Best lens channel on TH-cam. I always check here first too see if you've got a review of the lens I'm looking at. (You've already made me buy a couple of lenses....)
Sigma's 3 contemporary lenses for Sony would all make it to the very top of this list no doubt. You should review those contemporary lenses. 16mm f1.4, 30mm f1.4, and the newly released 56mm f1.4 DC DN. I'm surprised you still haven't reviewed any of them.
I've wondering all the time when the sigmas will come... I am using the 16 and the 30 by myself, they are really extrem sharp lenses and would have killed 3 other lenses in this video.
I have never, in my entire life, ever met or had anyone explain something - anything - to me that I would understand as you do Christopher. I wish you were a photography professor or did some workshops that I could attend in person. Thank you for what you do anyways. I love how clear and detailed your.
FYI, a Canon EF-S user cannot go wrong buying the EF-S 24mm f/2.8 pancake lens. It's a very sharp ~35mm equivalent prime and the only gripe anyone should ever have with it is the slow focus speed. It weighs practically nothing, the quality (at f/2.8 even!) is undeniable, the focal length makes it a great all-around prime, it's pretty cheap, and it's freaking f/2.8!
f/2.8 is dark, sorry, Canon spoiled us with the nifty-fifty but even in absolute terms, f/2.8 is just one stop more than the typical kit lens at the wide end
@@666Tomato666 No, f/2.8 is not dark. Most lenses that can reach f/2.0 or better are also not the sharpest at those apertures. Unless you're buying very expensive lenses, f/2.8 is where most fast lenses reach maximum sharpness. One stop is double the light, requiring half the ISO and noise for the same exposure, and you're hand-waving that? I own the EF 50mm f/1.8 and while it's a sharp lens, it's not some sort of magic low-light wand and its maximum sharpness is not at or near f/1.8. It's also an 80mm on APS-C which is a telephoto focal length and not practical for most casual shooting scenarios.
Jody Bruchon he doesn’t know what he’s talking about.. 2.8 is not dark. I have the 24 pancake on my sl2 & it’s a really nice setup. I wanted something compact that I can carry around & I find my self taking way more pics bc it’s lightweight & it’s a sharp lens. I also have the 55-250 on this list & it’s a great lens
@@derekderekderek2 and EF-S 24mm f/2.8 is not a zoom, it's a prime @UCZNy_u_bnCCfalW-XBFUaCw not all lenses are their sharpest at f/2.0, but there are plenty that are. Yes you need half the ISO, but the noise falls logarithmically with ISO, halving it likely won't even reduce the noise by 10%. The bigger problem is the lack of background separation, this you can't work around by manipulating other settings. And yes, 50 mm is telephoto on APS-C, but it has the price, aperture and sharpness I expect from a non-super-telephoto lens. 24mm one is almost 2 stops slower. At least it doesn't have the insane price of the EF-S 35mm.
Would love to see you review the Fuji 16mm F1.4 and the 56mm F1.2. I got the chance to play with the 16mm at a trade fair yesterday, and man did it impress. Super close min focus, and from what I could tell it is sharp as a tack too, with minimal distortion for a wide lens. Fuji is starting to really impress me with that 16mm and the X-T3, it is hard not to grab one of each and have a go at it.
Sigma 18-35 and 50-100 are on my list for the next couple of years (no money currently). I don't like switching lenses often, so these two will be the daily drivers. The sharpness is INSANE. Yes, I will get the dock as well to calibrate them.
Thanks for doing this, Christopher. Your videos have been so helpful for making decisions on which lenses to get. That Sigma 18-35 f1.8 is tempting me! Thanks for all the great content.
Definitely agree with 55-250mm IS STM lens. That's the best deal I have ever got. Previously I used 70-200 f4L lens and this one is just the same IQ with lower maximum brightness but for the size and price - just WOW! :-) I use it with great EF-S 24mm f2.8 lens and I'm very satisfying with this combo on 70D for allaround photography.
They would take number one spot and it's hard core fact :) it would make this "2019 lenses*" content obsolete. They would be good lenses to "compared to what" lenses making all these lenses in video make look bad.
Ha is for doing this review Chris. Crop shooters get left out all the time, but when you’re talking “value for money” and you’re more interested in taking photos than collecting trophy gear, it’s really hard to beat a carefully assembled APS-C camera system- particularly if you’re using a Sony E-mount camera (just for the ability to use Canon and Nikon mount DSLR lenses). I was totally shocked by the EF-S 55-250mm recommendation. How is that lens not terrible? Wow! I will check it out. Probably the most surprising lens recommend in recent memory.
YourTechGuide you can buy everyone - they are all sharp and good. Compared to canon or Nikon APSC Fujifilm feels like lenses made by alien with future technology.
Hi YTG, the Fujinon lens test charts on E-photozine will give you some idea of the relative merits of the Fujinon range, but because the range is still quite small and mostly very modern and all of very high build quality and performance you can be fairly sure that whichever lens you choose you will not be disappointed. I am currently the owner and user of at least ten fuji lenses and where there is a choice as between the 18-55 versus the 16-55 2,8 I now only ever use the later one because it is sharper, faster, better focusing, etc etc also twice the price!. One of my other favourites is the 10-24, just fabulous wide angle for landscapes, I just wish I could afford this new 8-16 F2.8!. In the end they are all brilliant but each of them has its special advantages, which ones you get depends on what you want to do, the more expensive lenses are certainly worth the extra money, if you can afford them. None of the reviews have really shown these lenses at their best, one of the reasons that the Fujifilm system is gaining such respect is that the cameras are capable of exceptional output, easily matching and in some cases surpassing Full Frame options, especially those with anti-aliasing filters and their cheaper lenses, the sort of resolution that really you cant see on a normal computer!. Cheers, Richard.
I loved this video dedicated for poor people like me with APSC bodies. Thank you so much. Please dedicate few videos for crop sensor as well in future.
well after seeing both top 2019 lenses videos, I am asking myself if I should still buy the tamron 70-200mm (as I planned) or switch to the canon 55-250mm (price difference is not a problem). Any suggestion between the two to help me decide is much appreciated :)
I cant believe you mentioned the 60mm Tamron macro. It's one of my favorite lenses and no one talks about it. There are several times where I've thought about selling it but I just can't let it go for how good it is.
For my APS-C Canons, I mostly carry my own 'holy trinity': 10-18 IS USM, 18-55 IS USM and 55-250 IS USM. Full frame equivalent, gapless, range of 16-400mm without breaking the bank.
My APS-C travel kit is built around an EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 IS USM, an EF-S 55-250 f/4-5.6 IS STM and an EF-S 10-18 f/4.5-5.6 IS STM. The 1990 vintage EF 50 f/1.8 and a Sigma 4.5mm f/2.8 fisheye are also usually in the corners of the old tamrac bag. Chris put Canon's EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 IS USM at the top of the fast standard zoom competition several years ago, though he did warn that some copies of that lens were reputed to suffer from excessive dust inhalation and/or early Image Stabilization system failure. Though Sigma's more recently introduced 18-35 f/1.8 lens seems to have a generally acknowledged advantage in lens speed and pure sharpness, that Sigma lacks image stabilization. As a slightly wobbly septuagenarian I still prefer the stabilized option, and I haven't noticed any dust or IS problems with my particular copy of the EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 IS USM.
I actually commented on the Full Frame 2019 sharpest lenses video, I had no idea you had made an aps-c top 10 as well, excellent work. I have the Sigma 18-35mm F1.8 and it really is an incredible lens. My only grip with it is that it doesn't go to 16mm which is really one of my preferred focal lengths but after watching your review on the Samyang 16mm F2, I went for that and have that covered very nicely so its not a big deal. Two outstanding lenses right there really. The only thing I can really add is that the Sigma 50-100mm is only available in Sigma, Canon and Nikon mounts. There is no Sony version of it that I am aware of (although mirrorless adapters will make it work on e-mount bodies). I'm not picking faults though, really enjoyed your comparison video.
Love your channel as well! I‘m a fuji owner and would love to see more reviews about their lenses... I own the 16mm f1.4, the 56mm f1.2 and the 18-55mm f2.8-4 kit lens...I can just say from a realworld use point of view that I‘m having so much fun with those lenses! Very pleased indeed with the results!
Christopher, Any chance you might be able to get and test some of the Nikon APS-C lenses, in particular the 16-80 f2.8-f4 VR, so we could get a sense for how they compare with the other ones you've tested? I'm considering switching from Canon back to Nikon for its more impressive sensor performance and metering. But i struggle with what sort of lenses to pair up with any of those Nikon DX bodies. Thanks for all your tests, they are extremely helpful! Craig
This video has just become more relevant to me now that I picked up the R7 and do not like stacking my large RF glass on it. I'll have to check out the 55-250 ef's stm.
Thank you for yet again another great video packed full of information that is very helpful to photographers of all levels. I really appreciate your work
Great review, as always, Christopher. Well done. (Slightly aggrieved not to find the one that I use didn't make it onto the list, of course - Sigma 17-70 f2.8-4 Contemporary. Oh well.)
I am a regular viewer of your wonderful TH-cam channel. I recently bought Samyang 135mm f2 lens based on your glowing review. I will highly appreciate if you could do a comparison video for current 135mm lenses from Sigma Art, Zeiss APO Sonnar and Sony FE 135
Big THANKS for all the reviews and this one! It is hardwork and you do it it great manner. I hope also to see more lenses from & for Fuji being tested by you. It is simply a matter of trust!
Hi Christopher, glad to hear you're reviewing more fuji lenses in the future, can I suggest you try my favourite fuji lens, the bokehlicious XF90 f2, it costs a little more than half of the xf80 2.8 OIS Macro and it may not beat the 80 Macro for sharpness, but it'll be interesting to see how it compares to the Samyang 85 1.8.
Good lens no doubt from all the reviews I have seen. It was a little over priced for me when I was looking to buy one used so I picked up a 28-105mm USM and have been very happy with the picture quality. It’s not the sharpest lens but there’s nothing wrong with that. Some lenses have a character and the focal range is perfect for my shooting style. I also have the 55-250mm IS STM and get to try it today once my camera arrives via USPS. I had to order a used 50D to tide my cravings for picture taking because my canon 5D classic broke...mirror fell off.
Ah damn you! Why'd ya have to mention the Tamron? I've been saving for a while, passed on one in new shape for $160 due to a lack of funds. Now they'll be going for $300 haha. Seems like the perfect nifty fifty for me. At least I have one lens on this list, the Rokinon 16mm. Thanks as always for the Videos, Chris.
Hello. I've been watching you for years fondly from Turkey. I think you are the best channel in this field. I just wanted to say a little thank you. we look forward to your nice reviews 😌👌📸
Hi Christopher, do you think you could make a review for the canon ef-m 32mm f1.4? ps: I think the canon ef-m 22mm f2.0 should be included in your list for the aps-c lenses :-) Thanks for your great reviews! I enjoy them a lot!
Hi Chris, if you had to choose between using the Canon EF-S 15-85 at 16mm or the Samyang 16mm prime, what would you choose?? Great reviews, looking forward to see what lens you review in 2019,
Christopher, I'd like to thank you for your amazing work reviewing lenses. You're hands down the best lens reviewer on TH-cam! Watching your videos helped me choose between the options I had and now I've got a handful of fastest and sharpest lenses on the market that turned my camera into a real beast.
Another great video and review - I was disappointed not to see any 18-50 or 18-55 "walkaround" lenses in the list such as the very capable Sigma 18-50 f/2.8 for example.
What about the Sigma 56mm F1.4? That lens is incredible! Would the new Sony 16-55mm F2.8 make the list but for its price? Thank you for the great reviews, Father Chris./Warren
I was really shocked and surprised when I didn't see the Sigma trio (16mm f1.4, 30mmf 1.4 & 56mm f1.4) on your list cause I've seen your reviews of 16mm & 56mm. But then when I went back and checked I saw the reviews were done after the making of this video and then everything was right in the universe again. Any chance we're going to see a review of the Sigma 40mm F1.4 Art lens soon? There are rumours on the internet that it's the sharpest lens ever made! I would love to see your opinion on it.
Now that I shoot on FF I miss few of the APS-C lenses I owned, like the Tokina 11-16 f/2.8 and the 24mm STM. I also was quite interested in the 18-35 and 50-100 and I had the chance to test them on a Nikon body, and boy oh boy they are impressive. I really wish Sigma develops something similar for the full frame telephoto environment, the 24-35 f/2 is impressive but not perfect, the range is quite limited and the lack of weather sealing makes me want to go towards the Tamron 24-70 G2
Fuji lenses are all fantastic, but the one that really stands head and shoulders above the rest is the 56mm 1.2. It's the sharpest lens I've ever used, hands down. And I've used a lot of lenses across many camera systems! Please check it out when you get the chance, Christopher!
That's weird acefibble, I find this lens to be sharper than my 23 f2 and the 16-50 2.8. What body did you use it on? Great to hear Christopher, I will be watching out for them!
Would love to see you review the Viltrox EF-EOS M2 speedbooster, and you could do a great comparison between M-body and your 6D full frame with EF lenses. I have Canon M5 and always hankered after a full frame camera but EosR is just too expensive, so I got the EF-EOS M2 to try today, initial impressions are the fov is great - almost full frame equivalent, but not had much chance to test, it doesn't auto-retract focus when camera switched off which is annoying with nifty 50mm but my other EF lenses all have internal focus so not so much of an issue, people have complained of infinity focus issue and it apparently drains camera battery even when camera is off.
Ya this lens should be on the list for sure. No question its the best I've tried.. You will see it on most of these kinds of lists.. Best bang for the buck, crazy sharp.
I've not ever had an issue. Hands down you will not be disappointed. Order from eglobalcentral.com. Asian version and no warrenty but comes fast and is very cheap (half price)...@@opfinger
Federico Opfinger speed is good but it is a little noisy, but you get a lot of a lens for 300$, i prefer it over the 50mm f1.8 Canon when it's stopped at f2.8.
Ryan Lawrence i know man! I thought it was going to be #1, I'm sure Christopher missed this one, because in his review it was all nothing but sharp sharp sharp from corner to corner.
Great video Chris! I'll set aside some budget next year to get my hands on that Samyang 85mm. Would to see your reviews of Fuji lenses. Merry Christmas to you too.
Thank you for this video ! Can't wait to see your future reviews on Fuji's lens as I am looking for a smaller replacement of my big Canon 6D for traveling ^^
So what happened to Sigma 17-50mm f2.8? I remember you've always valued it highly, I even bought it because of your recommendation (never regretted making that purchase).
Christopher, I'm thinking of getting a Canon M50, any thoughts? In that I have a number of Canon lenses I'd like to see you do a review on EF and EFS lenses to the M50 adapters.
The M50 sounds nice to me. I'm not going to re-review lenses on the M50 with an adapter though, I think you might be expecting a little too much of me there! All my EF-M lens reviews are done on a 24mp camera so they will all perform the same on your M50
@@christopherfrost After considering my real need (wants) I decided to purchase the Canon M100, it too has the same 24mp sensor as the M50. Wow, that dual-pixel auto-focus is fantastic. I think Canon has the best menu system. Of course, you are right; and thank you for all you do. You do do a lot. Here's wishing you a prosperous and holy new year.
I own tge 10-18 EF-S and Sigma 18-35mm! I disagree with recommending the 55-250 though. I found it very soft, and returned it. Went with the 70-200 2.8 L 🤗
for aps-c.. i need a sharp telephoto lens for wildlife and birding.. need decent af speed... minimum 300mm on the long end and budget is 700$....what should i go for... from your videos i have slected tamron 18-400, sigma 100-400,tamron 100-400,canon 70-300 usm ii and tamron 70-300 di vc usd... did i miss any better lens... and what would be best...
How about a list of sharpest wide-angle lens on a market? As an amateur landscape(astro) photographer I'd really like to find a perfect fast ultra-wide angle lens of all time.
@@christofi8390 Actually, I don't even have a decent camera for astrophotography yet. I'm going to buy Sony A7III for this type of shooting and I just want to hear Cristopher's trustworthy opinion about a perfect fast ultra-wide angle lens on a market from his personal experience.
Hey Chris! Have you ever thought about reviewing something like the Sony 70-200mm F4G, or even the 55-210? Could be very interesting to see how they compare to DSLR (Canon/Nikon) equivalents.
What about high performer APS-C lense from Tokina: 14-20mm f2.0? I would appreciate a review of it from you! That would be a nice Christmas present! Also wondering, why Canon EF-S 17-55 2.8 IS USM is not listed?
Never tried the Tokina lens I'm afraid, and the Canon lens is still nice but a bit long-in-the tooth now - the Sigma 18-35 f/1.8 is considerably sharper
I have an old Sony NEX-5R mirrorless camera with the kit 16-50mm lens. Picked up the Sony E50mm F1.8 OSS in the Black Friday sales last week and delighted to see it mentioned here in the Top 10. I'd like to add 1 more lens to my bag...so I have the 16-50, a brand new Prime 50mm and seeking 1 more recommendation...can anyone suggest anything?
In my personal experience. The sigma art 18-35 and the sigma art 50-100 are great lenses. I do have the Canon 10-18mm that I used to shoot on my M50 and my 80d crop sensor cameras. I've always got good results with the first 2 lenses but the Canon 10-2-18 mm I got a lot and I mean a lot of chromatic aberration. I even use that lens on my Canon EOS R and still have the same issues
I bot 24mm f/2.8 stm a great ef-s canon lens for my aps-c. Is it 24mm on aps-c or 38.4mm, I am confused. Coz it is designed for aps-c so it should not get multiplied by 1.6x .
I have just bought the canon 17-55 for my canon M50 (will be using with canon adapter) and receiving in 2 days but now wondering if that is the best for videos? I mainly do videos (cooking). Any help would be much appreciated.
I wonder what is going on with the EF-S 55-250mm STM lens. DXO mark didnt particularly think it was great with a score of 13, saying "No improvement over predecessor".
I am interested in cannon 70-200 mm F/4.0 USM II for my APSC body (77D). Using it on APSC body will convert it into 112-320 mm F/6.4. Can you suggest any other lens apart from sigma 50-100mm F/1.8 that provides similar result. I intent to use mainly for photography. Thanks 😊
Chris, i do video work for my daily research project. i have wide angle and potrait lenses. now im looking for standart prime/not-prime lens. Which one do you think i should take regarding image quality and low-light performance, they are : Sigma 35mm f1.4 art, Samyang 35mm t1.5, Sigma 18-35mm f1.8 or Sigma 30mm f1.4? i shoot with apsc sensor, that’s why i need 35mm as a standart lens. Sharpness in the widest open is important since i work often at night videography.
It depends what camera you're using. If it's a Canon digital SLR then the 35mm f/2 IS USM is the one you want. If it's a mirrorless camera then the Sigma 30mm f/1.4 is a good option
Christopher, thank you very much for this and all the other great videos. Are the focal lengths and apertures already correct for APS-C sensors or would we still need to apply the crop factor to get the full frame equivalent?
A really useful list thanks... It would be useful to get a sense of how EOS m lenses compare to the efs equivalents eg 11 to 22 vs 10 to 18, 55 to 250 vs 50 to 250
Not a single nikon lens. Interesting. I thought viltrox will make an entry here. I love sony & fuji lenses option. Also they offer IS & constant aperture for UWA zoom lenses & even some prime.
![[#SHORTS CLIP] ใช้ของของตัวเองไปเลยสิคะ l ซานิเบาได้เบา l One Playground](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Ea_mTywx2p4/mqdefault.jpg)
Best lens channel on TH-cam. I always check here first too see if you've got a review of the lens I'm looking at. (You've already made me buy a couple of lenses....)
You are my most favorite and trusted reviever.... love this channel!!! Real PRO!!!
me too
Sigma's 3 contemporary lenses for Sony would all make it to the very top of this list no doubt. You should review those contemporary lenses. 16mm f1.4, 30mm f1.4, and the newly released 56mm f1.4 DC DN.
I'm surprised you still haven't reviewed any of them.
This.
Yep. Also interested in this one.
I've wondering all the time when the sigmas will come... I am using the 16 and the 30 by myself, they are really extrem sharp lenses and would have killed 3 other lenses in this video.
Reviews are coming. In fact, I'm just finishing working with the 30mm lens
@@christopherfrost 1.4 or 2.8 ?
I don't watch other camera/lens review channels because none compare to the information you receive in these! Keep it up Chris, excellent!
I have never, in my entire life, ever met or had anyone explain something - anything - to me that I would understand as you do Christopher. I wish you were a photography professor or did some workshops that I could attend in person. Thank you for what you do anyways. I love how clear and detailed your.
Not strictly an apsc lens but the Laowa 15mm f4 macro is one of my favorites. The sharpest 15mm I've ever tried
FYI, a Canon EF-S user cannot go wrong buying the EF-S 24mm f/2.8 pancake lens. It's a very sharp ~35mm equivalent prime and the only gripe anyone should ever have with it is the slow focus speed. It weighs practically nothing, the quality (at f/2.8 even!) is undeniable, the focal length makes it a great all-around prime, it's pretty cheap, and it's freaking f/2.8!
f/2.8 is dark, sorry, Canon spoiled us with the nifty-fifty
but even in absolute terms, f/2.8 is just one stop more than the typical kit lens at the wide end
@@666Tomato666 f/2.8 is as fast as most "pro" zooms...
@@666Tomato666 No, f/2.8 is not dark. Most lenses that can reach f/2.0 or better are also not the sharpest at those apertures. Unless you're buying very expensive lenses, f/2.8 is where most fast lenses reach maximum sharpness. One stop is double the light, requiring half the ISO and noise for the same exposure, and you're hand-waving that? I own the EF 50mm f/1.8 and while it's a sharp lens, it's not some sort of magic low-light wand and its maximum sharpness is not at or near f/1.8. It's also an 80mm on APS-C which is a telephoto focal length and not practical for most casual shooting scenarios.
Jody Bruchon he doesn’t know what he’s talking about.. 2.8 is not dark. I have the 24 pancake on my sl2 & it’s a really nice setup. I wanted something compact that I can carry around & I find my self taking way more pics bc it’s lightweight & it’s a sharp lens. I also have the 55-250 on this list & it’s a great lens
@@derekderekderek2 and EF-S 24mm f/2.8 is not a zoom, it's a prime
@UCZNy_u_bnCCfalW-XBFUaCw not all lenses are their sharpest at f/2.0, but there are plenty that are. Yes you need half the ISO, but the noise falls logarithmically with ISO, halving it likely won't even reduce the noise by 10%. The bigger problem is the lack of background separation, this you can't work around by manipulating other settings. And yes, 50 mm is telephoto on APS-C, but it has the price, aperture and sharpness I expect from a non-super-telephoto lens. 24mm one is almost 2 stops slower. At least it doesn't have the insane price of the EF-S 35mm.
I'd love to see an update of this. Wouldn't be shocked at all to see all 3 mirrorless Sigma f1.4 lenses make the list.
Excellent review as usual. This is my "go to" channel for lens reviews, period.
Would love to see you review the Fuji 16mm F1.4 and the 56mm F1.2. I got the chance to play with the 16mm at a trade fair yesterday, and man did it impress. Super close min focus, and from what I could tell it is sharp as a tack too, with minimal distortion for a wide lens. Fuji is starting to really impress me with that 16mm and the X-T3, it is hard not to grab one of each and have a go at it.
Sigma 18-35 and 50-100 are on my list for the next couple of years (no money currently). I don't like switching lenses often, so these two will be the daily drivers. The sharpness is INSANE. Yes, I will get the dock as well to calibrate them.
Thanks for doing this, Christopher. Your videos have been so helpful for making decisions on which lenses to get. That Sigma 18-35 f1.8 is tempting me! Thanks for all the great content.
Definitely agree with 55-250mm IS STM lens. That's the best deal I have ever got. Previously I used 70-200 f4L lens and this one is just the same IQ with lower maximum brightness but for the size and price - just WOW! :-) I use it with great EF-S 24mm f2.8 lens and I'm very satisfying with this combo on 70D for allaround photography.
Too bad there's no Fuji APSC lenses, I think they are the most complete APSC system on the market.
7:15
They would take number one spot and it's hard core fact :) it would make this "2019 lenses*" content obsolete. They would be good lenses to "compared to what" lenses making all these lenses in video make look bad.
Ha is for doing this review Chris. Crop shooters get left out all the time, but when you’re talking “value for money” and you’re more interested in taking photos than collecting trophy gear, it’s really hard to beat a carefully assembled APS-C camera system- particularly if you’re using a Sony E-mount camera (just for the ability to use Canon and Nikon mount DSLR lenses). I was totally shocked by the EF-S 55-250mm recommendation. How is that lens not terrible? Wow! I will check it out. Probably the most surprising lens recommend in recent memory.
I'd love to see a new best apsc lens video now that you have tested so many mirrorless lenses!!!
*we need some fuji lenses to be tested so I know which one to buy.*
YourTechGuide you can buy everyone - they are all sharp and good. Compared to canon or Nikon APSC Fujifilm feels like lenses made by alien with future technology.
16mm F1.4 is amazing. 56mm F1.2 is also pretty great.
Yes true all these lenses listed in this video are far behind fujinon lenses
@@kevindiaz3459 *fuji sharpest lens is the 90mm f2. I already own the 16mm*
Hi YTG, the Fujinon lens test charts on E-photozine will give you some idea of the relative merits of the Fujinon range, but because the range is still quite small and mostly very modern and all of very high build quality and performance you can be fairly sure that whichever lens you choose you will not be disappointed. I am currently the owner and user of at least ten fuji lenses and where there is a choice as between the 18-55 versus the 16-55 2,8 I now only ever use the later one because it is sharper, faster, better focusing, etc etc also twice the price!. One of my other favourites is the 10-24, just fabulous wide angle for landscapes, I just wish I could afford this new 8-16 F2.8!. In the end they are all brilliant but each of them has its special advantages, which ones you get depends on what you want to do, the more expensive lenses are certainly worth the extra money, if you can afford them. None of the reviews have really shown these lenses at their best, one of the reasons that the Fujifilm system is gaining such respect is that the cameras are capable of exceptional output, easily matching and in some cases surpassing Full Frame options, especially those with anti-aliasing filters and their cheaper lenses, the sort of resolution that really you cant see on a normal computer!. Cheers, Richard.
thanks for this, I missed the fuji's in the tests indeed, but also the tokina 14-20mm f2 lens. a very fast, wide and sharp lens
I loved this video dedicated for poor people like me with APSC bodies. Thank you so much. Please dedicate few videos for crop sensor as well in future.
I’m poor too with the eos m 😂
Can you suggest me 4 lenses that would fit perfectly for me ?
I like most people started out on a crop sensor. I only shoot full-frame now the majority of the time. But, it's good to see crop sensor getting love.
well after seeing both top 2019 lenses videos, I am asking myself if I should still buy the tamron 70-200mm (as I planned) or switch to the canon 55-250mm (price difference is not a problem). Any suggestion between the two to help me decide is much appreciated :)
Canon 18-135 IS nano USM???
Really appreciate your list videos. Thank you always Christopher!
I cant believe you mentioned the 60mm Tamron macro. It's one of my favorite lenses and no one talks about it. There are several times where I've thought about selling it but I just can't let it go for how good it is.
It's very nice, but not quite as sharp as these
Chris, we'll love to see Nikon lenses please. Your quality reviews really helped me when I was Canon user.
Hey what was the reason for your switch?
For my APS-C Canons, I mostly carry my own 'holy trinity': 10-18 IS USM, 18-55 IS USM and 55-250 IS USM. Full frame equivalent, gapless, range of 16-400mm without breaking the bank.
Wow, those are my next purchases.
What about the 18-135mm is stm lens?
@@neovo903 yes
@@gwine9087 It's a good lens
My APS-C travel kit is built around an EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 IS USM, an EF-S 55-250 f/4-5.6 IS STM and an EF-S 10-18 f/4.5-5.6 IS STM. The 1990 vintage EF 50 f/1.8 and a Sigma 4.5mm f/2.8 fisheye are also usually in the corners of the old tamrac bag.
Chris put Canon's EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 IS USM at the top of the fast standard zoom competition several years ago, though he did warn that some copies of that lens were reputed to suffer from excessive dust inhalation and/or early Image Stabilization system failure. Though Sigma's more recently introduced 18-35 f/1.8 lens seems to have a generally acknowledged advantage in lens speed and pure sharpness, that Sigma lacks image stabilization. As a slightly wobbly septuagenarian I still prefer the stabilized option, and I haven't noticed any dust or IS problems with my particular copy of the EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 IS USM.
I was surprised the Canon 17-55 f2.8 didn't make the list or even the honorable mention.
The Sigma 18-35 f/1.8 is considerably sharper
I actually commented on the Full Frame 2019 sharpest lenses video, I had no idea you had made an aps-c top 10 as well, excellent work. I have the Sigma 18-35mm F1.8 and it really is an incredible lens. My only grip with it is that it doesn't go to 16mm which is really one of my preferred focal lengths but after watching your review on the Samyang 16mm F2, I went for that and have that covered very nicely so its not a big deal. Two outstanding lenses right there really. The only thing I can really add is that the Sigma 50-100mm is only available in Sigma, Canon and Nikon mounts. There is no Sony version of it that I am aware of (although mirrorless adapters will make it work on e-mount bodies). I'm not picking faults though, really enjoyed your comparison video.
Love your channel as well! I‘m a fuji owner and would love to see more reviews about their lenses... I own the 16mm f1.4, the 56mm f1.2 and the 18-55mm f2.8-4 kit lens...I can just say from a realworld use point of view that I‘m having so much fun with those lenses! Very pleased indeed with the results!
Christopher, Any chance you might be able to get and test some of the Nikon APS-C lenses, in particular the 16-80 f2.8-f4 VR, so we could get a sense for how they compare with the other ones you've tested? I'm considering switching from Canon back to Nikon for its more impressive sensor performance and metering. But i struggle with what sort of lenses to pair up with any of those Nikon DX bodies. Thanks for all your tests, they are extremely helpful! Craig
I am tempted, but unfortunately I just don't have the free time :-(
Sigma 50-100 1.8 unfortunately not available in Pentax K mount, unlike the 18-35 1.8.
This video has just become more relevant to me now that I picked up the R7 and do not like stacking my large RF glass on it. I'll have to check out the 55-250 ef's stm.
Thank you for yet again another great video packed full of information that is very helpful to photographers of all levels. I really appreciate your work
Great review, as always, Christopher. Well done. (Slightly aggrieved not to find the one that I use didn't make it onto the list, of course - Sigma 17-70 f2.8-4 Contemporary. Oh well.)
I am a regular viewer of your wonderful TH-cam channel. I recently bought Samyang 135mm f2 lens based on your glowing review. I will highly appreciate if you could do a comparison video for current 135mm lenses from Sigma Art, Zeiss APO Sonnar and Sony FE 135
Big THANKS for all the reviews and this one! It is hardwork and you do it it great manner.
I hope also to see more lenses from & for Fuji being tested by you. It is simply a matter of trust!
You have yourself a lovely Christmas too Christopher, and thank you for your fine reviews.
Hi Christopher, glad to hear you're reviewing more fuji lenses in the future, can I suggest you try my favourite fuji lens, the bokehlicious XF90 f2, it costs a little more than half of the xf80 2.8 OIS Macro and it may not beat the 80 Macro for sharpness, but it'll be interesting to see how it compares to the Samyang 85 1.8.
Still rocking my Canon 50D. works like a champ. this video is much appreceated
No mention of the Canon 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM. the image quality is very good and is classed as a APS-C L quality lens
It's nowhere near as sharp as these lenses, though
Good lens no doubt from all the reviews I have seen. It was a little over priced for me when I was looking to buy one used so I picked up a 28-105mm USM and have been very happy with the picture quality. It’s not the sharpest lens but there’s nothing wrong with that. Some lenses have a character and the focal range is perfect for my shooting style. I also have the 55-250mm IS STM and get to try it today once my camera arrives via USPS. I had to order a used 50D to tide my cravings for picture taking because my canon 5D classic broke...mirror fell off.
Hi Chris... great list and very concise review as usual. Hipe next year you can review the MITAKON 85mm 1.2
Thanks for all your informative videos this year Christopher- a very merry, peaceful and blessed Christmas to you and yours.
Ah damn you! Why'd ya have to mention the Tamron? I've been saving for a while, passed on one in new shape for $160 due to a lack of funds. Now they'll be going for $300 haha. Seems like the perfect nifty fifty for me.
At least I have one lens on this list, the Rokinon 16mm.
Thanks as always for the Videos, Chris.
Hmm, coming back to this video and I've owned the Tamron for a while haha.
the 22mm ef-m, instead of the 11-22mm, great list! merry christmas!
your reviews are sublime, and the model is stunning.!!
Would you an updated video for 2021 considering you have now reviewed many Fuji lenses?
Great work mate. Love this channel for the no BS straight-to-the-point reviews.
Excellent! Thank you for that quick run through. It gives some serious food for thought what to get next.
Thanks for recommending the Samyang 85 1.8!! It’s become my favorite lens
I think that one or all of the following Sigma lenses might make your next years list: 16mm f/1.4; 30mm f/1.4; and 56m f/1.4!
Hello. I've been watching you for years fondly from Turkey. I think you are the best channel in this field. I just wanted to say a little thank you. we look forward to your nice reviews 😌👌📸
Hi Christopher, do you think you could make a review for the canon ef-m 32mm f1.4? ps: I think the canon ef-m 22mm f2.0 should be included in your list for the aps-c lenses :-) Thanks for your great reviews! I enjoy them a lot!
Are that means my Maro 80mm Fuji lens is out. Expensive but fantastic.
Hi Chris, if you had to choose between using the Canon EF-S 15-85 at 16mm or the Samyang 16mm prime, what would you choose?? Great reviews, looking forward to see what lens you review in 2019,
The Samyang would blow it away, but that's what you'd expect, as the Canon is a zoom lens
Hi Christopher - great work as always. Why don't you test more Fuji lenses?
I am
Christopher, I'd like to thank you for your amazing work reviewing lenses. You're hands down the best lens reviewer on TH-cam!
Watching your videos helped me choose between the options I had and now I've got a handful of fastest and sharpest lenses on the market that turned my camera into a real beast.
Another great video and review - I was disappointed not to see any 18-50 or 18-55 "walkaround" lenses in the list such as the very capable Sigma 18-50 f/2.8 for example.
They'er just not as sharp as these particular lenses, TBH.
fingers crossed for not a cropped video this time!
In a year's time people are going to be mystified by that comment (thankfully) ;-)
@@christopherfrost no, the Internet never forgets!
@@christopherfrost it's only been 3 months and I have no idea what he's talking about.
@@TheJudge064 Originally this video didn't upload properly for some reason and it stopped after two minutes - I had to re-upload hehe
Here I am, over a year later, puzzled by that comment.
Love your reviews. I've got a Fuji system as well as Canon. Would enjoy your thoughts on Fuji's lenses.
What about the Sigma 56mm F1.4? That lens is incredible! Would the new Sony 16-55mm F2.8 make the list but for its price? Thank you for the great reviews, Father Chris./Warren
The Sigma 60mm 2.8 for Sony is probably the sharpest lens I’ve tried on my crop camera.
I would add the Tokina 11-16mm f2.8.
I was really shocked and surprised when I didn't see the Sigma trio (16mm f1.4, 30mmf 1.4 & 56mm f1.4) on your list cause I've seen your reviews of 16mm & 56mm. But then when I went back and checked I saw the reviews were done after the making of this video and then everything was right in the universe again.
Any chance we're going to see a review of the Sigma 40mm F1.4 Art lens soon? There are rumours on the internet that it's the sharpest lens ever made! I would love to see your opinion on it.
Sigma 17-50 is pretty sharp. When it's actually in focus that is. :)
Donald Weldon Tru using it in Live View for better focus.
thanks for that, My two favorite lenses are the 55-250 canon stm and the sigma 17-50. In my opinion both are as sharp as much more expensive lenses.
I just found the 55-250 STM in a pawnshop for $50! I will use it with a Fotodox adapter on my Canon m50, cant wait to put it to use!
HI Christopher....love your reviews... please, review the sony 10-18 for aps-c!!! Cheers!
I actually tried to but the copy of the lens I borrowed was terribly de-centered, so I had to send it back. One day I will review it
Now that I shoot on FF I miss few of the APS-C lenses I owned, like the Tokina 11-16 f/2.8 and the 24mm STM.
I also was quite interested in the 18-35 and 50-100 and I had the chance to test them on a Nikon body, and boy oh boy they are impressive. I really wish Sigma develops something similar for the full frame telephoto environment, the 24-35 f/2 is impressive but not perfect, the range is quite limited and the lack of weather sealing makes me want to go towards the Tamron 24-70 G2
Fuji lenses are all fantastic, but the one that really stands head and shoulders above the rest is the 56mm 1.2. It's the sharpest lens I've ever used, hands down. And I've used a lot of lenses across many camera systems!
Please check it out when you get the chance, Christopher!
I have just bought a new Fuji camera, so reviews will be coming in the new year :-)
That's weird acefibble, I find this lens to be sharper than my 23 f2 and the 16-50 2.8. What body did you use it on?
Great to hear Christopher, I will be watching out for them!
Would love to see you review the Viltrox EF-EOS M2 speedbooster, and you could do a great comparison between M-body and your 6D full frame with EF lenses. I have Canon M5 and always hankered after a full frame camera but EosR is just too expensive, so I got the EF-EOS M2 to try today, initial impressions are the fov is great - almost full frame equivalent, but not had much chance to test, it doesn't auto-retract focus when camera switched off which is annoying with nifty 50mm but my other EF lenses all have internal focus so not so much of an issue, people have complained of infinity focus issue and it apparently drains camera battery even when camera is off.
So, the Sigma 17-50 mm f/2.8 ois didn't make the cut, damn, i have that one and the 55-250 Canon stm.
Ya this lens should be on the list for sure. No question its the best I've tried.. You will see it on most of these kinds of lists.. Best bang for the buck, crazy sharp.
how good is the af speed of the 17-50?
I've not ever had an issue. Hands down you will not be disappointed. Order from eglobalcentral.com. Asian version and no warrenty but comes fast and is very cheap (half price)...@@opfinger
Federico Opfinger speed is good but it is a little noisy, but you get a lot of a lens for 300$, i prefer it over the 50mm f1.8 Canon when it's stopped at f2.8.
Ryan Lawrence i know man! I thought it was going to be #1, I'm sure Christopher missed this one, because in his review it was all nothing but sharp sharp sharp from corner to corner.
What a great job you do. Thank you so much for your hard work. Merry Christmas.
Great video Chris! I'll set aside some budget next year to get my hands on that Samyang 85mm.
Would to see your reviews of Fuji lenses.
Merry Christmas to you too.
Hi, what about the canon 17-55 f2.8
Thank you for this video ! Can't wait to see your future reviews on Fuji's lens as I am looking for a smaller replacement of my big Canon 6D for traveling ^^
Few of my lenses made it to the list and m really glad I own them. 😊
So what happened to Sigma 17-50mm f2.8? I remember you've always valued it highly, I even bought it because of your recommendation (never regretted making that purchase).
I too bought the Sigma 17-50 f2.8 based on Chrisopher's review. I like it a lot.
It's sharp but not sharp enough for *this* list
Christopher, I'm thinking of getting a Canon M50, any thoughts? In that I have a number of Canon lenses I'd like to see you do a review on EF and EFS lenses to the M50 adapters.
The M50 sounds nice to me. I'm not going to re-review lenses on the M50 with an adapter though, I think you might be expecting a little too much of me there! All my EF-M lens reviews are done on a 24mp camera so they will all perform the same on your M50
@@christopherfrost After considering my real need (wants) I decided to purchase the Canon M100, it too has the same 24mp sensor as the M50. Wow, that dual-pixel auto-focus is fantastic. I think Canon has the best menu system. Of course, you are right; and thank you for all you do. You do do a lot. Here's wishing you a prosperous and holy new year.
I own tge 10-18 EF-S and Sigma 18-35mm! I disagree with recommending the 55-250 though. I found it very soft, and returned it. Went with the 70-200 2.8 L 🤗
for aps-c.. i need a sharp telephoto lens for wildlife and birding.. need decent af speed... minimum 300mm on the long end and budget is 700$....what should i go for...
from your videos i have slected tamron 18-400, sigma 100-400,tamron 100-400,canon 70-300 usm ii and tamron 70-300 di vc usd... did i miss any better lens... and what would be best...
I have tamron 70 - 300. Good lense and quite cheap
How about a list of sharpest wide-angle lens on a market? As an amateur landscape(astro) photographer I'd really like to find a perfect fast ultra-wide angle lens of all time.
Have you already tried the Tokina 14-20 f2.0 lense? Seems to be a perfect Astro-zoom lense!
@@christofi8390 Actually, I don't even have a decent camera for astrophotography yet. I'm going to buy Sony A7III for this type of shooting and I just want to hear Cristopher's trustworthy opinion about a perfect fast ultra-wide angle lens on a market from his personal experience.
Hey Chris! Have you ever thought about reviewing something like the Sony 70-200mm F4G, or even the 55-210? Could be very interesting to see how they compare to DSLR (Canon/Nikon) equivalents.
Lens reviews like that are coming this year
Thank you very much for your opinion chris 👍
It would be interesting to compare the Samyang 85mm f 1.8 with the Fuji 90mm f2.
Are you going to do a 10 sharpest APS-C for 2024? Or a best lenses for the R7?
What about high performer APS-C lense from Tokina: 14-20mm f2.0?
I would appreciate a review of it from you! That would be a nice Christmas present!
Also wondering, why Canon EF-S 17-55 2.8 IS USM is not listed?
Never tried the Tokina lens I'm afraid, and the Canon lens is still nice but a bit long-in-the tooth now - the Sigma 18-35 f/1.8 is considerably sharper
I have an old Sony NEX-5R mirrorless camera with the kit 16-50mm lens. Picked up the Sony E50mm F1.8 OSS in the Black Friday sales last week and delighted to see it mentioned here in the Top 10. I'd like to add 1 more lens to my bag...so I have the 16-50, a brand new Prime 50mm and seeking 1 more recommendation...can anyone suggest anything?
In my personal experience. The sigma art 18-35 and the sigma art 50-100 are great lenses. I do have the Canon 10-18mm that I used to shoot on my M50 and my 80d crop sensor cameras. I've always got good results with the first 2 lenses but the Canon 10-2-18 mm I got a lot and I mean a lot of chromatic aberration. I even use that lens on my Canon EOS R and still have the same issues
Nice review as usual. I thought that Canon EF-M 32mm f/1.4 would be in the list. Anyway, thanks for the review. God bless!
So are the Samyang 85mm not as sharp for the canon eos cameras such as the 80d? And what does the umc stand for
Great video btw!
That Samyang lens is for mirrorless cameras only
I bot 24mm f/2.8 stm a great ef-s canon lens for my aps-c. Is it 24mm on aps-c or 38.4mm, I am confused. Coz it is designed for aps-c so it should not get multiplied by 1.6x .
If you own a Canon APS-C camera then you always, always, always, always multiply by 1.6x, no matter what lens it is, always. So, yes, it is 38.4mm
@@christopherfrost Thanks. You are great
I have just bought the canon 17-55 for my canon M50 (will be using with canon adapter) and receiving in 2 days but now wondering if that is the best for videos? I mainly do videos (cooking). Any help would be much appreciated.
I honestly love all of your reviews. Would it be possible to review some Nikon lenses?
Time is the problem I'm afraid (I don't have any)
I wonder what is going on with the EF-S 55-250mm STM lens. DXO mark didnt particularly think it was great with a score of 13, saying "No improvement over predecessor".
I am interested in cannon 70-200 mm F/4.0 USM II for my APSC body (77D). Using it on APSC body will convert it into 112-320 mm F/6.4. Can you suggest any other lens apart from sigma 50-100mm F/1.8 that provides similar result. I intent to use mainly for photography. Thanks 😊
Thanks for the videos! Have a great Christmas to you too and God bless!
Chris, i do video work for my daily research project. i have wide angle and potrait lenses. now im looking for standart prime/not-prime lens. Which one do you think i should take regarding image quality and low-light performance, they are : Sigma 35mm f1.4 art, Samyang 35mm t1.5, Sigma 18-35mm f1.8 or Sigma 30mm f1.4? i shoot with apsc sensor, that’s why i need 35mm as a standart lens. Sharpness in the widest open is important since i work often at night videography.
It depends what camera you're using. If it's a Canon digital SLR then the 35mm f/2 IS USM is the one you want. If it's a mirrorless camera then the Sigma 30mm f/1.4 is a good option
Christopher, thank you very much for this and all the other great videos. Are the focal lengths and apertures already correct for APS-C sensors or would we still need to apply the crop factor to get the full frame equivalent?
You still need to apply the crop factor, always :-)
A really useful list thanks... It would be useful to get a sense of how EOS m lenses compare to the efs equivalents eg 11 to 22 vs 10 to 18, 55 to 250 vs 50 to 250
Not a single nikon lens. Interesting. I thought viltrox will make an entry here.
I love sony & fuji lenses option. Also they offer IS & constant aperture for UWA zoom lenses & even some prime.