$600-$2,000: 10 Wildlife Photography Lenses Reviewed!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 มิ.ย. 2021
- Get the best prices with a warranty at SDP.io/BUY + 5% coupon TNC
Download sample pictures at: sdp.io/wlsamples
Get our photography books & videos at northrup.photo
Professional wildlife photographers Tony & Chelsea Northrup review EVERY wildlife lens under $2,000 for Canon, Sony, and Nikon cameras. Then, they ranked them from worst to best. The rankings are:
10. Sigma 150-600 Sport ($1,850)
Pros: Durable AF
Cons: Big AND expensive, slow AF, less sharp than it’s cheaper Contemporary cousin
9. Tamron 150-600 G1 ($600)
The least expensive lens is also the worst ranked… but if this is all that fits your budget, it’s still a good place to start, and when you’re ready to upgrade you’ll be able to trade it in at KEH.
Pros: Versatile, Inexpensive, Capable of producing great wildlife images… if you can get VERY CLOSE
Cons: SLOW AF. SO VERY SLOW. Really soft at 600mm. Our tests have shown it's outperformed by the Canon 400 f5.6 or Nikon 200-500
TIPS:
Use the focus limiter
Shut the aperture down to f/8 if you can
8. Canon 600 f/11 ($700)
Pros: Lightweight, Decent close-focusing, Sharp when you can fill the frame, Great stabilization, Decent AF speed (8 of 10)
Cons:
Only works with RF cameras, and we found AF to be frustrating with the R and RP. Thus, we can only recommend using it on the R5 and R6.
Not nearly as sharp as the 800mm f/11, considering cropping
Only work with their mirrorless R cameras, and the only R cameras we can recommend for wildlife are the expensive R6 ($2,500) and R5 ($3,900).
f/11 gives you less background blur/subject separation
Lets in less light leading to noise in low light or high shutter speed situations
7. Canon 400mm f5.6 ($850-$100 used)
Pros: Light, Well-built, 400mm makes finding subjects easier, adds versatility
Reason it’s in the test: it’s sharper than these other popular wildlife lenses, even cropped to 600 or 800mm
Cons: Not stabilized, so you always have to keep your shutter speed at 1/500 or shorter (unless you’re on an R5 or R6). Slow AF. Doesn’t focus very close. Discontinued… but KEH!
Above this point, it gets REALLY close. There are NO losers
6. Tamron 150-600 G2 ($1000-$1200)
Pros:
DRASTICALLY improved sharpness over the G1
Handling?
Light weight
BEST magnification up close (some breathing)
Cons:
Slow AF compared to native lenses
AF lagged a bit on fast-moving subjects, so birds flying at me at close range were basically always a little out of focus
Not unsharp, but kinda hazy
Truly awful chromatic aberration when shooting flying birds
Above this point, EVERYTHING IS RECOMMENDED.
5. Tamron 150-500 ($1400)
If you’re a Sony photographer who plans to travel or hike with the lens, or you don’t want to drop an extra $500 on the Sony 200-600, this is the lens for you.
Pros: GREAT AF… but it depends on your body. We only recommend the a1 for wildlife now, primarily because of EVF lag in other bodies. LIGHT. Easily handholdable.
Cons:
When you crop to 800mm, the equivalent aperture is f/11… compared to f/8.4 of the Tamron G2 and Sony 200-600
Pretty bad chromatic aberration in subjects with the sky behind them
Focus not as reliable as the Sony 200-600, especially with flying birds near the camera, the focus lagged behind the bird a bit, so the tail would be in focus instead of the head.
Recommended for:
Sony photographers traveling light or who don’t want to spend $2k on the 200-600
4. Sigma 150-600 Contemporary ($900)
Pros: Great price, Great sharpness at 600mm, Good magnification / close focusing. Real-world, VERY sharp shots at close range. Better pictures than the Tamron zooms and it’s big brother. Lock can stop the lens at 150 or 600
Cons: Slow AF compared to native lenses, Not great for flying birds (missed focus A LOT), Chromatic aberration for birds against a clear blue sky was pretty bad (not the worst)
Lots of “bad copies” out there (quality control isn’t as consistent as name-brand lenses)
Recommended for:
Canon DSLR photographers
Nikon DSLR photographers on a tight budget
3. Canon 800mm f/11 ($900 new)
Pros:
Sharpest lens in the test
Good AF
Amazing stabilization (how slow?)
Shockingly small and light
Cons:
TERRIBLE minimum focusing distance
Even cropped to 800mm, it’s a full stop slower than the zooms
Only the R5 and R6 have AF systems and viewfinders we really recommend… but if you have an R5, this lens is a no-brainer. Just carry it with you just in case.
2. Sony 200-600 ($2,000 new)
Pros:
Fast AF
SHARP
Internal zooming
Cons:
Most expensive
VERY heavy
Poor magnification up close
TERRIBLE focus breathing… 325mm at close range!
Tips:
Don’t bother with a TC
DO attach extension tubes if you want to fill the frame with small animals
Sony photographers with a budget under $10k
1. Nikon 200-500 ($1,400 new, $1,200 used)
Pros:
Fast AF
Great close-focusing (puts it ahead of the Sony)
Cons:
A couple hundred more than the Tamron and Sigma
What lenses and bodies do you want us to test in part 2?
Take your price point up high enough to include the Nikkor 500 PF and Canon 100-500 lenses. I think that my RF 100-500 is way sharper than my RF 800 but I'm waiting for the R7 to use it for small birds. Also, I'd like to see more about the R6 on your channel (not for wildlife where 20mp on full-frame is a little weak), I believe it has the flagship level autofocus for mid-level body pricing.
Since it has such a high megapixel density, the Canon 90D with a big prime would be interesting VS the R5 or the A1. Canon 90D with the Sigma Contemporary vs R5 would be interesting too. Thanks for the great content!!
Canon RF 100-500
What about some lighter lenses like the 100-400 tamron or something in yhat range (backpacking wildlife lens for longer haules than a day). Personally, i want Nikon mount suggestions.
Fujinon 100-400
At 7.50 talking about Sigma but showing the Tamron. Like me I think Tony secretly loves the Tamron G2
Yeah, I noticed it too, and did a double take.
i noticed that too.
Also catched that and had to look in the comments. I'm a tamron 150-600 G2 owner so reacted with familiarity, if I hadn't own it I would have missed it.
I'm not familiar with the lens but the hugely branded TAMRON down the side was a giveaway!
I noticed that too and did a double take. I thought I zoned out and he had moved onto another lens.
As a person who just recently bought a Nikkor 200-500 f/5.6, I am very happy about this video and my purchase!
Same here... whew.....
And for a person who is thinking about getting one 200-500 f/5.6, that's the answer!
Just got that lens two days ago for my D850. Had the Tamron 150-600 G1 and Sigma 50-500 before that. Nikon 200-500 is a big step so far!
I got it but I had a bad copy I think, trying to return !
I was lucky to have a good copy direct from Nikon Holland ...
You 2 are awesome! You've taught me a lot as I'm trying to find a camera and gear for landscape photography. Plus you both are light-hearted and have a sense of humor making your videos easy to watch
Thanks for yet another fantastic video, Tony and Chelsea! I loved the premise around this test, and thank you for revisiting these camera and lens combinations over a couple of weeks, which I know cannot have been the easiest thing to do.
You're welcome! And yes this was HARD lol
A couple of "pros" you ought to mention about the Nikon 200-500mm zoom:
1) SUPERB image stabilization (vibration reduction)
2) The fastest lens in the test at 500mm: f/5.6. In addition, it is the only constant-aperture zoom in its class.
3) It natively fits only Nikon DSLRs, but with the Nikon FTZ adapter can be used on Nikon Z-series mirrorless cameras as well.
Dear Chelsea and Tony, I'm extremely grateful for all of the hard work you've poured into this video, all of the lens and body specs, charting an easy to follow guide for us. You are both incredibly invaluable.
I'm so in love with your Stunning Digital Photography book. I'm especially grateful for the methods you both teach with.
Big big fan of Northrup Photography!
Thank you!!
Thank you Tony and Chelsea for the review! It was what I needed! I am a Canon 90D owner and have been looking very closely at the Sigma 150-600mm contemporary lens as a goto for bird photography! It is great to see that you give high praise for that combo!! This makes my decision much easier!! A Huge thank you!
I have been away from the YT photography scene for a while, so this was probably my second video in several months. But this video reminds me of why I like your channel so much! Very good work, and I especially like how you finish up with both explaining your methodology while also acknowledging that other testers very well might come to a different conclusion.
Good to see the Sigma 150-600 contemporary feature at #4. A solid choice for enthusiasts working they way into wildlife and sports. I think Tony wasn’t too keen on it when it came out, but I’ve had good results with it, especially with the excellent eye tracking on the R6. Why is Tony handling a Tamron lens at 7:50 though?
The best lens review video I've seen in a long time. Kudos! Actually makes me want to get into wildlife photography. If only buying the gear was enough, eh?
Totally appreciate you two; your efforts, presentations and, "straight shooting", keep me coming back. Thanks for another useful video. I like the added explanations too.
This test is amazing, and the time it must have taken for you to complete it is so much appreciated. Thanks and stay safe. Ian (UK)
Congratulations on a great video... These are the videos I love to see & hear your comments... I have a D500 & always wanted a good wildlife lens like Nikon 200-500mm...thanks for your help...cheers ..from Australia..
Great review/ranking, but I was a little surprised that the Sigma 60-600mm Sport did not make it onto the list. I had paired it with the Canon 7D Mark II and later with the Canon R5 with great results. I have since added an RF100-500mm Canon with both Canon RF teleconverters and the results of the Sigma 60-600 versus Canon RF100-500 are almost interchangeable. Lately, I have focused primarily on the Canon glass because of the size and weight benefit and have been extremely happy with the TC 1.4/Canon RF100-500 combination and less so with the 2x TC. Auto Focusing can be problematic with the 2x on the RF100-500 and sharpness is a little softer than the TC 1.4 and the Canon RF100-500. Thanks for all of your great work on such things. I always enjoy both of your inputs.
Absolutely a fantastic video. Appreciate the hard work that went behind making this content. It helps a lot. ❤️
As I hope others do, I really appreciate all of your content. Ive learned so much from you guys in the 2 years. THANK YOU
I enjoyed this video a lot. Solid recommendations. I have 2 systems that I use for wildlife. A Canon R6 with the Sigma 150-600 contemporary and a Panasonic G9 with the PL Leica 100-400 lens. I got the RF f11 600mm with the R6 package but I wasn’t thrilled with the 600. I ended up selling it for enough to buy the Sigma plus the 1.4 extender. I will probably still buy the 800mm f11 at some point. I couldn’t find one in stock anywhere when I bought the camera. Meanwhile the adapted Sigma works well. I think my dream setup might be the R5 with the RF 100-500 lens shooting in crop mode. Not as light as my M43 setup but reasonable. My photos typically go on social media so I don’t need huge megapixels as much as I need lots of reach. The 500mm on the R5 is 800mm equivalent in crop mode at around 18 megapixels I believe. And I don’t have to store lots of really large files. I know storage is cheap but I keep way too many photos.
Tony & Chelsea, thank you for a great overview of wildlife lenses. Thank you for making photography accessible to all levels of consumers.
I've been using the sigma 150-600mm contemporary for just over a year and absolutely love it . It does struggle at times in low light but that's easily compensated for . Great video thank you 😊
This was a very informative video and I’m happy that you made specific recommendations about equipment. Keep up the good work!
Thank you for all the time you put into this. I know this lens is outside the price range you selected, but the Canon 100 500 seems like and important lens to Canon at this point.
Any thoughts on why the camera manufactures don't try to fill the gap between the $2000 and $13000 lenses with something like Nikons 500PF. This is a great lens and I would love to see a 600 version.
For future:
Nikons Z6ii, 7ii with the 500pf
Canon R5 with the 100-500
Sony A7R4 with the 200-600
Sony A9ii with the 200-600
Lots of nice work here. I would love to have seen my overpriced RF 100-500 ranked but its high price kept it from being considered, I understand. I love my RF 800 f/11 but I feel like my 200-500 Nikon is sharper. Fine feather detail tells the tale. This is a really great video, thank you for all the hard work. I will say thanks to KEH for sponsoring but I believe "used photo pro", pays more for used gear. Also, the 200-500 is great on a Z50! Not just D500 and D7xxx. Thanks again, really enjoyed this.
I typed in "full frame" into the search box and nothing happened. An amateur site that needs a lot of work to even be useful. I have bought many things from KEH and I trust them. Whereas "used photo pro" does not impress me at all.
@@danncorbit3623 Understood, still, next time you sell some gear, I'd highly recommend getting an estimate from them before you accept an offer from KEH.
I was stunned by the success rate of my Z50 ,a downgrade from the Z6 that proved to be an upgrade
You are on point! Excellent work, even found that you confirmed a pairing that I’ve suspected to be very good. Concise, smart and professional you folks are top shelf!!
Great review! The short video just doesn’t show and viewers can’t appreciate how much work goes into such a huge group test. Thank you.
I have the Sigma Contemporary 150-600mm ...think I'm gonna keep it for awhile, I use it practically every single day for work
Interesting mix. I love using my z50 with the Nikon 200-500. Very, very impressed with the sharpness, speed and overall balance. Even breaking the reciprocal rule handheld 125th at 500mm. I prefer it over my Z6 combination, yet to find out why. There's something about the z50 that makes the image pop and puts a grin on my face
@@planetfun85I was watching another TH-cam channel the other day and it clicked. Greater pixel density.....
are you using a converter? the z50 is a mirrorless z mount camera while the nikkor 200-500 is a dx format lens.
@@thesilenttraveller7 The 200-500 f5.6 is for f mount full frame. I just use the ftz adapter and naturally get the x1.5 crop factor from the z50
Hi Tony and Chelsea , I've been watching your reviews for many years now. love you both for bringing a lot of informed comparisons. This is an eye-opener video that I watched many times.
You two help me so much, I appreciate all the hard work you do for us.
Great review will direct my newbies to this review for wildlife lens awesome work
Hope your 600 comes soon Tony amazing combo with the A1
Please include Nikon 300 mm PF F4 lens on this list. That lens used comes around $1700 and with TC1.4 it becomes 420 mm. Its amazing as well
Thank you for this video was amazing, also thank you for taking the time to add in the educational information on Focus breathing.
Great video. Thank you for the hard work it took to do this.
I use the 100-400 GM (past the $2,000 price point) with the A1 but my wildlife photography is more on the smaller insect side of things - the MFD of the 100-400 is great to have. Would love to see Sony release a mirrorless version of the Minolta 200 f/4 macro.
Thumbnail: what Chelsea and Tony keep in their glovebox.
please mention the brand of the car, it helps for their tax write off.
Thanks for your review!. I was wandering (also because I've noticed this more), why isn't the Sigma 60-600 taken into account?
Thank you Tony & Chelsea, we don't see everything that goes into your videos but I really appreciate the end results, great reviews.
Thanks for video! I've been on the fence about the RF 800mm for my R6, thanks to you, I pulled the trigger.
Would have appreciated hearing about lenses that can be adapted to micro four thirds. When I have to replace my Olympus, I'll replace it with a used Sony or Canon, so adapting sony or canon mount lenses is my priority for any new lens purchases.
Thanks for the great video. It was really interesting to watch.
One info i'd like to add : the Sigma 150-600 works very badly with any R-system camera, the AF is very inconsistent and inaccurate (even on static subjects), that's why i switched to the RF 100-500.
This seems to be a firmware issue (Sigma has a quite hidden statement with no detail on their site) which gets worse with cameras with IBIS (it performs worse on my R5 than on the RP i had previously)
would it work well with a fuji?
@@joefratt i don't know. It really depends if the camera system has been opened to third party manufacturers or not.
As I could see, they don't make the lens for the x mount so you'd have to use a third party adapter which is really a hit or miss thing as it would be depending on the adapter but I'd expect it to work really poorly.
If i were you, I'd spend a bit more and go for the original Fuji lens
Excellent job! Respect for the many hours of hard work and patience Chelsea and Tony! Alex - Brussels, Belgium
Thanks for all that work! It’s an impossible task for the average amateur to do that kind of review and comparison, massively appreciated! 🤙
Yay! My lens won. I use it with my Nikon D850, love it!
I use the D500 and the 200-500mm Nikon lens and kept my D7200 to use for macro
@Photo Bunny same me. 200-500 close focus is amazing.
@Photo Bunny I would like to try that lens
Been thinking about trading my AF-S NIKKOR 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR for the 200-500. Have seen several good reviews of the 200-500mm. D500 body. Both used and excellent condition from MPB. Similar to KEH: may have to try KEH with the coupon.
@@rzentz9690 Don't trade - just pick up the 200-500 and keep them both. I shoot both lenses on a D500 and wouldn't give up either one. The 200-500 is terrific for reaching out at distant subjects, while the 80-400 is terrific at everything else. Something about the image quality of the 80-400 that I can't explain, other than aesthetically really pleasing. I'm surprised you haven't noticed. Plus it focuses down to under 6 ft. On the D500 that's 600mm at 6 ft away - it's a butterfly master lens.
I love the 200-500, but it's long and heavy and only focuses to 20 ft. and won't fit in a shoulder bag - of course that's true for most telephotos, but not the 80-400 which has none of these problems (I've replaced that long deep lens hood with a 3rd party smaller hood and it carries nicely in my bag while mounted on camera).
anyway, nuff said . . .
Thank you so much for the video!!
I got the Sigma contemporary and I'm very happy with her.
I just hope you can do a video of how to bring the best form her.
Great review!! I've got the Sigma Contemporary and my girlfriend is getting the Nikon (we're both Nikon shooters) so they are our best optios.
Tony, you and Chelsea always give solid, sound advice.
Thanks for another terrific video.
Loved this one! Thank you so much.
I especially liked the quick and informative explanation to focus breathing!
Great work as always.
I used the Nikon 200-500 for several years on crop sensors before switching to the Sony 200-600 on the A7R3. The Nikon’s image stabilization was far better, allowing me to use shutter speeds far lower than what are useful on the Sony.
For wildlife this is of limited use, as you'll generally be freezing action regardless.
@@mattmangan1528 depends on the type of wildlife you’re shooting. Not everything flits around like a hummingbird or a squirrel on crack😃😃😃
I love the RF 800mm on my R body for capturing the Moon, then switching to the R6 for max handheld stabilization for animals at distance, even in lowish light. Great informative video guys.
nice updated lens comparison, thanks a lot for the hard work!
I would be interesting to have some comparison with popular m4/3 lenses on the field : panasonic 100-400mm, olympus 100-400, olympus 300mm f4, olympus 150-400 f4.5. I'm not a fan of m4/3 but a lot of users think that wildlife photography is one of the best use of m4/3 format. We need a real life comparison.
The Oly 100-400 should have been here, I think. The Panny, maybe not. And the Oly 150-400/4.5 is $7,500, so way out of this price range, tho selling out faster than they can make 'em.
Tony would just trash the format and lenses tested. Not worth it, trust me.
Was really hoping the Canon 100-400mm mkii made the cut. I love that lens
I’m guessing they count it as out of scope due to the retail price. It’s cheaper if you shop around though. It’s probably the best lens of them all.
Me too. I use it for hiking, and it's really versatile allowing whatever wildlife I didn't scare away :-) , flowers using the macro, and the 100mm is wide enough for some landscape shots.
Yes, I had the Canon 90D + EF 100-400 w/ 1.4x III which was an amazing combination
IG: denver.mike
Thank you both for your valuable suggestions
Really appreciate the efforts on testing so many lenses, as a photographer myself I know first hand it's tedious work. As a Sony "R" series shooter, it's almost like buying a camera body but Sony bundled it with an "internal" tele-converter, the crop-ability is great for wildlife photography. Great video 👍.
First off thanks for the informative review, deciding on gear is difficult task and it great to see comparisons between body types and lenses that will be used with them.
I have full frame , crop and M43 and tbh at the end of the day the M43 does fantastically well and holds up to the other formats in blue hour and daylight. Its about getting the story and it does just fine at that with images that are more than sharp enough. I would contend that because of the format size it can generally, not always of course, offer greater image quality as a whole with better hit rates of keepers because frankly the stabilization is better and your ability to move is less encumbered, you can also change lenses faster should the animal get closer to you, more on that in a moment.
M43 for wildlife photography its light weight and easy to travel with. Lenses that are heavy and take up volumes of space are lenses that generally left at home. They dont travel well on planes and push you towards weight limits when your travelling to places like Africa. Last time in Africa I used a D500 and 80-400 lens (the latest model) and it was great combo, well until the elephants were not so thrilled at the machine gun sound of the d500. After the obligatory safari’s the D500 and the one two other lenses I brought was put away and not used again because of size and weight. A smaller apsc crop sensor cam was used.
Wildlife photography defined in the this comparison of small and medium sized birds and a chipmunk is much more than the this, we can all agree upon this. Larger animal photography can benefit from these lenses when your further away, but when they get closer the 200 mm is just not usable as they are just too close. Ranges such as 80-400 100-400 are very versatile for a wider range of wildlife beyond birds and tiny animals. I think the sony lens having the focus breathing is actually a benefit because you can back off, but it doesn’t t back off enough I would want to see even more. When your 20 feet in front of rhino your going to be switching lenses. This video really clarifies the comparison of lenses on the specific use case of wildlife birding.
Large bulky voluminous lenses and lenses with significant weight are carried by people for small distances, perhaps a few hundred meters at best but your defiantly not hiking with these things into the mountains or for more than a mile or so. Most people in even without a camera will walk only a mile into the back country anyway. Ok some will but I will contend the number is really small. This is a real practical limitation to long zooms which is why you always see them for sale used. The ads read Got this lens used a few times, needs to find a new home, like new ……
Ok now onto the last point and lets talk about f-stops. Tony is well known for not using m43 based on equivalency of Fstop, there are many videos produced over the years that discuss this “deficit”, however in this video comparison there is no problem with slow lenses such as the F11’s or even 6.3’s why? We get a glossed over its a great lens in daylight ….. but the truth is the lack of larger apertures when blue hour shows up causes one to up the ISO up leading to the “dreaded” noise and leads to the decline of dynamic range and color fidelity.
Moreover, Full frame cameras dont have have the image stabilization ability of say M43. Now your going to have to take a full on tripod which is of course more weight and diminishes your mobility. The slow lenses offer very limited use case, which despite there good image quality makes it less practical lens to purchase. M43 6.3 is nearly the same DOF as the F11, a lumix 100-300 5.6 is so much smaller offers essentially equivalent DOF as the much larger Canon F11. I just think of the practicalities in my use case of hiking, travel, editorial and documentary work. I be surprised to see see the Canon F11 was indeed significantly better than say 100-300 lumix version 2, on a modern m43 sensor I bet its not.
Listen this is very well done video, I and so many other appreciate the effort here. Long zooms have place in peoples kit and they are tailored for specific use cases. What I look for is the combination of versatility, size, and weight. Every camera and lens decision carries compromises, if I know that the car is taking the lens and I’m not walking any significant distances than sure bring these FF telephotos along; Conversely if I am going be traveling, hiking and carrying I’m going as light as possible and knowing in advance what type of shot I’m going for. Thanks for the video, well done and very needed in the community
Thank you so much for all of the effort you put into this! Great stuff!!!
Great informative video. As always you guys do a great job. Thanks so much.
at 7:50 while talking about the Sigma Contemporary lens you actually show a Tamron lens 😁😁
Yes I saw that too.
The Sigma Contemporary also comes with a collar, just like the Sport. For some reason they didn't show that.
I was wondering the same thing. Rewound it a few times just to make sure I wasn't missing something. Should I keep my Tamron or get a Sigma?
I saw that too!
haha I am specifically looking to see if others noticed that lol.
Excellent video and bears out my experience with those lenses I have used myself. Nikon 200-500 a worthy winner
Tony & Chelsea - thank you for all the hard work. This was an amazing video. (this is coming from a person who enjoy educational content more than gear reviews) :) :)
Thank you, great review Tony and Chelsea! I love my Nikon D7200 & 200-500 mm combi, which I acquired for about $1200 in total. Perfect for wildlife and sports photography, using a HQ VR and constant diagfragm of 5.6.
Nice one, although I still cant imagine an f11 lens for wildlife photography, but I've not tried it. I'm pretty excited for the upcoming Nikon Z 100-400 & 200-600. If the F 200-500 topped your list, the Z versions should be impressive indeed. We just need a D500 equivalent to go with them.
So there will be a Nikon Z 200-600? Do you know when it will be released?
@@ricardocruz4235 think Tokyo Olympics. That would be the perfect time to release them. Now whether or not they will be in stock is a whole different kettle of fish.
If Nikon plans to get equipment into peoples hands before the Olympics, they need to do something soooooooooon! July 23 start date. Waiting anxiously!
@@tc6912 What I heard is the Z9 will be 'tested' by a select few at the Olympics and released later this year. Maybe some of the lenses will be released though, hopefully.
Maybe include the M43 lenses in your part 2?
Hi Chelsea and Tony,
Recently, I used the Sigma 150-600 C on the Canon R6 and got some amazing Blue Herons in flight photos hand held. The Eye-AF on the R6 got me so many sharp photos. I am so glad that I got this lens instead of the expensive brother. I am also glad to have switched from 5D Mark3 to Canon R6 for my photography needs.
Loved watching this video to find out I already own the best lens on this list! Fantastic Nikkor 200-500 Is even great on the z6 I picked up for video. Works awesome on a d500 cropped also instead of using a teleconverter.
So brave of you guys posing with all those lenses. I'd be too nervous to do that 😅
They're in a VERY decent part of town, with Very decent people, in a Very decent part of the country...
Confused, #4 sigma 150-600 at 7:51 in video picture of Tamron 150-600
(*WARNING!*) You're risking destroying your Nikon D850, it's missing the bottom rubber piece that covers the electrical contacts for the vertical grip. I know a few people have completely fried their Nikon camera's from dirt, debris and or water getting into those electrical contacts. Just either buy a new replacement rubber part or put the grip back on. If you sit that D850 down and moisture gets in there...you are screwed. Or at least your D850 will be!
No one gives a fcuk about Nikon
@@vikasswaminathan742 yeah, that's being constructive.
@@BrianJohnson-bq9tr Everyone hates nikon lol, btw wht do u shoot with?
NO ONE CARES ABOUT vikass swaminacesspool . . .
@@vikasswaminathan742 you're the special needs kid
Always top preparation and justifications from you guys, no arguments at all.
I'll just drop in my recent secondhand mint Canon 5Ds with existing 400 f5.6 - total cost $1,700 - the body is effectively a medium format for other things so versatile, reassuring to see you still keep the lens in the frame also.
Thank you for the always honest, helpful and consistently neutral advice and results! It's also refreshing to see a TH-cam channel as sucessful as yours maintain a low key non-confrontational vibe.
Would be great to see you two and Steve Perry get together for a few joint works.
Thanks for the hard work you put into your videos!!
The FE 200-600 G OSS doesn't have focus breathing. It's angle-of-view is constant with focus changes.
Agree. Just tested, the focus breathing is not noticeable. The claim in this video is totally misleading.
What about the new Sigma 60-600mm Sports lens ? Should make it's way easily into the top 5.
Yeah, I've been considering getting it and was hoping it would be compared when I started the video.
Picked up the Nikon D500 2 months ago and even though it is older I love this camera paired with my Tamron 18-250 f/3.5-f/6.3. Thank you for the other recommended lenses and all of your other great videos.
Thank you for the video great comparison nice to see how the various brands compared to each other
For another $600 go get the RF 100-500. Best bang for the buck. IMO
That one's next on my to-buy list.
It’s a very good lens. But it does not have the highest performance per dollar ratio of all these lenses.
@Photo Bunny This lens stays on my RP 90% of the time. It works for the types of shots I take. An EF 24-70 round out a 2 lens kit.
At what distance does the Sony 200-600 actually start giving your a full 600mm?
I wanted to know also
I also use the 1.4x convertor and am curious how that also effects the lens breathing.
I'm a Canon shooter but I have to say I agree with #1..... I've seen that lens in action and images, it's just an amazing lens.
Tony, Chelsea: Thanks for another great video, I own the Sigma 150-600 Contemporary and have gotten great results for an amateur wildlife photographer.
Wow! This is the first time I've seen anyone rank the Sigma 150-600 Sports lens lower than the Contemporary!
Apparently the Contemporary is sharper at most lengths, while the Sport is sharper at 600mm where you'll mostly be using it anyway. I'm not sure how much time they spent comparing them but it seems misleading.
I think you’re forgetting that sharpness at 600mm is not the only ranking criteria?
the quality of photos when compared side by side are either identical or the contemporary is better.
B roll at 7:49 shows the wrong lens...
I have the Tamron 150-600mm G1 (Minolta-A mount). Using it on a Sony A7II through LA-EA3 adaptor. Focusing is slow… Good advice to use the range limiter. Good for slow moving wildlife, or it moves from side to side. Also pretty good for aviation/airshow photography: planes are usually far enough that AF won’t hunt too much to find them near infinity. One last word: Tony’s advice to use it at f8 is key. This aperture setting is the sweet spot for this lens.
Wow! This is dedication. Thanks for the great video! That said, I would really like a review from you two of the Canon 90D for wild life. It is a really capable DSLR. Thanks again!
No love for the Sigma 60-600 Sport? :) It is at the top end of the budget you put out there
I'm guessing the IQ and the high weight disqualified it
@@666Tomato666 It weighs slightly less than the 150-600 sport that was on the list, and I would really argue that the IQ would have disappointed. I had the Sigma 150-600 C (on the list) prior to upgrading and the IQ is a well above what that lens could produce. It is just one of those lenses that gets missed in a lot of these wrap ups and I'm not sure why as the extra 40mm on the wide side really makes a difference, and the step up in OS is noticeable as well
Tony & Chelsea Northrp: An almost twenty minute video and you never address the key question, how did you get a Tony Northrup funk pop? Is it custom, a modification, or just one that happens to look a lot like you?
I thought i remember see somewhere that you can have a custom one made for you or you can do it yourself..
That was one of the most detailed and well-organized reviews of a large number of superzoom lenses that I have seen anywhere. Good job and thanks!
You're welcome!
Uhh NO, the Canon 800mm f/11 IS is NOT anywhere near the same image quality as the $12,399 Nikon 600mm f/4E VR FL. Your own side by example was glaringly evident, I could see an enormous difference in image quality, especially the contrast, which is much better on the Nikon. I'm not sure why you would mislead people, I'm sure the Canon 800mm f/11 is not a bad lens, but no it can't nor should it be compared with the Nikon 600mmm f/4 FL.
Have you shot then side by side? We do several times every week. Trust me, I'm the guy carrying the 13lbs of Nikon gear having my shots turn out almost identical to Chelsea's. The sample shots were taken with different cameras and Lightroom tends to wreck R5 raws, which might explain the exposure and contrast difference (though the Nikon definitely has better contrast).
Anyway don't underestimate that Lil Canon.
7:48 wrong footage, talking about the sigma and showing a tampon
tampon? lmao
🤣
:) :)
Great video, Tony and Chelsea! Ever thought of reviewing Carl Zeiss manual focus lenses? I love my Zeiss Distagon T* f2 25mm.
Great vid with great combo info at the end. 5 stars for a gear review. Nice work. I would of never thought of using extension tubes with a long telephoto lens. The 70-200 for close ups sure , but 400-600. Makes sense though.
Those lenses cost more than my car.
I bought a Tair 3 300mmm f3.5 for £30 . I also use Sigma DL 70-300 £40. The Eos version doesn't work on my 20D but the NK version on cheap adapter on 20D does.. Old but they do the job...
Nice video. Thanks for the comparisons and the explanations.
Glad I watched this. Been debating between the sigma contemporary versus sigma sport for my Rebel T5. But. I've been contemplating upgrading to a better Canon with better pixel and resolution, plus faster shooting capabilities. Helpful info at the end in regards to my upgrades.
Tony and Chelsea-- thanks, as always, for the great video. I find your videos to be insightful, informative, and often highly entertaining. I appreciate the time, effort, and thought that goes into each one (even though I seldom understand all of Tony's tech speak videos- LOL) I look forward to each video-- thank you for sharing your knowledge so freely ( in spite of the trolls). Thanks too, for the KEH codes-- I have scored some better glass, at an even better price thanks to you two. :)
Great review that’ll be thoroughly appreciated by many I’m sure, well worth the effort! 💪😁
Thank you for taking the time to put this video together.
Thanks Chelsea and Tony great video. I would have to include the R5 and the 100-500 Fantastic combo.
Interesting video...I appreciate the time and effort that goes into making a video like this thank you.
Glad to hear the good things about the Sigma 150-600 C; I just bought it along with a Nikon D500 and the learning curve is steeper than my previous setup of Nikon D90 with the Sigman 18-300mm. The D500 is like a Porche over the D90 Beetle, and I've made some good images with the D90.
This is the best review thus far! What an informative and thoughtful ranking of lenses. Thank you for doing the legwork. A+++
Do you like animals? Follow us 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
I bought the Sigma 150-600 C last year and it works well paired with both my Canon RP and M50. With adapters, of course. The autofocus is meh on those cameras, but I've enjoyed learning how to get around that. It's an amazing lens for the $$$
I like that the tamron g2 has a lock on the zoom ring that allows you to lock the focal length at any distance. this was one of the primary reasons that i bought it upgrading from the old sigma 150-500
Great video, thanks for all the amazing work 😊 I have the Canon R6 and the Sigma 150-600mm c. I love that combo, it's so good I might end up getting the rf 800mm lens for canon, as its a bit lighter and a small bit sharper. I use the Sigma almost entirely at f8 so f11 isn't much worse 😊
Thanks so much for this lineup. it's a huge effort and I really appreciate it! 🏆
I'd love to see a comparison of absolute beginner telephoto lenses (75-300, 55-250, etc) to any of these more advanced-enthusiast lenses to illustrate what folks can expect for the investment. I see so much hate for the 75-300 but it has a ton of value in getting folks out and learning how to shoot telephoto. It taught me a lot about overcoming its drawbacks, and has made me a much better photographer because of it. Unfortunately $600 for a 70-300, $900 for a 150-600, or $1400 for a 200-500 is a huge ask for most folks, so a video from you kind folks without absolutely trashing the lenses that most beginners have access to would be a super helpful resource to qualify expectations.