Hey make a video on Ravenclaw please! You made a really good one on gryffindor and you have of course made quite a few related to Hufflepuff. Super Carlin Brothers have supported Slytherin. I have not seen many videos focusing on Ravenclaw.
Honestly, I always just figured that Voldemort deliberately changed his appearance so that he wouldn't see his filthy Muggle father every time that he looked in the mirror.
@@allenoak138 He never met his father, but he did know what his father looked like. He knew, even at a young age, what his father's name was. His father was a member of the Aristocratic elite, so researching his family would have been easy. This research formed the basis of his eventual attack on the Riddle household in which the entire family was executed. You can bet your bottom dollar he would have known what his father looked like.
@@reign0599 You're right. For some reason, I thought that happened a lot later, and that it was the next generation of the family he murdered. However, I appear to have been mistaken. Looks like you were right on this one.
My initial thought was that Voldemort’s animagus form (if he were to become one) was a snake of some sort. Almost as if, as he strips away his humanity, he continues to transform into a “base” form, one he cannot change willingly. Animagus forms don’t appear to change, from what I know, and seem to follow similar rules to Patronuses, following your deepest desires and your soul. It’s somewhat supported by Pettigrew’s form changing after 12 years as a rat. It also means that, should anyone else create that many horcruxes, they wouldn’t become more snakelike, but rather more like their animagus form, whatever it may be. Just another thought, though yours is clearly more detailed than mine.
That is actually an interesting idea. Rowling has a page on Pottermore about patronuses where she explains how it is 'determined' what animal a person's patronus would be (which, indeed, seems relevant because the patronus and the animagus form are often the same animal). It's generally about some kind of very basic but potentially hidden aspect or talent of the soul that may not even have shown itself yet because it was never needed - but she adds that a few wizards in history have had exactly the patronus they wanted or that was their favorite animal, and those wizards have always been 'eccentric' to the point of being dangerous. Case in point: Umbridge. So it's interesting to think that the same thing might be happening to Voldemort involuntarily with this animal he's so fixated on. I can definitely see him have a snake patronus (if he were capable of casting one) or animagus form. He's losing his own shape... maybe this is the only thing that's 'there' to go in its place.
@@trishapellis *True. But it's pretty simple how it works:* you have a basic Animagus, which is always the same as your Patronus. Your Animagus form cannot change, while your Patronus can change to match the one of the person you love (not sure if it has to be romantic, though). Even if you change as a person, your basic Patronus/Animagus is gonna stay the same as it was set to you at your birth. In Harry Potter, there are infinite timelines which all happen the exact same way, and one can change in between them to time travel. So everything is already pre written, one cannot change time, your basic Animagus/Patronus is your destined self. Voldemort's would probably be a snake, yes, but his Patronus could not change as he is not able to love, and in fact he could not create one at all, he has no happy memories. So yes I do believe his eccentricity may be one of the reasons for his Animagus being the only thing he would ever care for at all. And I do believe that's why he ended up looking likea snake, too.
I imagine Voldemort's Patronus would be a snake. So, there is a good chance that his Animagus form would also be a snake. My point is: could it be that, by making the Horcruxes and fading away his soul and "humane" spirit, he started to display his "spirit animal" underneath?
Thats a really good theory! I just came to a similar conclusion in response to another comment here and I worded it very similarly. Interesting how both our minds went the same route. Do u think that if for example Harry made 6 horcruxes, that he would then appear less like a man and more like a stag? Thats really cool to think about.
But does even Voldemort need a patronus? He is so evil.. And in Order of Phoenix he posses nagini, doesn't transform into snake. So again we don't know if he has any specific form to turn into or is he so powerful he can take many forms. We all know he can fly without turning into any sort of bird. So nothing is beyond his evilness.
Celestino Morgado i don’t think Voldemort *can* cast a patronus because we know he can’t feel love, so I don’t think he’s *ever* truly been happy enough to cast a patronus
Yes that could be possible or Before Mommy Voldemort Died She Took The I Got Your Nose Game To Far... And the only reason he has a nose in the chamer of secrets flasback is because he was trasfigured but instead of made to look bad he was made to look good unlike Harry at Malfoy manor
@@katherinemayers6733 “There on the threshold, holding an old-fashioned lamp, stood a boy Harry recognized at once: tall, pale, dark-haired, and handsome-the teenage Voldemort.” “Harry recognized Voldemort at once. His was the most handsome face and he looked the most relaxed of all the boys.” “He was plainly dressed in a black suit; his hair was a little longer than it had been at school and his cheeks were hollowed, but all of this suited him; he looked more handsome than ever.” lol
Ever heard of vocal coaches? They have some for singing but also tons for learning accents. He looks like him, is a similar age, is already British so tweaking his accent wouldn’t be hard and he loves Harry Potter so he would know all about Voldemort and how to properly portray him.
This is how I see it playing out..... Voldemort walked into a muggle plastic surgeon's office and when the surgeon asked him what he wanted, he wordlessly held up a picture of a snake, gestured at it and then pointed at his own face. The plastic surgeon just told him he was crazy and tried to leave, but then Voldemort apparated towards the exit, blocking the surgeon's path. He then gestured more emphatically at his picture of the snake and then aggressively pointed at his face again, with the angriest look he could muster. The muggle surgeon at this point was too freaked out to argue and obediently performed the snake-oplasty for Voldemort
Talking to Snakes is a Magical Ability. So he has 'snaky energy' inside him, so to speak. Regardless of the question if that snake-energy/magic is evil, good or neutral, does not matter. The Dark Magic Overusing causes this snakeyness to become evilish. Get it?
Or maybe it's because after Voldemort nearly died, the only thing keeping him alive were his horcrux and the only two horcrux with life in them were Harry and Nagini so half human half snake?
I have a theory for you....Trelawny every year predicts someone’s death. (Refer back to McGonagall saying, “Who is going to die this year?”) WHAT IF..... everyone she predicted to die actually does in the battle at Hogwarts?
@@user-xu1ce4ri4h no, I'm saying that in the end he was still walking. I'm not disagreeing. I think that the theory is genius. Im just saying that over all, Harry came back. Not like how the stone does it, but actually came back
I thought about this as well. While it does make sense and I do like the theory. It also seems likely/ implied that Voldemort's features had already become snakelike by the first Wizarding War up to the Halloween night he lost his powers, when his face was assumed to be a mask by that child. The fact that yes he does appear to have the same face when possessing Quirrel and also that the Ministry wizards recognize him immediately in OotP, with no mention of any difference in his appearance. It seems like something we would hear Dumbledore make note of. The same thing with his Death Eaters on his resurrection though they would be too afraid to say anything anyway. It seemed clear cut that the snakelike transformation probably came entirely from the creation of too many Horcruxes. It is said serpents are often used in the worst kinds of dark magic. So they are probably involved in the making of a Horcrux in some way, a way that leads to adopting a few of their features when done too many times would be my guess. I'd love a definitive answer though!
Forrestt Clabaugh he was never part snake, even though one of his Horcruxes _was_ a legit snake. As he split his soul into more Horcruxes, it took a toll on his body, thus making him appear less human, and more serpentine
Quick Question: Can House-elves cast patronuses? Follow Ups: What would be Dobby’s? Or Winky’s? Kreacher? I’d love to hear your thoughts! Please do a video answering this question.
Interesting idea! I agree if they could, they probably would be very good natured animals. Snow White in the forest type creatures haha. But a patronus remember is supposed to be very difficult to produce. Implying that it would most certainly need a wand to produce. And Elves are not legally permitted to use wands. So even in the event that an elf has a wand (like Dobby took Narcissa's) he won't have the practice or the power level to produce even a wisp, let alone a full animal figure patronus. Neat thought though! I'd say Dobby's could be a cute, tiny bat.
Talking to Snakes is a Magical Ability. So he has 'snaky energy' inside him, so to speak. Regardless of the question if that snake-energy/magic is evil, good or neutral, does not matter. The Dark Magic Overusing causes this snakeyness to become evilish. Get it?
@@thedragonwarrior5861 In almost all cultures, snakes symbolize evil. Healing comes from Hermes, who had a staff with two pet snakes on them. Healing is associated with traveling because in ancient Greece, there were no hospitals, doctors traveled to their patients and from town to town. Snakes do not really have any other association with healing.
@@keithg460 You're making a mistake. Rod of Asclepius: The symbol has continued to be used in modern times, where it is associated with medicine and health care, yet frequently confused with the staff of the god Hermes, the caduceus.
@@erikijland4243 Hospitals use both symbols. Hermes came first. Doctors were associated with traveling at the time (Hermes). Asclepius became associated with medicine afterward.
If you think about it, voldemort is no different from a teenage girl. He has a locket, a diary, a tiara, a diary, a pet, a teacup, a special ring and he's obsessed with a famous teenage guy.
Lol, though as a teenage girl I can say that I only have a pet (who doesn't), a ring (Christmas present), and a diary (I haven't written in it for a month)
One thing I’ve always wondered... if someone else from a different house would make too many horcuxes... could they look like something else? Like a Gryffindor being a lion?
Potentially... But probably a really messed up, evil lion...If the theory in this video has any merit, it'd likely depend on the patronus/spirit animal of the wizard in question more than the symbol associated with their house, though. Voldemort had an affinity for snakes, even moreso than the average Slytherin.
Many people forgot that Book!Voldemort is not a "guy without a nose". He's really terrifying. Creating Horcruxes disfigures the soul. In fact that is what it is - an intentional disfiguring of the soul. The physical disfigurement I believe is a reflection of the disfigurement of the soul. We see this when Harry looks through people's memories to see Tom Riddle at different stages of his life. He starts off as a handsome man - but as he creates more and more horcruxes, this is more and more reflected in his physical appearance. In particular, he grows to be more snake-like. His eyes, his nose, his mouth grows to resemble a snake. Why this is is uncertain. But it's not just that his nose falls off - it's that his appearance becomes snake-like.
@@nose-cd5sc because he's the heir of Slytherin. His identity and soul were already defined by snake symbolism. The author wanted to make this obvious.
Since all the ministry people could tell at a glance it was really him after his duel with Dumbleodore, I believe he already had the snake features at the time of his "death" at godrics hallow. Maybe it was not the number horcruxes that made him like that, but several other dark experiments he performed on himself to become stronger
Talking to Snakes is a Magical Ability. So he has 'snaky energy' inside him, so to speak. Regardless of the question if that snake-energy/magic is evil, good or neutral, does not matter. The Dark Magic Overusing causes this snakeyness to become evilish. Get it?
Weird question: if Harry could speak parseltongue, then why didn't he just speak to the Basilisk instead of fight it? like at least try to bargain. I get that it obeys Voldemort/ Tom, but hey, a little bit of Voldemort is in Harry anyway so why not?
That's because he did. In the movie he tries to talk to it to change it's mine but Tom Riddle has more power over it. Plus, it's been locked up in a freaking statue for quite some time and is probably very hungry and bored... Just saying 😬
Riddle explains it in Chamber of Secrets. Slytherin’s Basilisk only obeys the Heir of Slytherin. Any other parselmouth would not be able to control it. Even though Harry is a a Horcrux, he only has a tiny bit of Voldemort in him, compared to Riddle from the diary who was the first horcrux he ever made.
The whole way Harry dealt with the chamber even before going in frustrates me (I just got done rereading the book so it's pretty fresh in my mind). Tbh, Harry rarely acts with any sort of logic in the moment relying almost solely on instinct.
It’s a shame snakes get such a bad rap in Harry Potter and real life. Lots of species are commonly kept as pets and are usually pretty handleable and nice.
rousod I always sort of felt the opposite. Most of the snakes in HP that I can remember seemed either antagonistic or owned/controlled by antagonistic people, thereby showing them in a negative light. The boa constrictor Harry talked to at the zoo seemed to be the one exception. Maybe there were other exceptions in Fantastic Beasts? I wouldn’t know since I didn’t see it.
Nope. Nope. Nope. Voldemort's new body he acquired in 1994 looked the same as it did in 1981. Why? Well, not 1 death eater was surprised at how he looked. Noone asked why he looked different. Noone, upon arrival, was like, "hey, my mark burned.....but where is my master?" They all recognized him instantly. Plus Dumbledore's line, after the Weasleys learn that Ginny had been Enchanted by Voldemort: "Very few people know that Lord Voldemort was once called Tom Riddle. I taught him myself, fifty years ago, at Hogwarts. He disappeared after leaving the school...traveled far and wide...sank so deeply into the Dark Arts, consorted with the very worst of our kind, underwent so many dangerous, magical transformations, that WHEN HE RESURFACED AS LORD VOLDEMORT, HE WAS BARELY RECOGNIZABLE. HARDLY ANYONE CONNECTED LORD VOLDEMORT WITH THE CLEVER, HANDSOME BOY WHO WAS ONCE HEAD BOY HERE" -Harry Potter and The Chamber of Secrets, chapter 18, page 329, 5th paragraph, emphasis added. Seriously, he looked the exact same.
He literally quotes in this video that Harry points out that the Voldermort he see's applying for the DADA job does NOT look the same as the Voldermort he was return in Goblet. . . Were you even paying attention to the video at all?
Uhhhh they were also scared shitless of him. Don’t think any of them would actually ask that question. As for how they knew it was him? Presence. You can tell who someone is without seeing their features sometimes, because of their presence. People don’t stand or carry themselves the same way. Also they literally live in a world where people change their appearances all the time; it’s not weird for them. Just saying, your evidence is far from the cut and dry slam dunk you seem to think it is.
Voldemort could have changed to the snakelike form after applying for DADA though but still before 1981. When he applied for the job he definitely had not become a huge public threat yet if he could just walk into Hogwarts and ask for a job. He was still under the radar at this point where as he was a full on threat by 1981, so there’s a significant gap from when he applied for the job and when he kills the Potters. I think the snakelike appearance happened once he made nagini a horcrux which is before killing Harry I think. I do think it’s odd that no one questioned or asked about his new appearance from the first war to second war. It was never mentioned by Dumbledore when he sees him in order of Phoenix that his appearance changed significantly from the night he killed the Potters. It just seems like a weird thing to gloss over.
I'd be so happy if the last Fantastic Beasts movie ends with Dumbledore saying something like "There will always be evil", then show a flashback to some of his encounters with Tom Riddle.
Unless those movies go further into the 30s and 40s it wouldn't make sense. At the moment those movies take place in 1927 and at that time Tom Riddle was a baby at the orphanage.
or maybe this year people can learn that it doesn't count views until the video is finished, but people can like and comment before they finish the video
Maybe voldemort looks like a snake because someone put the Maledictus curse on him but did it wrong. Voldemort started taking his snake form much slower and eventually, stopped transforming mid-curse. Or maybe he tried to become an animagus but someone sabotaged his transformation halfway through, leaving voldemort as a half-wizard half-snake.
Good try, but you can’t “put” a maledictus curse on somebody. It’s runs through bloodlines. Plus it only happens with females. But I like your thought process.
The animagus one was interesting though. But it still doesn’t explain how Voldemort progressively got more “snakey” as he got more evil and over a long period of time. When Voldemort meets Dumbledore to apply for the DADA job at Hogwarts, he is described as, don’t quote me, but less charming and he looked more sallow. But then again, you could be right because we don’t know what Voldy looked like before he was reborn in Goblet of Fire. Lots to unpack.
I dont believe there would’ve been anyone powerful enough to stand in his way, or that he would’ve told about his animagus plans to anybody. I mean, he is the mist powerful wizard right after Dumbledore, so failing an animagus course just doesnt seem to add up with the fact that he was creating horcruxes by that very time without a doubt
I've always just assumed it was because his soul was split so much, it took away some of his more human aspects and started to fill it in with his animal connection (a patronus, if he could make one), the snake
I assumed it was because when Voldy was regaining his body in book 4 he was drinking Nagini’s (a snake) milk. Also I feel like there was something about her venom or milk involved with the spell in the cauldron at the graveyard but idk. Either this was my thought process. Love the video! ❤️🐍
I always felt like he cut parts off himself when he created the horcruxes. the locket has his eyes in it, for example. so it only made sense to me that he lost more and more of his human features, because he gave away more and more of what made him human - his soul.
@@dev6539 I think, he is, though. The Cloak of Invisibility is meant to be passed on from father to son, thus, Harry has to be directly descended from the youngest Peverell brother
Harry is a descendant of the youngest Peverell, but not of Slytherin. Someone in Slytherins lineage married a descendant of the eldest Peverell and eventually produced the Gaunts. They're distantly related through marriage, sure, but Harry is not related to Slytherin. Voldemort is however related to both Slytherin AND the Peverells. Its complicated lol
I always thought that he spent so long as a spirit that he began to take on the animal shape of his soul (similar to how a patronus or animagi form comes about). An alternate to the idea that he just "set" into the snake shape from the length of time could be that his soul was so diminished it supplemented itself off of that which it attaches to, pulling some snake into voldy's soul as he went along.
Yeah and dumbledore looks like a Phoenix and harry looks like a stag Edit: and also isa greer, even if he couldent cast one he would still have a patronus. It also is what a persons animagi is (such as James Potter’s animagi AND patronus being a stag)
@@noorazraq2245 I believe JKR has said that a patronus can be used as defense against the types of spells a death eater would use, so they have no need for one, which is why Snape is the only recorded death eater that can cast a patronus. I believe Tom Riddle would still have a pre determined patronus even though he cannot conjure one
I think it is from making multiple horcrux. Where a Patonus is the positive side of your soul manifasting as an spirit animal making a Horcrux wil make the darkside of your soul manifest in a much more perminent way. Just al making a Horcrux is a more permenent action as making a patronus. The manifestation when making a horcrux stays around and slowly changes you as jou are reliing on it more and more to survive.
Do you think that if Voldemort could cast a Patronus it would be a snake? Seems likely. Like u said, the Patronus is a positive manifestation of your spirit animal. Since horcruxes disfiguire the soul and make one less than human, maybe all thats left is the spirit animal within? Hence why after dismembering his human soul, Voldemort became more snakelike? If this theory is correct, then if, for example, Harry created 6 horcruxes, he would become less human looking and more stag-like? Very interesting.
It’s a popular misunderstanding that Voldemort doesn’t have a nose because the movies. This is how Voldemort is described after he returned in Goblet of Fire: “Whiter than a skull, with wide, livid scarlet eyes and a nose than was flat as a snake's with slits for nostrils…” We can therefore draw the conclusion that Voldemort had both a nose and nostrils - the nose was only quite flat. This description may even be a bit excessive - it’s from the point of view of a boy who’s looking at his parents’ murderer. He also describes Voldemort’s hands like “large, pale spiders”, and that certainly doesn’t mean he had sixteen fingers. This is what happened moments later: He put back his terrible face and sniffed, his slit-like nostrils widening. "I smell guilt," he said. "There is a stench or guilt upon the air. No, Book!Voldemort wasn’t noseless.
Talking to Snakes is a Magical Ability. So he has 'snaky energy' inside him, so to speak. Regardless of the question if that snake-energy/magic is evil, good or neutral, does not matter. The Dark Magic Overusing causes this snakeyness to become evilish. Get it?
So when he made Nagini a Horcrux his soul was split in seven parts, a magical number according to Dumbledore, and this was his plan so maybe his appearence looked like that of his final horcrux because he was finished according to horcrux law
I just thought that he tried (and failes) to become an animagus and his animal form would be/is an smake. He tried because being able to transform himself at will would be very useful in his line of work. This probably happened after his interview with Dumbledore and the features he has then are explained by horcruxes
I remember when horcruxes are explained in the movies that one conceals a part of their soul in an object. But Nagini is not an object, she is a living thing. Making a horcrux out of a living thing could maybe lead to an exchange of some sort maybe?
My question is during the first wizarding war, did voldemort look like that as well? Fudge seemed to recognize him almost immediately, only seeing a flash of him but still saying "hE'S BACK" but does that have anything to do with how he looks or rather his surroundings?
The first two movies stick with the books fairly well, especially if your into the extended versions. But after that there's just too much going on with too many different people. The movies get more and more condensed and cut as the series progresses. Excellent read.
Snakes are not evil. Magic reflects the character of ones soul. It is what defines ones animagus form, their patronus, and even what wand mixture chooses them. Tonks longing for Lupin and trying to understand him resulted in her patronus turning into a wolf, Hermionie's patronus being an otter (of the weasel family [hint hint] intellegent, creative, with a not physically apparent penchant for viciousness [hitting Malfoy, sicing birds on Ron]). James being a stag (king of the forest, mostly benign, but more than able to defend himself and others, showoffy [the rack of the stag and Jame's nature]) while Peter was a rat (fearful, sneaking around) and Sirius was a large dog (this shows that he and James apart from being friends had a rivalry between them [the hound that pulls down the stag] where they would compete with each other as their history of misdeeds trying to outdo each other suggests, but also showcases his loyalty). And as for wands, the best examplenis Harry and Voldemort, the only two characters that we know of that use pheonix feather cores. Pheonix's are the symbolnof rebirth and both had conqured death in their own ways only to raise up more powerful than before. So that being said, Voldemort becoming a snake isnhis inner charcter manafesting. If he were an animagus he would likely be a snake, as would his patronus be. If Peter created horcruxes, no doubt he would become more rat like in appearance. This is also shown with Greyback whom had fully embraced being a werewolf, and so his body started to become more wolfish (sharped teeth, increased density of body hair, and alleged additional agility while in human form).
I think you're really spot on. I came to a similar conclusion in another comment on here but I like how you've fleshed out and fully laid out the idea with multiple canon examples. Its really interesting to think about!
I feel like jk Rowling didn’t even mean to make all these connections and stuff, but they make so much sense someday someone will ask her if any your theories are true and she’ll probably be like: umm.. yeah, sure. Y not?
Harry stopped being able to speak to snakes as soon as the horcrux inside of him was gone. It was the horcrux, the part of Voldemort, which allowed Harry to speak to snakes :3
Seriously though... Seamus for Tom Riddle right?!
SuperCarlinBrothers 100%
SuperCarlinBrothers yes. Seamus also agrees
😂
10/10
Perfect match
thank you very much for supporting my cause #MakeSeamusVoldemort
Seamus Gorman hi Seamus
Hey make a video on Ravenclaw please! You made a really good one on gryffindor and you have of course made quite a few related to Hufflepuff. Super Carlin Brothers have supported Slytherin. I have not seen many videos focusing on Ravenclaw.
#MakeSeamusVoldermortPlease
I literally scrolled down to the towel section to look for your comment
Seamus, I hope that the creative team for FB consider you if they include Tom Riddle as a character.
Honestly, I always just figured that Voldemort deliberately changed his appearance so that he wouldn't see his filthy Muggle father every time that he looked in the mirror.
He never knew what his father looked like
@@allenoak138 He never met his father, but he did know what his father looked like. He knew, even at a young age, what his father's name was. His father was a member of the Aristocratic elite, so researching his family would have been easy. This research formed the basis of his eventual attack on the Riddle household in which the entire family was executed.
You can bet your bottom dollar he would have known what his father looked like.
@@kiltmaster7041 He met his father, when he killed him.
@@reign0599 You're right. For some reason, I thought that happened a lot later, and that it was the next generation of the family he murdered. However, I appear to have been mistaken. Looks like you were right on this one.
Wow you should do a theory channel or something
My initial thought was that Voldemort’s animagus form (if he were to become one) was a snake of some sort. Almost as if, as he strips away his humanity, he continues to transform into a “base” form, one he cannot change willingly. Animagus forms don’t appear to change, from what I know, and seem to follow similar rules to Patronuses, following your deepest desires and your soul.
It’s somewhat supported by Pettigrew’s form changing after 12 years as a rat. It also means that, should anyone else create that many horcruxes, they wouldn’t become more snakelike, but rather more like their animagus form, whatever it may be.
Just another thought, though yours is clearly more detailed than mine.
in my thinking, that is not what/s happening
I mean that could be part of it
That was my first thought when I saw the title. But I like the explanation in the video too.
That is actually an interesting idea. Rowling has a page on Pottermore about patronuses where she explains how it is 'determined' what animal a person's patronus would be (which, indeed, seems relevant because the patronus and the animagus form are often the same animal). It's generally about some kind of very basic but potentially hidden aspect or talent of the soul that may not even have shown itself yet because it was never needed - but she adds that a few wizards in history have had exactly the patronus they wanted or that was their favorite animal, and those wizards have always been 'eccentric' to the point of being dangerous. Case in point: Umbridge. So it's interesting to think that the same thing might be happening to Voldemort involuntarily with this animal he's so fixated on. I can definitely see him have a snake patronus (if he were capable of casting one) or animagus form. He's losing his own shape... maybe this is the only thing that's 'there' to go in its place.
@@trishapellis *True. But it's pretty simple how it works:*
you have a basic Animagus, which is always the same as your Patronus. Your Animagus form cannot change, while your Patronus can change to match the one of the person you love (not sure if it has to be romantic, though).
Even if you change as a person, your basic Patronus/Animagus is gonna stay the same as it was set to you at your birth. In Harry Potter, there are infinite timelines which all happen the exact same way, and one can change in between them to time travel. So everything is already pre written, one cannot change time, your basic Animagus/Patronus is your destined self.
Voldemort's would probably be a snake, yes, but his Patronus could not change as he is not able to love, and in fact he could not create one at all, he has no happy memories.
So yes I do believe his eccentricity may be one of the reasons for his Animagus being the only thing he would ever care for at all. And I do believe that's why he ended up looking likea snake, too.
It would be so hilarious if Pettigrew threw Voldemort in the cauldron and left! :D
or just threw him next to harrys feet and was like: end it, and walked away
SOMEONE MAKE A MOVIE OF THAT!!!
Story ends on 4th book
*y e e t*
lmfa9oooooooooooo
I imagine Voldemort's Patronus would be a snake. So, there is a good chance that his Animagus form would also be a snake. My point is: could it be that, by making the Horcruxes and fading away his soul and "humane" spirit, he started to display his "spirit animal" underneath?
Thats a really good theory! I just came to a similar conclusion in response to another comment here and I worded it very similarly. Interesting how both our minds went the same route. Do u think that if for example Harry made 6 horcruxes, that he would then appear less like a man and more like a stag? Thats really cool to think about.
But does even Voldemort need a patronus? He is so evil.. And in Order of Phoenix he posses nagini, doesn't transform into snake. So again we don't know if he has any specific form to turn into or is he so powerful he can take many forms. We all know he can fly without turning into any sort of bird. So nothing is beyond his evilness.
@@roomisworld8802 still sounds like a good theory
Celestino Morgado i don’t think Voldemort *can* cast a patronus because we know he can’t feel love, so I don’t think he’s *ever* truly been happy enough to cast a patronus
@@TheBlockWIzard he could think of killing his dad. I bet that made him happy
Now that i think about it, Nagini is definitely Voldemorts SOULMATE! Buh dum tss.
That was great
Honestly though, making someone almost puke with your ideas is kinda distorted...
Idk, some fanfiction play wants us to believe its Bellatrix....
Or soulsnake
and so is Harry in that sense...
omg pls no stop your fanfic
That Seamus-Voldemort picture was so sly but it was good!
#MakeSeamusVoldemort
I mean he *is* a Slytherin.
5 years late ik shut up
I always thought the reason for the nose thing is from the use of his Father's bones to regenerate. Because a skull doesn't have a nose.
THATS COOL
Legend has it voldemort ran into the wrong wall to get to platform 9 3/4 and thats why he doesn't have a nose
Yes that could be possible or
Before Mommy Voldemort Died She Took The I Got Your Nose Game To Far...
And the only reason he has a nose in the chamer of secrets flasback is because he was trasfigured but instead of made to look bad he was made to look good unlike Harry at Malfoy manor
Strange. Because Voldemort was really hot. And Harry agrees.
@@katherinemayers6733 “There on the threshold, holding an old-fashioned lamp, stood a boy Harry recognized at once: tall, pale, dark-haired, and handsome-the teenage Voldemort.”
“Harry recognized Voldemort at once. His was the most handsome face and he looked the most relaxed of all the boys.”
“He was plainly dressed in a black suit; his hair was a little longer than it had been at school and his cheeks were hollowed, but all of this suited him; he looked more handsome than ever.”
lol
I ship Harry and Young Riddle... Someone get them a time turner👌
Legend also has it that Sirius kicked his nose off after what happened at the Potters on Halloween
The #MakeSeamusVoldemort shows up at 1:14, seeding it's way into the fandom, and before he knows it, Seamus will be cast as Young Voldemort.
*Y E S*
@@untitled6391 Agreed. Please no. Never.
And to those who do like him, he doesn't even have the right accent, it would be so bad.
Ever heard of vocal coaches? They have some for singing but also tons for learning accents. He looks like him, is a similar age, is already British so tweaking his accent wouldn’t be hard and he loves Harry Potter so he would know all about Voldemort and how to properly portray him.
just wait until they announce an open casting, the world will erupt
This is how I see it playing out..... Voldemort walked into a muggle plastic surgeon's office and when the surgeon asked him what he wanted, he wordlessly held up a picture of a snake, gestured at it and then pointed at his own face. The plastic surgeon just told him he was crazy and tried to leave, but then Voldemort apparated towards the exit, blocking the surgeon's path. He then gestured more emphatically at his picture of the snake and then aggressively pointed at his face again, with the angriest look he could muster.
The muggle surgeon at this point was too freaked out to argue and obediently performed the snake-oplasty for Voldemort
Talking to Snakes
is a Magical Ability.
So he has 'snaky energy' inside him, so to speak.
Regardless of the question
if that snake-energy/magic is evil, good or neutral, does not matter.
The Dark Magic Overusing causes
this snakeyness to become evilish.
Get it?
😆😆😆
Me: Reads title
Also Me: ... Because he is one ( hence how he acts)
Proof that it’s super easy to answer this question
Voldermort stoped to consider a prospect quite grim,
Was he made of snake,
Or was snake made of him.
Alex Stanley he screams, for he does not know
Dumbledore - ish ; Shakespeare - ish english
Or maybe it's because after Voldemort nearly died, the only thing keeping him alive were his horcrux and the only two horcrux with life in them were Harry and Nagini so half human half snake?
yeah, but Nagini didn't become a Horcrux until the last book or so.
@@nwojunkie I think Nagini was made into a Horcrux around book 4 or 5 after Voldemort was revived.
@@logicallyblue3814I'm super late but Voldemort used the death of Bertha Jorkins to create his final horocrux in Nagini
I wasn't this early for my own birth
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
You have more likes than the actual Supercarlin Brother s
Edit: this was soon after it was posted, not now
So true
@@noraaaaa Not anymore sadly
haha
"He lost all of his excellent dangly awkward teenage-- shows photos of Seamus* Oh wait wrong photo--"
Me: *subscribes*
I have a theory for you....Trelawny every year predicts someone’s death. (Refer back to McGonagall saying, “Who is going to die this year?”) WHAT IF..... everyone she predicted to die actually does in the battle at Hogwarts?
Well, Harry lived. But maybe.
@@sours-orchard Harry did die. He was brought back to life by love magic, but he did die.
@@user-xu1ce4ri4h no, I'm saying that in the end he was still walking. I'm not disagreeing. I think that the theory is genius. Im just saying that over all, Harry came back. Not like how the stone does it, but actually came back
@@sours-orchard this has potential
Cram he did die though, that was the point of that whole thing. But because of love only the piece of Voldemort’s soul stayed dead. He DID die tho
I thought about this as well. While it does make sense and I do like the theory. It also seems likely/ implied that Voldemort's features had already become snakelike by the first Wizarding War up to the Halloween night he lost his powers, when his face was assumed to be a mask by that child. The fact that yes he does appear to have the same face when possessing Quirrel and also that the Ministry wizards recognize him immediately in OotP, with no mention of any difference in his appearance. It seems like something we would hear Dumbledore make note of. The same thing with his Death Eaters on his resurrection though they would be too afraid to say anything anyway. It seemed clear cut that the snakelike transformation probably came entirely from the creation of too many Horcruxes. It is said serpents are often used in the worst kinds of dark magic. So they are probably involved in the making of a Horcrux in some way, a way that leads to adopting a few of their features when done too many times would be my guess. I'd love a definitive answer though!
Why does Voldemort look like a snake?
Nobody nose.
Darkside Warrior Builds this is great wow
Lol
Can someone pin this?
Oof
Darkside Warrior Builds
Is this a statement or a question
Someone write a fanfic where Voldemort is obsessed with bunnies
Troper H'ghar its probably out there if you look.
@@arandomuser9459 Do I want to dare..................?
@@BHuang92 No. No you should not. Its just better not to.
Then Nagini would be replaced by the bunny from Monty Python and the Holy Grail
There's one where his animagus form is a black rabbit I think? 🤔
If I remember correctly it was kinda cute 😅
His nose is a horcrux and he's still lurking out there somewhere with his nose, hair, and melanin
aStar omFg I’m dying
:-O
7:46 I thought it was the making of a Horcrux that made Rowlings editor puke?
"Tom's history was RIDDLED..." I see what you did there
I always believed his serpentine appearance was due to the fact that he's now part snake, due to the ritual at the end of book four
But like they said, he had snakelike appearances in book 1 too.
Forrestt Clabaugh he was never part snake, even though one of his Horcruxes _was_ a legit snake. As he split his soul into more Horcruxes, it took a toll on his body, thus making him appear less human, and more serpentine
Yeah, but his "regeneration" did involve snake milk...
Quick Question: Can House-elves cast patronuses?
Follow Ups: What would be Dobby’s? Or Winky’s? Kreacher?
I’d love to hear your thoughts! Please do a video answering this question.
i feel like they would all be extra tiny animals
Interesting idea! I agree if they could, they probably would be very good natured animals. Snow White in the forest type creatures haha.
But a patronus remember is supposed to be very difficult to produce. Implying that it would most certainly need a wand to produce. And Elves are not legally permitted to use wands. So even in the event that an elf has a wand (like Dobby took Narcissa's) he won't have the practice or the power level to produce even a wisp, let alone a full animal figure patronus.
Neat thought though! I'd say Dobby's could be a cute, tiny bat.
Socks
Their patronuses would be their masters. Kreachers would be Regulus
I hate this so much. Lol
Thanks for making his eyes red in the thumbnail!
Talking to Snakes
is a Magical Ability.
So he has 'snaky energy' inside him, so to speak.
Regardless of the question
if that snake-energy/magic is evil, good or neutral, does not matter.
The Dark Magic Overusing causes
this snakeyness to become evilish.
Get it?
Tom was so hot :( The biggest tragedy in Harry Potter.
Except for Sirius..
seriously
*tragic*
@@siriusthecat *Siriously #Sorrynotsorry 😂😂😝
And what makes this bad?
Voldemort has a baby, while I’m still single! >:(
Like seriously, he doesn’t even have a nose!
love the vids guys
Thanks!
keep up the great work love this kinda content and that J gets so easily distracted lol
I especially loved the humor in this one
“Are snakes inheritly evil or is Voldemort inherently snakey “
Snakes are symbols of Death...
But also of Healing, but Voldy dont ever heal
@Sam Smith fair enough
@@thedragonwarrior5861
In almost all cultures, snakes symbolize evil.
Healing comes from Hermes, who had a staff with two pet snakes on them. Healing is associated with traveling because in ancient Greece, there were no hospitals, doctors traveled to their patients and from town to town. Snakes do not really have any other association with healing.
@@keithg460 You're making a mistake.
Rod of Asclepius:
The symbol has continued to be used in modern times, where it is associated with medicine and health care, yet frequently confused with the staff of the god Hermes, the caduceus.
@@erikijland4243
Hospitals use both symbols. Hermes came first. Doctors were associated with traveling at the time (Hermes). Asclepius became associated with medicine afterward.
Cause he's a spooky spooker. That's what I think.
That made me giggle
I'd like to see Seamus face when he saw this video
aha same
I thought it was the otherwise untold secrets about the process of making a Horcrux that made J.K. Rowling's editor almost throw up when she told her.
KingsleyIII I thought I heard them say that in a previous video
Same
Something tells me that J.K. didn’t actually think of anything and just told people that
@@TheRock9500 that is what i believe aswell.
If you think about it, voldemort is no different from a teenage girl. He has a locket, a diary, a tiara, a diary, a pet, a teacup, a special ring and he's obsessed with a famous teenage guy.
😂
Ok but....this was posted in other videos.....many times.
sooooo right, exept, he hates this famous teenage guy
@@mitrarezvani8990 yeah, so is Jacob Sartorius...
Lol, though as a teenage girl I can say that I only have a pet (who doesn't), a ring (Christmas present), and a diary (I haven't written in it for a month)
Huuuuh, the snake sticking out its tongue stuff instantly made me think of Barty Crouch Jr x'D
I always liked that about the character.
Yup
One thing I’ve always wondered... if someone else from a different house would make too many horcuxes... could they look like something else? Like a Gryffindor being a lion?
Potentially... But probably a really messed up, evil lion...If the theory in this video has any merit, it'd likely depend on the patronus/spirit animal of the wizard in question more than the symbol associated with their house, though. Voldemort had an affinity for snakes, even moreso than the average Slytherin.
Well, they would probably have to be in a bunch of lion bodies, like his theory says
Many people forgot that Book!Voldemort is not a "guy without a nose". He's really terrifying.
Creating Horcruxes disfigures the soul. In fact that is what it is - an intentional disfiguring of the soul.
The physical disfigurement I believe is a reflection of the disfigurement of the soul. We see this when Harry looks through people's memories to see Tom Riddle at different stages of his life.
He starts off as a handsome man - but as he creates more and more horcruxes, this is more and more reflected in his physical appearance.
In particular, he grows to be more snake-like. His eyes, his nose, his mouth grows to resemble a snake. Why this is is uncertain. But it's not just that his nose falls off - it's that his appearance becomes snake-like.
This.
the thing is why particularly a snake?
Oh this reminds me of The Picture of Dorian Gray!
@@nose-cd5sc because he's the heir of Slytherin. His identity and soul were already defined by snake symbolism. The author wanted to make this obvious.
How long were you in the comments did you type the hole video
Ok that bunny guy is MENTALLY SCARRING
I SCREECHED
The movie is interesting but twisted. And yes the rabbit is freaky in it and more so than just in a picture.
I watched it with my little sis in the dark
Donnie darko is a beautifully done film and Frank's rabbit costume is not anything frightening. It's a party costume
That be true
Since all the ministry people could tell at a glance it was really him after his duel with Dumbleodore, I believe he already had the snake features at the time of his "death" at godrics hallow. Maybe it was not the number horcruxes that made him like that, but several other dark experiments he performed on himself to become stronger
FINALLY SOMEONE REALISES HE HAD A NOSE IN PHILOSIPHERS STONE
*Sorcerer's Stone
Acutally its philosiphers but americans say sorcerer's so i am actually correct WaterTrainer
@@deejah4529 no the movie was Sorcerer's, and he only has the nose in the movie.
popskull42 the movie was still called The Philosopher’s stone in the UK :)
FunkToFunky Did they change it every time it was said in the movie too?
Love that Seamus plug😂
Mik I don’t even pay them
Seamus Gorman 😂. BTW I’m a Gryffindor and proud (not just because Harry Potter is in my house 😂)
@@SeamusGorman4 Hello There! Proud Gryffindor and Wampus here! I quess i am a Gryffinpus now?
so is voldemort part ring, cup, snake, diadem, diary, human, and locket?
since his soul is in all those things?
like so they see this
And part rat. Wormtail gave his hand for the potion.
LIKEBEGGER
And rat
Talking to Snakes
is a Magical Ability.
So he has 'snaky energy' inside him, so to speak.
Regardless of the question
if that snake-energy/magic is evil, good or neutral, does not matter.
The Dark Magic Overusing causes
this snakeyness to become evilish.
Get it?
A teenage girl
Weird question: if Harry could speak parseltongue, then why didn't he just speak to the Basilisk instead of fight it? like at least try to bargain. I get that it obeys Voldemort/ Tom, but hey, a little bit of Voldemort is in Harry anyway so why not?
That's because he did. In the movie he tries to talk to it to change it's mine but Tom Riddle has more power over it. Plus, it's been locked up in a freaking statue for quite some time and is probably very hungry and bored... Just saying 😬
@@Jana-sv9sp but was it in the book?
No really, I don't remember. I probably should read them again 😋
@@valtun1864 tbh, I'm not 100% sure... I should read them again, too 😅
Riddle explains it in Chamber of Secrets. Slytherin’s Basilisk only obeys the Heir of Slytherin. Any other parselmouth would not be able to control it. Even though Harry is a a Horcrux, he only has a tiny bit of Voldemort in him, compared to Riddle from the diary who was the first horcrux he ever made.
The whole way Harry dealt with the chamber even before going in frustrates me (I just got done rereading the book so it's pretty fresh in my mind). Tbh, Harry rarely acts with any sort of logic in the moment relying almost solely on instinct.
It’s a shame snakes get such a bad rap in Harry Potter and real life. Lots of species are commonly kept as pets and are usually pretty handleable and nice.
The opposite, harry potter showed that this is a misconception. Harry's first encounter with a snake in the zoo was quite sad, it showed a good snake.
The only way I'm handling a snake Is if it becomes a Gucci handbag
rousod I always sort of felt the opposite. Most of the snakes in HP that I can remember seemed either antagonistic or owned/controlled by antagonistic people, thereby showing them in a negative light. The boa constrictor Harry talked to at the zoo seemed to be the one exception. Maybe there were other exceptions in Fantastic Beasts? I wouldn’t know since I didn’t see it.
agreed! I have a lovely little corn snake that wouldn't hurt anybody, and actually has really cute features and cute moments!
I had a ball python and she was such a cool pet. She never bit anybody or had bad temperament. But I can't say I like all snakes.
Nope.
Nope.
Nope.
Voldemort's new body he acquired in 1994 looked the same as it did in 1981.
Why?
Well, not 1 death eater was surprised at how he looked. Noone asked why he looked different. Noone, upon arrival, was like, "hey, my mark burned.....but where is my master?"
They all recognized him instantly.
Plus Dumbledore's line, after the Weasleys learn that Ginny had been Enchanted by Voldemort:
"Very few people know that Lord Voldemort was once called Tom Riddle. I taught him myself, fifty years ago, at Hogwarts. He disappeared after leaving the school...traveled far and wide...sank so deeply into the Dark Arts, consorted with the very worst of our kind, underwent so many dangerous, magical transformations, that WHEN HE RESURFACED AS LORD VOLDEMORT, HE WAS BARELY RECOGNIZABLE. HARDLY ANYONE CONNECTED LORD VOLDEMORT WITH THE CLEVER, HANDSOME BOY WHO WAS ONCE HEAD BOY HERE"
-Harry Potter and The Chamber of Secrets, chapter 18, page 329, 5th paragraph, emphasis added.
Seriously, he looked the exact same.
He literally quotes in this video that Harry points out that the Voldermort he see's applying for the DADA job does NOT look the same as the Voldermort he was return in Goblet. . . Were you even paying attention to the video at all?
Uhhhh they were also scared shitless of him. Don’t think any of them would actually ask that question.
As for how they knew it was him? Presence. You can tell who someone is without seeing their features sometimes, because of their presence. People don’t stand or carry themselves the same way.
Also they literally live in a world where people change their appearances all the time; it’s not weird for them.
Just saying, your evidence is far from the cut and dry slam dunk you seem to think it is.
@@Noobie2k7 that was before Voldy made all of his Horcruxes
Voldemort could have changed to the snakelike form after applying for DADA though but still before 1981. When he applied for the job he definitely had not become a huge public threat yet if he could just walk into Hogwarts and ask for a job. He was still under the radar at this point where as he was a full on threat by 1981, so there’s a significant gap from when he applied for the job and when he kills the Potters. I think the snakelike appearance happened once he made nagini a horcrux which is before killing Harry I think. I do think it’s odd that no one questioned or asked about his new appearance from the first war to second war. It was never mentioned by Dumbledore when he sees him in order of Phoenix that his appearance changed significantly from the night he killed the Potters. It just seems like a weird thing to gloss over.
True! And good job finding that quote in your book because I doubt that can be found online saying what paragraph it is from :)
I think you misspelled "snack"
I think your username makes me not question this
Good god this comment is underrated.
😂 love it
Snake snacks!
The snakiest snacks!
The snackiest snakes!
**I'm scared**
BUT THAT'S JUST A THEORY.
A POTTER THEORY.
Yeah lol
Thanks for geeking out.
A Potter Film Theory!
@@zacharyrose9939 anytime, my fellow theorist.
Always nice to meet another film/game theorist out there!!!
“8:16” Thanks man, I really needed that.
I want to see Tom Riddle in Fantastic Beasts.
I'd be so happy if the last Fantastic Beasts movie ends with Dumbledore saying something like "There will always be evil", then show a flashback to some of his encounters with Tom Riddle.
Unless those movies go further into the 30s and 40s it wouldn't make sense. At the moment those movies take place in 1927 and at that time Tom Riddle was a baby at the orphanage.
@@paradygmshift7826 It's supposed to be 5 movies spanning from 1927 to 1945. Basically ending with Dumbledore and Grindelwald's famous duel.
Hehehe played by Seamus #MakeSeamusVoldemort
#MakeSeamusVoldemort!
Wrong, it's because he ran into the wrong wall at King's Cross, obviously.
Thanks for 84 likes!
That must have been what happened to his nose!
"Truth can always be found by those who search for it in the comments" -Dumbledore. 😊
@@sweep_swoop That's why. It's what I said...
I always thought it was because he was a descendant of Salazar Slytherin, but this honestly a lot better.
Yay thanks for making me less bored at the airport
Candle Light you should board more at the airport.
Lirëza Elezaj omg I couldn’t stop laughing at this!!
86 views
466 likes
257 comments
I thought you were quitting drugs in 2019 TH-cam
This died so long ago, don't
or maybe this year people can learn that it doesn't count views until the video is finished, but people can like and comment before they finish the video
Snape4Life i dont care
If the 2018 rewind told us anything it was that youtube isn't quitting drugs anytime soon.
Fred Nathan o that is harsh
Maybe voldemort looks like a snake because someone put the Maledictus curse on him but did it wrong. Voldemort started taking his snake form much slower and eventually, stopped transforming mid-curse. Or maybe he tried to become an animagus but someone sabotaged his transformation halfway through, leaving voldemort as a half-wizard half-snake.
That actually makes a lot of sense.
Good try, but you can’t “put” a maledictus curse on somebody. It’s runs through bloodlines. Plus it only happens with females. But I like your thought process.
The animagus one was interesting though. But it still doesn’t explain how Voldemort progressively got more “snakey” as he got more evil and over a long period of time. When Voldemort meets Dumbledore to apply for the DADA job at Hogwarts, he is described as, don’t quote me, but less charming and he looked more sallow. But then again, you could be right because we don’t know what Voldy looked like before he was reborn in Goblet of Fire. Lots to unpack.
I dont believe there would’ve been anyone powerful enough to stand in his way, or that he would’ve told about his animagus plans to anybody.
I mean, he is the mist powerful wizard right after Dumbledore, so failing an animagus course just doesnt seem to add up with the fact that he was creating horcruxes by that very time without a doubt
I kinda siriusly believe that
I've always just assumed it was because his soul was split so much, it took away some of his more human aspects and started to fill it in with his animal connection (a patronus, if he could make one), the snake
I assumed it was because when Voldy was regaining his body in book 4 he was drinking Nagini’s (a snake) milk. Also I feel like there was something about her venom or milk involved with the spell in the cauldron at the graveyard but idk. Either this was my thought process. Love the video! ❤️🐍
The main reason I clicked on this video is because the thumbnail has the eyes I imagined when Voldemort was described in the books
Haha
"GOD I look bad in hats"
Lol love that line IDK why
Edit: also "One snake man plus one snake woman=BLAGARDAHEMVMWOCME
The title reminded me of Seamus Gorman's recent video so I came asap
Mousy0913 seamus’ theme tune playing in my head and then out loud...
i waited too long but i finally subscribed!
had to get used to your intro, but love the discussions of Harry Potter and the wizarding world.
A great video as always. I love your channel!!!
Happy New year guys
OMG THAT PIC OF SEAMUS HAD ME WEEING!!!! 😂😂😂
Everytime Quirell slept on his back, Voldy was burried in the pillow, this making his face flat!
Actually Voldemort lost his nose in gym class.
That one kid that throws to hard knocked off his nose.
No he ran into the wrong wall at the train station
Or Mommy Voldmort in the few hours she lived while Voldemort was alive she took the I got your nose game to far
10 years old?
He got hurt while playing Quidditch. A bludger squashed his nose...
I always felt like he cut parts off himself when he created the horcruxes. the locket has his eyes in it, for example. so it only made sense to me that he lost more and more of his human features, because he gave away more and more of what made him human - his soul.
isn't it odd that snakes, the whole premise of Voldy, the Basilisks are one of the only things that can destroy the very thing keeping Voldy alive.
Voldemort isn't the last living relative of Salazar Slytherin, Harry is descended from Slytherin too, through the Peverells.
I’m not sure but I think that Voldemort’s Slytherin ancestor could have married into the family line after the super pevaral brothers
No.
No because Harry isn't necessarily a relative of the peverells
@@dev6539 I think, he is, though.
The Cloak of Invisibility is meant to be passed on from father to son, thus, Harry has to be directly descended from the youngest Peverell brother
Harry is a descendant of the youngest Peverell, but not of Slytherin. Someone in Slytherins lineage married a descendant of the eldest Peverell and eventually produced the Gaunts. They're distantly related through marriage, sure, but Harry is not related to Slytherin. Voldemort is however related to both Slytherin AND the Peverells. Its complicated lol
Voldy Morty you are AFK,
I'm gonna take your nose away!
Voldy Voldy Voldy AFK,
I'm gonna take that nose away!
Don't ask lol 😂
Ask
Ok.... why? 😋
Just got done watching the weekly recap. Did not expect that reference on this video. 😂 Is it bad that I totally read that in Grian's voice?
Mumbo and Grian are great! 👍
@@valtun1864 Because Grian :3
I always thought that he spent so long as a spirit that he began to take on the animal shape of his soul (similar to how a patronus or animagi form comes about). An alternate to the idea that he just "set" into the snake shape from the length of time could be that his soul was so diminished it supplemented itself off of that which it attaches to, pulling some snake into voldy's soul as he went along.
You guys are the root to all of my Harry Potter knowledge, love you guys sm!
A snake could have been his potronous and that is why he looks like a snake
Voldemort cannot actually cast a Patronus
Yeah and dumbledore looks like a Phoenix and harry looks like a stag
Edit: and also isa greer, even if he couldent cast one he would still have a patronus. It also is what a persons animagi is (such as James Potter’s animagi AND patronus being a stag)
He is a parselmouth
Hunt3r Gaming He can’t have had a patronus,only good people can have patronuses.
@@noorazraq2245 I believe JKR has said that a patronus can be used as defense against the types of spells a death eater would use, so they have no need for one, which is why Snape is the only recorded death eater that can cast a patronus. I believe Tom Riddle would still have a pre determined patronus even though he cannot conjure one
"Not all compliments are well thought out."
Hear that, Newt? Middlehead.... Salamander eyes.
I bet he does one per movie. Anyone else?
I think it is from making multiple horcrux. Where a Patonus is the positive side of your soul manifasting as an spirit animal making a Horcrux wil make the darkside of your soul manifest in a much more perminent way. Just al making a Horcrux is a more permenent action as making a patronus. The manifestation when making a horcrux stays around and slowly changes you as jou are reliing on it more and more to survive.
Do you think that if Voldemort could cast a Patronus it would be a snake? Seems likely. Like u said, the Patronus is a positive manifestation of your spirit animal. Since horcruxes disfiguire the soul and make one less than human, maybe all thats left is the spirit animal within? Hence why after dismembering his human soul, Voldemort became more snakelike? If this theory is correct, then if, for example, Harry created 6 horcruxes, he would become less human looking and more stag-like? Very interesting.
Leo Velli but Voldy can’t do a patronus
Everyone has a patronus. He can't do one, but he still has a spirit animal: a snake.
I imagine that his patronus is a parasite like a tapeworm
OK BUT WHY IS HE ALWAYS BAREFOOT?! It drives me mental looking at his hideous trotters walking on gravel or in the forest.
It’s a popular misunderstanding that Voldemort doesn’t have a nose because the movies.
This is how Voldemort is described after he returned in Goblet of Fire:
“Whiter than a skull, with wide, livid scarlet eyes and a nose than was flat as a snake's with slits for nostrils…”
We can therefore draw the conclusion that Voldemort had both a nose and nostrils - the nose was only quite flat. This description may even be a bit excessive - it’s from the point of view of a boy who’s looking at his parents’ murderer. He also describes Voldemort’s hands like “large, pale spiders”, and that certainly doesn’t mean he had sixteen fingers.
This is what happened moments later: He put back his terrible face and sniffed, his slit-like nostrils widening. "I smell guilt," he said. "There is a stench or guilt upon the air.
No, Book!Voldemort wasn’t noseless.
Nah, pbviously because it was said in the book it must be true. I demand Spider hands Voldermort fan art.
Talking to Snakes
is a Magical Ability.
So he has 'snaky energy' inside him, so to speak.
Regardless of the question
if that snake-energy/magic is evil, good or neutral, does not matter.
The Dark Magic Overusing causes
this snakeyness to become evilish.
Get it?
@@Noobie2k7 *Why* is he blue on the movies though??
8:18
Your welcome
I highly recommend adjusting the speed
Put it to 0:25
Yeah, I’ve read 164 books last year and have already read two books this year...
Daaannnggggg! So impressive! You def need some coffee!
SuperCarlinBrothers maybe tea instead. I hate coffee to be honest...though I wouldn’t say no to try Carlin Brothers Coffee! :)
@@SuperCarlinBrothers Send this man some caffee, he deserves it lol
I have no idea what to read
Branko Cvjeticanin ^woman-or rather, girl :)
So when he made Nagini a Horcrux his soul was split in seven parts, a magical number according to Dumbledore, and this was his plan so maybe his appearence looked like that of his final horcrux because he was finished according to horcrux law
I agree
His appearance had already changed before he made Nagini into a horcrux
He didn't make Nalini into a horcrux until goblet. So she was the 7th, or the split of his soul into 8.
If all snakes looked like J’s impression of them, I’d have never disliked snakes! 😂
Where’s there to dislike about Snakes?
My New Years Resolution is to live in the moment, meditate more, and live happier
I figured it was just from his soul being so badly damaged like maybe it made him less human.
Biggest movie franchises with lore
1st: Star Wars
2nd: Harry Potter
3rd: Marvel/DC
4th: ?
Lord of the Rings?
@@FallenOne669 fnaf ?
@@wortz9291 Is that Five Nights at Freddie's?
@@FallenOne669 Yeah
Not a movie franchise
When you said there's "a snake in my" I instantly thought boot, how could have you not say boot?
I just thought that he tried (and failes) to become an animagus and his animal form would be/is an smake. He tried because being able to transform himself at will would be very useful in his line of work. This probably happened after his interview with Dumbledore and the features he has then are explained by horcruxes
Yayyyyyy you guys agree too!!! #MakeSeamusVoldemort
When I first saw it, I thought it said "Why he looks like a snack" and I was so confused but then I looked at it again and got it😂😂
I remember when horcruxes are explained in the movies that one conceals a part of their soul in an object. But Nagini is not an object, she is a living thing. Making a horcrux out of a living thing could maybe lead to an exchange of some sort maybe?
Imagine Voldemort with a cup handle for a nose.
My question is during the first wizarding war, did voldemort look like that as well? Fudge seemed to recognize him almost immediately, only seeing a flash of him but still saying "hE'S BACK" but does that have anything to do with how he looks or rather his surroundings?
Andi Animates the first war he looked like a human. I THINK it makes science
I’m FINNALLY getting around to reading the Harry Potter books REALLY BIG Movie film so hope the books are just as good! :)
Hyro Designs the movies are awful compared to the books so yeah they will be better than “as good” 😊
"Just as good" really?! Just listen to these 2 👆 lol. besides books are usually better than the movies 😜
The first two movies stick with the books fairly well, especially if your into the extended versions. But after that there's just too much going on with too many different people. The movies get more and more condensed and cut as the series progresses. Excellent read.
Snakes are not evil. Magic reflects the character of ones soul. It is what defines ones animagus form, their patronus, and even what wand mixture chooses them. Tonks longing for Lupin and trying to understand him resulted in her patronus turning into a wolf, Hermionie's patronus being an otter (of the weasel family [hint hint] intellegent, creative, with a not physically apparent penchant for viciousness [hitting Malfoy, sicing birds on Ron]). James being a stag (king of the forest, mostly benign, but more than able to defend himself and others, showoffy [the rack of the stag and Jame's nature]) while Peter was a rat (fearful, sneaking around) and Sirius was a large dog (this shows that he and James apart from being friends had a rivalry between them [the hound that pulls down the stag] where they would compete with each other as their history of misdeeds trying to outdo each other suggests, but also showcases his loyalty). And as for wands, the best examplenis Harry and Voldemort, the only two characters that we know of that use pheonix feather cores. Pheonix's are the symbolnof rebirth and both had conqured death in their own ways only to raise up more powerful than before. So that being said, Voldemort becoming a snake isnhis inner charcter manafesting. If he were an animagus he would likely be a snake, as would his patronus be. If Peter created horcruxes, no doubt he would become more rat like in appearance. This is also shown with Greyback whom had fully embraced being a werewolf, and so his body started to become more wolfish (sharped teeth, increased density of body hair, and alleged additional agility while in human form).
I think you're really spot on. I came to a similar conclusion in another comment on here but I like how you've fleshed out and fully laid out the idea with multiple canon examples. Its really interesting to think about!
But that’s just a theory... A FIL...
Lol
I feel like jk Rowling didn’t even mean to make all these connections and stuff, but they make so much sense someday someone will ask her if any your theories are true and she’ll probably be like: umm.. yeah, sure. Y not?
I was thinking that because nigini became a snake is a blood curse it kind of carried on to voldemort when he used her venom to revived himself.
SNAKES ARE NOT EVIL, I OWN A SNAKE AND IT IS LITERALLY THE NICEST CREATURE ON THIS PLANET! Also loved the video. The snake's name is Bindi.
BARTY CROUCH JR! POLLY JUICE POTION!
(I know its ment to be a snake, but cmon...its so similar)
This video has made me realize I would be 110% down for a SuperCarlinBrothers audiobook reading of the HP series
Can you do a theory on dobby the house elf
theory abou what...?
When house elves got bound to servitude. When did that happen? That’s what I’d want to know.
Alcor 618 that video is more for Harry Potter Folklore (if he doesn’t get his channel taken down) ):
I want to know if the house elves punish themselves because of a spell or because of mental abuse
he’s Dobby the free elf now
When Harry Potter killed Voldemort did Harry stop being able to speak to Snakes?
Harry stopped being able to speak to snakes as soon as the horcrux inside of him was gone. It was the horcrux, the part of Voldemort, which allowed Harry to speak to snakes :3
LittleMissDraakje thanks that’s what i meant so thanks for the answer
What LittleMissDraakje says is correct but years later he is able to speak to snakes again
I personally think voldemort messed up his process of being an animagus.....
And his inner beast is no doubt a snake
J: "On one hand (which is more than most snakes can say)" Me: MOST?
😆😂😉