Tis is the inetrview that possibly nailed Huntley also Carr says Holly was upset she didnt get the job on last day of term,yet Huntley claimed the girls asked him "Did Miss Carr get the job" when he saw them. But the Sky news interviewer referrred to them in the past tense also so I dont think any relevance can be taken.
Yeah I mean he used the past tense because she was no longer a teaching assistant to them. So she simply could had used the past tense because she was no longer in her class. I think the whole past tense theory has been blown out of perspective.
I genuinely think he was such a good manipulator and liar she just thought he was innocent… I was shocked that the police officer who ask searched the school asked for the hanger to be opened and he said he didn’t have the key!!! WTF surely you wld go to the head and ask for it to be opened, if he wld hv moved the evidence there was a good chance he would not have been convicted of murder but a lesser charge and in there right mind wld think being asked “how long does DNA last” and “how do they check for DNA” not be a huge red flag to a p officer!!!
I noticed that when watching the news way back when. I thought it was a bit odd as both girls were only classed as missing at the time. I just thought she'd already made up her mind that they were dead just as many people did (myself included). Haunting to think about looking back.
I’m not sure that talking in the past tense about someone is always that reliable. I do it a lot and I’m not a serial killer! In this situation it was spot on but I think sometimes we watch these interviews and turn into a country of amateur sleuths.
@@sallywright8065 The interviewer Jeremy Thompson actually asked her "What WERE they like"? Does that mean he was involved too? lol . Too much made out of the past tense theory.
Honestly, that seems like an easy "mistake" to make. She could have just figured that they were dead without actually knowing, which is a reasonable assumption given how missing persons cases with similar characteristics usually turn out, especially considering the fact that 11 whole days had passed at that point. It also would have been reasonable to talk about them in the past tense simply because they had completely vanished from that community, even if they could have still been alive somewhere else. Her use of the past tense was not reliable proof of anything at all, but of course the media was eager to pounce on it and blow it out of proportion because it boosted their story.
@@javahub3269 and that's why she lied, to remove the doubt. He was a controlling misogynist and she was frightened for her life. You have just contradicted your own argument and you are calling me stupid.
@@shanefolan How can you say she was terrified of him? There's a report of a man trying to defend her from Huntley & she turns on th man. Women involved with men & violent crime, always, always claim fear & violence as a defense.
I think people make far too much out of this. She was no longer working as a TA at that point. I'm a teacher and when I'm referring to students I'm no longer teaching I talk about them in the past tense. She may well have known what happened to Holly and Jessica at that point, she might not have. I don't think this interview tells you anything about what she really knew. Personally I think it's unlikely she knew.
I agree, people love to analyse body language and think it proves guilt. I refer to old friends in the past tense because that’s where they are in terms of my life, in the past. That doesn’t mean I killed them or that they are dead. Ultimately Maxine was an abused woman in a volatile relationship. I think most women would have done the same that she did under the same abusive circumstances with that evil man manipulating them. I see her as a victim, not a criminal
@benjervis2538 I was with a man for ten years who almost killed me and I never would have kept a secret like she did. I think it's easy to play the victim like she did.
Jeremy Thompson actually asked her what "were" they like so what's the problem with her answering they "were" like? Lol. Maybe Jeremy Thompson killed them.🤭🤣🤣🤣
This could be explained as MC talking about when she was a class assistant to Holly and the period the card related to and a past tense is set by _"she was very upset"_ Also, many people do not use perfect grammar. It may have been that, MC believed the girls must be dead and that IH was not involved, or was in suspicious denial of IH involvement, or knew IH had killed the girls. It's not conclusive proof of MC protecting IH, knowing he had killed the girls.
For a woman who spoke about the two girls in a past tence then claims she wasn't aware of ians intentions of murder is a liar. She was also involved clearly.
Females love an excuse to hate another female. This determines nothing. Carr had worked with the two girls in a job she no longer had, so for her to say 'were' makes perfect sense.
“That’s the sort of girl she WAS “ .... errr giveaway there and then : producer and interviewer told the police as they thought that was an odd comment to make -using past tense.
She should never have lied full stop! Not over children, something so serious, if he was innocent that would have been discovered!! She was either very stupid or guilty. We’ll never know if she knew, he later said she did, watching the latest drama “Maxine” it comes across that she didn’t, but who believes tv. Who knows…. I hope she didn’t, because if she did she should be rotting in jail. Holly and Jessica 💔💔
huntley was an accomplished liar and carr was extremely gullible,who wouldnt want to believe that there loved ones where incapable of something like this,she fell for the wrong man and she paid for it,im amazed sightings off people like her and thompson and venables dont come out online more often tbh,she has a unique look plus its next to impossible to police the internet.
@@stalkerfan86 She wasn't gullible. She wasn't some sweet young woman who "fell for the wrong man", or some little down-trodden woman. She KNEW he had murdered them. And then, she AGREED to cover it up with him. She LIED for him. In the BBC interview she literally Laughs!!! She's as bad as he was. No she didn't kill them. But she helped cover it up and tried to help him Get Away with it. And that's dreadful too.
@@NiceButBites how can you equate perverting the course of justice (at a point in the case where it was too late to save the victims) to kidnapping, assaulting, and brutally murdering two 10 year old girls? You don’t actually care about the girls, you’re just happy to have a witch to hunt.
A teacher would use the word "was" when they stopped teaching the children to be honest and in a normal situation it would be a natural phrase.. thing is these teachers were not dating a paedophile, child killer with a history of violence and they didn't give said peadophile an alibi that wasn't true!!
Thanks for pointing out what the subtitles said anyway and please come back to comment whenever it is that you have the earth-shattering revelation the reporter's question was also posed to her in the past tense, until then we shall remain in the dark.
She doesn't seem upset about the missing children. Children who she was close enough to to keep a card from one of them. Seems much more about her enjoying the attention.
I remember this like it was yesterday- at the time we were all expecting the girls to be alive - no one suspected this woman of anything - during the live broadcast the moment she said was- my blood ran cold my knees buckled and i knew- so did the police obviously because this footage was never played on reruns like all the other news clips- it was in the evidence locker by the time the cameras were switched off. Rip holly and jeasica ❤
Load of nonsense. She used past tense because they 'were' in her class, not because they are dead. Believe it or not, I also use the past tense when talking about things that happened in the past...
@@clon76 when anyone says what a load of nonsense to someone else experiences or opinions - I always imagine a man in a tweed jacket with elbow patches hunting pheasant with his Labrador. 😂
@@FunnyVideoCollectorYou’ve got a whole bunch of half hits right. She gave him an alibi in a rape case where the victim said it wasn’t him when shown Huntley. She also wasn’t home when he killed the girls or disposed of the bodies.
Bearing in mind that this was recorded only a couple of days after the girls disappeared I think it says an awful lot and it is curious is it not that it was never shown again!
It was not shown as the Police took possession of it as part of enquiries and used as initial evidence of her having knowledge that something had happened and nothing at all to do with do gooders or liberal minded individuals. She got off light she should have been locked up for life!
Allan Baxter The bastard was as guilty as sin. You couldn't look at the camera as she lied to protect that piece of shit Huntley. Fancy letting the parents have false hope like that with what they were going through. She is beneath contempt. Scum bag.
She wasn't even in town when it happened.. She covered for him but at the time she still didn't know what he had done.. She slowly started putting the pieces together, but he was so manipulative and abusive.. She was wrong not to come forward when she had suspicions afyer seeing the evidence around the house.
The police who interviewed her at the time and told her what Huntley had done said they were confident she DID NOT know. She was a immature simple women, the demonisation of her has always puzzled me. Are people really so stupid they think she knew everything and didn’t care? There’s just no evidence of this
Nonsense. The interviewer actually asked her "what WERE they like ? A reference to when she taught them in the past at school so obviously you answer in a past tense. Or maybe the interviewer was involved too.🤫😉🤣 If somebody asked me what were my workmates like in a job I had left I would not say "they are like" but "they were like". Simple unless you understand the Queens English.🤷♂️ Too much made of the past tense theory and not just in this case.
When she holds up the paper you can see that her nails are chewed down to the quick… she also avoids eye contact, especially at critical point of the interview, which normal ppl wouldn’t do. She holds the paper up as almost a shield, distancing herself from the questions and she grooms her hair, in a self soothing gesture… one might say, “oh, she only did that bc of the wind” but at other points in the vid, she doesn’t do it. So one has to take these things into consideration when assessing her credibility. She also sucks her lip in right at the end when saying what a sweet girl she was, further exhibiting some knowledge of foul play and her guilt in covering it up.
Her nails won’t be bitten to the quick now. Aside from the half a million it costs the tax payer annually to keep this monster anonymous, she had 8 grands worth of plastic surgery to change her appearance & demanded a boob job on the NHS because she was “depressed”. Living her best life married with a 12 year old.
She gets more hatred than the man who kidnapped, assaulted, and brutally killed the girls. Why? She didn’t help him do it, she wasn’t even in town when it happened. What she did was wrong, but her lying (intentionally or not) didn’t cause the girls death. They were already gone. People jump on this interview as definitive proof she knew, even though it’s completely reasonable for an ex-teacher to refer to ex-students in the past tense. When people try to explain the abuse and manipulation Ian objectively subjugated her to for years beforehand, they claim she “wanted” or “allowed” it. As I said, what she did was wrong, but it’s pointless arguing about whether she did or didn’t know at whatever point in time. Most of it is just misdirected hate from people who are eager to have a witch to hunt.
She spoke about her in the past tense using that’s the kind of girl she was she knew everything and should have got a minimum 20 year in jail by my opinion
No! You’ve read this out of context I’m afraid. She talks about the last day of term and when she was on probation for a job as a teaching assistant. She WAS just lovely, as a student, as a girl that she once taught in class before she never got the job. In this interview she hasn’t anything to do with the girl anymore. If I asked you how was so and so as a person that you used to know at school and you said they were or he was such a nice person, would I have to assume that they were dead because you were speaking of what you knew about a person in your past life, in the past tense?
@@FunnyVideoCollector Oh I agree that they were already on the police radar but the past tense thing is nonsense. Does that mean the interviewer was also a murderer because he asked "what were they like"???
This might be controversial, and she clearly deserved to be jailed, but lets get real for a minute and face the facts, this woman had NOTHING to do with the poor girls deaths and didn't even know what had happened or believed Huntley had done it, which is why I assume she gave him the alibi which was her only crime in this, in the video of her being told he had done this, the shock, hurt, pain, anger, everything else was clearly visible in her actions..... I suppose we have to remember as sick as the c*nt was, until this he was just your average person who she was in love with and someone she never thought could have done what he had..... Does anyone know if she was aware of the murders (despite this video which doesn't actually say anything of her knowledge to the crime if you ask me, its just terms of expression she was using, and most people had assumed the poor girls fate by then....) but anyway shoot me if i'm wrong (unless you can get to Huntley, in which case shoot him, twice, one in the cock and one in the eye, let the twat suffer in jail all his days if you ask me) .....but I remember the venom and hate myself and the country had over this woman, and i'm just thinking over it now and was she in some ways a victim too? She wasn't like Myra Hindley, Rose West, as far as I know, she had no murderous desires, she had no knowledge this was going to happen, she had no knowledge he had done it until the police told her...... I can see how many people could feel sorry for her more than want to kill her too Put yourself in her shoes, your partner does that, it had NOTHING to do with you at all, but you agree to give them an alibi of sorts saying they were somewhere at a certain time, not knowing it was to actually cover up that they had committed a crime.....I think if she had known he had done this, she would have rightfully grassed him up..... thoughts?
Sarah Smith Yes you are correct, if people _bothered_ to read the FACTS of the case she was giving him an alibi because he had a previous rape on file and didn't want the extra attention by police and having their house turned over etc, her covering for him isn't based on the understanding by her that he'd committed the murders.
At my old job I worked at a sheltered housing unit and one of the residents used to have a cleaner come in fortnightly and I swear it was Maxine Carr but an older version what she would look like now. Her height, her face, voice all matched same. Then one day I couldn't take it so as she was walking up corridor I whispered loudly ' maxine' and I'm sure she slightly turned her head left but stopped herself continuing to walk to residents flat.
She should not be allowed to walk the streets, she should never know a moments peace, I hope she gets discovered everywhere she goes and gets what she deserves in until she rots in hell where she belongs.
J F She was no victim, she knew exactly what he had done hence her receiving jail time, she provided a false alibi, dragging the agony of the families looking for their little girls for even longer , even after they were jailed she still professed her undying love for a child rapist and murder, she is pure evil and you clearly have issues for defending such a vile excuse of a human!
J F oh and believe me when I tell you if I bumped into her I would do something! She deserves to be terrorised for the rest of her days not tucked up in a safe house with a new identity, the pain and heartache Jessica and Hollys family must suffer every day, that thing does not deserve a moments peace. Victim pffffttt get gone
So while she was conducting the interview, she knew all that time what really happen. My god, I've seen a lot of terrible liars in my life, but her and Ian are by far the worst liars ever.
Wow why would she lie when police asked where he was slime ball ( Huntley) why would you protect, when two angels went missing! Thats why the government protect her because we all know she's full of shit! I know SW say she was vulnerable being with him but if it was there kids they wouldn't be so understanding!!!! She knew simple as. My partner asked me to say i was with him when two little girls went missing! He would be missing out my life full stop! I ain't black and white! Some things ain't to understand, some things you don't just do!!! That being an ultimate one. Children you don't lie when a children have gone missing.
Huntley had previously been arrested for rape, he was well aware of how important police rely on forensics, that’s why he cleaned the house (even though he was known for being a slob) there’s nothing to suggest that Carr told him to burn the bodies.
The hilarious thing is this eejit watermarking footage that he has no claim to, but in doing so just ensures that if anyone else tries to "steal" it they just reproduce proof that the guy has no brain; can't spell, and doesn't know how copyright or related law works. "Here, go spread this proof that I'm an idiot!"
Tis is the inetrview that possibly nailed Huntley also Carr says Holly was upset she didnt get the job on last day of term,yet Huntley claimed the girls asked him "Did Miss Carr get the job" when he saw them.
But the Sky news interviewer referrred to them in the past tense also so I dont think any relevance can be taken.
They didn't ask if miss Carr got the job, they asked how miss Carr was
They make a point that Maxine Carr said they "were" in the past tense when in fact Jeremy Thompson actually asked "what WERE they like"?🤷♂️
Yeah I mean he used the past tense because she was no longer a teaching assistant to them. So she simply could had used the past tense because she was no longer in her class. I think the whole past tense theory has been blown out of perspective.
He baited her, when when imbeciles realize that the government, the police, the council and the press are most definitely not your friends! 🤡🙄🥱
I always thought she used the past tense as she was no longer teaching them...
Maybe for the first instance, the second two times she’s says “was” don’t make sense though.
true
Exactly. Her use of the paste tense had nothing to do with knowing they were dead, because she didnt
I genuinely think he was such a good manipulator and liar she just thought he was innocent… I was shocked that the police officer who ask searched the school asked for the hanger to be opened and he said he didn’t have the key!!! WTF surely you wld go to the head and ask for it to be opened, if he wld hv moved the evidence there was a good chance he would not have been convicted of murder but a lesser charge and in there right mind wld think being asked “how long does DNA last” and “how do they check for DNA” not be a huge red flag to a p officer!!!
Also the reporter asked what “were” they like so she answered in the correct context
I noticed that when watching the news way back when. I thought it was a bit odd as both girls were only classed as missing at the time. I just thought she'd already made up her mind that they were dead just as many people did (myself included). Haunting to think about looking back.
Hmm
I’m not sure that talking in the past tense about someone is always that reliable. I do it a lot and I’m not a serial killer! In this situation it was spot on but I think sometimes we watch these interviews and turn into a country of amateur sleuths.
@@sallywright8065 I agree with you but experts and people do picking on "was" all the time
@@sallywright8065 The interviewer Jeremy Thompson actually asked her "What WERE they like"? Does that mean he was involved too? lol .
Too much made out of the past tense theory.
Honestly, that seems like an easy "mistake" to make. She could have just figured that they were dead without actually knowing, which is a reasonable assumption given how missing persons cases with similar characteristics usually turn out, especially considering the fact that 11 whole days had passed at that point. It also would have been reasonable to talk about them in the past tense simply because they had completely vanished from that community, even if they could have still been alive somewhere else. Her use of the past tense was not reliable proof of anything at all, but of course the media was eager to pounce on it and blow it out of proportion because it boosted their story.
People defending her..smh. She knew he killed those girls and she LIED for him so he would get away with it..then she did shit like this.
I don't think she knew, it was more that she was terrified of him.
You are so stupid if Huntley doubted her he would have killed her on the spot
@@javahub3269 and that's why she lied, to remove the doubt. He was a controlling misogynist and she was frightened for her life. You have just contradicted your own argument and you are calling me stupid.
@@shanefolan How can you say she was terrified of him? There's a report of a man trying to defend her from Huntley & she turns on th man. Women involved with men & violent crime, always, always claim fear & violence as a defense.
I think she knew and she seen the bodies in the boot
I think people make far too much out of this. She was no longer working as a TA at that point. I'm a teacher and when I'm referring to students I'm no longer teaching I talk about them in the past tense. She may well have known what happened to Holly and Jessica at that point, she might not have. I don't think this interview tells you anything about what she really knew. Personally I think it's unlikely she knew.
She probably did closer to the end.
She knew she's evil she knew
I agree, people love to analyse body language and think it proves guilt.
I refer to old friends in the past tense because that’s where they are in terms of my life, in the past.
That doesn’t mean I killed them or that they are dead.
Ultimately Maxine was an abused woman in a volatile relationship. I think most women would have done the same that she did under the same abusive circumstances with that evil man manipulating them.
I see her as a victim, not a criminal
@benjervis2538 I was with a man for ten years who almost killed me and I never would have kept a secret like she did. I think it's easy to play the victim like she did.
I don’t think she knew either but she should never have given an alibi.
Jeremy Thompson actually asked her what "were" they like so what's the problem with her answering they "were" like? Lol.
Maybe Jeremy Thompson killed them.🤭🤣🤣🤣
She knew and got a while new identity. Very sick system.
This could be explained as MC talking about when she was a class assistant to Holly and the period the card related to and a past tense is set by _"she was very upset"_ Also, many people do not use perfect grammar. It may have been that, MC believed the girls must be dead and that IH was not involved, or was in suspicious denial of IH involvement, or knew IH had killed the girls. It's not conclusive proof of MC protecting IH, knowing he had killed the girls.
Hey stop spoiling the witch burning.
For a woman who spoke about the two girls in a past tence then claims she wasn't aware of ians intentions of murder is a liar.
She was also involved clearly.
*tense
@@FunnyVideoCollector *Give
@@FunnyVideoCollector *Video-Collector
Females love an excuse to hate another female. This determines nothing. Carr had worked with the two girls in a job she no longer had, so for her to say 'were' makes perfect sense.
Nonsense. She was asked in the past tense
“That’s the sort of girl she WAS “ .... errr giveaway there and then : producer and interviewer told the police as they thought that was an odd comment to make -using past tense.
She should never have lied full stop! Not over children, something so serious, if he was innocent that would have been discovered!!
She was either very stupid or guilty.
We’ll never know if she knew, he later said she did, watching the latest drama “Maxine” it comes across that she didn’t, but who believes tv.
Who knows….
I hope she didn’t, because if she did she should be rotting in jail.
Holly and Jessica 💔💔
huntley was an accomplished liar and carr was extremely gullible,who wouldnt want to believe that there loved ones where incapable of something like this,she fell for the wrong man and she paid for it,im amazed sightings off people like her and thompson and venables dont come out online more often tbh,she has a unique look plus its next to impossible to police the internet.
Siiiiiiiiiiiiimp
@@stalkerfan86 She wasn't gullible. She wasn't some sweet young woman who "fell for the wrong man", or some little down-trodden woman. She KNEW he had murdered them. And then, she AGREED to cover it up with him. She LIED for him.
In the BBC interview she literally Laughs!!!
She's as bad as he was. No she didn't kill them. But she helped cover it up and tried to help him Get Away with it. And that's dreadful too.
@@NiceButBites how can you equate perverting the course of justice (at a point in the case where it was too late to save the victims) to kidnapping, assaulting, and brutally murdering two 10 year old girls? You don’t actually care about the girls, you’re just happy to have a witch to hunt.
Lmfao who puts a copyright watermark over footage they dont even own… HAHAHAHAHAHA
A teacher would use the word "was" when they stopped teaching the children to be honest and in a normal situation it would be a natural phrase.. thing is these teachers were not dating a paedophile, child killer with a history of violence and they didn't give said peadophile an alibi that wasn't true!!
Little did she know this video would play a part in their downfall. Talking like the kids were already dead!
Vile creature has never been punished. YET.
What do you suggest?
She’s talking about Holly and Jessica in the past tense “was”
Thanks for pointing out what the subtitles said anyway and please come back to comment whenever it is that you have the earth-shattering revelation the reporter's question was also posed to her in the past tense, until then we shall remain in the dark.
Should of got the same sentence as him.
She testified against him in court and helped bring him down
@@elliecreativeculture Yeah so she would get off lightly that's why
Why? She didn’t kill them or even help kill them
What's with the intro lol Its nearly as long as the interview and seems too lighthearted.
She doesn't seem upset about the missing children. Children who she was close enough to to keep a card from one of them. Seems much more about her enjoying the attention.
monster
BRUTUALTRUTH
I remember this like it was yesterday- at the time we were all expecting the girls to be alive - no one suspected this woman of anything - during the live broadcast the moment she said was- my blood ran cold my knees buckled and i knew- so did the police obviously because this footage was never played on reruns like all the other news clips- it was in the evidence locker by the time the cameras were switched off. Rip holly and jeasica ❤
Load of nonsense. She used past tense because they 'were' in her class, not because they are dead. Believe it or not, I also use the past tense when talking about things that happened in the past...
@@clon76 when anyone says what a load of nonsense to someone else experiences or opinions - I always imagine a man in a tweed jacket with elbow patches hunting pheasant with his Labrador. 😂
@@clon76you need to get a fn life!!
she knew they were already dead and where they were when this interview happened..
How the fuck do you know .?
Course she did.
@@FunnyVideoCollectorYou’ve got a whole bunch of half hits right. She gave him an alibi in a rape case where the victim said it wasn’t him when shown Huntley. She also wasn’t home when he killed the girls or disposed of the bodies.
Bearing in mind that this was recorded only a couple of days after the girls disappeared I think it says an awful lot and it is curious is it not that it was never shown again!
actoral Do you know why? Too many liberals and do gooders feeling sorry for the bastard.
It was not shown as the Police took possession of it as part of enquiries and used as initial evidence of her having knowledge that something had happened and nothing at all to do with do gooders or liberal minded individuals. She got off light she should have been locked up for life!
Allan Baxter The bastard was as guilty as sin. You couldn't look at the camera as she lied to protect that piece of shit Huntley. Fancy letting the parents have false hope like that with what they were going through. She is beneath contempt. Scum bag.
She wasn't even in town when it happened.. She covered for him but at the time she still didn't know what he had done.. She slowly started putting the pieces together, but he was so manipulative and abusive.. She was wrong not to come forward when she had suspicions afyer seeing the evidence around the house.
I think I will keep this for the rest of my life .......
She’s not guilty. She didn’t hurt or killed Holly and Jessica. Her mistake was to not act like she was home that day, also not to clean the home.
actually your right on venables he is still locked up on Cp charges,lets hope he is never released.
To be honest I dont blame her. Huntley would have killed her if he sensed that she was going to tell the police
Agreed, I think she lied for Huntley as she was genuinely terrified of him.
Pathetic.
can you imagine how frightening it would be living with a murderer? People are so dense sometimes.
The police who interviewed her at the time and told her what Huntley had done said they were confident she DID NOT know. She was a immature simple women, the demonisation of her has always puzzled me. Are people really so stupid they think she knew everything and didn’t care? There’s just no evidence of this
I wonder where she is,. Maybe she wears a burka now
New identity, press ban and has remarried
So true, i believe she was another victim of ian huntleys
She was demonised
So glad i saw this comment
No wonder she got caught out, referring to Holly in past tense was a big mistake, as if it’s been 20 years since they were killed.
Nonsense. The interviewer actually asked her "what WERE they like ? A reference to when she taught them in the past at school so obviously you answer in a past tense.
Or maybe the interviewer was involved too.🤫😉🤣
If somebody asked me what were my workmates like in a job I had left I would not say "they are like" but "they were like". Simple unless you understand the Queens English.🤷♂️
Too much made of the past tense theory and not just in this case.
She covered up the crime she would be in prison still
When she holds up the paper you can see that her nails are chewed down to the quick… she also avoids eye contact, especially at critical point of the interview, which normal ppl wouldn’t do. She holds the paper up as almost a shield, distancing herself from the questions and she grooms her hair, in a self soothing gesture… one might say, “oh, she only did that bc of the wind” but at other points in the vid, she doesn’t do it. So one has to take these things into consideration when assessing her credibility. She also sucks her lip in right at the end when saying what a sweet girl she was, further exhibiting some knowledge of foul play and her guilt in covering it up.
The behavior panel
good points
Thanks for that analysis..... What times your next reading, Mystic Meg....!??!!
@@justiceman9492 second Monday of the month , dont miss it
Her nails won’t be bitten to the quick now. Aside from the half a million it costs the tax payer annually to keep this monster anonymous, she had 8 grands worth of plastic surgery to change her appearance & demanded a boob job on the NHS because she was “depressed”. Living her best life married with a 12 year old.
She gets more hatred than the man who kidnapped, assaulted, and brutally killed the girls. Why? She didn’t help him do it, she wasn’t even in town when it happened. What she did was wrong, but her lying (intentionally or not) didn’t cause the girls death. They were already gone. People jump on this interview as definitive proof she knew, even though it’s completely reasonable for an ex-teacher to refer to ex-students in the past tense. When people try to explain the abuse and manipulation Ian objectively subjugated her to for years beforehand, they claim she “wanted” or “allowed” it. As I said, what she did was wrong, but it’s pointless arguing about whether she did or didn’t know at whatever point in time. Most of it is just misdirected hate from people who are eager to have a witch to hunt.
I always reference to people in the past and don't see much of as was this and that.
Don't tell that to the armchair statement analysis experts on TH-cam.
She spoke about her in the past tense using that’s the kind of girl she was she knew everything and should have got a minimum 20 year in jail by my opinion
No! You’ve read this out of context I’m afraid. She talks about the last day of term and when she was on probation for a job as a teaching assistant. She WAS just lovely, as a student, as a girl that she once taught in class before she never got the job. In this interview she hasn’t anything to do with the girl anymore.
If I asked you how was so and so as a person that you used to know at school and you said they were or he was such a nice person, would I have to assume that they were dead because you were speaking of what you knew about a person in your past life, in the past tense?
The interviewer also they was ... but she and that animal got what they deserved and more
20 years for… what?
*lovely
Your spelling - ouch.
Talking about holly in past tense 😮
Yes but so did the interviewer when he asked her "What "were" they like"? 🤷♂️
@@bobbybingle1662 true
@@FunnyVideoCollector Oh I agree that they were already on the police radar but the past tense thing is nonsense. Does that mean the interviewer was also a murderer because he asked "what were they like"???
Anyone know why she would say no comment at the end of the series? Seems out of character from everything else in the show
She is a victim as well I believe he would of killed her had he not been caught
Acting so calm and caring in the video like she know nothing. And all that time.... oh my gosh she's just as gulity as Ian Huntly.
Just as guilty? Seriously dude. In that case Ian Huntley's neighbour is 1/500th guilty for not noticing anything? Use yer brain.
It's spelt *lovely* .
Mousy McLiarface
This might be controversial, and she clearly deserved to be jailed, but lets get real for a minute and face the facts, this woman had NOTHING to do with the poor girls deaths and didn't even know what had happened or believed Huntley had done it, which is why I assume she gave him the alibi which was her only crime in this, in the video of her being told he had done this, the shock, hurt, pain, anger, everything else was clearly visible in her actions..... I suppose we have to remember as sick as the c*nt was, until this he was just your average person who she was in love with and someone she never thought could have done what he had..... Does anyone know if she was aware of the murders (despite this video which doesn't actually say anything of her knowledge to the crime if you ask me, its just terms of expression she was using, and most people had assumed the poor girls fate by then....) but anyway shoot me if i'm wrong (unless you can get to Huntley, in which case shoot him, twice, one in the cock and one in the eye, let the twat suffer in jail all his days if you ask me) .....but I remember the venom and hate myself and the country had over this woman, and i'm just thinking over it now and was she in some ways a victim too? She wasn't like Myra Hindley, Rose West, as far as I know, she had no murderous desires, she had no knowledge this was going to happen, she had no knowledge he had done it until the police told her...... I can see how many people could feel sorry for her more than want to kill her too
Put yourself in her shoes, your partner does that, it had NOTHING to do with you at all, but you agree to give them an alibi of sorts saying they were somewhere at a certain time, not knowing it was to actually cover up that they had committed a crime.....I think if she had known he had done this, she would have rightfully grassed him up..... thoughts?
Sarah Smith
Yes you are correct, if people _bothered_ to read the FACTS of the case she was giving him an alibi because he had a previous rape on file and didn't want the extra attention by police and having their house turned over etc, her covering for him isn't based on the understanding by her that he'd committed the murders.
@@pleasepermitmetospeakohgre1504 so she gave an alibi to a man she knew was a rapist...still not a good look for Maxine.
She must of new he. done it to give him a force alibi why would she do that? Only if he ask her to .
You *don't* own any form of copyright on this footage. Your as much a liar as Huntley and Carr were...
Not sure it’s quite the same level of crime..
Ummm bloody hell wouldn't go that far jeez lol calm down m8
um that escalated quickly
I would love to bump into her one day 🤛🏻
At my old job I worked at a sheltered housing unit and one of the residents used to have a cleaner come in fortnightly and I swear it was Maxine Carr but an older version what she would look like now. Her height, her face, voice all matched same. Then one day I couldn't take it so as she was walking up corridor I whispered loudly ' maxine' and I'm sure she slightly turned her head left but stopped herself continuing to walk to residents flat.
She should not be allowed to walk the streets, she should never know a moments peace, I hope she gets discovered everywhere she goes and gets what she deserves in until she rots in hell where she belongs.
Chichester.
J F She was no victim, she knew exactly what he had done hence her receiving jail time, she provided a false alibi, dragging the agony of the families looking for their little girls for even longer , even after they were jailed she still professed her undying love for a child rapist and murder, she is pure evil and you clearly have issues for defending such a vile excuse of a human!
J F oh and believe me when I tell you if I bumped into her I would do something! She deserves to be terrorised for the rest of her days not tucked up in a safe house with a new identity, the pain and heartache Jessica and Hollys family must suffer every day, that thing does not deserve a moments peace. Victim pffffttt get gone
So while she was conducting the interview, she knew all that time what really happen. My god, I've seen a lot of terrible liars in my life, but her and Ian are by far the worst liars ever.
Whether she knew has not been determined, despite the sheer amount of females who think they somehow know.
Wow why would she lie when police asked where he was slime ball ( Huntley) why would you protect, when two angels went missing! Thats why the government protect her because we all know she's full of shit! I know SW say she was vulnerable being with him but if it was there kids they wouldn't be so understanding!!!! She knew simple as. My partner asked me to say i was with him when two little girls went missing! He would be missing out my life full stop! I ain't black and white! Some things ain't to understand, some things you don't just do!!! That being an ultimate one. Children you don't lie when a children have gone missing.
My God 👈😕
I think she disgusts me more than Huntley.
Carr ordered him to burn the bodies, which he had dumped in a ditch, to destroy forensic clues.
SMITTYMOVIES Where is the evidence for that?
Huntley had previously been arrested for rape, he was well aware of how important police rely on forensics, that’s why he cleaned the house (even though he was known for being a slob) there’s nothing to suggest that Carr told him to burn the bodies.
Not guilty
You really are a dumb fuck!
Pity you can’t spell ‘lovely’.
The hilarious thing is this eejit watermarking footage that he has no claim to, but in doing so just ensures that if anyone else tries to "steal" it they just reproduce proof that the guy has no brain; can't spell, and doesn't know how copyright or related law works. "Here, go spread this proof that I'm an idiot!"