CRASH TEST Ford 2015 F150 vs. 2014 F150 - Compare REPAIR COSTS

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 1K

  • @007Kellam
    @007Kellam 8 ปีที่แล้ว +543

    That is a lot of damage for 10 miles an hour... I understand cars need to crumble to absorb the impact, but that seems quite excessive

    • @iiplaya
      @iiplaya 7 ปีที่แล้ว +38

      jay jay YOURE SAFE IN ANY CAR AT A 10 MPH CRASH UNLESS IF YOU HAVE FUCKING TAKATA AIRBAGS.

    • @chaoszombie9995
      @chaoszombie9995 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      007K the newer one was aluminium...

    • @andresosorio6330
      @andresosorio6330 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      antuan XII from the 2000s *

    • @chaoszombie9995
      @chaoszombie9995 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      antuan XII most cars have Takata airbags

    • @joshjlmgproductions3313
      @joshjlmgproductions3313 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @Chris B Our Ford was in a fire, pretty much the entire front end was melted. It was in the $20,000's to fix and still wasn't written off.

  • @helivesonforever
    @helivesonforever 9 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    I love how the aluminum crushed about a foot back, while the 2014 would be easily repairable. Surprised the airbags didn't blow in the new one too.

  • @Raprada
    @Raprada 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1197

    Note : Don't crash into older F-150s

    • @itsyoboiivan3255
      @itsyoboiivan3255 6 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Lol you all know if you crash into a car covered with nokeas will obviously kill everyone

    • @EternalResonance
      @EternalResonance 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      note. dont buy a Kmart ford.

    • @ec3886
      @ec3886 5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Note: Aluminum has been shown to be cheaper than steel to repair.
      Additional Note: Steel transfers the energy whereas the Aluminum absorbs.
      I'll take the "Kmart" Ford over steel.

    • @rosssuperman7205
      @rosssuperman7205 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@ec3886 that's why I don't wana buy a new car I wana get a 1995 back then they were made better

    • @chaoszombie9995
      @chaoszombie9995 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The newer steel body F150’s are like tanks though,

  • @rangerdanger4.074
    @rangerdanger4.074 5 ปีที่แล้ว +209

    it’s amazing how the steel compares to the Aluminum

  • @tedschmitt178
    @tedschmitt178 8 ปีที่แล้ว +314

    And where is the repair cost comparison?

    • @w00dchuck43
      @w00dchuck43 5 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      DESCRIPTION

    • @Tim.1113
      @Tim.1113 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      W00DCHUCK Thank you.

    • @canadadotca
      @canadadotca 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      You can see that in your own eyes dump.. You don't need an invoice lol

    • @rebelcowboy5.7l98
      @rebelcowboy5.7l98 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      The new one was beyond compare. Lol

    • @mrnoname7370
      @mrnoname7370 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If you live in America it’s cheaper than the previous. Well the repair is more but you’ll be saving thousands from your hospital charges.

  • @kuhndog52
    @kuhndog52 9 ปีที่แล้ว +248

    shit my 67 f100 woulda been like...what was that noise?

    • @loogi_if
      @loogi_if 9 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      cool story bro

    • @redlinemotorsportts
      @redlinemotorsportts 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      +Andrew Kuhn (kuhndog52) i have a 71 f100.
      id probably cry if it happened.

    • @motorpickle6410
      @motorpickle6410 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      +Andrew Kuhn (kuhndog52) My Dodge Dakota probably would have shattered into a million pieces. And I would be fine with it.

    • @christophermadden9210
      @christophermadden9210 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      +Alex Curle actually i just had an incident with my durango ata similar speed to this and there was absolutely nothing wrong with my truck.

    • @motorpickle6410
      @motorpickle6410 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      I was taking a jab at dodge......

  • @IKIN_10
    @IKIN_10 9 ปีที่แล้ว +832

    Looks like the 2014 is the better one

    • @kolby4078
      @kolby4078 9 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      +AssassinGame00 steel isn't as soft as aluminum and this proves it

    • @FCFordLord
      @FCFordLord 9 ปีที่แล้ว +43

      Not really. It's a large step forward in safety, for the occupants of both vehicles. The 2014 rear ending the 2015 was rather violent compaired to the 2015 rear ending the 2014.

    • @assaltmaster89
      @assaltmaster89 9 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      +kolby4078 true ever one knew this anyway. the reason ford did this with the 2015 was to sofin up the blow. the more stiff the impact the more messed up you will be in a wreck. they made the cock pit super strong and it has already been tested and proven.

    • @kolby4078
      @kolby4078 9 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      +josh b they did it so save weight, thus saving gas.
      safety improvements should always be there when making a new model, regardless of materials used

    • @AlejandroMendoza-re4ik
      @AlejandroMendoza-re4ik 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      yeah bro you have all razon of the World

  • @lapamful
    @lapamful 9 ปีที่แล้ว +142

    The drivers in both vehicles were like ''did you feel something?'' ;p

    • @Thomas___
      @Thomas___ 5 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      Nah, just the 2014

    • @albq_
      @albq_ 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Nope, the driver of the 2015 definitely was not

  • @cal920c
    @cal920c 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    In both cases, you're looking at replacing the front headlight, and fender assemblies. The only difference is that in the 2016, you also have to get a plastic trim piece that goes around the headlight

  • @Hisham23633
    @Hisham23633 8 ปีที่แล้ว +303

    clearly the steel one is the better contender at low speeds here

    • @GodlessMartyr666
      @GodlessMartyr666 8 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      +Prince Broly Yep, less damage to the vehicle and the cost to repair any damage is ultimately about half the price compared to the cost of repairing aluminum.

    • @sly9263
      @sly9263 8 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      The tools, skill, and time to repair aluminum is no different than steel. If you're letting them charge you more then you're a sucker.

    • @GodlessMartyr666
      @GodlessMartyr666 8 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Robert Kavanagh The tools used must be separate from any used to repair steel to avoid causing corrosion in the aluminum.. There are also tools specifically designed to repair aluminum vs steel because of the lack of 'memory' in the metal and it's thermodynamic properties vs steel.. Technicians without skill and experience in aluminum repair risk causing damage to the metal beyond repair. You can fuck around and do the job with the wrong tools if you want to wing it and/or have someone without proper training work on it but there are standards for a reason.
      That is aside from the fact that replacement parts cost on average 50% more than the same parts made of steel would cost.

    • @XFHgog
      @XFHgog 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +Robert Kavanagh You don't get to negotiate body repair costs. There is an industry standard that everyone uses.

    • @خالدالزين-ن9ض
      @خالدالزين-ن9ض 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ههههههههههه

  • @gootywooty
    @gootywooty 8 ปีที่แล้ว +47

    Safety wise, the 2015 version is more damaged due to the fact that it is hit in a crumple zone which is designed to reduce the impact of a crash. This will cost more but in fact is safer compared to the 2014 version has the occupants feel much more of the impact. If you want to keep repair costs down go with the 2014, if you want a lighter but safer pick-up, go with the 2015 version. The 2015 version also includes side airbags and ABS are standard with many other features available at request. So safety wise, the 2015 F-150 is better despite what the video above shows as it only takes in account the repair costs. - From an unbiased person living in the UK with no love for the F-150 ;) , just facts.

    • @AnthonyAwada
      @AnthonyAwada 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      You are right. Don't forget that aluminum doesn't have to worry about rust issues.

    • @gootywooty
      @gootywooty 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +amanoncrack Yeah it didn't have ABS as standard, it was an optional feature.

    • @gootywooty
      @gootywooty 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +amanoncrack I'm from the UK so we don't really have Chevys here. Hardly any pickup trucks as well. We do have the Ford Transit though xD

    • @gootywooty
      @gootywooty 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +amanoncrack Yeah you're right about that, especially with those massive diesel/petrol V8s. I'd find it hard to inagine a Ford F-150 on the roads of London, it would probably be around the size of a single decker bus. Only people who buy pickups here in the UK would be builders or farmers. Its usually the Nissan Navara or Ford Ranger but they're tiny compared to a Silverado or any other American pickup truck. They must be really good for hauling stuff around and towing. I wouldn't mind one myself If I lived in the countryside.

    • @johnmoore1495
      @johnmoore1495 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ABS had been required on vehicles sold in America since 2000.

  • @88jxckson
    @88jxckson 9 ปีที่แล้ว +373

    So basically the 2014 model is better....

    • @williams6550
      @williams6550 9 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      +Dave Jackson How did you come to this conclusion?

    • @88jxckson
      @88jxckson 9 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      +William S The 2014 model took less damage & it's made out of steel...Watch the video

    • @williams6550
      @williams6550 9 ปีที่แล้ว +47

      ***** Yes, I watched the video...but your comment doesn't mean anything. You assume it's better based on what you have seen, but it doesn't really work like that. Appearances can be deceiving. The outer body panels are designed to crumple in a collision. Will it cost more to repair from a low speed collision such as this compared to a steel body? Yes, probably, for now anyways. But there are still advantages.. lighter weight being the biggest one. ...which equates to better fuel economy and higher payload.

    • @88jxckson
      @88jxckson 9 ปีที่แล้ว +50

      +William S The video is about collision damage...not fuel economy or anything else you named which means your comment is just as irrelevant if not more...Its better when it comes to collisions...I'm more into Silverado trucks though so if you say so

    • @williams6550
      @williams6550 9 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      ***** Oh, you're not even a Ford man? Good day to you Sir.

  • @Bobbybeb
    @Bobbybeb 9 ปีที่แล้ว +235

    Steel all the way. Plus the repair cost are less for steel than aluminum.

    • @raekwonwillis102
      @raekwonwillis102 7 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      KYDashcam same thing was said with fuel injection vs carburetors

    • @emmarobbieus9107
      @emmarobbieus9107 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Raekwon Willis what? Carburetors are still cheaper to fix. Not as reliable.

    • @safetydoge
      @safetydoge 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Smells like W H I P L A S H

    • @komodobricks
      @komodobricks 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      The car crumples so your body doesn’t

    • @sevnlight6313
      @sevnlight6313 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@komodobricks STEEL vehicles also have crumple zones....
      The ALUMINUM 2015 F150 supercab kills the driver in the small overlap. Then the frame structure was redesigned for 2016.

  • @squangan
    @squangan 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I was in an actual crash like this but was hit at a higher speed. A Dodge 1500 truck rear ended my 2010 F150 FX4 while I was at a stop light and that driver was texting, she didn’t even hit her brakes until just before the impact (50 kmh zone) and tried to swerve at the last second. Impact wise the driver seat protected me well and I wasn’t injured, the right side of my rear bumper, truck box and taillight had to be replaced. The body shop insurance claim came in around $10,000.

  • @keyshawnrussell245
    @keyshawnrussell245 8 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    They should really do more test like this

    • @petergilbert144
      @petergilbert144 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not really. They should change ot and make a front hit a front and a back hit a back rather than comparing a front hitting a back.

    • @posinker
      @posinker 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Peter Gilbert did you check the IIHS test site? They more than likely do perform such a test.

    • @CrazySteTV
      @CrazySteTV 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Keyshawn Russell All Cars must be tested... search on TH-cam:
      - NHTSA Oblique Crash
      or
      - IIHS Small Overlap
      they are the 2 Hardest Tests all Cars have to go through, the Small Overlap Crashes cars agaibst a wall at 40mph with 25% of the Nose, whereas the Oblique Crash Test, which is just being introduced, crashes a 5500lb Cart running at 56mph against the Nose of a Car parked at a 15 degrees Angle ... you'll be impressed to see what the results are

  • @HCFX2011
    @HCFX2011 9 ปีที่แล้ว +116

    Everyone on here must be insurance appraisers or body shop workers. I worked at a body shop for 2 years and worked on high-end vehicles often built with aluminum or other composite material, so I can shed light on this.
    I don't see how the aluminum didn't hold up as well as the steel. Both trucks would need the same amount of new parts. In the front crashes, both trucks would need a new headlight, fender, hood, bumper and probably quite a few parts behind the bodywork. In the rear, both trucks would need a new taillight, bedside, tailgate and bumper. I really don't see how the repair costs could be 25% more with aluminum here, because panels on the aluminum body are riveted not welded so they are much easier to replace. Yes, in this video, the aluminum appears to have flexed more than the steel, but who gives a shit? The same amount of panels will need to be replaced on both trucks, so who cares how the panel reacted?
    The idea of the way the new aluminum F-150 is built is the ease of replacing panels. Yes, the parts are more expensive right now, but the labour required to replace the panel rather than trying to repair it should offset the cost of the part. That's the problem I have with Edmunds' test when they slammed a sledge into the side of their 2015. The body shop tried to repair the panel when it would've been easier and exponentially cheaper to replace the panel.
    Either way, I'm not really concerned. I upgraded from my 2013 F-150 to a 2015 F-150 and my insurance went down even though my new truck has a $10,000 higher sticker price than my 2013.

    • @ignacioalvarez1490
      @ignacioalvarez1490 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      so youre saying that the steel one in this video could be fixed with just a new headlight? do you really think everything will fit just like it was before? you will have to replace panels on both

    • @fadingbeleifs
      @fadingbeleifs 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      HCFX news flash, aluminum body panels ARE welded. You obviously don't know what the hell you're talking about.

    • @TwinShards
      @TwinShards 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      As well has Aluminium will survive better against Snow and water. It will not rust.
      Over all, without any accident, your Aluminium Ford-150 will last way longer visually than the steel.

    • @ebeneezerslpooge9864
      @ebeneezerslpooge9864 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@fadingbeleifs but how do you know?

    • @wva_trucks2336
      @wva_trucks2336 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Well aluminum parts are way more expensive even if you only need the same parts

  • @inconspicuous7464
    @inconspicuous7464 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    for those people saying "cars crumple to save your life" The steel version of the f150 has the crumple feature but the new F150 was almost totaled at 10 mph, nobody gets whiplash at that speed anyway

  • @mcgusto82
    @mcgusto82 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Just because the steel body f150 looks less damaged, it doesn't mean it'll be less costly to fix.
    A bent hood needs replacement as much as a balled up crumpled hood.

    • @floridianrailauto9032
      @floridianrailauto9032 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Read the description, the steel F150 is LITERALLY better than the aluminum F150

  • @luken2o223
    @luken2o223 5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Steel is heavier and stronger so that there is less damage, sure. But aluminium is lighter and less resistant and crumples more to allow for a softer impact therefore making the occupants safer in case of a crash.

    • @vuurkoning
      @vuurkoning 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      So u want a drivable car or a safe ride?

    • @luken2o223
      @luken2o223 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@vuurkoning A safe ride... so an aluminium truck.

    • @vuurkoning
      @vuurkoning 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@luken2o223 in a big crash thatsnot a good choice but ok

    • @luken2o223
      @luken2o223 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@vuurkoning Neither is a steel body but ok

    • @vuurkoning
      @vuurkoning 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@luken2o223 a steel body is safer tho

  • @NikoBell12
    @NikoBell12 9 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    LOL at all of the idiots here dissing aluminum. It doesn't have much to do with the material, it has everything to do with build quality. Numerous sturdy aluminum vehicles have been made in the past.

    • @nerdlydood
      @nerdlydood 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      NikoBell12 I think a lot of the extra costs will go down too as aluminum becomes more mainstream.

  • @Mr.Looooong
    @Mr.Looooong 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    People are missing the point. The aluminum body helps you not be affected by the hit, meanwhile the steel rocks the cab. You see how the cab barley moves on the 2015 but on the 2011-14 it shakes. It's all about safety.... and long lasting strength. Aluminum is strong, but not hard.

    • @saketnaik1
      @saketnaik1 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Do you seriously thinking people care enough about their safety? I mean LESS MONEY=BETTER PRODUCT, they forget to add their hospital bills into the equation 😂

  • @Simulator51
    @Simulator51 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I just recently purchased a 2014 f150 fx4, and I knew it was a steel body. I thought the aluminum body was newer than 2015, though. Boy, did I luck out on that one. From everything I've read, the fuel economy increase is negligible as well.

    • @Enzo187
      @Enzo187 ปีที่แล้ว

      You definitely didn't luck out but glad to know you're a moron.

  • @MrELIAN602
    @MrELIAN602 9 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    Steel rules

  • @42luke93
    @42luke93 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Even though the steel was not as damaged. It’s still damaged and the same parts need to be replaced it seems.

  • @RetroWorkShop773
    @RetroWorkShop773 8 ปีที่แล้ว +57

    Steel looks stronger bro......

    • @Wakelius
      @Wakelius 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +Nathan Oakes because it is

    • @calvins48
      @calvins48 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      +Nathan Oakes Not in the event of a high speed crash

    • @RetroWorkShop773
      @RetroWorkShop773 8 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      CalJack You mean a high speed crash where the steel frame underneath is doing most of the work of protecting you?

    • @XFHgog
      @XFHgog 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      +geese Just about. Vehicles are getting closer to disposable. Pay $50K for a truck and send it to the junkyard because you bumped into something. No body repair is as good as new, so avoiding those types of repairs are ideal.

    • @ximenabarron21
      @ximenabarron21 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      jclaunch00

  • @Twentythree33
    @Twentythree33 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    My family has a 2010 F150, and it kicks ass. It's got the 5.4 V8, which sounds insane!

    • @kyboy5
      @kyboy5 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Shut the fuck up

  • @MouhamedKonte
    @MouhamedKonte 9 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    The f-150 2014 is more than better that the 2015

  • @rickjones871
    @rickjones871 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    A glancing blow at 15 miles an hour. Wow. At least now they know now to strengthen the Headlights. That was a very informative test. Repair cost probably cost more than the test. If you're going to test two trucks, do it right. Head on

  • @StereoMike06
    @StereoMike06 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Kinda biased as the Aluminum versions bumper was just slightly lower placing all the force on the front panel and face. The steel version's bumper is a touch higher as you can see the initial contact deflect off the bumper first.

    • @blizzrd8153
      @blizzrd8153 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I didn't think anyone else caught that.. Good vision.

  • @2koolchris291
    @2koolchris291 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    So glad my brother got a 2013 instead of something newer. I’d like if they would offer a steel variant on the ford trucks so that people who want to use them won’t worry as much about crashes.

  • @skilashi21
    @skilashi21 9 ปีที่แล้ว +60

    This is a video ford does not want you to see.

    • @williams6550
      @williams6550 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      +skilashi21 What makes you say that?

    • @skilashi21
      @skilashi21 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      +William S Are you blind? The aluminum F150 sustained more damage than the steel F150

    • @williams6550
      @williams6550 9 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      skilashi21 What is your point? You know, all the flashy stuff on the outside is designed to absorb impacts... it's the cab/cabin that's important. Why don't you go cry about the fiberglass/plastic fenders on almost every dually, Saturn vehicles, Corvettes, etc. etc.?

    • @jonmario3440
      @jonmario3440 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      just dont crash

    • @rickyprs
      @rickyprs 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      And just don't buy f-150's

  • @fake._
    @fake._ 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Reading the description helped explain more

  • @kyledavis436
    @kyledavis436 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    “High strength aluminum alloy. Just as strong as steel but much lighter” My ass

    • @ec3886
      @ec3886 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Don't look at the impact zone as your irrefutable proof.. the newer F150's passengers are safe and didn't feel as much of the impact as compared to those in the steel body.

  •  6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I got a 2014 Ford F-150 3.5l twin turbo and its been amazing, test drove the 2015 and still chose 2014.

  • @s0meone1252
    @s0meone1252 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The steel body :TIS BUT A SCRATCH
    The aluminum body: uwu plz don't hurt me

  • @l4dyfett
    @l4dyfett 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Lot of hate for the F150.. This is the truck I have and I absolutely love it. Much safer than the other cars I've driven in the past.

  • @nicocabrera7675
    @nicocabrera7675 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Looks like the F150 wins again

  • @Spherz
    @Spherz 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    My dad owned a 2014 Ford F-150 Lariat, and rolled it over at 60mph a few years back.. completely totaled it. Had it been a new one I’m not sure if I would still have him🙏

  • @justplanecrazy5575
    @justplanecrazy5575 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I’d prefer to have the older F150

  • @LITTLE1994
    @LITTLE1994 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The bumpers did not hit dead center. That's why both truck took considerable damage above.
    But steel bumpers, while rare now, those are the thicker metal 1980s and before large American cars had, so in minor collisions, repair costs are minimal.

  • @acrane2
    @acrane2 7 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Aluminum = Soda cans. Keep it that way.

    • @UnderR
      @UnderR 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Hazim Azam wtf

  • @mike1536
    @mike1536 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    It was just a plastic parts that broke for the 2015. Also if you notice the bumper on the 2015 just came right down where the 2014 just stayed up which helped with the damage control

  • @kylebullard4780
    @kylebullard4780 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I understand why automanufatures design vehicles to have crumple zones to absorb energy from a impact but what should be a fender bender in the parking lot shouldn't total or car or truck...

    • @hnoobsho
      @hnoobsho 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Kyle Bullard even if the that saves one life its worth it, who cares about a totaled car.

    • @kleetus92
      @kleetus92 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Kyle Bullard I would hardly call that totaled.

    • @inconspicuous7464
      @inconspicuous7464 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      kleetus92 the front axle almost bent.

    • @inconspicuous7464
      @inconspicuous7464 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Chuck Norris I'm sure you would if you felt a slight bump from behind you and the rear axle was bent

  • @thatotherguy186
    @thatotherguy186 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Still rather have the higher damage. My deductible won’t change lol.
    Much rather have the vehicle crumble and absorb the impact, exactly as it’s designed to do. Steel cars at 10-15 can still cause some decent injuries. Notice it just pushed it out of the way instead of letting in go “through” it.

  • @mexi9787
    @mexi9787 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Love my 2012 ECO-BOOST 💯‼️

  • @jamesreed9714
    @jamesreed9714 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm glad i watched this. I'm struggling eith a decision to buy a 2014 or a 15/16 f150. I like the 14 exterior but the 15/16 tech and interior. I'll have to go with quality though. I'm not paying top dollar for a truck to crumble like that aluminum body did. Wow! 2014 it is. I think ford will go back to steel soon. I work for a place that buys about 300 fords a year and administrators are not happy about the repair cost of the aluminum fords

  • @xkclearly666
    @xkclearly666 9 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    just like an aluminum can.

    • @nonconsensualopinion
      @nonconsensualopinion 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      We should note the aluminum variant has a better crash rating and higher payload capacity.

    • @floridianrailauto9032
      @floridianrailauto9032 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@nonconsensualopinion And you also have to sell it for scrap if you get in a wreck at just 10 miles per hour

    • @floridianrailauto9032
      @floridianrailauto9032 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Hazim Azam Bro you need to understand no one is gonna pay 50 grand for a truck that gets totaled at just 5mph broooooooooooooo

    • @floridianrailauto9032
      @floridianrailauto9032 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Hazim Azam Your Urdu is also weak, work on it
      Also why don't you tell me whom you work for?

    • @floridianrailauto9032
      @floridianrailauto9032 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Hazim Azam Then use proper punctuation please.
      Why don't you give me my address Mr. Central Intelligence?
      Traduci questo dato che fai parte della CIA

  • @12skits63
    @12skits63 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The newer F-150 did just as good. Everyone saying it did poorly but it didn't. The 2014 F-150s hood is still impacted after the accident. And the fender and light still need to be replaced.

  • @saeed5757
    @saeed5757 6 ปีที่แล้ว +112

    اللي عربي لايك 😂❤️

    • @عبدالعزيز-ظ2ه4ت
      @عبدالعزيز-ظ2ه4ت 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      • احـساسـَ عـاشـق • ههههه موجودين

    • @scoapproductions
      @scoapproductions 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      kek

    • @as_1395
      @as_1395 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@عبدالعزيز-ظ2ه4ت موجودين

    • @ramirezdiego.m1b792
      @ramirezdiego.m1b792 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      No es un coche bomba

    • @as_1395
      @as_1395 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ramirezdiego.m1b792 shut up please

  • @ExtraFrySauce
    @ExtraFrySauce 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    and welcome back 5 years later.
    TH-cam recommend shut up and let me enjoy this

  • @scarumanga
    @scarumanga 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I have heard a couple stories of the new 2015's hitting moose in northern ontario. Apparently there is not very much left after that happens when compared to those who hit one with their steel bodied variants.

    • @serenan920
      @serenan920 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      New one is fragile. SAAB used to test with moose/elk. No way aluminium up to job..

    • @Enzo187
      @Enzo187 ปีที่แล้ว

      Give me a break lmfao. No truck is going to be repairable after hitting a fucking moose.

  • @oma3111
    @oma3111 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So why new f150s cost so much now it seems that they are fancy . Reliable no more . Own a 2001 5.4 liter and still running like a beast.

  • @xnrs9334
    @xnrs9334 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    2014 is better but 2015 weight is lower and it have lower fuel consuption

  • @is_dat_brock112
    @is_dat_brock112 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    It’s funny because the commercials for the new fords are like “MADE OF HIGH GRADE ALUMINUM”

  • @marcorenteria5245
    @marcorenteria5245 8 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    military grade?

    • @Ford_Everest
      @Ford_Everest 8 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      +Marco Renteria more of chinese made

    • @schon2395
      @schon2395 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Repair costs are going to go down in the next few years, and Chevy is going to go with aluminum in 4-5 years or so. (I'd bet they'd claim that they did it first.)

  • @galatians515
    @galatians515 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    The lighter the vehicle is, the more violent it will be in a crash, I don't know what the weight of either of these, but notice how when the 15 hit the 14 the 14 barely moved, but when the 14 hit the 15 the 15 moved a lot. The heavier steel body will be less impact because it will move the other vehicle more instead of stopping you faster. I also saw a few comments about corrosion, aluminum doesn't rust it just dissolves. If you have ever tried to get aluminum red hot like steel you know what I mean. It will do basically the same thing, so it will be interesting to see what happens, if it will "rust" faster, or if Ford figured something out to slow the rust.

    • @blackicegamingchannel
      @blackicegamingchannel 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Buddy the heavier the vehicle is the more damage it does

    • @galatians515
      @galatians515 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@blackicegamingchannel yes, to the other vehicle, but it carries it's momentum better.

  • @xaviercavalier4822
    @xaviercavalier4822 8 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    People saying "the car crumbles so you don't get hurt" get on my damn nerves. I would rather a TRUCK be able to take a low speed crash with little to no damage. My 80s steel suburban may not be safe for me if it hits another 80s steel truck, but if it hits a 2015 f150, you can bet your ass that pretty f150 will be undrivable... Ask me how I know lol the mans suspension gave in

    • @MyAlexVideos
      @MyAlexVideos 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      the front and rear ends of the car are designed to crumple like that to take all the impact

    • @xaviercavalier4822
      @xaviercavalier4822 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I understand that, and that is precisely what I said I do not like!!

    • @MyAlexVideos
      @MyAlexVideos 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      well if its designed to do that whay do you get mad? i dont understand lol

    • @xaviercavalier4822
      @xaviercavalier4822 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Because they didn't used to be!! You all can take your safe little plastic cars, but I'll keep driving my old steel ones, how bout that?

    • @MyAlexVideos
      @MyAlexVideos 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      lol you dont understand

  • @warwizard9584
    @warwizard9584 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm a vehicle physical damage appraiser and could have told you it will cost a lot more to repair the aluminum body because shops have to be aluminum repair certified and charge a lot more to repair aluminum.......you didn't have to destroy two perfectly good trucks.

  • @robertmcdonald338
    @robertmcdonald338 8 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Well gm & chevy going to alum next couple yrs. dodge been using alum hoods on there pick ups.ford always been one step ahead for many yrs. others try to copy!!

    • @oma3111
      @oma3111 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hope so they don't. Fancy material .

  • @_DoItTogether
    @_DoItTogether 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    That’s disheartening as an owner of a 2015 f150, but I CAN say, I have in fact rear ended an SUV at roughly 10mph, and I suffered nothing but very minor dents to the lowest part of my bumper and license plate... nothing else

  • @gagegarofalo123
    @gagegarofalo123 8 ปีที่แล้ว +70

    It's a shame. The Newer F-150 had so much potential. Guess I'll be buying a Chevy.

    • @haydenmedgyesy5674
      @haydenmedgyesy5674 8 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      Don't come crying to me to pull you home when you blow a gasket

    • @gagegarofalo123
      @gagegarofalo123 8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      +Hayden Medgyesy lol, I'm a Ford guy, but we get 2015-16 F-150's in the shop that have gotten in wrecks, and the way they are constructed now, you can't bang out the dents anymore, so we have to replace the whole quater panel which ends up costing the customer way more than it should to fix a dent. Any decent crash, and the new F-150 will total pretty easily. It's a truck, and I should be able to treat it as such. The F-150 is fragile now. It's like a coke can. It really is a shame. If it weren't for the aluminum I'd still be looking at Fords.

    • @CoffeeTechClub
      @CoffeeTechClub 8 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      +Loose Goose the chevy is not near as safe and the ford got 5 star safety rating

    • @benpidgeon9386
      @benpidgeon9386 8 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      it's safer than any other truck in its class...

    • @jamesthompson7116
      @jamesthompson7116 8 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Enjoy your Chevy and their ridiculously off-centered steering wheel issue... -.-

  • @MrRedFox13Photography
    @MrRedFox13Photography 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    is there a way to petition ford for a steel body instead of aluminum

  • @elvispresley3327
    @elvispresley3327 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    ford is stupid for going aluminum why cut weight for effeicency when you can use steel for saftey to the buyers.
    .. ford is always lacks quality

    • @bladadah3105
      @bladadah3105 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Donald Trump you can always Put it as a no 5 star safety since your president

    • @JW-hf5is
      @JW-hf5is 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Donald Trump Because aluminium is safer than steel, genius.

    • @bladadah3105
      @bladadah3105 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      J W do you want The Aluminum To crumble on your face, or have steel have dents on your face, And say this: Aluminum Is Much more expensive than the steel

  • @iavagabond124
    @iavagabond124 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    gotta remember 2015 was the beginning of the newest gen and there's always kinks. but they've been fixing it and making more durable we'll see how much better it is when the 18 f150 comes out. but my old 99 Taurus took a cement block to the mouth at 35 and only got a dent

  • @mohamedalsenafi9276
    @mohamedalsenafi9276 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    GM truck the best 😻

    • @dallasfrost1996
      @dallasfrost1996 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      yup!, way stronger then these fords...

  • @dragonheartedcs4061
    @dragonheartedcs4061 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just remember a very rigid vehicle (the older cor F150) Isnt as safe though i think its safer when some crashes into you or you want to kill someones car but if you hit someone or crash the passengers and driver will be more injured unlike the aliuminum where the Truck's panels or parts crumbles it absorbs the inpact much better and i believe the cabin is a stronger material than the outer area. Edit: Jeez so many people are either dumb or dont know much about cars

  • @dyingangelo
    @dyingangelo 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    10mph? is that a joke?

    • @Mat.Carvalho
      @Mat.Carvalho 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      NeATaNDtURdy "REPAIR COSTS"

    • @eltaco1959
      @eltaco1959 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      you're right they should have been at 35mph. that would have been real world crash test. I don't think they wanted to show what would happen to an aluminum ford at that scenario.

    • @dyingangelo
      @dyingangelo 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      cars should be capable of surviving a crash based on their top speed not 10mph

    • @miguelrios45
      @miguelrios45 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +NeATaNDtURdy well so far that new f150 couldn't survive a 10mph hit. a 35mph would tear the truck up

  • @FaceyourGiants1
    @FaceyourGiants1 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like how newer f150 had more softer impact. I would worry more about drivers/people inside it just smoothly impacted, everything else is insurance problem even if its 25% more repair. I noticed older had stiffer impact and the neck of that driver is now hurting

  • @swat260
    @swat260 9 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    aluminum body like a chinse car.

    • @AlbertArrabal
      @AlbertArrabal 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Except until you crash...

    • @archangel9975
      @archangel9975 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Chinese owned Volvo has great safety rating

    • @aliyasser4053
      @aliyasser4053 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Talal 543

    • @niuniun215
      @niuniun215 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Shai KO ur sound like a white fat guy

  • @onlyrock1
    @onlyrock1 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm confused??? You have the front, which is visually a weaker section on both- colliding into a virtually 90deg reinforced corner on the back (not designed for impact like the front corners). What kind of engineer thought this was a positive result??

  • @f_-gy5jg
    @f_-gy5jg 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    مافيه عربي

    • @مارتنديو
      @مارتنديو 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      في بخاري

    • @mjo4172
      @mjo4172 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@مارتنديو 😂😂

  • @lincolnhunt9558
    @lincolnhunt9558 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Vehicles are designed with crumple zones to minimize impact to the driver and passengers, but they also should be able to withstand a stronger impact than that with minimal damage. That thing crushed like a soda can

    • @FCFordLord
      @FCFordLord 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It's a fairly hard, localized hit.
      The 2014 didn't absorb it at all, resulting in a very violent shock to both trucks.
      The 2015 absorbed it nicely.

  • @cstrng12
    @cstrng12 5 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    I have an 04 steel body f150 i was tboned by a chick pulling out of a gas station, she was probly doing around 20 mph & she hit my drivers side door as i was going straight when she hit she completley bounced 180° in the other direction, my door was bent up pretty good but my window still goes down 🤣 tis but a scratch

  • @wsmcmc3864
    @wsmcmc3864 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    A lot of comments to read through. But I didn't see anyone addressing any statistics on crash speeds most likely to occur nor at what speed would you have to be going in a single car accident and insurance would total your brand new $48k vehicle. Obviously these insurance factors get spread across all policy holders. Such as high speed crash survivors cost way more in medical bills than a dead person. The insurance companies are a casino. They don't care cause they don't loose over time. Every time you buy a new vehicle watch how your rates jack up.

  • @JDAlwaysWorkin
    @JDAlwaysWorkin 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    And people believe an aluminum airplane went through the pentagon.. pshh

  • @robertthalmer1469
    @robertthalmer1469 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    The aluminum trucks may crumple more but they actually received a higher safety rating. In the end, it's not about keeping the vehicle intact, it's about keeping the driver and passengers safe. The more of the vehicle crumples, the better, because its taking the impact rather than the person taking it. And the F-150 is the safest out there when it comes to pickup trucks. Ram, GM, and Toyota don't come close, although the newer body style Rams are better than the older ones.

  • @Mathicuss
    @Mathicuss 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Wow thing peals open like a can....

    • @AlbanianSold13r
      @AlbanianSold13r 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      yeah

    • @kingdaniel3519
      @kingdaniel3519 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +matthebest018 Cant wait to see how Chevy and Ram handle it when they switch to aluminum.

    • @AlbanianSold13r
      @AlbanianSold13r 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Daniel Bell if they do

    • @kingdaniel3519
      @kingdaniel3519 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      AlbanianSold13r They will. They announced last year they had already found suppliers.

    • @Mathicuss
      @Mathicuss 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Daniel Bell Nothing's confirmed, they simply said they were investing in there aluminum plants. GM just built an all aluminum ct6 doesn't meen it was for the Silverado. But anything is possible.

  • @jbird1173
    @jbird1173 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    My steel body 2014 tundra took the mirror, front fender, headlight and grille off of a 16 f150. Repairs to my truck took 5 min. Bumper corner pushed in. His truck left on a flatbed. Ill stick with steel bodies

  • @rapanuimotocrossenduro9193
    @rapanuimotocrossenduro9193 9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    built tough??? haha looks like soda can

  • @ItsJosh
    @ItsJosh 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Domt see why everyone is complaining. Both trucks still have a destroyed headlight, hood, fender, and bumper.

  • @qjjl.
    @qjjl. 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    قرطس

  • @paultwice2279
    @paultwice2279 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The Ford F-150 is the only truck in its class that got a too safety pick award. No more explanation needed.

    • @paultwice2279
      @paultwice2279 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Top*

    • @galpinspeedshop2591
      @galpinspeedshop2591 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's also the most unreliable

    • @paultwice2279
      @paultwice2279 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Galpin Speed Shop I believe I would rather be safer than worrying about reliability which the ram is worse.

    • @joyride2013
      @joyride2013 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Paultwice22 Why are you so loyal to Ford? You shouldn't be that loyal to any corporation. Just remember; at the end of the day, Ford hates you.

    • @cristianmunoz4614
      @cristianmunoz4614 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +sugahotcakes why would you expect any company to love u

  • @j.d.fgamer1516
    @j.d.fgamer1516 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    mi abuelo me sigo que en sus tiempos habían camionetas más resisten y mujeres más calientes

  • @mazda9624
    @mazda9624 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Not only is it better for low speed impacts, but even the crashed up 2014 f150 looks better than a mint 2015 f150

  • @cstrng12
    @cstrng12 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    why is that even an option 😂 steele all the way

  • @videodude2010
    @videodude2010 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ford needs to do some explaining. What about this is "military grade" aluminum?

  • @elcausaaa
    @elcausaaa 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    JAJA:"(
    Yo queriendo una troca y estos vatos destrosandolas:'v

  • @spaghetti9067
    @spaghetti9067 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    To me it looks like the aluminium one kept crumbling after it hit the steel one

  • @natetarbox6660
    @natetarbox6660 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Aluminum is softer than steel and this proves it. It’s not as safe and easier to be destroyed. It’s also not as strong and melts faster.
    *Story about how I know this:*
    When I got in an accident with my 2019 F-150 King Ranch it was super bad. I had t-boned someone going 70mph after they ran a redlight and pulled out onto the highway to make a left and I didn’t see them in time and slammed into them. My door got stuck and I was stuck in my truck. I was hurting so badly. And then my truck burst into flames and I’m stuck in the truck. I was so scared. And since it was aluminum it melts way faster. So it melted so much that by the time people got me out of the truck that the fire had starting melting the gauge cluster and infotainment screen and steering wheel. So it went through the fire wall and started melting the dashboard. Steel wouldn’t have melted as quickly. I only got minor burns to my right foot. From the fire. But all the injuries I had were, broken ankle, sprained knee, broken humerus, sprained wrist, burn on foot, concussion, a huge bruise on my forehead from the airbag, 3 broken ribs, broken nose, and a bunch of cuts from the glass. I’m all better now and I’m happy to be here. It’s just so scary to think that I could’ve died. In the end, steel is stronger.
    *What happened to the other driver:*
    The other driver was in his moms Cadillac Escalade and he broke his left arm, ankle, right wrist, and a broken rib. His mom wasn’t happy.
    *In the end:*
    At first the mom blamed ME for “driving recklessly,” “speeding (speed limit was 65 and I was 70)” “and that I had enough time to brake.” But In court when they saw the dash cam footage they decided he was at fault.
    *What I think about aluminum:*
    It’s not as safe. And steel is still better. Sure steel is heavier but it’s not as safe, and has so many problems in the winter. (The cold weather makes the body panels shift and so doors can’t shut all the way. Also the reason they went to aluminum was for “fuel economy.” I don’t know about you but most people aren’t buying trucks for their fuel economy. If you were then get a Rivian or a Cybertruck.
    *Is the F-150 safe:*
    It really depends on your opinion of what safe is but, yes i think it’s safe. I lived I the end without anything that’s gonna effect me in the long run except a prediction by doctors of some major arthritis.
    *Would I recommend:*
    Yes. There nice trucks.
    If you read all that your a great person. Have a nice day.😊

  • @sunburntsilverado7665
    @sunburntsilverado7665 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Been watching ford truck crash test because I’m looking to purchase one for my first ( purchased ) car.

  • @MikeJohnson-nr4yo
    @MikeJohnson-nr4yo 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dang buying a truck made of beer cans might be a bad idea, I still love my 2015 though.

  • @justinleonard8361
    @justinleonard8361 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    What’s the speed of the vehicle at the point of impact?

  • @MonsterOFTR
    @MonsterOFTR 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    I rather the 2014.... Enough said.
    The offset crashes is scary on the 2015+ models.

  • @jjlegend3922
    @jjlegend3922 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Interesting the have new 14s laying around, but im pretty sure ive heard some of these crash facilities still have brand new 2002/2003 f150s to do the same thing with. Goes for other vehicles too... how do I get my hands on one? haha

  • @rachelgibson1858
    @rachelgibson1858 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well this video might have just sold me on the used 2014 I have been pondering. Was wanting the newer, lighter, better gas mileage 2016. BUT.. Crash test videos of the 2015+ are scary. I wish I could find full speed front impact and side impact of 2014.

    • @claudiomunoz471
      @claudiomunoz471 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Rachel Gibson the new f150 has a better crash rating, a stronger chassis, and more powerful engine options like the v8 and 3.5. I don't see why anyone would actually prefer the older one.

  • @dlyselxics
    @dlyselxics ปีที่แล้ว

    Makes me feel a lot better about my 2013! My 2003 is probably even more of a tank

    • @ZacCjw
      @ZacCjw ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You may want to watch crash test videos of the 2003 f150 🫣 it didn't fair so well

    • @dlyselxics
      @dlyselxics ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ZacCjw It's a supercrew

    • @isaac24
      @isaac24 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ZacCjw The regular cab and supercrew were better than the supercab of that era...the lack of a B pillar in the supercab (which the other 2 had) had a major impact...they fixed it in the 04 though which did much better even without a B pillar

  • @chrisf7731
    @chrisf7731 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    People always say old cars are built the best

  • @thomaspotemciano
    @thomaspotemciano 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    My question is what do they do with all the cars they wreck after testing them

    • @miker6052
      @miker6052 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +Eazydogg The vehicles are considered "junk" when they are built. Either by cosmetic defect or a random vehicle selected for testing. About 2% of the vehicles on the assembly line are chosen for "junk" status. They are sent to schools for training, crash testing and quality control testing. Most never leave the assembly plant.

    • @BadaBing.UCF30
      @BadaBing.UCF30 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Eazydogg They go to M&M.
      mandmautosalvage.hollanderapps.com/asp/vehicles/

    • @yunocomehere6312
      @yunocomehere6312 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      the vehicles are considered junk when they're built into fords xD

    • @TaigaXZ
      @TaigaXZ 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +dtrnsprtr OHHHH SAVAGE xD

  • @derbyjr
    @derbyjr 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Look, at 5 mph, no you don’t want to crash Aluminum into steel. But in higher speed, lethal force crashes, you want aluminum. Aluminum disperses the energy from the crash, because it shatters. Steel stays ridged, so all the energy from the crash is directed into the cab

  • @NewBPure
    @NewBPure 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Its the same repair costs since both trucks got the same pieces damaged... The only difference between the costs is that aluminium is more expensive, and it dosent matter if the 2014 damage was less impressive since both of them got the same damages in minor scales, they both have to be repaired or changed the same pieces...