Let's talk about Good Omens...

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 5

  • @ItsMzPhoenix
    @ItsMzPhoenix 3 วันที่ผ่านมา +13

    I was gonna point out the similarity to TOH's ending, and you did so. I hope they restore the full season format...sigh.

  • @ImzsCoffin
    @ImzsCoffin 4 วันที่ผ่านมา +30

    Honestly, i'm so upset about the 90 minute finale that we're getting because it made me realise that we probally won't be able to see everything that was planned for season 3 due to the shortness of the finale. I'm almost certain that they will cut out and rush a bunch of stuff in the finale in order to keep it in the 90 minute time slot :(

  • @Buzz-McCool
    @Buzz-McCool 5 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    😎

  • @kyrauniversal
    @kyrauniversal 3 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    You earned a Bell-On subscriber. Thank you for the news. I just need to rant a little bit. Sorry if it seems incoherent.
    The fact that the victims told Tortoise (the podcast) they didn't want him canceled, they just wanted him to stop, yet he got canceled anyways, certainly says a lot about someones character. Both Neils' and the corporations. Corporations just don't seem to care anyway. I mean, we still see the enabling hypocrites like Russell Davies hire yet another 18 year old to play a 20 year old, and no one bats an eye. We saw when that creep Noel hid behind his BAFTA, concerning his allegations. Marilyn Manson is STILL touring. We ALL know why Eccleston quit. Toxicity is EVERYWHERE. It's all just painful. I hate corporations and creeps equally because both have a cause and effect relationship, without the willingness to hold themselves accountable. And the fact Amazon actually did fire him is baffling, because they always seemed to let things slide when it came to things like this.

    • @brewster_4
      @brewster_4 3 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

      1. Neil Gaiman wasn't cancelled. Amazon most likely doesn't want the bad publicity that doing a full third season would involve. I doubt the people making it want to have their names associated with Gaiman during all this. Maybe Neil Gaiman should've stopped a long time ago if he didn't want this to happen. His actions have consequences, and that's what we're seeing.
      2. How is Russell T Davies a hypocrite for hiring 18 year old actors to play a 20 year old? How is that even a bad thing? Actors usually don't play their exact age, and instead play someone roughly in their age range.