent my finite time watching.
I recommend setting aside 90 minutes or more aside more often, there are plenty of great lectures and documentaries on youtube alone.
I know right!? Not only is it being brought back but it's being revamped for the progress that has been made in physics, AND Neil deGrasse Tyson is going to be the actual narrator! Can you say BEST...THING...EVER!
I think this is the best hour of my life that I have spent lol I always enjoy him speaking
Loving this. Thanks for posting. :)
Thanks for the post!
Can any human be this articulate and entertaining about science?….GOAT
In this video Neil has explosively filled his pants. The Bush and Star Names fiction was debunked in 2014 by Sean Davis. Lots of people have called out his addled history regarding Hamid al Ghazali and the Islamic Golden Age.
Neil likes to see scientific literacy empowers you to know when someone is full of it. You really need some of that scientific literacy.
The parenthesis on financial ledgers instead of the negative sign is at least partly because it makes it stand out at a quick glance.
This is the first time I have heard of this guy. I see him as the "Richard Pryor of the Scientific Community". He makes it more interesting to a regular guy like me. Reminds me of Sinbad too...
i will literaly watch anything wiith degrasse tyson
This is great, hilarious AND informative.
This should be a show he takes around the country.
This man is brilliant.
Truly a brilliant man! He isn't just smart and funny, he will inspire others to take an interest in science. Excellent video. I wish there was something like this to watch every day!
I watch this every six months or so.
And are you still swallowing this bull shit? Tyson's stories have been debunked years ago.
stand up physics comedy, life cant get better than this !!
A very wise way of thinking and I agree with you completely.
If everyone was like Neil there would never be time for war
Dare I say it but this reminded me so much of Bill Hicks.
Superb.
Yes, Al Ghazali rejected Greek Science and philosophy. But Thomas Aquinas studied Ghazali and claimed he learned much from the Muslims. But Aquinas disagreed with Ghazali and embraced Aristotle and the Greeks. Eventually it was the Christians who gave birth to Science.
I heard that Neil DeGrasse Tyson and Seth Mcfarlane are going to be bringing back the television series 'Cosmos' sometime in 2013. What better possible way to bring back the interest in science among children and adults alike. I have not been so excited about the announcement of a television series in...........ever.
Mel Brooks is a standup philosopher, Tyson is a standup Astrophysicist.
I love that vest of his. He wears it all the time. It's awesome.
31:25 after talking about electricity and god the static went wild for a sec in some sort of recognition.hmm i need another toke.awesome lecture so far!!!!!!!!
An abundance of food for thought
Don't get me wrong, but this lecture deserves an AMEN! 😜
If people like dr. Tyson went to politics, the world would be a better place.
You not aware of the false histories in this lecture?
49:22 Bush's actual 9-11 speech was a call for tolerance and inclusion. Titled "Islam Is Peace" it was delivered from the Islamic Center of Washington D.C. on September 17, 2001. Bush was exactly the opposite of the Arab hating demagogue Tyson describes.
And then it slides into Tyson's fiction on Ghazali and the Islamic Golden Age. Ghazali never wrote that math is the work of the devil. Many of the pre-Ghazali accomplishments Tyson gives to Araba come from India and other cultures. And Islamic innovation didn't end in 1100 with Ghazali.
I believe Tyson's slander against Newton is also in this video. But I don't have time to find the time stamp at the moment.
To swallow these one needs an extraordinary lack of critical thinking skills.
Best video on youtube.
Dr. Neil deGrasse Tyson is brilliant. I wished I had a teacher like him in school;)
wow, just because someone is loud, sounds confident & makes people laugh? he's an arrogant fool. you should listen carefully. most of what he's saying is opinions. his statements are full of fallacies, especially when speaking of religion.
@@Solrac924 what did he say that was incorrect besides, intelligent design, in your opinion?
Perfect Description
Thanks
the speech recognition works surprisingly well on this one
I was a christian for 20 years, then I went to college. After that, I studied religion and philosophy for 10 years. I found so many holes in the creationist theory, it seemed science was an easier pill to swallow.
I am not religious but I agree with you wholeheartedly. If more people thought that way, we wouldn't have a problem. Well, most of us wouldn't.